Search
Close this search box.

Plato Data Intelligence

Plato Data Intelligence

Home Page


Clinical trials data and search
Tue, 13 Jun 2023 15:37:14 +0000
en-US
1.2

Home Page

Home Page

2

2107

https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2

https://zephyrnet.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Logo-ExtraSmall.png
Plato Data Intelligence

Home Page


32
32

<![CDATA[ Minimally-invasive Non-surgical and Surgical Periodontitis Treatment ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797807
2019-03-20

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797807
NCT03797807https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797807?tab=tableVandana Luthra, Dr.BHNT.Clinicaloralresearchcentre@nhs.net02078826348To compare the efficacy of a modified minimally-invasive non-surgical periodontal therapy (MINST) approach with a surgical approach (M-MIST) in determining bone and clinical attachment changes in intrabony defects
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-19
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-26
Start Month Year March 20, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year April 30, 2025
Verification Month Year May 2023
Verification Date 2023-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-26

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20668410
Description Periodontal diseases are inflammatory conditions that affect the supporting apparatus of the teeth, including gingiva and alveolar bone. The bone loss resulting from periodontitis often is irregular and localised, giving onset to 'intrabony' or 'vertical defects' affecting one side of the tooth more than the other and more than on the neighbouring teeth. Periodontal intrabony defects have been associated with a higher risk of further progression and eventually tooth loss.

The treatment of periodontitis involves a non-specific reduction of the bacterial load below the gingival margin. This is achieved by oral hygiene instructions (OHI) and non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT), aimed at removing calculus and disrupting the plaque biofilm from the affected root surfaces. Intrabony defects are considered sites requiring therapy, often beyond NSPT. Decades ago, intrabony defects were treated with surgical elimination of the defect achieved by sacrificing the adjacent healthy supportive or non-supportive bone. More recently periodontal regenerative procedures have been advocated for deep intrabony defects, which are considered amenable for guided tissue regeneration. This technique results in regeneration of periodontal attachment measurable histologically and radiographically and measurable clinically. However, this is associated with potential morbidity and high costs due to the use of bone graft and barrier materials and is not always predictable. The more recent introduction of minimally-invasive surgical therapy (MIST), modified-MIST (M-MIST) and single-flap approach suggested that the use of biomaterials may not be so crucial for obtaining periodontal regeneration.

Retrospective studies from the investigator's group have shown that minimally invasive non-surgical periodontal treatment of intrabony defects results in clinical improvements (measured as PPD reductions and clinical attachment level-CAL- gain) but also in bone fill of the bony defects, measurable radiographically. The extent of the radiographic resolution of the defect was positively associated with initial defect depth and use of adjunctive antibiotics, while smoking seemed to negatively influence this outcome. A non-surgical minimally-invasive treatment protocol, named MINST, has been proposed along these principles. A more recent retrospective analysis has revealed a reduction in bony defect of nearly 3 mm for cases treated with minimally-invasive non-surgical therapy. The effect of MINST may be mediated by improved blood flow and stable blood clot in the intrabony defect. However, very few studies have been published on MINST and no data are available on the comparison between MINST and MIST.

This is a parallel group, single centre, examiner-blind, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to compare the effect of a modified minimally-invasive non-surgical therapy (MINST) approach to minimally invasive surgical treatment (MIST) in the healing of periodontal intrabony defects in 66 patients with periodontitis .

Facilities

Sequence: 199508244
Status Recruiting
Name Barts and The London Dental Hospital
City London
Zip E1 2AD
Country United Kingdom

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28041986 Sequence: 28041987
Facility Id 199508244 Facility Id 199508244
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Rinat Ezra, PhD Name Simona Salomone, PhD
Email BHNT.Clinicaloralresearchcentre@nhs.net Email BHNT.Clinicaloralresearchcentre@nhs.net
Phone 0207 882 6348 Phone 0207 882 6064
Phone Extension 6348 Phone Extension 6064

Conditions

Sequence: 52032178
Name Periodontitis
Downcase Name periodontitis

Id Information

Sequence: 40049393
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 18/LO/1956

Countries

Sequence: 42447076
Name United Kingdom
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55440100 Sequence: 55440101 Sequence: 55440102 Sequence: 55440103
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator
Title MINST Title MIST Title GTI + MINST Title GTI + MIST
Description Minimally invasive non surgical treatment Description Minimally invasive surgical treatment Description Minimally invasive non surgical treatment + Geometric/Thermal Imaging (GTI subgroup) Description Minimally invasive surgical treatment + Geometric/Thermal Imaging (GTI subgroup)

Interventions

Sequence: 52344252 Sequence: 52344253 Sequence: 52344254
Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Diagnostic Test
Name MINST Name MIST Name GTI subgroup (Geometrical/Thermal Imaging)
Description A non-surgical minimally invasive treatment protocol, named MINST, has been proposed for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects, in order to minimize patient discomfort and maximize the healing potential Description A minimally invasive surgical treatment protocol, named MIST, has been proposed for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects, in order to minimize patient discomfort and maximize the healing potential Description Geometrical/Thermal Imaging

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176898043 Sequence: 176898044 Sequence: 176898045 Sequence: 176898046 Sequence: 176898047 Sequence: 176898048 Sequence: 176898049 Sequence: 176898050 Sequence: 176898051
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Radiographic whole defect depth change Measure Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) change Measure Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) gain change Measure Markers and growth factors in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) Measure Bacterial detection Measure Gingival inflammation and healing Measure Self administered OIDP (oral impact on daily performances index) Measure Global ratings on health and quality of life with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Measure Global ratings on health and quality of life with a question "How would you rate the quality of your life"
Time Frame 9 months Time Frame Up to 15 months Time Frame Up to 15 months Time Frame Up to 15 months Time Frame Up to 15 months Time Frame Up to 15 months Time Frame Up to 9 months Time Frame Up to 9 months Time Frame Up to 9 months
Description Radiographic whole defect depth change in millimeters at 9 months [considered a surrogate measure evaluating the entire regenerative process including bone, cementum and periodontal ligament Description Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) change (in mm) Description Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) gain change (in mm) Description Levels of inflammatory markers and growth factors in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF). Specifically, markers related with the healing of epithelium, connective tissue, bone and related to inflammatory/host responses will be examined. Description Bacterial detection associated with presence of intrabony defects Description Gingival inflammation and healing (as measured by geometric/thermal stereophotogrammetry imaging in the 'GTI sub-study') Description We will utilize the oral impact on daily performances index (OIDP) to evaluate health and treatment outcomes. The OIDP focuses on the impact that the conditions of the teeth and mouth have on the physical/functional, psychological and social well-being of the person. Particularly, it assesses the impact of oral conditions on basic daily life activities and behaviours (eating, speaking, cleaning teeth, and going out, relaxing, smiling, major work or role, emotional stability, social contact). For each performance, both the frequency and severity of oral impacts are assessed. The overall OIDP score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. Description The VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. Description The responses will be scored on a six-point scale as:

Excellent
Very good
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192933827 Sequence: 192933828 Sequence: 192933829 Sequence: 192933830
Mesh Term Periodontitis Mesh Term Periodontal Diseases Mesh Term Mouth Diseases Mesh Term Stomatognathic Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term periodontitis Downcase Mesh Term periodontal diseases Downcase Mesh Term mouth diseases Downcase Mesh Term stomatognathic diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48189442
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Queen Mary University of London

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29204859
Role Principal Investigator
Name Luigi Nibali, PhD
Affiliation Barts & The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, QMUL

Central Contacts

Sequence: 11978642
Contact Type primary
Name Vandana Luthra, Dr.
Phone 02078826348
Email BHNT.Clinicaloralresearchcentre@nhs.net
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67963528 Sequence: 67963529 Sequence: 67963530 Sequence: 67963531 Sequence: 67963532 Sequence: 67963533
Design Group Id 55440102 Design Group Id 55440100 Design Group Id 55440103 Design Group Id 55440101 Design Group Id 55440102 Design Group Id 55440103
Intervention Id 52344252 Intervention Id 52344252 Intervention Id 52344253 Intervention Id 52344253 Intervention Id 52344254 Intervention Id 52344254

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30683699
Gender All
Minimum Age 25 Years
Maximum Age 70 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Age 25-70
Diagnosis of 'Periodontitis' stage III or IV (grades A to C)
Presence of ≥1 'intrabony defect' (PPD, >5 mm with intrabony defect depth ≥3mm at screening radiograph),
Signed informed consent. –

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Smoking (current or in past 5 years) including e-cigarettes/vaping 2. Medical history including diabetes or hepatic or renal disease, or other serious medical conditions or transmittable diseases 3. History of conditions requiring prophylactic antibiotic coverage prior to invasive dental procedures 4. Antiinflammatory or anticoagulant therapy during the month preceding the baseline exam 5. Systemic antibiotic therapy during the 3 months preceding the baseline exam 6. History of alcohol or drug abuse, 7. Self-reported pregnancy or lactation 8. Other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that according to the investigator may increase the risk associated with trial participation, 9. Periodontal treatment to the study site within the last 12 months (excluding not-extensive subgingival debridement as judged by the examining clinician).

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253886571
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 25
Maximum Age Num 70
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 8

Designs

Sequence: 30430426
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28796932
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 51921492 Sequence: 51921493 Sequence: 51921494 Sequence: 51921495 Sequence: 51921496 Sequence: 51921497 Sequence: 51921498 Sequence: 51921499 Sequence: 51921500 Sequence: 51921501 Sequence: 51921502 Sequence: 51921503
Pmid 11276518 Pmid 2066446 Pmid 12787211 Pmid 6964676 Pmid 11276509 Pmid 16625546 Pmid 19186978 Pmid 21303402 Pmid 21091528 Pmid 21284549 Pmid 26257238 Pmid 31351492
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type derived
Citation Papapanou PN, Tonetti MS. Diagnosis and epidemiology of periodontal osseous lesions. Periodontol 2000. 2000 Feb;22:8-21. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2000.2220102.x. No abstract available. Citation Papapanou PN, Wennstrom JL. The angular bony defect as indicator of further alveolar bone loss. J Clin Periodontol. 1991 May;18(5):317-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1991.tb00435.x. Citation Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Trombelli L, Heitz F, Needleman I, Moles D. A systematic review of the effect of surgical debridement vs non-surgical debridement for the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29 Suppl 3:92-102; discussion 160-2. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.29.s3.5.x. Citation Nyman S, Lindhe J, Karring T, Rylander H. New attachment following surgical treatment of human periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 1982 Jul;9(4):290-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1982.tb02095.x. Citation Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Focus on intrabony defects: guided tissue regeneration. Periodontol 2000. 2000 Feb;22:104-32. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2000.2220108.x. No abstract available. Citation Needleman IG, Worthington HV, Giedrys-Leeper E, Tucker RJ. Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD001724. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001724.pub2. Citation Trombelli L, Farina R, Franceschetti G, Calura G. Single-flap approach with buccal access in periodontal reconstructive procedures. J Periodontol. 2009 Feb;80(2):353-60. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080420. Citation Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the modified minimally invasive surgical technique with and without regenerative materials: a randomized-controlled trial in intra-bony defects. J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Apr;38(4):365-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01705.x. Epub 2011 Feb 8. Citation Nibali L, Pometti D, Tu YK, Donos N. Clinical and radiographic outcomes following non-surgical therapy of periodontal infrabony defects: a retrospective study. J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Jan;38(1):50-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01648.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22. Citation Ribeiro FV, Casarin RC, Palma MA, Junior FH, Sallum EA, Casati MZ. Clinical and patient-centered outcomes after minimally invasive non-surgical or surgical approaches for the treatment of intrabony defects: a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2011 Sep;82(9):1256-66. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.100680. Epub 2011 Feb 2. Citation Nibali L, Pometti D, Chen TT, Tu YK. Minimally invasive non-surgical approach for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a retrospective analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Sep;42(9):853-859. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12443. Epub 2015 Sep 29. Citation Nibali L, Koidou V, Salomone S, Hamborg T, Allaker R, Ezra R, Zou L, Tsakos G, Gkranias N, Donos N. Minimally invasive non-surgical vs. surgical approach for periodontal intrabony defects: a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Jul 27;20(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3544-8.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Influence of PESF on Oxygen Saturation, Quality of Life and Exercise Capacity in COPD ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797794
2019-01-31

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797794
NCT03797794https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797794?tab=tableHuib Kerstjensh.a.m.kerstjens@umcg.nlNAThe effect of PESF (Pulsating Electrostatic Field) on the oxygen saturation, quality of life and the exercise capacity will be studied in a randomized, dubbel blind, placebo-controlled parallel design with 32 COPD patients GOLD III and IV with a oxygen saturation below or equal to 90%.

The patients will be treated with three 30-minute PESF- or placebo-sessions distributed over 5 days.

Directly before the first session, oxygen saturation, quality of life (CCQuestionnaire), exercise capacity (6-MWT and grip strength) and phase angle (BIA) will be measured and compared to the results directly after the third session. Oxygen saturation is also monitored during 24 hours after each session.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-10
Start Month Year January 2019
Primary Completion Month Year November 1, 2019
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-10

Facilities

Sequence: 199965117
Status Recruiting
Name Tjongerschans
City Heerenveen
State Friesland
Zip 8441 PW
Country Netherlands

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28086663
Facility Id 199965117
Contact Type primary
Name Jaap Westbroek
Email j.westbroek@tjongerschans.nl
Phone 0513-685227

Conditions

Sequence: 52139061
Name COPD
Downcase Name copd

Id Information

Sequence: 40135104
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value PESF and COPD

Countries

Sequence: 42542719
Name Netherlands
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55559415 Sequence: 55559416
Group Type Experimental Group Type Sham Comparator
Title PESF-treatment Title Placebo-treatment
Description The group undergoing the pulsating electrostatic field intervention Description The group undergoing the SHAM Pulsating Electrostatic Field

Interventions

Sequence: 52454970 Sequence: 52454971
Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Device
Name Pulsating Electrostatic Field Name SHAM Pulsating Electrostatic Field
Description A pulsating electrostatic field is generated by the New Health 9000 (Akern). During the session the patients sits on a chair which contains the apparatus for 30 minutes. Description The same apparatus which produces the pulsating electrostatic field contains a 'sham-inlet'. This inlet will be used as placebo.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177264038 Sequence: 177264039 Sequence: 177264040 Sequence: 177264041
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Improvement of oxygen saturation Measure Improvement of quality of life Measure Improvement of exercise capacity Measure Improvement of phase angle
Time Frame 5 days Time Frame 5 days Time Frame 5 days Time Frame 5 days
Description Difference in oxygen saturation before first vs after last session Description Difference in CCQ score before first vs after last session Description Difference in 6-MWT outcome before first vs after last session Description Difference in oxygen saturation before first vs after last session

Sponsors

Sequence: 48290758 Sequence: 48290759
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class UNKNOWN
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University Medical Center Groningen Name Tjongerschans hospital

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12000498 Sequence: 12000499
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Jaap Westbroek Name Huib Kerstjens
Phone 0513-685227
Email j.westbroek@tjongerschans.nl Email h.a.m.kerstjens@umcg.nl
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68107533 Sequence: 68107534
Design Group Id 55559415 Design Group Id 55559416
Intervention Id 52454970 Intervention Id 52454971

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30747756
Gender All
Minimum Age 40 Years
Maximum Age 85 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

COPD patients, post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <70% and FEV1 <50% predicted
oxygen saturation without suppletion <=90% (home use of oxygen suppletion is allowed, but will be stopped during PESF-treatment)
Stable medication (no foreseeable need to change therapy)
Able to understand the purpose and method of research after adequate information and the ability to decide on participation
Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Known malignant condition with limited life expectancy
Carrier of electrical equipment (pacemaker, ICD etc)
COPD exacerbation in the last 3 weeks
Woman who are pregnant or of childbearing age without effective contraception
Manifest acute infection
Patients with manifest decompensatio cordis
Rehabilitation/reactivation program within 2 months before or during the study

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254122066
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 40
Maximum Age Num 85
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30494039
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Triple
Intervention Model Description prospective, randomized, dubbel blind, placebo-controlled parallel study
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28860319
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Huib A.M. Kerstjens
Title Head of the department Pulmonary diseases and Tuberculosis
Affiliation University Medical Center Groningen

]]>

<![CDATA[ Protein Ingestion and Skeletal Muscle Atrophy ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797781
2017-10-31

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797781
NCT03797781https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797781?tab=tableNANANAThe effect of different protein intakes on skeletal muscle atrophy during short term unilateral leg immobilisation.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2020-09-28
Start Month Year October 31, 2017
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2019
Verification Month Year September 2020
Verification Date 2020-09-30
Last Update Posted Date 2020-09-28

Facilities

Sequence: 200159416
Name Sport and Health Science
City Exeter
State Devon
Zip EX1 2LU
Country United Kingdom

Conditions

Sequence: 52185496
Name Muscle Atrophy
Downcase Name muscle atrophy

Id Information

Sequence: 40169077
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 6500619582

Countries

Sequence: 42580668
Name United Kingdom
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609126 Sequence: 55609127 Sequence: 55609128
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title High protein Title Low protein Title Minimum protein

Interventions

Sequence: 52499438
Intervention Type Other
Name Lower limb immobilisation (leg brace) with varying levels of protein intake
Description Single leg immobilisation via leg brace and crutches, the groups have different amounts of protein intake

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432050 Sequence: 177432051
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Muscle size Measure Muscle strength
Time Frame 3 days Time Frame 3 days

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193540163 Sequence: 193540164 Sequence: 193540165 Sequence: 193540166 Sequence: 193540167 Sequence: 193540168
Mesh Term Muscular Atrophy Mesh Term Atrophy Mesh Term Pathological Conditions, Anatomical Mesh Term Neuromuscular Manifestations Mesh Term Neurologic Manifestations Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term muscular atrophy Downcase Mesh Term atrophy Downcase Mesh Term pathological conditions, anatomical Downcase Mesh Term neuromuscular manifestations Downcase Mesh Term neurologic manifestations Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332341
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University of Exeter

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168188 Sequence: 68168189 Sequence: 68168190
Design Group Id 55609126 Design Group Id 55609127 Design Group Id 55609128
Intervention Id 52499438 Intervention Id 52499438 Intervention Id 52499438

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773581
Gender Male
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 35 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

BMI >18 and <28 no prescription medications or current illness.

Exclusion Criteria:

BMI <18 and >28 current prescription medication no history of leg injury.
Smoker
Medical conditions including (cardiovascular disease ((e.g. hypertension)), metabolic disease ((e.g. type 2 diabetes)), any personal or family history of deep vein thrombosis.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253952743
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 26
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 35
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30519712
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Basic Science
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Subject Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886013
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52078924
Pmid 32469388
Reference Type derived
Citation Kilroe SP, Fulford J, Jackman S, Holwerda A, Gijsen A, van Loon L, Wall BT. Dietary protein intake does not modulate daily myofibrillar protein synthesis rates or loss of muscle mass and function during short-term immobilization in young men: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Mar 11;113(3):548-561. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa136.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Community-based Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Nepal ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797768
2019-12-25

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797768
NCT03797768https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797768?tab=tableNANANAChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is the fourth most important cause of death worldwide and is one of the commonest non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Nepal. The presence of risk factors like indoor and outdoor air pollution, the high prevalence of smoking and lack of general awareness of COPD makes it a serious public health concern. However, no attempt has been made in Nepal to estimate its burden and address the disease at the community level. This community-based cluster randomized controlled study aims to fulfil that gap through mobilization of Female Community Health Workers (FCHVs) who will be trained to perform a certain set of health promotion activities aimed at prevention of the disease and its progression. Baseline and follow-up surveys will be conducted to compare the intervention and control groups. This study has the potential to generate evidence in helping address NCDs in Nepal and also other similar resource-limited countries.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2021-01-28
Start Month Year December 25, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year May 10, 2021
Verification Month Year March 2020
Verification Date 2020-03-31
Last Update Posted Date 2021-01-28

Facilities

Sequence: 200053304
Name Aarhus University
City Aarhus
Zip 8000
Country Denmark

Conditions

Sequence: 52156512
Name Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Downcase Name chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Id Information

Sequence: 40148220
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value AUTBA18

Countries

Sequence: 42557739
Name Denmark
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55577917 Sequence: 55577918
Group Type Experimental Group Type No Intervention
Title Intervention Title Control

Interventions

Sequence: 52472019
Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Behavioural-FCHV Visit
Description Female Community Health Volunteer will visit selected households on average 3 times a year for providing health promotion messages on improving lung health status and avoiding risk factors to COPD.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328035 Sequence: 177328036
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second Measure Proportion of risk factors of COPD between intervention and control arm
Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year
Description Mean difference in FVE1 between intervention and control arm

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193432117 Sequence: 193432118 Sequence: 193432119 Sequence: 193432120 Sequence: 193432121 Sequence: 193432122 Sequence: 193432123
Mesh Term Lung Diseases Mesh Term Lung Diseases, Obstructive Mesh Term Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases Mesh Term Chronic Disease Mesh Term Disease Attributes Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases, obstructive Downcase Mesh Term pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases Downcase Mesh Term chronic disease Downcase Mesh Term disease attributes Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306094
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University of Aarhus

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29277937
Role Principal Investigator
Name Tara Ballav Adhikari, MScPH
Affiliation Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130884
Design Group Id 55577917
Intervention Id 52472019

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757362
Gender All
Minimum Age 40 Years
Maximum Age 90 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Capable of performing spirometry
Aged greater than and equal to 40 years
Full time residents in the study area and will be in the study area for at least one year

Exclusion Criteria:

Younger than 40 years of age
Self-reported pregnancy
having active pulmonary tuberculosis or being on medications for pulmonary tuberculosis
thoracic, abdominal or eye surgery in the last six months
History of Mental illness
MI in past 8 weeks prior to study
Hospital admission in the past six months for cardiac illness
Those who decline to provide consent to the study will be excluded.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254228065
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 40
Maximum Age Num 90
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30503587
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Prevention
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Links

Sequence: 4386996
Url https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S268110
Description Prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and its Associated Factors in Nepal: Findings from a Community-based Household Survey

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869865
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52049416 Sequence: 52049417
Pmid 33061350 Pmid 34289879
Reference Type background Reference Type derived
Citation Adhikari TB, Acharya P, Hogman M, Neupane D, Karki A, Drews A, Cooper BG, Sigsgaard T, Kallestrup P. Prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and its Associated Factors in Nepal: Findings from a Community-based Household Survey. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Sep 29;15:2319-2331. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S268110. eCollection 2020. Citation Adhikari TB, Neupane D, Karki A, Drews A, Cooper B, Hogman M, Sigsgaard T, Kallestrup P. Community-based intervention for prevention and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Nepal (COBIN-P trial): study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Jul 21;22(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05447-7.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Prognosis of Patient Evaluated for Palliative Radiotherapy ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797755
2019-01-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797755
NCT03797755https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797755?tab=tableShing Fung Lee, MBBS (HK), FRCR (UK)leesfm@ha.org.hk852 2468 5087Many patients with incurable cancer will receive palliative oncological treatment before their death, and radiotherapy (RT) is an important element of this. The aim of palliative RT is to alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life. An accurate and practical survival prediction model for metastatic cancer patient receiving palliative RT can assist the decision making (ranging from best supportive treatment alone for expected short survival, to dose escalation for potential better disease control).

The available survival prediction models (such Survival Prediction Score using Number of Risk Factors by Chow et al and TEACHH model) have been developed in the Western world. We therefore perform a prospective observational study 1) to assess the overall survival of patients evaluated for palliative RT at a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong, and 2) to validate the prognostic score systems in our population.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09
Start Month Year January 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2019
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09

Facilities

Sequence: 200244847
Status Recruiting
Name Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun
City Hong Kong
Country Hong Kong

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28128075
Facility Id 200244847
Contact Type primary
Name Shing Fung Lee, MBBS (HK), FRCR (UK)
Email leesfm@ha.org.hk
Phone 852 2468 5087

Conditions

Sequence: 52208405 Sequence: 52208406
Name Cancer Name Radiotherapy
Downcase Name cancer Downcase Name radiotherapy

Id Information

Sequence: 40186362
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value NTWC_Onc_2019

Countries

Sequence: 42599841
Name Hong Kong
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55635012
Title Palliative Cancer Patients
Description Stage IV cancer patients evaluated for palliative radiotherapy.

Interventions

Sequence: 52522369
Intervention Type Radiation
Name palliative radiotherapy
Description Radiotherapy for palliating symptoms in stage IV cancer patients

Keywords

Sequence: 79923392 Sequence: 79923393 Sequence: 79923394 Sequence: 79923395 Sequence: 79923396
Name survival Name cancer Name palliative Name radiotherapy Name prognosis
Downcase Name survival Downcase Name cancer Downcase Name palliative Downcase Name radiotherapy Downcase Name prognosis

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177512384 Sequence: 177512385 Sequence: 177512386 Sequence: 177512387
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Overall Survival Measure Overall Survival in Each Indication of Palliative Radiotherapy Measure Overall Survival by Survival Prediction Model (NRF) Measure Overall Survival by Survival Prediction Model (TEACHH)
Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 3, 6, 9, 12 months Time Frame 3, 6, 9, 12 months Time Frame 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Description Overall Survival in the studied population Description Indications of Palliative Radiotherapy:

The indication will be as follow:

spinal cord compression brain metastases tumor bleeding tumoral mass Cancer pain Superior Vena Cava Syndrome/ Airway compression

Description Overall Survival by Survival Prediction Score using Number of Risk Factors (NRF) Description Overall Survival by Survival Prediction Score using TEACHH Model

Sponsors

Sequence: 48354003
Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Tuen Mun Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29306143
Role Principal Investigator
Name Shing Fung Lee, MBBS (HK), FRCR (UK)
Affiliation Department of Clinical Oncology, New Territory West Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12017289
Contact Type primary
Name Shing Fung Lee, MBBS (HK), FRCR (UK)
Phone 852 2468 5087
Email leesfm@ha.org.hk
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199602
Design Group Id 55635012
Intervention Id 52522369

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30787045
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Stage IV cancer patients evaluated for palliative radiotherapy in Tuen Mun Hospital
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

All adult patients with stage IV cancer who are referred for palliative RT in Tuen Mun Hospital, including both inpatients and outpatients.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who have received palliative RT before (i.e. not the first course palliative RT), have non-metastatic disease, are misclassified as palliative patients.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989941
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30533115
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899409
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Shing Fung Lee
Title Resident Specialist
Affiliation Tuen Mun Hospital

Study References

Sequence: 52103396 Sequence: 52103397 Sequence: 52103398 Sequence: 52103399 Sequence: 52103400 Sequence: 52103401 Sequence: 52103402
Pmid 11527298 Pmid 10678857 Pmid 20564632 Pmid 19018082 Pmid 21263086 Pmid 29147245 Pmid 24122413
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Chow E, Harth T, Hruby G, Finkelstein J, Wu J, Danjoux C. How accurate are physicians' clinical predictions of survival and the available prognostic tools in estimating survival times in terminally ill cancer patients? A systematic review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2001;13(3):209-18. doi: 10.1053/clon.2001.9256. Citation Christakis NA, Lamont EB. Extent and determinants of error in doctors' prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2000 Feb 19;320(7233):469-72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7233.469. Citation Gripp S, Mjartan S, Boelke E, Willers R. Palliative radiotherapy tailored to life expectancy in end-stage cancer patients: reality or myth? Cancer. 2010 Jul 1;116(13):3251-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25112. Citation Chow E, Abdolell M, Panzarella T, Harris K, Bezjak A, Warde P, Tannock I. Predictive model for survival in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 20;26(36):5863-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1363. Epub 2008 Nov 17. Citation Peppercorn JM, Smith TJ, Helft PR, Debono DJ, Berry SR, Wollins DS, Hayes DM, Von Roenn JH, Schnipper LE; American Society of Clinical Oncology. American society of clinical oncology statement: toward individualized care for patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 20;29(6):755-60. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.1744. Epub 2011 Jan 24. Citation Chow E, James JL, Hartsell W, Scarantino CW, Ivker R, Roach M III, Suh JH, Demas W, Konski A, Bruner DW. Validation of a Predictive Model for Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 9714. World J Oncol. 2011 Aug;2(4):181-190. doi: 10.4021/wjon325w. Epub 2011 Aug 24. Citation Krishnan MS, Epstein-Peterson Z, Chen YH, Tseng YD, Wright AA, Temel JS, Catalano P, Balboni TA. Predicting life expectancy in patients with metastatic cancer receiving palliative radiotherapy: the TEACHH model. Cancer. 2014 Jan 1;120(1):134-41. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28408. Epub 2013 Oct 2. Erratum In: Cancer. 2019 Jul 1;125(13):2325.

Ipd Information Types

Sequence: 3336937
Name Analytic Code

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Clinical Follow-up Study of Heart Failure Patients. ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797742
2018-01-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797742
NCT03797742https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797742?tab=tableZhangwei Chenchen.zhangwei@zs-hospital.sh.cn+86 021 64041990Heart failure (HF), a current worldwide pandemic with an unacceptable high level of morbidity and mortality, brings an enormous medical and societal burden. Chronic HF is characterized by progressive alteration of cardiac structure and function. But the molecular mechanism of these alterations is still not well-established and needs to be discussed further. HF is a highly heterogeneous disease that can be caused by a multiple of diseases. Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) are the main causes of this syndrome. Although HF is the common manifestation of DCM and ICM, the etiology and pathogenesis are different. Understanding the different pathophysiological mechanisms will contribute to the prevention and individualized therapy of heart failure. Therefore, this study aims to observation the different characteristics of the molecular biology and clinical courses in DCM and ICM patients.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-01
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09
Start Month Year January 1, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year December 1, 2022
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09

Facilities

Sequence: 200108787
Status Recruiting
Name Zhongshan Hospital
City Shanghai
Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28106512
Facility Id 200108787
Contact Type primary
Name Zhangwei Chen
Email chen.zhangwei@zs-hospital.sh.cn
Phone +8602164041990

Conditions

Sequence: 52171366
Name Heart Failure
Downcase Name heart failure

Id Information

Sequence: 40158706
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value HF201801

Countries

Sequence: 42569031
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55593293 Sequence: 55593294 Sequence: 55593295
Title NC Title DCM Title ICM
Description Patients without heart failure. Description Dilated cardiomyopathy patients. Description Ischemic cardiomyopathy patients.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177379262 Sequence: 177379263 Sequence: 177379264 Sequence: 177379265 Sequence: 177379266
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure NYHA functional class Measure All-cause mortality Measure hospitalization for cardiac causes Measure left ventricular end-diastolic dimension(LVEDD) dilates. Measure left ventricular ejection fraction reduces
Time Frame one year after enrolled Time Frame one year after enrolled Time Frame one year after enrolled Time Frame one year after enrolled Time Frame one year after enrolled
Description NYHA cardiac functional class Description All-cause mortality during follow-up Description hospitalization for cardiac causes during follow-up Description left ventricular structure changes:left ventricular end-diastolic dimension(LVEDD) dilates. Description left ventricular function changes:left ventricular ejection fraction reduces

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193487183 Sequence: 193487184 Sequence: 193487185
Mesh Term Heart Failure Mesh Term Heart Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term heart failure Downcase Mesh Term heart diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48319401
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12008908
Contact Type primary
Name Zhangwei Chen
Phone +86 021 64041990
Email chen.zhangwei@zs-hospital.sh.cn
Role Contact

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30765415
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 15 Years
Maximum Age 80 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Population The inpatient in the department of cardiology of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University will be selected.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

LVEF≤ 55%
enlarged left ventricular end-diastolic dimension
ICM group: with history of MI or revascularization; ≥ 75% stenosis of LM or proximal LAD; ≥ 75% stenosis of two or more epicardial vessels.
symptomatic heart failure

Exclusion Criteria:

Known malignant tumour diseases
Pregnancy or lactation period;
Investigators think not suitable to participate in this trial.

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253889193
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 15
Maximum Age Num 80
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30511581
Observational Model Case-Control
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28877876
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Early Initiation of Low Dose Tirofiban for PPCI in STEMI Patients. ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797729
2019-05-14

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797729
NCT03797729https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797729?tab=tableHongyi Wu, MDwu.hongyi@zs-hospital.sh.cn+8602164041990Anti-platelet therapy is a key point of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treatment. Nowadays, dual anti-platelet therapy based on aspirin and ADP-P2Y12 receptor inhibitor is the preferred treatment before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Restricted by pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics, ADP-P2Y12 receptor inhibitors cannot take effect immediately after oral administration. However, platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb / Ⅲa inhibitors take effect faster. Previous clinical trials indicated that combination of full dose of glycoprotein Ⅱb / Ⅲa inhibitor and dual anti-platelet therapy reduced AMI related ischemia events but increased bleeding events significantly. The high dose of glycoprotein Ⅱb / Ⅲa inhibitor may be the key factor contributing to the increased bleeding events. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and security of triple anti-platelet therapy based on a small dose of glycoprotein Ⅱb / Ⅲa inhibitor, aspirin and ADP-P2Y12 receptor inhibitor in AMI patients receiving PPCI.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-01
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2020-01-22
Start Month Year May 14, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year June 2021
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-01-22

Facilities

Sequence: 200280881
Status Recruiting
Name Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University
City Shanghai
State Shanghai
Zip 200032
Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28132928 Sequence: 28132929
Facility Id 200280881 Facility Id 200280881
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Zhangwei Chen, MD Name Danbo Lu, PhD
Email chen.zhangwei@zs-hospital.sh.cn Email lu.danbo@zs-hospital.sh.cn
Phone +86 21 64041990 Phone +86 21 64041990

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96133493 Sequence: 96133494 Sequence: 96133495 Sequence: 96133496 Sequence: 96133497
Mesh Term Tirofiban Mesh Term Fibrinolytic Agents Mesh Term Fibrin Modulating Agents Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
Downcase Mesh Term tirofiban Downcase Mesh Term fibrinolytic agents Downcase Mesh Term fibrin modulating agents Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term platelet aggregation inhibitors
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52221783
Name ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Downcase Name st elevation myocardial infarction

Id Information

Sequence: 40195804
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value TRYIT

Countries

Sequence: 42609784
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55650069 Sequence: 55650070
Group Type Placebo Comparator Group Type Experimental
Title Normal saline Title Tirofiban

Interventions

Sequence: 52535578 Sequence: 52535579
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Tirofiban Name Normal saline
Description Upon being diagnosed as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, if informed consent is obtained, patients start to receive Tirofiban(0.05mg/ml) intravenous drip in a dosage of 4ml/hour (patients weight<50kg) or 6ml/hour (patients weight > 50kg) lasting for 24 hours. Description Upon being diagnosed as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, if informed consent is obtained, patients start to receive normal saline intravenous drip in a dosage of 4ml/hour (patients weight<50kg) or 6ml/hour (patients weight > 50kg) lasting for 24 hours.

Keywords

Sequence: 79942103 Sequence: 79942104 Sequence: 79942105
Name ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Name Tirofiban Name Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Downcase Name st elevation myocardial infarction Downcase Name tirofiban Downcase Name percutaneous coronary intervention

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177562272 Sequence: 177562273 Sequence: 177562274 Sequence: 177562275 Sequence: 177562276 Sequence: 177562277 Sequence: 177562278 Sequence: 177562279 Sequence: 177562280 Sequence: 177562281 Sequence: 177562282 Sequence: 177562283 Sequence: 177562284
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure TFG(TIMI flow grades) grade III: complete myocardial perfusion immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention detected by DSA(Digital Substraction Angiography). Measure TMP(TIMI myocardial perfusion grades) grade III: complete myocardial perfusion immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention detected by DSA(Digital Substraction Angiography). Measure Remedial Tirofiban intravenous use during primary percutaneous coronary intervention procedure. Measure ST segment Measure Myocardial microcirculation perfusion estimated by cardiac magnetic (CMR). Measure Major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE), including a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization. Measure Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. Measure The serum microRNA expression pattern changes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Measure All the bleeding events assessed by bleeding academic research consortium(BARC) definition for bleeding) Measure Major bleeding events assessed by TIMI bleeding criteria. Measure Severe or life-threatening and moderate bleeding events assessed by GUSTO bleeding criteria. Measure Major bleeding events assessed by international society on thrombosis and haemostasis(ISTH) bleeding criteria. Measure Adverse events and severe adverse events.
Time Frame Immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Time Frame Immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Time Frame During the process of primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Time Frame 90 minutes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Time Frame 7 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Time Frame 30 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Time Frame 7 and 30 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Time Frame Pre-, 30 minutes, 3 hours and 24 hours after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Time Frame 30 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Time Frame 30 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Time Frame 30 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Time Frame 30 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Time Frame 30 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Description TIMI flow grades: grade III. Description TIMI myocardial perfusion grades: grade III. Description Remedial Tirofiban use during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Description The sum of the initial ST segment elevation drops 70% or more. Description Myocardial microcirculation perfusion estimated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Description Major adverse cardiovascular events, including a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization. Description Left ventricular ejection fraction assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. Description The microRNA expression pattern changes. Description All the bleeding events assessed by bleeding academic research consortium(BARC) definition for bleeding) Description Any intracranial bleeding (excluding microhemorrhages <10 mm evident only on gradient-echo MRI); Clinically overt signs of hemorrhage associated with a drop in hemoglobin of ≥ 5 g/dL; Fatal bleeding (bleeding that directly results in death within 7 d). Description GUSTO bleeding criteria:Severe or life-threatening :

Intracerebral hemorrhage ; Resulting in substantial hemodynamic compromise requiring treatment.

Moderate:

Requiring blood transfusion but not resulting in hemodynamic compromise.

Mild :

Bleeding that does not meet above criteria.

Description Fatal bleeding and/or symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra-articular or pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome, and/or bleeding causing hemoglobin drop of 20 g/L or more, and/or blood transfusion of 2 units or more Description Adverse events and severe adverse events.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193679412 Sequence: 193679413 Sequence: 193679414 Sequence: 193679415 Sequence: 193679416 Sequence: 193679417 Sequence: 193679418 Sequence: 193679419 Sequence: 193679420 Sequence: 193679421
Mesh Term Myocardial Infarction Mesh Term ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Mesh Term Infarction Mesh Term Ischemia Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Necrosis Mesh Term Myocardial Ischemia Mesh Term Heart Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Vascular Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term myocardial infarction Downcase Mesh Term st elevation myocardial infarction Downcase Mesh Term infarction Downcase Mesh Term ischemia Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term necrosis Downcase Mesh Term myocardial ischemia Downcase Mesh Term heart diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48366645
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29313022
Role Study Chair
Name Juying Qian, MD
Affiliation Fudan University

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12020642 Sequence: 12020643
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Zhangwei Chen, MD Name Hongyi Wu, MD
Phone +8602164041990 Phone +8602164041990
Email chen.zhangwei@zs-hospital.sh.cn Email wu.hongyi@zs-hospital.sh.cn
Phone Extension 612747
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68217714 Sequence: 68217715
Design Group Id 55650070 Design Group Id 55650069
Intervention Id 52535578 Intervention Id 52535579

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30794853
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 85 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Time after onset of chest pain: ≥ 30 minutes and ≤ 24 hours;
ST segment elevated ≥ 0.1mV in adjacent two or more leads;
Scheduled for primary percutaneous coronary intervention without contraindications;
Written informed consent is obtained.

Exclusion Criteria:

Life expectancy ≤ 1 year;
History of cerebral hemorrhage;
History of stroke in 6 months;
Active hemorrhage;
Severe hepatic and renal dysfunction(ALT > 3 folds of upper limit of normal, eGFR < 30ml/min/1.73mm^2 or Scr > 200 mmol/L);
Known hemorrhagic diseases;
Known malignant tumour diseases;
Active peptic ulcer disease;
Blood platelet counts < 100×10^9/L;
Blood hemoglobin < 90g/L;
Pregnancy or lactation period;
Take part in other intervention clinical trials;
Investigators think not suitable to participate in this trial.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254004536
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 85
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 4
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 7

Designs

Sequence: 30540893
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Subject Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26697027
Intervention Id 52535579
Name Sodium Chloride Injection

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28907213
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Paediatric Peri-operative Anxiety: Does the Little Journey App Help? ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797716
2019-03-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797716
NCT03797716https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797716?tab=tableChristopher R Evans, MBBSsitu.littlejourney@ucl.ac.uk02076799280To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a virtual reality psychological preparation app at reducing peri-operative anxiety and its associated sequelae in children aged 3-12 years old undergoing ambulatory surgery compared to standard care.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-11-23
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09
Start Month Year March 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year September 30, 2020
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20710007
Description This is a phase III multi-centre randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Little Journey app: a pre-hospital psychological preparation tool designed for children undergoing ambulatory surgery.

Children presenting to the Preoperative assessment clinic before their operation will be screened for recruitment to the trial. Those meeting the inclusion criteria will be recruited to participate in the trial before randomisation into either a standard practice arm or intervention arm. Consent will be provided by parents / guardians and assent by children aged 7-12 years old.

Children assigned to the intervention arm will be provided with a virtual reality google cardboard headset and access code for the Little Journey app which they can use as many times as they wish before their operation. They will also receive the standard pre-operative preparation and care as per the recruiting site. In comparison, the standard care arm will receive a google cardboard virtual reality headset with suggestions of free virtual apps to use and standard pre-operative preparation and care – as defined by each participating site.

Children's anxiety will be assessed at multiple time points along the surgical journey, ranging from the preoperative assessment clinic, ward and finally in the anaesthetic room during the induction of anaesthesia. Secondary outcome measures such as parent anxiety levels, post-hospital behavioural changes, need for rescue analgesia and antiemetics in the recovery room will be recorded.

Children's anxiety scores in those assigned to the intervention arm will undergo a further analysis assessing the impact of frequency and timing of Little Journey app use before surgery.

Conditions

Sequence: 52139051 Sequence: 52139052 Sequence: 52139053 Sequence: 52139054 Sequence: 52139055 Sequence: 52139056
Name Anxiety Acute Name Anxiety Fear Name Peri-operative Name Psychological Distress Name Surgery Name Children, Only
Downcase Name anxiety acute Downcase Name anxiety fear Downcase Name peri-operative Downcase Name psychological distress Downcase Name surgery Downcase Name children, only

Id Information

Sequence: 40135101
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 18/0197

Design Groups

Sequence: 55559408 Sequence: 55559409
Group Type No Intervention Group Type Experimental
Title Standard Care arm Title Intervention arm
Description Participants will receive standard of care from the pre-assessment clinic until discharge.

A typical preparatory National Health Service pathway would include: meeting a specialist nurse in the preoperative assessment clinic; a preoperative anaesthetic and surgical consultation; interaction with health play specialists on the day of surgery; and distraction interventions such as hand-held tablets during induction of anaesthesia. Participants may have inhalation or intravenous induction depending on the primary management plan of the anaesthetist in charge.

Participants in the standard care arm will also receive a virtual reality cardboard headset, which can be taken home, personalised and decorated before use with virtual reality apps available to download from the app stores.

Description Participants allocated to the intervention arm will receive the same peri-operative management as the standard care arm and will also receive an access code enabling them to use the Little Journey app in the weeks leading up to their operation. We suggest the Little Journey app is used in the days to weeks leading up to the child's operation depending on their age. On downloading the app, if parents/carers insert the age of the child and date of surgery into the Little Journey app they will be sent a push notifications reminding them when to use it according to their child's age. However, it can be used as frequently as the child and/or their parents or carers wish before the operation.

Interventions

Sequence: 52454964
Intervention Type Device
Name Little Journey app
Description The Little Journey app allows children to explore 360-degree hospital environments familiarising and desensitising them to areas and staff they'll see on the day of surgery. Children can "visit" the day case ward, anaesthetic and recovery rooms where their operation will occur -all while feeling safe in their own home. As the child explores the three areas, they are introduced to animated characters of staff who explain what will happen, the equipment that will be used and how they might feel. Using head tracking technology, the child triggers the animated characters by looking at them; meaning they control the pace of learning and speed at which they progress. The preparatory tool follows a pre-set story-line reflecting what happens from admission to discharge on the day of surgery.

Keywords

Sequence: 79822888
Name Anxiety, peri-operative, preparation, app
Downcase Name anxiety, peri-operative, preparation, app

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177264013 Sequence: 177264027 Sequence: 177264014 Sequence: 177264015 Sequence: 177264016 Sequence: 177264017 Sequence: 177264018 Sequence: 177264019 Sequence: 177264020 Sequence: 177264021 Sequence: 177264022 Sequence: 177264023 Sequence: 177264024 Sequence: 177264025 Sequence: 177264026 Sequence: 177264028 Sequence: 177264029 Sequence: 177264030 Sequence: 177264031 Sequence: 177264032 Sequence: 177264033 Sequence: 177264034 Sequence: 177264035
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Modified Yale Pre Operative Anxiety score (shortened form) Measure Virtual reality headset side effects Measure Modified Yale Pre Operative Anxiety score (shortened form) Measure Parent anxiety levels Measure Modified Yale Pre Operative Anxiety score (shortened form) Measure Parent satisfaction with pre-operative information Measure Child compliance in the anaesthetic room Measure Child distress in the anaesthetic room Measure Parent anxiety levels Measure Time to induction of anaesthesia Measure Incidence of the need for premedication Measure Analgesia and anti-emetic use in the recovery room. Measure Time to recovery readiness Measure Parent satisfaction with care Measure Time spent in hospital Measure Incidence of unplanned admissions to hospital following surgery Measure Incidence of unplanned cancellations on the scheduled date of surgery. Measure Post Hospital Behavioural Questionnaire Measure Social cost analysis (Parents/Guardian) Measure Social cost analysis (Participants) Measure Post Hospital Behavioural Questionnaire Measure Social cost analysis (Parents/Guardian) Measure Social cost analysis (Participants)
Time Frame Day of surgery (Day 1): Measured during the induction of anaesthesia in the anaesthetic room Time Frame Day of Surgery (Day 1): Non-validated questionnaire completed immediately prior to discharge from hospital Time Frame Two weeks to six months before surgery: mYPAS-SF measured pre-randomisation in the Pre-Assessment clinic occurring a minimum of two-weeks before surgery, up to six-months before surgery depending on the participating research site. Time Frame Two-weeks to six-months before surgery: Measured pre-randomisation in the pre-assessment clinic occurring a minimum of two-weeks before surgery, up to six-months before surgery date depending on the participating research site. Time Frame Day of Surgery (Day 1): Measured on the ward prior to surgery Time Frame Day of Surgery (Day 1): Measured on the ward prior to the operation on the day of surgery. Time Frame Day of surgery (Day 1): Recorded immediately following observation of the induction of anaesthesia Time Frame Day of surgery (Day 1): Recorded immediately following observation of the induction of anaesthesia Time Frame Day of surgery (Day 1): Measured immediately following observation of the induction of anaesthesia. Time Frame Day of surgery (Day 1): Measured from entry into the anaesthetic room to entry into theatre. Time Frame Day of surgery (Day 1): As recorded in the anaesthetic room Time Frame Day of surgery (Day 1): Recorded in the recovery room following surgery Time Frame Day of surgery (Day 1): Measured from patients arrival in the recovery room until deemed ready for discharge. Time Frame Day of surgery (Day 1): Measured on the ward prior to discharge home following surgery. Time Frame Day of surgery (Day 1): Recorded at end of day of surgery following discharge. Time Frame Day of surgery (Day 1): Recorded at end of day of surgery Time Frame Day of surgery (Day 1): Recorded on the day of surgery Time Frame Day 14 post surgery: Completed at two-weeks after surgery by telephone consultation with parents/guardians Time Frame Day 14 post surgery: Completed at two-weeks after surgery by telephone consultation with parents/guardians Time Frame Day 14 post surgery: Completed at two-weeks after surgery by telephone consultation with parents/guardians Time Frame Day 28 post surgery: Completed at four-weeks after surgery by telephone consultation with parents/guardians Time Frame Day 28 post surgery: Completed at four-weeks after surgery by telephone consultation with parents/guardians Time Frame Day 28 post surgery: Completed at four-weeks after surgery by telephone consultation with parents/guardians
Description An independent and blinded observer completed observational scoring tool. Children are scored in four categories: Activity, vocalisations, emotional expressivity and state of apparent arousal, according to pre-determined Likert scale observations. Each category score is divided by its highest possible score, before being added together; these scores are then divided by four and multiplied by 100, giving a value between 22.92 to 100. Higher values indicate greater anxiety levels, with scores greater than 30 typically representing clinically significant anxiety. Description An assessment of the side effects of use of a virtual reality headset in both children and their parents assessed through a parent reported checkbox questionnaire. Description An independent and blinded observer completed observational scoring tool. Children are scored in four categories: Activity, vocalisations, emotional expressivity and state of apparent arousal, according to pre-determined Likert scale observations. Each category score is divided by its highest possible score, before being added together; these scores are then divided by four and multiplied by 100, giving a value between 22.92 to 100. Higher values indicate greater anxiety levels, with scores greater than 30 typically representing clinically significant anxiety. Description A 100mm visual analogue scale assessing the current anxiety levels of parents (VAS-PA) about their child's surgery. The VAS-PA is a rapid method of assessing self-reported anxiety levels of parents before surgery. Self reported scores range from 0-100mm with higher scores signifying greater anxiety. Description An independent and blinded observer completed observational scoring tool. Children are scored in four categories: Activity, vocalisations, emotional expressivity and state of apparent arousal, according to pre-determined Likert scale observations. Each category score is divided by its highest possible score, before being added together; these scores are then divided by four and multiplied by 100, giving a value between 22.92 to 100. Higher values indicate greater anxiety levels, with scores greater than 30 typically representing clinically significant anxiety. Description A 100mm visual analogue scale assessing parents' satisfaction with the pre-operative information. This parent-reported score ranges from 0-100mm with higher scores signifying higher levels of satisfaction. Description A 100mm visual analogue scale assessing the child's compliance during the induction of anaesthesia completed by the independent observer following observation of the induction of anaesthesia. This independent observer reported score ranges from 0-100mm with higher scores signifying higher levels of compliance. Description A 100mm visual analogue scale assessing the child's level of distress during the induction of anaesthesia completed by the independent observer following observation of the induction of anaesthesia. This independent observer reported score ranges from 0-100mm with higher scores signifying higher levels of distress during the induction. Description A 100mm visual analogue scale assessing the current anxiety levels of parents (VAS-PA) about their child's surgery. The VAS-PA is a rapid method of assessing self-reported anxiety levels of parents before surgery. Self reported scores range from 0-100mm with higher scores signifying greater anxiety. Description The time taken for the induction of anaesthesia (minutes) Description Number of patients given premedication prior to the induction of anaesthesia as per the prescription of the anaesthetist. Description As directed by the trial arm blinded clinical team based on their perceptions of child's symptoms in the recovery room. Description The time taken for participant to be ready for discharge back to the ward from the recovery room (minutes) as deemed by the recovery room nursing staff. Description A 100mm visual analogue scale assessing parents' satisfaction with the care they received on the day of surgery. This parent-reported score ranges from 0-100mm with higher scores signifying higher levels of satisfaction. Description The total time the participant spend in hospital from arrival on the ward to being discharged home (minutes). Description The number of participants requiring unplanned admission to hospital following surgery for any reason. Description The number of participants whose surgery is cancelled on the day of surgery for any reason. Description A parent-completed eleven-point questionnaire assessing changes in their child's behaviour following surgery. Consisting of eleven items, each item is scored using a five-point Likert scale ranging from "much less than before" to " much more than before". Higher scores are suggestive of increased post hospital regressive behavioural changes. Description The number of combined days of work missed by Parents/guardians following their child's surgery. Higher numbers are indicative of increased social costs. Description The number of days of school missed by children following their surgery. Higher numbers are indicative of increased social costs. Description A parent-completed eleven-point questionnaire assessing changes in their child's behaviour following surgery. Consisting of eleven items, each item is scored using a five-point Likert scale ranging from "much less than before" to " much more than before". Higher scores are suggestive of increased post hospital regressive behavioural changes. Description The number of combined days of work missed by Parents/guardians following their child's surgery. Higher numbers are indicative of increased social costs. Description The number of days of school missed by children following their surgery. Higher numbers are indicative of increased social costs.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193366740 Sequence: 193366741
Mesh Term Anxiety Disorders Mesh Term Mental Disorders
Downcase Mesh Term anxiety disorders Downcase Mesh Term mental disorders
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48290753 Sequence: 48290754
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University College, London Name National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29268555
Role Study Chair
Name Ramani S Moonesinghe, MBBS, MRCP, FRCA, FFICM, MD
Affiliation University College, London

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12000497
Contact Type primary
Name Christopher R Evans, MBBS
Phone 02076799280
Email situ.littlejourney@ucl.ac.uk
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68107526
Design Group Id 55559409
Intervention Id 52454964

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30747753
Gender All
Minimum Age 3 Years
Maximum Age 12 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Children aged between 3-12 years of age on the date of parental consent to participate in the trial
Those undergoing surgery planned to be conducted as a day-case (surgery is defined as any therapeutic procedure taking place under the care of an anaesthetist and surgeon or dentist)
Requiring general anaesthetic (must be their first general anaesthetic)
American Society of Anesthetists physical status class I-III
Both child and parent able to speak / understand one of the languages available on the Little Journey app (to be confirmed)

Note: Surgery is defined as any procedure occurring in a theatre under the care of a surgeon or dentist and an anaesthetist.

Exclusion Criteria:

Children aged less than 3 years of age or more than 12 years' old on the date of parental consent
Any child and/or parent that refuses to be part of the study
Patients and parents who do not speak one of the languages which are available on the app
American Society of Anesthetists physical status class IV-VI
Children undergoing diagnostic procedures (e.g. scans, cardiac catheterisation)
Any child with a visual or hearing impairments significant enough to prevent use of the intervention as decided on case-by-case basis.

Note: Children undergoing diagnostic procedures (e.g. MRI, Cardiac catheterisation) will not be included due to diagnostic uncertainty.

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254122019
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 3
Maximum Age Num 12
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 22

Designs

Sequence: 30494036
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Health Services Research
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Caregiver Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28860316
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Efficacy of Lidocaine Gel Enema After Endoscopic Hemorrhoid Band Ligation for Relief of Post Procedural Pain ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797703
2018-11-26

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797703
NCT03797703https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797703?tab=tableNANANAThis is a prospective study to assess the utility of Lidocaine Hydrochloride 2% gel enema (Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc.) in reducing post-procedural pain after endoscopic band ligation of internal hemorrhoids. Briefly, patients will be consented prior to entry into the study. During the endoscopic band ligation procedure, patients will be blindly placed into the treatment arm or control arm. The treatment arm will receive 15 ml enema of lidocaine gel immediately upon cessation of the procedure. In the placebo arm, oral pain medications will be provided. Researchers will assess pain following the procedure at 1 hour, 24 hours and 48 hours via telephone call. Another telephone call will be performed at 72 to 96 hours to assess any side effects of the medication.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-19
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2020-11-25
Start Month Year November 26, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year May 29, 2020
Verification Month Year November 2020
Verification Date 2020-11-30
Last Update Posted Date 2020-11-25

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20727181
Description This is a prospective single center study to evaluate side effects and efficacy of a lidocaine jelly 2% enema following endoscopic hemorrhoid band ligation. The investigators will administer a single dose of 15 mL lidocaine jelly 2%, obtained from Advocate main pharmacy, as an enema immediately post procedure. Patients will not be permitted to self-administer additional doses following discharge.

Prior to being enrolled in the study, the clinician will perform a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel and Complete Blood Count. When appropriate, a urine pregnancy test will be performed prior to enrollment. The investigators will assess for any signs or symptoms of liver disease. These assessments will occur within one month of the procedure date. If the patient has any signs of renal or hepatic impairment (creatinine greater than 2 or Childs Pugh Class 3), they will be excluded from the study. The researchers will also exclude patients with any history of arrhythmias or who are currently on anti-arrhythmic medications. Once the patient is deemed safe to proceed, the lidocaine gel enema will be placed at the cessation of the procedure by the investigator. At the time of the procedure, the clinician will assess and use their best judgement to determine if the rectal mucosa is generally intact by visual inspection. If the mucosa remains intact, the subject will be able to be included in the study. However, if the rectal mucosa is traumatized the subject will be excluded and will not participate in the randomized treatment.

Following the procedure, the patient will be monitored closely with a one-on one registered nurse for 4 hours in an observation unit. Vital signs will be taken every 5 minutes, as well as continuous EKG monitoring and pulse oximetry monitoring. If any adverse side effects occur, the physician is immediately available for further management and admission to the hospital if needed. Upon completion of the 4-hour observation period, the participants will be evaluated by a registered nurse and physician prior to discharge home following the procedure. The patient will be discharged with a responsible adult who will care for the patient for 24 additional hours. The clinician will communicate with the patient and responsible adult regarding any adverse side effects. The patient will also receive a phone number to call to reach the physician or the physician's associate who will be able to verbally assist the patient immediately should any adverse events occur.

For data collection, one hour following the procedure a clinician will screen for any adverse side effects and pain will be assessed using a numeric pain scale (0-10). The patient will also be contacted via telephone to assess adverse side effects and pain scale at 24 hours and 48 hours post procedure. The investigators will also call the patient at 72 to 96 hours to assess for any adverse effects. The patients will be followed up by the principal investigator for routine check-ups following the procedure. The clinician will be easily accessible via telephone and the patient will be given instructions on how to contact the clinician, if needed.

Data to be collected on each subject will include: date of procedure, specific patient ID, gender, age, internal hemorrhoids grade, race (White, African American, Hispanic, Asian), BMI, comorbid conditions, pain 1 hour post procedure, pain 24 and 48 hours post procedure, requirement of narcotic pain medication, requirement of other oral analgesic medication, sedation utilized and complications or adverse side effects from the medication.

Upon data collection of this trial, we will monitor for any adverse events. If there is an adverse event that is deemed by the principal investigator likely due to drug administration, we will report it to the FDA immediately through written communication and an IND Safety Report. It will be reported within at least 7 calendar days of being notified of the adverse event.

Facilities

Sequence: 200159414
Name Advocate Christ Medical Center
City Oak Lawn
State Illinois
Zip 60453
Country United States

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96074169 Sequence: 96074170 Sequence: 96074171 Sequence: 96074172 Sequence: 96074173 Sequence: 96074174 Sequence: 96074175 Sequence: 96074176 Sequence: 96074177 Sequence: 96074178 Sequence: 96074179 Sequence: 96074180
Mesh Term Lidocaine Mesh Term Anesthetics, Local Mesh Term Anesthetics Mesh Term Central Nervous System Depressants Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Sensory System Agents Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Agents Mesh Term Anti-Arrhythmia Agents Mesh Term Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers Mesh Term Sodium Channel Blockers Mesh Term Membrane Transport Modulators Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Downcase Mesh Term lidocaine Downcase Mesh Term anesthetics, local Downcase Mesh Term anesthetics Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system depressants Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term sensory system agents Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system agents Downcase Mesh Term anti-arrhythmia agents Downcase Mesh Term voltage-gated sodium channel blockers Downcase Mesh Term sodium channel blockers Downcase Mesh Term membrane transport modulators Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52185494
Name Hemorrhoids
Downcase Name hemorrhoids

Id Information

Sequence: 40169075
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value AHC-6999-M5000223

Countries

Sequence: 42580666
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609122 Sequence: 55609123
Group Type Experimental Group Type No Intervention
Title Treatment Title Control
Description Patients will be randomly allocated into the treatment group. The treatment group will receive a 15 mL lidocaine gel enema rectally immediately following completion of the procedure. Description Patients will be randomly allocated into the control group. The control group will not receive a rectal enema.

Interventions

Sequence: 52499435
Intervention Type Drug
Name Lidocaine Hydrochloride 2% gel enema
Description Insertion of Lidocaine Hydrochloride 2% gel enema rectally immediately following the procedure.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432042 Sequence: 177432043
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change in Pain following Procedure at 1 hour, 24 hours and 48 hours Measure Pain Medication Needs
Time Frame This information will be collected at 1 hour, 24 hours and 48 hours after the procedure. Time Frame This will be evaluated 48 hours after the procedure.
Description This effect will be measured by statistical analysis comparing the treatment groups numeric pain scale ratings (0-10) with the control groups numeric pain scale ratings (0-10). Description This effect will be measured by asking the subject what pain medication was needed following the procedure and the amount taken.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193540144 Sequence: 193540145 Sequence: 193540146 Sequence: 193540147 Sequence: 193540148 Sequence: 193540149 Sequence: 193540150 Sequence: 193540151 Sequence: 193540152 Sequence: 193540153
Mesh Term Hemorrhoids Mesh Term Pain, Procedural Mesh Term Rectal Diseases Mesh Term Intestinal Diseases Mesh Term Gastrointestinal Diseases Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases Mesh Term Vascular Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Pain Mesh Term Neurologic Manifestations
Downcase Mesh Term hemorrhoids Downcase Mesh Term pain, procedural Downcase Mesh Term rectal diseases Downcase Mesh Term intestinal diseases Downcase Mesh Term gastrointestinal diseases Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term pain Downcase Mesh Term neurologic manifestations
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332338
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Advocate Health Care

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168185
Design Group Id 55609122
Intervention Id 52499435

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773579
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients older than 18 years of age
Patients undergoing endoscopic hemorrhoid band ligation at Advocate Christ Medical Center

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients undergoing endoscopic hemorrhoids band ligation who are already on pain medications chronically due to other reasons
Patients with moderate to severe renal impairment, defined as creatinine greater than 2
Patients with hepatic dysfunction, defined as patients with signs or symptoms of liver dysfunction and/or patients with Childs Pugh Class C
Patients with any history of arrhythmias or are currently on anti-arrhythmic medications
Patients with any contraindications to lidocaine, including hypersensitivity to local anesthetics of the amide type or any other component within the lidocaine 2% jelly
Patients with traumatized rectal mucosa in the area of application at the time of the procedure
Patients who are currently pregnant

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253952727
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 18
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30519710
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Supportive Care
Time Perspective
Masking Triple
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886011
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Effectiveness of Percutaneous Needle Aponeurotomy ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797690
2020-11-02

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797690
NCT03797690https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797690?tab=tableJohann BEAUDREUIL, PUPHjohann.beaudruil@aphp.fr+33 1 49 95 88 28The main objective is to investigate if percutaneous needle aponeurotomy is non-inferior to open surgery using aponeurectomy in treatment of flexion contracture due to Dupuytren’s disease.

Our hypothesis is that percutaneous needle aponeurotomy has suitable efficacy and safety profile for large application in the treatment of Dupuytren’s disease and that it is consequently able to drastically reduce the need of open surgery in this indication.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-06-25
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2022-12-08
Start Month Year November 2, 2020
Primary Completion Month Year March 14, 2025
Verification Month Year November 2022
Verification Date 2022-11-30
Last Update Posted Date 2022-12-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20663965
Description Scientific justification:

Dupuytren's disease is a world-wide musculoskeletal disorder. It consists in fibrosis of the palmar aponeurosis that can induce disabling flexion contracture of the metacarpophalageal or proximal interphalangeal joints. Treatment modalities of flexion contracture include open surgery, percutaneous needle aponeurotomy and collagenase. Collagenase is not available in France. Aponeurectomy, that is also called fasciectomy, is the main open surgical technique, and open surgery is the most frequently used treatment in Dupuytren's disease. Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy is recommended as a nonsurgical treatment for Dupuytren's disease. It is a minimally invasive procedure. Its most largely accepted indication is Dupuytren's disease with metacarpophalageal joint involvement. However, percutaneous needle aponeurotomy has been successful for metacarpophalageal or proximal interphalangeal joint involvement, in nonadvanced and in advanced Dupuytren's disease. A model analysis recently demonstrated that replacing open surgery with percutaneous needle aponeurotomy could save more than 50% of the total hospitalization costs for the disease.

Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy therefore appears as a unique minimally invasive approach for Dupuytren's disease. It could become a valuable alternative to open surgery. The hypothesis is that percutaneous needle aponeurotomy has suitable efficacy and safety profile for large application in the treatment of Dupuytren's disease and that it is consequently able to drastically reduce the need of open surgery in this indication.

Practical procedure:

Patients addressed to the consultation of the hand surgery centers for Dupuytren's disease will be prospectively selected, included, randomized, treated using percutaneous needle aponeurotomy or open surgery within six weeks after randomization, and followed at 1 week, 1, 3,12, 24 and 36 months after treatment. Assessment of efficacy will be blinded. Assessment of complications will be done by an unblinded assessor.

Facilities

Sequence: 199452811 Sequence: 199452812 Sequence: 199452813 Sequence: 199452814
Status Active, not recruiting Status Active, not recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting
Name Centre d'Imagerie Médicale Bachaumont Paris Centre Name Hopital LARIBOISIERE – Radiologie Name Hopital LARIBOISIERE – Rhumatologie Name JOUVENET – Orthopédie, chirurgie de la main et du membre supérieur
City Paris City Paris City Paris City Paris
Zip 75002 Zip 75010 Zip 75010 Zip 75016
Country France Country France Country France Country France

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28030496 Sequence: 28030497
Facility Id 199452813 Facility Id 199452814
Contact Type primary Contact Type primary
Name Johann BEAUDREUIL, PUPH Name ERIC ROULOT, PH
Email johann.beaudreuil@aphp.fr Email secretaire.roulot@gmail.com
Phone 01 49 95 88 28 Phone 01 42 15 42 33

Conditions

Sequence: 52020500
Name Dupuytren Disease of Finger
Downcase Name dupuytren disease of finger

Id Information

Sequence: 40040581
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value P160903J

Countries

Sequence: 42437035
Name France
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55427655 Sequence: 55427656
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy Title Open surgery with limited aponeurectomy
Description It consists in cutting the fibrotic cord due to the disease and responsible for the flexion contracture, with a needle under local anesthesia. The procedure can be repeated as required during the same session. One to three sessions with at least one-week interval are usually sufficient and will be allowed. It will be performed in outpatient setting by a senior physician experienced in the procedure. End of treatment will be considered as the last session of needle aponeurotomy. Description It consists in excision of the fibrotic aponeurosis.It will be performed by hand surgeons under loco-regional anaesthesia during a short hospitalization (1 day stay). Post-operative cares are necessary (analgesics, splint, nursing, physiotherapy). End of surgical treatment will be considered as the removal of the stitches (two weeks after the surgical treatment).

Interventions

Sequence: 52333132 Sequence: 52333133
Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Procedure
Name Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy Name Open surgery with limited aponeurectomy
Description It consists in cutting the fibrotic cord due to the disease and responsible for the flexion contracture, with a needle under local anesthesia. The procedure can be repeated as required during the same session. One to three sessions with at least one-week interval are usually sufficient and will be allowed. It will be performed in outpatient setting by a senior physician experienced in the procedure Description It consists in excision of the fibrotic aponeurosis.It will be performed by hand surgeons under loco-regional anaesthesia during a short hospitalization (1 day stay). Post-operative cares are necessary (analgesics, splint, nursing, physiotherapy)

Keywords

Sequence: 79626289 Sequence: 79626290 Sequence: 79626291 Sequence: 79626292
Name Dupuytren's disease Name Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy Name Limited aponeurectomy Name Randomized trial
Downcase Name dupuytren's disease Downcase Name percutaneous needle aponeurotomy Downcase Name limited aponeurectomy Downcase Name randomized trial

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176855118 Sequence: 176855119 Sequence: 176855120 Sequence: 176855121 Sequence: 176855122 Sequence: 176855123 Sequence: 176855124 Sequence: 176855125 Sequence: 176855126 Sequence: 176855127 Sequence: 176855128 Sequence: 176855129 Sequence: 176855130 Sequence: 176855131 Sequence: 176855132
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Metacarpophalangeal joint contracture during passive extension Measure Metacarpophalangeal joint contractures during passive and active extension Measure Main metacarpophalangeal joint contracture during passive extension, Measure The clinical success Measure The recurrence Measure The interphalangeal joint contractures during passive and active extension Measure The 70% improvement from baseline of the flexion contracture Measure The active range of motion of metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal treated joints Measure The functional limitation using Quick DASH questionnaire Measure The URAM scale Measure The patient satisfaction on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale Measure The number of secondary and repeated treatments Measure Complications and adverse events for primary treatment Measure Complications and adverse events for secondary treatment Measure The post-interventional pain and needs
Time Frame at 3 months after treatment Time Frame at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment Time Frame at 36 months after treament Time Frame at 3 months after treament Time Frame at 12, 24 and 36 months after treament Time Frame at 1 week, 1, 3,12, 24 and 36 months after treatment Time Frame at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment Time Frame at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment Time Frame at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment Time Frame at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment Time Frame at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment Time Frame at 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment Time Frame at the treatment time, and at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months; Time Frame at the treatment time, at 12, 24 and 36 months; Time Frame at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months
Description Expressed in degrees, using low energy computed tomography for blinded assessment (computed tomography imaging will be analysed by a blinded assessor not involved in the treatment). Baseline will be Metacarpophalangeal joint contracture during passive extension the day of the treatment, before any treatment Description Expressed in degrees using clinical goniometry, and patient wearing white opac gloves to ensure blinded assessment. Description Expressed in degrees, using low energy computed tomography, for blinded assessment (computed tomography imaging will be analysed by a blinded assessor not involved in the treatment). Description The clinical success is defined as the reduction of flexum to within 0 to 5° during passive extension, using clinical goniometry, for the main metacarpophalangeal joint); Patient will wear white opac gloves to ensure blinded assessment. Description The recurrence is defined as the flexum progression of 20°, during passive extension, using clinical goniometry, after clinical success. Patient will wear white opac gloves to ensure blinded assessment. Description Expressed in degrees, using clinical goniometry. Patient will wear white opac gloves to ensure blinded assessment. Description The flexion contracture of each treated joint, during passive extension will be assessed by a blinded assessor (Patient will wear white opac gloves). – Flexion contracture in degrees using goniometry reported as follows: ray Number; metacarpophalangeal angle; interphalangeal angle Description The active range of motion of metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal treated joints will be assessed by a blinded assessor (Patient will wear white opac gloves). Description The patient will fill out the auto-questionnaire. The blinded assessor will calculate the score (0 to 100, with highest value indicating highest disability). Description The patient will fill out the auto-questionnaire. The blinded assessor will calculate the score (0 to 45, with highest value indicating highest disability). Description The assessor will ask the patient the following question: "How would you rate satisfaction about the treatment you underwent in the study?" Patients will be asked to mark the level of their satisfaction on a l00-mm, nonhatched VAS scale marked at one end as "not satisfied" and at the other as "completely satisfied'' Description The number of secondary or repeated open surgeries and percutaneous needle aponeurotomy will be recorded by the unblinded assessor. Description The number and the types of complications and adverse events for primary open surgery and first line percutaneous needle aponeurotomy will be collected by an unblinded assessor. Description The number and the types of complications and adverse events for secondary open surgery and percutaneous needle aponeurotomy will be collected by an unblinded assessor. Description The post-interventional pain and needs of nursing, splinting, medication, physiotherapy,sick leave, time return to regular activities using a patient diary. These datas will be collected by the unblinded assessor.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192889470 Sequence: 192889471 Sequence: 192889472 Sequence: 192889473 Sequence: 192889474 Sequence: 192889475 Sequence: 192889476 Sequence: 192889477 Sequence: 192889478 Sequence: 192889479 Sequence: 192889480
Mesh Term Dupuytren Contracture Mesh Term Fibroma Mesh Term Neoplasms, Fibrous Tissue Mesh Term Neoplasms, Connective Tissue Mesh Term Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Contracture Mesh Term Muscular Diseases Mesh Term Musculoskeletal Diseases Mesh Term Connective Tissue Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term dupuytren contracture Downcase Mesh Term fibroma Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, fibrous tissue Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, connective tissue Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, connective and soft tissue Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term contracture Downcase Mesh Term muscular diseases Downcase Mesh Term musculoskeletal diseases Downcase Mesh Term connective tissue diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48178859
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29198734
Role Principal Investigator
Name Johann BEAUDREUIL, PUPH
Affiliation APHP

Central Contacts

Sequence: 11975275
Contact Type primary
Name Johann BEAUDREUIL, PUPH
Phone +33 1 49 95 88 28
Email johann.beaudruil@aphp.fr
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67948321 Sequence: 67948322
Design Group Id 55427655 Design Group Id 55427656
Intervention Id 52333132 Intervention Id 52333133

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30677198
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Age ≥ 18 years old
Ascertained Dupuytren disease: palpable fibrotic nodule or cord developed from the palmar aponeurosis, flexion contracture of a metacarpophalangeal or proximal interphalangeal joint.
Presence of at least one flexion contracture of a metacarpophalangeal joint of the hand due to Dupuytren's disease and > or = 20°
Written informed consent signed by the patient
Patient affiliated to the social security

Exclusion Criteria:

Presence of other musculoskeletal disorders of the hand than Dupuytren's disease: known inflammatory rheumatic disease of the hand, clinical signs of inflammatory rheumatic disease of the hand, MP or PIP pain at inclusion visit.
Previous open surgery of the hand for any reason
Any other pathological condition or limited range of motion in the finger to be treated
Psychiatric status precluding patient evaluation; vulnerable persons; adults under legal protection order or incompetent, physically or mentally incapable of giving his consent.
Pregnant or beastfeeding women
Participation in another interventional trial

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253870611
Number Of Facilities 4
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 14

Designs

Sequence: 30423951
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Masking Description The primary outcome (main metacarpophalangeal joint contracture during passive extension) will be assessed using low energy computed tomography before treatment, 3 months and 36 months after treatment for blinded assessment. Furthermore, in addition to the clinical follow-up, the patient will be followed by a blinded assessor. At each follow-up visits with the blinded assessor, patient will be asked to wear white opaque gloves to ensure the blinding for the treatment during assessment including the main outcome. Clinicians, nurses and patients will be instructed to the importance of avoiding communication about the treatment to the blinded assessor.
Intervention Model Description multicenter, non-inferiority PROBE (Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-point) trial. Two groups (ratio 1:1) will be compared in this phase III pivotal study: experimental group versus control group.
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28790471
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ MN4000 for Treatment of CF and MND Patients in the Home Setting ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797677
2017-03-09

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797677
NCT03797677https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797677?tab=tableNANANAThe study was a non-randomized open label pilot study. It was an observational design conducted at one (1) site in the US. All enrolled subjects received treatment with the MN4000.

This pilot study evaluated subject satisfaction with the therapy and adherence to the therapy during the 90-day treatment period, and also collected clinical outcome data. Outcomes were assessed before, during and after the MN4000 treatment period.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-27
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09
Start Month Year March 9, 2017
Primary Completion Month Year November 30, 2017
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735940
Description The study was a non-randomized open label pilot study. It was an observational design conducted at one (1) site in the US. All enrolled subjects received treatment with the MN4000.

This pilot study evaluated subject satisfaction with the therapy and adherence to the therapy during the 90-day treatment period, and also collected clinical outcome data. Outcomes were assessed before, during and after the MN4000 treatment period. The study did not include a control group. This pilot study was designed to provide initial information that could inform decisions for future larger-scale studies.

Ten (10) patients total were enrolled from CF and NMD clinics. Eligible subjects were adult patients who were able to perform MN4000 therapy using a mouthpiece and who met all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria.

All patients received therapy with the MN4000 following the labeled instructions for the device.

The MN4000 is an airway clearance and lung expansion therapy device that has been cleared to market by the FDA as The MetaNeb® System for Homecare environment, for clearance of pulmonary secretions and for treatment or prevention of pulmonary atelectasis. It is a Class II device, cleared to market on March 17, 2016 under premarket notification 510(k) K151689 as The MetaNeb® 4 System with application for homecare environment. It is commercially marketed as the MN4000. The device consists of a pneumatic compressor and an air pulse generator that delivers CHFO and CPEP to;

facilitate clearance of mucous from the lungs;
provide lung expansion therapy and;
enhance delivery of aerosol therapy.

This "triple" mode device can provide aerosol therapy while alternating between CPEP for lung expansion and CHFO for airway clearance. Supplemental oxygen therapy may also be delivered when used with compressed oxygen.

The MN4000 has three therapy modes:

CHFO (Continuous High Frequency Oscillation) – delivers aerosol therapy while providing oscillating pressure pulses to the airway
CPEP (Continuous Positive Expiratory Pressure) – delivers aerosol therapy while providing continuous positive pressure to help hold open and expand the airways
Aerosol – for delivery of aerosol only. In this mode, CHFO and CPEP are not available

After assessing baseline status, therapy with the MN4000 was introduced and incorporated into the daily home respiratory care treatment regimen for all patients.

Other airway clearance and/or lung expansion therapies were not to be performed during the three-month study period. The treatment regimen for other respiratory care modalities (e.g. aerosolized medications) was that which was prescribed by the patient's health care team in the routine standard care of each patient.

During the three-month follow-up period, adherence to the daily prescribed therapy regimen was assessed. Subjects/caregivers were asked to provide adherence information for each day during the 90-day study period.

Documentation of efficacy and safety Variables was completed by study staff at the time of occurrence, from review of the patient's medical records and from scores and rankings for questionnaires.

Facilities

Sequence: 200245068
Name Northwestern
City Chicago
State Illinois
Zip 60208
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52208492 Sequence: 52208493 Sequence: 52208494
Name Cystic Fibrosis Name Motor Neuron Disease Name Airway Clearance Impairment
Downcase Name cystic fibrosis Downcase Name motor neuron disease Downcase Name airway clearance impairment

Id Information

Sequence: 40186439
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value CR-RR2016-002

Countries

Sequence: 42599934
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55635115
Group Type Experimental
Title Home based airway clearance with Metaneb
Description Patients with CF and MND who required regular home airway clearance therapy were enrolled to use the Metaneb device in the home setting.

The MN4000 is an airway clearance and lung expansion therapy device that has been cleared to market by the FDA as The MetaNeb® System for Homecare environment, for clearance of pulmonary secretions and for treatment or prevention of pulmonary atelectasis. It is a Class II device, cleared to market on March 17, 2016 under premarket notification 510(k) K151689 as The MetaNeb® 4 System with application for homecare environment.

Interventions

Sequence: 52522459
Intervention Type Device
Name MN 4000
Description Patients who required regular home airway clearance therapy were enrolled in the study and were prescribed therapy with the MN4000. Adherence to the prescribed therapy regimen and patient/caregiver satisfaction with the therapy was assessed. Pulmonary function, was assessed for each subject at baseline, after 1 month and after 3 months of home therapy. Results from the therapy period was compared to the baseline period, during which the subject received their regular airway clearance regimen. Airway Clearance Satisfaction surveys were conducted at baseline, after 1 month, and after 3 months of therapy. Results from the MN4000 therapy period were compared to the baseline period, during which the subject received their regular regimen

Keywords

Sequence: 79923525 Sequence: 79923526 Sequence: 79923527 Sequence: 79923528
Name Airway Clearance Name Cystic Fibrosis Name Motor Neuron Disease Name Home care
Downcase Name airway clearance Downcase Name cystic fibrosis Downcase Name motor neuron disease Downcase Name home care

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177512730 Sequence: 177512731 Sequence: 177512732 Sequence: 177512733 Sequence: 177512734 Sequence: 177512735 Sequence: 177512736 Sequence: 177512737 Sequence: 177512738 Sequence: 177512739 Sequence: 177512740 Sequence: 177512741
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Patient / Caregiver Satisfaction scores Measure Mean adherence to prescribed treatment regimen Measure ALS-Functional Rating Scale (ALS-FRS) Measure Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire – Revised (CFQ-R) Measure Exacerbation of pulmonary disease Measure FEV1 Measure FVC Measure FEV1/FVC ratio Measure SVC Measure SPO2 Measure Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) Measure PCF
Time Frame 90 days Time Frame 90 days Time Frame 90 days Time Frame 90 days Time Frame 90 days Time Frame 90 days Time Frame 90 days Time Frame 90 days Time Frame 90 days Time Frame 90 days Time Frame 90 days Time Frame 90 days
Description The primary efficacy variable was patient and/or caregiver satisfaction with therapy, as evaluated using a Therapy Use Rating Scale questionnaire. The Therapy Use Rating Scale is an assessment of patient/caregiver satisfaction with the therapy and their subjective assessment of the benefit of the therapy. This was assessed by a 5 point likert scale assessing effectiveness, ease of use and likelihood to continue therapy with 5 representing positive responses and 1, negative. Description Evidenced by feedback on adherence to therapy. Use of the MN4000 was evaluated, collecting daily treatment usage information from study subjects and/or caregivers to determine the level of adherence to the prescribed therapy regimen. A self reporting tool has been developed for the study assessing adherence to duration of individual prescribed treatment time and overall study duration. Description MND patients only. MND patients only. The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS) is an instrument for evaluating the functional status of patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. It can be used to monitor functional change in a patient over time.

It contains 10 distinct measures:

Speech
Salivation
Swallowing
Handwriting
Cutting food and handling utensils (with or without gastrostomy)
Dressing and hygiene
turning in bed and adjusting bed clothes
Walking
Breathing
Climbing stairs

These 10 parameters are scored on a scale of 0-4, based on the patients' ability to perform tasks. The minimum score is 0 and maximum 40.The higher the score the more function is retained.

Description CF patients only. The Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ) is a disease-specific instrument that measures health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for adolescents and adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) > or = 14 years, consisting of 44 items on 12 generic and disease-specific scales. It offers 5 distinct 4-point Likert scales (e.g., always/often/ sometime/never). Scores for each HRQoL domain; after recoding, each item is summed to generate a domain score and standardized. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Description Hospitalization and/or antibiotics for respiratory infection or complication. Exacerbations of pulmonary disease were defined as respiratory infections that resulted in requirement for hospitalization and/or antibiotics to treat the respiratory infection or complication. Hospitalizations that are part of routine care (e.g. hospital admissions for annual "tune-up") or antibiotics that are part of the regular treatment regimen were not documented as exacerbations. Occurence of exarcerbation related hospitalization OR the necessity of a prescription for antibiotics qualify as worsening disease. Description FEV1: The forced expiratory volume-one second is the total volume of air a patient exhales in the first second during maximal effort. Normal range is >80%. Decreasing percentage is associated with worsening / Severe disease Description The functional vital capacity is the total volume of air a patient exhales for the total duration of the test during maximal effort. Normal range is >80%. Decreasing percentage is associated with worsening / Severe disease Description The percentage of the FVC expired in one second Results are given in both raw data (litres, litres per second) and % predicted-the test result as a percent of the "predicted values" for the patients of similar characteristics. Results over 80% are considered normal. Description Slow Vital Capacity displays the volume of gas measured on a complete expiration after a maximal inspiration without forced or rapid effort. Useful measurement when FVC is reduced and airway obstruction is present. educed SVC is associated with worsening respiratory disease Description SpO2 stands for peripheral capillary oxygen saturation, an estimate of the amount of oxygen in the blood. Low SPO2 is associated with worsening respiratory function. Description Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) is a measure of the strength of inspiratory muscles, primarily the diaphragm, and allows for the assessment of ventilatory failure, restrictive lung disease and respiratory muscle strength. Reduction in MIP is asociated with worsening neuromuscular status and poor ability to cough. Description The Peak Cough Flow is the maximum air flow generated during a cough. Decreasing air flow generated is associated with weakening neuromuscular status and associated poor cough impulse

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193628556 Sequence: 193628557 Sequence: 193628558 Sequence: 193628559 Sequence: 193628561 Sequence: 193628562 Sequence: 193628563 Sequence: 193628564 Sequence: 193628565 Sequence: 193628566 Sequence: 193628567 Sequence: 193628568 Sequence: 193628569 Sequence: 193628570 Sequence: 193628571 Sequence: 193628572 Sequence: 193628573 Sequence: 193628574 Sequence: 193628560
Mesh Term Cystic Fibrosis Mesh Term Motor Neuron Disease Mesh Term Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Mesh Term Fibrosis Mesh Term Pancreatic Diseases Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases Mesh Term Lung Diseases Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases Mesh Term Genetic Diseases, Inborn Mesh Term Infant, Newborn, Diseases Mesh Term Neurodegenerative Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Neuromuscular Diseases Mesh Term Spinal Cord Diseases Mesh Term Central Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term TDP-43 Proteinopathies Mesh Term Proteostasis Deficiencies Mesh Term Metabolic Diseases Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term cystic fibrosis Downcase Mesh Term motor neuron disease Downcase Mesh Term amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Downcase Mesh Term fibrosis Downcase Mesh Term pancreatic diseases Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases Downcase Mesh Term genetic diseases, inborn Downcase Mesh Term infant, newborn, diseases Downcase Mesh Term neurodegenerative diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term neuromuscular diseases Downcase Mesh Term spinal cord diseases Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term tdp-43 proteinopathies Downcase Mesh Term proteostasis deficiencies Downcase Mesh Term metabolic diseases Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48354112
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Hill-Rom

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29306197
Role Principal Investigator
Name Lisa F Wolfe, MD
Affiliation Northwestern University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199719
Design Group Id 55635115
Intervention Id 52522459

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30787106
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Documented diagnosis of CF or MND
Age > 18 years
Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Requirement for continuous mechanical ventilation
Anticipated requirement for hospitalization within the next three months
History of pneumothorax within past 6 months
History of hemoptysis requiring embolization within past 12 months
Inability to perform MN4000 therapy using a mouthpiece (e.g. inability to create adequate mouth seal)
Inability to perform MN4000 therapy as directed
Inability or unwillingness to complete study visits or provide follow-up data as required by the study protocol

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253990028
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 8
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 11

Designs

Sequence: 30533176
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2582508
Document Type Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True
Has Icf False
Has Sap True
Document Date 2016-12-05
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/77/NCT03797677/Prot_SAP_000.pdf

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899469
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Study of the Safety and Tolerability of CDX-6114 in Healthy Volunteers ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797664
2018-12-14

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797664
NCT03797664https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797664?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of an oral solution of CDX-6114 when administered as a single dose in healthy volunteers
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2021-08-04
Start Month Year December 14, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year April 12, 2019
Verification Month Year August 2021
Verification Date 2021-08-31
Last Update Posted Date 2021-08-04

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20721680
Description This is a second Phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in approximately 24 healthy volunteers who are 18 to 55 years old. Three cohorts are planned each consisting of 8 subjects; the cohorts as planned are 7.5, 15.0 and 22.5 g of CDX-6114 (or matching placebo) in oral solution. Increasing doses of CDX-6114 will be assessed sequentially un til the final dose is evaluated or any of the stopping criteria are reached. Subjects will each receive either a single dose of CDX-6114 or matching placebo, with food, and will then be followed for a total of 22 days (3 weeks).

Facilities

Sequence: 200108802
Name Linear Clinical Services
City Perth
State Western Australia
Zip 6009
Country Australia

Conditions

Sequence: 52171369
Name Healthy
Downcase Name healthy

Id Information

Sequence: 40158708
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value CDX6114-004

Countries

Sequence: 42569044
Name Australia
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55593297 Sequence: 55593298
Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title Experimental: CDX-6114 Title Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Description 7.5, 15.0 and 22.5g Description Phosphate Buffer Diluent Solution

Interventions

Sequence: 52485591 Sequence: 52485592
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name CDX-6114 Name Placebo
Description CDX-6114 will be administered as a single, oral dose solution at dose levels of 7.5, 15.0 and 22.5g Description Phosphate Buffer Diluent oral solution

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177379272 Sequence: 177379273 Sequence: 177379274
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events experienced by the subjects following oral administration of CDX-6114 Measure Pharmacokinetics of CDX-6114 Measure Pharmacodynamics of CDX-6114
Time Frame Up to 22 days after drug administartion Time Frame Up to 24 hours after drug administration Time Frame Up to 24 hours after drug administration
Description Will be measured by assessing the frequency and the nature of the AEs reported Description Assessed by the serum levels of CDX-6114 following oral administration of CDX-6114 Description Assessed by the plasma levels of phenylalanine and cinnamic acid following oral administration of CDX-6114

Sponsors

Sequence: 48319403
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Codexis Inc.

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29285411
Role Principal Investigator
Name Sam Salman
Affiliation Linear Clinical Services

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68149269 Sequence: 68149270
Design Group Id 55593297 Design Group Id 55593298
Intervention Id 52485591 Intervention Id 52485592

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30765417
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 55 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Healthy male and female, non-smoking, subjects between the ages of 18 and 55 years, inclusive, at the time of screening.
Have a body mass index (BMI) between 18.0 and 30.0 kg/m2 inclusive and weigh at least 50 kg and no more than 100 kg inclusive.
Good general health, as determined by an experienced physician based on a medical evaluation including detailed medical history, full physical examination, including blood pressure and pulse rate measurement, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and clinical laboratory tests.

Male subjects and their female spouse/partner(s) who are of childbearing potential:

Must agree to stay abstinent (where abstinence is the preferred and usual life-style of the subject), starting at screening and continuing throughout the clinical study period, and for 90 days after study drug administration.

Or

Must be using highly effective contraception consisting of 2 forms of birth control (1 of which must be a barrier method) starting at screening and continuing throughout the clinical study period, and for 90 days after study drug administration.
These requirements do not apply to participants in a same sex relationship.
Male subjects must agree not to donate sperm starting at screening and continuing throughout the clinical study period, and for 90 days after study drug administration.

Female subjects of childbearing potential:

Must agree not to become pregnant during the clinical study period and for 30 days after study drug administration.
Must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening.

If heterosexually active, must agree to consistently use a form of highly effective birth control, in combination with a barrier method starting at screening and continuing throughout the clinical study period, and for 30 days after study drug administration

Or

Must agree to stay abstinent, (where abstinence is the preferred and usual life-style of the subject), starting at screening and continuing throughout the clinical study period, and for 30 days after study drug administration.
These requirements do not apply to participants in a same sex relationship.

Female subjects of non-childbearing potential:

Must have a confirmed clinical history of sterility

Or

Must be postmenopausal as defined as: amenorrhea for at least 1 year prior to screening and a laboratory confirmed serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level ≥ 40mIU/mL.
Female subjects must agree not to breastfeed starting at screening and continuing throughout the clinical study period, and for 90 days after study drug administration.
Female subjects must agree not to donate ova starting at screening and continuing throughout the clinical study period, and for 90 days after study drug administration.
Subject must be competent to understand the nature of the study & capable of giving written informed consent. Be willing to report for the scheduled study visits and communicate to study personnel about adverse events and concomitant medication use.
Subject must abstain from the following foods from 1 week prior to study drug administration until the last PK sample has been obtained: grapefruit juice or products, pomegranate juice or products, foods containing poppy seeds, and/or drinks or foods containing quinine (e.g., tonic water) or Seville oranges (e.g., orange marmalade).

Subject agrees not to participate in another interventional study while participating in the present clinical study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Female subject who has been pregnant within the 6 months prior to screening or breastfeeding within the 3 months prior to screening.
Evidence or history of clinically significant hematological, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiovascular, hepatic, psychiatric, neurologic, or allergic disease (including drug allergies, but excluding untreated, asymptomatic, seasonal allergies and childhood asthma) at time of study drug administration.
Current or chronic history of gastrointestinal illness or conditions interfering with normal gastrointestinal anatomy or motility. Examples include gastrointestinal bypass surgery, cholecystectomy, partial or total gastrectomy, gastric band surgery, small bowel resection, vagotomy, malabsorption, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or celiac sprue.
Treatment with any anti-platelet and/or anticoagulant medication.
Evidence or history of specific food intolerance. Examples include gluten intolerance, lactose intolerance, or dairy food intolerance or any food/ingredient included in the protein breakfast.
A positive result, on screening, for serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis A virus antibodies (HAV), hepatitis C virus antibodies (HCV) or antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and/or type 2 (HIV-2).
A positive pre-study drug/alcohol screen. However, there is the option to re-screen during the screening period at the discretion of the PI or delegate in the case of a positive pre-study drug screen for a prescribed medication e.g. codeine.
Subject has a history of drinking > 21 units of alcohol/week for male subjects or > 14 units of alcohol/week for female subjects within the 3 months prior to screening.
Subject has a history of regular smoking (daily or most days in a week) or the use of nicotine products (3 or more nicotine-containing products) within the 6 months prior to screening.
Subjects who show evidence of use of any recreational drugs of abuse on testing or recent history (within the 3 months prior to screening).
Subject has a pulse rate <40 or > 100 bpm; mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 140 mmHg; mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > 90 mmHg at screening. Repeat measurements are allowed at the discretion of the PI or delegate.
Subject has any clinically significant abnormalities at screening in rhythm, conduction or morphology of the resting ECG and any clinically significant abnormalities in the 12-lead ECG, as considered by the Investigator, that may interfere with the interpretation of QTc interval changes including abnormal ST-T wave morphology.
Subject has prolonged QTcF (QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula) > 450 ms for male subjects or > 470 ms for female subjects, or shortened QTcF < 300 ms or a family history of prolonged QT syndrome, at screening.
Subject has any clinically significant abnormalities in clinical chemistry, hematology, or urinalysis at screening as judged by the Investigator, including: Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) or Total bilirubin (TBL) more than 1.5 times the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN).
Plasma donation within the 14 days prior to screening or any whole blood donation/significant blood loss > 500 mL during the 3 months prior to screening.
Treatment with any Investigational Drug or Device/Treatment within the 30 days prior to the administration of study drug.
Use of any prescribed or non-prescribed medication including, herbal and dietary supplements, antacids, analgesics (other than oral contraceptives, paracetamol or multi-vitamins) during the two weeks prior to the administration of the study drug, or up to a minimum of 5 times the half-life of the medication if it has a long half-life.
Previous treatment with CDX-6114 active study drug (but not placebo) in study CDX6114-001.

Known allergy or adverse reaction history to any of the oral dose formulation components e.g. mannitol

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253889233
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 3
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 55
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30511583
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Masking Description Double-Blind
Intervention Model Description Dose-escalating, Randomized, Double-Blinded,. Placebo-Controlled
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28877878
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Ticagrelor Monotherapy in PAtients Treated With New-generation Drug-eluting Stents for Acute Coronary Syndrome; T-PASS Trial ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797651
2019-04-24

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797651
NCT03797651https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797651?tab=tableMyeong-Ki Hong, MD, PhDmkhong61@yuhs.ac82-2-2228-8458We hypothesized that ticagrelor monotherapy might be enough to prevent thromboembolic events without aspirin after PCI in patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS). Moreover, ticagrelor monotherapy will reduce bleeding risk compared to DAPT with aspirin plus ticagrelor. We will also evaluate 1-year safety and efficacy of Orsiro stent for patient with acute coronary syndrome. After confirmation of enrollment, patients will be randomized to continue standard treatment (aspirin plus ticagrelor) for 1 year or to stop aspirin after discharge or less than 1 month after PCI (ticagrelor monotherapy). Randomization will be stratified according to 1) the presence of diabetes and 2) ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI). Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, laboratory findings will be assessed at the time of randomization. All patients will provide informed consent on their own initiative.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-06
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2023-03-07
Start Month Year April 24, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year April 4, 2025
Verification Month Year March 2023
Verification Date 2023-03-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-03-07

Facilities

Sequence: 199785018
Status Recruiting
Name Yonsei Cardiovascular Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine
City Seoul
Zip 03722
Country Korea, Republic of

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28075000
Facility Id 199785018
Contact Type primary
Name Myeong-Ki Hong, MD, PhD
Email mkhong61@yuhs.ac
Phone 82-2-2228-8458

Conditions

Sequence: 52104184
Name Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome
Downcase Name coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndrome

Id Information

Sequence: 40106111
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 4-2018-0782

Countries

Sequence: 42508632
Name Korea, Republic of
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55520476 Sequence: 55520477
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Experimental
Title Standard DAPT Title Very-short DAPT within 1 month
Description Patient will continue standard treatment (aspirin plus ticagrelor) for 1 year. Dosage of ticagrelor would be 90 mg twice a day, and 100 mg of aspirin will be prescribed once a day. Description Patient will stop aspirin after discharge (DAPT less than 1 months after PCI) (ticagrelor monotherapy). Dosage of ticagrelor would be 90 mg twice a day, and 100 mg of aspirin will be prescribed once a day (during hospitalization).

Interventions

Sequence: 52418212 Sequence: 52418213
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Standard DAPT Name Very-short DAPT less than 1 month after PCI
Description Patient will continue standard treatment (aspirin plus ticagrelor) for 1 year. Dosage of ticagrelor would be 90 mg twice a day, and 100 mg of aspirin will be prescribed once a day. Description Patient will stop aspirin (ticagrelor monotherapy) after discharge or within 1 month. Dosage of ticagrelor would be 90 mg twice a day, and 100 mg of aspirin will be prescribed once a day (during hospitalization).

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177146235 Sequence: 177146236 Sequence: 177146237 Sequence: 177146238 Sequence: 177146239
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Net clinical benefit Measure Each components of net clinical benefit Measure Cardiovascular mortality Measure Major or minor bleeding Measure Major adverse cardiac event
Time Frame 1 year after procedure Time Frame 1 year after procedure Time Frame 1 year after procedure Time Frame 1 year after procedure Time Frame 1 year after procedure
Description A composite of all-cause death, MI, stent thrombosis, stroke, major bleeding Description All-cause death, MI, stent thrombosis, stroke, major bleeding Description Cardiovascular mortality Description Major or minor bleeding Description A composite of cardiac death, MI, stent thrombosis, ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193223641 Sequence: 193223642 Sequence: 193223643 Sequence: 193223644 Sequence: 193223645 Sequence: 193223646 Sequence: 193223647 Sequence: 193223648 Sequence: 193223649 Sequence: 193223650 Sequence: 193223651 Sequence: 193223652 Sequence: 193223653 Sequence: 193223654
Mesh Term Coronary Artery Disease Mesh Term Acute Coronary Syndrome Mesh Term Syndrome Mesh Term Acute Disease Mesh Term Disease Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Coronary Disease Mesh Term Myocardial Ischemia Mesh Term Heart Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Arteriosclerosis Mesh Term Arterial Occlusive Diseases Mesh Term Vascular Diseases Mesh Term Disease Attributes
Downcase Mesh Term coronary artery disease Downcase Mesh Term acute coronary syndrome Downcase Mesh Term syndrome Downcase Mesh Term acute disease Downcase Mesh Term disease Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term coronary disease Downcase Mesh Term myocardial ischemia Downcase Mesh Term heart diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term arteriosclerosis Downcase Mesh Term arterial occlusive diseases Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term disease attributes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48257891
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Yonsei University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29246925
Role Principal Investigator
Name Myeong-Ki Hong
Affiliation Division of Cardiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine

Central Contacts

Sequence: 11994405
Contact Type primary
Name Myeong-Ki Hong, MD, PhD
Phone 82-2-2228-8458
Email mkhong61@yuhs.ac
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68059952 Sequence: 68059953
Design Group Id 55520476 Design Group Id 55520477
Intervention Id 52418212 Intervention Id 52418213

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30727084
Gender All
Minimum Age 19 Years
Maximum Age 80 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients ≥19 years old
Patients who received new generation sirolimus-eluting (Orsiro® series) stent implantation for treating ACS, including acute MI and unstable angina
Provision of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Age> 80 years
Increased risk of bleeding, anemia, thrombocytopenia
A need for oral anticoagulation therapy
Pregnant women or women with potential childbearing
Life expectancy < 1 year

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253978812
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 19
Maximum Age Num 80
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 4

Designs

Sequence: 30473514
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28839936
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Characterization of Manual Dexterity by Finger Force Manipuladum (FFM) in Patients With Writer’s Cramp and in Control Subjects ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797638
2018-10-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797638
NCT03797638https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797638?tab=tableNANANAWriter’s cramp is a focal dystonia characterized by abnormal movements and postures during writing. Limited finger independence during writing manifests as difficulty suppressing unwanted activations of neighbouring non task-relevant fingers. Patients with Writer’s cramp also have difficulty in fine control of grip force.

The investigators have recently developed the Finger Force Manipulandum which quantifies the forces applied by each fingers in different tasks. This method is sensitive for detection and quantification of small unwanted contractions in non-active (‘stationary’) fingers. Different tasks have been developed to assess abilities such as finger individuation but also fine finger force control, finger movement regularity and speed.

The aim of this study is to assess if developed tasks allow to precisely characterize writer’s cramp condition in terms of abilities aforementioned.

To do so, performance of 20 writer’s cramp patients in the developed task will be compared with performance of 20 control participants (matched in age, sex and writing hand) in the same tasks.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2021-06-22
Start Month Year October 1, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year July 19, 2019
Verification Month Year June 2021
Verification Date 2021-06-30
Last Update Posted Date 2021-06-22

Facilities

Sequence: 199965116
Name Fondation A de Rothschild
City Paris
Zip 75019
Country France

Conditions

Sequence: 52139058 Sequence: 52139059 Sequence: 52139060
Name Dystonic Disorder Name Focal Dystonia Name Writer's Cramp
Downcase Name dystonic disorder Downcase Name focal dystonia Downcase Name writer's cramp

Id Information

Sequence: 40135103
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value SSA_2018_4

Countries

Sequence: 42542718
Name France
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55559413 Sequence: 55559414
Group Type Experimental Group Type Other
Title Patients with writer's cramp Title Control subjects
Description Patients with writer's cramp Description Control subjects, without writer's cramp, matched with case subjects with age, gender and hand writing

Interventions

Sequence: 52454969
Intervention Type Device
Name Finger Force Manipuladum (FFM)
Description Tasks performed with the device Finger Force Manipuladum (FFM), to assess abilities such as finger individuation but also fine finger force control, finger movement regularity and speed.

Keywords

Sequence: 79822892 Sequence: 79822893 Sequence: 79822894
Name Dystonic Disorder Name Focal Dystonia Name Writer's Cramp
Downcase Name dystonic disorder Downcase Name focal dystonia Downcase Name writer's cramp

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177264037
Outcome Type primary
Measure Manual dexterity by the FFM
Time Frame Inclusion
Description Compare the manual dexterity by the FFM between subjects with writer's cramp and control subject

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193366748 Sequence: 193366749 Sequence: 193366750 Sequence: 193366751 Sequence: 193366752 Sequence: 193366753 Sequence: 193366742 Sequence: 193366743 Sequence: 193366744 Sequence: 193366745 Sequence: 193366746 Sequence: 193366747
Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Movement Disorders Mesh Term Central Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Muscular Diseases Mesh Term Musculoskeletal Diseases Mesh Term Neuromuscular Manifestations Mesh Term Muscle Cramp Mesh Term Dystonia Mesh Term Dystonic Disorders Mesh Term Spasm Mesh Term Dyskinesias Mesh Term Neurologic Manifestations
Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term movement disorders Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term muscular diseases Downcase Mesh Term musculoskeletal diseases Downcase Mesh Term neuromuscular manifestations Downcase Mesh Term muscle cramp Downcase Mesh Term dystonia Downcase Mesh Term dystonic disorders Downcase Mesh Term spasm Downcase Mesh Term dyskinesias Downcase Mesh Term neurologic manifestations
Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48290756 Sequence: 48290757
Agency Class NETWORK Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild Name Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29268557
Role Principal Investigator
Name Jean-Pierre BLETON, PhD
Affiliation Fondation A. de Rothschild

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68107531 Sequence: 68107532
Design Group Id 55559414 Design Group Id 55559413
Intervention Id 52454969 Intervention Id 52454969

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30747755
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion criteria for patients with writer's cramp

Patient with writer's cramp and writing speed <140 letters / min
Writer's cramp focal dystonia specific to the task of writing
Patient treated or not with botulinum toxin injection
Person having attended school in French

Non inclusion criteria for patients with writer's cramp

Patients whose writer's cramp has no impact on the handwriting and has kept a writing speed> 140 letters per minute.
Tremor of writing
Neurological condition other than writer's cramp (eg Parkinson's syndrome)
Pain, trauma or pathology of the upper limb of the writing member other than the writer's cramp who required medical or surgical treatment in the last 6 months preceding the initial check-up

Inclusion criteria for control subjects

•> 18 years old

Without writer's cramp
Person having attended school in French

Non inclusion criteria for control subjects

Tremor of writing
Neurological condition other than writer's cramp (eg Parkinson's syndrome)
Pain, trauma or pathology of the upper limb of the writing member other than the writer's cramp who required medical or surgical treatment in the last 6 months preceding the initial check-up

Matching criteria between cases and control patients

Age (± 5 years)
Gender
Hand writing

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254122065
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 9
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30494038
Allocation Non-Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28860318
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Endostar Combined With IP Second-line Treatment of Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797625
2017-05-04

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797625
NCT03797625https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797625?tab=tablechang jian hua, PDchangjianhua@163.com18017312689The aim of this study is to explore whether endostar combined with IP as treatment could improve progression-free surial time (PFS) and to evaluate the safety of the chemotherapy regimens
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09
Start Month Year May 4, 2017
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2020
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20727186
Description This study is to explore whether endostar combined with IP as treatment could improve progression-free surial time (PFS) and to evaluate the safety of the chemotherapy regimens used as second-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinomas

Facilities

Sequence: 200159423
Status Recruiting
Name Cancer hospital Fudan University
City Shanghai
State Shanghai
Zip 200032
Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28113731
Facility Id 200159423
Contact Type primary
Name Chang jian hua, PD

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96074204 Sequence: 96074205 Sequence: 96074206 Sequence: 96074207 Sequence: 96074208 Sequence: 96074209 Sequence: 96074210 Sequence: 96074211 Sequence: 96074212 Sequence: 96074213 Sequence: 96074214 Sequence: 96074215 Sequence: 96074216
Mesh Term Cisplatin Mesh Term Irinotecan Mesh Term Endostar protein Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents Mesh Term Topoisomerase I Inhibitors Mesh Term Topoisomerase Inhibitors Mesh Term Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Angiogenesis Inhibitors Mesh Term Angiogenesis Modulating Agents Mesh Term Growth Substances Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Growth Inhibitors
Downcase Mesh Term cisplatin Downcase Mesh Term irinotecan Downcase Mesh Term endostar protein Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents Downcase Mesh Term topoisomerase i inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term topoisomerase inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term angiogenesis inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term angiogenesis modulating agents Downcase Mesh Term growth substances Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term growth inhibitors
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52185503
Name Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Downcase Name esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Id Information

Sequence: 40169083
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value ENDO-SH-002

Countries

Sequence: 42580674
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609137
Group Type Experimental
Title Endostar Combined With IP
Description Endostar15mg/m2 Irinotecan 60mg/m2,D1,8 DDP 60mg/m2,D1

Interventions

Sequence: 52499445 Sequence: 52499446 Sequence: 52499447
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Irinotecan Name DDP Name Endostar
Description 60mg/m2,D1,8 Description 60mg/m2,D1 Description 15mg/d,d1-d7 civ

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432083
Outcome Type primary
Measure Progression Free Survival
Time Frame from the first cycle of treatment (day one) to two month after the last cycle

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193540191 Sequence: 193540192 Sequence: 193540193 Sequence: 193540194 Sequence: 193540195 Sequence: 193540196 Sequence: 193540197 Sequence: 193540198 Sequence: 193540199 Sequence: 193540200 Sequence: 193540201 Sequence: 193540202 Sequence: 193540203 Sequence: 193540204 Sequence: 193540205
Mesh Term Carcinoma Mesh Term Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Mesh Term Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Mesh Term Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms, Squamous Cell Mesh Term Esophageal Neoplasms Mesh Term Gastrointestinal Neoplasms Mesh Term Digestive System Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Head and Neck Neoplasms Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases Mesh Term Esophageal Diseases Mesh Term Gastrointestinal Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term carcinoma Downcase Mesh Term carcinoma, squamous cell Downcase Mesh Term esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, glandular and epithelial Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, squamous cell Downcase Mesh Term esophageal neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term gastrointestinal neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term digestive system neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term head and neck neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases Downcase Mesh Term esophageal diseases Downcase Mesh Term gastrointestinal diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332349
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Fudan University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29292998 Sequence: 29292999
Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name chang jian hua, PD Name wang hui jie, doctor
Affiliation PI Affiliation SUBI

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12012305
Contact Type primary
Name chang jian hua, PD
Phone 18017312689
Email changjianhua@163.com
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168198 Sequence: 68168199 Sequence: 68168200
Design Group Id 55609137 Design Group Id 55609137 Design Group Id 55609137
Intervention Id 52499445 Intervention Id 52499446 Intervention Id 52499447

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773587
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 75 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Histologically proven primary thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma According to the esophageal AJCC2009 7th to determine new stage IV esophageal cancer The subject has PD after first-line chemotherapy or radiation within a year Presence of at least one index lesion measurable by CT scan or MRI according to RECIST 1.1 Can eat more than liquid diet; No signs before esophageal perforation 18~75 years PS:0-1 Life expectancy of ≥ 3 months ANC ≥ 2×109/L,PLT ≥ 100×109/L,Hb ≥ 90g/L TB ≤ UNL; ALT/AST ≤ 2.5×UNL,AKP ≤ 5×UNL Ccr≤ UNL,Scr≥60 mL/min Normal electrocardiogram (ecg), the body had no unheal wounds Radiotherapy before within the scope of the normal dose and not affect subsequent treatment Prior to biological agents, especially e. coli genetically engineered products without severe allergic reactions Signed written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Breast-feeding or pregnant women, no effective contraception if risk of conception exists Chronic diarrhea, enteritis, intestine obstruction which are not under control Esophageal obstruction cannot eat liquid completely, esophagus have deep ulcer perforation or hematemesis; Esophageal cancer common complications such as anastomotic leakage, serious lung complications, etc.

A second primary tumor (except skin basal cell carcinoma) The original serious heart disease, including: higher risk of congestive heart failure, unable to control arrhythmia, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, severe valvular heart disease, and resistant hypertension With uncontrol nerve, mental illness or mental disorders, compliance is poor, can't cooperate with accounts and response to treatment; Primary brain tumors or CNS metastases illness did not get a control, has obvious cranial hypertension or nerve mental symptoms With bleeding tendency Has inherited bleeding evidence of physical or blood coagulation disorder With clear chemotherapy drug allergy Other researchers believe that patients should not participate in this testing

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253952757
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 75
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30519718
Allocation Non-Randomized
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26680429 Sequence: 26680430
Intervention Id 52499446 Intervention Id 52499447
Name Cisplatin Name ENDO

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886019
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Chang Jian Hua
Title Chief Physician
Affiliation Fudan University

Study References

Sequence: 52078927
Pmid 35380726
Reference Type derived
Citation Hu Z, Sun S, Zhao X, Yu H, Wu X, Wang J, Chang J, Wang H. Rh-Endostatin Plus Irinotecan/Cisplatin as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Open-Label, Phase II Study. Oncologist. 2022 Apr 5;27(4):253-e312. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab078.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Study to Evaluate a Preop Dose of Brivoligide Injection for Pain After Knee Replacement in Patients With High PCS Scores ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797612
2021-01-31

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797612
NCT03797612https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797612?tab=tableNANANAThis is a multi-center, Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of brivoligide injection administered intrathecally before surgery in patients with a Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) score ≥16 undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-06
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2020-07-13
Start Month Year January 2021
Primary Completion Month Year January 2022
Verification Month Year July 2020
Verification Date 2020-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-07-13

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20716302
Description The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and postoperative pain reducing efficacy of a single preoperative intrathecal administration of brivoligide injection in patients with a Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) score ≥16 undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Potential subjects will be prescreened for PCS scores of 16 or greater in advance; pre-qualified patients will be invited to the investigative site for informed consent and full screening within 30 days of randomization. Patients providing informed consent and meeting all study eligibility criteria will be enrolled in the study on the day of surgery (Day 1). Safety assessments will be performed through Day 28; efficacy assessments will be conducted at the follow-up visits and daily via electronic diary by subjects through Day 42. Follow up visits will occur on Days 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42.

Facilities

Sequence: 200053310 Sequence: 200053311
Name Research Site Name Research Site
City Sheffield City Phoenix
State Alabama State Arizona
Zip 35660 Zip 85023
Country United States Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52156519
Name Pain, Postoperative
Downcase Name pain, postoperative

Id Information

Sequence: 40148226
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value ADYX-005

Countries

Sequence: 42557744
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55577923 Sequence: 55577924
Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title Brivoligide Injection 660 mg/6 mL Title Placebo 6 mL
Description Subjects randomized to the active treatment group will receive a single 660 mg/6 mL intrathecal administration of brivoligide injection as a slow bolus injection just prior to administration of spinal anesthesia, via the same needle. Description Subjects randomized to the placebo group will receive a single 6 mL intrathecal injection of placebo as a slow bolus injection just prior to administration of spinal anesthesia, via the same needle.

Interventions

Sequence: 52472024 Sequence: 52472025
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Brivoligide Injection 660 mg/6 mL Name Placebo 6 mL
Description Single preoperative intrathecal injection Description Single preoperative intrathecal injection

Keywords

Sequence: 79848130 Sequence: 79848131 Sequence: 79848132
Name Knee replacement Name TKA Name Total Knee Arthroplasty
Downcase Name knee replacement Downcase Name tka Downcase Name total knee arthroplasty

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328053 Sequence: 177328054 Sequence: 177328055 Sequence: 177328056 Sequence: 177328057
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain with Walking 15 Meters Measure Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain at Rest Measure Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain with 90 Degrees Passive Knee Flexion Measure Total Postoperative Opioid Use Measure Time to Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain ≤ 3 for Worst Pain
Time Frame Day 7 to Day 28 Time Frame Day 7 to Day 28 Time Frame Day 7 to Day 28 Time Frame Postoperative through Day 42 Time Frame Postoperative through Day 42
Description Least squares mean pain rating (NRS) with walking during the 15-meter walk Day 7 to Day 28 Description Least squares mean pain rating (NRS) at rest Day 7 to Day 28 Description Least squares mean pain rating (NRS) with passive knee flexion to 90 degrees from Day 7 to Day 28 Description Total use of postoperative opioid medications (morphine equivalents) to Day 42 Description Time to achieve NRS pain score ≤ 3 for worst pain

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193432134 Sequence: 193432135 Sequence: 193432136 Sequence: 193432137 Sequence: 193432138
Mesh Term Pain, Postoperative Mesh Term Postoperative Complications Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Pain Mesh Term Neurologic Manifestations
Downcase Mesh Term pain, postoperative Downcase Mesh Term postoperative complications Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term pain Downcase Mesh Term neurologic manifestations
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306099
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Adynxx, Inc.

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130887 Sequence: 68130888
Design Group Id 55577923 Design Group Id 55577924
Intervention Id 52472024 Intervention Id 52472025

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757367
Gender All
Minimum Age 40 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Score of 16 or greater on the PCS scale
Scheduled for primary unilateral TKA with spinal anesthesia as the primary anesthetic for painful osteoarthritis without congenital knee pathology
American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System ≤ 3
Medically stable for elective surgery with spinal anesthetic as determined by the Investigator
Body mass index of 18-45 kg/m2
Stable medical regimen at least 1 week before randomization
Able to read and understand study instructions in English or Spanish, and willing to comply with all study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

Target knee > 20 degrees valgus or varus deformity, evidence of significant bone loss or ligamentous laxity, or existing major hardware that requires removal during TKA
Inflammatory arthridities (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis), with the exception of clinically stable/non-active gout
Undergoing concomitant surgical procedures or non-elective TKA, or contralateral knee is likely to require TKA within 6 weeks (or would interfere with study assessments)
Use of cryoneurolysis (including Iovera) on the current operative knee region within 6 months prior to randomization and/or at any time through the duration of the study
Planned use of general anesthesia as the primary anesthetic; planned use of neuroaxial (intrathecal or epidural) opioids, or any use of extended release/long acting opioids or ketamine preoperatively and/or at any time through the duration of the study
Use of more than 40 mg per day (on average) of oral morphine or its equivalent within 1 month prior to randomization
Current neurologic disorder, which could confound the assessment of pain (e.g., Parkinson's, Multiple Sclerosis)
Unstable mental condition and/or evidence of an uncooperative attitude in the opinion of the Investigator; subjects diagnosed with schizophrenia, prescribed antipsychotic medications or MAOIs
Women who are pregnant or nursing
Subjects engaged in pending or active litigation, or seeking disability compensation; subjects whose cases have been settled or finally decided are not excluded
Participation in a clinical trial with the last dose or intervention within 1 month of randomization, or planned participation in a clinical trial during this study
Previous participation in any study involving brivoligide injection

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254228084
Number Of Facilities 2
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 40
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 4

Designs

Sequence: 30503592
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26665922
Intervention Id 52472024
Name AYX1 Injection 660 mg/6 mL

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869870
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Study Examining the Effects of Mindfulness and Similar Audio-guided Exercises. ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797599
2019-03-28

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797599
NCT03797599https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797599?tab=tableNANANAThis study aims to examine whether greater length of mindfulness practice results in more beneficial outcomes.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-12-11
Start Month Year March 28, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 5, 2019
Verification Month Year September 2019
Verification Date 2019-09-30
Last Update Posted Date 2019-12-11

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735944
Description This study will randomise participants to one of three groups: (1) four sessions of medium length mindfulness practice (lasting 20 mins) and 5 mins of an audio book; (2) four sessions of brief mindfulness practice (lasting 5 mins) and 20 mins of an audio book; and (3) a control group who just receive 4 sessions of audio book (lasting 25 mins). In the mindfulness arms, in each session, the participants will receive the audio book prior to the mindfulness practice. Mindfulness levels, and depression, anxiety and stress will be measured by self-report at baseline, session by session, and at post-intervention.

Facilities

Sequence: 200245075
Name Canterbury Christ Church University
City Tunbridge Wells
State Kent
Zip TN1 2YG
Country United Kingdom

Conditions

Sequence: 52208506 Sequence: 52208507
Name Mindfulness Name Healthy Population
Downcase Name mindfulness Downcase Name healthy population

Id Information

Sequence: 40186444
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value S_Strohmaier_29-11-18

Countries

Sequence: 42599939
Name United Kingdom
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55635122 Sequence: 55635123 Sequence: 55635124
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title 20 minutes of mindfulness practice Title 5 minutes of mindfulness practice Title Audio book control
Description Two sessions a week for two weeks of: 5 minutes listening to audio book excerpts followed by 20 minutes of audio guided mindfulness practice. Participants will be asked not to engage in formal mindfulness practice outside of these sessions during the study. Description Two sessions a week for two weeks of: 20 minutes listening to audio book excerpts followed by 5 minutes of audio guided mindfulness practice. Participants will be asked not to engage in formal mindfulness practice outside of these sessions during the study. Description Two sessions a week for two weeks of: 25 minutes listening to audio book excerpts (with non mindfulness practice). Participants will be asked not to engage in formal mindfulness practice during the study.

Interventions

Sequence: 52522466 Sequence: 52522467 Sequence: 52522468 Sequence: 52522469 Sequence: 52522470
Intervention Type Behavioral Intervention Type Behavioral Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other
Name 20 minutes of mindfulness practice Name 5 minutes of mindfulness practice Name 5 minute audio book Name 20 minute audio book Name 25 minute audio book
Description A 20 minute audio guided mindfulness of breathing practice per session, for four sessions. Description A 5 minute audio guided mindfulness of breathing practice per session, for four sessions. Description 5 minutes from an audio book by Bill Bryson ('A Short History of Nearly Everything') per session, for four sessions. Description 20 minutes from an audio book by Bill Bryson ('A Short History of Nearly Everything'), per session, for four sessions. Description 25 minutes from an audio book by Bill Bryson ('A Short History of Nearly Everything'), per session, for four sessions.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177512779 Sequence: 177512780 Sequence: 177512781 Sequence: 177512786 Sequence: 177512782 Sequence: 177512783 Sequence: 177512784 Sequence: 177512785
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Change from baseline at post-intervention (week 3) on the Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire -15 item version (FFMQ-15) Measure Change from baseline at post-intervention (week 3) on the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale – 21 item version (DASS-21). Measure Sessional Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire -15 item version (FFMQ-15) scores. Measure Session 4 Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS). Measure Sessional Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale – 21 item version (DASS-21) scores Measure Session 1 Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS). Measure Session 2 Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS). Measure Session 3 Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS).
Time Frame Post-intervention (3 weeks after baseline). Time Frame Post-intervention (3 weeks after baseline). Time Frame Baseline, session 2 (week 1), session 3 and 4 (week 2), and post-intervention (week 3). Time Frame Session 4 (week 2). Time Frame Baseline, session 2 (week 1), session 3 and 4 (week 2), and post-intervention (week 3). Time Frame Session 1 (week 1). Time Frame Session 2 (week 1). Time Frame Session 3 (week 2).
Description The Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire -15 item version is a self-report measure of mindfulness, producing a total score between 15 and 75, with higher scores indicating greater levels of mindfulness. (Note that the observe subscale will be excluded from the calculation of the total score, as recommended in https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21865 and http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pas0000263 producing a total score between 12 and 60). Description The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale – 21 is a self-report measure of depression, anxiety and stress, producing a total score between 0 and 63, with higher scores indicating greater symptomatology. Description The FFMQ-15 (described above) will be administered at the start of the first session (baseline), immediately after sessions 2 (week 1), 3 (week 2) and 4 (week 2), and at post-intervention (week 3), to examine patterns in changes in mindfulness over the course of the study. Description As described above. Description The DASS-21 (described above) will be administered at the start of the first session (baseline), immediately after sessions 2 (week 1), 3 (week 2) and 4 (week 2), and at post-intervention (week 3), to to examine patterns in changes over the course of the study. Description The TMS is a 13-item self-report measure of state mindfulness that produces scores for curiosity and decentering. The curiosity score ranges from 0 to 24, the decentering score from 0 to 28, and the total score from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater curiosity, decentering and overall state mindfulness respectively. Description As described above. Description As described above.

Sponsors

Sequence: 48354119
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Canterbury Christ Church University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29306205 Sequence: 29306206 Sequence: 29306207
Role Study Director Role Study Director Role Principal Investigator
Name Fergal Jones, PhD, PsychD Name James Cane, PhD Name Sarah Strohmaier, MSc
Affiliation Canterbury Christ Church University Affiliation Canterbury Christ Church University Affiliation Canterbury Christ Church University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199727 Sequence: 68199728 Sequence: 68199729 Sequence: 68199730 Sequence: 68199731
Design Group Id 55635122 Design Group Id 55635123 Design Group Id 55635122 Design Group Id 55635123 Design Group Id 55635124
Intervention Id 52522466 Intervention Id 52522467 Intervention Id 52522468 Intervention Id 52522469 Intervention Id 52522470

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30787110
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Members of the general public, especially university students or staff.
Adequate understanding of spoken and written English

Exclusion Criteria:

Currently experiencing significant difficulties with their mental wellbeing.
Currently have a personal mindfulness practice.
Currently participating in a mindfulness-based intervention.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253990033
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 8
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30533180
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Basic Science
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Masking Description Participants will be masked to the extent that they will not be told which group they have been allocated to nor the exact nature of the the three groups. However, they will be aware of the exercises they are asked to undertake.

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899473
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Effect of Electroacupuncture on Opioid-induced Constipation in Patients With Cancer ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797586
2019-05-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797586
NCT03797586https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797586?tab=tableNANANAApproximately 70-80% of patients with advanced disease will be affected by moderate to severe pain. Opioid analgesics represented by morphine and oxycodone are the cornerstone of cancer-pain management, and recommended for use in the management of moderate to severe cancer pain according to WHO Cancer Pain Relief Guidelines. One view is that a trial of systemic opioid therapy should be administered to all cancer patients with pain of moderate or greater severity regardless of the pain mechanism. Although opioids analgesics do work well as relieving pain and improving quality of life via their action at opioid receptors in the central nervous system (CNS) and the peripheral nervous system, they also have powerful adverse effects. The overall occurrence of opioid-related adverse drug events has ranged from1.8% to 13.6%. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC), one of the most prevalent adverse events (AEs) in patients receiving opioid analgesics, defined as a change in baseline bowel habits or defecatory patterns following initiation, alteration, or increase in opioid therapy. The prevalence of OIC has been estimated to affect 41% of patients with chronic noncancer pain taking opioids and 94% of cancer patients taking opioids for pain. Unlike many other opioid-related AEs, OIC is persistent and rarely tolerated. OIC impacts pain control, patients’ quality of life and may cause patients to reduce the dose or discontinue opioid use.

Acupuncture, a traditional Chinese medicine, has been used to treat gastrointestinal disease including constipation for thousands of years. Two systematic reviews concluded that acupuncture can improve spontaneous bowel movements for functional constipation, and our recent study indicated that electroacupuncture(EA) could increase complete spontaneous bowel movements and is safe for chronic severe functional constipation. Acupuncture could improve gastrointestinal function via facilitating gastrointestinal motility. Currently, there is little detailed information available regarding the acupuncture use for OIC. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of EA for OIC in patients with cancer.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-05
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2022-07-06
Start Month Year May 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year October 16, 2021
Verification Month Year July 2022
Verification Date 2022-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-07-06

Facilities

Sequence: 198627730
Name Guang An Men Hospital
City Beijing
Zip 100053
Country China

Conditions

Sequence: 51788697
Name Opioid-induced Constipation in Patients With Cancer
Downcase Name opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer

Id Information

Sequence: 39854215
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 2018-164-KY-01

Countries

Sequence: 42253048
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55208912 Sequence: 55208913
Group Type Experimental Group Type Sham Comparator
Title Electroacupuncture group Title Sham electroacupuncture group
Description Bilateral ST25,SP14, ST37 will be used in the EA group. For ST25 and SP14, 0.30×50mm or 0.30×75mm needles will be vertically inserted to the muscle layer of the abdominal , where patients will feel sharp pain and acupuncturists will feel resistance from the needle tip. For ST37, 0.30×40 mm needles will be vertically inserted approximately 15 mm deep, followed by three-time manipulation of even lifting and twisting method to elicit the sensation of deqi. Then paired alligator clips of the EA apparatus will be attached to the needle holders of the bilateral ST25, SP14, and ST37. EA stimulation will be retained for 30 minutes with a continuous wave of 10 Hz and current intensity of 0.5 to 4 mA. Description Bilateral sham ST25, SP14, and ST37 will be used in the SA group. After sterilizing the skin, 0.30×40mm needles will be straightly inserted at the sham points about 2-3mm until they can be fixed on the skin when attached by the alligator clips. No manipulation will be used, and no deqi sensation are elicited for all sham points. The bilateral sham ST25, SP14, and ST37 points will be attached by the same EA apparatus with a continuous wave of 10 Hz and current intensity of 0.1 to 0.2 mA for 30 minutes with only the initial 30 seconds on.

Interventions

Sequence: 52111191 Sequence: 52111192
Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other
Name Electroacupuncture group Name Sham electroacupuncture group
Description Bilateral Tianshu (ST25), Fujie (SP14), Shangjuxu (ST37) will be used in the EA group. With the local skin of the patients was routinely sterilized in a prone position in relaxation, acupuncturists will insert needles into the acupuncture points. For ST25 and SP14, 0.30×50mm or 0.30×75mm needles will be vertically inserted to the muscle layer of the abdominal wall, where participants will feel sharp pain and acupuncturists will feel resistance from the needle tip. For ST37, 0.30×40 mm needles will be vertically inserted approximately 15 mm deep, followed by three-time manipulation of even lifting and twisting method to elicit the sensation of deqi. Then paired alligator clips of the EA apparatus will be attached to the needle holders of the bilateral ST25, SP14, and ST37. EA stimulation will be retained for 30 minutes with a continuous wave of 10 Hz and current intensity of 0.5 to 4 mA. Description Bilateral sham ST25, SP14, and ST37 will be used in the SA group. After sterilizing the skin, 0.30×40mm needles will be straightly inserted at the sham points about 2-3mm until they can be fixed on the skin when attached by the alligator clips. No manipulation will be used, and no deqi sensation are elicited for all sham points. The bilateral sham ST25, SP14, and ST37 points will be attached by the same EA apparatus with a continuous wave of 10 Hz and current intensity of 0.1 to 0.2 mA for 30 minutes with only the initial 30 seconds on.

Keywords

Sequence: 79240632
Name electroacupuncture;opioid-induced constipation ,cancer
Downcase Name electroacupuncture;opioid-induced constipation ,cancer

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176147714 Sequence: 176147715 Sequence: 176147716 Sequence: 176147717 Sequence: 176147718 Sequence: 176147719 Sequence: 176147720 Sequence: 176147721 Sequence: 176147722 Sequence: 176147723 Sequence: 176147724 Sequence: 176147725 Sequence: 176147726 Sequence: 176147727 Sequence: 176147728 Sequence: 176147729 Sequence: 176147730 Sequence: 176147731
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure The proportion of responders Measure Change in the mean weekly spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) from the baseline during weeks 1-8 and weeks 13-16. Measure The proportion of patients with ≥3 mean weekly spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) during weeks 1-8 and weeks 13-16 Measure The proportion of patients with an increase of ≥1 mean weekly spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) from the baseline during weeks 1-8 and weeks 13-16 Measure A Change in the mean weekly complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) from the baseline during weeks 1-8 and weeks 13-16. Measure The proportion of patients with ≥3 mean weekly spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) during weeks 1-8 and weeks 13-16 Measure The proportion of patients with an increase of ≥1 mean weekly spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) from the baseline during weeks 1-8 and weeks 13-16 Measure A change in the mean Bristol Stool Form Scale score for stool consistency of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) from the baseline during weeks 1-8 and weeks 13-16 Measure A change in the mean score for the straining of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) from the baseline during weeks 1-8 and weeks 13-16 Measure A change in the total and subscale score of the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptom (PAC-SYM) questionnaire from baseline at weeks 8 and 16 Measure A change in the total and subscale scores of the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) questionnaires from the baseline at weeks 8 and 16 Measure Patients' global assessment of treatment efficacy Measure The proportion of patients using rescue medicine and the mean frequency of rescue medicine use per week during weeks 1-8 and weeks 9-16 Measure Patients'expectation of the acupuncture efficacy Measure The patient blinding assessment Measure Incidence of adverse events Measure The intensity of cancerous pain evaluation Measure The proportion of patients discontinuing the opioid, and those with a ≥30% weekly mean increase or decrease in the dose of opioid from baseline during weeks 1-8 and weeks 9-16
Time Frame weeks 1-8 Time Frame weeks 1-8, and weeks 13-16 Time Frame weeks 1-8, and weeks 13-16 Time Frame weeks 1-8, and weeks 13-16 Time Frame weeks 1-8, and weeks 13-16 Time Frame weeks 1-8, and weeks 13-16 Time Frame weeks 1-8, and weeks 13-16 Time Frame weeks 1-8, and weeks 13-16 Time Frame weeks 1-8, and weeks 13-16 Time Frame week 8 and week 16 Time Frame week 8 and week 16 Time Frame week 8 and week 16 Time Frame weeks 1-8, and weeks 9-16 Time Frame at baseline Time Frame at week 8 Time Frame week 1 to week 16 Time Frame at baseline, at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 16. Time Frame at week 8 and week 16
Description A responder is defined as a patient that has at least three spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) per week and an increase of at least one SBM a week from the baseline for at least 6 of the 8 weeks of the treatment period. Description An SBM was defined as a bowel movement that occurred without any medication or intervention to assist defection within the previous 24 hours. A bowel movement occurring within 24 hours of an optional assisted method for defecation was not considered to be an SBM. Description An SBM was defined as a bowel movement that occurred without any medication or intervention to assist defection within the previous 24 hours. A bowel movement occurring within 24 hours of an optional assisted method for defecation was not considered to be an SBM. Description An SBM was defined as a bowel movement that occurred without any medication or intervention to assist defection within the previous 24 hours. A bowel movement occurring within 24 hours of an optional assisted method for defecation was not considered to be an SBM. Description An SBM was defined as a bowel movement that occurred without any medication or intervention to assist defection within the previous 24 hours. A bowel movement occurring within 24 hours of an optional assisted method for defecation was not considered to be an SBM. A CSBM was defined as an SBM with the feeling of complete evacuation. Description An SBM was defined as a bowel movement that occurred without any medication or intervention to assist defection within the previous 24 hours. A bowel movement occurring within 24 hours of an optional assisted method for defecation was not considered to be an SBM. A CSBM was defined as an SBM with the feeling of complete evacuation. Description An SBM was defined as a bowel movement that occurred without any medication or intervention to assist defection within the previous 24 hours. A bowel movement occurring within 24 hours of an optional assisted method for defecation was not considered to be an SBM. A CSBM was defined as an SBM with the feeling of complete evacuation. Description For stool consistency, each patient was asked to record their stool consistency according to the Bristol Stool Form Scale, on the following seven points scale. (scored from 1 to 7 for stool types 1 to 7, respectively) Description For assessment of straining of SBM, each patient was asked to rate his/her score for straining using the following five-point scale: not at all difficulty (0), a little bit difficulty (1), moderately difficulty (2), quite a bit difficulty (3), extremely difficulty (4). Description The PAC-SYM is a 12-item evaluative questionnaire for the chronic constipation, which consists of 4-item abdominal, 3-item rectal, and 5-item stool subscales. Each item score ranges from 0 to 4 in the 2 weeks (14 days) prior to assessment. The, where 0 = symptom absent, 1 = mild,2 = moderate,3 = severe and 4 = very severe. Lower scores indicate a lower symptom burden. Each subscale score will be calculated as the mean of the completed items for that subscale. The total score will be calculated as the mean of all completed items. Description The PAC-QOL is a 28-item self-reported instrument for assessing the burden of constipation on patients' everyday functioning and well-being in the 2 weeks (14 days) prior to assessment. It is divided into four subscales: physical discomfort (items 1-4), psychosocial discomfort (items 5-12), worries/concerns (items 13-23), and satisfaction (items 24 to 28). Each of the item scores ranges from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely), with lower scores indicating a better quality of life. For each visit, individual subscale scores will be calculated as the mean of the completed items for that subscale. Description each patient was asked to rate his/her efficacy of treatment using the following 7-point self-reporting scale: markedly worse (1), moderately worse (2),slightly worse (3), no change (4), slightly improved (5), moderately improved (6), markedly improved (7). Description The proportion of patients using rescue medicine will be compared between groups during weeks 1-8, and weeks 9-16. The mean frequency of using rescue medicine per week during weeks 1-8 equals the total of rescue medicine consumption divided by 8. The mean frequency of using rescue medicine per week during weeks 9-16 equals the total of rescue medicine consumption divided by 8. Description Participants will be asked to answer the following questions before the intervention: "Do you think acupuncture will be effective in treating the disease in general?" "Do you think acupuncture will be effective in improving the OIC?" and "which acupuncture modalities do you prefer, EA or SA?" For each question, patients will choose one of the following answers: "unclear/whatever", "EA", or "SA" Description Five minutes after the end of any treatment in the eighth week the patients will be asked to answer the following question: "Is traditional EA the acupuncture modality that you have received?". Description All adverse events (AEs) t will be recorded throughout the whole trial in case report form. AEs will be categorized as treatment-related (e.g., broken needle, dizziness, fainting, localized hematoma, localized infection or abscess, or some discomforts after acupuncture) and non-treatment-related. Detailed information regarding AEs and serious adverse events (SAEs)-including the name, onset and end date, intensity, relationship with acupuncture and outcome-will be recorded. Description The mean cancerous pain intensity and worst cancerous pain intensity during the preceding week will be evaluated by 11 grades (from "0=no pain" to "10=worst pain (the strongest pain ever experienced)" at baseline, as well as weeks 2, 4, 6, 8 and 16. Description The proportion of patients discontinuing the opioid, and those with increase/decrease from baseline of ≥30% opioid usage per week will be compared between groups during weeks 1-8, and weeks 9-16

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 191945859 Sequence: 191945860 Sequence: 191945861 Sequence: 191945862 Sequence: 191945863 Sequence: 191945864 Sequence: 191945865
Mesh Term Constipation Mesh Term Opioid-Induced Constipation Mesh Term Signs and Symptoms, Digestive Mesh Term Narcotic-Related Disorders Mesh Term Substance-Related Disorders Mesh Term Chemically-Induced Disorders Mesh Term Mental Disorders
Downcase Mesh Term constipation Downcase Mesh Term opioid-induced constipation Downcase Mesh Term signs and symptoms, digestive Downcase Mesh Term narcotic-related disorders Downcase Mesh Term substance-related disorders Downcase Mesh Term chemically-induced disorders Downcase Mesh Term mental disorders
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 47962730
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29059801
Role Study Chair
Name Zhishun Liu
Affiliation China Academy of Chinese Medicine Sciences

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67687601 Sequence: 67687602
Design Group Id 55208912 Design Group Id 55208913
Intervention Id 52111191 Intervention Id 52111192

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30540862
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 85 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Cancer patients who conformed to all the following conditions will be further screened for eligibility:

Cancer patients must meet the Rome IV[1] diagnostic criteria for OIC: New or worsening symptoms of constipation following initiation, alteration, or increase in opioid treatment. For patients with a history of chronic functional constipation, he/she must have worsening symptoms of constipation when the opioid therapy is initiated, changed, or the dose is increased;
Patients recruited in this trial must have a history of OIC symptoms for at least 1 week;
Patients must be ≥18 years of age and ≤85 years of age;
Patient's cancer condition must be stable with a life expectancy that is more than six months;
Patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-3;
Patients must have been receiving a relatively stable maintained opioid regimen, consisting of a total daily dose of 30 mg to 1000 mg oral morphine equivalents for at least 2 weeks prior to screening for cancer pain. Furthermore, it must be anticipated that the opioid will be maintained for at least 10 weeks;
The SBM frequency of the patients must be ≤ 2 times a week when laxatives are not being taken;
Patients must be capable of oral intake of drugs, food and beverages;
Provision of written informed consent before participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants who fulfill any of the following criteria will be excluded:

Patients diagnosed with clinically significant abnormal defecation due to structural abnormalities of the gastrointestinal tract and other tissues related to gastrointestinal tract (not including OIC): inflammatory bowel disease, rectal prolapse, gastrointestinal obstruction, peritoneal metastasis, or peritoneal tumor at the time of enrollment;
Patients with a history of gastrointestinal tract operation, abdominal operation, or abdominal adhesion within one month prior to screening; history of intestinal obstruction within three months prior to screening;
Diagnosis of active diverticular disease; or severe hemorrhoid; or anal fissure; or artificial rectum or anus;
Patients with an intraperitoneal catheter or a feeding tube;
Diagnosis of pelvic disorder which are considered to have obvious effects on the intestinal transport of feces (such as uterine prolapse ≥degree 2, uterine fibroids [located in the posterior of the uterus with a diameter ≥ 5 cm] affecting bowel movement);
Patients that are being treated with a new cancer chemotherapy, which had never been administered in the past, within 14 days of the screening or are scheduled to receive such therapy during the study;
Patients that received radiotherapy within 28 days of the screening or are scheduled to receive such therapy during the study;
Patients that underwent a surgery or intervention that is considered to have an obvious effect on the gastrointestinal functions within 28 days of the screening or are scheduled to receive surgery or intervention which is considered to have obvious effects on the gastrointestinal functions during the study, or scheduled to receive surgery or intervention which will be anticipated to prevent the patients from completing the trial;
Patients with uncontrolled hyperthyroidism, severe hypertension, heart disease, systematic infection or blood coagulation disorders (hypercoagulation status or hemorrhagic tendency) at the time of study inclusion;
Patients that consumed >4 additional opioid doses per day, for breakthrough pain, for more than 3 days during the baseline period, or if their maintenance opioid dosing regimen was modified during this period;
Patients with severe cancerous pain (e.g., typical average daily pain intensity rating of 7 to 10 on a numerical rating scales (NRS; 0 [no pain] to 10 [the worst pain possible]) after the use of routine dose and frequency of opioids) refractory to opioid therapy;
Patients with a history of opioid discontinuation due to severe adverse events or patients that are expected to discontinue opioid use due to the potential risk of adverse events;
Patients that received an opioid receptor antagonist within one month of the screening, or those who are scheduled to receive such therapy during the study;
Patients with a history of nerve neurolysis;
Patients with severe cognitive impairment, aphasia, or psychiatric disorders; abdominal aortic aneurysm; hepatomegaly(liver span > 14cm at the mid-clavicular line by ultrasound examination); or splenomegaly (spleen length [cranial to caudal] > 13cm by ultrasound examination);
Patients that have received acupuncture within three months of the screening;
Other patients who are considered ineligible for the study by the investigator on the basis of concomitant therapy and medical findings.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254203782
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 29
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 85
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 12
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 5

Designs

Sequence: 30289396
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Subject Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Pending Results

Sequence: 1487044 Sequence: 1487045
Event Release Event Reset
Event Date Description August 7, 2022 Event Date Description July 7, 2023
Event Date 2022-08-07 Event Date 2023-07-07

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28668356
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Liu Zhishun
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Study References

Sequence: 51684083
Pmid 35492306
Reference Type derived
Citation Wang W, Wang X, Liu Y, Sun Y, Liu X, Yan Y, Liu Z. Effects of Electroacupuncture on Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients With Cancer: Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 13;9:818258. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.818258. eCollection 2022.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Multichannel tDCS to Reduce Hypertonia in Patients With Prolonged DOC ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797573
2014-01-20

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797573
NCT03797573https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797573?tab=tableNANANAPrevious studies showed that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) transiently improves performance of motor function in stroke patients, as well as decrease muscle hypertonia. In severely brain injured patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC), a single stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has shown to improve patients’ sign of consciousness. Nevertheless, other brain areas could be stimulated in order to manage other symptoms occurring in this population of patients, such as muscle hypertonia. In this study, investigators will assess the effects of bilateral fronto-central tDCS on spasticity as measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores in patients with DOC in a double-blind sham-controlled experimental design.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09
Start Month Year January 20, 2014
Primary Completion Month Year June 28, 2014
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20741271
Description Following severe brain damage and coma, some patients may remain in a vegetative state (VS) or minimally conscious state (MCS). At present, there are no evidence-based guidelines regarding the treatment of patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC). A previous study showed that a single stimulation (using transcranial direct current stimulation – tDCS) of the left prefrontal cortex induces an behavioral improvement in some patients in DOC. Nevertheless, patients with DOC suffer from other invalidating dysfunctions such as spasticity (muscle hypertonia). In sroke patients, the inhibition of the motor cortex through cathodes placed over the motor region showed to reduce spasticity.

In this study, investigators aim to assess the effect of single session of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over right and left fronto-central areas (using 2 anodes and 2 cathodes), on the level of hypertonia and the level of consciousness of patients with DOC, in a double blind randomized sham controlled study. The anodes will be placed over F3 and F4, and the cathodes over C3 and C4.

tDCS is a form of safe non-invasive cortical stimulation, modulating cortical excitability under the electrodes, via weak polarizing currents. It has been reported that anodal tDCS transiently improves motor functions in healthy subjects and patients with stroke or Parkinson's disease.

By reducing the activity of the motor cortex (cathodes) and increasing the activity of the prefrontal cortex (anodes) we expect to observe a better motor function in patients with DOC.

Facilities

Sequence: 200280885
Name University of Liege
City Liege
Zip 4000
Country Belgium

Conditions

Sequence: 52221788 Sequence: 52221789 Sequence: 52221790 Sequence: 52221791
Name Vegetative State Name Minimally Conscious State Name Spasticity, Muscle Name Disorder of Consciousness
Downcase Name vegetative state Downcase Name minimally conscious state Downcase Name spasticity, muscle Downcase Name disorder of consciousness

Id Information

Sequence: 40195808
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 2014/280B

Countries

Sequence: 42609787
Name Belgium
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55650078 Sequence: 55650077
Group Type Sham Comparator Group Type Active Comparator
Title sham tDCS Title active tDCS
Description Patients will receive sham tDCS (5 seconds of stimulation) during 20 minutes preceded and followed by a clinical assessment (Modified Ashworth Scale and Coma Recovery Scale-Revised) and neurophysiological assessment (8 channels EEG). Description Patients will receive tDCS (bilateral fronto-central stimulation) during 20 minutes preceded and followed by a clinical assessment (Modified Ashworth Scale and Coma Recovery Scale-Revised) and neurophysiological assessment (8 channels EEG).

Interventions

Sequence: 52535586 Sequence: 52535587
Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Device
Name tDCS Name sham tDCS
Description tDCS will be applied during 20 minutes with a current of 1 mA preceded and followed by a behavioral assessments (Modified Ashworth Scale and Coma Recovery Scale Revised) and an EEG. The anodes will be placed over F3 and F4 and the cathodes over C3 and C4. Description Indentical to the active tDCS, except that the stimulation is terminated after 5 seconds.

Keywords

Sequence: 79942110 Sequence: 79942111 Sequence: 79942112 Sequence: 79942113 Sequence: 79942114 Sequence: 79942115
Name transcranial direct current stimulation Name disorder of consciousness Name muscle hypertonia Name spasticity Name vegetative state Name minimally conscious state
Downcase Name transcranial direct current stimulation Downcase Name disorder of consciousness Downcase Name muscle hypertonia Downcase Name spasticity Downcase Name vegetative state Downcase Name minimally conscious state

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177562303 Sequence: 177562304 Sequence: 177562305
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change in MAS scores Measure Change in the CRS-R total score Measure Change in brain oscillations
Time Frame baseline and directly after tDCS (20 minutes) Time Frame Baseline and directly after the tDCS (20 minutes)] Time Frame Baseline and directly after the tDCS (20 minutes)
Description Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) will by assessed before and after tDCS (active and sham). Comparison of treatment effect (MAS score after tDCS minus before) between active and sham tDCS. The MAS is a 5 points scale going from 0 (no spasticity) and 5 (extreme spasticity). Description Coma Recovery Scale Revised (CRS-R) will be performed before and after tDCS (anodal and sham). Comparison of the treatment effect (CRS-R total score score after tDCS minus before) between real and sham tDCS. The CRS-R is 23 points scale with 6 sub-scales (lower scores refer to reflexes, while higher scores refer to more complex behaviors). The total score is the sum of the scores in the 6 sub-scales. Description 8 channels electroencephalography (EEG) will be record before and after tDCS to record potential cortical changes induce by the stimulation. EEG power will be compared in different bandwidths (delta, theta, alpha, beta).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193679441 Sequence: 193679442 Sequence: 193679443 Sequence: 193679444 Sequence: 193679445 Sequence: 193679446 Sequence: 193679447 Sequence: 193679448 Sequence: 193679449 Sequence: 193679450 Sequence: 193679451 Sequence: 193679452 Sequence: 193679453 Sequence: 193679454 Sequence: 193679455 Sequence: 193679456
Mesh Term Muscle Spasticity Mesh Term Consciousness Disorders Mesh Term Persistent Vegetative State Mesh Term Muscle Hypertonia Mesh Term Muscular Diseases Mesh Term Musculoskeletal Diseases Mesh Term Neuromuscular Manifestations Mesh Term Neurologic Manifestations Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Neurobehavioral Manifestations Mesh Term Neurocognitive Disorders Mesh Term Mental Disorders Mesh Term Brain Damage, Chronic Mesh Term Brain Diseases Mesh Term Central Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Unconsciousness
Downcase Mesh Term muscle spasticity Downcase Mesh Term consciousness disorders Downcase Mesh Term persistent vegetative state Downcase Mesh Term muscle hypertonia Downcase Mesh Term muscular diseases Downcase Mesh Term musculoskeletal diseases Downcase Mesh Term neuromuscular manifestations Downcase Mesh Term neurologic manifestations Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term neurobehavioral manifestations Downcase Mesh Term neurocognitive disorders Downcase Mesh Term mental disorders Downcase Mesh Term brain damage, chronic Downcase Mesh Term brain diseases Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term unconsciousness
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48366651
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University of Liege

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68217722 Sequence: 68217723
Design Group Id 55650077 Design Group Id 55650078
Intervention Id 52535586 Intervention Id 52535587

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30794857
Gender All
Minimum Age 16 Years
Maximum Age 75 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

post comatose patients
patients in minimally conscious state
patients with stable condition
patients free of sedative drugs and Na+ or Ca++ blockers (e.g., carbamazepine) or NMDA receptor antagonist (e.g., dextromethorphan)

Exclusion Criteria:

premorbid neurology antecedent
patients in coma
patients < 28 days after the acute brain injury
patients with a metallic cerebral implant
cranioplasty
shunt

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254004540
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 5
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 16
Maximum Age Num 75
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30540897
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Crossover Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28907217
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Aurore Thibaut
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation University of Liege

Study References

Sequence: 52118558
Pmid 24574549
Reference Type background
Citation Thibaut A, Bruno MA, Ledoux D, Demertzi A, Laureys S. tDCS in patients with disorders of consciousness: sham-controlled randomized double-blind study. Neurology. 2014 Apr 1;82(13):1112-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000260. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Comparison of Ba-Duan-Jin and Pregabalin in Patients With Fibromyalgia ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797560
2019-03-22

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797560
NCT03797560https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797560?tab=tableNANANAFibromyalgia is a chronic debilitating musculoskeletal pain syndrome. Pregabalin is the only medication that has been approved to treat fibromyalgia in China. Currently, there has been a growing interest in the development of non-pharmacological therapies. Ba-Duan-Jin is an ancient Chinese exercise for health promotion yet easy to learn. Findings from our previous study showed an effectiveness and good safety of Ba-Duan-Jin in patients with fibromyalgia. This study is to evaluate the effectiveness comparison of Ba-Duan-Jin and pregabalin in managing fibromyalgia symptoms experienced by Chinese patients.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-06
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2022-12-06
Start Month Year March 22, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year October 31, 2021
Verification Month Year December 2022
Verification Date 2022-12-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-12-06

Facilities

Sequence: 198883323
Name Jiao Juan
City Beijing
State Beijing
Zip 100053
Country China

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 95442541 Sequence: 95442554 Sequence: 95442549 Sequence: 95442542 Sequence: 95442543 Sequence: 95442544 Sequence: 95442545 Sequence: 95442546 Sequence: 95442547 Sequence: 95442548 Sequence: 95442550 Sequence: 95442551 Sequence: 95442552 Sequence: 95442553
Mesh Term Pregabalin Mesh Term Psychotropic Drugs Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Analgesics Mesh Term Sensory System Agents Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Agents Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Anticonvulsants Mesh Term Calcium Channel Blockers Mesh Term Membrane Transport Modulators Mesh Term Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Agents Mesh Term Anti-Anxiety Agents Mesh Term Tranquilizing Agents Mesh Term Central Nervous System Depressants
Downcase Mesh Term pregabalin Downcase Mesh Term psychotropic drugs Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term analgesics Downcase Mesh Term sensory system agents Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system agents Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term anticonvulsants Downcase Mesh Term calcium channel blockers Downcase Mesh Term membrane transport modulators Downcase Mesh Term calcium-regulating hormones and agents Downcase Mesh Term anti-anxiety agents Downcase Mesh Term tranquilizing agents Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system depressants
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 51867114
Name Fibromyalgia
Downcase Name fibromyalgia

Id Information

Sequence: 39915355
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value Z181100001718153

Countries

Sequence: 42312531
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55293089 Sequence: 55293090
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Ba-Duan-Jin group Title Pregabalin group
Description Ba-Duan-Jin therapy: The participants will be guided by a research staff to do the Ba-Duan-Jin therapy for 50 minutes twice weekly for 12 weeks, in the outpatient section of the hospital.

Placebo pregabalin capsules: Pregabalin placebo treatment will be administered at bedtime once a day, starting at 150 mg for the first week, and increase to the dose of 300 mg from the second week. After one week, if 300 mg dose is tolerable, then maintain it for 10 additional weeks, if not, then go back to the 150 mg dose for 10 additional weeks.

Description Wellness education and muscle relaxation exercise program: This program will be held for 50 minutes twice weekly for twelve weeks, containing 10-minute wellness education, 10-minute doctor-patient discussion, and 30-minute guided muscle relaxation exercise.

Active pregabalin capsules: As same usage as the placebo pregabalin capsules.

Interventions

Sequence: 52186428 Sequence: 52186429
Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Drug
Name Ba-Duan-Jin Name Pregabalin capsule
Description Ba-Duan-Jin is a common form of "self-health-care" Qigong exercise that has been practiced by Chinese people for at least eight hundred years. It consists of eight sets of simple movements. By combining meditation with slow, graceful movements, deep breathing, and relaxation, Ba-Duan-Jin practitioners believe it has the ability to move vital energy (Qi) throughout the body. Ba-Duan-Jin is also considered to be a multicomponent intervention that integrates physical, psychosocial, emotional, spiritual, and behavioral elements. While the biological mechanisms remain unclear, previous clinical trials have demonstrated that Ba-Duan-Jin can improve sleep quality, physical health, and mental health in patients with various chronic diseases Description Pregabalin is one of the three medications (pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran) that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat fibromyalgia in US, and the only medicine that has been approved in China.

Keywords

Sequence: 79373829
Name Eight Brocades; Ba-Duan-Jin; Baduanjin; Qigong; Pain
Downcase Name eight brocades; ba-duan-jin; baduanjin; qigong; pain

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176386028 Sequence: 176386029 Sequence: 176386030 Sequence: 176386031 Sequence: 176386032 Sequence: 176386033 Sequence: 176386034 Sequence: 176386035
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure The change of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain from baseline. Measure The change of the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) from baseline. Measure The change of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (MFI-20) from baseline. Measure The change of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) from baseline. Measure The Beck II Depression Inventory (BDI) Measure The change of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) from baseline. Measure Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire evaluated at week 12. Measure The change of the Short Form-36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36) from baseline.
Time Frame up to 1 week Time Frame Baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12. Time Frame Baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12. Time Frame Baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12. Time Frame Baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12. Time Frame Baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12. Time Frame Week 12. Time Frame Baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12.
Description Pain VAS, range, 0 to 100 mm, where higher scores indicated the perceived pain to be more severe. Description A self-administered questionnaire with 10 subscales, measuring fibromyalgia symptoms and function domains. FIQR total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Description The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20 (MFI-20) measures fatigue severity. The MFI-20 total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicate more severe fatigue. Description Scores on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality. Description The Beck II Depression Inventory (BDI) assesses the severity of depressive symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 39, with higher scores indicate a greater degree of depression severity. Description The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is for measuring the perception of stress and current levels of experienced stress. Scores range from 0 to 56, with higher total score indicating a greater degree of symptom severity. Description A questionnaire determine any change in overall symptom status from the beginning of the study to its conclusion (score range, 1 [very much improved] to 7 [very much worse). Description The Short Form-36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36), which measured health-related quality of life (range, 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived health status).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192254867 Sequence: 192254868 Sequence: 192254869 Sequence: 192254870 Sequence: 192254871 Sequence: 192254872 Sequence: 192254873
Mesh Term Fibromyalgia Mesh Term Myofascial Pain Syndromes Mesh Term Muscular Diseases Mesh Term Musculoskeletal Diseases Mesh Term Rheumatic Diseases Mesh Term Neuromuscular Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term fibromyalgia Downcase Mesh Term myofascial pain syndromes Downcase Mesh Term muscular diseases Downcase Mesh Term musculoskeletal diseases Downcase Mesh Term rheumatic diseases Downcase Mesh Term neuromuscular diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48036671
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67784041 Sequence: 67784042
Design Group Id 55293089 Design Group Id 55293090
Intervention Id 52186428 Intervention Id 52186429

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30586823
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 70 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

meet the 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Research Classification Criteria for fibromyalgia;
be between the ages of 18 to 70 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

had practiced Ba-Duan-Jin, Tai Chi, yoga or other forms of Qigong exercise within 12 months of their recruitment to the study;
be less than 40mm of pain VAS score;
had renal failure, and severe depression or anxiety;
had any poorly-controlled comorbid medical conditions, such as dementia, cancer, thyroid disease, inflammatory arthritis;
pregnancy or planned pregnancy within the study period;
patients residing more than 70 miles from the research site.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253866118
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 31
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 70
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 7

Designs

Sequence: 30334847
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26532048
Intervention Id 52186428
Name Baduanjin; Eight Brocades; Eight-Section Brocade

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28713254
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Juan Jiao
Title Deputy chief physician
Affiliation Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Study References

Sequence: 51759696
Pmid 34292537
Reference Type derived
Citation Yang Y, Li YT, Sun YR, Wang J, Li Y, Zhang JH, Jiao J, Jiang Q. Therapeutic Effects of Ba-Duan-Jin versus Pregabalin for Fibromyalgia Treatment: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Sep;8(3):1451-1462. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00341-9. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Real Life Study in Myopic Neovascularization ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797547
2018-06-22

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797547
NCT03797547https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797547?tab=tableNANANAThis is a multi centre, single arm, prospective observational phase 4 study in naive or pretreated patients with myopic neovascularization. The patients will be treated with intravitreal injections of Aflibercept following a real life protocol.

This sudy aims to evaluate the visual acuity during a 36 months period of time.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-08-28
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2021-09-29
Start Month Year June 22, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year January 30, 2023
Verification Month Year September 2021
Verification Date 2021-09-30
Last Update Posted Date 2021-09-29

Facilities

Sequence: 200458242
Name Chu de Poitiers
City Poitiers
Country France

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96220658 Sequence: 96220659 Sequence: 96220660 Sequence: 96220661 Sequence: 96220662 Sequence: 96220663 Sequence: 96220664
Mesh Term Aflibercept Mesh Term Angiogenesis Inhibitors Mesh Term Angiogenesis Modulating Agents Mesh Term Growth Substances Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Growth Inhibitors Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents
Downcase Mesh Term aflibercept Downcase Mesh Term angiogenesis inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term angiogenesis modulating agents Downcase Mesh Term growth substances Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term growth inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52277512
Name Myopic Choroidal Neovascularisation
Downcase Name myopic choroidal neovascularisation

Id Information

Sequence: 40235504
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value VIC

Countries

Sequence: 42653095
Name France
Removed False

Interventions

Sequence: 52589568
Intervention Type Other
Name AFLIBERCEPT
Description Patients will be treated following a real life protocol and according to the French recommendation

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177770831 Sequence: 177770832 Sequence: 177770833 Sequence: 177770834 Sequence: 177770835 Sequence: 177770836 Sequence: 177770837
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure visual acuity measurement Measure visual acuity measurement in naive patient Measure visual acuity measurement after other treatment such as laser, pdt visudyneor other IVT treatment Measure pourcentage of patients who gain more than or equal of 15 letters Measure Anatomics parameters by oct Measure Anatomics parameters by color photographs Measure Anatomic parameters by fluoresceine angiography or angiography oct
Time Frame 6, 12, 24 and 36 months Time Frame 12, 24 and 36 months Time Frame 6, 12, 24 and 36 months Time Frame 6,12,24 and 36 months Time Frame 6, 12, 24 and 36 months Time Frame 6, 12, 24 and 36 months Time Frame 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Description Efficacy measurement will be performed by mean change of "ETDRS" for Best Corrected Visual Acuity evaluation (ETDRS score at 4 meters) from baseline to 6, 12, 24 and 36 month after initation of treatment by aflibercept Description Efficacy measurement will be performed by mean change of "ETDRS" for Best corrected visual acuity evaluation from baseline to month 12, 24 and 36 after initation of treatment by aflibercept in naïve patients Description Efficacy measurement will be evaluated by mean change of "ETDRS" for Best corrected visual Acuity evaluation after initation of treatment by aflibercept after switch from other treatment such as laser, visudyne PDT or other IVT treatment, after 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment with Eylea Description Efficacy measurement will be evaluated by pourcentage of patients who gain more than or equal of 15 letters at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after initiation of treatment with aflibercept within naïve or after switch from other treatment such as laser, visudyne PDT or other IVT treatment, Description Evaluation of anatomic parameters will be perfomed after 6,12, and 24 and 36 months of treatment with Eylea based on OCT parameters :

On SD-OCT :

Distance from CNV lesion to the fovea measured on the scan joining the fovea to the foveal edge of the mCNV Exudation assessed by presence of intraretinal cysts or subretinal fluid Central retinal thickness

Description On color retinal photographs:

Presence of retinal hemorrhage Presence of macular atrophy or lacquer cracks,

Description On fluoresceine angiography if deemed necessary by the investigator : diffusion during late phases On angiography OCT : neovascular network visualisation

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193893016 Sequence: 193893017 Sequence: 193893018 Sequence: 193893019 Sequence: 193893020 Sequence: 193893021 Sequence: 193893022 Sequence: 193893023 Sequence: 193893024
Mesh Term Choroidal Neovascularization Mesh Term Myopia Mesh Term Neovascularization, Pathologic Mesh Term Metaplasia Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Choroid Diseases Mesh Term Uveal Diseases Mesh Term Eye Diseases Mesh Term Refractive Errors
Downcase Mesh Term choroidal neovascularization Downcase Mesh Term myopia Downcase Mesh Term neovascularization, pathologic Downcase Mesh Term metaplasia Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term choroid diseases Downcase Mesh Term uveal diseases Downcase Mesh Term eye diseases Downcase Mesh Term refractive errors
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48418698
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Poitiers University Hospital

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30827067
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 99 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Active mCNV among:
Naïve patients.
Patients with previous history of laser photocoagulation or PDT, with no history of anti-VEGF.
Patients with previous history of other anti-VEGF treatments.including ranibizumab or bevacizumab, with sustaining mCNV activity, who did not receive injection since the last 3 month
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Man or woman aged 18 years and more under reliable method of contraception for woman with childbearing potenteial (hormonal or any intrauterine devices).
High myopy defined by refractive error ≤ -6 D or History of high myopia among pseudophakic patient or patient treated with refractive surgery
Patient with active CNVm

• Patients naïve or Patients pretreated with previous history of laser photocoagulation or PDT or by other anti-VEGF treatments who did not receive injection since the last 3 month

with OCT or angiography examination

Exclusion Criteria:

Treatment with an anti VEGF administrated by intravitreal injection within 1 months prior to baseline in the study eye.
Treatment with PDT or laser administrated within 6 months prior to baseline in the study eye.
History of vitrectomy in the study eye
History of any other retinal disease
VA less than 20/250

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254123813
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 99
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30572997
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28939419
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Individualized Administration of Warfarin by Polymorphisms of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 Genes ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797534
2019-02-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797534
NCT03797534https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797534?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this study is to explore the individualized administration model of warfarin suitable for Chinese people, and provide a scientific reference for the use of warfarin to Chinese people.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-06
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-15
Start Month Year February 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 1, 2022
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-15

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20716306
Description About 600 patients with VKORC1 and CYP2C9 gene mutations were included in the treatment of warfarin anticoagulant therapy. The main indications include valve replacement, atrial fibrillation, pulmonary embolism, etc., randomly divided into 2 groups, respectively, the control group (that is, the use of fixed-dose group), Bayesian-model group, the use of single-blind treatment method, to evaluate the number of major adverse events, TTR and INR adjustments in patients between different groups after three months of taking warfarin, and then to explore the individualized drug use model of warfarin suitable for Chinese population.

In the Bayesian group, according to the genotype of VKORC1 and CYP2C9, the stable dose was calculated by the dose prediction model of Bayesian, and the first three drugs were taken at this dose, and then adjusted to the actual stable dose according to the change of INR. Meanwhile, the control group was administered according to the traditional way, that is, the initial dose is 2.5 or 3mg/d and is gradually adjusted to a stable dose according to changes of INR. The monitoring frequency of INR is: once a day from the beginning of the drug to the time of discharge, once a week after discharge, and once a month after the stable dose is obtained. Detailed records of the number of days to reach a stable dose, the INR value and the occurrence of side effects and time are documented. The concrete steps are as follows:

clinicians to judge the standard of the selection criteria;
to obtain the consent of the patient and sign an informed consent certificate;
to collect 2ml anticoagulant blood before the drug, fill in the application form for individualized drug use in warfarin, and indicate the experimental group and control group;
the specimen assigned to the laboratory for Genotyping;
lab to calculate the predicted stable warfarin dose and the results fed back to the clinician within one working day after receiving the specimen;
in the control group, the drug retained at the regular dose, and the first 3 days of the experimental group administered at the predicted dose;
the dosage of warfarin in the two groups of cases adjusted to the stable dose according to the value, and the adjustment amplitude of the experimental group also referred to the predicted stable dose.
to monitor INR once a day during hospitalization, and to those who do not receive a stable dose of discharge, follow up and monitor INR once a week until a stable dose or medication is obtained for 90 days;
to document clinical trial records, including the daily use of warfarin, each detection of the appearance of the situation like INR value, bleeding, venous embolism and other side effects.

Finally,according to the outcome parameters,statistical analysis were performed with SPSS 11.5 software. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Facilities

Sequence: 200053337
Status Recruiting
Name the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery
City FuZhou
State Fujian
Zip 350001
Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28097566 Sequence: 28097567
Facility Id 200053337 Facility Id 200053337
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Liang-Wan Chen, M.D Ph.D Name Jin-Hua Zhang, Ph.D
Email 343983217@qq.com Email pollyzhang2006@126.com
Phone 86 13358255333 Phone 86 13609532263

Conditions

Sequence: 52156524
Name Heart Valve Prosthesis
Downcase Name heart valve prosthesis

Id Information

Sequence: 40148230
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value CLW2018WA

Countries

Sequence: 42557763
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55577929 Sequence: 55577930
Group Type No Intervention Group Type Experimental
Title Standard anticoagulant group Title Bayesian model group

Interventions

Sequence: 52472030
Intervention Type Other
Name dose regime
Description The initial dose of the experimental group will be calculated by the Bayesian model.

Keywords

Sequence: 79848137 Sequence: 79848138
Name warfarin Name gene
Downcase Name warfarin Downcase Name gene

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328074 Sequence: 177328075 Sequence: 177328072 Sequence: 177328076 Sequence: 177328073 Sequence: 177328068 Sequence: 177328069 Sequence: 177328070 Sequence: 177328071 Sequence: 177328077 Sequence: 177328078 Sequence: 177328079
Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure The time required from the beginning of treatment to the stable dose; Measure The percentage of time below the target INR range; Measure Percentage of time in therapeutic range Measure The percentage of time above the target INR range; Measure The time required to reach the treatment target INR for the first time; Measure excessive anticoagulant time ratio Measure The occurrence of primary bleeding events Measure The occurance of secondary bleeding events Measure The occurrence of thrombosis events Measure The number of dose adjustments and the number of INR measured during the first month of treatment; Measure The proportion of patients in each group receiving a stable dose after follow-up; Measure The proportion of patients in each group having side effects after follow-up
Time Frame 3 months postoperatively Time Frame 3 months postoperatively Time Frame 3 months, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively Time Frame 3 months postoperatively Time Frame 3 months postoperatively Time Frame 3 months postoperatively Time Frame 3 months postoperatively Time Frame 3 months postoperatively Time Frame 3 months postoperatively Time Frame 3 months postoperatively Time Frame 3 months postoperatively Time Frame 3 months postoperatively
Description INR>3,INR>4 Description gastrointestinal hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage,etc Description nasal bleeding, skin stasis,etc Description ischemic stroke, deep vein thrombosis,etc

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306103
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Fujian Medical University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130893
Design Group Id 55577930
Intervention Id 52472030

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757371
Gender All
Minimum Age 14 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Age > 14 years old;
Warfarin anticoagulant therapy is required for at least 3 months;
The genotype of patient VKORC1 is non-AA, CYP2C9 genotype is non*1/*1; the patients who are followed up, regularly monitored for INR and willing to provide peripheral blood for DNA extraction and genetic testing;
The patient or family members can understand the research plan and will participate in this study and provide a written informed consent;

Exclusion Criteria:

Severe liver dysfunction (ChildPugh ≥ 10);
Severe infection, respiratory failure;
Severe heart failure ( NYHA ≥ IV);
Severe renal insufficiency (Ccr ≤ 20ml / min);
Cancer;
Diseases of the blood system;
Severe pulmonary hypertension (PAPm ≥ 45mmHg);
Abnormal thyroid function;
Patients with a history of venous thromboembolism, or serious events such as severe bleeding or embolism;
Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding;
Taking or planning to take other oral anticoagulants;
The base INR value is >1.4;
VKORC1, CYP2C9 genotypes are AA, *1/*1;
Secondary valve replacement surgery;
Emergency hospital admission for valve surgery;
Diagnosis of coronary atherosclerotic heart disease;
Severe mental illness, mental disorder ; –

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254228093
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 14
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 4
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 8

Designs

Sequence: 30503596
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Supportive Care
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869874
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Liang-Wan Chen MD
Title The director of the department of cardiovascular surgery
Affiliation Fujian Medical University

Study References

Sequence: 52049419 Sequence: 52049420 Sequence: 52049421 Sequence: 52049422 Sequence: 52049423 Sequence: 52049424
Pmid 18305455 Pmid 19228618 Pmid 25889768 Pmid 24251363 Pmid 24251361 Pmid 25628141
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Gage BF, Eby C, Johnson JA, Deych E, Rieder MJ, Ridker PM, Milligan PE, Grice G, Lenzini P, Rettie AE, Aquilante CL, Grosso L, Marsh S, Langaee T, Farnett LE, Voora D, Veenstra DL, Glynn RJ, Barrett A, McLeod HL. Use of pharmacogenetic and clinical factors to predict the therapeutic dose of warfarin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Sep;84(3):326-31. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.10. Epub 2008 Feb 27. Erratum In: Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Sep;84(3):430. Citation International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium; Klein TE, Altman RB, Eriksson N, Gage BF, Kimmel SE, Lee MT, Limdi NA, Page D, Roden DM, Wagner MJ, Caldwell MD, Johnson JA. Estimation of the warfarin dose with clinical and pharmacogenetic data. N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 19;360(8):753-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809329. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 15;361(16):1613. Dosage error in article text. Citation Hamberg AK, Hellman J, Dahlberg J, Jonsson EN, Wadelius M. A Bayesian decision support tool for efficient dose individualization of warfarin in adults and children. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Feb 7;15:7. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0128-0. Citation Pirmohamed M, Burnside G, Eriksson N, Jorgensen AL, Toh CH, Nicholson T, Kesteven P, Christersson C, Wahlstrom B, Stafberg C, Zhang JE, Leathart JB, Kohnke H, Maitland-van der Zee AH, Williamson PR, Daly AK, Avery P, Kamali F, Wadelius M; EU-PACT Group. A randomized trial of genotype-guided dosing of warfarin. N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 12;369(24):2294-303. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311386. Epub 2013 Nov 19. Citation Kimmel SE, French B, Kasner SE, Johnson JA, Anderson JL, Gage BF, Rosenberg YD, Eby CS, Madigan RA, McBane RB, Abdel-Rahman SZ, Stevens SM, Yale S, Mohler ER 3rd, Fang MC, Shah V, Horenstein RB, Limdi NA, Muldowney JA 3rd, Gujral J, Delafontaine P, Desnick RJ, Ortel TL, Billett HH, Pendleton RC, Geller NL, Halperin JL, Goldhaber SZ, Caldwell MD, Califf RM, Ellenberg JH; COAG Investigators. A pharmacogenetic versus a clinical algorithm for warfarin dosing. N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 12;369(24):2283-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310669. Epub 2013 Nov 19. Citation Li X, Yang J, Wang X, Xu Q, Zhang Y, Yin T. Clinical benefits of pharmacogenetic algorithm-based warfarin dosing: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Thromb Res. 2015 Apr;135(4):621-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Jan 17.

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Study in Patients With Trichotillomania ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797521
2018-12-19

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797521
NCT03797521https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797521?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this study is to explore the safety, tolerability and activity of SXC-2023 when dosed for 6 weeks versus placebo in adult patients with moderate to severe Trichotillomania.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2021-10-28
Start Month Year December 19, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year December 2, 2019
Verification Month Year October 2021
Verification Date 2021-10-31
Last Update Posted Date 2021-10-28

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20787714
Description This is a Phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study consisting of a screening period of up to 40 days, a 6 week randomized double-blind treatment period, followed by an up to 2 week safety follow-up period after the last dose of study medication.

Patients will be randomized to one of four treatment groups. Patients will participate for a total of up to 10 weeks, including screening, the 6-week treatment period and follow-up.

Facilities

Sequence: 200656939 Sequence: 200656940 Sequence: 200656941 Sequence: 200656942 Sequence: 200656943 Sequence: 200656944 Sequence: 200656945 Sequence: 200656946 Sequence: 200656947 Sequence: 200656948 Sequence: 200656949 Sequence: 200656950 Sequence: 200656951
Name CNRI- Los Angeles Name Artemis Institute for Clinical Research Name Behavioral Clinical Research Name iResearch Atlanta Name Univ of Chicago Name Lake Charles Clinical Trials Name Massachusetts General Hospital Name Integrative Clinical Trials, LLC Name Finger Lakes Clinical Research Name Insight Clinical Trials, LLC Name IPS Research Company Name Carolina Clinical Trials, Inc Name Northwest Clinical Research Center
City Pico Rivera City Riverside City North Miami City Decatur City Chicago City Lake Charles City Boston City Brooklyn City Rochester City Shaker Heights City Oklahoma City City Charleston City Bellevue
State California State California State Florida State Georgia State Illinois State Louisiana State Massachusetts State New York State New York State Ohio State Oklahoma State South Carolina State Washington
Zip 90662 Zip 92503 Zip 33161 Zip 30030 Zip 60637 Zip 70629 Zip 02114 Zip 11229 Zip 14618 Zip 44122 Zip 73103 Zip 29407 Zip 98007
Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52340163
Name Trichotillomania
Downcase Name trichotillomania

Id Information

Sequence: 40279586
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value PRO-201

Countries

Sequence: 42699712
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55781354 Sequence: 55781355 Sequence: 55781356 Sequence: 55781357
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title SXC-2023 50mg QD Title SXC-2023 200mg QD Title SXC-2023 800mg QD Title Matching Placebo QD
Description SXC-2023 50mg dosed once daily for 6 weeks Description SXC-2023 200mg dosed once daily for 6 weeks Description SXC-2023 800mg dosed once daily for 6 weeks Description Matching Placebo dosed once daily for 6 weeks

Interventions

Sequence: 52650881 Sequence: 52650882
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name SXC-2023 Name Placebo
Description SXC-2023 oral capsules Description Matching Placebo oral capsules

Keywords

Sequence: 80102046 Sequence: 80102047 Sequence: 80102048
Name Promentis Pharmaceuticals Name TTM Name SXC-2023
Downcase Name promentis pharmaceuticals Downcase Name ttm Downcase Name sxc-2023

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178002910 Sequence: 178002911 Sequence: 178002912 Sequence: 178002913 Sequence: 178002914 Sequence: 178002915
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Explore the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in adults with moderate to severe TTM Measure Change from baseline hairpulling frequency and severity through 6 weeks Measure Change from baseline hairpulling frequency and severity through 6 weeks Measure Change from baseline hairpulling frequency and severity through 6 weeks Measure Change from baseline hairpulling frequency and severity daily through 6 weeks Measure Preliminary psychometric evidence of the Trichotillomania Symptom Diary (TSD) will be assessed
Time Frame Up to 7 weeks Time Frame Up to 7 weeks Time Frame Up to 7 weeks Time Frame Up to 7 weeks Time Frame Up to 7 weeks Time Frame Up to 7 weeks
Description Safety and tolerability assessed using the frequency of subjects with serious adverse events, adverse events leading to discontinuation, and adverse events judged to be related to study medication. Description Improvement will be assessed using the different measurement parameters of all scales using scales such as the Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling scale (MGH-HPS) Description Improvement will be assessed using the different measurement parameters of all scales using scales such as the Clinical Global Impression of Severity and Change (CGI-S/C) Description Improvement will be assessed using the different measurement parameters of all scales using scales such as the Patient Global Impression of Status and Change (PGI-S/C) Description Improvement will be assessed using the different measurement parameters of all scales using scales such as the Trichotillomania Symptom Diary (TSD) Description The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the newly developed TSD assessment will be assessed at the item level.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194130239 Sequence: 194130240 Sequence: 194130241
Mesh Term Trichotillomania Mesh Term Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders Mesh Term Mental Disorders
Downcase Mesh Term trichotillomania Downcase Mesh Term disruptive, impulse control, and conduct disorders Downcase Mesh Term mental disorders
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48477246
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Promentis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29375117
Role Study Director
Name Dean Brostowin
Affiliation Promentis Pharmaceuticals

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68378289 Sequence: 68378290 Sequence: 68378291 Sequence: 68378292
Design Group Id 55781355 Design Group Id 55781354 Design Group Id 55781356 Design Group Id 55781357
Intervention Id 52650881 Intervention Id 52650881 Intervention Id 52650881 Intervention Id 52650882

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30863199
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 45 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria

Adult, female or male, 18-45 years of age, inclusive at screening.
Provided signed written informed consent with willingness and ability to comply with all aspects of the protocol.

Diagnosis of current TTM based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) criteria and confirmed using the clinician-administered MINI-TTM. In addition, subjects should:

Have a history of TTM for at least one year
Have a history of daily hair pulling for at least 6 months prior to the first dose
Except for SSRIs or SNRIs, has not used any psychoactive medications including, but not limited to, other antidepressants, anxiolytics, mood stabilizers, anti-psychotics, benzodiazepines, stimulants, sulfasalazine, and St. John's Wort 30 days prior to first dose. Subjects will be allowed to maintain background therapy with SSRIs or SNRIs if on stable regimen for a minimum of 90 days prior to first dose and there are no anticipated changes to the SSRI/SNRI during course of trial.
Has not used N-acetylcysteine for at least 90 days prior to the first dose.
Has not used gemfibrozil or repaglinide for 1 week prior to the first screening visit.
Medically healthy with no clinically significant findings in medical history, physical examination, laboratory profiles, vital signs, or ECGs, as deemed by the Principal Investigator (PI) or designee.

For a female of childbearing potential: either be sexually inactive (abstinent as a life style) for 28 days prior to the first dosing and throughout the study or be using one of the following acceptable birth control options:

Oral contraception for at least 3 months prior to the first dosing along with either a physical (e.g., condom, diaphragm) or a chemical (e.g., spermicide) barrier method from the time of screening and throughout the study
IUD (either hormone-releasing or non-hormone releasing) for at least minimum duration per current labeling along with either a physical (e.g., condom, diaphragm) or a chemical (e.g., spermicide) barrier method from the time of screening and throughout the study
Depo contraception for at least minimum duration per current labeling prior to the first dosing along with either a physical (e.g., condom, diaphragm) or a chemical (e.g., spermicide) barrier method from the time of screening and throughout the study
Double physical barrier method (e.g., condom and diaphragm) from 14 days prior to the first dose and throughout the study
Physical plus chemical barrier method (e.g., condom with spermicide) from 14 days prior to the first dose and throughout the study.

In addition, female subjects of childbearing potential will be advised to remain sexually inactive or to keep the same birth control method for at least 30 days following the last dose.

Female of non childbearing potential: must have undergone one of the following sterilization procedures, at least 6 months prior to the first dose:

hysteroscopic sterilization;
bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy;
hysterectomy;
bilateral oophorectomy; Or be postmenopausal with amenorrhea for at least 1 year prior to the first dose with serum follicle stimulating hormone levels consistent with postmenopausal status or have medically documented history of biological or congenital sterility.
A non vasectomized, male subject must agree to use a condom with spermicide or abstain from sexual intercourse during the study until 30 days beyond the last dose of study drug/placebo.
If male, must agree not to donate sperm from the first dose until 30 days after the last dose administration.
Must be able to fluently read and write in English.
Understands the study procedures in the informed consent form (ICF) and is willing and able to comply with the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding or intend to become pregnant during the study period or within 30 days of the final dose of study drug.
Subjects engaged in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for TTM or other body-focused repetitive behavior or any obsessive-compulsive related or impulse control disorder any time within 60 days prior to first dose. For other psychotherapies, subject must have been engaged in that psychotherapy for a minimum of 60 days at the time of first dose and must be willing to maintain the same frequency and type of therapy for the duration of the study period.
Subjects engaged in any other behavioral interventions (e.g., wearable devices, behavioral self-help strategies) within 60 days prior to first dose.
Mentally or legally incompetent.
Suffered a concussion in the past 6 months prior to screening. Any history of traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness in the year prior to first screening visit.
Any lifetime history of any psychotic disorder, including schizophrenia or any bipolar or bipolar-related disorder as determined by clinical history or confirmed at screening with the MINI, version 7.0.2.
Current major depressive episode confirmed at screening with the MINI, version 7.0.2.
Per PI judgment, the presence of any emotional problems or psychiatric disorders that may obscure evaluation of primary TTM or pose a risk to subject safety or stability during the study period. Other emotional problems or diagnoses may include, but are not limited to, other body-focused repetitive behaviors, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, compulsive gambling, borderline personality disorder, or antisocial personality disorder.
History of any injury, illness, or condition that, in the opinion of the PI or designee, might confound the results of the study or poses an additional risk to the subject by their participation in the study.
Laboratory evidence of renal impairment (e.g. a creatine clearance of < 80)
Presence of any substance use disorder or, in the opinion of the PI or designee, problematic substance use (excluding nicotine or caffeine) within the 2 years prior to screening.
History of seizure disorder with the exception of subjects who have been off anti-seizure medication and have not had a seizure in the past 5 years.

Subjects with any of the following:

Any psychiatric hospitalizations in the past year,
Imminent risk of suicide based on PI's or designee's clinical judgment or psychiatric examination,
Active suicidal ideation in the past 6 months as evidenced by positive endorsement to Item 4 or 5 on the C-SSRS, OR
Any history of suicidal behavior in the past year as evidenced by positive endorsement to any of the suicidal behavior items on the C-SSRS.
Has previously participated in any Promentis Phase 1 study.
Participation in another interventional clinical study (including CBT or other behavioral intervention) within 30 days prior to the first screening visit. The 30 day window will be derived from the date of the last blood collection or dosing, whichever is later, in the previous study to the date of initiation of screening in the current study.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253933123
Number Of Facilities 13
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 11
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 45
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 5

Designs

Sequence: 30609022
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Masking Description Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2592323 Sequence: 2592324
Document Type Study Protocol Document Type Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True Has Protocol False
Has Icf False Has Icf False
Has Sap False Has Sap True
Document Date 2019-06-25 Document Date 2019-06-25
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/21/NCT03797521/Prot_000.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/21/NCT03797521/SAP_001.pdf

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28975560
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52245353
Pmid 34582562
Reference Type derived
Citation Hoffman J, Williams T, Rothbart R, Ipser JC, Fineberg N, Chamberlain SR, Stein DJ. Pharmacotherapy for trichotillomania. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;9(9):CD007662. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007662.pub3.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Biochemical Versus Ultrasound Findings as Predictors of Fetal Loss in Cases of First Trimester Threatened Miscarriage ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797508
2018-12-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797508
NCT03797508https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797508?tab=tablemohamed k abdelwahab, masterm.k.ali1987@gmail.com01000849822Threatened miscarriage occurs in about one-fifth of pregnancies with an estimated miscarriage rate of 3-16% after successful demonstration of fetal cardiac activity. Various biochemical markers have been studied previously to predict the outcome of threatened miscarriage; However, the results have been conflicting. Several studies have documented that a slow embryonic heart rate at 6.0-7.0 Weeks’ gestation is associated with a high rate of first trimester fetal demise.

our aim: To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound findings in comparison to serum CA125 and progesterone in predicting fetal demise in cases of first trimester threatened miscarriage.

Will this pregnancy be continued after the first trimester or not?
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-06
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-02-05
Start Month Year December 1, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year May 31, 2019
Verification Month Year February 2019
Verification Date 2019-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2019-02-05

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20721682
Description we are comparing between the accuracy of vaginal ultra sound versus serum progesterone level and serum CA 125 level in predicting of fetal demise in cases of threatened miscarriage three vaginal ultrasounds will be done ) the first one will be done at six to eight weeks of pregnancy to the patients who fulfill the criteria in this us we will make sure that the cardiac pulsations are present and measure the following:

the fetal heart rate,
the crown rump length
gestational sac diameter
yolk sac diameter. b) The second ultra sound will be after two weeks from the first one to follow up the patient for pregnancy survival, take the same measures again and correlate them with the results of laboratory investigations to select the investigation which is most accurate in anticipating outcome in cases of threatened abortion.

C) the third one will be at the end of first trimester (13 weeks) to ensure fetal viability.

. embryonic bradycardia and absence of yolk sac or smaller yolk sac than expected for any given gestational age are prognostic factors of poor pregnancy outcome in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy women with small for age gestational sac are more prone to have miscarriage we will do laboratory investigation in the form of A) Serum progesterone: low maternal P levels have been useful in predicting spontaneous abortion in threatened pregnancies with a sensitivity of 80% (<10 ng /mL) so, this will be our cutoff value. B) Serum CA 125 :we will take a level of 51.5 as cut off value.this is the upper level of normal we will do them once when the patient presents to us.

Facilities

Sequence: 200108804
Status Recruiting
Name Ain Shams University
City Cairo
Country Egypt

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96050400 Sequence: 96050401 Sequence: 96050402 Sequence: 96050403 Sequence: 96050404
Mesh Term Progesterone Mesh Term Progestins Mesh Term Hormones Mesh Term Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs
Downcase Mesh Term progesterone Downcase Mesh Term progestins Downcase Mesh Term hormones Downcase Mesh Term hormones, hormone substitutes, and hormone antagonists Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52171371
Name Abortion Threatened
Downcase Name abortion threatened

Id Information

Sequence: 40158710
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value us laboratory miscarriage

Countries

Sequence: 42569046
Name Egypt
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55593301
Group Type Other
Title threatened miscarriage
Description ultrasound ,CA125,progesterone

Interventions

Sequence: 52485595
Intervention Type Diagnostic Test
Name ultrasound
Description To evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound findings in comparison to serum CA125and progesterone in predicting fetal demise in cases of first trimester threatened miscarriage.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177379282
Outcome Type primary
Measure ultra sound
Time Frame the 12th week of gestation
Description presence of fetal heart rate

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193487201 Sequence: 193487202 Sequence: 193487203 Sequence: 193487204 Sequence: 193487205
Mesh Term Abortion, Spontaneous Mesh Term Abortion, Threatened Mesh Term Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term abortion, spontaneous Downcase Mesh Term abortion, threatened Downcase Mesh Term pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases and pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48319405
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Ain Shams University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29285413
Role Principal Investigator
Name amany a mahmoud
Affiliation Ain Shams University

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12008911
Contact Type primary
Name mohamed k abdelwahab, master
Phone 01000849822
Email m.k.ali1987@gmail.com
Phone Extension 002
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68149273
Design Group Id 55593301
Intervention Id 52485595

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30765419
Gender Female
Minimum Age 20 Years
Maximum Age 35 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Singleton Pregnancy.
Age20-35years.
Gestational age between6 to 8weeks.
Threatened miscarriage is diagnosed by vaginal bleeding, closed cervix and positive fetal life.
Patients who are sure of their dates (three regular menstrual cycles before conception without the use of hormonal contraception.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with recurrent miscarriage or pregnancy of unknown location (PUL).

Patients had ovulation induction medications or on progesterone treatment.
Patients with past medical history of diabetes mellitus or chronic hypertension.
Patients who are unsure of the last menstrual period date or with irregular menstrual cycle.
Pregnancy associated with presence of ovarian cyst.
Molar pregnancy.
Those who had a history of maternal disease which would cause an increase in CA-125level. These diseases include chronic pelvic infection, endometriosis, myoma uteri, endometrioma and lung, kidney and hepatic diseases.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253889281
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 20
Maximum Age Num 35
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30511585
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26673784 Sequence: 26673785
Intervention Id 52485595 Intervention Id 52485595
Name progesterone Name CA125

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28877880
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name amany abdel monem mahmoud
Title Egypt Cairo
Affiliation Ain Shams University

]]>

<![CDATA[ Study of Individuals Affected With Hypoplasminogenemia ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797495
2018-12-18

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797495
NCT03797495https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797495?tab=tableCharles Nakar, MDcnakar@ihtc.org317-871-0000This is an Investigator initiated retrospective and prospective single cohort study. The study will utilize an international registry and develop a specimen biobank to provide an improved understanding of the natural history of hyposplasminogenemia, to elucidate the heterogeneity of phenotypic expression, identify markers to predict disease course, and inform improved therapeutic modalities
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-28
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2023-06-18
Start Month Year December 18, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year March 8, 2027
Verification Month Year June 2023
Verification Date 2023-06-30
Last Update Posted Date 2023-06-18

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20845122
Description The aims of this study are to:

Define PLGD natural history in a large cohort of individuals with hypoplasminogenemia and their first-degree family members.
Identify factors that correlate with disease expression and severity.
Create a specimen biobank for further studies, available to other researchers.

The project will be international in scope with two collaborating centers that have created and will collect the subject data and samples. In North/Central/South America, the Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center (IHTC) will serve as the primary site while University of Milan will serve as the center for all other sites. The database is housed at the University of Milan, Italy.

Study population will include males and females affected with hyposplasminogenemia of any age. Both one-year retrospective and three-year prospective data will be collected on an international cohort of 100 affected individuals and their first degree family members (parents, siblings; total estimated study population ~500).

Study sample analysis, except for urine analyses, will be centralized and performed in Italy; the plasminogen antibody analysis will be batched for analysis, and the urine analyses will be performed locally. A sample biorepository will be created and ultimately housed in Italy. The study will provide testing for plasminogen activity and antigen, plasminogen genetic analysis, polymorphisms in genes that impact plasminogen expression and fibrinolysis, and global hemostatic assays. In addition, stored samples will be used for further testing and analyses to potentially include whole genome sequencing to further identify plasminogen genetic mutations as needed and to investigate other genetic modifiers of disease expression. An exploratory aim includes investigating the potential relationship with streptococcal strains and altered plasminogen products.

The study period will be 3 years for each enrolled subject. In-person visits will be conducted and samples for analysis will be collected at baseline and at end of study. Interval follow-up will be performed every 6 months by telephone. data will be collected at unscheduled visits that are performed for clinical need at the treating physician's discretion.

Facilities

Sequence: 201223995 Sequence: 201223996 Sequence: 201223997 Sequence: 201223998 Sequence: 201223999 Sequence: 201224000 Sequence: 201224001 Sequence: 201224002 Sequence: 201224003 Sequence: 201224004 Sequence: 201224005 Sequence: 201224006 Sequence: 201224007 Sequence: 201224008 Sequence: 201224009
Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting
Name Indiana Hemophila @Thrombosis Center Name Hemophilia Center of Western Pennsylvania Name Vanderbilt Children's Hematology-Oncology Name Cook Children's Medical Center Name The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Name Hospital Britanico Buenos Aires Name Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital Name University of Saskatchewan Name Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Name University Hospital of Padova Name Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University Name Dokuz Eylul University pediatric Pulmonology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Name Istanbul Üniversitesi Onkoloji Enstitüsü Name Istanbul University Cerrahpsasa, Cerrahpsasa Medical Faculty Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Department Name Yuzuncu Yil University Faculty of Medicine Department of Ophthalmology
City Indianapolis City Pittsburgh City Nashville City Fort Worth City Houston City Buenos Aires City Melbourne City Saskatoon City Milano City Padua City Chiang Mai City Izmir City Istanbul City Istanbul City Van
State Indiana State Pennsylvania State Tennessee State Texas State Texas State Victoria State Balçova
Zip 46260 Zip 15213 Zip 37232 Zip 76104 Zip 77030 Zip C1280 Zip 3052 Zip SK S7N 0W8 Zip 20122 Zip 35100 Zip 50200 Zip 35330 Zip 34093 Zip 34098 Zip 65040
Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country Argentina Country Australia Country Canada Country Italy Country Italy Country Thailand Country Turkey Country Turkey Country Turkey Country Turkey

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28273404 Sequence: 28273405 Sequence: 28273406 Sequence: 28273407 Sequence: 28273408 Sequence: 28273409 Sequence: 28273410 Sequence: 28273411 Sequence: 28273412 Sequence: 28273413 Sequence: 28273414 Sequence: 28273415 Sequence: 28273416 Sequence: 28273417 Sequence: 28273418 Sequence: 28273419 Sequence: 28273420 Sequence: 28273421 Sequence: 28273422 Sequence: 28273423 Sequence: 28273424 Sequence: 28273425 Sequence: 28273426 Sequence: 28273427 Sequence: 28273428
Facility Id 201223995 Facility Id 201223995 Facility Id 201223996 Facility Id 201223996 Facility Id 201223997 Facility Id 201223997 Facility Id 201223998 Facility Id 201223998 Facility Id 201223999 Facility Id 201223999 Facility Id 201224000 Facility Id 201224000 Facility Id 201224001 Facility Id 201224001 Facility Id 201224002 Facility Id 201224002 Facility Id 201224003 Facility Id 201224004 Facility Id 201224004 Facility Id 201224005 Facility Id 201224006 Facility Id 201224007 Facility Id 201224008 Facility Id 201224008 Facility Id 201224009
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup Contact Type primary Contact Type backup Contact Type primary Contact Type backup Contact Type primary Contact Type backup Contact Type primary Contact Type backup Contact Type primary Contact Type backup Contact Type primary Contact Type backup Contact Type primary Contact Type backup Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type backup Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type backup Contact Type primary
Name Neelam Thukral, CCRC Name Charles Nakar, MD Name Frederico Xavier, MD Name Debbie Vehec Name Delia Darst Name Heather McDaniel, MD, MSCI Name Heather Urbanek Name Marcela Torres, MD Name Katherine Addy, RN, BSN, MPH Name Nidra Rodriguez, MD Name Jhon A Avila, MD Name Jose M Ceresetto, MD Name Paul Monagle, MD Name Jodi Hislop, RN Name Sarah Tehseen, MBBS, MSc. FRCPC Name Rashmi Nagaraj Name Marzia Menegatti, PhD Name Maria Teresa Sartori, MD Name C. Dalla Porta, MD Name Rungrote Natesirinilkul, MD Name Serdar Al, MD Name Basak Koc, MD Name Ayse Gonca Kacar, MD Name Tulin Celkan, MD Name Muhammed Batur, MD
Email nthukral@ihtc.org Email cnakar@ihtc.org Email fxavier@hmc.psu.edu Email dvehec@vitalant.org Email delia.h.darst@vumc.org Email heather.mcdaniel@vumc.org Email Heather.Urbanek@cookchildrens.org Email marcela.torres@cookchildrens.org Email Katherine.E.Addy@uth.tmc.edu Email Nidra.I.Rodriguez@uth.tmc.edu Email jaavilar@gmail.com Email jceresetto@intramed.net Email paul.monagle@rch.org.au Email jodi.hislop@rch.org.au Email Sarah.Tehseen@saskhealthauthority.ca Email rashmi.nagaraj@usask.ca Email marzia.menegatti@guest.unimi.it Email mtsart@unipd.it Email cesare.dallaporta@gmail.com Email rungrote.n@cmu.ac.th Email drserdaral@gmail.com Email s_basakkoc@hotmail.com Email goncakacar@gmail.com Email tirajecelkan@yahoo.com Email muhammedbatur@gmail.com
Phone 317-871-0000 Phone 317-871-0000 Phone 412-209-7411 Phone 412-209-7564 Phone 615-343-7190 Phone 615 936 1762 Phone 682-885-1244 Phone 682 885 4007 Phone 713-500-8352 Phone 713 500 8360 Phone 549 114 187 9723 Phone 541 143 041 081 Phone 61 3 9936-6330 Phone 61 3 9936-6330 Phone 639 998 3972 Phone 306-978-8306 Phone +39 – 02/50320727 Phone 3334530450 Phone 39 049 821 1111 Phone 66 2 201 1749 Phone 905336510797 Phone 90 5326003027 Phone 505 259 1229 Phone 532 57 60723 Phone 904 322 150 473
Phone Extension 373 Phone Extension 6030

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18434231 Sequence: 18434232 Sequence: 18434233 Sequence: 18434234 Sequence: 18434235 Sequence: 18434236 Sequence: 18434237 Sequence: 18434238 Sequence: 18434239 Sequence: 18434240 Sequence: 18434241 Sequence: 18434242 Sequence: 18434243 Sequence: 18434244 Sequence: 18434245 Sequence: 18434246
Facility Id 201223995 Facility Id 201223995 Facility Id 201223997 Facility Id 201223998 Facility Id 201223999 Facility Id 201224000 Facility Id 201224000 Facility Id 201224001 Facility Id 201224002 Facility Id 201224003 Facility Id 201224004 Facility Id 201224005 Facility Id 201224006 Facility Id 201224007 Facility Id 201224008 Facility Id 201224009
Role Principal Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Amy D Shapiro, MD Name Charles Nakar, MD Name Heather McDaniel, MD, MSCI Name Marcela Torres, MD Name Nidra Rodriguez, MD Name Jose M Ceresetto, MD Name Jhon A Avila, MD Name Paul Monagle, MD Name Sarah Tehseen, MBBS, MSc. FRCPC Name Flora Peyvandi, MD,PhD Name Maria Teresa Sartori, MD Name Rungrote Natesirinilkul, MD Name Serdar Al, MD Name Basak Koc, MD Name Tulin Celkan, MD Name Muhammed Batur, MD

Conditions

Sequence: 52488208
Name Plasminogen Deficiency
Downcase Name plasminogen deficiency

Id Information

Sequence: 40385176
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value HISTORY

Countries

Sequence: 42820903 Sequence: 42820904 Sequence: 42820905 Sequence: 42820906 Sequence: 42820907 Sequence: 42820908 Sequence: 42820909
Name United States Name Argentina Name Australia Name Canada Name Italy Name Thailand Name Turkey
Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178566819 Sequence: 178566820 Sequence: 178566821
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary
Measure Define the natural history of plasminogen deficiency Measure Identify factors that contribute to or correlate with disease expression and severity Measure Create a specimen biobank
Time Frame 2 years Time Frame 5 years Time Frame 15 years
Description Recruit 100 subjects with hypoplasminogenemia and their first-degree family members
Collect up to 1 year retrospective and 3 year prospective data on symptoms, treatment and interventions
Description Perform centralized plasminogen activity and antigen analyses
Perform centralized genetic analysis to identify changes in the plasminogen gene
Perform centralized analysis of polymorphisms that affect plasminogen activity levels and impact fibrinolysis
Perform local urine analysis
Collect samples to explore the interaction of altered plasminogen proteins with bacterial strains
Description Bank plasma, serum and DNA on consenting enrolled subjects

Sponsors

Sequence: 48613450 Sequence: 48613451
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Indiana Hemophilia &Thrombosis Center, Inc. Name Fondazione Angelo Bianchi Bonomi

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29451026 Sequence: 29451027
Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Amy D Shapiro, MD Name Flora Peyvandi, MD, PhD
Affiliation Indiana Hemophilia &Thrombosis Center, Inc. Affiliation Univeristy of Milan

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12090738 Sequence: 12090739
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Amy D Shapiro, MD Name Charles Nakar, MD
Phone 317-871-0000 Phone 317-871-0000
Email ashapiro@ihtc.org Email cnakar@ihtc.org
Role Contact Role Contact

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30946771
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age N/A
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Study population will include males and females affected with hyposplasminogenemia of any age and their first degree family members (siblings and parents).
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Signed informed consent and assent as applicable (Appendix 1)
A. Males or females with type 1 PD diagnosed locally with plasminogen activity levels <50% OR B. First degree family members of a person diagnosed with type 1 PD (includes parents, siblings, half-siblings)
All ages included
Available clinical history and treatment for at least 1 year prior to entry except for infants < 1 year of age
Willingness to provide samples for analysis including DNA, plasma etc.
Willingness to participate in prospective follow-up for up to 3 years

Exclusion Criteria:

Previous organ transplant recipient
Any psychiatric disorder, other mental disorder, or any other medical disorder that impairs the subject's ability to give informed consent or to comply with the requirements of the study protocol
Refuses to provide informed consent
Special patient populations, including prisoners or, are deemed medically or cognitively unsuitable for research by their treating physician
Inability to obtain a blood sample due to poor or limited venous access

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254313857
Number Of Facilities 15
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30692368
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Other

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29059118
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Amy D Shapiro, MD
Title Medical Director
Affiliation Indiana Hemophilia &Thrombosis Center, Inc.

Study References

Sequence: 52396186 Sequence: 52396187 Sequence: 52396188 Sequence: 52396189 Sequence: 52396190 Sequence: 52396191
Pmid 32001536 Pmid 1455395 Pmid 17900274 Pmid 25208887 Pmid 27629020 Pmid 29321155
Reference Type background Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result
Citation Shapiro AD, Menegatti M, Palla R, Boscarino M, Roberson C, Lanzi P, Bowen J, Nakar C, Janson IA, Peyvandi F. An international registry of patients with plasminogen deficiency (HISTORY). Haematologica. 2020 Mar;105(3):554-561. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.241158. Epub 2020 Jan 30. Citation Tait RC, Walker ID, Conkie JA, Islam SI, McCall F, Mitchell R, Davidson JF. Plasminogen levels in healthy volunteers–influence of age, sex, smoking and oral contraceptives. Thromb Haemost. 1992 Nov 10;68(5):506-10. Citation Schuster V, Hugle B, Tefs K. Plasminogen deficiency. J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Dec;5(12):2315-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02776.x. Epub 2007 Sep 26. Citation Ma Q, Ozel AB, Ramdas S, McGee B, Khoriaty R, Siemieniak D, Li HD, Guan Y, Brody LC, Mills JL, Molloy AM, Ginsburg D, Li JZ, Desch KC. Genetic variants in PLG, LPA, and SIGLEC 14 as well as smoking contribute to plasma plasminogen levels. Blood. 2014 Nov 13;124(20):3155-64. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-03-560086. Epub 2014 Sep 10. Citation Celkan T. Plasminogen deficiency. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017 Jan;43(1):132-138. doi: 10.1007/s11239-016-1416-6. Citation Shapiro AD, Nakar C, Parker JM, Albert GR, Moran JE, Thibaudeau K, Thukral N, Hardesty BM, Laurin P, Sandset PM. Plasminogen replacement therapy for the treatment of children and adults with congenital plasminogen deficiency. Blood. 2018 Mar 22;131(12):1301-1310. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-09-806729. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Prospective Evaluation of the Peri-operative Hypoxia in Breast Cancer ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797482
2017-11-27

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797482
NCT03797482https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797482?tab=tableRohini A Hawaldarrwhawaldar@gmail.com09820432613To understand the effects induced by acute hypoxia that sets in during surgery in breast cancer. To study this, clinical samples (Tumor biopsies) will be obtained during the surgery after partial devascularisation (sample B) and stored for future genomic and proteonomic evaluations.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-06-28
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2023-04-12
Start Month Year November 27, 2017
Primary Completion Month Year July 30, 2024
Verification Month Year April 2023
Verification Date 2023-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2023-04-12

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20688627
Description Three tumor samples will be obtained after the patient is under anaesthesia,

Prior to starting surgery (Sample A)
The middle intra-operative sample, which will be collected when half the tumour has been devascularized (i.e., somewhere midway during the surgery). (Sample B)
A third post excision (anoxic sample C). These tumour tissue samples will be stored as snap frozen, in RNA later and as paraffin sections.

To understand the effects induced by acute hypoxia that sets in during surgery in breast cancer. To study this, clinical samples (Tumor biopsies) will be obtained during and stored for future genomic and proteonomic evaluations.

Facilities

Sequence: 199692716
Status Recruiting
Name Tata Memorial Center
City Mumbai
State Maharashtra
Zip 400012
Country India

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28067325 Sequence: 28067326
Facility Id 199692716 Facility Id 199692716
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Shalaka Joshi, MS, MCh Name Rohini A Hawaldar, BSc
Email drjoshishalaka@gmail.com Email rwhawaldar@gmail.com
Phone 22241608601 Phone 09820432613
Phone Extension 4265

Conditions

Sequence: 52083075
Name Breast Cancer Female
Downcase Name breast cancer female

Id Information

Sequence: 40088395
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value Protocol 254

Countries

Sequence: 42488168
Name India
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55497029
Title Intra-operative tumour tissue biopsies
Description Intra-operative tumour tissue biopsies will be collected for all patients

Interventions

Sequence: 52396226
Intervention Type Procedure
Name Intra-operative Tumor Tissue Biopsy
Description The changing pattern of gene expression during surgery has never been studied. This could be an effect of acute hypoxia that sets in the tumour during surgery or could be a surgical response. To study these changes happening in the tumour during surgery, we are taking serial biopsies during surgery, one at the beginning, one midway during surgery and one at the end of surgery. These samples will be snap frozen and stored at -80 deg celsius in biorepository for future analysis.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177079396 Sequence: 177079397
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Gene expression changes Measure Immunohistochemistry for other markers
Time Frame The study aims to evaluate gene expression changes during surgical resection, which lasts for 30-90 minutes on an average. Thus, we have not planned a clinical follow-up or collection of data for the patients post sampling during surgical resection. Time Frame The study aims to evaluate gene expression changes during surgical resection, which lasts for 30-90 minutes on an average. Thus, we have not planned a clinical follow-up or collection of data for the patients post sampling during surgical resection.
Description The primary outcome measured will be gene expression changes during surgical resection. Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) transcripts will be quantitated and their levels evaluated during different time-points of surgical resection, using high throughput omics technologies (Next generation sequencing, nanostring ncounter, qRT-PCR array). Description The secondary outcome measured will be protein expression changes during surgical resection. Protein levels will be quantitated, and their levels evaluated, during different time-points of surgical resection. Transcripts found to be de-regulated or changed at different time-points of surgical resection will be evaluated using IHC at protein level. We will also use high throughput omics technologies (SILAC, ITRAQ) for characterising these changes at protein levels.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193136462 Sequence: 193136463 Sequence: 193136464 Sequence: 193136465 Sequence: 193136466 Sequence: 193136467 Sequence: 193136468
Mesh Term Breast Neoplasms Mesh Term Hypoxia Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Breast Diseases Mesh Term Skin Diseases Mesh Term Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory
Downcase Mesh Term breast neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term hypoxia Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term breast diseases Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases Downcase Mesh Term signs and symptoms, respiratory
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48237694
Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Tata Memorial Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29233857
Role Principal Investigator
Name Rajendra Badwe
Affiliation Director, tata Memorial Centre

Central Contacts

Sequence: 11990529 Sequence: 11990530
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Shalaka Joshi, MS, MCh Name Rohini A Hawaldar
Phone 9869089803 Phone 09820432613
Email drjoshishalaka@gmail.com Email rwhawaldar@gmail.com
Phone Extension 4265
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68032208
Design Group Id 55497029
Intervention Id 52396226

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30714233
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender Female
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Women diagnosed with breast cancer at outpatient clinic
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Clinically diagnosis of breast cancer (by FNAC or Biopsy)
Not received any chemotherapy or surgical intervention except core biopsy.
Planed for Breast cancer surgery
Willing to give consent for the study

Exclusion Criteria:

Clinically diagnosis of Metastatic breast cancer
Received any anticancer therapy

Gender Description Women diagnosed with breast cancer, undergoing surgery upfront
Gender Based True
Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253946115
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30460801
Observational Model Other
Time Perspective Prospective

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26624003
Intervention Id 52396226
Name Breast cancer surgery

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28827262
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Dr Rajendra A. Badwe
Title Director, Tata Memorial Centre and Professor, Department of Surgical Oncology
Affiliation Tata Memorial Centre

Study References

Sequence: 51979274 Sequence: 51979275 Sequence: 51979276
Pmid 23222717 Pmid 11395851 Pmid 23915189
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Semenza GL. Cancer-stromal cell interactions mediated by hypoxia-inducible factors promote angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, and metastasis. Oncogene. 2013 Aug 29;32(35):4057-63. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.578. Epub 2012 Dec 10. Citation Hockel M, Vaupel P. Biological consequences of tumor hypoxia. Semin Oncol. 2001 Apr;28(2 Suppl 8):36-41. Citation Hoesel B, Schmid JA. The complexity of NF-kappaB signaling in inflammation and cancer. Mol Cancer. 2013 Aug 2;12:86. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-12-86.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Nutritional Supplements and Performance During Visual Field Testing (B3 Vitamin) ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797469
2019-04-15

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797469
NCT03797469https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797469?tab=tableNANANAThis study seeks to test whether these over-the-counter nutritional supplements have an impact on patients’ performance during visual field testing.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-05-28
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2021-11-11
Start Month Year April 15, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2020
Verification Month Year November 2021
Verification Date 2021-11-30
Last Update Posted Date 2021-11-11

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20795555
Description Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. The most important test to detect progression is visual field testing. Visual field testing is the reference standard to measure visual function in glaucoma. It is called called standard automated perimetry (SAP). However, this test is very subjective, often unreliable, and variable. One of the main causes of unreliable tests is the lack of attentiveness or concentration during the test. Previous studies have shown that listening to Mozart or taking vitamin B12 can improve the reliability of this test. Recent studies have suggested that over-the-counter medications such as nicotinamide (vitamin B3) and pyruvate can also improve the performance during this test. This can ultimately reduce costs due to repeated testing and increase doctor's certainty when analyzing the results of this test.

Facilities

Sequence: 200759979
Name Columbia University Medical Center
City New York
State New York
Zip 10032
Country United States

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96349735 Sequence: 96349736 Sequence: 96349737 Sequence: 96349738 Sequence: 96349739 Sequence: 96349740 Sequence: 96349741 Sequence: 96349742 Sequence: 96349743 Sequence: 96349744 Sequence: 96349745 Sequence: 96349746
Mesh Term Niacinamide Mesh Term Niacin Mesh Term Nicotinic Acids Mesh Term Vitamins Mesh Term Micronutrients Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Vitamin B Complex Mesh Term Hypolipidemic Agents Mesh Term Antimetabolites Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Lipid Regulating Agents Mesh Term Vasodilator Agents
Downcase Mesh Term niacinamide Downcase Mesh Term niacin Downcase Mesh Term nicotinic acids Downcase Mesh Term vitamins Downcase Mesh Term micronutrients Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term vitamin b complex Downcase Mesh Term hypolipidemic agents Downcase Mesh Term antimetabolites Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term lipid regulating agents Downcase Mesh Term vasodilator agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52360965 Sequence: 52360966
Name Visual Field Defect, Peripheral Name Glaucoma, Open-Angle
Downcase Name visual field defect, peripheral Downcase Name glaucoma, open-angle

Id Information

Sequence: 40294466
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value AAAR8208

Countries

Sequence: 42717509
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55804119 Sequence: 55804120
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title Nicotinamide and Pyruvate (N&P) Title Placebo
Description This group will receive two separate sets of tablets containing 3 x 1000 mg of Vitamin B3 (nicotinamide) and 2 x 1500 mg of Pyruvate. Description This group will receive an equal number of tablets as the N&P group.

Interventions

Sequence: 52671754 Sequence: 52671755 Sequence: 52671756
Intervention Type Dietary Supplement Intervention Type Dietary Supplement Intervention Type Dietary Supplement
Name Vitamin B3 Name Pyruvate Name Placebo
Description 3 tablets of 1000 mg each will be administered orally. Description 2 tablets of 1500 mg each will be administered orally. Description Tablets will look identical to the supplements and the number of tablets will equal the amount of supplements provided.

Keywords

Sequence: 80129277 Sequence: 80129278 Sequence: 80129279 Sequence: 80129280 Sequence: 80129281 Sequence: 80129282
Name Perimetry Name Vitamins Name Glaucoma Name Supplements Name Vitamin B3 Name Nicotinamide
Downcase Name perimetry Downcase Name vitamins Downcase Name glaucoma Downcase Name supplements Downcase Name vitamin b3 Downcase Name nicotinamide

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178080272 Sequence: 178080273
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change in 24-2 visual field test Measure Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores
Time Frame Up to 20 weeks Time Frame Up to 20 weeks
Description Changes in 24-2 visual field results based upon point-wise and global metrics before and after intervention, and between treatment and placebo groups will be compared. Description Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score before and after intervention and correlate these changes with those seen on visual field tests will be compared. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a brief 30-question test that assesses different types of cognitive abilities. Scores on the MoCA range from zero to 30, with a score of 26 and higher generally considered normal.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194208995 Sequence: 194208996 Sequence: 194208997 Sequence: 194208998
Mesh Term Glaucoma Mesh Term Glaucoma, Open-Angle Mesh Term Ocular Hypertension Mesh Term Eye Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term glaucoma Downcase Mesh Term glaucoma, open-angle Downcase Mesh Term ocular hypertension Downcase Mesh Term eye diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48495865
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Columbia University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29385559
Role Principal Investigator
Name Jeffrey M Liebmann, MD
Affiliation Columbia University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68407797 Sequence: 68407798 Sequence: 68407799
Design Group Id 55804119 Design Group Id 55804119 Design Group Id 55804120
Intervention Id 52671754 Intervention Id 52671755 Intervention Id 52671756

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30874786
Gender All
Minimum Age 40 Years
Maximum Age 80 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Confirmed diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma;
Visual field loss on 24-2 standard automated perimetry (SAP) worse than -3 decibels (dB) and better than -12 dB in both eyes;
Best corrected visual acuity better than 20/40 in both eyes;
Prior experience with 24-2 visual fields (at least 3 tests done in the past 3 years).

Exclusion Criteria:

Significant cataract or media opacity;
Diagnosis of dementia, Alzheimer's, and other neurological diseases;
Current use or use in the past 1 month of nutritional supplements;
Inability to take or intolerance to nicotinamide and/or pyruvate.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254022798
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 20
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 40
Maximum Age Num 80
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30620578
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking Triple
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26769282 Sequence: 26769283
Intervention Id 52671754 Intervention Id 52671755
Name B-3 Nicotinamide Name Calcium Pyruvate

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28987109
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Jeffrey Liebmann
Title Professor of Ophthalmology
Affiliation Columbia University

Study References

Sequence: 52264794 Sequence: 52264795 Sequence: 52264796 Sequence: 52264797 Sequence: 52264798 Sequence: 52264799 Sequence: 52264800
Pmid 29497468 Pmid 29295624 Pmid 28858158 Pmid 28538117 Pmid 28487632 Pmid 28209901 Pmid 34792559
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type derived
Citation Williams PA, Harder JM, Cardozo BH, Foxworth NE, John SWM. Nicotinamide treatment robustly protects from inherited mouse glaucoma. Commun Integr Biol. 2018 Jan 19;11(1):e1356956. doi: 10.1080/19420889.2017.1356956. eCollection 2018. Citation Zhang M, Ying W. NAD+ Deficiency Is a Common Central Pathological Factor of a Number of Diseases and Aging: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2019 Feb 20;30(6):890-905. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7445. Epub 2018 Feb 7. Citation Williams PA, Harder JM, John SWM. Glaucoma as a Metabolic Optic Neuropathy: Making the Case for Nicotinamide Treatment in Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2017 Dec;26(12):1161-1168. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000767. Citation Liebmann JM, Cioffi GA. Nicking Glaucoma with Nicotinamide? N Engl J Med. 2017 May 25;376(21):2079-2081. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcibr1702486. No abstract available. Citation Williams PA, Harder JM, Foxworth NE, Cardozo BH, Cochran KE, John SWM. Nicotinamide and WLDS Act Together to Prevent Neurodegeneration in Glaucoma. Front Neurosci. 2017 Apr 25;11:232. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00232. eCollection 2017. Citation Williams PA, Harder JM, Foxworth NE, Cochran KE, Philip VM, Porciatti V, Smithies O, John SW. Vitamin B3 modulates mitochondrial vulnerability and prevents glaucoma in aged mice. Science. 2017 Feb 17;355(6326):756-760. doi: 10.1126/science.aal0092. Citation De Moraes CG, John SWM, Williams PA, Blumberg DM, Cioffi GA, Liebmann JM. Nicotinamide and Pyruvate for Neuroenhancement in Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 1;140(1):11-18. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.4576.

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Study to Evaluate ICP-022 in Patients With R/R Marginal Zone Lymphoma (MZL) ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797456
2019-04-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797456
NCT03797456https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797456?tab=tableNANANAThe phase II clinical study is to investigate the safety, tolerability, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of ICP-022.

Safety, tolerability evaluation, and anti-tumor effects of ICP-022 in Chinese patients with R/R MZL will be evaluated in approximately 110 subjects. Pharmacokinetics of ICP-022 will be evaluated in approximately 20 subjects.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2022-10-12
Start Month Year April 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2023
Verification Month Year October 2022
Verification Date 2022-10-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-10-12

Facilities

Sequence: 198936606
Name Beijing Cancer Hospital
City Beijing
State Beijing
Zip 102206
Country China

Conditions

Sequence: 51879506
Name MZL
Downcase Name mzl

Id Information

Sequence: 39927542
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value ICP-CL-00104

Countries

Sequence: 42321502
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55299439
Group Type Experimental
Title ICP-022

Interventions

Sequence: 52197663
Intervention Type Drug
Name ICP-022
Description ICP-022 (tablets, 50 mg) is given orally at the dose of 150 mg/day from day 1 to day 28 of each cycle for up to a total of 6 cycles or until progression.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176408966 Sequence: 176408967 Sequence: 176408968 Sequence: 176408969 Sequence: 176408970 Sequence: 176408971 Sequence: 176408972 Sequence: 176408973 Sequence: 176408974 Sequence: 176408975
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Overall Response Rate (ORR) Measure Occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events according to NCI-CTCAE 4.03 grading criteria in Part I Measure Progressioin free survival (PFS) Measure Duration of Response (DR) Measure Overall survival (OS) Measure Area under the concentration time curve up to the time "t" (AUC(0-t)) Measure Maximum plasma drug concentrations (Cmax) Measure Time of maximum plasma drug concentrations (Tmax) Measure Apparent half-life for designated elimination phases (t½) Measure Area under the concentration time curve up to the last data point above LOQ (AUC(last))
Time Frame Up to 3 years Time Frame Up to 3 years Time Frame Up to 3 years Time Frame Up to 3 years Time Frame Up to 3 years Time Frame up to 4 weeks Time Frame up to 4 weeks Time Frame up to 4 weeks Time Frame up to 4 weeks Time Frame up to 4 weeks
Description The efficacy measured by overall response rate (ORR) in Part II according to the 2014 International Working Group NHL Description The safety of ICP-022 measured by the occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events according to NCI-CTCAE 4.03 grading criteria in Part I Description Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from registration to the first occurrence of progression or relapse as assessed by the investigator, or death from any cause. PFS for patients without disease progression, relapse, or death will be censored at the time of the last tumor assessment. Description Duration of response as defined as the period from the first response (at least PR) to treatment until evidence of disease progression, relapse or death of any cause. Patients alive without progression and relapse will be censored at the latest tumor assessment date or the stopping date. Description Overall survival is defined as the period from the induction registration to death from any cause. Patients who have not died until the time of the analysis will be censored at their last contact date. Description Area under the concentration time curve up to the time "t" (AUC(0-t)) of ICP-022 will be measured and calculated with noncompartmental analysis using WinNonlin. Description Individual plasma concentrations of ICP-022 will be measured and Cmax will be calculated with noncompartmental analysis using WinNonlin. Description Time of maximum plasma drug concentrations (Tmax) of ICP-022 will be recorded. Description Apparent half-life for designated elimination phases (t½) of ICP-022 will be measured and calculated with noncompartmental analysis using WinNonlin. Description Area under the concentration time curve up to the last data point above LOQ (AUC(last)) of ICP-022 will be measured and calculated with noncompartmental analysis using WinNonlin.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192307384 Sequence: 192307383 Sequence: 192307385 Sequence: 192307386 Sequence: 192307387 Sequence: 192307388 Sequence: 192307389 Sequence: 192307390 Sequence: 192307391 Sequence: 192307392
Mesh Term Lymphoma Mesh Term Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Lymphoproliferative Disorders Mesh Term Lymphatic Diseases Mesh Term Immunoproliferative Disorders Mesh Term Immune System Diseases Mesh Term Lymphoma, B-Cell Mesh Term Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma, b-cell, marginal zone Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term lymphoproliferative disorders Downcase Mesh Term lymphatic diseases Downcase Mesh Term immunoproliferative disorders Downcase Mesh Term immune system diseases Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma, b-cell Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma, non-hodgkin
Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48046371
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Beijing InnoCare Pharma Tech Co., Ltd.

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29113941
Role Principal Investigator
Name Jun Zhu, PhD
Affiliation Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67793235
Design Group Id 55299439
Intervention Id 52197663

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30593151
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 75 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Men and women between 18 and 75 years old
Histologically confirmed marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), and at least one measurable tumor of greater than 1.5 centimeter outside of the spleen
Subjects with refractory or relapsed MZL who has received at least 1 but no more than 4 prior therapies for MZL
ECOG performance status of 0-2
Documented failure to achieve at least partial response (PR) or documented disease progression after response to the most recent treatment regimen
Subjects who have indications for treatment (threatened end-organ function, bulky disease >5cm, symptoms, steady progression, wish to treat)

Subjects meet the following laboratory parameters:

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5×109/L Platelet count ≥ 75×109/L, independent of growth factor support within 7 days of the first dose with study drug, Hemoglobin ≥ 75 g/L; ANC ≥ 1.0×109/L, Platelet count ≥ 50×109/L, Hemoglobin ≥ 50 g/L; if bone marrow involvement
Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5× ULN; AST or ALT ≤ 2× ULN; Creatinine ≤ 1.5× ULN; Amylase ≤ ULN and Lipase ≤ ULN
International normalized ratio (INR) ≤ 1.5 ULN
Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
Able to provide signed written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

History of other active malignancies within 5 years of study entry, unless cured without evidence of relapse or metastasis
Current or history of lymphoma involved central nervous system
Prior corticosteroids (at dosages equivalent to prednisone > 20 mg/day) given with anti-neoplastic intent within 7 days, prior chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiation therapy, or antibody-based therapies or anti-cancer TCM within 4 weeks of the start of study drug
Non-hematological toxicity must recover to ≤ Grade 1 from prior anti-cancer therapy (except for alopecia)

Current clinically significant cardiovascular disease including:

Any class 3 or 4 cardiac disease such as arrhythmia, congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction defined by the New York Heart Association Functional Classification, or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%
Primary cardiomyopathy
Clinical significant QTc prolong history or QTc>470ms (female) QTc>450ms (male)
Uncontrolled hypertension
Known active bleeding within 2 months of screening or currently taking anticoagulant/antiplatelet drugs
Urine protein ≥ 2+ and quantitation ≥ 2g/24hours
History of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
Toxicity must be recovered to ≤ Grade 1 from prior anti-cancer therapy
Disease significantly affecting gastrointestinal function such as dysphagia, chronic diarrhea, intestinal obstruction, or resection of the stomach
Prior organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplant
Major surgery within 6 weeks of screening, except for diagnostic test or vascular access setup
Known active infection with HBV, HCV or HIV or any uncontrolled active systemic infection
Any history of pulmonary fibrosis, interstitial pneumonia, pneumoconiosis, radiation pneumonitis, drug-related pneumonia, severe lung function impairment
Prior exposure to a BTK or BCR pathway inhibitor (PI3K or Syk) and BCL-2 inhibitor
Suitable and ready for allogeneic stem cell transplant
Inability to comply with study procedures
Drug abuser or alcoholics
Lactating or pregnant women, or women who will not use contraception during the study and for 180 days after the last dose of study drug if sexually active and able to bear children
Requires treatment with moderate or strong cytochrome P450 family 3, subfamily A (CYP3A) inhibitors or strong CYP3A inducers.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253882634
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 75
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 9

Designs

Sequence: 30340809
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28717440
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ High Dose Ascorbic Acid (AA) + Nanoparticle Paclitaxel Protein Bound + Cisplatin + Gemcitabine (AA NABPLAGEM) in Patients Who Have Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797443
2019-01-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797443
NCT03797443https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797443?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this study is to see if a combination of paclitaxel protein bound (also known as nab-paclitaxel), gemcitabine, and cisplatin when given with high dose Ascorbic Acid will be safe and effective in individuals with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Vitamin C is a nutrient found in food and dietary supplements. It protects cells and also plays a key role in making collagen (which provides strength and structure to skin, bones, tissues and tendons). High-dose vitamin C may be given by intravenous (IV) infusion (through a vein into the bloodstream) or orally (taken by mouth). When taken by intravenous infusion, vitamin C can reach much higher levels in the blood than when the same amount is taken by mouth. Some human studies of high-dose IV vitamin C in patients with cancer have shown improved quality of life, as well as improvements in physical, mental, and emotional functions, symptoms of fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, and appetite loss. Intravenous high-dose ascorbic acid has caused very few side effects in clinical trials.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-05
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-05-31
Start Month Year January 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 2022
Verification Month Year May 2019
Verification Date 2019-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-05-31

Facilities

Sequence: 200245306 Sequence: 200245307 Sequence: 200245308
Name Piedmont Cancer Institute Name Piedmont Cancer Institute Name Piedmont Cancer Institute
City Atlanta City Fayetteville City Newnan
State Georgia State Georgia State Georgia
Zip 30318 Zip 30214 Zip 30265
Country United States Country United States Country United States

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96113860 Sequence: 96113861 Sequence: 96113862 Sequence: 96113863 Sequence: 96113864 Sequence: 96113865 Sequence: 96113866 Sequence: 96113867 Sequence: 96113868 Sequence: 96113869 Sequence: 96113870 Sequence: 96113871 Sequence: 96113872 Sequence: 96113873 Sequence: 96113874 Sequence: 96113875
Mesh Term Ascorbic Acid Mesh Term Paclitaxel Mesh Term Gemcitabine Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents Mesh Term Tubulin Modulators Mesh Term Antimitotic Agents Mesh Term Mitosis Modulators Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Vitamins Mesh Term Micronutrients Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic Mesh Term Antimetabolites Mesh Term Antioxidants Mesh Term Protective Agents
Downcase Mesh Term ascorbic acid Downcase Mesh Term paclitaxel Downcase Mesh Term gemcitabine Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents, phytogenic Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents Downcase Mesh Term tubulin modulators Downcase Mesh Term antimitotic agents Downcase Mesh Term mitosis modulators Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term vitamins Downcase Mesh Term micronutrients Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term antimetabolites, antineoplastic Downcase Mesh Term antimetabolites Downcase Mesh Term antioxidants Downcase Mesh Term protective agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52208628
Name Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Downcase Name metastatic pancreatic cancer

Id Information

Sequence: 40186532
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value PAN-VITC

Countries

Sequence: 42600024
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55635252
Group Type Experimental
Title AA NABPLAGEM
Description Ascorbic Acid Paclitaxel protein-bound cisplatin gemcitabine

Interventions

Sequence: 52522570 Sequence: 52522567 Sequence: 52522568 Sequence: 52522569
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Gemcitabine Name Ascorbic Acid Name nab paclitaxel Name Cisplatin
Description 30 minute IV infusion on days 1 and 8 repeated every 21 days Description Four escalating dose levels are planned in order to determine the MTD for Phase II

The dose level for Phase II patients will be determined following completion of the Phase 1b study based on response from 3-6 patients receiving the designated dose level of ascorbic acid.

Description 30 minute IV infusions on days 1 and 8 repeated every 21 days, followed by Cisplatin Description 60minute IV infusion on days 1 and 8 repeated every 21 days followed by Gemcitabine

Keywords

Sequence: 79923720 Sequence: 79923721 Sequence: 79923722 Sequence: 79923723 Sequence: 79923724 Sequence: 79923725 Sequence: 79923726 Sequence: 79923727
Name Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Name Cancer Name Pancreatic Name Vitamin C Name Ascorbic Acid Name Paclitaxel Protein Bound Name Cisplatin Name Gemcitabine
Downcase Name metastatic pancreatic cancer Downcase Name cancer Downcase Name pancreatic Downcase Name vitamin c Downcase Name ascorbic acid Downcase Name paclitaxel protein bound Downcase Name cisplatin Downcase Name gemcitabine

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177513231 Sequence: 177513232 Sequence: 177513233 Sequence: 177513234 Sequence: 177513235 Sequence: 177513236 Sequence: 177513237 Sequence: 177513238
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Maximum Tolerated Dose Measure Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD x18 weeks) Measure Incidence of Treatment Measure Percent of patients who normalize their CA19-9 Measure Overall survival (OS) Measure Progression free Measure Changes in patient's self-reported quality of life Measure Changes in patient's self-reported pain levels
Time Frame approx 63 days Time Frame approx 63 days Time Frame 63 days Time Frame 63 days Time Frame 12 weeks Time Frame approximately 12 weeks from last study treatment ] Time Frame 63 days Time Frame 63 days
Description To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of high dose ascorbic acid (AA) with triple therapy of nanoparticle paclitaxel protein bound+ cisplatin + gemcitabine (NABPLAGEM) in patients with advanced stage IV metastatic pancreatic cancer Description To determine the preliminary efficacy (Disease control rate of CR+ PR+SD X 18 weeks) of the combination of high dose ascorbic acid (AA) at MTD with triple therapy of nanoparticle albumin- bound paclitaxel + cisplatin + gemcitabine (NABPLAGEM) in patients with advanced stage IV metastatic pancreatic cancer. Description Lab testing will be completed to evaluate standard of care labs for subject safety Description Lab testing will be completed to evaluate normalization of CA19-19 Description Telephone followup will be conducted every 12 weeks from the last dose of treatment to determine survival status Description Telephone followup will be conducted every 12 weeks from the last dose of treatment to determine status of disease progression Description Changes in patient's self-reported quality of life will be determined by administering the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for Gastrointestinal Cancer (MDASI-GI) to assess the severity of multiple gastrointestinal cancer-related syymptoms and the impact of these symptoms of daily functiong. Description Changes in patient's self-reported pain levels will be determined by administering the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193629117 Sequence: 193629118 Sequence: 193629119 Sequence: 193629120 Sequence: 193629121 Sequence: 193629122 Sequence: 193629123 Sequence: 193629124
Mesh Term Pancreatic Neoplasms Mesh Term Digestive System Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Endocrine Gland Neoplasms Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases Mesh Term Pancreatic Diseases Mesh Term Endocrine System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term pancreatic neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term digestive system neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term endocrine gland neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases Downcase Mesh Term pancreatic diseases Downcase Mesh Term endocrine system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48354228 Sequence: 48354229 Sequence: 48354230 Sequence: 48354231 Sequence: 48354232 Sequence: 48354233
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Piedmont Cancer Institute Name Cancer Research UK Name Stand Up To Cancer Name Lustgarten Foundation Name Destroy Pancreatic Cancer Name Translational Genomics Research Institute

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199868 Sequence: 68199869 Sequence: 68199870 Sequence: 68199871
Design Group Id 55635252 Design Group Id 55635252 Design Group Id 55635252 Design Group Id 55635252
Intervention Id 52522567 Intervention Id 52522568 Intervention Id 52522569 Intervention Id 52522570

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30787181
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Be willing and able to provide written informed consent/assent for the trial.
Be ≥ 18 years of age on day of signing informed consent.
Histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (with measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1)
Have a performance status of 0 or 1 on the ECOG performance scale.
Demonstrate adequate organ function as defined below in Table 4, all screening labs should be performed within 21 days of treatment initiation.
Female participants of childbearing potential should have a negative serum pregnancy test within 72 hours prior to receiving first dose of study medication.
Female participants of childbearing potential must be willing to use adequate method of contraception (as outlined in section 4.4.2) for the duration of the trial through one month after the last dose of trial treatment.
Male participants must agree to use adequate contraception (as outlined in section 4.4.2) for the duration of the trial through one month after the last dose of trial treatment. Note: Abstinence is acceptable if this is the usual lifestyle and preferred contraception for the participant.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients must have received no previous radiotherapy, surgery, chemotherapy or investigational therapy for the treatment of metastatic disease. Prior treatments in the adjuvant setting with gemcitabine and/or 5-FU or gemcitabine administered as a radiation sensitizer are allowed, provided at least 6 months have elapsed since completion of the last dose and no lingering toxicities are present.
Palliative surgery and/or radiation treatment less than 4 weeks prior to initiation of study treatment.
Exposure to any investigational agent within 4 weeks prior to initiation of study treatment.
Patients who need constant use of finger stick blood glucose monitoring for tight control of their diabetes being that the ascorbic acid causes false low readings of glucose via that technology (Vasudevan and Hirsch 2014) 39
Any person with a G6PD deficiency
History of renal oxalate stones (if type of stone is unknown, need to assess urine oxalates level if >60mg/dL, then patient is not eligible for the study)
Patient is taking acetaminophen at any dose or any medication that contains acetaminophen within 72 hours of first dose of ascorbic acid
Hypersensitivity to any of the agents proposed for treatment.
Has a known additional malignancy that is progressing or requires active treatment. Exceptions include basal cell carcinoma of the skin or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has undergone potentially curative therapy or in situ cervical cancer.
Has known active central nervous system (CNS) metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis. Patients with previously treated brain metastases may participate provided they are stable (without evidence of progression by imaging for at least four weeks prior to the first dose of trial treatment and any neurologic symptoms have returned to baseline), have no evidence of new or enlarging brain metastases, and are not using steroids for at least 7 days prior to trial treatment. This exception does not include carcinomatous meningitis, which is excluded regardless of clinical stability.
Has an active infection requiring systemic therapy.
Has a history or current evidence of any condition, therapy, or laboratory abnormality that might confound the results of the trial, interfere with the patient's participation for the full duration of the trial, or is not in the best interest of the patient to participate, in the opinion of the treating investigator. Has known psychiatric or substance abuse disorders that would interfere with cooperation with the requirements of the trial.
For female participants: Is pregnant or breastfeeding, or expecting to conceive within the projected duration of the trial, starting with the pre-screening or screening visit through one month after the last dose of trial treatment.
For male participants: Is expecting to impregnate a sexual partner within the projected duration of the trial, starting with the pre-screening or screening visit through one month after the last dose of trial treatment.
Patients with evidence of iron overload, defined as a transferrin saturation > 45 percent AND serum ferritin > 200 ng/mL (males) or >150 ng/mL (females).
Current, serious, clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias as determined by the investigator, or patient receiving a digitalis derivative.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253990154
Number Of Facilities 3
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30533251
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description Ascorbic Acid Paclitaxel Protein Bound Cisplatin Gemcitabine

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26692239
Intervention Id 52522567
Name Vitamin C

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899543
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Determination of Normal Values for the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) in Handball Players ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797430
2019-01-02

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797430
NCT03797430https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797430?tab=tableNANANAthe aim of this study is to determine normal values for SEBT in young national or international handball women players for determining specific level for SEBT to predict risk of injury
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2020-07-17
Start Month Year January 2, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 2, 2020
Verification Month Year July 2020
Verification Date 2020-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-07-17

Conditions

Sequence: 52256584
Name Handball Players
Downcase Name handball players

Id Information

Sequence: 40220816
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value SEBTHAND ( 29BRC18.0254)

Keywords

Sequence: 79989877 Sequence: 79989878 Sequence: 79989879 Sequence: 79989880
Name hand ball Name evaluation Name risk of injury Name women
Downcase Name hand ball Downcase Name evaluation Downcase Name risk of injury Downcase Name women

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177692173
Outcome Type primary
Measure determination of normal values for SEBT
Time Frame one day
Description star excursion balance test : it is a functionnal test for predicting the risk of injury

Sponsors

Sequence: 48399114
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University Hospital, Brest

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29331573
Role Principal Investigator
Name Marc BEAUMONT, PhD
Affiliation CHU Brest

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30815001
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Gender Female
Minimum Age 14 Years
Maximum Age 18 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Population national or international hanball women players, aged from 14 to 18 years old
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

women
age from 14 to 18 years old
national or international level for handball

Exclusion Criteria:

no french language
players who don't understand the instructions to perform the test
Refusal to perform the test

Gender Description handball women players
Gender Based True
Adult True
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254076027
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 14
Maximum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30560964
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28927368
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Gut Microbiome and Metabolic Pathways Changes in Vitiligo ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797417
2018-09-18

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797417
NCT03797417https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797417?tab=tableQingrong Ninitina.tn@gmail.com15109230226Vitiligo is a chronic depigmenting autoimmune-associated skin disease and a growing psychological health concern because of its low quality of life. Genetics, immunology and environment triggers contribute to the pathophysiology of vitiligo. Identify and decrease the risk factors of vitiligo is very crucial for vitiligo treatment and prevention. Emerging evidence has linked gut microbiome to human autoimmune diseases. Here the investigators will analyze 10,913 metagenomes in stool samples from 100 adult vitiligo patients and gut microbiome associated metabolites in patients serum.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-05
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09
Start Month Year September 18, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year June 1, 2019
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20741283
Description Vitiligo, an autoimmune disease of the skin, is a commonly acquired chronic depigmenting disorder characterized by loss of epidermal melanocytes and progressive depigmentation clinically, affecting from 0.5% to 1% of the world population and about 1% in China Vitiligo can be a psychologically crushing associated with low quality of life, especially in colored skinned individuals. The pathoetiology of vitiligo is multifactorial and has genetic, immunological, and environmental components. Several environment-associated mechanisms have been implicated to explain melanocyte disappearance, including ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure, repeated mechanical or thermal stress, and exposure to chemicals (especially phenols or catechols), but epidemiologic data remain limited.

Broader gut dysbioses have been identified as potential causes or contributing factors to human autoimmune diseases; however, human studies have not yet identified microbial compositional or functional triggers that are predictive of skin autoimmunity or vitiligo. Metabolites from intestinal microbiota are key determinants of host-microbe mutualism and, consequently, the health or disease of the intestinal tract. However, whether such host-microbe crosstalk influences inflammation in peripheral tissues, such as the skin, is poorly understood.

The investigators will perform a metagenome association study and serum metabolomics profiling in a cohort of vitiligo Chinese individuals.

Facilities

Sequence: 200280928
Status Recruiting
Name Xijing Hospital
City Xi'an
State Shaanxi
Zip 710032
Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28132946 Sequence: 28132947
Facility Id 200280928 Facility Id 200280928
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Xijing Hospital Name Qingrong Ni
Email nitina.tn@gmail.com
Phone 15109230226
Phone Extension +86

Conditions

Sequence: 52221812
Name Gut Microbiome
Downcase Name gut microbiome

Id Information

Sequence: 40195826
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value XJPF-LCY-V201812

Countries

Sequence: 42609803
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55650105 Sequence: 55650106
Title Disease Title Healthy Control
Description patients with vitiligo Description healthy control

Keywords

Sequence: 79942133 Sequence: 79942134 Sequence: 79942135
Name Gut Microbiome Name Vitiligo Name Metabolic Pathways
Downcase Name gut microbiome Downcase Name vitiligo Downcase Name metabolic pathways

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177562358 Sequence: 177562359 Sequence: 177562360
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary
Measure Gut microbiota sequencing results by analyzing metagenomes of 16s rRNA gene or microbial genes Measure Gut microbiota associated metabolic pathways by using metabolomics profiling of serum samples study Measure Vitiligo associated activity measurements like VASI assays, serum markers detection
Time Frame 2018.10.1–2019.3.1 Time Frame 2018.12.1–2019.3.1 Time Frame 2019.1–2019.3.1
Description Fecal samples are obtained from all recruited subjects for metagenomic sequencing. The individuals have not received any antibiotic treatment for at least one month before sample collection. In the seven days before sample collection, subjects did not take any food containing probiotics such as yogurt. Each sample was either frozen immediately at -80 °C or briefly stored in personal -20 °C freezers before transport to the laboratory within 24 h. After extracting DNA from fecal samoles, gut microbiota sequencing results by using Shotgun Strategy or Meta 16s high-throughput sequencing. Description All serum samples will be thawed on ice and a quality control (QC) sample, made by mixing and blending equal volumes (10 μl) of each serum sample, is used to estimate a mean profile representing all the analytes encountered during analysis. The acquired MS data pretreatments included peak selection and grouping, retention time correction, second peak grouping, and isotopes and adducts annotation, will be performed as previously described56. LC-MS raw data files will be converted into mzXML format and then analyzed by the XCMS and CAMERA toolbox with R statistical language. Description VASI assays will be used to evaluate patients disease condition. VASI Scoring Criteria VASI=Σall body sites (hand units) × depigmentation. Serum markers like CXCL10, IL-2, and sCD25 will be detected by ELISA kits.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193679546 Sequence: 193679547 Sequence: 193679548 Sequence: 193679549
Mesh Term Vitiligo Mesh Term Hypopigmentation Mesh Term Pigmentation Disorders Mesh Term Skin Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term vitiligo Downcase Mesh Term hypopigmentation Downcase Mesh Term pigmentation disorders Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48366675
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Xijing Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29313037
Role Principal Investigator
Name Chunying Li
Affiliation Study Principal Investigator

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12020650
Contact Type primary
Name Qingrong Ni
Phone 15109230226
Email nitina.tn@gmail.com
Phone Extension +86
Role Contact

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30794871
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 3 Years
Maximum Age 65 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Population We recruit patients who have clinically advanced vitiligo, and barely have other diseases which may disturb our study results.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects who volunteered and signed Informed Consent Form;
Male or female subjects 3-65 years of age;
Clinically confirmed the diagnosis of advanced vitiligo as per the diagnostic criteria for vitiligo specified in Clinical Dermatology;
Stable vital signs.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who had taken systemic or local treatment with vitiligo in the last month;
Patients who had taken systemic antibiotics,systemic hormones,cytokines, immunosuppressors in the previous three months;
The combination of other autoimmune diseases,gastrointestinal diseases, hepatic diseases, psychiatric and psycho-related diseases, or other skin diseases;
The combination of Serious, life-threatening condition such as cardiac diseases, renal diseases, endocrine system disease, cancer, or immunodeficiency diseases;
Women of child-bearing potential who are pregnant, plan to become pregnant during the study or are lactating;
Any other condition that the investigator deems unsuitable for entering the study.

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254004559
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 3
Maximum Age Num 65
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30540911
Observational Model Case-Control
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28907231
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Li Chunying-1
Title Vice Chief
Affiliation Xijing Hospital

]]>

<![CDATA[ Airway Remodeling During Mepolizumab Treatment ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797404
2019-04-24

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797404
NCT03797404https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797404?tab=tableNANANAChronic airway changes, such as smooth muscle hypertrophy/hyperplasia, reticular basement membrane (RBM) thickening, goblet cells hyperplasia characterize severe asthma. Chronic inflammation, and especially eosinophilia and T2 cytokines are involved in these structural changes. The aim of this prospective observational study is to assess airway changes, assessed by bronchial biopsies before treatment, then after 6 months and 12 months, induced by mepolizumab in 40 severe asthma patients who will receive the treatment as part of their standard care. Changes in RBM thickening, in airway smooth muscle (ASM) area, in the number of PGP9 sections will be assessed on bronchial biopsies after 6 months and 12 months of mepolizumab treatment. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) levels of inflammatory and remodeling mediators and of extra-cellular matrix (ECM) components will be measured after 6 months and 12 months of mepolizumab treatment. Relationship between clinical response to mepolizumab and remodeling changes after 6 months and 12 months will be assessed.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-06
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2023-01-20
Start Month Year April 24, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year June 21, 2022
Verification Month Year January 2023
Verification Date 2023-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-01-20

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20722444
Description Scientific Rationale & Hypothesis:

Chronic airway changes, such as smooth muscle hypertrophy/hyperplasia, reticular basement membrane thickening, goblet cells hyperplasia characterize severe asthma. Chronic inflammation, and especially eosinophilia and T2 cytokines are involved in these structural changes. Increased ASM layer has been associated with eosinophilia for example, but not RBM thickening, suggesting that differential patterns of remodeling can be observed according to inflammatory patterns. Omalizumab, an anti IgE therapy, can reduce some features of airway remodeling, especially RBM and some parameters related to ASM. No data are available on potential changes in airway remodeling induced by mepolizumab.

The aim of the study is to assess airway changes, assessed by bronchial biopsies, induced by mepolizumab in severe asthma patients who will receive the treatment as part of their standard care.

All asthma patients refered to the asthma clinic are proposed to participate to the COBRA cohort (French national asthma cohort). Serum and DNA are collected at inclusion and every 6 months. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) is routinely performed as part of the standard care for difficult-to-severe asthma in our centre for many years, to assess differential diagnosis and inflammatory pattern since Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is not routinely performed in France. BAL and 4 to 6 bronchial biopsies are performed.

Study Population:

Severe asthma patients, refered to Severe Asthma Centre in Bichat and Bicetre Hospitals, receiving mepolizumab according to French recommendations (eos >300mm3 in the previous year, >2 exacerbations, despite optimal step 4-5 therapy, including daily use of steroids).

Study Design & Methods:

General study design Prospective, observational study in one Severe Asthma Centre : Bichat Hospital (Prof C.Taillé).

40 patients will be prospectively included during a 32 months period.

This study aims to assess :

Changes in RBM thickening, in ASM area after 6 months and 12 months of mepolizumab treatment
Changes in BAL levels of inflammatory and remodeling mediators and of ECM components after 6 months and 12 months of mepolizumab treatment
Changes in the number of PGP9 sections in the bronchial wall after 6 months and 12 months of mepolizumab treatment
Relationship between clinical response to mepolizumab and remodeling changes after 6 months and 12 months of mepolizumab treatment
Demographic and clinical characteristics of asthma (atopy, level of asthma control, FEV1…) will be available at inclusion and follow up, to assess clinical effect of mepolizumab treatment.

The following will perform at inclusion, 6 months and 12 months after initiating mepolizumab:

clinical evaluation (age, BMI, atopic status, chronic rhinosinusitis, daily doses of steroids, exacerbations…)
benefit of mepolizumab will be evaluated according to the physician's Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE)
asthma control test
lung function test (FEV1, FEV1/VC, TLC, RV, pre/post salbutamol)
FOB with BAL and 6 biopsies at inclusion, 6 months and 12 months

Blood test for eosinophil count and serum conservation.

Study groups/arms Group 1 (prospective) : patients initiating a mepolizumab treatment. Group 2 (retrospective): to assess airway changes that can "spontaneously" occur during a 12 month-period, a retrospective "historical group" of patients included in the previous ASMATHERM study who had 2 sets of biopsies and BAL within a 6 to 12 month-interval, without exposure to mepolizumab and without change in their treatment during this interval, will be studied as a control group . Clinical data are available at inclusion and after 12 months.
Main tests or procedures All biopsies, BAL and serum analysis will be performed in the UMR1152 lab unit (Head: Dr Marina Pretolani).

Biopsies are fixed in formaldehyde and processed to paraffin wax for immunohistochemical (IHC) and morphometric studies. One biopsy will be stored at -80°C for further RNAseq analyses.

RBM thickening (morphometry), ASM area and the rate of ASM-proliferating cells (PCNA immuno-staining) will be measured. PGP9 staining can assess the number of nerves in the bronchial wall.

The number of inflammatory cells (eosinophils, neutrophils, mast cells, T-lymphocytes evaluated respectively by MBP, elastase, tryptase, CD4 expression) and vascular sections will also be enumerated after IHC. Eosinophils localization in the airway will be described.

Cytospin preparations from BAL cell pellets will be used to assess the proportion of eosinophils and neutrophils.

In parallel, the levels of different pro-inflammatory and remodeling mediators will be measured in BAL aliquots concentrated x 10, by specific Elisa and Luminex assays.

• Trial plan

V0: screening visit

V1: inclusion visit

clinical evaluation
Asthma control test
Lung function test
Fiber optic fibroscopy with BAL and bronchial biopsies (note that if a fiber optic fibroscopy with BAL and bronchial biopsies has already been performed in the month prior to inclusion, it will not be repeated at inclusion and the tissue and BAL samples will be retrieved for analysis)
Blood sampling
first treatment by Mepolizumab is administrated in the hospital.
Patient injection training if this prescription is chosen
Prescription for Mepolizumab, given at home for the next 6 months

V2: 6-month visit

Clinical response assessment by GETE and ACT, clinical evaluation
Lung function test
Fiber optic fibroscopy with BAL and bronchial biopsies
Blood sampling
If responders, continuation of Mepolizumab treatment
Compliance evaluation (file signed by the nurse or patient after each injection)

V3: 12-month visit

clinical response assessment by GETE and ACT, clinical evaluation
Lung function test
Fiber optic fibroscopy with BAL and bronchial biopsies
Blood sampling
Compliance evaluation (file signed by the nurse or patient after each injection)

Facilities

Sequence: 200113249
Name Bichat hospital
City Paris
Zip 75018
Country France

Conditions

Sequence: 52173480
Name Asthma
Downcase Name asthma

Id Information

Sequence: 40160073 Sequence: 40160074
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value P180501J Id Value 2018-002591-40
Id Type EudraCT Number

Countries

Sequence: 42570357
Name France
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55595508 Sequence: 55595509
Title Mepolizumab Title Patients w/o mepolizumab (retrospective)
Description Patients receiving mepolizumab Description Retrospective control group of patients not exposed to mepolizumab, included in the COBRA cohort and the ASMATHERM protocol, who had 2 sets of biopsies and BAL within a 6 to 12 month-interval, without change in their treatment. Clinical data for this patients are available at inclusion and after 12 months.

Keywords

Sequence: 79871470 Sequence: 79871471 Sequence: 79871472 Sequence: 79871473
Name Eosinophil Name Bronchial biopsies Name Mepolizumab Name Severe
Downcase Name eosinophil Downcase Name bronchial biopsies Downcase Name mepolizumab Downcase Name severe

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177387163 Sequence: 177387164 Sequence: 177387162 Sequence: 177387135 Sequence: 177387136 Sequence: 177387137 Sequence: 177387138 Sequence: 177387139 Sequence: 177387140 Sequence: 177387141 Sequence: 177387142 Sequence: 177387143 Sequence: 177387144 Sequence: 177387145 Sequence: 177387146 Sequence: 177387147 Sequence: 177387148 Sequence: 177387149 Sequence: 177387150 Sequence: 177387151 Sequence: 177387152 Sequence: 177387153 Sequence: 177387154 Sequence: 177387155 Sequence: 177387156 Sequence: 177387157 Sequence: 177387158 Sequence: 177387159 Sequence: 177387160 Sequence: 177387161 Sequence: 177387165 Sequence: 177387166 Sequence: 177387167
Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Total lung capacity (TLC) Measure Residual volume (RV) Measure Total lung capacity (TLC) Measure Changes in reticular basement membrane (RBM) thickening Measure Changes in airway smooth muscle (ASM) area Measure Number of proliferating muscle cells Measure Number of nerve endings Measure Number of vascular sections Measure Number of infiltrating inflammatory cells in the biopsies Measure Number of inflammatory cells in the BAL Measure Proportion of eosinophils expressing MBP/IL3R Measure Interferon-gamma concentration Measure IL-13 concentration Measure Periostin concentration Measure IL-17A concentration Measure IL-22 concentration Measure IL-33 concentration Measure Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin (TSLP) concentration Measure Fibronectin concentration Measure Tenascin concentration Measure Fibulin-1 concentration Measure Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (CCL/MCP-1) concentration Measure EGF concentration Measure bFGF concentration Measure PDGF-BB concentration Measure Total score at Asthma Control Test Measure Global evaluation of mepolizumab benefit Measure Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) Measure Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) Measure Forced expiratory volume/Vital capacity (FEV1/VC) Measure Residual volume (RV) Measure Proportion of patients with pre-bronchodilator FEV1 greater than 80% Measure Proportion of patients with an increase from baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 greater than 20%
Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 0, 6 and 12 months Time Frame 6 and 12 months Time Frame 6 and 12 months
Description Measured during lung function test, pre/post salbutamol, expressed in % of predicted value. Description Measured during lung function test, pre/post salbutamol, expressed in ml. Description Measured during lung function test, pre/post salbutamol, expressed in ml. Description The absolute variation in RBM thickening (µm, morphometry measurement on bronchial biopsies) over 12 months is defined as the difference between month twelve and baseline (V1).

The absolute variation in RBM thickening over 6 months is defined as the difference between month six and baseline (V1).

Description Measured in morphometry in µm2 and expressed as a percentage of smooth muscle surface area relative to the biopsy surface.

The absolute variation in ASM area over 12 months is defined as the difference between month twelve and baseline (V1).

The absolute variation in ASM area over 6 months is defined as the difference between month six and baseline (V1).

Description Evaluated by anti proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) antibodies, expressed as the number of positive cells per muscle surface. Description Evaluated by PGP9 and expressed as number of positive cells per biopsy surface in mm2 Description Measured with an anti-CD31 antibody, expressed in number of sections per mm2. Description Number of infiltrating inflammatory cells (infiltrating neutrophils, lymphocytes and eosinophils) expressed as number of positive cells per biopsy surface in mm2 Description Number of inflammatory cells (neutrophils, lymphocytes and eosinophils) expressed as % of total cells in the BAL Description Measured on bronchial biopsies, expressed as number of cells per biopsy surface in mm2 Description Interferon-gamma (Th1 cytokine) will be measured in BAL and serum Description IL-13 (Th2 cytokine) will be measured in BAL and serum Description Periostin (Th2 cytokine) will be measured in BAL and serum Description IL-17A (Th17 cytokine) will be measured in BAL and serum Description IL-22 (Th17 cytokine) will be measured in BAL and serum Description IL-33 (innate immune cytokines) will be measured in BAL and serum Description TSLP (innate immune cytokines) will be measured in BAL and serum Description Fibronectin (soluble hallmarks of ECM remodeling) will be measured in BAL and serum Description Tenascin (soluble hallmarks of ECM remodeling) will be measured in BAL and serum Description Fibulin-1 (soluble hallmarks of ECM remodeling) will be measured in BAL and serum Description Will be measured in BAL and serum Description Will be measured in BAL and serum Description Will be measured in BAL and serum Description Will be measured in BAL and serum Description Measured using the Asthma Control Test (ACT) scale (range: 5 to 25). ACT assesses the frequency of shortness of breath and general asthma symptoms, use of rescue medications, the effect of asthma on daily functioning, and overall self-assessment of asthma control.

5 items, with 4-week recall (on symptoms and daily functioning)
each item is evaluated by a 5-point scale (for symptoms and activities: 1=all the time to 5= not at all; for asthma control rating: 1=not controlled at all to 5=completely controlled).

The total score ranges from 5 (poor control of asthma) to 25 (complete control of asthma), with higher scores reflecting greater asthma control. An ACT score >19 indicates well-controlled asthma.

Description Benefit of mepolizumab will be evaluated by patient and by physician according to the physician's Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE).

Patients will be considered as "responders" if classified as "excellent response" or "good response" by their physician.

Description Measured during lung function test, pre/post salbutamol, expressed in ml. Description Measured during lung function test, pre/post salbutamol, expressed in % of predicted value. Description Measured during lung function test, pre/post salbutamol, expressed in % Description Measured during lung function test, pre/post salbutamol, expressed in % of predicted value. Description In order to assess functional response to treatment Description In order to assess functional response to treatment

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193495134 Sequence: 193495135 Sequence: 193495136 Sequence: 193495137 Sequence: 193495138 Sequence: 193495139 Sequence: 193495140 Sequence: 193495141 Sequence: 193495142 Sequence: 193495143 Sequence: 193495144
Mesh Term Asthma Mesh Term Airway Remodeling Mesh Term Bronchial Diseases Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases Mesh Term Lung Diseases, Obstructive Mesh Term Lung Diseases Mesh Term Respiratory Hypersensitivity Mesh Term Hypersensitivity, Immediate Mesh Term Hypersensitivity Mesh Term Immune System Diseases Mesh Term Pathological Conditions, Anatomical
Downcase Mesh Term asthma Downcase Mesh Term airway remodeling Downcase Mesh Term bronchial diseases Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases, obstructive Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases Downcase Mesh Term respiratory hypersensitivity Downcase Mesh Term hypersensitivity, immediate Downcase Mesh Term hypersensitivity Downcase Mesh Term immune system diseases Downcase Mesh Term pathological conditions, anatomical
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48321189 Sequence: 48321190 Sequence: 48321191
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris Name GlaxoSmithKline Name Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29286432
Role Principal Investigator
Name Camille TAILLE, MD, PhD
Affiliation Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30766568
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Patients with severe uncontrolled eosinophil asthma with an indication for mepolizumab according to French recommandations (eos >300mm3 in the previous year, >2 exacerbations, despite optimal step 4-5 therapy, including daily use of steroids).
Criteria Inclusion criteria:

adult >18 years,
severe uncontrolled asthma, defined as eosinophil blood count >300/mm3 in the previous 12 months and at least 2 exacerbations in the previous 12 months or requiring oral steroids for more than half of the previous year,
indication for mepolizumab decided by an asthma specialist,
efficient contraception, for women of reproductive age

Exclusion criteria :

pregnancy,
smokers or ex smokers >10 pack/yr,
contra indication for fiberoptic bronchoscopy (allergy to xylocain, antiaggregant or anticoagulant treatment…),
contra indication for mepolizumab,
patient who previously received mepolizumab or already received mepolizumab at inclusion,
participation in another interventional trial

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253917990
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 38
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 8
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 25

Designs

Sequence: 30512730
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28879029
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Dose Escalation With Expansion Study of EMB-01 in Participants With Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797391
2018-12-13

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797391
NCT03797391https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797391?tab=tableXuemei Xiexmxie@epimab.com+86-21-61043299First-in-human, Phase I/II, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of EMB-01 in Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-26
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-31
Start Month Year December 13, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year March 14, 2025
Verification Month Year May 2023
Verification Date 2023-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-31

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20661413
Description This is a first-in-human (FIH), open-label, Phase I/II study of EMB-01, a bispecific Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and c-Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition (cMet) antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors who have progressed on available standard therapies or for which no standard therapy exists. The study consists of two parts: Phase I (dose escalation) and Phase II (cohort expansion). The study is planning to recruit tentatively 33-66 subjects with advanced/metastatic solid tumors in phase I and approximately 42-120 subjects with EGFR mutant and/or cMET aberrated NSCLC who have progressed on or are intolerant to standard treatment(s) (including platinum-based therapy) will be enrolled at the RP2D(s) in phase II part of the study. In phase II, patients will be assigned to five groups according to their molecular status at baseline. The trial will consist of molecular pre-screening period (Phase II only), clinical screening period (-28 to -1 days), treatment cycles (each cycle is 28 days, maximum up to 2 years), and safety follow-up period (30 days after the last dose).

Facilities

Sequence: 199431224 Sequence: 199431225 Sequence: 199431226 Sequence: 199431227 Sequence: 199431228
Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting
Name Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Name Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute Name Gabrail Cancer Center Research Name Guangdong General Hospital Name Shanghai Chest Hosptial
City Boston City Detroit City Canton City Guangzhou City Shanghai
State Massachusetts State Michigan State Ohio State Guang Dong State Shanghai
Zip 02215 Zip 48201 Zip 44718 Zip 510080 Zip 200030
Country United States Country United States Country United States Country China Country China

Conditions

Sequence: 52014308 Sequence: 52014309 Sequence: 52014310
Name Neoplasms Name Neoplasm Metastasis Name Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Downcase Name neoplasms Downcase Name neoplasm metastasis Downcase Name non-small-cell lung cancer

Id Information

Sequence: 40035738
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value EMB01X101

Countries

Sequence: 42431802 Sequence: 42431803
Name United States Name China
Removed False Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55420456
Group Type Experimental
Title Dose Escalation-Part 1, Expansion-Part 2
Description In part 1, escalating dose cohort, patients will receive intravenous infusions of EMB-01 weekly (QW). The duration of each treatment cycle is 28 days (4 weeks). Dose escalation will continue until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase II dose (RP2D) is reached or all planned doses are administered.

In part 2, participants will receive intravenous infusion of EMB-01 at the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) regimen(s) once weekly. The duration of each treatment cycle is 28 days (4 weeks).

Interventions

Sequence: 52326680
Intervention Type Drug
Name EMB-01
Description In part 1, patients will receive intravenous infusions of EMB01 weekly (QW). Dose escalation will continue until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase II dose (RP2D) is reached or all planned doses are administered.

In part 2, participants will receive intravenous infusion of EMB-01 at RP2D

The duration of each treatment cycle in both part 1 and part 2 is 28 days (4 weeks).

Participants may continue to receive study drug until discontinuation criteria are met.

Keywords

Sequence: 79616780 Sequence: 79616781 Sequence: 79616782 Sequence: 79616783 Sequence: 79616784 Sequence: 79616785
Name Human Bispecific antibody, Name Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), Name c-Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition (cMet), Name Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis, Name Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), First-in-human, Name EMB-01, Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Resistant
Downcase Name human bispecific antibody, Downcase Name epidermal growth factor receptor (egfr), Downcase Name c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition (cmet), Downcase Name neoplasms, neoplasm metastasis, Downcase Name non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc), first-in-human, Downcase Name emb-01, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (tki) resistant

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176831541 Sequence: 176831542 Sequence: 176831543 Sequence: 176831544 Sequence: 176831545 Sequence: 176831546 Sequence: 176831547 Sequence: 176831548 Sequence: 176831549 Sequence: 176831550 Sequence: 176831551 Sequence: 176831552 Sequence: 176831553 Sequence: 176831554 Sequence: 176831555
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other
Measure Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) (phase 1 only) Measure Adverse Events (AEs), and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Measure Overall Response Rate (ORR) (phase 2 only) Measure Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) Measure Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) Measure Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) Measure Elimination half-life (t1/2) Measure Clearance (CL) Measure Volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) Measure Accumulation Ratio (AR) Measure Dose Proportionality Measure Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Measure Duration Of Response (DOR) Measure Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Measure Pharmacodynamic (Soluble EGFR and cMET concentration)
Time Frame cycle 1 (1cycle = 28 days) Time Frame Screening up to follow-up (30 days after the last dose) Time Frame From the date fo dosing until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 48 months Time Frame Through treatment discontinuation: an average of 6 months Time Frame Through treatment discontinuation: an average of 6 months Time Frame Through treatment discontinuation: an average of 6 months Time Frame Through treatment discontinuation: an average of 6 months Time Frame Through treatment discontinuation: an average of 6 months Time Frame Through treatment discontinuation: an average of 6 months Time Frame hrough treatment discontinuation: an average of 6 months Time Frame Through treatment discontinuation: an average of 6 months Time Frame Through study completion, an average of 7 months Time Frame From the date fo dosing until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 48 months Time Frame Through treatment discontinuation: an average of 6 months Time Frame Through treatment discontinuation: an average of 6 months
Description Maximum tolerated dose Description Adverse Events, and Serious Adverse Events Description Overall Response Rate Description Maximum Serum Concentration Description Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve Description Trough Serum Concentration Description Elimination half-life Description Clearance Description volume of distribution at steady state Description Accumulation Ratio Description Dose Proportionality Description Anti-Drug Antibodies Description Duration Of Response Description Progression-free survival Description Pharmacodynamic (Soluble EGFR and cMET concentration)

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192864810 Sequence: 192864811 Sequence: 192864812 Sequence: 192864813 Sequence: 192864814 Sequence: 192864815 Sequence: 192864816 Sequence: 192864817 Sequence: 192864818 Sequence: 192864819 Sequence: 192864820 Sequence: 192864821 Sequence: 192864822
Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung Mesh Term Neoplasm Metastasis Mesh Term Lung Neoplasms Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Neoplasms Mesh Term Thoracic Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Lung Diseases Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases Mesh Term Carcinoma, Bronchogenic Mesh Term Bronchial Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplastic Processes Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term carcinoma, non-small-cell lung Downcase Mesh Term neoplasm metastasis Downcase Mesh Term lung neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term thoracic neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases Downcase Mesh Term carcinoma, bronchogenic Downcase Mesh Term bronchial neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplastic processes Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48172882 Sequence: 48172883
Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Shanghai EpimAb Biotherapeutics Co., Ltd. Name Covance

Central Contacts

Sequence: 11973960 Sequence: 11973961
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Xiaodong Sun, MD Name Xuemei Xie
Phone +86-21-61043299 Phone +86-21-61043299
Email xdsun@epimab.com Email xmxie@epimab.com
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67938917
Design Group Id 55420456
Intervention Id 52326680

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30673422
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Molecular Pre-screening Inclusion criteria (Phase II only)

The patient must sign the molecular pre-screening Inform Consent to allow for the molecular pre-screening process. All patients must have documented evidence of EGFR and/or cMet aberrations.

Screening Inclusion Criteria

Able to understand and willing to sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF).

Histologically/cytologically confirmed advanced/metastatic solid tumors with measurable disease [Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1]:

Phase I: advanced/metastatic solid tumors including but not limited to NSCLC, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer and liver cancer refractory to standard therapy or for which no standard therapy is available or accessible.

Phase II: Advanced/metastatic NSCLC Patients have confirmed EGFR mutant and/or cMET aberration, and have progressed after standard treatment (including platinum-based therapy) or are intolerant to standard treatment. Additionally, patients with T790M mutation have received FDA/Health Authority approved therapies (if accessible) for this indication (i.e., osimertinib) and have progressed or became intolerant.

A patient who has refused all currently available therapy is allowed to enroll, but must be documented in the source record.

Must have adequate organ function.

Regarding prior anti-tumor therapy:

Must have stopped treatment at least 4 weeks or within 5 half-lives.
Generalized radiation therapy must have stopped 3 weeks before first dose of EMB 01, or local radiotherapy or radiation therapy for bone metastases must have stopped 2 weeks before first dose of EMB-01. No therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals are taken within 8 weeks before first dose of EMB-01.
Patients must have recovered to ≤Grade 1 from the adverse effects of such above treatment before beginning study treatment.
Female patient with fertility or male patient whose partner has fertility should use one or more contraceptive methods for contraception starting from screening period and continue throughout the study treatment and for 3 months.
ECOG score 0 or 1 for phase I, and ≤2 for phase II.

Exclusion Criteria:

Molecular Pre-screening Exclusion Criteria (Phase II only)

Subject who meets any of the follow criteria can't be proceeded to clinical screening:

Patients who are unwilling to sign the molecular pre-screening ICF.
Patients for whom local EGFR and/or cMET data or the results of central laboratory testing do not meet the molecular pre-screening inclusion criteria.

Screening Exclusion Criteria

Life expectancy < 3 months.
Subject with primacy central nervous system (CNS) malignancy or symptomatic CNS (leptomeningeal or brain) metastases.
Pregnant or nursing females.
Subjects who have had major surgery within 28 days prior to screening.
Serious underlying medical conditions, including but not limited to un-controlled hypertension, other cardiovascular disease or diabetes, ongoing or active infection, psychiatric, psychological, familial or geographical condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, may interfere the compliance with study treatment.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253859444
Number Of Facilities 5
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 3
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 11
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30420189
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Sequential Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description Dose escalation followed by Protocol at 100mg, 200mg, 350mg, 500mg, 700mg, 900mg, 1200mg, 1600mg, 2100mg, 2700mg and 3000mg .

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26586999
Intervention Id 52326680
Name FIT-013a

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28786708
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Movement-2-Music: Lakeshore Examination of Activity, Disability, and Exercise Response Study ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797378
2019-08-09

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797378
NCT03797378https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797378?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this study is to test the effects of an innovative exercise program referred to as movement-2-music (M2M) on health and fitness outcomes in adults with physical/mobility disabilities. One hundred and eight participants with physical/mobility disabilities will be recruited and randomly enrolled into one of two groups: a) M2M or b) waitlist control. The primary aim of this study is to determine the effects of a 12-week M2M program on health and fitness in participants with physical/mobility disabilities who are in one of three functional mobility groups: 1) Group I – only able to exercise while sitting, 2) Group II – able to exercise sitting and standing with/without support, and 3) Group III – able to exercise one side of the body more than the other side. The second aim is to compare the observed effects of the program in this study to a previous M2M study that groups participants based on disability type. The third aim of this study is to test whether adherence (defined as attendance to the 12-week program) affects the effects of M2M in participants with physical/mobility disabilities. The potential influences of different functional mobility and disabilities of participants on how the program affects participants’ health and fitness outcomes will also be tested.

**In response to COVID-19, the 12-week M2M intervention and all assessments have been modified from being delivered in-person at Lakeshore Foundation to being delivered remotely in real-time through videoconferencing technology.**
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-11-13
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-31
Start Month Year August 9, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year May 25, 2023
Verification Month Year May 2023
Verification Date 2023-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-31

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20668028
Description The proposed intervention efficacy trial examines a remotely-delivered, rhythmic-based movement-2-music (eM2M) intervention with 108 adults with physical/mobility disabilities who are randomized into one of two groups: a) eM2M or b) waitlist control. The primary aim is to determine the effects of a 12-week eM2M intervention on physical and psychosocial health outcomes in participants with physical/mobility disabilities who are classified into three functional mobility groups: 1) Group I – only able to exercise while sitting, 2) Group II – able to exercise sitting and standing with/without support, and 3) Group III – able to exercise one side of the body more than the other side. The secondary aim is to compare effect sizes of the physical health outcomes including cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength and lower extremity function obtained in the current study to a previous M2M trial that grouped participants based on disability type. The tertiary aim of this study is to explore whether adherence (defined in terms of attendance to the 12-week intervention) moderates effects of eM2M in participants with physical/mobility disabilities. The heterogeneity of treatment effect across the physical health outcomes will also be examined using functional mobility and disability groups as moderators.

Participants will complete a set of assessments at baseline and after the 12-week intervention period remotely through videoconferencing technology. They will also be asked to complete the questionnaire portion of the assessments every 6 months and the entire set of assessments every year for up to 5 years. The assessments include cardiorespiratory fitness measured using a heart rate recovery test, grip strength measured using hand-held dynamometer, lower extremity function measured using the Short Physical Performance Battery and the Timed Up and Go test as well as questionnaires that assess health-related quality of life (NIH PROMIS 10 Global Health Items, NIH PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities), physical activity (Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire), exercise self-efficacy (Exercise Self-efficacy Scale), exercise goal-setting (Exercise Goal-setting Scale), outcome expectation for exercise (Multidimensional Outcomes Expectations for Exercise Scale), social support (Social Provision Scale) and barriers in physical activity (Barriers in Physical Activity Questionnaire). In addition, at the end of the 12-week intervention, participants will be interviewed about their study experience and perceived impact of eM2M on their fitness and health.

Facilities

Sequence: 199504795
Name UAB Research Collaborative
City Birmingham
State Alabama
Zip 35209
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52031128 Sequence: 52031129 Sequence: 52031130 Sequence: 52031131 Sequence: 52031132 Sequence: 52031133 Sequence: 52031134
Name Spinal Cord Injuries Name Traumatic Brain Injury Name Spina Bifida Name Cerebral Palsy Name Stroke Name Parkinson Disease Name Multiple Sclerosis
Downcase Name spinal cord injuries Downcase Name traumatic brain injury Downcase Name spina bifida Downcase Name cerebral palsy Downcase Name stroke Downcase Name parkinson disease Downcase Name multiple sclerosis

Id Information

Sequence: 40048716
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value IRB-300002645

Countries

Sequence: 42446383
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55439073 Sequence: 55439074
Group Type Experimental Group Type No Intervention
Title eM2M Title Waitlist Control
Description Participants in the eM2M arm will participate in an intervention that involves three 60-minute M2M sessions per week for 12 weeks. All sessions are delivered remotely in real-time through videoconferencing technology. At the beginning and end of each session, vital signs (heart rate, blood pressure and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation) are obtained from participants. Participants rate perceived exertion, pain, and fatigue level on a log. Participants set weekly exercise goals and expectations at first session of each week. Participants also record daily activities using a provided log. Description Participants in the waitlist control arm are instructed to maintain their usual activities during the 12-week intervention period and are asked to record their activities on a provided log.

Interventions

Sequence: 52343361
Intervention Type Other
Name eM2M
Description The eM2M intervention involves three 60-minute sessions per week for 12 weeks. All sessions are delivered remotely in real-time through videoconferencing technology. The intervention uses combinations of movement patterns that target range of motion, muscle strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, balance, and breathing. Each session consists of movement routines choreographed to music, and every routine can be adapted to participants' functional ability.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176894286 Sequence: 176894287 Sequence: 176894288 Sequence: 176894289 Sequence: 176894290 Sequence: 176894291 Sequence: 176894292 Sequence: 176894293 Sequence: 176894294 Sequence: 176894295 Sequence: 176894296 Sequence: 176894297
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Change from baseline cardiorespiratory fitness at 3 months Measure Change from baseline muscle strength at 3 months Measure Change from baseline lower extremity function at 3 months Measure Change from baseline lower extremity function at 3 months Measure Change from baseline health-related quality of life at 3 months Measure Change from baseline social participation at 3 months Measure Change from baseline physical activity at 3 months Measure Change from baseline barriers in physical activity at 3 months Measure Change from baseline exercise self-efficacy at 3 months Measure Change from baseline exercise goal-setting at 3 months Measure Change from baseline outcome expectations for exercise at 3 months Measure Change from baseline social support at 3 months
Time Frame Baseline and post 12-week intervention Time Frame Baseline and post 12-week intervention Time Frame Baseline and post 12-week intervention Time Frame Baseline and post 12-week intervention Time Frame Baseline and post 12-week intervention Time Frame Baseline and post 12-week intervention Time Frame Baseline and post 12-week intervention Time Frame Baseline and post 12-week intervention Time Frame Baseline and post 12-week intervention Time Frame Baseline and post 12-week intervention Time Frame Baseline and post 12-week intervention Time Frame Baseline and post 12-week intervention
Description The cardiorespiratory fitness is measured using a heart rate recovery test Description Muscle strength is measured with grip strength using a hand-held dynamometer. Description Lower extremity function is assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Description Lower extremity function will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Description Health-related quality of life is measured using the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 Health Items. The instrument is a 10-item measure with the response scores ranging from 1 (very severe) to 5 (none). Two summary scores, a global physical health score and a global mental health score, can be calculated from this scale, with each score ranging from 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate better health. The total raw score is translated into a T-score for each participant for analysis. Description Social participation is measured using the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities. The instrument is a 8-item measure with the response scores ranging from 1 (always) to 5 (never). The lowest possible total raw score is 8 and the highest possible score is 40. Higher scores indicate better ability to participate in social roles and activities. The total raw score is translated into a T-score for each participant for analysis. Description Physical activity is measured using the Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire. The questionnaire contains two questions. The first question asks participants to report weekly frequencies of activities they perform at different intensities. A total weekly leisure activity is a sum of activity scores calculated by multiplying the weekly frequencies of strenuous, moderate, and light activities by 9, 5, and 3, respectively. The second question asks participants the frequency of weekly leisure-time activities performed that are long enough to work up a sweat. Description Barriers in physical activity will be assessed using the Barriers in Physical Activity Questionnaire. The instrument contains 43 items. Each item is responded with either no (1) or yes (2). If response is yes, a follow-up response that ranges from 1 (very small) to 5 (very large) is selected. There are 8 domains, which include personal health, attitudes/beliefs towards physical activity, friends, family, fitness center built environment, policy/programs/staff, community built environment, and safety. Each domain score is calculated by summing the item responses with its respective item weight. Higher domain scores indicate greater perceived barriers to physical activity. Description Exercise self-efficacy will be assessed using the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale. The scale contains 8 items, with response options of each item ranging from 0% (not at all confident) to 100% (highly confident). All items are summed and a mean score is calculated. Higher scores indicate higher levels of self-efficacy. Description Exercise goal-setting will be measured using the Exercise Goal-Setting Scale. The instrument contains 10 items with response options ranging from 1 (does not describe) to 5 (describes completely). A mean score is calculated. A higher mean score indicate better goal-setting and self-monitoring for exercise. Description Outcome expectations for exercise will be assessed using the Multidimensional Outcome Expectations for Exercise Scale. The instrument contains 15 items, with the response options ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Three domains of outcome expectations for exercise are assessed, which include physical outcome expectations (6 items), social outcome expectations (4 items), and self-evaluative outcome expectations (5 items). Each dimension is scored by summing the item responses. Higher scores indicate higher levels of outcome expectations for exercise. Description Social support will be assessed using the Social Provision Scale. The instrument contains 24 items, with the response options ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). A total score is calculated by summing scores from all items. A higher score indicates a greater degree of perceived support.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192930142 Sequence: 192930135 Sequence: 192930136 Sequence: 192930137 Sequence: 192930138 Sequence: 192930139 Sequence: 192930140 Sequence: 192930141 Sequence: 192930143 Sequence: 192930144 Sequence: 192930145 Sequence: 192930146 Sequence: 192930147 Sequence: 192930148 Sequence: 192930149 Sequence: 192930150 Sequence: 192930151 Sequence: 192930152 Sequence: 192930153 Sequence: 192930154 Sequence: 192930155 Sequence: 192930156 Sequence: 192930157 Sequence: 192930158 Sequence: 192930159 Sequence: 192930160 Sequence: 192930161 Sequence: 192930162
Mesh Term Wounds and Injuries Mesh Term Parkinson Disease Mesh Term Multiple Sclerosis Mesh Term Brain Injuries Mesh Term Spinal Cord Injuries Mesh Term Cerebral Palsy Mesh Term Brain Injuries, Traumatic Mesh Term Spinal Dysraphism Mesh Term Parkinsonian Disorders Mesh Term Basal Ganglia Diseases Mesh Term Brain Diseases Mesh Term Central Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Movement Disorders Mesh Term Synucleinopathies Mesh Term Neurodegenerative Diseases Mesh Term Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS Mesh Term Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System Mesh Term Demyelinating Diseases Mesh Term Autoimmune Diseases Mesh Term Immune System Diseases Mesh Term Craniocerebral Trauma Mesh Term Trauma, Nervous System Mesh Term Spinal Cord Diseases Mesh Term Brain Damage, Chronic Mesh Term Neural Tube Defects Mesh Term Nervous System Malformations Mesh Term Congenital Abnormalities
Downcase Mesh Term wounds and injuries Downcase Mesh Term parkinson disease Downcase Mesh Term multiple sclerosis Downcase Mesh Term brain injuries Downcase Mesh Term spinal cord injuries Downcase Mesh Term cerebral palsy Downcase Mesh Term brain injuries, traumatic Downcase Mesh Term spinal dysraphism Downcase Mesh Term parkinsonian disorders Downcase Mesh Term basal ganglia diseases Downcase Mesh Term brain diseases Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term movement disorders Downcase Mesh Term synucleinopathies Downcase Mesh Term neurodegenerative diseases Downcase Mesh Term demyelinating autoimmune diseases, cns Downcase Mesh Term autoimmune diseases of the nervous system Downcase Mesh Term demyelinating diseases Downcase Mesh Term autoimmune diseases Downcase Mesh Term immune system diseases Downcase Mesh Term craniocerebral trauma Downcase Mesh Term trauma, nervous system Downcase Mesh Term spinal cord diseases Downcase Mesh Term brain damage, chronic Downcase Mesh Term neural tube defects Downcase Mesh Term nervous system malformations Downcase Mesh Term congenital abnormalities
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48188563 Sequence: 48188564 Sequence: 48188565
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class UNKNOWN
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University of Alabama at Birmingham Name Lakeshore Foundation Name YMCA of Greater Birmingham

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67962284
Design Group Id 55439073
Intervention Id 52343361

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30683168
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 70 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Primary diagnosis of head injury, stroke, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, spina bifida, Parkinson disease, cerebral palsy by a physician
Able to use upper limbs and/or lower limbs to exercise and follow instructions
Physician clearance to participate
Willing to participate in an exercise program three times per week
Conversant in and reads English

Exclusion Criteria:

Participate in an exercise intervention or a similar intervention in the last 6 months
Current smoker or recently quit less than 6 months prior
Cognitive impairment (Folstein's Mini-Mental State Exam score <24)
Presence of active pressure ulcer
Any contraindications to exercise based on the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) guidelines
Visual acuity that prevents following a group exercise class
Significant hearing impairment impeding ability to hear music to engage in exercise

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253885473
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 46
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 70
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 5
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 5

Designs

Sequence: 30429896
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28796401
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name James Rimmer
Title Lakeshore Foundation Endowed Chair in Health Promotion and Rehabilitation Sciences
Affiliation University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study References

Sequence: 51920421
Pmid 34743701
Reference Type derived
Citation Young HJ, Lai B, Mehta T, Thirumalai M, Wilroy J, Yates A, Kane B, Rimmer JH. The movement-to-music (M2M) study: study protocol for a randomized controlled efficacy trial examining a rhythmic teleexercise intervention for people with physical disabilities. Trials. 2021 Nov 7;22(1):779. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05751-2.

Ipd Information Types

Sequence: 3325526 Sequence: 3325527
Name Study Protocol Name Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

]]>

<![CDATA[ French Study to Evaluate the Impact of a Cognitive Therapy on Urinary Incontinent Women of All Age’s Perineal Settings. ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797365
2019-01-10

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797365
NCT03797365https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797365?tab=tablePierre-André MAL, residentmalpierreandre@gmail.com+33659363500This trial is a pathophysiological study evaluating the impact of a cognitive therapy on the perineal neuromuscular mechanisms in women patients with urinary incontinence.

Some research works have been realized on the impact of a cognitive load test (CLT) on the neuromuscular continence urinary mechanisms. It had been demonstrated that a CLT induced an increase in the latency of voluntary perineal contraction. It had also been demonstrated that a CLT had an influence on the involuntary perineal contraction pre-activation. Most recently, the impact of a cognitive therapy on the perineal neuromuscular mechanisms on healthy participants had been evaluated. It demonstrated that a cognitive therapy inhibited the impact of the CLT on the perineal neuromuscular mechanisms.

The present project is about the evaluation of the interest of a cognitive therapy on the neuromuscular mechanisms in case of attentional test in a urinary incontinent women population. It could conduce to new therapeutic leads for the management of urinary incontinence.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-10
Start Month Year January 10, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year July 2019
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-10

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735962
Description Objectives and results expected

Cognition seems to have an effect on the physiological mechanisms of urinary continence. Urinary continence is, among others, the effect of a good coordination between detrusor's contraction and pelvic floor muscles' contraction. A cognitive disturbance involves coordination's disturbance. It has already been demonstrated that a double task rehabilitation (between cognition and perineal muscles) could annihilate the effects induced by a cognitive disturbance on the physiological neuromuscular mechanisms of the urinary incontinence. The objective of this study is to evaluate the benefit of a double task cognitive rehabilitation for the patients with urinary incontinence (UI).

Current knowledge situation

Pelvic floor muscles have a major incidence for the physiological urinary continence. Even if the external anal sphincter (EAS)'s muscles are not directly involved in urinary incontinence, many studies have shown they had a synergistic contraction with levator ani muscles during the voluntary and involuntary perineal contraction . Because they are easily reachable for an electromyographic (EMG) recording, many authors have registered these muscles in order to investigate the physiologic urinary continence. Amarenco et al. had shown that pelvic floor muscles' intensity of contraction in response to a cough fit was proportional to the cough intensity in an healthy volunteers population. This correlation was beyond bladder's filling. For the patients with UI, Deffieux et al. shown a loss of correlation between cough intensity and perineal contraction. Deffieux et al. also analyzed the temporal sequence of muscle activation for the EAS during a cough fit. A perineal pre contraction in an healthy volunteers population was observed. EAS's muscles EMG activation began 210 ms (median) before external intercostal (EIC) muscles. This EAS's muscles anticipation of contraction was not found in the group of patients with UI. The observation that fewer patients were activating their AES's muscles, more the modulation of EAS's muscles contraction was distorted when coughing was made. Thubert et al. observed that the perineal contraction's latency was multiplied by 4 in case of cognitive load test (CLT) in an healthy volunteers population. CLT leads to an EAS's muscles pre activation in case of coughing effort, was also observed. A lowing of 29% of AES's muscles pre activation has been demonstrated. These results suggest that cognition is involved in urinary continence's physiological mechanisms. So it seamed to be interesting to study the impact of a double task rehabilitation (cognitive and muscular) on the urinary continence's neuromuscular mechanisms in case of diversion of attention. It was a randomized trial including two groups of healthy volunteers: one group had double task rehabilitation during 15 days, the other had no rehabilitation. After 15 days rehabilitation, in the rehabilitation's group, the attention deficit's correction restored the resistive abilities of UI in case of attention hijacking.

According to the last AFU's (Association Française d'Urologie – Urology French Association) and CNGOF's (Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français – French Gynecologists and Obstetricians National College) recommendations, the first intention treatment of urinary incontinence is pelvi-perineal rehabilitation. Pelvi-perineal rehabilitation conducted by a therapist is multimodal with different facets: a cognitive part (education, pelvic floor realization), a behavioral part of bladder training (modification of micturition habits), a muscle building part (voluntary contractions against resistance with and without biofeedback and electrosimulation), and also a postural work part (balance and pelvis position). Perineal rehabilitation technics' heterogeneity and the lack of description of these technics let the professionals adapt their rehabilitation's protocols. The objective of this study is to compare the results of two rehabilitation's technics in urinary incontinent patients.

Methodology, study population, previous studies and feasibility

Study population: The population is made of voluntary incontinent women. Inclusion criteria are the followings: Major women with stress urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence or urge urinary incontinence, in need to benefit from perineal rehabilitation or cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation, women able to read, understand, accept and sign the consent. Exclusion criteria are the following: pregnant women, refusal to participate, dementia and cognitive troubles (Mini Mental State score: MMS <30). Participants will be subjects to a medical statement (antecedents, age, weight, size, UDI6 (Urogenital Distress Inventory) questioner, Contilife and Wexner scores). The absence of a mental deficit will be verifies by Mini Mental Status questioner (MMS).

Ethical considerations: A "CPP" (comité de protection des personnes – persons' protection comity) have been requested and obtained for this study (N° cpp17-065a/2016-A01651-50). An information letter will be delivered to the volunteers, who will be included only after the acceptation and signature of the written consent.

Volunteers' randomization: Participants will be randomized in two groups (1/1) with data processing software at the first visit at the therapist practicing the perineal rehabilitation. The first group will receive "Classical" perineal rehabilitation for duration of height weeks. The second group will receive perineal rehabilitation associated with a double task cognitive therapy for a duration of height weeks. Participants will be evaluated during the consultation.

Initial evaluation of volunteers: initial evaluation will consist of an interrogation able to check the participants' antecedents and characteristics, urinary incontinence symptoms (quality life score (Contilife) and severity score (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form: ICIQ-SF), Urinary Handicap Measurement (MHU – Mesure du Handicap Urinaire) and also clinical examination (Pelvic Organ Prolaps Quantification: POP-Q, Ulmsten Test, levator Testing among Oxford, ureteral mobility). In a second time, the EMG analysis will be realized. It consists in the analysis of the CLT impact on the voluntary and unvoluntary perineal contraction. The CLT used is Paced Auditory Serial addition Test (PASAT). Test arrangements are the followings: The volunteer will listen to an audiotape on witch is recorded a 61 random numbers set inconstant from 1 to 9 (for example "1, 9, 4, 5…"). The volunteer patient will have to add each pair of number in order to add the number with the previous and speak verbally the response. To test the willingly perineal contraction, the volunteer will be in a sitting position with her arms on the armrests. The practitioner will position the two electrodes with self-adhesive surface from either side of the volunteer's anus regarding to the EAS muscle. These electrodes are usually used in a setting of classical evaluation with biofeedback or electro simulation. An order will be given to the volunteer in order to contract perineal muscles when she feels a stimulus on the left wrist (an electric reflex hammer regarding to the median nerve on the inside of the left wrist). The volunteer women will have to repeat the experience in two conditions: with and without the CLT. Different settings measurement will be realized: time limit for the perineal contraction reaction (RT), that is latency between stimulus and begins of AES's EMG activity increase. The other settings will be the RT max (latency between stimulus and maximum AES's EMG activity), maximum AES's EMG activity and air under the curve for the AES's EMG activity. Volunteer's perineal contraction (following coughing instruction) will also be evaluated with and without CLT. The coughing instruction will be ordered by an impulse (Reflex hammer) on the inside of the left wrist. Two more self-adhesive detection electrodes will be glued regarding the external intercostal muscles (7th right space). Principal data analyzed will be: latency between stimulus and perineal muscles (RT1) and latency between intercostal muscles and perineal muscles (RT3). The data set will be collected using a Biopac ®, Acknowledge ®.

Classical perineal rehabilitation protocol

Participants will benefit from two-phases perineal rehabilitation: first phase pelvic floor muscles (PFM)'s analytic rehabilitation, then a functional rehabilitation.

First phase will include the PFM's awareness and voluntary contraction learning with manual, biofeedback technics and functional electro stimulation (FES). Then, therapist will propose PFM's reinforcement under the PERFECT method (Pressure, Endurance, rapid Contraction, time measurement between each contraction sequence). These exercises will call out the manual rehabilitation technics (voluntary contraction learning, pelvic anatomy), biofeedback and electro stimulation. Electro stimulation and biofeedback will necessit the use of an electrode that serves to the electromyographic measurement with and without cognitive load test. Each classical rehabilitation session will take 30 minutes with 20 minutes of active working, twice per week. About the self-training, there will be no consensus for optimal homemade exercises, neither on the number, nor on the duration. The different authors describe very different types of protocols. The self-training program will be set up as soon as the participant will be able to realize, under therapist's manual control, a voluntary analytic contraction without synergy or command reversion. Exercises' number and characteristic will be given according to the PERFECT Scheme.

For the second phase, the participant will hold a micturition calendar. With the noticed elements, a behavior analyze will be summarized in order to update the favoring situations and inappropriate situations. The objective will be the learning of perineal locking and reinstatement of anticipative postural activity for stress urinary incontinence. The strategy put in place will be organized in unlearning of deleterious perineal habits and learning new behavior program. The functional training program will be made of activation of PFM's voluntary contractions during different stains of every day life; the main goal being the perineal locking set up (PFM's voluntary contraction associated with a good abdominal and perineal synergy), this locking must be systematic before and during efforts like carrying loads, trimming, coughing. During the second phase, the physiotherapist will twice weekly perform evaluations. These evaluations are similar to those in the first phase.

Cognitive associated rehabilitation protocol: Added to the classic perineal muscular rehabilitation, the cognitive associated rehabilitation group randomized participants will have to execute twice a day the rehabilitation protocol. Each cognitive rehabilitation session will take three minutes. Participants will have to synergistically execute attentional tests (N-Back Test) and execute a perineal contraction during the contraction instructions. (10 randomized auditory stimuli in three minutes). The attentional tests' difficulty will be gradually increased each 15 days. N-Back Test modalities are the followings: the participant will visualize a series of random numbers. First difficulty step will be to click the dedicated button when the volunteer will see the indicated letter. The second difficulty step will be to click the dedicated button when she will see two consecutives times the same letter. The third difficulty step will be to click the dedicated button when she will see two times the same letter separated by one different letter, and so on… The data will be saved on the digital application.

Methodology: Participants will consult twice per week their therapist. An intermediary clinical and EMG recording will be done in the fourth week to evaluate the evolution of symptoms and EMG's criteria, with the same arrangements as those of the first evaluation.

Participants' final evaluation: During the last visit in the eighth week, participants will be evaluated with same arrangements as those of the first evaluation.

Judgment criteria: About the involuntary perineal contraction study, the principal judgment criteria will be the latency between intercostal muscles contraction and perineal muscles contraction (RT3). Secondary judgment criteria will be: latency between stimulus and perineal muscles contraction (RT1) for the voluntary perineal contraction study, MHU score obtained (Mesure du Handicap Urinaire – urinary handicap score), ICIQ (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire), Contilife.

Statistic analysis:

Descriptive data will be expressed in the form of median and interquartile gap. The Wilcoxon Test will be used to compare quantitative values before and after rehabilitation, and Student Test to compare quantitative values between "classical perineal rehabilitation" group and "perineal rehabilitation + cognitive therapy" group. According to the literature, middle RT3 is -60ms, expected difference after rehabilitation is 16,66ms and known standard deviation is 18,7ms. For an alpha risk 5% and power 80%, it is necessary to include 20 participants by group, whether total of 40 participants.

Conditions

Sequence: 52208565 Sequence: 52208566
Name Urinary Incontinence, Stress Name Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Downcase Name urinary incontinence, stress Downcase Name urinary incontinence, urge

Id Information

Sequence: 40186480
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value cpp17-065a/2016-A01651-50

Design Groups

Sequence: 55635177 Sequence: 55635178
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Experimental
Title Classical rehabilitation Title Classical and cognitive associated rehabilitation
Description Twenty women will benefit from two-phases perineal rehabilitation: first phase pelvic floor muscles (PFM)'s analytic rehabilitation, then a functional rehabilitation. Description Twenty women will receive, added to the classic perineal rehabilitation, the cognitive rehabilitation and will have to execute twice a day the rehabilitation protocol.

Interventions

Sequence: 52522510 Sequence: 52522511
Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Classical rehabilitation Name Cognitive associated rehabilitation
Description Participants will benefit from two-phases perineal rehabilitation:

First phase will include the PFM's awareness and voluntary contraction learning with manual, biofeedback technics and functional electro stimulation. These exercises will call out the manual rehabilitation technics, biofeedback and electro stimulation. Each classical rehabilitation session will take 30 minutes with 20 minutes of active working, twice per week. About the self-training, there will be no consensus for optimal homemade exercises.

For the second phase, a behavior analyze will be summarized in order to update the favoring and inappropriate situations. The strategy put in place will be organized in unlearning of deleterious perineal habits and learning new behavior program. The main goal will be the perineal locking set up, which must be systematic before and during efforts. During this phase, the physiotherapist will twice weekly perform evaluations (similar to those in the first phase)

Description The cognitive associated rehabilitation group randomized participants will have to execute twice a day the rehabilitation protocol. Each cognitive rehabilitation session will take three minutes. Participants will have to synergistically execute attentional tests (N-Back Test) and execute a perineal contraction during the contraction instructions. (10 randomized auditory stimuli in three minutes). The attentional tests' difficulty will be gradually increased each 15 days. N-Back Test modalities are the followings: the participant will visualize a series of random numbers. First difficulty step will be to click the dedicated button when the volunteer will see the indicated letter. The second difficulty step will be to click the dedicated button when she will see two consecutives times the same letter. The third difficulty step will be to click the dedicated button when she will see two times the same letter separated by one different letter, and so on…

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177512962 Sequence: 177512963 Sequence: 177512964 Sequence: 177512965 Sequence: 177512966 Sequence: 177512967
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure RT3 – EMG Latency between intercostal muscles contraction and perineal muscles contraction Measure RT3 – EMG Latency between intercostal muscles contraction and perineal muscles Measure RT1 – EMG Latency between stimulus and perineal muscles contraction Measure Urinary Handicap Measurement (Mesure du Handicap Urinaire – MHU) Measure International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-SF) Measure Questionnaire for assessment of quality of life related to women urinary incontinence (Contilife)
Time Frame Final evaluation at the eighth week follow up Time Frame Intermediary evaluation at the fourth week follow up Time Frame Intermediary evaluation at the fourth week follow up, and final evaluation at the eighth week follow up Time Frame Intermediary evaluation at the fourth week follow up, and final evaluation at the eighth week follow up Time Frame Intermediary evaluation at the fourth week follow up, and final evaluation at the eighth week follow up Time Frame Intermediary evaluation at the fourth week follow up, and final evaluation at the eighth week follow up
Description EMG Latency between intercostal muscles contraction and perineal muscles contraction Description EMG Latency between intercostal muscles contraction and perineal muscles contraction Description EMG Latency between stimulus and perineal muscles contraction Description Urinary Handicap Measurement is a quantitative measurement of different urinary symptoms, with 7 different questions, each response is associated to a value from 0 to 4, and with a final score from 0 (lowest score, no symptoms of urinary incontinence) to 28 (Higher score, maximum urinary incontinence symptoms). Description The ICIQ SF is a subjective measurement of severity of urinary loss and quality of life for those with urinary incontinence. It has 4 main items (of 6 total) ask for rating of symptoms in the past 4 weeks. The actual score takes sum score of items 3+4+5 (items 1 and 2 are demographic). The final item (6) is self diagnostic item that is unscored.

Final score is from 0 (lowest score, no symptoms of urinary incontinence), to 21 (Higher score, maximum urinary incontinence symptoms).

Description Auto survey of 28 questions for the quality of life related to the women with urinary incontinence. There are 6 main subjects related to quality of life, and each question has a score from 0 or 1 to 5. The final score is Final score is from 23 (lowest score, no impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life), to 140 (Higher score, maximum impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193628870 Sequence: 193628871 Sequence: 193628872 Sequence: 193628873 Sequence: 193628874 Sequence: 193628875 Sequence: 193628876 Sequence: 193628877 Sequence: 193628878 Sequence: 193628879 Sequence: 193628880 Sequence: 193628881 Sequence: 193628882 Sequence: 193628883 Sequence: 193628884
Mesh Term Urinary Incontinence Mesh Term Enuresis Mesh Term Urinary Incontinence, Stress Mesh Term Urinary Incontinence, Urge Mesh Term Urination Disorders Mesh Term Urologic Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Male Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Mesh Term Urological Manifestations Mesh Term Behavioral Symptoms Mesh Term Elimination Disorders Mesh Term Mental Disorders
Downcase Mesh Term urinary incontinence Downcase Mesh Term enuresis Downcase Mesh Term urinary incontinence, stress Downcase Mesh Term urinary incontinence, urge Downcase Mesh Term urination disorders Downcase Mesh Term urologic diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases and pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term male urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term lower urinary tract symptoms Downcase Mesh Term urological manifestations Downcase Mesh Term behavioral symptoms Downcase Mesh Term elimination disorders Downcase Mesh Term mental disorders
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48354170 Sequence: 48354171
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Pierre and Marie Curie University Name APHP

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29306234 Sequence: 29306235
Role Principal Investigator Role Study Chair
Name Thibault THUBERT, MD Name Pierre-André MAL, resident
Affiliation CHU Hotel Dieu Nantes Affiliation CHU Hopital Tenon APHP

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12017337 Sequence: 12017338
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Thibault THUBERT, MD Name Pierre-André MAL, resident
Phone +33647697800 Phone +33659363500
Email Thibault.thubert@chu-nantes.fr Email malpierreandre@gmail.com
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199784 Sequence: 68199785
Design Group Id 55635177 Design Group Id 55635178
Intervention Id 52522510 Intervention Id 52522511

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30787141
Gender Female
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 80 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Major women with stress urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence or urge urinary incontinence, in need to benefit from perineal rehabilitation or cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation
Women able to read, understand, accept and sign the consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnant women,
Refusal to participate
Dementia and cognitive troubles (MMS<30).

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253990097
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 80
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 4

Designs

Sequence: 30533211
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description This study is a controlled randomized single blind multicentric study on a sample of 40 women stress or mixed urinary incontinent. Participants will be randomized in two groups with a 1/1 ratio with data processing software at the first visit at the therapist practicing the perineal rehabilitation. The first group will receive "Classical" perineal rehabilitation for duration of height weeks. The second group will receive perineal rehabilitation associated to a double task cognitive therapy for duration of height weeks. Participants will be evaluated during the consultation.

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899503
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Thubert Thibault
Title Principal Investigator, Medical Doctor of Gynecology
Affiliation Pierre and Marie Curie University

Study References

Sequence: 52103548 Sequence: 52103549 Sequence: 52103550 Sequence: 52103551 Sequence: 52103552 Sequence: 52103553 Sequence: 52103554 Sequence: 52103555 Sequence: 52103556 Sequence: 52103557 Sequence: 52103558 Sequence: 52103559 Sequence: 52103560
Pmid 11494188 Pmid 15592060 Pmid 17934686 Pmid 20236751 Pmid 22999088 Pmid 19214996 Pmid 10813117 Pmid 2265941 Pmid 26451967 Pmid 24519688 Pmid 27794195 Pmid 17905093 Pmid 17803192
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result
Citation Sapsford RR, Hodges PW. Contraction of the pelvic floor muscles during abdominal maneuvers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Aug;82(8):1081-8. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24297. Citation Amarenco G, Ismael SS, Lagauche D, Raibaut P, Rene-Corail P, Wolff N, Thoumie P, Haab F. Cough anal reflex: strict relationship between intravesical pressure and pelvic floor muscle electromyographic activity during cough. Urodynamic and electrophysiological study. J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):149-52. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000147305.00443.df. Citation Deffieux X, Hubeaux K, Porcher R, Ismael SS, Raibaut P, Amarenco G. External intercostal muscles and external anal sphincter electromyographic activity during coughing. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Apr;19(4):521-4. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0473-y. Epub 2007 Oct 13. Citation Fritel X, Fauconnier A, Bader G, Cosson M, Debodinance P, Deffieux X, Denys P, Dompeyre P, Faltin D, Fatton B, Haab F, Hermieux JF, Kerdraon J, Mares P, Mellier G, Michel-Laaengh N, Nadeau C, Robain G, de Tayrac R, Jacquetin B; French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Diagnosis and management of adult female stress urinary incontinence: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Jul;151(1):14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.041. Epub 2010 Mar 16. Citation Hermieu JF, Denys P, Fritel X. [Critical review of guidelines for female urinary incontinence diagnosis and treatment]. Prog Urol. 2012 Oct;22(11):636-43. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Sep 10. French. Citation Klovning A, Avery K, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. Comparison of two questionnaires for assessing the severity of urinary incontinence: The ICIQ-UI SF versus the incontinence severity index. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(5):411-5. doi: 10.1002/nau.20674. Citation Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC. Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Jan;43(1):9-16; discussion 16-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02237236. Citation Horton AM Jr, Alana S. Validation of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Int J Neurosci. 1990 Aug;53(2-4):209-12. doi: 10.3109/00207459008986604. Citation Thubert T, Villot A, Billecocq S, Auclair L, Amarenco G, Deffieux X. Influence of a distraction task on the involuntary reflex contraction of the pelvic floor muscles following cough. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Jan;36(1):160-165. doi: 10.1002/nau.22903. Epub 2015 Oct 9. Citation Thubert T, Deffieux X, Jousse M, Guinet-Lacoste A, Ismael SS, Amarenco G. Influence of a distraction task on pelvic floor muscle contraction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015 Feb;34(2):139-43. doi: 10.1002/nau.22524. Epub 2014 Feb 12. Citation Villot A, Deffieux X, Billecocq S, Auclair L, Amarenco G, Thubert T. Influence of cognitive rehabilitation on pelvic floor muscle contraction: A randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Aug;36(6):1636-1644. doi: 10.1002/nau.23169. Epub 2016 Oct 29. Citation Deffieux X, Hubeaux K, Porcher R, Ismael SS, Raibaut P, Amarenco G. Pelvic floor muscle activity during coughing: altered pattern in women with stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2007 Sep;70(3):443-7; discussion 447-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.084. Citation Deffieux X, Hubeaux K, Porcher R, Ismael SS, Raibaut P, Amarenco G. Abnormal pelvic response to cough in women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(4):291-6. doi: 10.1002/nau.20506.

]]>

<![CDATA[ HOPE (Healthy Older People Everyday) To Age in Place ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797352
2019-01-31

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797352
NCT03797352https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797352?tab=tableAssociate Professor Reshma Merchant, MDreshmaa@nuhs.edu.sg67795555Certain clinical syndromes eg frailty, sarcopenia, dementia, depression, cognitive impairment, vision impairment, falls in older adults carry an increased risk for poor health outcomes and if identified early, can be prevented, delayed or reversible. There is evidence to suggest that exercise and dietary intervention can help delay or prevent sarcopenia, frailty and dementia. Through early screening and detection of frailty and cognitive impairment, the investigators will be able to identify participants at risk of future physical or mental decline in primary care setting and ambulatory care clinics. Those prefrail, frail but ambulant with / without cognitive impairment will be randomised to dual task exercise with/without cognitive stimulation therapy and health education. The main hypothesis is that the combination of multicomponent group exercise activities and dual task exercise is effective in reversing frailty and improving cognition.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-01
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09
Start Month Year January 2019
Primary Completion Month Year May 2021
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20721684
Description Major challenges in the Singapore healthcare landscape include a rapidly aging population, due to rising life expectancy at birth combined with declining total fertility, and an epidemiological transition in the main source of disease burden from communicable and infectious conditions to non-communicable, chronic conditions. While acute care will always remain a crucial component of healthcare delivery systems, the increased healthcare burden centered on chronic diseases and the concomitant aging population is putting increased strain on healthcare resources. Frailty is reversible and progression to dementia can be delayed. From most recent study, prevalence of pre-frailty is 37% and mild cognitive impairment about 15-20%. WHO's definition of healthy ageing is maintaining functional ability. Cognicise, a dual task exercise has shown to delay decline in cognition and there are many studies which shows aerobic exercise improves endurance. Patients seen in Geriatric, Medicine Clinic or polyclinics who are prefrail, frail but ambulant with / without cognitive impairment will be randomised to dual task exercise with/without cognitive stimulation therapy and health education. In addition, high protein diet has been shown to improve muscle protein synthesis. Therefore, the aims of the study are to assess: a) Assess the effectiveness of dual task exercise with/without cognitive stimulation therapy b) Effect of health education alone for delaying the progression to dementia and mobility decline c) Assess impact of exercise on inflammatory and bone health biomarkers eg IL, TNF, Osteocalcin, sclerostin and C telopeptide in a subgroup of older adults randomly selected.

Conditions

Sequence: 52171373
Name Frail Elderly Syndrome
Downcase Name frail elderly syndrome

Id Information

Sequence: 40158712
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 2108/11

Design Groups

Sequence: 55593303 Sequence: 55593304
Group Type No Intervention Group Type Experimental
Title Control Title Intervention
Description Receive healthy ageing advice every 3 months for the duration of 12 months Description To participate in supervised Multicomponent exercise (combined exercise and cognitive activity) up to three times a week for 6 months and receive healthy ageing advice

Interventions

Sequence: 52485597
Intervention Type Other
Name Multicomponent exercise
Description To identify frailty and other potential health issues, and determine if Multicomponent exercise helps at-risk elderly to have better health outcomes.

Keywords

Sequence: 79868738 Sequence: 79868739 Sequence: 79868740 Sequence: 79868741
Name Bone Health Name Cognitive Decline Name Health Education Name Mobility Decline
Downcase Name bone health Downcase Name cognitive decline Downcase Name health education Downcase Name mobility decline

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177379284 Sequence: 177379285 Sequence: 177379286 Sequence: 177379287 Sequence: 177379288 Sequence: 177379289 Sequence: 177379290 Sequence: 177379291
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Changes in frailty status Measure Functional improvement Measure Upper extremity strength Measure Reduction of prevalence of depression Measure reduction in social isolation Measure Improved quality of life Measure Improved cognition Measure Improved cognition
Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year
Description Changes in frailty status by 5-item FRAIL scale Scale range from 0 to 5, the higher the value, the more frail (3 or greater = frailty; 1 or 2 = prefrail) Description Changes in short physical performance battery (SPPB) summary score 3 subscales (range from 0 to 4 for balance, gait speed and chair stand) summed to give total score range from 0 to 12. The higher the value, the better the performance of lower extremity. Description Changes in handgrip strength test performance (kg) Description Changes in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) Scale range from 0 to 15, the higher the score, the greater the likelihood of depression. A score > 5 points is suggestive of depression, a score ≥ 10 points is almost always indicative of depression Description Changes in Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6). Scale range from 0 to 30, the lower the value, the more likelihood of social isolation, A score of 12 and lower delineates "at-risk" for social isolation Description Changes in EuroQoL-5D (EQ5D) score 5 subscales (1 to 5): Mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depressed Each subscale assessed individually. Description Changes in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the scoring range from 0 to 30, the lower the scoring, the more likelihood of cognitive impairment. A score of 26 and higher is generally considered normal. Description Changes in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 5 subscales: Orientation (0 to 10), Registration (0 to 3), Attention and Calculation (0 to 5), Recall (0 to 3), Language and Praxis (0 to 9). Total scale range from 0 to 30, the higher the value, the less cognitive impairment. A score of 23 or lower is indicative of cognitive impairment.

Sponsors

Sequence: 48319407 Sequence: 48319408
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name National University Hospital, Singapore Name National Medical Research Council (NMRC), Singapore

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29285416
Role Principal Investigator
Name Associate Professor Reshma Merchant, MD
Affiliation National University Hospital, Singapore

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12008912
Contact Type primary
Name Associate Professor Reshma Merchant, MD
Phone 67795555
Email reshmaa@nuhs.edu.sg
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68149275
Design Group Id 55593304
Intervention Id 52485597

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30765421
Gender All
Minimum Age 65 Years
Maximum Age 120 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Pre frail or frail but ambulant (Frail scale score of at least 1)
Able to walk 400m aided or unaided (at least one bus stop away)
Has no significant heart or lung problems
Grip strength not more than 25kg for males and 18kg for females

Exclusion Criteria:

Unable to give consent personally
Wheelchair bound or at a very high falls risk
Unable to participate due to underlying health problems including severe weakness due to stroke
Undergoing active cancer treatment

Adult False
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253889357
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 65
Maximum Age Num 120
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30511587
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Factorial Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Investigator Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28877882
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Medicine
Title Head & Senior Consultant, Division of Geriatric Medicine
Affiliation National University Hospital, Singapore

]]>

<![CDATA[ Multi-omics Study of Clinical Endpoints in CHD ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797339
2017-07-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797339
NCT03797339https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797339?tab=tableJuer Liu, masterliujesysu@163.com13430267895This study aimed to explore underlying mechanisms of individual differences in drugs for coronary heart disease treatment and its association with adverse consequences. It will enroll approximately 4000 coronal heart disease patients aged between 18 and 80 years in mainland China and follow-up for at least 1 years. Questionnaires, anthropometric measures, laboratory tests, and biomaterials will be collected . The principal clinical outcomes of the study consist of ischemia attack , cardiac death, renal injury,and myotoxic activity.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-05
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-02-12
Start Month Year July 1, 2017
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2019
Verification Month Year February 2019
Verification Date 2019-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2019-02-12

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20741285
Description The study is a multicenter prospective cohort study, aimed to explore underlying mechanisms of individual differences in drugs for coronary heart disease treatment and its association with adverse consequences.The genomic genotype, DNA methylation and metabolome of 1000 patients with coronary heart disease were determined using illumina high-density genotyping chip, high-throughput sequencing and high-resolution mass spectrometry. Blood exposures of statins and metoprolol and its metabolites was determined by UPLC-MS/MS.

The biological network using cross-omics analysis was reconstructed to identify potential causative key genes, bacteria, and endogenous metabolite targets that cause differences in individual responses. A machine identification algorithm selecting clinical factors and multi-omics targets was used to establish a predictive mathematical model.

A multi-center clinical cohort of 3000 coronal heart disease patients was used to verify the effects of various levels of omic targets on drug blood exposures, efficacy and toxic side effects. A comprehensive model based on multi-target combination of individualized drugs was constructed, and the predictive effect was clinically analyzed.

Facilities

Sequence: 200280929 Sequence: 200280930 Sequence: 200280931 Sequence: 200280932 Sequence: 200280933
Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting
Name Guangdong General Hospital Name The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Name XiangYa Hospital Central South University Name Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University Name West China Hospital, Sichuan University
City Guangzhou City Guangzhou City Changsha City Shanghai City Chengdu
State Guangdong State Guangdong State Hunan State Shanghai State Sichuan
Zip 510080 Zip 510080 Zip 410008 Zip 200233 Zip 610041
Country China Country China Country China Country China Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28132948 Sequence: 28132949 Sequence: 28132950 Sequence: 28132951 Sequence: 28132952
Facility Id 200280929 Facility Id 200280930 Facility Id 200280931 Facility Id 200280932 Facility Id 200280933
Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary
Name Shilong Zhong, Ph.D Name Chen Liu, MD, PhD Name Qilin Ma, MD Name Linghong Shen, MD, PhD Name Liang Ouyang, PhD
Email zhongsl@hotmail.com Email chenliu81@hotmail.com Email mqilin2004@163.com Email drshenlinghong@126.com Email ouyangliang@scu.edu.cn
Phone 8618620819696 Phone 8615013270269 Phone 86731-84327203 Phone 8613916495713 Phone 8613880674611

Conditions

Sequence: 52221814
Name Coronary Heart Disease
Downcase Name coronary heart disease

Id Information

Sequence: 40195828
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 2017YFC0909301

Countries

Sequence: 42609804
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55650109 Sequence: 55650110
Title Discovery cohort Title Validation corhort
Description 1000 cases of coronary heart disease follow-up cohort was used for multi-omics target discovery.During the follow-up period, the information about the occurrence and risk factors of adverse cardiovascular events will be collected. Description 3000 coronary heart disease follow-up cohorts was used for validating the results from the discovery corhort. During the follow-up period, the occurrence and risk factors of adverse cardiovascular events.Predictive mathematical models based on multi-omics combination will be constructed finally.

Interventions

Sequence: 52535611 Sequence: 52535612 Sequence: 52535613 Sequence: 52535614
Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other
Name risk factors of adverse cardiovascular events Name multi-omics target discovery Name validation Name Predictive mathematical models
Description During the follow-up period,general information(age, sex, BMI, blood pressure, the history of drink and smoke, medical history, etc).Blood biochemistry parameters(Lipid, hsCRP levels, etc)and other laboratory examination parameters will be collected Description Genome-wide genotype , DNA methylation and metabolomes were determined using illumina high-density genotyping chips, high-throughput sequencing, and high-resolution mass spectrometry respectly. Blood exposure of statins and metoprolol and its metabolites was determined by UPLC-MS/MS. Description The genome-wide genotype of patients with coronary heart disease was detected using the illumina chip. The methylation level of the functional region was detected by the target region enrichment methylation sequencing method. Intestinal flora differences were detected using 16SrDNA high-throughput sequencing. Description Machine learning algorithms such as multiple linear regression or Bayesian classification are used to optimize clinical factors and multi-group targets to establish predictive mathematical models.

Keywords

Sequence: 79942136 Sequence: 79942137 Sequence: 79942138 Sequence: 79942139 Sequence: 79942140 Sequence: 79942141
Name epigenome Name metabolome Name microbiome Name genome Name multi-omics targets Name individual drug use
Downcase Name epigenome Downcase Name metabolome Downcase Name microbiome Downcase Name genome Downcase Name multi-omics targets Downcase Name individual drug use

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177562364 Sequence: 177562365 Sequence: 177562366 Sequence: 177562367 Sequence: 177562368 Sequence: 177562369
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other
Measure Death Measure MACE Measure Bleeding Measure Statin-induced myopathy (SIM) Measure CI-AKI Measure SYNTAX score
Time Frame from date of baseline examination until the date of first documented death,up to 48 months Time Frame from date of baseline examination until the date of first documented cardiovascular events,up to 48 months Time Frame from date of baseline examination until the date of first documented bleeding,up to 48 months Time Frame from date of baseline examination until the date of first documented SIM,up to 48 months Time Frame more than 6 h within 48 h after Coronary Angiography Time Frame more than 6 h within 48 h after Coronary Angiography
Description All-cause death Description MACE was defined as the occurrence of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarctions, coronary revascularisation and cerebral infraction. Description Bleeding was the six-month incidence of combined alarming, internal, and nuisance bleeding events defined according to Serebruany et al15. Alarming bleeding included bleeding requiring a transfusion, intracranial bleeding, and life-threatening bleeding. Internal bleeding included haematoma, epistaxis, blood loss from the mouth, vagina, melaena, eye bleed, haematuria, and haematemesis. Nuisance bleeding included easy bruising, bleeding from small cuts, petechiae, and ecchymosis. Description The definition of SIM from statin treatment was based on the patients' subjective sense of muscular pain as well as CK elevations. These muscular side effects included myalgia (muscle pain/ache without serum CK elevations), other muscle-related symptoms such as weakness, cramps, spasms, soreness and twitching, CK elevations without physical symptoms, myositis or other muscle symptoms with CK elevations, and rhabdomyolysis. Description CI-AKI was diagnosed if a patient had an absolute increase in serum creatinine (sCr) concentration ≥ 0.3 mg/dl (26.4 μmol/L) from baseline or a relative increase ≥ 50 % in sCr concentration for more than 6 h within 48 h after surgery Description It is mainly used for the treatment of left main coronary artery lesions and/or three-vessel lesions.Patients with a score of ≥33 are recommended for CABG. Patients with a score between 23 and 32 can choose either PCI or CABG. Patients with a score of ≤22 are recommended for PCI and CABG.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193679558 Sequence: 193679559 Sequence: 193679560 Sequence: 193679561 Sequence: 193679562 Sequence: 193679563 Sequence: 193679564 Sequence: 193679565
Mesh Term Heart Diseases Mesh Term Coronary Disease Mesh Term Coronary Artery Disease Mesh Term Myocardial Ischemia Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Vascular Diseases Mesh Term Arteriosclerosis Mesh Term Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term heart diseases Downcase Mesh Term coronary disease Downcase Mesh Term coronary artery disease Downcase Mesh Term myocardial ischemia Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term arteriosclerosis Downcase Mesh Term arterial occlusive diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48366677 Sequence: 48366678 Sequence: 48366679 Sequence: 48366680 Sequence: 48366681
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital Name RenJi Hospital Name West China Hospital Name Xiangya Hospital of Central South University Name First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29313039
Role Principal Investigator
Name Shilong Zhong, Ph.D
Affiliation Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12020651 Sequence: 12020652
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Shilong Zhong, Ph.D Name Juer Liu, master
Phone 862083827812 Phone 13430267895
Email zhongsl@hotmail.com Email liujesysu@163.com
Phone Extension 51157 Phone Extension 51157
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68217754 Sequence: 68217755 Sequence: 68217756 Sequence: 68217757 Sequence: 68217758
Design Group Id 55650109 Design Group Id 55650110 Design Group Id 55650109 Design Group Id 55650110 Design Group Id 55650110
Intervention Id 52535611 Intervention Id 52535611 Intervention Id 52535612 Intervention Id 52535613 Intervention Id 52535614

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30794873
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 80 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Chinese Han patients with coronary artery disease who have ingested metoprolol and statins were prospectively recruited from Guangdong General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Central South University, Sun Yat-sen University and Sichuan University.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

age: 18-80 years
Chinese Han patients with coronary artery disease
inpatients undergoing coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

renal insufficiency (defined as serum creatinine concentration > 2 times the upper limit of normal [230 μmol/L], renal transplantation or dialysis)
hepatic insufficiency (defined as serum transaminase concentration > 2 times the upper limit of normal [80 U/L], or a diagnosis of cirrhosis)
pre-existing bleeding disorders
being pregnant or lactating
advanced cancer or haemodialysis
history of thyroid problems, and use of antithyroid drugs or thyroid hormone medication
incomplete information about cardiovascular events during follow-up

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254004561
Number Of Facilities 5
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 80
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 4
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30540913
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28907233
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name ShiLong Zhong
Title Professor
Affiliation Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

]]>

<![CDATA[ Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Plus Lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) in Previously Treated Participants With Select Solid Tumors (MK-7902-005/E7080-G000-224/LEAP-005) ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797326
2019-02-12

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797326
NCT03797326https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797326?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with pembrolizumab (MK-3475) and lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) in participants with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), ovarian cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer (CRC), glioblastoma (GBM), biliary tract cancers (BTC), or pancreatic cancer.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2022-08-22
Start Month Year February 12, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 22, 2023
Verification Month Year August 2022
Verification Date 2022-08-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-08-22

Facilities

Sequence: 201025693 Sequence: 201025694 Sequence: 201025695 Sequence: 201025696 Sequence: 201025697 Sequence: 201025698 Sequence: 201025699 Sequence: 201025700 Sequence: 201025701 Sequence: 201025702 Sequence: 201025703 Sequence: 201025704 Sequence: 201025705 Sequence: 201025706 Sequence: 201025707 Sequence: 201025708 Sequence: 201025709 Sequence: 201025710 Sequence: 201025711 Sequence: 201025712 Sequence: 201025713 Sequence: 201025714 Sequence: 201025715 Sequence: 201025716 Sequence: 201025717 Sequence: 201025718 Sequence: 201025719 Sequence: 201025720 Sequence: 201025721 Sequence: 201025722 Sequence: 201025723 Sequence: 201025724 Sequence: 201025725 Sequence: 201025726 Sequence: 201025727 Sequence: 201025728 Sequence: 201025729 Sequence: 201025730 Sequence: 201025731 Sequence: 201025732 Sequence: 201025733 Sequence: 201025734 Sequence: 201025735 Sequence: 201025736 Sequence: 201025737 Sequence: 201025738 Sequence: 201025739 Sequence: 201025740 Sequence: 201025741 Sequence: 201025742 Sequence: 201025743 Sequence: 201025744 Sequence: 201025745 Sequence: 201025746 Sequence: 201025747 Sequence: 201025748 Sequence: 201025749 Sequence: 201025750 Sequence: 201025751 Sequence: 201025752 Sequence: 201025753 Sequence: 201025754 Sequence: 201025755 Sequence: 201025756 Sequence: 201025757 Sequence: 201025758 Sequence: 201025759 Sequence: 201025760 Sequence: 201025761 Sequence: 201025762 Sequence: 201025763 Sequence: 201025764 Sequence: 201025765 Sequence: 201025766 Sequence: 201025767 Sequence: 201025768 Sequence: 201025769 Sequence: 201025770 Sequence: 201025771 Sequence: 201025772 Sequence: 201025773 Sequence: 201025774 Sequence: 201025775 Sequence: 201025776 Sequence: 201025777 Sequence: 201025778 Sequence: 201025779 Sequence: 201025780
Name City of Hope ( Site 0002) Name Cedars Sinai Medical Center ( Site 0003) Name University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center ( Site 0005) Name University of Colorado, Anschutz Cancer Pavilion ( Site 0007) Name University of Florida-Health Cancer Center-Orlando ( Site 0015) Name Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey ( Site 0009) Name Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health ( Site 0023) Name Sanford Fargo Medical Center ( Site 0059) Name Lehigh Valley Hospital- Cedar Crest ( Site 0047) Name Sanford Cancer Center ( Site 0058) Name West Cancer Center – East Campus ( Site 0018) Name Mary Crowley Cancer Research Centers – Medical City Hospital ( Site 0049) Name Swedish Medical Center ( Site 0021) Name University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center ( Site 0017) Name Fundacion Favaloro para la Docencia e Investigacion Medica ( Site 2106) Name Hospital Aleman ( Site 2100) Name Hospital Britanico de Buenos Aires ( Site 2109) Name Instituto de Oncologia de Rosario ( Site 2105) Name CEMIC ( Site 2104) Name IDIM Instituto de Diagnostico e Investigaciones Metabolicas ( Site 2101) Name Royal Brisbane and Women s Hospital ( Site 0901) Name Alfred Health ( Site 0902) Name Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital ( Site 0903) Name BC Cancer – Abbotsford ( Site 0200) Name CancerCare Manitoba ( Site 0201) Name Hamilton Health Sciences-Juravinski Cancer Centre ( Site 0208) Name Sunnybrook Research Institute ( Site 0207) Name Princess Margaret Cancer Centre ( Site 0202) Name Centre Hospitalier de l Universite de Montreal – CHUM ( Site 0210) Name CHU de Quebec Universite de Laval ( Site 0206) Name Centro Investigación del Cáncer James Lind ( Site 1203) Name Fundacion Arturo Lopez Perez ( Site 1201) Name Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile ( Site 1202) Name Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile ( Site 1200) Name Fundacion Colombiana de Cancerologia Clinica Vida ( Site 1105) Name Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia E.S.E ( Site 1102) Name Oncologos del Occidente S.A. ( Site 1106) Name Fundacion Valle del Lili ( Site 1101) Name Centre Antoine Lacassagne ( Site 0404) Name Centre Leon Berard ( Site 0405) Name Institut Claudius Regaud IUCT Oncopole ( Site 0403) Name Centre Oscar Lambret ( Site 0401) Name Institut de Cancerologie de l Ouest Centre Rene Gauducheau ( Site 0402) Name Institut Gustave Roussy ( Site 0400) Name Robert Bosch GmbH ( Site 0307) Name Universitaetsklinikum Regensburg ( Site 0304) Name Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt ( Site 0306) Name HELIOS Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden ( Site 0301) Name SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera GmbH ( Site 0309) Name Universitaetsklinikum Jena ( Site 0302) Name Soroka Medical Center ( Site 0601) Name Rambam Medical Center ( Site 0602) Name Hadassah Ein Kerem Medical Center ( Site 0604) Name Chaim Sheba Medical Center ( Site 0600) Name Sourasky Medical Center ( Site 0603) Name Istituto Clinico Humanitas Research Hospital ( Site 1402) Name Policlinico Le Scotte – A.O. Senese ( Site 1401) Name Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale ( Site 1400) Name Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli ( Site 1403) Name Asan Medical Center ( Site 1002) Name Seoul National University Hospital ( Site 1000) Name Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System ( Site 1001) Name Arkhangelsk Clinical Oncological Dispensary ( Site 1600) Name Russian Oncological Research Center n.a. N.N. Blokhin ( Site 1604) Name Leningrad Regional Oncology Center ( Site 1609) Name Scientific Research Oncology Institute n.a. N.N.Petrov ( Site 1610) Name City Clinical Oncology Center ( Site 1608) Name Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary of Tatarstan MoH ( Site 1603) Name Hospital Clinic i Provincial ( Site 0703) Name Hospital Universitario Gregorio Maranon ( Site 0701) Name Clinica Universitaria de Navarra ( Site 0704) Name Hospital Ramon y Cajal ( Site 0702) Name Inselspital Universitaetsspital Bern ( Site 1705) Name Kantonsspital Graubuenden ( Site 1704) Name Kantonsspital St. Gallen ( Site 1702) Name Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli ( Site 1703) Name Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve HUG ( Site 1701) Name Universitaetsspital Zurich ( Site 1700) Name National Cheng Kung University Hospital ( Site 3003) Name National Taiwan University Hospital ( Site 3000) Name Chulalongkorn University ( Site 5001) Name Ramathibodi Hospital. ( Site 5002) Name Siriraj Hospital ( Site 5003) Name Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust ( Site 0803) Name Leicester Royal Infirmary. Univ. Hosp. of Leicester NHS Trust ( Site 0804) Name Guy's Hospital ( Site 0806) Name Royal Marsden Hospital (Sutton) ( Site 0800) Name Christie NHS Foundation Trust ( Site 0805)
City Duarte City Los Angeles City Sacramento City Aurora City Orlando City New Brunswick City New York City Fargo City Allentown City Sioux Falls City Germantown City Dallas City Seattle City Madison City Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires City Buenos Aires City Ciudad de Buenos Aires City Rosario City Buenos Aires City Caba City Herston City Melbourne City Nedlands City Abbotsford City Winnipeg City Hamilton City Toronto City Toronto City Montreal City Quebec City Temuco City Santiago City Santiago City Santiago City Medellin City Bogota City Pereira City Cali City Nice City Lyon City Toulouse City Lille City Saint-Herblain City Villejuif City Stuttgart City Regensburg City Frankfurt am Main City Wiesbaden City Gera City Jena City Beer Sheva City Haifa City Jerusalem City Ramat Gan City Tel Aviv City Rozzano City Siena City Napoli City Roma City Songpagu City Seoul City Seoul City Arkhangelsk City Moscow City Saint-Petersburg City Saint-Petersburg City Saint-Petersburg City Kazan City Barcelona City Madrid City Madrid City Madrid City Bern City Chur City St. Gallen City Bellinzona City Geneve City Zurich City Tainan City Taipei City Bangkok City Bangkok City Bangkok City Cambridge City Leicester City London City London City Manchester
State California State California State California State Colorado State Florida State New Jersey State New York State North Dakota State Pennsylvania State South Dakota State Tennessee State Texas State Washington State Wisconsin State Buenos Aires State Caba State Caba State Santa Fe State Queensland State Victoria State Western Australia State British Columbia State Manitoba State Ontario State Ontario State Ontario State Quebec State Araucania State Region M. De Santiago State Region M. De Santiago State Region M. De Santiago State Antioquia State Distrito Capital De Bogota State Risaralda State Valle Del Cauca State Alpes-Maritimes State Auvergne State Haute-Garonne State Nord State Val-de-Marne State Val-de-Marne State Baden-Wurttemberg State Bayern State Hessen State Hessen State Thuringen State Thuringen State Milano State Toscana State Seoul State Arkhangel Skaya Oblast State Moskva State Sankt-Peterburg State Sankt-Peterburg State Sankt-Peterburg State Tatarstan, Respublika State Berne State Grisons State Sankt Gallen State Ticino State Krung Thep Maha Nakhon State Krung Thep Maha Nakhon State Krung Thep Maha Nakhon State Cambridgeshire State Leicestershire State London, City Of State Surrey
Zip 91010 Zip 90048 Zip 95817 Zip 80045 Zip 32806 Zip 08901 Zip 10016 Zip 58102 Zip 18103 Zip 57104 Zip 38138 Zip 75230 Zip 98104 Zip 53792-0001 Zip C1078AAI Zip 1118 Zip C1280AEB Zip S2000KZE Zip C1431FWO Zip C1012AAR Zip 4029 Zip 3004 Zip 6009 Zip V2S 0C2 Zip R3E 0V9 Zip L8V 4X2 Zip M4N 3M5 Zip M5G 2M9 Zip H2X 3E4 Zip G1R 2J6 Zip 4780000 Zip 7500921 Zip 8330024 Zip 8380456 Zip 050030 Zip 110321 Zip 660001 Zip 760032 Zip 06189 Zip 69373 Zip 31059 Zip 59000 Zip 44805 Zip 94800 Zip 70376 Zip 93053 Zip 60528 Zip 65199 Zip 07548 Zip 07740 Zip 8457108 Zip 3109601 Zip 9112001 Zip 5262000 Zip 6423906 Zip 53100 Zip 80131 Zip 00168 Zip 05505 Zip 03080 Zip 03722 Zip 163045 Zip 115478 Zip 188663 Zip 197758 Zip 198255 Zip 420029 Zip 08036 Zip 28009 Zip 28027 Zip 28034 Zip 3010 Zip 7000 Zip 9007 Zip 6500 Zip 1211 Zip 8091 Zip 704 Zip 10002 Zip 10330 Zip 10400 Zip 10700 Zip CB2 0QQ Zip LE1 5WW Zip SE1 9RT Zip SM3 5PT Zip M20 4BX
Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country Argentina Country Argentina Country Argentina Country Argentina Country Argentina Country Argentina Country Australia Country Australia Country Australia Country Canada Country Canada Country Canada Country Canada Country Canada Country Canada Country Canada Country Chile Country Chile Country Chile Country Chile Country Colombia Country Colombia Country Colombia Country Colombia Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Israel Country Israel Country Israel Country Israel Country Israel Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Korea, Republic of Country Korea, Republic of Country Korea, Republic of Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Switzerland Country Switzerland Country Switzerland Country Switzerland Country Switzerland Country Switzerland Country Taiwan Country Taiwan Country Thailand Country Thailand Country Thailand Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96458967 Sequence: 96458968 Sequence: 96458969 Sequence: 96458970 Sequence: 96458971 Sequence: 96458972 Sequence: 96458973 Sequence: 96458974
Mesh Term Pembrolizumab Mesh Term Lenvatinib Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents Mesh Term Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Protein Kinase Inhibitors Mesh Term Enzyme Inhibitors
Downcase Mesh Term pembrolizumab Downcase Mesh Term lenvatinib Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents, immunological Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents Downcase Mesh Term immune checkpoint inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term protein kinase inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term enzyme inhibitors
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52429204 Sequence: 52429205 Sequence: 52429206 Sequence: 52429207 Sequence: 52429208 Sequence: 52429209 Sequence: 52429210 Sequence: 52429211
Name Advanced Solid Tumors Name Triple Negative Breast Cancer Name Ovarian Cancer Name Gastric Cancer Name Colorectal Cancer Name Glioblastoma Name Biliary Tract Cancers Name Pancreatic Cancer
Downcase Name advanced solid tumors Downcase Name triple negative breast cancer Downcase Name ovarian cancer Downcase Name gastric cancer Downcase Name colorectal cancer Downcase Name glioblastoma Downcase Name biliary tract cancers Downcase Name pancreatic cancer

Id Information

Sequence: 40342086 Sequence: 40342087 Sequence: 40342088 Sequence: 40342089 Sequence: 40342090
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id Id Source secondary_id Id Source secondary_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value 7902-005 Id Value MK-7902-005 Id Value E7080-G000-224 Id Value LEAP-005 Id Value 2018-003747-37
Id Type Other Identifier Id Type Other Identifier Id Type Other Identifier Id Type EudraCT Number
Id Type Description Merck Protocol Number Id Type Description Eisai Protocol Number Id Type Description Merck

Countries

Sequence: 42773650 Sequence: 42773651 Sequence: 42773652 Sequence: 42773653 Sequence: 42773654 Sequence: 42773655 Sequence: 42773656 Sequence: 42773657 Sequence: 42773658 Sequence: 42773659 Sequence: 42773660 Sequence: 42773661 Sequence: 42773662 Sequence: 42773663 Sequence: 42773664 Sequence: 42773665 Sequence: 42773666
Name United States Name Argentina Name Australia Name Canada Name Chile Name Colombia Name France Name Germany Name Israel Name Italy Name Korea, Republic of Name Russian Federation Name Spain Name Switzerland Name Taiwan Name Thailand Name United Kingdom
Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55879552 Sequence: 55879553
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title Pembrolizumab + Lenvatinib (Arm 1) Title Lenvatinib Monotherapy (Arm 2)
Description Participants receive pembrolizumab 200 mg via intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (Q3W) plus lenvatinib 20 mg via oral capsule once a day (QD). Pembrolizumab will be administered for up to 35 cycles (up to 2 years). Lenvatinib will be administered until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (up to at least 2 years). Description Participants receive lenvatinib 24 mg via oral capsule QD, to be administered until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (up to at least 2 years).

Interventions

Sequence: 52738566 Sequence: 52738567
Intervention Type Biological Intervention Type Drug
Name Pembrolizumab Name Lenvatinib
Description Administered as an IV infusion on Day 1 Q3W. Description Administered orally once a day during each 21-day cycle.

Keywords

Sequence: 80217521 Sequence: 80217522 Sequence: 80217523 Sequence: 80217524 Sequence: 80217525 Sequence: 80217526 Sequence: 80217527 Sequence: 80217528
Name programmed cell death 1 (PD-1, PD1) Name programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1, PDL1) Name programmed cell death ligand 2 (PD-L2, PDL2) Name tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) Name multiple TKI Name Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEFG) Name Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) Name Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (PDGF)
Downcase Name programmed cell death 1 (pd-1, pd1) Downcase Name programmed cell death ligand 1 (pd-l1, pdl1) Downcase Name programmed cell death ligand 2 (pd-l2, pdl2) Downcase Name tyrosine kinase inhibitor (tki) Downcase Name multiple tki Downcase Name vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (vefg) Downcase Name fibroblast growth factor (fgf) Downcase Name platelet-derived growth factor (pdgf)

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178349302 Sequence: 178349303 Sequence: 178349304 Sequence: 178349305 Sequence: 178349306 Sequence: 178349307 Sequence: 178349308 Sequence: 178349309 Sequence: 178349310 Sequence: 178349311 Sequence: 178349312 Sequence: 178349313 Sequence: 178349314 Sequence: 178349315 Sequence: 178349316 Sequence: 178349317 Sequence: 178349318 Sequence: 178349319 Sequence: 178349320 Sequence: 178349321
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Objective Response Rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) or Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria for Glioblastoma (GBM) by Investigator Assessment in Initial Cohorts Measure ORR per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (GBM) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Expanded Cohorts (Combined with Initial Cohorts) Measure Percentage of Participants Receiving Pembrolizumab Plus Lenvatinib who Experience an Adverse Event (AE) Measure Percentage of Participants Receiving Pembrolizumab Plus Lenvatinib who Discontinue Study Treatment Due to an AE Measure Percentage of Participants Receiving Lenvatinib Monotherapy who Experience an AE Measure Percentage of Participants Receiving Lenvatinib Monotherapy who Discontinue Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE) Measure Disease Control Rate (DCR) per RECIST 1.1 by Investigator Assessment in Initial Cohorts Measure Duration of Response (DOR) per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (GBM) by Investigator Assessment in Initial Cohorts Measure Progression Free Survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (GBM) by Investigator Assessment in Initial Cohorts Measure Overall Survival (OS) in Initial Cohorts Measure DCR per RECIST 1.1 by BICR in Expanded Cohorts (Combined with Initial Cohorts) Measure DOR per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (GBM) by BICR in Expanded Cohorts (Combined with Initial Cohorts) Measure PFS per RECIST 1.1 or RANO (GBM) by BICR in Expanded Cohorts (Combined with Initial Cohorts) Measure OS in Expanded Cohorts (Combined with Initial Cohorts) Measure ORR per RECIST 1.1 by BICR in Lenvatinib Monotherapy Arm Measure DCR per RECIST 1.1 by BICR in Lenvatinib Monotherapy Arm Measure DOR per RECIST 1.1 by BICR in Lenvatinib Monotherapy Arm Measure PFS per RECIST 1.1 by BICR in Lenvatinib Monotherapy Arm Measure OS in Lenvatinib Monotherapy Arm Measure Plasma Concentration of Lenvatinib
Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Up to approximately 72 months Time Frame Cycle 1 Day 1: 0.5-4 hours and 6-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: pre-dose and 2-12 hours post-dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: pre-dose, 0.5-4 hours, and 6-10 hours post-dose (up to approximately 23 days). Each cycle is 21 days.
Description ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who have a confirmed complete response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters [SOD] of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST 1.1, which is modified for this study to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. For participants with GBM, response will be assessed by the investigator based on RANO criteria (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: sum of products of diameters [SPD] decreased by ≥ 50% from baseline value). For participants in the pancreatic cancer cohort, response will be assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Description ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who have a confirmed CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) as assessed by BICR per RECIST 1.1, which is modified for this study to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. For participants with GBM, response will be assessed based on RANO criteria (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, PR: SPD decreased by ≥ 50% from baseline value). Description An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant that is temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. The percentage of participants receiving pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib who experience at least one AE will be reported. Description An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant that is temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. The percentage of participants receiving pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib who discontinue study treatment due to an AE will be reported. Description An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant that is temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. The percentage of participants receiving lenvatinib monotherapy who experience at least one AE will be reported. Description An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant that is temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. The percentage of participants receiving lenvatinib monotherapy who discontinue study treatment due to an AE will be reported. Description DCR is defined as the percentage of participants who have a best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) per RECIST 1.1. RECIST 1.1 has been modified for this study to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. DCR will be assessed by the investigator for all initial cohorts except for the pancreatic cancer cohort, will be assessed by BICR. Description DOR is determined by disease assessment and is defined as the time from the earliest date of qualifying response until earliest date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever comes first. RECIST 1.1 has been modified for this study to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. DOR will be assessed by the investigator for all initial cohorts except for the pancreatic cancer cohort, will be assessed by BICR. Description PFS is defined as the time from date of study treatment to the first documented disease progression based on RECIST 1.1, modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ (or RANO for GBM participants), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS will be assessed by the investigator for all initial cohorts except for the pancreatic cancer cohort, will be assessed by BICR. Description OS is defined as the time from the date of study treatment to the date of death due to any cause. Description DCR is defined as the percentage of participants who have a best overall response of CR, PR, or (SD) per RECIST 1.1. RECIST 1.1 has been modified for this study to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, and will be assessed by BICR for this outcome measure. Description DOR is determined by disease assessment and is defined as the time from the earliest date of qualifying response until earliest date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever comes first. RECIST 1.1 has been modified for this study to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, and will be assessed by BICR for this outcome measure. Description PFS is defined as the time from date of study treatment to the first documented disease progression based on RECIST 1.1, modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ (or RANO for GBM participants), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, as assessed by BICR. Description OS is defined as the time from the date of study treatment to the date of death due to any cause. Description ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who have a confirmed CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD) as assessed by BICR per RECIST 1.1, which is modified for this study to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ. Description DCR is defined as the percentage of participants who have a best overall response of CR, PR, or SD per RECIST 1.1. RECIST 1.1 has been modified for this study to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, and will be assessed by BICR for this outcome measure. Description DOR is determined by disease assessment and is defined as the time from the earliest date of qualifying response until earliest date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever comes first. RECIST 1.1 has been modified for this study to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ, and will be assessed by BICR for this outcome measure. Description PFS is defined as the time from date of study treatment to the first documented disease progression based on RECIST 1.1, modified to follow a maximum of 10 target lesions and a maximum of 5 target lesions per organ (or RANO for GBM participants), or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, as assessed by BICR. Description OS is defined as the time from the date of study treatment to the date of death due to any cause. Description Blood samples will be obtained on Day 1 and Day 15 of Cycle 1 (21-day cycle) and Day 1 of Cycle 2 (21-day cycle) for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis to determine the plasma concentration of lenvatinib.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194467972 Sequence: 194467973 Sequence: 194467974 Sequence: 194467975 Sequence: 194467976 Sequence: 194467977 Sequence: 194467978 Sequence: 194467979 Sequence: 194467980 Sequence: 194467981 Sequence: 194467982 Sequence: 194467983 Sequence: 194467984 Sequence: 194467985 Sequence: 194467986 Sequence: 194467987 Sequence: 194467988 Sequence: 194467989 Sequence: 194467990
Mesh Term Glioblastoma Mesh Term Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms Mesh Term Biliary Tract Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Digestive System Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases Mesh Term Astrocytoma Mesh Term Glioma Mesh Term Neoplasms, Neuroepithelial Mesh Term Neuroectodermal Tumors Mesh Term Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial Mesh Term Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue Mesh Term Breast Neoplasms Mesh Term Breast Diseases Mesh Term Skin Diseases Mesh Term Biliary Tract Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term glioblastoma Downcase Mesh Term triple negative breast neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term biliary tract neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term digestive system neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases Downcase Mesh Term astrocytoma Downcase Mesh Term glioma Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, neuroepithelial Downcase Mesh Term neuroectodermal tumors Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, germ cell and embryonal Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, glandular and epithelial Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, nerve tissue Downcase Mesh Term breast neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term breast diseases Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases Downcase Mesh Term biliary tract diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48558185 Sequence: 48558186
Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC Name Eisai Inc.

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29419486
Role Study Director
Name Medical Director
Affiliation Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68501784 Sequence: 68501785 Sequence: 68501786
Design Group Id 55879552 Design Group Id 55879553 Design Group Id 55879552
Intervention Id 52738566 Intervention Id 52738567 Intervention Id 52738567

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30913351
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Has a histologically or cytologically-documented, advanced (metastatic and/or unresectable) solid tumor that is incurable and for which prior standard systemic therapy has failed in one of the following cohorts: TNBC, Ovarian Cancer, Gastric Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, GBM, BTC (intrahepatic, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gall bladder cancer; excludes Ampulla of Vater), Pancreatic Cancer
Must have progressed on or since the last treatment
Has measurable disease per RECIST 1.1 (RANO for the GBM cohort) as assessed by the local site investigator/radiology and confirmed by BICR
Has provided a PD-L1 evaluable archival tumor tissue sample or newly obtained core or excisional biopsy of a tumor lesion not previously irradiated
Male participants agree to use approved contraception during the treatment period for at least 7 days after the last dose of lenvatinib, or refrain from heterosexual intercourse during this period
Female participants are not pregnant or breastfeeding, and are not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP), OR are a WOCBP that agrees to use contraception during the treatment period (or 14 days prior to the initiation of study treatment for oral contraception) and for at least 120 days post pembrolizumab, or 30 days post lenvatinib, whichever occurs last
Has an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 1 within 3 days of study treatment initiation
Has adequate organ function

For Triple Negative Breast Cancer Participants:

Has received one or 2 prior lines of therapy
Has Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) <2.0 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
Has locally determined results for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 tumor analyses

For Ovarian Cancer Participants:

– Has primary ovarian cancer and has received 3 prior lines of therapy.

For Gastric Cancer Participants:

– Has received 2 prior lines of therapy. Note: Gastric cancer will include participants with both gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Participants with squamous cell carcinoma histology are not eligible

For Colorectal Cancer Participants:

– Has received 2 prior lines of therapy

For GBM Participants:

Has failed initial systemic therapy for newly diagnosed GBM
Have the following time periods elapsed before the projected start of scheduled study treatment: 1) at least 3 weeks from prior surgical resection, 2) at least 1 week from stereotactic biopsy, 3) at least 6 months from completion of prior radiotherapy, 4) at least 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives, whichever is shorter) from any investigational agent, 5) at least 4 weeks from cytotoxic therapy, 6) at least 6 weeks from antibodies, 7) at least 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives, whichever is shorter) from other antitumor therapies and 1 week for cancer vaccines
Be neurologically stable (e.g. without a progression of neurologic symptoms or requiring escalating doses of systemic steroid therapy within last 2 weeks) and clinically stable
Has histologically confirmed World Health Organization (WHO) Grade IV GBM
Has locally determined result for O^6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) analysis

For Biliary Tract Cancer Participants:

Has received 1 prior line of therapy
Child-Pugh Score, Class A: well-compensated disease. Child-Pugh Score of 5-6

For Pancreatic Cancer Participants:

Has pathologically (histologically or cytologically) confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma that is metastatic at enrollment
Has received one or 2 prior lines of therapy
Has received prior therapy with at least 1 (platinum-containing regimen or gemcitabine-containing regimen) but no more than 2 prior systemic therapies for unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer

Exclusion Criteria:

Has gastrointestinal malabsorption or any other condition that might affect the absorption of lenvatinib
Has present or progressive accumulation of pleural, ascitic, or pericardial fluid requiring drainage or diuretic drugs within 2 weeks prior to enrollment (applies to all cohorts except the ovarian cancer cohort)
Has radiographic evidence of encasement or invasion of a major blood vessel or of intratumoral cavitation. Participants with portal vein invasion (Vp4), inferior vena cava, or cardiac involvement based on imaging in the BTC cohort are not eligible for enrollment
Has clinical significant hemoptysis or tumor bleeding within 2 weeks prior to the first dose of study treatment
Has significant cardiovascular impairment within 12 months of the first dose of study treatment, such as history of congestive heart failure greater than New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II, unstable angina, myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident (CVA), or cardiac arrhythmia associated with hemodynamic instability
Has a history of arterial thromboembolism within 12 months of start of study treatment
Has a known additional malignancy that is progressing or has required active treatment within the past 3 years.
Has a serious nonhealing wound, ulcer or bone fracture
Has had major surgery within 3 weeks prior to first dose of study interventions
Has biologic response modifiers therapy (e.g. granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) within 4 weeks before study entry
Has preexisting ≥Grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) or non-gastrointestinal fistula
Has received prior therapy with lenvatinib, an anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti PD-L2 agent or with an agent directed to another stimulatory or co-inhibitory T-cell receptor (e.g. cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 [CTLA-4], Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 4 [OX 40], tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 9 [CD137])
Has received prior systemic anti-cancer therapy including investigational agents within 4 weeks prior to study treatment start
If participant received major surgery, they must have recovered adequately from the toxicity and/or complications from the intervention prior to starting study treatment
Has received prior radiotherapy within 2 weeks of start of study treatment. Participants must have recovered from all radiation-related toxicities, not require corticosteroids, and not have had radiation pneumonitis. A 1-week washout is permitted for palliative radiation (≤2 weeks of radiotherapy) to non-central nervous system (CNS) disease
Has received a live vaccine within 30 days prior to the first dose of study treatment
Has known intolerance to lenvatinib (and/or any of the excipients)
Is currently participating in or has participated in a study of an investigational agent or has used an investigational device within 4 weeks prior to the first dose of study treatment
Has a diagnosis of immunodeficiency or is receiving chronic systemic steroid therapy (in dosing exceeding 10 mg daily of prednisone equivalent) or any other form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior the first dose of study treatment
Has known active CNS metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis
Has tumors involving the brain stem
Has severe hypersensitivity (≥Grade 3) to pembrolizumab and/or any of its excipients
Has an active autoimmune disease that has required systemic treatment in past 2 years
Has a history of (non-infectious) pneumonitis that required steroids or has current pneumonitis
Has an active infection requiring systemic therapy
Has a known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
Has a known history of hepatitis B or known active hepatitis C virus infection
Has a known history of active tuberculosis (TB; Bacillus tuberculosis)
Is pregnant or breastfeeding or expecting to conceive or father children within the projected duration of the study, starting with the screening visit through 120 days after the last dose of study treatment
Has had an allogenic tissue/solid organ transplant (large organ transplants, stem-cell transplant requiring chronic immunosuppressant therapy necessary to prevent graft rejection)

For GBM Participants:

Has carcinomatous meningitis
Has recurrent tumor greater than 6 cm in maximum diameter
Has tumor primarily localized to the brainstem or spinal cord
Has presence of multifocal tumor, diffuse leptomeningeal or extracranial disease
Has evidence of intratumoral or peritumoral hemorrhage on baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan other than those that are grade ≤ 1 and either post-operative or stable on at least 2 consecutive MRI scans
Has received Optune® TTFields within 2 weeks of study intervention

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254176392
Number Of Facilities 88
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 6
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 14

Designs

Sequence: 30659046
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26800394 Sequence: 26800395 Sequence: 26800396 Sequence: 26800397 Sequence: 26800398
Intervention Id 52738566 Intervention Id 52738566 Intervention Id 52738567 Intervention Id 52738567 Intervention Id 52738567
Name MK-3475 Name Keytruda® Name MK-7902 Name E7080 Name LENVIMA™

Links

Sequence: 4407745
Url http://merckoncologyclinicaltrials.com
Description Merck Oncology Clinical Trial Information

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29025720
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Observational Study of Expected ARF Recovery ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797313
2019-01-22

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797313
NCT03797313https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797313?tab=tableNANANAThis is an observational cohort study of the association between patient expectations for functional recovery and quality of life among acute respiratory failure survivors 6 months after hospital discharge.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2021-12-15
Start Month Year January 22, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 1, 2021
Verification Month Year February 2021
Verification Date 2021-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2021-12-15

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20774584
Description This study will enroll adults who are diagnosed with acute respiratory failure during an ICU admission and discharged from the ICU alive. All participants will receive usual clinical care. Participant expectations for functional recovery will be assessed before hospital discharge via a standardized questionnaire containing a visual analogue scale and questions about expected ability and importance of being able to perform activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living in 6 months. At 6 months, participants will be re-contacted by phone. Study staff will administer questionnaires to assess whether patient expectations have been met. Quality of life will be assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF and the EQ-5D-VAS.

Facilities

Sequence: 200548214 Sequence: 200548215 Sequence: 200548216 Sequence: 200548217
Name Johns Hopkins University Name Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Name Vanderbilt University Name Intermountain Medical Center
City Baltimore City Boston City Nashville City Murray
State Maryland State Massachusetts State Tennessee State Utah
Zip 21287 Zip 02215 Zip 37235 Zip 84107
Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52306590 Sequence: 52306591
Name Acute Respiratory Failure Name Post Intensive Care Syndrome
Downcase Name acute respiratory failure Downcase Name post intensive care syndrome

Id Information

Sequence: 40255942 Sequence: 40255943 Sequence: 40255944
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value IRB00197235 Id Value 00181895 Id Value K01HL141637-01
Id Type Other Identifier Id Type U.S. NIH Grant/Contract
Id Type Description Other
Id Link https://reporter.nih.gov/quickSearch/K01HL141637-01

Countries

Sequence: 42674764
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55744516 Sequence: 55744517
Title Patient's expectations met at Hospital discharge Title Patient's with unmet expectations at Hospital Discharge
Description ARF survivors whose expectations for recovery at hospital discharge are fully met 6 months later. Description ARF survivors whose expectations for recovery at hospital discharge are not fully met 6 months later.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177878415 Sequence: 177878416
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Quality of life measured using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF instrument (WHOQOL-BREF) after hospital discharge Measure Patient expectation error measure using EQ-5D VAS
Time Frame 6 months after hospital discharge Time Frame 6 months after hospital discharge
Description WHOQOL-BREF is a measure of overall quality of life that evaluates satisfaction with important aspects of life rather than of health. The instrument contains 26 items across 4 domains, and requires approximately 5 minutes to administer over the phone. The 26 items in the WHOQOL-BREF are scored in four domains: physical, psychological, social relations, and environment, with between 3 and 8 items in each domain and two "benchmark" items addressing overall QoL. Transforming the raw scores results in a domain score between 0 – 100, enabling comparisons between domains with different numbers of items. Higher scores indicate greater participant satisfaction with their quality of life and lower scores indicate worse satisfaction with quality of life. Description A secondary analysis will estimate patient expectation error, defined as the difference between the health-related quality of life score expected at hospital discharge and the actual health related quality of life score assessed using the EQ-5D VAS 6 months after hospital discharge. The EQ-5D VAS ranges from 0 to 100 with 0 representing the worst imaginable health state and 100 representing the best imaginable health state.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194004048 Sequence: 194004049 Sequence: 194004050 Sequence: 194004051 Sequence: 194004052
Mesh Term Respiratory Insufficiency Mesh Term Respiratory Distress Syndrome Mesh Term Respiration Disorders Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases Mesh Term Lung Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term respiratory insufficiency Downcase Mesh Term respiratory distress syndrome Downcase Mesh Term respiration disorders Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48446356 Sequence: 48446357
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class NIH
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Johns Hopkins University Name National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29358082
Role Principal Investigator
Name Alison Turnbull
Affiliation Johns Hopkins University

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30844061
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population survivors of acute respiratory failure (ARF) who are expected to be discharged home alive.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Age ≥ 18 years
Respiratory failure managed in the ICU, where respiratory failure is defined as ≥1 of the following:
Mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube ≥ 24 hours OR
Non-invasive ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP) ≥ 24 consecutive hours* provided for acute respiratory failure (not for Obstructive Sleep Apnea or other stable use) OR

High flow nasal cannula with FIO2 ≥ 0.5 and flow rate ≥ 30 LPM for ≥ 24 consecutive hours*

*Occasional rest periods of ≤ 1 hour each are not deducted from the calculation of consecutive hours.

Expected by the clinical team to be discharged home alive

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient in ICU < 24 hours
Mechanical ventilation at baseline or mechanical ventilation solely for airway protection or obstruction
Residing in a medical institution at the time of hospital admission
Homeless / Prisoner / Primary residence not in the USA / Unable to communicate by telephone in English
More than mild dementia (either known diagnosis of moderate or worse dementia or IQ-CODE > 3.6; screening performed on patients > 50 years old or with family reports of possible memory decline)
Patient on hospice at or before time of enrollment
Patients who, based solely on pre-existing medical problems (such as poorly controlled neoplasm or other end stage disease, including Stage IV heart failure or severe burns), would not be expected to survive 6 months in the absence of the acute respiratory failure.
Patients with neurological injury either receiving treatment for intracranial hypertension or who are not expected to return to consciousness.
Pregnancy

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254193084
Number Of Facilities 4
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 34
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30589932
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28956380
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52208856 Sequence: 52208857 Sequence: 52208858 Sequence: 52208859 Sequence: 52208860 Sequence: 52208861 Sequence: 52208862 Sequence: 52208863 Sequence: 52208864 Sequence: 52208865 Sequence: 52208866 Sequence: 52208867 Sequence: 52208868 Sequence: 52208869 Sequence: 52208870 Sequence: 52208871 Sequence: 52208872 Sequence: 52208873 Sequence: 52208874 Sequence: 52208875 Sequence: 52208876 Sequence: 52208877 Sequence: 52208878 Sequence: 52208879 Sequence: 52208880 Sequence: 52208881 Sequence: 52208882 Sequence: 52208883 Sequence: 52208884
Pmid 16236739 Pmid 19865004 Pmid 20224063 Pmid 18263687 Pmid 19011152 Pmid 21946660 Pmid 28463657 Pmid 28448162 Pmid 21965016 Pmid 24160906 Pmid 19770733 Pmid 27632675 Pmid 27294981 Pmid 7655809 Pmid 20088892 Pmid 21629159 Pmid 23575998 Pmid 27622598 Pmid 24787107 Pmid 30160803 Pmid 5420677 Pmid 5349366 Pmid 14754765 Pmid 12964174 Pmid 26821587 Pmid 15085902 Pmid 2280326 Pmid 28395702 Pmid 25531451
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, Weaver J, Martin DP, Neff M, Stern EJ, Hudson LD. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1685-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050333. Citation Cox CE, Docherty SL, Brandon DH, Whaley C, Attix DK, Clay AS, Dore DV, Hough CL, White DB, Tulsky JA. Surviving critical illness: acute respiratory distress syndrome as experienced by patients and their caregivers. Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;37(10):2702-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b6f64a. Citation Spragg RG, Bernard GR, Checkley W, Curtis JR, Gajic O, Guyatt G, Hall J, Israel E, Jain M, Needham DM, Randolph AG, Rubenfeld GD, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Ware LB, Young D, Harabin AL. Beyond mortality: future clinical research in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 May 15;181(10):1121-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201001-0024WS. Epub 2010 Mar 11. Citation Zambon M, Vincent JL. Mortality rates for patients with acute lung injury/ARDS have decreased over time. Chest. 2008 May;133(5):1120-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2134. Epub 2008 Feb 8. Citation Phua J, Badia JR, Adhikari NK, Friedrich JO, Fowler RA, Singh JM, Scales DC, Stather DR, Li A, Jones A, Gattas DJ, Hallett D, Tomlinson G, Stewart TE, Ferguson ND. Has mortality from acute respiratory distress syndrome decreased over time?: A systematic review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb 1;179(3):220-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200805-722OC. Epub 2008 Nov 14. Citation Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, Hopkins RO, Weinert C, Wunsch H, Zawistowski C, Bemis-Dougherty A, Berney SC, Bienvenu OJ, Brady SL, Brodsky MB, Denehy L, Elliott D, Flatley C, Harabin AL, Jones C, Louis D, Meltzer W, Muldoon SR, Palmer JB, Perme C, Robinson M, Schmidt DM, Scruth E, Spill GR, Storey CP, Render M, Votto J, Harvey MA. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders' conference. Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):502-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da75. Citation Hopkins RO, Suchyta MR, Kamdar BB, Darowski E, Jackson JC, Needham DM. Instrumental Activities of Daily Living after Critical Illness: A Systematic Review. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Aug;14(8):1332-1343. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201701-059SR. Citation Kamdar BB, Huang M, Dinglas VD, Colantuoni E, von Wachter TM, Hopkins RO, Needham DM; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Joblessness and Lost Earnings after Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in a 1-Year National Multicenter Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct 15;196(8):1012-1020. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201611-2327OC. Citation Lieu TA, Au D, Krishnan JA, Moss M, Selker H, Harabin A, Taggart V, Connors A; Comparative Effectiveness Research in Lung Diseases Workshop Panel. Comparative effectiveness research in lung diseases and sleep disorders: recommendations from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct 1;184(7):848-56. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201104-0634WS. Citation Carson SS, Goss CH, Patel SR, Anzueto A, Au DH, Elborn S, Gerald JK, Gerald LB, Kahn JM, Malhotra A, Mularski RA, Riekert KA, Rubenfeld GD, Weaver TE, Krishnan JA; American Thoracic Society Comparative Effectiveness Research Working Group. An official American Thoracic Society research statement: comparative effectiveness research in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov 15;188(10):1253-61. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201310-1790ST. Citation Cox CE, Martinu T, Sathy SJ, Clay AS, Chia J, Gray AL, Olsen MK, Govert JA, Carson SS, Tulsky JA. Expectations and outcomes of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2888-94; quiz 2904. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ab86ed. Citation Lamas DJ, Owens RL, Nace RN, Massaro AF, Pertsch NJ, Gass J, Bernacki RE, Block SD. Opening the Door: The Experience of Chronic Critical Illness in a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital. Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):e357-e362. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002094. Citation Turnbull AE, Davis WE, Needham DM, White DB, Eakin MN. Intensivist-reported Facilitators and Barriers to Discussing Post-Discharge Outcomes with Intensive Care Unit Surrogates. A Qualitative Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Sep;13(9):1546-52. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201603-212OC. Citation Thompson AG, Sunol R. Expectations as determinants of patient satisfaction: concepts, theory and evidence. Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Jun;7(2):127-41. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.2.127. Citation Gonzalez Saenz de Tejada M, Escobar A, Herrera C, Garcia L, Aizpuru F, Sarasqueta C. Patient expectations and health-related quality of life outcomes following total joint replacement. Value Health. 2010 Jun-Jul;13(4):447-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00685.x. Epub 2010 Jan 15. Citation Soroceanu A, Ching A, Abdu W, McGuire K. Relationship between preoperative expectations, satisfaction, and functional outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar and cervical spine surgery: a multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jan 15;37(2):E103-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182245c1f. Citation Hamilton DF, Lane JV, Gaston P, Patton JT, Macdonald D, Simpson AH, Howie CR. What determines patient satisfaction with surgery? A prospective cohort study of 4709 patients following total joint replacement. BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 9;3(4):e002525. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002525. Print 2013. Citation Pihl K, Roos EM, Nissen N, JoRgensen U, Schjerning J, Thorlund JB. Over-optimistic patient expectations of recovery and leisure activities after arthroscopic meniscus surgery. Acta Orthop. 2016 Dec;87(6):615-621. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1228411. Epub 2016 Sep 13. Citation Waljee J, McGlinn EP, Sears ED, Chung KC. Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. 2014 May;155(5):799-808. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.015. Epub 2013 Dec 16. Citation Aversa M, Chowdhury NA, Tomlinson G, Singer LG. Preoperative expectations for health-related quality of life after lung transplant. Clin Transplant. 2018 Oct;32(10):e13394. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13394. Epub 2018 Sep 25. Citation Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970 Spring;10(1):20-30. doi: 10.1093/geront/10.1_part_1.20. No abstract available. Citation Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available. Citation Charney DS. Psychobiological mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability: implications for successful adaptation to extreme stress. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;161(2):195-216. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.2.195. Citation Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82. doi: 10.1002/da.10113. Citation Cosco TD, Kaushal A, Richards M, Kuh D, Stafford M. Resilience measurement in later life: a systematic review and psychometric analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jan 28;14:16. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0418-6. Citation Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA; WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):299-310. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00. Citation Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095. Citation Shumaker SC, Frazier SK, Moser DK, Chung ML. Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in Patients With Heart Failure. J Nurs Meas. 2017 Apr 1;25(1):90-102. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.25.1.90. Citation Hoffmann TC, Del Mar C. Patients' expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):274-86. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6016.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Pulse Oximeter and Respiratory Rate Test ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797300
2018-12-12

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797300
NCT03797300https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797300?tab=tableNANANAAssessment of Spry Health’s Loop oximetry accuracy in profound hypoxia Assessment of Spry Health’s Respiratory rate accuracy in normal conditions and profound hypoxia
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09
Start Month Year December 12, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year December 14, 2018
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09

Facilities

Sequence: 200053339
Name UCSF Hypoxia Lab
City San Francisco
State California
Zip 94143
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52156526 Sequence: 52156527 Sequence: 52156528
Name Hypoxia Name Hypercapnia Name Hypocapnia
Downcase Name hypoxia Downcase Name hypercapnia Downcase Name hypocapnia

Id Information

Sequence: 40148232
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value SpryUCSF2

Countries

Sequence: 42557765
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55577932
Group Type Experimental
Title Primary

Interventions

Sequence: 52472032
Intervention Type Device
Name Spry Loop Band
Description Loop band measures pulse oximetry and respiration rate

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328082 Sequence: 177328083
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary
Measure Accuracy of SpO2 measurement Measure Accuracy of Respiratory Rate measurement
Time Frame duration of subject monitoring, usually up to one hour Time Frame duration of subject monitoring, usually up to one hour
Description Pulse oximetry measurement accuracy vs. gold standard Description Respiratory rate measurement accuracy vs. gold standard

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193432165 Sequence: 193432166 Sequence: 193432167 Sequence: 193432168
Mesh Term Hypoxia Mesh Term Hypercapnia Mesh Term Hypocapnia Mesh Term Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory
Downcase Mesh Term hypoxia Downcase Mesh Term hypercapnia Downcase Mesh Term hypocapnia Downcase Mesh Term signs and symptoms, respiratory
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306107 Sequence: 48306108
Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Spry Health Name University of California, San Francisco

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130895
Design Group Id 55577932
Intervention Id 52472032

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757373
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 60 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Healthy adult willing to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

Wrist size outside the indicated use
Low perfusion
Smoking

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254228117
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 0
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 60
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30503598
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Basic Science
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869876
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Arthroscopic Transosseous vs. Anchored Rotator Cuff Repair ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797287
2020-02-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797287
NCT03797287https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797287?tab=tableNANANAThis study will compare arthroscopic transosseous versus anchored rotator cuff repairs in terms of clinical outcomes, rotator cuff integrity, and cost-effectiveness. With the collection of patient-reported outcomes the health of patients undergoing each rotator cuff repair technique will be assessed. The aims of this study will be achieved through a clinical randomized controlled trial and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-05-30
Start Month Year February 1, 2020
Primary Completion Month Year December 2025
Verification Month Year May 2019
Verification Date 2019-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-05-30

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735953
Description Study Design: After the decision to proceed with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, patients will be asked to participate in this prospective randomized clinical trial.

Study Procedures:

Before Surgery: The Informed Consent process will be completed prior to any data collection. Consent will be completed after explanation of each treatment group and the data to be collected. Baseline and demographic data will be collected prior to surgery:

Randomization: Subjects will be randomized prior to surgery into one of the two rotator cuff repair technique groups using REDCap software. Randomization will be stratified by gender.

Patient Visits:

Patients will complete their questionnaires and testing before surgery then within 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years After the first week of surgery, patients will be given a pain diary to record all narcotic pain medications they consume during the 1st week post-op.

An ultrasound will be done during their 6 month, 1 year, and 2 year follow up.

Facilities

Sequence: 200245101
Name Johns Hopkins
City Columbia
State Maryland
Zip 21044
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52208532 Sequence: 52208533 Sequence: 52208534 Sequence: 52208535
Name Shoulder Pain Chronic Name Shoulder Pain Name Rotator Cuff Tear Name Rotator Cuff Injury
Downcase Name shoulder pain chronic Downcase Name shoulder pain Downcase Name rotator cuff tear Downcase Name rotator cuff injury

Id Information

Sequence: 40186462
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value IRB00046834

Countries

Sequence: 42599953
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55635150 Sequence: 55635151
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Tensor Tunnler Title Smith and Nephew PEEK Helicoil Anchor
Description The Tensor Tunneler (Chattanooga, TN) will be used to create the bone tunnels during the arthroscopic procedure. This is an FDA approved device and is used currently in routine clinical practice. Description The anchors used in this trial are FDA approved and are used currently in routine clinical practice (Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair).

Interventions

Sequence: 52522488 Sequence: 52522489
Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Procedure
Name Tensor Tunnler Name Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair
Description Create the bone tunnels during the arthroscopic rotator cuff repair procedure Description The suture anchors (Smith and Nephew PEEK Helicoil Anchor) are inserted in bone and the sutures are then used to sew the tendons to bone arthroscopically.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177512865 Sequence: 177512866 Sequence: 177512867 Sequence: 177512868 Sequence: 177512869 Sequence: 177512870 Sequence: 177512871
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change in condition of the shoulder as assessed by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) Score Measure Change in shoulder pain as assessed by Visual Analog Pain Score Measure Change in Range of Motion (ROM) Measure Change in Strength Testing Measure Change in quality of life as assessed by the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index Measure Change in health related quality of life as assessed by Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) Measure Implant Cost
Time Frame Before surgery, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery Time Frame Before surgery, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery Time Frame Before surgery, within 1 month after surgery, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year Time Frame Before surgery, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery Time Frame Before surgery, 1 year after surgery, 2 years after surgery Time Frame Before surgery, 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery Time Frame Within 1 month after surgery
Description 10 separate questions is scored on an ordinal scale from 0-3 for a maximal raw functional score of 30 (no difficulties). Description Patients are asked to identify whether they are having pain in the shoulder and are asked to record the location of their pain on a 10 cm line that ranges from 0(no pain at all) to 10 (pain as bad as it can be) Description Total (combined glenohumeral and scapulothoracic) shoulder motion is measured. Both active and passive motion for both shoulders is recorded. Forward elevation is measured as the maximum arm-trunk angle viewed from any direction. External rotation is measured with the arm comfortably at the side and also with the arm at 90° of abduction. Internal rotation is measured by noting the highest segment of spinal anatomy reached with the thumb. Cross-body adduction is measured by measuring the distance of the antecubital fossa from the opposite acromion. Description Strength is graded according to the Medical Research Council grade. Strength is measured in forward elevation, abduction, external rotation with the arm comfortably at the side, and internal rotation with the arm comfortably at the side. A perfect score is a 5 in each category. Description Quality of Life Measurement tool for patients with rotator cuff disease where patients mark a line on 21 visual analogue scale (VAS) lines labeled 0 (not affected) – 100 (affected). These items will ask about physical symptoms, sports and recreation, work, social function, and emotions. The maximum score is 2100 for worst possible symptoms and 0 represents no symptoms at all. Description Measures of health related quality of life (HRQoL) using 11 items from the SF-36 or SF-12. Patients are asked about their physical functioning, role limitations, social functioning, pain, mental health, and vitality. A score of 1 represents full health. Description Review of costs through our billing department

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193628731 Sequence: 193628732 Sequence: 193628733 Sequence: 193628734 Sequence: 193628735 Sequence: 193628736 Sequence: 193628737 Sequence: 193628738 Sequence: 193628739 Sequence: 193628740 Sequence: 193628741
Mesh Term Shoulder Pain Mesh Term Rotator Cuff Injuries Mesh Term Arthralgia Mesh Term Joint Diseases Mesh Term Musculoskeletal Diseases Mesh Term Pain Mesh Term Neurologic Manifestations Mesh Term Rupture Mesh Term Wounds and Injuries Mesh Term Shoulder Injuries Mesh Term Tendon Injuries
Downcase Mesh Term shoulder pain Downcase Mesh Term rotator cuff injuries Downcase Mesh Term arthralgia Downcase Mesh Term joint diseases Downcase Mesh Term musculoskeletal diseases Downcase Mesh Term pain Downcase Mesh Term neurologic manifestations Downcase Mesh Term rupture Downcase Mesh Term wounds and injuries Downcase Mesh Term shoulder injuries Downcase Mesh Term tendon injuries
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48354144
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Johns Hopkins University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29306219
Role Principal Investigator
Name Uma Srikumaran, MD, MBA
Affiliation Johns Hopkins University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199752 Sequence: 68199753
Design Group Id 55635150 Design Group Id 55635151
Intervention Id 52522488 Intervention Id 52522489

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30787125
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 75 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Adults age 18-75 years old
Full thickness rotator cuff tears of any size (documented by MRI or ultrasound)
Patients planning surgical repair with Dr. Uma Srikumaran (PI of this study) at Johns Hopkins Shoulder Service (Columbia, Odenton Clinic sites; Howard County General Hospital/Bayview/Johns Hopkins Hospital operative sites)

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with partial tears, massive rotator cuff tears that are irreparable, isolated subscapularis tears, and associated pathology (advanced degenerative changes)
Patients undergoing revision rotator cuff tears will be excluded.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253990069
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 75
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30533195
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899487
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Quantitative EEG During Anesthesia Emergence in Children ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797274
2019-02-08

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797274
NCT03797274https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797274?tab=tableNANANAMost drugs used in general anesthesia work on various receptors in the human brain, causing unconsciousness, loss of memory, and loss of reflection of the autonomic nervous system. After the anesthesia, baseline physiological function will be attained by administration of some reversal drugs or as the time goes by. In this process, various side effects may occur.

Emergence delirium (ED) is a representative behavioral disturbance after general anesthesia in children and that can cause several problems during the recovery period. Previous EEG studies reported that this phenomenon is related to hyperexcitation of the brain, and occurrence of epileptiform discharges during anesthesia induction may indicate an increased vulnerability for the development of a functional brain disorder in these children.

However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no studies concern evaluating quantitative EEG parameters for prediction of this postoperative negative behavior in children.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-05
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-09-04
Start Month Year February 8, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year May 29, 2019
Verification Month Year September 2019
Verification Date 2019-09-30
Last Update Posted Date 2019-09-04

Facilities

Sequence: 200390867
Name Eugene Kim
City Daegu
State Nam-gu
Zip 42472
Country Korea, Republic of

Conditions

Sequence: 52256822 Sequence: 52256823 Sequence: 52256824 Sequence: 52256825 Sequence: 52256826
Name Anesthesia, General Name Electroencephalography Name Brain Waves Name Psychology, Children Name Child Behavior
Downcase Name anesthesia, general Downcase Name electroencephalography Downcase Name brain waves Downcase Name psychology, children Downcase Name child behavior

Id Information

Sequence: 40221009
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value DCMC#7

Countries

Sequence: 42636632
Name Korea, Republic of
Removed False

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177693373 Sequence: 177693367 Sequence: 177693368 Sequence: 177693369 Sequence: 177693370 Sequence: 177693371 Sequence: 177693372 Sequence: 177693374 Sequence: 177693375
Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Delta-theta to alpha-beta ratio (DTABR) Measure Occurrence of Emergence delirium Measure Relative power of each brain waves Measure modified Yale preoperative anxiety score (mYPAS) Measure PAED score during PACU stay Measure FLACC score on initial, 10, 20, and 30 min Measure Watcha scale on initial, 10, 20, and 30 min Measure Delta to alpha ratio Measure Theta to beta ratio (TBR)
Time Frame From the cessation of sevoflurane inhalation to the extubation of airway devices such as tracheal tubes or laryngeal mask airway Time Frame During 60 minutes after PACU admission Time Frame From the cessation of sevoflurane inhalation to the extubation of airway devices such as tracheal tubes or laryngeal mask airway Time Frame before anesthesia induction (about 30 min before the surgery) Time Frame During 60 min after PACU admission Time Frame During 60 minutes after PACU admission] Time Frame During 60 minutes after PACU admission Time Frame From the cessation of sevoflurane inhalation to the extubation of airway devices such as tracheal tubes or laryngeal mask airway Time Frame From the cessation of sevoflurane inhalation to the extubation of airway devices such as tracheal tubes or laryngeal mask airway
Description From the relative power of each brain waves, the investigators calculated the ratio as follows:

DTABR = (Delta wave + Theta wave)/(alpha wave + beta wave)

Description On arrival at post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), patients are checked post-anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED). The PAED scale is a validated observational measure of 5 aspects of child behavior (caregiver eye contact, purposeful movement, evidence of awareness of surroundings, restlessness, and inconsolability). Ratings are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 20; greater scores indicate greater severity.

If the PAED score is greater than 12, investigators define emergence delirium.

Description Original frontal EEG segments are attained via 2 channel bispectral index monitoring (BIS VISTA™, Aspect Medical Systems, Inc. MA, USA) during the anesthesia period. The EEG is then segmented into 4 s epochs and fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis is performed for each of these segments. FFT of all these selected EEG segments are computed in the following frequency bands:

Delta: 1-4 Hz Theta: 4-8 Hz Alpha: 8-13 Hz Beta: 13-30 Hz

And then, the relative power of each frequency bands to the total power of the sum is calculated.

Description mYPAS is the assessment tool for measure the anxiety before induction. Higher score indicates higher anxiety. Description On arrival at post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and every 10 min from then, patients were checked PAED. The PAED scale is a validated observational measure of 5 aspects of child behavior (caregiver eye contact, purposeful movement, evidence of awareness of surroundings, restlessness, and inconsolability). Ratings are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 20; greater scores indicate greater severity. Description Face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) score is checked every 10min after PACU admission Description On arrival and 10, 20, and 30 min after PACU admission, patients were checked Watcha scale as following 4-point scale

calm
crying, but can be consoled
Crying, cannot be consoled
Agitated and thrashing around

Higher score indicates higher agitation.

Description From the relative power of each brain waves, the investigators calculated the ratio as follows:

DAR = Delta wave / alpha wave

Description From the relative power of each brain waves, the investigators calculated the ratio as follows:

TBR = Theta wave / beta wave

Sponsors

Sequence: 48399390
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Daegu Catholic University Medical Center

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29331738
Role Study Chair
Name Eugene Kim, MD, PhD
Affiliation Assistant professor

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30815169
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 2 Years
Maximum Age 10 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Population This study collects subjects from a tertiary university hospital.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Children aged between 2 and 10 years of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA PS) I or II who are planned to receive surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

If the guardian and the subject are difficult to evaluate normally due to language barriers/language disorders/delay or autistic disorder
with developmental delay, neurological disorders or psychiatric diseases associated with symptoms of agitation, anxiety, attention deficit, sleep disturbances, etc
refusal of consent
Recent history (within a month) of received general anesthesia or surgery
presence of congenital or other genetic conditions thought to influence brain development

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254077172
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 3
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 2
Maximum Age Num 10
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 7

Designs

Sequence: 30561132
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28927536
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Eugene Kim
Title Assistant professor
Affiliation Daegu Catholic University Medical Center

Study References

Sequence: 52155703
Pmid 33010926
Reference Type derived
Citation Kim J, Lee HC, Byun SH, Lim H, Lee M, Choung Y, Kim E. Frontal electroencephalogram activity during emergence from general anaesthesia in children with and without emergence delirium. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jan;126(1):293-303. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.07.060. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Study of Venetoclax and AMG 176 in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Hematologic Malignancies ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797261
2019-03-18

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797261
NCT03797261https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797261?tab=tableNANANAThis dose-escalation study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of venetoclax in combination with AMG 176 in participants with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and participants with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL)/diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

This study will include a dose escalation phase to identify the maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose (MTD/RPTD) of venetoclax plus AMG 176 as well as a dose expansion phase to confirm safety, explore efficacy, and confirm the suitability of the preliminary RPTD.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2021-12-07
Start Month Year March 18, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 30, 2019
Verification Month Year December 2021
Verification Date 2021-12-31
Last Update Posted Date 2021-12-07

Facilities

Sequence: 200754557 Sequence: 200754558 Sequence: 200754559 Sequence: 200754560 Sequence: 200754561 Sequence: 200754562 Sequence: 200754563 Sequence: 200754564 Sequence: 200754565 Sequence: 200754566 Sequence: 200754567 Sequence: 200754568 Sequence: 200754569 Sequence: 200754570 Sequence: 200754571 Sequence: 200754572 Sequence: 200754573
Name City of Hope /ID# 207393 Name USC Norris Cancer Center /ID# 207396 Name University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics /ID# 207459 Name Univ Kansas Med Ctr /ID# 207480 Name Duplicate_Dana-Farber Cancer Institute /ID# 207367 Name Washington University-School of Medicine /ID# 206995 Name NYU Langone Medical Center /ID# 207390 Name Unc /Id# 207388 Name UPMC Hillman Cancer Ctr /ID# 208482 Name Calvary Mater Newcastle /ID# 211455 Name Royal Adelaide Hospital /ID# 210602 Name Alfred Health /ID# 210350 Name Universitaetsklinikum Frankfurt /ID# 207984 Name Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig /ID# 209824 Name Charite Universitaetsklinikum Berlin – Campus Virchow /ID# 207987 Name Universitaetsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden /ID# 207803 Name Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE) /ID# 207788
City Duarte City Los Angeles City Iowa City City Kansas City City Boston City Saint Louis City New York City Chapel Hill City Pittsburgh City Waratah City Adelaide City Melbourne City Frankfurt am Main City Leipzig City Berlin City Dresden City Hamburg
State California State California State Iowa State Kansas State Massachusetts State Missouri State New York State North Carolina State Pennsylvania State New South Wales State South Australia State Victoria State Hessen State Sachsen
Zip 91010 Zip 90033 Zip 52242 Zip 66160 Zip 02215 Zip 63110 Zip 10016-6402 Zip 27599 Zip 15232 Zip 2298 Zip 5000 Zip 3004 Zip 60590 Zip 04103 Zip 13353 Zip 01307 Zip 20246
Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country Australia Country Australia Country Australia Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96346690 Sequence: 96346691
Mesh Term Venetoclax Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents
Downcase Mesh Term venetoclax Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52358496 Sequence: 52358497 Sequence: 52358498
Name Acute Myeloid Leukemia Name Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Name Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Downcase Name acute myeloid leukemia Downcase Name non-hodgkin's lymphoma Downcase Name diffuse large b-cell lymphoma

Id Information

Sequence: 40292744 Sequence: 40292745
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value M16-785 Id Value 2018-003314-41
Id Type EudraCT Number

Countries

Sequence: 42715852 Sequence: 42715853 Sequence: 42715854
Name United States Name Australia Name Germany
Removed False Removed False Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55801453
Group Type Experimental
Title Venetoclax + AMG 176
Description Venetoclax and AMG 176 will be administered in combination. Different combinations of dose levels for venetoclax and AMG 176 will be explored.

Interventions

Sequence: 52669438 Sequence: 52669439
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Venetoclax Name AMG 176
Description tablet, oral Description solution, intravenous

Keywords

Sequence: 80126133 Sequence: 80126134 Sequence: 80126135 Sequence: 80126136 Sequence: 80126137 Sequence: 80126138
Name Acute Myeloid Leukemia Name Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Name Cancer Name Venetoclax Name AMG 176 Name diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)
Downcase Name acute myeloid leukemia Downcase Name non-hodgkin's lymphoma Downcase Name cancer Downcase Name venetoclax Downcase Name amg 176 Downcase Name diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (dlbcl)

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178070364 Sequence: 178070365 Sequence: 178070366 Sequence: 178070367 Sequence: 178070368 Sequence: 178070369 Sequence: 178070370 Sequence: 178070371 Sequence: 178070372 Sequence: 178070373 Sequence: 178070374 Sequence: 178070375
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and/or Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RPTD) for Venetoclax + AMG 176 Measure Number of Participants With Adverse Events Measure Composite Complete Remission Rate (CRc) for Participants with AML Measure Objective Response Rate (ORR) for Participants with AML Measure ORR for Participants with NHL Measure Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Venetoclax Measure Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Venetoclax Measure AUC of Venetoclax Measure Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AMG 176 Measure Half-life (t1/2) of AMG 176 Measure AUC of AMG 176 Measure Clearance (CL) of AMG 176
Time Frame Up to 28 days after first dose of study drug in a dose-escalation phase Time Frame From first dose of study drug until 30 days or 5 half-lives after discontinuation of study drug administration will be collected (up to approximately 4 years). Time Frame Up to approximately 2 years from last subject first dose Time Frame Up to approximately 2 years from last subject first dose Time Frame Up to approximately 2 years from last subject first dose Time Frame Up to approximately 28 days after first dose of study drug Time Frame Up to approximately 28 days after first dose of study drug Time Frame Up to approximately 28 days after first dose of study drug Time Frame Up to approximately 16 days after first dose of study drug Time Frame Approximately 16 days after first dose of study drug Time Frame Approximately 16 days after first dose of study drug Time Frame Approximately 16 days after first dose of study drug
Description The MTD and/or RPTD of venetoclax and of AMG 176 will be determined during the dose escalation phase of the study. Description An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Description CRc rate is defined as CR + CRi (CR with incomplete blood count recovery). Description ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with documented partial response (PR) or better (CR + CRi + partial response [PR]) based on International Working Group (IWG) criteria for AML Description ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with documented CR + PR based on Lugano criteria for NHL. Description Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) of venetoclax. Description Time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) of Venetoclax. Description Area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of venetoclax. Description Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) of AMG 176 Description Terminal phase elimination half-life (t1/2) Description Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of AMG 176 Description Clearance (CL) is defined the volume of plasma cleared of the drug per unit time.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194199540 Sequence: 194199541 Sequence: 194199542 Sequence: 194199543 Sequence: 194199544 Sequence: 194199545 Sequence: 194199546 Sequence: 194199547 Sequence: 194199548 Sequence: 194199549 Sequence: 194199550 Sequence: 194199551 Sequence: 194199552 Sequence: 194199553 Sequence: 194199554 Sequence: 194199555
Mesh Term Lymphoma Mesh Term Leukemia, Myeloid Mesh Term Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute Mesh Term Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Mesh Term Lymphoma, B-Cell Mesh Term Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse Mesh Term Hematologic Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Lymphoproliferative Disorders Mesh Term Lymphatic Diseases Mesh Term Immunoproliferative Disorders Mesh Term Immune System Diseases Mesh Term Leukemia Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Hematologic Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma Downcase Mesh Term leukemia, myeloid Downcase Mesh Term leukemia, myeloid, acute Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma, non-hodgkin Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma, b-cell Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma, large b-cell, diffuse Downcase Mesh Term hematologic neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term lymphoproliferative disorders Downcase Mesh Term lymphatic diseases Downcase Mesh Term immunoproliferative disorders Downcase Mesh Term immune system diseases Downcase Mesh Term leukemia Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term hematologic diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48493518 Sequence: 48493519 Sequence: 48493520
Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name AbbVie Name Genentech, Inc. Name Amgen

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29384380
Role Study Director
Name ABBVIE INC.
Affiliation AbbVie

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68404723 Sequence: 68404724
Design Group Id 55801453 Design Group Id 55801453
Intervention Id 52669438 Intervention Id 52669439

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30873332
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Adequate kidney, liver and hematology values as described in the protocol.
Diagnosis of relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or R/R Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)/diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) confirmed by the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, as appropriate.
Meets the following disease activity criteria:
AML: must have received at least 1 prior therapy for AML and be ineligible for cytotoxic therapy and allogeneic stem cell transplant.
NHL/DLBCL: measurable disease with a bidimensional lesion measuring at least 1.5 cm; received at least 1 prior therapy for NHL with no curative treatment option as determined by the investigator and be ineligible for a stem cell transplant.

Exclusion Criteria:

History of clinically significant medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would adversely affect participation in this study.
History of of any malignancy within the last 6 months except for those specified in this protocol and low-grade malignancies not requiring active treatment such as non-melanoma skin cancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, or prostate cancer in situ.
Prior allogeneic stem cell transplant or autologous stem cell transplant within 100 days of study drug administration and no signs or symptoms of acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease.
Previous enrollment in a randomized trial including either venetoclax or AMG 176.
Known active or chronic pancreatitis; severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with hypoxemia; central nervous system manifestations of malignancy.
Active, uncontrolled infection.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254045098
Number Of Facilities 17
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 9
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 10

Designs

Sequence: 30619126
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Sequential Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26768509
Intervention Id 52669438
Name ABT-199

Links

Sequence: 4402705
Url http://www.rxabbvie.com
Description Related Info

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28985653
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Prospective Cohort Study of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Survival of Patients With Early Breast Cancer ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797248
2018-11-12

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797248
NCT03797248https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797248?tab=tableMing-Yen Tsai, PhDmissuriae@yahoo.com.tw+886975056534This 2-year trial is intended to be used to study breast cancer patients through forward-looking generation design through collaboration between Chinese and Western medical teams. The whole study consists of 2 stages, stage I comprises a cross-sectional study-baseline and stage II is a cohort for outcome evaluation and follow-up study across a 3-year period. To provide an empirical basis for combined TCM treatment in the Breast Cancer Research Team and to publish that as a reference for future TCM and Western medicine in integrative cancer treatment.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-05
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2019-09-17
Start Month Year November 12, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year October 24, 2020
Verification Month Year September 2019
Verification Date 2019-09-30
Last Update Posted Date 2019-09-17

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20710014
Description Breast cancer is a major health issue for women worldwide and has increased exponentially in the last decades. Improved earlier detection combined with adjuvant systemic therapy is responsible for much of the reduction in cause-specific mortality from breast cancer. Chemotherapy after surgery can decrease the risk of recurrence and is often used as routine treatment in clinic. Because of the fact that a considerable number of patients seek for traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) during adjuvant chemotherapy, it is thus need to evaluate the correlation between TCM treatment and prognosis. The investigators design a single center, prospective cohort study began in November 2018 in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. A sample of 104 participants diagnosed with early breast cancer was recruited from Breast Cancer Research Team and are followed up every 3 to 6 months till October 2023. Detailed information of participants includes general information, history of cancer, quality of life, side effects of chemotherapy and safety of treatment, body constitution of TCM and meridian energy analysis is taken face-to-face at baseline.

Facilities

Sequence: 199965204
Status Recruiting
Name Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
City Kaohsiung
Zip 83301
Country Taiwan

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28086689
Facility Id 199965204
Contact Type primary
Name Ming-Yen Tsai
Email missuriae@yahoo.com.tw
Phone +886975056534
Phone Extension +886975056534

Conditions

Sequence: 52139076
Name Early-stage Breast Cancer
Downcase Name early-stage breast cancer

Id Information

Sequence: 40135115
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 201801559A3

Countries

Sequence: 42542741
Name Taiwan
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55559430 Sequence: 55559431
Title Cohort 1 Title Cohort 2
Description adjuvant chemotherapy combined with Chinese herbal medicine Description adjuvant chemotherapy only

Interventions

Sequence: 52454987
Intervention Type Combination Product
Name Chinese herbal medicine
Description All Chinese herbal products prescribed from TCM physicians in our hospital during patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy

Keywords

Sequence: 79822913 Sequence: 79822914 Sequence: 79822915 Sequence: 79822916 Sequence: 79822917
Name traditional Chinese medicine Name quality of life Name disease-free survival Name adjuvant chemotherapy Name breast cancer
Downcase Name traditional chinese medicine Downcase Name quality of life Downcase Name disease-free survival Downcase Name adjuvant chemotherapy Downcase Name breast cancer

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177264076 Sequence: 177264077 Sequence: 177264078 Sequence: 177264079 Sequence: 177264080 Sequence: 177264081
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure disease-free survival Measure QOLs measurement-1 Measure QOLs measurement-2 Measure TCM pattern Measure meridian energy Measure Side effects of adjuvant chemotherapy
Time Frame 3 years Time Frame 6 months Time Frame 6 months Time Frame 6 months Time Frame 6 months Time Frame 6 months
Description 3-year disease-free survival Description Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Breast Cancer(FACT-B) Description Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Description Body Constitution Questionnaire (BCQ) Description Meridian Energy Analysis Device (MEAD) Description Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193366816 Sequence: 193366817 Sequence: 193366818 Sequence: 193366819 Sequence: 193366815
Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Breast Diseases Mesh Term Skin Diseases Mesh Term Breast Neoplasms
Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term breast diseases Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases Downcase Mesh Term breast neoplasms
Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list

Sponsors

Sequence: 48290774
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29268565
Role Principal Investigator
Name Chien-Ting Liu, MD
Affiliation Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12000505
Contact Type primary
Name Ming-Yen Tsai, PhD
Phone +886975056534
Email missuriae@yahoo.com.tw
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68107550 Sequence: 68107551
Design Group Id 55559430 Design Group Id 55559431
Intervention Id 52454987 Intervention Id 52454987

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30747767
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender Female
Minimum Age 20 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Patients with breast cancer aged over 20 years with histologically diagnosed stage 1-3 after radical surgery are enrolled from an academic medical center. All participants need to complete the 6-8 cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy, which may last 6 months.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Aged > 20 years old female patients;
Patients with histologically proven stage 1-3 breast cancer after surgery;
The duration from the end of radical surgery to the beginning of the trail is less than 1 month;
ECOG score is 0-2 points;
Agreed to participate in this study and signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Combined with inadequate heart, liver, kidney and hematopoietic function and other serious diseases;
Pregnant and lactating women;
Patients with a history of mental illness;
Patients with distant metastasis and/or expected lifetime less than 3 months;
Patients undergoing other medicinal herbs outside our hospital.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254122087
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 20
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 5

Designs

Sequence: 30494050
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28860330
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Ming-Yen Tsai
Title Department of Chinese medicine
Affiliation Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Study References

Sequence: 52032796
Pmid 31847861
Reference Type derived
Citation Liu CT, Chen YH, Huang YC, Chen SY, Tsai MY. Chemotherapy in conjunction with traditional Chinese medicine for survival of patients with early female breast cancer: protocol for a non-randomized, single center prospective cohort study. Trials. 2019 Dec 17;20(1):741. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3848-8.

]]>

<![CDATA[ The Impact of Nerve Cross Section Area on Sensory Block Onset ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797235
2019-01-19

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797235
NCT03797235https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797235?tab=tableNANANAThe study aims to describe a correlation between the nerve cross section and the sensory or motor block onset time. Therefore, different nerve cross sections with their Motor and sensory onset times are compared in order to find a correlation.

In the case of discovering a correlation, this could be translated into clinical practice, where a more tailored and individualized approach to performing peripheral nerve blocks would be possible, thus lowering the risks of adverse events occurring.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-05
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2020-05-22
Start Month Year January 19, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year June 20, 2019
Verification Month Year May 2020
Verification Date 2020-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-05-22

Facilities

Sequence: 200159508
Name Der Balgrist
City Zürich
Zip 8008
Country Switzerland

Conditions

Sequence: 52185583
Name Regional Anesthesia
Downcase Name regional anesthesia

Id Information

Sequence: 40169132
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value BASEC 2018-00939

Countries

Sequence: 42580719
Name Switzerland
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609215 Sequence: 55609216
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Dominant Arm Title Non-dominant arm
Description Two ultrasound guided nerve blocks (block of the ulnar and median nerve) on the dominant forearm Description Two ultrasound guided nerve blocks (block of the ulnar and median nerve) on the non-dominant forearm.

Interventions

Sequence: 52499517 Sequence: 52499518
Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Procedure
Name Dominant Arm Name Non-dominant arm
Description The volume of local anesthetic used for the block of the ulnar and median nerve will be 5 times the estimated 95% effective dose (ED 95 ) of LA needed to block the nerve relative to the nerve cross-sectional area. The ED 95 for the ulnar nerve has been elucidated to be 0,11ml/mm2. The same ED 95 will be used for the median nerve. Description The volume of local anesthetic used for the block of the ulnar and median nerve will be 5 times the estimated 95% effective dose (ED 95 ) of LA needed to block the nerve relative to the nerve cross-sectional area. The ED 95 for the ulnar nerve has been elucidated to be 0,11ml/mm2. The same ED 95 will be used for the median nerve.

Keywords

Sequence: 79888898
Name Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia
Downcase Name ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432337 Sequence: 177432338 Sequence: 177432339 Sequence: 177432340
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Correlation between nerve cross-section and time to complete sensory block of a nerve Measure Correlation between nerve cross-section and time to complete motor block of a nerve Measure Correlation between nerve cross-section and the duration of sensory nerve block Measure Correlation between the nerve cross-section and duration of motor nerve block
Time Frame Sensory evaluation will be carried out before the block and every 2 minutes after the start of the injection of LA until complete sensory loss to both cold and pinprick. Expected time frame: 10-60 minutes Time Frame Motor evaluation will be carried out before the block and every 2 minutes after the start of the injection of LA until complete motor block. Expected time frame: 10-100 minutes Time Frame The evaluation of the duration of block will start one hour after the determined complete sensory loss and will be tested every 10 minutes until complete resolution of the sensory block. Expected time frame: 10-300 minutes Time Frame The evaluation of the duration of sensory block will start one hour after the determined complete motor loss and will be tested every 10 minutes until complete resolution of the motor block. Expected time frame: 10-300min
Description Correlation between the nerve cross-section in mm2 of both nerves (median and ulnar) measured with an ultrasound system and time in minutes from the moment the investigator starts injecting the local anesthetic (LA) around the respective nerves to complete sensory loss in the innervation area of the blocked nerve, assessed by response to light touch, pinprick and cold sensation. This correlation will be expressed in min/ mm2. Description The correlation between the nerve cross-section area in mm2 of both nerves (median and ulnar) measured with an ultrasound system and time in minutes from the start of the LA injection around the nerve median and ulnar nerves to the respective onset of the motor block, assessed with a numerical scale ranging from 0 to 5 (0-no muscle contraction visible, 5-normal muscle strength, maximal force against resistance and gravity). This correlation will be expressed in min/ mm2. Description The correlation between the nerve cross-section area in mm2 of both nerves (median and ulnar) measured with an ultrasound system and the duration of the respective sensory block in minutes, as reflected by the return of normal sensation in the innervation area of the respective nerve. This correlation will be expressed in min/ mm2. Description The correlation between the nerve cross-section area in mm2 of both nerves (median and ulnar) measured with an ultrasound system and the duration of the respective motor block in minutes, as reflected by the return of normal muscle strength in the innervation area of the respective nerve. This correlation will be expressed in min/ mm2.

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332410
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Jose Aguirre

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29293043
Role Principal Investigator
Name José Aguirre, PD Dr Med
Affiliation Der Balgrist

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168288 Sequence: 68168289
Design Group Id 55609215 Design Group Id 55609216
Intervention Id 52499517 Intervention Id 52499518

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773629
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 64 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

ASA I – II, both sexes
≥ 18 years old
< 65 years old
Written informed consent as documented by signature

Exclusion Criteria:

Known allergy or hypersensitivity to a study drug or class of drug.
Severe coagulopathy.
History of alcohol abuse or the intake of psychotropic drugs.
Pregnancy.
Infection at the injection site or a systemic infection.
Fever of unknown origin.
Motor or sensory abnormalities in the arm.
Previous enrollment into the current study

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253952969
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 5
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 64
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30519760
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Crossover Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Subject Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886061
Responsible Party Type Sponsor-Investigator
Name Jose Aguirre
Title PD Dr. med.
Affiliation Balgrist University Hospital

Study References

Sequence: 52079059 Sequence: 52079060 Sequence: 52079061 Sequence: 52079062 Sequence: 52079063 Sequence: 52079064 Sequence: 52079065 Sequence: 52079066 Sequence: 52079067 Sequence: 52079068 Sequence: 52079069 Sequence: 52079070 Sequence: 52079071 Sequence: 52079072
Pmid 19051446 Pmid 26361135 Pmid 19587623 Pmid 25644578 Pmid 25376973 Pmid 26423050 Pmid 14504153 Pmid 22664978 Pmid 20034967 Pmid 24809480 Pmid 21148659 Pmid 16857551 Pmid 2899106 Pmid 20121770
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Capdevila X, Biboulet P, Morau D, Mannion S, Choquet O. How and why to use ultrasound for regional blockade. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2008;59(3):147-54. Citation Lewis SR, Price A, Walker KJ, McGrattan K, Smith AF. Ultrasound guidance for upper and lower limb blocks. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 11;2015(9):CD006459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006459.pub3. Citation Eichenberger U, Stockli S, Marhofer P, Huber G, Willimann P, Kettner SC, Pleiner J, Curatolo M, Kapral S. Minimal local anesthetic volume for peripheral nerve block: a new ultrasound-guided, nerve dimension-based method. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 May-Jun;34(3):242-6. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31819a7225. Citation Keplinger M, Marhofer P, Marhofer D, Schroegendorfer K, Haslik W, Zeitlinger M, Mayer CV, Kettner SC. Effective local anaesthetic volumes for sciatic nerve blockade: a clinical evaluation of the ED99. Anaesthesia. 2015 May;70(5):585-90. doi: 10.1111/anae.13013. Epub 2015 Jan 20. Citation Choi S, McCartney CJ. Evidence Base for the Use of Ultrasound for Upper Extremity Blocks: 2014 Update. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):242-50. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000155. Citation Fenten MG, Schoenmakers KP, Heesterbeek PJ, Scheffer GJ, Stienstra R. Effect of local anesthetic concentration, dose and volume on the duration of single-injection ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with mepivacaine: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Sep 30;15:130. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0110-0. Citation Serradell A, Herrero R, Villanueva JA, Santos JA, Moncho JM, Masdeu J. Comparison of three different volumes of mepivacaine in axillary plexus block using multiple nerve stimulation. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Oct;91(4):519-24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg215. Citation Fredrickson MJ, Abeysekera A, White R. Randomized study of the effect of local anesthetic volume and concentration on the duration of peripheral nerve blockade. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;37(5):495-501. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182580fd0. Citation Latzke D, Marhofer P, Zeitlinger M, Machata A, Neumann F, Lackner E, Kettner SC. Minimal local anaesthetic volumes for sciatic nerve block: evaluation of ED 99 in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):239-44. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep368. Epub 2009 Dec 23. Citation Ecoffey C, Oger E, Marchand-Maillet F, Cimino Y, Rannou JJ, Beloeil H; SOS French Regional Anaesthesia Hotline. Complications associated with 27 031 ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks: a web-based survey of 36 French centres. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Nov;31(11):606-10. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000063. Citation Jeng CL, Torrillo TM, Rosenblatt MA. Complications of peripheral nerve blocks. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Dec;105 Suppl 1:i97-107. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq273. Citation Hebl JR. The importance and implications of aseptic techniques during regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 Jul-Aug;31(4):311-23. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2006.04.004. No abstract available. Citation Rotter ML, Hirschl AM, Koller W. Effect of chlorhexidine-containing detergent, non-medicated soap or isopropanol and the influence of neutralizer on bacterial pathogenicity. J Hosp Infect. 1988 Apr;11(3):220-5. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(88)90100-4. Citation Marhofer P, Eichenberger U, Stockli S, Huber G, Kapral S, Curatolo M, Kettner S. Ultrasonographic guided axillary plexus blocks with low volumes of local anaesthetics: a crossover volunteer study. Anaesthesia. 2010 Mar;65(3):266-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06247.x. Epub 2010 Jan 29.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Vitamin E Supplementation in Hyperinsulinism/Hyperammonemia Syndrome ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797222
2019-04-15

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797222
NCT03797222https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797222?tab=tableNANANAInvestigators will assess the tolerability of oral Vitamin E supplementation in subjects with congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) and hyperammonemia (HA) syndrome.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-06
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2022-11-25
Start Month Year April 15, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year March 23, 2020
Verification Month Year November 2022
Verification Date 2022-11-30
Last Update Posted Date 2022-11-25
Results First Posted Date 2022-11-25

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20756417
Description Congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) is a rare disorder of pancreatic beta cell insulin secretion that causes persistent and severe hypoglycemia starting at birth. Hyperinsulinism/hyperammonemia (HI/HA) syndrome is the second most common type of congenital HI and is caused by activating mutations in glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH). Patients with HI/HA exhibit fasting hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, protein-induced hypoglycemia, hyperammonemia, seizures, and intellectual disability independent of hypoglycemia. These effects result from abnormal GDH activity in the beta cells, liver and kidney cells, neurons, and astrocytes. The only available treatment for HI/HA syndrome is diazoxide, which acts on the beta cells to decrease insulin secretion but has no effect on GDH activity itself or on other cell types. Thus, there remains a significant unmet need for improved therapies for this disorder. Preliminary data show that Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) inhibits GDH activity in cell lines and improves hypoglycemia in a GDH HI mouse model. Based on these preclinical studies, Investigators hypothesize that Vitamin E will inhibit GDH activity and may impact hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia and hyperammonemia in subjects with HI/HA syndrome. This hypothesis will be tested in a future study. In this initial pilot study, investigators will assess the tolerability of oral Vitamin E supplementation in subjects with HI/HA syndrome.

Facilities

Sequence: 200403436
Name Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
City Philadelphia
State Pennsylvania
Zip 19104
Country United States

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96195107 Sequence: 96195105 Sequence: 96195106 Sequence: 96195108 Sequence: 96195109 Sequence: 96195110 Sequence: 96195111 Sequence: 96195112 Sequence: 96195113
Mesh Term alpha-Tocopherol Mesh Term Vitamin E Mesh Term Tocopherols Mesh Term Vitamins Mesh Term Micronutrients Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Antioxidants Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Protective Agents
Downcase Mesh Term alpha-tocopherol Downcase Mesh Term vitamin e Downcase Mesh Term tocopherols Downcase Mesh Term vitamins Downcase Mesh Term micronutrients Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term antioxidants Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term protective agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52260446
Name Hyperinsulinism-Hyperammonemia Syndrome
Downcase Name hyperinsulinism-hyperammonemia syndrome

Id Information

Sequence: 40223701 Sequence: 40223702
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value 17-014550 Id Value T32DK063688
Id Type U.S. NIH Grant/Contract
Id Link https://reporter.nih.gov/quickSearch/T32DK063688

Countries

Sequence: 42639712
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55693336
Group Type Experimental
Title Vitamin E Supplementation
Description Daily oral supplementation with Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) for 2 weeks.

Interventions

Sequence: 52573213
Intervention Type Dietary Supplement
Name Vitamin E
Description Subjects will take an oral Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) supplement once daily with a fat-containing meal for 2 weeks. The dose will be based on subject age (150 IU if 1-3 years old, 300 IU if 4-8 years old, 450 IU if 9-17 years old, 600 IU if >17 years old). Formulations include 50 IU/mL liquid and 200 IU capsules. The liquid formulation will be used for subjects who will receive <600 IU daily, or for any subjects who prefer liquid medication to capsules.

Keywords

Sequence: 79995914 Sequence: 79995915 Sequence: 79995916 Sequence: 79995917
Name hyperinsulinism Name hyperammonemia Name hypoglycemia Name vitamin e
Downcase Name hyperinsulinism Downcase Name hyperammonemia Downcase Name hypoglycemia Downcase Name vitamin e

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177707526 Sequence: 177707527 Sequence: 177707528 Sequence: 177707529 Sequence: 177707530 Sequence: 177707531 Sequence: 177707532 Sequence: 177707533 Sequence: 177707534 Sequence: 177707535 Sequence: 177707536
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Tolerability of Vitamin E Based on Responses to a Subject/Parent-reported Symptom Questionnaire After Vitamin E Supplementation Compared to Baseline Measure Plasma Alpha-tocopherol Concentration Measure Delta-plasma Glucose Concentration Measure Fasting Plasma Glucose Concentration Measure Nadir Plasma Glucose Concentration Measure Fasting Plasma Insulin Concentration Measure Peak Plasma Insulin Concentration Measure Delta-plasma Insulin Concentration Measure Fasting Plasma Ammonia Concentration Measure Delta-plasma Ammonia Concentration Measure Hypoglycemia Frequency
Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks
Description The following symptoms will be scored as either "none" (did not occur)=0, "mild" (minimal symptoms, no treatment needed)=1, "moderate" (symptoms requiring treatment at home or as an outpatient=2, or "severe" (symptoms requiring hospitalization or emergency room visit, or life-threatening or potentially life-threatening symptoms)=4:

Seizure, Headache, Vision change/blurred vision, Weakness, Fatigue, Nausea, Vomiting, Diarrhea, Stomach pain, Constipation, Bruising, Bleeding, Rash, Itching, Other

Symptom scores will be summed to yield a Tolerability Questionnaire Score for each participant. The Tolerability Questionnaire Score has a minimum score of 0 (symptoms did not occur) and a maximum score of 60 (all of the measured symptoms occurred, each with severe designation).

The number (count) of participants with an increase in Tolerability Questionnaire Score from baseline to 2 weeks (following Vitamin E supplementation) will be reported.

Description change in fasting plasma alpha-tocopherol concentration following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in delta-glucose concentration (fasting plasma glucose – nadir plasma glucose during oral protein tolerance test) following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in fasting plasma glucose concentration following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in nadir plasma glucose concentration during oral protein tolerance test following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in fasting plasma insulin concentration following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in peak plasma insulin concentration during oral protein tolerance test following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in delta-plasma insulin concentration (peak plasma insulin – fasting plasma insulin during oral protein tolerance test) following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in fasting plasma ammonia concentration following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in delta-plasma ammonia concentration (plasma ammonia at 60 minutes – fasting plasma ammonia during oral protein tolerance test) following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in frequency of hypoglycemia (plasma glucose <70 mg/dL) detected on home glucose meter following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1])

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193828218 Sequence: 193828219 Sequence: 193828220 Sequence: 193828221 Sequence: 193828222 Sequence: 193828223 Sequence: 193828224
Mesh Term Hyperinsulinism Mesh Term Syndrome Mesh Term Hyperammonemia Mesh Term Disease Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Glucose Metabolism Disorders Mesh Term Metabolic Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term hyperinsulinism Downcase Mesh Term syndrome Downcase Mesh Term hyperammonemia Downcase Mesh Term disease Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term glucose metabolism disorders Downcase Mesh Term metabolic diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48402816 Sequence: 48402817 Sequence: 48402818 Sequence: 48402819
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class NIH
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Elizabeth A Rosenfeld Name University of Pennsylvania Name Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society Name National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29333879
Role Principal Investigator
Name Elizabeth Rosenfeld, MD
Affiliation Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68269834
Design Group Id 55693336
Intervention Id 52573213

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30817373
Gender All
Minimum Age 1 Year
Maximum Age 40 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Individuals age ≥12 months and ≤40 years
Diagnosis of HI/HA syndrome
On diazoxide therapy for treatment of hypoglycemia
Females ≥11 years of age or menstruating must have a negative urine/serum pregnancy test and must use an acceptable method of contraception, including abstinence, a barrier method (diaphragm or condom), Depo-Provera, or an oral contraceptive, for the duration of the study.
Informed consent for participants ≥18 years. Parental/guardian permission (informed consent) and, if appropriate, child assent for participants <18 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

Individuals age <12 months or >40 years
Individuals who have experienced an allergic reaction to Vitamin E
Individuals with a known allergy to dairy, whey, or soy
On concurrent therapy with a medication known to be metabolized by the CYP3A pathway
Individuals with a known increased risk of bleeding (bleeding disorder or on antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy)
Vitamin E supplementation within 30 days prior to enrollment, including multivitamins containing Vitamin E
Severe hypoglycemia (plasma glucose <50 mg/dL on repeat checks using home glucose meter) more than once weekly within 30 days prior to enrollment.
Evidence of a medical condition that might alter results or compromise the interpretation of results, including active infection, kidney failure, severe liver dysfunction, severe respiratory or cardiac failure.
Evidence of severe hematologic abnormality including severe anemia and/or thrombocytopenia.
Any investigational drug use within 30 days prior to enrollment.
Pregnant or lactating females.
Parents/guardians or subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, may be non-compliant with study schedules or procedures.
Unable to provide informed consent (e.g. impaired cognition or judgment).
Parents/guardians or subjects with limited English proficiency.

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254095062
Number Of Facilities 1
Number Of Nsae Subjects 34
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 11
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 27
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 1
Maximum Age Num 40
Minimum Age Unit Year
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 10

Designs

Sequence: 30563328
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description This open-label tolerability and feasibility pilot clinical study will use a before-and-after design, with blood tests and fasting oral protein tolerance test performed prior to and after 2 weeks of daily oral Vitamin E supplementation in individuals with HI/HA syndrome.

Drop Withdrawals

Sequence: 29040592
Result Group Id 56158765
Ctgov Group Code FG000
Period Overall Study
Reason Withdrawal by Subject
Count 1

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26715346
Intervention Id 52573213
Name alpha-tocopherol

Milestones

Sequence: 41077649 Sequence: 41077650 Sequence: 41077651
Result Group Id 56158765 Result Group Id 56158765 Result Group Id 56158765
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000
Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Count 14 Count 13 Count 1

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3926683

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 74131006 Sequence: 74131007 Sequence: 74131008 Sequence: 74131009 Sequence: 74131010 Sequence: 74131011 Sequence: 74131012 Sequence: 74131013 Sequence: 74131014 Sequence: 74131015 Sequence: 74131016
Outcome Id 30857536 Outcome Id 30857537 Outcome Id 30857538 Outcome Id 30857539 Outcome Id 30857540 Outcome Id 30857541 Outcome Id 30857542 Outcome Id 30857543 Outcome Id 30857544 Outcome Id 30857545 Outcome Id 30857546
Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 13 Count 12 Count 6 Count 12 Count 6 Count 12 Count 6 Count 6 Count 12 Count 5 Count 10

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2588063
Document Type Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True
Has Icf False
Has Sap True
Document Date 2019-12-11
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/22/NCT03797222/Prot_SAP_000.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 27986167 Sequence: 27986168 Sequence: 27986169 Sequence: 27986170 Sequence: 27986171 Sequence: 27986172 Sequence: 27986173 Sequence: 27986174 Sequence: 27986175 Sequence: 27986176 Sequence: 27986177 Sequence: 27986178 Sequence: 27986179 Sequence: 27986180 Sequence: 27986181
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG003 Ctgov Group Code EG003 Ctgov Group Code EG003 Ctgov Group Code EG004 Ctgov Group Code EG004 Ctgov Group Code EG004
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 9 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 2 Subjects At Risk 2 Subjects At Risk 2 Subjects At Risk 5 Subjects At Risk 5 Subjects At Risk 5 Subjects At Risk 3 Subjects At Risk 3 Subjects At Risk 3 Subjects At Risk 4 Subjects At Risk 4 Subjects At Risk 4
Created At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Created At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Created At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Created At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Created At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Created At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Created At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Created At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Created At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Created At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Created At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Created At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Created At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Created At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Created At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011
Updated At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Updated At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Updated At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Updated At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Updated At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Updated At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Updated At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Updated At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Updated At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Updated At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Updated At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Updated At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Updated At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Updated At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011 Updated At 2023-08-09 15:19:48.411011

Reported Events

Sequence: 529030973 Sequence: 529030974 Sequence: 529030975 Sequence: 529030976 Sequence: 529030977 Sequence: 529030978 Sequence: 529030979 Sequence: 529030971 Sequence: 529030972 Sequence: 529030963 Sequence: 529030964 Sequence: 529030965 Sequence: 529030966 Sequence: 529030967 Sequence: 529030968 Sequence: 529030969 Sequence: 529030970 Sequence: 529030980 Sequence: 529030981 Sequence: 529030982 Sequence: 529030983 Sequence: 529030984 Sequence: 529030985 Sequence: 529030986 Sequence: 529030987 Sequence: 529030988 Sequence: 529030989 Sequence: 529030990 Sequence: 529030991 Sequence: 529030992 Sequence: 529030993 Sequence: 529030994 Sequence: 529030995 Sequence: 529030996 Sequence: 529030997 Sequence: 529030998 Sequence: 529030999 Sequence: 529031000 Sequence: 529031001 Sequence: 529031002
Result Group Id 56158767 Result Group Id 56158768 Result Group Id 56158769 Result Group Id 56158770 Result Group Id 56158771 Result Group Id 56158767 Result Group Id 56158768 Result Group Id 56158770 Result Group Id 56158771 Result Group Id 56158767 Result Group Id 56158768 Result Group Id 56158769 Result Group Id 56158770 Result Group Id 56158771 Result Group Id 56158767 Result Group Id 56158768 Result Group Id 56158769 Result Group Id 56158769 Result Group Id 56158770 Result Group Id 56158771 Result Group Id 56158767 Result Group Id 56158768 Result Group Id 56158769 Result Group Id 56158770 Result Group Id 56158771 Result Group Id 56158767 Result Group Id 56158768 Result Group Id 56158769 Result Group Id 56158770 Result Group Id 56158771 Result Group Id 56158767 Result Group Id 56158768 Result Group Id 56158769 Result Group Id 56158770 Result Group Id 56158771 Result Group Id 56158767 Result Group Id 56158768 Result Group Id 56158769 Result Group Id 56158770 Result Group Id 56158771
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG003 Ctgov Group Code EG004 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG003 Ctgov Group Code EG004 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG003 Ctgov Group Code EG004 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG003 Ctgov Group Code EG004 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG003 Ctgov Group Code EG004 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG003 Ctgov Group Code EG004 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG003 Ctgov Group Code EG004 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG003 Ctgov Group Code EG004
Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period. Time Frame Adverse event data were collected over the 2 week study period.
Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other
Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 5 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 2 Subjects At Risk 5 Subjects At Risk 3 Subjects At Risk 4 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 0 Subjects At Risk 3 Subjects At Risk 4 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 2 Subjects At Risk 5 Subjects At Risk 3 Subjects At Risk 4 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 2 Subjects At Risk 5 Subjects At Risk 0 Subjects At Risk 2 Subjects At Risk 3 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 2 Subjects At Risk 5 Subjects At Risk 3 Subjects At Risk 4 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 2 Subjects At Risk 5 Subjects At Risk 3 Subjects At Risk 4 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 2 Subjects At Risk 5 Subjects At Risk 3 Subjects At Risk 4 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 2 Subjects At Risk 5 Subjects At Risk 3 Subjects At Risk 4
Event Count 6 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 3 Event Count 2 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 2 Event Count 4 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 6 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 2 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 2 Event Count 0 Event Count 2 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 0
Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Reproductive system and breast disorders Organ System Reproductive system and breast disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Reproductive system and breast disorders Organ System Reproductive system and breast disorders Organ System Reproductive system and breast disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Adverse Event Term Vomiting Adverse Event Term Vomiting Adverse Event Term Vomiting Adverse Event Term Vomiting Adverse Event Term Vomiting Adverse Event Term Increased menstrual bleeding Adverse Event Term Increased menstrual bleeding Adverse Event Term Headache Adverse Event Term Headache Adverse Event Term Otitis externa Adverse Event Term Otitis externa Adverse Event Term Otitis externa Adverse Event Term Otitis externa Adverse Event Term Otitis externa Adverse Event Term Headache Adverse Event Term Headache Adverse Event Term Headache Adverse Event Term Increased menstrual bleeding Adverse Event Term Increased menstrual bleeding Adverse Event Term Increased menstrual bleeding Adverse Event Term Abdominal pain Adverse Event Term Abdominal pain Adverse Event Term Abdominal pain Adverse Event Term Abdominal pain Adverse Event Term Abdominal pain Adverse Event Term Diarrhea Adverse Event Term Diarrhea Adverse Event Term Diarrhea Adverse Event Term Diarrhea Adverse Event Term Diarrhea Adverse Event Term Fatigue Adverse Event Term Fatigue Adverse Event Term Fatigue Adverse Event Term Fatigue Adverse Event Term Fatigue Adverse Event Term Rash Adverse Event Term Rash Adverse Event Term Rash Adverse Event Term Rash Adverse Event Term Rash
Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0
Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28929725
Responsible Party Type Sponsor-Investigator
Name Elizabeth A Rosenfeld
Title Attending Physician
Affiliation Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3857427
Pi Employee No

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3857392
Organization Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Name Lauren Mitteer
Phone 215-590-3174
Email mitteerl@chop.edu

Outcomes

Sequence: 30857536 Sequence: 30857537 Sequence: 30857538 Sequence: 30857539 Sequence: 30857540 Sequence: 30857541 Sequence: 30857542 Sequence: 30857543 Sequence: 30857544 Sequence: 30857545 Sequence: 30857546
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary
Title Tolerability of Vitamin E Based on Responses to a Subject/Parent-reported Symptom Questionnaire After Vitamin E Supplementation Compared to Baseline Title Plasma Alpha-tocopherol Concentration Title Delta-plasma Glucose Concentration Title Fasting Plasma Glucose Concentration Title Nadir Plasma Glucose Concentration Title Fasting Plasma Insulin Concentration Title Peak Plasma Insulin Concentration Title Delta-plasma Insulin Concentration Title Fasting Plasma Ammonia Concentration Title Delta-plasma Ammonia Concentration Title Hypoglycemia Frequency
Description The following symptoms will be scored as either "none" (did not occur)=0, "mild" (minimal symptoms, no treatment needed)=1, "moderate" (symptoms requiring treatment at home or as an outpatient=2, or "severe" (symptoms requiring hospitalization or emergency room visit, or life-threatening or potentially life-threatening symptoms)=4:

Seizure, Headache, Vision change/blurred vision, Weakness, Fatigue, Nausea, Vomiting, Diarrhea, Stomach pain, Constipation, Bruising, Bleeding, Rash, Itching, Other

Symptom scores will be summed to yield a Tolerability Questionnaire Score for each participant. The Tolerability Questionnaire Score has a minimum score of 0 (symptoms did not occur) and a maximum score of 60 (all of the measured symptoms occurred, each with severe designation).

The number (count) of participants with an increase in Tolerability Questionnaire Score from baseline to 2 weeks (following Vitamin E supplementation) will be reported.

Description change in fasting plasma alpha-tocopherol concentration following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in delta-glucose concentration (fasting plasma glucose – nadir plasma glucose during oral protein tolerance test) following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in fasting plasma glucose concentration following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in nadir plasma glucose concentration during oral protein tolerance test following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in fasting plasma insulin concentration following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in peak plasma insulin concentration during oral protein tolerance test following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in delta-plasma insulin concentration (peak plasma insulin – fasting plasma insulin during oral protein tolerance test) following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in fasting plasma ammonia concentration following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in delta-plasma ammonia concentration (plasma ammonia at 60 minutes – fasting plasma ammonia during oral protein tolerance test) following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in frequency of hypoglycemia (plasma glucose <70 mg/dL) detected on home glucose meter following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1])
Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks
Population The 2 week (visit 2) laboratory draw was unable to be obtained for 1 participant, yielding n=12 analyzed for this outcome Population Per the study protocol, the oral protein tolerance test was not repeated at 2 weeks (visit 2) if the baseline (visit 1) oral protein tolerance test was not tolerated. Of the 13 participants who completed the study, 7 did not tolerate the baseline (visit 1) oral protein tolerance test. The 2 week (visit 2) oral protein tolerance test was performed in 6 participants. Oral protein tolerance test parameters were analyzed for these 6 participants. Population The 2 week (visit 2) laboratory draw was unable to be obtained for 1 participant, yielding n=12 analyzed for this outcome Population Per the study protocol, the oral protein tolerance test was not repeated at 2 weeks (visit 2) if the baseline (visit 1) oral protein tolerance test was not tolerated. Of the 13 participants who completed the study, 7 did not tolerate the baseline (visit 1) oral protein tolerance test. The 2 week (visit 2) oral protein tolerance test was performed in 6 participants. Oral protein tolerance test parameters were analyzed for these 6 participants. Population The 2 week (visit 2) laboratory draw was unable to be obtained for 1 participant, yielding n=12 analyzed for this outcome Population Per the study protocol, the oral protein tolerance test was not repeated at 2 weeks (visit 2) if the baseline (visit 1) oral protein tolerance test was not tolerated. Of the 13 participants who completed the study, 7 did not tolerate the baseline (visit 1) oral protein tolerance test. The 2 week (visit 2) oral protein tolerance test was performed in 6 participants. Oral protein tolerance test parameters were analyzed for these 6 participants. Population Per the study protocol, the oral protein tolerance test was not repeated at 2 weeks (visit 2) if the baseline (visit 1) oral protein tolerance test was not tolerated. Of the 13 participants who completed the study, 7 did not tolerate the baseline (visit 1) oral protein tolerance test. The 2 week (visit 2) oral protein tolerance test was performed in 6 participants. Oral protein tolerance test parameters were analyzed for these 6 participants. Population The 2 week (visit 2) laboratory draw was unable to be obtained for 1 participant, yielding n=12 analyzed for this outcome Population The 2 week (visit 2) plasma ammonia at 60 minutes was not obtained in 1 participant in whom the visit 2 oral protein tolerance test was performed, yielding n=5 for analysis of this outcome. Population Home glucose meter testing was not performed by 3 participants, yielding n=10 analyzed for this outcome.
Units Participants Units micromolar Units mg/dL Units mg/dL Units mg/dL Units uIU/mL Units uIU/mL Units uIU/mL Units micromolar Units micromolar Units Hypoglycemia events
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Error Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 236095088 Sequence: 236095089 Sequence: 236095090 Sequence: 236095091 Sequence: 236095092 Sequence: 236095093 Sequence: 236095094 Sequence: 236095095 Sequence: 236095096 Sequence: 236095097 Sequence: 236095098
Outcome Id 30857536 Outcome Id 30857537 Outcome Id 30857538 Outcome Id 30857539 Outcome Id 30857540 Outcome Id 30857541 Outcome Id 30857542 Outcome Id 30857543 Outcome Id 30857544 Outcome Id 30857545 Outcome Id 30857546
Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766 Result Group Id 56158766
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000
Title Tolerability of Vitamin E Based on Responses to a Subject/Parent-reported Symptom Questionnaire After Vitamin E Supplementation Compared to Baseline Title Plasma Alpha-tocopherol Concentration Title Delta-plasma Glucose Concentration Title Fasting Plasma Glucose Concentration Title Nadir Plasma Glucose Concentration Title Fasting Plasma Insulin Concentration Title Peak Plasma Insulin Concentration Title Delta-plasma Insulin Concentration Title Fasting Plasma Ammonia Concentration Title Delta-plasma Ammonia Concentration Title Hypoglycemia Frequency
Description The following symptoms will be scored as either "none" (did not occur)=0, "mild" (minimal symptoms, no treatment needed)=1, "moderate" (symptoms requiring treatment at home or as an outpatient=2, or "severe" (symptoms requiring hospitalization or emergency room visit, or life-threatening or potentially life-threatening symptoms)=4:

Seizure, Headache, Vision change/blurred vision, Weakness, Fatigue, Nausea, Vomiting, Diarrhea, Stomach pain, Constipation, Bruising, Bleeding, Rash, Itching, Other

Symptom scores will be summed to yield a Tolerability Questionnaire Score for each participant. The Tolerability Questionnaire Score has a minimum score of 0 (symptoms did not occur) and a maximum score of 60 (all of the measured symptoms occurred, each with severe designation).

The number (count) of participants with an increase in Tolerability Questionnaire Score from baseline to 2 weeks (following Vitamin E supplementation) will be reported.

Description change in fasting plasma alpha-tocopherol concentration following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in delta-glucose concentration (fasting plasma glucose – nadir plasma glucose during oral protein tolerance test) following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in fasting plasma glucose concentration following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in nadir plasma glucose concentration during oral protein tolerance test following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in fasting plasma insulin concentration following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in peak plasma insulin concentration during oral protein tolerance test following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in delta-plasma insulin concentration (peak plasma insulin – fasting plasma insulin during oral protein tolerance test) following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in fasting plasma ammonia concentration following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in delta-plasma ammonia concentration (plasma ammonia at 60 minutes – fasting plasma ammonia during oral protein tolerance test) following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1]) Description change in frequency of hypoglycemia (plasma glucose <70 mg/dL) detected on home glucose meter following Vitamin E supplementation (2 weeks [visit 2] – baseline [visit 1])
Units Participants Units micromolar Units mg/dL Units mg/dL Units mg/dL Units uIU/mL Units uIU/mL Units uIU/mL Units micromolar Units micromolar Units Hypoglycemia events
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean
Param Value 2 Param Value 18.6 Param Value 1.1 Param Value -0.3 Param Value 0.01 Param Value -2.4 Param Value -6.3 Param Value -5.2 Param Value 1.0 Param Value -3.4 Param Value 0.6
Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 18.6 Param Value Num 1.1 Param Value Num -0.3 Param Value Num 0.01 Param Value Num -2.4 Param Value Num -6.3 Param Value Num -5.2 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num -3.4 Param Value Num 0.6
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Error Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 12.5 Dispersion Value 8.3 Dispersion Value 6.5 Dispersion Value 9.46 Dispersion Value 4.4 Dispersion Value 18.2 Dispersion Value 16.5 Dispersion Value 31.6 Dispersion Value 15.5 Dispersion Value 2.3
Dispersion Value Num 12.5 Dispersion Value Num 8.3 Dispersion Value Num 6.5 Dispersion Value Num 9.46 Dispersion Value Num 4.4 Dispersion Value Num 18.2 Dispersion Value Num 16.5 Dispersion Value Num 31.6 Dispersion Value Num 15.5 Dispersion Value Num 2.3

Study References

Sequence: 52159675 Sequence: 52159676 Sequence: 52159677 Sequence: 52159678 Sequence: 52159679 Sequence: 52159680 Sequence: 52159681 Sequence: 52159682 Sequence: 52159683 Sequence: 52159684
Pmid 20936362 Pmid 23275527 Pmid 11241047 Pmid 940710 Pmid 19531491 Pmid 26287975 Pmid 23642196 Pmid 23596164 Pmid 8429120 Pmid 20332361
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Palladino AA, Stanley CA. The hyperinsulinism/hyperammonemia syndrome. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2010 Sep;11(3):171-8. doi: 10.1007/s11154-010-9146-0. Citation Snider KE, Becker S, Boyajian L, Shyng SL, MacMullen C, Hughes N, Ganapathy K, Bhatti T, Stanley CA, Ganguly A. Genotype and phenotype correlations in 417 children with congenital hyperinsulinism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Feb;98(2):E355-63. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2169. Epub 2012 Dec 28. Citation Hsu BY, Kelly A, Thornton PS, Greenberg CR, Dilling LA, Stanley CA. Protein-sensitive and fasting hypoglycemia in children with the hyperinsulinism/hyperammonemia syndrome. J Pediatr. 2001 Mar;138(3):383-9. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.111818. Citation Stanley CA, Baker L. Hyperinsulinism in infancy: diagnosis by demonstration of abnormal response to fasting hypoglycemia. Pediatrics. 1976 May;57(5):702-11. Citation Li M, Smith CJ, Walker MT, Smith TJ. Novel inhibitors complexed with glutamate dehydrogenase: allosteric regulation by control of protein dynamics. J Biol Chem. 2009 Aug 21;284(34):22988-3000. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.020222. Epub 2009 Jun 15. Citation McBurney MI, Yu EA, Ciappio ED, Bird JK, Eggersdorfer M, Mehta S. Suboptimal Serum alpha-Tocopherol Concentrations Observed among Younger Adults and Those Depending Exclusively upon Food Sources, NHANES 2003-20061-3. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0135510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135510. eCollection 2015. Citation Ulatowski L, Manor D. Vitamin E trafficking in neurologic health and disease. Annu Rev Nutr. 2013;33:87-103. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071812-161252. Epub 2013 Apr 29. Citation Pfeiffer CM, Sternberg MR, Schleicher RL, Haynes BM, Rybak ME, Pirkle JL. The CDC's Second National Report on Biochemical Indicators of Diet and Nutrition in the U.S. Population is a valuable tool for researchers and policy makers. J Nutr. 2013 Jun;143(6):938S-47S. doi: 10.3945/jn.112.172858. Epub 2013 Apr 17. Citation Ferslew KE, Acuff RV, Daigneault EA, Woolley TW, Stanton PE Jr. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of the RRR and all racemic stereoisomers of alpha-tocopherol in humans after single oral administration. J Clin Pharmacol. 1993 Jan;33(1):84-8. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1993.tb03909.x. Citation Treberg JR, Clow KA, Greene KA, Brosnan ME, Brosnan JT. Systemic activation of glutamate dehydrogenase increases renal ammoniagenesis: implications for the hyperinsulinism/hyperammonemia syndrome. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Jun;298(6):E1219-25. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00028.2010. Epub 2010 Mar 23.

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11400192
Result Group Id 56158764
Ctgov Group Code BG000
Units Participants
Scope overall
Count 14

Result Groups

Sequence: 56158764 Sequence: 56158765 Sequence: 56158766 Sequence: 56158767 Sequence: 56158768 Sequence: 56158769 Sequence: 56158770 Sequence: 56158771
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG003 Ctgov Group Code EG004
Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event
Title Vitamin E Supplementation Title Vitamin E Supplementation Title Vitamin E Supplementation Title Vitamin E Supplementation (All Doses) Title Vitamin E 150 IU Title Vitamin E 300 IU Title Vitamin E 450 IU Title Vitamin E 600 IU
Description Daily oral supplementation with Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) for 2 weeks.

Vitamin E: Subjects will take an oral Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) supplement once daily with a fat-containing meal for 2 weeks. The dose will be based on subject age (150 IU if 1-3 years old, 300 IU if 4-8 years old, 450 IU if 9-17 years old, 600 IU if >17 years old). Formulations include 50 IU/mL liquid and 200 IU capsules. The liquid formulation will be used for subjects who will receive <600 IU daily, or for any subjects who prefer liquid medication to capsules.

Description Daily oral supplementation with Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) for 2 weeks.

Vitamin E: Subjects will take an oral Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) supplement once daily with a fat-containing meal for 2 weeks. The dose will be based on subject age (150 IU if 1-3 years old, 300 IU if 4-8 years old, 450 IU if 9-17 years old, 600 IU if >17 years old). Formulations include 50 IU/mL liquid and 200 IU capsules. The liquid formulation will be used for subjects who will receive <600 IU daily, or for any subjects who prefer liquid medication to capsules.

Description Daily oral supplementation with Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) for 2 weeks.

Vitamin E: Subjects will take an oral Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) supplement once daily with a fat-containing meal for 2 weeks. The dose will be based on subject age (150 IU if 1-3 years old, 300 IU if 4-8 years old, 450 IU if 9-17 years old, 600 IU if >17 years old). Formulations include 50 IU/mL liquid and 200 IU capsules. The liquid formulation will be used for subjects who will receive <600 IU daily, or for any subjects who prefer liquid medication to capsules.

Description Daily oral supplementation with Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) for 2 weeks.

Vitamin E: Subjects will take an oral Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) supplement once daily with a fat-containing meal for 2 weeks. The dose will be based on subject age (150 IU if 1-3 years old, 300 IU if 4-8 years old, 450 IU if 9-17 years old, 600 IU if >17 years old). Formulations include 50 IU/mL liquid and 200 IU capsules. The liquid formulation will be used for subjects who will receive <600 IU daily, or for any subjects who prefer liquid medication to capsules.

Description Daily oral supplementation with Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) 150 IU for 2 weeks. Description Daily oral supplementation with Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) 300 IU for 2 weeks. Description Daily oral supplementation with Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) 450 IU for 2 weeks. Description Daily oral supplementation with Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) 600 IU for 2 weeks.

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 125823470 Sequence: 125823471 Sequence: 125823472 Sequence: 125823473 Sequence: 125823474 Sequence: 125823475 Sequence: 125823476 Sequence: 125823477 Sequence: 125823478 Sequence: 125823479 Sequence: 125823480 Sequence: 125823481 Sequence: 125823482
Result Group Id 56158764 Result Group Id 56158764 Result Group Id 56158764 Result Group Id 56158764 Result Group Id 56158764 Result Group Id 56158764 Result Group Id 56158764 Result Group Id 56158764 Result Group Id 56158764 Result Group Id 56158764 Result Group Id 56158764 Result Group Id 56158764 Result Group Id 56158764
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000
Category Female Category Male Category Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino Category Unknown or Not Reported Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category Asian Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Black or African American Category White Category More than one race Category Unknown or Not Reported
Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB)
Units years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Param Type Median Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 8 Param Value 9 Param Value 5 Param Value 1 Param Value 12 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 5 Param Value 6 Param Value 0 Param Value 2
Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 9.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 12.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0
Dispersion Type Full Range
Dispersion Lower Limit 2.0
Dispersion Upper Limit 28.0
Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14

]]>

<![CDATA[ Hot AXIOS System Japan Post Market Survey ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797209
2019-01-15

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797209
NCT03797209https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797209?tab=tableNANANATo detect information of Adverse Events and Device Malfunctions under real world medical condition in Japan.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-09-25
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2022-03-18
Start Month Year January 15, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year October 30, 2020
Verification Month Year March 2022
Verification Date 2022-03-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-03-18

Facilities

Sequence: 201260406 Sequence: 201260407 Sequence: 201260408 Sequence: 201260409 Sequence: 201260410 Sequence: 201260411 Sequence: 201260412 Sequence: 201260413 Sequence: 201260414 Sequence: 201260415 Sequence: 201260416 Sequence: 201260417 Sequence: 201260418 Sequence: 201260419 Sequence: 201260420 Sequence: 201260421 Sequence: 201260422 Sequence: 201260423 Sequence: 201260424 Sequence: 201260425 Sequence: 201260426 Sequence: 201260427 Sequence: 201260428 Sequence: 201260429 Sequence: 201260430 Sequence: 201260431 Sequence: 201260432 Sequence: 201260433 Sequence: 201260434 Sequence: 201260435 Sequence: 201260436 Sequence: 201260437 Sequence: 201260438 Sequence: 201260439 Sequence: 201260440 Sequence: 201260441 Sequence: 201260442 Sequence: 201260443 Sequence: 201260444 Sequence: 201260445
Name Aichi Medical University Hospital Name Aichi Cancer Center Hospital Name Nagoya University Hospital Name Chiba University Hospital Name Kameda Medical Center Name National Cancer Center Hospital East Name Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center Name National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center Name Kyushu University Hospital Name Teine Keijinkai Hospital Name Kobe University Hospital Name Hyogo College of Medicine Hospital Name Kagoshima University Hospital Name Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Name Kitasato University Hospital Name Yokohama Rosai Hospital Name Yokohama City University Medical Center Name Mie University Hospital Name Tohoku University Hospital Name Sendai Open Hospital Name University of Miyazaki Hospital Name Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital Name Kawasaki Medical School General Medical Center Name Okayama University Hospital Name Osaka City University Hospital Name Kindai University Hospital Name Osaka Medical College Hospital Name Saitama Medical Universtity International Medical Center Name Saitama Medical Center Name Kitasato University Medical Center Name Tokyo Medical University Hospital Name Jichi Medical University Hospital Name Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital Name Juntendo University Hospital Name Toho University Ohashi Medical Center Name The Jikei University Hospital Name Kyorin University Hospital Name Keio University Hospital Name Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital Name Wakayama Medical University Hospital
City Nagakute-Shi City Nagoya-Shi City Nagoya-Shi City Chiba-Shi City Kamogawa-Shi City Kashiwa-Shi City Yachiyo-Shi City Fukuoka-Shi City Fukuoka-Shi City Sapporo-Shi City Kobe-Shi City Nishinomiya-Shi City Kagoshima-Shi City Kamakura-Shi City Sagamihara-Shi City Yokohama-Shi City Yokohama-Shi City Tsu-Shi City Sendai-Shi City Sendai-Shi City Miyazaki-Shi City Niigata-Shi City Okayama-Shi City Okayama-Shi City Osaka-Shi City Osakasayama-Shi City Takatsuki-Shi City Hidaka-Shi City Kawagoe-Shi City Kitamoto-Shi City Tokyo City Shimotsuke-Shi City Utsunomiya-Shi City Bunkyo-Ku City Meguro-Ku City Minato-Ku City Mitaka-Shi City Shinjuku-Ku City Shinjuku-Ku City Wakayama-Shi
State Aichi State Aichi State Aichi State Chiba State Chiba State Chiba State Chiba State Fukuoka State Fukuoka State Hokkaido State Hyogo State Hyogo State Kagoshima State Kanagawa State Kanagawa State Kanagawa State Kanagawa State Mie State Miyagi State Miyagi State Miyazaki State Niigata State Okayama State Okayama State Osaka State Osaka State Osaka State Saitama State Saitama State Saitama State Shinjuku-Ku State Tochigi State Tochigi State Tokyo State Tokyo State Tokyo State Tokyo State Tokyo State Tokyo State Wakayama
Zip 480-1195 Zip 464-8681 Zip 466-8560 Zip 260-8677 Zip 296-8602 Zip 277-8577 Zip 276-8524 Zip 810-8563 Zip 812-8582 Zip 006-8555 Zip 650-0017 Zip 663-8501 Zip 890-8520 Zip 247-8533 Zip 252-0375 Zip 222-0036 Zip 232-0024 Zip 514-8507 Zip 980-8574 Zip 983-0824 Zip 889-1692 Zip 951-8520 Zip 700-8505 Zip 700-8558 Zip 545-8586 Zip 589-8511 Zip 569-8686 Zip 350-1298 Zip 350-8550 Zip 364-8501 Zip 160-0023 Zip 329-0498 Zip 321-0974 Zip 113-8431 Zip 153-8515 Zip 105-8471 Zip 181-8611 Zip 160-8582 Zip 162-8666 Zip 641-8510
Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan

Conditions

Sequence: 52498478 Sequence: 52498479 Sequence: 52498480 Sequence: 52498481
Name Pancreatic Pseudocyst Infection Name Pancreatic Pseudocyst Name Walled Off Necrosis Infection Name Walled Off Necrosis
Downcase Name pancreatic pseudocyst infection Downcase Name pancreatic pseudocyst Downcase Name walled off necrosis infection Downcase Name walled off necrosis

Id Information

Sequence: 40392583
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value E7121

Countries

Sequence: 42828516
Name Japan
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55954442
Title AXIOS Patient

Interventions

Sequence: 52806558
Intervention Type Device
Name EUS-guided fistulization AXIOS
Description By using a convex type ultrasonic endoscope to form a fistula by gastrointestinal puncture, to perform various drainage.

Keywords

Sequence: 80312101 Sequence: 80312102
Name PPC Name WON
Downcase Name ppc Downcase Name won

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178601361 Sequence: 178601362 Sequence: 178601363 Sequence: 178601364 Sequence: 178601365 Sequence: 178601366
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary
Measure Safety (Adverse Events and Device Malfunction) Measure Placement success Measure Stent retention Measure Stent lumen patency Measure Decreased cyst size Measure Removal success
Time Frame From implant procedure to 7 days after removal Time Frame During implant procedure Time Frame From implant procedure to removal (a maximum of 60 days) Time Frame From implant procedure to removal (a maximum of 60 days) Time Frame From implant procedure to final observation (a maximum of 60 days) Time Frame Removal procedure (a maximum of 60 days after implant procedure)
Description AXIOS stent is placed in an appropriate position using the delivery system. Description AXIOS stent stays at the position where it was implanted during the implant procedure. Description The lumen of AXIOS stent is patent, and it can be used for drainage etc. Description AXIOS stent can be removed using standard endoscopic snares or forceps.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194735127 Sequence: 194735128 Sequence: 194735129 Sequence: 194735130 Sequence: 194735131 Sequence: 194735132 Sequence: 194735133 Sequence: 194735134 Sequence: 194735135 Sequence: 194735136 Sequence: 194735137
Mesh Term Infections Mesh Term Communicable Diseases Mesh Term Pancreatic Pseudocyst Mesh Term Necrosis Mesh Term Disease Attributes Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Pancreatic Cyst Mesh Term Cysts Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Pancreatic Diseases Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term infections Downcase Mesh Term communicable diseases Downcase Mesh Term pancreatic pseudocyst Downcase Mesh Term necrosis Downcase Mesh Term disease attributes Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term pancreatic cyst Downcase Mesh Term cysts Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term pancreatic diseases Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48622573
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Boston Scientific Japan K.K.

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68594973
Design Group Id 55954442
Intervention Id 52806558

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30952156
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age N/A
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Patient who received implant procedure using study device at Japanese site.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patient who received implant procedure using study device at Japanese site.

Exclusion Criteria:

NA

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253860908
Number Of Facilities 40
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 21
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30697742
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29064500
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ RCT Comparing Immunosuppressive Regimens in Elderly Renal Transplant Recipients ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797196
2019-07-29

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797196
NCT03797196https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797196?tab=tableNANANAOpen label, randomized, multicenter, intervention trial comparing standard immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with a low exposure tacrolimus regimen in combination with everolimus.

The primary objective is to test the hypothesis that an age-adapted immunosuppressive regimen targeted at reduced immunosuppression with low calcineurin inhibitor (tacrolimus) exposure in combination with everolimus will result in improved outcome in elderly recipients of A: Kidneys from older deceased donors (>64 years) and B: Kidneys from living donors (all ages) and younger deceased donors (<65 years).
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-11
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-10
Start Month Year July 29, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year June 2025
Verification Month Year May 2023
Verification Date 2023-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-10

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20842151
Description In this study two immunosuppressive regimes will be tested; In both groups basiliximab induction will be applied. Additionally, the standard therapy consisting of prednisolone, mycophenolic acid and tacrolimus once-daily (Envarsus®), or the comparator in which mycophenolic acid will be replaced by everolimus combined with strongly reduced levels of tacrolimus once-daily (Envarsus®). When not tolerated,tacrolimus may be replaced by ciclosporin. The hypothesis is that reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) exposure in combination with everolimus will lead to improved allograft function, a reduced incidence of complications and improved quality of life.

This study will consist of two strata: Stratum A: Elderly recipients (≥65 years) of kidneys from elderly deceased donors (≥65 years) within the Eurotransplant Senior Program. Stratum B: Elderly recipients (≥65 years) of kidneys from living donors (all ages) or deceased donors (<65 years). The primary endpoint will be "successful transplantation" which is defined as survival with a functioning allograft with a minimum estimated GFR of 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in stratum A and 45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in stratum B, after 2 years.

The study will be performed by the Dutch transplant centers and the Dutch Kidney Patient Organization (NVN) will participate.

Facilities

Sequence: 201202008 Sequence: 201202009 Sequence: 201202010 Sequence: 201202011 Sequence: 201202012 Sequence: 201202013 Sequence: 201202014
Name Leuven University Hospital Name Amsterdam UMC Name UMCG Name LUMC Name Radboud University Hospital Name Erasmus MC Name UMCU
City Leuven City Amsterdam City Groningen City Leiden City Nijmegen City Rotterdam City Utrecht
Country Belgium Country Netherlands Country Netherlands Country Netherlands Country Netherlands Country Netherlands Country Netherlands

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96551523 Sequence: 96551524 Sequence: 96551525 Sequence: 96551526 Sequence: 96551527 Sequence: 96551528 Sequence: 96551529 Sequence: 96551530 Sequence: 96551531 Sequence: 96551532 Sequence: 96551533 Sequence: 96551534 Sequence: 96551535 Sequence: 96551536 Sequence: 96551537 Sequence: 96551538 Sequence: 96551539
Mesh Term Mycophenolic Acid Mesh Term Everolimus Mesh Term Tacrolimus Mesh Term Immunosuppressive Agents Mesh Term Immunologic Factors Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Calcineurin Inhibitors Mesh Term Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term MTOR Inhibitors Mesh Term Protein Kinase Inhibitors Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents Mesh Term Antibiotics, Antineoplastic Mesh Term Antibiotics, Antitubercular Mesh Term Antitubercular Agents Mesh Term Anti-Bacterial Agents Mesh Term Anti-Infective Agents
Downcase Mesh Term mycophenolic acid Downcase Mesh Term everolimus Downcase Mesh Term tacrolimus Downcase Mesh Term immunosuppressive agents Downcase Mesh Term immunologic factors Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term calcineurin inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term mtor inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term protein kinase inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents Downcase Mesh Term antibiotics, antineoplastic Downcase Mesh Term antibiotics, antitubercular Downcase Mesh Term antitubercular agents Downcase Mesh Term anti-bacterial agents Downcase Mesh Term anti-infective agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52480057 Sequence: 52480058 Sequence: 52480059
Name Renal Transplant Recipients Name Elderly Patients Name Immunosuppression
Downcase Name renal transplant recipients Downcase Name elderly patients Downcase Name immunosuppression

Id Information

Sequence: 40379676
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value OPTIMIZE

Countries

Sequence: 42815397 Sequence: 42815398
Name Belgium Name Netherlands
Removed False Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55936121 Sequence: 55936122
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Experimental
Title group 1 Title group 2
Description standard tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil Description low dose tacrolimus with everolimus

Interventions

Sequence: 52789740 Sequence: 52789741
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name low dose tacrolimus in combination with everolimus Name standard dose tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil
Description a low exposure Tacrolimus once-daily (Envarsus®) regimen in combination with Everolimus will be evaluated in elderly transplant recipients Description A standard Tacrolimus once-daily (Envarsus) regimen in combination with Everolimus will be evaluated in elderly transplant recipients

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178538074 Sequence: 178538075 Sequence: 178538076 Sequence: 178538077 Sequence: 178538078 Sequence: 178538079 Sequence: 178538080 Sequence: 178538081 Sequence: 178538082 Sequence: 178538083 Sequence: 178538084 Sequence: 178538085 Sequence: 178538086 Sequence: 178538087 Sequence: 178538088 Sequence: 178538089 Sequence: 178538090 Sequence: 178538091 Sequence: 178538092 Sequence: 178538093 Sequence: 178538094 Sequence: 178538095
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other
Measure successful transplantation Measure death Measure graft loss Measure acute rejection Measure eGFR Measure type of rejection treatment Measure The evolution of renal function (eGFR) and creatinine clearance over time by slope analysis Measure The incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events and adverse reactions Measure The incidence of clinically relevant infections, post transplantation diabetes mellitus, malignancies and cardiovascular events Measure Presence of frailty after transplantation and change in frailty from baseline frailty from baseline Measure Physical functioning and changes over time Measure Cognitive functioning and changes over time Measure Presence of T-cell immunosenescence at 12 and 24 months and changes from baseline Measure HRQoL at 0, 12 and 24 months and changes from baseline Measure Development of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) Measure Difference in illness perception at 0, 12 and 24 months and changes from baseline Measure Difference in adherence of immunosuppressive medication at 12 and 24 months Measure Difference in symptoms at 0, 12 and 24 months and changes from baseline Measure Difference in iBOX predicted outcome at 3, 5 and 7 years Measure Development of a pharmacokinetic model for tacrolimus once-daily (Envarsus®), using data on AUC's Measure o evaluate the response to the COIVD-19 vaccine and identify possible differences between both treatment groups at the University Medical Center Groningen. Measure Evaluation of Cost-effectiveness of the new immunosuppressive regimen, and comparison to the current standard of care
Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 12 and 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 12 and 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months
Description The overall primary study endpoint "successful transplantation" as defined for the individual strata and analyzed for the whole study population.

Stratum A: Primary endpoint: successful transplantation at two years after transplantation defined as: absence of graft or patient loss in the presence of an eGFR above 30 ml/min/1.73m2.

Stratum B: Primary endpoint: successful transplantation at two years after transplantation defined as absence of graft or patient loss in the presence of an eGFR above 45 ml/min/1.73m2

Description patient survival Description graft survival Description treated biopsy-proven rejection (tBPAR) Description estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate below 30 and 45 ml/min/1.73m2 Description type of rejection treatment will be scored by questionnaire to the treating nephrologist Description The evolution of renal function (eGFR) and creatinine clearance over time by slope analysis Description The incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events and adverse reactions Description The incidence of clinically relevant infections, post transplantation diabetes, malignancies and cardiovascular events Description frailty is measured by clinical frailty score, hand grip strength and fried frailty index Description Short Physical Performance Battery Description Montreal Cognitive Assessment Description T cell differentiation, exhaustion and telomere length will be assessed by flowcytometry Description Questionnaire: EQ-5D and SF-12 Description DSA as measured by Luminex Description Questionnaire: Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire Description Questionnaire: Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale Description Questionnaire: Dialysis Symptom Index with additional items from the Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale-59 Description Based on the available data Description In addition to trough levels, additional AUC's will be withdrawn at the Leiden University Medical Center as routine patient care on week 2 and 6. Description Humoral and T-cell response Description Cost-effectiveness of the immunosuppressive regimen will be evaluated using state-of-the-art health-economic techniques; costs and effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy will be derived from the study

Sponsors

Sequence: 48606319 Sequence: 48606320 Sequence: 48606321 Sequence: 48606322 Sequence: 48606323 Sequence: 48606324 Sequence: 48606325 Sequence: 48606326
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University Medical Center Groningen Name Radboud University Medical Center Name Academisch Medisch Centrum – Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) Name Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc Name UMC Utrecht Name Leiden University Medical Center Name Erasmus Medical Center Name Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29447209 Sequence: 29447210 Sequence: 29447211 Sequence: 29447212 Sequence: 29447213 Sequence: 29447214 Sequence: 29447215 Sequence: 29447216 Sequence: 29447217
Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Study Chair Role Study Director Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Dennis Hesselink, MD, PhD Name Frederike Bemelman, Md, PhD Name Stefan Berger, Md, PhD Name Jan-Stephan Sanders, MD, PhD Name Azam Nurmohamed, Md, PhD Name Aiko De Vries, MD, PhD Name Luuk Hilbrands, Md, PhD Name Arjan Van Zuilen, MD, PhD Name Dirk Kuypers, MD, PhD
Affiliation EMC Affiliation AIDS Malignancy Consortium Affiliation UMCG Affiliation UMCG Affiliation VUMC Affiliation LUMC Affiliation Radboud MC Affiliation UMCU Affiliation Leuven MC

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68572130 Sequence: 68572131
Design Group Id 55936122 Design Group Id 55936121
Intervention Id 52789740 Intervention Id 52789741

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30942493
Gender All
Minimum Age 65 Years
Maximum Age 99 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed
Male or female subject ≥65 years old
Subject randomized within 24 hours of completion of transplant surgery
Stratum A: Recipient of a primary (or secondary, if first graft is not lost due to immunological reasons) renal transplant from a deceased donor aged 65 years or older
Stratum B: Recipient of a primary (or secondary, if first graft is not lost due to immunological reasons) renal transplant from a deceased donor aged below 65 years or a living donor of any age

Exclusion Criteria: Exclusion criteria for both stratum A and B

Subject is a multi-organ transplant recipient
Recipient of bloodgroup ABO incompatible allograft or CDC cross-match positive transplant
Subject at high immunological risk for rejection as determined by local practice for assessment of anti-donor reactivity
Recipient of a kidney with a cold ischaemia time (CIT) >24 hr
Recipients of a kidney from an HLA-identical related living donor
Known intolerability for one or more of the study drugs
Subject who is HIV positive
HBsAg and/or a HCV positive subject with evidence of elevated liver function tests (ALT/AST levels ≥2.5 times ULN). Viral serology results obtained within 6 months prior to randomization are acceptable
Recipient of a kidney from a donor who tests positive for human immunodeficiency virus, (HIV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV)
Subject with severe systemic infections, current or within the two weeks prior to randomization
Subject with severe restrictive or obstructive pulmonary disorders
Subject with severe hypercholesterolemia or hypertriglyceridemia that cannot be controlled
Subject with white blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 2,000/mm3 or with platelet count ≤ 50,000/mm3

Adult False
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254283175
Number Of Facilities 7
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 65
Maximum Age Num 99
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 20
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30688103
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29054840
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name J.S.F. Sanders
Title principal investigator, head of renal transplant program UMCG
Affiliation University Medical Center Groningen

Study References

Sequence: 52389469
Pmid 34078323
Reference Type derived
Citation de Boer SE, Sanders JSF, Bemelman FJ, Betjes MGH, Burgerhof JGM, Hilbrands L, Kuypers D, van Munster BC, Nurmohamed SA, de Vries APJ, van Zuilen AD, Hesselink DA, Berger SP. Rationale and design of the OPTIMIZE trial: OPen label multicenter randomized trial comparing standard IMmunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with a low exposure tacrolimus regimen In combination with everolimus in de novo renal transplantation in Elderly patients. BMC Nephrol. 2021 Jun 2;22(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12882-021-02409-8.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Genesis Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT): A Preliminary Study ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797183
2019-05-03

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797183
NCT03797183https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797183?tab=tableEmily DeBoer, MDemily.deboer@childrenscolorado.org720-777-4953The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Genesis Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) imaging system for use in pediatric respiratory disease populations including neuromuscular and bronchopulmonary dysplasia, as well as in age and height matched controls. The EIT does not use radiation, and is read through electrodes.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-28
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2023-07-27
Start Month Year May 3, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year November 30, 2023
Verification Month Year July 2023
Verification Date 2023-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-07-27

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20580086
Description The purpose of this study is to evaluate EIT for use in pediatric respiratory disease populations including neuromuscular and bronchopulmonary dysplasia, as well as in age and height matched controls.

Researchers will use EIT to determine changes in regional ventilation with pulmonary interventions including airway clearance and invasive and noninvasive ventilation in a pediatric respiratory disease population.

Facilities

Sequence: 198680614
Status Recruiting
Name Children's Hospital Colorado
City Aurora
State Colorado
Zip 80045
Country United States

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 27949979 Sequence: 27949980
Facility Id 198680614 Facility Id 198680614
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Emily DeBoer, MD Name Allison Keck
Email emily.deboer@childrenscolorado.org Email allison.keck@childrenscolorado.org
Phone 720-777-4953 Phone 720-777-0734

Conditions

Sequence: 51805985 Sequence: 51805986 Sequence: 51805987 Sequence: 51805988 Sequence: 51805989 Sequence: 51805990
Name Premature Infant Name Chronic Respiratory Disease Name Neuromuscular Diseases Name Healthy Name Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Name Pulmonary Vein Stenoses
Downcase Name premature infant Downcase Name chronic respiratory disease Downcase Name neuromuscular diseases Downcase Name healthy Downcase Name bronchopulmonary dysplasia Downcase Name pulmonary vein stenoses

Id Information

Sequence: 39867740
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 18-1843

Countries

Sequence: 42266301
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55226126 Sequence: 55226127 Sequence: 55226128 Sequence: 55226129 Sequence: 55226130 Sequence: 55226131 Sequence: 55226132
Title Premature Infants Title Chronic Respiratory Disease Title Neuromuscular Disease Title Healthy Controls Title V/Q Scan validation Title Premature Infants (Longitudinal Cohort) Title Pulmonary Vein/Artery Stenosis
Description Premature infants >1 month of age currently hospitalized with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) without acute respiratory infection Description Participants ages >1 month-21 years with chronic respiratory disease due to underlying neuromuscular disease Description Participants ages 21-40 years with confirmed neuromuscular disease with an echo completed within the preceding 12 months of study participation of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) or other diagnoses associated with mild cardiomyopathy Description Age and height matched healthy controls Description Adults or children who are having or have recently had a V/Q scan Description Premature infants ages 2 weeks to 1 year with diagnosed or suspected bronchopulmonary dysplasia Description Children age 2 months to 18 years, who will be undergoing cardiac catheterization for pulmonary vein stenosis, pulmonary hypertension and/or pulmonary artery stenosis

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176201925 Sequence: 176201926 Sequence: 176201927 Sequence: 176201928 Sequence: 176201929 Sequence: 176201930
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure EIT imaging maps that provide regional information regarding ventilation and perfusion of the lung. Measure Regional conductivity changes due to ventilation Measure Waveform for a mesh element Measure Regional conductivity changes due to perfusion Measure Regional pulsatile perfusion imaging at the end of systole Measure Power waveform (computed as the inner product of measured voltages and applied currents)
Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 5 minutes Time Frame 24 months
Description These images will be analyzed both visually for qualitative abnormalities and through quantitative pixel analysis that can provide information regarding lung volume, blood volume, and changes in either based on respiratory cycle, cardiac cycle, or intervention. Areas of low ventilation (atelectasis and consolidation) will be identified. Description Describe regional ventilation in pediatric respiratory disease populations including neuromuscular weakness, skeletal/chest wall disorders, and chronic airway and parenchymal lung disease including bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

This is a qualitative aim and will summarize EIT images pictorially. Pixel densities will be evaluated for normality and summarized as mean (SD) or median (interquartile range). EIT images will be qualitatively compared between cases and controls.

Description Time-series waveform indicated by time in seconds compared to Recon signal (au). Description This is a qualitative and quantitative aim. Results will qualitatively compare EIT images with CXR and CT scan images when available. Images will be displayed side by side and interpreted by both the clinician and the EIT study staff. Various summary measures of EIT outcomes will be calculated including pixel heterogeneity, summary changes over tidal breath and variation between tidal peaks. Pearson and Spearman correlation will be calculated between summary EIT outcomes and continuous primary clinical values. Linear and logistic regression will be used to estimate associations (with 95% CI) between EIT measures and clinical outcomes. Summary data will be presented in tables and figures using basic descriptive statistics stratified by study group.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192015435 Sequence: 192015429 Sequence: 192015430 Sequence: 192015431 Sequence: 192015432 Sequence: 192015433 Sequence: 192015434 Sequence: 192015436 Sequence: 192015437 Sequence: 192015438 Sequence: 192015439 Sequence: 192015440 Sequence: 192015441
Mesh Term Lung Injury Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases Mesh Term Respiration Disorders Mesh Term Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Mesh Term Neuromuscular Diseases Mesh Term Stenosis, Pulmonary Vein Mesh Term Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury Mesh Term Lung Diseases Mesh Term Infant, Premature, Diseases Mesh Term Infant, Newborn, Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Vascular Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term lung injury Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases Downcase Mesh Term respiration disorders Downcase Mesh Term bronchopulmonary dysplasia Downcase Mesh Term neuromuscular diseases Downcase Mesh Term stenosis, pulmonary vein Downcase Mesh Term ventilator-induced lung injury Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases Downcase Mesh Term infant, premature, diseases Downcase Mesh Term infant, newborn, diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases
Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 47978754
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University of Colorado, Denver

Central Contacts

Sequence: 11935320
Contact Type primary
Name Emily DeBoer, MD
Phone 720-777-4953
Email emily.deboer@childrenscolorado.org
Role Contact

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30550792
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 14 Days
Maximum Age 40 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Population pediatric respiratory disease populations including neuromuscular and bronchopulmonary dysplasia, as well as in age and height matched controls. Populations who will be undergoing cardiac catheterization for pulmonary vein stenosis, pulmonary hypertension and/or pulmonary artery stenosis
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

2 weeks old – 40 years old
Premature infants with current age >2 weeks with a confirmed diagnosis of BPD based on NIH criteria
Or Chronic respiratory disease due to underlying neuromuscular disease
Or confirmed neuromuscular disease with an echo completed within the preceding 12 months of study participation of DMD or other diagnoses associated with mild cardiomyopathy.
have had a VQ scan
will be undergoing cardiac catherization for for pulmonary vein stenosis, pulmonary hypertension and/or pulmonary artery stenosis
Or healthy controls

Exclusion Criteria:

<2 weeks of age
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia
Severe congenital heart disease
Significant genetic abnoralities
Anything that interferes with lead placement on the chest wall
Unwilling/refusal to sign consent
Pregnant or lactating
Pacemaker of other surgical implant and spinal implant (causes noise in the data)
Moderate to severe cardiomyopathy
Patients with temporary cognitive disability due to illness

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254231767
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 14
Maximum Age Num 40
Minimum Age Unit Days
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 5

Designs

Sequence: 30299161
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28677729
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Design of New Personalized Therapeutic Approaches for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797170
2019-04-02

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797170
NCT03797170https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797170?tab=tableNANANAIn Europe diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a rare disease whereas in Italy it is not. Approximately 40% of DLBCL patients has refractory disease or will relapse after initial response. In onco-hematology, a role for gut microbiota (GM) in mediating immune activation in response to chemotherapy, has been suggested. In this scenario, the Investigators hypothesized that GM could play an important role in DLBCL prognosis and response to treatment, establishing a connection between lifestyle and clinical response. The project is aimed to the study of the functional GM layout in association with specific patterns of treatment response in de novo DLBCL undergoing standard first line chemo-immunotherapy. Results may build the scientific basis to design new and personalized intervention strategies (both in treatment approach and in life-style recommendations), to enhance clinical response and reduction of disease refractoriness through modulation of the gut microbial ecosystem.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-19
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-08
Start Month Year April 2, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year July 20, 2023
Verification Month Year February 2023
Verification Date 2023-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-08

Facilities

Sequence: 201130765 Sequence: 201130766
Name Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (I.R.S.T.) Name Institute Of Hematology "Seràgnoli"
City Meldola City Bologna
State FC
Zip 40138
Country Italy Country Italy

Conditions

Sequence: 52459377
Name Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
Downcase Name diffuse large b cell lymphoma

Id Information

Sequence: 40364771 Sequence: 40364772
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value Oncopassport Id Value RF-2016-02363730
Id Type Other Grant/Funding Number
Id Type Description Italian Ministry of Health

Countries

Sequence: 42798704
Name Italy
Removed False

Interventions

Sequence: 52769172
Intervention Type Other
Name Gut microbiota samples
Description Gut microbiota analysis from diagnosis to follow up after first line-chemo-immuntherapy

Keywords

Sequence: 80259309 Sequence: 80259310 Sequence: 80259311 Sequence: 80259312 Sequence: 80259313 Sequence: 80259314
Name RCHOP Name first line Name microbiota Name response Name disease control Name therapy toxicity
Downcase Name rchop Downcase Name first line Downcase Name microbiota Downcase Name response Downcase Name disease control Downcase Name therapy toxicity

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178460398 Sequence: 178460399
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure GM dysbiosis assessment (bacterial DNA of gut microbiota in all patients) Measure Response to therapy
Time Frame 18 months Time Frame 2 years
Description dysbiosis index: the dysbiosis index relies on the calculation of the weighted ratio between health-promoting and disease-associated GM components
relative abundance of GM biomarkers of an eubiotic GM state: all GM dysbiotic states share a common feature, i.e. the depletion of strategic health-promoting GM components such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Lachnospiraceae. Thus, a GM dysbiotic state is determined by the assessment of a reduction of the abundance of these GM biomarkers below the thresholds characteristic of an eubiotc GM state.
Description Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. when the PET scan was positive before therapy, a post-treatment residual mass of any size is permitted as long as it is PET negative and all lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed on CT to normal size ( 1.5 cm in their greatest transverse diameter for nodes 1.5 cm before therapy).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194586748 Sequence: 194586749 Sequence: 194586750 Sequence: 194586751 Sequence: 194586752 Sequence: 194586753 Sequence: 194586754 Sequence: 194586755 Sequence: 194586756 Sequence: 194586757
Mesh Term Lymphoma Mesh Term Lymphoma, B-Cell Mesh Term Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Lymphoproliferative Disorders Mesh Term Lymphatic Diseases Mesh Term Immunoproliferative Disorders Mesh Term Immune System Diseases Mesh Term Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma, b-cell Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma, large b-cell, diffuse Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term lymphoproliferative disorders Downcase Mesh Term lymphatic diseases Downcase Mesh Term immunoproliferative disorders Downcase Mesh Term immune system diseases Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma, non-hodgkin
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48587155
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University of Bologna

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29436082
Role Principal Investigator
Name Pier Luigi L Zinzani, Professor
Affiliation Institute of Hematology "L. e A. Seràgnoli", University of Bologna

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30930675
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Patients affected by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergoing therapy with front-line R-CHOP (rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone).
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Age ≥18 years
Patients affected by histologically confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Patients amenable for therapy with RCHOP (RCHOP is the standard first line therapy for DLBCL and it scheduled regardless of participation in present study).
Patients must provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Concomitant second malignancy, other than lymphoma.
Previous anti-lymphoma therapy.
Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
Evidence of significant, uncontrolled concomitant diseases that could affect compliance with the protocol or interpretation of results.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254212468
Number Of Facilities 2
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30676319
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29043035
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Pier Luigi Zinzani
Title Full Professor, MD (Hematologist)
Affiliation University of Bologna

]]>

<![CDATA[ Human Milk Fortification in Extremely Preterm Infants ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797157
2019-02-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797157
NCT03797157https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797157?tab=tableNANANAThis is a randomised controlled multi-centre trial comparing the effect of diet supplementation of a human breast milk-based nutrient fortifier (H2MF®) with standard bovine protein-based nutrient fortifier in 222 extremely preterm infants (born before gestational week 28+0) exclusively fed with human breast milk (own mother´s milk and/or donor milk). The infants will be randomised to receive either the human breast-milk based H2MF® or the standard bovine protein-based nutrient fortifier when oral feeds have reached <100 ml/kg/day.

The randomised intervention, stratified by centre, will continue until the target gestational week 34+0. The infant must not be fed with formula during the intervention period. The allocation will be concealed before inclusion, but after randomisation the study is not blinded.

Primary endpoint of the intervention is the composite variable necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), sepsis and mortality.

The enrolled infants are characterised with clinical data including growth, feeding intolerance, use of enteral and parenteral nutrition, treatment, antibiotics and complications collected daily in a study specific case report form from birth until discharge from the hospital (not longer than gestational week 44+0). A follow up focusing on neurological development, growth and feeding problems will be performed at 2 years of age (corrected) and 5.5 years of age.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-17
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2022-12-13
Start Month Year February 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year September 1, 2022
Verification Month Year December 2022
Verification Date 2022-12-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-12-13

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20816433
Description This is a randomised controlled multi-centre trial comparing the effect of diet supplementation of a human breast milk-based nutrient fortifier (H2MF®) with standard bovine protein-based nutrient fortifier in 222 extremely preterm infants (born before gestational week 28+0) exclusively fed with human breast milk (own mother´s milk and/or donor milk). The infants will be randomised to receive either the human breast-milk based H2MF® or the standard bovine protein-based nutrient fortifier when oral feeds have reached <100 ml/kg/day. If fortification with extra enteral lipids is needed during the intervention period, the infants receiving H2MF® will be supplemented with the human milk-based Prolact CR®, while the infants receiving standard bovine protein-based fortification will be supplemented with the standard lipid products used at the unit. The study subject will be enrolled at level III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)s. Only infants with a home clinic with the logistics to maintain the intervention until gestational week 34+0 will be included.

The randomised intervention, stratified by centre, will continue until the target gestational week 34+0. The infant must not be fed with formula during the intervention period. The allocation will be concealed before inclusion, but after randomisation the study is not blinded. It would not be possible to prescribe the fortifier and prepare of the breast milk in a blinded fashion, since the fortifiers are not exactly equal in nutrient content and also look different. Instead the assessment of several of the outcomes will be made blinded, such as the assessment of X-ray images in NEC cases.

The enrolled infants are characterised with clinical data including growth, feeding intolerance, use of enteral and parenteral nutrition, treatment, antibiotics and complications collected daily in a study specific case report form from birth until discharge from the hospital (not longer than gestational week 44+0). A follow up focusing on neurological development, growth and feeding problems will be performed at 2 years of age (corrected).

Since it is often difficult to distinguish between the diagnoses of NEC and sepsis, and their clinical consequences, the investigator's primary endpoint of the intervention is the composite variable NEC, sepsis and mortality. Secondary endpoints are feeding intolerance and other severe complication such as Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and neurological impairment. Stool, urine and blood samples are also collected for microbiology, metabolomic and immunology analysis in order to study underlying mechanisms. Health economic analyses will be made to evaluate the costs and benefits of an introduction of human milk-based fortifier in NICUs in the Nordic countries.

Analyses will be conducted using an intention to treat approach. An evaluation will be performed when 20 infants have been included to evaluate feasibility and make it possible to adjust the protocol for the remaining part of the study. Safety analyses will be performed by an independent data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) when 50, 100 and 150 infants have been included. A sample size re-estimation will be made by an independent statistician when 150 infants have been included. Thus, the definitive sample size might be increased (never decreased) based on this interim analysis. The study can be terminated before 322 infants have been enrolled based on a decision of the sponsor and the DSMB, if the primary outcome is significantly lower (with a significance level <0.001) in the H2MF® than in the standard fortification group in the interim analysis made after 150 infants have completed the neonatal period. The study subject will be enrolled at level III NICUs in the Nordic Countries. All study subjects will be followed during the neonatal period until discharge (not longer than gestational week 44+0) and also be included in a follow up at 2 and 5.5 years of age based on the national follow up program for extremely preterm infants.

Facilities

Sequence: 200903281 Sequence: 200903282 Sequence: 200903283 Sequence: 200903284 Sequence: 200903285
Name Queen Silvia Children´s Hospital Name Crown Princess Victoria Children´s Hospital Name Karolinska Hospital Name Norrlands Universitetssjukhus Name Akademiska Barnsjukhuset
City Göteborg City Linköping City Stockholm City Umeå City Uppsala
Country Sweden Country Sweden Country Sweden Country Sweden Country Sweden

Conditions

Sequence: 52413241 Sequence: 52413242 Sequence: 52413243
Name Necrotizing Enterocolitis Name Sepsis Name Mortality
Downcase Name necrotizing enterocolitis Downcase Name sepsis Downcase Name mortality

Id Information

Sequence: 40329600
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value RegionOstergotland

Countries

Sequence: 42753473
Name Sweden
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55861040 Sequence: 55861041
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title H2MF Title Standard fortifier
Description Human milk-based breast milk fortifier Description Standard care: bovine milk-based breast milk fortifier

Interventions

Sequence: 52721117 Sequence: 52721118
Intervention Type Dietary Supplement Intervention Type Dietary Supplement
Name H2MF Name Bovine milk-based fortifier
Description H2MF is a human milk-based breastmilk fortifier for preterm infants Description Bovine milk-based fortifier is the standard breast milk fortifier in Sweden

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178276043 Sequence: 178276044 Sequence: 178276045 Sequence: 178276046 Sequence: 178276047 Sequence: 178276048 Sequence: 178276049 Sequence: 178276050 Sequence: 178276051 Sequence: 178276052 Sequence: 178276053 Sequence: 178276054 Sequence: 178276055 Sequence: 178276056 Sequence: 178276057 Sequence: 178276058 Sequence: 178276059 Sequence: 178276060 Sequence: 178276061 Sequence: 178276062 Sequence: 178276063 Sequence: 178276064 Sequence: 178276065 Sequence: 178276066 Sequence: 178276067 Sequence: 178276068 Sequence: 178276069 Sequence: 178276093 Sequence: 178276070 Sequence: 178276071 Sequence: 178276072 Sequence: 178276073 Sequence: 178276074 Sequence: 178276075 Sequence: 178276076 Sequence: 178276077 Sequence: 178276078 Sequence: 178276079 Sequence: 178276080 Sequence: 178276081 Sequence: 178276082 Sequence: 178276083 Sequence: 178276084 Sequence: 178276085 Sequence: 178276086 Sequence: 178276087 Sequence: 178276088 Sequence: 178276089 Sequence: 178276090 Sequence: 178276091 Sequence: 178276092 Sequence: 178276094 Sequence: 178276095
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure The incidence of the composite of necrotizing enterocolitis, culture-proven sepsis and mortality Measure The incidence of the composite of necrotizing enterocolitis and culture-proven sepsis Measure The incidence of the composite of necrotizing enterocolitis culture-proven sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity and mortality (Mortality and morbidity index) Measure Time to reach full enteral feeds Measure Number of feeding interruptions Measure Numbers of days with parenteral nutrition Measure Number of large gastric aspirates per day Measure Stool frequency Measure Time to regain birth weight Measure Change in head circumference in centimeters Measure Change in weight in gram Measure Change in length in centimeters Measure The mortality incidence Measure The incidence of necrotising enterocolitis: Bell´s stage II-III Measure The incidence spontaneous intestinal perforation Measure The incidence of abdominal surgery Measure The incidence culture-proven sepsis Measure The incidence of suspected sepsis, not culture-proven Measure The incidence of pneumonia Measure The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia Measure The incidence of retinopathy of the prematurity Measure The incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage Measure The incidence of periventricular leukomalacia Measure Number of days with intensive care Measure Length of stay at the hospital Measure Length of need of feeding tube Measure Neurocognitive development at 2 years Measure Levels of proteins in breast milk samples Measure Prevalence of cerebral palsy at 2 years Measure Prevalence of epilepsy at 2 years Measure Prevalence of squint and/or impaired vision at 2 years Measure Prevalence of impaired hearing at 2 years Measure The number of infants needing extra oxygen and/or ventilatory support after discharge from the hospital at the neonatal period Measure The incidence of wheeze and/or asthma Measure The incidence of severe infections after discharge from the neonatal unit Measure The number of infants needing feeding tube after discharge from the hospital at the neonatal period Measure The number of infants needing extra nutritional support after discharge from the hospital at the neonatal period Measure The prevalence of neurocognitive development at 5.5 years Measure The prevalence of cerebral palsy at 5.5 years Measure The prevalence of epilepsy at 5.5 years of age Measure The prevalence of squint and/or impaired vision at 5.5 years of age Measure The prevalence of children with impaired hearing at 5.5 years of age Measure The prevalence of wheeze and/or asthma at 5.5 years of age Measure Microbiome composition in stool samples Measure Levels of subclasses of T and B cells and granulocytes in blood samples Measure Levels of immune markers in plasma Measure Levels of growth factors in plasma samples Measure Levels of lipids in plasma samples Measure Levels of neurotransmitters in plasma samples Measure Levels of metabolic peptides in urine samples Measure Levels of markers of central nervous system (CNS) damage in plasma samples Measure Levels of human milk oligosaccharides in breast milk samples Measure Health care costs
Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not longer than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame At 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, the end of intervention (gestational week 34+0), gestational week 36+0, at discharge from neonatal ward (or at gestational week 44+0, whatever comes first) and at 2 years of age (corrected) and 5.5 years of age (uncorrected). Time Frame At 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, the end of intervention (gestational week 34+0), gestational week 36+0, at discharge from neonatal ward (or at gestational week 44+0, whatever comes first) and at 2 years of age (corrected) and 5.5 years of age (uncorrected). Time Frame At 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, the end of intervention (gestational week 34+0), gestational week 36+0, at discharge from neonatal ward (or at gestational week 44+0, whatever comes first) and at 2 years of age (corrected) and 5.5 years of age (uncorrected). Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame At gestational week 36+0 Time Frame From birth until gestational week 42+0 Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0) Time Frame At 2 years of age Time Frame At 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0 Time Frame At 2 years of age Time Frame At 2 years of age Time Frame At 2 years of age Time Frame At 2 years of age Time Frame From gestational week 44 until 2 years of age Time Frame From birth until 2 years of life Time Frame From gestational week 44 until 2 years of age Time Frame From gestational week 44 until 2 years of age Time Frame From gestational week 44 until 2 years of age Time Frame At 5.5 years of age Time Frame At 5.5 years of age Time Frame At 5.5 years of age Time Frame At 5.5 years of age Time Frame At 5.5 years of age Time Frame At 5.5 years of age Time Frame At 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0 Time Frame At 1, 2 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0 Time Frame At 1, 2 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0 Time Frame At 1, 2 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0 Time Frame At 1, 2 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0 Time Frame At 1, 2 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0 Time Frame At 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0 Time Frame At 1, 2 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0 Time Frame At 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks of age and gestational week 36+0 Time Frame From birth until discharge from hospital (but not loner than gestational week 44+0)
Description An infant should have had any of these diagnoses to fulfil the criterion Description An infant should have had any of these diagnoses to fulfil the criterion Description An infant should have had any of these diagnoses to fulfil the criterion Description The day of life the infant has received at least 150 mL/kg enteral feeds Description Number of days feedings held for ≥12 hours or feeds reduced by >50% (ml/kg/d) not due to a clinical procedure or transitioning to the breast Description Number of days of parental amino acid and/or lipid infusion. Only days when the enteral feed <150mL/kg/day should be included Description ≥100% pre-feed volume (2 hours feeding volume if continuous feeding). Lower limit=2 ml/kg. Description Pathological X-ray confirmed by an independent radiologist, need of increased respiratory support/oxygen and laboratory inflammatory response Description Need of extra oxygen, continuous positive air pressure (CPAP) or ventilator at gestational week 36+0 Description Classified into stage I-V. The diagnosis is set after gestational week 42+0 Description Classified into grade I-IV according to Papile Description Criteria according to de Vries Description Need of respirator or CPAP until discharge (not later than gestational week 44+0). Description Gestational week and day at discharge (not later than gestational week 44+0). Description Gestational week and day when the infant does not need it anymore (not later than gestational week 44+0) Description Bayleys III, PARCA-R (Parental Report of Children´s Abilities-Revised) and ASQ-3 (Ages and stages questionnaire) Description Protein composition will be measured with multiplex methods Description Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence IV (WPPSI-IV TM) and Movement ABC-2: the total scale points as well as the points of sub scales (motor, cognitive, language) will be presented. The prevalence of infants with a realist below 2 standard deviations will be defined to have mental retardation. Description The relative abundance and diversity of microbial taxa will be analyses with next generation sequencing and be related till the study intervention Description T helper subsets (TH1, Th2, TH17, Treg), T cells subsets associated with the intestinal mucosa (gamma/delta-T cells, MAIT cells) and neutrophils will be assessed using masscytometry Description Pre planned analyses are anti-inflammatory (e.g. IL-10) and proinflammatory (e.g. TNF) cytokines and chemokines (e.g. CXCL11, CCL18). Description The levels of growth factors such as IGF-1 and the associated IGFBP-3 will be analysed. Description Fatty acids in plasma Description Neurotransmitters such as GABA and serotonin in plasma Description Metabolic peptide will be measured with proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), liquid chromatography (LC) and mass spectroscopy couple to gas chromatography (GC-MC). Description Markers of CNS damage such as neurofilament light protein will be measured in plasma Description The levels of human milk oligosaccharides will be measured with high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection. Description The number of days at each level of care will be recorded until discharge from the hospital (not longer than gestational week 44+0). The cost will be calculated by multiplying the number of days at each level of care by the average cost

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194405145 Sequence: 194405146 Sequence: 194405147 Sequence: 194405148 Sequence: 194405149 Sequence: 194405150
Mesh Term Enterocolitis Mesh Term Enterocolitis, Necrotizing Mesh Term Gastroenteritis Mesh Term Gastrointestinal Diseases Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases Mesh Term Intestinal Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term enterocolitis Downcase Mesh Term enterocolitis, necrotizing Downcase Mesh Term gastroenteritis Downcase Mesh Term gastrointestinal diseases Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases Downcase Mesh Term intestinal diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48544071 Sequence: 48544072 Sequence: 48544073 Sequence: 48544074 Sequence: 48544075 Sequence: 48544076
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class UNKNOWN Agency Class UNKNOWN Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Thomas Abrahamsson, MD, PhD Name Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden Name Region Uppsala Name Vasterbottens lans landsting Name Prolacta Bioscience Name Region Stockholm

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29410668
Role Principal Investigator
Name Thomas R Abrahamsson, MD, PhD
Affiliation Region Ostergotland

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68476375 Sequence: 68476376
Design Group Id 55861040 Design Group Id 55861041
Intervention Id 52721117 Intervention Id 52721118

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30904505
Gender All
Minimum Age N/A
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Gestational age at birth 22+0-27+6: based on prenatal ultrasonography.
Enteral feeds < 100 mL/kg/day at the day of randomisation.
Written informed consent from the legal guardians of the infant.
The home clinic of the infant has the logistics of maintaining the intervention until gestational week 34+0

Exclusion Criteria:

Lethal or complicated malformation known at the time of inclusion
Chromosomal anomalies known at the time of inclusion
No realistic hope for survival at the time of inclusion
Gastrointestinal malformation known at the time of inclusion
Abdominal surgery before the time of inclusion
Participation in another intervention trial aiming at having an effect on growth, nutrition, feeding intolerance or severe complications such as NEC and sepsis
Infants having nutrient fortifier or formula prior to randomisation

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254161045
Number Of Facilities 5
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 43
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 52

Designs

Sequence: 30650221
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Prevention
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29016871
Responsible Party Type Sponsor-Investigator
Name Thomas Abrahamsson, MD, PhD
Title Principal Investigator, MD PhD
Affiliation Ostergotland County Council, Sweden

Study References

Sequence: 52323740
Pmid 34815288
Reference Type derived
Citation Jensen GB, Ahlsson F, Domellof M, Elfvin A, Naver L, Abrahamsson T. Nordic study on human milk fortification in extremely preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial-the N-forte trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 23;11(11):e053400. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053400.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Fenestrated Screw Study ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797144
2019-04-18

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797144
NCT03797144https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797144?tab=tableNANANAThe primary objective of this post-market study is to demonstrate that Oswestry disability index (ODI) score improved significantly at 12 months post-operatively as compared to baseline for each indication (degenerative spinal disease and deformity) in subjects with compromised bone quality, who will receive a surgical procedure requiring posterior stabilization and/or immobilization of one or more spinal segments using CD HORIZON® Fenestrated Screw Spinal System with Fenestrated Screw Cement.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-14
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2021-08-24
Start Month Year April 18, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year July 15, 2020
Verification Month Year July 2021
Verification Date 2021-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2021-08-24
Results First Posted Date 2021-08-24

Facilities

Sequence: 200032178 Sequence: 200032179 Sequence: 200032180 Sequence: 200032181 Sequence: 200032182 Sequence: 200032183
Name UZ Leuven – Campus Gasthuisberg Name Tyks Surgical Hospital Name Hôpital de la Pitié Salpétrière Name Athens Medical Center Name Mediterraneo Hospital Name IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas di Milano
City Leuven City Turku City Paris Cedex 13 City Marousi City Athens City Rozzano
State Athens
Zip 3000 Zip 20700 Zip 75651 Zip 15125 Zip 16675 Zip 20086
Country Belgium Country Finland Country France Country Greece Country Greece Country Italy

Conditions

Sequence: 52149443 Sequence: 52149444
Name Degenerative Spinal Disease Name Deformity of Spine
Downcase Name degenerative spinal disease Downcase Name deformity of spine

Id Information

Sequence: 40142890
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value MDT17040SD1703

Countries

Sequence: 42552236 Sequence: 42552237 Sequence: 42552238 Sequence: 42552239 Sequence: 42552240
Name Belgium Name Finland Name France Name Greece Name Italy
Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55570113
Group Type Experimental
Title Fenestrated Screw System

Interventions

Sequence: 52465141
Intervention Type Device
Name CD HORIZON® Fenestrated Screw System with Fenestrated Screw Cement
Description The CD HORIZON® Legacy™ and Solera™ Fenestrated Screw Spinal System consists of a variety of cannulated screws with a series of fenestrations to allow polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement (Fenestrated Screw Cement) to be injected into the treated site. The Fenestrated Screw Cement is used to augment screw fixation in subjects with compromised bone quality.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177303715 Sequence: 177303716 Sequence: 177303717 Sequence: 177303718 Sequence: 177303719 Sequence: 177303720 Sequence: 177303721 Sequence: 177303722 Sequence: 177303723 Sequence: 177303724 Sequence: 177303725 Sequence: 177303726 Sequence: 177303727 Sequence: 177303728
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change in ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) at 12 Months Compared to Baseline Measure Change in ODI From Baseline at 3 Months Visit Measure Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Measure Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Measure Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Measure Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Patients Measure Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Screws Measure Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Measure Rate of Secondary Spinal Surgeries at Index and/or Adjacent Level(s), Resulting From an AE up to 12 Months After Surgery Measure Radiographic Confirmation of Stabilization of the Pedicle Screw Instrumentation at 12-month Visit. Measure Radiographic Fusion at 12-month Visit for Those Subjects Where Fusion Was Intended. Measure For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Measure For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Coronal Alignment and Sagittal Vertical Axis From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Measure For Deformity Subjects Only: Number of Participants With Coronal Curve Type (T, L, D or N) at Baseline and 12 Months
Time Frame Baseline to 12 months Time Frame Baseline, 3 months Time Frame Baseline, 3, 12 months Time Frame Baseline, 3, 12 months Time Frame Baseline to 12 months. Time Frame Surgery to 12 months. Time Frame Surgery to 12 months. Time Frame Surgery to 12 months. Time Frame Surgery to 12 months. Time Frame Surgery to 12 months. Time Frame Surgery to 12 months. Time Frame Baseline to 12 months Time Frame Baseline to 12 months Time Frame Baseline to 12 months
Description Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a.This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. ODI is composed by 10 sections.

Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 2 subjects who completed the 12 month follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months time point.

Description Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a. [23]. This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders.

ODI is composed by 10 sections. Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline time point minus the value of the 3 months time point.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures. Description The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures. Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description When a patient requires additional surgery at the index and/or adjacent level(s), it can be an indicator of insufficient outcomes of the initial surgery.

Secondary spinal surgical procedures resulted from AE(s) could be classified into four categories: revision, removal, reoperation, and other.

One subject belonging to the Deformity group underwent a reoperation for a foraminal stenosis at index level L5-S1.

Description The surgeon or hospital radiologist reviewed radiographs and or CT's to assess for evidence of instability of the pedicle screw instrumentation at 12 months.

The following were considered as signs of instrumentation instability:

Screw pullout
Screw loosening
Screw toggle

Description The surgeon or hospital radiologist determined fusion status for those subjects where fusion was intended. The fusion assessment for each subject was collected at 12 months, preferably by collecting a CT-scan, alternatively fusion could also be collected through X-rays.

The criterion for fusion when assessed through a CT-scan is bony bridging and when assessed through X-rays the criteria bony bridging, no motion (<4˚) in Flexion/Extension views, and integrity of the instrumentation (implanted devices). A partial fusion (not meeting these criteria) should have been recorded as "No fusion success". For multi-level subjects, fusion success was assessed for each level and overall fusion status was defined as achieving fusion at all treated levels. If one level's fusion status could not be determined, then the subject level was considered unable to determine.

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Sagittal alignment – Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Coronal alignment : Distance between C7 plumb line and the central sacral vertical line
Sagittal alignment – Global parameter: Sagittal vertical axis (SVA)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameter was assessed in the deformity patients on standing frontal full spine X-ray:

– Coronal Curve Type

Coronal curve type is determined on the basis of maximal coronal angle measured according to standard Cobb technique and is classified as:

Curve type L: patients with a lumbar or thoracolumbar major curve >30˚ (apical level of T10 or lower)
Curve type T: patients with a thoracic major curve of >30˚ (apical level of T9 or higher)
Curve type D: patients with a double major curve, with each curve >30˚.
Curve type N: patients with no coronal curve >30˚.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193405170 Sequence: 193405171 Sequence: 193405172
Mesh Term Spinal Diseases Mesh Term Bone Diseases Mesh Term Musculoskeletal Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term spinal diseases Downcase Mesh Term bone diseases Downcase Mesh Term musculoskeletal diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48299639
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Medtronic Spinal and Biologics

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68121862
Design Group Id 55570113
Intervention Id 52465141

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30753219
Gender All
Minimum Age 22 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

A subject must meet the following inclusion criteria to participate in this trial:

One or more of the following diagnostic indications:

Degenerative Spinal Disease (e.g. degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis and/or spinal stenosis)
Deformity (e.g. degenerative deformity)
Degenerative Spinal Disease patients only: Patient has been unresponsive to non-operative treatment for at least three months or has progressive symptoms or signs of nerve root/spinal cord compression while undergoing continued non-operative management.
Compromised bone quality defined as a hip DXA scan T-score less than or equal to -1.0 or spine quantitative CT (qCT) actual volumetric bone mineral density threshold of ≤ 120 mg/cm3.
Requires a procedure with an instrumented, posterior thoracic and/or lumbar spinal stabilization and/or immobilization.
Is scheduled to receive a construct using CD Horizon® Spinal System components with at least one Fenestrated Screw cemented with Fenestrated Screw Cement.
At least 22 years old or greater at the time of informed consent.
Is able to understand and willing to sign the Patient Informed Consent Form.
Is willing and able to undergo the study procedure and perform the follow up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

A subject will be excluded from participating in this trial for any of the following reasons:

Has undergone stabilization and/or fusion procedure at the index or adjacent levels.
Will undergo vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty procedure during surgery.
Has been diagnosed with cauda equina syndrome.
Has been previously diagnosed with clinically significant peripheral neuropathy.
Has any degree of permanent neurologic deficit due to the presenting spinal disease (e.g. drop foot or gait deficit).
Has obesity defined by BMI greater than or equal to 35kg/m2.
Has documented allergy to the materials that will be used in the surgical or any imaging procedure (e.g. titanium alloys, cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloys and PMMA Fenestrated Screw Cement, contrast medium)
Has overt or active bacterial infection, local or systemic, and/or potential for bacteremia.
Has a non-correctable spontaneous or therapeutic coagulation disorder or history of coagulation disorder associated with bleeding.
Has evolutive cardiac disease (e.g. symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia) nonreactive to medical treatment.
Has any disease (e.g., neuromuscular disease, etc.) that would preclude the potential benefit and/or accurate clinical evaluation of the safety of the spinal implant surgery.
Is pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study duration.
Is illiterate or considered vulnerable as per the Investigator's assessment (e.g., participants incapable of judgment, or participants under tutelage).
Concurrent participation in another clinical study that may add additional safety risks and/or confound study results*.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254200395
Number Of Facilities 6
Number Of Nsae Subjects 3
Number Of Sae Subjects 7
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 15
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 9
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 22
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 13

Designs

Sequence: 30499481
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Drop Withdrawals

Sequence: 28977099 Sequence: 28977100 Sequence: 28977101 Sequence: 28977102 Sequence: 28977103 Sequence: 28977104 Sequence: 28977105 Sequence: 28977106 Sequence: 28977107 Sequence: 28977108
Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Period Enrollment Period Enrollment Period Surgery Period Surgery Period 3 Month Period 3 Month Period 12 Month Period 12 Month Period 24 Month Period 24 Month
Reason Protocol Violation Reason Protocol Violation Reason Protocol Violation Reason Protocol Violation Reason Early termination cut-off date Reason Early termination cut-off date Reason Early termination cut-off date Reason Early termination cut-off date Reason Early termination cut-off date Reason Early termination cut-off date
Count 4 Count 1 Count 1 Count 0 Count 2 Count 0 Count 8 Count 9 Count 1 Count 1

Milestones

Sequence: 40993394 Sequence: 40993395 Sequence: 40993396 Sequence: 40993397 Sequence: 40993398 Sequence: 40993399 Sequence: 40993400 Sequence: 40993401 Sequence: 40993402 Sequence: 40993403 Sequence: 40993404 Sequence: 40993405 Sequence: 40993406 Sequence: 40993407 Sequence: 40993408 Sequence: 40993409 Sequence: 40993410 Sequence: 40993411 Sequence: 40993412 Sequence: 40993413 Sequence: 40993414 Sequence: 40993415 Sequence: 40993416 Sequence: 40993417 Sequence: 40993418 Sequence: 40993419 Sequence: 40993420 Sequence: 40993421 Sequence: 40993422 Sequence: 40993423
Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753 Result Group Id 56080752 Result Group Id 56080753
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Enrollment Period Enrollment Period Enrollment Period Enrollment Period Enrollment Period Enrollment Period Surgery Period Surgery Period Surgery Period Surgery Period Surgery Period Surgery Period 3 Month Period 3 Month Period 3 Month Period 3 Month Period 3 Month Period 3 Month Period 12 Month Period 12 Month Period 12 Month Period 12 Month Period 12 Month Period 12 Month Period 24 Month Period 24 Month Period 24 Month Period 24 Month Period 24 Month Period 24 Month
Count 16 Count 11 Count 12 Count 10 Count 4 Count 1 Count 12 Count 10 Count 11 Count 10 Count 1 Count 0 Count 11 Count 10 Count 9 Count 10 Count 2 Count 0 Count 9 Count 10 Count 1 Count 1 Count 8 Count 9 Count 1 Count 1 Count 0 Count 0 Count 1 Count 1

Outcome Analyses

Sequence: 16563210 Sequence: 16563211 Sequence: 16563212 Sequence: 16563213 Sequence: 16563214 Sequence: 16563215 Sequence: 16563216 Sequence: 16563217 Sequence: 16563218 Sequence: 16563219
Outcome Id 30794526 Outcome Id 30794526 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528
Non Inferiority Type Other Non Inferiority Type Other Non Inferiority Type Other Non Inferiority Type Other Non Inferiority Type Other Non Inferiority Type Other Non Inferiority Type Other Non Inferiority Type Other Non Inferiority Type Other Non Inferiority Type Other
Non Inferiority Description A paired t-test for normally distributed data was performed to test whether the mean improvement from baseline was significantly greater than 0.

The normality of the data distribution was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test.

Non Inferiority Description A paired t-test for normally distributed data was performed to test whether the mean improvement from baseline was significantly greater than 0.

The normality of the data distribution was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test.

Non Inferiority Description A paired t-test for normally distributed data was performed to test whether the mean improvement from baseline was significantly greater than 0.

The normality of the data distribution was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test.

Non Inferiority Description A paired t-test for normally distributed data was performed to test whether the mean improvement from baseline was significantly greater than 0.

The normality of the data distribution was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test.

Non Inferiority Description A paired t-test for normally distributed data was performed to test whether the mean improvement from baseline was significantly greater than 0.

The normality of the data distribution was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test.

Non Inferiority Description A paired t-test for normally distributed data was performed to test whether the mean improvement from baseline was significantly greater than 0.

The normality of the data distribution was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test.

Non Inferiority Description A paired t-test for normally distributed data was performed to test whether the mean improvement from baseline was significantly greater than 0.

The normality of the data distribution was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test.

Non Inferiority Description A paired t-test for normally distributed data was performed to test whether the mean improvement from baseline was significantly greater than 0.

The normality of the data distribution was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test.

Non Inferiority Description A paired t-test for normally distributed data was performed to test whether the mean improvement from baseline was significantly greater than 0.

The normality of the data distribution was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test.

Non Inferiority Description A paired t-test for normally distributed data was performed to test whether the mean improvement from baseline was significantly greater than 0.

The normality of the data distribution was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test.

P Value Modifier P Value Modifier P Value Modifier P Value Modifier < P Value Modifier < P Value Modifier < P Value Modifier P Value Modifier P Value Modifier P Value Modifier
P Value 0.06 P Value 0.012 P Value 0.002 P Value 0.001 P Value 0.001 P Value 0.001 P Value 0.174 P Value 0.002 P Value 0.003 P Value 0.012
P Value Description Back Pain P Value Description Back Pain P Value Description Leg Pain P Value Description Leg Pain P Value Description Health State Score P Value Description Health State Score P Value Description Index score P Value Description Index score
Method t-test, 1 sided Method t-test, 1 sided Method t-test, 1 sided Method t-test, 1 sided Method t-test, 1 sided Method t-test, 1 sided Method t-test, 1 sided Method t-test, 1 sided Method t-test, 1 sided Method t-test, 1 sided
Groups Description To verify that the improvement of ODI from Baseline to 3 Month was significantly greater than 0 for each indication subgroup the following statistical analyses were planned.

The null hypothesis was H0: μ_ODI ≤ 0, and the alternative hypothesis was Ha: μ_ODI > 0 where μ_ODI is the mean improvement of ODI score at 3 months from baseline.

Groups Description To verify that the improvement of ODI from Baseline to 3 Month was significantly greater than 0 for each indication subgroup the following statistical analyses were planned.

The null hypothesis was H0: μ_ODI ≤ 0, and the alternative hypothesis was Ha: μ_ODI > 0 where μ_ODI is the mean improvement of ODI score at 3 months from baseline.

Groups Description To verify that the improvement of VAS from Baseline to 3 Month was significantly greater than 0 for each indication subgroup the following statistical analyses were planned.

The null hypothesis was H0: μ_VAS ≤ 0, and the alternative hypothesis was Ha: μ_VAS > 0 where μ_VAS is the mean improvement of VAS score at 3 months from baseline.

Groups Description To verify that the improvement of VAS from Baseline to 3 Month was significantly greater than 0 for each indication subgroup the following statistical analyses were planned.

The null hypothesis was H0: μ_VAS ≤ 0, and the alternative hypothesis was Ha: μ_VAS > 0 where μ_VAS is the mean improvement of VAS score at 3 months from baseline.

Groups Description To verify that the improvement of VAS from Baseline to 3 Month was significantly greater than 0 for each indication subgroup the following statistical analyses were planned.

The null hypothesis was H0: μ_VAS ≤ 0, and the alternative hypothesis was Ha: μ_VAS > 0 where μ_VAS is the mean improvement of VAS score at 3 months from baseline.

Groups Description To verify that the improvement of VAS from Baseline to 3 Month was significantly greater than 0 for each indication subgroup the following statistical analyses were planned.

The null hypothesis was H0: μ_VAS ≤ 0, and the alternative hypothesis was Ha: μ_VAS > 0 where μ_VAS is the mean improvement of VAS score at 3 months from baseline.

Groups Description To verify that the improvement of EQ-5D 5L from Baseline to 3 Month was significantly greater than 0 for each indication subgroup the following statistical analyses were planned.

The null hypothesis was H0: μ_EQ-5D 5L ≤ 0, and the alternative hypothesis was Ha: μ_EQ-5D 5L > 0 where μ_EQ-5D 5L is the mean improvement of EQ-5D 5L score at 3 months from baseline.

Groups Description To verify that the improvement of EQ-5D 5L from Baseline to 3 Month was significantly greater than 0 for each indication subgroup the following statistical analyses were planned.

The null hypothesis was H0: μ_EQ-5D 5L ≤ 0, and the alternative hypothesis was Ha: μ_EQ-5D 5L > 0 where μ_EQ-5D 5L is the mean improvement of EQ-5D 5L score at 3 months from baseline.

Groups Description To verify that the improvement of EQ-5D 5L from Baseline to 3 Month was significantly greater than 0 for each indication subgroup the following statistical analyses were planned.

The null hypothesis was H0: μ_EQ-5D 5L ≤ 0, and the alternative hypothesis was Ha: μ_EQ-5D 5L > 0 where μ_EQ-5D 5L is the mean improvement of EQ-5D 5L score at 3 months from baseline.

Groups Description To verify that the improvement of EQ-5D 5L from Baseline to 3 Month was significantly greater than 0 for each indication subgroup the following statistical analyses were planned.

The null hypothesis was H0: μ_EQ-5D 5L ≤ 0, and the alternative hypothesis was Ha: μ_EQ-5D 5L > 0 where μ_EQ-5D 5L is the mean improvement of EQ-5D 5L score at 3 months from baseline.

Outcome Analysis Groups

Sequence: 32122751 Sequence: 32122752 Sequence: 32122753 Sequence: 32122754 Sequence: 32122755 Sequence: 32122756 Sequence: 32122757 Sequence: 32122758 Sequence: 32122759 Sequence: 32122760
Outcome Analysis Id 16563210 Outcome Analysis Id 16563211 Outcome Analysis Id 16563212 Outcome Analysis Id 16563213 Outcome Analysis Id 16563214 Outcome Analysis Id 16563215 Outcome Analysis Id 16563216 Outcome Analysis Id 16563217 Outcome Analysis Id 16563218 Outcome Analysis Id 16563219
Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3920197
Recruitment Details The study aimed at evaluating overall 100 subjects with around 50 subjects (no less than 48 subjects) in each indication subgroup at approximately 10 study sites in Europe. Due to the premature closure of the study, the number of enrolled subjects was 27 (16 belonging to the degenerative spinal disease group and 11 to the deformity group) in 6 sites in Europe.

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 73976125 Sequence: 73976126 Sequence: 73976127 Sequence: 73976128 Sequence: 73976129 Sequence: 73976130 Sequence: 73976131 Sequence: 73976132 Sequence: 73976133 Sequence: 73976134 Sequence: 73976135 Sequence: 73976136 Sequence: 73976137 Sequence: 73976138 Sequence: 73976139 Sequence: 73976140 Sequence: 73976141 Sequence: 73976142 Sequence: 73976143 Sequence: 73976144 Sequence: 73976145 Sequence: 73976146 Sequence: 73976147 Sequence: 73976148 Sequence: 73976149
Outcome Id 30794525 Outcome Id 30794525 Outcome Id 30794526 Outcome Id 30794526 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794530 Outcome Id 30794530 Outcome Id 30794531 Outcome Id 30794531 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794533 Outcome Id 30794533 Outcome Id 30794534 Outcome Id 30794534 Outcome Id 30794535 Outcome Id 30794535 Outcome Id 30794536 Outcome Id 30794537 Outcome Id 30794538
Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 1 Count 1 Count 11 Count 10 Count 11 Count 10 Count 11 Count 10 Count 1 Count 1 Count 11 Count 10 Count 11 Count 10 Count 11 Count 10 Count 11 Count 10 Count 1 Count 1 Count 1 Count 1 Count 1 Count 1 Count 1

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2577885 Sequence: 2577886
Document Type Study Protocol Document Type Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True Has Protocol False
Has Icf False Has Icf False
Has Sap False Has Sap True
Document Date 2018-09-19 Document Date 2020-07-13
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/44/NCT03797144/Prot_000.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/44/NCT03797144/SAP_001.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 27935020 Sequence: 27935021 Sequence: 27935022 Sequence: 27935023 Sequence: 27935024 Sequence: 27935025
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 11 Subjects At Risk 11 Subjects At Risk 11 Subjects At Risk 10 Subjects At Risk 10 Subjects At Risk 10
Created At 2023-08-08 21:49:29.816882 Created At 2023-08-08 21:49:29.816882 Created At 2023-08-08 21:49:29.816882 Created At 2023-08-08 21:49:29.816882 Created At 2023-08-08 21:49:29.816882 Created At 2023-08-08 21:49:29.816882
Updated At 2023-08-08 21:49:29.816882 Updated At 2023-08-08 21:49:29.816882 Updated At 2023-08-08 21:49:29.816882 Updated At 2023-08-08 21:49:29.816882 Updated At 2023-08-08 21:49:29.816882 Updated At 2023-08-08 21:49:29.816882

Reported Events

Sequence: 528049833 Sequence: 528049834 Sequence: 528049835 Sequence: 528049836 Sequence: 528049837 Sequence: 528049838 Sequence: 528049839 Sequence: 528049840 Sequence: 528049841 Sequence: 528049842 Sequence: 528049843 Sequence: 528049844 Sequence: 528049845 Sequence: 528049846 Sequence: 528049847 Sequence: 528049848 Sequence: 528049849 Sequence: 528049850 Sequence: 528049851 Sequence: 528049852
Result Group Id 56080757 Result Group Id 56080758 Result Group Id 56080757 Result Group Id 56080758 Result Group Id 56080757 Result Group Id 56080758 Result Group Id 56080757 Result Group Id 56080758 Result Group Id 56080757 Result Group Id 56080758 Result Group Id 56080757 Result Group Id 56080758 Result Group Id 56080757 Result Group Id 56080758 Result Group Id 56080757 Result Group Id 56080758 Result Group Id 56080757 Result Group Id 56080758 Result Group Id 56080757 Result Group Id 56080758
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit Time Frame The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020 (12 months). At this study cut-off date: – 2 Degenerative Spinal Disease (DSD) patients completed their surgery visit – 8 DSD patients completed up to their 3 month follow-up visit – 1 DSD patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit – 9 Deformity patients completed up to their 3-month follow-up visit – 1 Deformity patient completed up to their 12 month follow-up visit
Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other
Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 11 Subjects At Risk 10 Subjects At Risk 11 Subjects At Risk 10 Subjects At Risk 11 Subjects At Risk 10 Subjects At Risk 11 Subjects At Risk 10 Subjects At Risk 11 Subjects At Risk 10 Subjects At Risk 11 Subjects At Risk 10 Subjects At Risk 11 Subjects At Risk 10 Subjects At Risk 11 Subjects At Risk 10 Subjects At Risk 11 Subjects At Risk 10 Subjects At Risk 11 Subjects At Risk 10
Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Organ System Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Psychiatric disorders Organ System Psychiatric disorders Organ System Vascular disorders Organ System Vascular disorders
Adverse Event Term SPINAL CSF LEAK Adverse Event Term SPINAL CSF LEAK Adverse Event Term PULMONARY EDEMA Adverse Event Term PULMONARY EDEMA Adverse Event Term FORAMINAL STENOSIS Adverse Event Term FORAMINAL STENOSIS Adverse Event Term INCISION WOUND DEHISCENCE Adverse Event Term INCISION WOUND DEHISCENCE Adverse Event Term SPINAL FRACTURE AT LEVEL T12 Adverse Event Term SPINAL FRACTURE AT LEVEL T12 Adverse Event Term PULMONARY EMBOLISM Adverse Event Term PULMONARY EMBOLISM Adverse Event Term INGUINAL HERNIA Adverse Event Term INGUINAL HERNIA Adverse Event Term PROXIMAL JUNCTIONAL KYPHOSIS Adverse Event Term PROXIMAL JUNCTIONAL KYPHOSIS Adverse Event Term ANXIETY Adverse Event Term ANXIETY Adverse Event Term HEMATOMA AT INDEX LEVEL CAUSING FEVER ABOVE 37.8°C Adverse Event Term HEMATOMA AT INDEX LEVEL CAUSING FEVER ABOVE 37.8°C
Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0
Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28865759
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3850941
Pi Employee No
Restriction Type GT60

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3850906
Organization Medtronic
Name Clinical Research Specialist
Phone +39 3450225929
Email francesca.molineris@medtronic.com

Outcomes

Sequence: 30794525 Sequence: 30794526 Sequence: 30794527 Sequence: 30794528 Sequence: 30794529 Sequence: 30794530 Sequence: 30794531 Sequence: 30794532 Sequence: 30794533 Sequence: 30794534 Sequence: 30794535 Sequence: 30794536 Sequence: 30794537 Sequence: 30794538
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary
Title Change in ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) at 12 Months Compared to Baseline Title Change in ODI From Baseline at 3 Months Visit Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Patients Title Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Screws Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Rate of Secondary Spinal Surgeries at Index and/or Adjacent Level(s), Resulting From an AE up to 12 Months After Surgery Title Radiographic Confirmation of Stabilization of the Pedicle Screw Instrumentation at 12-month Visit. Title Radiographic Fusion at 12-month Visit for Those Subjects Where Fusion Was Intended. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Coronal Alignment and Sagittal Vertical Axis From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Number of Participants With Coronal Curve Type (T, L, D or N) at Baseline and 12 Months
Description Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a.This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. ODI is composed by 10 sections.

Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 2 subjects who completed the 12 month follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months time point.

Description Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a. [23]. This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders.

ODI is composed by 10 sections. Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline time point minus the value of the 3 months time point.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures. Description The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures. Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description When a patient requires additional surgery at the index and/or adjacent level(s), it can be an indicator of insufficient outcomes of the initial surgery.

Secondary spinal surgical procedures resulted from AE(s) could be classified into four categories: revision, removal, reoperation, and other.

One subject belonging to the Deformity group underwent a reoperation for a foraminal stenosis at index level L5-S1.

Description The surgeon or hospital radiologist reviewed radiographs and or CT's to assess for evidence of instability of the pedicle screw instrumentation at 12 months.

The following were considered as signs of instrumentation instability:

Screw pullout
Screw loosening
Screw toggle

Description The surgeon or hospital radiologist determined fusion status for those subjects where fusion was intended. The fusion assessment for each subject was collected at 12 months, preferably by collecting a CT-scan, alternatively fusion could also be collected through X-rays.

The criterion for fusion when assessed through a CT-scan is bony bridging and when assessed through X-rays the criteria bony bridging, no motion (<4˚) in Flexion/Extension views, and integrity of the instrumentation (implanted devices). A partial fusion (not meeting these criteria) should have been recorded as "No fusion success". For multi-level subjects, fusion success was assessed for each level and overall fusion status was defined as achieving fusion at all treated levels. If one level's fusion status could not be determined, then the subject level was considered unable to determine.

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Sagittal alignment – Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Coronal alignment : Distance between C7 plumb line and the central sacral vertical line
Sagittal alignment – Global parameter: Sagittal vertical axis (SVA)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameter was assessed in the deformity patients on standing frontal full spine X-ray:

– Coronal Curve Type

Coronal curve type is determined on the basis of maximal coronal angle measured according to standard Cobb technique and is classified as:

Curve type L: patients with a lumbar or thoracolumbar major curve >30˚ (apical level of T10 or lower)
Curve type T: patients with a thoracic major curve of >30˚ (apical level of T9 or higher)
Curve type D: patients with a double major curve, with each curve >30˚.
Curve type N: patients with no coronal curve >30˚.

Time Frame Baseline to 12 months Time Frame Baseline, 3 months Time Frame Baseline, 3, 12 months Time Frame Baseline, 3, 12 months Time Frame Baseline to 12 months. Time Frame Surgery to 12 months. Time Frame Surgery to 12 months. Time Frame Surgery to 12 months. Time Frame Surgery to 12 months. Time Frame Surgery to 12 months. Time Frame Surgery to 12 months. Time Frame Baseline to 12 months Time Frame Baseline to 12 months Time Frame Baseline to 12 months
Population Due to the premature termination of the study, the number of subjects who completed the 12 month follow-up visit was very low (N=2/21, 9.5%). Population The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point.

Population The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow-up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12 months follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Population The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow-up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

Population 21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 months follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 months follow-up visit. Due to the premature termination of the study, the number of subjects who completed the 12 months follow-up visit was very low (N=2/21, 9.5%). Population 21 subjects were assessed at surgery,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 months follow-up visit. Population 21 subjects were assessed at surgery,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 months follow-up visit. Population 21 subjects were assessed at surgery,19 subjects completed the 3 months follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 months follow-up visit. Adverse events up to 12 month follow-up visits are reported in the Outcome Measure Data Table. Population 21 subjects were assessed at surgery,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit. Population 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit. Population 2 subjects who completed the 12 month follow-up visit were analyzed for fusion assessment with radiographic images. Population 1 subject who completed the 12 month follow-up visit was analyzed. Population 1 subject who completed the 12 month follow-up visit was analyzed. Population 1 subject who completed the 12 month follow-up visit was analyzed.
Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units participants Units Screws Units Events Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Degrees Units mm Units Participants
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Param Type Number Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Count of Participants

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 235577197 Sequence: 235577198 Sequence: 235577199 Sequence: 235577200 Sequence: 235577201 Sequence: 235577202 Sequence: 235577203 Sequence: 235577204 Sequence: 235577205 Sequence: 235577206 Sequence: 235577207 Sequence: 235577208 Sequence: 235577209 Sequence: 235577210 Sequence: 235577211 Sequence: 235577212 Sequence: 235577213 Sequence: 235577214 Sequence: 235577215 Sequence: 235577216 Sequence: 235577217 Sequence: 235577218 Sequence: 235577219 Sequence: 235577220 Sequence: 235577221 Sequence: 235577222 Sequence: 235577223 Sequence: 235577224 Sequence: 235577225 Sequence: 235577226 Sequence: 235577227 Sequence: 235577228 Sequence: 235577229 Sequence: 235577230 Sequence: 235577231 Sequence: 235577232 Sequence: 235577233 Sequence: 235577234 Sequence: 235577235 Sequence: 235577236 Sequence: 235577237 Sequence: 235577238 Sequence: 235577239 Sequence: 235577240 Sequence: 235577241 Sequence: 235577242 Sequence: 235577292 Sequence: 235577243 Sequence: 235577244 Sequence: 235577245 Sequence: 235577246 Sequence: 235577247 Sequence: 235577248 Sequence: 235577249 Sequence: 235577250 Sequence: 235577251 Sequence: 235577252 Sequence: 235577253 Sequence: 235577254 Sequence: 235577255 Sequence: 235577256 Sequence: 235577257 Sequence: 235577258 Sequence: 235577259 Sequence: 235577260 Sequence: 235577261 Sequence: 235577262 Sequence: 235577263 Sequence: 235577264 Sequence: 235577265 Sequence: 235577266 Sequence: 235577267 Sequence: 235577268 Sequence: 235577269 Sequence: 235577270 Sequence: 235577271 Sequence: 235577272 Sequence: 235577273 Sequence: 235577274 Sequence: 235577275 Sequence: 235577276 Sequence: 235577277 Sequence: 235577278 Sequence: 235577279 Sequence: 235577280 Sequence: 235577281 Sequence: 235577282 Sequence: 235577283 Sequence: 235577284 Sequence: 235577285 Sequence: 235577286 Sequence: 235577287 Sequence: 235577288 Sequence: 235577289 Sequence: 235577290 Sequence: 235577291 Sequence: 235577293 Sequence: 235577294 Sequence: 235577295 Sequence: 235577296 Sequence: 235577297 Sequence: 235577298 Sequence: 235577299 Sequence: 235577300 Sequence: 235577301 Sequence: 235577302 Sequence: 235577303 Sequence: 235577304 Sequence: 235577305 Sequence: 235577306 Sequence: 235577307 Sequence: 235577308 Sequence: 235577309 Sequence: 235577310 Sequence: 235577311 Sequence: 235577312 Sequence: 235577313 Sequence: 235577314 Sequence: 235577315 Sequence: 235577316 Sequence: 235577317 Sequence: 235577318 Sequence: 235577319 Sequence: 235577320 Sequence: 235577321 Sequence: 235577322 Sequence: 235577177 Sequence: 235577178 Sequence: 235577179 Sequence: 235577180 Sequence: 235577181 Sequence: 235577182 Sequence: 235577183 Sequence: 235577184 Sequence: 235577185 Sequence: 235577186 Sequence: 235577187 Sequence: 235577188 Sequence: 235577189 Sequence: 235577190 Sequence: 235577191 Sequence: 235577192 Sequence: 235577193 Sequence: 235577194 Sequence: 235577195 Sequence: 235577196
Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794528 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794529 Outcome Id 30794530 Outcome Id 30794530 Outcome Id 30794534 Outcome Id 30794530 Outcome Id 30794530 Outcome Id 30794531 Outcome Id 30794531 Outcome Id 30794531 Outcome Id 30794531 Outcome Id 30794531 Outcome Id 30794531 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794532 Outcome Id 30794533 Outcome Id 30794533 Outcome Id 30794534 Outcome Id 30794534 Outcome Id 30794534 Outcome Id 30794535 Outcome Id 30794535 Outcome Id 30794535 Outcome Id 30794535 Outcome Id 30794535 Outcome Id 30794535 Outcome Id 30794536 Outcome Id 30794536 Outcome Id 30794536 Outcome Id 30794536 Outcome Id 30794536 Outcome Id 30794536 Outcome Id 30794536 Outcome Id 30794536 Outcome Id 30794536 Outcome Id 30794536 Outcome Id 30794536 Outcome Id 30794536 Outcome Id 30794537 Outcome Id 30794537 Outcome Id 30794537 Outcome Id 30794537 Outcome Id 30794538 Outcome Id 30794538 Outcome Id 30794538 Outcome Id 30794538 Outcome Id 30794538 Outcome Id 30794538 Outcome Id 30794538 Outcome Id 30794538 Outcome Id 30794525 Outcome Id 30794525 Outcome Id 30794526 Outcome Id 30794526 Outcome Id 30794526 Outcome Id 30794526 Outcome Id 30794526 Outcome Id 30794526 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527 Outcome Id 30794527
Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080756 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755 Result Group Id 56080754 Result Group Id 56080755
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Classification Leg Pain_3 Months Classification Leg Pain_3 Months Classification Leg Pain_Change from Baseline at 3 Months Classification Leg Pain_Change from Baseline at 3 Months Classification Leg Pain_12 Months Classification Leg Pain_12 Months Classification Leg Pain_Change form Baseline at 12 Months Classification Leg Pain_Change form Baseline at 12 Months Classification Index score_Baseline Classification Index score_Baseline Classification Index score_3 Months Classification Index score_3 Months Classification Index score_Change from Baseline at 3 Months Classification Index score_Change from Baseline at 3 Months Classification Index score_12 Months Classification Index score_12 Months Classification Index score_Change from Baseline at 12 Months Classification Index score_Change from Baseline at 12 Months Classification Health State score_Baseline Classification Health State score_Baseline Classification Health State score_3 Months Classification Health State score_3 Months Classification Health State score_Change from Baseline Classification Health State score_Change from Baseline Classification Health State score_12 Months Classification Health State score_12 Months Classification Health State score_Change from Baseline at 12 Months Classification Health State score_Change from Baseline at 12 Months Classification Motor Functions_Baseline Classification Motor Functions_Baseline Classification Motor Functions_12 Months Classification Motor Functions_12 Months Classification Sensory Functions_Baseline Classification Sensory Functions_Baseline Classification Sensory Functions_12 Months Classification Sensory Functions_12 Months Classification Reflexes_Baseline Classification Reflexes_Baseline Classification Reflexes_12 Months Classification Reflexes_12 Months Classification Straight Leg Raise_Baseline Classification Straight Leg Raise_Baseline Classification Straight Leg Raise_12 Months Classification Straight Leg Raise_12 Months Classification Patients with cement extravasation Classification Patients with cement extravasation Classification Patients with symptomatic extravasation Classification Patients with symptomatic extravasation Classification Number of Cemented Fenestrated Screws Classification Number of Cemented Fenestrated Screws Classification Fenestrated Screws with cement extravasation Classification Fenestrated Screws with cement extravasation Classification Fenestrated screws with symptomatic cement extravasation Classification Fenestrated screws with symptomatic cement extravasation Classification Adverse Event (AE) Classification Adverse Event (AE) Classification Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Classification Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Classification Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) Classification Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) Classification Unexpected Serious Adverse Device Effect (USADE) Classification Unexpected Serious Adverse Device Effect (USADE) Classification SAEs Related to Procedure Classification SAEs Related to Procedure Classification SAEs Related to Access System Classification SAEs Related to Access System Classification SAEs Related to Cage/Interbody Classification SAEs Related to Cage/Interbody Classification SAEs Related to Anterior Plate Classification SAEs Related to Anterior Plate Classification SAEs Related to Bone Grafts and Substitutes Classification SAEs Related to Bone Grafts and Substitutes Classification SAEs Related to Rods Classification SAEs Related to Rods Classification SAEs Related to Fenestrated Screw Cement_Investigator assessment Classification SAEs Related to Fenestrated Screw Cement_Investigator assessment Classification SAEs Related to Fenestrated Screw Cement_Sponsor assessment Classification SAEs Related to Fenestrated Screw Cement_Sponsor assessment Classification SAEs Related to Fenestrated Screw(s) Classification SAEs Related to Fenestrated Screw(s) Classification SAEs Related to other components of the Fixation (stabilization) System Classification SAEs Related to other components of the Fixation (stabilization) System Classification SAEs Related to an underlying condition or disease_Investigator assessment Classification SAEs Related to an underlying condition or disease_Investigator assessment Classification SAEs Related to an underlying condition or disease_Sponsor assessment Classification SAEs Related to an underlying condition or disease_Sponsor assessment Classification Not Related SAEs_Investigator assessment Classification Not Related SAEs_Investigator assessment Classification Not Related SAEs_Sponsor assessment Classification Not Related SAEs_Sponsor assessment Classification Baseline Thoracic Kyphosis (TK) (degrees) Classification 12-months Thoracic Kyphosis (TK) (degrees) Classification Baseline Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK) (degrees) Classification 12-months Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK) (degrees) Classification Baseline Lumbar lordosis (LL) (degrees) Classification 12-months Lumbar Lordosis (LL) (degrees) Classification Baseline Pelvic Incidence (PI) (degrees) Classification 12-months Pelvic Incidence (PI) (degrees) Classification Baseline Pelvic Tilt (PT) (degrees) Classification 12-months Pelvic Tilt (PT) (degrees) Classification Baseline Sacral Slope (SS) (degrees) Classification 12-months Sacral Slope (SS) (degrees) Classification Baseline Coronal alignment (mm) Classification 12-months Coronal alignment (mm) Classification Baseline Sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (mm) Classification 12-months Sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (mm) Classification Baseline curve type L Classification 12-months curve type L Classification Baseline curve type T Classification 12-months curve type T Classification Baseline curve type D Classification 12-months curve type D Classification Baseline curve type N Classification 12-months curve type N Classification Baseline Classification Baseline Classification 3 Month Classification 3 Month Classification Change from Baseline Classification Change from Baseline Classification Back Pain_Baseline Classification Back Pain_Baseline Classification Back Pain_3 Months Classification Back Pain_3 Months Classification Back Pain_Change from Baseline at 3 Months Classification Back Pain_Change from Baseline at 3 Months Classification Back Pain_12 Months Classification Back Pain_12 Months Classification Back Pain_Change from Baseline at 12 Months Classification Back Pain_Change from Baseline at 12 Months Classification Leg Pain_Baseline Classification Leg Pain_Baseline
Category Unstable Construct Category Stable Construct Category Stable Construct Category Unstable Construct Category Fusion success Category Fusion success Category No fusion success Category No fusion success Category Unable to determine Category Unable to determine
Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Change in EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) at 3 and 12 Months From Baseline Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Neurological Success at 12-month Visit Title Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Patients Title Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Patients Title Radiographic Confirmation of Stabilization of the Pedicle Screw Instrumentation at 12-month Visit. Title Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Patients Title Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Patients Title Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Screws Title Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Screws Title Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Screws Title Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Screws Title Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Screws Title Rate of Intraoperative Cement Extravasation/Leakage. Screws Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events Through 12 Months. Title Rate of Secondary Spinal Surgeries at Index and/or Adjacent Level(s), Resulting From an AE up to 12 Months After Surgery Title Rate of Secondary Spinal Surgeries at Index and/or Adjacent Level(s), Resulting From an AE up to 12 Months After Surgery Title Radiographic Confirmation of Stabilization of the Pedicle Screw Instrumentation at 12-month Visit. Title Radiographic Confirmation of Stabilization of the Pedicle Screw Instrumentation at 12-month Visit. Title Radiographic Confirmation of Stabilization of the Pedicle Screw Instrumentation at 12-month Visit. Title Radiographic Fusion at 12-month Visit for Those Subjects Where Fusion Was Intended. Title Radiographic Fusion at 12-month Visit for Those Subjects Where Fusion Was Intended. Title Radiographic Fusion at 12-month Visit for Those Subjects Where Fusion Was Intended. Title Radiographic Fusion at 12-month Visit for Those Subjects Where Fusion Was Intended. Title Radiographic Fusion at 12-month Visit for Those Subjects Where Fusion Was Intended. Title Radiographic Fusion at 12-month Visit for Those Subjects Where Fusion Was Intended. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Coronal Alignment and Sagittal Vertical Axis From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Coronal Alignment and Sagittal Vertical Axis From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Coronal Alignment and Sagittal Vertical Axis From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Change in Coronal Alignment and Sagittal Vertical Axis From Baseline at the 12-month Visit. Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Number of Participants With Coronal Curve Type (T, L, D or N) at Baseline and 12 Months Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Number of Participants With Coronal Curve Type (T, L, D or N) at Baseline and 12 Months Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Number of Participants With Coronal Curve Type (T, L, D or N) at Baseline and 12 Months Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Number of Participants With Coronal Curve Type (T, L, D or N) at Baseline and 12 Months Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Number of Participants With Coronal Curve Type (T, L, D or N) at Baseline and 12 Months Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Number of Participants With Coronal Curve Type (T, L, D or N) at Baseline and 12 Months Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Number of Participants With Coronal Curve Type (T, L, D or N) at Baseline and 12 Months Title For Deformity Subjects Only: Number of Participants With Coronal Curve Type (T, L, D or N) at Baseline and 12 Months Title Change in ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) at 12 Months Compared to Baseline Title Change in ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) at 12 Months Compared to Baseline Title Change in ODI From Baseline at 3 Months Visit Title Change in ODI From Baseline at 3 Months Visit Title Change in ODI From Baseline at 3 Months Visit Title Change in ODI From Baseline at 3 Months Visit Title Change in ODI From Baseline at 3 Months Visit Title Change in ODI From Baseline at 3 Months Visit Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline Title Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) Back and Leg Pain Score at 3 and 12 Months Follow-up Visit From Baseline
Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description The EQ-5D 5L (European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions) self-report questionnaire was used to assess health-related quality of life status. The EQ-5D 5L questionnaire includes five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels, reflecting "no health problems," "slight health problems," "moderate health problems," "severe health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ-5D 5L will be used for calculating EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D VAS was also utilized to document the subject's self-rated overall health state on a 0 to 100 scale (0 = maximal health-related problems, 100 = minimal health-related problems).

EQ-5D 5L was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months follow-up visit and the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months follow-up visit.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description Neurological status is based on 4 sections: motor, sensory, reflexes, and straight leg raising, each comprising several elements. Following scales were used to evaluate neurological status: reflexes (0 = Absent or Trace, 1 = Hyper-reflexic, 2 = Normal), sensory function (Light Touch or Pin Prick L1 to S1; 1 = Absent, 2 = Impaired, 3 = Normal), motor function (using 0-5 scores 0-5 whereas 0= Total Paralysis, 1 = Palpable or Visible Contraction, 2 = Active Movement, Gravity Eliminated, 3 = Active Movement, Against Gravity, 4 = Active Movement, Against Some Resistance and 5 = Active Movement, Against Full Resistance (full strength) and straight leg raise (1 = Positive. Patient experiences radiating leg pain below the knee on elevating the leg between 15° and 70° with the knee extended, 2 = Negative. No pain experienced).

Overall neurological success will be defined as maintenance or improvement in all sections for time period evaluated (each element must remain the same or improve).

Description The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures. Description The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures. Description The surgeon or hospital radiologist reviewed radiographs and or CT's to assess for evidence of instability of the pedicle screw instrumentation at 12 months.

The following were considered as signs of instrumentation instability:

Screw pullout
Screw loosening
Screw toggle

Description The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures. Description The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures. Description The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures. Description The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures. Description The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures. Description The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures. Description The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures. Description The rate of intraoperative cement extravasation/leakage as directly assessed by the physician during the surgery or in the post-operative follow-up with imaging procedures. Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description The adverse events (AEs) were collected from the spinal surgery up to the study cut-off date of 15 JUL 2020. Adverse event relation to the study procedure and to the device was classified by the investigator and by the sponsor as not related, unlikely, possible, probable and causal relationship.

For the reporting below, AEs classified as having possible, probable and causal relationship are considered as device and/or procedure related. Sponsor assessment is reported if different from the Investigator assessment

21 subjects were assessed at Baseline,19 subjects completed the 3 month follow-up visit and 2 subjects completed the 12 month follow-up visit.

Description When a patient requires additional surgery at the index and/or adjacent level(s), it can be an indicator of insufficient outcomes of the initial surgery.

Secondary spinal surgical procedures resulted from AE(s) could be classified into four categories: revision, removal, reoperation, and other.

One subject belonging to the Deformity group underwent a reoperation for a foraminal stenosis at index level L5-S1.

Description When a patient requires additional surgery at the index and/or adjacent level(s), it can be an indicator of insufficient outcomes of the initial surgery.

Secondary spinal surgical procedures resulted from AE(s) could be classified into four categories: revision, removal, reoperation, and other.

One subject belonging to the Deformity group underwent a reoperation for a foraminal stenosis at index level L5-S1.

Description The surgeon or hospital radiologist reviewed radiographs and or CT's to assess for evidence of instability of the pedicle screw instrumentation at 12 months.

The following were considered as signs of instrumentation instability:

Screw pullout
Screw loosening
Screw toggle

Description The surgeon or hospital radiologist reviewed radiographs and or CT's to assess for evidence of instability of the pedicle screw instrumentation at 12 months.

The following were considered as signs of instrumentation instability:

Screw pullout
Screw loosening
Screw toggle

Description The surgeon or hospital radiologist reviewed radiographs and or CT's to assess for evidence of instability of the pedicle screw instrumentation at 12 months.

The following were considered as signs of instrumentation instability:

Screw pullout
Screw loosening
Screw toggle

Description The surgeon or hospital radiologist determined fusion status for those subjects where fusion was intended. The fusion assessment for each subject was collected at 12 months, preferably by collecting a CT-scan, alternatively fusion could also be collected through X-rays.

The criterion for fusion when assessed through a CT-scan is bony bridging and when assessed through X-rays the criteria bony bridging, no motion (<4˚) in Flexion/Extension views, and integrity of the instrumentation (implanted devices). A partial fusion (not meeting these criteria) should have been recorded as "No fusion success". For multi-level subjects, fusion success was assessed for each level and overall fusion status was defined as achieving fusion at all treated levels. If one level's fusion status could not be determined, then the subject level was considered unable to determine.

Description The surgeon or hospital radiologist determined fusion status for those subjects where fusion was intended. The fusion assessment for each subject was collected at 12 months, preferably by collecting a CT-scan, alternatively fusion could also be collected through X-rays.

The criterion for fusion when assessed through a CT-scan is bony bridging and when assessed through X-rays the criteria bony bridging, no motion (<4˚) in Flexion/Extension views, and integrity of the instrumentation (implanted devices). A partial fusion (not meeting these criteria) should have been recorded as "No fusion success". For multi-level subjects, fusion success was assessed for each level and overall fusion status was defined as achieving fusion at all treated levels. If one level's fusion status could not be determined, then the subject level was considered unable to determine.

Description The surgeon or hospital radiologist determined fusion status for those subjects where fusion was intended. The fusion assessment for each subject was collected at 12 months, preferably by collecting a CT-scan, alternatively fusion could also be collected through X-rays.

The criterion for fusion when assessed through a CT-scan is bony bridging and when assessed through X-rays the criteria bony bridging, no motion (<4˚) in Flexion/Extension views, and integrity of the instrumentation (implanted devices). A partial fusion (not meeting these criteria) should have been recorded as "No fusion success". For multi-level subjects, fusion success was assessed for each level and overall fusion status was defined as achieving fusion at all treated levels. If one level's fusion status could not be determined, then the subject level was considered unable to determine.

Description The surgeon or hospital radiologist determined fusion status for those subjects where fusion was intended. The fusion assessment for each subject was collected at 12 months, preferably by collecting a CT-scan, alternatively fusion could also be collected through X-rays.

The criterion for fusion when assessed through a CT-scan is bony bridging and when assessed through X-rays the criteria bony bridging, no motion (<4˚) in Flexion/Extension views, and integrity of the instrumentation (implanted devices). A partial fusion (not meeting these criteria) should have been recorded as "No fusion success". For multi-level subjects, fusion success was assessed for each level and overall fusion status was defined as achieving fusion at all treated levels. If one level's fusion status could not be determined, then the subject level was considered unable to determine.

Description The surgeon or hospital radiologist determined fusion status for those subjects where fusion was intended. The fusion assessment for each subject was collected at 12 months, preferably by collecting a CT-scan, alternatively fusion could also be collected through X-rays.

The criterion for fusion when assessed through a CT-scan is bony bridging and when assessed through X-rays the criteria bony bridging, no motion (<4˚) in Flexion/Extension views, and integrity of the instrumentation (implanted devices). A partial fusion (not meeting these criteria) should have been recorded as "No fusion success". For multi-level subjects, fusion success was assessed for each level and overall fusion status was defined as achieving fusion at all treated levels. If one level's fusion status could not be determined, then the subject level was considered unable to determine.

Description The surgeon or hospital radiologist determined fusion status for those subjects where fusion was intended. The fusion assessment for each subject was collected at 12 months, preferably by collecting a CT-scan, alternatively fusion could also be collected through X-rays.

The criterion for fusion when assessed through a CT-scan is bony bridging and when assessed through X-rays the criteria bony bridging, no motion (<4˚) in Flexion/Extension views, and integrity of the instrumentation (implanted devices). A partial fusion (not meeting these criteria) should have been recorded as "No fusion success". For multi-level subjects, fusion success was assessed for each level and overall fusion status was defined as achieving fusion at all treated levels. If one level's fusion status could not be determined, then the subject level was considered unable to determine.

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Sagittal alignment – Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Sagittal alignment – Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Sagittal alignment – Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Sagittal alignment – Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Sagittal alignment – Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Sagittal alignment – Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Sagittal alignment – Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Sagittal alignment – Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Sagittal alignment – Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Sagittal alignment – Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Sagittal alignment – Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Sagittal alignment – Regional parameters: Thoracic Kyphosis (TK), Thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and Lumbar lordosis (LL).
Sagittal spinopelvic parameters: Pelvic Incidence (PI): Pelvic Tilt (PT) and Sacral Slope (SS)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Coronal alignment : Distance between C7 plumb line and the central sacral vertical line
Sagittal alignment – Global parameter: Sagittal vertical axis (SVA)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Coronal alignment : Distance between C7 plumb line and the central sacral vertical line
Sagittal alignment – Global parameter: Sagittal vertical axis (SVA)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Coronal alignment : Distance between C7 plumb line and the central sacral vertical line
Sagittal alignment – Global parameter: Sagittal vertical axis (SVA)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameters were assessed in the deformity patients on standing, frontal and sagittal full spine X-ray:

Coronal alignment : Distance between C7 plumb line and the central sacral vertical line
Sagittal alignment – Global parameter: Sagittal vertical axis (SVA)

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameter was assessed in the deformity patients on standing frontal full spine X-ray:

– Coronal Curve Type

Coronal curve type is determined on the basis of maximal coronal angle measured according to standard Cobb technique and is classified as:

Curve type L: patients with a lumbar or thoracolumbar major curve >30˚ (apical level of T10 or lower)
Curve type T: patients with a thoracic major curve of >30˚ (apical level of T9 or higher)
Curve type D: patients with a double major curve, with each curve >30˚.
Curve type N: patients with no coronal curve >30˚.

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameter was assessed in the deformity patients on standing frontal full spine X-ray:

– Coronal Curve Type

Coronal curve type is determined on the basis of maximal coronal angle measured according to standard Cobb technique and is classified as:

Curve type L: patients with a lumbar or thoracolumbar major curve >30˚ (apical level of T10 or lower)
Curve type T: patients with a thoracic major curve of >30˚ (apical level of T9 or higher)
Curve type D: patients with a double major curve, with each curve >30˚.
Curve type N: patients with no coronal curve >30˚.

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameter was assessed in the deformity patients on standing frontal full spine X-ray:

– Coronal Curve Type

Coronal curve type is determined on the basis of maximal coronal angle measured according to standard Cobb technique and is classified as:

Curve type L: patients with a lumbar or thoracolumbar major curve >30˚ (apical level of T10 or lower)
Curve type T: patients with a thoracic major curve of >30˚ (apical level of T9 or higher)
Curve type D: patients with a double major curve, with each curve >30˚.
Curve type N: patients with no coronal curve >30˚.

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameter was assessed in the deformity patients on standing frontal full spine X-ray:

– Coronal Curve Type

Coronal curve type is determined on the basis of maximal coronal angle measured according to standard Cobb technique and is classified as:

Curve type L: patients with a lumbar or thoracolumbar major curve >30˚ (apical level of T10 or lower)
Curve type T: patients with a thoracic major curve of >30˚ (apical level of T9 or higher)
Curve type D: patients with a double major curve, with each curve >30˚.
Curve type N: patients with no coronal curve >30˚.

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameter was assessed in the deformity patients on standing frontal full spine X-ray:

– Coronal Curve Type

Coronal curve type is determined on the basis of maximal coronal angle measured according to standard Cobb technique and is classified as:

Curve type L: patients with a lumbar or thoracolumbar major curve >30˚ (apical level of T10 or lower)
Curve type T: patients with a thoracic major curve of >30˚ (apical level of T9 or higher)
Curve type D: patients with a double major curve, with each curve >30˚.
Curve type N: patients with no coronal curve >30˚.

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameter was assessed in the deformity patients on standing frontal full spine X-ray:

– Coronal Curve Type

Coronal curve type is determined on the basis of maximal coronal angle measured according to standard Cobb technique and is classified as:

Curve type L: patients with a lumbar or thoracolumbar major curve >30˚ (apical level of T10 or lower)
Curve type T: patients with a thoracic major curve of >30˚ (apical level of T9 or higher)
Curve type D: patients with a double major curve, with each curve >30˚.
Curve type N: patients with no coronal curve >30˚.

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameter was assessed in the deformity patients on standing frontal full spine X-ray:

– Coronal Curve Type

Coronal curve type is determined on the basis of maximal coronal angle measured according to standard Cobb technique and is classified as:

Curve type L: patients with a lumbar or thoracolumbar major curve >30˚ (apical level of T10 or lower)
Curve type T: patients with a thoracic major curve of >30˚ (apical level of T9 or higher)
Curve type D: patients with a double major curve, with each curve >30˚.
Curve type N: patients with no coronal curve >30˚.

Description Collection of spinopelvic parameters can show if patient's spine is balanced or not prior to and after surgery.

Any evolution of parameters after the surgery can indicate a change in spinopelvic alignment or a mechanism of regulation/compensation due to an evolution of the spinal alignment.

The following spinopelvic alignment parameter was assessed in the deformity patients on standing frontal full spine X-ray:

– Coronal Curve Type

Coronal curve type is determined on the basis of maximal coronal angle measured according to standard Cobb technique and is classified as:

Curve type L: patients with a lumbar or thoracolumbar major curve >30˚ (apical level of T10 or lower)
Curve type T: patients with a thoracic major curve of >30˚ (apical level of T9 or higher)
Curve type D: patients with a double major curve, with each curve >30˚.
Curve type N: patients with no coronal curve >30˚.

Description Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a.This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. ODI is composed by 10 sections.

Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 2 subjects who completed the 12 month follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months time point.

Description Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a.This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders. ODI is composed by 10 sections.

Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 2 subjects who completed the 12 month follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 12 months time point.

Description Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a. [23]. This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders.

ODI is composed by 10 sections. Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline time point minus the value of the 3 months time point.

Description Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a. [23]. This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders.

ODI is composed by 10 sections. Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline time point minus the value of the 3 months time point.

Description Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a. [23]. This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders.

ODI is composed by 10 sections. Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline time point minus the value of the 3 months time point.

Description Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a. [23]. This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders.

ODI is composed by 10 sections. Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline time point minus the value of the 3 months time point.

Description Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a. [23]. This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders.

ODI is composed by 10 sections. Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline time point minus the value of the 3 months time point.

Description Disability associated with thoracic/lumbar spine conditions was assessed using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, which yields the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Version 2.1a. [23]. This validated instrument is considered one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders.

ODI is composed by 10 sections. Each section can be scored 0 to 5, 5 being the worst case. The score is calculated by summing the different sections and then doubling the total. Maximum score is 100.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline and 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow-up visit. The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported. The reported ODI was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline time point minus the value of the 3 months time point.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Description Levels of back pain and leg pain were measured using the Visual Analogue Scales (VAS). Subjects were asked to rate the amount of back pain and leg pain they have had in the last week, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain possible.

The results are summarized for 21 subjects who were assessed at Baseline, 19 subjects who completed the 3 months follow up visit and 2 subjects who completed the 12month follow-up visit. The reported VAS was calculated from two timepoints as the value of the baseline point minus the value of the 3 months time point and the value of the baseline minus the value of the 12 months time point.

The 24 months follow-up visit did not have data collected and are not reported.

Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units participants Units participants Units Participants Units participants Units participants Units Screws Units Screws Units Screws Units Screws Units Screws Units Screws Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Events Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Degrees Units Degrees Units Degrees Units Degrees Units Degrees Units Degrees Units Degrees Units Degrees Units Degrees Units Degrees Units Degrees Units Degrees Units mm Units mm Units mm Units mm Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean
Param Value 0.9 Param Value 1.3 Param Value 6.2 Param Value 5.8 Param Value 0.0 Param Value 1.0 Param Value 6.0 Param Value 1.0 Param Value 0.24 Param Value 0.39 Param Value 0.66 Param Value 0.68 Param Value 0.43 Param Value 0.28 Param Value 0.910 Param Value 0.910 Param Value 0.423 Param Value 0.423 Param Value 64.8 Param Value 57.5 Param Value 72.8 Param Value 82.2 Param Value 11.9 Param Value 24.7 Param Value 90.0 Param Value 70.0 Param Value 50.0 Param Value 20.0 Param Value 5 Param Value 5 Param Value 5 Param Value 5 Param Value 3 Param Value 3 Param Value 3 Param Value 3 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 3 Param Value 5 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 39 Param Value 97 Param Value 3 Param Value 8 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 8 Param Value 1 Param Value 6 Param Value 1 Param Value 5 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 5 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 66 Param Value 78 Param Value 41 Param Value 5 Param Value 50 Param Value 58 Param Value 46 Param Value 50 Param Value 23 Param Value 23 Param Value 23 Param Value 27 Param Value 19.0 Param Value 4.0 Param Value 43.0 Param Value 49.0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 46.0 Param Value 17.8 Param Value 49.7 Param Value 39.6 Param Value 20.9 Param Value 23.0 Param Value 31.5 Param Value 16.6 Param Value 4.9 Param Value 6.8 Param Value 2.0 Param Value 1.7 Param Value 3.3 Param Value 5.1 Param Value 2.0 Param Value 3.0 Param Value 3.0 Param Value 0.0 Param Value 7.5 Param Value 7.1
Param Value Num 0.9 Param Value Num 1.3 Param Value Num 6.2 Param Value Num 5.8 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.24 Param Value Num 0.39 Param Value Num 0.66 Param Value Num 0.68 Param Value Num 0.43 Param Value Num 0.28 Param Value Num 0.91 Param Value Num 0.91 Param Value Num 0.423 Param Value Num 0.423 Param Value Num 64.8 Param Value Num 57.5 Param Value Num 72.8 Param Value Num 82.2 Param Value Num 11.9 Param Value Num 24.7 Param Value Num 90.0 Param Value Num 70.0 Param Value Num 50.0 Param Value Num 20.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 39.0 Param Value Num 97.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 66.0 Param Value Num 78.0 Param Value Num 41.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 50.0 Param Value Num 58.0 Param Value Num 46.0 Param Value Num 50.0 Param Value Num 23.0 Param Value Num 23.0 Param Value Num 23.0 Param Value Num 27.0 Param Value Num 19.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 43.0 Param Value Num 49.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 46.0 Param Value Num 17.8 Param Value Num 49.7 Param Value Num 39.6 Param Value Num 20.9 Param Value Num 23.0 Param Value Num 31.5 Param Value Num 16.6 Param Value Num 4.9 Param Value Num 6.8 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 1.7 Param Value Num 3.3 Param Value Num 5.1 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 7.5 Param Value Num 7.1
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 1.3 Dispersion Value 1.8 Dispersion Value 2.7 Dispersion Value 2.5 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 0.25 Dispersion Value 0.19 Dispersion Value 0.37 Dispersion Value 0.34 Dispersion Value 0.36 Dispersion Value 0.33 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 20.3 Dispersion Value 15.9 Dispersion Value 21.7 Dispersion Value 16.5 Dispersion Value 35.8 Dispersion Value 20.3 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 20.0 Dispersion Value 13.0 Dispersion Value 24.9 Dispersion Value 21.7 Dispersion Value 28.9 Dispersion Value 19.3 Dispersion Value 2.9 Dispersion Value 2.3 Dispersion Value 2.8 Dispersion Value 1.8 Dispersion Value 2.6 Dispersion Value 3.2 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 2.2 Dispersion Value 2.2
Dispersion Value Num 1.3 Dispersion Value Num 1.8 Dispersion Value Num 2.7 Dispersion Value Num 2.5 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 0.25 Dispersion Value Num 0.19 Dispersion Value Num 0.37 Dispersion Value Num 0.34 Dispersion Value Num 0.36 Dispersion Value Num 0.33 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 20.3 Dispersion Value Num 15.9 Dispersion Value Num 21.7 Dispersion Value Num 16.5 Dispersion Value Num 35.8 Dispersion Value Num 20.3 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 20.0 Dispersion Value Num 13.0 Dispersion Value Num 24.9 Dispersion Value Num 21.7 Dispersion Value Num 28.9 Dispersion Value Num 19.3 Dispersion Value Num 2.9 Dispersion Value Num 2.3 Dispersion Value Num 2.8 Dispersion Value Num 1.8 Dispersion Value Num 2.6 Dispersion Value Num 3.2 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 2.2 Dispersion Value Num 2.2

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11380132 Sequence: 11380133 Sequence: 11380134
Result Group Id 56080749 Result Group Id 56080750 Result Group Id 56080751
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Scope overall Scope overall Scope overall
Count 11 Count 10 Count 21

Result Groups

Sequence: 56080749 Sequence: 56080750 Sequence: 56080751 Sequence: 56080752 Sequence: 56080753 Sequence: 56080754 Sequence: 56080755 Sequence: 56080756 Sequence: 56080757 Sequence: 56080758
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event
Title Degenerative Spinal Disease Title Deformity Title Total Title Degenerative Spinal Disease Title Deformity Title Degenerative Spinal Disease Title Deformity Title Deformity Title Degenerative Spinal Disease Title Deformity
Description Subjects with compromised bone quality requiring stabilization and/or immobilization of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine for Degenerative Spinal Disease indication, defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies (e.g. degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis and/or spinal stenosis). Description Subjects with compromised bone quality requiring stabilization and/or immobilization of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine for deformity indication (e.g. degenerative deformity). Description Total of all reporting groups Description Subjects with compromised bone quality requiring stabilization and/or immobilization of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine for Degenerative Spinal Disease indication, defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies (e.g. degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis and/or spinal stenosis). Description Subjects with compromised bone quality requiring stabilization and/or immobilization of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine for deformity indication (e.g. degenerative deformity). Description Subjects with compromised bone quality requiring stabilization and/or immobilization of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine for Degenerative Spinal Disease indication, defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies (e.g. degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis and/or spinal stenosis). Description Subjects with compromised bone quality requiring stabilization and/or immobilization of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine for deformity indication (e.g. degenerative deformity). Description Subjects with compromised bone quality requiring stabilization and/or immobilization of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine for deformity indication (e.g. degenerative deformity). Description Subjects with compromised bone quality requiring stabilization and/or immobilization of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine for Degenerative Spinal Disease indication, defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies (e.g. degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis and/or spinal stenosis). Description Subjects with compromised bone quality requiring stabilization and/or immobilization of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine for deformity indication (e.g. degenerative deformity).

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 125544856 Sequence: 125544850 Sequence: 125544851 Sequence: 125544852 Sequence: 125544853 Sequence: 125544854 Sequence: 125544848 Sequence: 125544849 Sequence: 125544855 Sequence: 125544857 Sequence: 125544858 Sequence: 125544859 Sequence: 125544860 Sequence: 125544861 Sequence: 125544862 Sequence: 125544863 Sequence: 125544864 Sequence: 125544865 Sequence: 125544866 Sequence: 125544867 Sequence: 125544868 Sequence: 125544869 Sequence: 125544870 Sequence: 125544871 Sequence: 125544872 Sequence: 125544873 Sequence: 125544874 Sequence: 125544875 Sequence: 125544876 Sequence: 125544877 Sequence: 125544878 Sequence: 125544879 Sequence: 125544880 Sequence: 125544881 Sequence: 125544882 Sequence: 125544883 Sequence: 125544884
Result Group Id 56080751 Result Group Id 56080751 Result Group Id 56080749 Result Group Id 56080750 Result Group Id 56080751 Result Group Id 56080749 Result Group Id 56080749 Result Group Id 56080750 Result Group Id 56080750 Result Group Id 56080751 Result Group Id 56080749 Result Group Id 56080750 Result Group Id 56080751 Result Group Id 56080749 Result Group Id 56080750 Result Group Id 56080751 Result Group Id 56080749 Result Group Id 56080750 Result Group Id 56080751 Result Group Id 56080749 Result Group Id 56080750 Result Group Id 56080751 Result Group Id 56080749 Result Group Id 56080750 Result Group Id 56080751 Result Group Id 56080749 Result Group Id 56080750 Result Group Id 56080751 Result Group Id 56080749 Result Group Id 56080750 Result Group Id 56080751 Result Group Id 56080749 Result Group Id 56080750 Result Group Id 56080751 Result Group Id 56080749 Result Group Id 56080750 Result Group Id 56080751
Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Category Male Category Female Category Female Category Female Category Male Category Male
Title Sex: Female, Male Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Race and Ethnicity Not Collected Title Weight Title Weight Title Weight Title Height Title Height Title Height Title Body Max Index (BMI) Title Body Max Index (BMI) Title Body Max Index (BMI) Title Duration of conservative treatment Title Duration of conservative treatment Title Duration of conservative treatment Title Duration of Back Pain Resulting in Planned Surgery Title Duration of Back Pain Resulting in Planned Surgery Title Duration of Back Pain Resulting in Planned Surgery Title Duration of Leg Pain Resulting in Planned Surgery Title Duration of Leg Pain Resulting in Planned Surgery Title Duration of Leg Pain Resulting in Planned Surgery Title Duration of Other Generalized Pain Resulting in Planned Surgery Title Duration of Other Generalized Pain Resulting in Planned Surgery Title Duration of Other Generalized Pain Resulting in Planned Surgery Title Patients with previous surgeries Title Patients with previous surgeries Title Patients with previous surgeries Title Bone Density Assessment Title Bone Density Assessment Title Bone Density Assessment
Description DXA scan of the Hip. A T-score within 1 SD (+1 or -1) of the young adult mean indicates normal bone density.

A T-score of 1 to 2.5 SD below the young adult mean (-1 to -2.5 SD) indicates low bone mass.

A T-score of 2.5 SD or more below the young adult mean (more than -2.5 SD) indicates the presence of osteoporosis.

Description DXA scan of the Hip. A T-score within 1 SD (+1 or -1) of the young adult mean indicates normal bone density.

A T-score of 1 to 2.5 SD below the young adult mean (-1 to -2.5 SD) indicates low bone mass.

A T-score of 2.5 SD or more below the young adult mean (more than -2.5 SD) indicates the presence of osteoporosis.

Description DXA scan of the Hip. A T-score within 1 SD (+1 or -1) of the young adult mean indicates normal bone density.

A T-score of 1 to 2.5 SD below the young adult mean (-1 to -2.5 SD) indicates low bone mass.

A T-score of 2.5 SD or more below the young adult mean (more than -2.5 SD) indicates the presence of osteoporosis.

Units Participants Units years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units years Units years Units Participants Units Participants Units Kg Units Kg Units Kg Units cm Units cm Units cm Units kg/m^2 Units kg/m^2 Units kg/m^2 Units months Units months Units months Units months Units months Units months Units months Units months Units months Units months Units months Units months Units participants Units participants Units participants Units T-score Units T-score Units T-score
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean
Param Value 0 Param Value 70.7 Param Value 11 Param Value 10 Param Value 21 Param Value 0 Param Value 70.5 Param Value 70.9 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 60.8 Param Value 66.6 Param Value 63.5 Param Value 159.3 Param Value 158.6 Param Value 159.0 Param Value 23.9 Param Value 26.4 Param Value 25.1 Param Value 21.6 Param Value 20.9 Param Value 21.3 Param Value 13.5 Param Value 17.5 Param Value 15.4 Param Value 11.0 Param Value 9.2 Param Value 10.1 Param Value 0.0 Param Value 12.0 Param Value 5.7 Param Value 4 Param Value 2 Param Value 6 Param Value -1.9 Param Value -1.9 Param Value -1.9
Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 70.7 Param Value Num 11.0 Param Value Num 10.0 Param Value Num 21.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 70.5 Param Value Num 70.9 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 60.8 Param Value Num 66.6 Param Value Num 63.5 Param Value Num 159.3 Param Value Num 158.6 Param Value Num 159.0 Param Value Num 23.9 Param Value Num 26.4 Param Value Num 25.1 Param Value Num 21.6 Param Value Num 20.9 Param Value Num 21.3 Param Value Num 13.5 Param Value Num 17.5 Param Value Num 15.4 Param Value Num 11.0 Param Value Num 9.2 Param Value Num 10.1 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 12.0 Param Value Num 5.7 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num -1.9 Param Value Num -1.9 Param Value Num -1.9
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 8.3 Dispersion Value 10 Dispersion Value 6.6 Dispersion Value 13.3 Dispersion Value 10.8 Dispersion Value 12.2 Dispersion Value 7.3 Dispersion Value 8.2 Dispersion Value 7.6 Dispersion Value 4.1 Dispersion Value 3.6 Dispersion Value 4.0 Dispersion Value 49.0 Dispersion Value 22.7 Dispersion Value 37.8 Dispersion Value 13.6 Dispersion Value 17.9 Dispersion Value 15.5 Dispersion Value 11.4 Dispersion Value 6.1 Dispersion Value 9.1 Dispersion Value 0.0 Dispersion Value 37.9 Dispersion Value 26.2 Dispersion Value 0.8 Dispersion Value 0.8 Dispersion Value 0.7
Dispersion Value Num 8.3 Dispersion Value Num 10.0 Dispersion Value Num 6.6 Dispersion Value Num 13.3 Dispersion Value Num 10.8 Dispersion Value Num 12.2 Dispersion Value Num 7.3 Dispersion Value Num 8.2 Dispersion Value Num 7.6 Dispersion Value Num 4.1 Dispersion Value Num 3.6 Dispersion Value Num 4.0 Dispersion Value Num 49.0 Dispersion Value Num 22.7 Dispersion Value Num 37.8 Dispersion Value Num 13.6 Dispersion Value Num 17.9 Dispersion Value Num 15.5 Dispersion Value Num 11.4 Dispersion Value Num 6.1 Dispersion Value Num 9.1 Dispersion Value Num 0.0 Dispersion Value Num 37.9 Dispersion Value Num 26.2 Dispersion Value Num 0.8 Dispersion Value Num 0.8 Dispersion Value Num 0.7
Number Analyzed 21 Number Analyzed 21 Number Analyzed 11 Number Analyzed 10 Number Analyzed 21 Number Analyzed 11 Number Analyzed 11 Number Analyzed 10 Number Analyzed 10 Number Analyzed 21 Number Analyzed 11 Number Analyzed 10 Number Analyzed 21 Number Analyzed 11 Number Analyzed 10 Number Analyzed 21 Number Analyzed 11 Number Analyzed 10 Number Analyzed 21 Number Analyzed 11 Number Analyzed 10 Number Analyzed 21 Number Analyzed 11 Number Analyzed 10 Number Analyzed 21 Number Analyzed 11 Number Analyzed 10 Number Analyzed 21 Number Analyzed 11 Number Analyzed 10 Number Analyzed 21 Number Analyzed 11 Number Analyzed 10 Number Analyzed 21 Number Analyzed 11 Number Analyzed 10 Number Analyzed 21
Population Description Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. Population Description For 3 subjects the Bone Density Assessment was missing, and compromised bone quality was confirmed during surgery. Population Description For 3 subjects the Bone Density Assessment was missing, and compromised bone quality was confirmed during surgery. Population Description For 3 subjects the Bone Density Assessment was missing, and compromised bone quality was confirmed during surgery.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Clinical Food Study to Evaluate the Effect of KB195 on Gut Nitrogen Metabolism in Patients With Urea Cycle Disorders ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797131
2019-01-06

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797131
NCT03797131https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797131?tab=tableNANANAThis clinical food study aims to explore the effect of KB195, a novel mixture of oligosaccharides, on the metabolism of nitrogen by the microbiome in patients with urea cycle disorders (UCDs). This will be done using a stable isotope to assess nitrogen metabolism in the blood, urine, and stool. The study will also assess the safety and tolerability of KB195 in patients with UCDs.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-09
Last Update Posted Date 2020-01-10
Start Month Year January 6, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year September 1, 2019
Verification Month Year January 2020
Verification Date 2020-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-01-10

Facilities

Sequence: 200245277
Name University Children's Hospital Zurich
City Zürich
Zip CH-8032
Country Switzerland

Conditions

Sequence: 52208594
Name Urea Cycle Disorders
Downcase Name urea cycle disorders

Id Information

Sequence: 40186510
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value K013-118

Countries

Sequence: 42600006
Name Switzerland
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55635223
Group Type Experimental
Title KB195 Arm

Interventions

Sequence: 52522539
Intervention Type Other
Name KB195 (a novel mixture of oligosaccharides)
Description KB195 (a novel mixture of oligosaccharides) for oral intake for 21 days.

Keywords

Sequence: 79923662 Sequence: 79923663 Sequence: 79923664 Sequence: 79923665 Sequence: 79923666 Sequence: 79923667
Name KB195 Name Urea Cycle Disorders Name UCD Name microbiome Name Kaleido Name ammonia
Downcase Name kb195 Downcase Name urea cycle disorders Downcase Name ucd Downcase Name microbiome Downcase Name kaleido Downcase Name ammonia

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177513094 Sequence: 177513095 Sequence: 177513096 Sequence: 177513097 Sequence: 177513098 Sequence: 177513099
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other
Measure Change in labelled (15N-nitrogen) and total nitrogen excretion in urine Measure Change in labelled (15N-urea) and total urea excretion in urine Measure Change in labelled (15N-ammonia) and total ammonia excretion in urine Measure Change in Gastrointestinal Tolerability Questionnaire (GITQ) through the collection of daily patient questionnaires Measure Change in Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) through the collection of daily patient questionnaires Measure Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame Baseline to Day 25 Time Frame Baseline to Day 25 Time Frame Baseline to Day 25 Time Frame Baseline to Day 32 Time Frame Baseline to Day 32 Time Frame Baseline to Day 32
Description Evaluate the effect of KB195 on nitrogen metabolism in the gut of patients with UCD by analyzing the change in labelled (15N-nitrogen) and total nitrogen excretion in urine Description Evaluate the effect of KB195 on nitrogen metabolism in the gut of patients with UCD by analyzing the change in labelled (15N-urea) and total urea excretion in urine Description Evaluate the effect of KB195 on nitrogen metabolism in the gut of patients with UCD by analyzing the change in labelled (15N-ammonia) and total ammonia excretion in urine Description Evaluate the effect of KB195 on self-report questionnaires including the Gastrointestinal Tolerability Questionnaire, an assessment of the frequency and severity of GI symptoms, e.g., gas, abdominal pain, calculated on a scale from 0 (None/Not applicable) to a maximum score of 60 (Severe/Much more than usual) for all questions Description Evaluate the effect of KB195 on self-report questionnaires including the Bristol Stool Scale, an assessment of stool consistency on a scale from 1 (separate hard lumps, like nuts, hard to pass) through 7 (watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193628993 Sequence: 193628994 Sequence: 193628995 Sequence: 193628996 Sequence: 193628997 Sequence: 193628998 Sequence: 193628999 Sequence: 193629000 Sequence: 193629001 Sequence: 193629002
Mesh Term Urea Cycle Disorders, Inborn Mesh Term Brain Diseases, Metabolic, Inborn Mesh Term Brain Diseases, Metabolic Mesh Term Brain Diseases Mesh Term Central Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Amino Acid Metabolism, Inborn Errors Mesh Term Metabolism, Inborn Errors Mesh Term Genetic Diseases, Inborn Mesh Term Metabolic Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term urea cycle disorders, inborn Downcase Mesh Term brain diseases, metabolic, inborn Downcase Mesh Term brain diseases, metabolic Downcase Mesh Term brain diseases Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term amino acid metabolism, inborn errors Downcase Mesh Term metabolism, inborn errors Downcase Mesh Term genetic diseases, inborn Downcase Mesh Term metabolic diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48354204
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Kaleido Biosciences

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29306255
Role Study Director
Name Mark Wingertzahn
Affiliation Kaleido Biosciences

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199835
Design Group Id 55635223
Intervention Id 52522539

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30787162
Gender All
Minimum Age 14 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Confirmed UCD patient at any age ≥ 14 years
Parental/legal guardian permission or patient's written informed consent or assent, as applicable
Be willing and able to comply with study requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

Any medical condition unrelated to the sequelae of UCD
Patient has N-acetylglutamate synthase (NAGS) deficiency
Recent hospitalization or risk for metabolic decompensation
Liver transplantation
Systemic antibiotics, probiotics or prebiotics that do not align with study guidances
Change in dose or frequency of any drug or other compound to modulate GI motility
Contraindications or known allergy/sensitivity to the use of the study products
Use of an investigational drug, product or device within 30 days prior to Screening Visit, or current enrolment in another investigational drug, product, or device study
Considered to be at risk for noncompliance or unlikely for any reason to be able to comply with the study procedures

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253990130
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 7
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 14
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 3
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30533232
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Basic Science
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899524
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ One-Dimensional Mathematical Model-Based Automated Assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797118
2017-04-05

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797118
NCT03797118https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797118?tab=tableNANANAThis study evaluates the diagnostic efficiency of an automated method of noninvasive assessment of the fractional reserve of coronary blood flow.

Fractional flow reserve is estimated with a one-dimensional mathematical model constructed by means of an automated algorithm. Noninvasive method values are thereafter compared with invasive method values.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-22
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-05-18
Start Month Year April 5, 2017
Primary Completion Month Year June 5, 2019
Verification Month Year May 2020
Verification Date 2020-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-05-18

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20721683
Description Noninvasive assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve is almost never applied in the Russian Federation due to the relative novelty and study insufficiency, lack of the appropriate resource base, specific necessary software and trained qualified personnel.

In 2015, scientists from the Institute of Numerical Mathematics RAS in collaboration with specialists of the I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University developed a noninvasive method of fractional flow reserve assessment based on a one-dimensional mathematical model. A model is constructed based on images derived from the coronary computed tomography angiography performed by standard protocol; the method is fully automated.

The aim of our study is to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of this technique in clinical practice.

This is a pilot study; we are planning to enroll 30 patients: 13 of them underwent 64-slice computed tomography and are included retrospectively; 17 will be included prospectively, with a 640-slice CT scan. Specialists from the Laboratory of Mathematical Modeling will process CT images and evaluate noninvasive FFR. Ischemia is confirmed if FFR < 0.80 and disproved if FFR ≥ 0.80. After that, the prospective group of patients will be hospitalized for invasive FFR assessment as a reference standard; if ischemia is proved, patients will undergo stent implantation. In the retrospective group, patients already have invasive FFR values estimated.

Statistical analysis will be performed using R programming language packages (cran-r.project.com). Continuous variables will be presented as mean values ± standard deviations, order variables will be presented as medians with interquartile ranges in parentheses. We are going to use the D'Agostino-Pearson omnibus test for the assessment of normality of distribution and construct a Q-Q Plot. We will compare these two methods with the Bland-Altman analysis and ROC-analysis and will assess the degree of correlation with the Pearson's chi-squared.

The study should result in determining the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the method.

After the active phase of the research is done, we are planning to proceed observation on the prospective group of patients to verify the endpoints.

Facilities

Sequence: 200108805
Name Daria Gognieva
City Moscow
Zip 127540
Country Russian Federation

Conditions

Sequence: 52171372
Name Coronary Artery Disease
Downcase Name coronary artery disease

Id Information

Sequence: 40158711
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 17-51-53160

Countries

Sequence: 42569047
Name Russian Federation
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55593302
Group Type Experimental
Title FFRct
Description Patients will receive cCTA, ICA, FFRct, and FFRinv per protocol.

Interventions

Sequence: 52485596
Intervention Type Device
Name FFR
Description Fractional flow reserve measured during cardiac catheterization

Keywords

Sequence: 79868736 Sequence: 79868737
Name noninvasive assessment of the fractional flow reserve Name coronary computed tomography angiography
Downcase Name noninvasive assessment of the fractional flow reserve Downcase Name coronary computed tomography angiography

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177379283
Outcome Type primary
Measure Diagnostic Accuracy of FFRct
Time Frame through study completion, an average of 8 months
Description Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of FFRct at the vessel level using binary outcomes whith compared to FFR as the reference standard.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193487206 Sequence: 193487207 Sequence: 193487208 Sequence: 193487209 Sequence: 193487210 Sequence: 193487211 Sequence: 193487212 Sequence: 193487213
Mesh Term Coronary Artery Disease Mesh Term Coronary Disease Mesh Term Myocardial Ischemia Mesh Term Heart Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Arteriosclerosis Mesh Term Arterial Occlusive Diseases Mesh Term Vascular Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term coronary artery disease Downcase Mesh Term coronary disease Downcase Mesh Term myocardial ischemia Downcase Mesh Term heart diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term arteriosclerosis Downcase Mesh Term arterial occlusive diseases Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48319406
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29285414 Sequence: 29285415
Role Principal Investigator Role Study Director
Name Daria Gognieva, MD Name Philipp Kopylov, Professor
Affiliation I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) Affiliation I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68149274
Design Group Id 55593302
Intervention Id 52485596

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30765420
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 85 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients providing written informed consent
Scheduled to undergo clinically-indicated non-emergent invasive coronary angiography (ICA)
Has undergone >640 multidetector CCTA within 60 days prior to ICA
No cardiac interventional therapy between the CCTA and ICA

Exclusion Criteria:

Prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery
Prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for which suspected coronary artery lesion(s) are within a stented coronary vessel
Contraindication to adenosine, including 2nd or 3rd-degree heart block; sick sinus syndrome; long QT syndrome; severe hypotension, severe asthma, severe COPD or bronchodilator-dependent COPD
Suspicion of acute coronary syndrome (acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina)
Recent prior myocardial infarction within 40 days of ICA
Known complex congenital heart disease
Prior pacemaker or internal defibrillator lead implantation
Prosthetic heart valve
Significant arrhythmia or tachycardia
Impaired chronic renal function (serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dl
Patients with known anaphylactic allergy to iodinated contrast
Pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status
Body mass index >35
Patient requires an emergent procedure
Evidence of ongoing or active clinical instability, including acute chest pain (sudden onset), cardiogenic shock, unstable blood pressure with systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, and severe congestive heart failure (NYHA III or IV) or acute pulmonary edema
Any active, serious, life-threatening disease with a life expectancy of less than 2 months
Inability to comply with study procedures

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253889305
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 26
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 85
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30511586
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Diagnostic
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Links

Sequence: 4388099
Url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Am+J+Case+Rep+%5BJour%5D+AND+One-Dimensional+Mathematical+Model-Based+Automated+Assessment+of+Fractional+Flow+Reserve+in+a+Patient+with+Silent+Myocardial+Ischemia&TransSchema=title&cmd=detailssearch
Description Am J Case Rep. 2018 Jun 20;19:724-728. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.908449.

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28877881
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Daria Gognieva
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Study References

Sequence: 52063523
Pmid 29921835
Reference Type background
Citation Gognieva D, Gamilov T, Pryamonosov R, Betelin V, Ternovoy SK, Serova NS, Abugov S, Shchekochikhin D, Mitina Y, El-Manaa H, Kopylov P. One-Dimensional Mathematical Model-Based Automated Assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve in a Patient with Silent Myocardial Ischemia. Am J Case Rep. 2018 Jun 20;19:724-728. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.908449.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Frequency Needed for School-based Obesity Intervention ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797105
2012-08-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797105
NCT03797105https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797105?tab=tableNANANAThis randomized controlled trial compared changes in Mexican-American, adolescent standardized body mass index (zBMI) from a school-based obesity intervention given zero, one, three, or five days a week.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year August 1, 2012
Primary Completion Month Year September 30, 2014
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20741318
Description Efficacious school-based interventions have been intensive making it difficult for interventions to be scaled. The more components there are to an intervention, typically the better the results. Instead of decreasing intensity via the removal of intervention components, this randomized controlled trial aimed to compare changes in Mexican-American adolescent standardized body mass index (zBMI) based on the number of days per week they received a multi-component intervention. Mexican-American middle school students (n=203) with overweight or obesity were recruited from an independent school district in Houston. Students were randomized to receive an obesity intervention with established efficacy zero (control), one, three, or five days/week. In each condition, 80% of intervention time was allocated to physical activity and 20% to nutrition. Directly measured height and weight were used to calculate zBMI.

Facilities

Sequence: 200281860
Name YES Prep Brays Oaks
City Houston
State Texas
Zip 77031
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52221868
Name Obesity, Child
Downcase Name obesity, child

Id Information

Sequence: 40195877
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value STUDY00000487

Countries

Sequence: 42609894
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55650187 Sequence: 55650188 Sequence: 55650189 Sequence: 55650190
Group Type No Intervention Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title Control, 0 days Title 1 day Title 3 days Title 5 days
Description control group, no intervention Description received the intervention 1 day/week Description received the intervention 3 days/week Description received the intervention 5 days/week

Interventions

Sequence: 52535686
Intervention Type Behavioral
Name School-Based Obesity Intervention (FLOW)
Description The intervention consisted of nutrition lessons based on the traffic light diet, circuit-based physical activity, behavior modification techniques (token economy system, goal setting, self-monitoring), and parental involvement (materials sent home and monthly parent meetings). 80% of time was spent on physical activity and 20% was spent on nutrition. Behavior modification was incorporated into both physical activity and nutrition time. Specifically, instruction and activity time during PE class lasted approximately 40 minutes.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177562735
Outcome Type primary
Measure Change in Standardized Body Mass Index (zBMI)
Time Frame baseline, 6, and 12 months
Description standardized body mass index

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193679801 Sequence: 193679802 Sequence: 193679803 Sequence: 193679804 Sequence: 193679805 Sequence: 193679806
Mesh Term Obesity Mesh Term Pediatric Obesity Mesh Term Overweight Mesh Term Overnutrition Mesh Term Nutrition Disorders Mesh Term Body Weight
Downcase Mesh Term obesity Downcase Mesh Term pediatric obesity Downcase Mesh Term overweight Downcase Mesh Term overnutrition Downcase Mesh Term nutrition disorders Downcase Mesh Term body weight
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48366762 Sequence: 48366763
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University of Houston Name Baylor College of Medicine

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29313070
Role Principal Investigator
Name Craig A Johnston, PhD
Affiliation University of Houston

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68217849 Sequence: 68217850 Sequence: 68217851
Design Group Id 55650188 Design Group Id 55650189 Design Group Id 55650190
Intervention Id 52535686 Intervention Id 52535686 Intervention Id 52535686

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30794917
Gender All
Minimum Age 10 Years
Maximum Age 17 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

BMI-for-age (Body Mass Index) percentile ≥ 85
Male or female between ages 10 – 17 years
Self-identified as Mexican-American

Exclusion Criteria:

Student who is pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or becomes pregnant
School report of cognitive impairment significantly below average age and/or grade level
Use of any weight-loss medication (prescription or nonprescription) for at least 6 months prior to screening
Type 1 or 2 diabetes medical diagnosis

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254004646
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 26
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 10
Maximum Age Num 17
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30540957
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28907277
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Craig A Johnston
Title Associate Professor
Affiliation University of Houston

]]>

<![CDATA[ Stem Cell Therapy in Non-IschEmic Non-treatable Dilated CardiomyopathiEs II: a Pilot Study ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797092
2019-10-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797092
NCT03797092https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797092?tab=tableAbbas A Qayyum, MD, PhDabbas.ali.qayyum@regionh.dk004535451076The overall aim of the project is to test the feasibility and safety of allogeneic adipose-derived stromal cells (CSCC_ASC) investigational medicinal product, to improve myocardial function in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathies (NIDCM) and heart failure.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-06-28
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-01-19
Start Month Year October 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year July 1, 2021
Verification Month Year January 2021
Verification Date 2021-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2021-01-19

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20710016
Description Study design

The primary objective of the study is to investigate safety and regenerative capacity of direct intra-myocardial injection of 100 million allogeneic CSCC_ASCs in NIDCM patients with reduced left ventricular EF (≤ 40%) and heart failure.

It is a proof of concept study enrolling a total of 30 NIDCM patients with heart failure who will be randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio to either CSCC_ASC cell therapy (Stem Cell Group) or no cell therapy (Control Group). The treatment period is estimated to be 6 months (efficacy end-point) with a 12-month follow-up period for safety end-points.

Patient treatment and follow-up

The cell IMP will be delivered by a courier service to from REGIONH to UKCL using validated portable dry liquid nitrogen shipping containers. It will then be stored in nitrogen vapour containers until treatment.
The preparation of the IMP will be performed as described in the treatment manual. The IMP will be thawed and prepared for injection immediately before treatment.
A 3-D map of the left ventricle will be created using the NOGA XP® system (Biological Delivery System, Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, USA). The delivery of the IMP (100 million ASCs) into the myocardium will be performed by 10-15 injections of 0.2 cc, as described in the treatment manual.
The post cell therapy surveillance will include clinical and laboratory safety follow-up with monitoring of cardiac enzymes, hemodynamic and rhythm stability. The clinical follow-up will be obtained at pre-defined time points. The presence of allogeneic HLA anti-bodies will be monitored three and six months after treatment. End-points will be monitored continuously and reported as occurring throughout the 12 months follow-up period.

Primary and secondary endpoints

The primary endpoint is change in left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESV) at 6 months follow-up measured by Echocardiography.

The secondary endpoints are safety evaluated by development of allogeneic antibodies and laboratory safety measurements 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume and myocardial mass at 6 months follow-up.

Additional secondary endpoints are changes in NYHA, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, EQ-5D3L Questionnaire, 6 min walking test, additional echocardiographic measures (Global strain %) and NT-pro-BNP.

Safety of allogeneic CSCC_ASCs with respect to incidence and severity of serious adverse events and suspected unrelated serious adverse events will be evaluated at 12 months follow-up.

Outcome measures for safety Safety endpoints will be collected, reported to the authorities and monitored according to legislation during the entire study period.

Adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who was treated with an investigational product, and does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease, whether or not related to the investigational product.

Serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that:

results in death
is life-threatening
requires inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation
results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity
is a congenital anomaly/birth defect
is medically important

Suspected unexpected serious adverse event reactions (SUSAR) is defined as a SAE occurring in a subject in an interventional study that is assessed as both causally related to the suspect product under clinical investigation and unexpected per the Investigator's Brochure (IB).

An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will be established to evaluate the safety of the treatment. The DSMB will report directly to the director of the Project Management Board, which will take the necessary action upon the DSMB's recommendations.

Study medication The investigational cell product, CSCC_ASC, will be produced in an approved GMP facility in Cardiology Stem Cell Centre at Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

The production of the allogeneic CSCC_ASCs will follow the description in an approved Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier. The cell product will come from healthy donors.

The production unit will label the investigational medicinal product (IMP) in accordance with the legislation and keep the randomisation code until finalisation of the clinical trial. The final cell products will be stored in nitrogen vapour containers until clinical use.

Allogeneic MSCs and ASCs have been administered to more than 600 patients with heart disease. In the conducted clinical trials there has not been any serious adverse event due to the treatment. A few patients have developed transient donor specific HLA-antibodies in serum within the first months after treatment. However, none of the patients had any symptoms related to the presence of antibodies. Transient fever was registered in a few patients, but it could as well be due to the treatment procedure or the disease for treatment.

Based on the accumulated safety and efficacy evidence with clinical use of allogeneic MSCs and ASCs in conducted clinical trials and the safety data from the CSCC_ASC phase I trial and the two ongoing phase II trials then it is concluded that it is safe to conduct a pilot CSCC_ASC trial in patients with NIDCM and HF.

Echocardiography

The echocardiography data will be recorded at pre-defined intervals according to American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) recommendations. For each patient at least five end-expiratory full cardiac cycles will be recorded for each protocol specified view. All acquired images will be de-identified and transferred to independent imaging core-lab (Stanford Cardiovascular Institute Clinical Biomarker & Phenotyping Core Lab). The recordings will be analyzed at the end of the study by an independent echocardiographer who will be blinded to the patient's treatment status and the timing of the recordings. All measurements will be performed according to ASE/EACVI recommendations. All echocardiographic measurements will be averaged over 5 cardiac cycles. Left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD) and end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) will be measured in the parasternal long-axis view. Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and LVEF will be estimated using the Simpson's biplane method. Peak longitudinal strains will be computed automatically to generate regional data from each of the 17 segments and then averaged to calculate global longitudinal strain.

Facilities

Sequence: 199965404
Status Recruiting
Name The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet University Hospital Copenhagen,
City Copenhagen
Zip 2100
Country Denmark

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18318901
Facility Id 199965404
Role Principal Investigator
Name Jens Kastrup, MD

Conditions

Sequence: 52139081
Name Non-ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Downcase Name non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

Id Information

Sequence: 40135119
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value SCIENCE II – Pilot

Countries

Sequence: 42542779
Name Denmark
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55559437 Sequence: 55559438
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type No Intervention
Title Active Title Control group
Description Allogeneic adipose-derived stromal cells (CSCC_ASC) Description No treatment

Interventions

Sequence: 52454992 Sequence: 52454993
Intervention Type Biological Intervention Type Other
Name Allogeneic adipose-derived stromal cells (CSCC_ASC) Name Control group
Description Active group Description No treatment

Keywords

Sequence: 79822924 Sequence: 79822925 Sequence: 79822926 Sequence: 79822927
Name Stem cell therapy Name Heart failure Name Clinical trial Name Allogeneic
Downcase Name stem cell therapy Downcase Name heart failure Downcase Name clinical trial Downcase Name allogeneic

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177264117 Sequence: 177264118 Sequence: 177264111 Sequence: 177264112 Sequence: 177264113 Sequence: 177264114 Sequence: 177264115 Sequence: 177264116
Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure EQ-5D3L Questionnaire Measure 6 min walking test Measure Left ventricle end-systolic volume Measure Allogeneic antibodies Measure Left ventricular ejection fraction Measure Myocardial mass of left ventricle Measure NYHA Measure Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
Time Frame 6 months after treatment Time Frame 6 months Time Frame 6 months after treatment Time Frame Up to 12 months after treatment Time Frame 6 months after treatment Time Frame 6 months after treatment Time Frame 6 months after treatment Time Frame 6 months after treatment
Description Questionnaire Description Test Description Measured using echocardiography Description Development of allogeneic antibodies and laboratory safety measurements 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment Description Changes in LVEF Description Change in echo measured global myocardial mass Description Symptoms Description Questionnaire

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193366839 Sequence: 193366840 Sequence: 193366841 Sequence: 193366842 Sequence: 193366843 Sequence: 193366844 Sequence: 193366845
Mesh Term Cardiomyopathies Mesh Term Cardiomyopathy, Dilated Mesh Term Heart Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Cardiomegaly Mesh Term Laminopathies Mesh Term Genetic Diseases, Inborn
Downcase Mesh Term cardiomyopathies Downcase Mesh Term cardiomyopathy, dilated Downcase Mesh Term heart diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiomegaly Downcase Mesh Term laminopathies Downcase Mesh Term genetic diseases, inborn
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48290778 Sequence: 48290779
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name JKastrup Name University Medical Centre Ljubljana

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29268569
Role Principal Investigator
Name Bojan Vrtovec, MD, PhD
Affiliation Dep. of Cardiology, Uni. Medical Center Ljubljana, Slovenia

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12000506 Sequence: 12000507
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Jens Kastrup, MD, DMSc Name Abbas A Qayyum, MD, PhD
Phone 004535452819 Phone 004535451076
Email jens.akstrup@regionh.dk Email abbas.ali.qayyum@regionh.dk
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68107556 Sequence: 68107557
Design Group Id 55559437 Design Group Id 55559437
Intervention Id 52454992 Intervention Id 52454993

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30747771
Gender All
Minimum Age 30 Years
Maximum Age 80 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

30 to 80 years of age
Signed informed consent
Patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy
NYHA ≥ II in spite of optimal heart failure treatment and have no other treatment options
Heart failure medication unchanged two months prior to inclusion/signature of informed consent. Changes in diuretics accepted
LVEF ≤ 405%
Plasma NT-pro-BNP > 300 pg/ml (> 35 pmol/L)
Patients cannot be included until three months after implantation of a cardiac resynchronisation therapy device (CRTD) and until 1 month after an ICD unit

Exclusion Criteria:

Heart Failure NYHA I
Moderate to severe aortic stenosis (valve area < 1.3 cm2) or valvular disease with option for surgery or interventional therapy.
Heart failure caused by cardiac valve disease or untreated hypertension.
If the patient is expected to be candidate for MitraClip therapy of mitral regurgitation in the 12 months follow-up period.
Cardiomyopathy with a reversible cause that has not been treated e.g. thyroid disease, alcohol abuse, hypophosphataemia, hypocalcaemia, cocaine abuse, selenium toxicity & chronic uncontrolled tachycardia
Cardiomyopathy in association with a neuromuscular disorder e.g. Duchenne's progressive muscular dystrophy
Previous cardiac surgery
Diminished functional capacity for other reasons such as: obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with forced expiratory volume (FEV) <1 L/min, moderate to severe claudication or morbid obesity
Clinical significant anaemia (haemoglobin < 6 mmol/L), leukopenia (leucocytes < 2 109/L), leucocytosis (leucocytes > 14 109/L) or thrombocytopenia (thrombocytes < 50 109/L)
Reduced kidney function (eGFR < 30 ml/min)
Left ventricular thrombus
Anticoagulation treatment that cannot be paused during cell injections.
Patients with reduced immune response
History with malignant disease within five years of inclusion or suspected malignity – except treated skin cancer other than melanoma
Pregnant women
Woman of childbearing potential unless βHCG negative and they should be on contraception during the trial
Other experimental treatment within four weeks of baseline tests
Participation in another intervention trial
Life expectancy less than one year

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254122101
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 30
Maximum Age Num 80
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 7

Designs

Sequence: 30494054
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Masking Description The patients will be randomized to either IMP or control in a 2:1 randomization.

The outcome ECHO investigations will be analyzed blinded by an independent core lab.

Intervention Model Description Open randomized treatment group and control group clinical trial
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26655454
Intervention Id 52454992
Name Investigational medicinal product

Links

Sequence: 4385409
Url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28880460
Description PubMed abstract related to the used allogeneic stem cell product

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28860334
Responsible Party Type Sponsor-Investigator
Name JKastrup
Title Professor, Doctor
Affiliation Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Study References

Sequence: 52032799
Pmid 28880460
Reference Type result
Citation Kastrup J, Haack-Sorensen M, Juhl M, Harary Sondergaard R, Follin B, Drozd Lund L, Monsted Johansen E, Ali Qayyum A, Bruun Mathiasen A, Jorgensen E, Helqvist S, Jorgen Elberg J, Bruunsgaard H, Ekblond A. Cryopreserved Off-the-Shelf Allogeneic Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells for Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease and Heart Failure-A Safety Study. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017 Nov;6(11):1963-1971. doi: 10.1002/sctm.17-0040. Epub 2017 Sep 7.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Block for Chest Trauma ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797079
2019-01-20

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797079
NCT03797079https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797079?tab=tableNANANARib fractures are very common as a consequence of blunt chest trauma which is associated with severe pain, morbidity and mortality. The key to managing these patients is prompt and effective analgesia, early mobilization, respiratory support, with chest physiotherapy. The aim of this study is to compare and evaluate the differences between either continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) block, or thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) as analgesic modalities in patients with chest trauma. It is hypothesized that ESP block will be comparable to TEA as a promising effective analgesic alternative with fewer side effects.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-06-10
Start Month Year January 20, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year February 20, 2020
Verification Month Year June 2021
Verification Date 2021-06-30
Last Update Posted Date 2021-06-10

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20727200
Description Trauma is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide as a leading cause of death. Rib fractures are very common and are detected in at least 10% of all injured patients, the majority of which are as a consequence of blunt chest trauma. Chest trauma are associated with severe pain, morbidity and mortality, as it contributes to atelectasis, lobar collapse, pneumonia, effusion, aspiration, acute respiratory distress syndrome pulmonary embolism, increased intensive care admissions, and poor overall clinical outcomes. Trauma is associated with release of cytokines, which contribute to the development of hemodynamic instability and metabolic derangement, which can worsen prognosis. The efficacy of utilizing different modalities for analgesia in controlling extent of tissue damage can be compared by measuring these cytokines levels. Multiple analgesic modalities have been used in these patients with chest trauma, such as oral analgesics, intravenous opioids, patient-controlled opioid analgesia, inter-pleural blocks, intercostal blocks, serratus plane blocks, paravertebral blocks, and TEA. In trauma patients with rib fractures, retrospective studies showed that TEA has become the gold standard of care, while ultrasound-guided paravertebral and serratus plane blocks are possible alternatives. However, no single best analgesic modality could be recommended or established, based on available data in this population, as no meta-analysis on this topic has yet been completed. Ultrasound has been the fundamental tool for a significant improvement in the progress of regional analgesic techniques of inter-fascial chest wall blocks, allowing their description and introduction into clinical practice. Ultrasound-guided ESP block is a new technique that has been recently described in the control of both chronic neuropathic pain as well as acute postsurgical or post-traumatic pain of the chest wall. The ESP block holds promise as a simple, easy, fast and safe technique for thoracic analgesia in the context of pain associated with chest trauma.

Aim of the Study:

The aim of this study is to assess the quality of pain relief and improvement of pulmonary function in patients with chest trauma receiving either continuous ESP block or TEA by comparing and evaluating the differences between the two techniques. It is hypothesized that ESP block will be comparable to TEA as a promising effective analgesic alternative with fewer side effects.

Sample Size Calculation:

The literature available on ESP block is limited to some sporadic case reports and editorials. Hence, this clinical trial will be conducted on 50 patients and post hoc analysis will be performed using pain scores obtained from the present study with an α (type I error) = 0.05 and β (type II error) = 0.2 (power = 80%).

Methods:

The study will be conducted in Mansoura Emergency Hospital on fifty patients admitted with chest trauma. They will be randomly assigned to two equal groups (ESP group and TEA group) according to computer-generated table of random numbers using the permuted block randomization method. The group allocation will be concealed in sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelopes which will be opened only after obtaining the written informed consent. Patient demographic data including age, sex, body weight, and status of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) will be recorded. A written informed consent will be obtained from all study subjects after ensuring confidentiality. The study protocol will be explained to all patients after enrollment into the study. In both groups, catheter-based analgesia will be performed with a bolus dose of bupivacaine followed by a continuous infusion for 48 hours. Later on, the catheters will be removed, and the pain management will be switched to parental or oral analgesics.

Statistical Methods:

The collected data will be coded, processed, and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) program (version 22) for Windows. Normality of numerical data distribution will be tested by Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous data of normal distribution will be presented as mean ± standard deviation, and compared with the unpaired student's t test. Non-normally distributed data will be presented as median (range), and compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) test will be used for comparisons within the same group. Categorical data will be presented as number (percentage), and compared with the Chi-square test. All data will be considered statistically significant if P value is ≤ 0.05.

Facilities

Sequence: 200159461
Name Mansoura University Hospitals
City Mansoura
State Dakahlia
Zip 35511
Country Egypt

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96074250 Sequence: 96074251 Sequence: 96074252 Sequence: 96074253 Sequence: 96074254 Sequence: 96074255 Sequence: 96074256
Mesh Term Bupivacaine Mesh Term Anesthetics, Local Mesh Term Anesthetics Mesh Term Central Nervous System Depressants Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Sensory System Agents Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Downcase Mesh Term bupivacaine Downcase Mesh Term anesthetics, local Downcase Mesh Term anesthetics Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system depressants Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term sensory system agents Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52185552
Name Chest Trauma
Downcase Name chest trauma

Id Information

Sequence: 40169113
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value ESP Block for Chest Trauma

Countries

Sequence: 42580699
Name Egypt
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609179 Sequence: 55609180
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator
Title Group A (ESP block) Title Group B (TEA)
Description Ultrasound-guided ESP block will be performed under strict aseptic precautions with patient in the sitting position. Catheter insertion will be performed and bupivacaine will be administered. Description TEA will be performed under strict aseptic precautions with patient in the sitting position. Catheter insertion will be performed and bupivacaine will be administered.

Interventions

Sequence: 52499478 Sequence: 52499479 Sequence: 52499480 Sequence: 52499481
Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Drug
Name ESP block Name TEA Name Catheter insertion Name Bupivacaine
Description A high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed superficial to erector spinae muscle (ESM) in a parasagittal plane 3 cm lateral to the midline at the level of fifth thoracic vertebra. Three muscles will be identified superficial to the hyperechoic transverse process shadow: trapezius (uppermost), rhomboids major (middle), and ESM (lowermost). After local infiltration of skin and using in-plane approach, an 18 G Tuohy needle will be inserted, until the tip lay between the rhomboid major muscle and ESM. Description Skin will be locally infiltrated at the site of needle insertion, and 18 G Tuohy needle will be introduced until its tip lay in the epidural space of the T5-T6 thoracic intervertebral space. Description After obtaining loss of resistance, 20 G epidural catheter will be threaded for 5 cm and then fixed on the skin. Description After the negative aspiration for blood, a bolus dose of 15 ml 0.125% plain bupivacaine will be injected in the catheter, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.25% plain bupivacaine at the rate of 0.1 ml/kg/h for 48 hours

Keywords

Sequence: 79888852
Name Erector spinae plane block
Downcase Name erector spinae plane block

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432230 Sequence: 177432231 Sequence: 177432232 Sequence: 177432233 Sequence: 177432234 Sequence: 177432235 Sequence: 177432236 Sequence: 177432237 Sequence: 177432238 Sequence: 177432239 Sequence: 177432240
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Improvement in pain scores by Visual analogue scale (VAS) Measure Total analgesic requirements of fentanyl Measure First analgesic request Measure Changes in heart rate (HR) Measure Changes in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) Measure Improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) Measure Improvement in forced vital capacity (FVC) Measure Improvement in forced expiratory flow (FEF 25-75%) Measure Improvement in the level of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) Measure Improvement in the level of interleukin 6 (IL-6) Measure Incidence of adverse effects
Time Frame Up to 48 hours after the procedure Time Frame Up to 48 hours after the procedure Time Frame Up to 48 hours after the procedure Time Frame Up to 48 hours after the procedure Time Frame Up to 48 hours after the procedure Time Frame Up to 48 hours after the procedure Time Frame Up to 48 hours after the procedure Time Frame Up to 48 hours after the procedure Time Frame Up to 48 hours after the procedure Time Frame Up to 48 hours after the procedure Time Frame Up to 48 hours after the procedure
Description VAS score from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = the worst imaginable pain) will be assessed every two hours for 48 hours after the procedure. Description The amount of fentanyl consumption given as a rescue analgesia to patients will be measured all over the 48 hours. Description The time of the first analgesic request for fentanyl will be recorded. Description HR will be recorded every two hours for 48 hours after the procedure. Description MAP will be recorded every two hours for 48 hours after the procedure. Description FEV1 will be assessed by spirometry before and 48 hours after the procedure. Description FVC will be assessed by spirometry before and 48 hours after the procedure. Description FEF 25-75% will be assessed by spirometry before and 48 hours after the procedure. Description TNF-α will be measured before, 24, 48 hours after the procedure. Description IL-6 will be measured before, 24, 48 hours after the procedure. Description Any adverse effects like pneumothorax, respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, hematoma, or allergic reactions will be recorded.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193540386 Sequence: 193540387
Mesh Term Wounds and Injuries Mesh Term Thoracic Injuries
Downcase Mesh Term wounds and injuries Downcase Mesh Term thoracic injuries
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332381
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Sameh Fathy

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29293028
Role Principal Investigator
Name Sameh M El-Sherbiny, MD
Affiliation Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168244 Sequence: 68168245 Sequence: 68168246 Sequence: 68168247 Sequence: 68168248 Sequence: 68168249
Design Group Id 55609179 Design Group Id 55609180 Design Group Id 55609179 Design Group Id 55609180 Design Group Id 55609179 Design Group Id 55609180
Intervention Id 52499478 Intervention Id 52499479 Intervention Id 52499480 Intervention Id 52499480 Intervention Id 52499481 Intervention Id 52499481

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773610
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 65 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status: 1 or 2 .
Blunt chest trauma.
Multiple rib fractures.
Flail chest.
Lung contusions.

Exclusion Criteria:

Bilateral chest trauma.
Intubated patients.
Other peripheral or abdominal injuries.
Traumatic brain injury, altered mental status or un-cooperative patients.
Acute spine fractures or pre-existing spine deformity.
Unstable hemodynamics.
Sensitivity to local anesthetic drugs.
Coagulation abnormalities.
Infection at the site of procedure.
Significant cardiac or respiratory dysfunction, hepatic or renal impairment.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253952811
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 13
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 65
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 10

Designs

Sequence: 30519741
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Masking Description The study subjects and the resident assessing the outcomes will be blinded to the study group. A single investigator will assess the patients for eligibility, obtain written informed consent, open the sealed opaque envelopes containing group allocation, perform the block, and administer bupivacaine solution.
Intervention Model Description Prospective, randomized, double blind study
Subject Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26680443
Intervention Id 52499481
Name Marcaine

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886042
Responsible Party Type Sponsor-Investigator
Name Sameh Fathy
Title Lecturer of anesthesia, ICU & pain management; Faculty of Medicine
Affiliation Mansoura University

Study References

Sequence: 52079032 Sequence: 52079033 Sequence: 52079034 Sequence: 52079035 Sequence: 52079036 Sequence: 52079037 Sequence: 52079038 Sequence: 52079039
Pmid 27501016 Pmid 24368355 Pmid 27533913 Pmid 30052229 Pmid 28924315 Pmid 29102405 Pmid 29766081 Pmid 22704784
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451. Citation Gage A, Rivara F, Wang J, Jurkovich GJ, Arbabi S. The effect of epidural placement in patients after blunt thoracic trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):39-45; discussion 45-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab1b08. Citation Galvagno SM Jr, Smith CE, Varon AJ, Hasenboehler EA, Sultan S, Shaefer G, To KB, Fox AD, Alley DE, Ditillo M, Joseph BA, Robinson BR, Haut ER. Pain management for blunt thoracic trauma: A joint practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma and Trauma Anesthesiology Society. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Nov;81(5):936-951. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001209. Citation Nagaraja PS, Ragavendran S, Singh NG, Asai O, Bhavya G, Manjunath N, Rajesh K. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural analgesia with bilateral erector spinae plane block for perioperative pain management in cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth. 2018 Jul-Sep;21(3):323-327. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_16_18. Citation Singh S, Jacob M, Hasnain S, Krishnakumar M. Comparison between continuous thoracic epidural block and continuous thoracic paravertebral block in the management of thoracic trauma. Med J Armed Forces India. 2017 Apr;73(2):146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Dec 24. Citation Veiga M, Costa D, Brazao I. Erector spinae plane block for radical mastectomy: A new indication? Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2018 Feb;65(2):112-115. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Nov 2. English, Spanish. Citation Witt CE, Bulger EM. Comprehensive approach to the management of the patient with multiple rib fractures: a review and introduction of a bundled rib fracture management protocol. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Jan 5;2(1):e000064. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2016-000064. eCollection 2017. Citation Yeh DD, Kutcher ME, Knudson MM, Tang JF. Epidural analgesia for blunt thoracic injury–which patients benefit most? Injury. 2012 Oct;43(10):1667-71. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.05.022. Epub 2012 Jun 16.

]]>

<![CDATA[ ATTIC – Access To Treat in the Community ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797066
2019-03-23

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797066
NCT03797066https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797066?tab=tableNANANAThe study is looking at the potential of utilizing a “point of care” test and treat pathway; using the DDA called Zepatier for achieving SVR in an homeless population who have tested positive for genotype 1 or 4 HCV.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-10-30
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-06
Start Month Year March 23, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year July 28, 2020
Verification Month Year May 2023
Verification Date 2023-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-06

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20718754
Description Direct acting antivirals (DAA) are new medications that have been approved for the management of HCV. These drugs have proven to be very effective in curing the HCV, without the need for interferon injections; which have always been used in the past. There are many combinations of DAAs, which treat specific types of HCV. Persons who test positive for the virus are typically referred to be seen and treated by a specialist hepatitis service based in hospital. This means that individuals may sometimes not attend the hospital to commence treatment; or follow up on their management.

The study is designed to explore if testing and treating individuals close to their own "local" setting will be an improvement to the current treatment pathway and encourage better involvement with the health care team; as well as looking at what the health care team can do to ensure participants in this test-and-treat trial receive the entire course of drug treatment prescribed to treat their HCV infection.

Participants infected with either genotype 1 or 4 HCV infection will be treated with Zepatier, a DAA which works by stopping the hepatitis C virus from (multiplying). The study medication is taken for 12 or 16 weeks depending on the genotype (or strain of HCV). Some participants will be given an additional drug called ribavirin. The study will examine the effectiveness of Zepatier at clearing the hepatitis C virus from the blood and body; and also what particular effects may be experienced by participants who may also be taking treatment for other conditions. Participants affected with other genotypes (not 1 and 4)will be offered standard NHS treatment with the appropriate antiviral combination for these strains.

Facilities

Sequence: 200075482
Name Kings College Hospital NHS Trust
City London
Zip SE5 9RS
Country United Kingdom

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96037960 Sequence: 96037961 Sequence: 96037962
Mesh Term Elbasvir-grazoprevir drug combination Mesh Term Antiviral Agents Mesh Term Anti-Infective Agents
Downcase Mesh Term elbasvir-grazoprevir drug combination Downcase Mesh Term antiviral agents Downcase Mesh Term anti-infective agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52162910
Name Hepatitis C, Chronic
Downcase Name hepatitis c, chronic

Id Information

Sequence: 40152905
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value KCHATTIC01

Countries

Sequence: 42562368
Name United Kingdom
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55585028
Group Type Other
Title Single arm
Description A phase 4, open label, non-randomised study, conducted in hostels and homeless shelters in London; as well as mobile clinics in collaboration with the Hep C trust and the NHS Find and Treat program.

Treatment: 12 or 16 weeks of Zepatier, based on genotypes; with Ribavarin for certain subtypes. The study drug is administered as a single tablet; which is a combination of 100 mg of grazoprevir and 50 mg of elbasvir; as outlined below:

Genotypes 1a/b and 4: once daily dose for 12 weeks, taken with / without food. Genotype 1a and 4: (HCV RNA> 800,000 iu/ml or baseline NS5A resistance): once daily dose for 16 weeks, taken with / without food.

NO dose modifications with the study drug.

Interventions

Sequence: 52478185
Intervention Type Drug
Name ZEPATIER 50Mg-100Mg Tablet
Description Zepatier 50/100 OD , with addition of Ribavarin in patients with Genotype 1a and 4 with HCV RNA> 800,000 iu/ml or baseline NS5A resistance.

Keywords

Sequence: 79857083 Sequence: 79857084
Name hepatitis C virus Name homeless
Downcase Name hepatitis c virus Downcase Name homeless

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177351362 Sequence: 177351363 Sequence: 177351364 Sequence: 177351365 Sequence: 177351366 Sequence: 177351367 Sequence: 177351368
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure SVR Measure prevalence of HCV infection Measure Baseline knowledge evaluation Measure Change From Baseline (BL) to SVR12 timepoint in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores Measure Change From Baseline (BL) to SVR 12 in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV) Measure Percentage of Participants Who Were Compliant With Treatment According To Moriskey, Green And Levine Adherence Scale (MAS4)(Subset Analysis) Measure Percentage of Participants Who Were Compliant With Treatment According To Medication Count (Subset Analysis)
Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame baseline, SVR 12 (twelve weeks post end of active treatment/ last dose of study drug) Time Frame baseline , SVR 12 (twelve weeks post end of active treatment/last dose of study drug) Time Frame 12 or 16 weeks Time Frame 12 or 16 weeks
Description The percentage of participants achieving an SVR, defined as an HCV RNA evel less than the lower limit of quantification by sensitive PCR; by means of a short directed test and treat program in the homeless community. Description Reduction in local prevalence of of viraemic hepatitis C, after a pilot trial of treatment in three to four homeless hostels. Description Participant knowledge of their hepatitis C status (disease, diagnosis, and current available approved treatments) will be assessed by means of a questionnaire completed at baseline. The researchers will also review participants willingness to engage in a test and treat protocol and correlate these findings with demographic and sociological data. This will be done using a questionnaire designed by the researchers; containing simple questions with respect to currently available testing and treatment of HCV infection. Description The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. The survey addresses eight health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions. It also includes a single item that provides an indication of perceived change in health. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have between 2-6 choices per item using Likert-type responses (e.g. none of the time, some of the time, etc.). Summations of item scores of the same subscale give the subscale scores, which are transformed into a range from 0 to 100; zero= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL.

Data will be analysed ffg the guidelines suggested by the developers https://www.rand.org/health/surveys_tools/mos/36-item-short-form/scoring.html

Description Impact of a localized test and treat protocol on health related quality of life will be assessed using the CLDQ-HCV instruments. The CLDQ-HCV is a disease-specific questionnaire measuring HRQL that contains 29 items divided into 4 domains: emotional function (9 items), worry (6 items), systemic symptoms (8 items) and activity/energy (6 items). All items refer to the previous 2 weeks and are rated on a 7 point Likert scale, with 1 corresponding to the maximum frequency ("all of the time") and 7 to the minimum ("none of the time"). Domain scores are the means of the items contained. A summary score is calculated by the mean of all domain scores (CLDQ-HCV Global). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life Description Adherence to treatment measured by Moriskey, Green and Levine Adherence scale. This is a 4 item questionnaire that is easy to administer and score (using a yes/no format); and quickly identifies barriers to adherence.An answer of yes to zero questions indicates high adherence behavior, answering yes to one or two questions indicates medium adherence behavior, and answering yes to three or four questions indicates low adherence behavior Description Compliance will be calculated as the amount of dispensed medication minus the amount of medication returned by participants at each visit.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193456736 Sequence: 193456737 Sequence: 193456738 Sequence: 193456739 Sequence: 193456740 Sequence: 193456741 Sequence: 193456742 Sequence: 193456743 Sequence: 193456744 Sequence: 193456745 Sequence: 193456746 Sequence: 193456747 Sequence: 193456748 Sequence: 193456749 Sequence: 193456750 Sequence: 193456751 Sequence: 193456752 Sequence: 193456753 Sequence: 193456754
Mesh Term Hepatitis A Mesh Term Hepatitis C Mesh Term Hepatitis C, Chronic Mesh Term Hepatitis Mesh Term Liver Diseases Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases Mesh Term Hepatitis, Viral, Human Mesh Term Virus Diseases Mesh Term Infections Mesh Term Enterovirus Infections Mesh Term Picornaviridae Infections Mesh Term RNA Virus Infections Mesh Term Blood-Borne Infections Mesh Term Communicable Diseases Mesh Term Flaviviridae Infections Mesh Term Hepatitis, Chronic Mesh Term Chronic Disease Mesh Term Disease Attributes Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term hepatitis a Downcase Mesh Term hepatitis c Downcase Mesh Term hepatitis c, chronic Downcase Mesh Term hepatitis Downcase Mesh Term liver diseases Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases Downcase Mesh Term hepatitis, viral, human Downcase Mesh Term virus diseases Downcase Mesh Term infections Downcase Mesh Term enterovirus infections Downcase Mesh Term picornaviridae infections Downcase Mesh Term rna virus infections Downcase Mesh Term blood-borne infections Downcase Mesh Term communicable diseases Downcase Mesh Term flaviviridae infections Downcase Mesh Term hepatitis, chronic Downcase Mesh Term chronic disease Downcase Mesh Term disease attributes Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48312066 Sequence: 48312067 Sequence: 48312068
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class UNKNOWN
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name King's College Hospital NHS Trust Name Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC Name Hepatitis C Trust

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68139322
Design Group Id 55585028
Intervention Id 52478185

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30761050
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 90 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Participants 18 years or older with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 or 4 will be eligible.
Able and wiling to provide written informed consent.
Both interferon treatment naïve and experienced participants will be included.
Participants without cirrhosis will be eligible if HCV RNA positive, documented chronic hepatitis C and a FibroScan of ≤ 12.5.
Participants with cirrhosis (Fibroscan > 12.5 or APRI > 2) will be eligible if the serum albumin is > 3.5 g/dl, platelets > 100,000 and INR < 1.5 and there is no prior history of hepatic decompensation.
Participants with well controlled HIV coinfection will be included, but should be stabilized on antiretrovirals for which no clinically significant interaction is expected.
Participants who are HBsAg positive will be included, but will require antiviral prophylaxis for HepB. Anti- HbC positive participants will be included. Prophylaxis will not be given, but these participants will require careful monitoring of their ALT levels.

Exclusion Criteria:

Persons with prior HCV DAA treatment
Individuals younger than 18 years of age
Individuals infected with genotypes other than 1a or 1b or 4 HCV identified on screening; however such participants identified on screening will be offered appropriate NHS England standard of treatment for the genotype.
Unable or unwilling to give informed consent
Active tuberculosis
Females who are pregnant, planning pregnancy or breastfeeding
Concurrent and/or recent involvement in other research that is likely to interfere with the intervention within three months of study enrolment
Clinically-significant medical or psychiatric illness (other than chronic HCV) in the past, present, or being evaluated, that may interfere with participant treatment, safety, assessment or compliance with the protocol
Participants with cirrhosis (Fibroscan > 12.5 or APRI > 2) and serum albumin is < 3.5 g/dl, platelets <100,000 and INR > 1.5 or a prior history of hepatic decompensation
Severe renal impairment with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 or requiring dialysis

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254304727
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 16
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 90
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30507250
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description non-randomised, open label

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28873531
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Ex Vivo Expansion of Circulating Tumor Cells as a Model for Cancer Predictive Pharmacology ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797053
2015-04-06

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797053
NCT03797053https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797053?tab=tableMatthieu RESCHE-RIGON, MD PhDmatthieu.resche-rigon@univ-paris-diderot.fr142499742Several studies conducted over the past decade have shown that Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can be used as a marker for predicting disease progression and survival in patients with early or metastatic cancer. A high number of CTCs correlate with aggressive disease, increased metastasis and decreased survival rates.

Knowledge of metastasis mechanisms was mainly obtained from mouse models with CTCs after orthotopic transplants. The only possibility to study the patient’s CTC subpopulations is to carry out ex-vivo expansion and develop an animal model with CTC xenograft. Because circulating blood collection is simple and non-invasive, CTCs can be used as a marker to track disease progression and survival in real time. CTCs could also guide therapeutic choice.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-03-09
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year April 6, 2015
Primary Completion Month Year June 30, 2019
Verification Month Year March 2018
Verification Date 2018-03-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Facilities

Sequence: 200245138
Status Recruiting
Name Saint-Louis Hospital
City Paris
Zip 75010
Country France

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28128161 Sequence: 28128162
Facility Id 200245138 Facility Id 200245138
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Celeste Lebbe, MD PhD Name laetitia Da Meda
Email celeste.lebbe@aphp.fr Email laetitia.da-meda@aphp.fr
Phone 142499590 Phone 142499392
Phone Extension +33 Phone Extension +33

Conditions

Sequence: 52208572 Sequence: 52208573
Name Melanoma Name Circulating Tumor Cell
Downcase Name melanoma Downcase Name circulating tumor cell

Id Information

Sequence: 40186485
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value NI15009

Countries

Sequence: 42599972
Name France
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55635185 Sequence: 55635186
Title Cohort 1 : metastatic cohort Title Cohort 2 : adjuvant cohort
Description Cohort1: Cohort of patients with stage III inoperable or IV metastatic melanoma This cohort will enable the achievement of objectives 1 (proof of concept) and 2 (establishment of prognostic and predictive value). Description Cohort 2: Cohort of patients with melanoma who are candidates for sentinel lymph node analysis.

This group includes patients with melanoma in whom sentinel lymph node testing is performed. According to current French recommendations, these are patients whose primary melanoma has a Breslow index (thickness) of more than 1 mm or ulcerated primary melanoma (loss of the epidermis).

Interventions

Sequence: 52522518
Intervention Type Procedure
Name Biological sample
Description Biological sample performed :

before treatment
1 months after the beginning of treatment
every tumoral assessment

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177513012 Sequence: 177513013 Sequence: 177513014 Sequence: 177513015 Sequence: 177513016 Sequence: 177513017 Sequence: 177513018
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Therapeutical response Measure Survival Measure Survival Measure Survival Measure Disease free Survival Measure Disease free Survival Measure Disease free Survival
Time Frame 6 months Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 3 years Time Frame 5 years Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 3 years Time Frame 5 years
Description Occurrence of clinical benefit (defined as Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or stable disease (SD)) and progressive disease based on the best overall response which depends on the tumour evaluations assessed using RECIST 1.1 criteria.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193628908 Sequence: 193628909 Sequence: 193628910 Sequence: 193628911 Sequence: 193628912
Mesh Term Neoplastic Cells, Circulating Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasm Metastasis Mesh Term Neoplastic Processes Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term neoplastic cells, circulating Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasm metastasis Downcase Mesh Term neoplastic processes Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48354179 Sequence: 48354180 Sequence: 48354181 Sequence: 48354182 Sequence: 48354183
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class UNKNOWN Agency Class UNKNOWN Agency Class UNKNOWN Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris Name ScreenCell Name Celenys Name Imstar Name Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12017339 Sequence: 12017340
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Celeste Lebbe, MD PhD Name Matthieu RESCHE-RIGON, MD PhD
Phone 142499590 Phone 142499742
Email celeste.lebbe@aphp.fr Email matthieu.resche-rigon@univ-paris-diderot.fr
Phone Extension +33 Phone Extension +33
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199793 Sequence: 68199794
Design Group Id 55635185 Design Group Id 55635186
Intervention Id 52522518 Intervention Id 52522518

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30787146
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Cohort1: Cohort of patients with stage III unresectable or IV metastatic melanoma patients Cohort 2: Cohort of patients with melanoma candidates for sentinel lymph node analysis
Criteria COHORT 1

Inclusion Criteria:

Histologically confirmed cutaneous or mucosal melanoma (per American joint committee on cancer (AJCC) staging system) that is unresectable or metastatic
No prior systemic anticancer therapy for unresectable/metastatic melanoma or clinical/radiological disease progression (RECIST1.1) if previously treated and before new treatment
No prior malignancy active within the previous 3 years except for locally curable cancers that have been apparently cured, such as cutaneous carcinoma or cervix)
followed in Saint Louis Hospital
Tumor tissue available in Saint Louis Hospital
Subjects must have signed and approved written informed consent form
No pregnancy
Any positive test for hepatitis A virus, hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus indicating acute or chronic infection, and/or detectable virus

Exclusion Criteria:

None

COHORT 2 :

Inclusion Criteria :

Histologically confirmed cutaneous or mucosal melanoma
Candidates for sentinel lymph node analysis and surgical recovery (this examination is in practice reserved for melanomas >1mm thick or ulcerated)
No prior adjuvant anticancer therapy
followed in Saint Louis Hospital
Tumor tissue available in Saint Louis Hospital
Subjects must have signed and approved written informed consent form
No pregnancy
Any positive test for hepatitis A virus, hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus indicating acute or chronic infection, and/or detectable virus

Exclusion Criteria:

None

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253990102
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30533216
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899508
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Open-label Phase I Study for PEP or Treatment of HS-ARS PLX-R18 for the Post-Exposure Prevention (PEP) or Treatment of Hematopoietic Syndrome of Acute Radiation Syndrome (HS-ARS) ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797040
2021-01-31

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797040
NCT03797040https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797040?tab=tableNANANAThe objective of the study is to evaluate the safety of intramuscular (IM) administration of PLX-R18 in subjects exposed to ionizing radiation and who are at risk of developing HS-ARS.

Indication:Post-Exposure Prevention (PEP) or treatment of Hematopoietic Syndrome of Acute Radiation Syndrome (HS-ARS) in subjects suspected to have been exposed to ionizing radiation.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-17
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-07-28
Start Month Year January 2021
Primary Completion Month Year December 2021
Verification Month Year July 2020
Verification Date 2020-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-07-28

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20721690
Description This will be a Phase I, open-label safety study; each subject will receive two administrations of PLX-R18, 4 days apart. Each administration of PLX-R18 will contain 4 million cells/kg (up to a maximal dose of 400 million cells). The first administration should be preferably within 48 hours after suspected exposure and no later than 4 days after suspected exposure. The second administration will be provided 4 days after first administration.

All subjects will be hospitalized for at least 24 hours after each administration of PLX-R18,for close monitoring.In order to minimize risks, subjects will be divided in 3 sequential cohorts:

Cohort 1: 9 subjects, treated as soon as possible Cohort 2: 18 subjects, treated at least 12 hours following the first dose administered to the 9th subject Cohort 3: 33 subjects, treated at least 12 hours following the first dose administered to the 27th subject After the completion of each Cohort, stopping rules will be assessed. All subjects will receive PLX-R18 in addition to recommended care per physician discretion, based on the REMM guidelines (APPENDIX 2).

The study will be comprised of 2 periods:

Main study period – Subjects will be followed-up for 12 months and evaluated at the following time points after the first administration: Day 0 (first administration),Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4 (second administration), Day 5, Day 14 (2 weeks),Day 21 (3 weeks), Day 28 (4 weeks), Day 49 (7 weeks), Day 63 (9 weeks), Day 119(17 weeks), Day 182 (26 weeks), and Day 364 (52 weeks).Long-term survival follow-up -Week 52 to Week 260: During this period, patients will be followed-up for overall survival at: 104 weeks, 156 weeks, 208 weeks and 260 weeks.

Conditions

Sequence: 52171390
Name Ionizing Radiation Exposure
Downcase Name ionizing radiation exposure

Id Information

Sequence: 40158721
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value PLX-R18-ARS-01

Design Groups

Sequence: 55593317
Group Type Experimental
Title 4 million PLX-R18 cells/kg-up to a maximal dose of 400 million

Interventions

Sequence: 52485611
Intervention Type Biological
Name Cell therapy
Description PLX-R18: Allogeneic ex vivo expanded placental stromal cells

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177379334 Sequence: 177379335 Sequence: 177379336 Sequence: 177379337 Sequence: 177379338
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Any Adverse Reaction Measure Recovered with no sequelae Measure Recovered with sequelae Measure Ongoing AE Measure Overall survival
Time Frame From Week 52 to Week 260 patients will be followed-up for overall survival once a year (every 52 weeks±2 after visit 14) Time Frame From Week 52 to Week 260 patients will be followed-up for overall survival once a year (every 52 weeks±2 after visit 14) Time Frame From Week 52 to Week 260 patients will be followed-up for overall survival once a year (every 52 weeks±2 after visit 14) Time Frame From Week 52 to Week 260 patients will be followed-up for overall survival once a year (every 52 weeks±2 after visit 14) Time Frame From Week 52 to Week 260 patients will be followed-up for overall survival once a year (every 52 weeks±2 after visit 14)
Description The subject has fully recovered from the AE with no residual effects observable. Description The event resolved but the subject has sequelae, which is a condition following a consequence of a disease Description AE is still ongoing Description Overall survival

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193487251 Sequence: 193487252 Sequence: 193487253
Mesh Term Radiation Injuries Mesh Term Acute Radiation Syndrome Mesh Term Wounds and Injuries
Downcase Mesh Term radiation injuries Downcase Mesh Term acute radiation syndrome Downcase Mesh Term wounds and injuries
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48319420
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Pluristem Ltd.

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68149287
Design Group Id 55593317
Intervention Id 52485611

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30765430
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Subject was exposed or suspected to have been exposed to ionizing radiation of

≥1Gy and is at risk of developing HS-ARS, as assessed by the treating physician, based on REMM guidelines (see APPENDIX 1).

PLX-R18 treatment can be initiated within 4 days of exposure.
Aged ≥18 years.
Has provided informed consent. –

Exclusion Criteria:

Known active malignancy or history of malignancy within 3 years prior to screening except for successfully resected skin basal cell carcinoma or skin squamous cell carcinoma not located at the injection sites.
Known active uncontrolled infection (e.g. viral, fungal, and/or bacterial)
Known active infection with Hepatitis A, B, or C.
Pregnancy.
Known hypersensitivity to: Allogeneic stromal cells, dimethyl sulfoxid (DMSO), human serum albumin, or bovine products.
In the opinion of the Investigator the subject is at high risk of developing severe allergic/hypersensitivity reactions and a resuscitation kit including epinephrine is not at hand.

In the opinion of the treating physician, the subject is unsuitable for participating in the study.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253890308
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 4

Designs

Sequence: 30511596
Intervention Model Sequential Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26673791
Intervention Id 52485611
Name PLX-R18

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28877891
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Effects of Abdominal Cushion on PCNL in Prone Position ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797027
2019-01-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797027
NCT03797027https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797027?tab=tableChao Cai, PH.D & MD673059209@qq.com+86 13512780911Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the first choice for the treatment of ≥ 2cm renal stones. The positions of PCNL includes supine, prone and lateral. PCNL has been performed in my center for nearly twenty years. The prone position is routinely used. Generally speaking, an abdominal cushion is used to raise the abdominal in the prone position, in order to provide an adequate exposure of kidney, increase the intercostal space, decrease the mobility of kidney and lower the risk of pleura injury. However, there is no consensus and criterion on the height of abdominal cushion. With largely increased PCNL procedures and various BMI, precise evaluation of abdominal cushion is needed. In the preliminary work, the investigators measured the sunken height of waist of 100 patients in the prone position without a abdominal cushion. The results showed that the mean BMI of 100 patients was 23.45 (16.79-36.98) and the range of sunken height of waist was 2-7 cm. Therefore, the investigators are planning to conduct a randomized controlled study to compare the safety and efficacy among no cushion group, 5 cm cushion group and 10 cm cushion group. To clarify the relationship between height of abdominal cushion and BMI, the nurse could prepare the appropriate cushion the day before surgery, which would decrease operating time and accelerate postoperative recovery.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-05
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-10
Start Month Year January 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 1, 2021
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-10

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20741332
Description Background Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the first choice for the treatment of ≥ 2cm renal stones.The positions of PCNL includes supine, prone and lateral. PCNL has been performed in my center for nearly twenty years. The prone position is routinely used. Generally speaking, an abdominal cushion is used to raise the abdominal in the prone position, in order to provide an adequate exposure of kidney, increase the intercostal space, decrease the mobility of kidney and lower the risk of pleura injury. However, there is no consensus and criterion on the height of abdominal cushion. With largely increased PCNL procedures and various BMI, precise evaluation of abdominal cushion is needed. In the preliminary work, the investigators measured the sunken height of waist of 100 patients in the prone position without a abdominal cushion. The results showed that the mean BMI of 100 patients was 23.45 (16.79-36.98) and the range of sunken height of waist was 2-7 cm. Therefore, the investigators are planning to conduct a randomized controlled study to compare the safety and efficacy among no cushion group, 5 cm cushion group and 10 cm cushion group. To clarify the relationship between height of abdominal cushion and BMI, the nurse could prepare the appropriate cushion the day before surgery, which would decrease operating time and accelerate postoperative recovery.
Purpose To investigate effects of different height of abdominal cushion on prone PCNL, in terms of intraoperative parameters. Our study could provide high quality of evidences on making criteria of perioperative nurse.

Design 3.1 Participant: A single randomized controlled study 3.2 Number of cases: 180 patients who are candidates for PCNL will be enrolled in this study. By 1:2 simple random sampling technique, patients will be assigned to 60-patient no cushion PCNL and 120-patient cushion PCNL (60-patient for 5 cm cushion and 60-patient for 10 cm cushion).

*(Assuming SFR (1 month after procedure) with cushion PCNL of 90% and expected rate of 70% with no cushion PCNL, the sample size for each group are calculated as 120 and 60 [power > 0.90 with a type I error rate < 0.05.]

Candidate:

4.1 Included criterion:

Willing to receive PCNL
Aged 18-70 years
Normal renal function
ASA scoreⅠ to Ⅱ 4.2 Excluded criterion:
Uncorrected coagulopathy and active urinary tract infection (UTI)
Patients who underwent transplant or urinary diversion.
Congenital abnormalities. 4.3 Excluded from the study after inclusion Patients will be excluded from the study if the undergoing standard PNL/mini-perc have purulent fluid in the initial puncture.

Patients with positive preoperative urine culture should be treated with suitable antibiotics based on the culture sensitivity result for at least 72 h before PCNL. Patients who have negative urine culture should receive a single dose of broad spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis just prior to the procedure. Patients who are going to receive PCNL would get a envelope including a randomized number and consent letter.

Surgical technique

Under general anaesthesia, each patient is initially placed in the lithotomy position, and a 5 Fr or 6Fr ureteral catheter is inserted to the kidney and fixed with a 16 Fr Foley catheter. Then the patient is turned to the prone position. An abdominal cushion is used according to the randomized number. The choice of using C-arm fluoroscopic or ultrasonography guidance or a combination fashion for the percutaneous access was made at the discretion of the treating urologist. The length of the needle from skin to the collecting system is measured to ensure that the length of dilator is appropriate. No patient underwent bilateral simultaneous PCNL and patients with bilateral stones underwent surgery 4 weeks apart. The access tract is dilated with a fascial dilator from 8F up to 18F. The investigators defined access to the collecting system as gaining entry to the targeted urinary system and desired calix. For some complex cases, when indicated requiring multiple tracts, additional tracts were created in the same session. The stone was fragmented by pneumatic lithotripsy or Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy through 8/9.8F semirigid ureteroscope (Richard Wolf, Germany). The large fragments were extracted with a forceps and small fragments were flushed out with an endoscopic pulsed perfusion pump. A silastic nephrostomy tube was placed at the end of procedure and a 4-6Fr double pigtail ureteral stent was left for 2 weeks after operation. X-ray check for residual stone fragments is also performed at the end of the procedure.

Patients were candidates for the tubeless procedure only when the following strict conditions were met: single percutaneous tract, absence of major perforation of collecting system and bleeding, complete stone clearance assessed by intraoperative nephroscopy and fluoroscopy at the end of the procedure. For a tubeless procedure, the flank was compressed for 5 min. Patient was monitored for postoperative complications.

Data collection

Data for the 2 groups -demographic characteristics, time of puncture and dilation, site of target calix, site of access, S.T.O.N.E score, hemoglobin drop, postoperative pain, duration of procedure, hospital stay, cases of tubeless, complications (modified Clavin system), stone clearance (SFR of postoperative day 1 and 1 month follow-up) and the need for auxiliary treatment (for example, re-PCNL, RIRS and ESWL) – are compared.

Facilities

Sequence: 200281897
Status Recruiting
Name Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
City Guangzhou
State Guangdong
Zip 510230
Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28132963
Facility Id 200281897
Contact Type primary
Name Guohua Zeng, Ph.D & MD.
Email gzgyzgh@vip.tom.com
Phone +86 13802916676

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18346323 Sequence: 18346324
Facility Id 200281897 Facility Id 200281897
Role Principal Investigator Role Sub-Investigator
Name Guohua Zeng, Ph.D & MD. Name Hongling Sun, Ph.D & MD.

Conditions

Sequence: 52221907
Name Kidney Stone
Downcase Name kidney stone

Id Information

Sequence: 40195910
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value Honglin Sun

Countries

Sequence: 42609910
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55650217 Sequence: 55650218 Sequence: 55650219
Group Type Other Group Type Other Group Type Other
Title No cushion Title 5 cm cushion Title 10 cm cushion
Description Patients in no cushion group undergo prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy without an abdominal cushion Description Patients in 5 cm cushion group undergo prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy with an 5 cm abdominal cushion Description Patients in 10 cm cushion group undergo prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy with an 10 cm abdominal cushion

Interventions

Sequence: 52535725 Sequence: 52535726 Sequence: 52535727
Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Device
Name Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy without an abdominal cushion Name Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with an 5 cm abdominal cushion Name Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with an 5 cm abdominal cushion
Description patients undergo prone PNCL without an abdominal cushion Description patients undergo prone PNCL with an 5 cm abdominal cushion Description patients undergo prone PNCL with an 10 cm abdominal cushion

Keywords

Sequence: 79942291 Sequence: 79942292
Name Percutaneous nephrolithotomy Name cushion
Downcase Name percutaneous nephrolithotomy Downcase Name cushion

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177562931
Outcome Type primary
Measure time of puncture and dilation
Time Frame intraoperatively

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193679949 Sequence: 193679950 Sequence: 193679951 Sequence: 193679952 Sequence: 193679953 Sequence: 193679954 Sequence: 193679955 Sequence: 193679956 Sequence: 193679957 Sequence: 193679958 Sequence: 193679959 Sequence: 193679960
Mesh Term Kidney Calculi Mesh Term Nephrolithiasis Mesh Term Kidney Diseases Mesh Term Urologic Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Urolithiasis Mesh Term Urinary Calculi Mesh Term Male Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Calculi Mesh Term Pathological Conditions, Anatomical
Downcase Mesh Term kidney calculi Downcase Mesh Term nephrolithiasis Downcase Mesh Term kidney diseases Downcase Mesh Term urologic diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases and pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term urolithiasis Downcase Mesh Term urinary calculi Downcase Mesh Term male urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term calculi Downcase Mesh Term pathological conditions, anatomical
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48366794
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29313089
Role Principal Investigator
Name Guohua Zeng, PH.D & MD
Affiliation The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12020673 Sequence: 12020674
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Guohua Zeng, PH.D & MD Name Chao Cai, PH.D & MD
Phone +86 13802916676 Phone +86 13512780911
Email gzgyzgh@vip.tom.com Email 673059209@qq.com
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68217893 Sequence: 68217894 Sequence: 68217895
Design Group Id 55650217 Design Group Id 55650218 Design Group Id 55650219
Intervention Id 52535725 Intervention Id 52535726 Intervention Id 52535727

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30794935
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 70 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Willing to receive PCNL
Aged 18-70 years
Normal renal function
ASA scoreⅠ to Ⅱ

Exclusion Criteria:

Uncorrected coagulopathy and active urinary tract infection (UTI)
Patients who underwent transplant or urinary diversion.
Congenital abnormalities.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254004666
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 70
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30540974
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28907295
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Guohua Zeng
Title Vice president
Affiliation The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

]]>

<![CDATA[ B/F/TAF Switch Study for HIV-HBV Coinfection ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797014
2019-04-30

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797014
NCT03797014https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797014?tab=tableNANANAThe primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fixed dose combination (FDC) bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in adults coinfected with both HIV-1 and hepatitis B. As this is a switch study, all eligible subjects enrolled will be switched from their current antiretroviral regimen to B/F/TAF will be followed on treatment for 48 weeks.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-07-18
Start Month Year April 30, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year November 22, 2022
Verification Month Year July 2023
Verification Date 2023-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-07-18
Results First Posted Date 2023-07-18

Facilities

Sequence: 201256511 Sequence: 201256512
Name Institute of Human Virology Clinical Research Unit Name Newlands Health
City Baltimore City Philadelphia
State Maryland State Pennsylvania
Zip 21201 Zip 19114
Country United States Country United States

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96579461 Sequence: 96579462 Sequence: 96579463 Sequence: 96579464 Sequence: 96579465 Sequence: 96579466 Sequence: 96579467 Sequence: 96579468 Sequence: 96579469 Sequence: 96579470 Sequence: 96579471
Mesh Term Tenofovir Mesh Term Emtricitabine Mesh Term Emtricitabine tenofovir alafenamide Mesh Term Antiviral Agents Mesh Term Anti-Infective Agents Mesh Term Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Mesh Term Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors Mesh Term Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Anti-HIV Agents Mesh Term Anti-Retroviral Agents
Downcase Mesh Term tenofovir Downcase Mesh Term emtricitabine Downcase Mesh Term emtricitabine tenofovir alafenamide Downcase Mesh Term antiviral agents Downcase Mesh Term anti-infective agents Downcase Mesh Term reverse transcriptase inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term nucleic acid synthesis inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term anti-hiv agents Downcase Mesh Term anti-retroviral agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52497710 Sequence: 52497711
Name HIV-1-infection Name Hepatitis B
Downcase Name hiv-1-infection Downcase Name hepatitis b

Id Information

Sequence: 40391955
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value HP00083844

Countries

Sequence: 42827749
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55953682
Group Type Experimental
Title B/F/TAF
Description Treatment group (1-arm study)

Interventions

Sequence: 52805816
Intervention Type Drug
Name B/F/TAF
Description Fixed dose combination B/F/TAF (50 mg/ 200 mg/ 25 mg/ tablet) administered orally once daily without regards to food.

Keywords

Sequence: 80311041 Sequence: 80311042 Sequence: 80311043 Sequence: 80311044 Sequence: 80311045 Sequence: 80311046 Sequence: 80311047
Name HIV-1 Name Hepatitis B Name HIV-HBV coinfection Name Bictegravir Name B/F/TAF Name Tenofovir alafenamide Name Biktarvy
Downcase Name hiv-1 Downcase Name hepatitis b Downcase Name hiv-hbv coinfection Downcase Name bictegravir Downcase Name b/f/taf Downcase Name tenofovir alafenamide Downcase Name biktarvy

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178598811 Sequence: 178598812 Sequence: 178598813 Sequence: 178598814 Sequence: 178598815 Sequence: 178598816 Sequence: 178598817 Sequence: 178598818 Sequence: 178598819 Sequence: 178598820
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure HIV-1 RNA at Week 24 Measure HBV DNA at Week 24 Measure HIV-1 RNA at Week 48 Measure HBV DNA at Week 48 Measure CD4 Cell Count Change at Week 24 Measure CD4 Cell Count Change at Week 48 Measure ALT Normalization at Week 24 Measure ALT Normalization at Week 48 Measure HBeAg Loss at Week 48 Measure HBsAg Loss at Week 48
Time Frame Week 24 Time Frame Week 24 Time Frame Week 48 Time Frame Week 48 Time Frame Baseline; Week 24 Time Frame Baseline; Week 48 Time Frame Week 24 Time Frame Week 48 Time Frame Week 48 Time Frame Week 48
Description Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 24 by US FDA Snapshot Algorithm Description Proportion of participants with plasma HBV DNA <29 IU/mL at Week 24 as defined by Missing=Failure Approach Description Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48 by US FDA Snapshot Algorithm Description Proportion of participants with plasma HBV DNA <29 IU/mL at Week 48 as defined by Missing=Failure Approach Description Change from baseline in CD4 cell count at Week 24 Description Change from baseline in CD4 cell count at Week 48 Description Proportion of participants with normal ALT at Week 24 Description Proportion of participants with normal ALT at Week 48 Description Proportion of participants with hepatitis B envelop antigen (HBeAg) loss at Week 48 visit. Description Proportion of participants with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss at Week 48 visit.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194732095 Sequence: 194732093 Sequence: 194732094 Sequence: 194732096 Sequence: 194732097 Sequence: 194732098 Sequence: 194732099 Sequence: 194732100 Sequence: 194732101 Sequence: 194732102 Sequence: 194732103 Sequence: 194732104
Mesh Term Hepatitis Mesh Term Hepatitis B Mesh Term Coinfection Mesh Term Liver Diseases Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases Mesh Term Hepatitis, Viral, Human Mesh Term Virus Diseases Mesh Term Infections Mesh Term Blood-Borne Infections Mesh Term Communicable Diseases Mesh Term Hepadnaviridae Infections Mesh Term DNA Virus Infections
Downcase Mesh Term hepatitis Downcase Mesh Term hepatitis b Downcase Mesh Term coinfection Downcase Mesh Term liver diseases Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases Downcase Mesh Term hepatitis, viral, human Downcase Mesh Term virus diseases Downcase Mesh Term infections Downcase Mesh Term blood-borne infections Downcase Mesh Term communicable diseases Downcase Mesh Term hepadnaviridae infections Downcase Mesh Term dna virus infections
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48621919 Sequence: 48621920
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University of Maryland, Baltimore Name Gilead Sciences

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29455752
Role Principal Investigator
Name Joel V Chua, MD
Affiliation Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68593950
Design Group Id 55953682
Intervention Id 52805816

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30951749
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Age 18 years or older at enrollment.
Documented HIV-1 infection and currently on a stable regimen for at least 3 months if on an INSTI-based regimen (6 months if on a non-INSTI-based regimen) preceding the screening visit with documented plasma HIV-1 RNA ≤ 50 copies/mL for at least 3 months preceding the screening visit.
No known history of resistance to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), emtricitabine (FTC), or Bictegravir (BIC).
Documented chronic hepatitis B infection, based on any of the following: a. Positive HBsAg result or nucleic acid test for HBV DNA (including qualitative, quantitative, and genotype testing) or positive HBeAg on two occasions at least 6 months apart (any combination of these tests performed 6 months apart is acceptable); or b. Negative immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies to HBV core antigen (anti-HBc IgM) AND a positive results on one of the following tests: HBsAg, HBeAg, or nucleic acid test for HBV DNA (including qualitative, quantitative, and genotype testing) prior to or at screening.
No current or prior regimen containing three active anti-HBV agents (i.e. cannot be on tenofovir alafenamide (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC)/entecavir or TDF/lamivudine (3TC)/entecavir).
Must have a primary care provider(s) for medical management.
Females of childbearing potential must agree to utilize protocol recommended highly effective contraceptive methods or be non-heterosexually active or practice sexual abstinence from screening and throughout the duration of the study. Female subjects who utilize hormonal contraceptive as one of their birth control methods must have used the same method for at least 3 months prior to study drug dosing.
Male subjects must be willing to abstain from heterosexual intercourse or use a condom throughout the study period.
Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study.
Written informed consent must be obtained before any study procedure is performed.

Exclusion Criteria:

Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
Any known allergies to any of the components of B/F/TAF.
Treatment with another investigational drug within three months of enrollment.

Abnormal hematological and biochemical parameters at screening, including:

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 750 cells/mm3.
Platelets < 50,000/mm3.
Hemoglobin < 8.5 g/dL.
AST or ALT of > 5 times upper limit of normal (ULN).
Estimated GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2.
Total bilirubin > 1.5 times ULN.
Previous or current history of malignancy, other than cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, or resected, non-invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Note: Those with a history of malignancy who are in remission for two or more years may be included in the study.
An opportunistic illness indicative of stage 3 HIV diagnosed within the 30 days prior to screening.
Subjects experiencing decompensated cirrhosis (e.g. ascites, encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding).
Acute hepatitis in the 30 days prior to study entry.
Active tuberculosis infection.
Subjects receiving ongoing therapy with any medications contraindicated for co-administration with B/F/TAF FDC, including but not limited to the following medications: dofetilide, phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine, oxcarbamazepine, rifampin, rifapentine, cisapride, St. John's Wort, and Echinaceae.
Current alcohol or substance use that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with subject study compliance.
Any other clinical conditions that in the opinion of the investigator would make the subject unsuitable for the study or unable to comply with the dosing requirements.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253859787
Number Of Facilities 2
Number Of Nsae Subjects 19
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 43
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 6
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 8

Designs

Sequence: 30697335
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Masking Description This is an open label study
Intervention Model Description This is an open-label phase 4 switch study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of FDC B/F/TAF in adults with HIV-1 and HBV coinfection.

Drop Withdrawals

Sequence: 29188568 Sequence: 29188569 Sequence: 29188570
Result Group Id 56373371 Result Group Id 56373371 Result Group Id 56373371
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Reason Withdrawal by Subject Reason Lost to Follow-up Reason Protocol Violation
Count 1 Count 1 Count 1

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26835750
Intervention Id 52805816
Name Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide

Milestones

Sequence: 41283876 Sequence: 41283877 Sequence: 41283878
Result Group Id 56373371 Result Group Id 56373371 Result Group Id 56373371
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000
Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Count 28 Count 25 Count 3

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3945221

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 74502324 Sequence: 74502325 Sequence: 74502326 Sequence: 74502327 Sequence: 74502328 Sequence: 74502329 Sequence: 74502330 Sequence: 74502331 Sequence: 74502332 Sequence: 74502333
Outcome Id 31008818 Outcome Id 31008819 Outcome Id 31008820 Outcome Id 31008821 Outcome Id 31008822 Outcome Id 31008823 Outcome Id 31008824 Outcome Id 31008825 Outcome Id 31008826 Outcome Id 31008827
Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 28 Count 28 Count 28 Count 28 Count 26 Count 25 Count 4 Count 4 Count 26 Count 25

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2602223 Sequence: 2602224
Document Type Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan Document Type Informed Consent Form
Has Protocol True Has Protocol False
Has Icf False Has Icf True
Has Sap True Has Sap False
Document Date 2021-03-16 Document Date 2021-03-31
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/14/NCT03797014/Prot_SAP_000.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/14/NCT03797014/ICF_001.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 28124485 Sequence: 28124486 Sequence: 28124487
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 16 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28
Created At 2023-08-11 01:54:41.465431 Created At 2023-08-11 01:54:41.465431 Created At 2023-08-11 01:54:41.465431
Updated At 2023-08-11 01:54:41.465431 Updated At 2023-08-11 01:54:41.465431 Updated At 2023-08-11 01:54:41.465431

Reported Events

Sequence: 531830767 Sequence: 531830762 Sequence: 531830763 Sequence: 531830764 Sequence: 531830765 Sequence: 531830766 Sequence: 531830760 Sequence: 531830761
Result Group Id 56373373 Result Group Id 56373373 Result Group Id 56373373 Result Group Id 56373373 Result Group Id 56373373 Result Group Id 56373373 Result Group Id 56373373 Result Group Id 56373373
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000
Time Frame Adverse events were collected during the entire study participation (48 weeks). Time Frame Adverse events were collected during the entire study participation (48 weeks). Time Frame Adverse events were collected during the entire study participation (48 weeks). Time Frame Adverse events were collected during the entire study participation (48 weeks). Time Frame Adverse events were collected during the entire study participation (48 weeks). Time Frame Adverse events were collected during the entire study participation (48 weeks). Time Frame Adverse events were collected during the entire study participation (48 weeks). Time Frame Adverse events were collected during the entire study participation (48 weeks).
Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other
Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 5 Subjects Affected 2
Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28
Description Adverse events were graded according to the Division of AIDS (DIADS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, version 2.1 (March 2017). Description Adverse events were graded according to the Division of AIDS (DIADS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, version 2.1 (March 2017). Description Adverse events were graded according to the Division of AIDS (DIADS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, version 2.1 (March 2017). Description Adverse events were graded according to the Division of AIDS (DIADS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, version 2.1 (March 2017). Description Adverse events were graded according to the Division of AIDS (DIADS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, version 2.1 (March 2017). Description Adverse events were graded according to the Division of AIDS (DIADS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, version 2.1 (March 2017). Description Adverse events were graded according to the Division of AIDS (DIADS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, version 2.1 (March 2017). Description Adverse events were graded according to the Division of AIDS (DIADS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, version 2.1 (March 2017).
Event Count 2 Event Count 2 Event Count 2 Event Count 2 Event Count 2 Event Count 2 Event Count 5 Event Count 2
Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Vascular disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders
Adverse Event Term Rash Adverse Event Term Abscess, extremity Adverse Event Term Back pain Adverse Event Term Headache Adverse Event Term Hypertension Adverse Event Term Nausea Adverse Event Term Upper respiratory tract infection Adverse Event Term Abdominal pain
Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5
Vocab MedDRA (26.0) Vocab MedDRA (26.0) Vocab MedDRA (26.0) Vocab MedDRA (26.0) Vocab MedDRA (26.0) Vocab MedDRA (26.0) Vocab MedDRA (26.0) Vocab MedDRA (26.0)
Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29064094
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Joel Chua
Title Assistant Professor of Medicine
Affiliation University of Maryland, Baltimore

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3875965
Pi Employee Yes

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3875930
Organization Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland Baltimore
Name Dr. Joel Chua
Phone 14107065704
Email jchua@ihv.umaryland.edu

Outcomes

Sequence: 31008818 Sequence: 31008819 Sequence: 31008820 Sequence: 31008821 Sequence: 31008822 Sequence: 31008823 Sequence: 31008824 Sequence: 31008825 Sequence: 31008826 Sequence: 31008827
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary
Title HIV-1 RNA at Week 24 Title HBV DNA at Week 24 Title HIV-1 RNA at Week 48 Title HBV DNA at Week 48 Title CD4 Cell Count Change at Week 24 Title CD4 Cell Count Change at Week 48 Title ALT Normalization at Week 24 Title ALT Normalization at Week 48 Title HBeAg Loss at Week 48 Title HBsAg Loss at Week 48
Description Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 24 by US FDA Snapshot Algorithm Description Proportion of participants with plasma HBV DNA <29 IU/mL at Week 24 as defined by Missing=Failure Approach Description Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48 by US FDA Snapshot Algorithm Description Proportion of participants with plasma HBV DNA <29 IU/mL at Week 48 as defined by Missing=Failure Approach Description Change from baseline in CD4 cell count at Week 24 Description Change from baseline in CD4 cell count at Week 48 Description Proportion of participants with normal ALT at Week 24 Description Proportion of participants with normal ALT at Week 48 Description Proportion of participants with hepatitis B envelop antigen (HBeAg) loss at Week 48 visit. Description Proportion of participants with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss at Week 48 visit.
Time Frame Week 24 Time Frame Week 24 Time Frame Week 48 Time Frame Week 48 Time Frame Baseline; Week 24 Time Frame Baseline; Week 48 Time Frame Week 24 Time Frame Week 48 Time Frame Week 48 Time Frame Week 48
Population Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population: Enrolled subjects who received at least one study drug. Population Intention-to-Treat Population: All enrolled subjects who received at least one study drug. Population Intention-to-Treat Population: All enrolled subjects who received at least one study drug. Population Intention-to-Treat Population: All enrolled subjects who received at least one study drug. Population All enrolled subjects with CD4 count values at baseline and at week 24. Population All enrolled subjects with CD4 count results available at baseline and week 48. Population Enrolled subjects with abnormal ALT at baseline Population All enrolled subjects with abnormal baseline LFTs
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units cells/microliter Units cells/microliter Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 237262725 Sequence: 237262726 Sequence: 237262727 Sequence: 237262728 Sequence: 237262729 Sequence: 237262730 Sequence: 237262731 Sequence: 237262732 Sequence: 237262733 Sequence: 237262734
Outcome Id 31008818 Outcome Id 31008819 Outcome Id 31008820 Outcome Id 31008821 Outcome Id 31008822 Outcome Id 31008823 Outcome Id 31008824 Outcome Id 31008825 Outcome Id 31008826 Outcome Id 31008827
Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372 Result Group Id 56373372
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000
Title HIV-1 RNA at Week 24 Title HBV DNA at Week 24 Title HIV-1 RNA at Week 48 Title HBV DNA at Week 48 Title CD4 Cell Count Change at Week 24 Title CD4 Cell Count Change at Week 48 Title ALT Normalization at Week 24 Title ALT Normalization at Week 48 Title HBeAg Loss at Week 48 Title HBsAg Loss at Week 48
Description Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 24 by US FDA Snapshot Algorithm Description Proportion of participants with plasma HBV DNA <29 IU/mL at Week 24 as defined by Missing=Failure Approach Description Proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48 by US FDA Snapshot Algorithm Description Proportion of participants with plasma HBV DNA <29 IU/mL at Week 48 as defined by Missing=Failure Approach Description Change from baseline in CD4 cell count at Week 24 Description Change from baseline in CD4 cell count at Week 48 Description Proportion of participants with normal ALT at Week 24 Description Proportion of participants with normal ALT at Week 48 Description Proportion of participants with hepatitis B envelop antigen (HBeAg) loss at Week 48 visit. Description Proportion of participants with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss at Week 48 visit.
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units cells/microliter Units cells/microliter Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 25 Param Value 24 Param Value 22 Param Value 22 Param Value 32.8 Param Value 76.6 Param Value 4 Param Value 4 Param Value 0 Param Value 0
Param Value Num 25.0 Param Value Num 24.0 Param Value Num 22.0 Param Value Num 22.0 Param Value Num 32.8 Param Value Num 76.6 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 169.1 Dispersion Value 184.2
Dispersion Value Num 169.1 Dispersion Value Num 184.2

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11455446
Result Group Id 56373370
Ctgov Group Code BG000
Units Participants
Scope overall
Count 28

Result Groups

Sequence: 56373370 Sequence: 56373371 Sequence: 56373372 Sequence: 56373373
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000
Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event
Title B/F/TAF Title B/F/TAF Title B/F/TAF Title B/F/TAF
Description Treatment group (1-arm study)

B/F/TAF: Fixed dose combination B/F/TAF (50 mg/ 200 mg/ 25 mg/ tablet) administered orally once daily without regards to food.

Description Treatment group (1-arm study)

B/F/TAF: Fixed dose combination B/F/TAF (50 mg/ 200 mg/ 25 mg/ tablet) administered orally once daily without regards to food.

Description Treatment group (1-arm study)

B/F/TAF: Fixed dose combination B/F/TAF (50 mg/ 200 mg/ 25 mg/ tablet) administered orally once daily without regards to food.

Description Treatment group (1-arm study)

B/F/TAF: Fixed dose combination B/F/TAF (50 mg/ 200 mg/ 25 mg/ tablet) administered orally once daily without regards to food.

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 126468098 Sequence: 126468099 Sequence: 126468100 Sequence: 126468101 Sequence: 126468102 Sequence: 126468103 Sequence: 126468104 Sequence: 126468105 Sequence: 126468106 Sequence: 126468107 Sequence: 126468108 Sequence: 126468109 Sequence: 126468110 Sequence: 126468111 Sequence: 126468112 Sequence: 126468113 Sequence: 126468114 Sequence: 126468115 Sequence: 126468116 Sequence: 126468117 Sequence: 126468118 Sequence: 126468119 Sequence: 126468120 Sequence: 126468121
Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370 Result Group Id 56373370
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000
Classification United States
Category <=18 years Category Between 18 and 65 years Category >=65 years Category Female Category Male Category Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino Category Unknown or Not Reported Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category Asian Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Black or African American Category White Category More than one race Category Unknown or Not Reported
Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Region of Enrollment Title HIV RNA PCR <50 copies/mL Title CD4 count <200 cells/microliter Title HBV DNA PCR <29 IU/mL Title HBeAg positive Title Anti-HBe antibody positive Title Abnormal ALT Title Hepatitis D antibody positive
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 0 Param Value 25 Param Value 3 Param Value 50.1 Param Value 4 Param Value 24 Param Value 0 Param Value 28 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 25 Param Value 3 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 28 Param Value 20 Param Value 1 Param Value 22 Param Value 12 Param Value 10 Param Value 4 Param Value 5
Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 25.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 50.1 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 24.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 28.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 25.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 28.0 Param Value Num 20.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 22.0 Param Value Num 12.0 Param Value Num 10.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 5.0
Dispersion Type Full Range
Dispersion Lower Limit 28.0
Dispersion Upper Limit 71.0
Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 28

]]>

<![CDATA[ Interleukin-1 Blockade In Recently Decompensated Heart Failure – 2 ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03797001
2019-01-04

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03797001
NCT03797001https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03797001?tab=tableBenjamin Van Tassell, PharmDbvantassell@vcu.edu804-828-4583REDHART2 is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to determine the effects of Anakinra on peak aerobic exercise capacity measured with a cardiopulmonary test after 24 weeks in patients with recently decompensated systolic heart failure and increased systemic inflammation.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-03
Start Month Year January 4, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 2023
Verification Month Year May 2023
Verification Date 2023-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-03

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20583729
Description The REDHART2 (REcently Decompensated Heart failure Anakinra Response 2 Trial) study is a phase II clinical trial of anakinra or placebo to determine improvement in aerobic exercise capacity (by measuring maximal oxygen uptake (VO2)) in patients with recently decompensated systolic heart failure (HF). The recently completed pilot REDHART study showed anakinra treatment for 12 weeks led to a significant improvement in peak aerobic exercise capacity, whereas anakinra treatment for 2 weeks did not, and no significant changes were seen in placebo. The REDHART2 study is designed to expand and confirm the beneficial effect of sustained anakinra treatment (24 weeks) on peak VO2, and to explore the potential effect size on hospital readmissions for HF. The rationale of Interleukin-1 (IL-1) blockade with anakinra in heart failure stems from the evidence of a) reduced adverse cardiac remodeling and heart failure in animal models of acute myocardial infarction (AMI); b) reduced incidence of heart failure in patients with ST-segment elevation AMI; c) enhanced IL-1 activity in patients with heart failure, d) quenching of the acute inflammatory response in patients with acute decompensated heart failure, e) direct cardiodepressant effects of IL-1 in animal models, f) improved exercise capacity in pilot studies including patients with stable systolic heart failure, stable diastolic heart failure, and, recently decompensated systolic heart failure in the pilot REDHART study. Patients will be randomized 2:1 to active treatment, such that patients will be twice as likely to receive anakinra versus placebo.

Facilities

Sequence: 198704874
Status Recruiting
Name Virginia Commonwealth University
City Richmond
State Virginia
Zip 23298
Country United States

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 27952203
Facility Id 198704874
Contact Type primary
Name Benjamin Van Tassell, PharmD
Email bvantassell@vcu.edu
Phone 804-828-4583

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 95355226 Sequence: 95355227
Mesh Term Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein Mesh Term Antirheumatic Agents
Downcase Mesh Term interleukin 1 receptor antagonist protein Downcase Mesh Term antirheumatic agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 51815693 Sequence: 51815694
Name Heart Failure, Systolic Name Inflammation
Downcase Name heart failure, systolic Downcase Name inflammation

Id Information

Sequence: 39875422
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value REDHART2 HM20014686

Countries

Sequence: 42274031
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55237400 Sequence: 55237401
Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title anakinra Title placebo
Description Anakinra subcutaneous injection, 100 mg daily for 24 weeks Description Placebo subcutaneous injection, daily for 24 weeks

Interventions

Sequence: 52137476 Sequence: 52137477
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Anakinra Name Placebo
Description 100 mg subcutaneous injection, daily for 24 weeks Description subcutaneous injection, daily for 24 weeks

Keywords

Sequence: 79287848 Sequence: 79287849 Sequence: 79287850 Sequence: 79287851
Name heart failure Name inflammation Name anakinra Name exercise capacity
Downcase Name heart failure Downcase Name inflammation Downcase Name anakinra Downcase Name exercise capacity

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176229488 Sequence: 176229489 Sequence: 176229490 Sequence: 176229491 Sequence: 176229492 Sequence: 176229493 Sequence: 176229494 Sequence: 176229495 Sequence: 176229496
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure changes in peak oxygen consumption (VO2) Measure changes in peak VO2 at earlier endpoints Measure echocardiography assessments Measure hemodynamic assessments Measure Quality of Life Assessments Measure Biomarker – high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) Measure Biomarker – N-terminal pro b-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) Measure Clinical Outcome – cardiac death Measure Clinical Outcome – hospitalization for heart failure
Time Frame baseline – 24 weeks Time Frame baseline – 6 weeks and baseline – 12 weeks Time Frame baseline – 24 weeks Time Frame baseline – 24 weeks Time Frame baseline – 24 weeks Time Frame baseline – 24 weeks Time Frame baseline – 24 weeks Time Frame baseline – 24 weeks Time Frame baseline – 24 weeks
Description changes in peak oxygen consumption (VO2) after 24 weeks of treatment Description changes in peak VO2 at earlier endpoints (6 and 12 weeks) Description evaluation of heart function by standard echocardiography assessments at 24 weeks Description estimates of arterial elastance at 6, 12 and 24 weeks Description Duke Activity Status Index will be administered at 6, 12 and 24 weeks to provide patient perception of changes. Responses are yes or no, with yes responses corresponding to better clinical condition. Description The change in blood levels of CRP will be measured from baseline to 24 weeks. Description The change in blood levels of NT-proBNP will be measured from baseline to 24 weeks. Description Instances of cardiac death during the study will be recorded Description Instances of hospitalization for heart failure during the study will be recorded

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192054816 Sequence: 192054817 Sequence: 192054818 Sequence: 192054819 Sequence: 192054820 Sequence: 192054821 Sequence: 192054822 Sequence: 192054823
Mesh Term Heart Failure Mesh Term Heart Failure, Systolic Mesh Term Inflammation Mesh Term Systolic Murmurs Mesh Term Heart Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Heart Murmurs
Downcase Mesh Term heart failure Downcase Mesh Term heart failure, systolic Downcase Mesh Term inflammation Downcase Mesh Term systolic murmurs Downcase Mesh Term heart diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term heart murmurs
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 47988176
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Virginia Commonwealth University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29076357
Role Principal Investigator
Name Benjamin Van Tassell, PharmD
Affiliation Virginia Commonwealth University

Central Contacts

Sequence: 11936691
Contact Type primary
Name Benjamin Van Tassell, PharmD
Phone 804-828-4583
Email bvantassell@vcu.edu
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67719693 Sequence: 67719694
Design Group Id 55237400 Design Group Id 55237401
Intervention Id 52137476 Intervention Id 52137477

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30556786
Gender All
Minimum Age 21 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

All 6 criteria need to be met for enrollment of the patient in the study

Primary diagnosis for hospitalization is decompensated heart failure established as the finding at admission of both conditions listed below:

dyspnea or respiratory distress or tachypnea at rest or with minimal exertion;
evidence of elevated cardiac filling pressure or pulmonary congestion (at least one of the conditions must be met):
pulmonary congestion/edema at physical exam OR chest XRay;
plasma BNP levels ≥200 pg/mL;
invasive measurement of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure >18 mmHg or of pulmonary artery occluding pressure (wedge) >16 mmHg.
The patient has a prior documentation of impaired left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction ≤40%) at most recent assessment by any imaging modality (within 12 months).

The patient is now clinically stable, euvolemic, and meets standard criteria for hospital discharge as documented by all the 3 conditions listed below:

absence of dyspnea or pulmonary congestion/distress at rest;
absence of pitting edema in the lower extremities, or in any other region;
stable hemodynamic parameters (blood pressure, heart rate).
The patient is of age ≥21 years old, and is willing and able to provide written informed consent.
The patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol (i.e., self-administration, or exercise test).
The patient has screening high sensitivity plasma C-reactive protein levels (hsCRP) >2 mg/L.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects will not be eligible if they meet any of the following 15 exclusion criteria.

The primary diagnosis for admission is NOT decompensated heart failure, including diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes, hypertensive urgency/emergency, tachy- or brady-arrhythmias.
Concomitant clinically significant comorbidities that would interfere with the execution or interpretation of the study including but not limited to acute coronary syndromes, uncontrolled hypertension or orthostatic hypotension, tachy- or brady-arrhythmias, acute or chronic pulmonary disease or neuromuscular disorders affecting respiration.
Recent (previous 3 months) or planned resynchronization therapy (CRT), or valve surgeries.
Previous or planned implantation of left ventricular assist devices or heart transplant.
Chronic use of intravenous inotropes.
Recent (<14 days) use of immunosuppressive or anti-inflammatory drugs (including oral corticosteroids at a dose of prednisone equivalent of 0.5 mg/kg/day but not including inhaled or low dose oral corticosteroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs).
Chronic inflammatory disorder (including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus).
Active infection (of any type), including chronic/recurrent infectious disease (i.e. HBV, HCV, and HIV/AIDS) – but excluding HCV+ with undetectable plasma RNA.
Active malignancy – excluding carcinoma in situ [any location] or localized non-melanoma skin cancer.
Any comorbidity limiting survival or ability to complete the study.
Stage V kidney disease or on renal-replacement therapy.
Neutropenia (<1,500/mm3 or <1,000/mm3 in African-American patients).
Pregnancy.
Angina, hypertension, arrhythmias, electrocardiograph (ECG) changes, or other non-cardiac limitations (i.e., peak respiratory exchange ratio VCO2/VO2 [RER]<1.0, reflecting sub-maximal test) that limit maximum exertion during CPX obtained during the baseline testing.
Hypersensitivity to Kineret or to E. coli derived products. 16) Evidence of COVID19 within the last 60 days or recent (21 days) exposure to close personal contact.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254239739
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 21
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 8

Designs

Sequence: 30305115
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28683704
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 51709332 Sequence: 51709333
Pmid 35706006 Pmid 35283262
Reference Type derived Reference Type derived
Citation Van Tassell B, Mihalick V, Thomas G, Marawan A, Talasaz AH, Lu J, Kang L, Ladd A, Damonte JI, Dixon DL, Markley R, Turlington J, Federmann E, Del Buono MG, Biondi-Zoccai G, Canada JM, Arena R, Abbate A. Rationale and design of interleukin-1 blockade in recently decompensated heart failure (REDHART2): a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, single center, phase 2 study. J Transl Med. 2022 Jun 15;20(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03466-9. Citation Sedhai YR, Patel NK, Mihalick V, Talasaz A, Thomas G, Denlinger BL, Damonte JI, Del Buono MG, Federmann E, Hardin M, Ibe I, Harmon M, Van Tassell B, Abbate A. Heart failure clinical trial enrollment at a rural satellite hospital. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Apr;115:106731. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106731. Epub 2022 Mar 11.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Autologous Regeneration of Tissue (ART) for Wound Healing ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796988
2018-09-14

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796988
NCT03796988https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796988?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this research study is to learn about a new device, Autologous Regeneration of Tissue (ART), for collecting skin grafts from participant’s own skin.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-06-09
Start Month Year September 14, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2023
Verification Month Year June 2023
Verification Date 2023-06-30
Last Update Posted Date 2023-06-09

Facilities

Sequence: 199111588
Name University of Miami
City Miami
State Florida
Zip 33136
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 51929467
Name Wound of Skin
Downcase Name wound of skin

Id Information

Sequence: 39969730
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 20180154

Countries

Sequence: 42361324
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55333306
Group Type Experimental
Title Intervention arm
Description The donor area will be anesthetized with injected local anesthesia, harvested with the ART device, and bandaged with an occlusive dressing. The skin harvested will be placed on the recipient wound area. The area will be bandaged will a non-stick silicone dressing (covered by appropriate primary and secondary dressings) and left intact for 1-7 days.

Interventions

Sequence: 52242600
Intervention Type Device
Name Autologous Regeneration of Tissue (ART) device
Description This device will harvest hundreds of full-thickness columns of skin tissue (500 micrometer diameter) using single-needle, fluid-assisted harvesting technology.

Keywords

Sequence: 79484384
Name Chronic Wound
Downcase Name chronic wound

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176539629 Sequence: 176539630 Sequence: 176539631 Sequence: 176539632
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change of pain on harvesting of skin at donor site. Measure Time to healing of donor sites Measure Wound healing of recipient site Measure Histologic evaluation
Time Frame Baseline, Day 56 Time Frame Up to Day 56 Time Frame Up to Day 56 Time Frame Up to Day 56
Description Pain assessed using a Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with a score ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) Description At each weekly visit, the donor site will be assessed for wound area in cm^2 Description At each weekly visit, the recipient area will be assessed for healing area percentage Description As measured by tissue samples from biopsy

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192519543
Mesh Term Wounds and Injuries
Downcase Mesh Term wounds and injuries
Mesh Type mesh-list

Sponsors

Sequence: 48092274 Sequence: 48092275
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University of Miami Name Medline Industries

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29144149
Role Principal Investigator
Name Hadar Lev-Tov, MD
Affiliation University of Miami

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67834435
Design Group Id 55333306
Intervention Id 52242600

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30622038
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 90 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Adults from 18 to 90 years of age.
Patients that have a chronic wound in any area of the body defined as having been present for at least 30 days of duration.
Able and willing to give consent for the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnant women (Urine hCG test will be performed at baseline on women of child bearing potential).
Adults unable to consent.
Prisoners.
Subjects requiring concurrent systemic antimicrobials during the study period for any infection.
Subjects with leg lesions and clinically significant and unreconstructed peripheral arterial disease.
Subjects who are receiving immunosuppressive agents, radiation therapy, or cytotoxic agents.
Subjects who require treatment for a primary or metastatic malignancy (other than squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin).
Subjects with other conditions considered by the investigator to be reasons for disqualification that may jeopardize subject safety or interfere with the objectives of the trial (e.g., acute illness or exacerbation of chronic illness, lack of motivation, history of poor compliance).

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254024602
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 90
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30369189
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28738794
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Hadar Lev-Tov
Title Assistant Professor
Affiliation University of Miami

]]>

<![CDATA[ Efficacy of Pioglitazone Hydrochloride and Metformin Hydrochloride Tablets on the Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Combined With Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796975
2018-06-28

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796975
NCT03796975https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796975?tab=tableNANANAThis is an multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled study to evaluated the efficacy of pioglitazone hydrochloride and metformin hydrochloride tablets on the patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus combined with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-11-11
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-08-07
Start Month Year June 28, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year April 28, 2019
Verification Month Year July 2020
Verification Date 2020-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-08-07

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735695
Description Taking metformin monotherapy as a control, we evaluated the efficacy of pioglitazone hydrochloride and metformin hydrochloride tablets on hepatic fat ultrasound and liver enzyme levels, and observed whether the drug can improve fatty liver in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes combined with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. This is an multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled study.

Facilities

Sequence: 200243904
Name Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical university
City Xi'an
State Shaanxi
Zip 710032
Country China

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96112819 Sequence: 96112820 Sequence: 96112821 Sequence: 96112822
Mesh Term Metformin Mesh Term Pioglitazone Mesh Term Hypoglycemic Agents Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs
Downcase Mesh Term metformin Downcase Mesh Term pioglitazone Downcase Mesh Term hypoglycemic agents Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52207861 Sequence: 52207862 Sequence: 52207863
Name Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Name Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Name Efficacy
Downcase Name type 2 diabetes mellitus Downcase Name non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Downcase Name efficacy

Id Information

Sequence: 40186018
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value KY20172053-1

Countries

Sequence: 42599523
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55634470 Sequence: 55634471
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Combination of Pioglitazone and Metformin Tablets Title Metformin Hydrochloride Tablets
Description dosage form: tablet; dosage:15mg/500mg; frequency: the dose in week 1 is 15mg/500mg, once a day, increased to 15mg/500mg in the second week, twice a day and maintain this dose to 24 weeks duration: 24 weeks; type: oral; Description dosage form: tablet; dosage: 850mg; frequency: the dose in week 1 is 850mg, once a day, increased to 850mg in the second week, twice a day and maintain this dose to 24 weeks duration: 24 weeks; type: oral;

Interventions

Sequence: 52521881 Sequence: 52521882
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Combination of Pioglitazone and Metformin Tablets Name Metformin Hydrochloride Tablets
Description 15mg/500mg, oral, 2/day Description Oral metformin 850mg, 2/day in the control group

Keywords

Sequence: 79922651 Sequence: 79922652 Sequence: 79922653 Sequence: 79922654
Name Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Name Pioglitazone Hydrochloride and Metformin Hydrochloride Tablets Name Randomized Controlled Trial Name Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Downcase Name type 2 diabetes mellitus Downcase Name pioglitazone hydrochloride and metformin hydrochloride tablets Downcase Name randomized controlled trial Downcase Name non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177510522 Sequence: 177510523 Sequence: 177510524 Sequence: 177510525 Sequence: 177510526 Sequence: 177510527
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Decreased of liver fat content of fatty liver after 24 weeks treatment as assessed by B-ultrasound Measure Change of B-cell function after 24 weeks treatment as assessed by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index Measure Change of liver enzyme after 24 weeks treatment as assessed by blood test Measure Decreased of HbA1c after 24 weeks treatment as assessed by blood test Measure Decreased of fasting blood glucose after 24 weeks treatment as assessed by blood test Measure Change of weight and waistline after 24 weeks treatment as assessed by standard measurement
Time Frame up to 24 weeks Time Frame up to 24 weeks Time Frame up to 24 weeks Time Frame up to 24 weeks Time Frame up to 24 weeks Time Frame up to 24 weeks
Description Change from baseline liver fat content to up to 24 weeks after treatment Description Change from baseline B-cell function to up to 24 weeks after treatment Description Change from baseline liver enzyme to up to 24 weeks after treatment Description Change from baseline HbA1c to up to 24 weeks after treatment Description Change from baseline fasting blood glucose to up to 24 weeks after treatment Description Change from baseline weight and waistline to up to 24 weeks after treatment

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193626270 Sequence: 193626271 Sequence: 193626272 Sequence: 193626273 Sequence: 193626274 Sequence: 193626275 Sequence: 193626276 Sequence: 193626277 Sequence: 193626278
Mesh Term Liver Diseases Mesh Term Fatty Liver Mesh Term Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Mesh Term Diabetes Mellitus Mesh Term Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 Mesh Term Glucose Metabolism Disorders Mesh Term Metabolic Diseases Mesh Term Endocrine System Diseases Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term liver diseases Downcase Mesh Term fatty liver Downcase Mesh Term non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Downcase Mesh Term diabetes mellitus Downcase Mesh Term diabetes mellitus, type 2 Downcase Mesh Term glucose metabolism disorders Downcase Mesh Term metabolic diseases Downcase Mesh Term endocrine system diseases Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48353515 Sequence: 48353516 Sequence: 48353517 Sequence: 48353518 Sequence: 48353519 Sequence: 48353520 Sequence: 48353521 Sequence: 48353522
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class UNKNOWN Agency Class UNKNOWN Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class UNKNOWN Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Xijing Hospital Name Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University Name Shaanxi Aerospace Hospital Name Genertec Universal Xi'an Aero-Engine hospital (Xi' an) Co., Ltd Name Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital Name Chang'An Hospital Name Yan'an people's Hospital Name Shangluo Central Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29305888
Role Principal Investigator
Name Qiuhe Ph.D Ji, M.D.
Affiliation Department of Endocrinology,Xi jing Hospital,Fourth Military Medical University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68198950 Sequence: 68198951
Design Group Id 55634470 Design Group Id 55634471
Intervention Id 52521881 Intervention Id 52521882

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30786760
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 70 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

To meet the new diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients, never received oral hypoglycemic drugs or insulin therapy;
In accordance with the nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFLD) criteria for the diagnosis of patients.
the level of HbA1c was 7 -10.0%;
age 18-70, body mass index 21-35kg/m2;
the subjects informed consent and signed the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

type 1 diabetes or secondary diabetes;
suffering from other liver diseases, such as hepatitis, self – free liver, etc.
abnormal thyroid function (in the active period), or the need for long-term oral and intravenous glucocorticoids to treat patients;
patients with severe renal dysfunction or renal disease (eGFR<60);
in those with abnormal liver function, Alanine transaminase(ALT) or Aspartate transaminase(AST) was more than 3 times the normal upper limit.
people with serious gastrointestinal diseases such as peptic ulcers and chronic diarrhea;
patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease or stents;
hemopoietic system diseases such as serious primary diseases, hemoglobin < 100g/L or need regular transfusion treatment;
pregnant, breast-feeding, women of childbearing age who are unwilling to contraception during the study period;
chronic cardiac insufficiency, the classification of heart function III level and above;
uncontrolled malignant tumor, and the history of bladder cancer.
acute complications of diabetes;
the use of other drugs for diabetes and liver disease;
patients who had participated in other clinical studies within three months;
people who have known allergies to this kind of drugs are known.
it is impossible to guarantee the effect or the safety judgment of the drug or the person who is unable to cooperate with the mental illness.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989379
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 10
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 70
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 3
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30532831
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26691964 Sequence: 26691965
Intervention Id 52521881 Intervention Id 52521882
Name ka shuang ping Name ge hua zhi

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899124
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Study to Evaluate XEN1101 as Adjunctive Therapy in Focal Epilepsy ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796962
2019-01-30

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796962
NCT03796962https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796962?tab=tableNANANAThe XEN1101 Phase 2 clinical trial is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that will evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of increasing doses of XEN1101 administered as adjunctive treatment in adult patients diagnosed with focal epilepsy, followed by an optional open-label extension (OLE).
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-01-17
Start Month Year January 30, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year September 2, 2021
Verification Month Year January 2023
Verification Date 2023-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-01-17

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20568265
Description The XEN1101 Phase 2 clinical trial is designed as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study with an optional open-label extension (OLE) to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of XEN1101 administered as adjunctive treatment in adult patients aged 18 to 75 years diagnosed with focal epilepsy. Approximately 300 patients will be randomized in a blinded manner to one of three active treatment groups or placebo in a 2:1:1:2 fashion (XEN1101 25 mg : 20 mg : 10 mg : Placebo). After screening, patients will have 8 weeks of baseline to assess frequency of seizures, followed by 8 weeks of treatment and a 6-week post treatment follow-up period. In order to be included in the study, patients must already be treated with a stable dose of 1 to 3 allowable current anti-epileptic drugs for at least one month prior to screening, during baseline, and throughout the double-blind portion (DBP) of the study. During the treatment period, patients will be given XEN1101 or placebo once daily in the evening. A five year OLE will be available to eligible patients who complete the DBP. All patients will receive a 20 mg daily dose of XEN1101 during this extension period.

Facilities

Sequence: 198590229 Sequence: 198590230 Sequence: 198590231 Sequence: 198590232 Sequence: 198590233 Sequence: 198590234 Sequence: 198590235 Sequence: 198590236 Sequence: 198590237 Sequence: 198590238 Sequence: 198590239 Sequence: 198590240 Sequence: 198590241 Sequence: 198590242 Sequence: 198590243 Sequence: 198590244 Sequence: 198590245 Sequence: 198590246 Sequence: 198590247 Sequence: 198590248 Sequence: 198590249 Sequence: 198590250 Sequence: 198590251 Sequence: 198590252 Sequence: 198590253 Sequence: 198590254 Sequence: 198590255 Sequence: 198590256 Sequence: 198590257 Sequence: 198590258 Sequence: 198590259 Sequence: 198590260 Sequence: 198590261 Sequence: 198590262 Sequence: 198590263 Sequence: 198590264 Sequence: 198590265 Sequence: 198590266 Sequence: 198590267 Sequence: 198590268 Sequence: 198590269 Sequence: 198590270 Sequence: 198590271 Sequence: 198590272 Sequence: 198590273 Sequence: 198590274 Sequence: 198590275 Sequence: 198590276 Sequence: 198590277 Sequence: 198590278 Sequence: 198590279 Sequence: 198590280 Sequence: 198590281 Sequence: 198590282 Sequence: 198590283 Sequence: 198590284 Sequence: 198590285 Sequence: 198590286 Sequence: 198590287 Sequence: 198590288 Sequence: 198590289 Sequence: 198590290 Sequence: 198590291 Sequence: 198590292 Sequence: 198590293 Sequence: 198590294 Sequence: 198590295 Sequence: 198590296 Sequence: 198590297 Sequence: 198590298 Sequence: 198590299 Sequence: 198590300 Sequence: 198590301 Sequence: 198590302 Sequence: 198590303 Sequence: 198590304 Sequence: 198590305 Sequence: 198590306 Sequence: 198590307 Sequence: 198590308 Sequence: 198590309 Sequence: 198590310 Sequence: 198590311 Sequence: 198590312 Sequence: 198590313 Sequence: 198590314 Sequence: 198590315 Sequence: 198590316 Sequence: 198590317 Sequence: 198590318 Sequence: 198590319 Sequence: 198590320 Sequence: 198590321 Sequence: 198590322 Sequence: 198590323
Name University of Alabama at Birmingham Name Strada Patient Care Center Name Xenoscience, Inc. Name Clinical Trials, Inc. Name Altman Clinical Translational Research Institute (ACTRI) Name California Pacific Medical Center (CPMC) – Sutter Pacific Epilepsy Program Name University of Colorado Hospital Anschutz Outpatient Pavilion Name University of Florida Jacksonville Name Mayo Clinic Florida Name Visionary Investigators Network Name Don Clinical Research Center Name The Neurology Research Group, LLC. Name Research Institute of Orlando, LLC Name Medsol Clinical Research Center Name Tallahassee Neurological Clinic Name University of South Florida Name Georgia Neurology and Sleep Medicine Associate Name Hawaii Pacific Neuroscience Name Consultants in Epilepsy and Neurology, PLLC Name Northwestern Medical Group, Department of Neurology Name University of Kansas Medical Center Name Bluegrass Epilepsy Research Name Maine Medical Partners Neurology Name Mid-Atlantic Epilepsy and Sleep Center Name Boston Neuro Research Center Name Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology, Ltd. Name Minnesota Epilepsy Group, P. A. Name Northeast Regional Epilepsy Group Name Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery at Saint Barnabas Name Northeast Regional Epilepsy Group Name Dent Neurosciences Research Center Name NYU Langone Medical Center/NYU School of Medicine Name Northwell Health – Lenox Hill Name SUNY Upstate Medical University Institute for Human Performance Name Five Towns Neuroscience Research Name Asheville Neurology Specialists, PA Name UC Gardner Neuroscience Institute Name Miami Valley Hospital Name University of Toledo Medical Center Name Providence Neurological Specialties East Name Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Name Thomas Jefferson University Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Name Allegheny Neurological Associates Name Vanderbilt Epilepsy Clinic Name Austin Epilepsy Care Center Name James W. Aston Ambulatory Care Center Name The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Name University of Utah Health Clinical Neurosciences Center Name University of Virginia Name Virginia Commonwealth University Name Carilion Neurology Clinic Name Winchester Neurological Consultants Name UW Medicine Valle Medical Center Name University of Washington School of Medicine, Regional Epilepsy Center at Harborview Medical Center Name Children's and Women's Health Centre of British Columbia (BC Children's Hospital) Name London Health Sciences Center Name University Health Network-Toronto Western Hospital Name LLC Arensia Exploratory Medicine Name Epilepsiezentrum Berlin-Brandenburg Name Bethel Epilepsy Centre Name Univ.-Klinik Bonn, Klinik und Poliklinik fur Epileptologie Name Universitatsklinikym Frankfurt Name Universitatsklinikum Freiburg, Neurozentrum/Epilepsiezentrum Name University Hospital Munster (UKM) Name Klinikum Osnabruck Name Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brueder Regensburg Name University of Tubingen-Dept. of Neurology and Epileptology Name IRCCS- Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche, Bellaria Hospital Name Dipartimento Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Universita Magna Graecia di Catanzaro Name Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta Name IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Nazionale C. Mondino Name Azienda Ospedaliera Universita' Pisana Name Azienda Ospedaliera "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelle"di Reggio Calabria Name Policlinico di Roma Umberto I Name PMSI Republican Clinical Hospital, ARENSIA Exploratory Medicine Name Hospital Virgen Macarena Name Centro de Neurologia Avanzada Name Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol Name Clínica Universidad Navarra Name Hospital del Mar Name Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron Name Hospital Vithas La Salud Name Hospital U. Ramón y Cajal Name Hospital Ruber Internacional Name Hospital U. Clínico San Carlos Name Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz Name Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Name Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga Name Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe Name Hospital Clínico Universitario Valladolid Name Medical Center of Limited Liability Company "Harmoniya Krasy" Name Institute of Neurological Sciences Name University Hospital of Wales Name King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Name St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City Birmingham City Mobile City Phoenix City Little Rock City La Jolla City San Francisco City Aurora City Jacksonville City Jacksonville City Miami City Miami City Miami City Orlando City Port Charlotte City Tallahassee City Tampa City Suwanee City Honolulu City Boise City Chicago City Kansas City City Lexington City Scarborough City Bethesda City South Dartmouth City Golden Valley City Saint Paul City Hackensack City Livingston City Morristown City Amherst City New York City New York City Syracuse City Woodmere City Asheville City Cincinnati City Dayton City Toledo City Portland City Philadelphia City Philadelphia City Pittsburgh City Nashville City Austin City Dallas City San Antonio City Salt Lake City City Charlottesville City Richmond City Roanoke City Winchester City Renton City Seattle City Vancouver City London City Toronto City Tbilisi City Berlin City Bielefeld City Bonn City Frankfurt City Freiburg City Muenster City Osnabrück City Regensburg City Tübingen City Bologna City Catanzaro City Milano City Pavia City Pisa City Reggio Calabria City Roma City Chisinau City Sevilla City Sevilla City Badalona City Pamplona City Barcelona City Barcelona City Granada City Madrid City Madrid City Madrid City Madrid City Madrid City Málaga City Valencia City Valladolid City Kyiv City Glasgow City Cardiff City London City London
State Alabama State Alabama State Arizona State Arkansas State California State California State Colorado State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Georgia State Hawaii State Idaho State Illinois State Kansas State Kentucky State Maine State Maryland State Massachusetts State Minnesota State Minnesota State New Jersey State New Jersey State New Jersey State New York State New York State New York State New York State New York State North Carolina State Ohio State Ohio State Ohio State Oregon State Pennsylvania State Pennsylvania State Pennsylvania State Tennessee State Texas State Texas State Texas State Utah State Virginia State Virginia State Virginia State Virginia State Washington State Washington State British Columbia State Ontario State Ontario State Andalusia State Andalusia State Barcelona State Navarra State Scotland State Wales
Zip 35294 Zip 36604 Zip 85004 Zip 72205 Zip 92037 Zip 94109 Zip 80045 Zip 32209 Zip 32224 Zip 33133 Zip 33136 Zip 33176 Zip 32806 Zip 33952 Zip 32308 Zip 33606 Zip 30024 Zip 96817 Zip 83702 Zip 60611 Zip 66160 Zip 40504 Zip 04074 Zip 20817 Zip 02747 Zip 55422 Zip 55102 Zip 07601 Zip 07039 Zip 07960 Zip 14226 Zip 10016 Zip 10075 Zip 13210 Zip 11598 Zip 28806 Zip 45219 Zip 45409 Zip 43606 Zip 97213 Zip 19104 Zip 19107 Zip 15212 Zip 37232 Zip 78758 Zip 75390 Zip 78229-3900 Zip 84132 Zip 22903 Zip 23219 Zip 24016 Zip 22601 Zip 98055 Zip 98104 Zip V6H 3V4 Zip N6A 5A5 Zip M5T 2S8 Zip 0112 Zip 10365 Zip 33617 Zip 53127 Zip 60528 Zip 79106 Zip 48149 Zip 49076 Zip 93049 Zip 72076 Zip 40139 Zip 88100 Zip 20133 Zip 27100 Zip 56124 Zip 89123 Zip 00185 Zip 2025 Zip 41009 Zip 41013 Zip 08916 Zip 31008 Zip 08003 Zip 08035 Zip 18008 Zip 28034 Zip 28036 Zip 28040 Zip 28040 Zip 28041 Zip 29010 Zip 46026 Zip 47003 Zip 01135 Zip G514TF Zip CF14 4XW Zip SE5 9RS Zip SW17 0QT
Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country Canada Country Canada Country Canada Country Georgia Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Moldova, Republic of Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Ukraine Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom

Conditions

Sequence: 51776075
Name Focal Epilepsy
Downcase Name focal epilepsy

Id Information

Sequence: 39844675 Sequence: 39844676
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value XPF-008-201 Id Value 2018-003221-29
Id Type EudraCT Number

Countries

Sequence: 42243730 Sequence: 42243731 Sequence: 42243732 Sequence: 42243733 Sequence: 42243734 Sequence: 42243735 Sequence: 42243736 Sequence: 42243737 Sequence: 42243738
Name United States Name Canada Name Georgia Name Germany Name Italy Name Moldova, Republic of Name Spain Name Ukraine Name United Kingdom
Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55194900 Sequence: 55194901 Sequence: 55194902 Sequence: 55194903
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title 25 mg XEN1101 Title 20 mg XEN1101 Title 10 mg XEN1101 Title Placebo
Description Capsule filled with 25 mg XEN1101 Description Capsule filled with 20 mg XEN1101 Description Capsule filled with 10 mg XEN1101 Description Placebo capsule

Interventions

Sequence: 52098277
Intervention Type Drug
Name XEN1101
Description Oral dose

Keywords

Sequence: 79221678
Name Epilepsy
Downcase Name epilepsy

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176103354 Sequence: 176103355 Sequence: 176103356 Sequence: 176103357
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure To assess the efficacy of XEN1101 compared to placebo on focal seizure frequency (e.g., median percent change in focal seizure frequency) in adults with focal epilepsy taking 1-3 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the double-blind treatment period (DBP) Measure To assess the safety and tolerability of XEN1101 (e.g., adverse events) in adults with focal epilepsy taking 1-3 AEDs Measure To evaluate the 50% XEN1101 response rates in comparison to placebo in the DBP Measure To evaluate trends in focal seizure frequency over time in the DBP
Time Frame From baseline (8 weeks prior to Day 0) through to the final dose (up to Day 56) Time Frame From screening (up to 28 days prior to baseline) through to 42 days post-final dose Time Frame From baseline (8 weeks prior to Day 0) through to the final dose (up to Day 56) Time Frame From baseline (8 weeks prior to Day 0) through to the final dose (up to Day 56)
Description Median percent change in monthly (28 days) focal seizure frequency from baseline to DBP for XEN1101 versus placebo Description To assess adverse events as criteria for safety and tolerability Description Responders are defined as patients experiencing ≥50% reduction in monthly (28 days) focal seizure frequency from baseline to DBP Description Percent change from baseline in weekly focal seizure frequency for each week in the DBP

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 191896151 Sequence: 191896152 Sequence: 191896153 Sequence: 191896149 Sequence: 191896150
Mesh Term Brain Diseases Mesh Term Central Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Epilepsy Mesh Term Epilepsies, Partial
Downcase Mesh Term brain diseases Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term epilepsy Downcase Mesh Term epilepsies, partial
Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list

Sponsors

Sequence: 47950794 Sequence: 47950795
Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class UNKNOWN
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc. Name Novotech Health Holdings Pte. Ltd.

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29052729
Role Study Director
Name Study Director
Affiliation Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67669722 Sequence: 67669723 Sequence: 67669724 Sequence: 67669725
Design Group Id 55194902 Design Group Id 55194901 Design Group Id 55194900 Design Group Id 55194903
Intervention Id 52098277 Intervention Id 52098277 Intervention Id 52098277 Intervention Id 52098277

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30533728
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 75 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Key Inclusion Criteria:

Be properly informed of the nature and risks of the study and give informed consent in writing, prior to entering the study
BMI ≤40 kg/m2
Diagnosis (≥2 years) of focal epilepsy according to the International League Against Epilepsy [ILAE] Classification of Epilepsy (2017)
Prior neuroimaging within the last 10 years and documentation is available
Treatment with a stable dose of 1 to 3 allowable current AEDs for at least one month prior to screening, during baseline, and throughout the duration of the DBP
Must be willing to comply with the contraception requirements
Males must agree not to donate sperm from the time of the first administration of study drug until 6 months after the last dose. Females must agree not to donate ova from the time of the first administration of study drug until 6 months after the last dose.
Able to keep accurate seizure diaries

Key Exclusion Criteria:

History of pseudoseizures, psychogenic seizures, primary generalized seizure, or focal aware non-motor seizures only
Presence or previous history of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome
Seizures secondary to other diseases or conditions
History of repetitive seizures within the last 12 months where the individual seizures cannot be counted
History of neurosurgery for seizures <1 year prior to enrollment, or radiosurgery <2 years prior to enrollment
Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, or active suicidal plan/intent in the past 6 months, or a history of suicide attempt in the last 2 years, or more than 1 lifetime suicide attempt
History or presence of any significant medical or surgical condition or uncontrolled medical illness at screening, or history of cancer within the past 2 years, with the exception of appropriately treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma

Any clinically significant abnormalities on pre-study physical examination, vital signs, laboratory values or ECG indicating a medical problem that would preclude study participation including but not limited to:

History of presence of long QT syndrome; QTcF > 450 msec at baseline; family history of sudden death of unknown cause
History of skin or retinal pigment epithelium abnormalities caused by ezogabine
Past use of vigabatrin without stable visual fields tested twice over the 12 months after the last dose of vigabatrin (concomitant use of vigabatrin is not allowed)
If felbamate is used as a concomitant AED, patients must be taking it for at least 2 years, with a stable dose for 2 months (or no less than 49 days) and acceptable hematology and LFT history and values prior to Screening. If received in the past, felbamate must have been discontinued 2 months (or no less than 49 days) prior to Screening.
Have had multiple drug allergies or a severe drug reaction to an AED(s), including dermatological (e.g., Stevens-Johnson syndrome), hematological, or organ toxicity reactions
Current use of a ketogenic diet

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254136387
Number Of Facilities 95
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 31
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 75
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30282281
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28661219
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Threatened Preterm Birth and Time of Subsequent Delivery -a Prediction Model ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796949
2014-05-31

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796949
NCT03796949https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796949?tab=tableNANANAThis study investigates immunological and clinical markers in threatened preterm birth aiming to create a prediction model for preterm birth.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year May 2014
Primary Completion Month Year August 2018
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20783022
Description Preterm birth is the main cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity and despite a lot of effort the mechanisms leading to preterm birth are poorly understood. In threatened preterm birth it is difficult to identify the true high risk cases ultimately leading to preterm birth. These women are often overtreated.

In this study blood samples are taken from women with threatened preterm birth and from women with normal pregnancies before and during labor.

Differences in clinical characteristics and immunological markers between the groups are studied in order to design a prediction model for preterm birth.

Conditions

Sequence: 52328256 Sequence: 52328257
Name Preterm Birth Name Immunologic Activity Alteration
Downcase Name preterm birth Downcase Name immunologic activity alteration

Id Information

Sequence: 40271055
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 960624abc

Design Groups

Sequence: 55768084 Sequence: 55768085
Title threatened preterm birth Title Controls
Description Women with either preterm labor or preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes. Blood samples taken at time of inclusion in the study. Description Women with normal pregnancies. Blood samples taken at time of inclusion in the study, either prelabor (during pregnancy) or during active phase of labor.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177959786
Outcome Type primary
Measure Time of delivery
Time Frame Outcome noted at delivery
Description Delivery before 34 weeks of gestation or after 34 weeks of gestation

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194084932 Sequence: 194084933 Sequence: 194084934 Sequence: 194084935 Sequence: 194084936 Sequence: 194084937
Mesh Term Premature Birth Mesh Term Obstetric Labor, Premature Mesh Term Obstetric Labor Complications Mesh Term Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term premature birth Downcase Mesh Term obstetric labor, premature Downcase Mesh Term obstetric labor complications Downcase Mesh Term pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases and pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48466391
Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Linkoeping University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29368853
Role Principal Investigator
Name Marie Blomberg, MD PhD
Affiliation Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30856305
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender Female
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Population 80 women with threatened preterm labor before 34 weeks of gestation, 40 women with preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes before 34 weeks of gestation, 40 women with normal pregnancies in labor at term, 44 women with normal pregnancies during pregnancy (before labor)
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Threatened preterm birth before 34 weeks of gestation; either threatened preterm labor and/or preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes
Age > 18 years
Swedish-speaking (understanding study information)

Exclusion Criteria:

Multiple gestation
Blood borne infections

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254313025
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 51
Were Results Reported False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30602143
Observational Model Case-Control
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28968659
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Marie Blomberg
Title Professor
Affiliation Linkoeping University

]]>

<![CDATA[ 3MDR to Treat PTSD With mTBI (3MDR) ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796936
2019-01-11

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796936
NCT03796936https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796936?tab=tableNANANABackground and Purpose: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) are persistent and frequently comorbid complications of recent combat. There is no proven treatment for mTBI, and standard treatments for PTSD frequently achieve only transient, modest impact. Motion-assisted, Multi-modular Memory Desensitization and Reconsolidation (3MDR) is a novel treatment for PTSD combining aspects of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), within the Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN). The added benefit of the eye movement (EM) component of EMDR is controversial; the purpose of this pilot study is therefore to: 1) obtain an initial estimate of the efficacy of 3MDR in service members with comorbid PTSD and mTBI, and 2) determine the impact of EM on treatment response. The investigators hypothesize that 3MDR will significantly improve symptom severity, both with and without EM.

Population: Participants will be active or retired service members with a history of mTBI who meet criteria for probable PTSD on the PCL5. It is anticipated that participants will be recruited through the Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine (CNRM) Recruitment Core and the National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE).

Design type and procedures: This is a pilot, controlled clinical trial in which all 20 participants with comorbid PTSD and mTBI receive 10 sessions (3 preparatory, 6 3MDR treatment, and 1 conclusion), but will be randomized to either include EM (EM+) or not (EM-). In the preparatory sessions, the therapist will help each participant select 2 songs and 14 pictures to be used in their treatment sessions. The therapist will help the participant rate the pictures from least to most impactful. Each 3MDR treatment session will start by playing the first song, to bring them back to the time of their trauma. This will be done while the participant walks on the CAREN’s embedded treadmill through the 3MDR virtual environment (VE) projected onto the system’s curved screen. This is followed by a display of one of their pictures, a manifestation of their trauma, which they directly face and walk down a hallway toward, until the picture looms before them. The therapist, standing next to the participant along the treadmill’s edge, will query the participant about what the picture means to them, how it makes them feel, etc., while the CAREN operator superimposes key words (said by the participant) over the picture, which the therapist later asks the participant to read aloud. Then, for ~60 seconds, the EM+ group will see a red ball “bounce” across the screen in front of the picture, and a number appears on the ball as it touches the screen’s edge. The participant will be asked to recite each number aloud. This element is absent for EM- participants. All participants repeats these procedures for 5-7 pictures in each 3MDR treatment session; the pictures used will be agreed upon by therapist and participant, targeting more impactful pictures, whether repeats or new, in later sessions. The pictures are followed by playing the second song, chosen to bring the participant back to present day. The participant will walk at a comfortable pace throughout the session, with each session lasting typically ~60 minutes. The primary outcome measure will be change in PCL-5 score from pre- to post-intervention, with additional measures at 3 and 6 months.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-25
Start Month Year January 11, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 2020
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-25

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20710017
Description This is a pilot prospective, randomized, interventional controlled clinical trial. Our study at the NICoE site will specifically target active or retired SMs who are OIF/OEF/OND veterans of any age and either gender who meet criteria for PTSD and have a lifetime history of mTBI. Comorbid PTSD and mTBI is highly prevalent in SMs and veterans of the recent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and having both diagnoses is associated with significantly greater symptom severity than either PTSD or mTBI alone (Brenner et al., 2010). TBI, the great majority of which is mTBI, is one of the most challenging, significant, and costly problems facing the DoD, and inhibiting readiness, whether in times of war or peace. Currently, no therapy has yet been proven efficacious in reducing persistent symptoms after TBI. Many patients with PTSD, particularly when it is combat-related, still suffer from substantial residual symptoms even after undergoing evidence-based psychotherapy (Watts et al., 2013; Bradley et al., 2001; Bison et al., 2007) and many even maintain their PTSD diagnosis (Steenkamp et al., 2015). The novel elements of 3MDR may prove to be particularly beneficial for those with both PTSD and a history of mTBI. If our approach is proven effective, there will be a sizeable population for whom this treatment could be provided, translating into both individual and DoD-wide benefit. Both TBI and PTSD have become signature wounds of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and pose significant health concerns for many military personnel. Currently, no intervention has yet been proven efficacious in reducing long-term symptoms of TBI. Furthermore, individuals with PTSD often have persistent symptoms even after completing validated treatments.

The proposed research has the potential to have a significant positive impact on the care of individuals with both PTSD and mTBI. As previously stated, 3MDR combines emotional exposure, dual-task processing, attenuation of working memory resources, and physical activity. Physical activity may be particularly beneficial in enhancing blood flow to the brain and facilitating production of beneficial factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). In addition, participants have the opportunity to demonstrate to themselves that they can actively overcome their avoidance by approaching and walking toward, or deliberately confronting, representations of their own traumatic memories. This approach may be particularly useful or of interest to veterans and SMs, who are accustomed to being physically active, may be less inclined to turn to pharmacotherapy than others with PTSD, and also have had high dropout rates and greater resistance to established, more traditional therapies. This relatively short treatment approach could have tremendous implications for improvement in symptoms as well as quality of life in individuals with PTSD and mTBI. Prior to any other study procedures, written informed consent will be obtained from each participant by the principal investigator (PI) or another study staff member trained by the PI to obtain informed consent. The PI will then complete a medical history and a series of questionnaires, to include a review of inclusion and exclusion criteria, to ensure that each participant is eligible to be enrolled in the study. A random number table will be used to randomly assign participants to either the eye movement (EM+) or no eye movement (EM-) group.

Table 1

Weeks Months 0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3 6 Consent X

3MDR Preparatory Sessions

X X X

3MDR CAREN Sessions

X X X X X X

Wrap-up Session

X

Post-Therapy Follow-Up

X X

Intervention All participants will complete 10 treatment sessions (three preparatory sessions, six 3MDR sessions and one concluding session; see Table 1), led by a therapist who has been completed training in the conduct of this form of therapy, with the only difference between the intervention groups being the presence (EM+) or absence (EM-) of the eye movement component. Dr. Eric Vermetten, head of research at the Military Mental Health unit of the Netherlands Ministry of Defense, and one of the developers of the 3MDR system, will conduct the training of all study therapists, will ensure that they are fully prepared to carry out the treatment protocol using the study manual he wrote, and he will provide regular supervision for the study therapists throughout the conduct of the study.

Preparatory Session 1: Research personnel will explain the upcoming 3MDR therapy sessions. Participants will be asked to identify 14 photographs, as well as two songs. The photographs may be digital, hard copy, or downloaded from the internet, and should be related to or reminiscent of the participant's traumatic experience. Each of the two songs are selected for specific purposes and will be played in their entirety during each of the 3MDR sessions. The first song is intended to bring them back to the time in which the trauma occurred; for example, for a service member with combat-related PTSD, this might be a song that they listened to a lot during their deployment. This will be played at the start of the 3MDR session while the participant walks at a comfortable pace through a virtual environment, before any of their pictures are displayed. The second song, on the other hand, is specifically chosen in order to bring them back to the present time, to remind them they are safe and are in the present moment.

Preparatory Session 2: The participant will share their photographs and music selections with the therapist. If the participant has difficulty identifying a sufficient number of appropriate photographs, the therapist will work with the participant during this session to identify why they may not have been able to come up with a sufficient number, and to help them find suitable options. This could include conducting online searches for publicly available pictures, including such options as Google Maps images of the area in which their trauma occurred. Sometimes, difficulty in the selection of pictures is a manifestation of the avoidance of any reminders of the traumatic, which is a cardinal feature of PTSD. The therapist may at this time explore the avoidance, if it is perceived to be a significant factor, and help the participant to work through and overcome it to a sufficient degree to identify suitable pictures to use in the treatment sessions. While the selection of songs does not usually pose as significant a challenge, the therapist will also review the participant's song selections, discuss why they were chosen, and try to ensure that the songs selected are suitable to take the participant back to the trauma, and then bring them back to the present and help them differentiate past from present, respectively. The therapist will then guide the participant to arrange their photographs according to their subjective units of distress (SUDS; Wolp,1969). The SUDS is a verbal self-report rating of subjective distress on a scale from 0-10, with 0 indicating no distress, and 10 representing maximum distress. The SUDS scale will be explained verbally to the participant and is not given via pencil and paper format. This will be used to rank the pictures for use during 3MDR treatment.

Preparatory Session 3: Participants will be introduced to, and familiarized with, the CAREN system (e.g., standing, shifting weight, and walking) located at the National Intrepid Center of Excellence (NICoE). Participants will be fitted by the engineer with a safety harness that will be worn for the entirety of each session that a participant is on the CAREN platform. In this session, a series of introductory applications will be used to familiarize the participant with the CAREN, which will take less than five minutes to perform. A short practice 3MDR session with a non-affecting photograph (e.g., a flower) will be conducted.

3MDR Sessions 1-6: A 3MDR trained therapist, as well as a CAREN engineer, will be present at every 3MDR therapy session.

Since sessions only include level treadmill walking, the platform will be disengaged with the bridge extended, as opposed to being separated from the main floor and set up to enable left-right and forward-backward shifts from the horizontal. This will minimize equipment noise and facilitate the communication between the therapist and participant. For participant monitoring and objective data collection, heart rate and kinematic data will be collected. A chest strap heart rate monitor will be worn by the participant throughout the session (Polar Electro Inc., Woodbury, NY; Zephyr Performance Systems, Annapolis, MD). Reflective motion capture markers will be placed on the participant's head, torso, and legs to measure biomechanics collected via motion capture cameras (Motion Analysis Inc., Santa Rosa, CA) that surround the CAREN.

Participants will then be fitted with an adjustable safety harness that fits comfortably over the shoulders. There is a risk of skin chafing if there is a lot of movement and the harness is not fitted properly. Each participant will be asked if they are comfortable throughout the study to mitigate this risk. The safety harness will be slipped into the safety support on the CAREN, which allows the participant to walk freely on the treadmill, but it does not allow them to walk off the platform. There is also a safety bar in front of the participant. The therapist will stand next to the participant during the session, on the edge of the platform but not on the treadmill. Up to seven pictures will be selected based on the participant's SUDS scores and/or themes agreed upon for each session. Pictures may be repeated during a session, reducing the number of pictures used for some sessions; this will be at the discretion of the treating therapist.

Each session has three phases: warm-up, intervention, and cool-down. The participant's preferred walking speed will be used to start the warm-up phase (2-5 min) and can be adjusted as needed. During this phase, the participant will virtually walk along an outdoor pathway toward a door while their chosen opening song plays to bring them back to a time of their trigger, as verbal guidance from their therapist prepares them for the intervention phase.

The CAREN system will be operated by a Biomedical Engineer, Sarah Kruger, who has been operating CAREN systems since 2007, and is certified by Motekforce Link. Motekforce Link is the manufacturer of the CAREN system. Motekforce Link provides CAREN operators with training and also verifies competencies required for system operation.

During utilization, the system is operated by a certified CAREN Operator and per protocol, at no time will the system be operated with less than two staff members in the room.

System checks are run daily by the CAREN Operator. All equipment is calibrated and maintained. Personnel from Motekforce Link visit annually to verify that everything is working properly and make any changes that are necessary.

In the intervention phase (50-55 min), the participant passes through an initial hallway leading to an open door that in turn leads them down a second hallway to approach their first picture, while being guided by the therapist with regard to what to do at each stage. The picture appears in the distance, but gradually becomes larger as they get closer to it, until it fills their field of vision. As soon as the participant is able to see the picture clearly, the therapist will request that they provide a detailed description of what the picture represents to them, and will then go on to ask the participant about their related memories and feelings. The therapist will verbally repeat key feelings and phrases that seem to carry particular meaning and resonance for the participant, so the CAREN engineer can type these words into the computer to have them appear superimposed over the picture (stage 1).

For those in the EM+ intervention group, the EM component will start after the participant has confirmed there are no more new feelings or words to be identified with the picture, and the therapist has asked the participant to read each of these words aloud, after which the engineer will remove the words from the screen but retain the picture. At this point a red ball will start at the left edge of the screen, and will move across the screen fairly rapidly from left to right, and upon reaching the right edge of the screen, a 2-digit number will appear superimposed on the red ball in white font (stage 2). The ball will then reverse course, passing from right to left, and the number will change as the ball meets the opposite edge of the screen. The ball will continue to move back and forth and the number will change every time the ball meets either edge of the screen. The participant will be asked to track the ball and call out the numbers displayed on the ball. After approximately 60 seconds, the distractor stimulus (ball image) is removed and a SUDS score is reported by the participant and recorded by the CAREN operator (stage 3). The participant will then walk out of the virtual hallway and onto an outdoor pathway that will lead them to another set of hallways, leading in turn to another picture, and the stages are repeated. There will be no exposure to the distractor stimulus (red ball) for those in the EM- intervention group.

After the last picture, the final phase of treatment (cool-down) begins (2-5 min). The session concludes with a piece of music, chosen by the participant to bring them back to the present time, typically a current favorite song of theirs. This music will be used to assist the participant in returning back to the present moment, while the therapist simultaneously provides them with positive feedback regarding their performance during the session, with a goal of achieving a significantly reduced SUDS score, which is reassessed at the end of the song.

Following the session, the CAREN operator will remove the safety harness from the participant. Participants will also be able to stop the session at any time if they feel ill or any motion sickness. A therapist-led discussion (approximately 15 minutes) with the participant will then occur in a private room; open questions will be used to elicit how the session was for the participant, and to discuss the purpose of re-experiencing to the participant in this setting. Notes made by the therapist will be stored, identified by study code and session number only, stored in password-protected files on a CAC-requiring computer. The study therapist will ensure the participant has completely returned to the present moment, has a reduced SUDS, and has ideally been able to attach a positive meaning to the 3MDR session. Participants will be asked to write their experiences and reflections down following each session in a diary format. All sessions will be recorded and a report summarizing the behavioral response to the intervention will be produced.

Concluding Session: Participants will provide their perception of how beneficial the treatment was, and if the current state of their symptoms will be discussed, with a focus on to what degree they have or have not improved compared to prior to their participation in the study.

Participants will return to the laboratory to complete follow-up assessments at 3 and 6 months. If participants are unable to return to the laboratory (i.e., no longer in the area), they will be contacted via phone, and the study questionnaires will be completed telephonically.

Facilities

Sequence: 199965405
Status Recruiting
Name Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
City Bethesda
State Maryland
Zip 20889
Country United States

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28086690 Sequence: 28086691
Facility Id 199965405 Facility Id 199965405
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Michael J Roy, MD, MPH Name Paula Bellini, MA
Email michael.roy@usuhs.edu Email paula.bellini.ctr@usuhs.edu
Phone 301-295-9601 Phone 301-295-5840

Conditions

Sequence: 52139082 Sequence: 52139083
Name Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Name Traumatic Brain Injury
Downcase Name posttraumatic stress disorder Downcase Name traumatic brain injury

Id Information

Sequence: 40135120
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value WRNMMC-2018-0201

Countries

Sequence: 42542780
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55559439 Sequence: 55559440
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title 3MDR With Eye Movement Component (EM+) Title 3MDR Without Eye Movement Component (EM-)
Description All participants will complete 10 treatment sessions (3 preparatory, 6 3MDR and 1 concluding), led by a trained therapist, with the only difference between the intervention groups being the presence (EM+) or absence (EM-) of the eye movement component. For those in the EM+ intervention group, the EM component starts after the participant has thoroughly discussed a picture with the therapist; a red ball starts at one edge of the screen, moves rapidly back and forth across it, and upon reaching either edge, a 2-digit number appears superimposed in white on the ball. The number changes every time the ball meets either edge. The participant is asked to track the ball and call out the displayed numbers. Description All participants will complete 10 treatment sessions (three preparatory sessions, six 3MDR sessions and one concluding session; see Table 1), led by a therapist who has been completed training in the conduct of this form of therapy, with the only difference between the intervention groups being the presence (EM+) or absence (EM-) of the eye movement component.There will be no exposure to the distractor stimulus (red ball) for those in the EM- intervention group.

Interventions

Sequence: 52454994
Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Motion-assisted, Multi-modular Memory Desensitization and Reconsolidation (3MDR) Therapy
Description a novel treatment for PTSD combining aspects of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), within the Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN)

Keywords

Sequence: 79822928 Sequence: 79822929 Sequence: 79822930 Sequence: 79822931
Name posttraumatic stress disorder Name traumatic brain injury Name virtual reality Name eye movement desensitization and reprocessing
Downcase Name posttraumatic stress disorder Downcase Name traumatic brain injury Downcase Name virtual reality Downcase Name eye movement desensitization and reprocessing

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177264120 Sequence: 177264119 Sequence: 177264121 Sequence: 177264122
Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change in Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) score Measure Change in PTSD Checklist for DSM5 (PCL-5) score Measure Change in Patient Health Questionnaire depression module (PHQ-9) score Measure Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score
Time Frame Post-intervention session, and 3 and 6 months later, compared to baseline Time Frame Post-intervention session 10, as well as 3 and 6 months later, compared to baseline Time Frame Post-intervention session 10, as well as pre-intervention session 7, and 3 and 6 months later, compared to baseline Time Frame Post-intervention session 10, as well as pre-intervention session 7, 3 and 6 months later, compared to baseline
Description measure of postconcussive symptom severity; range 0-88, higher score represents greater severity Description The well-validated PCL-5 will assess self-reported PTSD symptom severity; range 0-84, higher score represents greater severity. Description measure of depression symptom severity; range 0-27, higher score represents greater severity Description measure of insomnia and sleep concerns; range 0-28, higher score represents greater severity

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193366846 Sequence: 193366847 Sequence: 193366848 Sequence: 193366849 Sequence: 193366850 Sequence: 193366851 Sequence: 193366852 Sequence: 193366853 Sequence: 193366854 Sequence: 193366855 Sequence: 193366856 Sequence: 193366857
Mesh Term Brain Injuries Mesh Term Brain Injuries, Traumatic Mesh Term Stress Disorders, Traumatic Mesh Term Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic Mesh Term Brain Diseases Mesh Term Central Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Craniocerebral Trauma Mesh Term Trauma, Nervous System Mesh Term Wounds and Injuries Mesh Term Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders Mesh Term Mental Disorders
Downcase Mesh Term brain injuries Downcase Mesh Term brain injuries, traumatic Downcase Mesh Term stress disorders, traumatic Downcase Mesh Term stress disorders, post-traumatic Downcase Mesh Term brain diseases Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term craniocerebral trauma Downcase Mesh Term trauma, nervous system Downcase Mesh Term wounds and injuries Downcase Mesh Term trauma and stressor related disorders Downcase Mesh Term mental disorders
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48290780 Sequence: 48290781
Agency Class FED Agency Class FED
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Name Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68107558 Sequence: 68107559
Design Group Id 55559439 Design Group Id 55559440
Intervention Id 52454994 Intervention Id 52454994

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30747772
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Military service member or veteran
Diagnosis of probable PTSD, as manifest by a PCL-5 score of 34 or greater
History of mild traumatic injury (mTBI) at least 3 months prior, documented by the OSU TBI-ID.

Exclusion Criteria:

History of moderate, severe, or penetrating TBI
History of a psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, or active suicidal or homicidal ideation
Use of benzodiazepines on a regular basis within the past 30 days.
Inability to walk continuously, at a normal pace, for up to 60 minutes
Inability to follow verbal command and/or observe safety precautions
Women who are pregnant, based on self-reported date of last menses
Does not demonstrate capacity for informed consent

Gender Description we seek to enroll 50% male, 50% female participants
Gender Based True
Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254122168
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30494055
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description This is a pilot, controlled clinical trial in which all 20 participants with comorbid PTSD and mTBI receive 10 sessions (3 preparatory, 6 3MDR treatment, and 1 conclusion), but will be randomized to either include eye movement, EM (EM+), or not (EM-).

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28860335
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Michael Roy
Title Professor of Medicine & Director, Division of Military Internal Medicine
Affiliation Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Ipd Information Types

Sequence: 3331372
Name Clinical Study Report (CSR)

]]>

<![CDATA[ Models of Care in the Transition From the Secondary to the Primary Sector Among the Frailest Elderly ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796923
2018-01-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796923
NCT03796923https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796923?tab=tableNANANAIn most Western countries the elderly population increases rapidly. In Denmark, the population of elderly aged 75 years or older may amount to nearly 15 % of the entire population in 2050 compared to 9 % today (2017). A large part of the elderly population is at high risk of hospitalization including more admissions and increased morbidity and mortality. The number of hospital beds is declining persistently, calling for shorter lengths of stay (LOS). Increasingly complex treatments now take place outside hospital. Presently, many Danish regional hospitals establish geriatric wards and other geriatric in-hospital and outpatient services to overcome these challenges. The aim of the present PhD-study is to investigate the effects of different models of transitional care among the frailest elderly patients.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-04-30
Start Month Year January 1, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year September 16, 2020
Verification Month Year April 2021
Verification Date 2021-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2021-04-30

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20727216
Description Design Population: The frailest acutely admitted geriatric patients aged +75. Intervention: Early follow-up visits after discharge. Comparison: Usual care follow-up. Outcomes: The primary outcome is readmission within 30 days after discharge. Secondary outcomes are: mortality 30 days after discharge and 90 days after admission, length of stay (LOS), direct discharge from the Emergency Department, time at home before readmission, duration of readmission and physical functional status 30 days after discharge.

Methods The first study is conducted as a randomized controlled trial (RCT) using two different degrees of intervention. The second study is a cohort study of an unexposed control group. The third study is sub-group analyses of the RCT data according to frailty status and type of dwelling.

A focus group comprised of included patients and relatives will be set to identify additional patient related outcome measures (PROMs) and to participate in an advisory group throughout the remaining project.

Facilities

Sequence: 200159509
Name Aarhus University
City Aarhus
Country Denmark

Conditions

Sequence: 52185586 Sequence: 52185584 Sequence: 52185585 Sequence: 52185587 Sequence: 52185588 Sequence: 52185589
Name Frailty Name Frail Elderly Syndrome Name Transitional Care Name Readmission Name Aging Name Elderly
Downcase Name frailty Downcase Name frail elderly syndrome Downcase Name transitional care Downcase Name readmission Downcase Name aging Downcase Name elderly

Id Information

Sequence: 40169133
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value MOCATRANFRAELRCT

Countries

Sequence: 42580720
Name Denmark
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609217 Sequence: 55609218 Sequence: 55609219
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Experimental Group Type Other
Title Intervention I Title Intervention II Title Control
Description Intervention (I): early follow-up visit from the community nurse within 24 hours after discharge Description Intervention (II): early follow-up by the geriatric team within 24 hours after discharge Description Usual care: individualized follow-up performed by the GP and municipality services

Interventions

Sequence: 52499521 Sequence: 52499519 Sequence: 52499520 Sequence: 52499522
Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other
Name Continued geriatric care Name Early follow-up visit after discharge Name Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) Name Possible follow-up visit from GP
Description Continued specialized geriatric care after discharge Description Early follow-up visit and different degrees of specialized care after discharge Description Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) during admission Description Usual care: follow up visit from GP within one week after discharge

Keywords

Sequence: 79888899 Sequence: 79888900 Sequence: 79888901 Sequence: 79888902 Sequence: 79888903 Sequence: 79888904
Name Elderly Name Hospital at home Name Readmission Name Transitional care Name Frailty Name Patient Related Outcome Measures
Downcase Name elderly Downcase Name hospital at home Downcase Name readmission Downcase Name transitional care Downcase Name frailty Downcase Name patient related outcome measures

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432341 Sequence: 177432342 Sequence: 177432343 Sequence: 177432344 Sequence: 177432345 Sequence: 177432346 Sequence: 177432347
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Readmission Measure Mortality Measure Length of stay (LOS) Measure Physical functional status 30 days after discharge Measure Duration of readmission Measure Time at home before readmission Measure Number of patients discharged directly from the Emergency Department (ED)
Time Frame 30 days Time Frame 90 days after admission and 30 days after primary discharge Time Frame 30 days after primary discharge Time Frame 30 days after discharge Time Frame 30 days after discharge Time Frame 30 days after discharge Time Frame 30 days after discharge
Description Readmission within 30 days after discharge Description Mortality within 90 days after admission and 30 days after discharge Description Length of stay during primary admission and total length of stay including following readmissions Description Functional Recovery Score ADL and Functional Recovery Score I-ADL: sum-score, range 100-0 (100 is the highest physical functional status score possible, 0 is the lowest) Description Duration of readmission Description Time at home before readmission Description Patients discharged directly from the ED

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193540503 Sequence: 193540504
Mesh Term Frailty Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term frailty Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332411
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University of Aarhus

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29293044
Role Study Chair
Name Else Marie S Damsgaard, Prof., DMSci
Affiliation University of Aarhus

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168290 Sequence: 68168291 Sequence: 68168292 Sequence: 68168293 Sequence: 68168294 Sequence: 68168295
Design Group Id 55609217 Design Group Id 55609218 Design Group Id 55609217 Design Group Id 55609218 Design Group Id 55609218 Design Group Id 55609219
Intervention Id 52499519 Intervention Id 52499519 Intervention Id 52499520 Intervention Id 52499520 Intervention Id 52499521 Intervention Id 52499522

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773630
Gender All
Minimum Age 75 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria

Aged 75 years or older
Living within the municipality of Aarhus (except for the control group, see below)
MPI-score = 2 (moderate frailty) or MPI score = 3 (severe frailty)

Exclusion Criteria

Included in any other kind of follow-up schemes
Declared terminally ill or undergoing palliative care at admission
Admitted from one specific temporary nursing home with geriatric medical assistance
Discharge or transfer to another department, including hospice
MPI-score = 1 (low frailty)
Discharged to one specific temporary nursing home with geriatric medical assistance
The patient does not want a visit after discharge

Adult False
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253952971
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 32
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 75
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 4

Designs

Sequence: 30519761
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Supportive Care
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2580807
Document Type Study Protocol
Has Protocol True
Has Icf False
Has Sap False
Document Date 2019-02-08
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/23/NCT03796923/Prot_002.pdf

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886062
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52079073
Pmid 34479071
Reference Type derived
Citation Hansen TK, Pedersen LH, Shahla S, Damsgaard EM, Bruun JM, Gregersen M. Effects of a new early municipality-based versus a geriatric team-based transitional care intervention on readmission and mortality among frail older patients – a randomised controlled trial. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Nov-Dec;97:104511. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104511. Epub 2021 Aug 26.

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of SPR720 in Healthy Volunteers ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796910
2018-12-18

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796910
NCT03796910https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796910?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) following single and multiple ascending dose administration of SPR720 administered orally in healthy volunteers.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-10-28
Start Month Year December 18, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year September 24, 2019
Verification Month Year October 2019
Verification Date 2019-10-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-10-28

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20716319
Description This is a single-center, phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-in-man study. Up to 120 healthy volunteers may be enrolled in this 2-part, multi-cohort study. In both Part 1 and Part 2, sequential cohorts will be exposed to increasing doses of SPR720. Each cohort will enrol 8 subjects, randomized (3:1) to receive SPR720 (6 subjects) or placebo (2 subjects). Each subject will be assigned to only one cohort.

In Part 1 single ascending dose (SAD):

A single oral dose of SPR720 (n=6) or placebo (n=2) will be administered to 8 subjects at an initial dose level of 100 mg. Additional cohorts of 8 subjects will be enrolled to investigate increasing doses of SPR720 ranging from 250 mg to 3000 mg. All subjects will receive SPR720 (or placebo) by oral administration in the fasted state. One Part 1 cohort (the Food Effect Cohort) will receive an additional single dose of SPR720 (or placebo) in the fed state.

Part 2 multiple ascending dose (MAD):

SPR720 (or placebo) will be administered to approximately 3 planned dose cohorts of 8 subjects each. Subjects will receive SPR720 (or placebo) orally once daily for 7 (or 14) consecutive days starting with a planned initial dose of 500 mg. Additional cohorts of 8 subjects will be enrolled to investigate repeated daily doses of SPR720 ranging from 1000 mg to 1500 mg.

For both Part 1 and Part 2, a Safety Monitoring Group (SMG) will review cumulative safety and PK data from each cohort before proceeding to the next cohort/dose level. Doses to be evaluated in each subsequent cohort may be modified by the SMG based on review of safety and PK data from preceding cohorts. Part 2 will run concurrent with Part 1 and will be initiated following SMG review of safety and PK data for the corresponding Part 1 dose level cohort.

Part 1 will be conducted in up to 64 subjects (8 planned dose cohorts of 8 subjects each). Part 2 will be conducted in up to 24 subjects (3 planned dose cohorts of 8 subjects each); additional cohorts of 8 subjects each (up to 16 additional subjects) may be enrolled in either Part if further investigation of SPR720 is required.

Facilities

Sequence: 200053412
Name Simbec Research, Ltd.
City Merthyr Tydfil,
State Mid Glamorgan
Zip CF48 4DR
Country United Kingdom

Conditions

Sequence: 52156557
Name Healthy Volunteers
Downcase Name healthy volunteers

Id Information

Sequence: 40148248
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value SPR720-101

Countries

Sequence: 42557782
Name United Kingdom
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55577952 Sequence: 55577953 Sequence: 55577954 Sequence: 55577955
Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title SPR720 for SAD Title Placebo for SAD Title SPR720 for MAD Title Placebo for MAD
Description 6 out of 8 subjects per cohort will be randomized to receive SPR720 Description 2 out of 8 subjects per cohort will be randomized to receive placebo Description 6 out of 8 subjects per cohort will be randomized to receive SPR720 Description 2 out of 8 subjects per cohort will be randomized to receive placebo

Interventions

Sequence: 52472054 Sequence: 52472055 Sequence: 52472056 Sequence: 52472057
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name SPR720 for SAD Name Placebo for SAD Name SPR720 for MAD Name Placebo for MAD
Description Healthy subjects meeting eligibility criteria will be sequentially randomized to each dose cohort (up to 8 dose ascending cohorts) to receive either SPR720 or placebo. The study drug (SPR720 or placebo) will be administered as a single dose. Description Healthy subjects meeting eligibility criteria will be sequentially randomized to each dose cohort (up to 8 dose ascending cohorts) to receive either SPR720 or placebo. The study drug (SPR720 or placebo) will be administered orally as a single dose. Description Healthy subjects meeting eligibility criteria will be sequentially randomized to each dose cohort (up to 3 cohorts) to receive either SPR720 or placebo. The study drug (SPR720 or placebo) will be administered orally for a total of 7 (or 14) days of dosing. Description Healthy subjects meeting eligibility criteria will be sequentially randomized to each dose cohort (up to 3 cohorts) to receive either SPR720 or placebo. The study drug (SPR720 or placebo) will be administered orally for a total of 7 (or 14) days of dosing

Keywords

Sequence: 79848177 Sequence: 79848178 Sequence: 79848179 Sequence: 79848180
Name safety Name tolerability Name pharmacokinetics Name SPR720
Downcase Name safety Downcase Name tolerability Downcase Name pharmacokinetics Downcase Name spr720

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328214 Sequence: 177328215 Sequence: 177328216 Sequence: 177328217 Sequence: 177328218 Sequence: 177328219 Sequence: 177328220 Sequence: 177328221 Sequence: 177328222 Sequence: 177328223 Sequence: 177328224 Sequence: 177328225 Sequence: 177328226 Sequence: 177328227 Sequence: 177328228 Sequence: 177328229 Sequence: 177328230
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Treatment emergent adverse events assessments after single and multiple dose administration at baseline and repeatedly until study completion [Safety and Tolerability] Measure Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Parameter (plasma): Cmax measurement Measure Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Parameter (plasma): CmaxSS measurement Measure Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Parameter (plasma): CminSS Measure Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Parameter (plasma): Ctrough Measure Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Parameter (plasma): CavSS Measure Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Parameter (plasma): Tmax Measure Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Parameter (plasma): kel Measure Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Parameter (plasma): t1/2 Measure Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Parameter (plasma): AUC0-24 Measure Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Parameter (plasma): AUC0-tau Measure Assessment of Parameter (plasma): AUC0-t Measure Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Parameter (plasma): AUC0-inf Measure Assessment of Parameter (plasma): AUC%extrapolated Measure Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Parameter (plasma): Degree of fluctuation Measure Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Parameter (plasma): Swing Measure Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Parameter (urine): SPR719
Time Frame Day 1 through last follow-up visit (5-7 days after last dose) Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 48 hours post last dose Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 48 hours post last dose Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 48 hours post last dose Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 48 hours post last dose Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 48 hours post last dose Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 48 hours post last dose Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 48 hours post last dose Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 48 hours post last dose Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 48 hours post last dose Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 48 hours post last dose Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 48 hours post last dose Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 48 hours post last dose Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 48 hours post last dose Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 48 hours post last dose Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 48 hours post last dose Time Frame From Day 1 pre-dose to 24 hours post last dose
Description Incidence and severity of AEs Description Maximum concentration of study drug in plasma Description Maximum concentration of study drug in plasma at steady state Description Lowest concentration of study drug in a dosing interval in plasma Description Concentration of study drug at the end of the dosing interval in plasma Description Average concentration of study drug in plasma during a dosing interval Description The time to maximum observed concentration of study drug in plasma Description Elimination rate constant of study drug in plasma Description Terminal elimination half-life of study drug in plasma Description Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of study drug in plasma from 0 to 24 hours post dose (dose escalation) Description Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to tau, where tau is the dosing interval (multiple dose only) of study drug in plasma Description Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of study drug in plasma from the time of dosing to the time of the last measurable concentration Description AUC extrapolated to infinity of study drug in plasma Description Residual area of study drug in plasma Description (Cmax-Cmin)/Cavss of study drug in plasma Description (Cmaxss-Cminss)/Cminss of study drug in plasma Description amount of SPR719 excreted in urine

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306138 Sequence: 48306139
Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Spero Therapeutics Name Simbec Research

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29277958
Role Principal Investigator
Name Annelize Koch, MBChB
Affiliation Simbec Research

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130916 Sequence: 68130917 Sequence: 68130918 Sequence: 68130919
Design Group Id 55577952 Design Group Id 55577953 Design Group Id 55577954 Design Group Id 55577955
Intervention Id 52472054 Intervention Id 52472055 Intervention Id 52472056 Intervention Id 52472057

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757389
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria KEY INCLUSION CRITERIA:

Healthy adult male or female of non-childbearing potential,18 to 55 or ≥ 65 years of age (inclusive) at the time of screening;
Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18.5 and ≤ 32 (kg/m2) and weight between 55.0 and 100.0 kg (inclusive). BMI = body weight (kg) / [height (m)]2 (subjects 18 to 55 years of age); Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18 and ≤ 32 (kg/m2) and weight between 50.0 and 100.0 kg (inclusive). BMI = body weight (kg) / [height (m)]2 (subjects 65 years of age and older);

Medically healthy without clinically significant (CS) abnormalities as assessed by the Principal Investigator (or deputy) based on the following at screening assessments:

a. Detailed medical history, complete physical examination, vital signs, 12-lead ECG, hematology, blood chemistry and urinalysis laboratory variables;

Willing and able to provide written informed consent;
Willing and able to comply with all study assessments and adhere to the protocol schedule;
If female, must be non-lactating and be of non-childbearing potential;
If male, must agree to not donate sperm for 90 days after the last dose of study drug and, if engaging in vaginal sexual intercourse with a female partner of childbearing potential, agree to use a condom with spermicide in addition to requesting the female partner use a highly effective method of birth control (e.g. intrauterine device, diaphragm with spermicide, hormonal contraceptives) throughout the duration of the study and for 90 days after the last dose of study drug. This criterion also applies to males who have had a vasectomy.

KEY EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

History or presence of any clinically significant disease state in any body system, as assessed by the Principal Investigator (or deputy), that may affect the outcome of the study or compromise the safety of the subject;
Subjects who do not have suitable veins for multiple venipunctures/cannulation as assessed by the Principal Investigator (or deputy) at screening;
Subjects who are unable to demonstrate the ability to swallow a "dummy" capsule (i.e., an empty gelatin capsule) of the size proposed for administration in a particular cohort/dose level;
History of any clinically significant acute illness or surgery within the previous three months;
History of chronic gastritis, gastrointestinal tract disorders, including Clostridium difficile infection; chronic liver or biliary disease;
History of seizure disorder, except for febrile seizures in childhood;
Documented history of significant hypersensitivity reaction or anaphylaxis to any medication;
History of significant allergic disease requiring treatment; allergic rhinitis (hay fever) is allowed unless it has required medication for treatment or prophylaxis within the 14 days prior to randomization;
Clinically significant screening ECG findings as assessed by the investigator;
Subject or family history of cardiac arrhythmia, prolonged QT syndrome, Torsades de pointes, unexplained sudden cardiac arrest or syncope, sick sinus syndrome or other clinically relevant cardiac disease;
Clinically significant abnormalities in vital signs at screening and/or prior to randomization;
Clinically significant screening laboratory abnormalities;
History or suspicion of routine or chronic drug or alcohol abuse or dependence within 1 year prior to randomization, and/or positive urine drug testing at screening or check-in (Day -1);
Reported consumption of alcoholic beverages > 21 units per week on average (1 unit = 12 oz or 360 mL of beer; 5 oz or 150 mL of wine; 1.5 oz or 45 mL of distilled spirits); positive alcohol urine test at check in (Day -1);
Use of tobacco, nicotine, or nicotine replacement products within 30 days prior to randomization or planned use during the study; positive carbon monoxide breath test at check in (Day -1);
Use of any prescription or non-prescription medication, including herbal products, vitamins and vaccines within 7 days (or 5 half-lives whichever is longer) prior to randomization or planned use during the study period;
Consumption of grapefruit or grapefruit-containing products in the 7 days prior to randomization;
Donation of more than 500 mL of blood or plasma within 30 days prior to randomization, or loss of whole blood of more than 500 mL within 30 days prior to randomization, or receipt of a blood transfusion within 1 year of study enrolment.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254228374
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 9
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 16

Designs

Sequence: 30503614
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Sequential Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Masking Description Subjects will be randomized in a 3:1 ratio to receive SPR720 or placebo. The randomization code will produced by Simbec using the PROC PLAN procedure of SAS® version 9.3 or higher. The randomization code will include 2 dose-leaders (1 active:1 placebo) in each cohort who will be randomized prior to the remainder of the cohort. The allocation to SPR720 or placebo will be performed using a block randomization algorithm.
Intervention Model Description Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single and multiple ascending dose (SAD and MAD) trial
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26665936 Sequence: 26665937 Sequence: 26665938 Sequence: 26665939
Intervention Id 52472054 Intervention Id 52472055 Intervention Id 52472056 Intervention Id 52472057
Name SPR720 Oral Capsule Name Placebo oral Capsule Name SPR720 Oral Capsule Name Placebo Oral Capsule

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869892
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52049431
Pmid 34491803
Reference Type derived
Citation Talley AK, Thurston A, Moore G, Gupta VK, Satterfield M, Manyak E, Stokes S, Dane A, Melnick D. First-in-Human Evaluation of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of SPR720, a Novel Oral Bacterial DNA Gyrase (GyrB) Inhibitor for Mycobacterial Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 Oct 18;65(11):e0120821. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01208-21. Epub 2021 Sep 7.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Supplementation of a Leucine-enriched Protein Blend ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796897
2019-06-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796897
NCT03796897https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796897?tab=tableDaniel A Traylor, PhDtraylord@mcmaster.caNAIt is well known that dietary protein transiently stimulates muscle protein synthesis (MPS) whereby changes in MPS in response to feeding may be regulated by specific downstream target proteins of mammalian target of rapamycin signaling, such as S6K1, rpS6, and eIF2B. A meal deficient in protein, however, does not increase the rate of MPS because a rise in the bioavailability of amino acids does not occur. In addition, the source of dietary proteins has been shown to impact postprandial blood levels of amino acids. The concept that certain types of proteins are “fast acting” or “slow acting” has been shown to affect the postprandial profile of amino acids appearing in the systemic circulation. Native whey and micellar casein are both dairy proteins that contain a similar amount of essential (EAA), but blood EAA levels increase faster and to a higher level after the consumption of whey protein. Differences in gastric emptying, digestion and absorption kinetics between micellar casein and native whey are the underlying factors. Nonetheless, micellar casein protein has been shown to protract MPS in humans. Despite the significant amount of information gained with respect to both of these protein sources, the effects of combinatorial formulations on the postprandial profile of amino acids appearing in the blood is less well known.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-02-07
Start Month Year June 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 2020
Verification Month Year February 2020
Verification Date 2020-02-29
Last Update Posted Date 2020-02-07

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735701
Description In a cross-over, randomized controlled trial, 10 healthy young participants (5 men and 5 women) will be recruited to undergo exercise resistance training randomized to habitual diet or habitual diet and supplementation (2 x per training session). For two of the training sessions the investigators will utilize a uni-lateral resistance exercise model to identify the acute effects of exercise and exercise + supplementation on the integrated rate of myofibrillar MPS within subject. This model enhances statistical power and eliminates between-subject differences impacting our outcomes. Throughout the study participants will record their macronutrient dietary intake. In addition, baseline body composition will be assessed with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Visit 1 (Day -7): Familiarization, strength testing and baseline body composition One week before the exercise trial, the investigators will ask participants to visit McMaster University to undergo a familiarization session with the exercise equipment and to perform 3-5 repetition maximum strength testing. This will allow the investigators to calculate the resistance (weight) participants will lift in their upcoming training sessions. The investigators will also perform a body composition scan using a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), assess participants' height and weight, and administer daily food logs with instructions to assess their habitual diet.

Visit 2 (Day 0): D2O administration and resting blood and saliva sampling One week after the familiarization visit, the investigators will ask participants to come to McMaster University in a fasted state and receive a dose of doubly labelled water D2O equal to 0.8mLs/kgBW and every hour for 3 hours after providing a blood and saliva sample. D2O is a safe, and widely used stable isotope, used to effectively measure the rate at which participants' muscle grow.

Visits 3 and 7 (Days 1 and 7): Resistance training program and muscle biopsy On these days participants will come to the lab in the morning following their habitual diet routine and will have a resting biopsy, blood and saliva samples taken. Next, participants may be asked to consume the supplement but will be asked to drink a small amount of D2O. Finally, participants will perform a combination resistance style exercise training session and immediately following training may be asked to consume the supplement.

Visit 4, 5, 8 & 9 (Days 2, 3, 8, 9): Resistance training program On these days participants will come to the lab in the morning following their habitual diet routine and have a saliva sample taken. Next, participants may be asked to consume the supplement but will be asked to drink a small amount of D2O. Finally, participants will perform a combination resistance style exercise training session and immediately following training participants may be asked to consume the supplement.

Visits 6 and 10 (Days 4 and 10): Uni-lateral acute training session and muscle biopsy On these days participants will come to the lab in the morning following their habitual diet routine. First, participants may be asked to consume the supplement immediately before performing a uni-lateral acute resistance training session. Participants will be asked to drink a small amount of D2O but only during Visit 6 (Day 4). Immediately following training, participants may be asked to consume the supplement. One hour following exercise participants will have a muscle biopsy, blood and saliva samples taken.

Days 5 and 6 (see attached study timeline): Washout period The investigators will ask that participants drink one aliquot of D2O on day 5 and one aliquot of D2O on day 6. One hour after participants drink the aliquot of D2O the investigators ask that participants take their own saliva sample at home (D2O aliquots and a sampling kit will be provided with instructions).

Facilities

Sequence: 200243910
Status Recruiting
Name Exercise Metabolism Research Laboratory, McMaster Univeristy
City Hamilton
State Ontario
Zip L8S 4K1
Country Canada

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28127889
Facility Id 200243910
Contact Type primary
Name Stuart M Phillips, Ph.D.
Email phillis@mcmaster.ca
Phone 905-525-9140
Phone Extension 24465

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18343517
Facility Id 200243910
Role Principal Investigator
Name Stuart M Phillips, Ph.D.

Conditions

Sequence: 52207881 Sequence: 52207882
Name Dietary Modification Name Diet Habit
Downcase Name dietary modification Downcase Name diet habit

Id Information

Sequence: 40186024
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 5706

Countries

Sequence: 42599529
Name Canada
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55634478 Sequence: 55634479
Group Type Experimental Group Type Sham Comparator
Title Leucine-enriched protein + exercise Title Habitual diet + exercise
Description whey protein- hydrolyzed whey protein-micellar casein blend (50:43:7 whey:hydrolyzed-whey:casein), vitamin D, and free leucine Description habitual diet only

Interventions

Sequence: 52521894 Sequence: 52521895
Intervention Type Dietary Supplement Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Leucine-enriched protein Name Habitual diet only
Description Supplement contains 16g of protein given twice per exercise session (4 total exercise sessions) Description Habitual diet only (no supplementation) for 4 exercise sessions

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177510565
Outcome Type primary
Measure Integrated Muscle Protein Synthetic Rate
Time Frame 10 days
Description oral deuterium consumption: Isotope protocol (See ref., PMID 23821570)

Sponsors

Sequence: 48353529
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name McMaster University

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12017152 Sequence: 12017153
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Stuart M Phillips, PhD Name Daniel A Traylor, PhD
Phone 905-525-9140
Email phillis@mcmaster.ca Email traylord@mcmaster.ca
Phone Extension 24465
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68198963 Sequence: 68198964
Design Group Id 55634478 Design Group Id 55634479
Intervention Id 52521894 Intervention Id 52521895

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30786766
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 29 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Be between the ages of 18-29 years (inclusive)
Be able to maintain a habitual diet, physical activity patterns, and body mass throughout the trial
Be in general good health
Be able to participate in resistance training and aerobic training
Understand the study procedures and sign this form providing informed consent to participate in the study
Be able to consume a protein bar in the allotted time frame of 10 minutes

Exclusion Criteria:

Smoker
Excessive alcohol consumption (more than 21 units of alcohol / week; 1 unit of alcohol is approximately 25 mL of spirits (40% alcohol), 250 mL of beer (4% alcohol) or 75 mL of wine (13% alcohol))
Have health problems such as: renal or gastrointestinal disorders, metabolic disease, heart disease, vascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, poor lung function, uncontrolled blood pressure, dizziness, thyroid problems, or any other health conditions for which you are being treated that might put you at risk for this study
Have a known or suspected allergy to local anesthetics such as lidocaine
Have a dairy protein allergy
Participation in another nutrition or exercise research study
Do not understand English or have a condition the PI believes would interfere with a participants' ability to provide informed consent, comply with the study protocol, or which might confound the interpretation of the study results or put someone at undue risk
Use of medications known to affect protein metabolism (i.e. corticosteroids, or prescription strength acne medications)
Consuming a vegan diet
Use of an investigational drug product or nutraceutical within the last 30 days
Any concurrent medical, orthopedic, or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the Investigators, would compromise the ability to comply with the study requirements

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989424
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 29
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30532837
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Crossover Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Basic Science
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899130
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Stuart Phillips
Title Professor
Affiliation McMaster University

Study References

Sequence: 52102848 Sequence: 52102849 Sequence: 52102850 Sequence: 52102851 Sequence: 52102852 Sequence: 52102853 Sequence: 52102854 Sequence: 52102855 Sequence: 52102856
Pmid 19474134 Pmid 19625697 Pmid 19056590 Pmid 16507602 Pmid 25790724 Pmid 15570142 Pmid 9405716 Pmid 23821570 Pmid 36126327
Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type derived
Citation Koopman R, Crombach N, Gijsen AP, Walrand S, Fauquant J, Kies AK, Lemosquet S, Saris WH, Boirie Y, van Loon LJ. Ingestion of a protein hydrolysate is accompanied by an accelerated in vivo digestion and absorption rate when compared with its intact protein. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Jul;90(1):106-15. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27474. Epub 2009 May 27. Citation Koopman R, Walrand S, Beelen M, Gijsen AP, Kies AK, Boirie Y, Saris WH, van Loon LJ. Dietary protein digestion and absorption rates and the subsequent postprandial muscle protein synthetic response do not differ between young and elderly men. J Nutr. 2009 Sep;139(9):1707-13. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.109173. Epub 2009 Jul 22. Citation Moore DR, Robinson MJ, Fry JL, Tang JE, Glover EI, Wilkinson SB, Prior T, Tarnopolsky MA, Phillips SM. Ingested protein dose response of muscle and albumin protein synthesis after resistance exercise in young men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Jan;89(1):161-8. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26401. Epub 2008 Dec 3. Citation Katsanos CS, Kobayashi H, Sheffield-Moore M, Aarsland A, Wolfe RR. A high proportion of leucine is required for optimal stimulation of the rate of muscle protein synthesis by essential amino acids in the elderly. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Aug;291(2):E381-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00488.2005. Epub 2006 Feb 28. Citation Luiking YC, Abrahamse E, Ludwig T, Boirie Y, Verlaan S. Protein type and caloric density of protein supplements modulate postprandial amino acid profile through changes in gastrointestinal behaviour: A randomized trial. Clin Nutr. 2016 Feb;35(1):48-58. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Mar 5. Citation Tipton KD, Elliott TA, Cree MG, Wolf SE, Sanford AP, Wolfe RR. Ingestion of casein and whey proteins result in muscle anabolism after resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Dec;36(12):2073-81. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000147582.99810.c5. Citation Boirie Y, Dangin M, Gachon P, Vasson MP, Maubois JL, Beaufrere B. Slow and fast dietary proteins differently modulate postprandial protein accretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 23;94(26):14930-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14930. Citation MacDonald AJ, Small AC, Greig CA, Husi H, Ross JA, Stephens NA, Fearon KC, Preston T. A novel oral tracer procedure for measurement of habitual myofibrillar protein synthesis. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2013 Aug 15;27(15):1769-77. doi: 10.1002/rcm.6622. Citation Lim C, Traylor DA, McGlory C, Joanisse S, McKendry J, Grewal T, Mcleod JC, Prior T, Nunes EA, Lees M, Phillips SM. Increased protein intake derived from leucine-enriched protein enhances the integrated myofibrillar protein synthetic response to short-term resistance training in untrained men and women: a 4-day randomized controlled trial. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2022 Nov 1;47(11):1104-1114. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2022-0164. Epub 2022 Sep 20.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Linaclotide in Treating Patients With Stages 0-3 Colorectal Cancer ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796884
2019-10-30

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796884
NCT03796884https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796884?tab=tableNANANAThis phase II trial studies the how well linaclotide works in treating patients with stages 0-3 colorectal cancer. Linaclotide is a very small protein that binds to receptors on intestinal cells and makes them secrete water and salt.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-03-22
Start Month Year October 30, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year October 2023
Verification Month Year March 2023
Verification Date 2023-03-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-03-22

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20657687
Description PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine whether, compared to placebo, linaclotide administered as a single oral daily dose x 7 days, induces a pharmacodynamics (PD) effect on cGMP levels, based on biopsy samples of adenomas or resected colorectal adenocarcinomas.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare Ki-67, guanylin levels and GUCY2C expression in adenomas and cancers versus normal tissue after exposure to linaclotide or placebo.

II. To confirm the safety and tolerability of linaclotide in sporadic adenoma and cancer patients.

TRANSLATIONAL OBJECTIVE:

I. To assess the pharmacodynamic effect of linaclotide on pathway-specific biomarkers relevant to GUCY2C signaling (i.e. VASP phosphorylation), markers of mutant APC-beta-catenin signaling (beta-catenin levels, beta-catenin nuclear localization, axin levels, c-Myc levels, guanylin levels, PCNA expression), based on adenoma/cancer and normal mucosa biopsy samples obtained by endoscopy following linaclotide or placebo exposure.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients receive linaclotide orally (PO) daily on days 1-7 and undergo standard of care colonoscopy or surgery on day 7.

ARM II. Patients receive placebo PO QD on days 1-7 and undergo standard of care colonoscopy or surgery on day 7.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at day 14.

Facilities

Sequence: 199396417 Sequence: 199396418 Sequence: 199396419
Name Fox Chase Cancer Center Name Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University Name VA Puget Sound Health Care Sysem
City Philadelphia City Philadelphia City Seattle
State Pennsylvania State Pennsylvania State Washington
Zip 19111 Zip 19126 Zip 98108
Country United States Country United States Country United States

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 95728819 Sequence: 95728820 Sequence: 95728821 Sequence: 95728822 Sequence: 95728823
Mesh Term Linaclotide Mesh Term Guanylyl Cyclase C Agonists Mesh Term Enzyme Activators Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Gastrointestinal Agents
Downcase Mesh Term linaclotide Downcase Mesh Term guanylyl cyclase c agonists Downcase Mesh Term enzyme activators Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term gastrointestinal agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52004720 Sequence: 52004721 Sequence: 52004722 Sequence: 52004723 Sequence: 52004724 Sequence: 52004725 Sequence: 52004726 Sequence: 52004727 Sequence: 52004728 Sequence: 52004729 Sequence: 52004730
Name Colorectal Adenoma Name Stage 0 Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 Name Stage I Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 Name Stage II Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 Name Stage IIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 Name Stage IIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 Name Stage IIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 Name Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 Name Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 Name Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 Name Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8
Downcase Name colorectal adenoma Downcase Name stage 0 colorectal cancer ajcc v8 Downcase Name stage i colorectal cancer ajcc v8 Downcase Name stage ii colorectal cancer ajcc v8 Downcase Name stage iia colorectal cancer ajcc v8 Downcase Name stage iib colorectal cancer ajcc v8 Downcase Name stage iic colorectal cancer ajcc v8 Downcase Name stage iii colorectal cancer ajcc v8 Downcase Name stage iiia colorectal cancer ajcc v8 Downcase Name stage iiib colorectal cancer ajcc v8 Downcase Name stage iiic colorectal cancer ajcc v8

Id Information

Sequence: 40028736
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 18F.524

Countries

Sequence: 42424204
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55409935 Sequence: 55409936
Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title Arm I (linaclotide) Title Arm II (placebo)
Description Patients receive linaclotide PO daily on days 1-7 and undergo standard of care colonoscopy or surgery on day 7. Description Patients receive placebo PO QD on days 1-7 and undergo standard of care colonoscopy or surgery on day 7.

Interventions

Sequence: 52317359 Sequence: 52317360
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Other
Name Linaclotide Name Placebo
Description Given PO Description Given PO

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176796960 Sequence: 176796961 Sequence: 176796962 Sequence: 176796963 Sequence: 176796964 Sequence: 176796965 Sequence: 176796966 Sequence: 176796967 Sequence: 176796968 Sequence: 176796969
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Pharmacodynamics effect on cGMP levels Measure Incidence of adverse events (AEs) Measure Ki-67 expression Measure GUCY2C expression Measure Guanylin levels Measure VASP serine 239 phosphorylation Measure Beta-catenin levels Measure Beta-catenin nuclear localization Measure Axin and c-Myc messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) levels Measure PCNA expression
Time Frame Up to 2 years Time Frame From the time of first dose of linaclotide or placebo until resolution, if related to linaclotide, or through 30 days after occurrence Time Frame Up to 2 years Time Frame Up to 2 years Time Frame Up to 2 years Time Frame Up to 2 years Time Frame Up to 2 years Time Frame Up to 2 years Time Frame Up to 2 years Time Frame Up to 2 years
Description Will compare cGMP levels in adenomas between study arms using a two-sample t-test (alpha=.05; two-sided) or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Description All participants will be evaluated for toxicity. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 will be used to summarize adverse events associated with linaclotide. Description Wilcoxon rank sum test will be used to compare Ki-67 expression in adenomas across arms. Description Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests will be used to compare GUCY2C expression between study arms. Description Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests will be used to compare guanylin levels between study arms. Description Assessed by immunoblot analysis. Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests will be used to compare VASP phosphorylation between study arms. Description Assessed by immunoblot analysis. Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests will be used to compare beta-catenin accumulation and downstream signaling between study arms. Description Assessed by immunofluorescence. Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests will be used to compare beta-catenin accumulation and downstream signaling between study arms Description Assessed by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests will be used to compare axin and c-Myc mRNA levels between study arms. Description Assessed by immunofluorescence.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192828166 Sequence: 192828167 Sequence: 192828168 Sequence: 192828169 Sequence: 192828170 Sequence: 192828171 Sequence: 192828172 Sequence: 192828173 Sequence: 192828174 Sequence: 192828175 Sequence: 192828176 Sequence: 192828177 Sequence: 192828178 Sequence: 192828179
Mesh Term Colorectal Neoplasms Mesh Term Adenoma Mesh Term Intestinal Neoplasms Mesh Term Gastrointestinal Neoplasms Mesh Term Digestive System Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases Mesh Term Gastrointestinal Diseases Mesh Term Colonic Diseases Mesh Term Intestinal Diseases Mesh Term Rectal Diseases Mesh Term Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type
Downcase Mesh Term colorectal neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term adenoma Downcase Mesh Term intestinal neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term gastrointestinal neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term digestive system neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases Downcase Mesh Term gastrointestinal diseases Downcase Mesh Term colonic diseases Downcase Mesh Term intestinal diseases Downcase Mesh Term rectal diseases Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, glandular and epithelial Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48163873 Sequence: 48163874
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class FED
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University Name United States Department of Defense

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29189972
Role Principal Investigator
Name Scott Waldman, MD
Affiliation Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67926456 Sequence: 67926457
Design Group Id 55409935 Design Group Id 55409936
Intervention Id 52317359 Intervention Id 52317360

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30667829
Gender Female
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 80 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

History of 1 or more sporadic colorectal adenoma on previous endoscopy (adenoma cohort) or stage 0-3 biopsy proven colorectal cancer (CRC) (colorectal cancer cohort) who are scheduled for a surgical procedure
Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document and follow study procedures
Ability to swallow capsules without difficulty
Ability to maintain pill diaries
Willingness to employ adequate contraception for men and women of childbearing potential for the duration of the study. Acceptable methods include double barrier methods, intrauterine device (IUD), postmenopausal status, and/or documentation of surgical sterilization
Participants must have no chronic, clinically severe health issues which, in the opinion of their physician or the research team, could preclude trial activities including the one week drug exposure phase

Exclusion Criteria:

History of gastroparesis
History of celiac disease
Inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis)
Microscopic colitis, including collagenous colitis
Has taken linaclotide within 30 days prior to consent
Any malignancy except colorectal cancer or any active radiotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy within the last 6 months of baseline. Participants with a history of basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer may be enrolled at the discretion of the investigator
Participants may not be receiving any other investigational agents, or be active participants in any clinical trials. If participants previously participated in a clinical trial, a 30 day washout period for the investigational drug is needed before the participant can be considered for this study
History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to linaclotide
Uncontrolled current illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements
Pregnant or lactating women
History of bleeding/coagulation problems. Concurrent use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) including aspirin is acceptable
Any medical condition judged by the investigator to constitute a risk to safe participation
At risk for obstructing or near-obstructing mechanical gastrointestinal obstruction
Chronic use of anti-coagulants or non-NSAID anti-platelet agents will serve as an exclusion only when such medications cannot be safely discontinued before study related endoscopy or surgery

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254292507
Number Of Facilities 3
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 80
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 4
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 5

Designs

Sequence: 30414615
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Subject Masked True
Investigator Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26583450 Sequence: 26583451 Sequence: 26583452 Sequence: 26583453 Sequence: 26583454 Sequence: 26583455 Sequence: 26583456
Intervention Id 52317359 Intervention Id 52317359 Intervention Id 52317359 Intervention Id 52317359 Intervention Id 52317359 Intervention Id 52317359 Intervention Id 52317359
Name 851199-59-2 Name Linzess Name [9-L-tyrosine]heat-stable enterotoxin (Escherichia coli)-(6-19)-peptide Name L-Tyrosine Name L-cysteinyl-L-cysteinyl-L-alpha-glutamyl-L-tyrosyl-L-cysteinyl-L-cysteinyl-L- asparaginyl-L-prolyl-L-alanyl-L-cysteinyl-L-threonylglycyl-L-cysteiny Name cyclic (1->6), (2->10), (5->13)-tris(disulfide) Name MD-1100

Links

Sequence: 4373240 Sequence: 4373241
Url http://www.kimmelcancercenter.org/cancer-center.html Url http://hospitals.jefferson.edu/
Description Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University Description Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28781136
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Medical Device Based on Polarized Light for Cutaneous Lesions Visualization ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796871
2019-06-19

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796871
NCT03796871https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796871?tab=tableNicolas MEYER, MDnicolas.meyer@chru-strasbourg.fr3 88 11 63 32Skin cancers represent a real public health issue. The diagnosis of pre-cancerous lesions thus is a priority. The diagnosis gold standard is based on the combination of clinical and histopathological examinations. Nevertheless, the clinical examination is not sufficiently effective, meaning that a biopsy has to be done for each suspected lesion. In order to avoid unnecessary biopsy excisions, a new medical device (DERMAPOL) was designed to help dermatologists in diagnosing skin lesions.

This medical device combined with its software is a strong and ergonomic spectro-polarimetric imager instrument. It can realize images of the superficial cutaneous tissues and subcutaneous tissues close to the surface by exploiting polarized light properties.

This first clinical trial aims to demonstrate that this medical device is able to segment effectively healthy and tumor tissues and that it can correlate main semiological elements (identified thanks to the clinical and histopathological examinations) to the physico-optical characteristics obtained on the images of the medical device.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-06
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-08-19
Start Month Year June 19, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 14, 2024
Verification Month Year August 2022
Verification Date 2022-08-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-08-19

Facilities

Sequence: 201197505
Status Recruiting
Name Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg
City Strasbourg
Zip 67091
Country France

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28267436
Facility Id 201197505
Contact Type primary
Name Bernard Cribier, MD
Email bernard.cribier@chru-strasbourg.fr
Phone 88 11 61 80
Phone Extension +33

Conditions

Sequence: 52477667
Name Skin Lesion
Downcase Name skin lesion

Id Information

Sequence: 40378147
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 6798

Countries

Sequence: 42813907
Name France
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55933592
Group Type Experimental
Title Dermapol
Description Use of the experimental medical device

Interventions

Sequence: 52787602
Intervention Type Device
Name Dermapol
Description Use of the experimental medical device before lesion excision : skin lesion lighting (4 wavelengths) for less than 1 minute and image recording

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178528007 Sequence: 178528008 Sequence: 178528009 Sequence: 178528010 Sequence: 178528011 Sequence: 178528012
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Proportion of lesions with semiological characteristics Measure Physico-optical description of the lesions Measure Number of different semiological characteristics Measure Proportion of semiological characteristics properly identified Measure Specificity, sensitivity and predictive values Measure Cases proportion for which the same semiological characteristics list was found between the medical device and the combination of clinical and histopathological diagnosis
Time Frame Before biopsy Time Frame Before biopsy Time Frame Before biopsy Time Frame Before biopsy Time Frame Before biopsy Time Frame Before biopsy
Description Proportion of lesions for which at least one semiological characteristic (detected by the combination of visual and histopathological examinations) was identified by the medical device thanks to physico-optical properties Description Physico-optical description of the cutaneous lesions by the medical device Description Number of different semiological characteristics visualized by the medical device and by the combination of clinical and histopathological examinations for each image processing Description Proportion of semiological characteristics properly identified by the medical device for all lesions Description Specificity, sensitivity, true positive rate, true negative rate, false positive rate, false negative rate of the medical device, for each semiological characteristic identified by the combination of the clinical and histopathological examinations Description Proportion of cases with same semiological characteristics list

Sponsors

Sequence: 48604136
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29446117
Role Principal Investigator
Name Bernard CRIBIER, MD
Affiliation Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12087287
Contact Type primary
Name Nicolas MEYER, MD
Phone 3 88 11 63 32
Email nicolas.meyer@chru-strasbourg.fr
Phone Extension +33
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68569126
Design Group Id 55933592
Intervention Id 52787602

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30941221
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

adult patient with a skin tumor (benign or cancerous) which has to be excised and analysed according to histopathological examination

skin lesion belonging to one of these groups (diagnosed by clinical examination):

cutaneous cyst
seborrhoeic keratosis
cutaneous carcinoma
naevus
melanoma
actinic keratosis and cutaneous horn
other skin tumors
skin lesion size equal to or less than 5 cm
signed written consent form
patient affiliated to a social insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

skin lesion size strictly over than 5 cm
eyelid lesion
aluminium, POM (polyoxymethylene) or organic glass allergy
known pregnancy, breast-feeding

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254279392
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 5

Designs

Sequence: 30686831
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Diagnostic
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29053568
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Study of Guselkumab in Participants With Active Psoriatic Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (Anti-TNF Alpha) Therapy ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796858
2019-03-22

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796858
NCT03796858https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796858?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this study is to evaluate guselkumab efficacy versus placebo in participants with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and an inadequate response to Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-alpha) therapy by assessing the reduction in signs and symptoms of joint disease.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-12-10
Start Month Year March 22, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year November 11, 2020
Verification Month Year November 2021
Verification Date 2021-11-30
Last Update Posted Date 2021-12-10

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20734667
Description Psoriatic arthritis is a multi-faceted disease that impacts the joints, soft tissues, and skin, all of which not only results in functional disability and impaired quality of life, but participants with this disease also have increased mortality. Guselkumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to human interleukin 23 (IL-23) and inhibits IL-23 specific intracellular signaling and subsequent activation and cytokine production. Investigation of guselkumab in this Phase 3b PsA clinical study is supported by the favorable efficacy and safety results from Phase 2 study of guselkumab in PsA and Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies in psoriasis including the subset of participants with PsA. The primary hypothesis is that guselkumab 100 milligram (mg) at Weeks 0, 4, and every 8 weeks (q8w) thereafter is superior to placebo which will be assessed by the proportion of participants achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR 20) response at Week 24. The study includes 2 periods: A 24-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period for the primary analysis of the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, compared with placebo and a 32-week active-treatment and safety follow-up period for additional analysis of the efficacy and safety of guselkumab. Safety will be monitored throughout the study (Up to Week 56).

Facilities

Sequence: 200237472 Sequence: 200237473 Sequence: 200237474 Sequence: 200237475 Sequence: 200237476 Sequence: 200237477 Sequence: 200237478 Sequence: 200237479 Sequence: 200237480 Sequence: 200237481 Sequence: 200237482 Sequence: 200237483 Sequence: 200237484 Sequence: 200237485 Sequence: 200237486 Sequence: 200237487 Sequence: 200237488 Sequence: 200237489 Sequence: 200237490 Sequence: 200237491 Sequence: 200237492 Sequence: 200237493 Sequence: 200237494 Sequence: 200237495 Sequence: 200237496 Sequence: 200237497 Sequence: 200237498 Sequence: 200237499 Sequence: 200237500 Sequence: 200237501 Sequence: 200237502 Sequence: 200237503 Sequence: 200237504 Sequence: 200237505 Sequence: 200237506 Sequence: 200237507 Sequence: 200237508 Sequence: 200237509 Sequence: 200237510 Sequence: 200237511 Sequence: 200237512 Sequence: 200237513 Sequence: 200237514 Sequence: 200237515 Sequence: 200237516 Sequence: 200237517 Sequence: 200237518 Sequence: 200237519 Sequence: 200237520 Sequence: 200237521 Sequence: 200237522 Sequence: 200237523 Sequence: 200237524 Sequence: 200237525 Sequence: 200237526 Sequence: 200237527 Sequence: 200237528 Sequence: 200237529 Sequence: 200237530 Sequence: 200237531 Sequence: 200237532 Sequence: 200237533 Sequence: 200237534 Sequence: 200237535 Sequence: 200237536 Sequence: 200237537 Sequence: 200237538 Sequence: 200237539 Sequence: 200237540 Sequence: 200237541 Sequence: 200237542 Sequence: 200237543 Sequence: 200237544 Sequence: 200237545 Sequence: 200237546 Sequence: 200237547 Sequence: 200237548 Sequence: 200237549 Sequence: 200237550 Sequence: 200237551 Sequence: 200237552 Sequence: 200237553 Sequence: 200237554 Sequence: 200237555 Sequence: 200237556 Sequence: 200237557 Sequence: 200237558 Sequence: 200237559 Sequence: 200237560 Sequence: 200237561 Sequence: 200237562 Sequence: 200237563 Sequence: 200237564 Sequence: 200237565 Sequence: 200237566 Sequence: 200237567 Sequence: 200237568 Sequence: 200237569 Sequence: 200237570 Sequence: 200237571 Sequence: 200237572 Sequence: 200237573 Sequence: 200237574 Sequence: 200237575 Sequence: 200237576 Sequence: 200237577 Sequence: 200237578 Sequence: 200237579 Sequence: 200237580 Sequence: 200237581 Sequence: 200237582 Sequence: 200237583 Sequence: 200237584 Sequence: 200237585 Sequence: 200237586 Sequence: 200237587 Sequence: 200237588
Name CHU Saint Pierre BXL Name Reuma Clinic Name Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent Name UZ Leuven Name Diagnostic – Consulting Center II-Pleven Name Medical Center Medconsult-Pleven Name Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment – Plovdiv Name Multiprofile Hosptal for Active Treatment Eurohospital Plovdiv Name Medical Center 'Teodora' Name Diagnostic Consulting Center No 17 Name Military Medical Academy Name Hopital Pellegrin Tripode – CHU de Bordeaux Name CHU Lapeyronie Name Centre Hospitalier Regional d'Orleans (CHRO) – Hopital La Source Name Hopital Lariboisiere Name Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière Name Hopital Cochin Name Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse – Hopital Purpan Name CHU Trousseau – Service de Rhumatologie Name Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf Name Hamburger Rheuma Forschungszentrum II Name Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Name Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Name Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis Name Krankenhaus St. Josef Name 424 Military Hospital of Thessaloniki Name Betegapolo Irgalmas Rend – Budai Irgalmasrendi Korhaz Name Bekes Megyei Kozponti Korhaz Pandy Kalman Tagkorhaz Name Szabolcs-Szatmar-Bereg Megyei Korhazak es Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz Name MAV Korhaz es Rendelointezet Name Fejer Megyei Szent Gyorgy Egyetemi Oktatokorhaz Name Vital Medical Center Orvosi es Fogaszati Kozpont Name Barzilai Medical Center Name Bnai Zion Medical Center Name Carmel Medical Center Name Hadassah Medical Center Name Sheba Medical Center Name Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Name Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II Name Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Paolo Giaccone Name Policlinico Tor Vergata Name Complesso Integrato Columbus Name Humanitas Hospital Name Szpital Uniwersytecki Nr 2 w Bydgoszczy Name Centrum Kliniczno Badawcze Name Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J. M. Jasnorzewska J. M. Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo-Akcyjna Name Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o Name NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED. S.C. Name Medycyna Kliniczna Name Mazowieckie Centrum Reumatologii i Osteoporozy Name WroMedica I.Bielicka, A.Strzałkowska s.c. Name Hosp. Garcia de Orta Name Chbv – Hosp. Infante D. Pedro Name Ccab – Hosp. de Braga Name Ipr – Inst. Port. de Reumatologia Name Chlo – Hosp. Egas Moniz Name Chln – Hosp. Santa Maria Name Ulsam – Hosp. Conde de Bertiandos Name Chelyabinck Regional Clinical Hospital Name Kemerovo State Medical University Name Medical Centre Maximum Health Name Family polyclinic #4 Name Krasnodar Clinical Dermatovenerologic Dispensary Name Krasnoyarsk State Medical University Name Orenburg State Medical Academy Name Rostov Regional Clinical Dermatovenerological Dispensary Name Ryazan Regional Clinical Dermatovenerological Dispensary Name Samara Regional Clinical Hospital Named After V.D.Seredavin Name Sararov Regional Clinical Hospital Name Smolensk regional hospital on Smolensk railway station Name Leningrad region clinical hospital Name Tula Regional Clinical Dermatovenerological Dispensary Name Republican Clinical Hospital – G.G. Kuvatov Name Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Hospital Name Regional Clinical Hospital Name Clinical Emergency Hospital n.a. N.V. Solovyev Name Clinical Hospital #3 Name Hosp. Univ. A Coruña Name Hosp. Univ. de Cruces Name Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol Name Hosp. Univ. de Basurto Name Hosp. Reina Sofia Name Hosp. Univ. Ramon Y Cajal Name Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre Name Hosp. Univ. de Getafe Name Hosp. Regional Univ. de Malaga Name Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Santiago Name Hosp. Virgen Macarena Name Hosp. Infanta Luisa Name Hosp. Virgen Del Rocio Name Hosp. Ntra. Sra. de Valme Name Hosp. Do Meixoeiro Name Communal Noncommercial Enterprise 'Cherkasy Regional Hospital of Cherkasy Regional Council' Name Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University, Ivano-Frankivsk City Clinical Hospital Name City Multifield Hospital #18, Mechnikov Institute of Microbiology and Immunology of NAMS Name Municipal non-commercial enterprise of Kharkiv Regional Council Regional Clinical Hospital Name Khmelnitckiy regional hospital Name Kyiv City Clinical Hospital #3, National Medical University Name Medical Center 'Consylium Medical' Name Kyiv Railway Station Clinical Hospital #2 Name SI 'National Scientific Center Institute of Cardiology of M.D. Strazhesko' of NAMS of Ukraine Name ME 'Poltava Regional Clinical Hospital named after M.V. Sklifosovsky of Poltava Regional Consuil' Name Municipal Institution of Sumy Regional Council Sumy Regional Clinical Hospital Name Municipal Non-commercial Enterprise 'Ternopil University Hospital' of Ternopil Regional Council Name Medical Center LTD Health Clinic Department of Cardiology and Rheumatology Name VNMUn.af.Pyrogova,CNE Vinnytsia Regional Clinical Hospital n.af.Pyrogova Vinnytsia Regional Council Name Municipal institution Central Clinical Hospital #1 Zhytomir Name Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases Name Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Name Cannock Chase Hospital Name Chapel Allerton Hospital Name Barts Health NHS Trust Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust Name Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust – Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Clinic Name North Tyneside General Hospital Name Peterborough City Hospital Name Haywood Hospital Name Torbay Hospital-Devon
City Brussels City Genk City Gent City Leuven City Pleven City Pleven City Plovdiv City Plovdiv City Ruse City Sofia City Sofia City Bordeaux City Montpellier, Herault City Orleans City Paris City Paris City Paris City Toulouse City Tours City Dusseldorf City Hamburg City Hannover City Herne City Rendsburg City Wuppertal City Thessaloniki City Budapest City Gyula City Nyiregyhaza City Szolnok City Székesfehérvár City Veszprem City Ashkelon City Hifa City Hifa City Jerusalem City Ramat Gan City Tel Aviv City Napoli City Palermo City Roma City Rome City Rozzano (MI) City Bydgoszcz City Elblag City Lodz City Lodz City Nadarzyn City Warsaw City Warszawa City Wrocław City Almada City Aveiro City Braga City Lisboa City Lisboa City Lisboa City Ponte de Lima City Chelyabinsk City Kemerovo City Kemerovo City Korolev City Krasnodar City Krasnoyarsk City Orenburg City Rostov City Ryazan City Samara City Saratov City Smolensk City St-Petersburg City Tula City Ufa City Ulyanovsk City Velikiy Novgorod City Yaroslavl City Yaroslavl City A Coruña City Barakaldo City Barcelona City Bilbao City Córdoba City Madrid City Madrid City Madrid City Málaga City Santiago de Compostela City Sevilla City Sevilla City Sevilla City Sevilla City Vigo City Cherkasy City Ivano-Frankivsk City Kharkiv City Kharkiv City Khmelnytsky City Kyiv City Kyiv City Kyiv City Kyiv City Poltava City Sumy City Ternopil City Vinnytsya City Vinnytsya City Zhytomir City Bath City Cambridge City Cannock City Leeds City London City London City Newcastle City Peterborough City Stoke on Trent City Torquay
Zip 1000 Zip 3600 Zip 9000 Zip 3000 Zip 5800 Zip 5800 Zip 4003 Zip 4004 Zip 7003 Zip 1505 Zip 1606 Zip 33076 Zip 34295 Zip 45067 Zip 75010 Zip 75013 Zip 75014 Zip 30159 Zip 37044 Zip 40225 Zip 20095 Zip 30625 Zip 44649 Zip 24768 Zip 42105 Zip 56429 Zip 1023 Zip 5700 Zip 4400 Zip 5000 Zip 8000 Zip 8200 Zip 7830604 Zip 31048 Zip 34362 Zip 91120 Zip 5265601 Zip 64239 Zip 80131 Zip 90127 Zip 00133 Zip 00168 Zip 20089 Zip 85-168 Zip 82-300 Zip 90-242 Zip 90-265 Zip 05-830 Zip 00-874 Zip 04-030 Zip 51-685 Zip 2805-267 Zip 3814-501 Zip 4710-243 Zip 1050-034 Zip 1349-019 Zip 1649-035 Zip 4990-041 Zip 454076 Zip 650000 Zip 650066 Zip 141060 Zip 350020 Zip 660022 Zip 460000 Zip 344007 Zip 390046 Zip 443095 Zip 410053 Zip 214025 Zip 194291 Zip 300053 Zip 450005 Zip 432063 Zip 173008 Zip 150003 Zip 150007 Zip 15006 Zip 48902 Zip 08916 Zip 48013 Zip 14004 Zip 28034 Zip 28041 Zip 28905 Zip 29009 Zip 15706 Zip 41009 Zip 41010 Zip 41013 Zip 41014 Zip 36312 Zip 18009 Zip 76018 Zip 61029 Zip 61058 Zip 29000 Zip 02125 Zip 04050 Zip 36011 Zip 40031 Zip 46002 Zip 21009 Zip 21018 Zip 10002 Zip BA1 1RL Zip CB2 0QQ Zip WS11 5XY Zip LS7 4SA Zip E11 1NR Zip SE1 9RS Zip NE29 8NH Zip PE3 9GZ Zip ST6 7AG Zip TQ2 7AA
Country Belgium Country Belgium Country Belgium Country Belgium Country Bulgaria Country Bulgaria Country Bulgaria Country Bulgaria Country Bulgaria Country Bulgaria Country Bulgaria Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Greece Country Hungary Country Hungary Country Hungary Country Hungary Country Hungary Country Hungary Country Israel Country Israel Country Israel Country Israel Country Israel Country Israel Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Portugal Country Portugal Country Portugal Country Portugal Country Portugal Country Portugal Country Portugal Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Ukraine Country Ukraine Country Ukraine Country Ukraine Country Ukraine Country Ukraine Country Ukraine Country Ukraine Country Ukraine Country Ukraine Country Ukraine Country Ukraine Country Ukraine Country Ukraine Country Ukraine Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom

Conditions

Sequence: 52205118
Name Arthritis, Psoriatic
Downcase Name arthritis, psoriatic

Id Information

Sequence: 40184062 Sequence: 40184063 Sequence: 40184064
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value CR108573 Id Value 2018-003214-41 Id Value CNTO1959PSA3003
Id Type EudraCT Number Id Type Other Identifier
Id Type Description Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium

Countries

Sequence: 42597617 Sequence: 42597618 Sequence: 42597619 Sequence: 42597620 Sequence: 42597621 Sequence: 42597622 Sequence: 42597623 Sequence: 42597624 Sequence: 42597625 Sequence: 42597626 Sequence: 42597627 Sequence: 42597628 Sequence: 42597629 Sequence: 42597630 Sequence: 42597631
Name Belgium Name Bulgaria Name France Name Germany Name Greece Name Hungary Name Israel Name Italy Name Poland Name Portugal Name Russian Federation Name Spain Name Ukraine Name United Kingdom Name Austria
Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed True

Design Groups

Sequence: 55631585 Sequence: 55631586
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title Group 1: Guselkumab Title Group 2: Placebo followed by Guselkumab
Description Participants will receive guselkumab 100 milligram (mg) Subcutaneous (SC) injection at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, and 44 and placebo SC at Week 24 to maintain the blind. At Week 16, Participants who meet the early escape criteria will receive placebo at Week 16 and guselkumab at Week 20, then guselkumab every 8 weeks (q8w). Description Participants will receive placebo SC injection at Weeks 0, 4, 12, and 20, and will crossover to receive guselkumab 100 mg SC injection at Weeks 24, 28, 36, and 44. At Week 16, Participants who meet the early escape criteria will receive guselkumab at Weeks 16 and 20, then guselkumab q8w.

Interventions

Sequence: 52519435 Sequence: 52519436
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Guselkumab 100 mg Name Placebo
Description Participants will receive guselkumab 100mg as SC injection. Description Participants will receive placebo as SC injection.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177501890 Sequence: 177501891 Sequence: 177501892 Sequence: 177501893 Sequence: 177501894
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Percentage of Participants who Achieve an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24 Measure Change from Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24 Measure Percentage of Participants who Achieve an ACR 50 Response at Week 24 Measure Change from Baseline in 36-Item Short form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 24 Measure Percentage of Participants who Achieve Psoriatic Area and Severity Index (PASI) 100 Response at Week 24 Among Participants with >=3% body Surface area Psoriatic Involvement and an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of >=2 (Mild) at Baseline
Time Frame Week 24 Time Frame Baseline, Week 24 Time Frame Week 24 Time Frame Baseline, Week 24 Time Frame Week 24
Description The ACR 20 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and >=20 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: participant's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10 millimeter [mm], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), participant's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, [0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas. The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Description The HAQ-DI is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0 to 3 (0=no difficulty and 3=inability to perform a task in that area). Overall score is computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Description The ACR 50 Response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent improvement in swollen joint count (66 joints) and tender joint count (68 joints) and >=50 percent improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments: participant's assessment of pain using Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10 millimeter [mm], 0 mm=no pain and 10 mm=worst possible pain), participant's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (scale ranges from 0 mm to 100 mm, [0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=worst possible pain]), physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS, participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI, defined as a 20-question instrument assessing 8 functional areas. The derived HAQ-DI ranges from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Description The SF-36 is a generic health survey with 36 items that measure functional health and well-being from the participant's perspective. The survey is summarized into 8 dimensions/scales: physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). The physical component summary measure is derived from 4 of the 8 health dimensions (aggregate of PF, RP, BP, and GH scales). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 100. A higher score indicates a better health state. Description PASI 100 response is defined as 100% improvement in PASI score from baseline (PASI score of 0). The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI scoring system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90%-100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that could range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193615948 Sequence: 193615949 Sequence: 193615950 Sequence: 193615951 Sequence: 193615952 Sequence: 193615953 Sequence: 193615954 Sequence: 193615955 Sequence: 193615956 Sequence: 193615957 Sequence: 193615958 Sequence: 193615959 Sequence: 193615960 Sequence: 193615961
Mesh Term Arthritis Mesh Term Arthritis, Psoriatic Mesh Term Necrosis Mesh Term Joint Diseases Mesh Term Musculoskeletal Diseases Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Spondylarthropathies Mesh Term Spondylarthritis Mesh Term Spondylitis Mesh Term Spinal Diseases Mesh Term Bone Diseases Mesh Term Psoriasis Mesh Term Skin Diseases, Papulosquamous Mesh Term Skin Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term arthritis Downcase Mesh Term arthritis, psoriatic Downcase Mesh Term necrosis Downcase Mesh Term joint diseases Downcase Mesh Term musculoskeletal diseases Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term spondylarthropathies Downcase Mesh Term spondylarthritis Downcase Mesh Term spondylitis Downcase Mesh Term spinal diseases Downcase Mesh Term bone diseases Downcase Mesh Term psoriasis Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases, papulosquamous Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48351009
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29304324
Role Study Director
Name Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium Clinical Trial
Affiliation Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Belgium

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68195653 Sequence: 68195654 Sequence: 68195655 Sequence: 68195656
Design Group Id 55631585 Design Group Id 55631586 Design Group Id 55631585 Design Group Id 55631586
Intervention Id 52519435 Intervention Id 52519435 Intervention Id 52519436 Intervention Id 52519436

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30785196
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Have a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study intervention and meet classification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) at screening
Have active PsA as defined by at least 3 swollen joints and at least 3 tender joints at screening and at baseline
Have at least 1 of the PsA subsets: distal interphalangeal joint involvement, polyarticular arthritis with absence of rheumatoid nodules, arthritis mutilans, asymmetric peripheral arthritis, or spondylitis with peripheral arthritis
Have an inadequate response to anti-TNF alpha therapy, defined as presence of active PsA despite previous treatment with either 1 or 2 anti-TNF alpha agents and either of the following: a) Lack of benefit of an anti-TNF alpha therapy, as documented in the participant history by the treating physician, after at least 12 weeks of etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, or certolizumab pegol therapy (or biosimilars) and/or at least a 14-week dosage regimen (i.e., at least 4 doses) of infliximab (or biosimilars). Documented lack of benefit may include inadequate improvement in joint counts, skin response, physical function, or disease activity, b) Intolerance to an anti-TNF alpha therapy, as documented in the patient history by the treating physician, to etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol, or infliximab (or biosimilars, if available)
Be willing to refrain from the use of complementary therapies for PsA or psoriasis including ayurvedic medicine, traditional Taiwanese, Korean, or Chinese medications and acupuncture within 2 weeks before the first study intervention administration and through Week 48

Exclusion Criteria:

Has other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of benefit of guselkumab therapy, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (this does not include a primary diagnosis of PsA with spondylitis), systemic lupus erythematosus, or Lyme disease
Has ever received more than 2 different anti-TNF alpha agents
Has previously received any biologic treatment (other than anti-TNF Alpha agents), including, but not limited to ustekinumab, abatacept, secukinumab, tildrakizumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, risankizumab, or other investigative biologic treatment
Has previously received tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, peficitinib (ASP015K), decernotinib (VX 509), or any other a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor
Has previously received any systemic immunosuppressants (for example, azathioprine, cyclosporine, 6 thioguanine, mercaptopurine, mycophenolate mofetil, hydroxyurea, tacrolimus) within 4 weeks of the first administration of study intervention

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253986427
Number Of Facilities 117
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 20
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 4

Designs

Sequence: 30531275
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Triple
Subject Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26691082
Intervention Id 52519435
Name CNTO 1959

Links

Sequence: 4391007
Url https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2018-003214-41/results
Description Link to results on EudraCT registry.

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28897571
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52099568
Pmid 34819273
Reference Type derived
Citation Coates LC, Gossec L, Theander E, Bergmans P, Neuhold M, Karyekar CS, Shawi M, Noel W, Schett G, McInnes IB. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who are inadequate responders to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results through one year of a phase IIIb, randomised, controlled study (COSMOS). Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Mar;81(3):359-369. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220991. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Limited Versus No-limited Shoulder Movement in Breast Cancer Surgery ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796845
2019-02-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796845
NCT03796845https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796845?tab=tableNANANARandomized clinical trial that will include women aged 18 or older, submitted a curative surgery for breast cancer at Hospital do Câncer III (HCIII-INCA). Patients will be allocated into two groups: Intervention (upper limbs no-limited movement with amplitude above 90º for flexion and abduction of shoulder) and Control (upper limbs limited movement at maximum 90º amplitude flexion and abduction of shoulder, until withdrawal surgical points). Sociodemographic and clinical data will be collected through interviews, questionnaires and electronic and physical records. The outcomes will be incidence of operative wound complications, like edema, joint restraint, winged scapula, pain, axillary web syndrome through the physical examination, performed by the nursing and physiotherapy team throughout the intervention period, ending in the 30-day post-operatory.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-07-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-04-07
Start Month Year February 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year July 1, 2019
Verification Month Year April 2020
Verification Date 2020-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2020-04-07

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20727204
Description Breast cancer treatment has been accompanying advances in technology, surgeries are more conservative, however postoperative complications are still observed. At early postoperative period, the most common operative wound complications are seroma, infection and necrosis. Shoulder dysfunctions are a frequent complication and difficult women to return to their activities. There is no consensus regarding the onset and type of exercise in postoperative period. Thus, the objective of this study is to compare the active no-limited mobilization with limited mobilization in the immediate post operatory at the incidence of wound complications in women submitted to surgery for the treatment of breast cancer.

It's a randomized clinical trial that will include women aged 18 years or older, submitted a curative surgery for breast cancer at Hospital do Câncer III (HCIII-INCA) located in Rio de Janeiro. All patients admitted for surgical treatment at the institution and during the study period will be evaluated for eligibility criteria. Those considered eligible for the study will be clarified regarding the objectives, treatment groups, adverse effects and non-compulsory participation of the study. Upon acceptance to participate, they will be allocated to the respective intervention groups. Group 1 – upper limbs no-limited movement with amplitude above 90º for flexion and abduction of shoulder; Group 2 – upper limbs limited movement at maximum 90º amplitude flexion and abduction of shoulder, until withdrawal surgical points.

Facilities

Sequence: 200159466
Name Clarice Gomes Chagas Teodozio
City Rio de Janeiro
State RJ
Zip 20230240
Country Brazil

Conditions

Sequence: 52185556
Name Breast Neoplasms
Downcase Name breast neoplasms

Id Information

Sequence: 40169117
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value Shoulder exercise cancer

Countries

Sequence: 42580703
Name Brazil
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609189 Sequence: 55609190
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title No-limited movement after surgery Title Limited movement after surgery
Description Participants should move their arms from the first postoperative day, with unrestricted movement, with an amplitude above 90º for flexion and abduction of shoulder. Description Participants should move their arms with restricted movements on the first postoperative day, with maximum amplitude of 90º for flexion and abduction of the shoulder, until withdrawal surgical points. Actual hospital's routine.

Interventions

Sequence: 52499490
Intervention Type Other
Name No limited movement after surgery
Description Participants should move their arms from the first postoperative day, with unrestricted movement, with an amplitude above 90º for flexion and abduction of shoulder.

Keywords

Sequence: 79888863
Name Exercise
Downcase Name exercise

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432249 Sequence: 177432247 Sequence: 177432248
Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Measurement of shoulder's range of motion Measure Presence or absence of wound complications. Measure Measurement of upper limb functionality
Time Frame Thirty days of follow-up Time Frame Thirty days of follow-up Time Frame Thirty days of follow-up
Description Performed routinely by the physiotherapist through physical examination of the range of motion of the shoulder during the first month after the surgical procedure. Description Occurrence of wound complications (necrosis, dehiscence, seroma, infection or hematoma) will be obtained by the physical examination, performed routinely by the nursing and physiotherapy during the first month after the surgical procedure. Description Performed routinely by physical therapy using the upper limb functionality questionnaire (Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand – DASH) during the first month after the surgical procedure. It is a validated, reliable and translated into Portuguese questionnaire. It has 30 items classified from 1 to 5, and aims to grade physical function and symptoms in people with any upper limb dysfunction. The total score ranges from 0 (no dysfunction) to 100 (severe dysfunction).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193540412 Sequence: 193540413 Sequence: 193540414 Sequence: 193540415 Sequence: 193540416
Mesh Term Breast Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Breast Diseases Mesh Term Skin Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term breast neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term breast diseases Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332387
Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Brazil

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29293031
Role Principal Investigator
Name Anke Bergmann
Affiliation CPQ – INCA

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168258 Sequence: 68168259
Design Group Id 55609190 Design Group Id 55609189
Intervention Id 52499490 Intervention Id 52499490

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773614
Gender Female
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 80 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Women aged 18 and over;
Indication of curative surgical treatment for breast cancer axillary approach at Hospital do Câncer III / INCA.

Exclusion Criteria:

Bilateral breast cancer;
Surgical treatment and / or previous radiotherapy for breast cancer;
Reconstruction surgery;
Functional alteration in upper limbs prior to diagnosis of breast cancer;
Illiterate women who are not able to read and complete the protocol of adhesion;
Women who are not able to answer questions clearly;
Age over 80.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253952815
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 5
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 80
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30519745
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description Patients submitted to surgery for breast cancer will be allocated into two groups: Intervention (upper limbs no-limited movement with amplitude above 90º for flexion and abduction of shoulder) and Control (upper limbs limited movement at maximum 90º amplitude flexion and abduction of shoulder, until withdrawal surgical points).

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886046
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Anke Bergmann
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Brazil

Study References

Sequence: 52079040
Pmid 32804282
Reference Type derived
Citation Teodozio CGC, Marchito LO, Fabro EAN, Macedo FO, de Aguiar SS, Thuler LCS, Bergmann A. Shoulder amplitude movement does not influence postoperative wound complications after breast cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Nov;184(1):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05826-9. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Footwear and Exercise for Knee Osteoarthritis (FiREwORK Trial) ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796832
2019-01-28

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796832
NCT03796832https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796832?tab=tableNANANAOsteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic degenerative joint disease and leading cause of musculoskeletal pain and disability worldwide. The high rates of knee replacement surgery worldwide emphasize the need for more effective non-surgical interventions to attenuate progressive disability. International scientific and professional societies also propose that therapies need to seek efficacious combinations of modalities with the ultimate aim to achieve longer-term, optimal and synergistic treatment effects.

Exercise therapy, such as strengthening and aerobic exercise, is universally, and strongly, recommended as it demonstrates beneficial effects on clinical symptoms and is considered safe for all patients with knee OA. However, during activities as simple as walking, higher knee joint loads have been demonstrated in people with medial tibiofemoral OA, a common form of knee OA. Increased joint loading as such may elicit aggravated symptoms and accelerated joint structural decline over time. No convincing evidence exists to confirm exercise therapy effectively alters joint loading parameters during walking gait in people with knee OA. Notably, recent studies suggest that wearing appropriate footwear may help offload the joint in people with knee OA, a strategy that is also easily applicable at a wide population level.

The purpose of this clinical study is to compare 9-month treatment consisting of exercise therapy and daily wear of one of two shoe classes (flat flexible shoes or stable supportive shoes), on symptom relief and joint structural damage in people with knee OA. In this study, we will randomly allocate eligible participants in one of two treatment arms. This means there will be an equal amount of participants in each group, and participants nor researchers will be able to choose in which group participants will end up in.Participants in both groups will enroll in a 9 month exercise program and will be provided a pair of one of the two shoe classes to wear daily. To ensure an unbiased appraisal of treatment effects, we will not disclose the study hypotheses to participants during the intervention period.

The results of this study will help determine whether the addition of appropriate footwear to exercise therapy improves symptom relief and/or slows structural disease progression in people with knee OA.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-21
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-01-25
Start Month Year January 28, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year June 1, 2022
Verification Month Year January 2023
Verification Date 2023-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-01-25

Facilities

Sequence: 200660006
Name Ghent University, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences
City Ghent
Zip 9000
Country Belgium

Conditions

Sequence: 52340876
Name Knee Osteoarthritis
Downcase Name knee osteoarthritis

Id Information

Sequence: 40280095 Sequence: 40280096 Sequence: 40280097
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value B670201835057 Id Value G013318N Id Value U1111-1225-9954
Id Type Other Grant/Funding Number Id Type Other Identifier
Id Type Description Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FWO) Id Type Description WHO

Countries

Sequence: 42700378
Name Belgium
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55782210 Sequence: 55782211
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Flat Flexible Shoes+Exercise Therapy Title Stable Supportive Shoes+Exercise Therapy
Description This arm will wear Flat Flexible Shoes daily for the duration of 9 months combined with supervised facility-based and home-based exercise therapy (months 0-3) and unsupervised home-based exercise therapy (months 4-9). Description This arm will wear Stable Supportive Shoes daily for the duration of 9 months combined with supervised facility-based and home-based exercise therapy (months 0-3) and unsupervised home-based exercise therapy (months 4-9).

Interventions

Sequence: 52651641 Sequence: 52651642 Sequence: 52651643
Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Other
Name Flat Flexible Shoes Name Stable Supportive Shoes Name Exercise Therapy
Description Off-the-shelf commercially available shoes will be used compliant with previously published criteria: (i) heel height <15 mm, (ii) shoe pitch <10 mm, (iii) absent arch support/motion control, (iv) minimal sole rigidity, (v) weight <=200g (+/-10%). Participants will be instructed to wear the shoes at least 4 hours daily for the duration of the 9-month intervention and to avoid wearing other types of shoes, if possible. Description Off-the-shelf commercially available shoes will be used compliant with previously published criteria: (i) heel height >30 mm, (ii) shoe pitch >10 mm, (iii) present arch support/motion control, (iv) sole rigidity, (v) weight >300g (+/-10%). Participants will be instructed to wear the shoes at least 4 hours daily for the duration of the 9-month intervention and to avoid wearing other types of shoes, if possible. Description The 3-month supervised exercise program will consist of one group session per week of approximately 30 minutes complemented with home-based exercises 3 times per week. Group sessions will consist of a 10-min warm-up followed by a circuit training of strengthening and/or neuromuscular exercises. Subsequently, during a 6-month unsupervised home exercise program, participants will perform strengthening exercises of the lower limb muscles 3 times weekly. Throughout the 9-month intervention, participants will be encouraged to maintain a daily routine of aerobic exercises, consisting of structured activity bouts of at least 10 minutes at a moderate intensity (grade 5-6 (out of 10, maximum exertion) on a Rate of Perceived Exertion scale), achieving at least 70 minutes of weekly physical activity at 3 months and 150 minutes at 9 months.

Keywords

Sequence: 80102933 Sequence: 80102934 Sequence: 80102935 Sequence: 80102936
Name Knee Osteoarthritis Name Exercise Therapy Name Shoes Name Pain
Downcase Name knee osteoarthritis Downcase Name exercise therapy Downcase Name shoes Downcase Name pain

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178005703 Sequence: 178005704 Sequence: 178005705 Sequence: 178005706 Sequence: 178005707 Sequence: 178005708 Sequence: 178005709 Sequence: 178005710 Sequence: 178005711 Sequence: 178005712 Sequence: 178005713 Sequence: 178005714 Sequence: 178005715 Sequence: 178005716 Sequence: 178005717 Sequence: 178005718 Sequence: 178005719 Sequence: 178005720 Sequence: 178005721 Sequence: 178005722 Sequence: 178005723 Sequence: 178005724 Sequence: 178005725 Sequence: 178005726 Sequence: 178005727 Sequence: 178005728 Sequence: 178005729 Sequence: 178005730 Sequence: 178005731 Sequence: 178005732
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Change in severity of knee pain on walking Measure Severity of intercondylar synovitis Measure Severity of whole knee effusion Measure Severity of bone marrow lesions Measure Severity of physical dysfunction Measure Severity of knee pain overall Measure Participant-perceived global change in pain Measure Participant-perceived global change in physical function Measure Participant-perceived global change overall Measure Average Daily Step Count Measure Habitual physical activity level Measure Health-related quality of life Measure Adherence to shoe usage Measure Adherence to exercise therapy Measure Adverse events, co-interventions including medication use Measure Knee joint loading – lower limb kinetics and kinematics Measure Markers of local synovial inflammation – synovial hypertrophy and Doppler activity Measure Neuropathic pain Measure Foot posture Measure Location of knee pain Measure Numbers of participants dropped out from study Measure Peripheral sensitization (thermal) Measure Widespread sensitization (thermal) Measure Pain sensitivity (local) Measure Pain sensitivity (peripheral) Measure Peripheral sensitization (mechanical) Measure Widespread sensitization (mechanical) Measure Dysfunctional endogenous analgesia Measure Dysfunctional endogenous analgesia Measure Central sensitization
Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured during weeks 1, 12 and 36 Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured by pedometer at week 1, week 12, week 37, and by logbooks at month 1 , month 2, month 3, month 4, month 5, month 6, month 7, month 8, month 9 Time Frame Measured at week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 5, week 6, week 7, week 8, week 9, week 10, week 11, week 12 and month 4, month 5, month 6, month 7, month 8, month 9 Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame From baseline to 9 months Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks Time Frame Measured at baseline, 13 and 37 weeks
Description Scored on an 11-point numeric rating scale for average knee pain on walking over the past week, with terminal descriptors of "0=no pain" to "10=worst pain imaginable". Description Graded using the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score hoffa-synovitis sub-score, ranging grade 0 (normal) to grade 3 (severe). Description Graded using the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score effusion-synovitis sub-score, ranging grade 0 (physiologic amount) to grade 3 (large – evidence of capsular distention). Description Graded using the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score bone marrow lesion sub-score, grade 0 (none) to grade 3 (>66% of subregional volume). Description Measured with the function subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index. This sub-scale gives a range of possible scores from "0=no dysfunction" to "68=maximum dysfunction". Description Scored on an 11-point numeric rating scale for average knee pain overall the past week, with terminal descriptors of "0=no pain" to "10=worst pain imaginable". Description Scored on a 7-point ordinal scale (with terminal descriptors of "1=much worse" to "7=much better"). Participants who report they are "moderately better" and above will be classified as "improved". Description Scored on a 7-point ordinal scale (with terminal descriptors of "1=much worse" to "7=much better"). Participants who report they are "moderately better" and above will be classified as "improved". Description Scored on a 7-point ordinal scale (with terminal descriptors of "1=much worse" to "7=much better"). Participants who report they are "moderately better" and above will be classified as "improved". Description Measured using a pedometer attached to the hip for 7 subsequent days to assess objective physical activity. Description Measured using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly with scores ranging 0-400 where higher scores indicate greater physical activity. Description Measured using the EuroQoL Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) with scores ranging from 0 to 100 (higher scores indication better health-related quality of life). Description Measured using a shoe-mounted pedometer on week 1, 12 and 37 for 7 consecutive days and by self-report in logbooks for one week during each month. The number of hours of daily shoe wearing will be recorded for 7 consecutive days and compliance will be rated using an 11-point NRS (with terminal descriptors "0=never worn" to "10=always worn"). Description During the supervised 12-week phase, participants will record completed exercise sessions every week in a logbook and will complete weekly 11-point NRS scales rating their overall compliance with the exercise prescription (with terminal descriptors: "0= not at all compliant" to "10=extremely compliant"). Therapists will record participants' attendance. During the 6-month phase, patient-reported adherence will be collected for one week each month. Description will be collected monthly using logbooks and will also be quired by questionnaire. Description An 8-camera optical motion capture system and a force plate will be used to collect kinematic and ground reaction forces. Participants will perform barefoot walking trials at a self-selected walking speed until seven complete "clean" foot strikes (satisfactory force plate contact defined as initial contact at the heel and toe off occurring on the force plate)) will be recorded from both limbs. At 36 weeks, participants will perform gait analysis under two conditions (in random order): (i) barefoot and (ii) allocated shoe. Major parameters of interest will be: (i) peak knee adduction moment, (ii) knee adduction moment angular impulse, and (iii) peak knee flexion moment. Unblinded scientific personnel and a blinded PhD student will collect the gait data. At 36 weeks the PhD student will be unblinded during the 3D gait analyses (last test of the testing session). Subsequent analyses will be performed by the blinded PhD student. Description Will be measured using an ultrasound machine with a 10-18 MHz linear array transducer. The regions examined will be: the suprapatellar recess, the medial and lateral parapatellar recesses and the medial and lateral femorotibial joint space. All anterior scans will be performed in the longitudinal position except for the parapatellar recess (transverse). Posteriorly, The medial aspect of the popliteal space will be assessed both in the longitudinal and transversal position to assess Baker's cyst presence. All US examinations will be carried out by one unblinded investigator with the participant lying supine on an examination table (knee flexed to 30°), except for the Baker's cyst assessment in which the participant is prone (knee fully extended). The same investigator will evaluate all images for capsular distension, synovial Doppler activity, synovial hypertrophy, effusion and presence of Baker's cyst. The investigator will be blinded to participant ID and test date. Description Will be assessed using the modified painDETECT questionnaire (mPDQ) a 12-item patient-based, screening questionnaire to determine the presence of neuropathic pain components validated in a range of conditions including OA. Description Will be assessed using the Foot Posture Index (FPI), a valid and reliable tool that scores six features of foot posture from – 2 (more supinated) to + 2 (more pronated). Description The Photographic Knee Pain Map will be used to determine location of knee pain. The map consists of a photographic representation of the anterior view of a pair of knees on which the participant can mark all painful locations in their study knee. Description Participants who will stop participating in the study (either due to loss to follow-up or study withdrawal) will be asked by mail or telephone to provide the reason why they dropped out from the study. These information will be formally recorded throughout the trial by the trial coordinator. Description Will be measured assessing heat detection and pain thresholds on the study knee (i.e., most painful knee) by one (always the same) blinded investigator.Heat contact thermal stimuli will be delivered using a computer-controlled (Medoc Pathway Pain & Sensory Evaluation System). Description Will be measured assessing heat detection and pain threshold on a remote peripheral site (i.e., extensor carpi radialis longus) by one (always the same) blinded investigator. Heat contact thermal stimuli will be delivered using a computer-controlled (Medoc Pathway Pain & Sensory Evaluation System). Description Will be measured by temporal summation (TS) at the study knee (i.e., most painful knee) performed by one (always the same) blinded investigator. Heat contact thermal stimuli will be delivered using a computer-controlled (Medoc Pathway Pain & Sensory Evaluation System). Heat stimuli will be individualized for each subject. Participants will receive10 heat pulses. Participants will be asked to provide a verbal pain rating on a 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale (NRS) (0 = no pain and 10 = most intense pain imaginable) at 1st; 5th and 10th pulse. TS will be derived according to established protocols. Description Will be measured by temporal summation (TS) on a remote peripheral site (i.e., extensor carpi radialis longus) performed by one (always the same person) blinded investigator. Heat contact thermal stimuli will be delivered using a computer-controlled (Medoc Pathway Pain & Sensory Evaluation System). Heat stimuli will be individualized for each subject. Participants will receive10 heat pulses. Participants will be asked to provide a verbal pain rating on a 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale (NRS) (0 = no pain and 10 = most intense pain imaginable) at 1st; 5th and 10th pulse. TS will be derived according to established protocols. Description Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) will be performed on the study knee (i.e., most painful knee) by eliciting mechanical pressure pain applied perpendicular to the skin using an analogue algometer. PPTs will be performed by one (always the same person) blinded investigator. Description Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) will be performed on a remote peripheral site (i.e., extensor carpi radialis longus) by eliciting mechanical pressure pain applied perpendicular to the skin using an analogue algometer. PPTs will be performed by one (always the same person) blinded investigator. Description Will be assessed by conditioned pain modulation (CPM) at the study knee (i.e., most painful knee) by one (always the same person) blinded investigator. CPM will be measured using a test stimulus followed by a conditioning stimulus and re-assessment of the test stimulus during and after the conditioning stimulus. Description Will be assessed by conditioned pain modulation (CPM) on a remote peripheral site (i.e., extensor carpi radialis longus) by one (always the same person) blinded investigator. CPM will be measured using a test stimulus followed by a conditioning stimulus and re-assessment of the test stimulus during and after the conditioning stimulus. Description Will be assessed using the central sensitisation inventory (CSI).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194133149 Sequence: 194133150 Sequence: 194133151 Sequence: 194133152 Sequence: 194133153 Sequence: 194133154
Mesh Term Osteoarthritis Mesh Term Osteoarthritis, Knee Mesh Term Arthritis Mesh Term Joint Diseases Mesh Term Musculoskeletal Diseases Mesh Term Rheumatic Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term osteoarthritis Downcase Mesh Term osteoarthritis, knee Downcase Mesh Term arthritis Downcase Mesh Term joint diseases Downcase Mesh Term musculoskeletal diseases Downcase Mesh Term rheumatic diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48477862 Sequence: 48477863
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University Ghent Name Universiteit Antwerpen

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29375462
Role Principal Investigator
Name Patrick Calders, PhD
Affiliation University Ghent

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68379361 Sequence: 68379362 Sequence: 68379363 Sequence: 68379364
Design Group Id 55782210 Design Group Id 55782211 Design Group Id 55782210 Design Group Id 55782211
Intervention Id 52651641 Intervention Id 52651642 Intervention Id 52651643 Intervention Id 52651643

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30863617
Gender All
Minimum Age 50 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Symptomatic and radiographic diagnosis of knee OA as per the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ie, aged≥50, knee pain on most days and osteophytes)
Radiographic evidence of medial OA (ie, Kellgren Lawrence(KL) grade ≥2, ≥grade 1 medial joint space narrowing (JSN) (scale 0-3)> lateral JSN, using a standardized atlas)
Average knee pain on walking over the past week of ≥4 on a 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS; "0=no pain" to "10=worst pain imaginable")
Ability to walk unaided
Willing to comply with therapy prescriptions
Sufficient understanding of the Dutch language

Exclusion Criteria:

Current and previous (3 months) participation in exercise therapy
Current and previous (3 months) use of customised footwear, minimalist shoes, insoles, braces and unable/unwilling to abandon during the study
Knee surgery in either knee and/or injections (corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid) in the study knee (most painful knee or right knee if both equally painful) in the past 6 months
Current or recent (4 weeks) use of oral corticosteroids
Knee replacement or high tibial osteotomy surgery in the past, or planned during the study
Inflammatory arthropathies
Other muscular, joint, neurological or metabolic conditions affecting lower limb function and/or precluding safe regular participation in exercise therapy and walking
Body mass index (BMI) of >36 kg/m2 (due to difficulties performing gait analysis and MRI)
Foot/ankle pain/pathologies at either side, and worse than knee pain complaints
Contra-indications for radiography & MRI
Use of supplements (eg, glucosamine, chondroitin, curcuma derivates) or pain medication (NSAIDs, paracetamol) or other disease modifying or anti-bone resorptive drugs if participants were not on a stable dose for ≥2 months prior to entering the trial

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253939272
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 40
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 50
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 11
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 18

Designs

Sequence: 30609438
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Triple
Intervention Model Description This will be a mono-centre randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation into the experimental treatment (exercise therapy and Flat Flexible Shoes) and comparator treatment (exercise therapy and Stable Supportive Shoes). Exercise therapy will consist of supervised facility- and home-based exercises for 3 months (primary time point) and unsupervised home-based exercises for a subsequent 6 months (secondary time point).
Subject Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28975977
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Routine Lymphadenectomy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796819
2019-01-10

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796819
NCT03796819https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796819?tab=tableNANANAThe role of routine lymphadenectomy (LND) in the surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains controversial. The investigators’ multi-institutional retrospective study have showed an increasing adoption of LND among patients undergoing curative resection for ICC during the last decade. The current prospective and randomized study based on a multi-institutional collaboration would investigate whether routine LND would benefit patients in short- and long-term survival remains.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-06
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-12-09
Start Month Year January 10, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year August 1, 2021
Verification Month Year August 2019
Verification Date 2019-08-31
Last Update Posted Date 2021-12-09

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20792334
Description Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer and its incidence is increasing worldwide.Resection of the primary ICC tumor site within the liver represents the best curative treatment option. However, the role of lymphadenectomy (LND) at the time of surgery remains controversial with some centers considering it standard while other surgeons perform LND only in select circumstances. The utilization of LND may not only vary among different institutions, but also by geographic region. Specifically, data from East and West centers have noted a variation in the utilization of LND ranging 27%-100%.While several case series from Asia have noted that most centers do not regularly perform LND,other data from the West suggest that LND may be becoming more routine. Despite the lack of consensus among surgeons, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging manual recommends that the nodal basin be staged. Disease-specific staging for ICC was first introduced in the 7th edition of the AJCC staging manual published in 2010. The newly updated 8th edition of the AJCC staging system now recommends that 6 lymph nodes be evaluated to stage a patient with ICC.

The previous multi-institutional retrospective study from the investigators have showed an increasing adoption of LND among patients undergoing curative resection for ICC during the last decade. The current prospective and randomized study based on a multi-institutional collaboration would investigate whether routine LND would benefit patients in short- and long-term survival remains.

Facilities

Sequence: 200729943
Name The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
City Xi'an
State Shaanxi
Zip 710061
Country China

Conditions

Sequence: 52352798
Name Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Downcase Name intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Id Information

Sequence: 40288732
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value XJTU1AFCRC2017SJ-007

Countries

Sequence: 42710616
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55795173 Sequence: 55795174
Group Type Experimental Group Type No Intervention
Title lymphadenectomy Title No lymphadenectomy
Description This group of patients would undergo routine hepatoduodenal lymphadenectomy combined with ICC resection Description This group of patients would not undergo hepatoduodenal lymphadenectomy when preoperative imaging and intraoperative exploration found no lymph node enlargement.

Interventions

Sequence: 52663853
Intervention Type Procedure
Name lymphadenectomy
Description Patients would undergo routine hepatoduodenal lymphadenectomy at the time of ICC resection

Keywords

Sequence: 80118428 Sequence: 80118429 Sequence: 80118430 Sequence: 80118431 Sequence: 80118432
Name intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Name surgery Name lymphadenectomy Name lymph node metastasis Name prognosis
Downcase Name intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Downcase Name surgery Downcase Name lymphadenectomy Downcase Name lymph node metastasis Downcase Name prognosis

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178048754 Sequence: 178048755 Sequence: 178048756 Sequence: 178048757 Sequence: 178048758
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure 1-year recurrence rate Measure 3-year recurrence rate Measure Postoperative morbidity Measure 1-year overall survival Measure 3-year overall survival
Time Frame 1 year after surgery (up to 1 year) Time Frame 3 years after surgery (up to 3 years) Time Frame From the date of surgery to stitches off (up to 1 month) Time Frame 1 year after surgery (up to 1 year) Time Frame 3 years after surgery (up to 3 years)
Description compare the 1-year recurrence rate of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy and those not undergoing lymphadenectomy Description compare the 3-year recurrence rate of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy and those not undergoing lymphadenectomy Description investigate the postoperative morbidity, such as hepatic failure, postoperative bleeding, superficial and deep site infection between lymphadenectomy and no lymphadenectomy groups Description compare the 1-year overall survival rate of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy and those not undergoing lymphadenectomy Description compare the 3-year overall survival rate of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy and those not undergoing lymphadenectomy

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194177450 Sequence: 194177451 Sequence: 194177452 Sequence: 194177453 Sequence: 194177454 Sequence: 194177455
Mesh Term Cholangiocarcinoma Mesh Term Adenocarcinoma Mesh Term Carcinoma Mesh Term Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms
Downcase Mesh Term cholangiocarcinoma Downcase Mesh Term adenocarcinoma Downcase Mesh Term carcinoma Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, glandular and epithelial Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48488245 Sequence: 48488246 Sequence: 48488247 Sequence: 48488248 Sequence: 48488249 Sequence: 48488250 Sequence: 48488251
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class UNKNOWN
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University Name Ningxia Medical University Name Nanchang University Name Binzhou Medical University Name Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital Name Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine Name The Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29381424 Sequence: 29381425
Role Study Chair Role Principal Investigator
Name Yi Lv, MD, PhD Name Xu-Feng Zhang, MD,PhD
Affiliation First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University Affiliation First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68396843
Design Group Id 55795173
Intervention Id 52663853

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30870132
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 65 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by imaging or biopsy
The tumor is limited in the liver with no distant metastasis, and the primary disease is resectable
Preoperative imaging (e.g. CT, MRI, PET-CT, etc.) and intraoperative exploration found no nodal swelling or enlargement

Exclusion Criteria:

The primary disease is unresectable with or without distant metastasis
The liver function or general condition of patients does not permit surgery
Preoperative imaging (e.g. CT, MRI, PET-CT, etc.) and intraoperative exploration found obvious nodal swelling or enlargement, which indicates lymphadenectomy should be performed
Patients aged below 18 or older than 65 would be excluded
Pregnant women would not be enrolled

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254027864
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 31
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 65
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30615930
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Masking Description patients would not be told about the lymphadenectomy
Intervention Model Description routine hepatoduodenal lymphadenectomy
Subject Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28982468
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Methods Validation Assessment for Study of Inflammatory Skin Disease ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796806
2019-01-14

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796806
NCT03796806https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796806?tab=tableNANANAAssess validity of methods involved in molecular studies of the skin in inflammatory skin disease
Assess feasibility of methods for grafting fresh human skin (normal and diseased with inflammatory skin disease) onto an established xenograft murine model.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-10-22
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-10-08
Start Month Year January 14, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 14, 2019
Verification Month Year October 2021
Verification Date 2021-10-31
Last Update Posted Date 2021-10-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20754929
Description The use of fixed tissue specimens for research studies is attractive, because a large number of relevant specimens can be collected quickly from tissue registry. There is a current lack of knowledge regarding to what extent formalin fixation alters the identification of proteins in the skin with inflammatory dermatoses. This information would be important to assess when determining the limitations (or potentially lack thereof) of using fixed specimens in research.

Collaborators have successfully developed a murine model that can accept human skin xenografts. While those investigators have successfully demonstrated transplantation of healthy skin onto mice, it is unknown whether skin affected by inflammatory disease can be transplanted and, if so, whether the inflammatory skin disease remains, whether it spreads to involve host skin, or whether it resolves. Determining feasibility of transplanting inflamed human skin using this model, as well as observing the course of this inflammation, are the next steps in advancing this potentially invaluable research modality.

Facilities

Sequence: 200390309
Name Mayo Clinic in Rochester
City Rochester
State Minnesota
Zip 55905
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52256617
Name Lichen Planus
Downcase Name lichen planus

Id Information

Sequence: 40220850
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 18-002404

Countries

Sequence: 42636478
Name United States
Removed False

Keywords

Sequence: 79989946 Sequence: 79989947 Sequence: 79989948
Name lichen planus Name proteomics Name xenograft model for lichen planus
Downcase Name lichen planus Downcase Name proteomics Downcase Name xenograft model for lichen planus

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177692368 Sequence: 177692369 Sequence: 177692370
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary
Measure Comparative analysis of proteomes on fresh versus formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded tissue. Measure Viability of human inflammatory skin (lichen planus) graft in a xenograft murine model Measure Evaluation of inflammation around human inflammatory skin graft (lichen planus) and elsewhere in a established xenograft murine model
Time Frame 8 months Time Frame 8 months Time Frame 8 months
Description Identification and quantification of proteins as obtained by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods using fresh and formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded tissue. Mass spectrometry data will be matched against a composite protein sequence database using the MyriMatch search engine and IDPicker will filter protein identification at 2% false discovery rate. QuasiTel software will process the spectral count data for the identification of differentially expressed proteins. Description Viability of diseased human graft into an established murine xenograft model by visual inspection and microscopic analysis. Description Assessment of inflammation around graft and elsewhere in the host by visual inspection and microscopic analysis.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193812753 Sequence: 193812754 Sequence: 193812755 Sequence: 193812756
Mesh Term Skin Diseases Mesh Term Lichen Planus Mesh Term Lichenoid Eruptions Mesh Term Skin Diseases, Papulosquamous
Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases Downcase Mesh Term lichen planus Downcase Mesh Term lichenoid eruptions Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases, papulosquamous
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48399174
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Mayo Clinic

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29331601
Role Principal Investigator
Name Julia S Lehman
Affiliation Mayo Clinic

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30815029
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Clinic patients with active lichen planus and residing within a 50-mile radius of Mayo Clinic-Rochester.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

– Adults >18 years with active cutaneous lichen planus with capacity to consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Concurrent skin infection
Wound healing disturbances
Patients on systemic immunosuppressive medications.
Lidocaine allergy
Platelets <10,000

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254076116
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 0
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30560992
Observational Model Case-Only
Time Perspective Prospective

Links

Sequence: 4394826
Url https://www.mayo.edu/research/clinical-trials
Description Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28927396
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Julia S. Lehman
Title Professor of Dermatology and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology
Affiliation Mayo Clinic

]]>

<![CDATA[ Developing Strategies for Effective Debridement in Patients for Venous Leg Ulcers ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796793
2019-03-18

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796793
NCT03796793https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796793?tab=tableAliette Espinosaa.espinosa2@med.miami.edu305-689-3376The goal of this project is to use genomic profiling, candidate genes and proteins to develop guided surgical debridement to improve healing in chronic non-healing venous leg ulcers (VLUs) and to test the efficacy of this approach.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-07-20
Start Month Year March 18, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2024
Verification Month Year July 2023
Verification Date 2023-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-07-20

Facilities

Sequence: 199731494
Status Recruiting
Name University of Miami
City Miami
State Florida
Zip 33136
Country United States

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28070782
Facility Id 199731494
Contact Type primary
Name Aliette Espinosa
Email a.espinosa2@med.miami.edu
Phone 305-689-3376

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18308461
Facility Id 199731494
Role Principal Investigator
Name Marjana Tomic-Canic, PhD

Conditions

Sequence: 52091217
Name Venous Leg Ulcer
Downcase Name venous leg ulcer

Id Information

Sequence: 40095255 Sequence: 40095256
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value 20180256 Id Value R01AR073614
Id Type U.S. NIH Grant/Contract
Id Link https://reporter.nih.gov/quickSearch/R01AR073614

Countries

Sequence: 42497160
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55505820 Sequence: 55505821
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Wound Edge Debridement Group Title Standard care group
Description Participants in this group will receive wound edge debridement in addition to standard of care (SOC) treatment for up to 4 weeks. Description Participants in this group will receive only the standard care of treatment for up to 4 weeks.

Interventions

Sequence: 52404550 Sequence: 52404551
Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Other
Name Wound Edge Debridement Name Standard of Care Treatment
Description Wound debridement is performed using a sharp, circular disposable curette to remove the slough, non-viable tissue and any fibrous tissue down to the vascular base. Description Standard of Care treatment will include foam dressing and 4 layer compression therapy, changed weekly.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177106128 Sequence: 177106129
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change in the genetic profile after debridement in the intervention group. Measure Percent rate of healing
Time Frame Baseline and 4 weeks Time Frame Up to 4 weeks
Description RNA sequencing will be used to determine the number of differentially expressed genes of the intervention group in samples collected pre-debridement to samples collected post-debridement. Description Percent rate of healing is measured at every weekly visit and divided by 4 to calculate the average percent wound healing rate in cm2/week.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193170033 Sequence: 193170034 Sequence: 193170035 Sequence: 193170036 Sequence: 193170037 Sequence: 193170038 Sequence: 193170039 Sequence: 193170040 Sequence: 193170041
Mesh Term Varicose Ulcer Mesh Term Leg Ulcer Mesh Term Ulcer Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Skin Ulcer Mesh Term Skin Diseases Mesh Term Varicose Veins Mesh Term Vascular Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term varicose ulcer Downcase Mesh Term leg ulcer Downcase Mesh Term ulcer Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term skin ulcer Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases Downcase Mesh Term varicose veins Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48245471 Sequence: 48245472
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class NIH
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University of Miami Name National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29239000 Sequence: 29239001
Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Marjana Tomic-Canic, PhD Name Robert Kirsner, MD/PhD
Affiliation University of Miami Affiliation University of Miami

Central Contacts

Sequence: 11992203
Contact Type primary
Name Aliette Espinosa
Phone 305-689-3376
Email a.espinosa2@med.miami.edu
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68042633 Sequence: 68042634 Sequence: 68042635
Design Group Id 55505820 Design Group Id 55505821 Design Group Id 55505820
Intervention Id 52404550 Intervention Id 52404551 Intervention Id 52404551

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30719137
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

>18 years of age
Conformation of venous disease by non-invasive venous studies with either Doppler-confirmed venous reflux, or having ≥ 2 clinical characteristics of venous insufficiency (varicose veins, lipodermatosclersosis, venous dermatitis, atrophie blanche, edema)
have a venous ulcer between the knee and ankle, at or above the malleolus
wound size would be greater than or equal to 5cm2 in area without exposed tendon, muscle or bone
wound duration of at least 6 months
VLU containing yellow/white slough with or without fibrous/scar tissue and/or non-viable tissue
ability of subject to tolerate limb compression bandage

Exclusion Criteria:

history of diabetes mellitus and a HbA1c > 12% (obtained within past 6 months)
Ankle brachial index(ABI) less than 0.80
any active cancer other than a nonmelanoma skin cancer; any previous cancer must be in remission for at least 5 years
suspicion of malignancy within VLU
life expectancy <6 months
history of kidney disease and creatinine greater than 2.0 (obtained within past 6 months)
history of liver disease and liver function test (ALT, AST, ALK PHOS, and bilirubin) >2x upper limit of normal (obtained within past 6 months)
requirement for long-term systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressive therapy, or history of corticosteroid or immunosuppressive use in the 4 weeks prior to study entry
history of immunodeficiency
ulcers due to none venous etiology and leg ulcers associated with mixed etiology
Untreated osteomyelitis
Hepatitis
acute deep venous thrombosis
allergy to lidocaine and/or epinephrine
Subject's inability to successfully tolerate compression therapy that is changed weekly
Skin ulcer previously treated within the last 4 weeks with biologic therapies (e.g. cell therapy or growth factors)
if currently incarcerated
known pregnancy

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253957626
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30465655
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Basic Science
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28832112
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Robert S. Kirsner
Title Professor & Chairman
Affiliation University of Miami

]]>

<![CDATA[ Comparison of Extra-Virgin and Refined Olive Oil on Some Cardiovascular Risk Factors ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796780
2019-01-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796780
NCT03796780https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796780?tab=tableNANANAConsumption of extra-virgin olive oil has beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk factors. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of extra-virgin olive oil and refined olive oil, in adjunct to conventional medical treatment, in improving liver enzymes, plasma lipid profile and inflammatory markers in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-29
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-12-10
Start Month Year January 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year September 1, 2019
Verification Month Year December 2019
Verification Date 2019-12-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-12-10

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20710018
Description A randomized placebo controlled clinical trial will be conducted in Rajaie Cardiovascular Center in Tehran, Iran. After review of the inclusion and exclusion criteria and explanation of the design of the study, written consent form will be completed. The participants are 40 eligible patients, aged 20-75 years. Intervention group will be received 25 mL/d extra-virgin olive oil and control group will be received 25 mL/d refined olive oil for 6 weeks. Fasting blood sample will be taken to measure lipid profile, liver enzymes and inflammatory markers (Interleukine-6 [IL-6] and Interleukine-10 [IL-10] and C-Reactive Protein [CRP]).

Facilities

Sequence: 199965406
Name Rajaei Cardiovascular, Medical & Research Center
City Tehran
Country Iran, Islamic Republic of

Conditions

Sequence: 52139084
Name Cardiovascular Risk Factor
Downcase Name cardiovascular risk factor

Id Information

Sequence: 40135121
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 425

Countries

Sequence: 42542781
Name Iran, Islamic Republic of
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55559441 Sequence: 55559442
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title Extra-Virgin Olive Oil Title Refined Olive Oil
Description Daily consumption of 25 mL Extra-Virgin Olive Oil for 6 weeks Description Daily consumption of 25 mL Refined Olive Oil for 6 weeks

Interventions

Sequence: 52454995 Sequence: 52454996
Intervention Type Dietary Supplement Intervention Type Dietary Supplement
Name Extra-Virgin Olive Oil Name Refined Olive Oil
Description Daily consumption of 25 mL Extra-Virgin Olive Oil in adjunct to medical treatment for 6 weeks Description Daily consumption of 25 mL Refined Olive Oil in adjunct to medical treatment for 6 weeks

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177264123 Sequence: 177264124 Sequence: 177264125 Sequence: 177264126 Sequence: 177264127
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Measure plasma lipid profile Measure plasma liver enzymes (SGOT & SGPT) Measure Interleukin-10 (IL-10) Measure C reactive protein (CRP)
Time Frame 6 week Time Frame 6 week Time Frame 6 week Time Frame 6 week Time Frame 6 week
Description change in plasma level of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in pg/mL from baseline at week-6 Description change in plasma level of lipoproteins in mg/dL from baseline at 6 week Description change in plasma level of liver enzymes (SGOT & SGPT) in mg/dL from baseline at 6 week Description Change in plasma level of interleukin-10 (IL-10) in pg/mL at baseline and week-6 Description Change in plasma level of C reactive protein (CRP) in mg/dL from baseline and week-6

Sponsors

Sequence: 48290782 Sequence: 48290783
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Javad Nasrollahzadeh Name Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29268570
Role Study Chair
Name Javad Nasrollahzadeh, Ph.D
Affiliation Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68107560 Sequence: 68107561
Design Group Id 55559441 Design Group Id 55559442
Intervention Id 52454995 Intervention Id 52454996

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30747773
Gender All
Minimum Age 20 Years
Maximum Age 75 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

patients with at least one of the cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus) candidate for angiography
willing to participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

Continuous consumption of any supplement with anti-inflammatory or antioxidant properties such as Omega-3, vitamin E, vitamin C and Selenium in last month
َChronic kidney disease stage 5
Any change in disease treatment plan such as change in type and dose of lipid lowering drugs or surgical operation

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254122192
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 8
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 20
Maximum Age Num 75
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 4

Designs

Sequence: 30494056
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Supportive Care
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28860336
Responsible Party Type Sponsor-Investigator
Name Javad Nasrollahzadeh
Title Investigator in Clinical Nutrition
Affiliation Shahid Beheshti University

Study References

Sequence: 52032800
Pmid 33121297
Reference Type derived
Citation Khandouzi N, Zahedmehr A, Nasrollahzadeh J. Effect of polyphenol-rich extra-virgin olive oil on lipid profile and inflammatory biomarkers in patients undergoing coronary angiography: a randomised, controlled, clinical trial. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2021 Jun;72(4):548-558. doi: 10.1080/09637486.2020.1841123. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Salvage Oligometastasectomy and Radiation Therapy in Recurrent Prostate Cancer ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796767
2019-09-09

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796767
NCT03796767https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796767?tab=tableKristen JewkesKristen.Jewkes@hci.utah.edu801-587-4776This phase II trial studies how well surgery and radiation therapy work in treating patients with prostate cancer that has come back or spread to other parts of the body. Radiation therapy uses high energy beams to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Surgical procedures, such as oligometastasectomy, may remove tumor cells that have spread to other parts of the body. Surgery and radiation therapy may work better in treating patients with prostate cancer that has come back or spread to other parts of the body.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-01-06
Start Month Year September 9, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 1, 2023
Verification Month Year January 2023
Verification Date 2023-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-01-06

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20691053
Description PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess response to treatment of oligometastatic disease.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To assess additional measurements of response to treatment of oligometastatic disease.

II. To assess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression free-survival following treatment of oligometastatic disease.

III. To assess time to disease recurrence following treatment of oligometastatic disease.

IV. To assess time to initiation of antiandrogen therapy (ADT) for metastatic prostate cancer following treatment of oligometastatic disease.

V. To assess the rate of undetectable PSA following treatment of oligometastatic disease in subjects who have previously undergone prostatectomy.

VI. To assess safety. VII. To assess the impact of study treatment on change in quality of life over three years.

Facilities

Sequence: 199713188
Status Recruiting
Name Huntsman Cancer Institute/University of Utah
City Salt Lake City
State Utah
Zip 84112
Country United States

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28068632
Facility Id 199713188
Contact Type primary
Name Alejandro Sanchez
Email Alejandro.Sanchez@hci.utah.edu
Phone 801-587-4385

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18307648
Facility Id 199713188
Role Principal Investigator
Name Alejandro Sanchez

Conditions

Sequence: 52089303 Sequence: 52089304 Sequence: 52089305 Sequence: 52089306 Sequence: 52089307 Sequence: 52089308
Name Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma Name Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the Bone Name Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm in the Lymph Nodes Name Oligometastasis Name Prostate Adenocarcinoma Name PSA Failure
Downcase Name recurrent prostate carcinoma Downcase Name metastatic malignant neoplasm in the bone Downcase Name metastatic malignant neoplasm in the lymph nodes Downcase Name oligometastasis Downcase Name prostate adenocarcinoma Downcase Name psa failure

Id Information

Sequence: 40093524 Sequence: 40093525
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value HCI115811 Id Value NCI-2018-03418
Id Type Registry Identifier
Id Type Description CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program)

Countries

Sequence: 42493573
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55503652 Sequence: 55503653 Sequence: 55503654
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title Arm A (radiation therapy) Title Arm B (salvage oligometastasectomy) Title Arm C (salvage oligometastasectomy, radiation therapy)
Description Patients with bone metastases undergo SBR) or hypofractionated radiation per institutional standard of care guidelines at investigator's discretion. Description Patients with nodal metastases undergo salvage oligometastasectomy. Description Patients with nodal metastases undergo salvage oligometastasectomy. Following recovery, patients undergo SBRT or hypofractionated radiation per institutional standard of care guidelines at investigator's discretion. Within 4 months following completion of salvage therapy (defined as the combination of oligometastasectomy and/or bone radiation) and depending on PSA response as well as previous treatment, patients may receive adjuvant nodal IMRT.

Interventions

Sequence: 52402533 Sequence: 52402534 Sequence: 52402535 Sequence: 52402536 Sequence: 52402537 Sequence: 52402538
Intervention Type Radiation Intervention Type Radiation Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Radiation
Name Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy Name Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Name Metastasectomy Name Quality-of-Life Assessment Name Questionnaire Administration Name Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Description Undergo hypofractionated radiation therapy Description Undergo IMRT Description Undergo salvage oligometastasectomy Description Ancillary studies Description Ancillary studies Description Undergo SBRT

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177096735 Sequence: 177096736 Sequence: 177096737 Sequence: 177096738 Sequence: 177096739 Sequence: 177096740 Sequence: 177096741
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate Measure PSA progression-free survival (PFS) Measure Time to disease recurrence Measure Time to antiandrogen therapy (ADT) Measure Rate of undetectable PSA Measure Incidence of adverse events Measure Assess impact of study treatment on Change in quality of life over 3 years
Time Frame At 6 months after completion of treatment Time Frame Time elapsed between completion of treatment (salvage + – adjuvant) and the first occurrence of confirmed PSA progression, assessed up to 3 years Time Frame Time elapsed between study enrollment and first occurrence of confirmed radiographic disease progression, assessed up to 3 years Time Frame Time elapsed between study enrollment and initiation of ADT up to 3 years Time Frame Up to 3 years Time Frame Up to 3 years Time Frame Up to 3 years
Description Defined according to Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG3) criteria as the proportion of patients achieving a PSA decline >= 50% at 6 months after completion of treatment (salvage + – adjuvant). All study data will use descriptive statistics and will be exploratory only. Description Assessed according to PCWG3 criteria. All study data will use descriptive statistics and will be exploratory only. Description Time from study enrollment until the date of confirmed radiographic disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1 and PCWG3. Description All study data will use descriptive statistics and will be exploratory only. Description Patients previously treated with prostatectomy evaluate the proportion of patients whose PSA remains =< 0.2 ng/mL after 6 and 12 months following completion of treatment (salvage + – adjuvant). All study data will use descriptive statistics and will be exploratory only. Description Assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. All study data will use descriptive statistics and will be exploratory only. Description Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaires (FACT-P and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite EPIC-26) administered at screening, response assessment visit, and each follow up visit.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193161848 Sequence: 193161849 Sequence: 193161850 Sequence: 193161851 Sequence: 193161852
Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms, Second Primary Mesh Term Recurrence Mesh Term Disease Attributes Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, second primary Downcase Mesh Term recurrence Downcase Mesh Term disease attributes Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48243722
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University of Utah

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29237974
Role Principal Investigator
Name Alejandro Sanchez
Affiliation Huntsman Cancer Institute/ University of Utah

Central Contacts

Sequence: 11991441
Contact Type primary
Name Kristen Jewkes
Phone 801-587-4776
Email Kristen.Jewkes@hci.utah.edu
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68039776 Sequence: 68039777 Sequence: 68039778 Sequence: 68039779 Sequence: 68039780 Sequence: 68039781 Sequence: 68039782 Sequence: 68039783 Sequence: 68039784 Sequence: 68039785 Sequence: 68039786 Sequence: 68039787 Sequence: 68039788
Design Group Id 55503652 Design Group Id 55503654 Design Group Id 55503654 Design Group Id 55503653 Design Group Id 55503654 Design Group Id 55503652 Design Group Id 55503653 Design Group Id 55503654 Design Group Id 55503652 Design Group Id 55503653 Design Group Id 55503654 Design Group Id 55503652 Design Group Id 55503654
Intervention Id 52402533 Intervention Id 52402533 Intervention Id 52402534 Intervention Id 52402535 Intervention Id 52402535 Intervention Id 52402536 Intervention Id 52402536 Intervention Id 52402536 Intervention Id 52402537 Intervention Id 52402537 Intervention Id 52402537 Intervention Id 52402538 Intervention Id 52402538

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30718003
Gender Male
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Recurrent prostate carcinoma after definitive therapy for primary disease defined as:

Post-prostatectomy (with/without adjuvant radiotherapy): Patients must have a detectable or rising PSA level that is > 0.05 ng/mL, with a second confirmatory level of > 0.05 ng/mL after a minimum of 1 week.
Post radiotherapy/ablation (without radical prostatectomy): PSA rise >= 2ng/mL over nadir.

Subjects treated with prior definitive radiotherapy for prostate cancer who have positive molecular imaging (e.g., fluciclovine PET/CT scan or other per PI discretion) suggesting recurrent intraprostatic disease must undergo transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy less than or equal to one year before study enrollment:

If the TRUS biopsy is negative, no additional treatment is required to the prostate in addition to that of scan positive sites.
If the TRUS biopsy is positive, subject must undergo salvage prostatectomy or salvage radiotherapy to the primary site concurrently with the study treatment per the treatment protocol algorithm.
NOTE: Biopsy is not required for prostate fossa recurrences after radical prostatectomy.
Oligometastatic disease defined as 10 or fewer metastatic lesions to lymph nodes and/or bones only.
For patients with oligometastatic disease involving lymph nodes, metastasis is confined to the pelvic or para-aortic (below IMA) regions on molecular imaging (e.g., fluciclovine PET/CT or PSMA PET/CT scan or other per PI discretion).
All subjects must be surgical candidates if surgery is indicated per the treatment algorithm.
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =< 2.
Use of condoms for male subjects who have not had surgical removal of their prostate and have a partner of child bearing potential beginning at the time of informed consent form (ICF) signature and lasting until at least 6 months after the last radiation treatment. Because of the potential side effect on spermatogenesis associated with radiation, female partners of childbearing potential must agree to use a highly effective contraceptive method during and for 6 months after completing treatment.
Recovery to baseline or =< grade 1 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v)5 from toxicities related to any prior treatments, unless adverse event (AE)(s) are clinically non-significant and/or stable on supportive therapy as determined by the treating physician.
Able to provide informed consent and willing to sign an approved consent form that conforms to federal and institutional guidelines.

Exclusion Criteria:

Known brain or visceral metastases other than lymph nodes as defined by CT, MRI, or othermolecular imaging (e.g., fluciclovine PET/CT or PSMA PET/CT scan or other per PI discretion).
Patients actively receiving hormone therapy for prostate cancer. Patients may have received hormone therapy perviously but must have documented non-castrate levels of testosterone (>50 ng/dL)
Prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment, in the opinion of the enrolling investigator, may have the potential to interfere wih the safety or efficay assessment of the investigational treatment protocol of the study.
Use of finasteride within 30 days prior to initiation of therapy. Baseline PSA should not be obtained prior to 30 days after stopping finasteride.
Use of dutasteride within 90 days prior to initiation of therapy. Baseline PSA should not be obtained prior to 90 days after stopping dutasteride.
Use of any prohibited therapy.

Active, uncontrolled, significant intercurrent or recent illness including, but not limited to, the following conditions:

Cardiovascular disorders:

Congestive heart failure New York Heart Association class 3 or 4, unstable angina pectoris, serious cardiac arrhythmias.
Uncontrolled hypertension defined as sustained blood pressure (BP) > 150 mmHg systolic or > 100 mmHg diastolic despite optimal antihypertensive treatment.
Stroke (including transient ischemic attack [TIA]), myocardial infarction (MI), or other ischemic event, or thromboembolic event (e.g., deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism) within 6 months before first dose.
Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of registration
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation or other respiratory illness requiring hospitalization or precluding study therapy at the time of registration or within 30 days of registration.
Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253954834
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30464524
Allocation Non-Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26627177 Sequence: 26627178 Sequence: 26627179 Sequence: 26627180 Sequence: 26627181 Sequence: 26627182 Sequence: 26627183 Sequence: 26627184 Sequence: 26627185
Intervention Id 52402533 Intervention Id 52402533 Intervention Id 52402534 Intervention Id 52402534 Intervention Id 52402534 Intervention Id 52402536 Intervention Id 52402538 Intervention Id 52402538 Intervention Id 52402538
Name Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Name hypofractionation Name IMRT Name Intensity Modulated RT Name Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Name Quality of Life Assessment Name SABR Name SBRT Name Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28830978
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ YoBEKA Program (Yoga, Movement, Relaxation, Concentration and Mindfulness) in Elementary Schools ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796754
2019-01-21

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796754
NCT03796754https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796754?tab=tableNANANAThe aim of this study is a first evaluation of the effectiveness of the YoBEKA Program (Yoga, Movement, Relaxation, Concentration and Mindfulness) to evaluate potential effects in stress reduction and concomitant psychological parameters.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-09-29
Start Month Year January 21, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year February 15, 2020
Verification Month Year September 2022
Verification Date 2022-09-30
Last Update Posted Date 2022-09-29

Facilities

Sequence: 198397120
Name Charite University
City Berlin
Zip 14109
Country Germany

Conditions

Sequence: 51725090
Name Stress, Psychological
Downcase Name stress, psychological

Id Information

Sequence: 39804022
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value YoBEKA

Countries

Sequence: 42203025
Name Germany
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55144774 Sequence: 55144775
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type No Intervention
Title YoBEKA Intervention Title Control group

Interventions

Sequence: 52046656
Intervention Type Behavioral
Name YoBEKA
Description The teachers and students of the YoBEKA study arm receive a guided YoBEKA practice from an experienced YoBEKA trainer during the regular 4 month intervention period. The YoBEKA program is based on a combination of different, easy to perform exercises appropriate to the school situation, consisting of postures, verses for speech, song and movement, affirmations in movement to promote balance and coordination, and various rest and silence exercises to promote body awareness and relaxation techniques. The teaching is ideologically neutral and without religious background. The participating teachers receive an initial two-hour YoBEKA introductory course. Every 2 weeks there is a one to two-hour training course. The pedagogical specialists are supported once a week by an experienced YoBEKA trainer. The teachers are encouraged to integrate the learned exercises independently and regularly into their everyday school life.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 175926398 Sequence: 175926395 Sequence: 175926396 Sequence: 175926397 Sequence: 175926399 Sequence: 175926400 Sequence: 175926401 Sequence: 175926402
Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Teacher anxiety and stress inventory (LASI) Measure Questionnaire on the assessment of stress and stress management in childhood and adolescence – Revision (SSKJ 3-8 R) Measure Inventory of the quality of life of children and adolescents (KIDSCREEN-27 children) Measure Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Measure Screening for somatoform disorders of childhood and adolescence (SOMS-E) Measure Inventory of the quality of life of children and adolescents (KIDSCREEN-52 parents) Measure Heart rate variability Measure Qualitative interviews
Time Frame Change Baseline, 4 months, 12 months Time Frame Change baseline, 4 months Time Frame Change Baseline, 4 months, 12 months Time Frame Change Baseline, 4 months, 12 months Time Frame Change Baseline, 4 months, 12 months Time Frame Change Baseline, 4 months, 12 months Time Frame Baseline, 4 months, 12 months Time Frame 4 months, 12 months
Description Filled out by teachers, assessing LASI 2, range 46-230, higher score meaning a better outcome Description Filled out by students, assessing composite score (range 29-94): subscale 1 (stress-vulnerability [range 7-28]) summed with subscale 3 (stress symptoms and well-being [range 22-66]), lower score meaning a better outcome Description Filled out by students, assessing full scale, range 27-135, lower score meaning a better outcome Description Filled out by teachers, assessing full scale, range 0-40, lower score meaning a better outcome Description Filled out by parents, assessing full scale, range 55-110, lower score meaning a better outcome Description Filled out by parents, assessing full scale, range 27-135, lower score meaning a better outcome Description Assessed with Faros 180 over 24 hours Description Semi-structured interviews in focus groups

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 191692408 Sequence: 191692409
Mesh Term Stress, Psychological Mesh Term Behavioral Symptoms
Downcase Mesh Term stress, psychological Downcase Mesh Term behavioral symptoms
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 47905217
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67604820
Design Group Id 55144774
Intervention Id 52046656

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30505404
Gender All
Minimum Age 6 Years
Maximum Age 12 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion criteria:

Students from participating primary schools in Berlin aged 6-12 years
Written declaration of consent of the parent or legal guardian

Exclusion criteria:

Serious chronic or acute diseases
Immobility or serious restriction for gymnastic exercises due to orthopaedic, neurological or other medical causes
Participation in another study

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254050981
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 13
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 6
Maximum Age Num 12
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 5
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30254489
Allocation Non-Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Prevention
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28634979
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Andreas Michalsen
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation Charite University, Berlin, Germany

]]>

<![CDATA[ STable Coronary Artery Diseases RegisTry ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796741
2016-03-17

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796741
NCT03796741https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796741?tab=tableNANANAObservational, prospective multicentric, national study, evaluating the diagnostic and therapeutic pathways of patient with cronic coronary artery disease followed in Italian cardiology centers.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-20
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-02-03
Start Month Year March 17, 2016
Primary Completion Month Year February 28, 2018
Verification Month Year December 2018
Verification Date 2018-12-31
Last Update Posted Date 2021-02-03

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20780382
Description Coronary heart disease is still highly prevalent in the world, and chronic stable angina is one of the most common clinical presentations of this disease. The objectives of chronic stable angina treatment include the reduction of symptoms, the inhibition or slowing of the progression of the disease, the prevention of associated cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction, and the possible improvement of survival.The results of COURAGE Study and of meta-analysis of more recent studies demonstrate that patients in optimized medical therapy (OMT) (aspirin, beta-blocker and statin in association with an ACE-inhibitor and strict control of risk factors). ) the percutaneous coronary revascularization procedure (PCI) did not lead to an improvement in the cardiovascular prognosis. These data led the groups in charge of drafting the guidelines to recommend OMT as an initial treatment of stable angina, reserving the revascularization procedure for those patients with symptoms not adequately controlled by medical therapy.

It is therefore considered appropriate to plan a registry in patients with stable coronary artery disease that has the ability to describe in the heterogeneity of Italian cardiological centers the current characteristics of these patients, their treatment modalities, adherence to the current guidelines both as regards invasive therapy that the optimized medical, the use and the total cost of the resources needed to manage this pathology, the clinical course one year after entering the register.

Consecutive patients discharged (after an ordinary or day hospital admission) or managed as outpatient at Cardiology department participating in the project with a diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease will be included in the register. Enrollment will last 3 months in each center, starting with the first enrolled patient, or up to 50 patients enrolled.

Facilities

Sequence: 200594899 Sequence: 200594900 Sequence: 200594901 Sequence: 200594902 Sequence: 200594903 Sequence: 200594904 Sequence: 200594905 Sequence: 200594906 Sequence: 200594907 Sequence: 200594908 Sequence: 200594909 Sequence: 200594910 Sequence: 200594911 Sequence: 200594912 Sequence: 200594913 Sequence: 200594914 Sequence: 200594915 Sequence: 200594916 Sequence: 200594917 Sequence: 200594918 Sequence: 200594919 Sequence: 200594920 Sequence: 200594921 Sequence: 200594922 Sequence: 200594923 Sequence: 200594924 Sequence: 200594925 Sequence: 200594926 Sequence: 200594927 Sequence: 200594928 Sequence: 200594929 Sequence: 200594930 Sequence: 200594931 Sequence: 200594932 Sequence: 200594933 Sequence: 200594934 Sequence: 200594935 Sequence: 200594936 Sequence: 200594937 Sequence: 200594938 Sequence: 200594939 Sequence: 200594940 Sequence: 200594941 Sequence: 200594942 Sequence: 200594943 Sequence: 200594944 Sequence: 200594945 Sequence: 200594946 Sequence: 200594947 Sequence: 200594948 Sequence: 200594949 Sequence: 200594950 Sequence: 200594951 Sequence: 200594952 Sequence: 200594953 Sequence: 200594954 Sequence: 200594955 Sequence: 200594956 Sequence: 200594957 Sequence: 200594958 Sequence: 200594959 Sequence: 200594960 Sequence: 200594961 Sequence: 200594962 Sequence: 200594963 Sequence: 200594964 Sequence: 200594965 Sequence: 200594966 Sequence: 200594967 Sequence: 200594968 Sequence: 200594969 Sequence: 200594970 Sequence: 200594971 Sequence: 200594972 Sequence: 200594973 Sequence: 200594974 Sequence: 200594975 Sequence: 200594976 Sequence: 200594977 Sequence: 200594978 Sequence: 200594979 Sequence: 200594980 Sequence: 200594981 Sequence: 200594982 Sequence: 200594983 Sequence: 200594984 Sequence: 200594985 Sequence: 200594986 Sequence: 200594987 Sequence: 200594988 Sequence: 200594989 Sequence: 200594990 Sequence: 200594991 Sequence: 200594992 Sequence: 200594993 Sequence: 200594994 Sequence: 200594995 Sequence: 200594996 Sequence: 200594997 Sequence: 200594998 Sequence: 200594999 Sequence: 200595000 Sequence: 200595001 Sequence: 200595002 Sequence: 200595003 Sequence: 200595004 Sequence: 200595005 Sequence: 200595006 Sequence: 200595007 Sequence: 200595008 Sequence: 200595009 Sequence: 200595010 Sequence: 200595011 Sequence: 200595012 Sequence: 200595013 Sequence: 200595014 Sequence: 200595015 Sequence: 200595016 Sequence: 200595017 Sequence: 200595018 Sequence: 200595019 Sequence: 200595020 Sequence: 200595021 Sequence: 200595022 Sequence: 200595023 Sequence: 200595024 Sequence: 200595025 Sequence: 200595026 Sequence: 200595027 Sequence: 200595028 Sequence: 200595029 Sequence: 200595030 Sequence: 200595031 Sequence: 200595032 Sequence: 200595033 Sequence: 200595034 Sequence: 200595035 Sequence: 200595036 Sequence: 200595037 Sequence: 200595038 Sequence: 200595039 Sequence: 200595040 Sequence: 200595041 Sequence: 200595042 Sequence: 200595043 Sequence: 200595044 Sequence: 200595045 Sequence: 200595046 Sequence: 200595047 Sequence: 200595048 Sequence: 200595049 Sequence: 200595050 Sequence: 200595051 Sequence: 200595052 Sequence: 200595053 Sequence: 200595054 Sequence: 200595055 Sequence: 200595056 Sequence: 200595057 Sequence: 200595058 Sequence: 200595059 Sequence: 200595060 Sequence: 200595061 Sequence: 200595062 Sequence: 200595063 Sequence: 200595064 Sequence: 200595065 Sequence: 200595066 Sequence: 200595067 Sequence: 200595068 Sequence: 200595069 Sequence: 200595070 Sequence: 200595071 Sequence: 200595072 Sequence: 200595073 Sequence: 200595074 Sequence: 200595075 Sequence: 200595076 Sequence: 200595077 Sequence: 200595078 Sequence: 200595079 Sequence: 200595080 Sequence: 200595081
Name Ospedale San Giovanni Di Dio – Uo Cardiologia E Utic Name Istituto Scientifico Inrca – Uo Cardiologia/Utic/Telecardiologia Name Ospedale Civile Profili – U.O. Cardiologia Name Ospedale Di Jesi Carlo Urbani – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Principe Di Piemonte – Uoc Cardiologia Utic Name Ospedale Gen.Le Prov.Le C.G. Mazzoni – Sc Cardiologia Name Ospedale Madonna Del Soccorso – Uoc Cardiologia Indirizzo Riabilitativo Name Ospedale Valdichiana Santa Margherita – Uos Cardiologia E Hdu Name Aorn San Giuseppe Moscati – U.O. Cardiologia/Utic 'D. Rotiroti' Name Ospedale San Paolo – Cardiologia-Utic Name Ospedale Policlinico – U.O. Di Cardiologia Ospedaliera Name Ics Maugeri Spa Societa' Benefit – Uo Cardiologia Name Ospedale Umberto I – Uosd Di Cardiologia Name P.O. Don Tonino Bello – Uosd Cardiologia Name Asst Papa Giovanni Xxiii – Cardiologia 1 Name Iob – Policlinico San Marco – U.O. Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile – Sc Cardiologia Name Ospedale Santa Maria Del Prato – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Azienda Ospedaliera G. Rummo – Cardiologia Interventistica E Utic Name Ospedale Perrino – U.O.C. Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile Dario Camberlingo – U.O. Di Cardiologia – Utic Name Ospedale Civile 'La Memoria' – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Ics Maugeri Spa Societa' Benefit – U.O. Di Cardiologia Riabilitativa Name Osp. Andria Canosa – Po Andria – Cardiologia – Utic Name Ospedale Monsignor Angelo R. Di Miccoli – Unita' Operativa Di Cardiologia Name Presidio Ospedaliero Ss Trinita' – Sc Di Cardiologia Name Azienda Ospedaliera G. Brotzu – Struttura Complessa Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale A. Cardarelli – U.O. Cardiologia E Utic Name Presidio Ospedaliero Moscati – U.O.C. Cardiologia Name Az. Ospedaliera S. Anna E S. Sebastiano – Cardiologia E Riabilit. Cardiologica Name Az. Ospedaliera S. Anna E S. Sebastiano – U.O. Cardiologia-Utic Name Pineta Grande Hospital – U.O. Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile Ave Gratia Plena – U.O. Di Cardiologia E Utic Name Ospedale San Giuseppe E Melorio – U.O.C. Cardiologia Utic Name Presidio Ospedaliero San Rocco – U.O.C. Cardiologia – Utic Name Po Vittorio Emanuele Di Gela – U.O.C Cardiologia – Utic Name Ospedale Moriggia Pelascini – Unita' Operativa Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile Oglio Po – U.O. Di Cardiologia-Utic Name Ospedale Di Cremona – Uo Di Cardiologia Name Capt Di Cariati – Ambulatorio Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Annunziata – Uoc Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile Minervini – Medicina Interna Name P.O. Garibaldi-Nesima – U.O.C. Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Giovanni Paolo Ii – U.O. Cardiologia E Utic Name I.R.C.C.S. Oasi Maria Ss. – U.O. Cardiologia Name Ospedale M.Bufalini – U.O. Di Cardiologia-Utic Name Ospedale Ss. Annunziata – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Arcispedale Sant'Anna – U.O. Cardiologia – Utic Name Ospedale Civile Giuseppe Tatarella – U.O. Di Cardiologia – Utic Name Ospedali Riuniti – S.C. Di Cardiologia Univ.-Utic Name Ospedale Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza – Cardiologia – Utic – Riabil Cardiologica Name Ospedale Civile Augusto Murri – U.O. Cardiologia Name Ospedale Padre Antero Micone – Sc Cardiologia – Utic Name Ospedale San Giovanni Di Dio – S.O.C. Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile San Polo – S.O.C. Cardiologia Name Ospedale Della Misericordia – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile – U.O. Cardiologia-Utic Name Presidio Ospedaliero – U.O. Cardiologia Name Ospedale F. Veneziale – Ssd Cardiologia Emodinamica Name Ospedale San Giuseppe Da Copertino – U.O. Di Cardiologia-Utic Name Ospedale Santa Caterina Novella – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Casa Di Cura Petrucciani – U.O. Cardiologia – Card. Riabilitativa Name Ospedale Vito Fazzi – U.O. Card. Interventistica – Emodinamica Name Ospedale Vito Fazzi – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Ignazio Veris Delli Ponti – Uoc Cardiologia-Utic Name Azienda Osp. Cardinale G. Panico – U.O. Cardiologia – Utic Name Ospedale Villamarina – Cardiologia E Utic Name Casa Di Cura Citta' Di Aprilia – U.O. Cardiologia Name Ospedale Del Dono Svizzero – U.O.C. Di Cardiologia – Utic Name Polo Ospedaliero Integrato (C/O Icot) – Uoc Cardiologia Ed Emodinamica Univ. Name Nuovo Ospedale Versilia – Sc Cardiologia Name Ospedale Carate Brianza – Cardiologia – Carate Brianza/Giussano Name Policlinico Di Monza – Uo Cardiol. Clinica E Scompenso Cardiaco Name Presidio Osp. Di Civitanova Marche – Sc Cardiologia Name P.O. Sant'Agata Di Militello – Uoc Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile – Uo Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile Fornaroli – U.O. Cardiologia Name Istituto Clinico Citta' Studi – U.O. Cardiologia Name Ospedale San Raffaele – Utic E Subintensiva Name Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo – Cardiologia-Ucc Name Istituto Clinico Humanitas – Uo Emodinamica Cardiologia Invasiva Ucc Name Irccs Policlinico San Donato – U.O. Cardiologia Con Utic Name Irccs Policlinico Multimedica – Uo Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Di Vizzolo Predabissi – Uo Cardiologia E Ucc Name Ospedale Di Sassuolo – Cardiologia Name Ftgm – Stabilimento Di Massa – Uoc Cardiologia Diagn. E Interventistica Name Ospedale Apuane – U.O. Cardiologia-Utic Name Ospedale San Francesco – Cardiologia – Utic Name Casa Di Cura Candela – Uof Cardiologia Name Aor Villa Sofia-Cervello P.O. Cervello – U.O. Cardiologia – Cervello Name Ospedale Di Camposampiero – U.O.A. Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile Dello Spirito Santo – Utic E Cardiologia Interventistica Name Presidio Ospedaliero Citta' Di Castello – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Di Pordenone – S.O.C. Cardiologia Name Ospedale Di S. Vito Al Tagliamento – S.O.C. Cardiologia Name Fondazione Irccs Policlinico San Matteo – Cardiologia Name Ics Maugeri Spa Societa' Benefit – U.O. Di Riabilitazione Cardiologica Name Istituto Di Cura Citta' Di Pavia – U.O. Cardiologia Ii Name Ospedale Civile – Cardiologia Name Ospedale S. Giovanni Di Dio – U.O. Cardiologia E Utic Name Azienda Ospedaliera San Carlo – S.S.D. Cardiologia Riabilitativa Name Ospedale Per Gli Infermi – U.O. Cardiologia – Utic Name Ospedale Civile – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile Santa Maria Delle Croci – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile – S.O.C. Cardiologia-Utic Name Ospedale Tiberio Evoli Riabilitazione – Cardio-Respiratoria Name Ospedale Santa Maria Degli Ungheresi – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Ao Bianchi Melacrino Morelli- Po Riuniti – Divisione Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile San Sebastiano – Sos Cardiologia Area Nord Name Ospedale Civile – Sc Cardiologia Area Nord Name Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova – S.C. Cardiologia Name Giovanni Paolo Ii – U.O.C. Cardiologia-Utic Name Ospedale Riccardo Guzzardi – U.O.C. Di Cardiologia-Utic Name P.O. San Camillo de Lellis – U.O.C. Cardiologia Name Ospedali Riuniti Anzio-Nettuno – U.O. Di Cardiologia – Utic Name Nuovo Ospedale Dei Castelli – U.O.C. Di Cardiologia E Utic Name Ospedale Civile San Paolo – U.O. Cardiologia – Utic Name Policlinico Citta' Di Pomezia S. Anna – U.O. Cardiologia-Utic Name Campus Biomedico – Cardiologia Name P.O. San Filippo Neri – Asl Roma 1 – Uoc Cardiologia E Utic Name European Hospital – Uo. Cardiologia Interventistica Name Ospedale San Camillo – Cardiologia 2 (Ex Cardio 3) Name Ospedale San Camillo – Uoc Cardiologia 1 Name Ospedale Sandro Pertini – Uoc Cardiologia Name Policlinico Umberto Primo – Cardiologia B – Cardiologia E Angiologia Name Policlinico Umberto Primo – Malattie Cardiovascolari A Name Aurelia Hospital – U.O.C Cardiologia Name Ospedale Madre Giuseppina Vannini – U.O.C. Cardiologia Name Ospedale San Pietro Fatebenefratelli – U.O Complessa Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Sant'Andrea Di Roma – U.O.C. Cardiologia Name Ospedale Santo Spirito – U.O.C. Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale San Giovanni Evangelista – U.O.C. Di Cardiologia – Utic Name Ospedale Santa Maria Della Misericordia – U.O.C. Cardiologia Name Presidio Osped. S. Maria Della Speranza – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Di Roccadaspide – Cardiologia-Utic Name Aou S. Giovanni Di Dio-Ruggi D'Aragona – Uoc Cardiologia Preventiva Name Ospedale San Luca – U.O. Utic – Cardiologia Name Ospedale Dell'Alta Val D'Elsa – Uosd Cardiologia-Utic Name Aou Senese Ospedale S. Maria Alle Scotte – U.O.C. Cardiologia Ospedaliera Name Ospedale San Bartolomeo – U.O. Cardiologia Clinica-Riabilitativa Name Ospedale E. Muscatello – U.O. Di Cardiologia – Utic Name Ospedale G. Di Maria – Cardiologia Utic Name Ospedale Umberto I – Uoc Cardiologia E Utic Name Ospedale Civile M. Giannuzzi – Cardiologia E Utic Name Casa Di Cura Villa Verde – Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile G. Mazzini -Cardiologia Utic Ed Emodinamica Name Ospedale Santa Chiara – Divisione Di Cardiologia Name Por Cirie'- Lanzo Presidio Cirie' – S.C. Cardiologia Cirie'- Ivrea Name Ospedale Civile – S.C. Cardiologia Cirie' Ivrea Name Maria Pia Hospital – U.O. Cardiologia Name Ospedale Ss. Vito E Spirito – U.O.S. Di Cardiologia Name Presidio Ospedaliero Paolo Borsellino – U.O.C Cardiologia- Utic Name Ospedale S. Maria Della Stella – Sc Di Cardiologia Name Ospedali Riuniti – Osp. Maggiore – A.F. Cardiologia E Riabil. Cardiologica Name Ospedale Santa Maria Dei Battuti – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Pou Santa Maria Della Misericordia – S.O.C. Cardiologia Name Ospedale S. Antonio Abate – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Presidio Ospedaliero Di Saronno – U.O.C. Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Di Circolo A. Bellini – Medicina Generale E Card. Riabilitativa Name Ospedale Di Circolo Galmarini – Cardiologia Name Ospedale Di Circolo E Fondazione Macchi – Cardiologia I Name Ospedale Sant'Andrea – Sc Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile – U.O.C. Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile Di Venezia – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile – U.O.C. Cardiologia Name Centro Polifunzionale Boldrini – Cardiologia Riabilitativa-Cardioaction Name Ospedale G. Fracastoro – U.O.C. Di Cardiologia Name Ospedale Belcolle – U.O.C. Cardiologia Utic Emodinamica Name Clinica Citta' Di Alessandria – Uo Cardiologia Name Ospedale Civile Di Boscotrecase – Utic Cardiologia Name Ospedale San Giovanni Di Dio – Uo Cardiologia – Utic Name Ospedale Generale Di Zona – U.O. Cardiologia – Utic Name Clinica Mediterranea – U.O. Di Cardiologia Name Aorn Cardarelli – U.O. Cardiologia Con Utic Name Aorn Osp. Dei Colli- Po Vincenzo Monaldi – U.O.C. Cardiologia E Utic 'Vanvitelli' Name Aorn Osp. Dei Colli- Po Vincenzo Monaldi – U.O.C. Cardiologia Name Ospedale San Gennaro – U.O. Cardiologia E Riabilitazione Card. Name Ospedale Del Mare – U.O. Cardiologia Con Utic Name Aou Maggiore Della Carita' – Cardiologia Ii Name Aou Maggiore Della Carita' Scdu Clinica Cardiologica-Cardiologia I Name Clinica San Gaudenzio – Uoa Cardiologia Name Casa Di Salute Santa Lucia – U.O. Cardiologia Name Ics Maugeri Spa Societa' Benefit – Uo Cardiologia Riabilitativa
City Agrigento City Ancona City Fabriano City Jesi City Senigallia City Ascoli Piceno City San Benedetto Del Tronto City Cortona City Avellino City Bari City Bari City Cassano Delle Murge City Corato City Molfetta City Bergamo City Osio Sotto City Belluno City Feltre City Benevento City Brindisi City Francavilla Fontana City Gavardo City Lumezzane City Andria City Barletta City Cagliari City Cagliari City Campobasso City Aversa City Caserta City Caserta City Castel Volturno City Piedimonte Matese City Santa Maria Capua Vetere City Sessa Aurunca City Gela City Gravedona City Casalmaggiore City Cremona City Cariati City Cosenza City Mormanno City Catania City Lamezia Terme City Troina City Cesena City Cento City Ferrara City Cerignola City Foggia City San Giovanni Rotondo City Fermo City Genova City Gorizia City Monfalcone City Grosseto City Imperia City Sanremo City Isernia City Copertino City Galatina City Lecce City Lecce City Lecce City Scorrano City Tricase City Piombino City Aprilia City Formia City Latina City Lido Di Camaiore City Carate Brianza City Monza City Civitanova Marche City Sant'Agata Di Militello City Legnano City Magenta City Milano City Milano City Milano City Rozzano City San Donato Milanese City Sesto San Giovanni City Vizzolo Predabissi City Sassuolo City Massa City Massa City Nuoro City Palermo City Palermo City Camposampiero City Pescara City Città Di Castello City Pordenone City San Vito Al Tagliamento City Pavia City Pavia City Pavia City Vigevano City Melfi City Potenza City Faenza City Lugo City Ravenna City Locri City Melito di Porto Salvo City Polistena City Reggio Calabria City Correggio City Guastalla City Reggio Emilia City Ragusa City Vittoria City Rieti City Anzio City Ariccia City Civitavecchia City Pomezia City Roma City Roma City Roma City Roma City Roma City Roma City Roma City Roma City Roma City Roma City Roma City Roma City Roma City Tivoli City Rovigo City Battipaglia City Roccadaspide City Salerno City Vallo Della Lucania City Poggibonsi City Siena City Sarzana City Augusta City Avola City Siracusa City Manduria City Taranto City Teramo City Trento City Ciriè City Ivrea City Torino City Alcamo City Marsala City Orvieto City Trieste City Conegliano City Udine City Gallarate City Saronno City Somma Lombardo City Tradate City Varese City Vercelli City Chioggia City Venezia City Arzignano City Thiene City San Bonifacio City Viterbo City Alessandria City Boscotrecase City Frattamaggiore City Giugliano In Campania City Napoli City Napoli City Napoli City Napoli City Napoli City Napoli City Novara City Novara City Novara City San Giuseppe Vesuviano City Veruno
State AG State AN State AN State AN State AN State AP State AP State AR State AV State BA State BA State BA State BA State BA State BG State BG State BL State BL State BN State BR State BR State BS State BS State BT State BT State CA State CA State CB State CE State CE State CE State CE State CE State CE State CE State CL State CO State CR State CR State CS State CS State CS State CT State CZ State EN State FC State FE State FE State FG State FG State FG State FM State GE State GO State GO State GR State IM State IM State IS State LE State LE State LE State LE State LE State LE State LE State LI State LT State LT State LT State LU State MB State MB State MC State ME State MI State MI State MI State MI State MI State Mi State MI State MI State MI State MO State MS State MS State NU State PA State PA State PD State PE State PG State PN State PN State PV State PV State PV State PV State PZ State PZ State RA State RA State RA State RC State RC State RC State RC State RE State RE State RE State RG State RG State RI State RM State RM State RM State RM State RM State RM State RM State RM State RM State RM State RM State RM State RM State RM State RM State RM State RM State RM State RO State SA State SA State SA State SA State SI State SI State SP State SR State SR State SR State TA State TA State TE State TN State TO State TO State TO State TP State TP State TR State TS State TV State UD State VA State VA State VA State VA State VA State VC State VE State VE State VI State VI State VR State VT
Zip 92100 Zip 60131 Zip 60044 Zip 60035 Zip 60019 Zip 63100 Zip 63074 Zip 52044 Zip 83100 Zip 70123 Zip 70124 Zip 70020 Zip 70033 Zip 70056 Zip 24127 Zip 24046 Zip 32100 Zip 32032 Zip 82100 Zip 72100 Zip 72021 Zip 25085 Zip 25065 Zip 76123 Zip 76121 Zip 09121 Zip 09134 Zip 86100 Zip 81031 Zip 81100 Zip 81100 Zip 81030 Zip 81016 Zip 81055 Zip 81037 Zip 93012 Zip 22015 Zip 26041 Zip 26100 Zip 87063 Zip 87100 Zip 87026 Zip 95122 Zip 88046 Zip 94018 Zip 47023 Zip 44042 Zip 44124 Zip 71042 Zip 71100 Zip 71013 Zip 63900 Zip 16153 Zip 34170 Zip 34074 Zip 58100 Zip 18100 Zip 18038 Zip 86170 Zip 73043 Zip 73013 Zip 73100 Zip 73100 Zip 73100 Zip 73020 Zip 73039 Zip 57025 Zip 04011 Zip 04023 Zip 04100 Zip 55043 Zip 20048 Zip 20900 Zip 62012 Zip 98076 Zip 20025 Zip 20013 Zip 20131 Zip 20132 Zip 20153 Zip 20089 Zip 20097 Zip 20099 Zip 20077 Zip 41049 Zip 54100 Zip 54100 Zip 08100 Zip 90141 Zip 90146 Zip 35012 Zip 65124 Zip 06012 Zip 33170 Zip 33078 Zip 27100 Zip 27100 Zip 27100 Zip 27029 Zip 85025 Zip 85100 Zip 48018 Zip 48022 Zip 48100 Zip 89044 Zip 89063 Zip 89024 Zip 89124 Zip 42015 Zip 42016 Zip 42100 Zip 97100 Zip 97019 Zip 02100 Zip 00042 Zip 00040 Zip 00053 Zip 00040 Zip 00128 Zip 00135 Zip 00149 Zip 00152 Zip 00152 Zip 00157 Zip 00161 Zip 00161 Zip 00163 Zip 00177 Zip 00189 Zip 00189 Zip 00193 Zip 00019 Zip 45100 Zip 84091 Zip 84069 Zip 84131 Zip 84078 Zip 53036 Zip 53100 Zip 19038 Zip 96011 Zip 96012 Zip 96100 Zip 74024 Zip 74100 Zip 64100 Zip 38122 Zip 10073 Zip 10015 Zip 10132 Zip 91011 Zip 91025 Zip 05018 Zip 34125 Zip 31015 Zip 33100 Zip 21013 Zip 21047 Zip 21019 Zip 21049 Zip 21100 Zip 13100 Zip 30019 Zip 30122 Zip 36071 Zip 36016 Zip 37047 Zip 01100 Zip 15100 Zip 80042 Zip 80027 Zip 80014 Zip 80122 Zip 80131 Zip 80131 Zip 80131 Zip 80136 Zip 80142 Zip 28100 Zip 28100 Zip 28100 Zip 80047 Zip 28010
Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy Country Italy

Conditions

Sequence: 52321457
Name Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease
Downcase Name chronic ischemic heart disease

Id Information

Sequence: 40266176
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value K14

Countries

Sequence: 42685681
Name Italy
Removed False

Interventions

Sequence: 52632608
Intervention Type Other
Name Data collection on Stable Ischemic heart disease
Description No intervention only description of management and treatment

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177934596 Sequence: 177934592 Sequence: 177934593 Sequence: 177934594 Sequence: 177934595
Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Angina recurrence rate Measure Number of patients in medical therapy and that underwent revascularization Measure Number of patient in optimal medical therapy Measure Mortality rate Measure All cause hospitalization rate
Time Frame 12 months Follow-up Time Frame Enrollment Time Frame 12 months Follow-up Time Frame 12 months Follow-up Time Frame 12 months Follow-up
Description Rate of patients with angina symtoms Description Number of patients in medical therapy and that underwent revascularization Description Patient treated according to International Guidelines Description Rate of patients died Description Rate of patients hospitalized

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194059032 Sequence: 194059033 Sequence: 194059034 Sequence: 194059035 Sequence: 194059036 Sequence: 194059037 Sequence: 194059038 Sequence: 194059039
Mesh Term Coronary Artery Disease Mesh Term Myocardial Ischemia Mesh Term Coronary Disease Mesh Term Heart Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Arteriosclerosis Mesh Term Arterial Occlusive Diseases Mesh Term Vascular Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term coronary artery disease Downcase Mesh Term myocardial ischemia Downcase Mesh Term coronary disease Downcase Mesh Term heart diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term arteriosclerosis Downcase Mesh Term arterial occlusive diseases Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48460065
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Heart Care Foundation

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29365371
Role Study Chair
Name Leonardo De Luca, MD
Affiliation Heart Care Foundation

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30852372
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Consecutive patients discharged (after a hospitalization or DH hospitalization) or managed as outpatients in Cardiology department with diagnoses of stable coronary heart disease.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients aged >/= 18
Patients discharged from hospital or ambulatory visit with a diagnoses of stable heart disease;
Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Acute coronary syndrome within 30 days from enrollment
CCS Angina Class IV
Angina probably not for coronary artery disease

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254272145
Number Of Facilities 183
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 23
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 4

Designs

Sequence: 30598224
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28964714
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52225969 Sequence: 52225970 Sequence: 52225971 Sequence: 52225972 Sequence: 52225973 Sequence: 52225974 Sequence: 52225975 Sequence: 52225976 Sequence: 52225977
Pmid 30001355 Pmid 30039543 Pmid 31969932 Pmid 32470532 Pmid 32559279 Pmid 32830646 Pmid 33422564 Pmid 29124952 Pmid 30649303
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type result Reference Type result
Citation De Luca L, Temporelli PL, Lucci D, Colivicchi F, Calabro P, Riccio C, Amico A, Mascia F, Proia E, Di Lenarda A, Gulizia MM; START Investigators. Characteristics, treatment and quality of life of stable coronary artery disease patients with or without angina: Insights from the START study. PLoS One. 2018 Jul 12;13(7):e0199770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199770. eCollection 2018. Citation De Luca L, Arca M, Temporelli PL, Colivicchi F, Gonzini L, Lucci D, Bosco B, Callerame M, Lettica GV, Di Lenarda A, Gulizia MM; START Investigators. Prevalence and pharmacologic management of familial hypercholesterolemia in an unselected contemporary cohort of patients with stable coronary artery disease. Clin Cardiol. 2018 Aug;41(8):1075-1083. doi: 10.1002/clc.23031. Epub 2018 Aug 20. Citation Colivicchi F, Massimo Gulizia M, Arca M, Luigi Temporelli P, Gonzini L, Venturelli V, Morici N, Indolfi C, Gabrielli D, De Luca L. Lipid Lowering Treatment and Eligibility for PCSK9 Inhibition in Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients in Italy: Insights from Two Contemporary Nationwide Registries. Cardiovasc Ther. 2020 Jan 3;2020:3856242. doi: 10.1155/2020/3856242. eCollection 2020. Citation De Luca L, Arca M, Temporelli PL, Meessen J, Riccio C, Bonomo P, Colavita AR, Gabrielli D, Gulizia MM, Colivicchi F; START Investigators. Current lipid lowering treatment and attainment of LDL targets recommended by ESC/EAS guidelines in very high-risk patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Insights from the START registry. Int J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 1;316:229-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.05.055. Epub 2020 May 26. Citation De Luca L, Formigli D, Meessen J, Uguccioni M, Cosentino N, Paolillo C, Di Lenarda A, Colivicchi F, Gabrielli D, Gulizia MM, Scherillo M; START Investigators. COMPASS criteria applied to a contemporary cohort of unselected patients with stable coronary artery diseases: insights from the START registry. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2021 Sep 16;7(5):513-520. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa054. Citation De Luca L, Uguccioni M, Meessen J, Temporelli PL, Tomai F, De Rosa FM, Passamonti E, Formigli D, Riccio C, Gabrielli D, Colivicchi F, Gulizia MM, Perna GP. External applicability of the ISCHEMIA trial: an analysis of a prospective, nationwide registry of patients with stable coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention. 2020 Dec 18;16(12):e966-e973. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00610. Citation De Luca L, Temporelli PL, Amico AF, Gonzini L, Uguccioni M, Varani E, Brunetti ND, Colivicchi F, Gabrielli D, Gulizia MM. Impact of history of depression on 1-year outcomes in patients with chronic coronary syndromes: An analysis of a contemporary, prospective, nationwide registry. Int J Cardiol. 2021 May 15;331:273-280. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.12.086. Epub 2021 Jan 8. Citation De Luca L, Temporelli PL, Lucci D, Gonzini L, Riccio C, Colivicchi F, Geraci G, Formigli D, Maras P, Falcone C, Di Lenarda A, Gulizia MM; START Investigators. Current management and treatment of patients with stable coronary artery diseases presenting to cardiologists in different clinical contexts: A prospective, observational, nationwide study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Jan;25(1):43-53. doi: 10.1177/2047487317740663. Epub 2017 Nov 10. Citation De Luca L, Temporelli PL, Riccio C, Gonzini L, Marinacci L, Tartaglione SN, Costa P, Scherillo M, Senni M, Colivicchi F, Gulizia MM; START Investigators. Clinical outcomes, pharmacological treatment, and quality of life of patients with stable coronary artery diseases managed by cardiologists: 1-year results of the START study. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2019 Oct 1;5(4):334-342. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcz002.

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine for Lip Augmentation ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796728
2018-12-19

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796728
NCT03796728https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796728?tab=tableNANANAThis is an open-label, multi-center, study where eligible participants will undergo treatment with Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ with Lidocaine injected into the lips for lip augmentation.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-17
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-07-28
Start Month Year December 19, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year June 9, 2020
Verification Month Year July 2021
Verification Date 2021-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2021-07-28
Results First Posted Date 2021-07-28

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20717260
Description This is a prospective, open-label, multi-center, interventional, medical device, post-marketing study. Each participant will act as his/her own control. Eligible participants will undergo treatment with Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ with Lidocaine injected into the lips for lip augmentation.

Facilities

Sequence: 200061914 Sequence: 200061915 Sequence: 200061916 Sequence: 200061917
Name Clinica Milenio Name Clínica Secret Beauty Name Medical and Cosmetic Clinic Name MediZen Ltd
City Lisbon City Lisbon City Edinburgh City Sutton Coldfield
Zip 1600-166 Zip 1600-503 Zip EH3 6RS Zip B74 2UG
Country Portugal Country Portugal Country United Kingdom Country United Kingdom

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96032032 Sequence: 96032033 Sequence: 96032034 Sequence: 96032035 Sequence: 96032036 Sequence: 96032037 Sequence: 96032038 Sequence: 96032039 Sequence: 96032040 Sequence: 96032041 Sequence: 96032042 Sequence: 96032043
Mesh Term Lidocaine Mesh Term Anesthetics, Local Mesh Term Anesthetics Mesh Term Central Nervous System Depressants Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Sensory System Agents Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Agents Mesh Term Anti-Arrhythmia Agents Mesh Term Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers Mesh Term Sodium Channel Blockers Mesh Term Membrane Transport Modulators Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Downcase Mesh Term lidocaine Downcase Mesh Term anesthetics, local Downcase Mesh Term anesthetics Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system depressants Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term sensory system agents Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system agents Downcase Mesh Term anti-arrhythmia agents Downcase Mesh Term voltage-gated sodium channel blockers Downcase Mesh Term sodium channel blockers Downcase Mesh Term membrane transport modulators Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52158849
Name Lip Augmentation
Downcase Name lip augmentation

Id Information

Sequence: 40150046
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value CMO-MA-FAS-0512

Countries

Sequence: 42559641 Sequence: 42559642
Name Portugal Name United Kingdom
Removed False Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55580740
Group Type Experimental
Title Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ with Lidocaine
Description Initial treatment with Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ with Lidocaine injectable gel to augment the lips on Day 1, with an optional touch-up treatment 14 days later, if applicable. Volume was determined by the Investigator not to exceed 3.0 milliliters (mL).

Interventions

Sequence: 52474438
Intervention Type Device
Name Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ with Lidocaine
Description Injectable gel that is a sterile, biodegradable, non-pyrogenic, viscoelastic, clear, colorless, homogeneous gel implant (dermal filler).

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177336192 Sequence: 177336193 Sequence: 177336194 Sequence: 177336195 Sequence: 177336196 Sequence: 177336197 Sequence: 177336198 Sequence: 177336199 Sequence: 177336200
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1-point Improvement (Increase) in the Lip Fullness Scale (LFS2) Compared to Baseline Assessment at Day 30 Measure Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Measure Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Satisfaction With Lips as Measured by the FACE-Q Lips Questionnaire Measure Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Measure Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Measure Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Measure Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Measure Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Measure Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories
Time Frame Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to Day 30 Time Frame Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12 Time Frame Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12 Time Frame Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12 Time Frame Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12 Time Frame Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12 Time Frame Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12 Time Frame Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12 Time Frame Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12
Description The LFS2 is an Investigator assessment of overall lip fullness measured by a 5-point scale where: 0=Minimal (Flat or nearly flat contour; minimal red lip show), 1=Mild (Some red lip show; no lower lip pout), 2=Moderate (Moderate red lip show with slight lower lip pout), 3=Marked (Significant red lip show and lower lip pout), and 4=Very Marked (Very significant red lip show, lower lip pout, and upper lip pout). The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1-point Improvement (Increase) in the Lip Fullness Scale (LFS2) compared to Baseline are reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The FACE-Q™ is a validated 10 question assessment measuring how satisfied the participant is with their lips. Each question is answered on a 4-point scale where: 1=Very Dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat dissatisfied, 3=Somewhat satisfied, and 4= Very Satisfied. The responses to the items were converted to a 100-point Rausch transformed scale score: 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported.

Sponsors

Sequence: 48308423
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Allergan

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68134145
Design Group Id 55580740
Intervention Id 52474438

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30758794
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Male or female, 18 years of age or older
Signed the Institutional Independent Ethics Committee (IEC)-approved informed consent form prior to any study-related procedures being performed
Accept the obligation not to receive any other facial procedures or treatments anywhere in the lower face (below the orbital rim), neck, and oral cavity at any time during the study that are not related to the study
Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test before each injectable treatment and practice a reliable method of contraception throughout the study
Ability to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits and assessments, as assessed by the Investigator.

Exclusion Criteria:

Has lip tattoos, piercings, facial hair, or scars that would interfere with visualization of the lips and perioral area
Has dentures or any device covering all or part of the upper palate, and/or severe malocclusion or dentofacial or maxillofacial deformities
Has undergone oral surgery (e.g., tooth extraction, orthodontia, or implantation) within 6 weeks before enrollment or is planning to undergo any of these procedures during the study
Has ever undergone facial plastic surgery or received permanent facial implants (e.g., polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, polytetrafluoroethylene) anywhere in the face or neck, or is planning to be implanted with any of these products during the study
Has undergone semi-permanent dermal filler treatment (e.g., hyaluronic acid, calcium hydroxylapatite, poly-L-lactic acid) in the lower face (below the orbital rim) within 24 months before enrollment or is planning to undergo such treatment during the study
Has undergone mesotherapy or cosmetic resurfacing (laser, photo-modulation, intense pulsed light, radiofrequency, dermabrasion, chemical peel, or other ablative or non-ablative procedures) anywhere in the face or neck, or Botulinum toxin injections in the lower face (below the orbital rim) within 6 months before enrollment or is planning to undergo any of these procedures during the study
Has used any lip plumping products within 10 days before enrollment or is planning to use such products during the study (study treatment may be delayed as necessary to accommodate this 10-day washout period)
Has begun using any over-the-counter or prescription, oral or topical, anti-wrinkle products for the lips or around the mouth within 90 days before enrollment or is planning to begin using such products during the study (participants who have been on a regimen of such products for at least 90 days are eligible for the study if they intend to continue their regimen throughout the study)
Is on an ongoing regimen of anti-coagulation therapy (e.g., warfarin) or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (e.g., aspirin, ibuprofen) or other substances known to increase coagulation time (e.g., herbal supplements with garlic or gingko) within 10 days of undergoing study device treatment (study treatment may be delayed as necessary to accommodate this 10-day washout period)
Is on a concurrent regimen of lidocaine or structurally related local anesthetics (e.g., bupivacaine)
Has a history of anaphylaxis, atopy, or allergy to lidocaine, hyaluronic acid (HA) products, or Streptococcal protein, or is planning to undergo desensitization therapy during the study
Has an active inflammation, infection, cancerous or precancerous lesion, or unhealed wound in the mouth area
Has porphyria
Has epilepsy
Has impaired cardiac conduction, severely impaired hepatic function, or severe renal dysfunction
Has any uncontrolled disease
Females who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy
Current enrollment in an investigational drug or device study, participation in such a study within 6 weeks before enrollment, or be planning to participate in another investigation during the course of this study
Is an employee (or immediate relative of an employee) of the Investigator, Allergan, or a representative of Allergan

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254251198
Number Of Facilities 4
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 17
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 12
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 8

Designs

Sequence: 30505011
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description All participants will sign an informed consent form, and begin at the Screening Visit. Filler treatment (Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ with Lidocaine) will be performed at (Initial Treatment visit) and data will be collected at this visit for all relevant parameters as per the Schedule of Study Procedures, Treatments and Assessments. Fourteen days after the initial treatment, participants will return to the clinic and the Investigator will assess whether a Touch-up treatment is to be performed at this visit. Follow up visits will occur at Day 30 and 3, 6, and 12 months after the last treatment.

Drop Withdrawals

Sequence: 28983586 Sequence: 28983587
Result Group Id 56087637 Result Group Id 56087637
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Reason Lost to Follow-up Reason Reason not Specified
Count 8 Count 16

Milestones

Sequence: 41000882 Sequence: 41000883 Sequence: 41000884
Result Group Id 56087637 Result Group Id 56087637 Result Group Id 56087637
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000
Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Count 60 Count 36 Count 24

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3920807

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 73990181 Sequence: 73990182 Sequence: 73990183 Sequence: 73990184 Sequence: 73990185 Sequence: 73990186 Sequence: 73990187 Sequence: 73990188 Sequence: 73990189
Outcome Id 30800490 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800492 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800498
Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 59 Count 59 Count 59 Count 59 Count 59 Count 59 Count 59 Count 59 Count 59

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2578525 Sequence: 2578526
Document Type Study Protocol Document Type Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True Has Protocol False
Has Icf False Has Icf False
Has Sap False Has Sap True
Document Date 2019-10-10 Document Date 2019-10-10
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/28/NCT03796728/Prot_000.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/28/NCT03796728/SAP_001.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 27939439 Sequence: 27939440 Sequence: 27939441
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 60 Subjects At Risk 60 Subjects At Risk 60
Created At 2023-08-08 23:06:53.472604 Created At 2023-08-08 23:06:53.472604 Created At 2023-08-08 23:06:53.472604
Updated At 2023-08-08 23:06:53.472604 Updated At 2023-08-08 23:06:53.472604 Updated At 2023-08-08 23:06:53.472604

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28871291
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3851551
Pi Employee No
Restriction Type OTHER
Other Details A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
Restrictive Agreement A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3851516
Organization Allergan
Name Therapeutic Area, Head
Phone 714-246-4500
Email clinicaltrials@allergan.com

Outcomes

Sequence: 30800490 Sequence: 30800496 Sequence: 30800491 Sequence: 30800492 Sequence: 30800493 Sequence: 30800494 Sequence: 30800495 Sequence: 30800497 Sequence: 30800498
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary
Title Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1-point Improvement (Increase) in the Lip Fullness Scale (LFS2) Compared to Baseline Assessment at Day 30 Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Satisfaction With Lips as Measured by the FACE-Q Lips Questionnaire Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories
Description The LFS2 is an Investigator assessment of overall lip fullness measured by a 5-point scale where: 0=Minimal (Flat or nearly flat contour; minimal red lip show), 1=Mild (Some red lip show; no lower lip pout), 2=Moderate (Moderate red lip show with slight lower lip pout), 3=Marked (Significant red lip show and lower lip pout), and 4=Very Marked (Very significant red lip show, lower lip pout, and upper lip pout). The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1-point Improvement (Increase) in the Lip Fullness Scale (LFS2) compared to Baseline are reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The FACE-Q™ is a validated 10 question assessment measuring how satisfied the participant is with their lips. Each question is answered on a 4-point scale where: 1=Very Dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat dissatisfied, 3=Somewhat satisfied, and 4= Very Satisfied. The responses to the items were converted to a 100-point Rausch transformed scale score: 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported.
Time Frame Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to Day 30 Time Frame Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12 Time Frame Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12 Time Frame Baseline (Prior to Treatment) to Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12 Time Frame Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12 Time Frame Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12 Time Frame Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12 Time Frame Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12 Time Frame Day 30, Months 3, 6, and 12
Population Evaluable Set included all participants in the Full Analysis Set who had at least a Baseline and a Day 30 post-treatment efficacy assessment during the study. Population Evaluable Set included all participants in the Full Analysis Set who had at least a Baseline and a Day 30 post-treatment efficacy assessment during the study. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given timepoint. Population Evaluable Set included all participants in the Full Analysis Set who had at least a Baseline and a Day 30 post-treatment efficacy assessment during the study. Number analyzed is the number of participants with available data for analysis at the given timepoint Population Evaluable Set included all participants in the Full Analysis Set who had at least a Baseline and a Day 30 post-treatment efficacy assessment during the study. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given timepoint. Population Evaluable Set included all participants in the Full Analysis Set who had at least a Baseline and a Day 30 post-treatment efficacy assessment during the study. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given timepoint. Population Evaluable Set included all participants in the Full Analysis Set who had at least a Baseline and a Day 30 post-treatment efficacy assessment during the study. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given timepoint. Population Evaluable Set included all participants in the Full Analysis Set who had at least a Baseline and a Day 30 post-treatment efficacy assessment during the study. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given timepoint. Population Evaluable Set included all participants in the Full Analysis Set who had at least a Baseline and a Day 30 post-treatment efficacy assessment during the study. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given timepoint. Population Evaluable Set included all participants in the Full Analysis Set who had at least a Baseline and a Day 30 post-treatment efficacy assessment during the study. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given timepoint.
Units percentage of participants Units Participants Units Participants Units score on a scale Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Param Type Number Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 235627458 Sequence: 235627459 Sequence: 235627460 Sequence: 235627461 Sequence: 235627462 Sequence: 235627463 Sequence: 235627464 Sequence: 235627465 Sequence: 235627466 Sequence: 235627467 Sequence: 235627468 Sequence: 235627469 Sequence: 235627470 Sequence: 235627471 Sequence: 235627472 Sequence: 235627473 Sequence: 235627474 Sequence: 235627475 Sequence: 235627476 Sequence: 235627477 Sequence: 235627478 Sequence: 235627479 Sequence: 235627480 Sequence: 235627481 Sequence: 235627482 Sequence: 235627483 Sequence: 235627484 Sequence: 235627485 Sequence: 235627486 Sequence: 235627487 Sequence: 235627488 Sequence: 235627489 Sequence: 235627490 Sequence: 235627491 Sequence: 235627492 Sequence: 235627493 Sequence: 235627494 Sequence: 235627495 Sequence: 235627496 Sequence: 235627497 Sequence: 235627498 Sequence: 235627499 Sequence: 235627500 Sequence: 235627501 Sequence: 235627502 Sequence: 235627503 Sequence: 235627504 Sequence: 235627505 Sequence: 235627506 Sequence: 235627507 Sequence: 235627508 Sequence: 235627509 Sequence: 235627510 Sequence: 235627511 Sequence: 235627512 Sequence: 235627513 Sequence: 235627514 Sequence: 235627515 Sequence: 235627516 Sequence: 235627517 Sequence: 235627518 Sequence: 235627519 Sequence: 235627520 Sequence: 235627521 Sequence: 235627522 Sequence: 235627523 Sequence: 235627524 Sequence: 235627530 Sequence: 235627525 Sequence: 235627526 Sequence: 235627527 Sequence: 235627528 Sequence: 235627529 Sequence: 235627531 Sequence: 235627532 Sequence: 235627533 Sequence: 235627534 Sequence: 235627535 Sequence: 235627536 Sequence: 235627537 Sequence: 235627538 Sequence: 235627539 Sequence: 235627540 Sequence: 235627541 Sequence: 235627542 Sequence: 235627543 Sequence: 235627544 Sequence: 235627545 Sequence: 235627567 Sequence: 235627546 Sequence: 235627547 Sequence: 235627548 Sequence: 235627549 Sequence: 235627550 Sequence: 235627551 Sequence: 235627552 Sequence: 235627568 Sequence: 235627553 Sequence: 235627554 Sequence: 235627555 Sequence: 235627556 Sequence: 235627557 Sequence: 235627558 Sequence: 235627559 Sequence: 235627560 Sequence: 235627561 Sequence: 235627562 Sequence: 235627563 Sequence: 235627564 Sequence: 235627565 Sequence: 235627566 Sequence: 235627569 Sequence: 235627570 Sequence: 235627571 Sequence: 235627572 Sequence: 235627573 Sequence: 235627574 Sequence: 235627575 Sequence: 235627576 Sequence: 235627577 Sequence: 235627578 Sequence: 235627579 Sequence: 235627580 Sequence: 235627581 Sequence: 235627582 Sequence: 235627583 Sequence: 235627584 Sequence: 235627585 Sequence: 235627586 Sequence: 235627587 Sequence: 235627588 Sequence: 235627589 Sequence: 235627590 Sequence: 235627591 Sequence: 235627592 Sequence: 235627593 Sequence: 235627594 Sequence: 235627595 Sequence: 235627596 Sequence: 235627597 Sequence: 235627598 Sequence: 235627599 Sequence: 235627600 Sequence: 235627601 Sequence: 235627602 Sequence: 235627603 Sequence: 235627604 Sequence: 235627605 Sequence: 235627606 Sequence: 235627607 Sequence: 235627608 Sequence: 235627609 Sequence: 235627610
Outcome Id 30800490 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800491 Outcome Id 30800492 Outcome Id 30800492 Outcome Id 30800492 Outcome Id 30800492 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800493 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800494 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800495 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800496 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800497 Outcome Id 30800498 Outcome Id 30800498 Outcome Id 30800498 Outcome Id 30800498 Outcome Id 30800498 Outcome Id 30800498 Outcome Id 30800498 Outcome Id 30800498 Outcome Id 30800498 Outcome Id 30800498 Outcome Id 30800498 Outcome Id 30800498 Outcome Id 30800498 Outcome Id 30800498 Outcome Id 30800498 Outcome Id 30800498
Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638 Result Group Id 56087638
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000
Classification Change from Baseline to Day 30 Classification Change from Baseline to Day 30 Classification Change from Baseline to Day 30 Classification Change from Baseline to Day 30 Classification Change from Baseline to Day 30 Classification Change from Baseline to Day 30 Classification Change from Baseline to Day 30 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 3 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 3 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 3 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 3 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 3 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 3 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 3 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 6 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 6 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 6 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 6 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 6 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 6 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 6 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 12 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 12 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 12 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 12 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 12 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 12 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 12 Classification Change from Baseline to Day 30 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 3 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 6 Classification Change from Baseline to Month 12 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Day 30 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 3 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 6 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12 Classification Month 12
Category -3 Point Change Category -2 Point Change Category -1 Point Change Category 0 Point Change (No change) Category 1 Point Change Category 2 Point Change Category 3 Point Change Category -3 Point Change Category -2 Point Change Category -1 Point Change Category 0 Point Change (No change) Category 1 Point Change Category 2 Point Change Category 3 Point Change Category -3 Point Change Category -2 Point Change Category -1 Point Change Category 0 Point Change (No change) Category 1 Point Change Category 2 Point Change Category 3 Point Change Category -3 Point Change Category -2 Point Change Category -1 Point Change Category 0 Point Change (No change) Category 1 Point Change Category 2 Point Change Category 3 Point Change Category 2=Much Improved Category 1=Improved Category 0=No Change Category -1=Worse Category -2=Much Worse Category 2=Much Improved Category 1=Improved Category 0=No Change Category -1=Worse Category -2=Much Worse Category 2=Much Improved Category 1=Improved Category 0=No Change Category -1=Worse Category -2=Much Worse Category 2=Much Improved Category 1=Improved Category 0=No Change Category -1=Worse Category -2=Much Worse Category 2=Much Improved Category 1=Improved Category 0=No Change Category -1=Worse Category -2=Much Worse Category 2=Much Improved Category 1=Improved Category 0=No Change Category -1=Worse Category -2=Much Worse Category 2=Much Improved Category 1=Improved Category 0=No Change Category -1=Worse Category -2=Much Worse Category -2=Much Worse Category 2=Much Improved Category 1=Improved Category 0=No Change Category -1=Worse Category 0=Not at all Category 1 Category 2=Somewhat Category 3 Category 4=Very much Category Missing Category 0=Not at all Category 1 Category 2=Somewhat Category 3 Category 4=Very much Category Missing Category 0=Not at all Category 1 Category 2=Somewhat Category 2=Somewhat Category 3 Category 4=Very much Category Missing Category 0=Not at all Category 1 Category 2=Somewhat Category 3 Category 3 Category 4=Very much Category Missing Category 0=Not at all Category 1 Category 2=Somewhat Category 3 Category 4=Very much Category 0=Not at all Category 1 Category 2=Somewhat Category 3 Category 4=Very much Category 0=Not at all Category 1 Category 4=Very much Category 0=Not at all Category 1 Category 2=Somewhat Category 3 Category 4=Very much Category 0=Lumpy/Grainy Category 1=Faintly Smooth Category 2=Somewhat Smooth Category 3=Smooth Category 4=Very Smooth Category 0=Lumpy/Grainy Category 1=Faintly Smooth Category 2=Somewhat Smooth Category 3=Smooth Category 4=Very Smooth Category 0=Lumpy/Grainy Category 1=Faintly Smooth Category 2=Somewhat Smooth Category 3=Smooth Category 4=Very Smooth Category 0=Lumpy/Grainy Category 1=Faintly Smooth Category 2=Somewhat Smooth Category 3=Smooth Category 4=Very Smooth Category 0=Worse Category 1=No Change Category 2=Improved Category 3=Much Improved Category 0=Worse Category 1=No Change Category 2=Improved Category 3=Much Improved Category 0=Worse Category 1=No Change Category 2=Improved Category 3=Much Improved Category 0=Worse Category 1=No Change Category 2=Improved Category 3=Much Improved
Title Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1-point Improvement (Increase) in the Lip Fullness Scale (LFS2) Compared to Baseline Assessment at Day 30 Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Investigator's Assessment of Oral Commissures Lines as Measured by the 4-point Oral Commissures Severity Scale (OCSS) Title Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Satisfaction With Lips as Measured by the FACE-Q Lips Questionnaire Title Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Satisfaction With Lips as Measured by the FACE-Q Lips Questionnaire Title Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Satisfaction With Lips as Measured by the FACE-Q Lips Questionnaire Title Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Overall Satisfaction With Lips as Measured by the FACE-Q Lips Questionnaire Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Category as Measured by the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Participant's Assessment of Global Aesthetic Improvement Score Categories as Measured by the 5-point GAIS Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Look of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Assessment of Natural Feel of Their Lips Score Category as Measured by a 5-point Likert Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Product Smoothness Score Categories as Measured by a 5-point Scale Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories Title Number of Participants by Investigator's Assessment of Dynamic Lip Lines Upon Animation Score Categories
Description The LFS2 is an Investigator assessment of overall lip fullness measured by a 5-point scale where: 0=Minimal (Flat or nearly flat contour; minimal red lip show), 1=Mild (Some red lip show; no lower lip pout), 2=Moderate (Moderate red lip show with slight lower lip pout), 3=Marked (Significant red lip show and lower lip pout), and 4=Very Marked (Very significant red lip show, lower lip pout, and upper lip pout). The percentage of participants with a ≥ 1-point Improvement (Increase) in the Lip Fullness Scale (LFS2) compared to Baseline are reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's oral commissures lines (lines at the corner of the mouth) using the OCSS 4 point scale where: 0=None (No wrinkle or fold; slight upturned corners), 1=Mild (Shallow, just perceptible wrinkle or crease; horizontal or slightly downturned corners), 2=Moderate (Moderately deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; downturned corners), and 3=Severe (Very deep and/or long wrinkle or crease; frown at rest). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening. The number of participants is reported for each of the following point changes from Baseline: -3 to 3 at each timepoint. Description The FACE-Q™ is a validated 10 question assessment measuring how satisfied the participant is with their lips. Each question is answered on a 4-point scale where: 1=Very Dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat dissatisfied, 3=Somewhat satisfied, and 4= Very Satisfied. The responses to the items were converted to a 100-point Rausch transformed scale score: 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Description The FACE-Q™ is a validated 10 question assessment measuring how satisfied the participant is with their lips. Each question is answered on a 4-point scale where: 1=Very Dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat dissatisfied, 3=Somewhat satisfied, and 4= Very Satisfied. The responses to the items were converted to a 100-point Rausch transformed scale score: 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Description The FACE-Q™ is a validated 10 question assessment measuring how satisfied the participant is with their lips. Each question is answered on a 4-point scale where: 1=Very Dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat dissatisfied, 3=Somewhat satisfied, and 4= Very Satisfied. The responses to the items were converted to a 100-point Rausch transformed scale score: 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Description The FACE-Q™ is a validated 10 question assessment measuring how satisfied the participant is with their lips. Each question is answered on a 4-point scale where: 1=Very Dissatisfied, 2=Somewhat dissatisfied, 3=Somewhat satisfied, and 4= Very Satisfied. The responses to the items were converted to a 100-point Rausch transformed scale score: 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator assessed the participant's global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1=Improved, 0=No Change, -1= Worse, and -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed their global aesthetic improvement using the GAIS 5-point scale where: 2=Much Improved, 1= Improved, 0=No Change, -1=Worse, -2=Much Worse. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural look of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The participant assessed the natural feel of their lips using a 5-point Likert scale where: 0=Not at All to 4=Very Much. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The Investigator evaluated the smoothness of product using a 5-point scale where: 0=Lumpy/Grainy, 1=Faintly Smooth, 2=Somewhat Smooth, 3= Smooth, and 4=Very Smooth. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported. Description The investigator evaluated the improvement of the participant's dynamic lip lines upon animation using a 4-point scale where: 0=Worse, 1=No Change, 2=Improved, 3=Much Improved. The number of participants in each score response category at each timepoint is reported.
Units percentage of participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Param Type Number Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 93.2 Param Value 0 Param Value 5 Param Value 29 Param Value 25 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 4 Param Value 27 Param Value 21 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 3 Param Value 22 Param Value 21 Param Value 4 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 3 Param Value 9 Param Value 22 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 45.2 Param Value 42.7 Param Value 38.5 Param Value 23.6 Param Value 32 Param Value 27 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 24 Param Value 28 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 12 Param Value 39 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 28 Param Value 6 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 32 Param Value 25 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 28 Param Value 21 Param Value 3 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 15 Param Value 34 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 6 Param Value 25 Param Value 5 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 3 Param Value 18 Param Value 38 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 15 Param Value 37 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 20 Param Value 30 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 4 Param Value 5 Param Value 21 Param Value 26 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 5 Param Value 21 Param Value 32 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 17 Param Value 34 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 28 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 4 Param Value 4 Param Value 28 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 22 Param Value 35 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 3 Param Value 14 Param Value 35 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 17 Param Value 33 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 33 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 30 Param Value 27 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 28 Param Value 22 Param Value 0 Param Value 6 Param Value 26 Param Value 19 Param Value 0 Param Value 10 Param Value 20 Param Value 6
Param Value Num 93.2 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 29.0 Param Value Num 25.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 27.0 Param Value Num 21.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 22.0 Param Value Num 21.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 9.0 Param Value Num 22.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 45.2 Param Value Num 42.7 Param Value Num 38.5 Param Value Num 23.6 Param Value Num 32.0 Param Value Num 27.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 24.0 Param Value Num 28.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 12.0 Param Value Num 39.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 28.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 32.0 Param Value Num 25.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 28.0 Param Value Num 21.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 15.0 Param Value Num 34.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 25.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 18.0 Param Value Num 38.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 15.0 Param Value Num 37.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 20.0 Param Value Num 30.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 21.0 Param Value Num 26.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 21.0 Param Value Num 32.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 17.0 Param Value Num 34.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 28.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 28.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 22.0 Param Value Num 35.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 14.0 Param Value Num 35.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 17.0 Param Value Num 33.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 33.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 30.0 Param Value Num 27.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 28.0 Param Value Num 22.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 26.0 Param Value Num 19.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 10.0 Param Value Num 20.0 Param Value Num 6.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 27.16 Dispersion Value 30.23 Dispersion Value 26.25 Dispersion Value 31.78
Dispersion Value Num 27.16 Dispersion Value Num 30.23 Dispersion Value Num 26.25 Dispersion Value Num 31.78

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11381955
Result Group Id 56087636
Ctgov Group Code BG000
Units Participants
Scope overall
Count 60

Result Groups

Sequence: 56087636 Sequence: 56087637 Sequence: 56087638 Sequence: 56087639
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000
Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event
Title Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine Title Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine Title Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine Title Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine
Description Initial treatment with Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ with Lidocaine injectable gel to augment the lips on Day 1, with an optional touch-up treatment 14 days later, if applicable. Volume was determined by the Investigator not to exceed 3.0 milliliters (mL). Description Initial treatment with Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ with Lidocaine injectable gel to augment the lips on Day 1, with an optional touch-up treatment 14 days later, if applicable. Volume was determined by the Investigator not to exceed 3.0 milliliters (mL). Description Initial treatment with Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ with Lidocaine injectable gel to augment the lips on Day 1, with an optional touch-up treatment 14 days later, if applicable. Volume was determined by the Investigator not to exceed 3.0 milliliters (mL). Description Initial treatment with Juvéderm® VOLIFT™ with Lidocaine injectable gel to augment the lips on Day 1, with an optional touch-up treatment 14 days later, if applicable. Volume was determined by the Investigator not to exceed 3.0 milliliters (mL).

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 125567295 Sequence: 125567296 Sequence: 125567297
Result Group Id 56087636 Result Group Id 56087636 Result Group Id 56087636
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000
Category Female Category Male
Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male
Units years Units Participants Units Participants
Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 36.8 Param Value 59 Param Value 1
Param Value Num 36.8 Param Value Num 59.0 Param Value Num 1.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 9.25
Dispersion Value Num 9.25
Number Analyzed 60 Number Analyzed 60 Number Analyzed 60

]]>

<![CDATA[ Red Cell Distribution Width Versus Presepsin (Soluble CD14) as a Prognostic Marker in Critically-ill Sepsis Patients ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796715
2018-08-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796715
NCT03796715https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796715?tab=tableNANANAPresepsin (soluble CD14 subtype) is a novel marker with growing body of evidence supporting its accuracy and value for the diagnosis of sepsis. Patients with sepsis showed higher Prsepsin levels compared to those with SIRS. In addition the increase in Prsepsin levels correlates well with sepsis severity. Red cell distribution width variations are increased in a variety of medical conditions such as congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, critical illness, and cardiac arrest , and is a predictor of mortality in the general population. we aim to compare between Presepsin (soluble CD14) and RDW as prognostic markers in critically-ill patients with sepsis.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-01
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year August 1, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year November 20, 2018
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Facilities

Sequence: 200279701
Name Ain Shams University Hospitals
City Cairo
Zip 11591
Country Egypt

Conditions

Sequence: 52221188
Name Sepsis
Downcase Name sepsis

Id Information

Sequence: 40195390
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value FMASU R76/2018

Countries

Sequence: 42609346
Name Egypt
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55649415 Sequence: 55649416
Title Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) Title Presepsin (sCD14-ST)
Description RDW was assessed as part of complete blood count analysis using SYSMEX XN-550 automated analyzer Description Presepsin analysis was done by utilising Elisa technique using kits from (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA 92195-3308 USA)

Interventions

Sequence: 52534957 Sequence: 52534956
Intervention Type Diagnostic Test Intervention Type Diagnostic Test
Name Presepsin (sCD14-ST) Name Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW)
Description : A total of 100 sepsis patients, Presepsin (sCD14-ST) was used as prognostic marker. Description A total of 100 sepsis patients, Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) was used as prognostic marker.

Keywords

Sequence: 79941319 Sequence: 79941320 Sequence: 79941321
Name sepsis Name presepsin Name red cell distribution width
Downcase Name sepsis Downcase Name presepsin Downcase Name red cell distribution width

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177560092 Sequence: 177560093 Sequence: 177560094 Sequence: 177560095 Sequence: 177560096 Sequence: 177560097 Sequence: 177560098
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Mortality during intensive care unit stay Measure Length of ICU stay Measure Need for readmission to ICU Measure Ventilatory support duration Measure Number of participants who need renal replacement therapy Measure Number of participants who need inotropic or vasopressor support Measure Transfusion requirements (blood and blood products)
Time Frame 28 days Time Frame assessed up to 3 months Time Frame assessed up to 3 months Time Frame assessed up to 3 months Time Frame assessed up to 3 months Time Frame assessed up to 3 months Time Frame assessed up to 3 months

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193677223 Sequence: 193677224 Sequence: 193677225 Sequence: 193677226 Sequence: 193677227 Sequence: 193677228
Mesh Term Sepsis Mesh Term Toxemia Mesh Term Infections Mesh Term Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Mesh Term Inflammation Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term sepsis Downcase Mesh Term toxemia Downcase Mesh Term infections Downcase Mesh Term systemic inflammatory response syndrome Downcase Mesh Term inflammation Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48366092
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Ain Shams University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29312749
Role Principal Investigator
Name Ahmed Elsayed
Affiliation Ain Shams University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68216864 Sequence: 68216865
Design Group Id 55649415 Design Group Id 55649416
Intervention Id 52534956 Intervention Id 52534957

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30794507
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 65 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Patients admitted to the general ICU with sepsis or septic shock of both sexes between 18 and 65 years of age.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Male or female aged 18 65 years.
Appropriate clinical data to enable classification into sepsis or SIRS according to Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).
Written informed consent by the patient or guardian

Exclusion Criteria:

No informed consent
Renal failure
Liver failure
Hematologic diseases
Neutropenia
Malignancy
Chemotherapy during the previous 90 days.
Patients using antibiotics at presentation

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254003994
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 3
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 65
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30540547
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Retrospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28906867
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Ahmed Elsayed
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation Ain Shams University

]]>

<![CDATA[ Early Versus Late Closure of Preventive Ileostomy ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796702
2011-11-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796702
NCT03796702https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796702?tab=tableNANANAThe study is designed and performed as a prospective randomized controlled single-center study. Patients who underwent rectal resection with preventive ileostomy due to rectal cancer will be included. The study investigates the effect of reversing a temporary ileostomy after 30 vs 90 days.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-30
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-04-26
Start Month Year November 1, 2011
Primary Completion Month Year November 30, 2018
Verification Month Year April 2023
Verification Date 2023-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2023-04-26

Facilities

Sequence: 199010325
Name National Cancer Institute
City Vilnius
Country Lithuania

Conditions

Sequence: 51898409
Name Ileostomy, Rectal Cancer
Downcase Name ileostomy, rectal cancer

Id Information

Sequence: 39944504
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 1

Countries

Sequence: 42336779
Name Lithuania
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55309329 Sequence: 55309330
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title Early closure of preventive ileostomy Title Late closure of preventive ileostomy
Description A preventive ileostomy is closed 30 days after the primary surgery Description A preventive ileostomy is closed 90 days after the primary surgery

Interventions

Sequence: 52214167
Intervention Type Procedure
Name Deileostomy
Description Deileostomy

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176450404 Sequence: 176450405 Sequence: 176450406 Sequence: 176450407
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Postoperative morbidity Measure Hospitalization time after ileostomy closure Measure 30-days re-admission rate Measure Quality of life of patients after ileostomy closure
Time Frame 30 days after surgery Time Frame 30 days after surgery Time Frame 30 days after surgery Time Frame at 3, 6, 9 and 12 moths after surgery
Description Patients are scored according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications. Description Hospitalization time Description Re-admission rate during 30 days after re-admission Description Patients quality of life is assessed with EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192389436 Sequence: 192389437 Sequence: 192389438 Sequence: 192389439 Sequence: 192389440 Sequence: 192389441 Sequence: 192389442 Sequence: 192389443 Sequence: 192389444 Sequence: 192389445 Sequence: 192389446
Mesh Term Rectal Neoplasms Mesh Term Colorectal Neoplasms Mesh Term Intestinal Neoplasms Mesh Term Gastrointestinal Neoplasms Mesh Term Digestive System Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases Mesh Term Gastrointestinal Diseases Mesh Term Intestinal Diseases Mesh Term Rectal Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term rectal neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term colorectal neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term intestinal neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term gastrointestinal neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term digestive system neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases Downcase Mesh Term gastrointestinal diseases Downcase Mesh Term intestinal diseases Downcase Mesh Term rectal diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48062877
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Vilnius University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67805880 Sequence: 67805881
Design Group Id 55309329 Design Group Id 55309330
Intervention Id 52214167 Intervention Id 52214167

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30603583
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients with temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for rectal cancer
Patients willing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

Anastomosis insufficiency detected clinically or radiologically.
Patients, who are physically and mentally unfit to undergo surgery or to be followed-up

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253917993
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 86
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30350944
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Caregiver Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28724311
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Rimantas Bausys
Title Investigator
Affiliation Vilnius University

]]>

<![CDATA[ The PCORnet Blood Pressure Home Monitoring Study ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796689
2019-08-15

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796689
NCT03796689https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796689?tab=tableNANANAThe PCORnet Blood Pressure Home Monitoring (BP HOME) Study is a patient-level randomized controlled trial that will compare the effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring (HPBM) with versus without a linked Smartphone application (“app”) for helping patients with uncontrolled hypertension achieve a reduction in systolic blood pressure. The trial will be conducted within the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet), which supports a research network that enables distributed querying of EHR data in a common data model. It will also use the Eureka Research Platform, an online research platform hosted by UCSF that supports eConsent, online surveys, and data collection from devices such as HBPMs. Data from these two data sources will be used together to accomplish the study aims. Given that HBPM is the guideline-recommended standard of care (without specification of Smartphone linkage), the HPBM devices and the app are all commercially available and currently in use, and that clinicians, with input from patients, will maintain full control of how BP is clinically managed, we believe participation in the project poses minimal risk to participants.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-11-16
Start Month Year August 15, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year October 23, 2021
Verification Month Year October 2022
Verification Date 2022-10-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-11-16
Results First Posted Date 2022-11-16

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20825201
Description We have designed a patient-level randomized controlled trial that will compare the effectiveness of Smartphone-linked versus standard HBPM for helping patients with uncontrolled hypertension achieve a reduction in their Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), and patient satisfaction with the device. Our original plan was to recruit 2000 patients who would be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a Smartphone-linked or standard HBPM. However, to recruit higher diversity with more African Americans and LatinX patients, we extended the recruitment period.* We will use data from the electronic health record (EHR), an online patient portal, and the home BP monitor (in the Smartphone-linked arm) to collect outcome data for a period of at least 6 months (for the primary outcome), and up to 18 months (for secondary outcomes, depending on enrollment date). The primary BP control outcome will be reduction in SBP, by clinic measurements, at 6 months. The primary patient satisfaction outcome will be the Net Promoter Score derived from self-reported likelihood of recommending the device to a friend, at 6 months.

*edited after completing recruitment

Facilities

Sequence: 201065113 Sequence: 201065114 Sequence: 201065115 Sequence: 201065116
Name University of California, San Francisco Name University of Florida Health Name University Medical Center Name Mayo Clinic
City San Francisco City Gainesville City New Orleans City Rochester
State California State Florida State Louisiana State Minnesota
Zip 94143 Zip 32610 Zip 70112 Zip 55902
Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52437518
Name Hypertension
Downcase Name hypertension

Id Information

Sequence: 40348493
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 18-254-53

Countries

Sequence: 42781688
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55888499 Sequence: 55888500
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Smartphone-linked Title Standard

Interventions

Sequence: 52747054 Sequence: 52747055
Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Device
Name Smartphone-linked HBPM and associated app Name Standard HBPM
Description Participants in the Smartphone-linked arm of the study will receive an Omron 786N Home Blood Pressure Monitor (HBPM) that can be linked to the Omron Connect app via Bluetooth. They will also receive instructions about how to use their device and download the app and will be provided with publicly available guidelines for HBPM. Participants will be instructed to use their device and app to take readings which they can track over time and share with their provider using the app. Description Participants in the Standard arm of the study will receive an Omron 785N Home Blood Pressure Monitor (HBPM), instructions about how to use their device and publicly available guidelines for HBPM. They will be instructed to use their device to take readings which they can track over time and share with their provider.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178380798 Sequence: 178380799
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary
Measure Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) Measure Net Promoter Score
Time Frame Baseline and 6 months Time Frame 6 months
Description Change is defined by the absolute difference between the SBP measured at the most recent outpatient clinical encounter at the time of enrollment, and the SBP measured at the most recent outpatient clinical encounter 6 months after enrollment. If more than 1 measurement is recorded during a single clinical encounter, the lower/lowest will be used. Description This score is assessed by asking a single question about likelihood of recommending the device to a friend, with options from 1-10 (10 being extremely likely). As per published methods, persons indicating 9 or 10 are considered "Promoters"; persons indicating 7 or 8 are "Passives"; and persons indicating 1-6 are "Detractors". The score is calculated by taking the percent of Promoters and subtracting the percent of Detractors, yielding a score for each group ranging from -100 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194501015 Sequence: 194501016 Sequence: 194501017
Mesh Term Hypertension Mesh Term Vascular Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term hypertension Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48565792 Sequence: 48565793
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University of California, San Francisco Name Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29423847
Role Principal Investigator
Name Mark Pletcher, MD MPH
Affiliation University of California, San Francisco

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68513564 Sequence: 68513565
Design Group Id 55888499 Design Group Id 55888500
Intervention Id 52747054 Intervention Id 52747055

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30917846
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Age ≥ 18 years
At least one ambulatory visit in one of the participating study sites during the past year
SBP > 145 mmHg at most recent clinic visit (may be treated with BP meds already or not)
A self-reported commitment to "work on lowering your blood pressure by 10 points or more to reduce your risk of heart attack and stroke"
Owns a Smartphone (Android or iOS)
Willing to receive text messages from the study
Can read/write English well enough to use English-based Smartphone apps and fill out online surveys in English

Exclusion Criteria:

Has an arm circumference <22 cm or >42 cm
Owns a functioning HPBM and has used it in the last 3 months

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254185221
Number Of Facilities 4
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 26
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 10
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30663530
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Milestones

Sequence: 41216177 Sequence: 41216178 Sequence: 41216179 Sequence: 41216180 Sequence: 41216181 Sequence: 41216182
Result Group Id 56294819 Result Group Id 56294820 Result Group Id 56294819 Result Group Id 56294820 Result Group Id 56294819 Result Group Id 56294820
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Count 1051 Count 1050 Count 1051 Count 1050 Count 0 Count 0

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3937901
Recruitment Details Patients meeting screening criteria were invited to participate by mail, email, phone, patient portal message or in person, and directed to the online study portal for eligibility assessment. The first participant was enrolled on August 15, 2019 and the last participant was enrolled on December 31, 2020.
Pre Assignment Details 137 participants who withdrew consent prior to randomization or did not complete their baseline surveys were excluded.

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 74388540 Sequence: 74388541 Sequence: 74388542 Sequence: 74388543
Outcome Id 30959881 Outcome Id 30959881 Outcome Id 30959882 Outcome Id 30959882
Result Group Id 56294821 Result Group Id 56294822 Result Group Id 56294821 Result Group Id 56294822
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 1051 Count 1050 Count 1051 Count 1050

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2599103
Document Type Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True
Has Icf False
Has Sap True
Document Date 2021-04-28
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/89/NCT03796689/Prot_SAP_000.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 28074286 Sequence: 28074287 Sequence: 28074288 Sequence: 28074289 Sequence: 28074290 Sequence: 28074291
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 0 Subjects At Risk 0 Subjects At Risk 0 Subjects At Risk 0 Subjects At Risk 0 Subjects At Risk 0
Created At 2023-08-10 17:40:50.162300 Created At 2023-08-10 17:40:50.162300 Created At 2023-08-10 17:40:50.162300 Created At 2023-08-10 17:40:50.162300 Created At 2023-08-10 17:40:50.162300 Created At 2023-08-10 17:40:50.162300
Updated At 2023-08-10 17:40:50.162300 Updated At 2023-08-10 17:40:50.162300 Updated At 2023-08-10 17:40:50.162300 Updated At 2023-08-10 17:40:50.162300 Updated At 2023-08-10 17:40:50.162300 Updated At 2023-08-10 17:40:50.162300

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29030216
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3868645
Pi Employee Yes

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3868610
Organization University of California, San Fransico
Name Dr. Mark Pletcher, Professor
Phone 415-514-8008
Email mark.pletcher@ucsf.edu

Outcomes

Sequence: 30959881 Sequence: 30959882
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary
Title Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) Title Net Promoter Score
Description Change is defined by the absolute difference between the SBP measured at the most recent outpatient clinical encounter at the time of enrollment, and the SBP measured at the most recent outpatient clinical encounter 6 months after enrollment. If more than 1 measurement is recorded during a single clinical encounter, the lower/lowest will be used. Description This score is assessed by asking a single question about likelihood of recommending the device to a friend, with options from 1-10 (10 being extremely likely). As per published methods, persons indicating 9 or 10 are considered "Promoters"; persons indicating 7 or 8 are "Passives"; and persons indicating 1-6 are "Detractors". The score is calculated by taking the percent of Promoters and subtracting the percent of Detractors, yielding a score for each group ranging from -100 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Time Frame Baseline and 6 months Time Frame 6 months
Units mmHg Units score on a scale
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 236956870 Sequence: 236956871 Sequence: 236956872 Sequence: 236956873
Outcome Id 30959881 Outcome Id 30959881 Outcome Id 30959882 Outcome Id 30959882
Result Group Id 56294821 Result Group Id 56294822 Result Group Id 56294821 Result Group Id 56294822
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Title Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) Title Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) Title Net Promoter Score Title Net Promoter Score
Description Change is defined by the absolute difference between the SBP measured at the most recent outpatient clinical encounter at the time of enrollment, and the SBP measured at the most recent outpatient clinical encounter 6 months after enrollment. If more than 1 measurement is recorded during a single clinical encounter, the lower/lowest will be used. Description Change is defined by the absolute difference between the SBP measured at the most recent outpatient clinical encounter at the time of enrollment, and the SBP measured at the most recent outpatient clinical encounter 6 months after enrollment. If more than 1 measurement is recorded during a single clinical encounter, the lower/lowest will be used. Description This score is assessed by asking a single question about likelihood of recommending the device to a friend, with options from 1-10 (10 being extremely likely). As per published methods, persons indicating 9 or 10 are considered "Promoters"; persons indicating 7 or 8 are "Passives"; and persons indicating 1-6 are "Detractors". The score is calculated by taking the percent of Promoters and subtracting the percent of Detractors, yielding a score for each group ranging from -100 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Description This score is assessed by asking a single question about likelihood of recommending the device to a friend, with options from 1-10 (10 being extremely likely). As per published methods, persons indicating 9 or 10 are considered "Promoters"; persons indicating 7 or 8 are "Passives"; and persons indicating 1-6 are "Detractors". The score is calculated by taking the percent of Promoters and subtracting the percent of Detractors, yielding a score for each group ranging from -100 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Units mmHg Units mmHg Units score on a scale Units score on a scale
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean
Param Value 10.8 Param Value 10.6 Param Value 59 Param Value 57
Param Value Num 10.8 Param Value Num 10.6 Param Value Num 59.0 Param Value Num 57.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 18 Dispersion Value 18 Dispersion Value 2.81 Dispersion Value 4.00
Dispersion Value Num 18.0 Dispersion Value Num 18.0 Dispersion Value Num 2.81 Dispersion Value Num 4.0

Study References

Sequence: 52346828 Sequence: 52346829 Sequence: 52346830 Sequence: 52346831
Pmid 11129362 Pmid 24788496 Pmid 25345554 Pmid 35969408
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type result
Citation Adler NE, Epel ES, Castellazzo G, Ickovics JR. Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 2000 Nov;19(6):586-92. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.586. Citation Hamilton DF, Lane JV, Gaston P, Patton JT, Macdonald DJ, Simpson AH, Howie CR. Assessing treatment outcomes using a single question: the net promoter score. Bone Joint J. 2014 May;96-B(5):622-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B5.32434. Citation Krol MW, de Boer D, Delnoij DM, Rademakers JJ. The Net Promoter Score–an asset to patient experience surveys? Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):3099-109. doi: 10.1111/hex.12297. Epub 2014 Oct 27. Citation Pletcher MJ, Fontil V, Modrow MF, Carton T, Chamberlain AM, Todd J, O'Brien EC, Sheer A, Vittinghoff E, Park S, Orozco J, Lin F, Maeztu C, Wozniak G, Rakotz M, Shay CM, Cooper-DeHoff RM. Effectiveness of Standard vs Enhanced Self-measurement of Blood Pressure Paired With a Connected Smartphone Application: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Oct 1;182(10):1025-1034. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.3355. Erratum In: JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Mar 1;183(3):278.

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11434962 Sequence: 11434963 Sequence: 11434964
Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Scope overall Scope overall Scope overall
Count 1051 Count 1050 Count 2101

Result Groups

Sequence: 56294816 Sequence: 56294817 Sequence: 56294818 Sequence: 56294819 Sequence: 56294820 Sequence: 56294821 Sequence: 56294822 Sequence: 56294823 Sequence: 56294824
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event
Title Smartphone-linked Title Standard Title Total Title Smartphone-linked Title Standard Title Smartphone-linked Title Standard Title Smartphone-linked Title Standard
Description Smartphone-linked HBPM and associated app: Participants in the Smartphone-linked arm of the study will receive an Omron 786N Home Blood Pressure Monitor (HBPM) that can be linked to the Omron Connect app via Bluetooth. They will also receive instructions about how to use their device and download the app and will be provided with publicly available guidelines for HBPM. Participants will be instructed to use their device and app to take readings which they can track over time and share with their provider using the app. Description Standard HBPM: Participants in the Standard arm of the study will receive an Omron 785N Home Blood Pressure Monitor (HBPM), instructions about how to use their device and publicly available guidelines for HBPM. They will be instructed to use their device to take readings which they can track over time and share with their provider. Description Total of all reporting groups Description Smartphone-linked HBPM and associated app: Participants in the Smartphone-linked arm of the study will receive an Omron 786N Home Blood Pressure Monitor (HBPM) that can be linked to the Omron Connect app via Bluetooth. They will also receive instructions about how to use their device and download the app and will be provided with publicly available guidelines for HBPM. Participants will be instructed to use their device and app to take readings which they can track over time and share with their provider using the app. Description Standard HBPM: Participants in the Standard arm of the study will receive an Omron 785N Home Blood Pressure Monitor (HBPM), instructions about how to use their device and publicly available guidelines for HBPM. They will be instructed to use their device to take readings which they can track over time and share with their provider. Description Smartphone-linked HBPM and associated app: Participants in the Smartphone-linked arm of the study will receive an Omron 786N Home Blood Pressure Monitor (HBPM) that can be linked to the Omron Connect app via Bluetooth. They will also receive instructions about how to use their device and download the app and will be provided with publicly available guidelines for HBPM. Participants will be instructed to use their device and app to take readings which they can track over time and share with their provider using the app. Description Standard HBPM: Participants in the Standard arm of the study will receive an Omron 785N Home Blood Pressure Monitor (HBPM), instructions about how to use their device and publicly available guidelines for HBPM. They will be instructed to use their device to take readings which they can track over time and share with their provider. Description Smartphone-linked HBPM and associated app: Participants in the Smartphone-linked arm of the study will receive an Omron 786N Home Blood Pressure Monitor (HBPM) that can be linked to the Omron Connect app via Bluetooth. They will also receive instructions about how to use their device and download the app and will be provided with publicly available guidelines for HBPM. Participants will be instructed to use their device and app to take readings which they can track over time and share with their provider using the app. Description Standard HBPM: Participants in the Standard arm of the study will receive an Omron 785N Home Blood Pressure Monitor (HBPM), instructions about how to use their device and publicly available guidelines for HBPM. They will be instructed to use their device to take readings which they can track over time and share with their provider.

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 126260711 Sequence: 126260712 Sequence: 126260713 Sequence: 126260714 Sequence: 126260715 Sequence: 126260716 Sequence: 126260717 Sequence: 126260718 Sequence: 126260719 Sequence: 126260720 Sequence: 126260721 Sequence: 126260722 Sequence: 126260723 Sequence: 126260724 Sequence: 126260725 Sequence: 126260726 Sequence: 126260727 Sequence: 126260728 Sequence: 126260729 Sequence: 126260730 Sequence: 126260731 Sequence: 126260732 Sequence: 126260733 Sequence: 126260734 Sequence: 126260735 Sequence: 126260736 Sequence: 126260737 Sequence: 126260738 Sequence: 126260739 Sequence: 126260740 Sequence: 126260741 Sequence: 126260742 Sequence: 126260743 Sequence: 126260744 Sequence: 126260745 Sequence: 126260746 Sequence: 126260747 Sequence: 126260748 Sequence: 126260749 Sequence: 126260750 Sequence: 126260751 Sequence: 126260752 Sequence: 126260753 Sequence: 126260754 Sequence: 126260755
Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818 Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818 Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818 Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818 Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818 Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818 Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818 Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818 Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818 Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818 Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818 Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818 Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818 Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818 Result Group Id 56294816 Result Group Id 56294817 Result Group Id 56294818
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Classification Sex, male Classification Sex, male Classification Sex, male Classification Sex, female Classification Sex, female Classification Sex, female Classification Race/Ethnicity Classification Race/Ethnicity Classification Race/Ethnicity Classification Race/Ethnicity Classification Race/Ethnicity Classification Race/Ethnicity Classification Race/Ethnicity Classification Race/Ethnicity Classification Race/Ethnicity Classification Race/Ethnicity Classification Race/Ethnicity Classification Race/Ethnicity Classification Race/Ethnicity Classification Race/Ethnicity Classification Race/Ethnicity Classification Overall Classification Overall Classification Overall Classification Your healthcare provider Classification Your healthcare provider Classification Your healthcare provider Classification Your BP medications Classification Your BP medications Classification Your BP medications
Category Non-Hispanic Asian Category Non-Hispanic Asian Category Non-Hispanic Asian Category Non-Hispanic Black Category Non-Hispanic Black Category Non-Hispanic Black Category Non-Hispanic White Category Non-Hispanic White Category Non-Hispanic White Category Hispanic/LatinX, any race Category Hispanic/LatinX, any race Category Hispanic/LatinX, any race Category Non-Hispanic, other/multiple races Category Non-Hispanic, other/multiple races Category Non-Hispanic, other/multiple races
Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Sex/Gender, Customized Title Sex/Gender, Customized Title Sex/Gender, Customized Title Sex/Gender, Customized Title Sex/Gender, Customized Title Sex/Gender, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Subjective Social Status Title Subjective Social Status Title Subjective Social Status Title Eligibility systolic BP Title Eligibility systolic BP Title Eligibility systolic BP Title Eligibility diastolic BP Title Eligibility diastolic BP Title Eligibility diastolic BP Title Satisfaction with BP management Title Satisfaction with BP management Title Satisfaction with BP management Title Satisfaction with BP management Title Satisfaction with BP management Title Satisfaction with BP management Title Satisfaction with BP management Title Satisfaction with BP management Title Satisfaction with BP management Title Comfort using technology like a computer or smartphone Title Comfort using technology like a computer or smartphone Title Comfort using technology like a computer or smartphone
Description MacArthur Subjective Social Scale, 1-10 scale (10 = Best off; 1 = Worst off) Description MacArthur Subjective Social Scale, 1-10 scale (10 = Best off; 1 = Worst off) Description MacArthur Subjective Social Scale, 1-10 scale (10 = Best off; 1 = Worst off) Description 1-5 scale (1 = Very Unsatisfied; 5 = Very Satisfied) Description 1-5 scale (1 = Very Unsatisfied; 5 = Very Satisfied) Description 1-5 scale (1 = Very Unsatisfied; 5 = Very Satisfied) Description 1-5 scale (1 = Very Unsatisfied; 5 = Very Satisfied) Description 1-5 scale (1 = Very Unsatisfied; 5 = Very Satisfied) Description 1-5 scale (1 = Very Unsatisfied; 5 = Very Satisfied) Description 1-5 scale (1 = Very Unsatisfied; 5 = Very Satisfied) Description 1-5 scale (1 = Very Unsatisfied; 5 = Very Satisfied) Description 1-5 scale (1 = Very Unsatisfied; 5 = Very Satisfied) Description 1-5 scale (1 = Not at all comfortable; 5 = Very comfortable) Description 1-5 scale (1 = Not at all comfortable; 5 = Very comfortable) Description 1-5 scale (1 = Not at all comfortable; 5 = Very comfortable)
Units years Units years Units years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units mmHg Units mmHg Units mmHg Units mmHg Units mmHg Units mmHg Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean
Param Value 59 Param Value 58 Param Value 58 Param Value 462 Param Value 448 Param Value 910 Param Value 589 Param Value 602 Param Value 1191 Param Value 6 Param Value 22 Param Value 28 Param Value 239 Param Value 226 Param Value 465 Param Value 676 Param Value 666 Param Value 1342 Param Value 79 Param Value 101 Param Value 180 Param Value 51 Param Value 35 Param Value 86 Param Value 6.2 Param Value 6.2 Param Value 6.2 Param Value 157 Param Value 158 Param Value 157 Param Value 88 Param Value 88 Param Value 88 Param Value 3.8 Param Value 3.7 Param Value 3.8 Param Value 4.3 Param Value 4.3 Param Value 4.3 Param Value 3.7 Param Value 3.7 Param Value 3.7 Param Value 4.1 Param Value 4.1 Param Value 4.1
Param Value Num 59.0 Param Value Num 58.0 Param Value Num 58.0 Param Value Num 462.0 Param Value Num 448.0 Param Value Num 910.0 Param Value Num 589.0 Param Value Num 602.0 Param Value Num 1191.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 22.0 Param Value Num 28.0 Param Value Num 239.0 Param Value Num 226.0 Param Value Num 465.0 Param Value Num 676.0 Param Value Num 666.0 Param Value Num 1342.0 Param Value Num 79.0 Param Value Num 101.0 Param Value Num 180.0 Param Value Num 51.0 Param Value Num 35.0 Param Value Num 86.0 Param Value Num 6.2 Param Value Num 6.2 Param Value Num 6.2 Param Value Num 157.0 Param Value Num 158.0 Param Value Num 157.0 Param Value Num 88.0 Param Value Num 88.0 Param Value Num 88.0 Param Value Num 3.8 Param Value Num 3.7 Param Value Num 3.8 Param Value Num 4.3 Param Value Num 4.3 Param Value Num 4.3 Param Value Num 3.7 Param Value Num 3.7 Param Value Num 3.7 Param Value Num 4.1 Param Value Num 4.1 Param Value Num 4.1
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 13 Dispersion Value 13 Dispersion Value 13 Dispersion Value 2.2 Dispersion Value 2.2 Dispersion Value 2.2 Dispersion Value 11 Dispersion Value 12 Dispersion Value 11 Dispersion Value 11 Dispersion Value 12 Dispersion Value 12 Dispersion Value 1.1 Dispersion Value 1.2 Dispersion Value 1.2 Dispersion Value 1.1 Dispersion Value 1.0 Dispersion Value 1.0 Dispersion Value 1.2 Dispersion Value 1.2 Dispersion Value 1.2 Dispersion Value 1.1 Dispersion Value 1.1 Dispersion Value 1.1
Dispersion Value Num 13.0 Dispersion Value Num 13.0 Dispersion Value Num 13.0 Dispersion Value Num 2.2 Dispersion Value Num 2.2 Dispersion Value Num 2.2 Dispersion Value Num 11.0 Dispersion Value Num 12.0 Dispersion Value Num 11.0 Dispersion Value Num 11.0 Dispersion Value Num 12.0 Dispersion Value Num 12.0 Dispersion Value Num 1.1 Dispersion Value Num 1.2 Dispersion Value Num 1.2 Dispersion Value Num 1.1 Dispersion Value Num 1.0 Dispersion Value Num 1.0 Dispersion Value Num 1.2 Dispersion Value Num 1.2 Dispersion Value Num 1.2 Dispersion Value Num 1.1 Dispersion Value Num 1.1 Dispersion Value Num 1.1
Number Analyzed 1051 Number Analyzed 1050 Number Analyzed 2101 Number Analyzed 1051 Number Analyzed 1050 Number Analyzed 2101 Number Analyzed 1051 Number Analyzed 1050 Number Analyzed 2101 Number Analyzed 1051 Number Analyzed 1050 Number Analyzed 2101 Number Analyzed 1051 Number Analyzed 1050 Number Analyzed 2101 Number Analyzed 1051 Number Analyzed 1050 Number Analyzed 2101 Number Analyzed 1051 Number Analyzed 1050 Number Analyzed 2101 Number Analyzed 1051 Number Analyzed 1050 Number Analyzed 2101 Number Analyzed 1051 Number Analyzed 1050 Number Analyzed 2101 Number Analyzed 1051 Number Analyzed 1050 Number Analyzed 2101 Number Analyzed 1051 Number Analyzed 1050 Number Analyzed 2101 Number Analyzed 1051 Number Analyzed 1050 Number Analyzed 2101 Number Analyzed 1051 Number Analyzed 1050 Number Analyzed 2101 Number Analyzed 1051 Number Analyzed 1050 Number Analyzed 2101 Number Analyzed 1051 Number Analyzed 1050 Number Analyzed 2101

]]>

<![CDATA[ JAK1 Inhibitor With Medicated Topical Therapy in Adolescents With Atopic Dermatitis ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796676
2019-02-18

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796676
NCT03796676https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796676?tab=tableNANANAThis is a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group, Phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PF 04965842 in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-04-13
Start Month Year February 18, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year April 8, 2020
Verification Month Year April 2022
Verification Date 2022-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2022-04-13
Results First Posted Date 2021-06-04

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20713748
Description This is a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group, Phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PF 04965842 in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants will be screened within 28 days prior to the first dose of study intervention to confirm study eligibility. Subjects must have moderate-severe AD involving at least 10% Body Surface Area (BSA); an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of at least 3; an Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) of at least 16 and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Score (NRS) of at least 4 on baseline/Day 1. Eligible subjects will be randomized at the Baseline/Day 1 visit. Approximately 225 participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive once daily PF 04965842 at 200 mg, 100 mg, or placebo for 12 weeks. Randomization will be stratified by baseline disease severity (moderate [IGA = 3] vs. severe [IGA = 4] AD). The investigational products will be administered QD for 12 weeks. Background therapy (medicated and non-medicated topical therapy) must be applied BID for the duration of the treatment period. The co-primary efficacy endpoints are an IGA score of clear (0) or almost clear (1) with a reduction from baseline of greater than 2 points at Week 12 AND an at least 75% improvement of the EASI score (EASI-75) at week 12. Safety and efficacy assessments will be conducted at the investigator site by a clinical assessor blinded to treatment assignment. Scheduled clinic or telephone study visits for all subjects will occur at Screening, Baseline/Day 1, Day 8 (by phone), Day 15, Day 29, Day 43 (by phone), Day 57, Day 85 (End of treatment/Early termination), Day 113 (End of Study). Participants discontinuing early from the study will undergo a 4 week follow up period.

This study includes an immunogenicity sub study integrated into the last 4 weeks of the main study treatment period. At Week 8, up to approximately 90 participants (up to approximately 30 in each treatment arm) who have completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention will receive a tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap), and collection of blood samples for the evaluation of immunogenicity at Weeks 8 and 12. Participants of this sub study will complete all other protocol specified procedures in the main study.

At the end of the 12 week study treatment, qualified participants completing the study will have the option to enter the long term extension (LTE) study B7451015.

Facilities

Sequence: 200032995 Sequence: 200032996 Sequence: 200032997 Sequence: 200032998 Sequence: 200032999 Sequence: 200033000 Sequence: 200033001 Sequence: 200033002 Sequence: 200033003 Sequence: 200033004 Sequence: 200033005 Sequence: 200033006 Sequence: 200033007 Sequence: 200033008 Sequence: 200033009 Sequence: 200033010 Sequence: 200033011 Sequence: 200033012 Sequence: 200033013 Sequence: 200033014 Sequence: 200033015 Sequence: 200033016 Sequence: 200033017 Sequence: 200033018 Sequence: 200033019 Sequence: 200033020 Sequence: 200033021 Sequence: 200033022 Sequence: 200033023 Sequence: 200033024 Sequence: 200033025 Sequence: 200033026 Sequence: 200033027 Sequence: 200033028 Sequence: 200033029 Sequence: 200033030 Sequence: 200033031 Sequence: 200033032 Sequence: 200033033 Sequence: 200033034 Sequence: 200033035 Sequence: 200033036 Sequence: 200033037 Sequence: 200033038 Sequence: 200033039 Sequence: 200033040 Sequence: 200033041 Sequence: 200033042 Sequence: 200033043 Sequence: 200033044 Sequence: 200033045 Sequence: 200033046 Sequence: 200033047 Sequence: 200033048 Sequence: 200033049 Sequence: 200033050 Sequence: 200033051 Sequence: 200033052 Sequence: 200033053 Sequence: 200033120 Sequence: 200033054 Sequence: 200033055 Sequence: 200033056 Sequence: 200033057 Sequence: 200033058 Sequence: 200033059 Sequence: 200033060 Sequence: 200033061 Sequence: 200033062 Sequence: 200033063 Sequence: 200033064 Sequence: 200033065 Sequence: 200033066 Sequence: 200033067 Sequence: 200033121 Sequence: 200033068 Sequence: 200033069 Sequence: 200033070 Sequence: 200033071 Sequence: 200033072 Sequence: 200033073 Sequence: 200033074 Sequence: 200033075 Sequence: 200033076 Sequence: 200033077 Sequence: 200033078 Sequence: 200033079 Sequence: 200033080 Sequence: 200033081 Sequence: 200033082 Sequence: 200033083 Sequence: 200033084 Sequence: 200033085 Sequence: 200033086 Sequence: 200033087 Sequence: 200033088 Sequence: 200033089 Sequence: 200033090 Sequence: 200033091 Sequence: 200033092 Sequence: 200033093 Sequence: 200033094 Sequence: 200033095 Sequence: 200033096 Sequence: 200033097 Sequence: 200033098 Sequence: 200033099 Sequence: 200033100 Sequence: 200033101 Sequence: 200033102 Sequence: 200033103 Sequence: 200033104 Sequence: 200033105 Sequence: 200033106 Sequence: 200033107 Sequence: 200033108 Sequence: 200033109 Sequence: 200033110 Sequence: 200033111 Sequence: 200033112 Sequence: 200033113 Sequence: 200033114 Sequence: 200033115 Sequence: 200033116 Sequence: 200033117 Sequence: 200033118 Sequence: 200033119 Sequence: 200033122 Sequence: 200033123 Sequence: 200033124 Sequence: 200033125 Sequence: 200033126 Sequence: 200033127 Sequence: 200033128 Sequence: 200033129 Sequence: 200033130
Name Clinical Research Center of Alabama, LLC Name Madera Family Medical Group Name Allergy & Asthma Associates of Southern California dba Southern California Research Name UC Davis Name Moonshine Research Center, Inc. Name Homestead Research Institute Name Olympian Clinical Research Name Clinical Trials Solutions Name Global Health Clinical Trials Corp Name La Salud Research Clinic, Inc. Name Nicklaus Children's Hospital Name South Miami Medical & Research Group, Inc. Name Ciocca Dermatology, PA Name INTERMED Medical Research Center, Inc Name Suncoast Research Associates Name AdventHealth Orlando Name AdventHealth Pediatric Dermatology Orlando Name AdventHealth Orlando – Investigational Drug Services Name Outpatient Service Center-AdventHealth Orlando Name Pediatric Outpatient Procedures and Sedation Name NeuroSkeletal Imaging Name Accel Research Sites – Pure Skin Dermatology & Aesthetics Name Accel Research Sites – Nona Pediatric Center Name ForCare Clinical Research Name Columbus Regional Research Institute Name Meridian Clinical Research, LLC Name Midwest Allergy Sinus Asthma, SC Name NorthShore University HealthSystem Dermatology Clinical Trials Unit Name Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC Name The South Bend Clinic Center for Research Name Forefront Dermatology S.C. Name Institute for Asthma and Allergy Name DermAssociates, LLC Name Chesapeake Clinical Research, Inc. Name Clarkston Skin Research Name Wayne State University / Integrative Biosciences Center Name Center for Outpatient Health Name St. Louis Children's Hospital Name St. Louis Children's Hospital Name Washington University School of Medicine Name Clinical Research Consortium Name DermResearch Center of New York, Inc. Name Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. Name University of Oklahoma Health Science Center Name Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. Name Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. Name Austin Institute for Clinical Research, Inc. Name Center for Clinical Studies, LTD.LLP Name Virginia Clinical Research, Inc Name West Virginia Research Institute Name Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Investigational Drug Service Name Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Translational Research Unit Name Australian Clinical Research Network Name The Skin Hospital Name The Skin Centre Name Sinclair Dermatology Name The Royal Children's Hospital Name The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Dermatology Department Name The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University Name Hospital General Universitario de Alicante Name Dermatology Hospital of Jiangxi Province Name Shandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology & Shandong Provincial Hospital for Skin Name Huashan Hospital Fudan University Name First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University Name Hangzhou Third Hospital Name The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine/Dermatology Dept Name Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine/Dermatology Name Shanghai Dermatology Hospital Name Lekarna Na Vaclavskem namesti Name Kozni ambulance Kutna Hora, s.r.o Name Dermamedica S.R.O. Name Oblastni nemocnice Nachod Name Lekarna u Stribrneho orla Name Lekarna Cisarska Name Hospital De La Santa Creu I Sant Pau Name Synexus Czech S.R.O. Name Mestska poliklinika Praha Name Dermatovenerologicka ambulance Name Lekarna na Hranicni Name Nemocnice Svitavy Name Universitaetsklinikum Bonn Name Fachklinik Bad Bentheim Thermalsole- und Schwefelbad Bentheim GmbH Name Universitaetsklinikum Bonn Name MENSINGDERMA research GmbH Name Uniklinik Muenster Name Clinexpert Kft. Name Bugát Pál Kórház, Bőrgyógyászati Szakrendelés Name Trial Pharma Kft. Name Trial Pharma Kft. Name Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén Megyei Központi Kórház és Gyermek Gasztroenterológia II. emelet Name Trial Pharma Kft. Name Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCSS – UOC di Dermatologia Name Takagi Dermatological Clinic Name Dermatology Shimizu Clinic Name Noguchi Dermatology Clinic Name Yoshioka Dermatology Clinic Name Kume Clinic Name Fukuwa Clinic Name Hoshikuma Dermatology・Allergy Clinic Name Matsuda Tomoko Dermatological Clinic Name Aesthetic dermatology clinic of Prof. J. Kisis Name Outpatient Clinic Of Ventspils Name Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez Name Hospital de Jesus, I.A.P. Name Trials in Medicine S.C. Name Clinical Research Institute Saltillo S.A. de C.V. Name Unidad de Atención Médica e Investigación en Salud Name Centro Multidisciplinario para el Desarrollo Especializado de la Investigacion Clinica en Yucatan Name Servicios Hospitalarios de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Hospital Ángeles Chihuahua) Name Sociedad de Metabolismo y Corazón S.C. Name KLIMED Marek Klimkiewicz Name Clinica Dermatoestetica Prywatny Gabinet Dermatologiczny i Alergologiczny Name Centrum Medyczne SENSEMED Name Centrum Medyczne Pratia Czestochowa Name Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Przychodnia Specjalistyczna "A-DERM-SERWIS" Name Neutrum Lekarze M. Hlebowicz i Partnerzy Spolka Partnerska Name MULTIKLINIKA Salute Sp. z o.o. Name Centrum Medyczne Angelius Provita Name Centrum medyczne PLEJADY Name Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne Name Dermoklinika-Centrum Medyczne s.c. M. Kierstan, J. Narbutt, A. Lesiak Name Dermedic Jacek Zdybski Name Irmed Name Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Poznaniu Name Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial w Warszawie Name Synexus Polska Sp. z o.o. Oddzial we Wroclawiu Name Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin Name Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre Name Hospital Universitario La Paz Name Consultas Externas Dermatologia Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet Name Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet Name Servicio de Radiologia Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet Name Chung Shan Medical University Hospital Name National Taiwan University Hospital Name Taipei Veterans General Hospital Name Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
City Birmingham City Madera City Mission Viejo City Sacramento City Doral City Homestead City Largo City Miami City Miami City Miami City Miami City Miami City Miami City Miami City Miami City Orlando City Orlando City Orlando City Orlando City Orlando City Orlando City Orlando City Orlando City Tampa City Columbus City Savannah City Normal City Skokie City Indianapolis City South Bend City Louisville City Chevy Chase City Rockville City White Marsh City Clarkston City Detroit City Saint Louis City Saint Louis City Saint Louis City Saint Louis City Las Vegas City Stony Brook City Cincinnati City Oklahoma City City Anderson City Greer City Austin City Webster City Norfolk City Morgantown City Milwaukee City Milwaukee City Maroubra City Westmead City Benowa City East Melbourne City Parkville City Fuzhou City Changsha City Alicante City Nanchang City Jinan City Shanghai City Kunming City Hangzhou City Hangzhou City Shanghai City Shanghai City Kutna Hora City Kutna Hora City Nachod City Nachod City Nachod City Praha 2 City Barcelona City Praha 2 City Praha City Svitavy City Svitavy City Svitavy City Bonn City Bad Bentheim City Bonn City Hamburg City Muenster City Budapest City Gyöngyös City Győr City Kaposvár City Miskolc City Püspökladány City Milano City Obihiro City Kobe City Kamimashiki-gun City Neyagawa City Sakai City Chuo-ku City Fukuoka City Fukuoka City Riga City Ventspils City Del. Cuauhtemoc City Del. Cuauhtémoc City Cuauhtemoc City Saltillo City Merida City Merida City Chihuahua City Veracruz City Bialystok City Bydgoszcz City Chorzow City Czestochowa City Czestochowa City Gdansk City Katowice City Katowice City Krakow City Krakow City Lodz City Ostrowiec Swietokrzyski City Piotrkow Trybunalski City Poznan City Warszawa City Wroclaw City Las Palmas de Gran Canaria City Madrid City Madrid City Zaragoza City Zaragoza City Zaragoza City Taichung City Taipei City Taipei City Barnsley
State Alabama State California State California State California State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Georgia State Georgia State Illinois State Illinois State Indiana State Indiana State Kentucky State Maryland State Maryland State Maryland State Michigan State Michigan State Missouri State Missouri State Missouri State Missouri State Nevada State New York State Ohio State Oklahoma State South Carolina State South Carolina State Texas State Texas State Virginia State West Virginia State Wisconsin State Wisconsin State New South Wales State New South Wales State Queensland State Victoria (vic) State Victoria State Fujian State Hunan State Jiangxi State Shandong State Shanghai State Yunnan State Zhejiang State Zhejiang State NRW State Hokkaido State Hyogo State Kumamoto State Osaka State Osaka State Tokyo State Ciudad DE Mexico State Ciudad DE Mexico State Ciudad DE México State Coahuila State Yucatan State Yucatan State LAS Palmas State South Yorkshire
Zip 35244 Zip 93637 Zip 92691 Zip 95816 Zip 33166 Zip 33030 Zip 33770 Zip 33126 Zip 33135 Zip 33155 Zip 33155 Zip 33155 Zip 33173 Zip 33175 Zip 33184 Zip 32803 Zip 32803 Zip 32804 Zip 32804 Zip 32804 Zip 32806 Zip 32819 Zip 32829 Zip 33613 Zip 31904 Zip 31406 Zip 61761 Zip 60077 Zip 46250 Zip 46617 Zip 40202 Zip 20815 Zip 20850 Zip 21162 Zip 48346 Zip 48202 Zip 63108 Zip 63108 Zip 63110 Zip 63110 Zip 89119 Zip 11790 Zip 45236 Zip 73104 Zip 29621 Zip 29651 Zip 78705 Zip 77598 Zip 23502 Zip 26505 Zip 53226 Zip 53226 Zip 2035 Zip 2145 Zip 4217 Zip 3002 Zip 3052 Zip 350005 Zip 410013 Zip 03010 Zip 330000 Zip 250022 Zip 200040 Zip 650032 Zip 310009 Zip 310009 Zip 200092 Zip 200443 Zip 284 01 Zip 28401 Zip 547 01 Zip 547 01 Zip 54701 Zip 120 00 Zip 08041 Zip 120 00 Zip 110 00 Zip 56802 Zip 56802 Zip 56825 Zip 53105 Zip 48455 Zip 53127 Zip 22391 Zip 48149 Zip 1033 Zip 3200 Zip 9026 Zip 7400 Zip 3526 Zip 4150 Zip 20089 Zip 080-0013 Zip 657-0846 Zip 861-3101 Zip 572-0838 Zip 593-8324 Zip 104-0031 Zip 814-0171 Zip 819-0167 Zip LV-1003 Zip LV-3601 Zip 06720 Zip 06090 Zip 06700 Zip 25020 Zip 97000 Zip 97130 Zip 31238 Zip 91900 Zip 15-704 Zip 85-650 Zip 41-500 Zip 42-200 Zip 42-217 Zip 80-462 Zip 40-123 Zip 40-611 Zip 30-363 Zip 31-501 Zip 90-436 Zip 27-400 Zip 97-300 Zip 60-702 Zip 01-192 Zip 50-381 Zip 35010 Zip 28041 Zip 28046 Zip 50009 Zip 50009 Zip 50009 Zip 402 Zip 100 Zip 11217 Zip S75 2EP
Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country Australia Country Australia Country Australia Country Australia Country Australia Country China Country China Country Spain Country China Country China Country China Country China Country China Country China Country China Country China Country Czechia Country Czechia Country Czechia Country Czechia Country Czechia Country Czechia Country Spain Country Czechia Country Czechia Country Czechia Country Czechia Country Czechia Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Hungary Country Hungary Country Hungary Country Hungary Country Hungary Country Hungary Country Italy Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Japan Country Latvia Country Latvia Country Mexico Country Mexico Country Mexico Country Mexico Country Mexico Country Mexico Country Mexico Country Mexico Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Taiwan Country Taiwan Country Taiwan Country United Kingdom

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96015731 Sequence: 96015732 Sequence: 96015733 Sequence: 96015734
Mesh Term Abrocitinib Mesh Term Protein Kinase Inhibitors Mesh Term Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Downcase Mesh Term abrocitinib Downcase Mesh Term protein kinase inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52149698
Name Atopic Dermatitis
Downcase Name atopic dermatitis

Id Information

Sequence: 40143078 Sequence: 40143079 Sequence: 40143080
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value B7451036 Id Value JADE TEEN Id Value 2018-003804-37
Id Type Other Identifier Id Type EudraCT Number
Id Type Description Alias Study Number

Countries

Sequence: 42552456 Sequence: 42552457 Sequence: 42552458 Sequence: 42552459 Sequence: 42552460 Sequence: 42552461 Sequence: 42552462 Sequence: 42552463 Sequence: 42552464 Sequence: 42552465 Sequence: 42552466 Sequence: 42552467 Sequence: 42552468 Sequence: 42552469
Name United States Name Australia Name China Name Czechia Name Germany Name Hungary Name Italy Name Japan Name Latvia Name Mexico Name Poland Name Spain Name Taiwan Name United Kingdom
Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55570381 Sequence: 55570382 Sequence: 55570383
Group Type Placebo Comparator Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title Placebo Title PF-04965842 100 mg QD Title PF-04965842 200 mg QD
Description Placebo Description active Description active

Interventions

Sequence: 52465389 Sequence: 52465390 Sequence: 52465391
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Placebo Name PF-04965842 Name PF04965842
Description Placebo Description 100 mg QD Description 200 mg QD

Keywords

Sequence: 79837212
Name Atopic Dermatitis, JAK1 inhibitor
Downcase Name atopic dermatitis, jak1 inhibitor

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177304434 Sequence: 177304435 Sequence: 177304436 Sequence: 177304437 Sequence: 177304438 Sequence: 177304439 Sequence: 177304440 Sequence: 177304441 Sequence: 177304442 Sequence: 177304443 Sequence: 177304444 Sequence: 177304445 Sequence: 177304446 Sequence: 177304447 Sequence: 177304448 Sequence: 177304449 Sequence: 177304450 Sequence: 177304451 Sequence: 177304452 Sequence: 177304453 Sequence: 177304454 Sequence: 177304455 Sequence: 177304456 Sequence: 177304457 Sequence: 177304458 Sequence: 177304459 Sequence: 177304460 Sequence: 177304461 Sequence: 177304462 Sequence: 177304463 Sequence: 177304464 Sequence: 177304465 Sequence: 177304469 Sequence: 177304466 Sequence: 177304467 Sequence: 177304468 Sequence: 177304470 Sequence: 177304471 Sequence: 177304472 Sequence: 177304473 Sequence: 177304474 Sequence: 177304475
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of 'Clear' (0) or 'Almost Clear' (1) and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at Week 12 Measure Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at Week 12 Measure Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in Peak Pruritis Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) for Severity of Pruritus at Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Measure Change From Baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) at Week 12 Measure Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Measure Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Measure Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Measure Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline Measure Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline Measure Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Measure Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Measure Time to First Achieve ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Measure Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Measure Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) Measure Percent Change From Baseline in Percentage BSA Measure Percentage of Participants Achieving Percentage BSA < 5% at Week 12 Measure Percentage of Participants Achieving Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Measure Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline Measure Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Measure Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Measure Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Sleep Loss Measure Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective VAS of Sleep Loss Measure Number of Days When a Corticosteroid Not Used up to Day 88 Measure Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Measure Percentage of Participants With ≥2.5 Points at Baseline and Achieving ≥2.5 Points Improvement From Baseline in Children's DLQI Measure Change From Baseline in Anxiety of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Measure Change From Baseline in Depression of HADS Measure Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Measure Change From Baseline in Dermatitis Family Impact (DFI) at Week 12 Measure Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Measure Percentage of Participants With ≥2 Points at Baseline and Achieving 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline in PtGA Measure Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Score Measure Number of Participants Who Discontinued From the Study Due to TEAEs Measure Change From Baseline in Pediatric Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (Peds-FACIT-F) at Week 12 Measure Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Measure Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Measure Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Measure Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Measure Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Measure Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Measure Plasma PF-04965842 Concentration at Week 8 Measure Plasma PF-04965842 Concentration at Week 12
Time Frame Baseline to Week 12 Time Frame Baseline to Week 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Time Frame Baseline to Week 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 Time Frame Baseline to Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline to Week 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline to Day 88 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline to Week 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame Baseline to Week 12 Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 4 weeks post-vaccination with Tdap (Week 12) Time Frame 2 hours pre-dose at Week 8 Time Frame 2 hours post-dose at Week 12
Description The IGA of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) was scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of body surface area (BSA) affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The PSAAD is a daily patient reported symptom diary presented as a 15 item questionnaire that includes 11 items developed to measure symptoms of AD, along with 4 additional items for exploratory and psychometric validation purposes (Sleep & Usual Activities Questions and Patient Global Impression of Severity & Patient Global Impression of Change Questions). Participants answer each question about skin condition based on a 24 hour recall. Each question was evaluated on a 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate more impact on skin condition.The PSAAD total score is calculated as the average of the responses to each of the 11 items and ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme), where higher scores indicate worse severity of AD symptoms. Description The IGA of AD is scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The POEM is a 7-item PRO measure used to assess the impact of AD over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28. The higher values represent more severe AD. Description The DFI is a validated 10-item measure filled out by the parent/caregiver of the patient used to assess the impact of the patient's eczema on the family. The instrument has a recall period of 7 days. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" or "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse impact. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that is the most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. The EQ-5D-Y is a version of the instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. Components assess level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Score scale for each domain ranges from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse health condition. In addition, respondents use a vertical, graduated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to rate their own health between 0 (the worst) and 100 (the best health state he/she can imagine). Description An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time). Larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), greater was the participant's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score), with higher scores representing better overall health status (less fatigue). Changes from baseline at Week 12 are presented below. Changes from baseline at other scheduled time points were not evaluated. Description An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description A 12-lead ECG was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and corrected QT intervals. All scheduled ECGs were performed after the participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. Reading of ECGs were performed by a central reader who has expertise reading and interpreting ECGs in adolescents. The QTcF interval is the only prespecified ECG criteria (Marked prolongation of the QTcF interval to >500 ms or >60 ms change from screening ECG); data are presented below. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193406230 Sequence: 193406229 Sequence: 193406232 Sequence: 193406233 Sequence: 193406234 Sequence: 193406235 Sequence: 193406236 Sequence: 193406237 Sequence: 193406238 Sequence: 193406231
Mesh Term Dermatitis Mesh Term Dermatitis, Atopic Mesh Term Skin Diseases Mesh Term Skin Diseases, Genetic Mesh Term Genetic Diseases, Inborn Mesh Term Skin Diseases, Eczematous Mesh Term Hypersensitivity, Immediate Mesh Term Hypersensitivity Mesh Term Immune System Diseases Mesh Term Eczema
Downcase Mesh Term dermatitis Downcase Mesh Term dermatitis, atopic Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases, genetic Downcase Mesh Term genetic diseases, inborn Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases, eczematous Downcase Mesh Term hypersensitivity, immediate Downcase Mesh Term hypersensitivity Downcase Mesh Term immune system diseases Downcase Mesh Term eczema
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list

Sponsors

Sequence: 48299884
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Pfizer

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29273767
Role Study Director
Name Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Affiliation Pfizer

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68122177 Sequence: 68122178 Sequence: 68122179
Design Group Id 55570381 Design Group Id 55570382 Design Group Id 55570383
Intervention Id 52465389 Intervention Id 52465390 Intervention Id 52465391

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30753371
Gender All
Minimum Age 12 Years
Maximum Age 17 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Aged between 12 and to 17 with a minimum body weight of 40 kg
Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) for at least 1 year and current status of moderate to severe disease (>= the following scores: BSA 10%, IGA 3, EASI 16, Pruritus NRS severity 4)

Exclusion Criteria:

Acute or chronic medical or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with study participation
Unwilling to discontinue current AD medications prior to the study or require treatment with prohibited medications during the study
Prior treatment with JAK inhibitors
Other active non-AD inflammatory skin diseases or conditions affecting skin
Medical history including thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy or platelet dysfunction, malignancies, current or history of certain infections, lymphoproliferative disorders and other medical conditions at the discretion of the investigator
Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to use contraception

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254165153
Number Of Facilities 136
Number Of Nsae Subjects 239
Number Of Sae Subjects 3
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 13
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 11
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 12
Maximum Age Num 17
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 40

Designs

Sequence: 30499631
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Drop Withdrawals

Sequence: 28977257 Sequence: 28977258 Sequence: 28977259 Sequence: 28977260 Sequence: 28977261 Sequence: 28977262 Sequence: 28977263 Sequence: 28977264 Sequence: 28977265 Sequence: 28977266 Sequence: 28977267 Sequence: 28977268 Sequence: 28977269 Sequence: 28977270 Sequence: 28977271
Result Group Id 56080963 Result Group Id 56080964 Result Group Id 56080965 Result Group Id 56080963 Result Group Id 56080964 Result Group Id 56080965 Result Group Id 56080963 Result Group Id 56080964 Result Group Id 56080965 Result Group Id 56080963 Result Group Id 56080964 Result Group Id 56080965 Result Group Id 56080963 Result Group Id 56080964 Result Group Id 56080965
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG002
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Reason Adverse Event Reason Adverse Event Reason Adverse Event Reason Lost to Follow-up Reason Lost to Follow-up Reason Lost to Follow-up Reason Protocol Violation Reason Protocol Violation Reason Protocol Violation Reason Withdrawal by Subject Reason Withdrawal by Subject Reason Withdrawal by Subject Reason Participant did not complete Week 16 due to COVID-19 impact Reason Participant did not complete Week 16 due to COVID-19 impact Reason Participant did not complete Week 16 due to COVID-19 impact
Count 2 Count 1 Count 2 Count 2 Count 1 Count 0 Count 0 Count 0 Count 1 Count 1 Count 1 Count 0 Count 1 Count 0 Count 0

Milestones

Sequence: 40993641 Sequence: 40993642 Sequence: 40993643 Sequence: 40993644 Sequence: 40993645 Sequence: 40993646 Sequence: 40993647 Sequence: 40993648 Sequence: 40993649
Result Group Id 56080963 Result Group Id 56080964 Result Group Id 56080965 Result Group Id 56080963 Result Group Id 56080964 Result Group Id 56080965 Result Group Id 56080963 Result Group Id 56080964 Result Group Id 56080965
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG002
Title STARTED Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Count 96 Count 95 Count 94 Count 90 Count 92 Count 91 Count 6 Count 3 Count 3

Outcome Analyses

Sequence: 16563356 Sequence: 16563357 Sequence: 16563358 Sequence: 16563359 Sequence: 16563360 Sequence: 16563361 Sequence: 16563362 Sequence: 16563363 Sequence: 16563364 Sequence: 16563365 Sequence: 16563366 Sequence: 16563367
Outcome Id 30794699 Outcome Id 30794699 Outcome Id 30794700 Outcome Id 30794700 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794702 Outcome Id 30794702
Non Inferiority Type Superiority Non Inferiority Type Superiority Non Inferiority Type Superiority Non Inferiority Type Superiority Non Inferiority Type Superiority Non Inferiority Type Superiority Non Inferiority Type Superiority Non Inferiority Type Superiority Non Inferiority Type Superiority Non Inferiority Type Superiority Non Inferiority Type Superiority Non Inferiority Type Superiority
Param Type Estimate of difference Param Type Estimate of difference Param Type Estimate of difference Param Type Estimate of difference Param Type Estimate of difference Param Type Estimate of difference Param Type Estimate of difference Param Type Estimate of difference Param Type Estimate of difference Param Type Estimate of difference Param Type Mean Difference (Net) Param Type Mean Difference (Net)
Param Value 16.7 Param Value 20.6 Param Value 26.5 Param Value 29.4 Param Value 14.7 Param Value 26.1 Param Value 10.9 Param Value 29.4 Param Value 22.8 Param Value 25.6 Param Value -0.5 Param Value -0.7
P Value Modifier P Value Modifier P Value Modifier P Value Modifier < P Value Modifier P Value Modifier < P Value Modifier P Value Modifier < P Value Modifier P Value Modifier P Value Modifier P Value Modifier
P Value 0.0147 P Value 0.003 P Value 0.0002 P Value 0.0001 P Value 0.0119 P Value 0.0001 P Value 0.0971 P Value 0.0001 P Value 0.0035 P Value 0.0013 P Value 0.0664 P Value 0.0142
Ci N Sides 2-Sided Ci N Sides 2-Sided Ci N Sides 2-Sided Ci N Sides 2-Sided Ci N Sides 2-Sided Ci N Sides 2-Sided Ci N Sides 2-Sided Ci N Sides 2-Sided Ci N Sides 2-Sided Ci N Sides 2-Sided Ci N Sides 2-Sided
Ci Percent 95.0 Ci Percent 95.0 Ci Percent 95.0 Ci Percent 95.0 Ci Percent 95.0 Ci Percent 95.0 Ci Percent 95.0 Ci Percent 95.0 Ci Percent 95.0 Ci Percent 95.0 Ci Percent 95.0 Ci Percent 95.0
Ci Lower Limit 3.5 Ci Lower Limit 7.3 Ci Lower Limit 13.1 Ci Lower Limit 16.3 Ci Lower Limit 3.5 Ci Lower Limit 13.9 Ci Lower Limit -1.8 Ci Lower Limit 16.0 Ci Lower Limit 8.0 Ci Lower Limit 10.6 Ci Lower Limit -1.1 Ci Lower Limit -1.3
Ci Upper Limit 29.9 Ci Upper Limit 33.9 Ci Upper Limit 39.8 Ci Upper Limit 42.5 Ci Upper Limit 25.9 Ci Upper Limit 38.3 Ci Upper Limit 23.6 Ci Upper Limit 42.9 Ci Upper Limit 37.7 Ci Upper Limit 40.6 Ci Upper Limit 0.0 Ci Upper Limit -0.1
Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Method Mixed Models Analysis Method Mixed Models Analysis
Estimate Description Estimate of the difference in percentages of response at Week 12 was calculated by PF-04965842 100 mg minus placebo Estimate Description Estimate of the difference in percentages of response at Week 12 was calculated by PF-04965842 200 mg minus placebo Estimate Description Estimate of the difference in percentages of response at Week 12 was calculated by PF-04965842 100 mg minus placebo Estimate Description Estimate of the difference in percentages of response at Week 12 was calculated by PF-04965842 200 mg minus placebo Estimate Description Estimate of the difference in percentages of response at Week 2 was calculated by PF-04965842 100 mg minus placebo Estimate Description Estimate of the difference in percentages of response at Week 2 was calculated by PF-04965842 200 mg minus placebo Estimate Description Estimate of the difference in percentages of response at Week 4 was calculated by PF-04965842 100 mg minus placebo Estimate Description Estimate of the difference in percentages of response at Week 4 was calculated by PF-04965842 200 mg minus placebo Estimate Description Estimate of the difference in percentages of response at Week 12 was calculated by PF-04965842 100 mg minus placebo Estimate Description Estimate of the difference in percentages of response at Week 12 was calculated by PF-04965842 200 mg minus placebo Estimate Description The least squares mean difference at Week 12 was calculated by PF-04965842 100 mg minus placebo Estimate Description The least squares mean difference at Week 12 was calculated by PF-04965842 200 mg minus placebo

Outcome Analysis Groups

Sequence: 32123018 Sequence: 32123019 Sequence: 32123020 Sequence: 32123021 Sequence: 32123022 Sequence: 32123023 Sequence: 32123024 Sequence: 32123025 Sequence: 32123026 Sequence: 32123027 Sequence: 32123028 Sequence: 32123029 Sequence: 32123030 Sequence: 32123031 Sequence: 32123032 Sequence: 32123033 Sequence: 32123034 Sequence: 32123035 Sequence: 32123036 Sequence: 32123037 Sequence: 32123038 Sequence: 32123039 Sequence: 32123040 Sequence: 32123041
Outcome Analysis Id 16563356 Outcome Analysis Id 16563356 Outcome Analysis Id 16563357 Outcome Analysis Id 16563357 Outcome Analysis Id 16563358 Outcome Analysis Id 16563358 Outcome Analysis Id 16563359 Outcome Analysis Id 16563359 Outcome Analysis Id 16563360 Outcome Analysis Id 16563360 Outcome Analysis Id 16563361 Outcome Analysis Id 16563361 Outcome Analysis Id 16563362 Outcome Analysis Id 16563362 Outcome Analysis Id 16563363 Outcome Analysis Id 16563363 Outcome Analysis Id 16563364 Outcome Analysis Id 16563364 Outcome Analysis Id 16563365 Outcome Analysis Id 16563365 Outcome Analysis Id 16563366 Outcome Analysis Id 16563366 Outcome Analysis Id 16563367 Outcome Analysis Id 16563367
Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080968
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG002

Links

Sequence: 4386355
Url https://pmiform.com/clinical-trial-info-request?StudyID=B7451036
Description To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3920219
Pre Assignment Details A total of 287 adolescent participants were randomized to the study, and 285 adolescent participants received study treatment, including 96 participants in the placebo group, 95 participants in the abrocitinib 100 mg QD group, and 94 participants in the abrocitinib 200 mg QD group.

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 73976465 Sequence: 73976466 Sequence: 73976467 Sequence: 73976468 Sequence: 73976469 Sequence: 73976470 Sequence: 73976471 Sequence: 73976472 Sequence: 73976473 Sequence: 73976474 Sequence: 73976475 Sequence: 73976476 Sequence: 73976477 Sequence: 73976478 Sequence: 73976479 Sequence: 73976480 Sequence: 73976481 Sequence: 73976482 Sequence: 73976483 Sequence: 73976484 Sequence: 73976485 Sequence: 73976486 Sequence: 73976487 Sequence: 73976488 Sequence: 73976489 Sequence: 73976490 Sequence: 73976491 Sequence: 73976492 Sequence: 73976493 Sequence: 73976494 Sequence: 73976495 Sequence: 73976496 Sequence: 73976497 Sequence: 73976498 Sequence: 73976499 Sequence: 73976500 Sequence: 73976501 Sequence: 73976502 Sequence: 73976503 Sequence: 73976504 Sequence: 73976505 Sequence: 73976506 Sequence: 73976507 Sequence: 73976508 Sequence: 73976509 Sequence: 73976510 Sequence: 73976511 Sequence: 73976512 Sequence: 73976513 Sequence: 73976514 Sequence: 73976515 Sequence: 73976516 Sequence: 73976517 Sequence: 73976518 Sequence: 73976519 Sequence: 73976520 Sequence: 73976521 Sequence: 73976522 Sequence: 73976523 Sequence: 73976524 Sequence: 73976525 Sequence: 73976526 Sequence: 73976527 Sequence: 73976528 Sequence: 73976529 Sequence: 73976530 Sequence: 73976531 Sequence: 73976532 Sequence: 73976533 Sequence: 73976534 Sequence: 73976535 Sequence: 73976536 Sequence: 73976537 Sequence: 73976538 Sequence: 73976539 Sequence: 73976540 Sequence: 73976541 Sequence: 73976542 Sequence: 73976543 Sequence: 73976544 Sequence: 73976545 Sequence: 73976546 Sequence: 73976547 Sequence: 73976548 Sequence: 73976549 Sequence: 73976550 Sequence: 73976551 Sequence: 73976552 Sequence: 73976553 Sequence: 73976554 Sequence: 73976555 Sequence: 73976556 Sequence: 73976557 Sequence: 73976558 Sequence: 73976559 Sequence: 73976560 Sequence: 73976561 Sequence: 73976562 Sequence: 73976563 Sequence: 73976564 Sequence: 73976565 Sequence: 73976566 Sequence: 73976567 Sequence: 73976568 Sequence: 73976569 Sequence: 73976570 Sequence: 73976571 Sequence: 73976572 Sequence: 73976573 Sequence: 73976574 Sequence: 73976575 Sequence: 73976576 Sequence: 73976577 Sequence: 73976578 Sequence: 73976579 Sequence: 73976580 Sequence: 73976581 Sequence: 73976582 Sequence: 73976583 Sequence: 73976584 Sequence: 73976585 Sequence: 73976586 Sequence: 73976587 Sequence: 73976588
Outcome Id 30794699 Outcome Id 30794699 Outcome Id 30794699 Outcome Id 30794700 Outcome Id 30794700 Outcome Id 30794700 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794702 Outcome Id 30794702 Outcome Id 30794702 Outcome Id 30794703 Outcome Id 30794703 Outcome Id 30794703 Outcome Id 30794704 Outcome Id 30794704 Outcome Id 30794704 Outcome Id 30794705 Outcome Id 30794705 Outcome Id 30794705 Outcome Id 30794706 Outcome Id 30794706 Outcome Id 30794706 Outcome Id 30794707 Outcome Id 30794707 Outcome Id 30794707 Outcome Id 30794708 Outcome Id 30794708 Outcome Id 30794708 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794710 Outcome Id 30794710 Outcome Id 30794710 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794712 Outcome Id 30794712 Outcome Id 30794712 Outcome Id 30794713 Outcome Id 30794713 Outcome Id 30794713 Outcome Id 30794714 Outcome Id 30794714 Outcome Id 30794714 Outcome Id 30794715 Outcome Id 30794715 Outcome Id 30794715 Outcome Id 30794716 Outcome Id 30794716 Outcome Id 30794716 Outcome Id 30794717 Outcome Id 30794717 Outcome Id 30794717 Outcome Id 30794718 Outcome Id 30794718 Outcome Id 30794718 Outcome Id 30794719 Outcome Id 30794719 Outcome Id 30794719 Outcome Id 30794720 Outcome Id 30794720 Outcome Id 30794720 Outcome Id 30794721 Outcome Id 30794721 Outcome Id 30794721 Outcome Id 30794722 Outcome Id 30794722 Outcome Id 30794722 Outcome Id 30794723 Outcome Id 30794723 Outcome Id 30794723 Outcome Id 30794724 Outcome Id 30794724 Outcome Id 30794724 Outcome Id 30794725 Outcome Id 30794725 Outcome Id 30794725 Outcome Id 30794726 Outcome Id 30794726 Outcome Id 30794726 Outcome Id 30794727 Outcome Id 30794727 Outcome Id 30794727 Outcome Id 30794728 Outcome Id 30794728 Outcome Id 30794728 Outcome Id 30794729 Outcome Id 30794729 Outcome Id 30794729 Outcome Id 30794730 Outcome Id 30794730 Outcome Id 30794730 Outcome Id 30794731 Outcome Id 30794731 Outcome Id 30794731 Outcome Id 30794732 Outcome Id 30794732 Outcome Id 30794732 Outcome Id 30794733 Outcome Id 30794733 Outcome Id 30794733 Outcome Id 30794734 Outcome Id 30794734 Outcome Id 30794734 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794736 Outcome Id 30794736 Outcome Id 30794736 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794739 Outcome Id 30794739 Outcome Id 30794740 Outcome Id 30794740
Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080969 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080970 Result Group Id 56080971 Result Group Id 56080970 Result Group Id 56080971
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 94 Count 89 Count 93 Count 94 Count 89 Count 93 Count 95 Count 92 Count 88 Count 95 Count 95 Count 93 Count 96 Count 92 Count 94 Count 96 Count 92 Count 94 Count 96 Count 92 Count 94 Count 96 Count 92 Count 94 Count 96 Count 92 Count 94 Count 96 Count 92 Count 94 Count 84 Count 83 Count 82 Count 96 Count 93 Count 90 Count 84 Count 83 Count 82 Count 96 Count 95 Count 94 Count 96 Count 95 Count 94 Count 94 Count 89 Count 93 Count 96 Count 93 Count 93 Count 96 Count 93 Count 93 Count 96 Count 95 Count 93 Count 96 Count 95 Count 93 Count 96 Count 95 Count 93 Count 96 Count 95 Count 93 Count 83 Count 89 Count 82 Count 96 Count 95 Count 94 Count 95 Count 92 Count 94 Count 96 Count 95 Count 94 Count 96 Count 95 Count 94 Count 95 Count 95 Count 94 Count 92 Count 95 Count 93 Count 96 Count 95 Count 94 Count 96 Count 93 Count 94 Count 96 Count 95 Count 94 Count 96 Count 95 Count 94 Count 96 Count 95 Count 94 Count 96 Count 95 Count 94 Count 96 Count 95 Count 94 Count 96 Count 95 Count 93 Count 96 Count 95 Count 93 Count 96 Count 95 Count 93 Count 10 Count 8 Count 4 Count 72 Count 62 Count 59 Count 50

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2577899 Sequence: 2577900
Document Type Study Protocol Document Type Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True Has Protocol False
Has Icf False Has Icf False
Has Sap False Has Sap True
Document Date 2019-04-26 Document Date 2020-04-16
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/76/NCT03796676/Prot_000.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/76/NCT03796676/SAP_001.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 27935158 Sequence: 27935159 Sequence: 27935160 Sequence: 27935161 Sequence: 27935162 Sequence: 27935163 Sequence: 27935164 Sequence: 27935165 Sequence: 27935166
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG002
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 42 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 40 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 50 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 94
Created At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Created At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Created At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Created At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Created At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Created At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Created At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Created At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Created At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759
Updated At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Updated At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Updated At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Updated At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Updated At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Updated At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Updated At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Updated At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759 Updated At 2023-08-08 21:51:35.721759

Reported Events

Sequence: 528051228 Sequence: 528051229 Sequence: 528051230 Sequence: 528051231 Sequence: 528051232 Sequence: 528051233 Sequence: 528051234 Sequence: 528051235 Sequence: 528051236 Sequence: 528051237 Sequence: 528051238 Sequence: 528051239 Sequence: 528051240 Sequence: 528051241 Sequence: 528051242 Sequence: 528051243 Sequence: 528051244 Sequence: 528051245 Sequence: 528051246 Sequence: 528051247 Sequence: 528051248 Sequence: 528051249 Sequence: 528051250 Sequence: 528051251 Sequence: 528051252 Sequence: 528051253 Sequence: 528051254 Sequence: 528051255 Sequence: 528051256 Sequence: 528051257 Sequence: 528051258 Sequence: 528051259 Sequence: 528051260 Sequence: 528051261 Sequence: 528051262 Sequence: 528051263 Sequence: 528051264 Sequence: 528051265 Sequence: 528051266 Sequence: 528051267 Sequence: 528051268 Sequence: 528051269 Sequence: 528051270 Sequence: 528051271 Sequence: 528051272 Sequence: 528051273 Sequence: 528051274 Sequence: 528051275 Sequence: 528051276 Sequence: 528051277 Sequence: 528051278 Sequence: 528051279 Sequence: 528051280 Sequence: 528051281 Sequence: 528051282 Sequence: 528051283 Sequence: 528051284 Sequence: 528051285 Sequence: 528051286 Sequence: 528051287 Sequence: 528051288 Sequence: 528051289 Sequence: 528051290 Sequence: 528051291 Sequence: 528051292 Sequence: 528051293 Sequence: 528051294 Sequence: 528051295 Sequence: 528051296 Sequence: 528051297 Sequence: 528051298 Sequence: 528051299 Sequence: 528051300 Sequence: 528051301 Sequence: 528051302 Sequence: 528051303 Sequence: 528051304 Sequence: 528051305 Sequence: 528051306 Sequence: 528051307 Sequence: 528051308 Sequence: 528051309 Sequence: 528051310 Sequence: 528051311 Sequence: 528051312 Sequence: 528051313 Sequence: 528051314 Sequence: 528051315 Sequence: 528051316 Sequence: 528051317 Sequence: 528051318 Sequence: 528051319 Sequence: 528051320 Sequence: 528051321 Sequence: 528051322 Sequence: 528051323 Sequence: 528051324 Sequence: 528051325 Sequence: 528051326 Sequence: 528051327 Sequence: 528051328 Sequence: 528051329 Sequence: 528051330 Sequence: 528051331 Sequence: 528051332 Sequence: 528051333 Sequence: 528051334 Sequence: 528051335
Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974 Result Group Id 56080972 Result Group Id 56080973 Result Group Id 56080974
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002
Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks
Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other
Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 7 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 6 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 5 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 7 Subjects Affected 5 Subjects Affected 8 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 9 Subjects Affected 8 Subjects Affected 8 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 5 Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 10 Subjects Affected 9 Subjects Affected 10 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 7 Subjects Affected 17 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 5
Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94 Subjects At Risk 96 Subjects At Risk 95 Subjects At Risk 94
Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs. Description The same event may appear as both an AE and an SAE. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study. Total number at risk below refers to the number of participants evaluable for SAEs or AEs.
Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 2 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 1 Event Count 3 Event Count 1 Event Count 2 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 7 Event Count 2 Event Count 0 Event Count 2 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 5 Event Count 4 Event Count 2 Event Count 0 Event Count 9 Event Count 2 Event Count 1 Event Count 3 Event Count 2 Event Count 3 Event Count 5 Event Count 2 Event Count 2 Event Count 2 Event Count 2 Event Count 6 Event Count 1 Event Count 4 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 8 Event Count 7 Event Count 12 Event Count 2 Event Count 0 Event Count 2 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 2 Event Count 2 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 3 Event Count 2 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 2 Event Count 2 Event Count 0 Event Count 2 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 4 Event Count 2 Event Count 11 Event Count 10 Event Count 9 Event Count 0 Event Count 2 Event Count 2 Event Count 3 Event Count 5 Event Count 3 Event Count 2 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 3 Event Count 12 Event Count 11 Event Count 14 Event Count 4 Event Count 3 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 5 Event Count 0 Event Count 2 Event Count 1 Event Count 2 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 2 Event Count 7 Event Count 27 Event Count 0 Event Count 4 Event Count 7
Organ System Psychiatric disorders Organ System Psychiatric disorders Organ System Psychiatric disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Blood and lymphatic system disorders Organ System Blood and lymphatic system disorders Organ System Blood and lymphatic system disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Investigations Organ System Investigations Organ System Investigations Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Investigations Organ System Investigations Organ System Investigations Organ System Investigations Organ System Investigations Organ System Investigations Organ System Investigations Organ System Investigations Organ System Investigations Organ System Investigations Organ System Investigations Organ System Investigations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System General disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders
Adverse Event Term Anxiety Adverse Event Term Anxiety Adverse Event Term Anxiety Adverse Event Term Angioedema Adverse Event Term Angioedema Adverse Event Term Angioedema Adverse Event Term Dermatitis stopic Adverse Event Term Dermatitis stopic Adverse Event Term Dermatitis stopic Adverse Event Term Eosinophilia Adverse Event Term Eosinophilia Adverse Event Term Eosinophilia Adverse Event Term Abdominal Pain Adverse Event Term Abdominal Pain Adverse Event Term Abdominal Pain Adverse Event Term Fatigue Adverse Event Term Fatigue Adverse Event Term Fatigue Adverse Event Term Folliculitis Adverse Event Term Folliculitis Adverse Event Term Folliculitis Adverse Event Term Contusion Adverse Event Term Contusion Adverse Event Term Contusion Adverse Event Term Blood creatine phosphokinase increased Adverse Event Term Blood creatine phosphokinase increased Adverse Event Term Blood creatine phosphokinase increased Adverse Event Term Dizziness Adverse Event Term Dizziness Adverse Event Term Dizziness Adverse Event Term Asthma Adverse Event Term Asthma Adverse Event Term Asthma Adverse Event Term Acne Adverse Event Term Acne Adverse Event Term Acne Adverse Event Term Dermatitis atopic Adverse Event Term Dermatitis atopic Adverse Event Term Dermatitis atopic Adverse Event Term Cough Adverse Event Term Cough Adverse Event Term Cough Adverse Event Term Rhinorrhoea Adverse Event Term Rhinorrhoea Adverse Event Term Rhinorrhoea Adverse Event Term Headache Adverse Event Term Headache Adverse Event Term Headache Adverse Event Term Somnolence Adverse Event Term Somnolence Adverse Event Term Somnolence Adverse Event Term Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased Adverse Event Term Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased Adverse Event Term Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased Adverse Event Term Blood uric acid increased Adverse Event Term Blood uric acid increased Adverse Event Term Blood uric acid increased Adverse Event Term Haemoglobin decreased Adverse Event Term Haemoglobin decreased Adverse Event Term Haemoglobin decreased Adverse Event Term Protein urine Adverse Event Term Protein urine Adverse Event Term Protein urine Adverse Event Term Gastroenteritis Adverse Event Term Gastroenteritis Adverse Event Term Gastroenteritis Adverse Event Term Hordeolum Adverse Event Term Hordeolum Adverse Event Term Hordeolum Adverse Event Term Influenza Adverse Event Term Influenza Adverse Event Term Influenza Adverse Event Term Nasopharyngitis Adverse Event Term Nasopharyngitis Adverse Event Term Nasopharyngitis Adverse Event Term Oral herpes Adverse Event Term Oral herpes Adverse Event Term Oral herpes Adverse Event Term Pharyngitis Adverse Event Term Pharyngitis Adverse Event Term Pharyngitis Adverse Event Term Pharyngitis streptococcal Adverse Event Term Pharyngitis streptococcal Adverse Event Term Pharyngitis streptococcal Adverse Event Term Sinusitis Adverse Event Term Sinusitis Adverse Event Term Sinusitis Adverse Event Term Upper respiratory tract infection Adverse Event Term Upper respiratory tract infection Adverse Event Term Upper respiratory tract infection Adverse Event Term Pyrexia Adverse Event Term Pyrexia Adverse Event Term Pyrexia Adverse Event Term Abdominal pain upper Adverse Event Term Abdominal pain upper Adverse Event Term Abdominal pain upper Adverse Event Term Diarrhoea Adverse Event Term Diarrhoea Adverse Event Term Diarrhoea Adverse Event Term Lip swelling Adverse Event Term Lip swelling Adverse Event Term Lip swelling Adverse Event Term Nausea Adverse Event Term Nausea Adverse Event Term Nausea Adverse Event Term Vomiting Adverse Event Term Vomiting Adverse Event Term Vomiting
Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2
Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0 Vocab MedDRA v23.0
Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28865908
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3850963
Pi Employee No
Restriction Type OTHER
Other Details Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
Restrictive Agreement Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3850928
Organization Pfizer, Inc.
Name Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Phone 1-800-718-1021
Email ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com

Outcomes

Sequence: 30794699 Sequence: 30794700 Sequence: 30794701 Sequence: 30794702 Sequence: 30794703 Sequence: 30794704 Sequence: 30794705 Sequence: 30794706 Sequence: 30794707 Sequence: 30794708 Sequence: 30794709 Sequence: 30794710 Sequence: 30794711 Sequence: 30794712 Sequence: 30794713 Sequence: 30794734 Sequence: 30794714 Sequence: 30794715 Sequence: 30794716 Sequence: 30794717 Sequence: 30794718 Sequence: 30794719 Sequence: 30794720 Sequence: 30794721 Sequence: 30794722 Sequence: 30794723 Sequence: 30794724 Sequence: 30794725 Sequence: 30794726 Sequence: 30794727 Sequence: 30794728 Sequence: 30794729 Sequence: 30794730 Sequence: 30794731 Sequence: 30794732 Sequence: 30794733 Sequence: 30794735 Sequence: 30794736 Sequence: 30794737 Sequence: 30794738 Sequence: 30794739 Sequence: 30794740
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary
Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of 'Clear' (0) or 'Almost Clear' (1) and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in Peak Pruritis Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) for Severity of Pruritus at Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Change From Baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) at Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline Title Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Time to First Achieve ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) Title Percent Change From Baseline in Percentage BSA Title Number of Participants Who Discontinued From the Study Due to TEAEs Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Percentage BSA < 5% at Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Sleep Loss Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective VAS of Sleep Loss Title Number of Days When a Corticosteroid Not Used up to Day 88 Title Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2.5 Points at Baseline and Achieving ≥2.5 Points Improvement From Baseline in Children's DLQI Title Change From Baseline in Anxiety of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Title Change From Baseline in Depression of HADS Title Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Title Change From Baseline in Dermatitis Family Impact (DFI) at Week 12 Title Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2 Points at Baseline and Achieving 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline in PtGA Title Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Score Title Change From Baseline in Pediatric Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (Peds-FACIT-F) at Week 12 Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Title Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Plasma PF-04965842 Concentration at Week 8 Title Plasma PF-04965842 Concentration at Week 12
Description The IGA of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) was scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of body surface area (BSA) affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The PSAAD is a daily patient reported symptom diary presented as a 15 item questionnaire that includes 11 items developed to measure symptoms of AD, along with 4 additional items for exploratory and psychometric validation purposes (Sleep & Usual Activities Questions and Patient Global Impression of Severity & Patient Global Impression of Change Questions). Participants answer each question about skin condition based on a 24 hour recall. Each question was evaluated on a 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate more impact on skin condition.The PSAAD total score is calculated as the average of the responses to each of the 11 items and ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme), where higher scores indicate worse severity of AD symptoms. Description The IGA of AD is scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The POEM is a 7-item PRO measure used to assess the impact of AD over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28. The higher values represent more severe AD. Description The DFI is a validated 10-item measure filled out by the parent/caregiver of the patient used to assess the impact of the patient's eczema on the family. The instrument has a recall period of 7 days. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" or "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse impact. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that is the most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. The EQ-5D-Y is a version of the instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. Components assess level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Score scale for each domain ranges from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse health condition. In addition, respondents use a vertical, graduated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to rate their own health between 0 (the worst) and 100 (the best health state he/she can imagine). Description The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time). Larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), greater was the participant's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score), with higher scores representing better overall health status (less fatigue). Changes from baseline at Week 12 are presented below. Changes from baseline at other scheduled time points were not evaluated. Description An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description A 12-lead ECG was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and corrected QT intervals. All scheduled ECGs were performed after the participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. Reading of ECGs were performed by a central reader who has expertise reading and interpreting ECGs in adolescents. The QTcF interval is the only prespecified ECG criteria (Marked prolongation of the QTcF interval to >500 ms or >60 ms change from screening ECG); data are presented below. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution.
Time Frame Baseline to Week 12 Time Frame Baseline to Week 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Time Frame Baseline to Week 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4 and 8 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 Time Frame Baseline to Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame Baseline to Week 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline to Day 88 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline to Week 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 Time Frame Baseline to Week 12 Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 16 weeks Time Frame 4 weeks post-vaccination with Tdap (Week 12) Time Frame 2 hours pre-dose at Week 8 Time Frame 2 hours post-dose at Week 12
Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for this time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for this time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for this time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Participants in the FAS with a baseline numeric rating score for severity of pruritus >=4 were included in the analysis. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for this time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. The analysis population included all participants in the FAS who had used corticosteroid during treatment period. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for this time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable for each time point. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Number analyzed refers to the number of participants with at least one observation of the given laboratory test. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Population The analysis population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Population The immunogenicity sub-study analysis set included all participants who had completed 8 weeks of treatment and received Tdap vaccination. Number of Participants Analyzed refers to the number of participants evaluable in the analysis set at the specified visit. Population The PK analysis included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Samples from site 1173 were excluded from the analysis. Population The PK analysis included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. Samples from site 1173 were excluded from the analysis.
Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Units on a scale Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percent change Units Percentage of participants Units Days Units Percent change Units Units on a scale Units Percent change Units Participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Units on a scale Units Percent change Units Units on a scale Units Percent change Units Days Units Units on a scale Units Percentage of participants Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Percentage of participants Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Ratio Units ng/mL Units ng/mL
Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Number Param Type Median Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Number Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Number Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 235578856 Sequence: 235578857 Sequence: 235578858 Sequence: 235578859 Sequence: 235578198 Sequence: 235578199 Sequence: 235578200 Sequence: 235578201 Sequence: 235578202 Sequence: 235578203 Sequence: 235578204 Sequence: 235578205 Sequence: 235578206 Sequence: 235578207 Sequence: 235578208 Sequence: 235578209 Sequence: 235578210 Sequence: 235578211 Sequence: 235578212 Sequence: 235578213 Sequence: 235578214 Sequence: 235578215 Sequence: 235578216 Sequence: 235578217 Sequence: 235578218 Sequence: 235578219 Sequence: 235578220 Sequence: 235578221 Sequence: 235578222 Sequence: 235578223 Sequence: 235578224 Sequence: 235578225 Sequence: 235578340 Sequence: 235578226 Sequence: 235578227 Sequence: 235578228 Sequence: 235578229 Sequence: 235578230 Sequence: 235578231 Sequence: 235578232 Sequence: 235578233 Sequence: 235578234 Sequence: 235578235 Sequence: 235578236 Sequence: 235578237 Sequence: 235578238 Sequence: 235578239 Sequence: 235578240 Sequence: 235578241 Sequence: 235578242 Sequence: 235578243 Sequence: 235578244 Sequence: 235578245 Sequence: 235578246 Sequence: 235578247 Sequence: 235578248 Sequence: 235578249 Sequence: 235578250 Sequence: 235578251 Sequence: 235578252 Sequence: 235578253 Sequence: 235578254 Sequence: 235578255 Sequence: 235578256 Sequence: 235578257 Sequence: 235578258 Sequence: 235578259 Sequence: 235578260 Sequence: 235578261 Sequence: 235578262 Sequence: 235578263 Sequence: 235578264 Sequence: 235578265 Sequence: 235578266 Sequence: 235578267 Sequence: 235578268 Sequence: 235578269 Sequence: 235578270 Sequence: 235578271 Sequence: 235578272 Sequence: 235578273 Sequence: 235578274 Sequence: 235578275 Sequence: 235578276 Sequence: 235578277 Sequence: 235578278 Sequence: 235578279 Sequence: 235578280 Sequence: 235578281 Sequence: 235578282 Sequence: 235578283 Sequence: 235578284 Sequence: 235578285 Sequence: 235578286 Sequence: 235578287 Sequence: 235578288 Sequence: 235578289 Sequence: 235578290 Sequence: 235578291 Sequence: 235578292 Sequence: 235578293 Sequence: 235578860 Sequence: 235578294 Sequence: 235578295 Sequence: 235578296 Sequence: 235578297 Sequence: 235578298 Sequence: 235578299 Sequence: 235578300 Sequence: 235578301 Sequence: 235578302 Sequence: 235578303 Sequence: 235578341 Sequence: 235578304 Sequence: 235578305 Sequence: 235578306 Sequence: 235578307 Sequence: 235578308 Sequence: 235578309 Sequence: 235578310 Sequence: 235578311 Sequence: 235578312 Sequence: 235578313 Sequence: 235578314 Sequence: 235578315 Sequence: 235578316 Sequence: 235578317 Sequence: 235578318 Sequence: 235578319 Sequence: 235578320 Sequence: 235578321 Sequence: 235578322 Sequence: 235578323 Sequence: 235578324 Sequence: 235578325 Sequence: 235578326 Sequence: 235578327 Sequence: 235578328 Sequence: 235578329 Sequence: 235578330 Sequence: 235578331 Sequence: 235578332 Sequence: 235578333 Sequence: 235578334 Sequence: 235578342 Sequence: 235578343 Sequence: 235578335 Sequence: 235578336 Sequence: 235578337 Sequence: 235578338 Sequence: 235578339 Sequence: 235578344 Sequence: 235578345 Sequence: 235578346 Sequence: 235578347 Sequence: 235578348 Sequence: 235578349 Sequence: 235578350 Sequence: 235578351 Sequence: 235578352 Sequence: 235578353 Sequence: 235578354 Sequence: 235578355 Sequence: 235578356 Sequence: 235578357 Sequence: 235578358 Sequence: 235578359 Sequence: 235578360 Sequence: 235578361 Sequence: 235578362 Sequence: 235578363 Sequence: 235578364 Sequence: 235578365 Sequence: 235578366 Sequence: 235578367 Sequence: 235578368 Sequence: 235578369 Sequence: 235578370 Sequence: 235578371 Sequence: 235578372 Sequence: 235578373 Sequence: 235578374 Sequence: 235578375 Sequence: 235578376 Sequence: 235578377 Sequence: 235578378 Sequence: 235578379 Sequence: 235578380 Sequence: 235578381 Sequence: 235578387 Sequence: 235578382 Sequence: 235578383 Sequence: 235578384 Sequence: 235578385 Sequence: 235578386 Sequence: 235578388 Sequence: 235578389 Sequence: 235578390 Sequence: 235578391 Sequence: 235578392 Sequence: 235578393 Sequence: 235578394 Sequence: 235578395 Sequence: 235578396 Sequence: 235578397 Sequence: 235578398 Sequence: 235578399 Sequence: 235578400 Sequence: 235578401 Sequence: 235578402 Sequence: 235578403 Sequence: 235578404 Sequence: 235578405 Sequence: 235578406 Sequence: 235578407 Sequence: 235578408 Sequence: 235578409 Sequence: 235578410 Sequence: 235578411 Sequence: 235578412 Sequence: 235578413 Sequence: 235578414 Sequence: 235578415 Sequence: 235578416 Sequence: 235578417 Sequence: 235578418 Sequence: 235578419 Sequence: 235578420 Sequence: 235578421 Sequence: 235578422 Sequence: 235578423 Sequence: 235578424 Sequence: 235578425 Sequence: 235578523 Sequence: 235578426 Sequence: 235578427 Sequence: 235578428 Sequence: 235578429 Sequence: 235578430 Sequence: 235578431 Sequence: 235578432 Sequence: 235578433 Sequence: 235578434 Sequence: 235578435 Sequence: 235578436 Sequence: 235578437 Sequence: 235578438 Sequence: 235578439 Sequence: 235578440 Sequence: 235578441 Sequence: 235578442 Sequence: 235578443 Sequence: 235578444 Sequence: 235578445 Sequence: 235578446 Sequence: 235578447 Sequence: 235578448 Sequence: 235578449 Sequence: 235578450 Sequence: 235578451 Sequence: 235578452 Sequence: 235578453 Sequence: 235578454 Sequence: 235578455 Sequence: 235578456 Sequence: 235578457 Sequence: 235578458 Sequence: 235578595 Sequence: 235578459 Sequence: 235578460 Sequence: 235578461 Sequence: 235578462 Sequence: 235578463 Sequence: 235578464 Sequence: 235578465 Sequence: 235578466 Sequence: 235578467 Sequence: 235578468 Sequence: 235578469 Sequence: 235578470 Sequence: 235578471 Sequence: 235578472 Sequence: 235578473 Sequence: 235578474 Sequence: 235578475 Sequence: 235578476 Sequence: 235578477 Sequence: 235578478 Sequence: 235578479 Sequence: 235578480 Sequence: 235578481 Sequence: 235578596 Sequence: 235578482 Sequence: 235578483 Sequence: 235578484 Sequence: 235578485 Sequence: 235578486 Sequence: 235578487 Sequence: 235578488 Sequence: 235578489 Sequence: 235578490 Sequence: 235578491 Sequence: 235578492 Sequence: 235578493 Sequence: 235578494 Sequence: 235578495 Sequence: 235578496 Sequence: 235578497 Sequence: 235578498 Sequence: 235578499 Sequence: 235578500 Sequence: 235578501 Sequence: 235578502 Sequence: 235578503 Sequence: 235578504 Sequence: 235578505 Sequence: 235578506 Sequence: 235578507 Sequence: 235578508 Sequence: 235578509 Sequence: 235578510 Sequence: 235578511 Sequence: 235578512 Sequence: 235578513 Sequence: 235578514 Sequence: 235578522 Sequence: 235578515 Sequence: 235578516 Sequence: 235578517 Sequence: 235578518 Sequence: 235578519 Sequence: 235578520 Sequence: 235578521 Sequence: 235578524 Sequence: 235578525 Sequence: 235578526 Sequence: 235578527 Sequence: 235578528 Sequence: 235578529 Sequence: 235578530 Sequence: 235578531 Sequence: 235578538 Sequence: 235578532 Sequence: 235578533 Sequence: 235578534 Sequence: 235578535 Sequence: 235578536 Sequence: 235578537 Sequence: 235578539 Sequence: 235578540 Sequence: 235578541 Sequence: 235578542 Sequence: 235578543 Sequence: 235578544 Sequence: 235578545 Sequence: 235578597 Sequence: 235578598 Sequence: 235578546 Sequence: 235578547 Sequence: 235578548 Sequence: 235578549 Sequence: 235578550 Sequence: 235578551 Sequence: 235578552 Sequence: 235578553 Sequence: 235578554 Sequence: 235578555 Sequence: 235578556 Sequence: 235578599 Sequence: 235578557 Sequence: 235578558 Sequence: 235578559 Sequence: 235578560 Sequence: 235578561 Sequence: 235578562 Sequence: 235578563 Sequence: 235578564 Sequence: 235578565 Sequence: 235578566 Sequence: 235578567 Sequence: 235578568 Sequence: 235578569 Sequence: 235578570 Sequence: 235578571 Sequence: 235578600 Sequence: 235578572 Sequence: 235578573 Sequence: 235578574 Sequence: 235578575 Sequence: 235578576 Sequence: 235578577 Sequence: 235578578 Sequence: 235578579 Sequence: 235578580 Sequence: 235578581 Sequence: 235578582 Sequence: 235578583 Sequence: 235578584 Sequence: 235578585 Sequence: 235578586 Sequence: 235578587 Sequence: 235578588 Sequence: 235578589 Sequence: 235578590 Sequence: 235578591 Sequence: 235578592 Sequence: 235578593 Sequence: 235578594 Sequence: 235578601 Sequence: 235578602 Sequence: 235578603 Sequence: 235578604 Sequence: 235578605 Sequence: 235578606 Sequence: 235578607 Sequence: 235578608 Sequence: 235578609 Sequence: 235578610 Sequence: 235578611 Sequence: 235578612 Sequence: 235578613 Sequence: 235578614 Sequence: 235578615 Sequence: 235578616 Sequence: 235578617 Sequence: 235578618 Sequence: 235578619 Sequence: 235578620 Sequence: 235578621 Sequence: 235578622 Sequence: 235578623 Sequence: 235578624 Sequence: 235578625 Sequence: 235578626 Sequence: 235578627 Sequence: 235578628 Sequence: 235578629 Sequence: 235578630 Sequence: 235578631 Sequence: 235578632 Sequence: 235578633 Sequence: 235578634 Sequence: 235578635 Sequence: 235578636 Sequence: 235578637 Sequence: 235578638 Sequence: 235578639 Sequence: 235578640 Sequence: 235578641 Sequence: 235578642 Sequence: 235578643 Sequence: 235578644 Sequence: 235578645 Sequence: 235578646 Sequence: 235578647 Sequence: 235578648 Sequence: 235578649 Sequence: 235578650 Sequence: 235578651 Sequence: 235578652 Sequence: 235578653 Sequence: 235578654 Sequence: 235578655 Sequence: 235578656 Sequence: 235578657 Sequence: 235578658 Sequence: 235578659 Sequence: 235578660 Sequence: 235578661 Sequence: 235578662 Sequence: 235578663 Sequence: 235578664 Sequence: 235578665 Sequence: 235578666 Sequence: 235578667 Sequence: 235578668 Sequence: 235578669 Sequence: 235578670 Sequence: 235578671 Sequence: 235578672 Sequence: 235578673 Sequence: 235578674 Sequence: 235578675 Sequence: 235578676 Sequence: 235578677 Sequence: 235578678 Sequence: 235578679 Sequence: 235578680 Sequence: 235578681 Sequence: 235578682 Sequence: 235578683 Sequence: 235578684 Sequence: 235578685 Sequence: 235578686 Sequence: 235578687 Sequence: 235578688 Sequence: 235578689 Sequence: 235578690 Sequence: 235578691 Sequence: 235578692 Sequence: 235578693 Sequence: 235578694 Sequence: 235578695 Sequence: 235578696 Sequence: 235578697 Sequence: 235578698 Sequence: 235578699 Sequence: 235578700 Sequence: 235578701 Sequence: 235578702 Sequence: 235578703 Sequence: 235578704 Sequence: 235578705 Sequence: 235578706 Sequence: 235578707 Sequence: 235578708 Sequence: 235578709 Sequence: 235578710 Sequence: 235578711 Sequence: 235578712 Sequence: 235578713 Sequence: 235578714 Sequence: 235578715 Sequence: 235578716 Sequence: 235578717 Sequence: 235578718 Sequence: 235578719 Sequence: 235578720 Sequence: 235578721 Sequence: 235578722 Sequence: 235578723 Sequence: 235578724 Sequence: 235578725 Sequence: 235578726 Sequence: 235578727 Sequence: 235578728 Sequence: 235578729 Sequence: 235578730 Sequence: 235578731 Sequence: 235578741 Sequence: 235578732 Sequence: 235578733 Sequence: 235578734 Sequence: 235578735 Sequence: 235578736 Sequence: 235578737 Sequence: 235578738 Sequence: 235578739 Sequence: 235578740 Sequence: 235578742 Sequence: 235578743 Sequence: 235578744 Sequence: 235578745 Sequence: 235578746 Sequence: 235578747 Sequence: 235578748 Sequence: 235578749 Sequence: 235578750 Sequence: 235578751 Sequence: 235578752 Sequence: 235578753 Sequence: 235578754 Sequence: 235578755 Sequence: 235578756 Sequence: 235578773 Sequence: 235578757 Sequence: 235578758 Sequence: 235578759 Sequence: 235578760 Sequence: 235578761 Sequence: 235578762 Sequence: 235578763 Sequence: 235578764 Sequence: 235578765 Sequence: 235578766 Sequence: 235578767 Sequence: 235578768 Sequence: 235578769 Sequence: 235578770 Sequence: 235578771 Sequence: 235578772 Sequence: 235578774 Sequence: 235578775 Sequence: 235578776 Sequence: 235578777 Sequence: 235578778 Sequence: 235578779 Sequence: 235578780 Sequence: 235578781 Sequence: 235578782 Sequence: 235578783 Sequence: 235578784 Sequence: 235578785 Sequence: 235578786 Sequence: 235578787 Sequence: 235578788 Sequence: 235578789 Sequence: 235578790 Sequence: 235578791 Sequence: 235578792 Sequence: 235578793 Sequence: 235578794 Sequence: 235578795 Sequence: 235578796 Sequence: 235578797 Sequence: 235578798 Sequence: 235578799 Sequence: 235578800 Sequence: 235578801 Sequence: 235578802 Sequence: 235578803 Sequence: 235578804 Sequence: 235578805 Sequence: 235578806 Sequence: 235578807 Sequence: 235578808 Sequence: 235578809 Sequence: 235578810 Sequence: 235578811 Sequence: 235578812 Sequence: 235578813 Sequence: 235578814 Sequence: 235578815 Sequence: 235578816 Sequence: 235578817 Sequence: 235578818 Sequence: 235578819 Sequence: 235578820 Sequence: 235578821 Sequence: 235578822 Sequence: 235578823 Sequence: 235578824 Sequence: 235578825 Sequence: 235578826 Sequence: 235578827 Sequence: 235578828 Sequence: 235578854 Sequence: 235578829 Sequence: 235578830 Sequence: 235578855 Sequence: 235578831 Sequence: 235578832 Sequence: 235578833 Sequence: 235578834 Sequence: 235578835 Sequence: 235578836 Sequence: 235578837 Sequence: 235578838 Sequence: 235578839 Sequence: 235578840 Sequence: 235578841 Sequence: 235578842 Sequence: 235578843 Sequence: 235578844 Sequence: 235578845 Sequence: 235578846 Sequence: 235578847 Sequence: 235578848 Sequence: 235578849 Sequence: 235578850 Sequence: 235578851 Sequence: 235578852 Sequence: 235578853 Sequence: 235578861 Sequence: 235578862 Sequence: 235578863 Sequence: 235578864 Sequence: 235578865 Sequence: 235578866 Sequence: 235578867 Sequence: 235578868 Sequence: 235578869 Sequence: 235578870 Sequence: 235578884 Sequence: 235578885 Sequence: 235578871 Sequence: 235578872 Sequence: 235578873 Sequence: 235578874 Sequence: 235578875 Sequence: 235578876 Sequence: 235578877 Sequence: 235578878 Sequence: 235578879 Sequence: 235578880 Sequence: 235578881 Sequence: 235578882 Sequence: 235578883
Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794699 Outcome Id 30794699 Outcome Id 30794699 Outcome Id 30794700 Outcome Id 30794700 Outcome Id 30794700 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794701 Outcome Id 30794702 Outcome Id 30794702 Outcome Id 30794702 Outcome Id 30794703 Outcome Id 30794703 Outcome Id 30794703 Outcome Id 30794703 Outcome Id 30794703 Outcome Id 30794703 Outcome Id 30794703 Outcome Id 30794703 Outcome Id 30794703 Outcome Id 30794704 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794704 Outcome Id 30794704 Outcome Id 30794704 Outcome Id 30794704 Outcome Id 30794704 Outcome Id 30794704 Outcome Id 30794704 Outcome Id 30794704 Outcome Id 30794705 Outcome Id 30794705 Outcome Id 30794705 Outcome Id 30794705 Outcome Id 30794705 Outcome Id 30794705 Outcome Id 30794705 Outcome Id 30794705 Outcome Id 30794705 Outcome Id 30794705 Outcome Id 30794705 Outcome Id 30794705 Outcome Id 30794706 Outcome Id 30794706 Outcome Id 30794706 Outcome Id 30794706 Outcome Id 30794706 Outcome Id 30794706 Outcome Id 30794706 Outcome Id 30794706 Outcome Id 30794706 Outcome Id 30794706 Outcome Id 30794706 Outcome Id 30794706 Outcome Id 30794707 Outcome Id 30794707 Outcome Id 30794707 Outcome Id 30794707 Outcome Id 30794707 Outcome Id 30794707 Outcome Id 30794707 Outcome Id 30794707 Outcome Id 30794707 Outcome Id 30794707 Outcome Id 30794707 Outcome Id 30794707 Outcome Id 30794708 Outcome Id 30794708 Outcome Id 30794708 Outcome Id 30794708 Outcome Id 30794708 Outcome Id 30794708 Outcome Id 30794708 Outcome Id 30794708 Outcome Id 30794708 Outcome Id 30794708 Outcome Id 30794708 Outcome Id 30794708 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794709 Outcome Id 30794710 Outcome Id 30794710 Outcome Id 30794710 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794711 Outcome Id 30794712 Outcome Id 30794712 Outcome Id 30794712 Outcome Id 30794712 Outcome Id 30794712 Outcome Id 30794712 Outcome Id 30794712 Outcome Id 30794712 Outcome Id 30794712 Outcome Id 30794712 Outcome Id 30794712 Outcome Id 30794712 Outcome Id 30794713 Outcome Id 30794713 Outcome Id 30794713 Outcome Id 30794713 Outcome Id 30794713 Outcome Id 30794713 Outcome Id 30794713 Outcome Id 30794713 Outcome Id 30794713 Outcome Id 30794713 Outcome Id 30794713 Outcome Id 30794713 Outcome Id 30794714 Outcome Id 30794714 Outcome Id 30794714 Outcome Id 30794715 Outcome Id 30794715 Outcome Id 30794715 Outcome Id 30794715 Outcome Id 30794715 Outcome Id 30794715 Outcome Id 30794715 Outcome Id 30794715 Outcome Id 30794715 Outcome Id 30794715 Outcome Id 30794715 Outcome Id 30794715 Outcome Id 30794716 Outcome Id 30794716 Outcome Id 30794716 Outcome Id 30794716 Outcome Id 30794716 Outcome Id 30794716 Outcome Id 30794716 Outcome Id 30794716 Outcome Id 30794716 Outcome Id 30794716 Outcome Id 30794716 Outcome Id 30794716 Outcome Id 30794717 Outcome Id 30794717 Outcome Id 30794717 Outcome Id 30794717 Outcome Id 30794717 Outcome Id 30794717 Outcome Id 30794726 Outcome Id 30794717 Outcome Id 30794717 Outcome Id 30794717 Outcome Id 30794717 Outcome Id 30794717 Outcome Id 30794717 Outcome Id 30794718 Outcome Id 30794718 Outcome Id 30794718 Outcome Id 30794718 Outcome Id 30794718 Outcome Id 30794718 Outcome Id 30794718 Outcome Id 30794718 Outcome Id 30794718 Outcome Id 30794718 Outcome Id 30794718 Outcome Id 30794718 Outcome Id 30794719 Outcome Id 30794719 Outcome Id 30794719 Outcome Id 30794719 Outcome Id 30794719 Outcome Id 30794719 Outcome Id 30794719 Outcome Id 30794719 Outcome Id 30794719 Outcome Id 30794719 Outcome Id 30794719 Outcome Id 30794719 Outcome Id 30794720 Outcome Id 30794720 Outcome Id 30794720 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794720 Outcome Id 30794720 Outcome Id 30794720 Outcome Id 30794720 Outcome Id 30794720 Outcome Id 30794720 Outcome Id 30794720 Outcome Id 30794720 Outcome Id 30794720 Outcome Id 30794721 Outcome Id 30794721 Outcome Id 30794721 Outcome Id 30794722 Outcome Id 30794722 Outcome Id 30794722 Outcome Id 30794722 Outcome Id 30794722 Outcome Id 30794722 Outcome Id 30794722 Outcome Id 30794722 Outcome Id 30794722 Outcome Id 30794722 Outcome Id 30794722 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794722 Outcome Id 30794723 Outcome Id 30794723 Outcome Id 30794723 Outcome Id 30794723 Outcome Id 30794723 Outcome Id 30794723 Outcome Id 30794723 Outcome Id 30794723 Outcome Id 30794723 Outcome Id 30794723 Outcome Id 30794723 Outcome Id 30794723 Outcome Id 30794724 Outcome Id 30794724 Outcome Id 30794724 Outcome Id 30794724 Outcome Id 30794724 Outcome Id 30794724 Outcome Id 30794724 Outcome Id 30794724 Outcome Id 30794724 Outcome Id 30794724 Outcome Id 30794724 Outcome Id 30794724 Outcome Id 30794725 Outcome Id 30794725 Outcome Id 30794725 Outcome Id 30794725 Outcome Id 30794725 Outcome Id 30794725 Outcome Id 30794725 Outcome Id 30794725 Outcome Id 30794726 Outcome Id 30794725 Outcome Id 30794725 Outcome Id 30794725 Outcome Id 30794725 Outcome Id 30794726 Outcome Id 30794726 Outcome Id 30794726 Outcome Id 30794726 Outcome Id 30794726 Outcome Id 30794726 Outcome Id 30794726 Outcome Id 30794726 Outcome Id 30794726 Outcome Id 30794726 Outcome Id 30794727 Outcome Id 30794728 Outcome Id 30794727 Outcome Id 30794727 Outcome Id 30794728 Outcome Id 30794728 Outcome Id 30794728 Outcome Id 30794728 Outcome Id 30794728 Outcome Id 30794728 Outcome Id 30794728 Outcome Id 30794728 Outcome Id 30794728 Outcome Id 30794728 Outcome Id 30794728 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794729 Outcome Id 30794729 Outcome Id 30794729 Outcome Id 30794729 Outcome Id 30794729 Outcome Id 30794729 Outcome Id 30794729 Outcome Id 30794729 Outcome Id 30794729 Outcome Id 30794729 Outcome Id 30794729 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794729 Outcome Id 30794730 Outcome Id 30794730 Outcome Id 30794730 Outcome Id 30794730 Outcome Id 30794730 Outcome Id 30794730 Outcome Id 30794730 Outcome Id 30794730 Outcome Id 30794730 Outcome Id 30794730 Outcome Id 30794730 Outcome Id 30794730 Outcome Id 30794731 Outcome Id 30794731 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794731 Outcome Id 30794732 Outcome Id 30794732 Outcome Id 30794732 Outcome Id 30794732 Outcome Id 30794732 Outcome Id 30794732 Outcome Id 30794733 Outcome Id 30794733 Outcome Id 30794733 Outcome Id 30794733 Outcome Id 30794733 Outcome Id 30794733 Outcome Id 30794734 Outcome Id 30794734 Outcome Id 30794734 Outcome Id 30794734 Outcome Id 30794734 Outcome Id 30794734 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794735 Outcome Id 30794736 Outcome Id 30794736 Outcome Id 30794736 Outcome Id 30794736 Outcome Id 30794736 Outcome Id 30794736 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794737 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794740 Outcome Id 30794740 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794738 Outcome Id 30794739 Outcome Id 30794739
Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080969 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080969 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080969 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080969 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080970 Result Group Id 56080971 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080966 Result Group Id 56080967 Result Group Id 56080968 Result Group Id 56080970 Result Group Id 56080971
Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Classification Systolic Blood Pressure Value <90mmHg Classification Systolic Blood Pressure Value <90mmHg Classification Systolic Blood Pressure Increase From Baseline >=30mmHg Classification Systolic Blood Pressure Increase From Baseline >=30mmHg Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 2 Classification Day 6 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Day 2 Classification Day 2 Classification Day 2 Classification Day 3 Classification Day 3 Classification Day 3 Classification Day 4 Classification Day 4 Classification Day 4 Classification Day 5 Classification Day 5 Classification Day 5 Classification Systolic Blood Pressure Increase From Baseline >=30mmHg Classification Day 6 Classification Day 6 Classification Day 6 Classification Day 7 Classification Day 7 Classification Day 7 Classification Day 8 Classification Day 8 Classification Day 8 Classification Day 9 Classification Day 6 Classification Day 9 Classification Day 9 Classification Day 10 Classification Day 10 Classification Day 10 Classification Day 11 Classification Day 11 Classification Day 11 Classification Day 12 Classification Day 12 Classification Day 12 Classification Day 13 Classification Day 13 Classification Day 13 Classification Day 14 Classification Day 14 Classification Day 14 Classification Day 15 Classification Day 15 Classification Day 15 Classification Day 2 Classification Day 2 Classification Day 2 Classification Day 3 Classification Day 3 Classification Day 3 Classification Day 4 Classification Day 4 Classification Day 7 Classification Day 7 Classification Day 4 Classification Day 5 Classification Day 5 Classification Day 5 Classification Day 6 Classification Day 7 Classification Day 8 Classification Day 8 Classification Day 8 Classification Day 9 Classification Day 9 Classification Day 9 Classification Day 10 Classification Day 10 Classification Day 10 Classification Day 11 Classification Day 11 Classification Day 11 Classification Day 12 Classification Day 12 Classification Day 12 Classification Day 13 Classification Day 13 Classification Day 13 Classification Day 14 Classification Day 14 Classification Day 14 Classification Day 15 Classification Day 15 Classification Day 15 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Hematocrit (%) <0.8*LLN Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Hematocrit (%) <0.8*LLN Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Erythrocytes (10^6/mm^3) <0.8*LLN Classification Erythrocytes (10^6/mm^3) <0.8*LLN Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Erythrocytes (10^6/mm^3) <0.8*LLN Classification Week 12 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 2 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 4 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 8 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Week 12 Classification Reticulocytes (10^3/mm^3) <0.5*LLN Classification All-causality TEAEs Classification All-causality TEAEs Classification All-causality TEAEs Classification Treatment-related TEAEs Classification Treatment-related TEAEs Classification Treatment-related TEAEs Classification All-causality SAEs Classification All-causality SAEs Classification All-causality SAEs Classification Treatment-related SAEs Classification Treatment-related SAEs Classification Treatment-related SAEs Classification All-causality TEAEs Classification All-causality TEAEs Classification All-causality TEAEs Classification Treatment-related TEAEs Classification Treatment-related TEAEs Classification Treatment-related TEAEs Classification Hemoglobin (g/dL) <0.8*LLN Classification Hemoglobin (g/dL) <0.8*LLN Classification Hemoglobin (g/dL) <0.8*LLN Classification Hematocrit (%) <0.8*LLN Classification Reticulocytes (10^3/mm^3) <0.5*LLN Classification Reticulocytes (10^3/mm^3) <0.5*LLN Classification Reticulocytes (10^3/mm^3) >1.5*ULN Classification Reticulocytes (10^3/mm^3) >1.5*ULN Classification Reticulocytes (10^3/mm^3) >1.5*ULN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular Volume (10^-15L) <0.9*LLN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular Volume (10^-15L) <0.9*LLN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular Volume (10^-15L) <0.9*LLN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular Volume (10^-15L) >1.1*ULN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular Volume (10^-15L) >1.1*ULN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular Volume (10^-15L) >1.1*ULN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (pg/cell) <0.9*LLN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (pg/cell) <0.9*LLN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (pg/cell) <0.9*LLN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (pg/cell) >1.1*ULN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (pg/cell) >1.1*ULN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (pg/cell) >1.1*ULN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration (g/dL) <0.9*LLN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration (g/dL) <0.9*LLN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration (g/dL) <0.9*LLN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration (g/dL) >1.1*ULN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration (g/dL) >1.1*ULN Classification Ery. Mean Corpuscular HGB Concentration (g/dL) >1.1*ULN Classification Platelets (10^3/mm^3) <0.5*LLN Classification Platelets (10^3/mm^3) <0.5*LLN Classification Platelets (10^3/mm^3) <0.5*LLN Classification Platelets (10^3/mm^3) >1.75*ULN Classification Platelets (10^3/mm^3) >1.75*ULN Classification Platelets (10^3/mm^3) >1.75*ULN Classification Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes (%) <0.5*LLN Classification Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes (%) <0.5*LLN Classification Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes (%) <0.5*LLN Classification Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes (%) >1.5*ULN Classification Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes (%) >1.5*ULN Classification Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes (%) >1.5*ULN Classification Leukocytes (10^3/mm^3) <0.6*LLN Classification Leukocytes (10^3/mm^3) <0.6*LLN Classification Leukocytes (10^3/mm^3) <0.6*LLN Classification Leukocytes (10^3/mm^3) >1.5*ULN Classification Leukocytes (10^3/mm^3) >1.5*ULN Classification Leukocytes (10^3/mm^3) >1.5*ULN Classification Lymphocytes (10^3/mm^3) <0.8*LLN Classification Lymphocytes (10^3/mm^3) <0.8*LLN Classification Lymphocytes (10^3/mm^3) <0.8*LLN Classification Lymphocytes (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*ULN Classification Lymphocytes (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*ULN Classification Lymphocytes (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*ULN Classification Lymphocytes/Leukocytes (%) <0.8*LLN Classification Lymphocytes/Leukocytes (%) <0.8*LLN Classification Lymphocytes/Leukocytes (%) <0.8*LLN Classification Lymphocytes/Leukocytes (%) >1.2*ULN Classification Lymphocytes/Leukocytes (%) >1.2*ULN Classification Lymphocytes/Leukocytes (%) >1.2*ULN Classification Neutrophils (10^3/mm^3) <0.8*LLN Classification Neutrophils (10^3/mm^3) <0.8*LLN Classification Neutrophils (10^3/mm^3) <0.8*LLN Classification Neutrophils (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*ULN Classification Neutrophils (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*ULN Classification Neutrophils (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*ULN Classification Neutrophils/Leukocytes (%) <0.8*LLN Classification Neutrophils/Leukocytes (%) <0.8*LLN Classification Neutrophils/Leukocytes (%) <0.8*LLN Classification Neutrophils/Leukocytes (%) >1.2*ULN Classification Neutrophils/Leukocytes (%) >1.2*ULN Classification Neutrophils/Leukocytes (%) >1.2*ULN Classification Basophils (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*ULN Classification Basophils (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*ULN Classification Basophils (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*ULN Classification Basophils/Leukocytes (%) >1.2*ULN Classification Basophils/Leukocytes (%) >1.2*ULN Classification Basophils/Leukocytes (%) >1.2*ULN Classification Eosinophils (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*ULN Classification Eosinophils (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*ULN Classification Eosinophils (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*ULN Classification Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%) >1.2*ULN Classification Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%) >1.2*ULN Classification Eosinophils/Leukocytes (%) >1.2*ULN Classification Monocytes (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*ULN Classification Monocytes (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*ULN Classification Monocytes (10^3/mm^3) >1.2*ULN Classification Monocytes/Leukocytes (%) >1.2*ULN Classification Monocytes/Leukocytes (%) >1.2*ULN Classification Monocytes/Leukocytes (%) >1.2*ULN Classification Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (sec) >1.1*ULN Classification Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (sec) >1.1*ULN Classification Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (sec) >1.1*ULN Classification Prothrombin Time (sec) >1.1*ULN Classification Prothrombin Time (sec) >1.1*ULN Classification Prothrombin Time (sec) >1.1*ULN Classification Prothrombin Intl.Normalized Ratio >1.1*ULN Classification Prothrombin Intl.Normalized Ratio >1.1*ULN Classification Prothrombin Intl.Normalized Ratio >1.1*ULN Classification Bilirubin (mg/dL) >1.5*ULN Classification Bilirubin (mg/dL) >1.5*ULN Classification Bilirubin (mg/dL) >1.5*ULN Classification Direct Bilirubin (mg/dL) >1.5*ULN Classification Direct Bilirubin (mg/dL) >1.5*ULN Classification Direct Bilirubin (mg/dL) >1.5*ULN Classification Indirect Bilirubin (mg/dL) >1.5*ULN Classification Indirect Bilirubin (mg/dL) >1.5*ULN Classification Indirect Bilirubin (mg/dL) >1.5*ULN Classification Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) >3.0*ULN Classification Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) >3.0*ULN Classification Aspartate Aminotransferase (U/L) >3.0*ULN Classification Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) >3.0*ULN Classification Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) >3.0*ULN Classification Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) >3.0*ULN Classification Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (U/L) >3.0*ULN Classification Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (U/L) >3.0*ULN Classification Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (U/L) >3.0*ULN Classification Lactate Dehydrogenase (U/L) >3.0*ULN Classification Lactate Dehydrogenase (U/L) >3.0*ULN Classification Lactate Dehydrogenase (U/L) >3.0*ULN Classification Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) >3.0*ULN Classification Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) >3.0*ULN Classification Alkaline Phosphatase (U/L) >3.0*ULN Classification Protein (g/dL) <0.8*LLN Classification Protein (g/dL) <0.8*LLN Classification Protein (g/dL) <0.8*LLN Classification Protein (g/dL) >1.2*ULN Classification Protein (g/dL) >1.2*ULN Classification Protein (g/dL) >1.2*ULN Classification Albumin (g/dL) <0.8*LLN Classification Albumin (g/dL) <0.8*LLN Classification Albumin (g/dL) <0.8*LLN Classification Albumin (g/dL) >1.2*ULN Classification Albumin (g/dL) >1.2*ULN Classification Albumin (g/dL) >1.2*ULN Classification Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) >1.3*ULN Classification Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) >1.3*ULN Classification Urea Nitrogen (mg/dL) >1.3*ULN Classification Triglycerides (mg/dL) >1.3*ULN Classification Creatinine (mg/dL) >1.3*ULN Classification Creatinine (mg/dL) >1.3*ULN Classification Creatinine (mg/dL) >1.3*ULN Classification Urate (mg/dL) >1.2*ULN Classification Urate (mg/dL) >1.2*ULN Classification Urate (mg/dL) >1.2*ULN Classification LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) >1.2*ULN Classification LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) >1.2*ULN Classification LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) >1.2*ULN Classification Triglycerides (mg/dL) >1.3*ULN Classification Triglycerides (mg/dL) >1.3*ULN Classification Sodium (mEq/L) <0.95*LLN Classification Sodium (mEq/L) <0.95*LLN Classification Sodium (mEq/L) <0.95*LLN Classification Sodium (mEq/L) >1.05*ULN Classification Sodium (mEq/L) >1.05*ULN Classification Sodium (mEq/L) >1.05*ULN Classification Potassium (mEq/L) <0.9*LLN Classification Potassium (mEq/L) <0.9*LLN Classification Potassium (mEq/L) <0.9*LLN Classification Potassium (mEq/L) >1.1*ULN Classification Potassium (mEq/L) >1.1*ULN Classification Potassium (mEq/L) >1.1*ULN Classification Chloride (mEq/L) <0.9*LLN Classification Bicarbonate (mEq/L) >1.1*ULN Classification Chloride (mEq/L) <0.9*LLN Classification Chloride (mEq/L) <0.9*LLN Classification Chloride (mEq/L) >1.1*ULN Classification Chloride (mEq/L) >1.1*ULN Classification Chloride (mEq/L) >1.1*ULN Classification Calcium (mg/dL) <0.9*LLN Classification Calcium (mg/dL) <0.9*LLN Classification Calcium (mg/dL) <0.9*LLN Classification Calcium (mg/dL) >1.1*ULN Classification Calcium (mg/dL) >1.1*ULN Classification Calcium (mg/dL) >1.1*ULN Classification Bicarbonate (mEq/L) <0.9*LLN Classification Bicarbonate (mEq/L) <0.9*LLN Classification Bicarbonate (mEq/L) <0.9*LLN Classification Bicarbonate (mEq/L) >1.1*ULN Classification Bicarbonate (mEq/L) >1.1*ULN Classification Glucose (mg/dL) <0.6*LLN Classification Glucose (mg/dL) <0.6*LLN Classification Glucose (mg/dL) <0.6*LLN Classification Glucose (mg/dL) >1.5*ULN Classification Glucose (mg/dL) >1.5*ULN Classification Glucose (mg/dL) >1.5*ULN Classification Creatine Kinase (U/L) >2.0*ULN Classification Creatine Kinase (U/L) >2.0*ULN Classification Creatine Kinase (U/L) >2.0*ULN Classification Cholesterol (mg/dL)>1.3*ULN Classification Cholesterol (mg/dL)>1.3*ULN Classification Cholesterol (mg/dL)>1.3*ULN Classification HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) <0.8*LLN Classification HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) <0.8*LLN Classification HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) <0.8*LLN Classification Urine Specific Gravity (scalar) <1.003 Classification Urine Specific Gravity (scalar) <1.003 Classification Urine Specific Gravity (scalar) <1.003 Classification Urine Specific Gravity (scalar) >1.030 Classification Urine Specific Gravity (scalar) >1.030 Classification Urine Specific Gravity (scalar) >1.030 Classification Urine pH (Scalar) <4.5 Classification Urine pH (Scalar) <4.5 Classification Urine pH (Scalar) <4.5 Classification Urine pH (Scalar) >8 Classification Urine pH (Scalar) >8 Classification Urine pH (Scalar) >8 Classification Urine Glucose >=1 Classification Urine Glucose >=1 Classification Urine Glucose >=1 Classification Urine Ketones >=1 Classification Urine Ketones >=1 Classification Urine Ketones >=1 Classification Urine Protein >=1 Classification Urine Protein >=1 Classification Urine Protein >=1 Classification Urine Hemoglobin >=1 Classification Urine Hemoglobin >=1 Classification Urine Hemoglobin >=1 Classification Urine Nitrite >=1 Classification Urine Nitrite >=1 Classification Urine Nitrite >=1 Classification Urine Leukocyte Esterase >=1 Classification Urine Leukocyte Esterase >=1 Classification Urine Leukocyte Esterase >=1 Classification Urine Erythrocytes (/HPF) >=20 Classification Urine Erythrocytes (/HPF) >=20 Classification Urine Erythrocytes (/HPF) >=20 Classification Urine Leukocytes (/HPF) >=20 Classification Urine Leukocytes (/HPF) >=20 Classification Urine Leukocytes (/HPF) >=20 Classification Urine Granular Casts (/LPF) >1 Classification Urine Granular Casts (/LPF) >1 Classification Urine Granular Casts (/LPF) >1 Classification Urine Hyaline Casts (/LPF) >1 Classification Pulse Rate Value >120 bpm Classification Urine Hyaline Casts (/LPF) >1 Classification Urine Hyaline Casts (/LPF) >1 Classification Systolic Blood Pressure Value <90mmHg Classification Urine Bacteria >20 Classification Urine Bacteria >20 Classification Urine Bacteria >20 Classification QTcF Interval, Single Beat (msec) Value >500 Classification QTcF Interval, Single Beat (msec) Value >500 Classification QTcF Interval, Single Beat (msec) Value >500 Classification QTcF Interval, Single Beat (msec) Change From Screening >60 Classification QTcF Interval, Single Beat (msec) Change From Screening >60 Classification QTcF Interval, Single Beat (msec) Change From Screening >60 Classification Diastolic Blood Pressure Value <50mmHg Classification Diastolic Blood Pressure Value <50mmHg Classification Diastolic Blood Pressure Value <50mmHg Classification Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase From Baseline >= 20mmHg Classification Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase From Baseline >= 20mmHg Classification Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase From Baseline >= 20mmHg Classification Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease From Baseline >= 20mmHg Classification Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease From Baseline >= 20mmHg Classification Diastolic Blood Pressure Decrease From Baseline >= 20mmHg Classification Pulse Rate Value <40 bpm Classification Pulse Rate Value <40 bpm Classification Pulse Rate Value <40 bpm Classification Pulse Rate Value >120 bpm Classification Pulse Rate Value >120 bpm Classification Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease From Baseline >=30mmHg Classification Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease From Baseline >=30mmHg Classification Systolic Blood Pressure Decrease From Baseline >=30mmHg Classification Diphtheria IgG Antibody Classification Diphtheria IgG Antibody Classification Diphtheria IgG Antibody Classification Filamentous Hemagglutinin IgG Classification Filamentous Hemagglutinin IgG Classification Filamentous Hemagglutinin IgG Classification Fimbriae 2/3 IgG Classification Fimbriae 2/3 IgG Classification Fimbriae 2/3 IgG Classification Pertactin IgG Classification Pertactin IgG Classification Pertactin IgG Classification Pertussis Toxin IgG Classification Pertussis Toxin IgG Classification Pertussis Toxin IgG Classification Tetanus Toxoid IGG AB Classification Tetanus Toxoid IGG AB Classification Tetanus Toxoid IGG AB
Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of 'Clear' (0) or 'Almost Clear' (1) and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of 'Clear' (0) or 'Almost Clear' (1) and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of 'Clear' (0) or 'Almost Clear' (1) and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in Peak Pruritis Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) for Severity of Pruritus at Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in Peak Pruritis Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) for Severity of Pruritus at Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in Peak Pruritis Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) for Severity of Pruritus at Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in Peak Pruritis Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) for Severity of Pruritus at Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in Peak Pruritis Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) for Severity of Pruritus at Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in Peak Pruritis Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) for Severity of Pruritus at Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in Peak Pruritis Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) for Severity of Pruritus at Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in Peak Pruritis Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) for Severity of Pruritus at Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in Peak Pruritis Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) for Severity of Pruritus at Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Change From Baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) at Week 12 Title Change From Baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) at Week 12 Title Change From Baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) at Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline at All Scheduled Time Points Except Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response ≥ 90% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI Response =100% Improvement From Baseline Title Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus at All Scheduled Time Points Other Than Weeks 2, 4 and 12 Title Time to First Achieve ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Time to First Achieve ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Time to First Achieve ≥4 Points Improvement From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS for Severity of Pruritus Title Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) Title Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) Title Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) Title Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) Title Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) Title Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) Title Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) Title Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) Title Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) Title Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) Title Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) Title Change From Baseline in Percentage Body Surface Area (BSA) Title Percent Change From Baseline in Percentage BSA Title Percent Change From Baseline in Percentage BSA Title Percent Change From Baseline in Percentage BSA Title Percent Change From Baseline in Percentage BSA Title Percent Change From Baseline in Percentage BSA Title Percent Change From Baseline in Percentage BSA Title Percent Change From Baseline in Percentage BSA Title Percent Change From Baseline in Percentage BSA Title Percent Change From Baseline in Percentage BSA Title Percent Change From Baseline in Percentage BSA Title Percent Change From Baseline in Percentage BSA Title Percent Change From Baseline in Percentage BSA Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Percentage BSA < 5% at Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Percentage BSA < 5% at Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Percentage BSA < 5% at Week 12 Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline Title Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD Response ≥ 75% Improvement From Baseline Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Total Score Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Sleep Loss Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Sleep Loss Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Sleep Loss Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Sleep Loss Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Sleep Loss Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Sleep Loss Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Sleep Loss Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Sleep Loss Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Sleep Loss Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Sleep Loss Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Sleep Loss Title Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Sleep Loss Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective VAS of Sleep Loss Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective VAS of Sleep Loss Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective VAS of Sleep Loss Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective VAS of Sleep Loss Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective VAS of Sleep Loss Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective VAS of Sleep Loss Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective VAS of Sleep Loss Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective VAS of Sleep Loss Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective VAS of Sleep Loss Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective VAS of Sleep Loss Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective VAS of Sleep Loss Title Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Subjective VAS of Sleep Loss Title Number of Days When a Corticosteroid Not Used up to Day 88 Title Number of Days When a Corticosteroid Not Used up to Day 88 Title Number of Days When a Corticosteroid Not Used up to Day 88 Title Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Title Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Title Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Title Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Title Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Title Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Title Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Title Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Title Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Title Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Title Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2.5 Points at Baseline and Achieving ≥2.5 Points Improvement From Baseline in Children's DLQI Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2.5 Points at Baseline and Achieving ≥2.5 Points Improvement From Baseline in Children's DLQI Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2.5 Points at Baseline and Achieving ≥2.5 Points Improvement From Baseline in Children's DLQI Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2.5 Points at Baseline and Achieving ≥2.5 Points Improvement From Baseline in Children's DLQI Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2.5 Points at Baseline and Achieving ≥2.5 Points Improvement From Baseline in Children's DLQI Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2.5 Points at Baseline and Achieving ≥2.5 Points Improvement From Baseline in Children's DLQI Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2.5 Points at Baseline and Achieving ≥2.5 Points Improvement From Baseline in Children's DLQI Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2.5 Points at Baseline and Achieving ≥2.5 Points Improvement From Baseline in Children's DLQI Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2.5 Points at Baseline and Achieving ≥2.5 Points Improvement From Baseline in Children's DLQI Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2.5 Points at Baseline and Achieving ≥2.5 Points Improvement From Baseline in Children's DLQI Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2.5 Points at Baseline and Achieving ≥2.5 Points Improvement From Baseline in Children's DLQI Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2.5 Points at Baseline and Achieving ≥2.5 Points Improvement From Baseline in Children's DLQI Title Change From Baseline in Anxiety of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Title Change From Baseline in Anxiety of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Title Change From Baseline in Anxiety of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Title Change From Baseline in Anxiety of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Title Change From Baseline in Anxiety of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Title Change From Baseline in Anxiety of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Title Change From Baseline in Anxiety of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Title Change From Baseline in Anxiety of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Title Change From Baseline in Anxiety of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Title Change From Baseline in Anxiety of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Title Change From Baseline in Anxiety of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Title Change From Baseline in Anxiety of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Title Change From Baseline in Depression of HADS Title Change From Baseline in Depression of HADS Title Change From Baseline in Depression of HADS Title Change From Baseline in Depression of HADS Title Change From Baseline in Depression of HADS Title Change From Baseline in Depression of HADS Title Change From Baseline in Depression of HADS Title Change From Baseline in Depression of HADS Title Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Title Change From Baseline in Depression of HADS Title Change From Baseline in Depression of HADS Title Change From Baseline in Depression of HADS Title Change From Baseline in Depression of HADS Title Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Title Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Title Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Title Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Title Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Title Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Title Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Title Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Title Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Title Change From Baseline in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Title Change From Baseline in Dermatitis Family Impact (DFI) at Week 12 Title Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Title Change From Baseline in Dermatitis Family Impact (DFI) at Week 12 Title Change From Baseline in Dermatitis Family Impact (DFI) at Week 12 Title Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Title Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Title Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Title Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Title Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Title Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Title Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Title Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Title Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Title Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Title Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2 Points at Baseline and Achieving 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline in PtGA Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2 Points at Baseline and Achieving 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline in PtGA Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2 Points at Baseline and Achieving 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline in PtGA Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2 Points at Baseline and Achieving 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline in PtGA Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2 Points at Baseline and Achieving 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline in PtGA Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2 Points at Baseline and Achieving 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline in PtGA Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2 Points at Baseline and Achieving 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline in PtGA Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2 Points at Baseline and Achieving 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline in PtGA Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2 Points at Baseline and Achieving 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline in PtGA Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2 Points at Baseline and Achieving 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline in PtGA Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2 Points at Baseline and Achieving 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline in PtGA Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Percentage of Participants With ≥2 Points at Baseline and Achieving 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' and ≥2 Points Improvement From Baseline in PtGA Title Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Score Title Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Score Title Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Score Title Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Score Title Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Score Title Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Score Title Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Score Title Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Score Title Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Score Title Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Score Title Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Score Title Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Score Title Change From Baseline in Pediatric Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (Peds-FACIT-F) at Week 12 Title Change From Baseline in Pediatric Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (Peds-FACIT-F) at Week 12 Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Change From Baseline in Pediatric Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (Peds-FACIT-F) at Week 12 Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Title Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Title Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Title Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Title Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Title Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Title Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Title Number of Participants Who Discontinued From the Study Due to TEAEs Title Number of Participants Who Discontinued From the Study Due to TEAEs Title Number of Participants Who Discontinued From the Study Due to TEAEs Title Number of Participants Who Discontinued From the Study Due to TEAEs Title Number of Participants Who Discontinued From the Study Due to TEAEs Title Number of Participants Who Discontinued From the Study Due to TEAEs Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality) Title Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Categorization of Vital Signs Data Meeting Prespecified Criteria Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Plasma PF-04965842 Concentration at Week 12 Title Plasma PF-04965842 Concentration at Week 12 Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Fold Increase of Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Concentrations Against Specific Vaccine Antigens at 4 Weeks Post-Vaccination Title Plasma PF-04965842 Concentration at Week 8 Title Plasma PF-04965842 Concentration at Week 8
Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description The IGA of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) was scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The IGA of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) was scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The IGA of Atopic Dermatitis (AD) was scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of body surface area (BSA) affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of body surface area (BSA) affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of body surface area (BSA) affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The PSAAD is a daily patient reported symptom diary presented as a 15 item questionnaire that includes 11 items developed to measure symptoms of AD, along with 4 additional items for exploratory and psychometric validation purposes (Sleep & Usual Activities Questions and Patient Global Impression of Severity & Patient Global Impression of Change Questions). Participants answer each question about skin condition based on a 24 hour recall. Each question was evaluated on a 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate more impact on skin condition.The PSAAD total score is calculated as the average of the responses to each of the 11 items and ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme), where higher scores indicate worse severity of AD symptoms. Description The PSAAD is a daily patient reported symptom diary presented as a 15 item questionnaire that includes 11 items developed to measure symptoms of AD, along with 4 additional items for exploratory and psychometric validation purposes (Sleep & Usual Activities Questions and Patient Global Impression of Severity & Patient Global Impression of Change Questions). Participants answer each question about skin condition based on a 24 hour recall. Each question was evaluated on a 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate more impact on skin condition.The PSAAD total score is calculated as the average of the responses to each of the 11 items and ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme), where higher scores indicate worse severity of AD symptoms. Description The PSAAD is a daily patient reported symptom diary presented as a 15 item questionnaire that includes 11 items developed to measure symptoms of AD, along with 4 additional items for exploratory and psychometric validation purposes (Sleep & Usual Activities Questions and Patient Global Impression of Severity & Patient Global Impression of Change Questions). Participants answer each question about skin condition based on a 24 hour recall. Each question was evaluated on a 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate more impact on skin condition.The PSAAD total score is calculated as the average of the responses to each of the 11 items and ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme), where higher scores indicate worse severity of AD symptoms. Description The IGA of AD is scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The IGA of AD is scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The IGA of AD is scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The IGA of AD is scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The IGA of AD is scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The IGA of AD is scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The IGA of AD is scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The IGA of AD is scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The IGA of AD is scored on a 5-point scale (0-4), reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling. The overall severity of AD was assessed according to the 5-point scale: 0=Clear, 1=Almost Clear, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, and 4=Severe. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The EASI quantifies the severity of AD based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and the percent of BSA affected. The EASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description PP-NRS assesses the severity of itch (pruritus) due to AD. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD on an NRS anchored by the terms "no itch" (0) and "worst itch imaginable" (10). Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description BSA efficacy is derived from the sum of the BSA in handprints across 4 body regions assessed as part of the EASI assessment. Handprint refers to that of each individual participant for their own measurement. The BSA efficacy ranges from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD. The percentage BSA ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. Since the scalp, palms, and soles were excluded from the BSA (efficacy) assessment, the maximum possible percentage BSA was less than 100. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description The POEM is a 7-item PRO measure used to assess the impact of AD over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28. The higher values represent more severe AD. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD,which combines extent (0-100),severity (0-18),and subjective symptoms (0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss,each scored (0-10). Extent,denoted as A,is measured by BSA affected by AD as a percentage of the whole BSA.The score for each body region is added up to determine A (maximum of 100).Severity, denoted as B,consists of the severity of several signs.Each is assessed as none(0),mild(1),moderate(2) or severe(3).The severity scores are added together to give B (maximum of 18).Subjective symptoms,denoted as C,are each scored by the participant using a NRS where "0" is no itch (or no sleeplessness) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness).These scores are added to give 'C' (maximum of 20).SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103).Higher values of SCORAD represent worse outcome. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description SCORAD is a validated scoring index for AD, which combines extent (A, 0-100), severity (B, 0-18), and subjective symptoms (C, 0-20) based on pruritus and sleep loss, each scored (0-10). The SCORAD for an individual is calculated by the formula: A/5 + 7B/2 + C (can range from 0 to 103). Subjective symptoms (ie, itch and sleep loss) are each scored by the participant using a VAS where "0" is no itch (or no sleep loss) and "10" is the worst imaginable itch (or sleep loss). The value for each should reflect the average on a 10 point scale for the last 3 days/nights. Changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of itch were not evaluated. Only changes from baseline in SCORAD subjective assessments of sleep loss are presented below. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items to assess participant-reported health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment).The DLQI is a psychometrically valid and reliable instrument that has been translated into several languages, and the DLQI total scores have been shown to be responsive to change. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 3-5 point change from baseline. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" and "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse dermatology life quality. Participants who withdrew from the study were counted as non-responder. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The POEM is a 7-item PRO measure used to assess the impact of AD over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28. The higher values represent more severe AD. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The HADS is a 14-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure used to detect states of anxiety and depression over the past week. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 which means a person can score between 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression. Higher values represent worse outcome. Description The POEM is a 7-item PRO measure used to assess the impact of AD over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28. The higher values represent more severe AD. Description The POEM is a 7-item PRO measure used to assess the impact of AD over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28. The higher values represent more severe AD. Description The POEM is a 7-item PRO measure used to assess the impact of AD over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28. The higher values represent more severe AD. Description The POEM is a 7-item PRO measure used to assess the impact of AD over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28. The higher values represent more severe AD. Description The POEM is a 7-item PRO measure used to assess the impact of AD over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28. The higher values represent more severe AD. Description The POEM is a 7-item PRO measure used to assess the impact of AD over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28. The higher values represent more severe AD. Description The POEM is a 7-item PRO measure used to assess the impact of AD over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28. The higher values represent more severe AD. Description The POEM is a 7-item PRO measure used to assess the impact of AD over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28. The higher values represent more severe AD. Description The POEM is a 7-item PRO measure used to assess the impact of AD over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28. The higher values represent more severe AD. Description The POEM is a 7-item PRO measure used to assess the impact of AD over the past week. Each item is scored as "no days (0)", "1-2 days (1)", "3-4 days (2)", "5-6 days (3)" and "every day (4)". The score ranges from 0 to 28. The higher values represent more severe AD. Description The DFI is a validated 10-item measure filled out by the parent/caregiver of the patient used to assess the impact of the patient's eczema on the family. The instrument has a recall period of 7 days. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" or "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse impact. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The DFI is a validated 10-item measure filled out by the parent/caregiver of the patient used to assess the impact of the patient's eczema on the family. The instrument has a recall period of 7 days. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" or "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse impact. Description The DFI is a validated 10-item measure filled out by the parent/caregiver of the patient used to assess the impact of the patient's eczema on the family. The instrument has a recall period of 7 days. Each item is scored as "very much (3)", "a lot (2)", "a little (1)" or "not at all (0)". The score can range from 0 to 30. The higher values represent the worse impact. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description The PtGA asked the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single-item, 5-point scale. The same category labels used in the IGA were used for the PtGA, ie, "severe (4)", "moderate (3)", "mild (2)","almost clear (1)", and "clear (0)". The PtGA was completed as per schedule of activities. Description The EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that is the most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. The EQ-5D-Y is a version of the instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. Components assess level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Score scale for each domain ranges from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse health condition. In addition, respondents use a vertical, graduated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to rate their own health between 0 (the worst) and 100 (the best health state he/she can imagine). Description The EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that is the most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. The EQ-5D-Y is a version of the instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. Components assess level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Score scale for each domain ranges from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse health condition. In addition, respondents use a vertical, graduated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to rate their own health between 0 (the worst) and 100 (the best health state he/she can imagine). Description The EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that is the most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. The EQ-5D-Y is a version of the instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. Components assess level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Score scale for each domain ranges from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse health condition. In addition, respondents use a vertical, graduated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to rate their own health between 0 (the worst) and 100 (the best health state he/she can imagine). Description The EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that is the most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. The EQ-5D-Y is a version of the instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. Components assess level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Score scale for each domain ranges from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse health condition. In addition, respondents use a vertical, graduated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to rate their own health between 0 (the worst) and 100 (the best health state he/she can imagine). Description The EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that is the most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. The EQ-5D-Y is a version of the instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. Components assess level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Score scale for each domain ranges from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse health condition. In addition, respondents use a vertical, graduated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to rate their own health between 0 (the worst) and 100 (the best health state he/she can imagine). Description The EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that is the most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. The EQ-5D-Y is a version of the instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. Components assess level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Score scale for each domain ranges from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse health condition. In addition, respondents use a vertical, graduated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to rate their own health between 0 (the worst) and 100 (the best health state he/she can imagine). Description The EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that is the most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. The EQ-5D-Y is a version of the instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. Components assess level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Score scale for each domain ranges from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse health condition. In addition, respondents use a vertical, graduated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to rate their own health between 0 (the worst) and 100 (the best health state he/she can imagine). Description The EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that is the most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. The EQ-5D-Y is a version of the instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. Components assess level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Score scale for each domain ranges from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse health condition. In addition, respondents use a vertical, graduated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to rate their own health between 0 (the worst) and 100 (the best health state he/she can imagine). Description The EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that is the most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. The EQ-5D-Y is a version of the instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. Components assess level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Score scale for each domain ranges from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse health condition. In addition, respondents use a vertical, graduated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to rate their own health between 0 (the worst) and 100 (the best health state he/she can imagine). Description The EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that is the most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. The EQ-5D-Y is a version of the instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. Components assess level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Score scale for each domain ranges from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse health condition. In addition, respondents use a vertical, graduated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to rate their own health between 0 (the worst) and 100 (the best health state he/she can imagine). Description The EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that is the most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. The EQ-5D-Y is a version of the instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. Components assess level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Score scale for each domain ranges from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse health condition. In addition, respondents use a vertical, graduated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to rate their own health between 0 (the worst) and 100 (the best health state he/she can imagine). Description The EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that is the most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. The EQ-5D-Y is a version of the instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. Components assess level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. Score scale for each domain ranges from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse health condition. In addition, respondents use a vertical, graduated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to rate their own health between 0 (the worst) and 100 (the best health state he/she can imagine). Description The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time). Larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), greater was the participant's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score), with higher scores representing better overall health status (less fatigue). Changes from baseline at Week 12 are presented below. Changes from baseline at other scheduled time points were not evaluated. Description The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time). Larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), greater was the participant's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score), with higher scores representing better overall health status (less fatigue). Changes from baseline at Week 12 are presented below. Changes from baseline at other scheduled time points were not evaluated. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (none of the time) to 4 (all of the time). Larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), greater was the participant's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score), with higher scores representing better overall health status (less fatigue). Changes from baseline at Week 12 are presented below. Changes from baseline at other scheduled time points were not evaluated. Description An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator. Description A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator. Description A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator. Description A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator. Description A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator. Description A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment-related SAEs were determined by the investigator. Description An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were AEs that occurred following the start of treatment or AEs increasing in severity during treatment. Treatment-related TEAEs were determined by the investigator. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description Laboratory tests included hematology (including coagulation panel), clinical chemistry, lipid profile panel, and routine urinalysis. LLN is lower limit of normal. ULN is upper limit of normal. Description A 12-lead ECG was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and corrected QT intervals. All scheduled ECGs were performed after the participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. Reading of ECGs were performed by a central reader who has expertise reading and interpreting ECGs in adolescents. The QTcF interval is the only prespecified ECG criteria (Marked prolongation of the QTcF interval to >500 ms or >60 ms change from screening ECG); data are presented below. Description A 12-lead ECG was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and corrected QT intervals. All scheduled ECGs were performed after the participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. Reading of ECGs were performed by a central reader who has expertise reading and interpreting ECGs in adolescents. The QTcF interval is the only prespecified ECG criteria (Marked prolongation of the QTcF interval to >500 ms or >60 ms change from screening ECG); data are presented below. Description A 12-lead ECG was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and corrected QT intervals. All scheduled ECGs were performed after the participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. Reading of ECGs were performed by a central reader who has expertise reading and interpreting ECGs in adolescents. The QTcF interval is the only prespecified ECG criteria (Marked prolongation of the QTcF interval to >500 ms or >60 ms change from screening ECG); data are presented below. Description A 12-lead ECG was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and corrected QT intervals. All scheduled ECGs were performed after the participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. Reading of ECGs were performed by a central reader who has expertise reading and interpreting ECGs in adolescents. The QTcF interval is the only prespecified ECG criteria (Marked prolongation of the QTcF interval to >500 ms or >60 ms change from screening ECG); data are presented below. Description A 12-lead ECG was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and corrected QT intervals. All scheduled ECGs were performed after the participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. Reading of ECGs were performed by a central reader who has expertise reading and interpreting ECGs in adolescents. The QTcF interval is the only prespecified ECG criteria (Marked prolongation of the QTcF interval to >500 ms or >60 ms change from screening ECG); data are presented below. Description A 12-lead ECG was obtained using an ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and corrected QT intervals. All scheduled ECGs were performed after the participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes in a supine position. Reading of ECGs were performed by a central reader who has expertise reading and interpreting ECGs in adolescents. The QTcF interval is the only prespecified ECG criteria (Marked prolongation of the QTcF interval to >500 ms or >60 ms change from screening ECG); data are presented below. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description Vital signs (pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were obtained with participant in the seated position, after having sat calmly for at least 5 minutes. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution. Description The immunogenicity analysis was to evaluate the effect of abrocitinib on immunogenicity to a tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis combination vaccine (Tdap) vaccine in adolescent participants 12 to <18 years of age with moderate to severe AD. Participants who completed 8 weeks of treatment with study intervention received Tdap at Week 8, and had blood samples collected for the evaluation of immunogenicity to the vaccine at Weeks 8 and 12. The fold increase was defined as the ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) of concentration values. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) is presented below, and was calculated by first arithmetically averaging the logarithmically transformed ratio (post-vaccination: pre-vaccination) values, and then back transformation. A 95% CI for GMFR was constructed by back transformation of the CI for the logarithmically transformed GMFRs computed using the Student's t distribution.
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percent change Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percent change Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Days Units Days Units Days Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Participants Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Percent change Units Days Units Days Units Days Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Participants Units Units on a scale Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Participants Units Participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Percentage of participants Units Participants Units Percentage of participants Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Units on a scale Units Participants Units Units on a scale Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Ratio Units Ratio Units Ratio Units Ratio Units Ratio Units Ratio Units Ratio Units ng/mL Units ng/mL Units Ratio Units Ratio Units Ratio Units Ratio Units Ratio Units Ratio Units Ratio Units Ratio Units Ratio Units Ratio Units Ratio Units ng/mL Units ng/mL
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Median Param Type Median Param Type Median Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Least Squares Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean
Param Value 7 Param Value 4 Param Value 2 Param Value 1 Param Value 24.5 Param Value 41.6 Param Value 46.2 Param Value 41.5 Param Value 68.5 Param Value 72.0 Param Value 12.6 Param Value 27.2 Param Value 38.6 Param Value 20.7 Param Value 31.5 Param Value 50.0 Param Value 29.8 Param Value 52.6 Param Value 55.4 Param Value -2.0 Param Value -2.5 Param Value -2.7 Param Value 1.1 Param Value 6.5 Param Value 12.8 Param Value 3.1 Param Value 19.6 Param Value 38.3 Param Value 16.0 Param Value 30.8 Param Value 48.9 Param Value 4.4 Param Value -18.5 Param Value 19.6 Param Value 25.5 Param Value 14.6 Param Value 41.3 Param Value 63.8 Param Value 33.3 Param Value 60.4 Param Value 68.5 Param Value 24.2 Param Value 55.4 Param Value 64.9 Param Value 51.0 Param Value 75.0 Param Value 81.9 Param Value 65.6 Param Value 85.7 Param Value 82.6 Param Value 69.1 Param Value 87.6 Param Value 87.1 Param Value 0 Param Value 8.7 Param Value 10.6 Param Value 2.1 Param Value 17.4 Param Value 30.9 Param Value 14.0 Param Value 29.7 Param Value 40.2 Param Value 18.1 Param Value 41.6 Param Value 49.5 Param Value 0 Param Value 1.1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 2.2 Param Value 5.3 Param Value 0 Param Value 3.3 Param Value 9.8 Param Value 2.1 Param Value 2.2 Param Value 8.6 Param Value -27.6 Param Value -51.5 Param Value -54.5 Param Value -41.7 Param Value -66.1 Param Value -74.3 Param Value -57.6 Param Value -72.6 Param Value -77.8 Param Value -63.7 Param Value -77.3 Param Value -80.6 Param Value 1.2 Param Value 2.8 Param Value 3.9 Param Value 0 Param Value 5.1 Param Value 7.7 Param Value 4.9 Param Value 11.5 Param Value 14.3 Param Value 6.9 Param Value 12.2 Param Value 18.5 Param Value 2 Param Value 8.8 Param Value 16.0 Param Value 21.3 Param Value 10.1 Param Value 16.0 Param Value 21.3 Param Value 4.0 Param Value 17.3 Param Value 25.0 Param Value 6.0 Param Value -18.7 Param Value 16.0 Param Value 25.0 Param Value 8.3 Param Value 15.6 Param Value 28.8 Param Value 7.6 Param Value 20.8 Param Value 27.0 Param Value 10.8 Param Value 22.2 Param Value 23.6 Param Value 10.0 Param Value 26.3 Param Value 31.2 Param Value 9.5 Param Value 24.7 Param Value 32.4 Param Value 14.3 Param Value 27.7 Param Value 37.8 Param Value 90.0 Param Value 70.0 Param Value 29.0 Param Value -0.9 Param Value -9.5 Param Value -5.4 Param Value -1.1 Param Value -11.3 Param Value -10.2 Param Value -5.0 Param Value -14.6 Param Value -12.3 Param Value -20.0 Param Value -14.7 Param Value -9.5 Param Value -16.1 Param Value -17.6 Param Value -8.7 Param Value -18.8 Param Value -10.6 Param Value -21.6 Param Value -22.7 Param Value -9.9 Param Value -20.9 Param Value -21.7 Param Value -10.8 Param Value -26.1 Param Value -28.0 Param Value -10.7 Param Value -26.5 Param Value -26.3 Param Value -11.0 Param Value -27.0 Param Value -28.9 Param Value -14.1 Param Value -25.2 Param Value -32.5 Param Value -12.0 Param Value -29.4 Param Value -35.3 Param Value -15.8 Param Value -30.7 Param Value -33.4 Param Value -10.9 Param Value -21.0 Param Value -20.7 Param Value -15.1 Param Value -27.7 Param Value -32.6 Param Value -21.8 Param Value -32.6 Param Value -34.1 Param Value -24.2 Param Value -34.4 Param Value -35.2 Param Value -20.6 Param Value -46.0 Param Value -40.4 Param Value -42.2 Param Value -29.0 Param Value -55.4 Param Value -66.0 Param Value -65.7 Param Value -69.5 Param Value -53.4 Param Value -71.4 Param Value -72.6 Param Value 24.5 Param Value 38.2 Param Value 36.6 Param Value 8.6 Param Value 22.6 Param Value 29.0 Param Value 24.0 Param Value 44.1 Param Value 64.1 Param Value 34.0 Param Value 65.6 Param Value 75.0 Param Value 37.6 Param Value 75.6 Param Value 73.9 Param Value 0 Param Value 5.4 Param Value 7.5 Param Value 0 Param Value 11.8 Param Value 21.7 Param Value 8.5 Param Value 17.2 Param Value 33.7 Param Value 12.9 Param Value 36.7 Param Value 34.8 Param Value -12.3 Param Value -24.6 Param Value -25.8 Param Value -20.2 Param Value -32.4 Param Value -38.0 Param Value -9.5 Param Value -26.6 Param Value -37.3 Param Value -41.5 Param Value -30.2 Param Value -40.9 Param Value -42.9 Param Value -18.7 Param Value -36.1 Param Value -38.7 Param Value -30.0 Param Value -47.4 Param Value -56.9 Param Value -39.9 Param Value -54.0 Param Value -62.0 Param Value -44.4 Param Value -59.2 Param Value -64.3 Param Value -0.9 Param Value -2.1 Param Value -2.6 Param Value -1.8 Param Value -2.9 Param Value -3.4 Param Value -2.2 Param Value -3.3 Param Value -3.7 Param Value -2.7 Param Value -3.5 Param Value -3.9 Param Value 2.6 Param Value 65.1 Param Value -36.5 Param Value 0 Param Value -20.0 Param Value -35.2 Param Value -53.4 Param Value -24.7 Param Value -44.2 Param Value -30.6 Param Value -39.5 Param Value -49.8 Param Value -35.2 Param Value 6.8 Param Value 10.9 Param Value 15.1 Param Value -4.2 Param Value -6.1 Param Value -6.3 Param Value -5.4 Param Value -7.3 Param Value -7.6 Param Value -6.1 Param Value -8.1 Param Value -8.2 Param Value -6.3 Param Value -8.6 Param Value 0 Param Value -8.7 Param Value 61.5 Param Value 73.6 Param Value 71.3 Param Value 73.7 Param Value 82.4 Param Value 73.4 Param Value 71.0 Param Value 85.9 Param Value 79.6 Param Value 67.7 Param Value 80.9 Param Value 78.5 Param Value -1.2 Param Value -1.6 Param Value -1.3 Param Value -1.5 Param Value -1.6 Param Value -1.9 Param Value -1.7 Param Value -2.1 Param Value -2.2 Param Value -2.1 Param Value -2.0 Param Value -2.4 Param Value -0.8 Param Value -1.2 Param Value -0.8 Param Value -0.8 Param Value -1.3 Param Value -1.3 Param Value -1.1 Param Value -1.4 Param Value -4.8 Param Value -1.2 Param Value -1.0 Param Value -1.4 Param Value -1.2 Param Value -3.4 Param Value -6.9 Param Value -8.2 Param Value -10.6 Param Value -5.4 Param Value -10.0 Param Value -10.6 Param Value -6.9 Param Value -11.1 Param Value -10.9 Param Value -5.2 Param Value -0.9 Param Value -6.7 Param Value -7.3 Param Value -0.4 Param Value -0.7 Param Value -1.0 Param Value -0.7 Param Value -1.2 Param Value -0.8 Param Value -1.2 Param Value -1.4 Param Value -0.9 Param Value -1.4 Param Value -1.6 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1.1 Param Value 5.4 Param Value 5.3 Param Value 4.2 Param Value 14.1 Param Value 20.2 Param Value 6.4 Param Value 22.6 Param Value 26.9 Param Value 10.6 Param Value 30.0 Param Value 0 Param Value 36.6 Param Value 7.140 Param Value 11.241 Param Value 12.141 Param Value 8.784 Param Value 13.222 Param Value 14.677 Param Value 8.415 Param Value 14.502 Param Value 14.653 Param Value 9.944 Param Value 14.226 Param Value 15.756 Param Value 2.5 Param Value 4.5 Param Value 0 Param Value 4.3 Param Value 50 Param Value 54 Param Value 59 Param Value 16 Param Value 20 Param Value 31 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 6 Param Value 4 Param Value 6 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 4 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 1 Param Value 6 Param Value 5 Param Value 3 Param Value 5 Param Value 3 Param Value 7 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 3 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 35 Param Value 24 Param Value 27 Param Value 63 Param Value 55 Param Value 39 Param Value 61 Param Value 62 Param Value 47 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 7 Param Value 11 Param Value 6 Param Value 2 Param Value 4 Param Value 4 Param Value 4 Param Value 6 Param Value 8 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 4 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 3 Param Value 0 Param Value 3 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 3 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 17 Param Value 3 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 4 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 3 Param Value 11 Param Value 13 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 3 Param Value 5 Param Value 7 Param Value 12 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 8 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 4 Param Value 5 Param Value 0 Param Value 20 Param Value 19 Param Value 15 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 7 Param Value 14 Param Value 17 Param Value 8 Param Value 7 Param Value 5 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 4 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 3 Param Value 1 Param Value 9 Param Value 3 Param Value 6 Param Value 6 Param Value 3 Param Value 4 Param Value 8 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 14.00 Param Value 6.51 Param Value 34.61 Param Value 15.19 Param Value 11.48 Param Value 22.77 Param Value 1.93 Param Value 486.6 Param Value 1271 Param Value 1.11 Param Value 1.47 Param Value 54.03 Param Value 15.60 Param Value 60.18 Param Value 6.94 Param Value 10.17 Param Value 33.16 Param Value 8.36 Param Value 16.26 Param Value 48.41 Param Value 7.882 Param Value 32.33
Param Value Num 7.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 24.5 Param Value Num 41.6 Param Value Num 46.2 Param Value Num 41.5 Param Value Num 68.5 Param Value Num 72.0 Param Value Num 12.6 Param Value Num 27.2 Param Value Num 38.6 Param Value Num 20.7 Param Value Num 31.5 Param Value Num 50.0 Param Value Num 29.8 Param Value Num 52.6 Param Value Num 55.4 Param Value Num -2.0 Param Value Num -2.5 Param Value Num -2.7 Param Value Num 1.1 Param Value Num 6.5 Param Value Num 12.8 Param Value Num 3.1 Param Value Num 19.6 Param Value Num 38.3 Param Value Num 16.0 Param Value Num 30.8 Param Value Num 48.9 Param Value Num 4.4 Param Value Num -18.5 Param Value Num 19.6 Param Value Num 25.5 Param Value Num 14.6 Param Value Num 41.3 Param Value Num 63.8 Param Value Num 33.3 Param Value Num 60.4 Param Value Num 68.5 Param Value Num 24.2 Param Value Num 55.4 Param Value Num 64.9 Param Value Num 51.0 Param Value Num 75.0 Param Value Num 81.9 Param Value Num 65.6 Param Value Num 85.7 Param Value Num 82.6 Param Value Num 69.1 Param Value Num 87.6 Param Value Num 87.1 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 8.7 Param Value Num 10.6 Param Value Num 2.1 Param Value Num 17.4 Param Value Num 30.9 Param Value Num 14.0 Param Value Num 29.7 Param Value Num 40.2 Param Value Num 18.1 Param Value Num 41.6 Param Value Num 49.5 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.1 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.2 Param Value Num 5.3 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 3.3 Param Value Num 9.8 Param Value Num 2.1 Param Value Num 2.2 Param Value Num 8.6 Param Value Num -27.6 Param Value Num -51.5 Param Value Num -54.5 Param Value Num -41.7 Param Value Num -66.1 Param Value Num -74.3 Param Value Num -57.6 Param Value Num -72.6 Param Value Num -77.8 Param Value Num -63.7 Param Value Num -77.3 Param Value Num -80.6 Param Value Num 1.2 Param Value Num 2.8 Param Value Num 3.9 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 5.1 Param Value Num 7.7 Param Value Num 4.9 Param Value Num 11.5 Param Value Num 14.3 Param Value Num 6.9 Param Value Num 12.2 Param Value Num 18.5 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 8.8 Param Value Num 16.0 Param Value Num 21.3 Param Value Num 10.1 Param Value Num 16.0 Param Value Num 21.3 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 17.3 Param Value Num 25.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num -18.7 Param Value Num 16.0 Param Value Num 25.0 Param Value Num 8.3 Param Value Num 15.6 Param Value Num 28.8 Param Value Num 7.6 Param Value Num 20.8 Param Value Num 27.0 Param Value Num 10.8 Param Value Num 22.2 Param Value Num 23.6 Param Value Num 10.0 Param Value Num 26.3 Param Value Num 31.2 Param Value Num 9.5 Param Value Num 24.7 Param Value Num 32.4 Param Value Num 14.3 Param Value Num 27.7 Param Value Num 37.8 Param Value Num 90.0 Param Value Num 70.0 Param Value Num 29.0 Param Value Num -0.9 Param Value Num -9.5 Param Value Num -5.4 Param Value Num -1.1 Param Value Num -11.3 Param Value Num -10.2 Param Value Num -5.0 Param Value Num -14.6 Param Value Num -12.3 Param Value Num -20.0 Param Value Num -14.7 Param Value Num -9.5 Param Value Num -16.1 Param Value Num -17.6 Param Value Num -8.7 Param Value Num -18.8 Param Value Num -10.6 Param Value Num -21.6 Param Value Num -22.7 Param Value Num -9.9 Param Value Num -20.9 Param Value Num -21.7 Param Value Num -10.8 Param Value Num -26.1 Param Value Num -28.0 Param Value Num -10.7 Param Value Num -26.5 Param Value Num -26.3 Param Value Num -11.0 Param Value Num -27.0 Param Value Num -28.9 Param Value Num -14.1 Param Value Num -25.2 Param Value Num -32.5 Param Value Num -12.0 Param Value Num -29.4 Param Value Num -35.3 Param Value Num -15.8 Param Value Num -30.7 Param Value Num -33.4 Param Value Num -10.9 Param Value Num -21.0 Param Value Num -20.7 Param Value Num -15.1 Param Value Num -27.7 Param Value Num -32.6 Param Value Num -21.8 Param Value Num -32.6 Param Value Num -34.1 Param Value Num -24.2 Param Value Num -34.4 Param Value Num -35.2 Param Value Num -20.6 Param Value Num -46.0 Param Value Num -40.4 Param Value Num -42.2 Param Value Num -29.0 Param Value Num -55.4 Param Value Num -66.0 Param Value Num -65.7 Param Value Num -69.5 Param Value Num -53.4 Param Value Num -71.4 Param Value Num -72.6 Param Value Num 24.5 Param Value Num 38.2 Param Value Num 36.6 Param Value Num 8.6 Param Value Num 22.6 Param Value Num 29.0 Param Value Num 24.0 Param Value Num 44.1 Param Value Num 64.1 Param Value Num 34.0 Param Value Num 65.6 Param Value Num 75.0 Param Value Num 37.6 Param Value Num 75.6 Param Value Num 73.9 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 5.4 Param Value Num 7.5 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 11.8 Param Value Num 21.7 Param Value Num 8.5 Param Value Num 17.2 Param Value Num 33.7 Param Value Num 12.9 Param Value Num 36.7 Param Value Num 34.8 Param Value Num -12.3 Param Value Num -24.6 Param Value Num -25.8 Param Value Num -20.2 Param Value Num -32.4 Param Value Num -38.0 Param Value Num -9.5 Param Value Num -26.6 Param Value Num -37.3 Param Value Num -41.5 Param Value Num -30.2 Param Value Num -40.9 Param Value Num -42.9 Param Value Num -18.7 Param Value Num -36.1 Param Value Num -38.7 Param Value Num -30.0 Param Value Num -47.4 Param Value Num -56.9 Param Value Num -39.9 Param Value Num -54.0 Param Value Num -62.0 Param Value Num -44.4 Param Value Num -59.2 Param Value Num -64.3 Param Value Num -0.9 Param Value Num -2.1 Param Value Num -2.6 Param Value Num -1.8 Param Value Num -2.9 Param Value Num -3.4 Param Value Num -2.2 Param Value Num -3.3 Param Value Num -3.7 Param Value Num -2.7 Param Value Num -3.5 Param Value Num -3.9 Param Value Num 2.6 Param Value Num 65.1 Param Value Num -36.5 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num -20.0 Param Value Num -35.2 Param Value Num -53.4 Param Value Num -24.7 Param Value Num -44.2 Param Value Num -30.6 Param Value Num -39.5 Param Value Num -49.8 Param Value Num -35.2 Param Value Num 6.8 Param Value Num 10.9 Param Value Num 15.1 Param Value Num -4.2 Param Value Num -6.1 Param Value Num -6.3 Param Value Num -5.4 Param Value Num -7.3 Param Value Num -7.6 Param Value Num -6.1 Param Value Num -8.1 Param Value Num -8.2 Param Value Num -6.3 Param Value Num -8.6 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num -8.7 Param Value Num 61.5 Param Value Num 73.6 Param Value Num 71.3 Param Value Num 73.7 Param Value Num 82.4 Param Value Num 73.4 Param Value Num 71.0 Param Value Num 85.9 Param Value Num 79.6 Param Value Num 67.7 Param Value Num 80.9 Param Value Num 78.5 Param Value Num -1.2 Param Value Num -1.6 Param Value Num -1.3 Param Value Num -1.5 Param Value Num -1.6 Param Value Num -1.9 Param Value Num -1.7 Param Value Num -2.1 Param Value Num -2.2 Param Value Num -2.1 Param Value Num -2.0 Param Value Num -2.4 Param Value Num -0.8 Param Value Num -1.2 Param Value Num -0.8 Param Value Num -0.8 Param Value Num -1.3 Param Value Num -1.3 Param Value Num -1.1 Param Value Num -1.4 Param Value Num -4.8 Param Value Num -1.2 Param Value Num -1.0 Param Value Num -1.4 Param Value Num -1.2 Param Value Num -3.4 Param Value Num -6.9 Param Value Num -8.2 Param Value Num -10.6 Param Value Num -5.4 Param Value Num -10.0 Param Value Num -10.6 Param Value Num -6.9 Param Value Num -11.1 Param Value Num -10.9 Param Value Num -5.2 Param Value Num -0.9 Param Value Num -6.7 Param Value Num -7.3 Param Value Num -0.4 Param Value Num -0.7 Param Value Num -1.0 Param Value Num -0.7 Param Value Num -1.2 Param Value Num -0.8 Param Value Num -1.2 Param Value Num -1.4 Param Value Num -0.9 Param Value Num -1.4 Param Value Num -1.6 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.1 Param Value Num 5.4 Param Value Num 5.3 Param Value Num 4.2 Param Value Num 14.1 Param Value Num 20.2 Param Value Num 6.4 Param Value Num 22.6 Param Value Num 26.9 Param Value Num 10.6 Param Value Num 30.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 36.6 Param Value Num 7.14 Param Value Num 11.241 Param Value Num 12.141 Param Value Num 8.784 Param Value Num 13.222 Param Value Num 14.677 Param Value Num 8.415 Param Value Num 14.502 Param Value Num 14.653 Param Value Num 9.944 Param Value Num 14.226 Param Value Num 15.756 Param Value Num 2.5 Param Value Num 4.5 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 4.3 Param Value Num 50.0 Param Value Num 54.0 Param Value Num 59.0 Param Value Num 16.0 Param Value Num 20.0 Param Value Num 31.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 7.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 35.0 Param Value Num 24.0 Param Value Num 27.0 Param Value Num 63.0 Param Value Num 55.0 Param Value Num 39.0 Param Value Num 61.0 Param Value Num 62.0 Param Value Num 47.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 7.0 Param Value Num 11.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 17.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 11.0 Param Value Num 13.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 7.0 Param Value Num 12.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 20.0 Param Value Num 19.0 Param Value Num 15.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 7.0 Param Value Num 14.0 Param Value Num 17.0 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 7.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 9.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 14.0 Param Value Num 6.51 Param Value Num 34.61 Param Value Num 15.19 Param Value Num 11.48 Param Value Num 22.77 Param Value Num 1.93 Param Value Num 486.6 Param Value Num 1271.0 Param Value Num 1.11 Param Value Num 1.47 Param Value Num 54.03 Param Value Num 15.6 Param Value Num 60.18 Param Value Num 6.94 Param Value Num 10.17 Param Value Num 33.16 Param Value Num 8.36 Param Value Num 16.26 Param Value Num 48.41 Param Value Num 7.882 Param Value Num 32.33
Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 403.69 Dispersion Value 1000.4 Dispersion Value 26.350 Dispersion Value 76.506
Dispersion Value Num 403.69 Dispersion Value Num 1000.4 Dispersion Value Num 26.35 Dispersion Value Num 76.506
Dispersion Lower Limit 15.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 31.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 36.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 31.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 58.9 Dispersion Lower Limit 62.9 Dispersion Lower Limit 6.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 18.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 28.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 12.4 Dispersion Lower Limit 21.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 39.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 20.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 41.4 Dispersion Lower Limit 44.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -2.4 Dispersion Lower Limit -2.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -3.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 1.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 6.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 11.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 28.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 8.6 Dispersion Lower Limit 21.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 38.7 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -25.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 11.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 16.7 Dispersion Lower Limit 7.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 31.2 Dispersion Lower Limit 54.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 23.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 50.4 Dispersion Lower Limit 59.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 15.4 Dispersion Lower Limit 45.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 55.2 Dispersion Lower Limit 41.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 66.2 Dispersion Lower Limit 74.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 55.9 Dispersion Lower Limit 78.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 74.9 Dispersion Lower Limit 59.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 80.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 80.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 2.9 Dispersion Lower Limit 4.4 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 9.6 Dispersion Lower Limit 21.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 6.9 Dispersion Lower Limit 20.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 30.2 Dispersion Lower Limit 10.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 31.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 39.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 3.7 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 2.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -34.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -57.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -61.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -48.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -72.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -81.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -63.4 Dispersion Lower Limit -78.4 Dispersion Lower Limit -83.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -69.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -83.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -86.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.2 Dispersion Lower Limit 1.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.2 Dispersion Lower Limit 4.4 Dispersion Lower Limit 6.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 1.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 5.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 10.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 2.6 Dispersion Lower Limit 8.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 12.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 3.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 8.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 12.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 8.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 15.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -25.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 7.7 Dispersion Lower Limit 15.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 2.4 Dispersion Lower Limit 7.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 18.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 1.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 11.7 Dispersion Lower Limit 16.9 Dispersion Lower Limit 3.7 Dispersion Lower Limit 12.6 Dispersion Lower Limit 13.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 3.4 Dispersion Lower Limit 16.6 Dispersion Lower Limit 20.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 3.2 Dispersion Lower Limit 15.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 21.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 6.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 18.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 27.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 62.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 30.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 15.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -5.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -14.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -10.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -6.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -16.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -15.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -10.6 Dispersion Lower Limit -20.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -19.4 Dispersion Lower Limit -27.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -20.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -15.8 Dispersion Lower Limit -22.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -23.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -15.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -26.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -17.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -28.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -30.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -17.6 Dispersion Lower Limit -28.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -29.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -17.8 Dispersion Lower Limit -33.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -35.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -17.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -33.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -33.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -18.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -34.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -36.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -20.4 Dispersion Lower Limit -31.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -39.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -18.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -35.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -41.6 Dispersion Lower Limit -22.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -37.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -40.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -14.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -24.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -23.8 Dispersion Lower Limit -18.4 Dispersion Lower Limit -31.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -36.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -25.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -36.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -37.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -27.8 Dispersion Lower Limit -38.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -38.8 Dispersion Lower Limit -26.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -52.6 Dispersion Lower Limit -46.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -48.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -36.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -62.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -73.4 Dispersion Lower Limit -72.4 Dispersion Lower Limit -76.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -60.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -78.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -79.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 15.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 28.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 26.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 2.9 Dispersion Lower Limit 14.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 19.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 15.4 Dispersion Lower Limit 34.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 54.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 24.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 55.9 Dispersion Lower Limit 66.2 Dispersion Lower Limit 27.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 66.7 Dispersion Lower Limit 64.9 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 2.2 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 5.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 13.3 Dispersion Lower Limit 2.9 Dispersion Lower Limit 9.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 24.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 6.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 26.7 Dispersion Lower Limit 25.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -15.4 Dispersion Lower Limit -27.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -28.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -23.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -35.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -41.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -10.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -30.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -40.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -45.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -33.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -44.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -46.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -23.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -40.6 Dispersion Lower Limit -43.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -34.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -52.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -61.6 Dispersion Lower Limit -44.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -59.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -67.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -50.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -64.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -70.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.4 Dispersion Lower Limit -2.6 Dispersion Lower Limit -3.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -2.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -3.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -3.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -2.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -3.8 Dispersion Lower Limit -4.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -3.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -3.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -4.4 Dispersion Lower Limit -101.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -39.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -140.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -35.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -50.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -69.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -60.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -79.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -66.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -77.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -88.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -74.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 2.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 6.2 Dispersion Lower Limit 10.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -5.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -7.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -7.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -6.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -8.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -8.6 Dispersion Lower Limit -7.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -9.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -9.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -7.4 Dispersion Lower Limit -9.6 Dispersion Lower Limit -9.7 Dispersion Lower Limit 51.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 64.6 Dispersion Lower Limit 62.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 64.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 74.6 Dispersion Lower Limit 64.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 61.7 Dispersion Lower Limit 78.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 71.4 Dispersion Lower Limit 58.2 Dispersion Lower Limit 72.7 Dispersion Lower Limit 70.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -2.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.8 Dispersion Lower Limit -2.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -2.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -2.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -2.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -2.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -2.8 Dispersion Lower Limit -2.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -2.6 Dispersion Lower Limit -3.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.8 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.8 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.6 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -6.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -4.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -8.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -9.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -11.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -6.7 Dispersion Lower Limit -11.4 Dispersion Lower Limit -12.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -8.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -12.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -12.2 Dispersion Lower Limit -6.5 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -7.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -8.6 Dispersion Lower Limit -0.6 Dispersion Lower Limit -0.9 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -0.8 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.4 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.3 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.6 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.1 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.6 Dispersion Lower Limit -1.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.2 Dispersion Lower Limit 7.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 12.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 1.4 Dispersion Lower Limit 14.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 17.9 Dispersion Lower Limit 4.4 Dispersion Lower Limit 20.5 Dispersion Lower Limit 26.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 3.787 Dispersion Lower Limit 7.882 Dispersion Lower Limit 8.763 Dispersion Lower Limit 5.625 Dispersion Lower Limit 10.02 Dispersion Lower Limit 11.438 Dispersion Lower Limit 4.888 Dispersion Lower Limit 10.977 Dispersion Lower Limit 11.076 Dispersion Lower Limit 6.373 Dispersion Lower Limit 10.624 Dispersion Lower Limit 12.153 Dispersion Lower Limit 1.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 3.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 2.9 Dispersion Lower Limit 6.32 Dispersion Lower Limit 2.31 Dispersion Lower Limit 6.96 Dispersion Lower Limit 4.89 Dispersion Lower Limit 2.65 Dispersion Lower Limit 7.26 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.79 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.85 Dispersion Lower Limit 0.61 Dispersion Lower Limit 14.67 Dispersion Lower Limit 5.77 Dispersion Lower Limit 12.79 Dispersion Lower Limit 1.95 Dispersion Lower Limit 4.71 Dispersion Lower Limit 5.04 Dispersion Lower Limit 1.62 Dispersion Lower Limit 3.52 Dispersion Lower Limit 9.01
Dispersion Upper Limit 33.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 51.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 56.4 Dispersion Upper Limit 51.4 Dispersion Upper Limit 78.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 81.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 19.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 36.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 48.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 28.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 41.1 Dispersion Upper Limit 60.7 Dispersion Upper Limit 39.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 63.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 66.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -2.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -2.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 3.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 11.6 Dispersion Upper Limit 19.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 6.6 Dispersion Upper Limit 27.7 Dispersion Upper Limit 48.1 Dispersion Upper Limit 23.4 Dispersion Upper Limit 40.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 59.1 Dispersion Upper Limit 8.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -12.1 Dispersion Upper Limit 27.7 Dispersion Upper Limit 34.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 21.6 Dispersion Upper Limit 51.4 Dispersion Upper Limit 73.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 42.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 70.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 78.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 33.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 65.6 Dispersion Upper Limit 74.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 61.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 83.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 89.7 Dispersion Upper Limit 75.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 92.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 90.4 Dispersion Upper Limit 78.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 94.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 93.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 4.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 14.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 16.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 4.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 25.1 Dispersion Upper Limit 40.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 21.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 39.1 Dispersion Upper Limit 50.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 25.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 51.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 59.6 Dispersion Upper Limit 4.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 3.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 3.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 3.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 5.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 9.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 3.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 7.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 15.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 5.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 5.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 14.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -21.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -45.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -48.0 Dispersion Upper Limit -35.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -59.4 Dispersion Upper Limit -67.5 Dispersion Upper Limit -51.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -66.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -71.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -57.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -71.5 Dispersion Upper Limit -74.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 3.6 Dispersion Upper Limit 6.7 Dispersion Upper Limit 8.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 4.6 Dispersion Upper Limit 9.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 13.6 Dispersion Upper Limit 9.7 Dispersion Upper Limit 18.6 Dispersion Upper Limit 22.1 Dispersion Upper Limit 12.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 19.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 27.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 14.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 24.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 30.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 16.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 24.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 30.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 8.4 Dispersion Upper Limit 25.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 34.7 Dispersion Upper Limit 11.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -12.1 Dispersion Upper Limit 24.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 34.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 14.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 23.7 Dispersion Upper Limit 38.7 Dispersion Upper Limit 13.4 Dispersion Upper Limit 29.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 37.1 Dispersion Upper Limit 17.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 31.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 33.4 Dispersion Upper Limit 16.6 Dispersion Upper Limit 35.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 41.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 15.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 34.1 Dispersion Upper Limit 43.1 Dispersion Upper Limit 21.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 37.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 48.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 85.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 61.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 3.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -4.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.7 Dispersion Upper Limit 3.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -6.4 Dispersion Upper Limit -5.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 0.5 Dispersion Upper Limit -9.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -5.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -12.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -9.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -3.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -9.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -11.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -2.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -11.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -3.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -14.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -15.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -2.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -13.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -13.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -3.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -19.0 Dispersion Upper Limit -20.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -3.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -19.4 Dispersion Upper Limit -19.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -4.0 Dispersion Upper Limit -20.0 Dispersion Upper Limit -21.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -7.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -18.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -26.0 Dispersion Upper Limit -5.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -23.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -29.0 Dispersion Upper Limit -8.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -23.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -26.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -7.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -17.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -17.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -11.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -24.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -29.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -18.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -29.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -30.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -20.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -30.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -31.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -14.5 Dispersion Upper Limit -39.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -34.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -36.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -21.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -48.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -58.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -59.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -62.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -46.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -64.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -65.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 33.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 48.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 46.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 14.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 31.1 Dispersion Upper Limit 38.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 32.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 54.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 73.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 43.6 Dispersion Upper Limit 75.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 83.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 47.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 84.4 Dispersion Upper Limit 82.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 3.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 10.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 12.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 3.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 18.4 Dispersion Upper Limit 30.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 14.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 24.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 43.4 Dispersion Upper Limit 19.7 Dispersion Upper Limit 46.6 Dispersion Upper Limit 44.5 Dispersion Upper Limit -9.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -21.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -22.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -17.0 Dispersion Upper Limit -29.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -34.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -8.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -23.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -33.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -38.0 Dispersion Upper Limit -26.4 Dispersion Upper Limit -37.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -39.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -14.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -31.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -34.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -25.5 Dispersion Upper Limit -42.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -52.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -34.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -48.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -56.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -38.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -53.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -58.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.4 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -2.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -2.4 Dispersion Upper Limit -2.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -2.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -3.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -2.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -3.0 Dispersion Upper Limit -3.4 Dispersion Upper Limit 106.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 169.4 Dispersion Upper Limit 67.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -4.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -19.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -37.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 10.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -8.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 5.5 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -11.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 3.7 Dispersion Upper Limit 11.6 Dispersion Upper Limit 15.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 19.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -3.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -5.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -5.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -4.5 Dispersion Upper Limit -6.4 Dispersion Upper Limit -6.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -5.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -7.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -7.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -5.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -7.5 Dispersion Upper Limit -7.6 Dispersion Upper Limit 71.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 82.7 Dispersion Upper Limit 80.4 Dispersion Upper Limit 82.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 90.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 82.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 80.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 93.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 87.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 77.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 89.1 Dispersion Upper Limit 86.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.0 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.5 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.5 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.5 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.4 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -3.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.5 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -2.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -5.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -6.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -9.4 Dispersion Upper Limit -4.0 Dispersion Upper Limit -8.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -9.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -5.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -9.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -9.5 Dispersion Upper Limit -3.9 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -5.4 Dispersion Upper Limit -6.0 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.3 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.8 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.5 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.1 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.6 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.0 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -0.7 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.2 Dispersion Upper Limit -1.4 Dispersion Upper Limit 3.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 10.1 Dispersion Upper Limit 9.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 8.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 21.2 Dispersion Upper Limit 28.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 11.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 31.1 Dispersion Upper Limit 35.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 16.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 39.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 46.3 Dispersion Upper Limit 10.492 Dispersion Upper Limit 14.601 Dispersion Upper Limit 15.52 Dispersion Upper Limit 11.943 Dispersion Upper Limit 16.423 Dispersion Upper Limit 17.917 Dispersion Upper Limit 11.941 Dispersion Upper Limit 18.028 Dispersion Upper Limit 18.231 Dispersion Upper Limit 13.515 Dispersion Upper Limit 17.828 Dispersion Upper Limit 19.36 Dispersion Upper Limit 3.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 5.9 Dispersion Upper Limit 5.7 Dispersion Upper Limit 30.99 Dispersion Upper Limit 18.34 Dispersion Upper Limit 172.06 Dispersion Upper Limit 47.16 Dispersion Upper Limit 49.69 Dispersion Upper Limit 71.45 Dispersion Upper Limit 4.73 Dispersion Upper Limit 1.46 Dispersion Upper Limit 3.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 199.03 Dispersion Upper Limit 42.14 Dispersion Upper Limit 283.08 Dispersion Upper Limit 24.71 Dispersion Upper Limit 21.94 Dispersion Upper Limit 218.38 Dispersion Upper Limit 43.18 Dispersion Upper Limit 75.11 Dispersion Upper Limit 260.09
Explanation Of Na The upper limit was not evaluable as too few events were observed.

Study References

Sequence: 52042300 Sequence: 52042301
Pmid 34743361 Pmid 34406366
Reference Type derived Reference Type derived
Citation Cork MJ, McMichael A, Teng J, Valdez H, Rojo R, Chan G, Zhang F, Myers DE, DiBonaventura M. Impact of oral abrocitinib on signs, symptoms and quality of life among adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: an analysis of patient-reported outcomes. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Mar;36(3):422-433. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17792. Epub 2021 Dec 4. Citation Eichenfield LF, Flohr C, Sidbury R, Siegfried E, Szalai Z, Galus R, Yao Z, Takahashi H, Barbarot S, Feeney C, Zhang F, DiBonaventura M, Rojo R, Valdez H, Chan G. Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib in Combination With Topical Therapy in Adolescents With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: The JADE TEEN Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Oct 1;157(10):1165-1173. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.2830. Erratum In: JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Oct 1;157(10):1246.

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11380189 Sequence: 11380190 Sequence: 11380191 Sequence: 11380192
Result Group Id 56080959 Result Group Id 56080960 Result Group Id 56080961 Result Group Id 56080962
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Scope overall Scope overall Scope overall Scope overall
Count 96 Count 95 Count 94 Count 285

Result Groups

Sequence: 56080959 Sequence: 56080960 Sequence: 56080961 Sequence: 56080962 Sequence: 56080963 Sequence: 56080964 Sequence: 56080965 Sequence: 56080966 Sequence: 56080967 Sequence: 56080968 Sequence: 56080969 Sequence: 56080970 Sequence: 56080971 Sequence: 56080972 Sequence: 56080973 Sequence: 56080974
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002
Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event
Title Placebo Title PF-04965842 100mg QD Title PF-04965842 200mg QD Title Total Title Placebo Title PF-04965842 100mg QD Title PF-04965842 200mg QD Title Placebo Title PF-04965842 100mg QD Title PF-04965842 200mg QD Title Placebo Title PF-04965842 100mg QD Title PF-04965842 200mg QD Title Placebo Title PF-04965842 100mg QD Title PF-04965842 200mg QD
Description Participants received two PF-04965842-matching placebo tablets QD Description Participants received one PF-04965842 100 mg tablet and one matching placebo tablet QD Description Participants received two PF-04965842 100 mg tablets QD Description Total of all reporting groups Description Participants received two PF-04965842-matching placebo tablets QD Description Participants received one PF-04965842 100 mg tablet and one matching placebo tablet QD Description Participants received two PF-04965842 100 mg tablets QD Description Participants received two PF-04965842-matching placebo tablets QD Description Participants received one PF-04965842 100 mg tablet and one matching placebo tablet QD Description Participants received two PF-04965842 100 mg tablets QD Description Participants received PF-04965842-matching placebo tablets QD Description Participants received one PF-04965842 100 mg tablet and one matching placebo tablet QD Description Participants received two PF-04965842 100 mg tablets QD Description Participants received two PF-04965842-matching placebo tablets QD Description Participants received one PF-04965842 100 mg tablet and one matching placebo tablet QD Description Participants received two PF-04965842 100 mg tablets QD

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 125545452 Sequence: 125545453 Sequence: 125545454 Sequence: 125545455 Sequence: 125545456 Sequence: 125545457 Sequence: 125545458 Sequence: 125545459 Sequence: 125545460 Sequence: 125545461 Sequence: 125545462 Sequence: 125545463 Sequence: 125545464 Sequence: 125545465 Sequence: 125545466 Sequence: 125545467 Sequence: 125545468 Sequence: 125545469 Sequence: 125545470 Sequence: 125545471 Sequence: 125545472 Sequence: 125545473 Sequence: 125545474 Sequence: 125545475 Sequence: 125545476 Sequence: 125545477 Sequence: 125545478 Sequence: 125545479 Sequence: 125545480 Sequence: 125545481 Sequence: 125545482 Sequence: 125545483 Sequence: 125545484 Sequence: 125545485 Sequence: 125545486 Sequence: 125545487 Sequence: 125545488 Sequence: 125545489 Sequence: 125545490 Sequence: 125545491 Sequence: 125545492 Sequence: 125545493 Sequence: 125545494 Sequence: 125545495 Sequence: 125545496 Sequence: 125545497 Sequence: 125545498 Sequence: 125545499 Sequence: 125545500 Sequence: 125545501 Sequence: 125545502 Sequence: 125545503
Result Group Id 56080959 Result Group Id 56080960 Result Group Id 56080961 Result Group Id 56080962 Result Group Id 56080959 Result Group Id 56080960 Result Group Id 56080961 Result Group Id 56080962 Result Group Id 56080959 Result Group Id 56080960 Result Group Id 56080961 Result Group Id 56080962 Result Group Id 56080959 Result Group Id 56080960 Result Group Id 56080961 Result Group Id 56080962 Result Group Id 56080959 Result Group Id 56080960 Result Group Id 56080961 Result Group Id 56080962 Result Group Id 56080959 Result Group Id 56080960 Result Group Id 56080961 Result Group Id 56080962 Result Group Id 56080959 Result Group Id 56080960 Result Group Id 56080961 Result Group Id 56080962 Result Group Id 56080959 Result Group Id 56080960 Result Group Id 56080961 Result Group Id 56080962 Result Group Id 56080959 Result Group Id 56080960 Result Group Id 56080961 Result Group Id 56080962 Result Group Id 56080959 Result Group Id 56080960 Result Group Id 56080961 Result Group Id 56080962 Result Group Id 56080959 Result Group Id 56080960 Result Group Id 56080961 Result Group Id 56080962 Result Group Id 56080959 Result Group Id 56080960 Result Group Id 56080961 Result Group Id 56080962 Result Group Id 56080959 Result Group Id 56080960 Result Group Id 56080961 Result Group Id 56080962
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003
Category Female Category Female Category Female Category Female Category Male Category Male Category Male Category Male Category Hispanic or Latino Category Hispanic or Latino Category Hispanic or Latino Category Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported Category White Category White Category White Category White Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category Asian Category Asian Category Asian Category Asian Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Multiracial Category Multiracial Category Multiracial Category Multiracial Category Not reported Category Not reported Category Not reported Category Not reported
Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Units Years Units Years Units Years Units Years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 14.8 Param Value 15.1 Param Value 14.7 Param Value 14.9 Param Value 52 Param Value 50 Param Value 38 Param Value 140 Param Value 44 Param Value 45 Param Value 56 Param Value 145 Param Value 25 Param Value 26 Param Value 25 Param Value 76 Param Value 65 Param Value 63 Param Value 69 Param Value 197 Param Value 6 Param Value 6 Param Value 0 Param Value 12 Param Value 56 Param Value 52 Param Value 52 Param Value 160 Param Value 3 Param Value 9 Param Value 5 Param Value 17 Param Value 32 Param Value 31 Param Value 31 Param Value 94 Param Value 1 Param Value 3 Param Value 4 Param Value 8 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 2
Param Value Num 14.8 Param Value Num 15.1 Param Value Num 14.7 Param Value Num 14.9 Param Value Num 52.0 Param Value Num 50.0 Param Value Num 38.0 Param Value Num 140.0 Param Value Num 44.0 Param Value Num 45.0 Param Value Num 56.0 Param Value Num 145.0 Param Value Num 25.0 Param Value Num 26.0 Param Value Num 25.0 Param Value Num 76.0 Param Value Num 65.0 Param Value Num 63.0 Param Value Num 69.0 Param Value Num 197.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 12.0 Param Value Num 56.0 Param Value Num 52.0 Param Value Num 52.0 Param Value Num 160.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 9.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 17.0 Param Value Num 32.0 Param Value Num 31.0 Param Value Num 31.0 Param Value Num 94.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 1.7 Dispersion Value 1.8 Dispersion Value 1.8 Dispersion Value 1.7
Dispersion Value Num 1.7 Dispersion Value Num 1.8 Dispersion Value Num 1.8 Dispersion Value Num 1.7
Number Analyzed 96 Number Analyzed 95 Number Analyzed 94 Number Analyzed 285 Number Analyzed 96 Number Analyzed 95 Number Analyzed 94 Number Analyzed 285 Number Analyzed 96 Number Analyzed 95 Number Analyzed 94 Number Analyzed 285 Number Analyzed 96 Number Analyzed 95 Number Analyzed 94 Number Analyzed 285 Number Analyzed 96 Number Analyzed 95 Number Analyzed 94 Number Analyzed 285 Number Analyzed 96 Number Analyzed 95 Number Analyzed 94 Number Analyzed 285 Number Analyzed 96 Number Analyzed 95 Number Analyzed 94 Number Analyzed 285 Number Analyzed 96 Number Analyzed 95 Number Analyzed 94 Number Analyzed 285 Number Analyzed 96 Number Analyzed 95 Number Analyzed 94 Number Analyzed 285 Number Analyzed 96 Number Analyzed 95 Number Analyzed 94 Number Analyzed 285 Number Analyzed 96 Number Analyzed 95 Number Analyzed 94 Number Analyzed 285 Number Analyzed 96 Number Analyzed 95 Number Analyzed 94 Number Analyzed 285 Number Analyzed 96 Number Analyzed 95 Number Analyzed 94 Number Analyzed 285

]]>

<![CDATA[ Mindful Parenting and Parent Training Program Study ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796663
2018-12-18

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796663
NCT03796663https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796663?tab=tableNANANAThe Mindful Parenting and Parent Training Study will be investigating the combination of Bögels and Restifo’s (2014) Mindful Parenting Program and Chorpita and Weisz’s (2009) Modular Approach to Therapy for Children with Anxiety, Depression, Trauma, or Conduct Problems (MATCH) Program, specifically the BPT module. The Mindful Parenting Program is an adaptation for parents of the Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy, and the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program; the program will consist of 7-weekly 2.5-hour parent group sessions. Following the completion of the Mindful Parenting group sessions, half of the participants will be randomly selected to receive individually-implemented MATCH BPT sessions, which will consist of 8-12 weekly (depending on how long it takes for individual parents and their assigned trainer to get through the material), 1.5-hour sessions. The other half of families will have the opportunity to also receive the MATCH BPT program following the completion of data collection.

Both evaluation and treatment services will be offered at no cost to study participants. Parents, children, and teachers will also be offered monetary incentive to thank them for their time and effort completing study related assessments throughout the course of the study to determine if the combination of the Mindful Parenting Program with BPT improves functioning in children with disruptive behavioral problems, as well as the parent-child relationship and the parent’s acquisition and enactment of the skills they learn in BPT.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-19
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-11-02
Start Month Year December 18, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year October 31, 2020
Verification Month Year June 2021
Verification Date 2021-06-30
Last Update Posted Date 2022-11-02

Facilities

Sequence: 199402660
Name New York University – Kimball Hall
City New York
State New York
Zip 10003
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52006265 Sequence: 52006266 Sequence: 52006267 Sequence: 52006268 Sequence: 52006269
Name Disruptive Behavior Name Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Name Oppositional Defiant Disorder Name Conduct Disorder Name Disruptive Behavior Disorder
Downcase Name disruptive behavior Downcase Name attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Downcase Name oppositional defiant disorder Downcase Name conduct disorder Downcase Name disruptive behavior disorder

Id Information

Sequence: 40029866
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value IRB-FY2019-2401

Countries

Sequence: 42425576
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55411555 Sequence: 55411556
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Experimental
Title Mindful Parenting Only Title Mindful Parenting and BPT Combined
Description Participants in this arm will receive only the Mindful Parenting Program at the start of the study. Bögels and Restifo's (2014) Mindful Parenting Program is an adaptation for parents of MBCT, and MBSR; the program will consist of 7-weekly 2.5-hour parent group sessions. In the program, parents learn to apply the skills of mindfulness to themselves and to their experience of parenting their children.

Following the completion of the Mindful Parenting Sessions, participants in this arm will be asked continue to participate in data collection for the post-intervention assessment time point (i.e. 8 weeks after the completion of the Mindful Parenting group sessions) and for the 2-month follow up assessment time point (i.e. 16 weeks after the completion of the Mindful Parenting group sessions). After they have completed both assessments, they will be offered the opportunity to participate in the MATCH BPT program if they so choose (no data will be collected).

Description Participants in this arm will receive the Mindful Parenting Program at the start of the study, which will consist of 7-weekly 2.5-hour parent group sessions. In the program, parents learn to apply the skills of mindfulness to themselves and to their experience of parenting their children.

Following the completion of the Mindful Parenting Sessions, participants in this arm will receive receive individually-implemented MATCH BPT sessions, which will consist of 8-12 weekly (depending on how long it takes for individual parents and their assigned trainer to get through the material), 1 hour sessions. The MATCH manual is comprised of 33 modules (i.e. coping, giving effective instructions, learning to relax, etc.). For the purpose of this study we will be utilizing the section on BPT, which consists of 12 modules with corresponding handouts and worksheets.

Interventions

Sequence: 52318839 Sequence: 52318840
Intervention Type Behavioral Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Mindful Parenting Program Name MATCH BPT Program
Description The Mindful Parenting Program consists of 7, 2.5 hour weekly group sessions. In the program, parents learn to apply the skills of mindfulness to themselves and to their experience of parenting their children. Parents are introduced to formal meditation practices, including the bodyscan; choiceless awareness; mindful walking; and yoga. They are also introduced to mindfulness of everyday activities from the beginning of the sessions, with an added focus on day-to-day parenting and family activities. Additionally, short self-compassion practices occur throughout the weekly sessions, culminating in the teaching of formal loving-kindness meditation.

Additionally, the program encourages parents to engage in "home practice", where parents can experience and practice many of the new skills they are learning. This includes both formal, longer meditation practices, as well as shorter practices, which can occur throughout the day, such as mindfulness of daily routines.

Description The MATCH BPT Program consists of 8-12 weekly (depending on how long it takes for individual parents and their assigned trainer to get through the material), 60 minute individually-implemented sessions.The sessions will consist of the coach obtaining and reviewing weekly assignments completed by the parent, followed by activities and discussions that focus on a particular parenting skill (i.e. praise, active ignoring, giving effective instructions). The discussions will emphasize benefits and possible problems that the parent may encounter throughout the week while implementing the new skill. The coach will assign to the parent a practice assignment to further encourage use of the concept.

Keywords

Sequence: 79605259 Sequence: 79605260 Sequence: 79605261 Sequence: 79605262 Sequence: 79605263 Sequence: 79605264 Sequence: 79605265
Name Disruptive Behavioral Problems Name ADHD Name Oppositional Defiant Disorder Name Conduct Disorder Name Mindfulness Name Mindful Parenting Name Behavioral Parent Training
Downcase Name disruptive behavioral problems Downcase Name adhd Downcase Name oppositional defiant disorder Downcase Name conduct disorder Downcase Name mindfulness Downcase Name mindful parenting Downcase Name behavioral parent training

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176802415 Sequence: 176802416 Sequence: 176802417 Sequence: 176802418 Sequence: 176802419 Sequence: 176802420 Sequence: 176802421 Sequence: 176802422 Sequence: 176802423 Sequence: 176802424 Sequence: 176802425 Sequence: 176802426 Sequence: 176802427 Sequence: 176802428 Sequence: 176802429 Sequence: 176802430 Sequence: 176802431 Sequence: 176802432
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Behavioral Assessment System for Children – 3 (BASC-3) Measure Brief Problem Checklist-Parent (BPC-P) Measure Impairment Rating Scale – Parent/Teacher Version (IRS) Measure Columbia Impairment Scale (CIS) Measure Mindfulness In Parenting Questionnaire (MIPQ) Measure Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) Measure Parent-Child Interaction Questionnaire-Revised-Parent and Child Version (PACHIQ-R) Measure Parenting Scale (PS) Measure Parent Behavior Inventory (PBI) – Supportive/Engaged Subscale Measure Family and Peer Process Code (FPP) and Five Observational Lab Tasks Measure IOWA Conners Rating Scale Measure Parent Emotion Regulation Inventory-2 (PERI-2) Measure Knowledge of Parenting Strategies Scale (KoPSS) Measure Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) Measure Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire (BEQ) Measure Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) Measure Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF) Measure Fragile Families Aggravation in Parenting Scale
Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention. Time Frame Seven months from start of intervention.
Description A well-standardized, multidimensional approach to evaluating the behavior of children. For this measure we will be looking at several subscales, including Hyperactivity, Agression, Conduct Problems, Externalizing Problems, Attention Problems, Anger Control, and Emotional Self-Control. For each subscale, a T-score is obtained using norms; T-scores range from 20 to 120, with higher T-Scores indicating a worse outcome/greater impairment. Description A measure designed to periodically assess the clinical progress of a child over the course of psychological treatment, specifically measuring the severity of internalizing and externalizing problems found in children. The scale scores of the BPC are based on the raw sum of item responses, each of which ranges from 0 to 2. Thus, scores on the six-item Internalizing and Externalizing scales each range from 0 to 12, and scores on the Total Problems scale range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating increased problem levels. Description A multidimensional measure that assesses functioning across domains. Specifically, the IRS qualifies and quantifies impairment present in a child's life, both in school and non-school settings. No total or subscale scores are calculated, each item of this measure is considered individually. Description Measures 4 major areas of functioning: interpersonal relations, broad psychopathological domains, functioning in job or schoolwork, and use of leisure time. Items are scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 ("no problem") to 4 ("a very big problem"). "Not applicable/do not know" is scored as a 5. Sum scores can range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. Description Assesses two factors of mindfulness in parenting: Being in the moment with the child and mindful discipline. For all 28 items, parents rate themselves for each item using the following scale: 1 = never, 2 = rarely, 3 = sometimes, 4 = often, 5 = almost always. Standard Scores are obtained for each subscale by summing up the items that make up that subscale and then using a conversion table. Description A widely used scale to assess the tendency to be mindful in daily life.The FFMQ is a 39-item self-report measure that evaluates five facets of the tendency to be mindful in daily life and consists of the five subscales of Observing (scores range from 8 to 40), Describing (scores range from 8 to 40), Acting with Awareness (scores range from 8 to 40), Nonreactivity (scores range from 7 to 35), and Nonjudging (scores range from 8 to 40). The scale uses a five-point Likert scale for all items, where 1 = never or very rarely true and 5 = very often or always true. For all subscales a higher score is indicative of a greater tendency to be mindful in that particular facet. The two subscales are Mindful Discipline and Being in the Moment with the Child; for both scales, Standard scores between 90 and 110 fall within the average range, with higher scores indicating greater levels of mindful parenting. Description Assesses how parents view their relationship with their children (and how children view their relationship with their parents). There are 25 items split into two parts, part 1 with items 1 through 14 and part 2 with items 15 through 25 in the PACHIQ-R questionnaire. The Total Score ranges from 25 to 125. A high Total Score is indicative for a positive relationship. Description Self-report measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. The measure consists of 30 items, and each item receives a 1-7 score. The Total Score is calculated by averaging the responses on all 30 items and ranges from 1 to 7. There are 4 subscales – Laxness, Overreactivity, Verbosity, and Other – the scores for which are also calculated by averaging the responses on the items that make up each subscale. The score for each subscale ranges from 1 to 7. For each score, lower numbers indicate a higher probability of using effective discipline strategies and higher numbers indicate a higher probability of using ineffective discipline strategies. Description Measure of parenting behavior that contains two independent scales, Supportive/Engaged and Hostile/Coercive. We will only be looking at the Supportive/Engaged Subscale, which measures levels of supportive/engagement parenting behavior. For this subscale, parents rate themselves for each item using the following scale: 0 = not at all true, 1 = a little true, 2 = somewhat true, 3= moderately true, 4 = quite a bit true, 5 = very true. To obtain To obtain the Subscale score, the responses to each item are summed together; the score can range from 0 to 50. A higher score is indicative of parents engaging in more supportive or engaged parenting behaviors. Description Parenting practices will be assessed using data derived from 35 min of videotaped parent-child interaction. These interactions will sample five different tasks. Trained observers blind to intervention assignment will then code the tapes of the family interaction using the FPP and will make global ratings. Description The first half of the measure is designed to assess inattentive-impulsive-overactive behaviors while the second half captures behaviors related to oppositional-defiant activity. All 10 items of the measure are scored using a four point Likert scale with the following anchors: not at all (0); just a little (1); pretty much (2); and very much (3). The first five items on the IOWA are designed to measure inattentive-impulsive-overactive (IO Subscale) behaviors and the second five items are designed to measure oppositional-defiant (OD Subscale) behaviors. For both scales, higher scores indicate greater impairment and the scores can range from 0 to 15. Description Measures parent emotions and their ability to regulate their emotions during interactions with their child. This measure consists of items, on which parents rate themselves for each item using a Likert scale of 1 (I never do this) to 7 (I very often do this). We will be looking at two subscales – Reappraisal and Suppression; the scores for both subscales are calculated by taking the average of the responses on the items for each subscale, and so each of the subscales scores can range from 1 to 7. For the Reappraisal scale, a higher score indicates a more frequent use of reappraisal as an emotional regulation strategy, and for the Suppression Subscale a higher score indicates a more frequent use of suppression as an emotion regulation strategy. Description A measure of parents' knowledge of effective parenting strategies.This measure consists of 33 items, and we will be looking at the total number of correct answers obtained by the participant. As such, the score can range from 0 to 33, with a higher score indicate a greater knowledge of parenting strategies. Description Assesses individual differences in the habitual use of two emotion regulation strategies: cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. The ERQ is a 10-item scale on which parents rate each item using a Likert scale of 1 (Strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). There are two subscales, Reappraisal (ranges from 1 to 42) and Suppression (ranges from 4 to 28). For the Reappraisal scale higher scores indicate a more frequent use of reappraisal as an emotional regulation strategy, and for the Suppression Subscale higher scores mean a more frequent use of suppression as an emotion regulation strategy. Description A measure of parent emotional expression in discipline specific situations; it will be modified to reflect parents' emotional expression when faced with child misbehavior. We will be looking at the Total Score (which ranges from 16 to 112), as well as several subscale scores: Negative Expressivity (ranges from 6 to 42), Positive Expressivity (ranges from 4 to 28), and Impulse Strength (ranges from 6 to 42). For all scales a higher score means a greater amount of emotional expressivity is displayed by the individual. Description A measure of parent's emotional experience in discipline specific situations. The measure consists of 20 items, on which parents rate themselves for each item using the following scale: 1 = very slightly or not at all, 2 = a little, 3 = moderately, 4 = quite a bit, and 5 = very much. To calculate the Positive Affect Subscale Score, the scores on the ten items that make up the subscale are summed together. Scores can range from 10-50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect. To calculate the Negative Affect Subscale Score, the scores on the 10 items that make up that subscale are summed together. Scores can range from 10-50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect. Description Measures the level of stress in the parent-child relationship and is appropriate for use with children aged 1 month to 12 years. It consists of 36 statements, each rated on a 1 to 5 scale (i.e., strongly disagree, disagree, not sure, agree, and strongly agree), which produces a Total Stress score that ranges from 36 to 180, with a higher score indicating greater levels of parenting stress. Description The scale measures the amount of parenting stress brought on by changes in employment, income or other factors in the parent's life. This questionnaire consists of 4 items on a Likert Scale. Parents rate themselves for each item using the following scale on a: 1 = Strongly agree, 2 = Somewhat agree, 3 = Somewhat disagree, and 4 = Strongly disagree. A Total Score is calculated by using the sum of all items divided by the top value of the Likert scale (i.e. 4); as such the Total Score ranges from 1 to 4, with a higher score indicating greater levels of stress.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192834404 Sequence: 192834405 Sequence: 192834406 Sequence: 192834407 Sequence: 192834408 Sequence: 192834409 Sequence: 192834410
Mesh Term Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity Mesh Term Mental Disorders Mesh Term Problem Behavior Mesh Term Conduct Disorder Mesh Term Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders Mesh Term Neurodevelopmental Disorders Mesh Term Behavioral Symptoms
Downcase Mesh Term attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity Downcase Mesh Term mental disorders Downcase Mesh Term problem behavior Downcase Mesh Term conduct disorder Downcase Mesh Term attention deficit and disruptive behavior disorders Downcase Mesh Term neurodevelopmental disorders Downcase Mesh Term behavioral symptoms
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48165305
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name New York University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67928404 Sequence: 67928405 Sequence: 67928406
Design Group Id 55411555 Design Group Id 55411556 Design Group Id 55411556
Intervention Id 52318839 Intervention Id 52318839 Intervention Id 52318840

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30668703
Gender All
Minimum Age 6 Years
Maximum Age 11 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

the child participant must be between the ages of 6 and 11 years old at baseline/time of pretreatment data collection;
he/she must have an elevated score (i.e. a t-score of 60 or greater) on one or more of the Externalizing Problems clinical scales (i.e. Hyperactivity, Aggression, and Conduct Problems) or on the Attention Problems clinical scale of the Behavior Assessment System for Children 3rd Edition – Parent Report (BASC-3; Reynolds & Kamphaus,

2015), as assessed during the intake assessment for the study; 3) both the parent and child participants must be fluent English speakers, and; 4) the parent participant(s) must be available to attend weekly treatment sessions and assessments for up to 26 weeks at New York University – Kimball Hall.

Exclusion Criteria:

There is evidence of significant developmental delay or psychosis that impacts the child's ability to fully engage in the intervention;
The youth or parent presents with emergency psychiatric needs that require services beyond that which can be managed within this intervention format (e.g. hospitalization, specialized placement outside the home);
if the parent and/or child are not fluent English speakers;
if the family is currently enrolled in any type of behavioral parent or parent management training program; and
if the child has an estimated Full Scale IQ below 80, based on completing two subtests of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Second Edition during the intake assessment for the study.

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254293606
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 22
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 6
Maximum Age Num 11
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 11
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 7

Designs

Sequence: 30415483
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Crossover Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description All participants will receive the Mindful Parenting program at the start of their involvement in the study. Following the completion of the Mindful Parenting group sessions, half of the participants will be randomly selected to receive individually-implemented MATCH BPT sessions. The other half of families will have the opportunity to also receive the MATCH BPT program following the completion of data collection.

Links

Sequence: 4373368
Url https://steinhardt.nyu.edu/appsych/faceslab/
Description FACES Lab – Study Website

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28782002
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Fecal Transplantation for Primary Clostridium Difficile Infection ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796650
2019-07-17

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796650
NCT03796650https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796650?tab=tableFrederik Emil Juul, MDf.e.juul@medisin.uio.no+4797512966In this randomized controlled trial the investigators want to compare the effect of one-time rectal instillation of fecal microbiota transplantation, compared to a ten-day antibiotic course for the treatment of primary Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). The investigators hypothetsize that the instillation of feces from a healthy donor will be non-inferior to vancomycin in inducing a durable cure.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-04-29
Start Month Year July 17, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 31, 2024
Verification Month Year April 2022
Verification Date 2022-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2022-04-29

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20753260
Description Up to one third of patients with clostridium difficile infection treated with antibiotics experience recurrent or relapsing symptoms within a few weeks. Even with subsequent antibiotic treatment, multiple recurrences/relapses are frequent. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been shown to be significantly more effective in curing recurrent CDI than repeated antibiotic treatment. In current guidelines, FMT is proposed as a treatment option after multiple recurrences/relapses of CDI. The rationale to reserve transplantation of donor feces for recurrent and difficult cases of CDI is a possible risk of pathogen transmittance and the process of finding a donor and screen for communicable disease.

The effect of FMT for recurrent CDI, however, suggests that this therapy may be more effective than antibiotics in inducing a durable cure also for primary CDI. If the therapeutic effect of FMT proves to be equal (non-inferior) or more effective than antibiotics, FMT may be the preferable treatment option due to favourable ecological impact compared to antibiotics. In an era with increasing concerns about overuse of antibiotics and emergence of antibiotic resistant bacteria, it is important to investigate therapeutic alternatives that may reduce the need for antibiotics.

This trial is a phase III multicentre, randomized controlled, open-label non-inferiority parallel group trial with two arms (FMT and antibiotics), and is a continuation of the phase II trial IMT for Primary Clostridium Difficile Infection (NCT02301000). In the current trial, patients with Clostridium difficile infection and no previous CDI within 12 months prior to inclusion will be randomized 1:1 to FMT or 10 days of guideline-recommended antibiotic therapy (vancomycin 125 mg four times a day).

Patients are recruited in Norwegian hospitals.

The investigators plan to use frozen microbiota, because supply is easier to organize, compared to fresh fecal samples. Patients in the FMT treatment group will receive one rectal dose of FMT, originating from screened, healthy donors. Patients who are not cured by the first dose is offered a protocol defined additional FMT treatment. In the case of clinical deterioration, appropriate measures will be undertaken according to current guidelines.

Patient treatment outcomes are evaluated after 14, 60 and 365 days from inclusion and treatment initiation.

An interim analysis is planned after inclusion of the first 94 patients (corresponding to 50% of the planned number of patients).

Facilities

Sequence: 200371639 Sequence: 200371640 Sequence: 200371641 Sequence: 200371642 Sequence: 200371643 Sequence: 200371644 Sequence: 200371645 Sequence: 200371646 Sequence: 200371647 Sequence: 200371648 Sequence: 200371649 Sequence: 200371650 Sequence: 200371651 Sequence: 200371652 Sequence: 200371653 Sequence: 200371654 Sequence: 200371655 Sequence: 200371656
Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Not yet recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting
Name Vestre Viken HF, Bærum Hospital Name Haukeland universitetssykehus Name Nordlandssykehuset Name Sykehuset Østfold Kalnes Name UNN Harstad Name Sørlandet Hospital HF Name Sykehuset Levanger Name Sykehuset Innlandet HF Name Akershus University Hospital Name Diakonhjemmet Hospital Name Lovisenberg sykehus Name Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet Name Oslo University Hospital Ullevål Name Telemark Hospital HF Name Stavanger University Hospital Name UNN Tromsø Name Sykehuset i Vestfold Name Ålesund Sjukehus
City Sandvika City Bergen City Bodø City Grålum City Harstad City Kristiansand City Levanger City Lillehammer City Lørenskog City Oslo City Oslo City Oslo City Oslo City Skien City Stavanger City Tromsø City Tønsberg City Ålesund
State Gjettum
Zip 1346 Zip 8092 Zip 1478 Zip 0319
Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway Country Norway

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28144249 Sequence: 28144250 Sequence: 28144251 Sequence: 28144252 Sequence: 28144253 Sequence: 28144254 Sequence: 28144255 Sequence: 28144256 Sequence: 28144257 Sequence: 28144258 Sequence: 28144259 Sequence: 28144260 Sequence: 28144261 Sequence: 28144262 Sequence: 28144263 Sequence: 28144264 Sequence: 28144265 Sequence: 28144266 Sequence: 28144267
Facility Id 200371639 Facility Id 200371640 Facility Id 200371641 Facility Id 200371642 Facility Id 200371643 Facility Id 200371644 Facility Id 200371645 Facility Id 200371646 Facility Id 200371647 Facility Id 200371648 Facility Id 200371649 Facility Id 200371650 Facility Id 200371650 Facility Id 200371651 Facility Id 200371652 Facility Id 200371653 Facility Id 200371654 Facility Id 200371655 Facility Id 200371656
Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type backup Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary
Name Øystein Rose, MD Name Trygve Hausken, MD, PhD Name Eirik H Ofstad, MD, PhD Name Jon Birger Haug, MD, PhD Name Peter H. Johnsen, MD Name Håvard Wiig, MD Name Eivind Ness-Jensen, MD, PhD Name Ragnhild Eiken, MD Name Jan Erik Berdal, MD, PhD Name Raziye B. Cetinkaya, MD, PhD Name Jørgen Valeur, MD, PhD Name Frederik Emil Juul, MD Name Siv Elisabeth Isaksen Name Kristian Tonby, MD, PhD Name Pavel Gudkov, MD Name Trond J Cooper, MD Name Rasmus Goll, MD, PhD Name Awet Abraham, MD Name Dag Arne Lihaug Hoff, MD, PhD
Email f.e.juul@medisin.uio.no

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18352428 Sequence: 18352429 Sequence: 18352430
Facility Id 200371644 Facility Id 200371650 Facility Id 200371651
Role Sub-Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Sub-Investigator
Name Rita Helleren, MD Name Kjetil Garborg, MD, PhD Name Frederik Emil Juul, MD

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96181110 Sequence: 96181111 Sequence: 96181112
Mesh Term Vancomycin Mesh Term Anti-Bacterial Agents Mesh Term Anti-Infective Agents
Downcase Mesh Term vancomycin Downcase Mesh Term anti-bacterial agents Downcase Mesh Term anti-infective agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52251963
Name Clostridium Difficile Infection
Downcase Name clostridium difficile infection

Id Information

Sequence: 40217539
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value COLONIZE

Countries

Sequence: 42632499
Name Norway
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55683735 Sequence: 55683736
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Fecal microbiota transplantation Title Antibiotic treatment
Description Fecal microbiota from healthy, screened stool donors at the University Hospital of North Norway. Patients will receive one FMT enema immediately after enrolment. Description Patients randomized to the control group will receive a ten-day course of oral vancomycin four times a day. This is according to international guidelines for primary C. difficile treatment.

Interventions

Sequence: 52564848 Sequence: 52564849
Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Drug
Name Fecal microbiota transplantation Name Vancomycin
Description 50 g donor feces suspended in saline with added glycerol, administered by a enema kit. Description Peroral vancomycin 125 mg q.i.d. for ten days.

Keywords

Sequence: 79983168 Sequence: 79983169 Sequence: 79983170 Sequence: 79983171 Sequence: 79983172 Sequence: 79983173
Name Clostridium difficile Name Intestinal microbiota therapy Name Fecal microbiota transplantation Name Investigator-initiated Name Antibiotics Name Diarrhea
Downcase Name clostridium difficile Downcase Name intestinal microbiota therapy Downcase Name fecal microbiota transplantation Downcase Name investigator-initiated Downcase Name antibiotics Downcase Name diarrhea

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177674994 Sequence: 177674995 Sequence: 177674996 Sequence: 177674997 Sequence: 177674998 Sequence: 177674999
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other
Measure Patients with durable cure Measure Patients with durable cure with additional treatment. Measure Treatment adverse events Measure Patients with long-time cure Measure Health-economic evaluation Measure Fecal composition and treatment outcome
Time Frame 60 days Time Frame 60 days Time Frame 60 and 365 days Time Frame 365 days Time Frame 365 days Time Frame 60 days
Description Proportion of patients with primary clinical cure at day 14 after treatment start and no recurrent C. difficile infection during 60 days after treatment start, with the assigned treatment alone. Description Proportion of patients with primary clinical cure at day 14 after treatment start and no recurrent C. difficile infection during 60 days after treatment start, with or without the need of additional treatment (FMT, metronidazole or vancomycin). Description Proportion of patients with adverse events. Description Proportion of patients with primary clinical cure at day 14 after treatment start and no recurrent C. difficile infection during 60 days after treatment start, and without recurrent C. difficile infection within 365 days after treatment start. Description Health-economic analysis of the two compared treatment modalities Description Correlation in fecal composition changes before versus after treatment, and treatment outcome (such as bacterial diversity and fecal short chain fatty acids).

Subgroup analyses will be performed for sex, age, co-morbidities, and FMT donor.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193795775 Sequence: 193795776 Sequence: 193795777 Sequence: 193795778 Sequence: 193795779 Sequence: 193795780 Sequence: 193795781 Sequence: 193795782
Mesh Term Infections Mesh Term Communicable Diseases Mesh Term Clostridium Infections Mesh Term Disease Attributes Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections Mesh Term Bacterial Infections Mesh Term Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Downcase Mesh Term infections Downcase Mesh Term communicable diseases Downcase Mesh Term clostridium infections Downcase Mesh Term disease attributes Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term gram-positive bacterial infections Downcase Mesh Term bacterial infections Downcase Mesh Term bacterial infections and mycoses
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48395117 Sequence: 48395118 Sequence: 48395119 Sequence: 48395120 Sequence: 48395121 Sequence: 48395122 Sequence: 48395123 Sequence: 48395124 Sequence: 48395125 Sequence: 48395126 Sequence: 48395127 Sequence: 48395128 Sequence: 48395129 Sequence: 48395130 Sequence: 48395131 Sequence: 48395132 Sequence: 48395133
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER_GOV Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER_GOV Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Oslo University Hospital Name South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority Name University Hospital of North Norway Name Haukeland University Hospital Name Helse Nord-Trøndelag HF Name Vestre Viken Hospital Trust Name The Hospital of Vestfold Name Sykehuset Telemark Name Alesund Hospital Name University Hospital, Akershus Name Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital Name Sorlandet Hospital HF Name Ostfold Hospital Trust Name Diakonhjemmet Hospital Name Nordlandssykehuset HF Name Sykehuset Innlandet HF Name Helse Stavanger HF

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29329311
Role Study Chair
Name Michael Bretthauer, MD, PhD
Affiliation Oslo Universitetssykehus HF, Rikshospitalet

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12027622 Sequence: 12027623
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Kjetil Garborg, MD, PhD Name Frederik Emil Juul, MD
Phone +4741578975 Phone +4797512966
Email k.k.garborg@medisin.uio.no Email f.e.juul@medisin.uio.no
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68258096 Sequence: 68258097
Design Group Id 55683735 Design Group Id 55683736
Intervention Id 52564848 Intervention Id 52564849

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30812489
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients, ≥18 years with primary C. difficile infection, defined by the following three criteria:

Diarrhea as defined by the WHO (≥3 loose stools per day), and
Positive stool test for toxin producing C. difficile, and
No evidence of previous C. difficile infection during 365 days before enrolment.
Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Known presence of other stool pathogens known to cause diarrhea.
Ongoing antibiotic treatment for other infections that cannot be stopped before study treatment administration.
Inflammatory bowel disease or microscopic colitis.
< 3 months life expectancy.

Serious immunodeficiency, defined as one of the following:

Ongoing or recent chemotherapy and current or expected neutropenia with neutrophil count of < 500/μL.
Active severe immunocompromising disease.
Inability to comply with protocol requirements.
Need of intensive care.
Known irritable bowel syndrome, diarrheal type.
Pregnancy or nursing.
Known or suspected toxic megacolon or ileus.
Total or subtotal colectomy, ileostomy or colonostomy.
Contraindications for rectal catheter insertion
Known hypersensitivity or other contraindications to vancomycin

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254054915
Number Of Facilities 18
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 4
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30558462
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Masking Description An open-label, partly assessor blinded trial.
Intervention Model Description Randomized clinical trial with two parallel treatment arms with a 1:1 allocation.

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26710768 Sequence: 26710769 Sequence: 26710770
Intervention Id 52564848 Intervention Id 52564848 Intervention Id 52564848
Name FMT Name IMT Name Bacteriotherapy

Links

Sequence: 4394397
Url https://www.med.uio.no/helsam/english/research/groups/clinical-effectiveness/index.html
Description Investigating research group' home page

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28924854
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Kjetil Garborg
Title Joint Principal Investigator
Affiliation Oslo University Hospital

Study References

Sequence: 52151266 Sequence: 52151267 Sequence: 52151268 Sequence: 52151269 Sequence: 52151270
Pmid 29562266 Pmid 29860912 Pmid 25875259 Pmid 23718168 Pmid 23511459
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Bakken JS, Carroll KC, Coffin SE, Dubberke ER, Garey KW, Gould CV, Kelly C, Loo V, Shaklee Sammons J, Sandora TJ, Wilcox MH. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):987-994. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy149. Citation Juul FE, Garborg K, Bretthauer M, Skudal H, Oines MN, Wiig H, Rose O, Seip B, Lamont JT, Midtvedt T, Valeur J, Kalager M, Holme O, Helsingen L, Loberg M, Adami HO. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Primary Clostridium difficile Infection. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 28;378(26):2535-2536. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1803103. Epub 2018 Jun 2. No abstract available. Citation Leffler DA, Lamont JT. Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 16;372(16):1539-48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1403772. No abstract available. Citation van Nood E, Dijkgraaf MG, Keller JJ. Duodenal infusion of feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2013 May 30;368(22):2145. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1303919. No abstract available. Citation Kassam Z, Lee CH, Yuan Y, Hunt RH. Fecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Apr;108(4):500-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.59. Epub 2013 Mar 19.

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Study to Assess Dystrophin Levels in Participants With Nonsense Mutation Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (nmDMD) Who Have Been Treated With Ataluren ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796637
2019-04-11

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796637
NCT03796637https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796637?tab=tableNANANAThis study is designed to generate additional data on the effect of ataluren for producing dystrophin protein in nonsense mutation nmDMD participants. This study will evaluate dystrophin levels from participants with nmDMD who currently have been receiving ataluren for ≥9 months.

The study will have a single visit (Visit 1).
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-04-05
Start Month Year April 11, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year June 3, 2019
Verification Month Year February 2022
Verification Date 2022-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2022-04-05
Results First Posted Date 2022-04-05

Facilities

Sequence: 200680833
Name University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
City Los Angeles
State California
Zip 90025
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52346405
Name Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Downcase Name duchenne muscular dystrophy

Id Information

Sequence: 40284235 Sequence: 40284236
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value PTC124-GD-046-DMD Id Value 2019-001691-11
Id Type EudraCT Number

Countries

Sequence: 42705278
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55788746
Group Type Experimental
Title nmDMD Participants
Description Participants who have been receiving ataluren, will be dosed daily 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) in the morning, 10 mg/kg at midday, and 20 mg/kg in the evening, for >=9 months from ongoing PTC-sponsored nmDMD clinical trials.

Interventions

Sequence: 52657530
Intervention Type Drug
Name Ataluren
Description Ataluren will be administered as per the dose and schedule specified in the arm.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178026343 Sequence: 178026342
Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type primary
Measure Dystrophin Protein Levels as Determined by Immunohistochemistry Measure Mean Dystrophin Levels as Measured by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL)
Time Frame Day 1 of biopsy Time Frame Day 1 of biopsy
Description Dystrophin levels by IHC mean membrane stain density are reported by muscle group (gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and across muscle locations). Description The mean dystrophin protein levels were measured by ECL. Dystrophin levels are reported by muscle group (gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and across muscle locations). Results below the limit of quantitation were imputed as half of lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ). LLOQ = 0.5 micrograms (μg)/milliliter (mL)

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194154819 Sequence: 194154820 Sequence: 194154821 Sequence: 194154822 Sequence: 194154823 Sequence: 194154824 Sequence: 194154825 Sequence: 194154826 Sequence: 194154827
Mesh Term Muscular Dystrophies Mesh Term Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne Mesh Term Muscular Disorders, Atrophic Mesh Term Muscular Diseases Mesh Term Musculoskeletal Diseases Mesh Term Neuromuscular Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Genetic Diseases, Inborn Mesh Term Genetic Diseases, X-Linked
Downcase Mesh Term muscular dystrophies Downcase Mesh Term muscular dystrophy, duchenne Downcase Mesh Term muscular disorders, atrophic Downcase Mesh Term muscular diseases Downcase Mesh Term musculoskeletal diseases Downcase Mesh Term neuromuscular diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term genetic diseases, inborn Downcase Mesh Term genetic diseases, x-linked
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48483100
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name PTC Therapeutics

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29378433
Role Study Director
Name Francesco Bibbiani, MD
Affiliation PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68387515
Design Group Id 55788746
Intervention Id 52657530

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30866923
Gender Male
Minimum Age N/A
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Evidence of signed and dated informed consent/assent document(s) indicating that the participant (and/or his parent/legal guardian) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the trial.
Ambulatory (10 meters walk/run in less than [<] 30 seconds) and functional grade on the Brooke Upper Extremity Scale of a 1 or a 2.
Currently being treated with ataluren 10, 10, 20 mg/kg for >=9 months, with no gap in treatment of greater than (>) 1 month, in an ongoing PTC-sponsored nmDMD clinical trial prior to study entry.
Phenotypic evidence of duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) based on the onset of characteristic clinical symptoms or signs (for example, proximal muscle weakness, waddling gait, and Gowers' maneuver) by 6 years of age and an elevated serum creatine kinase (CK). Medical documentation of phenotypic evidence of DMD needs to be provided upon request by the medical monitor.
Willing to undergo muscle biopsy.

Exclusion Criteria:

Known contra-indication to muscle biopsy (such as bleeding or clotting disorders).
Exposure to another investigational drug within 2 months prior to study enrollment or ongoing participation in any non-ataluren interventional clinical trial.
Requirement for daytime ventilator assistance or any use of invasive mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy. Note: Evening non-invasive mechanical ventilation such as use of bilevel positive airway pressure (Bi-PAP) therapy is allowed.
Prior or ongoing medical condition (for example, concomitant illness, psychiatric condition, behavioral disorder), medical history, physical findings or laboratory abnormality that, in the investigator's opinion, could adversely affect the safety of the participant, makes it unlikely that the course of treatment or follow-up would be completed, or could impair the assessment of study results.

Gender Based True
Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253996071
Number Of Facilities 1
Number Of Nsae Subjects 3
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 1
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 33
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30612737
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26757218
Intervention Id 52657530
Name PTC124

Milestones

Sequence: 41116521 Sequence: 41116522 Sequence: 41116523
Result Group Id 56195085 Result Group Id 56195085 Result Group Id 56195085
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000
Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Count 6 Count 6 Count 0

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3929694

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 74203077 Sequence: 74203078
Outcome Id 30886617 Outcome Id 30886618
Result Group Id 56195086 Result Group Id 56195086
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000
Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants
Count 6 Count 6

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2592612 Sequence: 2592613
Document Type Study Protocol Document Type Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True Has Protocol False
Has Icf False Has Icf False
Has Sap False Has Sap True
Document Date 2019-03-20 Document Date 2020-02-12
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/37/NCT03796637/Prot_000.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/37/NCT03796637/SAP_001.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 28009294 Sequence: 28009295 Sequence: 28009296
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 6 Subjects At Risk 6 Subjects At Risk 6
Created At 2023-08-10 03:28:17.253571 Created At 2023-08-10 03:28:17.253571 Created At 2023-08-10 03:28:17.253571
Updated At 2023-08-10 03:28:17.253571 Updated At 2023-08-10 03:28:17.253571 Updated At 2023-08-10 03:28:17.253571

Reported Events

Sequence: 529562395 Sequence: 529562396
Result Group Id 56195087 Result Group Id 56195087
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000
Time Frame Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 1 Time Frame Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 1
Event Type other Event Type other
Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 2
Subjects At Risk 6 Subjects At Risk 6
Description Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of ataluren. Description Safety population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of ataluren.
Organ System General disorders Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Adverse Event Term Puncture site discharge Adverse Event Term Procedural pain
Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5
Vocab MedDRA 22.1 Vocab MedDRA 22.1
Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28979271
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3860438
Pi Employee No
Restriction Type OTHER
Other Details The Sponsor can review results and/or communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is up to 180 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor may consult with the PI to require changes to the communication or extend the embargo.
Restrictive Agreement The Sponsor can review results and/or communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is up to 180 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor may consult with the PI to require changes to the communication or extend the embargo.

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3860403
Organization PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
Name Medical Information
Phone 1-866-562-4620
Email medinfo@ptcbio.com

Outcomes

Sequence: 30886617 Sequence: 30886618
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary
Title Mean Dystrophin Levels as Measured by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) Title Dystrophin Protein Levels as Determined by Immunohistochemistry
Description The mean dystrophin protein levels were measured by ECL. Dystrophin levels are reported by muscle group (gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and across muscle locations). Results below the limit of quantitation were imputed as half of lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ). LLOQ = 0.5 micrograms (μg)/milliliter (mL) Description Dystrophin levels by IHC mean membrane stain density are reported by muscle group (gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and across muscle locations).
Time Frame Day 1 of biopsy Time Frame Day 1 of biopsy
Population ITT population included all enrolled participants with a valid assessment of dystrophin level, as measured by ECL. Population ITT population included all enrolled participants with a valid assessment of dystrophin level, as measured by ECL.
Units nanograms (ng)/mg Units ng/mg
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 236337704 Sequence: 236337705 Sequence: 236337700 Sequence: 236337701 Sequence: 236337702 Sequence: 236337703
Outcome Id 30886618 Outcome Id 30886618 Outcome Id 30886617 Outcome Id 30886617 Outcome Id 30886617 Outcome Id 30886618
Result Group Id 56195086 Result Group Id 56195086 Result Group Id 56195086 Result Group Id 56195086 Result Group Id 56195086 Result Group Id 56195086
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000
Classification Tibialis Anterior Classification Across Muscle Locations Classification Gastrocnemius Classification Tibialis Anterior Classification Across Muscle Locations Classification Gastrocnemius
Title Dystrophin Protein Levels as Determined by Immunohistochemistry Title Dystrophin Protein Levels as Determined by Immunohistochemistry Title Mean Dystrophin Levels as Measured by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) Title Mean Dystrophin Levels as Measured by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) Title Mean Dystrophin Levels as Measured by Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) Title Dystrophin Protein Levels as Determined by Immunohistochemistry
Description Dystrophin levels by IHC mean membrane stain density are reported by muscle group (gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and across muscle locations). Description Dystrophin levels by IHC mean membrane stain density are reported by muscle group (gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and across muscle locations). Description The mean dystrophin protein levels were measured by ECL. Dystrophin levels are reported by muscle group (gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and across muscle locations). Results below the limit of quantitation were imputed as half of lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ). LLOQ = 0.5 micrograms (μg)/milliliter (mL) Description The mean dystrophin protein levels were measured by ECL. Dystrophin levels are reported by muscle group (gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and across muscle locations). Results below the limit of quantitation were imputed as half of lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ). LLOQ = 0.5 micrograms (μg)/milliliter (mL) Description The mean dystrophin protein levels were measured by ECL. Dystrophin levels are reported by muscle group (gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and across muscle locations). Results below the limit of quantitation were imputed as half of lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ). LLOQ = 0.5 micrograms (μg)/milliliter (mL) Description Dystrophin levels by IHC mean membrane stain density are reported by muscle group (gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior, and across muscle locations).
Units ng/mg Units ng/mg Units nanograms (ng)/mg Units nanograms (ng)/mg Units nanograms (ng)/mg Units ng/mg
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean
Param Value 0.26578 Param Value 0.30483 Param Value 0.0844 Param Value 0.1002 Param Value 0.1054 Param Value 0.28817
Param Value Num 0.26578 Param Value Num 0.30483 Param Value Num 0.0844 Param Value Num 0.1002 Param Value Num 0.1054 Param Value Num 0.28817
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 0.226510 Dispersion Value 0.218600 Dispersion Value 0.05874 Dispersion Value 0.08060 Dispersion Value 0.08300 Dispersion Value 0.220547
Dispersion Value Num 0.22651 Dispersion Value Num 0.2186 Dispersion Value Num 0.05874 Dispersion Value Num 0.0806 Dispersion Value Num 0.083 Dispersion Value Num 0.220547

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11409504
Result Group Id 56195084
Ctgov Group Code BG000
Units Participants
Scope overall
Count 6

Result Groups

Sequence: 56195084 Sequence: 56195085 Sequence: 56195086 Sequence: 56195087
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000
Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event
Title Ataluren Title Ataluren Title Ataluren Title Ataluren
Description Participants who had been receiving ataluren, were dosed daily 10 mg/kg in the morning, 10 mg/kg at midday, and 20 mg/kg in the evening, for ≥9 months from ongoing PTC-sponsored nmDMD clinical trials. Description Participants who had been receiving ataluren, were dosed daily 10 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg) in the morning, 10 mg/kg at midday, and 20 mg/kg in the evening, for ≥9 months from ongoing PTC-sponsored nmDMD clinical trials. Description Participants who had been receiving ataluren, were dosed daily 10 mg/kg in the morning, 10 mg/kg at midday, and 20 mg/kg in the evening, for ≥9 months from ongoing PTC-sponsored nmDMD clinical trials. Description Participants who had been receiving ataluren, were dosed daily 10 mg/kg in the morning, 10 mg/kg at midday, and 20 mg/kg in the evening, for ≥9 months from ongoing PTC-sponsored nmDMD clinical trials.

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 125951106 Sequence: 125951107 Sequence: 125951108 Sequence: 125951109 Sequence: 125951110 Sequence: 125951111 Sequence: 125951112 Sequence: 125951113 Sequence: 125951114 Sequence: 125951115 Sequence: 125951116 Sequence: 125951117 Sequence: 125951118
Result Group Id 56195084 Result Group Id 56195084 Result Group Id 56195084 Result Group Id 56195084 Result Group Id 56195084 Result Group Id 56195084 Result Group Id 56195084 Result Group Id 56195084 Result Group Id 56195084 Result Group Id 56195084 Result Group Id 56195084 Result Group Id 56195084 Result Group Id 56195084
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000
Category Female Category Male Category Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino Category Unknown or Not Reported Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category Asian Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Black or African American Category White Category More than one race Category Unknown or Not Reported
Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB)
Units years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 10.2 Param Value 0 Param Value 6 Param Value 0 Param Value 6 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 6 Param Value 0 Param Value 0
Param Value Num 10.2 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 2.04
Dispersion Value Num 2.04
Number Analyzed 6 Number Analyzed 6 Number Analyzed 6 Number Analyzed 6 Number Analyzed 6 Number Analyzed 6 Number Analyzed 6 Number Analyzed 6 Number Analyzed 6 Number Analyzed 6 Number Analyzed 6 Number Analyzed 6 Number Analyzed 6

]]>

<![CDATA[ Clinical Outcomes of MICROPURE and PodEye Monofocal Intraocular Lenses ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796624
2019-02-12

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796624
NCT03796624https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796624?tab=tableNANANAProspective, non-randomised, open, controlled, single-center post-market clinical follow study about Micropure 1.2.3. and PODEYE intraocular lenses.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-07-09
Start Month Year February 12, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year June 17, 2021
Verification Month Year July 2021
Verification Date 2021-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2021-07-09

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20709966
Description This clinical investigation is a prospective, non-randomised, open, controlled, single-center post-market clinical follow whereby study patients undergoing routine cataract surgery will have implantation of monofocal intraocular lens Micropure 1.2.3. (PhysIOL, Liège, Belgium) in one eye and implantation of monofocal intraocular lens PODEYE (PhysIOL, Liège, Belgium) in the contralateral eye of the same patient.

The study purpose is to obtain clinical data on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity on patients implanted with Micropure 1.2.3. and PODEYE

The devices under investigation (Micropure 1.2.3. and PODEYE) are a monofocal glistening-free hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) manufactured by the sponsor of this study PhysIOL sa/nv. The optical properties of the lenses are very comparable. The main difference is the mechanical design of the haptics, that is not expected to have an influence on the clinical outcomes.

The IOLs will be implanted as part of the routine cataract surgery on patients suffering from cataract development.

In total 76 patients will be recruited for this clinical study and receive the implantation of Micropure 1.2.3. and POPDEYE intraocular lenses.

Subjects participating in the trial will attend study visits over a period of 12 months.

Facilities

Sequence: 199964473
Name GEMINI Eye Clinic
City Zlin
Zip 76001
Country Czechia

Conditions

Sequence: 52138947 Sequence: 52138948
Name Cataract Name Lens Opacities
Downcase Name cataract Downcase Name lens opacities

Id Information

Sequence: 40135016
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value PHY1803

Countries

Sequence: 42542637
Name Czechia
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55559283 Sequence: 55559284
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Investigational Device Micropure 1.2.3. Title Comparator PODEYE
Description Implantation of monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) "Micropure 1.2.3." in one of the eyes of the study subject Description Implantation of monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) "PODEYE" in the contralateral eye of the study subject

Interventions

Sequence: 52454847 Sequence: 52454848
Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Device
Name Micropure 1.2.3. Name PODEYE
Description Implantation of intraocular lens (IOL). Name: "MicroPure 1.2.3." It is a monofocal intraocular lens consisting of hydrophobic acrylic material. One IOL per patient will be implanted Description Implantation of intraocular lens (IOL). Name: "PODEYE" It is a monofocal intraocular lens consisting of hydrophobic acrylic material. The IOL will be implanted in the contralateral eye of the same patient already implanted with Micropure 1.2.3.

Keywords

Sequence: 79822735 Sequence: 79822736 Sequence: 79822737
Name Intraocular lens Name Monofocal Name Hydrophobic
Downcase Name intraocular lens Downcase Name monofocal Downcase Name hydrophobic

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177263363 Sequence: 177263364 Sequence: 177263365 Sequence: 177263366 Sequence: 177263367 Sequence: 177263368 Sequence: 177263369 Sequence: 177263370 Sequence: 177263371 Sequence: 177263372 Sequence: 177263373 Sequence: 177263374 Sequence: 177263377 Sequence: 177263375 Sequence: 177263376 Sequence: 177263378 Sequence: 177263379 Sequence: 177263380 Sequence: 177263381 Sequence: 177263382 Sequence: 177263383 Sequence: 177263384
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure monocular Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) Measure Manifested refraction Measure Monocular Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) under photopic light conditions Measure Monocular Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA) under mesopic light conditions Measure Monocular Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) under photopic light conditions Measure Monocular Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) under mesopic light conditions Measure Monocular Contrast Sensitivity under photopic light conditions Measure Monocular Contrast Sensitivity under mesopic light conditions Measure Slitlamp examination – Corneal status Measure Slitlamp examination – Fundus Measure Slitlamp examination – Signs of inflammation Measure Slitlamp examination – Pupillary block Measure Slitlamp examination – IOL decentration Measure Slitlamp examination – Retinal detachment Measure Slitlamp examination – Status of anterior and posterior capsule Measure Slitlamp examination IOL tilt Measure Slitlamp examination – IOL discoloration Measure Slitlamp examination – IOL opacity Measure Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement Measure Questionnaire on IOL implantation Measure Keratometry Measure Biometry
Time Frame 6 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 1 week postoperative, 1 month postoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 1 week postoperative, 1 month postoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 1 month postoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 1 week postoperative, 1 month postoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 1 month postoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame 6 months postoperative Time Frame 6 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 1 week postoperative, 1 month postoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 1 week postoperative, 1 month postoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 1 week postoperative, 1 month postoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 1 week postoperative, 1 month postoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 1 week postoperative, 1 month postoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 1 week postoperative, 1 month postoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 1 week postoperative, 1 month postoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 1 week postoperative, 1 month postoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 1 week postoperative, 1 month postoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame preoperative, 1 week postoperative, 1 month postoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative Time Frame peroperative Time Frame preoperative Time Frame preoperative
Description Statistically non-inferior visual acuity outcomes on monocular Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) under photopic light conditions compared to eyes implanted with the comparator PODEYE at the 6 months follow up visit. Description The manifested refraction is measured by means of a phoropter. The data contains values for sphere, cylinder and axis of cylinder according to ISO 11979-7:2018. Description UDVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 4m distance according to ISO 11979-7:2018. This assessment is performed under photopic light conditions Description UDVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 4m distance according to ISO 11979-7:2018. This assessment is performed under mesopic light conditions Description CDVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 4m distance with best aided corrective glasses according to ISO 11979-7:2018. This assessment is performed under photopic light conditions Description CDVA is measured with ETDRS charts placed in 4m distance with best aided corrective glasses according to ISO 11979-7:2018. This assessment is performed under mesopic light conditions Description Contrast Sensitivity under photopic light conditions using the standardized contrast sensitivity device CSV-1000 (VectorVision) Description Contrast Sensitivity under mesopic light conditions using the standardized contrast sensitivity device CSV-1000 (VectorVision) Description The slitlamp examination is one examination to analyse the integrity of eye structures and the implanted IOL. The examination is performed and documented according to the guidelines in ISO 11979-7:2018.

With the slitlamp the ophthalmologist can observe the eyes stereoscopically. A focussed slit of light, which can be width-adjusted, is projected on the eye to be examined. The investigator observes this projection on the eye through a reflected light microscope. The slitlamp is used to observe the anterior and posterior part of the eye, including cornea, lens and anterior chamber. By dilating the pupil the fundus can also be examined. Following conditions shall be examined with the slitlamp:

• Corneal status.

Description The slitlamp examination is one examination to analyse the integrity of eye structures and the implanted IOL. The examination is performed and documented according to the guidelines in ISO 11979-7:2018.

With the slitlamp the ophthalmologist can observe the eyes stereoscopically. A focussed slit of light, which can be width-adjusted, is projected on the eye to be examined. The investigator observes this projection on the eye through a reflected light microscope. The slitlamp is used to observe the anterior and posterior part of the eye, including cornea, lens and anterior chamber. By dilating the pupil the fundus can also be examined. Following conditions shall be examined with the slitlamp:

• Fundus.

Description The slitlamp examination is one examination to analyse the integrity of eye structures and the implanted IOL. The examination is performed and documented according to the guidelines in ISO 11979-7:2018.

With the slitlamp the ophthalmologist can observe the eyes stereoscopically. A focussed slit of light, which can be width-adjusted, is projected on the eye to be examined. The investigator observes this projection on the eye through a reflected light microscope. The slitlamp is used to observe the anterior and posterior part of the eye, including cornea, lens and anterior chamber. By dilating the pupil the fundus can also be examined. Following conditions shall be examined with the slitlamp:

• Signs of inflammation.

Description The slitlamp examination is one examination to analyse the integrity of eye structures and the implanted IOL. The examination is performed and documented according to the guidelines in ISO 11979-7:2018.

With the slitlamp the ophthalmologist can observe the eyes stereoscopically. A focussed slit of light, which can be width-adjusted, is projected on the eye to be examined. The investigator observes this projection on the eye through a reflected light microscope. The slitlamp is used to observe the anterior and posterior part of the eye, including cornea, lens and anterior chamber. By dilating the pupil the fundus can also be examined. Following conditions shall be examined with the slitlamp:

• Pupillary block.

Description The slitlamp examination is one examination to analyse the integrity of eye structures and the implanted IOL. The examination is performed and documented according to the guidelines in ISO 11979-7:2018.

With the slitlamp the ophthalmologist can observe the eyes stereoscopically. A focussed slit of light, which can be width-adjusted, is projected on the eye to be examined. The investigator observes this projection on the eye through a reflected light microscope. The slitlamp is used to observe the anterior and posterior part of the eye, including cornea, lens and anterior chamber. By dilating the pupil the fundus can also be examined. Following conditions shall be examined with the slitlamp:

• IOL decentration.

Description The slitlamp examination is one examination to analyse the integrity of eye structures and the implanted IOL. The examination is performed and documented according to the guidelines in ISO 11979-7:2018.

With the slitlamp the ophthalmologist can observe the eyes stereoscopically. A focussed slit of light, which can be width-adjusted, is projected on the eye to be examined. The investigator observes this projection on the eye through a reflected light microscope. The slitlamp is used to observe the anterior and posterior part of the eye, including cornea, lens and anterior chamber. By dilating the pupil the fundus can also be examined. Following conditions shall be examined with the slitlamp:

• Retinal detachment.

Description The slitlamp examination is one examination to analyse the integrity of eye structures and the implanted IOL. The examination is performed and documented according to the guidelines in ISO 11979-7:2018.

With the slitlamp the ophthalmologist can observe the eyes stereoscopically. A focussed slit of light, which can be width-adjusted, is projected on the eye to be examined. The investigator observes this projection on the eye through a reflected light microscope. The slitlamp is used to observe the anterior and posterior part of the eye, including cornea, lens and anterior chamber. By dilating the pupil the fundus can also be examined. Following conditions shall be examined with the slitlamp:

• Status of anterior and posterior capsule.

Description The slitlamp examination is one examination to analyse the integrity of eye structures and the implanted IOL. The examination is performed and documented according to the guidelines in ISO 11979-7:2018.

With the slitlamp the ophthalmologist can observe the eyes stereoscopically. A focussed slit of light, which can be width-adjusted, is projected on the eye to be examined. The investigator observes this projection on the eye through a reflected light microscope. The slitlamp is used to observe the anterior and posterior part of the eye, including cornea, lens and anterior chamber. By dilating the pupil the fundus can also be examined. Following conditions shall be examined with the slitlamp:

• IOL tilt.

Description The slitlamp examination is one examination to analyse the integrity of eye structures and the implanted IOL. The examination is performed and documented according to the guidelines in ISO 11979-7:2018.

With the slitlamp the ophthalmologist can observe the eyes stereoscopically. A focussed slit of light, which can be width-adjusted, is projected on the eye to be examined. The investigator observes this projection on the eye through a reflected light microscope. The slitlamp is used to observe the anterior and posterior part of the eye, including cornea, lens and anterior chamber. By dilating the pupil the fundus can also be examined. Following conditions shall be examined with the slitlamp:

• IOL discoloration.

Description The slitlamp examination is one examination to analyse the integrity of eye structures and the implanted IOL. The examination is performed and documented according to the guidelines in ISO 11979-7:2018.

With the slitlamp the ophthalmologist can observe the eyes stereoscopically. A focussed slit of light, which can be width-adjusted, is projected on the eye to be examined. The investigator observes this projection on the eye through a reflected light microscope. The slitlamp is used to observe the anterior and posterior part of the eye, including cornea, lens and anterior chamber. By dilating the pupil the fundus can also be examined. Following conditions shall be examined with the slitlamp:

• IOL opacity.

Description The IOP will be measured with non-contact tonometer as part of the routine follow up examinations Description A questionnaire will be handed out to the surgeon right after the surgery to document the ease of use and possible issues during IOL implantation. These data will be used to compare the outcomes to different surgery techniques or injectors. The questionnaire is not validated and the outcomes serve only for the sponsor to receive feedback if one or the other IOL is easier to implant. Description Keratometric measurements are performed to calculate the required IOL power Description Biometry measurements are performed to calculate the required IOL power

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193366322 Sequence: 193366323 Sequence: 193366324
Mesh Term Cataract Mesh Term Lens Diseases Mesh Term Eye Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term cataract Downcase Mesh Term lens diseases Downcase Mesh Term eye diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48290663
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Beaver-Visitec International, Inc.

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29268504
Role Principal Investigator
Name Pavel Stodůlka, MD, PhD
Affiliation Gemini Eye Clinic

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68107374 Sequence: 68107375
Design Group Id 55559283 Design Group Id 55559284
Intervention Id 52454847 Intervention Id 52454848

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30747690
Gender All
Minimum Age 45 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Cataractous eyes with no comorbidity
Availability, willingness and sufficient cognitive awareness to comply with examination procedures
Clear intraocular media other than cataract;
Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Age of patient < 45 years;
Irregular astigmatism;
Regular corneal astigmatism >0.75 dioptres by an automatic keratometer or biometer or >1.0 dioptres if the steep axis of cylinder is between 90° and 120°;
Difficulty for cooperation (distance from their home, general health condition);
Previous intraocular or corneal surgery;
Traumatic cataract;
Any ocular comorbidity;
Instability of keratometry or biometry measurements.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254121751
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 28
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 45
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 17
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 4

Designs

Sequence: 30493973
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28860253
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Phenotypic and Functional Study of 4BL B Cells in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796611
2020-12-31

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796611
NCT03796611https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796611?tab=tableHélène ZEPHIR, MD, PhDhelene.zephir@chru-lille.fr3 20 44 68 46Recent works highlight the B cells involvement in multiple sclerosis (MS) pathology but their role remains poorly understood. It was previously described that activated memory B cells called 4BL due to the increased expression of 4-1BBL, an activation marker, induce pro-inflammatory response by activating T CD8+ lymphocytes. Those 4BL cells are also described in systemic inflammation in 80 years old people explaining the poor efficiency of vaccination in that sub population. Those 4BL cells can also induce anti-tumoral T cell response.

The hypothesize is that 4BL may induce a pathogenic inflammatory response in MS.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-09-16
Start Month Year December 2020
Primary Completion Month Year October 2022
Verification Month Year September 2020
Verification Date 2020-09-30
Last Update Posted Date 2020-09-16

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20762972
Description the aim to compare the proportion of peripheral (blood) 4 BL cells but also 4-BL cells in cerebro spinal fluid (CSF) in MS compared to healthy controls and to other inflammatory neurological disease but also non inflammatory neurological disease.

For all groups of patients and controls it will collect blood and CSF only once (at diagnosis time for patients).

Blood collect from healthy controls will come from transfusion volunteers and we won't have CSF from them.

For patients from the MS group, the blood collect will be sequential at diagnosis, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after during the follow up.

In the blood and CSF we will evaluate:

percentage of 4 BL cells. 4 BL cells are found using cytometric parameters
capacity of 4 BL cells to induce inflammatory response in vitro: percentage of induced activated TCD8 proliferation after cell culture using extracellular and intracellular cytometric parameters

Conditions

Sequence: 52277551
Name Multiple Sclerosis
Downcase Name multiple sclerosis

Id Information

Sequence: 40235528 Sequence: 40235529
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value 2016_04 Id Value 2017-A00835-48
Id Type Other Identifier
Id Type Description ID-RCB number, ANSM

Design Groups

Sequence: 55711690 Sequence: 55711691 Sequence: 55711692 Sequence: 55711693
Title multiple sclerosis patient Title other neurological inflammatory disease Title neurological non inflammatory disease Title healthy controls
Description MS is defined according to McDonald criteria 2017. MS patients included have a disease duration of less than 1 year Description autoimmune encephalitis, myasthenia gravis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculitis Description benign intracranial hypertension, degenerative disorder Description transfusion volunteers from transfusion center

Keywords

Sequence: 80019112 Sequence: 80019113
Name immunology Name B cells
Downcase Name immunology Downcase Name b cells

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177770952 Sequence: 177770953 Sequence: 177770954 Sequence: 177770955 Sequence: 177770956
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other
Measure the percentage of 4 BL cells in blood between MS patients and healthy controls Measure the percentage of 4 BL cells in blood between MS patients and patients with inflammatory and non inflammatory neurological disease Measure the percentage of 4 BL cells in CSF between MS patients and patients with inflammatory and non inflammatory neurological disease Measure to analyse over time the evolution of 4BL percentages in blood in MS patients Measure biological bank with mononuclear cells from all the groups fo that study
Time Frame Baseline: one session Time Frame Baseline: one session Time Frame Baseline: one session Time Frame 5 blood collection at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after baseline Time Frame through study completion, an average of 2 years
Description 4 BL are defined using cytometric parameters Description 4 BL are defined using cytometric parameters Description 4 BL are defined using cytometric parameters Description 4 BL are defined using cytometric parameters Description to constitute at Baseline a biological bank with mononuclear cells from all the groups fo that study

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193893202 Sequence: 193893203 Sequence: 193893204 Sequence: 193893205 Sequence: 193893206 Sequence: 193893207 Sequence: 193893208 Sequence: 193893209 Sequence: 193893210
Mesh Term Multiple Sclerosis Mesh Term Sclerosis Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS Mesh Term Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Demyelinating Diseases Mesh Term Autoimmune Diseases Mesh Term Immune System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term multiple sclerosis Downcase Mesh Term sclerosis Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term demyelinating autoimmune diseases, cns Downcase Mesh Term autoimmune diseases of the nervous system Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term demyelinating diseases Downcase Mesh Term autoimmune diseases Downcase Mesh Term immune system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48418732
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University Hospital, Lille

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29342669
Role Principal Investigator
Name Hélène ZEPHIR, MD, PhD
Affiliation University Hospital, Lille

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12034511
Contact Type primary
Name Hélène ZEPHIR, MD, PhD
Phone 3 20 44 68 46
Email helene.zephir@chru-lille.fr
Phone Extension +33
Role Contact

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30827088
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 60 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Population MS patients and controls: healthy controls and patients having non-MS neurological inflammatory disease and patients having other non inflammatory neurological disease.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria for MS group:

MS defined by McDonald 2017 criteria with a disease duration of less than 1 year
between 18 and 60 years old patients
naïve of any immune therapy or steroid intake
patients who signed consent to the study

Inclusion Criteria for controls with inflammatory of non inflammatory neurological disease:

patients who signed consent to the study
between 18 and 60 years old patients
naïve of any steroid intake or immune therapy

Inclusion criteria for healthy controls:

control who signed consent at transfusion center for their blood collect to be used for study
between 18 and 60 years old patients
naïve of any steroid intake or immune therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

pregnancy or breast-feeding
patients or controls unable to sign the consent or to consent

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254123869
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 60
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30573018
Observational Model Case-Control
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28939440
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ FMT in Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796598
2019-07-29

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796598
NCT03796598https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796598?tab=tableEdith A Gavis, RNedith.gavis@va.gov(804) 675-5584Patients with end stage of liver disease or cirrhosis can develop confusion due to high ammonia and inflammation. This confusion is brought upon by changes in the bacteria in the bowels and may not respond to current standard of care treatments. Repeated episodes of confusion can make it difficult for patients to function and may result in multiple admissions to the hospital and burden on the family. The investigators have studied using a healthy person’s stool to replace the bowel bacteria, called fecal microbial transplant, in small studies with good results. In this trial the investigators propose to perform these procedures using an upper and lower route in Veterans who suffer from this condition and follow them for safety and hospitalizations over 6 months. The investigators will compare this to placebo treatments and hope that this intervention can improve the health and daily functioning of affected patients.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-27
Start Month Year July 29, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year June 24, 2024
Verification Month Year February 2023
Verification Date 2023-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-27

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20698245
Description Indication: Cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy

Study Objectives: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of fecal transplant in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy

Rationale and Supporting Evidence:

Hepatic encephalopathy affects 30-45% of patients with cirrhosis and adversely affects survival in these patients. The mainstay of treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (HE) has long been the manipulation of the gut flora through antibiotics, prebiotics or probiotics. The current first and second line therapies for HE in the US are lactulose and rifaximin respectively that uniquely act within the confines of the gut lumen with encouraging clinical results. However, there is a subset of patients with HE that continues to recur despite being on both treatments. This patient group is at a higher risk of poor outcomes because HE has now been removed from liver transplant priority and multiple episodes of HE can result in cumulative brain injury which may be irreversible. Therefore, the prevention of recurrent HE is an important therapeutic goal.

The investigators' group and other reports have shown that patients with HE and cirrhosis are more likely to have overgrowth of potentially pathogenic bacterial taxa such as Enterobacteriaceae and reduction of autochthonous species such as Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in the stool and the colonic mucosa. This has been linked to poor performance on cognitive tests that are a hallmark of HE and with increased systemic inflammation in these patients.

Therefore, a gut-based therapeutic option that can potentially improve the recurrence rate and the overall prognosis is needed. Fecal transplant has been shown to be effective in conditions with predominant gut-bacterial overgrowth or alteration such as recurrent Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Safe protocols have been developed across the world and studies are being performed in the US under FDA-monitored INDs. Limitations to performing fecal transplant include identifying and screening appropriate donors, which is time consuming and costly, with the cost typically falling to the patient or donor as the required screening is generally not covered by insurance.

The investigators' preliminary data suggest that a one-time administration of an FMT-enema using a rationally-selected donor is safe in patients with cirrhosis and recurrent HE. However, given the small bowel overgrowth and the predominantly small bowel location for bacterial translocation in cirrhosis, which is out of the reach of an enema, an upper GI route for FMT needs to be explored. In the investigators' published experience, a single enema from a rationally-derived donor was associated with significantly lower total and HE-related hospitalizations compared to patients who were randomized to standard of care, with a stable long-term course over >1 year. The investigators' data show that FMT was associated with favorable changes in fecal bile acid (BA) profile with a decrease in proportions of fecal secondary BAs, conjugated BAs and increase in sulfated BAs, indicating a healthier milieu. The investigators also have preliminary data defining the safety of oral FMT capsules in patients with cirrhosis and HE in a current trial led by us. The use of combined oral and rectal routes of FMT, which can potentially alleviate both small bowel and colonic translocation are likely to be better than either alone.

Overall aim: To determine the effect of dual oral and rectal administration of FMT from a rational donor on clinical outcomes (hospitalizations, brain function, quality of life) and host-microbiota interactions (microbial composition and bile acid composition with systemic and intestinal inflammation), compared to single route of administration and placebo, along with a second oral capsular FMT vs placebo administration in cirrhotic patients with HE using a randomized, phase II clinical trial.

Design overview: Four groups of outpatients with cirrhosis will be randomized using random sequence generator into placebo and FMT groups and followed for 6 months under an FDA IND double-blind clinical trial.

Facilities

Sequence: 199800418
Status Recruiting
Name Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA
City Richmond
State Virginia
Zip 23249
Country United States

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28076463 Sequence: 28076464
Facility Id 199800418 Facility Id 199800418
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Edith A Gavis, RN Name Jasmohan S Bajaj, MD MS
Email edith.gavis@va.gov Email Jasmohan.Bajaj@va.gov
Phone 804-675-5584 Phone (804) 675-5802

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18312189
Facility Id 199800418
Role Principal Investigator
Name Jasmohan S. Bajaj, MD MS

Conditions

Sequence: 52107620 Sequence: 52107621
Name Cirrhosis Name Hepatic Encephalopathy
Downcase Name cirrhosis Downcase Name hepatic encephalopathy

Id Information

Sequence: 40109200 Sequence: 40109201
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value GAST-001-18S Id Value CX001076
Id Type Other Grant/Funding Number
Id Type Description Office of Research and Development, VA

Countries

Sequence: 42511976
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55524286 Sequence: 55524287 Sequence: 55524288 Sequence: 55524289
Group Type Placebo Comparator Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Experimental
Title Placebo Title Group 3: Oral placebo and rectal FMT Title Group 2: Oral FMT and rectal placebo Title Group 1: Dual Oral and rectal FMT
Description Oral and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30 Description Oral placebo and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral placebo at day 30 Description Oral FMT and rectal placebo at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30 Description Dual Oral and rectal FMT at visit 2 Oral FMT at day 30

Interventions

Sequence: 52421910 Sequence: 52421911 Sequence: 52421912
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Other
Name Fecal Microbial transplant Capsules Name Fecal Microbial Transplant Enema Name Placebo
Description Oral capsules of FMT Description FMT enema Description Placebo

Keywords

Sequence: 79768005 Sequence: 79768006 Sequence: 79768007
Name fecal microbial transplant Name cirrhosis Name hepatic encephalopathy
Downcase Name fecal microbial transplant Downcase Name cirrhosis Downcase Name hepatic encephalopathy

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177157102 Sequence: 177157103 Sequence: 177157104 Sequence: 177157105 Sequence: 177157106 Sequence: 177157107 Sequence: 177157108
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Serious adverse events related to FMT Measure Adverse events related to FMT Measure Change in microbial diversity in stool Measure Sickness Impact Profile change Measure EncephalApp performance change Measure Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) change Measure Change in microbial diversity in saliva
Time Frame 6 months Time Frame 6 months Time Frame 6 months Time Frame 30 days and 6 months Time Frame 30 days, 60 days and 6 months Time Frame 30 days, 60 days and 6 months Time Frame 6 months
Description Number of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT Description Number of adverse events that do not fit the criteria of serious adverse events between groups related to FMT Description Shannon diversity index compared to baseline and engraftment related to the donor at baseline, within 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10 Description Quality of life assessment change defined by Sickness Impact Profile total score at 30 days and 6 months between groups. This is a percentage result ranges usually from 0-100 Description Cognitive assessment change using the OffTime+OnTime in seconds between groups at 30 days, 60 days and 6 months Description Cognitive assessment change using the total PHES score between groups at 30 days, 60 days and 6 months. This ranges from -15 to +5 Description Shannon diversity index compared to baseline at 30 days and then monthly till 6 months. Ranges usually from 0-10

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193238222 Sequence: 193238223 Sequence: 193238224 Sequence: 193238225 Sequence: 193238226 Sequence: 193238227 Sequence: 193238228 Sequence: 193238229 Sequence: 193238230 Sequence: 193238231 Sequence: 193238232 Sequence: 193238233 Sequence: 193238234
Mesh Term Liver Cirrhosis Mesh Term Hepatic Encephalopathy Mesh Term Brain Diseases Mesh Term Fibrosis Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Liver Diseases Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases Mesh Term Central Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Liver Failure Mesh Term Hepatic Insufficiency Mesh Term Brain Diseases, Metabolic Mesh Term Metabolic Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term liver cirrhosis Downcase Mesh Term hepatic encephalopathy Downcase Mesh Term brain diseases Downcase Mesh Term fibrosis Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term liver diseases Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term liver failure Downcase Mesh Term hepatic insufficiency Downcase Mesh Term brain diseases, metabolic Downcase Mesh Term metabolic diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48261299
Agency Class FED
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name VA Office of Research and Development

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29249227
Role Principal Investigator
Name Jasmohan S. Bajaj, MD MS
Affiliation Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA

Central Contacts

Sequence: 11994963 Sequence: 11994964
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Jasmohan S Bajaj, MD MS Name Edith A Gavis, RN
Phone (804) 675-5802 Phone (804) 675-5584
Email Jasmohan.Bajaj@va.gov Email edith.gavis@va.gov
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68064678 Sequence: 68064679 Sequence: 68064680 Sequence: 68064681 Sequence: 68064682 Sequence: 68064683
Design Group Id 55524289 Design Group Id 55524288 Design Group Id 55524289 Design Group Id 55524287 Design Group Id 55524287 Design Group Id 55524286
Intervention Id 52421910 Intervention Id 52421910 Intervention Id 52421911 Intervention Id 52421911 Intervention Id 52421912 Intervention Id 52421912

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30729206
Gender All
Minimum Age 21 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Cirrhosis diagnosed by either of the following in a patient with chronic liver disease

Liver Biopsy
Radiologic evidence of varices, cirrhosis or portal hypertension
Laboratory evidence of platelet count <100,000 or AST/ALT ratio>1
Endoscopic evidence of varices or portal gastropathy
Fibroscan values suggestive of cirrhosis
On treatment for hepatic encephalopathy (patient can be on lactulose and rifaximin)
Able to give written, informed consent (demonstrated by mini-mental status exam>25 at the time of consenting)
Women of child bearing potential must agree to use effective contraception for the duration of the study and for 10 days prior and 30 days after the study
Negative pregnancy test in women of childbearing age

Exclusion Criteria:

MELD score >22
WBC count <1000 cells/mm3
Platelet count<25,000/mm3
TIPS in place for less than a month
Currently on antibiotics apart from rifaximin
Infection at the time of the FMT (diagnosed by blood culture positivity, urinalysis, paracentesis as needed)
Hospitalization for any non-elective cause within the last 1 month
Patients who are pregnant or nursing (will be checked using a urine pregnancy test)
Patients who are incarcerated
Patients who are incapable of giving their own informed consent

Patients who are immuno-compromised due to the following reasons:

HIV infection (any CD4 count)
Inherited/primary immune disorders
Current or recent (<3 mos) treatment with anti-neoplastic agent

Current or recent (<3 mos) treatment with any immunosuppressant medications [including but not limited to monoclonal antibodies to B and T cells, anti-TNF agents, glucocorticoids, antimetabolites (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine), calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus, cyclosporine), mycophenolate mofetil].

Subjects who are otherwise immunocompetent and have discontinued any immunosuppressant medications 3 or more months prior to enrollment may be eligible to enroll
Patients on renal replacement therapy
Patients with untreated, in-situ colorectal cancer

Patients with a history of chronic intrinsic GI diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease

ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease or microscopic colitis

eosinophilic gastroenteritis or celiac disease
Major gastro-intestinal or intra-abdominal surgery in the last three months

Other Exclusion Criteria:

Enema-related

Platelet count<25,000
Grade IV hemorrhoids

Safety-related:

Dysphagia
History of aspiration, gastroparesis, intestinal obstruction
Ongoing antibiotic use (except for Rifaximin)
Severe anaphylactic food allergy
Allergy to ingredients Generally Recognized As Safe in the FMT capsules (glycerol, sodium chloride, hypromellose, gellan gum, titanium dioxide, theobroma oil)
Adverse event attributable to prior FMT
ASA Class IV or V
Pregnant or nursing patients
Acute illness or fever within 48 hours of the day of planned FMT
Immunocompromised due to medical conditions
Probiotics use within the last 48 hours of the day of planned FMT
Any condition that the physician investigators deem unsafe, including other conditions or medications that the investigator determines puts the participant at greater risk from FMT

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253985567
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 21
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30475615
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Intervention Model Description Subjects will be divided into 4 groups via randomization

Group 1: Dual oral and rectal FMT, Group 2: Oral FMT and rectal placebo, Group 3: Oral placebo and rectal FMT and Group 4: Oral and rectal placebo

Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28842026
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Assessing Barriers and Increasing Use of Immunization Registries in Pharmacies ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796585
2019-01-10

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796585
NCT03796585https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796585?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this study is to identify barriers to utilization of immunization registries within a pharmacy context and tailor the information into a novel immunization registry training program.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-10-30
Start Month Year January 10, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year September 15, 2019
Verification Month Year October 2019
Verification Date 2019-10-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-10-30

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735705
Description The purpose of this study is to identify barriers to utilization of immunization registries within a pharmacy context and tailor the information learned about barriers into a novel immunization registry training program with strategies specific to individual subsets of pharmacies, independent pharmacies in rural areas. Doing so will help achieve the long-term goal which is to increase the use of immunization registries in community pharmacies in Alabama.

The specific aims are to

identify barriers and best practices of immunization registry implementation,
use a participatory design approach to develop an immunization registry training program, and
disseminate and assess the impact of the immunization registry training program among community pharmacies' registry participation rates.

The impact of the training program on registry participation rates will be assessed using a randomized controlled trial design comparing Alabama community pharmacies' registry data as well as intention to participate.

Facilities

Sequence: 200243938
Name Auburn University
City Auburn
State Alabama
Zip 36849
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52207888
Name Immunization
Downcase Name immunization

Id Information

Sequence: 40186029
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 1R36HS026093-01A1
Id Type U.S. AHRQ Grant/Contract
Id Link https://reporter.nih.gov/quickSearch/1R36HS026093-01A1

Countries

Sequence: 42599533
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55634488 Sequence: 55634489
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Intervention Title Control
Description Pharmacists assigned to this group will receive an immunization registry training program and informational flyer. Description Pharmacists assigned to this group will receive an informational flyer. They will not receive training.

Interventions

Sequence: 52521905 Sequence: 52521904
Intervention Type Behavioral Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Informational flyer Name Immunization Registry Training
Description Informational flyer with ImmPRINT contact information Description Education highlighting practical strategies to improve pharmacies' willingness to adopt the immunization registry and improve their ability to integrate the immunization registry into their pharmacy workflow.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177510609 Sequence: 177510610 Sequence: 177510611 Sequence: 177510612 Sequence: 177510613 Sequence: 177510614 Sequence: 177510615
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Number of pharmacies enrolled in the Alabama Immunization Registry Measure Level of Immunization Registry Participation Measure Change in awareness Measure Change in knowledge Measure Change in attitudes Measure Change in intention to enroll in immunization registry Measure Change in Implementation Factors
Time Frame 3 months Time Frame 3 months Time Frame 1 month and 3 months Time Frame 1 month and 3 months Time Frame 1 month and 3 months Time Frame 1 month and 3 months Time Frame 3 months
Description The change in the number of participant pharmacies enrolled in the Alabama immunization registry from baseline to 3 months. Description Proportion of self-reported doses administered that are verified in the immunization registry. Description The change in participant awareness of immunization registries from baseline to 3 months assessed by online questionnaire at baseline, one month, and three months. Awareness will be measured using three true or false items. Each item will be scored, 0 for an incorrect answer and 1 for a correct answer. Awareness index is the sum of the 3 items and could range from 0-3 with higher values representing greater awareness. Description The extent to which participant is familiar with and understands immunization registries will be assessed via online questionnaire at baseline, one month, and three months. Eight true or false and multiple answer items will be used to measure knowledge. Each item will be scored, 0 for an incorrect answer and 1 for a correct answer. Knowledge is the sum of the 8 items and could range from 0-8 with higher values representing greater knowledge. Description Participant's perceptions toward attributes of the immunization registry assessed via online questionnaire at baseline, one month, and three months. A scale including 25 Likert-type items will be used to measure attitudes. Each Likert-type item will be scored, ranging from 0 for strongly disagree to 6 for strongly agree. Mean scores will be calculated for the 25 items in the scale so that attitudes score range from 0 to 6 with higher values indicating greater positive attitudes. Description Participant's likelihood to enroll their pharmacy in the immunization registry assessed via online questionnaire at baseline and one month. A scale including 3 Likert-type items will be used to measure intention. Each Likert-type item will be scored, ranging from 0 for strongly disagree to 6 for strongly agree. Mean scores will be calculated for the three items in the scale so that intention score ranges from 0 to 6 with higher values indicating greater intention. Description Implementation factors informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) including innovation characteristics, characteristics of individuals, inner setting, outer setting, and process will be assessed via online questionnaire at baseline and three months. A scale including 42 Likert-type items will be used to measure Implementation Factors. Each Likert-type item will be scored, ranging from 0 for strongly disagree to 6 for strongly agree. Mean scores will be calculated so that the implementation factors score ranges from 0 to 6 with higher values indicating greater positive influence of CFIR implementation factors.

Sponsors

Sequence: 48353536 Sequence: 48353537
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class FED
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Auburn University Name Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68198973 Sequence: 68198974 Sequence: 68198975
Design Group Id 55634488 Design Group Id 55634489 Design Group Id 55634488
Intervention Id 52521904 Intervention Id 52521905 Intervention Id 52521905

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30786771
Gender All
Minimum Age 19 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

not currently enrolled in ImmPRINT
currently provide at least one type of vaccination in addition to influenza
independently owned
agree to provide requested data for assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989429
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 8
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 19
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30532842
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Health Services Research
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899135
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Tessa Hastings
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation Auburn University

Study References

Sequence: 52102857
Pmid 35292212
Reference Type derived
Citation Hastings TJ, Ha D, Fox BI, Qian J, Lakin J, Westrick SC. Increasing use of immunization information systems for routine vaccinations in independent community pharmacies: A randomized controlled trial. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Jul-Aug;62(4):1270-1279.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.02.010. Epub 2022 Feb 19.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Regional Blocks for Lateral Condyle Fractures ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796572
2019-09-16

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796572
NCT03796572https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796572?tab=tableSierra M Pinal, BSspinal@mednet.ucla.edu2137421057The purpose of this study is to investigate the post-operative pain control in pediatric patients with closed lateral condyle fractures who undergo open reduction and percutaneous pinning. Patients will be randomized into one of two groups. Group 1 will receive an infraclavicular nerve block to the affected extremity by a fellowship trained pediatric anesthesiologist prior to surgery. Group 2 will undergo the Orthopaedic Institute of Children’s (OIC) standard preoperative protocol. Post-operative pain management will be the same for both groups per standard protocol. Pain level will be assessed post-operatively using the Wong-Baker FACES scale and parents will be asked to fill out a questionnaire regarding their satisfaction with the surgery and pain control. Parents will also fill out a medication log until the patient no longer requires pain medication. All patients in both groups will receive standard oxycodone solution prescriptions post-operatively as per typical protocol. The duration of participation in the study is approximately 1 week and requires 2 visits (time of recruitment at surgery and 1st post-op visit). This study is being conducted in hopes of developing comprehensive pain management protocols to reduce opioid consumption after surgical fixations of displaced lateral condyle fractures if the study can show that patients are more satisfied and require less opioid medication when receiving preoperative regional anesthesia.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-04-27
Start Month Year September 16, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 7, 2024
Verification Month Year April 2021
Verification Date 2021-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2021-04-27

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20721560
Description This is a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial evaluating the analgesic efficacy of infraclavicular regional blocks for postoperative pain control in patients following open reduction and percutaneous pinning for isolated closed lateral condyle fractures. Each patient will be evaluated initially at OIC's pediatric urgent care center and placed in a long arm splint with instructions to elevate the affected arm. Patients will not be discharged with any prescriptions for narcotic pain medication and will be instructed to take weight-based doses of acetaminophen and/or ibuprofen for pain control as needed.

All patients age 4-12 with isolated closed Weiss classification type II and III (>2mm displacement) lateral condyle fractures requiring fixation (e.g. satisfactory reduction not achieved with closed reduction and casting) will be approached for participation in the study. Demographic data (age, gender, weight, height, ethnicity, primary language spoken at home, insurance type) will be obtained through chart review on each included patient.

The exclusion criteria include open fractures, fractures with concomitant vascular or neurologic deficit, pathologic fractures, those presenting with concomitant injuries, swelling requiring post-operative hospitalization for monitoring, any known history of allergies to ropivacaine or oxycodone, and patients with developmental delay that would preclude participation in the visual analog Faces Pain Scale-Revised. Informed consent will be obtained from all parents who wish to participate in the study, and assent will be obtained from patients when possible. If parents refuse participation in the study, the reason for refusal will be documented, and their child's care and post-operative protocol will be consistent with typical protocol at OIC.

All surgeries will be performed at the outpatient surgery center at OIC. Prior to surgery each patient will be randomized into one of two treatment groups. The group selected to undergo regional anesthesia will receive a single-stick ultrasound-guided infraclavicular nerve block to the affected extremity by a fellowship-trained pediatric anesthesiologist in the operating room using standard sterile technique. For each block ropivacaine 0.5% will be administered up to a max of 0.5 mL/kg until appropriate US-guided spread is achieved. Block duration and volume of ropivacaine used will be recorded, as will any immediate complications encountered (e.g. failed block). Participants randomized to the no regional anesthesia group will not receive any additional anesthetic prior to surgery and will undergo OIC's standard preoperative protocol. All patients in both groups will receive general anesthesia per standard protocol. All patients will undergo open reduction and percutaneous pinning using 2-3 pins placed laterally by two pediatric orthopedic surgeons (Dr. Mauricio Silva and Dr. Rachel Thompson). Participants will all be placed in posterior long arm splints thereafter and made non-weight bearing in that extremity. The patients will be transferred to OIC's post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), where morphine IV 0.1mg/kg will be utilized as needed before discharge home. Nursing staff will record the amount of pain medication provided in the PACU, as well as the pre-discharge pain scores, as is typical post-operative protocol. Prior to discharge a prescription for oxycodone solution 0.1 mg/kg PO q4-6 hours as needed will be given to all participants in both groups with instructions on medication administration and how to fill out the home medication log as per typical OIC post-operative protocol.

Post-operatively, the parents of each participant will be asked to use the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) to rate the child's level of pain at 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery. A research team member will call each participant's guardian at 24 and 48 hours post-operatively to collect these responses. Parents will further be asked to complete the modified Total Quality Pain Management Instrument (TQPM) regarding their level of satisfaction with surgery and post-operative pain control. Parents will be asked to report any side effects (e.g. nausea, vomiting, lethargy, constipation) associated with the medications. Parents will also be asked about any side effects (e.g. swelling, redness, hematoma, prolonged block) from the regional anesthesia. A take-home medication log will be utilized by the parents to record the type and amount of mediation given to each participant and to record any associated side effects.

Facilities

Sequence: 200107763
Status Recruiting
Name Orthopaedic Institute for Children
City Los Angeles
State California
Zip 90007
Country United States

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28106370 Sequence: 28106371
Facility Id 200107763 Facility Id 200107763
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Mauricio Silva, MD Name Samantha C Bauer, MS
Email msilva@mednet.ucla.edu Email SBauer@mednet.ucla.edu
Phone 213-742-1369 Phone 2137426537
Phone Extension 6537

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18332474
Facility Id 200107763
Role Principal Investigator
Name Mauricio Silva, MD

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96049968 Sequence: 96049969 Sequence: 96049970 Sequence: 96049971 Sequence: 96049972 Sequence: 96049973 Sequence: 96049974
Mesh Term Ropivacaine Mesh Term Anesthetics, Local Mesh Term Anesthetics Mesh Term Central Nervous System Depressants Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Sensory System Agents Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Downcase Mesh Term ropivacaine Downcase Mesh Term anesthetics, local Downcase Mesh Term anesthetics Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system depressants Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term sensory system agents Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52171053 Sequence: 52171054 Sequence: 52171055
Name Fractures, Closed Name Humeral Fractures Name Pain
Downcase Name fractures, closed Downcase Name humeral fractures Downcase Name pain

Id Information

Sequence: 40158503
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 18-001552

Countries

Sequence: 42568815
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55592988 Sequence: 55592989
Group Type Experimental Group Type Sham Comparator
Title Infraclavicular Regional Block Title Puncture Wound
Description This group is given ropivacaine 0.5% up to a max of .5 ml/kg until appropriate ultrasound guided spread is achieved. Description This group is given the same puncture wound and dressing given to the experimental group.

Interventions

Sequence: 52485302 Sequence: 52485303
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Other
Name Ropivacaine Name Puncture Wound and Dressing
Description Regional anesthesia protocol of open reduction percutaneous pinning of lateral condyle humerus fracture Ropivacaine Description No regional anesthesia is given for open reduction percutaneous pinning of lateral condyle humerus fracture

Keywords

Sequence: 79868224 Sequence: 79868225 Sequence: 79868226
Name lateral condyle Name infraclavicular Name regional block
Downcase Name lateral condyle Downcase Name infraclavicular Downcase Name regional block

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177378105 Sequence: 177378106 Sequence: 177378107 Sequence: 177378108
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Change in Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale-Revised (FPSR) Measure Total Quality Pain Management (TQPM) Instrument: 30 question questionnaire Measure Pain Medication Logs (Amount Taken) Measure Pain Medication Logs (Side Effects)
Time Frame 24 hours, 48 hours, and 1 week post-operatively Time Frame 1 week at first post-operative follow-up Time Frame Immediately after surgery. Until the patient returns to first post-operative visit, 7-10 days post-operatively, assess up to 10 days. Time Frame Immediately after surgery. Until the patient returns to first post-operative visit, 7-10 days post-operatively, assess up to 10 days.
Description Self reported measure of pain on scale ranging from 0 to 10. 0 (best) equals no pain and 10 (worst) equals worse pain imaginable. Description 30 question questionnaire used to measure the quality of children's post-operative pain management in which parents and patients are asked multiple questions. Questions are partitioned into the following categories: "What were you told about the hurt or pain?", "How did the pain medicine make you feel?", "How long did the hurt or pain last?", "How much hurt or pain did you feel?", "How happy were you with the pain?", and "Tell us how we could get an A+ for taking the hurt or pain away." Specific questions were aimed at gaining information on the following topics: post-operative pain management including domains in pain experience, pain relief, adverse affects, and future analgesic uses. The majority of the questions are binary (yes or no) and there are a few questions that include mild (best), moderate, and severe (worst) option. There is no numerical output or subscales; every question is evaluated independently and not combined for summary scores. Description Self report take home medications logs recording time, type, and dosage of medication to record total amount of medication (mg) taken by patient. Description Self report take home medications logs recording associated side effects of medication taken.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193485973 Sequence: 193485974 Sequence: 193485975 Sequence: 193485976 Sequence: 193485977
Mesh Term Fractures, Bone Mesh Term Humeral Fractures Mesh Term Fractures, Closed Mesh Term Wounds and Injuries Mesh Term Arm Injuries
Downcase Mesh Term fractures, bone Downcase Mesh Term humeral fractures Downcase Mesh Term fractures, closed Downcase Mesh Term wounds and injuries Downcase Mesh Term arm injuries
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48319111
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University of California, Los Angeles

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12008832 Sequence: 12008833
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Samantha C Bauer, MS Name Sierra M Pinal, BS
Phone 2137426537 Phone 2137421057
Email SBauer@mednet.ucla.edu Email spinal@mednet.ucla.edu
Phone Extension 6537 Phone Extension 1057
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68148922 Sequence: 68148923
Design Group Id 55592988 Design Group Id 55592989
Intervention Id 52485302 Intervention Id 52485303

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30765244
Gender All
Minimum Age 4 Years
Maximum Age 12 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Isolated lateral condyle humerus fracture
Closed lateral condyle humerus fracture
Weiss classification type II and III (>2mm displacement) lateral condyle fractures
Fractures treated with open reduction percutaneous pinning requiring fixation

Exclusion Criteria:

Open fractures
Fractures with concomitant vascular or neurologic deficit
Pathologic fractures
Those presenting with concomitant injuries
Swelling requiring post-operative hospitalization for monitoring
Any known history of allergies to ropivacaine or oxycodone
Patients with developmental delay that would preclude participation in the visual analog Faces Pain Scale-Revised

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253875075
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 4
Maximum Age Num 12
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30511411
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Masking Description Randomized envelopes used to allocate treatment groups.
Intervention Model Description Double-blinded randomized control trial
Subject Masked True
Investigator Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28877705
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Mauricio Silva
Title Mauricio Silva, M.D., Associate Clinical Professor, UCLA/Orthopaedic Institute for Children Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Principal Investigator
Affiliation University of California, Los Angeles

]]>

<![CDATA[ Magseed Enabled Long-Term Localization of Axillary Lymph Nodes ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796559
2019-06-13

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796559
NCT03796559https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796559?tab=tableMatt Womack, PhDmwomack@endomag.com+447851247439The purpose of this study is to provide prospective evidence that the use of Magseed/Sentimag in marking axillary lymph nodes and guiding surgical localization in patients with breast cancer following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is effective.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-11-08
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-16
Start Month Year June 13, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 2023
Verification Month Year February 2023
Verification Date 2023-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-16

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20556335
Description This is a post-market, prospective, open-label, single arm study of Magseed and Sentimag in patients with breast cancer with biopsy-proven axillary node metastases who had a clip placed to mark the metastatic node and are having that clipped node selectively removed at surgery following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Subjects will have the Magseed placed to mark axillary lymph nodes with biopsy-proven metastasis under ultrasound guidance before initiating NAC. After completion of NAC, the Magseed will be localized using the Sentimag system during surgery and removed with the targeted lymph node.

Facilities

Sequence: 198466531 Sequence: 198466532
Status Recruiting Status Recruiting
Name Baylor Medicine Name MD Anderson Cancer Center
City Houston City Houston
State Texas State Texas
Zip 77030 Zip 77030
Country United States Country United States

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 27924867 Sequence: 27924868
Facility Id 198466531 Facility Id 198466532
Contact Type primary Contact Type primary
Name Ivan Marin Name Veronika Noregil
Email ivan.marin@bcm.edu Email VYNovegil@mdanderson.org

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18218864
Facility Id 198466532
Role Sub-Investigator
Name Kelly Hunt, MD, F.A.C.S.

Conditions

Sequence: 51746384 Sequence: 51746385
Name Breast Cancer Name Axillary Lymph Nodes
Downcase Name breast cancer Downcase Name axillary lymph nodes

Id Information

Sequence: 39819961
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value US-003

Countries

Sequence: 42219089
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55167194
Group Type Experimental
Title Magseed marker
Description Magseed marker deployed percutaneously, prior to patient undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), under ultrasound guidance to mark a lymph node intended for selective surgical removal post NAC.

Interventions

Sequence: 52067994
Intervention Type Device
Name Magseed Marker
Description Implantable Magseed marker for marking lesions in soft tissue, detected using the Sentimag handheld probe.

Keywords

Sequence: 79173101
Name Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
Downcase Name neo-adjuvant chemotherapy

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176003852 Sequence: 176003853 Sequence: 176003854 Sequence: 176003855 Sequence: 176003856 Sequence: 176003857 Sequence: 176003858
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Retrieval rate of clipped node and Magseed in the excised specimen Measure Rates of device and serious device-related events Measure Radiologic rated ease of Magseed placement Measure Radiologic placement accuracy Measure Radiologic seed position Measure Surgical nodes localized Measure Ease of surgical localization
Time Frame Time of surgery Time Frame Up to 42 days post-surgery Time Frame Time of Magseed marker placement Time Frame Between completion of NAC time of surgery Time Frame After completion of NAC Time Frame Time of surgery Time Frame Time of surgery
Description The retrieval rate of the clipped node and Magseed in the excised specimen. This is defined as the number of subjects in whom the clipped node and Magseed are retrieved in a single excised specimen divided by the total number of subjects. Description Rates of device-related adverse events and serious device-related adverse events Description 5 point Likert scale, very easy = 5, very difficult = 1 Description Success rate of seed placement (placement accuracy) Description Success rate of maintained seed position at the completion of NAC Description Number of nodes retrieved within the surgical specimen containing the Magseed Description 5 point Likert scalevery easy = 5, very difficult = 1

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 191775728 Sequence: 191775729 Sequence: 191775730 Sequence: 191775731 Sequence: 191775732
Mesh Term Breast Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Breast Diseases Mesh Term Skin Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term breast neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term breast diseases Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 47924541 Sequence: 47924542
Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Endomagnetics Inc Name M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29037399
Role Principal Investigator
Name Abigail Caudle, MD, MS
Affiliation MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Central Contacts

Sequence: 11922967
Contact Type primary
Name Matt Womack, PhD
Phone +447851247439
Email mwomack@endomag.com
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67633091
Design Group Id 55167194
Intervention Id 52067994

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30517389
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Age 18 years or older at time of consent
Histologically confirmed cT0-4, N1 breast cancer
Axillary lymph node metastasis with pathologic confirmation by needle biopsy
Clip placed in the sampled axillary lymph node before initiation of chemotherapy
Planned for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgical resection
Eligible for targeted axillary dissection (defined as selective localization and removal of the clipped node and SLND) at the completion of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
ECOG performance status 0-2

Exclusion Criteria:

Distant metastases
Inflammatory breast cancer
Prior ipsilateral axillary surgical procedure including SLND or axillary node excision
Prior history of breast cancer in the ipsilateral breast
History of lymphoma
Subject is pregnant
Previous radiation to the breast or axilla
Pacemaker or other implantable cardiac device in the ipsilateral chest wall

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254069554
Number Of Facilities 2
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30266416
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28646624
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Pediatric Infectious Disease Precision Medicine Using Sequencing Evaluation of CSF ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796546
2019-01-22

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796546
NCT03796546https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796546?tab=tableNANANAProspective, multi-site, study to evaluate the diagnosis rate of DNA and RNA sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid for identification of pathogens directly in patients who have already had a spinal tap to evaluate for infection and were found to have a pleocytosis. Diagnostic rate and clinical utility of concurrent standard testing will be compared to diagnostic rate and clinical utility of DNA and RNA sequencing.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-19
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-11-10
Start Month Year January 22, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year October 7, 2020
Verification Month Year November 2020
Verification Date 2020-11-30
Last Update Posted Date 2020-11-10

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20727562
Description IDbyDNA, Inc. has developed a robust sequencing reference database for viruses, bacteria, fungi and parasites and developed novel analysis methods to analyze next-generation (NGS) sequencing data to rapidly identify infectious agents. This technology suite, known as the Explify™ platform, holds the promise to improve patient care and efficiently guide provider treatment planning for those suffering from infectious disease.

The PIPSEC trial, developed by pediatric physicians specializing in genomic medicine, is intended to facilitate the acquisition of high quality and clinically annotated biospecimens for the purpose of research discovery. This project intends to advance metagenomics, microbial genetics, bioinformatics and data analytics, for pathogen detection utilizing cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) specimens to contribute to the diagnosis of infectious agents impacting the central nervous system among pediatric patients. Clinically annotated specimens will facilitate continued development and validation of the Explify test and its clinical utility for providers treating central nervous system (CNS) infections.

The primary objective is to assess clinical utility of the Explify test compared to concurrent standard of care testing to identify pathogens from CSF fluid within a pediatric patient population.

Facilities

Sequence: 200161382 Sequence: 200161383 Sequence: 200161384
Name CHOC Children's Hospital Orange County Name Rady Children's Hospital Name Nicklaus Children's Hospital
City Orange City San Diego City Miami
State California State California State Florida
Zip 92868 Zip 92123 Zip 33155
Country United States Country United States Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52186460 Sequence: 52186461
Name Infection Name Meningitis
Downcase Name infection Downcase Name meningitis

Id Information

Sequence: 40169761
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value PIPSEC – 01

Countries

Sequence: 42581381
Name United States
Removed False

Keywords

Sequence: 79890177
Name Pediatric
Downcase Name pediatric

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177435469 Sequence: 177435470 Sequence: 177435471 Sequence: 177435472 Sequence: 177435473
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Diagnostic Rate Measure Clinical Utilization Measure Post-Hoc Analysis – Economic Evaluation (1) Measure Post-Hoc Analysis – Economic Evaluation (2) Measure Post-Hoc Analysis – Host Response
Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months Time Frame 24 months
Description Comparison of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of IDbyDNA NGS results with the Explify diagnostic platform compared with standard care. Description Change of Management resulting from NGS diagnosis versus diagnosis based on standard of care. Change of Management is a binary (yes or no) based on assignments made by the PI or designee at each site using the following domains:

Diagnosis specific pharmacological treatment
Diagnosis specific management
Diagnosis specific supportive interventions A change in any of these domains will be considered a change of clinical management for utilization purposes.

Description Economic evaluation of cost of standard of care testing compared to economic cost of NGS testing:

Determination of what diagnosis made could have been made with best possible clinical tests currently available.

Description Cost analysis of what best available testing would have cost. Description RNA sequencing to determine if there is a specific host response to either specific infectious or noninfectious etiologies.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193543662 Sequence: 193543663 Sequence: 193543664 Sequence: 193543665
Mesh Term Infections Mesh Term Meningitis Mesh Term Neuroinflammatory Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term infections Downcase Mesh Term meningitis Downcase Mesh Term neuroinflammatory diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48333181 Sequence: 48333182
Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name IDbyDNA, Inc. Name Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30774159
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 0 Years
Maximum Age 17 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Population This project will enroll children who are having an evaluation for central nervous system (CNS) infection and have already had a lumbar puncture to obtain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to evaluate for infection and host immune response. As such enrolled patients will be undergoing an evaluation for suspected meningitis, encephalitis, ventriculitis and VP shunt infection.

Patients in whom there is CSF remaining after standard testing has been obtained and who meet the other inclusion criteria will be approached for enrollment in the study.

Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Age 0-17 years of age (not yet 18)
Clinical evaluation for CNS infection
CSF white blood cell count (WBC) > 15 cells/µL when there are less than 5000 RBCs on same
Admitted to a participating study site
CSF obtained per standard protocol
1 mL of appropriately stored CSF is available following completion of all standard of care testing

Exclusion Criteria:

CSF Red blood cell (RBC) count > 5000 cells/µL on same CSF sample as with pleocytosis
Unable to obtain consent

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253955427
Number Of Facilities 3
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 20
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 0
Maximum Age Num 17
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30520287
Observational Model Other
Time Perspective Prospective

Links

Sequence: 4389291
Url http://idbydna.com
Description Sponsor Website

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886591
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Pharmacokinetics Variability of Posaconazole (PCZ) and Its Glucuronide Metabolite During Induction and Consolidation Treatments in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): a Covariate Analysis With the Tablets Formulation and Evaluation of the Potential Risk of Hepatotoxicity ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796533
2018-12-10

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796533
NCT03796533https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796533?tab=tableMohamed EL HAMRImohamed.el-hamri@chu-lyon.fr04 78 86 22 20Among its authorized indications, posaconazole (PCZ) is prescribed for prophylaxis in onco-hematology patients at high risk of invasive fungal infections. This azole antifungal has a low bioavailability. The enteric-coated tablets form available since mid-2015 has significantly improved its pharmacokinetic profile compared to the oral suspension form initially used. According to the recommendations of The European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-6), the minimum serum concentration desirable for prophylaxis is 0.7 mg/L. This concentration threshold was difficult to achieve in onco-hematology patients treated with oral suspension.

The investigators retrospectively collected and analyzed 201 results of residual PCZ serum concentrations from 91 onco-hematology patients on Noxafil® tablets prophylaxis. The median concentration of PCZ was 1.08 mg/L. In this study, the pharmacokinetics of tablet-PCZ showed significant inter-individual variability. Thus, while 25% of the concentrations remained below the recommended threshold of 0.7 mg/L (25% percentile = 0.69 mg/L), exposure to PCZ was greater than 2.63 mg/L in 10% of cases. This level of exposure, however, did not have obvious hepatic repercussions. Nevertheless, further studies involving larger cohorts are needed to clarify a hypothetical relationship between serum PCZ concentration and the occurrence of hepatic toxicity.

In addition, the investigators found significant intra-individual variability in PCZ exposure (CV = 48.8%), especially in leukemic patients. This variability is probably related to a modification during the treatment of the physio-pathological conditions of the patient likely to impact the pharmacokinetics of PCZ (absorption, distribution, metabolism, etc.) as well as the effect of possible pharmacokinetic drug interactions.

The metabolism of PCZ is mediated primarily by the uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronosyltransferase 1A4 (UGT1A4) pathway. Although hepatic metabolism of PCZ is low compared with other azoles (such as itraconazole or voriconazole), differences in the metabolic capacity of UGT1A4 may alter PCZ exposure. A previous study of the oral suspension form had shown that low concentrations of PCZ were associated with a high ratio of PCZ-glucuronide / PCZ concentrations. Two genetic variants of the gene encoding UGT1A4 are associated with a decrease in the metabolic clearance of glucuronide drugs via UGT1A4. A recent study suggests less exposure to PCZ in the presence of UGT1A4 polymorphism.

The main objective of the investigator’s project is to study prospectively in a homogeneous population of patients treated by intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (induction and consolidation) the pharmacokinetics of PCZ administered in its tablet formulation, and in particular:

Clinical and biological tolerance of high concentrations of PCZ
The influence of clinical and demographic covariates on PCZ and PCZ-glucuronide ratio
The influence of genetic variants of UGT1A4 on PCZ metabolism (PCZ-glucuronide / PCZ ratio).
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-11-16
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-02-24
Start Month Year December 10, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year April 10, 2023
Verification Month Year February 2022
Verification Date 2022-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2022-02-24

Facilities

Sequence: 200159515
Status Recruiting
Name Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hematology department
City Pierre-Bénite
Country France

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28113751 Sequence: 28113752
Facility Id 200159515 Facility Id 200159515
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Sophie DUCASTELLE-LEPRETRE, MD Name Mohamed EL HAMRI, MD
Email Sophie.ducastelle-lepretre@chu-lyon.fr Email mohamed.el-hamri@chu-lyon.fr
Phone 04 78 86 22 36 Phone 04 78 86 22 20
Phone Extension +33 Phone Extension +33

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18336495 Sequence: 18336496 Sequence: 18336497 Sequence: 18336498 Sequence: 18336499 Sequence: 18336500 Sequence: 18336501 Sequence: 18336502 Sequence: 18336503 Sequence: 18336504
Facility Id 200159515 Facility Id 200159515 Facility Id 200159515 Facility Id 200159515 Facility Id 200159515 Facility Id 200159515 Facility Id 200159515 Facility Id 200159515 Facility Id 200159515 Facility Id 200159515
Role Principal Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Sub-Investigator
Name Sophie Ducastelle-Lepretre, MD Name Xavier THOMAS, MD Name Fiorenza BARRACO, MD Name Etienne PAUBELLE, MD Name Hélène Labussiere-Wallet, MD Name Eric Wattel Name Marie Virginie Larcher, MD Name Clement Rocher, MD Name Gaelle Fossard, MD Name Marie Balsat, MD

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96074323 Sequence: 96074322 Sequence: 96074312 Sequence: 96074313 Sequence: 96074314 Sequence: 96074315 Sequence: 96074316 Sequence: 96074317 Sequence: 96074318 Sequence: 96074319 Sequence: 96074320 Sequence: 96074321 Sequence: 96074324 Sequence: 96074325
Mesh Term Hormone Antagonists Mesh Term Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors Mesh Term Posaconazole Mesh Term Antifungal Agents Mesh Term Anti-Infective Agents Mesh Term Trypanocidal Agents Mesh Term Antiprotozoal Agents Mesh Term Antiparasitic Agents Mesh Term 14-alpha Demethylase Inhibitors Mesh Term Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs
Downcase Mesh Term hormone antagonists Downcase Mesh Term steroid synthesis inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term posaconazole Downcase Mesh Term antifungal agents Downcase Mesh Term anti-infective agents Downcase Mesh Term trypanocidal agents Downcase Mesh Term antiprotozoal agents Downcase Mesh Term antiparasitic agents Downcase Mesh Term 14-alpha demethylase inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term cytochrome p-450 enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term hormones, hormone substitutes, and hormone antagonists Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs
Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52185592
Name Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
Downcase Name leukemia, myeloid, acute

Id Information

Sequence: 40169137 Sequence: 40169138
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value 69HCL18_0429 Id Value 2018-003488-67
Id Type Other Identifier
Id Type Description ID-RCB

Countries

Sequence: 42580723
Name France
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609224
Group Type Other
Title Posaconazole pharmacokinetics
Description Patients with AML over the age of 18 years treated with intensive chemotherapy in induction and consolidation whose was under antifungal prophylaxis by PCZ formulation tablets.

Interventions

Sequence: 52499526
Intervention Type Drug
Name Posaconazole
Description PCZ will be used as recommended in tablet formulation at an initial dosage of 300 mg twice a day on the first day and then once a day at a dose of 300 mg the following days.
PCZ prophylaxis will be started on the same day as the start of chemotherapy and will be continued until the end of aplasia.
The dosage of the PCZ can be adjusted according to the results of the PCZ assay. It may be interrupted if the transaminase level is greater than 3 times higher than normal (3N) or on medical decision.

Keywords

Sequence: 79888912
Name AML-PCZ-UGT1A4 gene
Downcase Name aml-pcz-ugt1a4 gene

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432362 Sequence: 177432363
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Evolution of the blood concentration of posaconazole and its metabolite from the beginning of treatment to the end of the induction phase (pharmacokinetic). Measure Search and identification by sequencing gene variants of UGT1A4
Time Frame Day 21 Time Frame At diagnosis
Description Posaconazole (PCZ) treatment will start at Day 1 at the beginning of induction/ consolidation therapy.

For the pharmacokinetics study of PCZ during induction, blood samples (5 mL) will be taken on days 3, 7, 14 and 21. Predoses (just prior to a daily dose) or trough concentrations (C0) will be collected on days 3, 7, 14 and 21. A peak concentration (at 3 hours post dose) will also be collected on day 14.
After achieving complete remission, patients receive a consolidation cure. During the consolidation cures, trough concentrations will be collected on days 3, 7, 14 and 21. A peak concentration (at 3 hours post dose) will also be collected on day 14.

Description The blood sample (5 mL) for the study of polymorphisms of the UGT1A4 gene will be performed before the initiation of induction.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193540512 Sequence: 193540513 Sequence: 193540514 Sequence: 193540515 Sequence: 193540516
Mesh Term Leukemia Mesh Term Leukemia, Myeloid Mesh Term Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms
Downcase Mesh Term leukemia Downcase Mesh Term leukemia, myeloid Downcase Mesh Term leukemia, myeloid, acute Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332415
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Hospices Civils de Lyon

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12012326 Sequence: 12012327
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Sophie Ducastelle-lepretre Name Mohamed EL HAMRI
Phone 04 78 86 22 36 Phone 04 78 86 22 20
Email Sophie.ducastelle-lepretre@chu-lyon.fr Email mohamed.el-hamri@chu-lyon.fr
Phone Extension +33 Phone Extension +33
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168301
Design Group Id 55609224
Intervention Id 52499526

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773633
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patient aged 18 or over
Patients with AML de novo or secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome or therapy-related AML except acute myeloid leukemia (AML3)
Patient hospitalized for the treatment of leukemia (induction chemotherapy or consolidation)
General state retained (ECOG performance scale ≤ 3)
alanine aminotransferase aspartate transaminase (ASAT) and alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) ≤ 2.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), total bilirubin ≤ 2 times the ULN, creatinine <150 μmol / L unless these biological abnormalities are related to leukemia
Patients affiliated or beneficiaries of a social security scheme (Social Security or Universal Medical Coverage)
Having read and understood the information sheet and signed the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (AML3)
History of uncontrolled cancer for at least two years
Patient included in another clinical study that may interfere with the objectives of this study
Treatment with antifungal other than posaconazole
Severe uncontrolled infection at the time of inclusion
Positive serology for HIV 1 or 2 or human T-cell lymphoma virus (HTLV 1) or 2, or active viral infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV)
Pregnant woman (beta positive HCG) or breastfeeding
A woman of childbearing potential who can not justify the use of effective contraception during treatment with Noxafil®
Patient incapacitated, under guardianship, curators or safeguard of justice

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253952974
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30519764
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Health Services Research
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26680460
Intervention Id 52499526
Name PCZ

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886065
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Validation Study of the Simplified Seizure Classification Algorithm ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796520
2019-06-02

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796520
NCT03796520https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796520?tab=tableNANANAAn algorithm has been developed for simplified classification of epileptic seizures, in order to optimize choice of antiepileptic drugs.

The objective of this study was to clinically validate the algorithm.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-02-17
Start Month Year June 2, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2020
Verification Month Year February 2021
Verification Date 2021-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2021-02-17

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20716321
Description Optimal choice of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) depend on the patients´ seizure-types. Over the last four decades, several classification systems have been proposed for epileptic seizures. The recent position paper of the International League Against Epilepsy defines 63 seizure-types. While this complex system might be useful for detailed phenotyping, currently there is no evidence that each of these seizure-types needs different clinical management strategy, and many clinicians find it difficult to implement.

To help physicians with optimizing the choice of AEDs, the investigators developed a simplified seizure classification, consisting of the minimal number of seizure-types, necessary for choice of AEDs, and the investigators developed an algorithm that identifies the patient´s seizure-type, based on a set of 10 simple questions, that can be answered by physicians even without extensive training in epilepsy. The current form of the algorithm was developed for patients whose seizures started in adolescence or adulthood (at the age of 10 years or older).

In this study, the investigators aim to validate the diagnostic algorithm, by comparing the seizure-type identified by the algorithm with the diagnosis and seizure-type as defined by trained experts, in the clinical workup of the patients.

Facilities

Sequence: 200053414 Sequence: 200053415 Sequence: 200053416 Sequence: 200053417 Sequence: 200053418
Name Thomas Jefferson University Name Aarhus University Hospital Name Danish Epilepsy Centre Name Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Name University of Pavia
City Philadelphia City Aarhus City Dianalund City Shiraz City Pavia
State Pennsylvania
Zip 19107 Zip 8000 Zip 4293 Zip 27100
Country United States Country Denmark Country Denmark Country Iran, Islamic Republic of Country Italy

Conditions

Sequence: 52156560
Name Epilepsy
Downcase Name epilepsy

Id Information

Sequence: 40148250
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value EpiPick-1

Countries

Sequence: 42557784 Sequence: 42557785 Sequence: 42557786 Sequence: 42557787
Name United States Name Denmark Name Iran, Islamic Republic of Name Italy
Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55577958
Title Patients suspected for epilepsy
Description The cohort includes patients referred to the participating centers on suspicion of epilepsy, provided their seizure onset was at 10 years of age or older.

Interventions

Sequence: 52472060
Intervention Type Diagnostic Test
Name EpiPick simplified seizure classification algorithm
Description EpiPick simplified seizure classification algorithm input:

Grey matter brain lesion Exclusively nocturnal seizures First seizure at age > 20 years Lip smacking or chewing during seizures Staring with impaired awareness, lasting less than 20s without postictal confusion Sudden irregular jerks, in isolation or brief series, if none of the following applies: Are the jerks consistently in the same limb? When resting in bed when falling asleep? Bilateral tonic-clonic seizures within 1h of awakening or immediately preceded by irregular jerks Any of the following is present: Skin turning pale pre-ictally; Loss of consciousness immediately after urination or defecation; Sudden slump with loss of awareness, lasting less than 10 seconds; Seizure lasting longer than 10 minutes, with eyes closed throughout the seizure; Severe pre-ictal headache; Episodes consisting of falls that occur always after change in posture to the upright position, or coughing or feeling pain.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328232
Outcome Type primary
Measure AC1
Time Frame Through study completion, an average of 8 months.
Description Agreement coefficient between index test (EpiPick) and the reference standard (expert classification)

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193432263 Sequence: 193432264 Sequence: 193432265
Mesh Term Seizures Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Neurologic Manifestations
Downcase Mesh Term seizures Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term neurologic manifestations
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306142 Sequence: 48306143 Sequence: 48306144 Sequence: 48306145 Sequence: 48306146
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class UNKNOWN Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Sándor Beniczky Name Danish Epilepsy Centre Name Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Name University of Pavia Name Thomas Jefferson University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29277959 Sequence: 29277960 Sequence: 29277961 Sequence: 29277962 Sequence: 29277963
Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Sandor Beniczky, MD, PhD Name Guido Rubboli, MD, PhD Name Michael Sperling, MD, PhD Name Emilio Perucca, MD, PhD Name Ali A Asadi-Pooya, MD, PhD
Affiliation Aarhus University Hospital Affiliation Danich Epilepsy Centre Affiliation Thomas Jefferson University Affiliation University of Pavia Affiliation Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130922
Design Group Id 55577958
Intervention Id 52472060

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757391
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 10 Years
Maximum Age 120 Years
Population The study population includes patients referred to the participating centers on suspicion of epilepsy, provided their seizure onset was at 10 years of age or older.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

patients referred to the participating centers on suspicion of epilepsy

Exclusion Criteria:

none

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254228506
Number Of Facilities 5
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 19
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 10
Maximum Age Num 120
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30503616
Observational Model Case-Only
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869894
Responsible Party Type Sponsor-Investigator
Name Sándor Beniczky
Title professor
Affiliation Aarhus University Hospital

Study References

Sequence: 52049432 Sequence: 52049433 Sequence: 52049434 Sequence: 52049435 Sequence: 52049436 Sequence: 52049437 Sequence: 52049438
Pmid 28276060 Pmid 26507832 Pmid 21763207 Pmid 19853218 Pmid 19800848 Pmid 28677857 Pmid 34420206
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type derived
Citation Fisher RS, Cross JH, French JA, Higurashi N, Hirsch E, Jansen FE, Lagae L, Moshe SL, Peltola J, Roulet Perez E, Scheffer IE, Zuberi SM. Operational classification of seizure types by the International League Against Epilepsy: Position Paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia. 2017 Apr;58(4):522-530. doi: 10.1111/epi.13670. Epub 2017 Mar 8. Citation Brodie MJ. Practical Use of Newer Antiepileptic Drugs as Adjunctive Therapy in Focal Epilepsy. CNS Drugs. 2015 Nov;29(11):893-904. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0285-4. Citation Brodie MJ, Covanis A, Gil-Nagel A, Lerche H, Perucca E, Sills GJ, White HS. Antiepileptic drug therapy: does mechanism of action matter? Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Aug;21(4):331-41. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2011.05.025. Epub 2011 Jul 16. Citation Stephen LJ, Brodie MJ. Selection of antiepileptic drugs in adults. Neurol Clin. 2009 Nov;27(4):967-992. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2009.06.007. Citation Brodie MJ, Elder AT, Kwan P. Epilepsy in later life. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Nov;8(11):1019-30. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70240-6. Epub 2009 Oct 1. Citation Beniczky S, Rubboli G, Aurlien H, Hirsch LJ, Trinka E, Schomer DL; SCORE consortium. The new ILAE seizure classification: 63 seizure types? Epilepsia. 2017 Jul;58(7):1298-1300. doi: 10.1111/epi.13799. No abstract available. Citation Beniczky S, Asadi-Pooya AA, Perucca E, Rubboli G, Tartara E, Meritam Larsen P, Ebrahimi S, Farzinmehr S, Rampp S, Sperling MR. A web-based algorithm to rapidly classify seizures for the purpose of drug selection. Epilepsia. 2021 Oct;62(10):2474-2484. doi: 10.1111/epi.17039. Epub 2021 Aug 22.

Ipd Information Types

Sequence: 3332719 Sequence: 3332720
Name Study Protocol Name Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)

]]>

<![CDATA[ Early Temozolomide in Patients With High-Grade Gliomas in Rehabilitation ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796507
2021-09-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796507
NCT03796507https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796507?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of a possible treatment regimen that could be used to delay tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma. The study is being conducted in patients who qualify for inpatient rehabilitation, as this population is particularly vulnerable to delays in initiation of chemoradiation and further tumor growth in the period between surgical resection and the start of treatment.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-04-09
Start Month Year September 1, 2021
Primary Completion Month Year December 15, 2021
Verification Month Year April 2021
Verification Date 2021-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2021-04-09

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735715
Description This is a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of early postsurgical temozolomide therapy prior to initiation of standard chemoradiation regimen in patients with glioblastoma who undergo inpatient rehabilitation. The study will be conducted with adult patients who qualify for inpatient rehabilitation following surgical resection of pathologically confirmed Grade IV glioma. Patients will begin a 21-day cycle of temozolomide starting 14 days after surgery at 75mg per square meter of body surface area daily to serve as bridge therapy. Patients will then progress to receive standard therapy following their rehabilitation stay. Patients will be assessed for their ability to complete the chemotherapy protocol without dose-limiting toxicity as well as complete inpatient rehabilitation successfully. Additionally, we will be assessing for tumor progression between the time of surgery and the time of treatment initiation.

If this study shows the expected results, the research team plans to proceed to a larger trial assessing the efficacy of early TMZ in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) who are admitted to acute inpatient rehabilitation compared to the current standard of care.

Facilities

Sequence: 200243986
Name University of Rochester Medical Center
City Rochester
State New York
Zip 14642
Country United States

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96112884 Sequence: 96112885 Sequence: 96112886 Sequence: 96112887 Sequence: 96112888
Mesh Term Temozolomide Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating Mesh Term Alkylating Agents Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents
Downcase Mesh Term temozolomide Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents, alkylating Downcase Mesh Term alkylating agents Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52207915
Name Glioma of Brain
Downcase Name glioma of brain

Id Information

Sequence: 40186043
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value RSRB00003258

Countries

Sequence: 42599551
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55634513
Group Type Experimental
Title Temozolomide Arm
Description This study will only include one treatment group who will receive oral temozolomide at 75 mg per square meter of body surface area daily for 21 days before progressing to standard chemoradiation treatment.

Interventions

Sequence: 52521929
Intervention Type Drug
Name Temozolomide
Description oral temozolomide at 75 mg per square meter of body surface area daily for 21 days

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177510689 Sequence: 177510690 Sequence: 177510691
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure The number of patient who fail to complete temozolomide (TMZ) Measure Mean functional independence measure (FIM) score Measure Response rate to TMZ
Time Frame 1 month Time Frame 1 month Time Frame 1 month
Description The number of subjects who fail to complete early TMZ plus inpatient rehabilitation for any reason, including adverse events or progression or patient withdrawal Description FIM is comprised of 18 items, grouped into 2 subscales -motor and cognition. Each item is scored on a 7 point ordinal scale, ranging from a score of 1 to a score of 7. The higher the score, the more independent the patient is in performing the task associated with that item therefore the better the health outcome. The total score for the FIM instrument (the sum of the motor and cognition subscale scores) will be a value between 18 and 126. Description The response rate to early TMZ will be evaluated by comparing the MRI of the head before and after one course using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. The response rate will be reported with a (two-sided) 90% confidence interval. The RANO criteria consists of 5 elements: T1 Gadolinium enhancing disease, T2/FLAIR assessment, new lesions, use of corticosteroids and clinical status. Patients will be categorized as complete response, partial response, stable disease or progressive disease.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193626388 Sequence: 193626389 Sequence: 193626390 Sequence: 193626391 Sequence: 193626392 Sequence: 193626393 Sequence: 193626394 Sequence: 193626395
Mesh Term Glioma Mesh Term Neoplasms, Neuroepithelial Mesh Term Neuroectodermal Tumors Mesh Term Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial Mesh Term Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue
Downcase Mesh Term glioma Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, neuroepithelial Downcase Mesh Term neuroectodermal tumors Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, germ cell and embryonal Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, glandular and epithelial Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, nerve tissue
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48353554 Sequence: 48353555
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class NIH
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University of Rochester Name National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29305907
Role Principal Investigator
Name Kevin A Walter, MD
Affiliation University of Rochester Medical Center, Dept. of Neurosurgery

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199003
Design Group Id 55634513
Intervention Id 52521929

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30786785
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Adult patients, aged 18+
Newly diagnosed World Health Organization (WHO) Grade IV glioma, confirmed on pathology
Karnofsky Performance Score ≥ 60
Subject has undergone biopsy, subtotal resection, or gross total resection of tumor
Subject has been evaluated by physical therapy and thought to be a candidate for acute rehabilitation
Subject must be accepted for admission on 5-1200 unit at Strong Memorial Hospital
Subject must be able to provide informed consent

Subject must meet the following laboratory parameters:

Absolute neutrophil count > 1.5 x103/uL
Platelet count > 140 x103/uL
Alanine transaminase < 135 U/L
Aspartate transaminase < 120 U/L

Exclusion Criteria:

Subject has received previous treatment for high-grade glioma
Subject has other active malignancy
Subject is currently pregnant or breastfeeding
Subject is a women of childbearing potential who is not using a reliable method of contraception
Subject has history of hypersensitivity to temozolomide

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989450
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30532856
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899149
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Kevin Walter
Title Professor
Affiliation University of Rochester

]]>

<![CDATA[ Peri-implant Tissues on Aesthetic Slim Abutment Galimplant (PSG) ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796494
2019-03-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796494
NCT03796494https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796494?tab=tableNANANAThis is a randomized, single-blind, split-mouth clinical trial to evaluate the performance of peri-implant tissues (bone and soft tissues) in conventionally loaded Galimplant implants, using a classic multi-position, anti-rotational abutment, comparing it to the new multi-abutment aesthetic slim anti-rotational placed both at the time of the implant surgery. To this end, 80 Galimplant implants with a diameter of 4 mm and 10 mm in length will be placed in areas of mature scarred post-extraction bone. Patients be divided into 2 study groups, group C: straight pillar; Group T: Slim pillar. The bone and clinical radiological stability of the peri-implant tissues will be evaluated at 6 weeks post-surgery and at 6-12 months post-prosthetic loading.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-04-01
Start Month Year March 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year April 1, 2019
Verification Month Year March 2020
Verification Date 2020-03-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-04-01

Facilities

Sequence: 200107764
Name Mario Pérez Sayáns
City Santiago De Compostela
State A Coruña
Zip 15785
Country Spain

Conditions

Sequence: 52171056 Sequence: 52171057
Name Dental Implant Failed Name Dental Prosthesis Failure
Downcase Name dental implant failed Downcase Name dental prosthesis failure

Id Information

Sequence: 40158504
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value CT-2019-01

Countries

Sequence: 42568816
Name Spain
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55592990 Sequence: 55592991
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Experimental
Title Control Group Title Test group
Description The control group is considered, using the company's classic multi-position straight anti-rotational abutment Description The test group is considered, where the new multi-position straight esthetic anti-rotational slim abutment is used

Interventions

Sequence: 52485304 Sequence: 52485305
Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Procedure
Name Straight abutment Name Slim abutment
Description This is the classic abutment, straight and anti-rotational for dental implants which have been tested before Description This is the new concept of the prostheses abutment, slim and anti-rotational to improve the width of biologic space

Keywords

Sequence: 79868227 Sequence: 79868228
Name dental implant Name periimplant tissues
Downcase Name dental implant Downcase Name periimplant tissues

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177378109 Sequence: 177378110 Sequence: 177378111 Sequence: 177378112 Sequence: 177378113 Sequence: 177378114 Sequence: 177378115 Sequence: 177378116
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other
Measure Primary stability of implants and peri-implant tissues Measure Basal Peri-implant tissue level: implant stability Measure Basal Radiological Bone Implant level Measure Basal Peri-implant tissue level: probing depth Measure Radiological bone implant stability Measure Peri-implant tissue stability: probing depth Measure Peri-implant tissue stability: ISQ Measure Long-term evaluation of definitive prostheses
Time Frame 10 months Time Frame 1 day Time Frame 1 day Time Frame 1 day Time Frame 8 weeks Time Frame 8 weeks Time Frame 8 weeks Time Frame 6 months
Description Randomly and following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the implants will be placed with the normal preparation protocol. Investigators will evaluate the immediate post-surgical stability of implants and peri-implant tissues through the Ostell system, based on the resonance frequency analysis (RFA). The implant stability quotient (ISQ) is the value on a scale that indicates the level of stability and osseointegration in dental implants. The scale ranges from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater stability. The acceptable stability range lies between 55-85 ISQ Description Randomly and following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the implants will be placed with the normal preparation protocol. We will load the crowns 8 weeks after implant surgery. Investigators will evaluate the stability at different moments, 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) is the value on a scale that indicates the level of stability and osseointegration in dental implants. The scale ranges from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater stability. The acceptable stability range lies between 55-85 ISQ. ISQ values are obtained using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Description At the moment of placing the implant, clinical variables will be evaluated: depth of probing (distance from the peri-implant margin to the most depth of the peri-implant sulcus). This will be the basal measure of the implant stability and peri-implant tissue levels. Investigators will calculate the difference between the basal measure and the future measurements. Description At the moment of placing the implant, clinical variables will be evaluated: depth of probing (distance from the peri-implant margin to the most depth of the peri-implant sulcus). This will be the basal measure of the implant stability and peri-implant tissue levels. Investigators will calculate the difference between the basal measure and the future measurements. Description After the implantation, we´ll load the temporary 8 weeks after the implantation. Investigators will evaluate the bone level stability at 6 weeks in both groups, through a dental X-ray radiography. The bone stability will be measured as a difference between de basal bone level and the actual one in mm. Description After the implantation, we´ll load the definitive prostheses in 8 weeks. Investigators will evaluate the peri-implant tissue stability by measuring the probing depth or just in case, the recession of the gingival margin. The stability will be given by the differences between both measures, basal and actual in mm. Description After the implantation, we´ll load the temporary prostheses in 8 weeks. Investigators will evaluate the peri-implant tissue stability by measuring the ISQ through RFA. The stability will be given by the differences between both measures, basal and actual. Description After 6 months of loading of final ceramic restoration, investigators will evaluate the differences of clinical (mm of probing depth, ISQ implant stability) and radiological aspects (bone implant level in mm calculated from the neck to the actual bone level, comparing on the basal and final values.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193485978 Sequence: 193485979 Sequence: 193485980
Mesh Term Prosthesis Failure Mesh Term Postoperative Complications Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term prosthesis failure Downcase Mesh Term postoperative complications Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48319112 Sequence: 48319113
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University of Santiago de Compostela Name Galimplant Dental Implants

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68148924 Sequence: 68148925
Design Group Id 55592990 Design Group Id 55592991
Intervention Id 52485304 Intervention Id 52485305

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30765245
Gender All
Minimum Age 20 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients without systemic pathology that are grounds for absolute contraindication
Older adults who agree to be part of the study and sign the informed consent
Consumption of tobacco less than 5 cigarettes / day
Do not be completely toothless
Absences of at least two pieces in posterior area with or without free ends to distal, maxillary or mandibular that do not require regenerative techniques. In case of odd absences (3,5,7), a Slim pillar will be placed, being the group to always be the majority.
Area of mature bone healed at least 6 months post-extraction.
Patients with a sufficient amount of bone to place implants 4 mm in diameter and 10 mm long

Exclusion Criteria:

Immunosuppressed
Aesthetic edentulous areas of 13-23 and 33-43
Smokers of more than 5 cigarettes
Index of bleeding greater than 30%
Patients with less than 2 mm of keratinized gingiva
Implants with primary stability with ISQ <55
Implants with ISQ index <55 at 8 weeks
When a margin of safety can not be assumed to the inferior dental nerve of at least 1 mm

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253875099
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 1
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 20
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30511412
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Links

Sequence: 4388070
Url http://imaisd.usc.es/grupoficha.asp?idpersoatipogrupo=75189&i=es&s=-2-26-148
Description GI-1319

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28877706
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Mario Pérez Sayáns
Title Professor Mario Perez Sayans MD, PhD (Principal investigator)
Affiliation University of Santiago de Compostela

Ipd Information Types

Sequence: 3334110 Sequence: 3334111 Sequence: 3334112 Sequence: 3334113
Name Study Protocol Name Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Name Clinical Study Report (CSR) Name Analytic Code

]]>

<![CDATA[ Sleep, Pain and Function in People With Chronic Spinal Pain and Comorbid Insomnia ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796481
2019-01-08

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796481
NCT03796481https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796481?tab=tableNANANAThis study is focused on people with chronic spinal pain. To investigate the impact of sleep problems on pain and function, 45 people with chronic spinal pain and comorbid insomnia will be compared to 45 people with chronic spinal pain without insomnia.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-19
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-12-01
Start Month Year January 8, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year July 28, 2022
Verification Month Year November 2022
Verification Date 2022-11-30
Last Update Posted Date 2022-12-01

Facilities

Sequence: 200682757 Sequence: 200682758
Name Vrije Universiteit Brussel Name Ghent University
City Brussel City Ghent
Country Belgium Country Belgium

Conditions

Sequence: 52347516 Sequence: 52347517 Sequence: 52347518
Name Chronic Low Back Pain Name Chronic Neck Pain Name Chronic Insomnia
Downcase Name chronic low back pain Downcase Name chronic neck pain Downcase Name chronic insomnia

Id Information

Sequence: 40285053
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value EC/2018/0277/Amend

Countries

Sequence: 42706069
Name Belgium
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55790044 Sequence: 55790045
Title Cases Title Controls
Description People with chronic spinal pain (i.e. chronic low back pain or chronic neck pain) with comorbid insomnia Description People with chronic spinal pain (i.e. chronic low back pain or chronic neck pain) without comorbid insomnia

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178030461 Sequence: 178030462 Sequence: 178030463 Sequence: 178030464 Sequence: 178030465 Sequence: 178030466 Sequence: 178030467 Sequence: 178030468 Sequence: 178030469 Sequence: 178030470 Sequence: 178030471 Sequence: 178030472 Sequence: 178030473 Sequence: 178030474
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Brief Pain Inventory (Numeric Rating Scale): Pain intensity Measure Brief Pain Inventory: Pain Interference Measure Central sensitization Inventory Measure Pressure Pain Thresholds Measure Sleep: Polysomnography (PSG) using the portable Alice PDX system, Philips Respironics Inc Measure Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index Measure Insomnia Severity Index Measure DBAS (i.e. Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep) Measure Epworth Sleepiness Scale Measure Brugmann Fatigue Scale Measure Hospital Anxiety and Depression rating scale Measure Physical Activity using Actigraphy Measure Short Form Health Survey – 36 items Mental Health Measure Short Form Health Survey – 36 items Physical Health
Time Frame Participants will be tested one time only (one assessment) at one day, in between January 20, 2019 and April 30, 2021. Time Frame Participants will be tested one time only (one assessment) at one day, in between January 20, 2019 and April 30, 2021. Time Frame Participants will be tested one time only (one assessment) at one day, in between January 20, 2019 and April 30, 2021. Time Frame Participants will be tested one time only (one assessment) at one day, in between January 20, 2019 and April 30, 2021. Time Frame Participants will be tested one time only (one assessment) at one day, in between January 20, 2019 and April 30, 2021. Time Frame Participants will be tested one time only (one assessment) at one day, in between January 20, 2019 and April 30, 2021. Time Frame Participants will be tested one time only (one assessment) at one day, in between January 20, 2019 and April 30, 2021. Time Frame Participants will be tested one time only (one assessment) at one day, in between January 20, 2019 and April 30, 2021. Time Frame Participants will be tested one time only (one assessment) at one day, in between January 20, 2019 and April 30, 2021. Time Frame Participants will be tested one time only (one assessment) at one day, in between January 20, 2019 and April 30, 2021. Time Frame Participants will be tested one time only (one assessment) at one day, in between January 20, 2019 and April 30, 2021. Time Frame Participants will be tested one time only (one assessment) at one day, in between January 20, 2019 and April 30, 2021. Time Frame Participants will be tested one time only (one assessment) at one day, in between January 20, 2019 and April 30, 2021. Time Frame Participants will be tested one time only (one assessment) at one day, in between January 20, 2019 and April 30, 2021.
Description Self-reported pain: The question "please rate your pain by circling the one number that best describes your pain on the AVERAGE" is used as the primary outcome measure to evaluate pain intensity. Scale ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more self-reported pain. Description Self-reported central sensitization symptoms. Score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more self-reported symptoms of central sensitization. Description Self-reported central sensitization symptoms. Score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more self-reported symptoms of central sensitization. Description Pressure Pain Thresholds at measured bilaterally with a digital pressure algometer (Wagner Instruments), both at symptomatic levels (trapezius muscle and 5 centimetres lateral to the spinous process of L3) and at remote sites (i.e. secondary hyperalgesia). Description Participants will be monitored in the comfort of their own home by ambulatory polysomnography. This will provide the following parameters: time in bed, total sleep time, sleep onset latency, wake duration after sleep onset, early morning awakening, sleep staging, sleep efficiency, sleep fragmentation, respiratory parameters, cardiac and myoclonic activity. Description Self-reported perceived sleep quality. Score ranges from 0 to 21, 0 indicating no difficulty and 21 indicating severe sleep difficulties. Description Self-reported insomnia severity. Score ranges from 0 to 28, with 0 indicating no clinically significant insomnia and 28 indicating severe clinical insomnia. Description Change in self-reported dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep. Score ranges from 0 to 10. Scores above 4 indicate unrealistic expectations for sleep or unrealistic thoughts about sleep. Description Self-reported sleep propensity. Score ranges from 0 to 24, with 0 indicating normal daytime sleepiness and 24 indicating severe excessive daytime sleepiness. Description Self-reported fatigue severity. Score ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating higher subjective levels of fatigue. Description Self-reported affective symptoms. Score ranges from 0 to 21, with 0 indicating absence of depression or anxiety and 21 indicating the presence of depression or anxiety. Description Physical activity: Continuous assessment of physical activity and rest/activity cycles Description Self-reported functional status and well-being or quality of life. Score ranges from 0 to 400 with higher scores indicating better mental health. Description Self-reported functional status and well-being or quality of life. Score ranges from 0 to 400 with higher scores indicating better physical health.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194159164 Sequence: 194159165 Sequence: 194159166 Sequence: 194159167 Sequence: 194159168 Sequence: 194159169 Sequence: 194159170 Sequence: 194159171 Sequence: 194159172 Sequence: 194159173 Sequence: 194159174
Mesh Term Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders Mesh Term Low Back Pain Mesh Term Neck Pain Mesh Term Back Pain Mesh Term Pain Mesh Term Neurologic Manifestations Mesh Term Sleep Disorders, Intrinsic Mesh Term Dyssomnias Mesh Term Sleep Wake Disorders Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Mental Disorders
Downcase Mesh Term sleep initiation and maintenance disorders Downcase Mesh Term low back pain Downcase Mesh Term neck pain Downcase Mesh Term back pain Downcase Mesh Term pain Downcase Mesh Term neurologic manifestations Downcase Mesh Term sleep disorders, intrinsic Downcase Mesh Term dyssomnias Downcase Mesh Term sleep wake disorders Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term mental disorders
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48484256 Sequence: 48484257 Sequence: 48484258 Sequence: 48484259 Sequence: 48484260
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University Ghent Name Vrije Universiteit Brussel Name University Hospital, Ghent Name Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel Name Research Foundation Flanders

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30867638
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 65 Years
Population People with chronic spinal pain with and without comorbid insomnia (cases vs controls)
Criteria Inclusion criteria cases:

nonspecific spinal pain (≥3 days per week and ≥3 months of chronic low back pain, failed back surgery syndrome > 3 years prior, chronic whiplash, or chronic non traumatic neck pain)
aged between 18 and 65 years
seeking care because of neck pain or low back pain
native dutch speaker
having insomnia: in the absence of other intrinsic sleep disorders and shift work, insomnia is defined as > 30 minutes of sleep latency and/or minutes awake after sleep onset for > 3 days / week for > 6 months
living or working within a radius of 50 km around the test location
not starting new treatments or medication and continuing their usual care 6 weeks prior to and during study participation (to obtain steady state)
referring from analgesics, caffeine, alcohol or nicotine in the previous 48 h of the assessments
nonspecific failed back surgery > 3 years are permitted
not undertaking exercise (>3 metabolic equivalents) 3 days before the experiment

Exclusion criteria cases:

severe underlying sleep pathology (identified through baseline data of polysomnography)
neuropathic pain
chronic widespread pain
being pregnant or pregnancy (including giving birth) in the preceding year
history of specific spinal surgery
thoracic pain in absence of neck or low back pain
shift workers
present clinical depression
BMI ≥ 30

Inclusion criteria controls:

native dutch speaking
18 to 65 years of age
having chronic nonspecific chronic spinal pain (≥3 days per week and ≥3 months of chronic low back pain, failed back surgery syndrome > 3 years prior, chronic whiplash, or chronic non traumatic neck pain)
referring from analgesics, caffeine, alcohol or nicotine in the previous 48 h of the assessments
not undertaking exercise (>3 metabolic equivalents) 3 days before the experiment
No new medication 6 weeks prior to the assessment
currently not undergoing any treatment (excl. medication) for chronic spinal pain

Exclusion criteria controls:

specific medical conditions (neuropathic pain, specific neck of back surgery, osteoporotic vertebral fractures, or rheumatologic diseases)
chronic widespread pain syndromes (fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome)
having insomnia (in the absence of other intrinsic sleep disorders and shift work, insomnia is defined as > 30 minutes of sleep latency and/or minutes awake after sleep onset for > 3 days / week for > 6 months)
severe underlying sleep pathology
being pregnant or pregnancy in the preceding year
thoracic pain in the absence of neck or low back pain
diagnosed depression
BMI over 30

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254001495
Number Of Facilities 2
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 43
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 65
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 13

Designs

Sequence: 30613452
Observational Model Case-Control
Time Perspective Cross-Sectional

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28979986
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Minor Stroke Therapy Evaluation ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796468
2019-04-10

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796468
NCT03796468https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796468?tab=tableBertrand LAPERGUE, PHbertrand.lapergue@gmail.com1 46255973Stroke represents the fourth leading cause of death in industrialized nations, after heart disease, cancer, and chronic lower respiratory disease. Approximately one-quarter of the patients suffering a stroke die within one year after the initial event and stroke is a leading cause of serious long-term disability. Although mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke with proximal large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation, the management of patients harboring proximal occlusion but presenting minor-to-mild stroke symptoms, has not yet been determined by these recent randomized clinical trials. However, patients with proximal occlusions may present with a low NIHSS, a proximal intraarterial occlusion being present in up to 28% when considering patients with an NIHSS ≤ 4.

The evidence of benefit from endovascular therapy (EVT) in large vessel occlusion stroke is demonstrated, STAIR IX (Stroke Treatment Academic Industry Roundtable) consensus recommendations were developed that outline priorities for future research in EVT.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-04-27
Start Month Year April 10, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year July 2023
Verification Month Year April 2022
Verification Date 2022-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2022-04-27

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20853673
Description Proximal intracranial arterial occlusions cause the most disabling types of ischemic strokes and are predictive of poor neurological outcomes. The "Time is Brain" assessment has been confirmed in many recent trials (MR CLEAN, SWIFT PRIME, REVASCAT, HERMES) within the first 6 hours. Recently the time window has been enlarged to 24h00 after the DAWN trial results, enforcing nevertheless the strong relation between patient disability and time loss in this extended time window.

In population-based studies, patients presenting with minor or mild stroke symptoms represent about two-thirds of stroke patients, and almost one-third of these patients are unable to ambulate independently at the time of discharge.

Although mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke with proximal large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation, the management of patients harboring proximal occlusion but presenting minor-to-mild stroke symptoms, has not yet been determined by these recent randomized clinical trials. Indeed, the majority of patients presented with major clinical impairment, with a median NIHSS of 17. Thus, American Heart Association (AHA) gives level 1a evidence for MT performed only for patients with baseline NIHSS score ≥6.

However, patients with proximal occlusions may present with a low NIHSS, a proximal intra-arterial occlusion being present in up to 28% when considering patients with an NIHSS ≤ 4. In observational study, patient with minor or mild stroke symptoms and LVO have a high risk of both clinical worsening and bad outcome.

The STAIR meeting aims to advance acute stroke therapy development through collaboration between academia, industry, and regulatory institutions. In pursuit of this goal and building on the available level I evidence of benefit from endovascular therapy (EVT) in large vessel occlusion stroke, STAIR IX consensus recommendations were developed that outline priorities for future research in EVT.

Recent AHA/ASA guidelines have also highlighted the need to gain more evidence to determine whether there is an overall net benefit from endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with LVO and minor stroke.

The MOSTE protocol is an International, multi-center, prospectively randomized to two parallel (1:1) arms, open to treatment with blinded endpoint trial, designed to demonstrate that mechanical thrombectomy with best medical treatment is superior to medical treatment alone, in improving clinical outcomes at 90 days, in patient presenting an acute large vessel occlusion stroke with a minor deficit, defined as NIHSS below 6 and < 24 hours from onset. If this study is positive, more patients in the future could receive urgent endovascular treatment in addition to the best medical treatment.

Facilities

Sequence: 201296290
Status Recruiting
Name Hopital Gui De Chauliac
City Montpellier
Zip 34295
Country France

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28283102 Sequence: 28283103
Facility Id 201296290 Facility Id 201296290
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Caroline ARQUIZAN, MD Name Vincent COSTALAT, PU-PH
Email c-arquizan@chu-montpellier.fr Email v-costalat@chu-montpellier.fr
Phone 4 67 33 75 32 Phone 4 67 33 75 32
Phone Extension +33

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18439293 Sequence: 18439294
Facility Id 201296290 Facility Id 201296290
Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Bertrand LAPERGUE, MD Name Tudor JOVIN, MD

Conditions

Sequence: 52511154
Name Stroke
Downcase Name stroke

Id Information

Sequence: 40401626
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value RECHMPL18_0172

Countries

Sequence: 42837794
Name France
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55967547 Sequence: 55967548
Group Type Other Group Type Other
Title Best Medical Therapy (BMT) Title Mechanical Thrombectomy (MT)
Description Best treatment medical probably associated to the rescue endovascular treatment in case of neurological deterioration Description Endovascular treatment (thrombectomy) associated with the best treatment medical

Interventions

Sequence: 52818791 Sequence: 52818792
Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Procedure
Name Best Medical Therapy Name Mechanical Thrombectomy
Description The administration of medications is at the treating physician's discretion (for example intravenous fibrinolysis, anticoagulants or antiplatelet) according to local standards of care but may NOT include any intra-arterial therapies. The rescue MT may be performed in case of deterioration within the 24 hours Description MT in the Experimental Arm can be performed with any thrombectomy (CE labeled) device usually used at study site. For the subjects randomized to the MT plus medical, the MT is performed immediately after the randomization

Keywords

Sequence: 80329902 Sequence: 80329903 Sequence: 80329904 Sequence: 80329905
Name Mechanical thrombectomy Name stroke Name Proximal intracranial arterial occlusions Name Large vessel occlusion
Downcase Name mechanical thrombectomy Downcase Name stroke Downcase Name proximal intracranial arterial occlusions Downcase Name large vessel occlusion

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178643412 Sequence: 178643413 Sequence: 178643414 Sequence: 178643415 Sequence: 178643416 Sequence: 178643417 Sequence: 178643418 Sequence: 178643419 Sequence: 178643420 Sequence: 178643421
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Incidence of all-cause mortality at 90 days Measure Incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage Measure Deterioration of patient's condition Measure Incidence of procedure/device-related adverse events Measure Evaluation of functional outcome Measure Quality of life of the patient Measure Evaluation of cognitive function Measure Evaluation of cognitive function Measure Medico-economic study Measure Evaluation of functional outcome
Time Frame 3 months Time Frame 1 day Time Frame 3 months Time Frame 1 day Time Frame 3 months Time Frame 3 months Time Frame 3 months Time Frame 3 months Time Frame 3 months Time Frame 3 months
Description Evaluation of mortality at 90 days Description Incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage according to HEIDELBERG at imaging at 24 (-6/+12) hours post randomization Description National Intitutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥ 10 points during hospitalization. this scale is constitued by 15 items and the minimum score is 1 and the maximum score is 20. Description Incidence of procedure/device-related adverse events (in patients treated by mechanical treatment, in the MT group or in the BMT group, in case of rescue therapy) Description Rate of patients with a favorable or perfect outcome at 90-days defined by mRS 0-2 or mRS 0 Description Quality of life at 90 days assessed by EuroQol 5D-5L (5-level EQ-5-Dimension) scale Description Cognitive function at 90-days according to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Description Cognitive function at 90-days according to Trail Making Test A and B Description Cost-effectiveness analysis (number of patients functionally independent at 3 months : mRS =< 2), cost of devices and drugs, staff hourly cost, operating room cost Description Rate of patients at 90-days with excellent outcome defined as Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194782712 Sequence: 194782713 Sequence: 194782714 Sequence: 194782715 Sequence: 194782716 Sequence: 194782717 Sequence: 194782718
Mesh Term Stroke Mesh Term Cerebrovascular Disorders Mesh Term Brain Diseases Mesh Term Central Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Vascular Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term stroke Downcase Mesh Term cerebrovascular disorders Downcase Mesh Term brain diseases Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48633743
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University Hospital, Montpellier

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29462759 Sequence: 29462760 Sequence: 29462761 Sequence: 29462762
Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Vincent COSTALAT, PU-PH Name Caroline ARQUIZAN, PH Name Bertrand LAPERGUE, PH Name Tudor JOVIN, PU-PH
Affiliation Hôpital Gui de Chauliac Affiliation Hôpital Gui de Chauliac Affiliation Hôpital Foch Affiliation Cooper Neurological Institute

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12095935 Sequence: 12095936
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Caroline ARQUIZAN, PH Name Bertrand LAPERGUE, PH
Phone 4 67 33 75 32 Phone 1 46255973
Email c-arquizan@chu-montpellier.fr Email bertrand.lapergue@gmail.com
Phone Extension +33 Phone Extension +33
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68611705 Sequence: 68611706
Design Group Id 55967547 Design Group Id 55967548
Intervention Id 52818791 Intervention Id 52818792

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30958988
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 100 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Subject is ≥ 18 years old at inclusion (no upper age limit)
Clinical signs consistent with acute ischemic stroke with time last known well (TLKW) ≤ 23h at randomization (With the goal of remaining within 24 hours from TLKW til treatment)
Patients NIHSS 0-5 at the time of randomization
ASPECT ≥ 6 on non-contrast CT or Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI)-MRI
Ischemic Stroke confirmed with cerebral imaging or normal imaging with suspected ischemic stroke
Proved anterior circulation intracranial large vessel occlusion on CTA or Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) (ICA, M1, M1-M2, with or without cervical lesion (Tandem))
Patient or patient's representative has received information about the study and has signed and dated the appropriate Informed Consent Form, or fulfilling the criteria for emergent consent.
Anticipated possibility to start the procedure (arterial access) within 60 minutes after randomization
Pre stroke mRS ≤ 1
For Drip and Ship patients : new imaging performed again on inclusion center if first imaging performed > 1 hour before randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

General Exclusion Criteria

Anticipated impossibility to start the procedure (arterial access) within 60 minutes after randomization
Known absence of vascular access
Known contrast or endovascular product life-threatening allergy
Female who is known to be pregnant or lactating at time of admission
Patient presents severe or fatal co-morbidities or Life expectancy under 6 months that will likely prevent improvement or follow-up or that will render the procedure unlikely to benefit the patient.
Patient unable to present or be available for follow-up
Pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disease that would confound the neurological or functional evaluations
Evidence of vessel recanalization prior to randomization
Seizures at stroke onset if it makes the diagnosis of stroke doubtful and precludes obtaining an accurate baseline NIHSS assessment.
Current participation in another investigational drug study
Suspicion of aortic dissection based on medical history, clinical evaluation or/and imaging
Major patients under guardianship

Imaging Exclusion Criteria

Evidence of intracranial hemorrhage on CT/MRI
Excessive tortuosity of cervical vessels on CTA/MRA that would likely result in unstable access platform
High Suspicion of underlying intracranial stenosis on CTA/MRA
Suspected cerebral vascular disease (e.g. vasculitis) based on medical history and CTA/MRA
Presumed calcified Embolus or Intracranial Stenosis decompensation
Intracranial stent implanted in the same vascular territory that would preclude the safe deployment/removal of the stentriever device
Occlusions in multiple vascular territories (e.g.: bilateral anterior circulation, or anterior circulation/vertebrobasilar system) on CTA/MRA
Significant mass effect with midline shift as confirmed on CT/MRI

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253975812
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 100
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 9

Designs

Sequence: 30704555
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29071280
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Fish Oil and HMB Supplementation in COPD ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796455
2018-04-25

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796455
NCT03796455https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796455?tab=tableNANANAIn the present study, the role of chronic (10 weeks) intake of low dose (2g/day) of EPA+DHA in whole body protein metabolism, and functional performance and systemic inflammation will be examined, and whether adding either HMB at 3.0 g/d to the low dose of EPA+DHA (2.0 g/d) will enhance these effects even more.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-09-28
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-02-07
Start Month Year April 25, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year April 1, 2020
Verification Month Year February 2022
Verification Date 2022-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2022-02-07

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20783961
Description Weight loss commonly occurs in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), negatively influencing their quality of life, treatment response and survival. Furthermore, limb muscle dysfunction (weakness and/or enhanced fatigue) is a major systemic comorbidity in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), negatively affecting their exercise performance, physical activity, quality of life, and mortality. As nutritional abnormalities are main contributors to muscle loss and dysfunction in COPD, nutritional support is viewed as an essential component of integrated care in these patients.

Although nutritional support is effective in the treatment of weight loss in COPD, attempts to increase muscle mass and function in COPD by supplying large amounts of protein or calories to these patients have been small. This suggests that gains in muscle mass and function are difficult to achieve in COPD unless specific metabolic abnormalities are targeted. The investigators and other researchers found that low muscle mass in COPD was strongly associated with elevated whole body protein turnover and increased myofibrillar protein breakdown rates indicative of muscle contractile protein loss. The investigators have extended this finding recently to normal weight COPD patients characterized by muscle weakness using a more precise and accurate pulse method of tau-methylhistidine tracer.

A substantial number of COPD patients, underweight as well as normal weight to obese, are characterized by an increased inflammatory response as evidenced by elevated levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines (Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α, Interleukin (IL) 6 and 8, and the soluble TNF-α receptors (55 and 75). Furthermore, CRP levels are elevated in COPD and associated with reduced quadriceps strength, lower maximal and submaximal exercise capacity and increased morbidity.

One of the few agents capable to suppress the generation of pro-inflammatory cytokines are eicosapentanoic acid (EPA) and docosahexanoic acid (DHA), primary ω-3 fatty acids found in fish oils.

Previous experimental research and clinical studies in cachectic conditions (mostly malignancy) indicate that polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) are able to attenuate protein degradation by improving the anabolic response to feeding and by decreasing the acute phase response. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), in combination with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), has been shown to effectively inhibit weight loss in several disease states, however weight weight and muscle mass and function increase was not present or minimal. Also in healthy older adults, fish oil can slow the decline in muscle mass and function. A randomized clinical trial in COPD patients showed that extra nutritional supplementation with PUFAs daily of 1000 mg EPA+DHA as adjunct to exercise training during 8 weeks enhanced exercise capacity but did not lead to muscle mass gain. The patients who did not respond adequately (< 2% gain in weight), had a higher TNF-α level than those who did gain sufficient weight, which is in line with previous data in COPD showing an association between an increased systemic inflammation with non-response to nutritional therapy.

Although previous studies support the concept of EPA+DHA supplementation to ameliorate the systemic inflammatory response and decrease protein breakdown, there is no information present on the effects of EPA+DHA supplementation on whole body and muscle protein metabolism in COPD. The investigators have recently examined the dose-response effects of 0, 2 and 3.5 g of EPA+DHA intervention ( EPA / DHA) for 4 weeks in stable moderate to severe COPD patients (8pts /group) (unpublished data) but were not able to find a positive effect of muscle mass and strength, even with the highest dose, likely related to the relatively short (4 week) supplementation period. The effect of EPA+DHA intervention on whole body and muscle protein synthesis and breakdown rates is currently being analysed.

Although numerous animal studies have shown the benefit of HMB in downregulating muscle protein breakdown under catabolic conditions, there is very little data in COPD patients. Others have tested HMB (3g/d) in COPD patients in the ICU and reported anti-inflammatory benefits and improvement in pulmonary function. In patients with bronchiectasis, 24 week supplementation with an ONS containing HMB (1.5g/d) versus standard of care during pulmonary rehabilitation program, resulted in benefits on body composition, muscle strength and QoL. A combination of HMB and EPA/DHA in a mouse model of cancer cachexia showed a synergy between the two ingredients on preventing muscle loss and downregulation of muscle protein degradation.

Facilities

Sequence: 200622351
Name Texas A&M University-CTRAL
City College Station
State Texas
Zip 77843
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52330527
Name Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Downcase Name chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Id Information

Sequence: 40272623
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 2017-0870

Countries

Sequence: 42692662
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55770682 Sequence: 55770683 Sequence: 55770684
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title Fish Oil Title Fish Oil and HMB Title Placebo
Description 2.0 g EPA + DHA / day + placebo powder Description 2.0 g EPA + DHA + 3.0 g HMB / day Description 3 g/d soy oil: corn oil (50:50 ratio) + placebo powder

Interventions

Sequence: 52641463 Sequence: 52641464
Intervention Type Dietary Supplement Intervention Type Other
Name Capsule + Powder supplementation Name stable tracer infusion
Description For Fish oil and Placebo oil, treatment will be provided in capsules.Each group will receive dose distributed to 3 capsules per day. Participants will be instructed to take all capsules with morning meal. . For HMB and a placebo powder, product will be delivered as powder taken with water or non-carbonated beverage (like juice). Product will be provided in 2 sachets/day. One sachet should be consumed with breakfast and the other prior to bedtime (approx. 10pm). Description labeled amino acids L-Phenylalanine (ring-13C6), L-Tyrosine (ring-D4), and tau-Methylhistidine will be infused as a single injection. Subsequently, the catheter will be used for arterialized venous blood samples (3 ml) drawn multiple through the day

Keywords

Sequence: 80088474 Sequence: 80088475
Name Fish Oil supplement Name HMB supplement
Downcase Name fish oil supplement Downcase Name hmb supplement

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177967623 Sequence: 177967624 Sequence: 177967625 Sequence: 177967626 Sequence: 177967627 Sequence: 177967628 Sequence: 177967629
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Changes to net whole body protein metabolism Measure muscle mass Measure limb muscle strength Measure respiratory muscle strength Measure functional performance via six minute walk test Measure systemic inflammatory markers Measure resting energy expenditure
Time Frame baseline and after 10-week supplementation Time Frame 15 minutes on baseline visit, visit at week 5 of supplement intake, and after 10-week supplementation Time Frame 15 minutes on baseline visit, visit at week 5 of supplement intake, and after 10-week supplementation Time Frame 15 minutes on baseline visit, visit at week 5 of supplement intake, and after 10-week supplementation Time Frame baseline visit, visit at week 5 of supplement intake, and after 10-week supplementation Time Frame baseline visit and after 10-week supplementation Time Frame baseline visit and after 10-week supplementation
Description whole body protein synthesis and myofibrillar protein breakdown measured by labeled amino acids on each study day via blood drawn at time 4, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 60, 120, 180, 240 minutes of infusion Description Body composition as measured by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Description kin-com 1-leg test Description Micro-respiratory pressure meter to measure maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure Description walk a predetermined loop of 69.77 meters (228.89 feet) at self-selected pace for six minutes Description blood sample will be taken to measure c-reactive protein levels Description Oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production will be calculated from the airflow in a transparent plastic (Plexiglas) hood to determine concentration differences between inhaled and exhaled air

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194093809 Sequence: 194093810 Sequence: 194093811 Sequence: 194093812 Sequence: 194093813 Sequence: 194093814 Sequence: 194093815
Mesh Term Lung Diseases, Obstructive Mesh Term Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Mesh Term Lung Diseases Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases Mesh Term Chronic Disease Mesh Term Disease Attributes Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases, obstructive Downcase Mesh Term pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases Downcase Mesh Term chronic disease Downcase Mesh Term disease attributes Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48468537
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Texas A&M University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68364618 Sequence: 68364619 Sequence: 68364620 Sequence: 68364621 Sequence: 68364622 Sequence: 68364623
Design Group Id 55770682 Design Group Id 55770683 Design Group Id 55770684 Design Group Id 55770682 Design Group Id 55770683 Design Group Id 55770684
Intervention Id 52641463 Intervention Id 52641463 Intervention Id 52641463 Intervention Id 52641464 Intervention Id 52641464 Intervention Id 52641464

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30857678
Gender All
Minimum Age 45 Years
Maximum Age 100 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion criteria

Ability to walk, sit down and stand up independently
Ability to lie in supine or slightly elevated position for 8.5 hours
Age 45 – 100
Clinical diagnosis of COPD, including moderate to very severe chronic airflow limitation, and an FEV1 < 70% of reference FEV1 (GOLD II-III). If subjects are on β2 agonists, only those subjects with <10% improvement in FEV1 will be included.
Clinically stable condition and not suffering from a respiratory tract infection or exacerbation of their disease (defined as a combination of increased cough, sputum purulence, shortness of breath, systemic symptoms such as fever, and a decrease in FEV1 > 10% compared with values when clinically stable in the preceding year) at least 4 weeks prior to the first test day
Shortness of breath on exertion

Willingness and ability to comply with the protocol, including:

Refraining from intense physical activities (72h) prior to each study visit
Adhering to fasting state and no smoking from 10 pm ± 2h onwards the day prior to each study visit

Exclusion Criteria

Participants 86 and older that fail to get physician approval
Established diagnosis of malignancy
Established diagnosis of Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus
History of untreated metabolic diseases including hepatic or renal disorder
Presence of acute illness or metabolically unstable chronic illness
Recent myocardial infarction (less than 1 year)
Any other condition according to the PI or nurse that was found during the screening visit, that would interfere with the study or safety of the patient
BMI ≥ 45 kg/m2

Dietary or lifestyle characteristics:

Daily use of supplements containing EPA+DHA or HMB prior to the first test day
Use of protein or amino acid containing nutritional supplements within 5 days of first test day
Indications related to interaction with study products. Known hypersensitivity to fish and/or shellfish and/or soy
Use of long-term oral corticosteroids or short course of oral corticosteroids 4 weeks preceding first test day
Failure to give informed consent or Investigator's uncertainty about the willingness or ability of the subject to comply with the protocol requirements

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253868901
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 23
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 45
Maximum Age Num 100
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30603513
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Supportive Care
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Subject Masked True
Investigator Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28970031
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Marielle PKJ Engelen, PhD
Title Associate Professor
Affiliation Texas A&M University

Study References

Sequence: 52235323
Pmid 34743729
Reference Type derived
Citation Pinson MR, Deutz NEP, Harrykissoon R, Zachria AJ, Engelen MPKJ. Disturbances in branched-chain amino acid profile and poor daily functioning in mildly depressed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Nov 7;21(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01719-9.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Comparison of Two Pericardial Bioprostheses in AVR ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796442
2019-01-23

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796442
NCT03796442https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796442?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of the study is to compare early and 1-year hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement using two pericardial bioprosthesis, Avalus and Carpentier Edwards Perimount Magna Ease.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-01
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-08
Start Month Year January 23, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year May 13, 2021
Verification Month Year January 2023
Verification Date 2023-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-08
Results First Posted Date 2023-02-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20559223
Description This trial was designed as a multicenter randomized, controlled trial to recruit 386 patients who undergo aortic valve replacement with pericardial bioprosthesis. Patients were randomized by use of a randomization table. Bioprosthesis was chosen between Avalus or Carpentier Edwards Perimount Magna Ease according to the randomization result. The primary end point is postoperative 1-year transvalvular mean pressure gradient. The secondary end points are postoperative 1-year effective orifice area, operative mortality, operative morbidities, 1-year overall survival, 1-year freedom from cardiac death and 1-year freedom from valve-related events.

Facilities

Sequence: 198497634 Sequence: 198497635
Name Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Name Seoul National University Hospital
City Seongnam City Seoul
Country Korea, Republic of Country Korea, Republic of

Conditions

Sequence: 51753967
Name Aortic Valve Disease
Downcase Name aortic valve disease

Id Information

Sequence: 39825290
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value D-1812-024-991

Countries

Sequence: 42225344
Name Korea, Republic of
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55175113 Sequence: 55175114
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title AVALUS group Title CEPME group
Description patients who will undergo aortic valve replacement with Avalus bioprosthesis Description patients who will undergo aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis

Interventions

Sequence: 52075379 Sequence: 52075380
Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Device
Name AVR with AVALUS Name AVR with CEPME
Description aortic valve replacement with AVALUS bioprosthesis Description aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis

Keywords

Sequence: 79182620 Sequence: 79182621
Name aortic valve replacement Name bioprosthesis
Downcase Name aortic valve replacement Downcase Name bioprosthesis

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176032717 Sequence: 176032718 Sequence: 176032719 Sequence: 176032720 Sequence: 176032721 Sequence: 176032722 Sequence: 176032723
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Transvalvular Mean Pressure Gradient (mPG) Measure Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Measure Number of Participants With Op Mortality Measure Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Measure Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality Measure Number of Participants With Cardiac Death Measure Number of Participants With Aortic Valve-related Events
Time Frame at postoperative 1 year Time Frame at postoperative 1 year Time Frame at postoperative 30 days or at the time of discharge Time Frame at postoperative 1 year Time Frame at postoperative 1 year Time Frame at postoperative 1 year Time Frame at postoperative 1 year
Description transvalvular mean pressure gradient measured by trans-thoracic echocardiography Description effective orifice area measured by trans-thoracic echocardiography Description any death within 30 days after surgery or during the same hospital admission Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description patients who died from any cause Description Any death related to cardiac events, including sudden death during follow-up Description valve-related mortality, thromboembolism, bleeding, endocarditis, reoperation

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 191804469 Sequence: 191804470 Sequence: 191804471 Sequence: 191804472
Mesh Term Aortic Valve Disease Mesh Term Heart Valve Diseases Mesh Term Heart Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term aortic valve disease Downcase Mesh Term heart valve diseases Downcase Mesh Term heart diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 47931257 Sequence: 47931258
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Seoul National University Hospital Name Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29041128
Role Principal Investigator
Name Ho Young Hwang, MD, PhD
Affiliation Seoul National University Hospital

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67643255 Sequence: 67643256
Design Group Id 55175113 Design Group Id 55175114
Intervention Id 52075379 Intervention Id 52075380

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30521459
Gender All
Minimum Age 19 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

patients who are going to undergo aortic valve replacement with bioprosthesis

Exclusion Criteria:

heart failure with severe LV dysfunction (LV EF <30%)
active infective endocarditis
with other critical cardiovascular disease (e.g. acute aortic dissection)
with other critical comorbities by which the expected life span is less than 1 year
inadequate participant by the researcher's discretion

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254081447
Number Of Facilities 2
Number Of Sae Subjects 15
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 28
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 17
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 19
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30270472
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Milestones

Sequence: 40739496 Sequence: 40739497 Sequence: 40739498 Sequence: 40739499 Sequence: 40739500 Sequence: 40739501
Result Group Id 55809025 Result Group Id 55809026 Result Group Id 55809025 Result Group Id 55809026 Result Group Id 55809025 Result Group Id 55809026
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Count 70 Count 70 Count 66 Count 63 Count 4 Count 7

Outcome Analyses

Sequence: 16449188
Outcome Id 30592435
Non Inferiority Type Non-Inferiority
Non Inferiority Description The study was designed to have 80% power to detect 1-year AVMPG of 12.6±4.3mmHg for the study prosthesis and 11.9±4.3mmHg for the control prosthesis, with a 1-sided type I error of 2.5% and a noninferiority margin of 3mmHg. The noninferiority margin was determined by the values of 15mmHg for AVMPG of clinically significant aortic stenosis and 12mmHg for AVMPG of the control prosthesis.
P Value Modifier
P Value 0.0004
Method t-test, 1 sided
Groups Description The null hypothesis was that the AvalusTM was inferior to the CEPME based on the AVMPG at 1-year echocardiographic follow-up, with a non-inferiority margin of 3mmHg. The result for the primary endpoint was presented with 97.5% one-sided confidence interval for mean difference between groups. The non-inferiority test was performed using a t-test which compared mean difference between groups with the non-inferiority margin under the one-sided significance level of 0.025.

Outcome Analysis Groups

Sequence: 31901331 Sequence: 31901332
Outcome Analysis Id 16449188 Outcome Analysis Id 16449188
Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3896094

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 73491503 Sequence: 73491504 Sequence: 73491505 Sequence: 73491506 Sequence: 73491507 Sequence: 73491508 Sequence: 73491509 Sequence: 73491510 Sequence: 73491511 Sequence: 73491512 Sequence: 73491513 Sequence: 73491514 Sequence: 73491515 Sequence: 73491516
Outcome Id 30592435 Outcome Id 30592435 Outcome Id 30592436 Outcome Id 30592436 Outcome Id 30592437 Outcome Id 30592437 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592439 Outcome Id 30592439 Outcome Id 30592440 Outcome Id 30592440 Outcome Id 30592441 Outcome Id 30592441
Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 66 Count 63 Count 66 Count 63 Count 70 Count 70 Count 70 Count 70 Count 70 Count 70 Count 70 Count 70 Count 70 Count 70

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2563986 Sequence: 2563987
Document Type Study Protocol Document Type Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True Has Protocol False
Has Icf False Has Icf False
Has Sap False Has Sap True
Document Date 2018-12-28 Document Date 2018-12-28
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/42/NCT03796442/Prot_000.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/42/NCT03796442/SAP_001.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 27759502 Sequence: 27759503 Sequence: 27759504 Sequence: 27759505 Sequence: 27759506 Sequence: 27759507
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 5 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 6 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 6
Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70
Created At 2023-08-06 13:07:23.820187 Created At 2023-08-06 13:07:23.820187 Created At 2023-08-06 13:07:23.820187 Created At 2023-08-06 13:07:23.820187 Created At 2023-08-06 13:07:23.820187 Created At 2023-08-06 13:07:23.820187
Updated At 2023-08-06 13:07:23.820187 Updated At 2023-08-06 13:07:23.820187 Updated At 2023-08-06 13:07:23.820187 Updated At 2023-08-06 13:07:23.820187 Updated At 2023-08-06 13:07:23.820187 Updated At 2023-08-06 13:07:23.820187

Reported Events

Sequence: 524235338 Sequence: 524235339 Sequence: 524235340 Sequence: 524235341 Sequence: 524235342 Sequence: 524235343 Sequence: 524235344 Sequence: 524235345 Sequence: 524235346 Sequence: 524235347 Sequence: 524235348 Sequence: 524235349
Result Group Id 55809029 Result Group Id 55809030 Result Group Id 55809029 Result Group Id 55809030 Result Group Id 55809029 Result Group Id 55809030 Result Group Id 55809029 Result Group Id 55809030 Result Group Id 55809029 Result Group Id 55809030 Result Group Id 55809029 Result Group Id 55809030
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year
Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious
Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70 Subjects At Risk 70
Organ System Cardiac disorders Organ System Cardiac disorders Organ System Cardiac disorders Organ System Cardiac disorders Organ System Cardiac disorders Organ System Cardiac disorders Organ System Cardiac disorders Organ System Cardiac disorders Organ System Cardiac disorders Organ System Cardiac disorders Organ System Cardiac disorders Organ System Cardiac disorders
Adverse Event Term cardiac deaths Adverse Event Term cardiac deaths Adverse Event Term nonstructural valve dysfunction Adverse Event Term nonstructural valve dysfunction Adverse Event Term thromboembolism Adverse Event Term thromboembolism Adverse Event Term bleeding event Adverse Event Term bleeding event Adverse Event Term prosthetic valve endocarditis Adverse Event Term prosthetic valve endocarditis Adverse Event Term permanent pacemaker implantation Adverse Event Term permanent pacemaker implantation
Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0
Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28650624
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Ho Young Hwang
Title Professor
Affiliation Seoul National University Hospital

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3826838
Pi Employee No

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3826803
Organization Seoul National University Hospital
Name Prof. Ho Young Hwang
Phone 00-82-2-2072-3020
Email scalpel@snu.ac.kr

Outcomes

Sequence: 30592440 Sequence: 30592435 Sequence: 30592436 Sequence: 30592437 Sequence: 30592438 Sequence: 30592439 Sequence: 30592441
Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary
Title Number of Participants With Cardiac Death Title Transvalvular Mean Pressure Gradient (mPG) Title Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Title Number of Participants With Op Mortality Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality Title Number of Participants With Aortic Valve-related Events
Description Any death related to cardiac events, including sudden death during follow-up Description transvalvular mean pressure gradient measured by trans-thoracic echocardiography Description effective orifice area measured by trans-thoracic echocardiography Description any death within 30 days after surgery or during the same hospital admission Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description patients who died from any cause Description valve-related mortality, thromboembolism, bleeding, endocarditis, reoperation
Time Frame at postoperative 1 year Time Frame at postoperative 1 year Time Frame at postoperative 1 year Time Frame at postoperative 30 days or at the time of discharge Time Frame at postoperative 1 year Time Frame at postoperative 1 year Time Frame at postoperative 1 year
Units Participants Units mmHg Units cm2 Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 233985182 Sequence: 233985183 Sequence: 233985184 Sequence: 233985185 Sequence: 233985186 Sequence: 233985187 Sequence: 233985188 Sequence: 233985189 Sequence: 233985190 Sequence: 233985191 Sequence: 233985192 Sequence: 233985193 Sequence: 233985194 Sequence: 233985195 Sequence: 233985196 Sequence: 233985197 Sequence: 233985198 Sequence: 233985199 Sequence: 233985200 Sequence: 233985201 Sequence: 233985202 Sequence: 233985203 Sequence: 233985204 Sequence: 233985205 Sequence: 233985206 Sequence: 233985207 Sequence: 233985208 Sequence: 233985209 Sequence: 233985210 Sequence: 233985211 Sequence: 233985212 Sequence: 233985213
Outcome Id 30592435 Outcome Id 30592435 Outcome Id 30592436 Outcome Id 30592436 Outcome Id 30592437 Outcome Id 30592437 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592438 Outcome Id 30592439 Outcome Id 30592439 Outcome Id 30592440 Outcome Id 30592440 Outcome Id 30592441 Outcome Id 30592441
Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028 Result Group Id 55809027 Result Group Id 55809028
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Category Postoperative atrial fibrillation Category Postoperative atrial fibrillation Category Respiratory complication Category Respiratory complication Category Acute kidney injury Category Acute kidney injury Category Stroke Category Stroke Category Low cardiac output Category Low cardiac output Category Complete atrioventricular block Category Complete atrioventricular block Category Bleeding reoperation Category Bleeding reoperation Category Mediastinitis Category Mediastinitis Category Infective endocarditis Category Infective endocarditis Category No complication Category No complication
Title Transvalvular Mean Pressure Gradient (mPG) Title Transvalvular Mean Pressure Gradient (mPG) Title Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Title Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Title Number of Participants With Op Mortality Title Number of Participants With Op Mortality Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With Op Morbidities Title Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality Title Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality Title Number of Participants With Cardiac Death Title Number of Participants With Cardiac Death Title Number of Participants With Aortic Valve-related Events Title Number of Participants With Aortic Valve-related Events
Description transvalvular mean pressure gradient measured by trans-thoracic echocardiography Description transvalvular mean pressure gradient measured by trans-thoracic echocardiography Description effective orifice area measured by trans-thoracic echocardiography Description effective orifice area measured by trans-thoracic echocardiography Description any death within 30 days after surgery or during the same hospital admission Description any death within 30 days after surgery or during the same hospital admission Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection Description patients who died from any cause Description patients who died from any cause Description Any death related to cardiac events, including sudden death during follow-up Description Any death related to cardiac events, including sudden death during follow-up Description valve-related mortality, thromboembolism, bleeding, endocarditis, reoperation Description valve-related mortality, thromboembolism, bleeding, endocarditis, reoperation
Units mmHg Units mmHg Units cm2 Units cm2 Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 14.1 Param Value 13.9 Param Value 1.48 Param Value 1.53 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 21 Param Value 24 Param Value 6 Param Value 7 Param Value 4 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 32 Param Value 33 Param Value 1 Param Value 6 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 5 Param Value 6
Param Value Num 14.1 Param Value Num 13.9 Param Value Num 1.48 Param Value Num 1.53 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 21.0 Param Value Num 24.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 7.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 32.0 Param Value Num 33.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 6.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 4.3 Dispersion Value 5.1 Dispersion Value 0.39 Dispersion Value 0.38
Dispersion Value Num 4.3 Dispersion Value Num 5.1 Dispersion Value Num 0.39 Dispersion Value Num 0.38

Study References

Sequence: 51645986
Pmid 35917824
Reference Type derived
Citation Sohn SH, Kim JS, Choi JW, Lee JH, Kim JS, Lim C, Hwang HY. Preliminary Report from a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Bovine Pericardial Valves. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug 2. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1753494. Online ahead of print.

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11310265 Sequence: 11310266 Sequence: 11310267
Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Scope overall Scope overall Scope overall
Count 70 Count 70 Count 140

Result Groups

Sequence: 55809022 Sequence: 55809023 Sequence: 55809024 Sequence: 55809025 Sequence: 55809026 Sequence: 55809027 Sequence: 55809028 Sequence: 55809029 Sequence: 55809030
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event
Title AVALUS Group Title CEPME Group Title Total Title AVALUS Group Title CEPME Group Title AVALUS Group Title CEPME Group Title AVALUS Group Title CEPME Group
Description patients who will undergo aortic valve replacement with Avalus bioprosthesis

AVR with AVALUS: aortic valve replacement with AVALUS bioprosthesis

Description patients who will undergo aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis

AVR with CEPME: aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis

Description Total of all reporting groups Description patients who will undergo aortic valve replacement with Avalus bioprosthesis

AVR with AVALUS: aortic valve replacement with AVALUS bioprosthesis

Description patients who will undergo aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis

AVR with CEPME: aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis

Description patients who will undergo aortic valve replacement with Avalus bioprosthesis

AVR with AVALUS: aortic valve replacement with AVALUS bioprosthesis

Description patients who will undergo aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis

AVR with CEPME: aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis

Description patients who will undergo aortic valve replacement with Avalus bioprosthesis

AVR with AVALUS: aortic valve replacement with AVALUS bioprosthesis

Description patients who will undergo aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis

AVR with CEPME: aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 124800232 Sequence: 124800230 Sequence: 124800231 Sequence: 124800233 Sequence: 124800234 Sequence: 124800235 Sequence: 124800236 Sequence: 124800237 Sequence: 124800238 Sequence: 124800239 Sequence: 124800240 Sequence: 124800241 Sequence: 124800242 Sequence: 124800243 Sequence: 124800244 Sequence: 124800245 Sequence: 124800246 Sequence: 124800247 Sequence: 124800248 Sequence: 124800249 Sequence: 124800250 Sequence: 124800251 Sequence: 124800252 Sequence: 124800253 Sequence: 124800254 Sequence: 124800255 Sequence: 124800256 Sequence: 124800257 Sequence: 124800258 Sequence: 124800259 Sequence: 124800260 Sequence: 124800261 Sequence: 124800262 Sequence: 124800263 Sequence: 124800264 Sequence: 124800265 Sequence: 124800266 Sequence: 124800267 Sequence: 124800268 Sequence: 124800269 Sequence: 124800270 Sequence: 124800271 Sequence: 124800272 Sequence: 124800273 Sequence: 124800274 Sequence: 124800275 Sequence: 124800276 Sequence: 124800277 Sequence: 124800278 Sequence: 124800279 Sequence: 124800280 Sequence: 124800281 Sequence: 124800282 Sequence: 124800283 Sequence: 124800284 Sequence: 124800285 Sequence: 124800286 Sequence: 124800287 Sequence: 124800288 Sequence: 124800289 Sequence: 124800290 Sequence: 124800291 Sequence: 124800292 Sequence: 124800293 Sequence: 124800294 Sequence: 124800295 Sequence: 124800296 Sequence: 124800297 Sequence: 124800298
Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024 Result Group Id 55809022 Result Group Id 55809023 Result Group Id 55809024
Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Classification South Korea Classification South Korea Classification South Korea
Category Female Category Female Category Female Category Male Category Male Category Male Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category Asian Category Asian Category Asian Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category White Category White Category White Category More than one race Category More than one race Category More than one race Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported
Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Region of Enrollment Title Region of Enrollment Title Region of Enrollment Title Body mass index Title Body mass index Title Body mass index Title Body surface area Title Body surface area Title Body surface area Title Diabetes mellitus Title Diabetes mellitus Title Diabetes mellitus Title Hypertension Title Hypertension Title Hypertension Title Dyslipidemia Title Dyslipidemia Title Dyslipidemia Title Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Title Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Title Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Title Stroke Title Stroke Title Stroke Title Chronic kidney disease Title Chronic kidney disease Title Chronic kidney disease Title Peripheral vascular disease Title Peripheral vascular disease Title Peripheral vascular disease Title Atrial fibrillation Title Atrial fibrillation Title Atrial fibrillation Title Reoperation Title Reoperation Title Reoperation Title EuroSCORE II Title EuroSCORE II Title EuroSCORE II
Description The EuroSCORE II (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) is a prognostic scoring system developed in Europe for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. It calculates the risk of in-hospital mortality after major cardiac surgery. The scale ranges from 0 to 100. Higher value of the EuroSCORE II represents that the patient is predicted to have a worse outcome. Description The EuroSCORE II (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) is a prognostic scoring system developed in Europe for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. It calculates the risk of in-hospital mortality after major cardiac surgery. The scale ranges from 0 to 100. Higher value of the EuroSCORE II represents that the patient is predicted to have a worse outcome. Description The EuroSCORE II (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) is a prognostic scoring system developed in Europe for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. It calculates the risk of in-hospital mortality after major cardiac surgery. The scale ranges from 0 to 100. Higher value of the EuroSCORE II represents that the patient is predicted to have a worse outcome.
Units years Units years Units years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units participants Units participants Units participants Units kg/m^2 Units kg/m^2 Units kg/m^2 Units m^2 Units m^2 Units m^2 Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean
Param Value 72.8 Param Value 71.4 Param Value 74.3 Param Value 36 Param Value 33 Param Value 69 Param Value 34 Param Value 37 Param Value 71 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 70 Param Value 70 Param Value 140 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 70 Param Value 70 Param Value 140 Param Value 24.8 Param Value 24.4 Param Value 24.6 Param Value 1.64 Param Value 1.65 Param Value 1.65 Param Value 24 Param Value 24 Param Value 48 Param Value 52 Param Value 47 Param Value 99 Param Value 42 Param Value 31 Param Value 73 Param Value 4 Param Value 9 Param Value 13 Param Value 7 Param Value 7 Param Value 14 Param Value 8 Param Value 18 Param Value 26 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 3 Param Value 8 Param Value 7 Param Value 15 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 1.87 Param Value 2.11 Param Value 1.99
Param Value Num 72.8 Param Value Num 71.4 Param Value Num 74.3 Param Value Num 36.0 Param Value Num 33.0 Param Value Num 69.0 Param Value Num 34.0 Param Value Num 37.0 Param Value Num 71.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 70.0 Param Value Num 70.0 Param Value Num 140.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 70.0 Param Value Num 70.0 Param Value Num 140.0 Param Value Num 24.8 Param Value Num 24.4 Param Value Num 24.6 Param Value Num 1.64 Param Value Num 1.65 Param Value Num 1.65 Param Value Num 24.0 Param Value Num 24.0 Param Value Num 48.0 Param Value Num 52.0 Param Value Num 47.0 Param Value Num 99.0 Param Value Num 42.0 Param Value Num 31.0 Param Value Num 73.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 9.0 Param Value Num 13.0 Param Value Num 7.0 Param Value Num 7.0 Param Value Num 14.0 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 18.0 Param Value Num 26.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 7.0 Param Value Num 15.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 1.87 Param Value Num 2.11 Param Value Num 1.99
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 6.4 Dispersion Value 5.5 Dispersion Value 6.9 Dispersion Value 3.4 Dispersion Value 2.8 Dispersion Value 3.1 Dispersion Value 0.18 Dispersion Value 0.15 Dispersion Value 0.16 Dispersion Value 1.41 Dispersion Value 1.67 Dispersion Value 1.54
Dispersion Value Num 6.4 Dispersion Value Num 5.5 Dispersion Value Num 6.9 Dispersion Value Num 3.4 Dispersion Value Num 2.8 Dispersion Value Num 3.1 Dispersion Value Num 0.18 Dispersion Value Num 0.15 Dispersion Value Num 0.16 Dispersion Value Num 1.41 Dispersion Value Num 1.67 Dispersion Value Num 1.54
Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 70 Number Analyzed 140

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy Combined With Toripalimab in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796429
2018-12-17

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796429
NCT03796429https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796429?tab=tableTianshu Liu, Doctorliu.tianshu@zs-hospital.sh.cn+861368 1973 996Target population: patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (including gallbladder carcinoma, intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) .
Primary objective: progression free survival (PFS)/ overall survival (OS) of first-line chemotherapy plus PD-1 antibody (Toripalimab) in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

Secondary objectives:

objective response rate (ORR) of first-line chemotherapy plus PD-1 antibody (Toripalimab)
safety of first-line chemotherapy plus PD-1 antibody (Toripalimab)

3.Trial design: This is a monocenter, single arm, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy plus PD-1 antibody (Toripalimab) in patients with advanced advanced biliary tract cancer.

4.Treatment plan: Patients will be given treatment as below once recruited: PD-1 antibody Toripalimab(240mg, iv, q3w),combined with GS regimen(gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 ,d1,d8 + S1 40-60mg bid*14d,Q21d).

The treatment will be continued until emerging of disease progression or intolerable adverse effects (The upper time limit for treatment is 2 years).

5.Number of subjects: 40 patients. Number of centers: 1 sites ( Fudan University Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital).
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year December 17, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year December 1, 2022
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735720
Description Backgrounds:

Toripalimab (JS-001) is a PD-1 antibody developed by Shanghai Jun Shi Biomedical technology Co. Ltd. Nowadays, eighteen clinical trials of this drug have been conducted in patients with different types of advanced malignant tumor. Until now, Toripalimab has exhibited favorable safety in recruited patients. Incidence rate of SAE is 14.7%. JS001-Ib-CRP-1.0 is a phase Ib/II basket trial, aiming at evaluating safety and efficacy of JS001 in treating advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.The interim analyses results of 161 patients show that the ORR is 22.4%.

Now, the standard chemotherapies regimen for advanced biliary tract cancer include gemcitabine, platinum and fluorouracil; Considering the synergistic effect of chemotherapy and immune therapy, we choose GS regimen (gemcitabine+S1) to combine Toripalimab.

We will shut down the study in advance, if unpredicted SAE or low efficacy occur.

Patients with abnormal autoimmune status, unfavorable body function, factors impeding drug taking, absorption and metabolism will be excluded. Study participants with disease progression or severe/ intolerant toxicity during treatment will withdraw the study.

Hyper-progressive disease is defined as 1) progression 2) more than doubled growth rate 3) tumor volume increase >50% in 2 months after initialing the treatment.

Facilities

Sequence: 200243995
Status Recruiting
Name Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University
City Shanghai
State Shanghai
Zip 200032
Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28127921
Facility Id 200243995
Contact Type primary
Name Tianshu Liu, Doctor
Email liu.tianshu@zs-hospital.sh.cn

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18343526
Facility Id 200243995
Role Sub-Investigator
Name Yiyi Yu, master

Conditions

Sequence: 52207923
Name Biliary Tract Cancer
Downcase Name biliary tract cancer

Id Information

Sequence: 40186052
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value JS001-ZS-BC001

Countries

Sequence: 42599558
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55634523
Group Type Experimental
Title GS+Toripalimab

Interventions

Sequence: 52521940
Intervention Type Drug
Name GS+Toripalimab
Description Patients will be given treatment as below once recruited: PD-1 antibody Toripalimab(240mg, iv, q3w),combined with GS regimen(gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 ,d1,d8 + S1 40-60mg bid*14d,Q21d).

The treatment will be continued until emerging of disease progression or intolerable adverse effects (The upper time limit for treatment is 2 years).

Keywords

Sequence: 79922728 Sequence: 79922729 Sequence: 79922730
Name Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Name PD-1 antibody(Toripalimab) Name first-line chemotherapy
Downcase Name advanced biliary tract cancer Downcase Name pd-1 antibody(toripalimab) Downcase Name first-line chemotherapy

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177510711 Sequence: 177510712 Sequence: 177510713 Sequence: 177510714
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure progression free survival (PFS) of GS regimen plus PD-1 antibody (Toripalimab) Measure overall survival (OS) of GS regimen plus PD-1 antibody (Toripalimab) Measure objective response rate (ORR) of GS regimen plus PD-1 antibody (Toripalimab) Measure safety of GS regimen plus PD-1 antibody (Toripalimab)
Time Frame 36 months after the last subject participating in Time Frame 36 months after the last subject participating in Time Frame 36 months after the last subject participating in Time Frame 1 month after the last date of treatment
Description PFS is defined as time interval from recruitment to tumor progression or censoring. Tumor progression is defined as below: 1) relapse of primary lesion 2) emerging of new lesion 3) distant metastasis 4) death of any reason 5)tumor progression according to RESIST 1.1 on CT/MRI. Description OS is defined as time interval from recruitment to all-caused death or censoring. Description rate of patients with complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) based on RESIST1.1. ORR was evaluated by chest, abdominal & pelvic CT/MRI. Evaluation will be conducted every 6 weeks during treatment, and every 0.5 year after all treatments. Description Adverse events (AE) of chemotherapy will be graded and documented according to NCI-CTC AE v4.03 from the beginning of treatment to 1 months after the last date of treatment. Documentary will include severity, lasting period and occurrence time. Main AEs include vomiting, diarrhea, anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, hand-foot syndrome, immune related adverse events (including interstitial lung disease, AST/ALT elevations, hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism,etc) and hyper-progressive tumor.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193626419 Sequence: 193626420 Sequence: 193626421 Sequence: 193626422 Sequence: 193626423 Sequence: 193626424
Mesh Term Biliary Tract Neoplasms Mesh Term Digestive System Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Biliary Tract Diseases Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term biliary tract neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term digestive system neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term biliary tract diseases Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48353566 Sequence: 48353567 Sequence: 48353568
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital Name Shanghai Junshi Bioscience Co., Ltd. Name OrigiMed

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29305913
Role Principal Investigator
Name Tianshu Liu, Doctor
Affiliation Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12017165
Contact Type primary
Name Tianshu Liu, Doctor
Phone +861368 1973 996
Email liu.tianshu@zs-hospital.sh.cn
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199013
Design Group Id 55634523
Intervention Id 52521940

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30786793
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 75 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Male or female. Age ≥ 18 years and ≤75 years.
histologically documented advanced biliary duct cancer, including gallbladder cancer, intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, specimen within a year available for test (at least 10 pathological sections) .
at least one measurable lesion in abdominal CT/MRI according to RESIST 1.1 is required.
Karnofsky score≥ 80.
Adequate hematological function: Neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 × 109/L, Platelets ≥ 100 × 109/L and Hemoglobin ≥90g/L.
Adequate liver function: Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN); AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT) < 2.5 × ULN in the absence of liver metastases, or < 5 × ULN in case of liver metastases. ALP ≤ 2.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN); ALB ≥30g/L.
Adequate renal function: Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN, and creatinine clearance ≥ 60 ml/min.
Adequate coagulation function: INR/PT≤ 1.5 x ULN, aPTT≤ 1.5 x ULN.
No serious concomitant disease that will threaten the survival of patients to less than 5 years.
Written (signed) informed consent.
Good compliance with the study procedures, including lab and auxiliary examination and treatment.
Female patients should not be pregnant or breast feeding.
Agree to take contraception measures during treatment and in 120 days after last dose of Toripalimab or in 180 days after last dose of chemo.

Exclusion Criteria:

history of chemo, radiation, immune therapy or radical resection for the biliary tract cancer, except those patients who relapsed after 6 months since the last time of adjuvant therapy.
patients with active autoimmune disease or history of refractory autoimmune disease.
patients with active malignant tumor in recent 2 years, except the tumor studied in this research or cured locally tumor like resected basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, cervical or breast carcinoma in situ.
uncontrollable pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites in 2 weeks before recruitment.
patients who have digestive tract bleeding in 2 weeks before recruitment or with high risk of bleeding.
perforation / fistula of GI tract in 6 months before recruitment.
losing over 20% body weight in 2 months before recruitment.
pulmonary disease history: interstitial pulmonary disease, non-infective pneumonitis, pulmonary fibrosis, acute pulmonary disease.
uncontrollable systemic diseases, including diabetes, hypertension, etc.
severe chronic or active infections in need of systemic antibacterial, antifungal, or antiviral treatment, including TB or HIV, etc.
patients with untreated chronic hepatitis B or HBV DNA over 500 IU/ml or positive HCV RNA.

patients with any cardiovascular risk factors below:

cardiac chest pain occurring in 28 days before recruitment, defined as moderate pain that limits daily activity.
pulmonary embolism with symptoms occurring in 28 days before recruitment.
acute myocardial infarction occurring in 6 months before recruitment.
any history of heart failure reaching grade 3/4 of NYHA in 6 months before recruitment.
ventricular arrhythmias of Grade 2 or grater in 6 months before recruitment, or accompanied by supraventricular tachyarrhythmias requiring medical treatment.
cerebrovascular accident within 6 months before recruitment.
patients with peripheral neuropathy NCI CTC AE grade 1, except those with only deep tendon reflex disappearing.
moderate or severe renal injury [creatinine clearance rate≤50 ml/min (according to Cockroft & Gault equation)], or Scr>ULN.
allergic to any drug in this study.
history of allogeneic stem cell transplantation or organ transplantation.
use of steroids (dosage>10mg/d prednisone) or other systemic immune suppressive therapy in 14 days before recruitment, except patients treated with regimens below: a. steroids for hormone replacement (dosage>10mg/d prednisone); b. steroids for local application with little systemic absorption; c. short -term (≤ 7 days) steroids for preventing allergy or vomiting.
vaccinated with live vaccine in 4 weeks before recruitment.
receiving immune (interleukin, interferon, thymin) treatment or treatment of other trials in 28 days before recruitment.
receiving palliative radiation in 14 days before recruitment.
history of anti PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2 or any other specific T cell co-stimulation or checkpoint pathway targeted treatment.
receiving operation in 28 days before recruitment, only if the operation is a minimally invasive one e.g. PICC.
for patients with uncontrolled epilepsy, CNS diseases or history of mental disorder, researchers should evaluate whether their diseases will impede their signing of informed consent or compliance of treatment.
existing of potential situation which will impede drug administration or affect toxicity analysis or alcohol/ drug abuse.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989461
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 75
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30532863
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899157
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Tianshu Liu
Title Doctor
Affiliation Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

]]>

<![CDATA[ Obesity Study to Assess Induction of Labor ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796416
2019-12-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796416
NCT03796416https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796416?tab=tableNANANAThere are more and more pregnant women who are obese. It is very difficult for obese women to get into labor. That is why when women are obese, half are likely to need a Cesarean delivery(C-section). Unfortunately, C-sections are more dangerous for obese women. There may be a combination of issues that cause obese women to need C-sections. We believe one of those reasons is that the womb of obese women respond differently to medications and devices compared to non-obese women. There are commonly two ways to help women get into labor. One way is a medication called misoprostol. The second way is a device called Foley balloon. In most studies, both ways are equally effective in helping women get into labor. However, these studies included everyone, and didn’t focus on obese women.

So far there are no studies in this area that focus only on obese women. Therefore we need to design this study to focus just on obese women and what is the best way to help them get into labor and avoid a C-section.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-03-22
Start Month Year December 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 2022
Verification Month Year March 2022
Verification Date 2022-03-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-03-22

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 95376750 Sequence: 95376751 Sequence: 95376752 Sequence: 95376753 Sequence: 95376754 Sequence: 95376755 Sequence: 95376756 Sequence: 95376757
Mesh Term Misoprostol Mesh Term Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal Mesh Term Abortifacient Agents Mesh Term Reproductive Control Agents Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Anti-Ulcer Agents Mesh Term Gastrointestinal Agents Mesh Term Oxytocics
Downcase Mesh Term misoprostol Downcase Mesh Term abortifacient agents, nonsteroidal Downcase Mesh Term abortifacient agents Downcase Mesh Term reproductive control agents Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term anti-ulcer agents Downcase Mesh Term gastrointestinal agents Downcase Mesh Term oxytocics
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 51829157
Name Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn
Downcase Name induction of labor affected fetus / newborn

Id Information

Sequence: 39885427
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value HP-00077208

Design Groups

Sequence: 55252108 Sequence: 55252109
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Experimental
Title misoprostol Title Misoprostol and foley bulb
Description Induction using misoprostol:

Insert misoprostol 25 micrograms in the posterior fornix of the vagina digitally Repeat cervical exam every 4 hours

Description Induction using Foley balloon combined with misoprostol:

A 26 French intracervical Foley balloon will be inserted above the internal os at the start of induction, inflated using 80cc of sterile water.

If a Foley balloon is not able to be inserted at the time of starting induction of labor, misoprostol 25microgram can be inserted in the posterior fornix of the vagina and the misoprostol protocol followed.

Interventions

Sequence: 52150121
Intervention Type Drug
Name Misoprostol
Description used at a rate of 25 mcg Q4hours for cervical ripening.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176273032
Outcome Type primary
Measure achieving complete cervical dilation
Time Frame 24 hours

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192106937 Sequence: 192106938 Sequence: 192106939 Sequence: 192106940 Sequence: 192106941
Mesh Term Obesity Mesh Term Overweight Mesh Term Overnutrition Mesh Term Nutrition Disorders Mesh Term Body Weight
Downcase Mesh Term obesity Downcase Mesh Term overweight Downcase Mesh Term overnutrition Downcase Mesh Term nutrition disorders Downcase Mesh Term body weight
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48001218
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University of Maryland, Baltimore

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67736268 Sequence: 67736269
Design Group Id 55252109 Design Group Id 55252108
Intervention Id 52150121 Intervention Id 52150121

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30564635
Gender Female
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 45 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Morbidly obese patient (BMI≥40kg/m2) at admission for induction of labor Speaks English Gestational age between 37and0 weeks and 41and6 weeks Cervical exam: dilation <4cm and Bishop score 6 or less Contractions < 2 per 10 minutes

Exclusion Criteria:

History of cesarean delivery Maternal contraindications to labor Fetal contraindications to labor Maternal age <18yo Fetal growth restriction with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler indexes Cervical dilation ≥4cm or Bishop score ≥7 Contractions ≥3 per 10 minutes Non-reassuring fetal status Latex allergy

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254259129
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 45
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30312913
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28691554
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Sarah Crimmins
Title Assistant Professor
Affiliation University of Maryland, Baltimore

]]>

<![CDATA[ Bupivacaine Plus Diclofenac Versus Bupivacaine Alone for Postoperative Pain Relief in Gynecologic Cancer Patients ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796403
2019-02-15

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796403
NCT03796403https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796403?tab=tableNANANAcompare the postoperative pain between Bupivacaine peritoneal Infiltration plus immediately postoperative intramuscular Diclofenac and Bupivacaine peritoneal infiltration alone by using visual analogue score (VAS).
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-09-28
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-10-23
Start Month Year February 15, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year September 30, 2019
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-10-23

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20741032
Description The primary objective is to compare the postoperative pain between Bupivacaine peritoneal Infiltration plus immediately postoperative intramuscular Diclofenac and Bupivacaine peritoneal infiltration alone by using visual analogue score (VAS). The secondary objective is to evaluate the time to first dose and the total amount of morphine requirement after the operation in both groups.

Facilities

Sequence: 200279709
Name Rajavithi hospital
City Bangkok
Zip 10400
Country Thailand

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96132450 Sequence: 96132451 Sequence: 96132452 Sequence: 96132453 Sequence: 96132454 Sequence: 96132455 Sequence: 96132456 Sequence: 96132457 Sequence: 96132458 Sequence: 96132459 Sequence: 96132460 Sequence: 96132461
Mesh Term Diclofenac Mesh Term Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal Mesh Term Analgesics, Non-Narcotic Mesh Term Analgesics Mesh Term Sensory System Agents Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Agents Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Anti-Inflammatory Agents Mesh Term Antirheumatic Agents Mesh Term Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors Mesh Term Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Downcase Mesh Term diclofenac Downcase Mesh Term anti-inflammatory agents, non-steroidal Downcase Mesh Term analgesics, non-narcotic Downcase Mesh Term analgesics Downcase Mesh Term sensory system agents Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system agents Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term anti-inflammatory agents Downcase Mesh Term antirheumatic agents Downcase Mesh Term cyclooxygenase inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52221198
Name Post-operative Pain
Downcase Name post-operative pain

Id Information

Sequence: 40195401
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value Suphetgyn2516

Countries

Sequence: 42609354
Name Thailand
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55649431 Sequence: 55649432
Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title diclofenac and bupivacaine group Title bupivacaine only group
Description Twenty mL of bupivacaine was infiltrated into surgical-site peritoneum , divided in 10 sites before closure, and diclofenac 75 mg (3 mL) was intramuscularly injected immediately after complete the procedure and the operative field was covered with sterile adhesive wound dressing. Description Twenty mL of bupivacaine was infiltrated into surgical-site peritoneum, divided in 10 sites before closure and a 3 mL of sterile water was intramuscularly injected immediately after complete the procedure.

Interventions

Sequence: 52534972
Intervention Type Other
Name Diclofenac
Description Twenty mL of bupivacaine was infiltrated into surgical-site peritoneum , divided in 10 sites before closure, and diclofenac 75 mg (3 mL) was intramuscularly injected immediately after complete the procedure and the operative field was covered with sterile adhesive wound dressing.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177560132 Sequence: 177560133
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Post-operative pain relief Measure Morphine requirement
Time Frame During acute post operation peroid as 24 hours post operation Time Frame During acute post operation period as 24 hours post operation
Description compare the postoperative pain between Bupivacaine peritoneal Infiltration plus immediately postoperative intramuscular Diclofenac and Bupivacaine peritoneal infiltration alone by using visual analogue score(VAS). Score 0-10 .When Score is higher than 5 score ,the pateint will gain the analgesia as opioid. Description evaluate the time to first dose post operation and the total amount of morphine requirement after the operation in both groups. Score 0-10 .When Score is higher than 5 score ,the pateint will gain the analgesia as opioid.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193677292 Sequence: 193677293 Sequence: 193677294 Sequence: 193677295 Sequence: 193677296
Mesh Term Pain, Postoperative Mesh Term Postoperative Complications Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Pain Mesh Term Neurologic Manifestations
Downcase Mesh Term pain, postoperative Downcase Mesh Term postoperative complications Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term pain Downcase Mesh Term neurologic manifestations
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48366110
Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Rajavithi Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29312755
Role Principal Investigator
Name Suphet Tuipae, MD
Affiliation Rajavithi Hospital

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68216883 Sequence: 68216884
Design Group Id 55649432 Design Group Id 55649431
Intervention Id 52534972 Intervention Id 52534972

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30794516
Gender Female
Minimum Age 21 Years
Maximum Age 70 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

gynecologic cancer patients ,i.e. cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, or ovarian tumor suspicious for malignancy
who has scheduled for operation via laparotomy route
Women who has ASA physical status I-II
All of the have age more than 20 years old
able to communicate in Thai
Women who agrees to participate in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

patient who had emergency conditions – indication for emergency operation
intraoperative cardiac arrhythmia

operation purpose for only tumor biopsy

Women who have abnormal kidney function test (Cr > 1.5)
Women with history of gastrointestinal bleeding
Women who take the antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications
Women with history of allergy to bupivacaine and NSAIDs
Women who cannot evaluated pain score

Gender Description Gynecologic cancer patients
Gender Based True
Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254004003
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 7
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 21
Maximum Age Num 70
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30540556
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Triple
Intervention Model Description randomized into two groups by simple random. In bupivacaine and diclofenac group (n=70), Twenty ml of bupivacaine was infiltrated into surgical-site peritoneum and diclofenac 75 mg was intramuscularly injected immediately after complete the procedure and the operative field was covered with sterile adhesive wound dressing. In the bupivacaine alone group (n=70), 20 ml of bupivacaine was infiltrated into surgical-site peritoneum before closure and a 3 ml of sterile water was intramuscularly injected immediately after complete the procedure. Intravenous morphine injection was given if the pain score was more than 6 in the first 24 hours. Post-operation; time to first request of pain medication, doses, side effects, and vital signs were recorded. VAS was recorded at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours post-operation and patients' satisfied score was recorded after 24 hours post-operation.
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28906876
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of CAR-T Cells Targeting CD123 in Patients With Acute Myelocytic Leukemia ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796390
2018-12-26

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796390
NCT03796390https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796390?tab=tableJianqiang Li, PhD&MDlimmune@gmail.com008615511369555This is an open, single-arm, phase I clinical study to evaluate efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T cell immunotherapy (CAR-T) targeting CD123 in the treatment of Acute Myelocytic Leukemia. A total of 15 patients are planned to be enrolled following up one year.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-11
Start Month Year December 26, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year November 6, 2020
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-11

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20709977
Description Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells targeted against CD19 have demonstrated unprecedented successes in treating patients with hematopoietic and lymphoid malignancies. Besides CD19, many other molecules such as CD22, CD30,BCMA,CD123, etc. may be potential in developing the corresponding CAR-T cells to treat patients whose tumors expressing those markers. In this study, investigators will evaluate the safety and efficacy of CAR-T targeting CD123 in patients with Acute Myelocytic Leukemia. The primary goal is safety assessment including cytokine storm response and any other adverse effects. In addition, disease status after treatment will also be evaluated.

Facilities

Sequence: 199965046
Status Recruiting
Name Hebei Yanda Ludaopei Hospital
City Langfang
State Hebei
Zip 065000
Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28086642
Facility Id 199965046
Contact Type primary
Name Peihua Lu, PhD&MD
Email peihua_lu@126.com
Phone 008618611636172

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18318885 Sequence: 18318886
Facility Id 199965046 Facility Id 199965046
Role Principal Investigator Role Sub-Investigator
Name Peihua Lu, PhD&MD Name Jianqiang Li, PhD&MD

Conditions

Sequence: 52138974
Name Acute Myelocytic Leukemia
Downcase Name acute myelocytic leukemia

Id Information

Sequence: 40135035
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value Daopei CD123CAR-T

Countries

Sequence: 42542669
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55559311
Group Type Experimental
Title CD123 CAR-T cells
Description Patients will be be treated with CD123 CAR-T cells

Interventions

Sequence: 52454874
Intervention Type Biological
Name CD123 CAR-T cells
Description Patients will be drawn 50-100 ml blood to obtain enough peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) for CAR-T manufacturing. The T cells will be purified from the PBMC, transduced with CAR lentiviral vector, expanded in vitro and then frozen for future administration. Chemotherapy will then be given. Following tumor burden reassessment, CD123 CAR-T cells will be infused.

Keywords

Sequence: 79822776
Name AML,CD123
Downcase Name aml,cd123

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177263538 Sequence: 177263539
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Tumor load Measure CAR-T cell persistence
Time Frame Up to 12 months Time Frame Up to 12 months
Description Tumor load will be quantified with radiology, bone marrow and/or blood samples dependent on diagnosis. Description CAR-T cell persistence will be quantified with flow cytometry and qPCR; Percentage of CART cells in BM and copies of car per ug DNA

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193366401 Sequence: 193366402 Sequence: 193366403 Sequence: 193366399 Sequence: 193366400
Mesh Term Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Leukemia Mesh Term Leukemia, Myeloid
Downcase Mesh Term leukemia, myeloid, acute Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term leukemia Downcase Mesh Term leukemia, myeloid
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list

Sponsors

Sequence: 48290682 Sequence: 48290683
Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Hebei Senlang Biotechnology Inc., Ltd. Name Hebei Yanda Ludaopei Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29268523
Role Study Chair
Name Peihua Lu, PhD&MD
Affiliation Hebei Yanda Ludaopei Hospital

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12000483 Sequence: 12000484
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Peihua Lu, PhD&MD Name Jianqiang Li, PhD&MD
Phone 008618611636172 Phone 008615511369555
Email peihua_lu@126.com Email limmune@gmail.com
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68107410
Design Group Id 55559311
Intervention Id 52454874

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30747705
Gender All
Minimum Age 2 Years
Maximum Age 65 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects with acute myeloid leukemia who voluntarily signed informed consent and met the following criteria:

Diagnosed as recurrent or refractory acute myeloid leukemia
Tumor cells confirmed CD123 positive by Flow cytometry (FCM) or immunohistochemical detection, and CD123 positive rate >80%
Age ≥ 2 years old, and <65 years old
Estimated survival time is longer than 3 months from the date of signing the informed consent form
KPS ≥ 80 points
Important organs function need to meet the following conditions:

1) EF>50%, and there is no obvious abnormality in ECG; 2) SpO2≥90%; 3)Cr≤2.5ULN; 4)ALT and AST≤4ULN, TBil≤50μmol/L 7. Subjects with a pregnancy plan must agree to take contraception before the enrollment study and after the study lasts for six months; if the subject is pregnant or suspects of pregnancy, the investigator should be notified immediately 8. Need to stop chemotherapy for at least 2 weeks before collecting the blood to manufacture CAR-T cells.

9. For allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation subjects, it is necessary to stop the immunosuppressant against GVHD for at least 2 weeks before collecting autologous blood preparation, and if the donor is preparing blood, it is of no influence; 10. If the subject has a history of central nervous system (CNS) leukemia, the tumor cells in the cerebrospinal fluid need to be cleared and the white blood cell count <5 * 10^6 / L ,then can proceed lymphodepletion 11. Subjects who participate in other studies must withdraw other studies for 2 weeks before they can be enrolled.

Exclusion Criteria:

Combine other diseases not effectively controlled, including but not limited to persistent or poorly controlled infections, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina, arrhythmia, poorly controlled lung disease or mental illness
There are other active malignant tumors
Combined serious infection and can not be effectively controlled
Active hepatitis (HBV DNA or hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid [HCVRNA] detection positive)
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or syphilis infection
Have a history of severe allergies in biological products (including antibiotics)
One month after discontinuation of immunosuppressants, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients still have acute graft versus host response (GvHD)
Female subjects are pregnant or lactating
Systemic administration of glucocorticoids within one week prior to CAR-T treatment
In the past, there was a prolonged QT interval or severe heart disease.
Active autoimmune diseases requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy
The investigator believes that it may increase the risk of the subject or interfere with the study results.

Exit criteria:

The subjects request to withdraw from the study before CAR-T infusion
The subjects seriously violate the protocol
Before CAR-T infusion, the following indicators are still abnormal after treatment:

1) EF>50%, and there is no obvious abnormality in ECG 2) SpO2≥90% 3)Cr≤2.5ULN(the upper limit of normal ) 4) ALT and AST ≤ 4ULN, TBil ≤ 50μmol / L 4.Not enough T cells for manufacture standard CAR-T cells 5. Other serious adverse events occurred

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254121799
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 2
Maximum Age Num 65
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30493988
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28860268
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Rivaroxaban Hypericum Trial ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796377
2019-02-13

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796377
NCT03796377https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796377?tab=tableNANANASingle-center, open-label, sequential treatment study to investigate the influence of the combined P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4 inducer hypericum perforatum on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban in healthy volunteers.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-11-03
Start Month Year February 13, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year April 9, 2019
Verification Month Year October 2020
Verification Date 2020-10-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-11-03

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20727219
Description Each session (one with and one without preceding CYP induction) will start with phenotyping using 25 mg fexofenadine orally for P-gp phenotyping and 2 mg midazolam orally for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 phenotyping. After a washout period of 5 days, subjects will receive a single oral dose of 20 mg rivaroxaban, a dose currently approved for human use in clinical routine. The same procedure will be repeated after pretreatment with St. John's wort extract (Jarsin®) twice daily 450 mg po (dose usually used in clinical routine) for 2 weeks.

Facilities

Sequence: 200159517
Name Inselspital
City Bern
Country Switzerland

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96074326 Sequence: 96074327 Sequence: 96074328 Sequence: 96074329 Sequence: 96074330 Sequence: 96074331 Sequence: 96074332 Sequence: 96074333
Mesh Term Rivaroxaban Mesh Term Factor Xa Inhibitors Mesh Term Antithrombins Mesh Term Serine Proteinase Inhibitors Mesh Term Protease Inhibitors Mesh Term Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Anticoagulants
Downcase Mesh Term rivaroxaban Downcase Mesh Term factor xa inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term antithrombins Downcase Mesh Term serine proteinase inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term protease inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term anticoagulants
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52185594
Name Drug Interaction Study
Downcase Name drug interaction study

Id Information

Sequence: 40169141
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value Studien-Nr. 3459

Countries

Sequence: 42580725
Name Switzerland
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609230 Sequence: 55609231
Group Type Other Group Type Other
Title Rivaroxaban Title Rivaroxaban after CYP- and P-gp induction
Description Single oral dose of 20 mg rivaroxaban Description Single oral dose of 20 mg rivaroxaban after pretreatment with St. John's wort extract (Jarsin®) twice daily 450 mg po for 2 weeks.

Interventions

Sequence: 52499527 Sequence: 52499528
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name St Johns Wort Extract Name Rivaroxaban
Description 20 mg rivaroxaban after supplementation with St. John's wort extract (Jarsin®) twice daily 450 mg po for 2 weeks. Description 20 mg rivaroxaban.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432367 Sequence: 177432368 Sequence: 177432369 Sequence: 177432370 Sequence: 177432371 Sequence: 177432372 Sequence: 177432373 Sequence: 177432374
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Pharmacokinetic outcome measures: area under the curve (AUC). Measure Pharmacokinetic outcome measures: maximal concentration of rivaroxaban. Measure Pharmacodynamic outcome measures: Factor Xa activity Measure Pharmacokinetic parameters: Time to reach maximal concentration Measure Pharmacokinetic parameters: Plasma elimination half-life Measure Phenotyping metrics: AUC fexofenadine Measure Phenotyping metrics: AUC ratios midazolam Measure Phenotyping metrics: Single point metabolic ratios midazolam
Time Frame AUC will be calculated from the concentration-time plot (time points included: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours (post-dose) during both sessions) Time Frame Will be obtained from the individual plasma concentration data (time points included: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours (post-dose) during both sessions) Time Frame Time points used for analysis: pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours (post-dose) during both sessions Time Frame Time points used for analysis: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours (post-dose) during both sessions Time Frame Time points used for analysis: 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours (post-dose) during both sessions Time Frame Time points used for analysis: Before dosing and 0.5, 2, 3, 6 h after administration Time Frame Time points used for analysis: Before dosing and 0.5, 2, 3, 6 h after administration Time Frame Time points used for analysis: Before dosing and 0.5, 2, 3, 6 h after administration
Description Effect of pretreatment with hypericum perforatum on geometric mean AUC. Description Effect of pretreatment with hypericum perforatum on maximal concentration of rivaroxaban. Description Displayed as maximal effect (Emax) and parametrized by calculating the area under the time-effect curves (AUEC)). Description Time to reach maximal concentration of rivaroxaban Description Plasma elimination half-life of rivaroxaban Description Estimated AUC of fexofenadine Description AUC ratios of midazolam and 1'-hydroxymidazolam Description Single point metabolic ratios of midazolam and 1'-hydroxymidazolam

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332417 Sequence: 48332418
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern Name Bayer

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29293048
Role Study Director
Name Inselpital
Affiliation Sponsor: Inselspital, Bern University Hospital

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168302 Sequence: 68168303 Sequence: 68168304
Design Group Id 55609231 Design Group Id 55609230 Design Group Id 55609231
Intervention Id 52499527 Intervention Id 52499528 Intervention Id 52499528

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773635
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 45 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Men or women, age between 18 and 45 years (inclusive) at screening
BMI between 18 and 28 kg/m2 (inclusive) at screening
No clinically significant findings on the physical examination at screening
Hematology and clinical chemistry results not deviating from the normal range to a clinically relevant extent at screening
Ability to communicate well with the investigator and to understand and comply with the requirements of the study
Women of child-bearing age: willingness of using a double barrier contraception method during the study, i.e. a hormonal method (oral contraceptive, intrauterine device) in combination with a mechanical barrier (e.g. condom, diaphragm)
Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Known allergic reaction to any excipient of the drug formulations
Known photosensitivity
Smoking
History or clinical evidence of alcoholism or drug abuse within the 3-year period prior to screening
Loss of ≥ 250 ml of blood within 3 months prior to screening, including blood donation
Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days prior to screening
Previous treatment with any prescribed or over-the-counter medications (including herbal medicines such as St. John's wort) within 2 weeks prior to screening
Pregnant (positive results from urine drug screen at screening) or lactating women
History or clinical evidence of any disease (e.g. gastrointestinal tract disease) and/or existence of any surgical or medical condition, which might interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of the study drugs, or which might increase the risk for toxicity
Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity at screening
Any circumstances or conditions, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may affect full participation in the study or compliance with the protocol

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253952979
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 1
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 45
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 3
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 5

Designs

Sequence: 30519766
Allocation Non-Randomized
Intervention Model Sequential Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26680461
Intervention Id 52499527
Name Inducer of CYP3A4 and P-gp

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886067
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52079076
Pmid 32959922
Reference Type result
Citation Scholz I, Liakoni E, Hammann F, Grafinger KE, Duthaler U, Nagler M, Krahenbuhl S, Haschke M. Effects of Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban in humans. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Mar;87(3):1466-1474. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14553. Epub 2020 Oct 25.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Clinical Study of Endostatin in Improving Radiation Pneumonia and Fibrosis ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796364
2018-09-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796364
NCT03796364https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796364?tab=tableJianguo Sun, DoctorSunjg@aliYun.com8613983155736To verify the efficacy and safety of endostatin in the treatment of SRILI(symptomatic radiation-induced lung injury) and fibrosis. The results of this study are expected to be a new clinical strategy for the treatment of radiation pneumonia and fibrosis.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-25
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09
Start Month Year September 1, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year May 31, 2020
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20716323
Description Radiotherapy is an important treatment of lung cancer, symptomatic radiation-induced lung injury (SRILR) is the most common complications. In view of the important role of endostatin in inhibiting angiogenesis and pro-inflammatory factors, Combined with randomized controlled clinical study and small sample clinical exploration, the investigators concluded that endostatin is a new clinical technique for the treatment of radiation pneumonia(RP) and radiation fibrosis(RF), which can reduce the recurrence rate of RP. In order to verify the efficacy and safety of endostatin in the treatment of SRILI and fibrosis, the investigators intend to use a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial to classify unresectable phase III-IV Non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) patients with SRILI above grade 2 into the control group (standard SRILI treatment) and observation group (Endostar® plus standard treatment) on a 1:1 randomized basis. The results of this study are expected to be a new clinical strategy for the treatment of radiation pneumonia and fibrosis.

Facilities

Sequence: 200053420
Status Recruiting
Name Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing
City Chongqing
Zip 400000
Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28097573
Facility Id 200053420
Contact Type primary
Name Sun Jianguo
Email Sunjg@aliYun.com

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96027930 Sequence: 96027931 Sequence: 96027932 Sequence: 96027933 Sequence: 96027934 Sequence: 96027935 Sequence: 96027936
Mesh Term Endostar protein Mesh Term Angiogenesis Inhibitors Mesh Term Angiogenesis Modulating Agents Mesh Term Growth Substances Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Growth Inhibitors Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents
Downcase Mesh Term endostar protein Downcase Mesh Term angiogenesis inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term angiogenesis modulating agents Downcase Mesh Term growth substances Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term growth inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52156563 Sequence: 52156562
Name Endostatin Name Radiation Pneumonitis
Downcase Name endostatin Downcase Name radiation pneumonitis

Id Information

Sequence: 40148252
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value XQonc-008

Countries

Sequence: 42557789
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55577960 Sequence: 55577961
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Experimental
Title control group Title observation group
Description standard SRILI treatment Description Endostar® plus standard treatment

Interventions

Sequence: 52472062 Sequence: 52472063
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Endostar Name standard SRILI treatment
Description Patients in the observation group were treated with routine radiation pneumonia and Endostar. Endostar usage: continuous intravenous pumping of Endostar(14 doses each time) over 5 days. At week 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 36, 52, lung functional and blood oxygen saturation was measured, chest CT and the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were assessed for quality of life at week 12, 24, 52 and before treatment; collecting the related observation indexes of patients; primary endpoint; recrudescence rate of RP; secondary endpoints; remission rate of RP and incidence rate of RF; incidence rate of RF; number of acute exacerbations and quality of life. Description Patients in the control group were treated with current routine radiation pneumonia. At week 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 36, 52, lung functional and blood oxygen saturation was measured, chest CT and the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were assessed for quality of life at week 12, 24, 52 and before treatment; collecting the related observation indexes of patients; primary endpoint; recrudescence rate of RP; secondary endpoints; remission rate of RP and incidence rate of RF; incidence rate of RF; number of acute exacerbations and quality of life.

Keywords

Sequence: 79848186 Sequence: 79848187 Sequence: 79848188 Sequence: 79848189
Name endostatin Name Radiotherapy Name Radiation pneumonitis Name Radiation fibrosis
Downcase Name endostatin Downcase Name radiotherapy Downcase Name radiation pneumonitis Downcase Name radiation fibrosis

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328235 Sequence: 177328236 Sequence: 177328237
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure recrudescence rate of RP(Radiation pneumonitis) Measure remission rate of RP Measure incidence rate of RF(Radioactive fibrosis)
Time Frame at week12 Time Frame at week 12 Time Frame at week 12
Description Patients in the observation group were treated with routine radiation pneumonia and Endostar.

Patients in the control group were treated with current routine radiation pneumonia. Chest CT were assessed for recrudescence rate of RP at week 12. The calculation method is: number of relapse cases / total number of treatment groups × 100%; RP is classified according to CTCAE4.0, patients with grade 2 or higher are improved after treatment, and those who are assessed to be grade 2 or higher are considered recrudescence). Results are expressed as a percentage.

Description Patients in the observation group were treated with routine radiation pneumonia and Endostar. Results are expressed as a percentage.

Patients in the control group were treated with current routine radiation pneumonia. Chest CT were assessed for remission rate of RP at week 12.

Description Patients in the observation group were treated with routine radiation pneumonia and Endostar.

Patients in the control group were treated with current routine radiation pneumonia. Chest CT were assessed for incidence rate of RF at week 12.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193432270 Sequence: 193432271 Sequence: 193432272 Sequence: 193432273 Sequence: 193432274 Sequence: 193432275 Sequence: 193432276 Sequence: 193432277 Sequence: 193432278 Sequence: 193432279 Sequence: 193432280 Sequence: 193432281
Mesh Term Pneumonia Mesh Term Radiation Pneumonitis Mesh Term Fibrosis Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Infections Mesh Term Infections Mesh Term Lung Diseases Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases Mesh Term Lung Diseases, Interstitial Mesh Term Lung Injury Mesh Term Radiation Injuries Mesh Term Wounds and Injuries
Downcase Mesh Term pneumonia Downcase Mesh Term radiation pneumonitis Downcase Mesh Term fibrosis Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract infections Downcase Mesh Term infections Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases, interstitial Downcase Mesh Term lung injury Downcase Mesh Term radiation injuries Downcase Mesh Term wounds and injuries
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306148
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12004757
Contact Type primary
Name Jianguo Sun, Doctor
Phone 8613983155736
Email Sunjg@aliYun.com
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130924 Sequence: 68130925 Sequence: 68130926
Design Group Id 55577961 Design Group Id 55577960 Design Group Id 55577961
Intervention Id 52472062 Intervention Id 52472063 Intervention Id 52472063

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757393
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients defined as NSCLC who could not be operated on, phase III-IV;
EOCG PS: 0-3;
The clinical diagnosis is RILI, with grade 2-3;
No major organ dysfunction, such as heart failure and chronic obstructive pneumonia;
No Endostar use contraindication;
Volunteer to participate, good compliance, can cooperate with the test observation, and sign a written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient compliance is poor and violates the test regulations;
Major organ dysfunction like liver and kidney occurs, such as myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, liver transaminase increased significantly;
Hemorrhage or thrombus occurs, anticoagulant medication is required;
Serious adverse drug reactions occur during treatment;
The patient asked to be withdrawn from the trial;
Other antiangiogenic drugs were used.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254228569
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30503618
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26665943
Intervention Id 52472062
Name standard SRILI treatment

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869896
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Jianguo Sun
Title Deputy director
Affiliation Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing

]]>

<![CDATA[ Pharmacodynamic and Safety of MT10107(Botulinum Type A Neurotoxin) in Comparison to BOTOX® ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796351
2012-09-30

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796351
NCT03796351https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796351?tab=tableNANANAThis study design is a randomized, double-blind, intra-individual controlled, single-center, phase 1 healthy volunteer study. Subjects who voluntarily signed the informed consent and are judged to be eligible for this study will be intramuscularly injected with the study drug or the comparator at a randomized unit(2U, 5U, 10U, 20U, 30U) in each site of the Extensor digirotum brevis. Thereafter, follow-up visits will be made 14 days, 30days, 60days, 90days and pharmacodynamic and safety assessments will be conducted for total 90days.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2015-11-26
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-08-26
Start Month Year September 2012
Primary Completion Month Year January 2013
Verification Month Year August 2020
Verification Date 2020-08-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-08-26

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735718
Description This is a randomised, double-blind, intra-individual controlled, dose escalation study to assess the safety, tolerability and preliminary effectiveness of a single dose of MT10107 in comparison to Botox®50U (BOTOX® is a registered trademark owned by Allergan). This is the first-in-human study for MT10107, and will be performed in healthy volunteers.

Subjects will be administered a single equivalent dose of MT10107 and Botox®50U by intramuscular injection to the EDB muscles of contralateral feet. Five cohorts of eligible subjects will be studied; Group A (2 U dose), Group B (5 U dose), Group C (10 U dose), Group D (20 U dose) and Group E (30 U dose).

The foot in which each drug is to be administered (i.e. left or right) will be assigned in a randomized manner.

Facilities

Sequence: 200243993
Name The Catholic University of Korea, St. Paul's Hospital
City Seoul
Country Korea, Republic of

Conditions

Sequence: 52207920
Name Healthy Volunteers
Downcase Name healthy volunteers

Id Information

Sequence: 40186049
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value MT_PRT_EDB01

Countries

Sequence: 42599556
Name Korea, Republic of
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55634519 Sequence: 55634520
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title MT10107(botulinum toxin type A) Title BOTOX® 50U(botulinum toxin type A)
Description Subjects will be administered a single equivalent dose of MT10107 by intramuscular injection to the EDB muscles of contralateral feet in five treatment group. Description Subjects will be administered a single equivalent dose of BOTOX® 50U by intramuscular injection to the EDB muscles of contralateral feet in five treatment group.

Interventions

Sequence: 52521936 Sequence: 52521937
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name MT10107 Name Botox
Description Subjects will be administered a single equivalent dose of MT10107 and Botox® by intramuscular injection to the EDB muscles of contralateral feet. Five cohorts of eligible subjects will be studied; Group A (2 U dose), Group B (5 U dose), Group C (10 U dose), Group D (20 U dose) and Group E (30 U dose).

The foot in which each drug is to be administered (i.e. left or right) will be assigned in a randomized manner.

Description Subjects will be administered a single equivalent dose of MT10107 and Botox® by intramuscular injection to the EDB muscles of contralateral feet. Five cohorts of eligible subjects will be studied; Group A (2 U dose), Group B (5 U dose), Group C (10 U dose), Group D (20 U dose) and Group E (30 U dose).

The foot in which each drug is to be administered (i.e. left or right) will be assigned in a randomized manner.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177510703 Sequence: 177510704 Sequence: 177510705
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure The percentage change in CMAP M-wave amplitude in EDB muscle compared with the individual mean baseline value. Measure The potential diffusion effect on the adjacent muscles (AH and ADQ) as measured by surface EMG. Measure The percentage change in CMAP M-wave amplitude in EDB muscle compared with the individual mean baseline value.
Time Frame 30 days after the injection Time Frame 14, 30 and 90 days after the injection Time Frame 14 and 90 days after the injection
Description percentage change of CMAP(Compound Muscle Action Potential) amplitude of the EDB(Extensor Digitorum Brevis) muscle from baseline Description percentage change of CMAP(Compound Muscle Action Potential) amplitude of the adjacent muscles (AH and ADQ) from baseline Description percentage change of CMAP(Compound Muscle Action Potential) amplitude of the EDB(Extensor Digitorum Brevis) muscle from baseline

Sponsors

Sequence: 48353563
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Medy-Tox

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29305911
Role Principal Investigator
Name MyungEun Chung
Affiliation Catholic University of Korea Saint Paul's Hospital

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199009 Sequence: 68199010
Design Group Id 55634519 Design Group Id 55634520
Intervention Id 52521936 Intervention Id 52521937

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30786790
Gender Male
Minimum Age 20 Years
Maximum Age 65 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Healthy male adults aged between 20 and 65 years
Subjects with CMAP M-wave amplitude of the EDM muscle of ≥ 4.0 mV, CMAP M-wave amplitude of the AH muscle of ≥ 5.0 mV, and CMAP M-wave amplitude of the ADQ muscle of ≥ 5.0 mV.
Have no clinically significant medical conditions.
Able to provide written informed consent.
Able to attend all assessment visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects who have previously been treated in 3 month with botulinum toxin type A.
Subjects who had childhood botulism.
Subjects who have a pacemaker or other heart device.
Subjects who have had previous myotomy or denervation surgery in the muscle of interest (e.g., peripheral denervation and/or spinal cord stimulation).
Subjects with peripheral neuropathy and/or an accessary peroneal nerve.
Participation in any research study involving drug administration and/or significant blood loss.
Subjects with laboratory (haematology and biochemistry) or urinalysis results out of the normal range and considered to be of clinical significance by the investigator.
Subjects with a history of alcohol abuse and/or drug habituation.
Subjects who take regular medication.
Subjects with allergy or hypersensitivity to the investigational products or their components
Subjects who have been given any of the following drugs within previous 4 weeks at screening: Muscle relaxants, Benzodiazepines
Subjects who do not agree to use barrier method contraception (i.e. condoms) for the duration of the study.
Subjects who participate in regular physical activity/sport, which requires high load and intensity to the foot and cannot be stopped for the duration of the study.
Patients who are not eligible for this study at the discretion of the investigator

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989457
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2015
Actual Duration 4
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 20
Maximum Age Num 65
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30532861
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Screening
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26691976
Intervention Id 52521936
Name Coretox

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899154
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Sleep Quantity and Quality in the ICU: a Prospective Observational Stud ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796338
2018-02-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796338
NCT03796338https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796338?tab=tableNANANASeveral evidences in the literature suggest sleep interruption in critical care patients. Nowadays, the amount and the quality of sleep phases during the length of stay in the intensive care unit are largely unknown.

In this study, the amount of time spent by the patients in N1, N2 N3 and REM phases during sleep is quantified.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-07-22
Start Month Year February 1, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year January 31, 2019
Verification Month Year July 2022
Verification Date 2022-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-07-22

Facilities

Sequence: 199189147
Name Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi
City Florence
Zip 50100
Country Italy

Conditions

Sequence: 51953401 Sequence: 51953402
Name Sleep Disturbance Name Critical Illness
Downcase Name sleep disturbance Downcase Name critical illness

Id Information

Sequence: 39989613
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value CEAVC, 8611/2018; 11535/OSS

Countries

Sequence: 42380518
Name Italy
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55353395
Title Critically ill patients
Description age > 18 years

Interventions

Sequence: 52265629
Intervention Type Device
Name Sleep Profiler
Description Patients are observed through a Sleep profiler, routinely used in the intensive care unit (ICU). This device is applied at every patient in the ICU and it acquires EEG, electrooculography, and electromyography from three frontopolar EEG signals.

Keywords

Sequence: 79528870 Sequence: 79528868 Sequence: 79528869
Name Sleep phases Name intensive care unit Name Sleep interruption
Downcase Name sleep phases Downcase Name intensive care unit Downcase Name sleep interruption

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176606152 Sequence: 176606153 Sequence: 176606154 Sequence: 176606155
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Sleep N2 phase Measure Sleep N1 phase Measure Sleep N3 phase Measure Sleep REM phase
Time Frame The sleep architecture will be observed during the first night spent in the ICU Time Frame The sleep architecture will be observed during the first night spent in the ICU Time Frame The sleep architecture will be observed during the first night spent in the ICU Time Frame The sleep architecture will be observed during the first night spent in the ICU
Description describe the percentage of the total sleep time spent by the patient in N2 stage Description describe the percentage of the total sleep time spent by the patient in N1 stage Description describe the percentage of the total sleep time spent by the patient in N3 stage Description describe the percentage of the total sleep time spent by the patient in REM stage

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192623048 Sequence: 192623049 Sequence: 192623050 Sequence: 192623051 Sequence: 192623052 Sequence: 192623053 Sequence: 192623054 Sequence: 192623055
Mesh Term Dyssomnias Mesh Term Parasomnias Mesh Term Critical Illness Mesh Term Disease Attributes Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Sleep Wake Disorders Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Mental Disorders
Downcase Mesh Term dyssomnias Downcase Mesh Term parasomnias Downcase Mesh Term critical illness Downcase Mesh Term disease attributes Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term sleep wake disorders Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term mental disorders
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48115548
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Careggi Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29160894
Role Study Director
Name Gianluca Villa, MD
Affiliation Azienda Careggi

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67857642
Design Group Id 55353395
Intervention Id 52265629

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30637062
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age N/A
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Critically ill patients
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

age > 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnancy
Previous enrollment in the same study (sleep recording during previous night)
Previous use of hypnotic drugs

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254132261
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 12
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30383996
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28750729
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Gianluca Villa
Title M.D.
Affiliation Careggi Hospital

]]>

<![CDATA[ Depressive State After Sleeve Gastrectomy ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796325
2013-01-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796325
NCT03796325https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796325?tab=tableNANANAObesity is an epidemic disease that continues to increase causing morbidity and mortality to those who suffer. Obese patients suffer, frequently, from a depressive state, anger, and emotional disturbances. It cannot be recognized and depression causes obesity affecting eating habits or obesity causes depression based on physical, social and occupational limitations. Many times we see that obese patients are discriminated in every sense of daily life increasing their depressive state. The best treatment for obesity is bariatric surgery that causes a sufficient weight loss to correct sleep apnea, diabetes, hypertension, and many other co-morbidity. The study is based on elucidating the effect of sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients suffering from depression
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-29
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09
Start Month Year January 1, 2013
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2017
Verification Month Year December 2018
Verification Date 2018-12-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20783044
Description The patients were classified as suffering from a depressive state before the bariatric surgery and followed until 3 years after surgery, the data was collected by personal interview or telephone survey.

Facilities

Sequence: 200618352
Name Assuta MC
City Tel Aviv
Country Israel

Conditions

Sequence: 52328322 Sequence: 52328323
Name Obesity, Morbid Name Depression
Downcase Name obesity, morbid Downcase Name depression

Id Information

Sequence: 40271101
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value AMC 002-2018

Countries

Sequence: 42691172
Name Israel
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55768158 Sequence: 55768159
Title Depression Title No-depression
Description patients characterize with morbid obesity or obesity type 2 with co-morbidities and depression Description patients characterize with morbid obesity or obesity type 2 with co-morbidities without depression

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177959987 Sequence: 177959988
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Weight loss 3 years after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy Measure Depression state changes after Sleeve gastrectomy
Time Frame 36 month Time Frame 36 month
Description Measure of weight calculating Delta body mass index between preoperative measurement and three years after surgery Description Telephonic Questionnaire about feeling satisfaction (Very satisfied, satisfied, indifferent ,unsatisfied), eating mode (Volume-eater, sweet-eater, snack eater, binge eater, healthy-eater), occupations (Unemployed, employed, type of employment).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194085201 Sequence: 194085208 Sequence: 194085202 Sequence: 194085203 Sequence: 194085204 Sequence: 194085205 Sequence: 194085206 Sequence: 194085207
Mesh Term Obesity, Morbid Mesh Term Body Weight Mesh Term Depression Mesh Term Behavioral Symptoms Mesh Term Obesity Mesh Term Overweight Mesh Term Overnutrition Mesh Term Nutrition Disorders
Downcase Mesh Term obesity, morbid Downcase Mesh Term body weight Downcase Mesh Term depression Downcase Mesh Term behavioral symptoms Downcase Mesh Term obesity Downcase Mesh Term overweight Downcase Mesh Term overnutrition Downcase Mesh Term nutrition disorders
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48466447
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Assuta Medical Center

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30856343
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Patients 18 years and older with BMI at less 40 or 35-40 with co-morbidities
Criteria Inclusion Criteria: 18 years and older No any type of complication after surgery No difficult to drink, eat or take medicaments

Exclusion Criteria:

Any surgical complication Previous gastrointestinal surgery schizofrenia

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254313063
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 60
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30602181
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28968697
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Sergio Gabriel Susmallian
Title Head of the Department of General Surgery
Affiliation Assuta Medical Center

Study References

Sequence: 52232639
Pmid 30524743
Reference Type background
Citation Griauzde DH, Ibrahim AM, Fisher N, Stricklen A, Ross R, Ghaferi AA. Understanding the psychosocial impact of weight loss following bariatric surgery: a qualitative study. BMC Obes. 2018 Dec 3;5:38. doi: 10.1186/s40608-018-0215-3. eCollection 2018.

]]>

<![CDATA[ The Effect of Tub vs Sponge Bathing on the Comfort of Premature Infants ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796312
2015-11-20

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796312
NCT03796312https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796312?tab=tableNANANAThe integumentary system protects the underlying body from the external environment, such as shocks, temperature, ultraviolet radiation, chemicals, and other threats. There is a considerable body of clinical evidence highlighting the importance of the stratum corneum and its barrier functions, which are especially beneficial for newborns. Given the dramatic transition from the aqueous womb to the dry terrestrial environment at birth, studies describing adaptations made by the skin barrier within the first month of life assume greater importance. The skin of the baby is morphologically and functionally different from the skin of adults. Neonatal skin is thinner, more fragile, and drier than adult skin; it is difficult to maintain fluid-electrolyte balance and temperature regulation. Notwithstanding, structure and function of skin continues to improve during the first months and even years of life. Special care procedures are nonetheless necessary to ensure healthy development, to protect the skin from irritation and reddening, and to help the newborn feel well. Therefore, this study, taking the form of a randomized controlled trial, aims to examine the effectiveness of tub bathing and sponge bathing on the physiological parameters (heart rate, respiration rate, oxygen saturation, body temperature) and comfort of late preterm infants. Increasing comfort and physiological stabilization in premature infants during neonatal care improves their neurophysiological development. Bathing procedures that support this development and will not expose the newborn to stress should be preferred.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-26
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year November 20, 2015
Primary Completion Month Year November 29, 2016
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20709970
Description Increasing comfort and physiological stabilization in premature infants during neonatal care improves their neurophysiological development. Bathing procedures that support this improves and will not expose the newborn to stress should be preferred.This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of tub bathing and sponge bathing methods on the comfort and physiological parameters of late preterm infants. The study was conducted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a university hospital in Turkey, between November 2015 and November 2016. Skin care is routinely performed between 08.00 and 09.00 in the form of sponge bathing. This research study sampled 120 stable, late preterm infants being cared for in the NICU. This sample was deemed adequate based on a sample size calculation conducted in PS Power and Sample Size Calculations (Version 3.0). Information concerning allocation was available only to the principal investigator. Participants were assigned a sequential number that was placed in an opaque, sealed envelope by the researcher who received the signed parental informed consent. When the participant was scheduled to be bathing, the envelope was opened by the researcher who then performed the test. The nurses could not be blinded to the allocation because of the nature of the intervention. However, the outcome assessment of the participants was blinded. Participats were randomly assigned to either sponge bathing or tub bathing groups. Bathing was performed anywhere from 6 to 48 hours post-birth, based on individual participant needs. Participants were subsequently placed in a preheated incubator, which varied according to the participant's weight and age. In order to compensate for such differences, the heads of all participants were placed at a height of 30 degrees in a right lateral position after bathing and they were monitored. The participants were not dressed during the observation period. After bathing, participants were left without intervention or contact for approximately 10 minutes or until settled before being assessed. The data collection instrument, the Preterm Infant Bathing Study Record, was designed specifically for this study. The instrument incorporates a number of scales for the measurement of outcome variables, physiological parameters, and demographic information (age, gender, type of delivery, gestational age, birth weight, body weight at study time, etc.). Outcome measures include neonatal comfort behavior and physiological parameters (body temperature, heart rate, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate). Those responsible for data collection were blinded as to the allocation of participants they were assessing. The ComfortNeo scale was used to measure newborns' comfort and pain intensity. Comfort was inferred based on infant behavior, which was evaluated on two separate occasions, 10 minutes before bathing and 10 minutes after bathing. Measurement took approximately 1-2 minutes. Internal consistency was measured by way of Cronbach's alpha coefficient, which was 0.94 before bathing, 0.93 after bathing for the second researcher, and 0.92 after bathing for the nurse. Kappa coefficients were approximately 0.84 for each sub-item. Thus, there was harmony between the two observers. Infant physiological parameters (heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and body temperature) were evaluated on three separate occasions (10 minutes before bathing, 15 minutes and 30 minutes after bathing).Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 and SAS (ver.9.3), with statistical significance set at p<0.05.

Data was presented as means and standard deviations for continuous variables, and frequencies for categorical variables. For participant characteristics, such as the type of delivery and sex, a Chi-square test was applied to determine whether there were significant between-group differences. participant characteristics, such as birth weight and body weight at the time of the study, were evaluated for significant between-group differences using a one way ANOVA test. For a comparison of the different phases, measurement parameters (comfort score, heart rate, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, body temperature) through the baths were averaged separately. Repeated measurement analysis of variance was performed to analyze both between and within-group differences, followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc test.

Facilities

Sequence: 199964478
Name Akdeniz Universty
City Antalya
Zip 07000
Country Turkey

Conditions

Sequence: 52138954 Sequence: 52138955
Name Preterm Infant Name Premature Birth
Downcase Name preterm infant Downcase Name premature birth

Id Information

Sequence: 40135021
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 455111

Countries

Sequence: 42542642
Name Turkey
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55559292 Sequence: 55559293
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Tub Bathing Title Sponge Bathing
Description In this group, preterm infants were given tub bathing. Description Separate cotton cloths were prepared for each body area in the sponge bath. The room temperature was set to 26-27°C to prevent hypothermia. The temperature of the water used for sponge bathing was set to 37-38°C. Alongside the bath, the infant was placed on a flat, protected surface and washed from a bowl of water, using the same mild cleanser. The eyes, face, and head were wiped and dried while the baby was wrapped in a blanket. The wrap was opened so that body parts could be washed, dried, and then immediately rewrapped, after which infants were diapered.

Interventions

Sequence: 52454854 Sequence: 52454855
Intervention Type Behavioral Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Tub Bathing Name Sponge Bathing
Description The infant's face was washed and dried while still wrapped before being immersed. The water level in the tub was set at approximately 9-12 cm or deep enough to cover the baby's shoulders. A folded cloth towel was placed into the tub before bathing. The temperature of the bath water was controlled using a special water thermometer and adjusted to 37-38°C. The infant was held securely; the head and neck were supported on the researcher's forearm, and the shoulder was grasped using the researcher's thumb and finger. Cleaning was performed using a soft cloth and baby skin cleaner. The front and back areas were cleaned without turning the infant. The newborn was safely removed from the water and wrapped in a clean towel. Description Sponge bathing is routine care of the clinic

Keywords

Sequence: 79822750 Sequence: 79822751 Sequence: 79822752 Sequence: 79822753 Sequence: 79822754 Sequence: 79822755
Name Bathing Name Comfort Name Neonatal intensive care unit Name Nursing care Name Premature infant Name Skin care
Downcase Name bathing Downcase Name comfort Downcase Name neonatal intensive care unit Downcase Name nursing care Downcase Name premature infant Downcase Name skin care

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177263403 Sequence: 177263404 Sequence: 177263405 Sequence: 177263406 Sequence: 177263407
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Neonatal Comfort Measure Heart Rate Measure Oxygen Saturation Measure Respiration Rate Measure Body Temperature
Time Frame An average of 1 year Time Frame An average of 1 year Time Frame An average of 1 year Time Frame An average of 1 year Time Frame An average of 1 year
Description Data on comfort behavior was collected by a second researcher and by research nurses who had been trained by the lead researcher. Those responsible for data collection were blinded as to the allocation of infants they were assessing. The ComfortNeo scale was used to measure newborns' comfort. The ComfortNeo is a Likert-type scale consisting of six parameters: alertness, calmness/agitation, crying, body movement, facial tension, and (body) muscle tone. The lowest score that can be obtained using this scale is 6, and the highest score is 30. Scores in the range of 6 to 13 indicate that the newborn is comfortable, while scores 14-30 are indicative of pain or distress in the newborn, thus necessitating comforting. Comfort was inferred based on infant behavior 10 minutes before bathing and 10 minutes after bathing. Description The number of heartbeats per minute was obtained using a pulse oximetry device. A separate pulse oximetry probe was inserted into each of the infants. Description Oxygen saturation (SpO2) was obtained using a pulse oximetry device. A separate pulse oximetry probe was inserted into each of the infants. Pulse oximetry measures peripheral arterial oxygen saturation (%) as a surrogate marker for tissue oxygenation. Description The respiration rate is the number of breaths a person takes per minute. The rate is usually measured when a person is at rest and simply involves counting the number of breaths for one minute by counting how many times the chest rises. Description Body temperature was measured using the axillary method (under the armpit)in degrees Celsius.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193366342 Sequence: 193366343 Sequence: 193366344 Sequence: 193366345 Sequence: 193366346 Sequence: 193366347
Mesh Term Premature Birth Mesh Term Obstetric Labor, Premature Mesh Term Obstetric Labor Complications Mesh Term Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term premature birth Downcase Mesh Term obstetric labor, premature Downcase Mesh Term obstetric labor complications Downcase Mesh Term pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases and pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48290671
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Akdeniz University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29268512
Role Study Director
Name Emine EFE
Affiliation Akdeniz University Children's Health and the Nursing Department

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68107385 Sequence: 68107386
Design Group Id 55559292 Design Group Id 55559293
Intervention Id 52454854 Intervention Id 52454855

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30747695
Gender All
Minimum Age 34 Weeks
Maximum Age 36 Weeks
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

All inborn infants with a gestational age of 34 weeks and 0 days to 36 weeks and 6 days (late preterm) were eligible to participate in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants were excluded from the study if they were connected to
a mechanical ventilator,
if they had bathed in the last 12 hours,
if within the first 78 hours of the postoperative period,
had a central catheter,
had received either a sedative and/or muscle relaxant,
if they did not fulfill the inclusion criteria.

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254121789
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 12
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 34
Maximum Age Num 36
Minimum Age Unit Weeks
Maximum Age Unit Weeks
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 4

Designs

Sequence: 30493978
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Supportive Care
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Masking Description Physiological data was collected by nurses trained by the lead researcher. Data on neonatal comfort behavior was collected by a second researcher and by research nurses who had been trained by the lead researcher. Those responsible for data collection were blinded as to the allocation of infants they were assessing.
Intervention Model Description A randomized controlled two-group pre-test and repeated post-test study design were adopted. Preterm infants were randomly allocated before bathing by the researcher using a random computer-generated table to one of two groups: sponge bathing (routine care) or tub bathing. The bathing procedures were performed by the researcher. Nurses and a second researcher were blinded to the study hypotheses.
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28860258
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Halil Ibrahim Tasdemir
Title Research Assistant
Affiliation Akdeniz University

Study References

Sequence: 52032542 Sequence: 52032543 Sequence: 52032544
Pmid 15561658 Pmid 22375955 Pmid 31442786
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type derived
Citation Bryanton J, Walsh D, Barrett M, Gaudet D. Tub bathing versus traditional sponge bathing for the newborn. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004 Nov-Dec;33(6):704-12. doi: 10.1177/0884217504270651. Citation Loring C, Gregory K, Gargan B, LeBlanc V, Lundgren D, Reilly J, Stobo K, Walker C, Zaya C. Tub bathing improves thermoregulation of the late preterm infant. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2012 Mar;41(2):171-179. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01332.x. Epub 2012 Feb 29. Citation Tasdemir HI, Efe E. The effect of tub bathing and sponge bathing on neonatal comfort and physiological parameters in late preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Nov;99:103377. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Expression of MCM5 in Urine in Patients With Urothelial Cancers ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796299
2019-01-31

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796299
NCT03796299https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796299?tab=tableNANANAIn patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, the development and introduction to the clinical practice of an adequately accurate biomarker may allow to limit the indications for performing control cystoscopy. Thus, it will reduce the discomfort and stress of patients, the risk of complications of the invasive procedure and probably significantly reduce the costs incurred by healthcare systems.

The aim of the present study is to determine the usefulness of the determination of MCM5 protein expression in the urine of patients with urinary bladder or upper urinary tract cancer.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-27
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year January 2019
Primary Completion Month Year August 2019
Verification Month Year December 2018
Verification Date 2018-12-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Facilities

Sequence: 200159518
Name Medical University of Warsaw, Dept. of Urology
City Warsaw
Zip 02005
Country Poland

Conditions

Sequence: 52185595
Name Bladder Cancer
Downcase Name bladder cancer

Id Information

Sequence: 40169142
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 4-2018

Countries

Sequence: 42580726
Name Poland
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609232 Sequence: 55609233 Sequence: 55609234
Title 1 Title 2 Title 3 (control)
Description Patients with bladder cancer Description Patients with upper urinary tract cancer Description Controls

Interventions

Sequence: 52499529
Intervention Type Diagnostic Test
Name Assessment of expression of MCM5 in the urine (ADX Bladder)
Description Each participant will be asked to urinate in a plastic container. Urine will be centrifuged afterwards, then the expression of MCM5 protein will be examined in cells from urine sediment. For this purpose, it is planned to use the Arquer Diagnostics ADXBLADDER test. It is an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using two monoclonal antibodies directed against two different epitopes. Both antibodies have high affinity and specificity for the MCM5 antigen.

Keywords

Sequence: 79888915 Sequence: 79888916 Sequence: 79888917 Sequence: 79888918
Name bladder cancer Name biomarker Name urothelial cancer Name cystoscopy
Downcase Name bladder cancer Downcase Name biomarker Downcase Name urothelial cancer Downcase Name cystoscopy

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432375
Outcome Type primary
Measure Expression of MCM-5 in the urine
Time Frame Within 48 hours after subject enrollment
Description Expression of MCM-5 will be determined in urine sediment by Arquer Diagnostics ADXBLADDER test (ELISA test using two monoclonal antibodies directed against epitopes of high affinity and specificity for the MCM5 antigen).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193540518 Sequence: 193540519 Sequence: 193540520 Sequence: 193540521 Sequence: 193540522 Sequence: 193540523 Sequence: 193540524 Sequence: 193540525 Sequence: 193540526 Sequence: 193540527 Sequence: 193540528
Mesh Term Urinary Bladder Neoplasms Mesh Term Urologic Neoplasms Mesh Term Urogenital Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Urinary Bladder Diseases Mesh Term Urologic Diseases Mesh Term Male Urogenital Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term urinary bladder neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term urologic neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term urogenital neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases and pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term urinary bladder diseases Downcase Mesh Term urologic diseases Downcase Mesh Term male urogenital diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332419
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Medical University of Warsaw

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168305 Sequence: 68168306 Sequence: 68168307
Design Group Id 55609232 Design Group Id 55609233 Design Group Id 55609234
Intervention Id 52499529 Intervention Id 52499529 Intervention Id 52499529

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773636
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Population Patients qualified for surgery due to bladder or upper urinary tract tumors and controls.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

age >18 years,
written consent to participate in the study,
ability to void and collect >50ml of urine,
recurrent bladder cancer confirmed by cystoscopy (group 1) or upper urinary tract tumor confirmed by imaging studies (group 2) or no history of urological/gynecological cancers (controls)

Exclusion Criteria:

urinary tracy infection,
nephrolithiasis

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253952981
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30519767
Observational Model Case-Control
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886068
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52079077
Pmid 32924986
Reference Type derived
Citation Bialek L, Czerwinska K, Fus L, Krajewski W, Sadowska A, Radziszewski P, Dobruch J, Kryst P, Poletajew S. MCM5 urine expression (ADXBLADDER) is a reliable biomarker of high-risk non- muscle-invasive bladder cancer recurrence: A prospective matched case-control study. Cancer Biomark. 2021;30(2):139-143. doi: 10.3233/CBM-200316.

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Randomized, Crossover Study to Assess the Effects of Dietary Fiber-containing Bars on Glucose and Insulin Responses ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796286
2018-12-14

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796286
NCT03796286https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796286?tab=tableNANANAThis randomized, crossover study will include four clinic visits: one screening (day -7) and three test visits (days 0, 2, 4). The objective of this study is to assess the effects of dietary fiber-containing bars, at two doses of fiber, compared to a control product, on postprandial glucose and insulin responses in healthy adult men and women.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-07-24
Start Month Year December 14, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year February 27, 2019
Verification Month Year July 2019
Verification Date 2019-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-07-24

Facilities

Sequence: 200053455 Sequence: 200053456
Name MB Clinical Research Name Great Lakes Clinical Trials
City Boca Raton City Chicago
State Florida State Illinois
Zip 33487 Zip 60640
Country United States Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52156573 Sequence: 52156574 Sequence: 52156575
Name Blood Glucose Name Insulin Sensitivity Name Dietary Fiber
Downcase Name blood glucose Downcase Name insulin sensitivity Downcase Name dietary fiber

Id Information

Sequence: 40148259
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value MB-1805

Countries

Sequence: 42557795
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55577976 Sequence: 55577977 Sequence: 55577978
Group Type Placebo Comparator Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title Control bar (0 g fiber) Title Medium-fiber bar Title High-fiber bar
Description Each subject will be randomly assigned to consume a control sports bar-type product (0 grams of fiber) at one treatment visit. Description Each subject will be randomly assigned to consume sports bar-type product (containing 10 grams of fiber) at one treatment visit. Description Each subject will be randomly assigned to consume sports bar-type product (containing 20 grams of fiber) at one treatment visit.

Interventions

Sequence: 52472078 Sequence: 52472079 Sequence: 52472080
Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other
Name Medium-fiber bar Name High-fiber bar Name Control bar (0 g fiber)
Description Each subject will receive one control and two active treatments in a crossover design. The two active treatments are dietary fiber-containing bars at two doses of fiber. The control bar will not contain fiber. Description Each subject will receive one control and two active treatments in a crossover design. The two active treatments are dietary fiber-containing bars at two doses of fiber. The control bar will not contain fiber. Description Each subject will receive one control and two active treatments in a crossover design. The two active treatments are dietary fiber-containing bars at two doses of fiber. The control bar will not contain fiber.

Keywords

Sequence: 79848196 Sequence: 79848197
Name Postprandial glucose Name Meal tolerance test
Downcase Name postprandial glucose Downcase Name meal tolerance test

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328346 Sequence: 177328347 Sequence: 177328348
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change in the incremental area under the curve for capillary glucose. Measure Change in the incremental area under the curve for venous glucose. Measure Change in the incremental area under the curve for venous insulin.
Time Frame Up to 120 minutes – measured at each treatment visit Time Frame Up to 120 minutes – measured at each treatment visit Time Frame Differences between the dietary fiber and control conditions following a breakfast meal tolerance test (MTT) completed at visits 2, 3, and 4 in the incremental AUC (iAUC) from pre-breakfast intake to 2 hours post breakfast intake for venous glucose.
Description Differences between the dietary fiber and control conditions following a breakfast meal tolerance test (MTT) completed at visits 2, 3, and 4 in the incremental AUC (iAUC) from pre-breakfast intake to 2 hours post breakfast intake for capillary glucose. Description Differences between the dietary fiber and control conditions following a breakfast meal tolerance test (MTT) completed at visits 2, 3, and 4 in the incremental AUC (iAUC) from pre-breakfast intake to 2 hours post breakfast intake for venous glucose. Description Differences between the dietary fiber and control conditions following a breakfast meal tolerance test (MTT) completed at visits 2, 3, and 4 in the incremental AUC (iAUC) from pre-breakfast intake to 2 hours post breakfast intake for venous insulin.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193432315 Sequence: 193432316 Sequence: 193432317 Sequence: 193432318
Mesh Term Insulin Resistance Mesh Term Hyperinsulinism Mesh Term Glucose Metabolism Disorders Mesh Term Metabolic Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term insulin resistance Downcase Mesh Term hyperinsulinism Downcase Mesh Term glucose metabolism disorders Downcase Mesh Term metabolic diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306159 Sequence: 48306160
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Midwest Center for Metabolic and Cardiovascular Research Name Ingredion Incorporated

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29277986
Role Study Director
Name Kevin Maki, PhD
Affiliation MB Clinical Research and Consulting LLC

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130949 Sequence: 68130950 Sequence: 68130951
Design Group Id 55577977 Design Group Id 55577978 Design Group Id 55577976
Intervention Id 52472078 Intervention Id 52472079 Intervention Id 52472080

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757399
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 65 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Male or female, 18-65 y of age, inclusive.
Subject has a body mass index of 18.5 to 32.0 kg/m, inclusive.
Subject is judged by the Investigator to be in generally good health on the basis of medical history and screening measurements.
Subject is willing to consume the study products as described in the protocol.
Subject is willing to maintain usual diet and activity patterns throughout the study.
Subject has no plans to change smoking or other nicotine use during the study period.
Subject is willing and able to attend all clinic visits.
Subject has a vein access scale score of 7-10.
Subject understands the study procedures and signs forms documenting informed consent to participate in the study and authorization for release of relevant protected health information to the study Investigator and is willing to complete study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

Individual has a clinically significant gastrointestinal, endocrine (including Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus), cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, pancreatic, neurologic, or biliary disorder.
Subject has pre-diabetes (fasting capillary glucose between 100 and 125 mg/dL) at screening. One re-test on a separate day will be allowed for subjects with no known history of pre-diabetes or diabetes who have a capillary glucose of 100 – 110 mg/dL at screening (visit 1).
Individual has uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥100 mm Hg) at screening.
Individual has a history of cancer in the prior 2 years, except for non-melanoma skin cancer.
Individual has extreme dietary habits (e.g., Atkins, vegan).
Individual has had weight change of ±4.5 kg (10 lbs) in the previous 3 months.
Individual has a known allergy, sensitivity, or intolerance to any ingredients in the study products.
Individual is a female, who is pregnant, planning to be pregnant during the study period, lactating, or is of childbearing potential and is unwilling to commit to the use of a medically approved form of contraception throughout the study period.
Individual has been exposed to any non-registered drug product within 30 days of screening.
Individual has a condition the Investigator believes would interfere with his or her ability to provide informed consent or comply with the study protocol, or which might confound the interpretation of the study results or put the person at undue risk.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254228953
Number Of Facilities 2
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 2
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 65
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30503624
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Crossover Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Masking Description The study site will be provided pre-packaged, sealed containers of control (a bar with no fiber) and active study products (a bar with 10 grams of fiber and a bar with 20 grams of fiber). Each product container will be labeled with the lot number, expiration date, and blinded product code.
Intervention Model Description Randomized, controlled, three-treatment, crossover trial with one screening/baseline visit and three test visits. At each testing visit, the study product (a bar) will be consumed with water.
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869902
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Ketoconazole Before Surgery in Treating Patients With Recurrent Glioma or Breast Cancer Brain Metastases ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796273
2019-03-13

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796273
NCT03796273https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796273?tab=tableNANANAThis trial studies the side effects and how well ketoconazole works before surgery in treating patients with glioma that has come back or breast cancer that has spread to the brain. Ketoconazole is an antifungal drug that may be able to block a protein, tGLI1 and may help to treat brain tumors.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-26
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-06-01
Start Month Year March 13, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year July 2023
Verification Month Year May 2023
Verification Date 2023-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-06-01

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20758300
Description PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine if ketoconazole alters the tGLI1 activation signature (tGAS) which is consisted of eight validated tGLI1 regulated genes (CD24, CD44, VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGFR2, TEM7, OCT-4. and heparanase) in tGLI1 expressing brain biospecimens.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine if pre-treatment with ketoconazole, an inhibitor of the tGLI1 pathway in tissue culture and animal models, reduces circulating tGLI1 associated exosomal miRNA expression (miR1290 and miR1246) in brain tumor patients.

II. To describe the safety of ketoconazole when administered peri-operatively to patients with primary and secondary brain tumors.

III. To measure the blood brain penetrance of ketoconazole in serum relative to enhancing brain tissue.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To measure blood brain penetration of ketoconazole in serum relative to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum relative to non-enhancing brain tissue (exploratory recurrent glioma patients only).

II. To compare tGLI1 expression and pathway modulation with ketoconazole pre-treatment in patients with recurrent gliomas relative to breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM).

III. To determine the overall survival and toxicity outcomes for patients that continue ketoconazole after surgery, at the discretion of the treating physician.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients receive ketoconazole orally (PO) once daily (QD) on days 1-4 before standard surgery in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

ARM II: Patients undergo standard surgery.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days.

Facilities

Sequence: 200417177
Status Recruiting
Name Wake Forest University Health Sciences
City Winston-Salem
State North Carolina
Zip 27157
Country United States

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28150961
Facility Id 200417177
Contact Type primary
Name Roy E. Strowd
Email rstrowd@wakehealth.edu
Phone 336-716-7422

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18356783
Facility Id 200417177
Role Principal Investigator
Name Roy E. Strowd

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96202594 Sequence: 96202595 Sequence: 96202596 Sequence: 96202597 Sequence: 96202598 Sequence: 96202599 Sequence: 96202600 Sequence: 96202601 Sequence: 96202602 Sequence: 96202603 Sequence: 96202604 Sequence: 96202605
Mesh Term Ketoconazole Mesh Term Antifungal Agents Mesh Term Anti-Infective Agents Mesh Term 14-alpha Demethylase Inhibitors Mesh Term Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors Mesh Term Hormone Antagonists Mesh Term Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inhibitors
Downcase Mesh Term ketoconazole Downcase Mesh Term antifungal agents Downcase Mesh Term anti-infective agents Downcase Mesh Term 14-alpha demethylase inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term cytochrome p-450 enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term steroid synthesis inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term hormone antagonists Downcase Mesh Term hormones, hormone substitutes, and hormone antagonists Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term cytochrome p-450 cyp3a inhibitors
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52265400 Sequence: 52265401 Sequence: 52265402 Sequence: 52265403 Sequence: 52265404 Sequence: 52265405 Sequence: 52265406 Sequence: 52265407
Name Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8 Name Astrocytoma Name Breast Carcinoma Metastatic in the Brain Name Glioma Name Invasive Breast Carcinoma Name Oligodendroglioma Name Prognostic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8 Name Recurrent Glioma
Downcase Name anatomic stage iv breast cancer ajcc v8 Downcase Name astrocytoma Downcase Name breast carcinoma metastatic in the brain Downcase Name glioma Downcase Name invasive breast carcinoma Downcase Name oligodendroglioma Downcase Name prognostic stage iv breast cancer ajcc v8 Downcase Name recurrent glioma

Id Information

Sequence: 40227073 Sequence: 40227074 Sequence: 40227075 Sequence: 40227076
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id Id Source secondary_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value IRB00054587 Id Value NCI-2018-03087 Id Value CCCWFU 91118 Id Value P30CA012197
Id Type Registry Identifier Id Type Other Identifier Id Type U.S. NIH Grant/Contract
Id Type Description CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) Id Type Description Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Id Link https://reporter.nih.gov/quickSearch/P30CA012197

Countries

Sequence: 42643472
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55698704 Sequence: 55698705
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Arm I (ketoconazole) Title Arm II (standard surgery)
Description Patients receive ketoconazole PO QD on days 1-4 before standard surgery in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Description Patients undergo standard surgery.

Interventions

Sequence: 52578072 Sequence: 52578073
Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Drug
Name Best Practice Name Ketoconazole
Description Undergo standard surgery Description Given PO

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177725770 Sequence: 177725771 Sequence: 177725772 Sequence: 177725773 Sequence: 177725774 Sequence: 177725775 Sequence: 177725776 Sequence: 177725777 Sequence: 177725778
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure tGLI1 activation signature 8 (t-GAS 8) Measure tGLI1 pathway activation Measure Incidence of adverse events (AEs) Measure Blood brain penetrance of ketoconazole in serum relative to enhancing brain tissue Measure Serum ketoconazole concentrations in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Measure Serum ketoconazole concentrations in enhancing brain tissue Measure Serum ketoconzcole concentrations in unenhancing brain tissue Measure Changes in tGLI1 signaling pathway Measure Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame Up to 30 days after surgery Time Frame Up to 30 days after surgery Time Frame Up to 30 days after surgery Time Frame Up to 30 days after surgery Time Frame Up to 30 days after surgery Time Frame Up to 30 days after surgery Time Frame Up to 30 days after surgery Time Frame Baseline up to 30 days after surgery Time Frame From the date of the starting ketoconazole to the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 30 days after ketoconazole treatment completion
Description The primary outcome of this study is modulation of the tGLI1 pathway as assessed by the tGLI1 activation signature 8 (t-GAS 8) [29, 40]. t-GAS 8 consists of eight validated tGLI1 regulated genes (CD24, CD44, VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGFR2, TEM7, OCT-4. and heparanase) and is measured using qPCR in patients whose brain tissue expresses tGLI1 (by IHC). The distribution of the tGAS will be examined and transformed to approximate the conditional normality assumption if necessary. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods will be used to determine the effects of different factors of interest (e.g., treatment or tumor type) on the outcomes measured. Description tGLI1 pathway activation will be compared between treatment groups using ANOVA as described for the analysis of primary objective. Description The safety of ketoconazole will be defined by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 4.0 criteria and determined by adverse event proportions. The adverse event proportions will be compared between treatment groups using chi-squared tests. If feasible, a logistic regression model will be used to detect whether the adverse event proportion is higher in the treatment group after adjusting for the tumor type. Description The analysis will be the same as that for the analysis of primary objective. Description Measured using mass spectroscopy. The analysis will be the same as that for the analysis of primary objective. If the sample size is too small, the nonparametric approach will be considered as the primary analysis. Description Measured using mass spectroscopy. The analysis will be the same as that for the analysis of primary objective. If the sample size is too small, the nonparametric approach will be considered as the primary analysis. Description Measured using mass spectroscopy. The analysis will be the same as that for the analysis of primary objective. If the sample size is too small, the nonparametric approach will be considered as the primary analysis. Description Will be calculated and compared between treatment groups. Ideally analysis of covariance should be done. However, due to the small sample size, ANOVA as described for the primary analysis approach or the 2-sample t test will be used. If needed, non-parametric approaches will be used instead. Description The Kaplan-Meier method will be used to estimate OS probability and median time of survival along with the 95% confidence interval.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193847071 Sequence: 193847072 Sequence: 193847073 Sequence: 193847074 Sequence: 193847075 Sequence: 193847076 Sequence: 193847077 Sequence: 193847078 Sequence: 193847079 Sequence: 193847080 Sequence: 193847081 Sequence: 193847082 Sequence: 193847083 Sequence: 193847084 Sequence: 193847085 Sequence: 193847086 Sequence: 193847087 Sequence: 193847088 Sequence: 193847089 Sequence: 193847090 Sequence: 193847091
Mesh Term Carcinoma Mesh Term Breast Neoplasms Mesh Term Glioma Mesh Term Brain Neoplasms Mesh Term Astrocytoma Mesh Term Oligodendroglioma Mesh Term Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Breast Diseases Mesh Term Skin Diseases Mesh Term Neoplasms, Neuroepithelial Mesh Term Neuroectodermal Tumors Mesh Term Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal Mesh Term Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue Mesh Term Central Nervous System Neoplasms Mesh Term Nervous System Neoplasms Mesh Term Brain Diseases Mesh Term Central Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term carcinoma Downcase Mesh Term breast neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term glioma Downcase Mesh Term brain neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term astrocytoma Downcase Mesh Term oligodendroglioma Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, glandular and epithelial Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term breast diseases Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, neuroepithelial Downcase Mesh Term neuroectodermal tumors Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, germ cell and embryonal Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, nerve tissue Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term nervous system neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term brain diseases Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48407258 Sequence: 48407259
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class NIH
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Wake Forest University Health Sciences Name National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29336401
Role Principal Investigator
Name Roy Strowd
Affiliation Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68276462 Sequence: 68276463 Sequence: 68276464
Design Group Id 55698704 Design Group Id 55698705 Design Group Id 55698704
Intervention Id 52578072 Intervention Id 52578072 Intervention Id 52578073

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30820183
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects must have a history of:

Histologically confirmed primary breast cancer including primary invasive and metastatic breast cancers with imaging findings consistent with brain metastasis. In the event that a patient presents with an initial diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer with imaging findings of a new brain metastases and unequivocal imaging findings of a primary breast cancer, consideration for study enrollment requires approval from the study chair (primary cohort)

OR

Histologically confirmed primary glioma including astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma of any World Health Organization grade with imaging findings consistent with recurrent or progressive disease (exploratory cohort). Patients with ependymoma will not be included.

Subjects must be undergoing surgical resection for clinical purposes with anticipated resection of at least 300 mg of tissue.
Patients with any prior number of radiation (including brain radiation), chemotherapy, or surgical interventions will be eligible for this protocol.
The effects of ketoconazole on the developing human fetus are unknown. For this reason, women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately.
Ability to understand and the willingness to sign an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved informed consent document (either directly or via a legally authorized representative).

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects with contraindication to ketoconazole including:

Prior allergic reaction or intolerance of ketoconazole
Known active hepatitis
QTc prolongation (based on electrocardiography [EKG] obtained within 21 days of enrollment, with a threshold of >450 ms in males and >470 ms in female)
Known liver cirrhosis will be excluded from enrollment
Positive serum pregnancy test within 21 days of enrollment
Subjects currently taking medications that are included in the contraindicated concurrent medications section of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indications for ketoconazole will be required to complete a seven day wash out period prior to consideration for enrollment.
Subjects for whom collection of blood, or tissue samples is unsafe or clinically inadvisable.
Pregnant women are excluded from this study because ketoconazole is a Class B agent with the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects. Because there is an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother with ketoconazole, breastfeeding should be discontinued if the mother is treated with ketoconazole.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254104462
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 5

Designs

Sequence: 30566130
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26717243 Sequence: 26717244 Sequence: 26717245 Sequence: 26717246 Sequence: 26717247 Sequence: 26717248 Sequence: 26717249 Sequence: 26717250 Sequence: 26717251 Sequence: 26717252 Sequence: 26717253
Intervention Id 52578072 Intervention Id 52578072 Intervention Id 52578073 Intervention Id 52578073 Intervention Id 52578073 Intervention Id 52578073 Intervention Id 52578073 Intervention Id 52578073 Intervention Id 52578073 Intervention Id 52578073 Intervention Id 52578073
Name standard of care Name standard therapy Name Fungarest Name Fungoral Name Ketoderm Name Ketoisdin Name Nizoral Name Orifungal M Name Panfungol Name R-41400 Name Xolegel

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28932525
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Study to Investigate the Relative Bioavailability of Entrectinib Capsule Formulations F1 and F06 Under Fed Conditions in Healthy Participants ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796260
2019-01-09

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796260
NCT03796260https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796260?tab=tableNANANAThis study aims to investigate the relative bioavailability, safety, and tolerability of entrectinib capsule formulations F1 and F06 under fed conditions in healthy adult male and female participants.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-02-26
Start Month Year January 9, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year February 4, 2019
Verification Month Year February 2020
Verification Date 2020-02-29
Last Update Posted Date 2020-02-26
Results First Posted Date 2020-02-26

Facilities

Sequence: 198630696
Name Covance Research Unit – Daytona
City Daytona Beach
State Florida
Zip 32117
Country United States

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 95307601 Sequence: 95307602 Sequence: 95307603 Sequence: 95307604
Mesh Term Entrectinib Mesh Term Protein Kinase Inhibitors Mesh Term Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Downcase Mesh Term entrectinib Downcase Mesh Term protein kinase inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 51790014
Name Healthy Volunteers
Downcase Name healthy volunteers

Id Information

Sequence: 39855188
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value GP41048

Countries

Sequence: 42254027
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55210668 Sequence: 55210669
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title F1 to F06 Crossover Title F06 to F1 Crossover
Description Participants first randomized to this arm will receive a single oral dose of entrectinib F1 (test formulation) on Day 1 of Period 1 after a standardized meal. This dose will be followed by a minimum 14-day washout period, after which participants will receive a single oral dose of entrectinib F06 (reference formulation) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Participants first randomized to this arm will receive a single oral dose of entrectinib F06 (reference formulation) on Day 1 of Period 1 after a standardized meal. This dose will be followed by a minimum 14-day washout period, after which participants will receive a single oral dose of entrectinib F1 (test formulation) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days).

Interventions

Sequence: 52112623 Sequence: 52112624
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Entrectinib Test Formulation (F1) Name Entrectinib Reference Formulation (F06)
Description Participants will receive a single oral dose of entrectinib F1 after completion of a standardized meal. Description Participants will receive a single oral dose of entrectinib F06 after completion of a standardized meal.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176153640 Sequence: 176153638 Sequence: 176153639 Sequence: 176153641
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Measure Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Measure Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-t) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Measure Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame At pre-defined intervals from study Day 1 through Day 5 of each Period (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days) Time Frame At pre-defined intervals from study Day 1 through Day 5 of each Period (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days) Time Frame At pre-defined intervals from study Day 1 through Day 5 of each Period (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days])
Description The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description The area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity is calculated using the formula: AUC0-inf = AUC0-t + (Ct/λz) where Ct is the last measurable concentration and λz is the apparent terminal elimination rate constant. The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description The area under the concentration-time curve calculated from Hour 0 to the last measurable concentration, calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule for increasing concentrations and the logarithmic rule for decreasing concentrations. The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 191950712 Sequence: 191950713
Mesh Term Malnutrition Mesh Term Nutrition Disorders
Downcase Mesh Term malnutrition Downcase Mesh Term nutrition disorders
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 47964008
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Genentech, Inc.

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29060524
Role Study Director
Name Clinical Trials
Affiliation Hoffmann-La Roche

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67689831 Sequence: 67689832 Sequence: 67689833 Sequence: 67689834
Design Group Id 55210669 Design Group Id 55210668 Design Group Id 55210669 Design Group Id 55210668
Intervention Id 52112623 Intervention Id 52112623 Intervention Id 52112624 Intervention Id 52112624

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30541671
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 60 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Healthy in the opinion of the investigator. Healthy is defined by the absence of evidence of any active disease or clinically significant medical condition based on a detailed medical history and examination
Negative test results for Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
Females must not be pregnant or breastfeeding, and females of childbearing potential will agree to use highly-effective contraception. Females of childbearing potential must also agree to refrain from donating eggs during the treatment period and for 6 weeks after the final dose of study drug
Males must agree to use contraception and to refrain from sperm donation from check-in (Day -1 of Period 1) to 90 days after the final dose of study drug

Exclusion Criteria:

History of gastrointestinal surgery or other gastrointestinal disorder that might affect absorption of medicines from the gastrointestinal tract
Presence of a clinically significant disease, illness, medical condition or disorder, or any other medical history determined by the investigator to be clinically significant and relevant. Ongoing chronic disorders which are not considered clinically significant are permissible providing they are stable
Clinically significant change in health status, as judged by the investigator, or any major illness within the 4 weeks before screening, or clinically significant acute infection or febrile illness within the 14 days before screening
Participation in any other clinical study involving an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or device within 30 days or 5 half-lives (if known), whichever is longer, before screening

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254206585
Number Of Facilities 1
Number Of Nsae Subjects 12
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 0
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 11
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 60
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 3
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30290205
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Crossover Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Milestones

Sequence: 40799729 Sequence: 40799730 Sequence: 40799731 Sequence: 40799732 Sequence: 40799733 Sequence: 40799734 Sequence: 40799735 Sequence: 40799736 Sequence: 40799737 Sequence: 40799738 Sequence: 40799739 Sequence: 40799740
Result Group Id 55879888 Result Group Id 55879889 Result Group Id 55879888 Result Group Id 55879889 Result Group Id 55879888 Result Group Id 55879889 Result Group Id 55879888 Result Group Id 55879889 Result Group Id 55879888 Result Group Id 55879889 Result Group Id 55879888 Result Group Id 55879889
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Period 1 Period Period 1 Period Period 1 Period Period 1 Period Period 1 Period Period 1 Period Period 2 Period Period 2 Period Period 2 Period Period 2 Period Period 2 Period Period 2
Count 7 Count 7 Count 7 Count 7 Count 0 Count 0 Count 7 Count 7 Count 7 Count 7 Count 0 Count 0

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3902854

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 73593026 Sequence: 73593027 Sequence: 73593028 Sequence: 73593029 Sequence: 73593030 Sequence: 73593031 Sequence: 73593032 Sequence: 73593033
Outcome Id 30636654 Outcome Id 30636654 Outcome Id 30636655 Outcome Id 30636655 Outcome Id 30636656 Outcome Id 30636656 Outcome Id 30636657 Outcome Id 30636657
Result Group Id 55879890 Result Group Id 55879891 Result Group Id 55879890 Result Group Id 55879891 Result Group Id 55879890 Result Group Id 55879891 Result Group Id 55879890 Result Group Id 55879891
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 14 Count 14 Count 14 Count 14 Count 14 Count 14 Count 14 Count 14

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2568503 Sequence: 2568504
Document Type Study Protocol Document Type Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True Has Protocol False
Has Icf False Has Icf False
Has Sap False Has Sap True
Document Date 2018-11-02 Document Date 2019-01-28
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/60/NCT03796260/Prot_000.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/60/NCT03796260/SAP_001.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 27805375 Sequence: 27805376 Sequence: 27805377 Sequence: 27805378 Sequence: 27805379 Sequence: 27805380
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14
Created At 2023-08-06 18:18:15.231472 Created At 2023-08-06 18:18:15.231472 Created At 2023-08-06 18:18:15.231472 Created At 2023-08-06 18:18:15.231472 Created At 2023-08-06 18:18:15.231472 Created At 2023-08-06 18:18:15.231472
Updated At 2023-08-06 18:18:15.231472 Updated At 2023-08-06 18:18:15.231472 Updated At 2023-08-06 18:18:15.231472 Updated At 2023-08-06 18:18:15.231472 Updated At 2023-08-06 18:18:15.231472 Updated At 2023-08-06 18:18:15.231472

Reported Events

Sequence: 524777667 Sequence: 524777668 Sequence: 524777669 Sequence: 524777670 Sequence: 524777671 Sequence: 524777672 Sequence: 524777673 Sequence: 524777674 Sequence: 524777675 Sequence: 524777676 Sequence: 524777677 Sequence: 524777678 Sequence: 524777679 Sequence: 524777680 Sequence: 524777681 Sequence: 524777682 Sequence: 524777683 Sequence: 524777684
Result Group Id 55879892 Result Group Id 55879893 Result Group Id 55879892 Result Group Id 55879893 Result Group Id 55879892 Result Group Id 55879893 Result Group Id 55879892 Result Group Id 55879893 Result Group Id 55879892 Result Group Id 55879893 Result Group Id 55879892 Result Group Id 55879893 Result Group Id 55879892 Result Group Id 55879893 Result Group Id 55879892 Result Group Id 55879893 Result Group Id 55879892 Result Group Id 55879893
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days])
Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other
Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14 Subjects At Risk 14
Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment.
Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System Metabolism and nutrition disorders Organ System Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Adverse Event Term Headache Adverse Event Term Headache Adverse Event Term Paraesthesia Adverse Event Term Paraesthesia Adverse Event Term Cognitive disorder Adverse Event Term Cognitive disorder Adverse Event Term Parosmia Adverse Event Term Parosmia Adverse Event Term Paraesthesia oral Adverse Event Term Paraesthesia oral Adverse Event Term Dyspepsia Adverse Event Term Dyspepsia Adverse Event Term Nausea Adverse Event Term Nausea Adverse Event Term Fatigue Adverse Event Term Fatigue Adverse Event Term Decreased appetite Adverse Event Term Decreased appetite
Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5
Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1
Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28669165
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3833598
Pi Employee No
Restriction Type OTHER
Other Details The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
Restrictive Agreement The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3833563
Organization Hoffmann-La Roche
Name Medical Communications
Phone 800 821-8590
Email genentech@druginfo.com

Outcomes

Sequence: 30636654 Sequence: 30636655 Sequence: 30636656 Sequence: 30636657
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary
Title Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-t) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Description The area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity is calculated using the formula: AUC0-inf = AUC0-t + (Ct/λz) where Ct is the last measurable concentration and λz is the apparent terminal elimination rate constant. The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description The area under the concentration-time curve calculated from Hour 0 to the last measurable concentration, calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule for increasing concentrations and the logarithmic rule for decreasing concentrations. The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Time Frame At pre-defined intervals from study Day 1 through Day 5 of each Period (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days) Time Frame At pre-defined intervals from study Day 1 through Day 5 of each Period (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days) Time Frame At pre-defined intervals from study Day 1 through Day 5 of each Period (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 04 Feb 2019 [27 days])
Population The PK Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 evaluable postdose pharmacokinetic (PK) sample. Population The PK Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 evaluable postdose PK sample. Population The PK Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 evaluable postdose PK sample. Population The Safety Population included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment.
Units nmol*h/L Units nmol*h/L Units nmol/L Units Percentage of Participants
Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation
Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Number

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 234242646 Sequence: 234242647 Sequence: 234242648 Sequence: 234242649 Sequence: 234242650 Sequence: 234242651 Sequence: 234242652 Sequence: 234242653 Sequence: 234242654 Sequence: 234242655 Sequence: 234242656 Sequence: 234242657 Sequence: 234242658 Sequence: 234242659
Outcome Id 30636654 Outcome Id 30636654 Outcome Id 30636654 Outcome Id 30636654 Outcome Id 30636655 Outcome Id 30636655 Outcome Id 30636655 Outcome Id 30636655 Outcome Id 30636656 Outcome Id 30636656 Outcome Id 30636656 Outcome Id 30636656 Outcome Id 30636657 Outcome Id 30636657
Result Group Id 55879890 Result Group Id 55879891 Result Group Id 55879890 Result Group Id 55879891 Result Group Id 55879890 Result Group Id 55879891 Result Group Id 55879890 Result Group Id 55879891 Result Group Id 55879890 Result Group Id 55879891 Result Group Id 55879890 Result Group Id 55879891 Result Group Id 55879890 Result Group Id 55879891
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Classification Entrectinib Classification Entrectinib Classification M5 Metabolite Classification M5 Metabolite Classification Entrectinib Classification Entrectinib Classification M5 Metabolite Classification M5 Metabolite Classification Entrectinib Classification Entrectinib Classification M5 Metabolite Classification M5 Metabolite
Title Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-t) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-t) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-t) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-t) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Description The area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity is calculated using the formula: AUC0-inf = AUC0-t + (Ct/λz) where Ct is the last measurable concentration and λz is the apparent terminal elimination rate constant. The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description The area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity is calculated using the formula: AUC0-inf = AUC0-t + (Ct/λz) where Ct is the last measurable concentration and λz is the apparent terminal elimination rate constant. The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description The area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity is calculated using the formula: AUC0-inf = AUC0-t + (Ct/λz) where Ct is the last measurable concentration and λz is the apparent terminal elimination rate constant. The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description The area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity is calculated using the formula: AUC0-inf = AUC0-t + (Ct/λz) where Ct is the last measurable concentration and λz is the apparent terminal elimination rate constant. The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description The area under the concentration-time curve calculated from Hour 0 to the last measurable concentration, calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule for increasing concentrations and the logarithmic rule for decreasing concentrations. The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description The area under the concentration-time curve calculated from Hour 0 to the last measurable concentration, calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule for increasing concentrations and the logarithmic rule for decreasing concentrations. The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description The area under the concentration-time curve calculated from Hour 0 to the last measurable concentration, calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule for increasing concentrations and the logarithmic rule for decreasing concentrations. The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description The area under the concentration-time curve calculated from Hour 0 to the last measurable concentration, calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule for increasing concentrations and the logarithmic rule for decreasing concentrations. The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description The presented values in the table are based on all 14 participants receiving the F1 formulation in a 2-way crossover pattern. Description An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. Description An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Units nmol*h/L Units nmol*h/L Units nmol*h/L Units nmol*h/L Units nmol*h/L Units nmol*h/L Units nmol*h/L Units nmol*h/L Units nmol/L Units nmol/L Units nmol/L Units nmol/L Units Percentage of Participants Units Percentage of Participants
Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Number Param Type Number
Param Value 44000 Param Value 44900 Param Value 14400 Param Value 15000 Param Value 41200 Param Value 42100 Param Value 11600 Param Value 12600 Param Value 1870 Param Value 2000 Param Value 427 Param Value 487 Param Value 28.6 Param Value 21.4
Param Value Num 44000.0 Param Value Num 44900.0 Param Value Num 14400.0 Param Value Num 15000.0 Param Value Num 41200.0 Param Value Num 42100.0 Param Value Num 11600.0 Param Value Num 12600.0 Param Value Num 1870.0 Param Value Num 2000.0 Param Value Num 427.0 Param Value Num 487.0 Param Value Num 28.6 Param Value Num 21.4
Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation
Dispersion Value 52.0 Dispersion Value 50.1 Dispersion Value 51.09 Dispersion Value 50.8 Dispersion Value 50.9 Dispersion Value 48.5 Dispersion Value 49.4 Dispersion Value 48.2 Dispersion Value 49.4 Dispersion Value 37.6 Dispersion Value 60.8 Dispersion Value 50.6
Dispersion Value Num 52.0 Dispersion Value Num 50.1 Dispersion Value Num 51.09 Dispersion Value Num 50.8 Dispersion Value Num 50.9 Dispersion Value Num 48.5 Dispersion Value Num 49.4 Dispersion Value Num 48.2 Dispersion Value Num 49.4 Dispersion Value Num 37.6 Dispersion Value Num 60.8 Dispersion Value Num 50.6

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11328794 Sequence: 11328795 Sequence: 11328796
Result Group Id 55879885 Result Group Id 55879886 Result Group Id 55879887
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Scope overall Scope overall Scope overall
Count 7 Count 7 Count 14

Result Groups

Sequence: 55879885 Sequence: 55879886 Sequence: 55879887 Sequence: 55879888 Sequence: 55879889 Sequence: 55879890 Sequence: 55879891 Sequence: 55879892 Sequence: 55879893
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event
Title F1 to F06 Crossover Title F06 to F1 Crossover Title Total Title F1 to F06 Crossover Title F06 to F1 Crossover Title F1 Test Formulation Title F06 Reference Formulation Title F1 Test Formulation Title F06 Reference Formulation
Description Participants first randomized to F1/F06 arm and received a single oral dose of entrectinib F1 (test formulation) on Day 1 of Period 1 after a standardized meal. This dose was followed by a minimum 14-day washout period, after which participants received a single oral dose of entrectinib F06 (reference formulation) under fed conditions on Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Participants first randomized to this arm received a single oral dose of entrectinib F06 (reference formulation) on Day 1 of Period 1 after a standardized meal. This dose was followed by a minimum 14-day washout period, after which participants received a single oral dose of entrectinib F1 (test formulation) under fed conditions on Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Total of all reporting groups Description Participants first randomized to F1/F06 arm and received a single oral dose of entrectinib F1 (test formulation) on Day 1 of Period 1 after a standardized meal. This dose was followed by a minimum 14-day washout period, after which participants received a single oral dose of entrectinib F06 (reference formulation) under fed conditions on Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Participants first randomized to this arm received a single oral dose of entrectinib F06 (reference formulation) on Day 1 of Period 1 after a standardized meal. This dose was followed by a minimum 14-day washout period, after which participants received a single oral dose of entrectinib F1 (test formulation) under fed conditions on Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Participants who received a single oral dose of entrectinib F1 (test formulation) on Day 1 of Period 1 and Day 1 of Period 2 after a standardized meal (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Participants who received a single oral dose of entrectinib F06 (reference formulation) on Day 1 of Period 1 and Day 1 of Period 2 after a standardized meal (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Participants who received a single oral dose of entrectinib F1 (test formulation) on Day 1 of Period 1 and Day 1 of Period 2 after a standardized meal (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Participants who received a single oral dose of entrectinib F06 (reference formulation) on Day 1 of Period 1 and Day 1 of Period 2 after a standardized meal (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days).

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 124996058 Sequence: 124996059 Sequence: 124996060 Sequence: 124996061 Sequence: 124996062 Sequence: 124996063 Sequence: 124996064 Sequence: 124996065 Sequence: 124996066 Sequence: 124996067 Sequence: 124996068 Sequence: 124996069 Sequence: 124996070 Sequence: 124996071 Sequence: 124996072 Sequence: 124996073 Sequence: 124996074 Sequence: 124996075 Sequence: 124996076 Sequence: 124996077 Sequence: 124996078 Sequence: 124996079 Sequence: 124996080 Sequence: 124996081
Result Group Id 55879885 Result Group Id 55879886 Result Group Id 55879887 Result Group Id 55879885 Result Group Id 55879886 Result Group Id 55879887 Result Group Id 55879885 Result Group Id 55879886 Result Group Id 55879887 Result Group Id 55879885 Result Group Id 55879886 Result Group Id 55879887 Result Group Id 55879885 Result Group Id 55879886 Result Group Id 55879887 Result Group Id 55879885 Result Group Id 55879886 Result Group Id 55879887 Result Group Id 55879885 Result Group Id 55879886 Result Group Id 55879887 Result Group Id 55879885 Result Group Id 55879886 Result Group Id 55879887
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Category Female Category Female Category Female Category Male Category Male Category Male Category White Category White Category White Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category Multiple Category Multiple Category Multiple Category Hispanic or Latino Category Hispanic or Latino Category Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino
Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Units Years Units Years Units Years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 37.3 Param Value 33.3 Param Value 36 Param Value 4 Param Value 3 Param Value 7 Param Value 3 Param Value 4 Param Value 7 Param Value 5 Param Value 7 Param Value 12 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 4 Param Value 6 Param Value 10 Param Value 3 Param Value 1 Param Value 4
Param Value Num 37.3 Param Value Num 33.3 Param Value Num 36.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 7.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 7.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 7.0 Param Value Num 12.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 10.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 4.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 11.7 Dispersion Value 10.5 Dispersion Value 11.6
Dispersion Value Num 11.7 Dispersion Value Num 10.5 Dispersion Value Num 11.6
Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 7 Number Analyzed 14

]]>

<![CDATA[ Alexithymia Frequency and Interhemispheric Transfer in Patients With a First Demyelinating Event ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796247
2011-05-02

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796247
NCT03796247https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796247?tab=tableNANANAPrevalence of alexithymia in multiple sclerosis (MS) is closed to 50% but is unknown in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS).The present study sought to characterize alexithymia in CIS patients and his link between psycho behavioral and cognitive disturbances.

In this context, the objectives of the present study were to (a ) define the prevalence of alexithymia in CIS patients, (b ) to study this relation between psycho behavioral and cognitive disorders frequently encountered in MS.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year May 2, 2011
Primary Completion Month Year May 2016
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20783047
Description The aim to recruit 40 CIS patients with at least two subclinical lesions on brain MRI. Patients are tested only one month at least after steroids intake and after 6 weeks at least after any relapse. The control group include 40 right -handed participants; each of them are matched for age, gender, and education level with a CIS patient.

The parameters to be evaluated are:

The prevalence of alexithymia is assessed by The Toronto Alexithymia Scale TAS-20, a self-reported scale. The TAS-20 total score corresponds to global level of alexithymia, as the sum of these three subdomains: 1.Difficulties in Identifying Feelings (DIF); 2. Difficulties in Describing Feelings (DDF); 3. Externally Oriented Thinking (EOT).

Standard neurological examination is performed by a neurologist using the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS ).

The standardized neuropsychological battery, named BCcogSEP, is administrated. The BCcogSEP is made of eight tests commonly impaired in MS. Fourteen scores were obtained and a score was considered impaired when it was inferior to 5th percentile range compared to the normal range. The number of impaired scores are considered and a cognitive impairment is considered when 4 scores are superior or equal to percentile 5th.

For psychobehavioral assessments, the investigators estimated (a) depression (according to the Beck Depression Inventory; BDI (30)) and anxiety (according to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (31)); (b) apathy (according to the Lille Apathy Rating Scale (32)); (c) empathy (according to Interpersonal Reactivity Index; IRI).

Facilities

Sequence: 200618356
Name Hôpital Roger Salengro, CHRU de Lille
City Lille
Country France

Conditions

Sequence: 52328327
Name Multiple Sclerosis
Downcase Name multiple sclerosis

Id Information

Sequence: 40271106 Sequence: 40271107
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value 2010_39 Id Value 2011-A00016-35
Id Type Other Identifier
Id Type Description ID-RCB number, ANSM

Countries

Sequence: 42691176
Name France
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55768163 Sequence: 55768164
Title multiple sclerosis Title healthy control

Keywords

Sequence: 80085358 Sequence: 80085359
Name cognition Name alexithymia
Downcase Name cognition Downcase Name alexithymia

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177960001 Sequence: 177960002 Sequence: 177960003 Sequence: 177960004 Sequence: 177960005 Sequence: 177960006 Sequence: 177960007
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Frequency of alexithymia in the CIS population Measure relation between alexithymia and cognitive impairment in CIS patients and controls Measure relation between alexithymia and thymic disorder in CIS and controls Measure relation between alexithymia and thymic disorder in CIS and controls Measure relation between alexithymia and thymic disorder in CIS and controls Measure relation between alexithymia and thymic disorder in CIS and controls Measure to evaluate the callosal functions and inter-hemispheric transfer in CIS and controls
Time Frame Baseline: one session Time Frame Baseline: one session Time Frame Baseline: one session Time Frame Baseline: one session Time Frame Baseline: one session Time Frame Baseline: one session Time Frame Baseline: one session
Description alexithymia is defined according to TAS-20 (Toronto Alexithymia Scale) The Toronto Alexithymia Scale is a measure of deficiency in understanding, processing, or describing emotions. The current version has twenty statements rated on a five-point Likert scale. ( range : Strongly disagree/Disagree/ Neither agree nor disagree/ Agree/ Strongly agree) Description cognitive functions are evaluated by the standardized neuropsychological battery, named BCcogSEP. The BCcogSEP is made of eight tests commonly impaired in MS. Fourteen scores are obtained and a score is considered impaired when it is inferior to 5th percentile range compared to the normal range. The number of impaired scores is considered and a cognitive impairment is considered when 4 scores are superior or equal to percentile 5th. Description Psychobehavioral assessments use the following Tools :

We estimated depression according to the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) The BDI consisted of twenty-one questions about how the subject has been feeling in the last week. Each question had a set of at least four possible responses, ranging in intensity. (0) I do not feel sad/ (1) I feel sad./ (2) I am sad all the time and I can't snap out of it/ (3) I am so sad or unhappy that I can't stand it.

When the test is scored, a value of 0 to 3 is assigned for each answer and then the total score is compared to a key to determine the depression's severity. The standard cut-off scores were as follows:0-9: indicates minimal depression/ 10-18: indicates mild depression/ 19-29: indicates moderate depression/ 30-63: indicates severe depression.

Description Psychobehavioral assessments use the following Tools We estimated anxiety according to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) STAI is a psychological inventory based on a 4-point Likert scale and consists of 40 questions on a self-report basis Description Psychobehavioral assessments use the following Tools :

We estimated apathy according to the Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) The LARS is based on a structured interview. It includes 33 items, divided into nine domains. Responses are scored on a dichotomous scale

Description Psychobehavioral assessments use the following Tools :

We estimated empathy according to Interpersonal Reactivity Index( IRI) The tool is a self-report comprising 28-items answered on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "Does not describe me well" to "Describes me very well".

Description dichotic listening tasks (number of sounds recognized from right or left ears) ; tactile localization recognition (number of right localization of right or left touch); letter matching test (number of right letter matching with right or left visual field) All those parameters are evaluated with qualitative assessment of functional MRI parameters

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194085225 Sequence: 194085224 Sequence: 194085226 Sequence: 194085227 Sequence: 194085228 Sequence: 194085229 Sequence: 194085230 Sequence: 194085231 Sequence: 194085232 Sequence: 194085233 Sequence: 194085234
Mesh Term Sclerosis Mesh Term Multiple Sclerosis Mesh Term Affective Symptoms Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS Mesh Term Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Demyelinating Diseases Mesh Term Autoimmune Diseases Mesh Term Immune System Diseases Mesh Term Behavioral Symptoms
Downcase Mesh Term sclerosis Downcase Mesh Term multiple sclerosis Downcase Mesh Term affective symptoms Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term demyelinating autoimmune diseases, cns Downcase Mesh Term autoimmune diseases of the nervous system Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term demyelinating diseases Downcase Mesh Term autoimmune diseases Downcase Mesh Term immune system diseases Downcase Mesh Term behavioral symptoms
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48466453
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University Hospital, Lille

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29368912
Role Principal Investigator
Name Hélène Zephir, MD, PhD
Affiliation University Hospital, Lille

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30856347
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 60 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Population MS patients admited in MS center of Lille after the first neurological inflammatory clinical event
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

right-handed patient
at least 1 month after steroid intake
without severe neurological impairment
without psychiatric disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

patients with steroids in the last month
patients with psychotropic drugs started in the last month
patients with immunotherapies
patients having contra indications for MRI
pregnancy or breast feeding

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254313067
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 61
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 60
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30602185
Observational Model Case-Control
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28968701
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Multidisciplinary Program Based in High Intensity Interval Training and Dietary Education for Coronary Artery Disease ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796234
2018-03-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796234
NCT03796234https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796234?tab=tableNANANAA multidisciplinary program based on physiotherapy and diet education will be carried out for 3 months in patients with coronary artery disease with percutaneous coronary intervention. Educational lectures on nutrition and high intensity interval training will be developed in old patients with chronic heart disease. A control group will not develop any program. Effectiveness on anthropometric parameters, eating habits, physical activity, quality of life, anxiety and depression will be assessed at baseline and at 3 months.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-09-17
Start Month Year March 1, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year June 30, 2018
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-09-17

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20709978
Description A multidisciplinary program based on high intensity interval training and diet education will be carried out for 3 months for patients with coronary artery disease with percutaneous coronary intervention. Three educational lectures on nutrition and a 3-month high intensity interval training will be developed in old patients with chronic heart disease. A control group will not develop any program. Effectiveness on anthropometric parameters, eating habits, physical activity, quality of life, anxiety and depression will be assessed at baseline and at 3 months.

Facilities

Sequence: 199965047
Name University of Valencia
City Valencia
Zip 46010
Country Spain

Conditions

Sequence: 52138975
Name Coronary Artery Disease
Downcase Name coronary artery disease

Id Information

Sequence: 40135036
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 147697976792

Countries

Sequence: 42542670
Name Spain
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55559312 Sequence: 55559313
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title Dietary and physiotherapy Title Physiotherapy
Description A multidisciplinary program was developed. 3 group talks were carried out, in a period of 3 months, in which different topics related to healthy eating were treated. In addition, a 3-month high intensity interval training program was developed. Physiotherapy sessions were carried out twice a week for one hour and intensity was established based in effort tests. Description A 3-month high intensity interval training program was developed. Physiotherapy sessions were carried out twice a week for one hour and intensity was established based in effort tests.

Interventions

Sequence: 52454875 Sequence: 52454876
Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other
Name Dietary and physiotherapy Name Physiotherapy
Description 3 group talks were carried out, in a period of 3 months, in which different topics related to healthy eating were treated. In addition, a 3-month high intensity interval training program was developed. Physiotherapy sessions were carried out twice a week for one hour and intensity was established based in effort tests. Description A 3-month high intensity interval training program was developed. Physiotherapy sessions were carried out twice a week for one hour and intensity was established based in effort tests.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177263540 Sequence: 177263541 Sequence: 177263542 Sequence: 177263543 Sequence: 177263544 Sequence: 177263545 Sequence: 177263546 Sequence: 177263547 Sequence: 177263548 Sequence: 177263549 Sequence: 177263550 Sequence: 177263551 Sequence: 177263552 Sequence: 177263553 Sequence: 177263554 Sequence: 177263555 Sequence: 177263556 Sequence: 177263557 Sequence: 177263558 Sequence: 177263559 Sequence: 177263560 Sequence: 177263561
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Adherence to the mediterranean diet Measure Adherence to the mediterranean diet Measure Food consumption frequency questonnaire Measure Food consumption frequency questonnaire Measure Body composition: body fat in %, visceral fat in %, muscle mass in %, body water in % Measure Body composition: body fat in %, visceral fat in %, muscle mass in %, body water in % Measure Weight (in kilograms) Measure Weight (in kilograms) Measure Body mass index Measure Body mass index Measure Circumferences: abdominal circumference in cm, hip circumference in cm, arm circumference in cm, calf circumference in cm Measure Circumferences: abdominal circumference in cm, hip circumference in cm, arm circumference in cm, calf circumference in cm Measure Triceps fat fold in mm Measure Triceps fat fold in mm Measure Physical activity Measure Physical activity Measure Health related quality of life Measure Health related quality of life Measure Anxiety Measure Anxiety Measure Depression Measure Depression
Time Frame baseline Time Frame 3 months Time Frame baseline Time Frame 3 months Time Frame baseline Time Frame 3 months Time Frame baseline Time Frame 3 months Time Frame baseline Time Frame 3 months Time Frame baseline Time Frame 3 months Time Frame Baseline Time Frame 3 months Time Frame baseline Time Frame 3 months Time Frame baseline Time Frame 3 months Time Frame baseline Time Frame 3 months Time Frame baseline Time Frame 3 months
Description Test of adherence to the mediterranean diet, which consists of 14 questions related to the Mediterranean diet. Depending on the answer of the question it can be obtained 1 point or 0 points, being the value of each item 0 or 1. If the sum of the points is 9 or higher the subject has a good adhesion to the mediterranean diet. If it is less than 9 points is considered bad adhesion. The range can vary between 0 points (minimum adhesion) and 14 points (maximum adhesion) (PREDIMED, 2017). Description Test of adherence to the mediterranean diet, which consists of 14 questions related to the Mediterranean diet. Depending on the answer of the question it can be obtained 1 point or 0 points, being the value of each item 0 or 1. If the sum of the points is 9 or higher the subject has a good adhesion to the mediterranean diet. If it is less than 9 points is considered bad adhesion. The range can vary between 0 points (minimum adhesion) and 14 points (maximum adhesion) (PREDIMED, 2017). Description Food consumption frequency questionnaire: registers the number of times/week or the number of times/month a series of foods is consumed, so that information about the foods the individual consumes most frequently during the week can be obtained. The list of foods that are part of the questionnaire is made up of those most common among the population, with a total of 45 items (yoghurts, fish, fruits, etc.). It also includes a table called Table of Weight of the Item Ration (PRI), in which the weight of the ration of each item is collected to facilitate the completion of the questionnaire (Trinidad et al., 2008). Description Food consumption frequency questionnaire: registers the number of times/week or the number of times/month a series of foods is consumed, so that information about the foods the individual consumes most frequently during the week can be obtained. The list of foods that are part of the questionnaire is made up of those most common among the population, with a total of 45 items (yoghurts, fish, fruits, etc.). It also includes a table called Table of Weight of the Item Ration (PRI), in which the weight of the ration of each item is collected to facilitate the completion of the questionnaire (Trinidad et al., 2008). Description Bioimpedanciometer OMRON HBF-500INT Description Bioimpedanciometer OMRON HBF-500INT Description Weight (in kilograms) Description Weight (in kilograms) Description weight (in kilograms) and height (in meters) will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2 Description weight (in kilograms) and height (in meters) will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2 Description Circumferences by using a measuring tape Description Circumferences by using a measuring tape Description Lipocalibre Holtain Description Lipocalibre Holtain Description International physical activity questionnaire: it has 9 items and provides information on the time spent while walking, in activities of low, moderate and vigorous intensity and in sedentary activities. Based on the estimated METS consumed, the IPAQ divides the subjects into three levels or categories: Low, moderate and high physical activity.

The score of the different types of activity is expressed in METS-minutes per week.

Description International physical activity questionnaire: it has 9 items and provides information on the time spent while walking, in activities of low, moderate and vigorous intensity and in sedentary activities. Based on the estimated METS consumed, the IPAQ divides the subjects into three levels or categories: Low, moderate and high physical activity.

The score of the different types of activity is expressed in METS-minutes per week.

Description Short-form 36: the questionnaire is composed of 36 questions that value both positive and negative health status. It was developed from an extensive battery of questionnaires employed at WHO, which included 40 concepts related to health. The questionnaire contains 8 scales, which represent the concepts of health most frequently used in the main health questionnaires. The 36 items of the instrument cover the following scales: Physical function, Physical role, Body pain, General health, Vitality, Social function, Emotional role, Mental health. The scores of each of the 8 dimensions of the SF-36 oscillate between 0 and 100. A result of 100 indicates optimal health and 0 would reflect a very poor state of health. Description Short-form 36: the questionnaire is composed of 36 questions that value both positive and negative health status. It was developed from an extensive battery of questionnaires employed at WHO, which included 40 concepts related to health. The questionnaire contains 8 scales, which represent the concepts of health most frequently used in the main health questionnaires. The 36 items of the instrument cover the following scales: Physical function, Physical role, Body pain, General health, Vitality, Social function, Emotional role, Mental health. The scores of each of the 8 dimensions of the SF-36 oscillate between 0 and 100. A result of 100 indicates optimal health and 0 would reflect a very poor state of health. Description Hospital anxiety and depression questionnaire: the questionnaire includes 14 questions regarding the depressant and anxious symptoms of the patient. Two subsets of 7 items each, on Likert scale 0-3. For anxiety HAD-A sum of odd items (1,3,5,7,9,11,13), for depression HAD-D sum of even items (2,4,6,8,10,12,14 ), with a score range in each subscale of 0-21. A higher score means greater anxiety and depression. For both subscales, scores higher than eleven would indicate "case" and greater than eight would be considered "probable case". The internal consistency for the Spanish population is HAD-A α = .83 and HAD-D α = .87 (Vallejo, Rivera, Esteve-Vives and RodríguezMuñoz, 2012). Description Hospital anxiety and depression questionnaire: the questionnaire includes 14 questions regarding the depressant and anxious symptoms of the patient. Two subsets of 7 items each, on Likert scale 0-3. For anxiety HAD-A sum of odd items (1,3,5,7,9,11,13), for depression HAD-D sum of even items (2,4,6,8,10,12,14 ), with a score range in each subscale of 0-21. A higher score means greater anxiety and depression. For both subscales, scores higher than eleven would indicate "case" and greater than eight would be considered "probable case". The internal consistency for the Spanish population is HAD-A α = .83 and HAD-D α = .87 (Vallejo, Rivera, Esteve-Vives and RodríguezMuñoz, 2012). Description Hospital anxiety and depression questionnaire: the questionnaire includes 14 questions regarding the depressant and anxious symptoms of the patient. Two subsets of 7 items each, on Likert scale 0-3. For anxiety HAD-A sum of odd items (1,3,5,7,9,11,13), for depression HAD-D sum of even items (2,4,6,8,10,12,14 ), with a score range in each subscale of 0-21. A higher score means greater anxiety and depression. For both subscales, scores higher than eleven would indicate "case" and greater than eight would be considered "probable case". The internal consistency for the Spanish population is HAD-A α = .83 and HAD-D α = .87 (Vallejo, Rivera, Esteve-Vives and RodríguezMuñoz, 2012). Description Hospital anxiety and depression questionnaire: the questionnaire includes 14 questions regarding the depressant and anxious symptoms of the patient. Two subsets of 7 items each, on Likert scale 0-3. For anxiety HAD-A sum of odd items (1,3,5,7,9,11,13), for depression HAD-D sum of even items (2,4,6,8,10,12,14 ), with a score range in each subscale of 0-21. A higher score means greater anxiety and depression. For both subscales, scores higher than eleven would indicate "case" and greater than eight would be considered "probable case". The internal consistency for the Spanish population is HAD-A α = .83 and HAD-D α = .87 (Vallejo, Rivera, Esteve-Vives and RodríguezMuñoz, 2012).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193366404 Sequence: 193366405 Sequence: 193366406 Sequence: 193366407 Sequence: 193366408 Sequence: 193366409 Sequence: 193366410 Sequence: 193366411
Mesh Term Coronary Artery Disease Mesh Term Myocardial Ischemia Mesh Term Coronary Disease Mesh Term Heart Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Arteriosclerosis Mesh Term Arterial Occlusive Diseases Mesh Term Vascular Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term coronary artery disease Downcase Mesh Term myocardial ischemia Downcase Mesh Term coronary disease Downcase Mesh Term heart diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term arteriosclerosis Downcase Mesh Term arterial occlusive diseases Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48290684
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University of Valencia

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29268524
Role Principal Investigator
Name Elena Marques-Sule, PT, PhD
Affiliation University of Valencia

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68107411 Sequence: 68107412
Design Group Id 55559312 Design Group Id 55559313
Intervention Id 52454875 Intervention Id 52454876

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30747706
Gender All
Minimum Age 40 Years
Maximum Age 100 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

infarction or angina pectoris.
At least six months elapsed since the diagnosis of heart disease at the time of the start of the study.
Be physically and cognitively able to complete the evaluations and the program.

Exclusion Criteria:

Present another type of cardiac disease different from ischemic heart disease.
Present any physical or psychiatric condition that prevents the normal performance of the evaluations and the program.
Mobility problems to attend reassessments.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254121810
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 4
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 40
Maximum Age Num 100
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 4
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 18

Designs

Sequence: 30493989
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28860269
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Elena Marques-Sule
Title Doctor in Physiotherapy
Affiliation University of Valencia

]]>

<![CDATA[ Parenting Intervention for Pediatric Obesity ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796221
2019-03-11

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796221
NCT03796221https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796221?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this study is to see if educational videos about how to help children develop healthy behaviors, paired with treatment in a pediatric obesity clinic, can increase caregiver confidence and improve child behaviors and weight. Caregivers of children between the ages of 4 and 11 years old who are new patients to a pediatric obesity clinic will be invited to take part in the study. All families will receive the standard treatment provided in the pediatric obesity clinic. Half of the caregivers will be assigned to also watch a few educational videos every month for 3 months in between clinic visits.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-03-23
Start Month Year March 11, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year February 19, 2021
Verification Month Year March 2022
Verification Date 2022-03-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-03-23

Facilities

Sequence: 198738354
Name Nemours Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children
City Wilmington
State Delaware
Zip 19803
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 51829158 Sequence: 51829159
Name Childhood Obesity Name Parenting
Downcase Name childhood obesity Downcase Name parenting

Id Information

Sequence: 39885428 Sequence: 39885429
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value K23HD083439 Id Value K23HD083439
Id Type U.S. NIH Grant/Contract Id Type U.S. NIH Grant/Contract
Id Link https://reporter.nih.gov/quickSearch/K23HD083439 Id Link https://reporter.nih.gov/quickSearch/K23HD083439

Countries

Sequence: 42283956
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55252110 Sequence: 55252111
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Experimental
Title Control Group Title Intervention Group
Description Will receive standard pediatric obesity treatment Description Will receive standard pediatric obesity treatment and parenting videos

Interventions

Sequence: 52150122 Sequence: 52150123
Intervention Type Behavioral Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Parenting videos Name Standard pediatric obesity treatment
Description Brief online videos, featuring families of children with obesity of diverse backgrounds, to provide education on parenting skills and motivate families to adopt healthy lifestyle behaviors as a family. Videos will be delivered monthly for three months in between pediatric obesity clinic visits. Description Standard treatment in a hospital-based pediatric obesity clinic with a team of medical providers, dietitians, exercise specialists, and behavioral health specialists. Treatment includes management of obesity-related medical conditions, nutrition education, physical activity counseling, and discussion of behavioral strategies such as goal-setting and self-monitoring, with elements of motivational interviewing used to encourage behavior change and adoption of healthy lifestyle behaviors by the entire family.

Keywords

Sequence: 79309365 Sequence: 79309366 Sequence: 79309367 Sequence: 79309368
Name Childhood obesity Name Parenting intervention Name Video intervention Name Healthcare delivery
Downcase Name childhood obesity Downcase Name parenting intervention Downcase Name video intervention Downcase Name healthcare delivery

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176273033 Sequence: 176273034 Sequence: 176273035 Sequence: 176273036 Sequence: 176273037 Sequence: 176273038 Sequence: 176273039 Sequence: 176273040 Sequence: 176273041
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change in child weight status Measure Change in child weight status Measure Change in caregiver confidence managing child lifestyle behaviors Measure Change in child lifestyle behaviors Measure Discussion of parenting topics during visits to the pediatric obesity clinic Measure Change in child weight status Measure Change in child weight status Measure Change in caregiver confidence managing child lifestyle behaviors Measure Change in child lifestyle behaviors
Time Frame 6 months Time Frame 6 months Time Frame 6 months Time Frame 6 months Time Frame 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months Time Frame 3 months Time Frame 3 months Time Frame 3 months Time Frame 3 months
Description Change in child BMI-z score Description Change in child BMI percentile (referenced to the 95th percentile) Description Change in Lifestyle Behavior Checklist Confidence score Description Change in Lifestyle Behavior Checklist Problem score Description Discussion helpfulness ratings at each visit Description Change in child BMI-z score Description Change in child BMI percentile (referenced to the 95th percentile) Description Change in Lifestyle Behavior Checklist Confidence score Description Change in Lifestyle Behavior Checklist Problem score

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192106942 Sequence: 192106943 Sequence: 192106944 Sequence: 192106945 Sequence: 192106946 Sequence: 192106947
Mesh Term Obesity Mesh Term Pediatric Obesity Mesh Term Overweight Mesh Term Overnutrition Mesh Term Nutrition Disorders Mesh Term Body Weight
Downcase Mesh Term obesity Downcase Mesh Term pediatric obesity Downcase Mesh Term overweight Downcase Mesh Term overnutrition Downcase Mesh Term nutrition disorders Downcase Mesh Term body weight
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48001219 Sequence: 48001220
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class NIH
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Nemours Children's Health System Name Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29084328
Role Principal Investigator
Name Thao-Ly T Phan, MD MPH
Affiliation Nemours Children's Health System

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67736270 Sequence: 67736271 Sequence: 67736272
Design Group Id 55252111 Design Group Id 55252110 Design Group Id 55252111
Intervention Id 52150122 Intervention Id 52150123 Intervention Id 52150123

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30564636
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 100 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Legal guardian of a new patient to the Nemours pediatric obesity clinic
Child with body mass index (BMI) greater than the 95th percentile for age and sex
Child 4-11 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

Not proficient in English or Spanish
Not able to access the internet on any type of device
Child has a genetic syndrome or primary endocrine disorder associated with obesity
Child is taking a medication known to impact weight

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254259130
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 23
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 100
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 4
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 5

Designs

Sequence: 30312914
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28691555
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Thao-Ly Phan
Title Associate Professor of Pediatrics
Affiliation Nemours Children's Health System

]]>

<![CDATA[ Behavioral and Enhanced Perinatal Intervention for Cessation (B-EPIC): Reducing Tobacco Use Among Opioid Addicted Women ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796208
2018-12-12

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796208
NCT03796208https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796208?tab=tableNANANAThis study tests an intervention for tobacco cessation (named B-EPIC) in an established community medication assisted treatment (MAT) clinic for pregnant and postpartum women with opioid dependence. Half of the participants will receive the intervention for tobacco cessation, which is standard cessation counseling from the provider plus additional cessation support from a Certified Tobacco Treatment Specialist (CTTS). The other half of participants will receive standard tobacco cessation from their provider. The project will also determine the economic impact of the B-EPIC intervention on healthcare expenditures.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-07-15
Start Month Year December 12, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year May 24, 2021
Verification Month Year December 2021
Verification Date 2021-12-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-07-15
Results First Posted Date 2022-07-15

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20722598
Description The study will use a prospective, 2-group, randomized, comparative effectiveness design to determine if the B-EPIC tobacco intervention is superior to tobacco 'treatment as usual (TAU)' for opioid dependent pregnant women maintained on buprenorphine; the outcomes for the first aim will be quitting smoking and/or reducing cigarette consumption during pregnancy. The project design also will determine the economic impact the B-EPIC intervention (10-months) has on healthcare expenditures.

After informed consent, eligible participants will be randomized (1:1) to the B-EPIC group (tobacco intervention) or TAU tobacco treatment (control group). All will continue to receive opioid dependence treatment with buprenorphine, regardless of treatment assignment.

Women enrolled in the control group are informed of the risks of tobacco use and benefits of quitting using the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) 5'A's approach by their healthcare provider. This standard tobacco cessation counseling takes approximately 5-15 minutes, and is offered at each prenatal and postpartum appointment.

Women enrolled in the intervention group will receive TAU plus B-EPIC, which includes four core components: 1) Individualized tobacco treatment plus supplemental counseling, 2) Biomarker validation and feedback, 3) Change in maternal thought process and adoption of healthy behavior (e.g. exercise, based on PI framework), and 4) Pharmacotherapy as needed. The initial assessment for this intervention takes 60 minutes, with follow-up sessions typically lasting 15-20 minutes. The intervention will be led by a certified tobacco treatment specialist (CTTS).

Facilities

Sequence: 200114672 Sequence: 200114673
Name Baptist Health Lexington Name University of Kentucky Polk Dalton Clinic
City Lexington City Lexington
State Kentucky State Kentucky
Zip 40503 Zip 40536
Country United States Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52173884
Name Smoking Cessation
Downcase Name smoking cessation

Id Information

Sequence: 40160339 Sequence: 40160340
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value 45062 Id Value 1R34DA046005-01
Id Type U.S. NIH Grant/Contract
Id Link https://reporter.nih.gov/quickSearch/1R34DA046005-01

Countries

Sequence: 42570715
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55595949 Sequence: 55595950
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Tobacco Intervention Title Treatment As Usual
Description Participants in this group will be randomized to the Behavioral and Enhanced Perinatal Intervention for Cessation (B-EPIC) intervention. Description Participants in this group will be randomized to tobacco treatment as usual.

Interventions

Sequence: 52487905 Sequence: 52487906
Intervention Type Behavioral Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Behavioral and Enhanced Perinatal Intervention for Cessation (B-EPIC) Name Treatment As Usual
Description Women enrolled in the intervention group will receive TAU plus B-EPIC, which includes four core components: 1) Individualized tobacco treatment plus supplemental counseling, 2) Biomarker validation and feedback, 3) Change in maternal thought process and adoption of healthy behavior (e.g. exercise, based on PI framework), and 4) Pharmacotherapy as needed (see Table 3 for a summary of the study design). The initial assessment for this intervention takes 60 minutes, with follow-up sessions typically lasting 15-20 minutes. All sessions occur prior to or after pre-scheduled perinatal appointments. The intervention will be led by a certified tobacco treatment specialist (CTTS). Description Women enrolled in the control group are informed of the risks of tobacco use and benefits of quitting using the ACOG 5'A's approach by their healthcare provider. This standard takes approximately 5-15 minutes, and is offered at each prenatal and postpartum appointment. The five steps of the ACOG recommendation are: 1.) Ask about tobacco use, 2.) Advise to quit, 3.) Assess willingness to make a quit attempt, 4.) Assist in quit attempt, and 5.) Arrange follow-up. The provider may also talk to the participant about nicotine replacement therapy.

Keywords

Sequence: 79871975 Sequence: 79871976 Sequence: 79871977
Name Opioid Use Disorder Name Pregnancy Name tobacco
Downcase Name opioid use disorder Downcase Name pregnancy Downcase Name tobacco

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177388857 Sequence: 177388858 Sequence: 177388859 Sequence: 177388860 Sequence: 177388861 Sequence: 177388862 Sequence: 177388863 Sequence: 177388864
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change in the Number of Cigarettes Smoked Per Day Measure Change in Urine Cotinine Concentration Level Measure Change in Electronic Cigarette Usage Per Day Measure Change in Cigarette Dependence Measure Change in Electronic Cigarette Dependence Measure Change in Maternal Depression Over Time Measure Change in Maternal Anxiety Over Time Measure Change in Maternal Perceived Stress Over Time
Time Frame up to 50 weeks (third trimester (28-36.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery)) Time Frame up to 50 weeks (enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery)) Time Frame up to 50 weeks (enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery)) Time Frame up to 50 weeks (enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery)) Time Frame up to 50 weeks (enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery)) Time Frame Up to 50 weeks (enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery)) Time Frame Up to 50 weeks (enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery)) Time Frame Up to 50 weeks (enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery))
Description Participants will be asked during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks) to self-report the number of cigarettes smoked per day. Data will be presented as the change in the number of cigarettes smoked per day compared between groups. Description Participants will provide a urine sample to be measured by litmus analysis during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The litmus levels range from 0 (minimum) to 6 (maximum). Data will be presented as the change in cotinine levels by the litmus measure over the course of the study compared between groups. Description Participants will be asked during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks) to self-report electronic cigarette (e-cig) usage per day. Data will be presented as the change in e-cig usage per day compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey instrument asks seven questions related to cigarette dependency. For scoring, yes/no questions are scored from 0 to 1, and multiple choice questions from 0 to 3. Items are then summed to yield a total score of 0-10. The higher the total score, the more intense the patient's nicotine dependence. Any score greater than 8 is considered high dependency, a score of 5-7 is considered moderately dependent, 3-4 is low to moderate dependence and 1-2 is low dependence. Data will be presented as the change in cigarette dependency over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Penn State Electronic Cigarette Dependence Index (PSECDI) during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey instrument asks ten questions and responses are scored on a scale from zero to 20. Summed scores correlate to a dependence category; 0-3 is not dependent, 4-8 is low dependence, 9-12 is medium dependence, and above 12 is high dependence. Data will be presented as the change in electronic cigarette dependency over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey consisted of 10 multiple choice questions with scores for each question ranging from 0-3. Scores are then summed for a total score, ranging from 0-30. Questions 1, 2 & 4 are scored 0-3 with the first answer to each question scored as 0 and the fourth answer scored as 3. Questions 3 & 5-10 are reverse scored, with the first answer to each question scored as 3 and the fourth answer scored as 0. A score of 10 or greater is interpreted as "possible depression". A score of greater than 0 on item 10 indicates "suicidal thoughts". Data will be presented as the change in depression over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey consisted of 7 questions scored between zero and 21. A score of 5-9 indicates mild severity, 10-14 is moderate, and 15 and greater is considered severe. Data will be presented as the change in anxiety over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Perceived Stress Scale 4-item (PSS4) during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey consisted of 4 questions scored between zero and 16. Higher scores are correlated with more stress. Data will be presented as the change in stress over time compared between groups.

Sponsors

Sequence: 48321551 Sequence: 48321552
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class NIH
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Kristin Ashford Name National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29286619 Sequence: 29286620
Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Kristin Ashford Name Amanda Fallin-Bennett
Affiliation University of Kentucky Affiliation University of Kentucky

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68152443 Sequence: 68152444
Design Group Id 55595949 Design Group Id 55595950
Intervention Id 52487905 Intervention Id 52487906

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30766792
Gender Female
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 49 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Current diagnosis of opioid dependence with participation in the University of Kentucky Healthcare and Baptist Health Lexington buprenorphine treatment program
Less than 24 weeks gestation
Age 18-49 years old
Diagnosis of current tobacco use disorder
Read or write in English

Exclusion Criteria:

Current prisoner status
Current severe mental illness (e.g., bipolar disorder with current mania, current suicidal ideation)
Alcohol or sedative/hypnotic dependence that requires medical intervention

Gender Description All participants in this study will be pregnant females.
Gender Based True
Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253920427
Number Of Facilities 2
Number Of Nsae Subjects 13
Number Of Sae Subjects 12
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 29
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 12
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 49
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 5
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30512954
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Drop Withdrawals

Sequence: 28988535 Sequence: 28988536 Sequence: 28988537 Sequence: 28988538 Sequence: 28988539 Sequence: 28988540 Sequence: 28988541 Sequence: 28988542
Result Group Id 56094235 Result Group Id 56094236 Result Group Id 56094235 Result Group Id 56094236 Result Group Id 56094235 Result Group Id 56094236 Result Group Id 56094235 Result Group Id 56094236
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Reason Withdrawal by Subject Reason Withdrawal by Subject Reason Loss of pregnancy Reason Loss of pregnancy Reason Changed prenatal clinics Reason Changed prenatal clinics Reason Lost to Follow-up Reason Lost to Follow-up
Count 3 Count 0 Count 1 Count 1 Count 0 Count 5 Count 20 Count 16

Milestones

Sequence: 41007548 Sequence: 41007549 Sequence: 41007550 Sequence: 41007551 Sequence: 41007552 Sequence: 41007553
Result Group Id 56094235 Result Group Id 56094236 Result Group Id 56094235 Result Group Id 56094236 Result Group Id 56094235 Result Group Id 56094236
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Count 40 Count 38 Count 16 Count 16 Count 24 Count 22

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3921354
Recruitment Details Number of individuals consented and further screened for eligibility = 79; Number of participants randomized to intervention = 40; Number of participants randomized to treatment as usual = 38
Pre Assignment Details Participants may have been excluded prior to randomization for the following reason:

1. Withdrawal (changed mind)

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 74002700 Sequence: 74002701 Sequence: 74002702 Sequence: 74002703 Sequence: 74002704 Sequence: 74002705 Sequence: 74002706 Sequence: 74002707 Sequence: 74002708 Sequence: 74002709 Sequence: 74002710 Sequence: 74002711 Sequence: 74002712 Sequence: 74002713 Sequence: 74002714 Sequence: 74002715
Outcome Id 30805782 Outcome Id 30805782 Outcome Id 30805783 Outcome Id 30805783 Outcome Id 30805784 Outcome Id 30805784 Outcome Id 30805785 Outcome Id 30805785 Outcome Id 30805786 Outcome Id 30805786 Outcome Id 30805787 Outcome Id 30805787 Outcome Id 30805788 Outcome Id 30805788 Outcome Id 30805789 Outcome Id 30805789
Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094238 Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094238 Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094238 Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094238 Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094238 Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094238 Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094238 Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094238
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 15 Count 18 Count 22 Count 24 Count 4 Count 6 Count 26 Count 24 Count 1 Count 2 Count 26 Count 26 Count 26 Count 25 Count 26 Count 24

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2579526
Document Type Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Has Protocol True
Has Icf True
Has Sap True
Document Date 2018-06-12
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/08/NCT03796208/Prot_SAP_ICF_000.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 27943855 Sequence: 27943856 Sequence: 27943857 Sequence: 27943858 Sequence: 27943859 Sequence: 27943860
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 9 Subjects Affected 10 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 38 Subjects At Risk 38 Subjects At Risk 38 Subjects At Risk 38 Subjects At Risk 38 Subjects At Risk 38
Created At 2023-08-09 01:04:31.345542 Created At 2023-08-09 01:04:31.345542 Created At 2023-08-09 01:04:31.345542 Created At 2023-08-09 01:04:31.345542 Created At 2023-08-09 01:04:31.345542 Created At 2023-08-09 01:04:31.345542
Updated At 2023-08-09 01:04:31.345542 Updated At 2023-08-09 01:04:31.345542 Updated At 2023-08-09 01:04:31.345542 Updated At 2023-08-09 01:04:31.345542 Updated At 2023-08-09 01:04:31.345542 Updated At 2023-08-09 01:04:31.345542

Reported Events

Sequence: 528239201 Sequence: 528239202 Sequence: 528239197 Sequence: 528239198 Sequence: 528239199 Sequence: 528239200 Sequence: 528239193 Sequence: 528239194 Sequence: 528239195 Sequence: 528239196
Result Group Id 56094239 Result Group Id 56094240 Result Group Id 56094239 Result Group Id 56094240 Result Group Id 56094239 Result Group Id 56094240 Result Group Id 56094239 Result Group Id 56094240 Result Group Id 56094239 Result Group Id 56094240
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Time Frame Enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) through second postpartum visit (20-28.6 weeks after delivery) Time Frame Enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) through second postpartum visit (20-28.6 weeks after delivery) Time Frame Enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) through second postpartum visit (20-28.6 weeks after delivery) Time Frame Enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) through second postpartum visit (20-28.6 weeks after delivery) Time Frame Enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) through second postpartum visit (20-28.6 weeks after delivery) Time Frame Enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) through second postpartum visit (20-28.6 weeks after delivery) Time Frame Enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) through second postpartum visit (20-28.6 weeks after delivery) Time Frame Enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) through second postpartum visit (20-28.6 weeks after delivery) Time Frame Enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) through second postpartum visit (20-28.6 weeks after delivery) Time Frame Enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) through second postpartum visit (20-28.6 weeks after delivery)
Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious
Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 5 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 2
Subjects At Risk 38 Subjects At Risk 38 Subjects At Risk 38 Subjects At Risk 38 Subjects At Risk 38 Subjects At Risk 38 Subjects At Risk 38 Subjects At Risk 38 Subjects At Risk 38 Subjects At Risk 38
Organ System General disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System Social circumstances Organ System Social circumstances Organ System General disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions Organ System Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions Organ System General disorders Organ System General disorders
Adverse Event Term Treatment for dehydration Adverse Event Term Treatment for dehydration Adverse Event Term Incarceration Adverse Event Term Incarceration Adverse Event Term Positive response to depression evaluation Adverse Event Term Positive response to depression evaluation Adverse Event Term Initial or prolonged hospitalization Adverse Event Term Initial or prolonged hospitalization Adverse Event Term Initial or prolonged hospitalization Adverse Event Term Initial or prolonged hospitalization
Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5
Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28879253
Responsible Party Type Sponsor-Investigator
Name Kristin Ashford
Title Professor and Dean of Undergraduate Faculty Affairs
Affiliation University of Kentucky

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3852098
Pi Employee No

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3852063
Organization University of Kentucky
Name Kristin Ashford, PhD, Study MPI
Phone 859-257-9333
Email khashf0@uky.edu

Outcomes

Sequence: 30805782 Sequence: 30805783 Sequence: 30805784 Sequence: 30805785 Sequence: 30805786 Sequence: 30805787 Sequence: 30805788 Sequence: 30805789
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary
Title Change in the Number of Cigarettes Smoked Per Day Title Change in Urine Cotinine Concentration Level Title Change in Electronic Cigarette Usage Per Day Title Change in Cigarette Dependence Title Change in Electronic Cigarette Dependence Title Change in Maternal Depression Over Time Title Change in Maternal Anxiety Over Time Title Change in Maternal Perceived Stress Over Time
Description Participants will be asked during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks) to self-report the number of cigarettes smoked per day. Data will be presented as the change in the number of cigarettes smoked per day compared between groups. Description Participants will provide a urine sample to be measured by litmus analysis during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The litmus levels range from 0 (minimum) to 6 (maximum). Data will be presented as the change in cotinine levels by the litmus measure over the course of the study compared between groups. Description Participants will be asked during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks) to self-report electronic cigarette (e-cig) usage per day. Data will be presented as the change in e-cig usage per day compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey instrument asks seven questions related to cigarette dependency. For scoring, yes/no questions are scored from 0 to 1, and multiple choice questions from 0 to 3. Items are then summed to yield a total score of 0-10. The higher the total score, the more intense the patient's nicotine dependence. Any score greater than 8 is considered high dependency, a score of 5-7 is considered moderately dependent, 3-4 is low to moderate dependence and 1-2 is low dependence. Data will be presented as the change in cigarette dependency over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Penn State Electronic Cigarette Dependence Index (PSECDI) during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey instrument asks ten questions and responses are scored on a scale from zero to 20. Summed scores correlate to a dependence category; 0-3 is not dependent, 4-8 is low dependence, 9-12 is medium dependence, and above 12 is high dependence. Data will be presented as the change in electronic cigarette dependency over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey consisted of 10 multiple choice questions with scores for each question ranging from 0-3. Scores are then summed for a total score, ranging from 0-30. Questions 1, 2 & 4 are scored 0-3 with the first answer to each question scored as 0 and the fourth answer scored as 3. Questions 3 & 5-10 are reverse scored, with the first answer to each question scored as 3 and the fourth answer scored as 0. A score of 10 or greater is interpreted as "possible depression". A score of greater than 0 on item 10 indicates "suicidal thoughts". Data will be presented as the change in depression over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey consisted of 7 questions scored between zero and 21. A score of 5-9 indicates mild severity, 10-14 is moderate, and 15 and greater is considered severe. Data will be presented as the change in anxiety over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Perceived Stress Scale 4-item (PSS4) during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey consisted of 4 questions scored between zero and 16. Higher scores are correlated with more stress. Data will be presented as the change in stress over time compared between groups.
Time Frame up to 50 weeks (third trimester (28-36.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery)) Time Frame up to 50 weeks (enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery)) Time Frame up to 50 weeks (enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery)) Time Frame up to 50 weeks (enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery)) Time Frame up to 50 weeks (enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery)) Time Frame Up to 50 weeks (enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery)) Time Frame Up to 50 weeks (enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery)) Time Frame Up to 50 weeks (enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery))
Population Overall number of participants analyzed in each Group is based on number of participants with cigarettes smoked per day data available at third trimester (28-36.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery) to determine a change. Enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) was not used in this analysis due to a change in the data collection format from categorical to continuous. Disruptions by COVID-19 created many challenges with longitudinal data collection. Population Overall number of participants analyzed in each Group is based on the number of participants with cotinine levels data available at enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery) to determine a change in the level of urine cotinine using NICALERT, an immunochromatographic assay test strip (Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation, Montreal, Quebec). Disruptions caused by COVID-19 created many challenges in longitudinal data collection. Population Overall number of participants analyzed in each Group is based on the number of participants with self-report electronic cigarette (e-cig) usage per day and with data available at study time points enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery) to determine a change. Disruptions caused by COVID-19 created many challenges in longitudinal data collection. Population Overall number of participants analyzed in each Group is based on the number of participants with Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence data available at study time points enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery) to determine a change. Disruptions caused by COVID-19 created many challenges in longitudinal data collection. Population Overall number of participants analyzed in each Group is based on the number of participants with Penn State Electronic Cigarette Dependence Index (PSECDI) data available at study time points enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery) to determine a change. Disruptions caused by COVID-19 created many challenges in longitudinal data collection. Population Overall number of participants analyzed in each Group is based on the number of participants with Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) data available at study time points enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery) to determine a change. Disruptions caused by COVID-19 created many challenges in longitudinal data collection. Population Overall number of participants analyzed in each Group is based on the number of participants with Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) data available at study time points enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery) to determine a change. Disruptions caused by COVID-19 created many challenges in longitudinal data collection. Population Overall number of participants analyzed in each Group is based on the number of participants with Perceived Stress Scale 4-item (PSS4) data available at study time points enrollment (up to 31.6 weeks gestation) minus first postpartum visit (2-8.6 weeks after delivery) to determine a change. Disruptions caused by COVID-19 created many challenges in longitudinal data collection.
Units cigarettes per day Units litmus levels Units e-cig use times per day Units Score on a scale Units scores on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale
Dispersion Type Inter-Quartile Range Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Inter-Quartile Range Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Param Type Median Param Type Mean Param Type Median Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 235667197 Sequence: 235667193 Sequence: 235667194 Sequence: 235667195 Sequence: 235667196 Sequence: 235667198 Sequence: 235667199 Sequence: 235667200 Sequence: 235667201 Sequence: 235667202 Sequence: 235667203 Sequence: 235667204 Sequence: 235667205 Sequence: 235667206 Sequence: 235667207 Sequence: 235667208
Outcome Id 30805784 Outcome Id 30805782 Outcome Id 30805782 Outcome Id 30805783 Outcome Id 30805783 Outcome Id 30805784 Outcome Id 30805785 Outcome Id 30805785 Outcome Id 30805786 Outcome Id 30805786 Outcome Id 30805787 Outcome Id 30805787 Outcome Id 30805788 Outcome Id 30805788 Outcome Id 30805789 Outcome Id 30805789
Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094238 Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094238 Result Group Id 56094238 Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094238 Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094238 Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094238 Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094238 Result Group Id 56094237 Result Group Id 56094238
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Title Change in Electronic Cigarette Usage Per Day Title Change in the Number of Cigarettes Smoked Per Day Title Change in the Number of Cigarettes Smoked Per Day Title Change in Urine Cotinine Concentration Level Title Change in Urine Cotinine Concentration Level Title Change in Electronic Cigarette Usage Per Day Title Change in Cigarette Dependence Title Change in Cigarette Dependence Title Change in Electronic Cigarette Dependence Title Change in Electronic Cigarette Dependence Title Change in Maternal Depression Over Time Title Change in Maternal Depression Over Time Title Change in Maternal Anxiety Over Time Title Change in Maternal Anxiety Over Time Title Change in Maternal Perceived Stress Over Time Title Change in Maternal Perceived Stress Over Time
Description Participants will be asked during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks) to self-report electronic cigarette (e-cig) usage per day. Data will be presented as the change in e-cig usage per day compared between groups. Description Participants will be asked during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks) to self-report the number of cigarettes smoked per day. Data will be presented as the change in the number of cigarettes smoked per day compared between groups. Description Participants will be asked during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks) to self-report the number of cigarettes smoked per day. Data will be presented as the change in the number of cigarettes smoked per day compared between groups. Description Participants will provide a urine sample to be measured by litmus analysis during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The litmus levels range from 0 (minimum) to 6 (maximum). Data will be presented as the change in cotinine levels by the litmus measure over the course of the study compared between groups. Description Participants will provide a urine sample to be measured by litmus analysis during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The litmus levels range from 0 (minimum) to 6 (maximum). Data will be presented as the change in cotinine levels by the litmus measure over the course of the study compared between groups. Description Participants will be asked during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks) to self-report electronic cigarette (e-cig) usage per day. Data will be presented as the change in e-cig usage per day compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey instrument asks seven questions related to cigarette dependency. For scoring, yes/no questions are scored from 0 to 1, and multiple choice questions from 0 to 3. Items are then summed to yield a total score of 0-10. The higher the total score, the more intense the patient's nicotine dependence. Any score greater than 8 is considered high dependency, a score of 5-7 is considered moderately dependent, 3-4 is low to moderate dependence and 1-2 is low dependence. Data will be presented as the change in cigarette dependency over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey instrument asks seven questions related to cigarette dependency. For scoring, yes/no questions are scored from 0 to 1, and multiple choice questions from 0 to 3. Items are then summed to yield a total score of 0-10. The higher the total score, the more intense the patient's nicotine dependence. Any score greater than 8 is considered high dependency, a score of 5-7 is considered moderately dependent, 3-4 is low to moderate dependence and 1-2 is low dependence. Data will be presented as the change in cigarette dependency over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Penn State Electronic Cigarette Dependence Index (PSECDI) during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey instrument asks ten questions and responses are scored on a scale from zero to 20. Summed scores correlate to a dependence category; 0-3 is not dependent, 4-8 is low dependence, 9-12 is medium dependence, and above 12 is high dependence. Data will be presented as the change in electronic cigarette dependency over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Penn State Electronic Cigarette Dependence Index (PSECDI) during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey instrument asks ten questions and responses are scored on a scale from zero to 20. Summed scores correlate to a dependence category; 0-3 is not dependent, 4-8 is low dependence, 9-12 is medium dependence, and above 12 is high dependence. Data will be presented as the change in electronic cigarette dependency over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey consisted of 10 multiple choice questions with scores for each question ranging from 0-3. Scores are then summed for a total score, ranging from 0-30. Questions 1, 2 & 4 are scored 0-3 with the first answer to each question scored as 0 and the fourth answer scored as 3. Questions 3 & 5-10 are reverse scored, with the first answer to each question scored as 3 and the fourth answer scored as 0. A score of 10 or greater is interpreted as "possible depression". A score of greater than 0 on item 10 indicates "suicidal thoughts". Data will be presented as the change in depression over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey consisted of 10 multiple choice questions with scores for each question ranging from 0-3. Scores are then summed for a total score, ranging from 0-30. Questions 1, 2 & 4 are scored 0-3 with the first answer to each question scored as 0 and the fourth answer scored as 3. Questions 3 & 5-10 are reverse scored, with the first answer to each question scored as 3 and the fourth answer scored as 0. A score of 10 or greater is interpreted as "possible depression". A score of greater than 0 on item 10 indicates "suicidal thoughts". Data will be presented as the change in depression over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey consisted of 7 questions scored between zero and 21. A score of 5-9 indicates mild severity, 10-14 is moderate, and 15 and greater is considered severe. Data will be presented as the change in anxiety over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey consisted of 7 questions scored between zero and 21. A score of 5-9 indicates mild severity, 10-14 is moderate, and 15 and greater is considered severe. Data will be presented as the change in anxiety over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Perceived Stress Scale 4-item (PSS4) during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey consisted of 4 questions scored between zero and 16. Higher scores are correlated with more stress. Data will be presented as the change in stress over time compared between groups. Description Participants will complete the Perceived Stress Scale 4-item (PSS4) during the second trimester, third trimester, two months postpartum and six months postpartum (up to 50 weeks). The survey consisted of 4 questions scored between zero and 16. Higher scores are correlated with more stress. Data will be presented as the change in stress over time compared between groups.
Units e-cig use times per day Units cigarettes per day Units cigarettes per day Units litmus levels Units litmus levels Units e-cig use times per day Units Score on a scale Units Score on a scale Units scores on a scale Units scores on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale
Param Type Median Param Type Median Param Type Median Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Median Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean
Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value -0.09 Param Value 0.17 Param Value -6 Param Value 2.04 Param Value 1.42 Param Value -5.0 Param Value -1.5 Param Value 2.42 Param Value 2.58 Param Value 2.0 Param Value 1.52 Param Value 0.73 Param Value 1.04
Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num -0.09 Param Value Num 0.17 Param Value Num -6.0 Param Value Num 2.04 Param Value Num 1.42 Param Value Num -5.0 Param Value Num -1.5 Param Value Num 2.42 Param Value Num 2.58 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 1.52 Param Value Num 0.73 Param Value Num 1.04
Dispersion Type Inter-Quartile Range Dispersion Type Inter-Quartile Range Dispersion Type Inter-Quartile Range Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Inter-Quartile Range Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 0.68 Dispersion Value 0.56 Dispersion Value 3.14 Dispersion Value 2.9 Dispersion Value 2.12 Dispersion Value 3.86 Dispersion Value 5.64 Dispersion Value 5.68 Dispersion Value 4.57 Dispersion Value 2.79 Dispersion Value 3.17
Dispersion Value Num 0.68 Dispersion Value Num 0.56 Dispersion Value Num 3.14 Dispersion Value Num 2.9 Dispersion Value Num 2.12 Dispersion Value Num 3.86 Dispersion Value Num 5.64 Dispersion Value Num 5.68 Dispersion Value Num 4.57 Dispersion Value Num 2.79 Dispersion Value Num 3.17
Dispersion Lower Limit 0.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -10.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -5.0 Dispersion Lower Limit -20.0
Dispersion Upper Limit 18.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 5.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 3.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 4.0

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11383653 Sequence: 11383654 Sequence: 11383655
Result Group Id 56094232 Result Group Id 56094233 Result Group Id 56094234
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Scope overall Scope overall Scope overall
Count 38 Count 38 Count 76

Result Groups

Sequence: 56094232 Sequence: 56094233 Sequence: 56094234 Sequence: 56094235 Sequence: 56094236 Sequence: 56094237 Sequence: 56094238 Sequence: 56094239 Sequence: 56094240
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event
Title Tobacco Intervention Title Treatment As Usual Title Total Title Tobacco Intervention Title Treatment As Usual Title Tobacco Intervention Title Treatment As Usual Title Tobacco Intervention Title Treatment As Usual
Description Participants in this group will be randomized to the Behavioral and Enhanced Perinatal Intervention for Cessation (B-EPIC) intervention.

Behavioral and Enhanced Perinatal Intervention for Cessation (B-EPIC): Women enrolled in the intervention group will receive TAU plus B-EPIC, which includes four core components: 1) Individualized tobacco treatment plus supplemental counseling, 2) Biomarker validation and feedback, 3) Change in maternal thought process and adoption of healthy behavior (e.g. exercise, based on PI framework), and 4) Pharmacotherapy as needed (see Table 3 for a summary of the study design). The initial assessment for this intervention takes 60 minutes, with follow-up sessions typically lasting 15-20 minutes. All sessions occur prior to or after pre-scheduled perinatal appointments. The intervention will be led by a certified tobacco treatment specialist (CTTS).

Description Participants in this group will be randomized to tobacco treatment as usual.

Treatment As Usual: Women enrolled in the control group are informed of the risks of tobacco use and benefits of quitting using the ACOG 5'A's approach by their healthcare provider. This standard takes approximately 5-15 minutes, and is offered at each prenatal and postpartum appointment. The five steps of the ACOG recommendation are: 1.) Ask about tobacco use, 2.) Advise to quit, 3.) Assess willingness to make a quit attempt, 4.) Assist in quit attempt, and 5.) Arrange follow-up. The provider may also talk to the participant about nicotine replacement therapy.

Description Total of all reporting groups Description Participants in this group will be randomized to the Behavioral and Enhanced Perinatal Intervention for Cessation (B-EPIC) intervention.

Behavioral and Enhanced Perinatal Intervention for Cessation (B-EPIC): Women enrolled in the intervention group will receive TAU plus B-EPIC, which includes four core components: 1) Individualized tobacco treatment plus supplemental counseling, 2) Biomarker validation and feedback, 3) Change in maternal thought process and adoption of healthy behavior (e.g. exercise, based on PI framework), and 4) Pharmacotherapy as needed (see Table 3 for a summary of the study design). The initial assessment for this intervention takes 60 minutes, with follow-up sessions typically lasting 15-20 minutes. All sessions occur prior to or after pre-scheduled perinatal appointments. The intervention will be led by a certified tobacco treatment specialist (CTTS).

Description Participants in this group will be randomized to tobacco treatment as usual.

Treatment As Usual: Women enrolled in the control group are informed of the risks of tobacco use and benefits of quitting using the ACOG 5'A's approach by their healthcare provider. This standard takes approximately 5-15 minutes, and is offered at each prenatal and postpartum appointment. The five steps of the ACOG recommendation are: 1.) Ask about tobacco use, 2.) Advise to quit, 3.) Assess willingness to make a quit attempt, 4.) Assist in quit attempt, and 5.) Arrange follow-up. The provider may also talk to the participant about nicotine replacement therapy.

Description Participants in this group will be randomized to the Behavioral and Enhanced Perinatal Intervention for Cessation (B-EPIC) intervention.

Behavioral and Enhanced Perinatal Intervention for Cessation (B-EPIC): Women enrolled in the intervention group will receive TAU plus B-EPIC, which includes four core components: 1) Individualized tobacco treatment plus supplemental counseling, 2) Biomarker validation and feedback, 3) Change in maternal thought process and adoption of healthy behavior (e.g. exercise, based on PI framework), and 4) Pharmacotherapy as needed (see Table 3 for a summary of the study design). The initial assessment for this intervention takes 60 minutes, with follow-up sessions typically lasting 15-20 minutes. All sessions occur prior to or after pre-scheduled perinatal appointments. The intervention will be led by a certified tobacco treatment specialist (CTTS).

Description Participants in this group will be randomized to tobacco treatment as usual.

Treatment As Usual: Women enrolled in the control group are informed of the risks of tobacco use and benefits of quitting using the ACOG 5'A's approach by their healthcare provider. This standard takes approximately 5-15 minutes, and is offered at each prenatal and postpartum appointment. The five steps of the ACOG recommendation are: 1.) Ask about tobacco use, 2.) Advise to quit, 3.) Assess willingness to make a quit attempt, 4.) Assist in quit attempt, and 5.) Arrange follow-up. The provider may also talk to the participant about nicotine replacement therapy.

Description Participants in this group will be randomized to the Behavioral and Enhanced Perinatal Intervention for Cessation (B-EPIC) intervention.

Behavioral and Enhanced Perinatal Intervention for Cessation (B-EPIC): Women enrolled in the intervention group will receive TAU plus B-EPIC, which includes four core components: 1) Individualized tobacco treatment plus supplemental counseling, 2) Biomarker validation and feedback, 3) Change in maternal thought process and adoption of healthy behavior (e.g. exercise, based on PI framework), and 4) Pharmacotherapy as needed (see Table 3 for a summary of the study design). The initial assessment for this intervention takes 60 minutes, with follow-up sessions typically lasting 15-20 minutes. All sessions occur prior to or after pre-scheduled perinatal appointments. The intervention will be led by a certified tobacco treatment specialist (CTTS).

Description Participants in this group will be randomized to tobacco treatment as usual.

Treatment As Usual: Women enrolled in the control group are informed of the risks of tobacco use and benefits of quitting using the ACOG 5'A's approach by their healthcare provider. This standard takes approximately 5-15 minutes, and is offered at each prenatal and postpartum appointment. The five steps of the ACOG recommendation are: 1.) Ask about tobacco use, 2.) Advise to quit, 3.) Assess willingness to make a quit attempt, 4.) Assist in quit attempt, and 5.) Arrange follow-up. The provider may also talk to the participant about nicotine replacement therapy.

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 125592037 Sequence: 125592038 Sequence: 125592039 Sequence: 125592040 Sequence: 125592041 Sequence: 125592042 Sequence: 125592043 Sequence: 125592044 Sequence: 125592045 Sequence: 125592046 Sequence: 125592047 Sequence: 125592048 Sequence: 125592049 Sequence: 125592050 Sequence: 125592051 Sequence: 125592052 Sequence: 125592053 Sequence: 125592054 Sequence: 125592055 Sequence: 125592056 Sequence: 125592057 Sequence: 125592058 Sequence: 125592059 Sequence: 125592060 Sequence: 125592061 Sequence: 125592062 Sequence: 125592063 Sequence: 125592064 Sequence: 125592065 Sequence: 125592066 Sequence: 125592067 Sequence: 125592068 Sequence: 125592069 Sequence: 125592070 Sequence: 125592071 Sequence: 125592072 Sequence: 125592073 Sequence: 125592074 Sequence: 125592075 Sequence: 125592076 Sequence: 125592077 Sequence: 125592078
Result Group Id 56094232 Result Group Id 56094233 Result Group Id 56094234 Result Group Id 56094232 Result Group Id 56094233 Result Group Id 56094234 Result Group Id 56094232 Result Group Id 56094233 Result Group Id 56094234 Result Group Id 56094232 Result Group Id 56094233 Result Group Id 56094234 Result Group Id 56094232 Result Group Id 56094233 Result Group Id 56094234 Result Group Id 56094232 Result Group Id 56094233 Result Group Id 56094234 Result Group Id 56094232 Result Group Id 56094233 Result Group Id 56094234 Result Group Id 56094232 Result Group Id 56094233 Result Group Id 56094234 Result Group Id 56094232 Result Group Id 56094233 Result Group Id 56094234 Result Group Id 56094232 Result Group Id 56094233 Result Group Id 56094234 Result Group Id 56094232 Result Group Id 56094233 Result Group Id 56094234 Result Group Id 56094232 Result Group Id 56094233 Result Group Id 56094234 Result Group Id 56094232 Result Group Id 56094233 Result Group Id 56094234 Result Group Id 56094232 Result Group Id 56094233 Result Group Id 56094234
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Classification United States Classification United States Classification United States
Category <=18 years Category <=18 years Category <=18 years Category Between 18 and 65 years Category Between 18 and 65 years Category Between 18 and 65 years Category >=65 years Category >=65 years Category >=65 years Category Female Category Female Category Female Category Male Category Male Category Male Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category Asian Category Asian Category Asian Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category White Category White Category White Category More than one race Category More than one race Category More than one race Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported
Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Region of Enrollment Title Region of Enrollment Title Region of Enrollment
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units years Units years Units years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 38 Param Value 38 Param Value 76 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 30.9 Param Value 30.8 Param Value 30.9 Param Value 38 Param Value 38 Param Value 76 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 33 Param Value 35 Param Value 68 Param Value 3 Param Value 2 Param Value 5 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 38 Param Value 38 Param Value 76
Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 38.0 Param Value Num 38.0 Param Value Num 76.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 30.9 Param Value Num 30.8 Param Value Num 30.9 Param Value Num 38.0 Param Value Num 38.0 Param Value Num 76.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 33.0 Param Value Num 35.0 Param Value Num 68.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 38.0 Param Value Num 38.0 Param Value Num 76.0
Dispersion Type Full Range Dispersion Type Full Range Dispersion Type Full Range
Dispersion Lower Limit 22.7 Dispersion Lower Limit 21.8 Dispersion Lower Limit 21.8
Dispersion Upper Limit 43.5 Dispersion Upper Limit 41.8 Dispersion Upper Limit 43.5
Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 76 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 76 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 76 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 76 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 76 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 76 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 76 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 76 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 76 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 76 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 76 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 76 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 76 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 38 Number Analyzed 76

]]>

<![CDATA[ (SGB) in Men Treated for Prostate Cancer Improve Hot Flashes ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796195
2019-11-13

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796195
NCT03796195https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796195?tab=tableNANANAAndrogen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) is a critical component of advanced prostate cancer treatment but causes numerous adverse effects including decreased bone mass, decreased muscle mass, gynecomastia, erectile dysfunction, loss of sexual desire, depression, disordered sleep, urinary symptoms, and hot flashes (HF). HF are unpleasant paroxysmal episodes of flushing, sweating with vasodilation of the face, neck, and chest. These episodes can last for seconds to minutes and are often associated with night sweats, anxiety, and insomnia and have negative effects on quality of life.

Stellate ganglion blockade (SGB) with local anesthetic may be an effective treatment of HF in men on ADT, but has not been studied in any published clinical trials.

The stellate ganglion is a neural structure in the anterior cervical spine region and is part of the sympathetic nervous system. It has been injected safely in the practice of pain management for more than 50 years in cases of post herpetic neuralgia (shingles), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and other painful neuropathies as well as some types of cardiac dysrhythmias.

Given the frequency and severity and interference of HF in men on ADT for prostate cancer, in addition to the negative effects HF impose on this patient population and a paucity of effective treatments, finding alternative treatments for HF in this population is needed.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-01-25
Start Month Year November 13, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year July 16, 2021
Verification Month Year January 2023
Verification Date 2023-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-01-25
Results First Posted Date 2023-01-25

Facilities

Sequence: 200887837
Name Northwestern Memorial Hospital
City Chicago
State Illinois
Zip 60611
Country United States

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96419639 Sequence: 96419640 Sequence: 96419641 Sequence: 96419642 Sequence: 96419643 Sequence: 96419644 Sequence: 96419645
Mesh Term Bupivacaine Mesh Term Anesthetics, Local Mesh Term Anesthetics Mesh Term Central Nervous System Depressants Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Sensory System Agents Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Agents
Downcase Mesh Term bupivacaine Downcase Mesh Term anesthetics, local Downcase Mesh Term anesthetics Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system depressants Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term sensory system agents Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52409999 Sequence: 52410000
Name Prostate Cancer Name Hot Flashes
Downcase Name prostate cancer Downcase Name hot flashes

Id Information

Sequence: 40327353
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value STU00208657

Countries

Sequence: 42750534
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55857548
Group Type Experimental
Title .5% Bupivacaine
Description Guided right sided stelate ganglion block using .5% bupivacaine (5mLs)

Interventions

Sequence: 52718000
Intervention Type Drug
Name .5% Bupivacaine
Description Ultrasound guided right sided stelate ganglion block using .5% bupivacaine (5mLs)

Keywords

Sequence: 80191107
Name Stelate Ganglion Block
Downcase Name stelate ganglion block

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178262198 Sequence: 178262199 Sequence: 178262200 Sequence: 178262201
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Hot Flash Frequency Change Baseline to 3 Months After Treatment. Measure Change in Hot Flash Severity Baseline to 3 Months After Stellate Ganglion Block Measure PROMIS SF4a Score 4 Weeks After Stellate Ganglion Block. Measure Patient Global Impression of Change Score (PGIC)
Time Frame 3 months after SGB procedure Time Frame 3 months after stellate ganglion block Time Frame 4 weeks after stellate ganglion block Time Frame 4 weeks after stellate ganglion block
Description Change in mean daily hot flashes using a self-report hot flash diary from baseline to 3 months after stellate ganglion block. Description The change in hot flash severity (hot flash frequency x hot flash intensity) between baseline and 3 months after SGB. Hot flash severity is determined using the mean frequency= ((Fmo+Fse))7 where FMi, Fmo and Fse are the weekly total number of mild, moderate or severe HF events. The mean severity= (Fmi+2x Fmo + 3 x Fse)/7 where FMI, Fmo and Fse are the weekly total number of mild, moderate or severe/very severe hot flash events in the case of mean severity, frequency of mild vasomotor symptoms is not counted at baseline. Description PROMIS SF4a (sleep) Patient Reportee Outcomes Measurement Information System. The PROMIS SF4a is a 4 item questionnaire that queries sleep duration, quality and interruption. This instrument accesses self reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth and restoratoin associated with sleep. This includes perceived difficulties and concerns with getting to sleep or staying asleep, as well as perceptions of the adequacy and satisfaction with sleep. The 4 items are scored 1-5 where 1 is good quality and 5 is poor quality for a total score range of 4 (good quality) to 20 (poor quality). Description The PGIC assesses the participants improvement in hot flashes from the time of the stellate ganglion block to 4 weeks after the procedure. The PGIC queries how much the hot flashes have improved on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194393177 Sequence: 194393178 Sequence: 194393179 Sequence: 194393180 Sequence: 194393181 Sequence: 194393182 Sequence: 194393183 Sequence: 194393184 Sequence: 194393185 Sequence: 194393186 Sequence: 194393187
Mesh Term Prostatic Neoplasms Mesh Term Hot Flashes Mesh Term Genital Neoplasms, Male Mesh Term Urogenital Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Genital Diseases, Male Mesh Term Genital Diseases Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Prostatic Diseases Mesh Term Male Urogenital Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term prostatic neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term hot flashes Downcase Mesh Term genital neoplasms, male Downcase Mesh Term urogenital neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term genital diseases, male Downcase Mesh Term genital diseases Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term prostatic diseases Downcase Mesh Term male urogenital diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48541438
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Northwestern University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29409164
Role Principal Investigator
Name David Walega, MD, MS
Affiliation Northwestern University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68471860
Design Group Id 55857548
Intervention Id 52718000

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30902762
Gender Male
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 65 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Men with prostate cancer (with or without metastatic disease) on ADT for at least 2 months
Age less than 65 years
Body Mass Index (BMI) less than 32
Willingness to undergo image guided intervention
Greater than 28 hot flashes per week.

Exclusion Criteria:

Conditions that preclude SGB or sham intervention (e.g., anatomic abnormalities of the anterior neck or cervical spine; metastatic disease in or near the cervical spine; goiter;cardiac/pulmonary compromise; sleep apnea; acute illness/infection; coagulopathy or bleeding disorder; allergic reactions/contraindications to a local anesthetic or contrast dye)
Current treatment of prostate cancer with radium or chemotherapy
Use of treatments in the past two months that can affect HF (e.g., testosterone or androgen supplementation) Note: SSRIs, serotonin norepinephrine uptake inhibitors, and membrane stabilizers will be allowed but must be on stable unchanged dose for at least 8 weeks)
Inability to write, speak, or read in English

Gender Description Men with prostate cancer with bothersome hot flashes.
Gender Based True
Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254157677
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 20
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 12
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 65
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30648479
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Drop Withdrawals

Sequence: 29097759
Result Group Id 56225515
Ctgov Group Code FG000
Period Overall Study
Reason Study closed early
Count 1

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26787930
Intervention Id 52718000
Name Right sided stelate ganglion block (SGB)

Milestones

Sequence: 41146746 Sequence: 41146747 Sequence: 41146748
Result Group Id 56225515 Result Group Id 56225515 Result Group Id 56225515
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000
Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Count 1 Count 0 Count 1

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3932135

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 74261238 Sequence: 74261239 Sequence: 74261240 Sequence: 74261241
Outcome Id 30909163 Outcome Id 30909164 Outcome Id 30909165 Outcome Id 30909166
Result Group Id 56225516 Result Group Id 56225516 Result Group Id 56225516 Result Group Id 56225516
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 1 Count 1 Count 1 Count 1

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2595938 Sequence: 2595939
Document Type Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan Document Type Informed Consent Form
Has Protocol True Has Protocol False
Has Icf False Has Icf True
Has Sap True Has Sap False
Document Date 2020-09-16 Document Date 2020-09-16
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/95/NCT03796195/Prot_SAP_000.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/95/NCT03796195/ICF_001.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 28028941 Sequence: 28028942 Sequence: 28028943
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 1 Subjects At Risk 1 Subjects At Risk 1
Created At 2023-08-10 13:09:51.353110 Created At 2023-08-10 13:09:51.353110 Created At 2023-08-10 13:09:51.353110
Updated At 2023-08-10 13:09:51.353110 Updated At 2023-08-10 13:09:51.353110 Updated At 2023-08-10 13:09:51.353110

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29015122
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name David Walega
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation Northwestern University

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3862879
Pi Employee Yes

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3862844
Organization Northwestern University
Name David Walega, MD
Phone 3126952500
Email d-walega@northwestern.edu

Outcomes

Sequence: 30909163 Sequence: 30909164 Sequence: 30909165 Sequence: 30909166
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary
Title Hot Flash Frequency Change Baseline to 3 Months After Treatment. Title Change in Hot Flash Severity Baseline to 3 Months After Stellate Ganglion Block Title PROMIS SF4a Score 4 Weeks After Stellate Ganglion Block. Title Patient Global Impression of Change Score (PGIC)
Description Change in mean daily hot flashes using a self-report hot flash diary from baseline to 3 months after stellate ganglion block. Description The change in hot flash severity (hot flash frequency x hot flash intensity) between baseline and 3 months after SGB. Hot flash severity is determined using the mean frequency= ((Fmo+Fse))7 where FMi, Fmo and Fse are the weekly total number of mild, moderate or severe HF events. The mean severity= (Fmi+2x Fmo + 3 x Fse)/7 where FMI, Fmo and Fse are the weekly total number of mild, moderate or severe/very severe hot flash events in the case of mean severity, frequency of mild vasomotor symptoms is not counted at baseline. Description PROMIS SF4a (sleep) Patient Reportee Outcomes Measurement Information System. The PROMIS SF4a is a 4 item questionnaire that queries sleep duration, quality and interruption. This instrument accesses self reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth and restoratoin associated with sleep. This includes perceived difficulties and concerns with getting to sleep or staying asleep, as well as perceptions of the adequacy and satisfaction with sleep. The 4 items are scored 1-5 where 1 is good quality and 5 is poor quality for a total score range of 4 (good quality) to 20 (poor quality). Description The PGIC assesses the participants improvement in hot flashes from the time of the stellate ganglion block to 4 weeks after the procedure. The PGIC queries how much the hot flashes have improved on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Time Frame 3 months after SGB procedure Time Frame 3 months after stellate ganglion block Time Frame 4 weeks after stellate ganglion block Time Frame 4 weeks after stellate ganglion block
Units Hot flashes/day Units Score on a scale Units Score on a scale Units Score on a scale
Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 236519221 Sequence: 236519218 Sequence: 236519219 Sequence: 236519220
Outcome Id 30909166 Outcome Id 30909163 Outcome Id 30909164 Outcome Id 30909165
Result Group Id 56225516 Result Group Id 56225516 Result Group Id 56225516 Result Group Id 56225516
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000
Title Patient Global Impression of Change Score (PGIC) Title Hot Flash Frequency Change Baseline to 3 Months After Treatment. Title Change in Hot Flash Severity Baseline to 3 Months After Stellate Ganglion Block Title PROMIS SF4a Score 4 Weeks After Stellate Ganglion Block.
Description The PGIC assesses the participants improvement in hot flashes from the time of the stellate ganglion block to 4 weeks after the procedure. The PGIC queries how much the hot flashes have improved on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Description Change in mean daily hot flashes using a self-report hot flash diary from baseline to 3 months after stellate ganglion block. Description The change in hot flash severity (hot flash frequency x hot flash intensity) between baseline and 3 months after SGB. Hot flash severity is determined using the mean frequency= ((Fmo+Fse))7 where FMi, Fmo and Fse are the weekly total number of mild, moderate or severe HF events. The mean severity= (Fmi+2x Fmo + 3 x Fse)/7 where FMI, Fmo and Fse are the weekly total number of mild, moderate or severe/very severe hot flash events in the case of mean severity, frequency of mild vasomotor symptoms is not counted at baseline. Description PROMIS SF4a (sleep) Patient Reportee Outcomes Measurement Information System. The PROMIS SF4a is a 4 item questionnaire that queries sleep duration, quality and interruption. This instrument accesses self reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth and restoratoin associated with sleep. This includes perceived difficulties and concerns with getting to sleep or staying asleep, as well as perceptions of the adequacy and satisfaction with sleep. The 4 items are scored 1-5 where 1 is good quality and 5 is poor quality for a total score range of 4 (good quality) to 20 (poor quality).
Units Score on a scale Units Hot flashes/day Units Score on a scale Units Score on a scale
Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number
Param Value 4 Param Value -1.78 Param Value -55.94 Param Value 8
Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num -1.78 Param Value Num -55.94 Param Value Num 8.0

Study References

Sequence: 52321013 Sequence: 52321014 Sequence: 52321015 Sequence: 52321016 Sequence: 52321017 Sequence: 52321018 Sequence: 52321019 Sequence: 52321020 Sequence: 52321021
Pmid 29072790 Pmid 28712786 Pmid 27294289 Pmid 11872028 Pmid 15379937 Pmid 19962840 Pmid 23021559 Pmid 27993906 Pmid 23893467
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Gonzalez BD, Small BJ, Cases MG, Williams NL, Fishman MN, Jacobsen PB, Jim HSL. Sleep disturbance in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: The role of hot flashes and nocturia. Cancer. 2018 Feb 1;124(3):499-506. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31024. Epub 2017 Oct 26. Citation Dosani M, Morris WJ, Tyldesley S, Pickles T. The Relationship between Hot Flashes and Testosterone Recovery after 12 Months of Androgen Suppression for Men with Localised Prostate Cancer in the ASCENDE-RT Trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017 Oct;29(10):696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jul 13. Citation Grunfeld EA, Hunter MS, Yousaf O. Men's experience of a guided self-help intervention for hot flushes associated with prostate cancer treatment. Psychol Health Med. 2017 Apr;22(4):425-433. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2016.1195504. Epub 2016 Jun 13. Citation Kouriefs C, Georgiou M, Ravi R. Hot flushes and prostate cancer: pathogenesis and treatment. BJU Int. 2002 Mar;89(4):379-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.01761.x. No abstract available. Citation Nishiyama T, Kanazawa S, Watanabe R, Terunuma M, Takahashi K. Influence of hot flashes on quality of life in patients with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy. Int J Urol. 2004 Sep;11(9):735-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00896.x. Citation Frisk J. Managing hot flushes in men after prostate cancer–a systematic review. Maturitas. 2010 Jan;65(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.10.017. Epub 2009 Dec 4. Citation Trump DL. Commentary on "association of androgen deprivation therapy with cardiovascular death in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials." Nguyen PL, Je Y, Schutz FA, Hoffman KE, Hu JC, Parekh A, Beckman JA, Choueiri TK, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA: JAMA 2011;306(21):2359-66. Urol Oncol. 2012 Sep;30(5):746-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.06.007. No abstract available. Citation Gavin AT, Donnelly D, Donnelly C, Drummond FJ, Morgan E, Gormley GJ, Sharp L. Effect of investigation intensity and treatment differences on prostate cancer survivor's physical symptoms, psychological well-being and health-related quality of life: a two country cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 19;6(12):e012952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012952. Erratum In: BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 23;7(1):e012952corr1. Citation Eziefula CU, Grunfeld EA, Hunter MS. 'You know I've joined your club… I'm the hot flush boy': a qualitative exploration of hot flushes and night sweats in men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2013 Dec;22(12):2823-30. doi: 10.1002/pon.3355. Epub 2013 Jul 28.

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11417217
Result Group Id 56225514
Ctgov Group Code BG000
Units Participants
Scope overall
Count 1

Result Groups

Sequence: 56225514 Sequence: 56225515 Sequence: 56225516 Sequence: 56225517
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000
Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event
Title .5% Bupivacaine Title .5% Bupivacaine Title .5% Bupivacaine Title .5% Bupivacaine
Description Guided right sided stelate ganglion block using .5% bupivacaine (5mLs)

.5% Bupivacaine: Ultrasound guided right sided stelate ganglion block using .5% bupivacaine (5mLs)

Description Guided right sided stelate ganglion block using .5% bupivacaine (5mLs)

.5% Bupivacaine: Ultrasound guided right sided stelate ganglion block using .5% bupivacaine (5mLs)

Description Guided right sided stelate ganglion block using .5% bupivacaine (5mLs)

.5% Bupivacaine: Ultrasound guided right sided stelate ganglion block using .5% bupivacaine (5mLs)

Description Guided right sided stelate ganglion block using .5% bupivacaine (5mLs)

.5% Bupivacaine: Ultrasound guided right sided stelate ganglion block using .5% bupivacaine (5mLs)

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 126051364 Sequence: 126051365 Sequence: 126051366 Sequence: 126051367 Sequence: 126051368 Sequence: 126051380 Sequence: 126051369 Sequence: 126051370 Sequence: 126051371 Sequence: 126051372 Sequence: 126051373 Sequence: 126051374 Sequence: 126051375 Sequence: 126051376 Sequence: 126051377 Sequence: 126051378 Sequence: 126051379 Sequence: 126051381
Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514 Result Group Id 56225514
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000
Classification United States
Category <=18 years Category Between 18 and 65 years Category >=65 years Category Female Category Male Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category Asian Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Black or African American Category White Category More than one race Category Unknown or Not Reported
Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Baseline mean daily hot flashes Title Sex: Female, Male Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Region of Enrollment Title Body Mass Index (kg/m^2) Title Baseline Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) Title PROMIS SF4a Sleep Score
Description Baseline mean daily hot flashes reported by subject using daily diary. Description HFRIDS is a 10 question survey scored on a scale of 0=no interference and 10=high interference.

Questions inquire about work, social activities, leisure activities,sleep, mood,concentratoin, relationship with others, sexuality,enjoyment of life and overqll quality of life. Low score=0 is the lowest interference score and the highest interference score is 100.

Description PROMIS SF4a (sleep) Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. The PROMIS SF4a is a 4 item questionnaire that queries sleep duration, quality and interruption. This instrument accesses self reported perceptions of sleep quality. sleep depth and restoratoin associated with sleep. This includes perceived difficulties and concerns with getting to sleep or staying asleep, as well as perceptions of the adequacy of satisfaction with sleep. The 4 items are scored 1-5 where 1 is good quality and 5 is poor quality for a total score range of 4 (good quality) to 20 (poor quality).
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units years Units Participants Units Hot flashes/day Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units participants Units (kg/m^2) Units score on a scale Units Score on a scale
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number
Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 67 Param Value 0 Param Value 9.78 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 25 Param Value 48 Param Value 11
Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 67.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 9.78 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 25.0 Param Value Num 48.0 Param Value Num 11.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 1

]]>

<![CDATA[ Study of PF 04965842 Effect on MATE1/2K Activity in Healthy Participants ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796182
2019-01-10

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796182
NCT03796182https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796182?tab=tableNANANAThis is a Phase 1, randomized, 2 way crossover, open label study of the effect of PF-04965842 on metformin (a probe for MATE1/2K activity) PK in healthy adult participants. The effect of PF-04965842 on N1-methylnicotinamide (NMN; an endogenous biomarker for MATE1/2K) PK and its correlation to the effect on metformin PK will also be assessed. Participants will be randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequences as described below. A total of 12 healthy male and/or female participants will be enrolled in the study so that 6 participants will be enrolled in each treatment sequence. Each treatment sequence will consist of 2 periods.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-02-05
Start Month Year January 10, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year February 13, 2019
Verification Month Year January 2020
Verification Date 2020-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-02-05
Results First Posted Date 2020-02-05

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20573953
Description This is a Phase 1, randomized, 2 way crossover, open label study of the effect of PF-04965842 on metformin (a probe for MATE1/2K activity) PK in healthy adult participants. The effect of PF-04965842 on N1-methylnicotinamide (NMN; an endogenous biomarker for MATE1/2K) PK and its correlation to the effect on metformin PK will also be assessed. Participants will be randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequences as described below. A total of 12 healthy male and/or female participants will be enrolled in the study so that 6 participants will be enrolled in each treatment sequence. Each treatment sequence will consist of 2 periods. Participants who discontinue from the study may be replaced at the sponsor's discretion. The replacement participant will receive the same treatment sequence as the participant who discontinued.

Participants will be screened within 28 days of the first dose of investigational product. Participants will report to the clinical research unit (CRU) the day prior to Day 1 (ie Day -1) dosing in Period 1 for both treatment sequences. In both sequences, participants will remain in the CRU for a total of 8 days and 7 nights (including Period 1 and Period 2). There will be a minimum 4 day washout period between metformin dosing events. NMN and metformin PK will be assessed in plasma and urine over 24 and 48 hours, respectively.

Facilities

Sequence: 198630697
Name Pfizer Clinical Research Unit
City Brussels
Zip B-1070
Country Belgium

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 95307605 Sequence: 95307606 Sequence: 95307607 Sequence: 95307608 Sequence: 95307609 Sequence: 95307610 Sequence: 95307611
Mesh Term Metformin Mesh Term Abrocitinib Mesh Term Hypoglycemic Agents Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Protein Kinase Inhibitors Mesh Term Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Downcase Mesh Term metformin Downcase Mesh Term abrocitinib Downcase Mesh Term hypoglycemic agents Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term protein kinase inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 51790015
Name Healthy
Downcase Name healthy

Id Information

Sequence: 39855189 Sequence: 39855190 Sequence: 39855191
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value B7451034 Id Value DDI Id Value 2018-003683-31
Id Type Other Identifier Id Type EudraCT Number
Id Type Description Alias Study Number

Countries

Sequence: 42254028
Name Belgium
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55210670 Sequence: 55210671
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title Sequence 1 Title Sequence 2
Description Patients in sequence 1 will received treatment A (metformin) in Period 1 then complete at least 4 days of washout and continue to period 2 where treatment B (PF-04965842 + metformin) will be administered. Description Patients in Sequence 2 will start treatment B (PF-04965842 + metformin) then go through a washout period of at least 4 days and continue to Period 2 where treatment A (metformin) will be administered.

Interventions

Sequence: 52112625 Sequence: 52112626
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Metformin Name PF-04965842
Description Commercially available metformin (GLUCOPHAGE®) as 500 mg tablets. Description PF 04965842 100 mg tablets

Keywords

Sequence: 79242342 Sequence: 79242343 Sequence: 79242344
Name Phase 1 Name Metformin Name Atopic dermatitis
Downcase Name phase 1 Downcase Name metformin Downcase Name atopic dermatitis

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176153642 Sequence: 176153643 Sequence: 176153644 Sequence: 176153645 Sequence: 176153646 Sequence: 176153647 Sequence: 176153648 Sequence: 176153649 Sequence: 176153650 Sequence: 176153651 Sequence: 176153652 Sequence: 176153653 Sequence: 176153654 Sequence: 176153655
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Renal Clearance (CLr) of Metformin Measure Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Metformin Measure Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Metformin Measure Time for Cmax (Tmax) of Metformin Measure Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Metformin Measure Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Metformin Measure Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Metformin Measure Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Metformin Measure Cumulative Amount of Drug Recovered Unchanged in Urine From 0 to 48 Hours (Ae) of Metformin Measure Percent of Dose Recovered Unchanged in Urine From 0 to 24 Hours (Ae%) of Metformin Measure Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities Measure Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Measure Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Measure Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs and SAEs (All Causalities and Treatment-related)
Time Frame For both Period 1 and Period 2 at intervals of 0-12, 12-24, 24-36, and 36-48 hours post metformin dose Time Frame Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose of metformin on Day 1 for both Period 1 and Period 2 Time Frame Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose of metformin on Day 1 for both Period 1 and Period 2 Time Frame Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose of metformin on Day 1 for both Period 1 and Period 2 Time Frame Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose of metformin on Day 1 for both Period 1 and Period 2 Time Frame Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose of metformin on Day 1 for both Period 1 and Period 2 Time Frame Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose of metformin on Day 1 for both Period 1 and Period 2 Time Frame Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose of metformin on Day 1 for both Period 1 and Period 2 Time Frame For both Period 1 and Period 2 at intervals of 0-12, 12-24, 24-36, and 36-48 hours post metformin dose Time Frame For both Period 1 and Period 2 at intervals of 0-12 and 12-24 hours post metformin dose Time Frame Screening (within 28 days prior to Day 1) to Day 7 Time Frame Screening (within 28 days prior to Day 1) to Day 7 Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin)
Description CLr was calculated as cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine during the dosing interval (Ae) divided by area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau). Description AUCinf is a measure of the serum concentration of the drug over time. It was used to characterize drug absorption. Description Cmax is maximum observed plasma concentration. Description Tmax of metformin administrated with or without PF-04965842. Description AUClast of metformin administrated with or without PF-04965842. Description CL/F is a quantitative measure of the rate at which drug was removed from the blood. Description Vz/F is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Description t1/2 is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. Description Ae is the cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine during the dosing interval. Cumulative amount was calculated as sum of urine drug concentration in sample volume for each collection interval. Sample volume = (urine weight in gram [g]/1.020), where 1.020 g/mL is the approximate specific gravity of urine. Description Ae% is percent of dose recovered unchanged in urine from 0 to 24 hours post-dose of metformin. Description Laboratory parameters included: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, ery. mean corpuscular volume, ery. mean corpuscular hemoglobin, ery. mean corpuscular HGB concentration, platelets, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, prothrombin intl. normalized ratio, large unstained cells/leukocytes and large unstained cells), clinical chemistry (bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, protein, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, urea, creatinine, urate, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, bicarbonate, urobilinogen and glucose -FASTING), urinalysis (specific gravity, pH, urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, urine bilirubin, nitrite and leukocytes). Clinical significance of laboratory parameters is determined at the investigator's discretion. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Sponsors

Sequence: 47964009
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Pfizer

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29060525
Role Study Director
Name Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Affiliation Pfizer

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67689835 Sequence: 67689836 Sequence: 67689837 Sequence: 67689838
Design Group Id 55210670 Design Group Id 55210671 Design Group Id 55210670 Design Group Id 55210671
Intervention Id 52112625 Intervention Id 52112625 Intervention Id 52112626 Intervention Id 52112626

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30541672
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 55 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Male and female participants who are overtly healthy as determined by medical evaluation including a detailed medical history, complete physical examination, laboratory tests, and cardiovascular tests.
Participants who are willing and able to comply with all scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, lifestyle considerations, and other study procedures.
Female participants who are of child bearing potential must not be intending to become pregnant, currently pregnant, or lactating.
Body mass index (BMI) of 17.5 to 30.5 kg/m2; and a total body weight >50 kg (110 lb).
Capable of giving signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Evidence or history of clinically significant hematological, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, psychiatric, neurological, or allergic disease.
Any condition possibly affecting drug absorption (eg, gastrectomy).
History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus infection; positive testing for HIV, hepatitis B surface antigen (HepBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (HepBcAb), or hepatitis C virus antibody (HCVAb).
Other acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition including recent (within the past year).
Evidence or history of clinically significant dermatological condition (eg, atopic dermatitis or psoriasis) or visible rash present during physical examination.
Clinically relevant history of lactic acidosis.
Use of prescription or nonprescription drugs and dietary and herbal supplements within 7 days or 5 half lives (whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of investigational product.
A positive urine drug test.
Selected laboratory abnormalities.
History of regular alcohol consumption exceeding 14 drinks/week for female participants or 21 drinks/week for male participants (1 drink = 5 ounces [150 mL] of wine or 12 ounces [360 mL] of beer or 1.5 ounces [45 mL] of hard liquor) within 6 months before screening.
Known relevant history of elevated liver function tests (LFTs).
History of tuberculosis (TB) (active or latent)
Any history of chronic infections, any history of recurrent infections, any history of latent infections, or any acute infection within 2 weeks of baseline.
History of disseminated herpes zoster, or disseminated herpes simplex, or recurrent localized dermatomal herpes zoster.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254206588
Number Of Facilities 1
Number Of Nsae Subjects 14
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 1
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 11
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 55
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 13

Designs

Sequence: 30290206
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Crossover Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description This is a Phase 1, randomized, 2 way crossover, open label study of the effect of PF 04965842 on metformin PK in healthy adult participants. The effect of PF 04965842 on N1 methylnicotinamide (NMN) PK and its correlation to the effect on metformin PK will also be assessed.

A total of approximately 12 healthy male and/or female participants will be enrolled in the study so that approximately 6 participants will be enrolled in each treatment sequence. Each treatment sequence will consist of 2 periods. Participants who discontinue from the study may be replaced at the sponsor's discretion. The replacement participant will receive the same treatment sequence as the participant who discontinued.

Participants will be screened within 28 days of the first dose of investigational product. Participants will report to the clinical research unit (CRU) the day prior to Day 1 (ie Day -1) dosing in Period 1 for both treatment sequences. In both sequences, participants will remain in the CRU for

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26490678
Intervention Id 52112625
Name Glucophage

Milestones

Sequence: 40799741 Sequence: 40799742 Sequence: 40799743 Sequence: 40799744 Sequence: 40799745 Sequence: 40799746 Sequence: 40799747 Sequence: 40799748 Sequence: 40799749 Sequence: 40799750 Sequence: 40799751 Sequence: 40799752 Sequence: 40799753 Sequence: 40799754 Sequence: 40799755 Sequence: 40799756 Sequence: 40799757 Sequence: 40799758
Result Group Id 55879895 Result Group Id 55879896 Result Group Id 55879895 Result Group Id 55879896 Result Group Id 55879895 Result Group Id 55879896 Result Group Id 55879895 Result Group Id 55879896 Result Group Id 55879895 Result Group Id 55879896 Result Group Id 55879895 Result Group Id 55879896 Result Group Id 55879895 Result Group Id 55879896 Result Group Id 55879895 Result Group Id 55879896 Result Group Id 55879895 Result Group Id 55879896
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Period 1 Period Period 1 Period Period 1 Period Period 1 Period Period 1 Period Period 1 Period Washout Period Period Washout Period Period Washout Period Period Washout Period Period Washout Period Period Washout Period Period Period 2 Period Period 2 Period Period 2 Period Period 2 Period Period 2 Period Period 2
Count 6 Count 6 Count 6 Count 6 Count 0 Count 0 Count 6 Count 6 Count 6 Count 6 Count 0 Count 0 Count 6 Count 6 Count 6 Count 6 Count 0 Count 0

Outcome Analyses

Sequence: 16467542 Sequence: 16467543 Sequence: 16467544 Sequence: 16467545
Outcome Id 30636658 Outcome Id 30636659 Outcome Id 30636660 Outcome Id 30636662
Non Inferiority Type Equivalence Non Inferiority Type Equivalence Non Inferiority Type Equivalence Non Inferiority Type Equivalence
Non Inferiority Description The corresponding 90% confidence intervals equivalence criteria was (80%, 125%) acceptance range. Non Inferiority Description The corresponding 90% confidence intervals equivalence criteria was (80%, 125%) acceptance range. Non Inferiority Description The corresponding 90% confidence intervals equivalence criteria was (80%, 125%) acceptance range. Non Inferiority Description The corresponding 90% confidence intervals equivalence criteria was (80%, 125%) acceptance range.
Param Type Ratio Param Type Ratio Param Type Ratio Param Type Ratio
Param Value 98.5 Param Value 93.49 Param Value 88.07 Param Value 94.25
P Value Modifier P Value Modifier P Value Modifier P Value Modifier
Ci N Sides 2-Sided Ci N Sides 2-Sided Ci N Sides 2-Sided Ci N Sides 2-Sided
Ci Percent 90.0 Ci Percent 90.0 Ci Percent 90.0 Ci Percent 90.0
Ci Lower Limit 82.09 Ci Lower Limit 85.15 Ci Lower Limit 80.99 Ci Lower Limit 88.19
Ci Upper Limit 118.2 Ci Upper Limit 102.65 Ci Upper Limit 95.76 Ci Upper Limit 100.73

Outcome Analysis Groups

Sequence: 31936344 Sequence: 31936345 Sequence: 31936346 Sequence: 31936347 Sequence: 31936348 Sequence: 31936349 Sequence: 31936350 Sequence: 31936351
Outcome Analysis Id 16467542 Outcome Analysis Id 16467542 Outcome Analysis Id 16467543 Outcome Analysis Id 16467543 Outcome Analysis Id 16467544 Outcome Analysis Id 16467544 Outcome Analysis Id 16467545 Outcome Analysis Id 16467545
Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001

Links

Sequence: 4355568
Url https://pmiform.com/clinical-trial-info-request?StudyID=B7451034
Description To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3902855
Pre Assignment Details A total of 12 healthy participants were enrolled in the study and 6 participants were assigned in each of the 2 treatment sequences, all receiving study treatment.

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 73593034 Sequence: 73593035 Sequence: 73593036 Sequence: 73593037 Sequence: 73593038 Sequence: 73593039 Sequence: 73593040 Sequence: 73593041 Sequence: 73593042 Sequence: 73593043 Sequence: 73593044 Sequence: 73593045 Sequence: 73593046 Sequence: 73593047 Sequence: 73593048 Sequence: 73593049 Sequence: 73593050 Sequence: 73593051 Sequence: 73593052 Sequence: 73593053 Sequence: 73593054 Sequence: 73593055 Sequence: 73593056 Sequence: 73593057 Sequence: 73593058 Sequence: 73593059 Sequence: 73593060 Sequence: 73593061
Outcome Id 30636658 Outcome Id 30636658 Outcome Id 30636659 Outcome Id 30636659 Outcome Id 30636660 Outcome Id 30636660 Outcome Id 30636661 Outcome Id 30636661 Outcome Id 30636662 Outcome Id 30636662 Outcome Id 30636663 Outcome Id 30636663 Outcome Id 30636664 Outcome Id 30636664 Outcome Id 30636665 Outcome Id 30636665 Outcome Id 30636666 Outcome Id 30636666 Outcome Id 30636667 Outcome Id 30636667 Outcome Id 30636668 Outcome Id 30636668 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636670 Outcome Id 30636670 Outcome Id 30636671 Outcome Id 30636671
Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 11 Count 12 Count 8 Count 11 Count 12 Count 12 Count 12 Count 12 Count 12 Count 12 Count 8 Count 11 Count 8 Count 11 Count 8 Count 11 Count 11 Count 12 Count 11 Count 12 Count 12 Count 12 Count 12 Count 12 Count 12 Count 12 Count 12 Count 12

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2568505 Sequence: 2568506
Document Type Statistical Analysis Plan Document Type Study Protocol
Has Protocol False Has Protocol True
Has Icf False Has Icf False
Has Sap True Has Sap False
Document Date 2018-12-14 Document Date 2018-11-01
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/82/NCT03796182/SAP_000.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/82/NCT03796182/Prot_001.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 27805381 Sequence: 27805382 Sequence: 27805383 Sequence: 27805384 Sequence: 27805385 Sequence: 27805386
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 6 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12
Created At 2023-08-06 18:18:16.420335 Created At 2023-08-06 18:18:16.420335 Created At 2023-08-06 18:18:16.420335 Created At 2023-08-06 18:18:16.420335 Created At 2023-08-06 18:18:16.420335 Created At 2023-08-06 18:18:16.420335
Updated At 2023-08-06 18:18:16.420335 Updated At 2023-08-06 18:18:16.420335 Updated At 2023-08-06 18:18:16.420335 Updated At 2023-08-06 18:18:16.420335 Updated At 2023-08-06 18:18:16.420335 Updated At 2023-08-06 18:18:16.420335

Reported Events

Sequence: 524777685 Sequence: 524777686 Sequence: 524777687 Sequence: 524777688 Sequence: 524777689 Sequence: 524777690 Sequence: 524777691 Sequence: 524777692 Sequence: 524777693 Sequence: 524777694 Sequence: 524777695 Sequence: 524777696 Sequence: 524777697 Sequence: 524777698 Sequence: 524777699 Sequence: 524777700
Result Group Id 55879899 Result Group Id 55879900 Result Group Id 55879899 Result Group Id 55879900 Result Group Id 55879899 Result Group Id 55879900 Result Group Id 55879899 Result Group Id 55879900 Result Group Id 55879899 Result Group Id 55879900 Result Group Id 55879899 Result Group Id 55879900 Result Group Id 55879899 Result Group Id 55879900 Result Group Id 55879899 Result Group Id 55879900
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin)
Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other
Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12 Subjects At Risk 12
Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 4 Event Count 3 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 1 Event Count 0
Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Organ System Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Organ System Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Organ System Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Adverse Event Term Abdominal discomfort Adverse Event Term Abdominal discomfort Adverse Event Term Anorectal discomfort Adverse Event Term Anorectal discomfort Adverse Event Term Diarrhoea Adverse Event Term Diarrhoea Adverse Event Term Nausea Adverse Event Term Nausea Adverse Event Term Fatigue Adverse Event Term Fatigue Adverse Event Term Nasopharyngitis Adverse Event Term Nasopharyngitis Adverse Event Term Muscle spasms Adverse Event Term Muscle spasms Adverse Event Term Neck pain Adverse Event Term Neck pain
Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5
Vocab MedDRA v21.1 Vocab MedDRA v21.1 Vocab MedDRA v21.1 Vocab MedDRA v21.1 Vocab MedDRA v21.1 Vocab MedDRA v21.1 Vocab MedDRA v21.1 Vocab MedDRA v21.1 Vocab MedDRA v21.1 Vocab MedDRA v21.1 Vocab MedDRA v21.1 Vocab MedDRA v21.1 Vocab MedDRA v21.1 Vocab MedDRA v21.1 Vocab MedDRA v21.1 Vocab MedDRA v21.1
Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28669166
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3833599
Pi Employee Yes
Restriction Type OTHER
Other Details Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
Restrictive Agreement Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3833564
Organization Pfizer, Inc
Name Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Phone 1-800-718-1021
Email ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquires@pfizer.com

Outcomes

Sequence: 30636658 Sequence: 30636659 Sequence: 30636660 Sequence: 30636661 Sequence: 30636662 Sequence: 30636663 Sequence: 30636664 Sequence: 30636665 Sequence: 30636666 Sequence: 30636667 Sequence: 30636668 Sequence: 30636669 Sequence: 30636670 Sequence: 30636671
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary
Title Renal Clearance (CLr) of Metformin Title Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Metformin Title Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Metformin Title Time for Cmax (Tmax) of Metformin Title Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Metformin Title Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Metformin Title Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Metformin Title Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Metformin Title Cumulative Amount of Drug Recovered Unchanged in Urine From 0 to 48 Hours (Ae) of Metformin Title Percent of Dose Recovered Unchanged in Urine From 0 to 24 Hours (Ae%) of Metformin Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs and SAEs (All Causalities and Treatment-related)
Description CLr was calculated as cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine during the dosing interval (Ae) divided by area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau). Description AUCinf is a measure of the serum concentration of the drug over time. It was used to characterize drug absorption. Description Cmax is maximum observed plasma concentration. Description Tmax of metformin administrated with or without PF-04965842. Description AUClast of metformin administrated with or without PF-04965842. Description CL/F is a quantitative measure of the rate at which drug was removed from the blood. Description Vz/F is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Description t1/2 is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. Description Ae is the cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine during the dosing interval. Cumulative amount was calculated as sum of urine drug concentration in sample volume for each collection interval. Sample volume = (urine weight in gram [g]/1.020), where 1.020 g/mL is the approximate specific gravity of urine. Description Ae% is percent of dose recovered unchanged in urine from 0 to 24 hours post-dose of metformin. Description Laboratory parameters included: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, ery. mean corpuscular volume, ery. mean corpuscular hemoglobin, ery. mean corpuscular HGB concentration, platelets, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, prothrombin intl. normalized ratio, large unstained cells/leukocytes and large unstained cells), clinical chemistry (bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, protein, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, urea, creatinine, urate, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, bicarbonate, urobilinogen and glucose -FASTING), urinalysis (specific gravity, pH, urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, urine bilirubin, nitrite and leukocytes). Clinical significance of laboratory parameters is determined at the investigator's discretion. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Time Frame For both Period 1 and Period 2 at intervals of 0-12, 12-24, 24-36, and 36-48 hours post metformin dose Time Frame Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose of metformin on Day 1 for both Period 1 and Period 2 Time Frame Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose of metformin on Day 1 for both Period 1 and Period 2 Time Frame Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose of metformin on Day 1 for both Period 1 and Period 2 Time Frame Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose of metformin on Day 1 for both Period 1 and Period 2 Time Frame Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose of metformin on Day 1 for both Period 1 and Period 2 Time Frame Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose of metformin on Day 1 for both Period 1 and Period 2 Time Frame Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48 hours post-dose of metformin on Day 1 for both Period 1 and Period 2 Time Frame For both Period 1 and Period 2 at intervals of 0-12, 12-24, 24-36, and 36-48 hours post metformin dose Time Frame For both Period 1 and Period 2 at intervals of 0-12 and 12-24 hours post metformin dose Time Frame Screening (within 28 days prior to Day 1) to Day 7 Time Frame Screening (within 28 days prior to Day 1) to Day 7 Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin) Time Frame Day 1 up to Day 40 (35 days after the last dose of metformin)
Population This analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed referred to participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Population This analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed referred to participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Population This analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period. Population This analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period. Population This analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period. Population This analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed referred to participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Population This analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed referred to participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Population This analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed referred to participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Population This analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed referred to participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Population This analysis population was defined as all participants randomized and treated who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of primary interest in at least 1 treatment period. Overall number of participants analyzed referred to participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Population This analysis population was defined as all participants randomly assigned to investigational product and who took at least 1 dose of investigational product. Population This analysis population was defined as all participants randomly assigned to investigational product and who took at least 1 dose of investigational product. Population This analysis population was defined as all participants randomly assigned to investigational product and who took at least 1 dose of investigational product. Population This analysis population was defined as all participants randomly assigned to investigational product and who took at least 1 dose of investigational product.
Units litre per hour (L/hr) Units nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL) Units nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) Units Hours (hrs) Units ng*h/mL Units L/hr Units liter (L) Units hrs Units milligram (mg) Units percentage of dose Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units percentage of participants
Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Full Range Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Full Range Dispersion Type Full Range
Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Median Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Median Param Type Median Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 234242685 Sequence: 234242686 Sequence: 234242660 Sequence: 234242661 Sequence: 234242662 Sequence: 234242663 Sequence: 234242664 Sequence: 234242665 Sequence: 234242666 Sequence: 234242667 Sequence: 234242668 Sequence: 234242669 Sequence: 234242670 Sequence: 234242671 Sequence: 234242672 Sequence: 234242673 Sequence: 234242674 Sequence: 234242675 Sequence: 234242676 Sequence: 234242677 Sequence: 234242678 Sequence: 234242679 Sequence: 234242680 Sequence: 234242681 Sequence: 234242682 Sequence: 234242683 Sequence: 234242684 Sequence: 234242687 Sequence: 234242691 Sequence: 234242688 Sequence: 234242689 Sequence: 234242690 Sequence: 234242692 Sequence: 234242693 Sequence: 234242694 Sequence: 234242695 Sequence: 234242696 Sequence: 234242697 Sequence: 234242698 Sequence: 234242699 Sequence: 234242700 Sequence: 234242701 Sequence: 234242702 Sequence: 234242703 Sequence: 234242704 Sequence: 234242705 Sequence: 234242706 Sequence: 234242707 Sequence: 234242708 Sequence: 234242709 Sequence: 234242710 Sequence: 234242711 Sequence: 234242712 Sequence: 234242713
Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636658 Outcome Id 30636658 Outcome Id 30636659 Outcome Id 30636659 Outcome Id 30636660 Outcome Id 30636660 Outcome Id 30636661 Outcome Id 30636661 Outcome Id 30636662 Outcome Id 30636662 Outcome Id 30636663 Outcome Id 30636663 Outcome Id 30636664 Outcome Id 30636664 Outcome Id 30636665 Outcome Id 30636665 Outcome Id 30636666 Outcome Id 30636666 Outcome Id 30636667 Outcome Id 30636667 Outcome Id 30636668 Outcome Id 30636668 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636669 Outcome Id 30636670 Outcome Id 30636670 Outcome Id 30636670 Outcome Id 30636670 Outcome Id 30636670 Outcome Id 30636670 Outcome Id 30636670 Outcome Id 30636670 Outcome Id 30636671 Outcome Id 30636671 Outcome Id 30636671 Outcome Id 30636671 Outcome Id 30636671 Outcome Id 30636671 Outcome Id 30636671 Outcome Id 30636671
Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898 Result Group Id 55879897 Result Group Id 55879898
Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Classification Supine DBP Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase Classification Supine DBP Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease Classification Supine DBP Value < 50 mmHg Classification Supine DBP Value < 50 mmHg Classification Supine DBP Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase Classification Supine DBP Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease Classification Supine pulse rate Value > 120 bpm Classification Supine pulse rate Value < 40 bpm Classification Supine pulse rate Value < 40 bpm Classification Supine pulse rate Value > 120 bpm Classification Supine SBP Value < 90 mmHg Classification Supine SBP Value < 90 mmHg Classification Supine SBP Chg ≥ 30 mmHg increase Classification Supine SBP Chg ≥ 30 mmHg increase Classification Supine SBP Chg ≥ 30 mmHg decrease Classification Supine SBP Chg ≥ 30 mmHg decrease Classification AEs (all causalities) Classification AEs (all causalities) Classification AEs (treatment-related) Classification AEs (treatment-related) Classification SAEs (all causalities) Classification SAEs (all causalities) Classification SAEs (treatment-related) Classification SAEs (treatment-related) Classification AEs (all causalities) Classification AEs (all causalities) Classification AEs (treatment-related) Classification AEs (treatment-related) Classification SAEs (all causalities) Classification SAEs (all causalities) Classification SAEs (treatment-related) Classification SAEs (treatment-related)
Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Renal Clearance (CLr) of Metformin Title Renal Clearance (CLr) of Metformin Title Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Metformin Title Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Profile From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Metformin Title Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Metformin Title Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Metformin Title Time for Cmax (Tmax) of Metformin Title Time for Cmax (Tmax) of Metformin Title Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Metformin Title Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Metformin Title Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Metformin Title Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of Metformin Title Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Metformin Title Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Metformin Title Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Metformin Title Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Metformin Title Cumulative Amount of Drug Recovered Unchanged in Urine From 0 to 48 Hours (Ae) of Metformin Title Cumulative Amount of Drug Recovered Unchanged in Urine From 0 to 48 Hours (Ae) of Metformin Title Percent of Dose Recovered Unchanged in Urine From 0 to 24 Hours (Ae%) of Metformin Title Percent of Dose Recovered Unchanged in Urine From 0 to 24 Hours (Ae%) of Metformin Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities Title Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Categorical Vital Signs Meeting Pre-defined Criteria Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs and SAEs (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs and SAEs (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs and SAEs (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs and SAEs (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs and SAEs (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs and SAEs (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs and SAEs (All Causalities and Treatment-related) Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent AEs and SAEs (All Causalities and Treatment-related)
Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description CLr was calculated as cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine during the dosing interval (Ae) divided by area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau). Description CLr was calculated as cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine during the dosing interval (Ae) divided by area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to end of dosing interval (AUCtau). Description AUCinf is a measure of the serum concentration of the drug over time. It was used to characterize drug absorption. Description AUCinf is a measure of the serum concentration of the drug over time. It was used to characterize drug absorption. Description Cmax is maximum observed plasma concentration. Description Cmax is maximum observed plasma concentration. Description Tmax of metformin administrated with or without PF-04965842. Description Tmax of metformin administrated with or without PF-04965842. Description AUClast of metformin administrated with or without PF-04965842. Description AUClast of metformin administrated with or without PF-04965842. Description CL/F is a quantitative measure of the rate at which drug was removed from the blood. Description CL/F is a quantitative measure of the rate at which drug was removed from the blood. Description Vz/F is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Description Vz/F is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Description t1/2 is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. Description t1/2 is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. Description Ae is the cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine during the dosing interval. Cumulative amount was calculated as sum of urine drug concentration in sample volume for each collection interval. Sample volume = (urine weight in gram [g]/1.020), where 1.020 g/mL is the approximate specific gravity of urine. Description Ae is the cumulative amount of drug recovered unchanged in urine during the dosing interval. Cumulative amount was calculated as sum of urine drug concentration in sample volume for each collection interval. Sample volume = (urine weight in gram [g]/1.020), where 1.020 g/mL is the approximate specific gravity of urine. Description Ae% is percent of dose recovered unchanged in urine from 0 to 24 hours post-dose of metformin. Description Ae% is percent of dose recovered unchanged in urine from 0 to 24 hours post-dose of metformin. Description Laboratory parameters included: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, ery. mean corpuscular volume, ery. mean corpuscular hemoglobin, ery. mean corpuscular HGB concentration, platelets, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, prothrombin intl. normalized ratio, large unstained cells/leukocytes and large unstained cells), clinical chemistry (bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, protein, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, urea, creatinine, urate, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, bicarbonate, urobilinogen and glucose -FASTING), urinalysis (specific gravity, pH, urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, urine bilirubin, nitrite and leukocytes). Clinical significance of laboratory parameters is determined at the investigator's discretion. Description Laboratory parameters included: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, ery. mean corpuscular volume, ery. mean corpuscular hemoglobin, ery. mean corpuscular HGB concentration, platelets, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, monocytes, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, prothrombin intl. normalized ratio, large unstained cells/leukocytes and large unstained cells), clinical chemistry (bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, protein, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, urea, creatinine, urate, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, bicarbonate, urobilinogen and glucose -FASTING), urinalysis (specific gravity, pH, urine glucose, ketones, urine protein, urine hemoglobin, urine bilirubin, nitrite and leukocytes). Clinical significance of laboratory parameters is determined at the investigator's discretion. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description Criteria for change in vital signs: pulse rate value less than (<) 40 beats per minute (bpm) or value over than (>) 120 bpm, systolic blood pressure (SBP) value < 90 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) or change from baseline (Chg) equal to or over than (≥) 30 mmHg increase or ≥ Chg 30 mmHg decrease, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value < 50 mmHg or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg increase or Chg ≥ 20 mmHg decrease. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Description AEs with all causalities were any untoward medical occurrences in a study subject administered a product or medical device which did not necessarily had causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following endpoints or deemed significant for any other reason: death; life threatening (immediate risk of death); inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or considered to be an important medical event. Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 35 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Units Participants Units Participants Units litre per hour (L/hr) Units litre per hour (L/hr) Units nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL) Units nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*hr/mL) Units nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) Units nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) Units Hours (hrs) Units Hours (hrs) Units ng*h/mL Units ng*h/mL Units L/hr Units L/hr Units liter (L) Units liter (L) Units hrs Units hrs Units milligram (mg) Units milligram (mg) Units percentage of dose Units percentage of dose Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units percentage of participants Units percentage of participants Units percentage of participants Units percentage of participants Units percentage of participants Units percentage of participants Units percentage of participants Units percentage of participants
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Median Param Type Median Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Median Param Type Median Param Type Median Param Type Median Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number
Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 32.18 Param Value 33.33 Param Value 5050 Param Value 5202 Param Value 634.7 Param Value 720.7 Param Value 4.00 Param Value 4.00 Param Value 4849 Param Value 5145 Param Value 98.97 Param Value 96.13 Param Value 1087 Param Value 1211 Param Value 8.318 Param Value 9.261 Param Value 168.0 Param Value 170.5 Param Value 33.60 Param Value 34.05 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 6 Param Value 4 Param Value 5 Param Value 4 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 50.0 Param Value 33.3 Param Value 41.7 Param Value 33.3 Param Value 0.0 Param Value 0.0 Param Value 0.0 Param Value 0.0
Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 32.18 Param Value Num 33.33 Param Value Num 5050.0 Param Value Num 5202.0 Param Value Num 634.7 Param Value Num 720.7 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 4849.0 Param Value Num 5145.0 Param Value Num 98.97 Param Value Num 96.13 Param Value Num 1087.0 Param Value Num 1211.0 Param Value Num 8.318 Param Value Num 9.261 Param Value Num 168.0 Param Value Num 170.5 Param Value Num 33.6 Param Value Num 34.05 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 50.0 Param Value Num 33.3 Param Value Num 41.7 Param Value Num 33.3 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0
Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Full Range Dispersion Type Full Range Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Full Range Dispersion Type Full Range Dispersion Type Full Range Dispersion Type Full Range
Dispersion Value 39 Dispersion Value 28 Dispersion Value 16 Dispersion Value 19 Dispersion Value 14 Dispersion Value 20 Dispersion Value 18 Dispersion Value 18 Dispersion Value 16 Dispersion Value 19 Dispersion Value 42 Dispersion Value 37 Dispersion Value 4.2508 Dispersion Value 3.5165
Dispersion Value Num 39.0 Dispersion Value Num 28.0 Dispersion Value Num 16.0 Dispersion Value Num 19.0 Dispersion Value Num 14.0 Dispersion Value Num 20.0 Dispersion Value Num 18.0 Dispersion Value Num 18.0 Dispersion Value Num 16.0 Dispersion Value Num 19.0 Dispersion Value Num 42.0 Dispersion Value Num 37.0 Dispersion Value Num 4.2508 Dispersion Value Num 3.5165
Dispersion Lower Limit 2.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 1.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 70.7 Dispersion Lower Limit 114.0 Dispersion Lower Limit 14.1 Dispersion Lower Limit 22.7
Dispersion Upper Limit 4.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 4.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 210.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 248.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 42.0 Dispersion Upper Limit 49.7

Study References

Sequence: 51685542
Pmid 35344588
Reference Type derived
Citation Vourvahis M, Byon W, Chang C, Le V, Diehl A, Graham D, Tripathy S, Raha N, Luo L, Mathialagan S, Dowty M, Rodrigues AD, Malhotra B. Evaluation of the Effect of Abrocitinib on Drug Transporters by Integrated Use of Probe Drugs and Endogenous Biomarkers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Sep;112(3):665-675. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2594. Epub 2022 May 9.

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11328797
Result Group Id 55879894
Ctgov Group Code BG000
Units Participants
Scope overall
Count 12

Result Groups

Sequence: 55879894 Sequence: 55879895 Sequence: 55879896 Sequence: 55879897 Sequence: 55879898 Sequence: 55879899 Sequence: 55879900
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event
Title All Participants Title Metformin Then Metformin + PF-04965842 Title Metformin + PF-04965842 Then Metformin Title Metformin + PF-04965842 Title Metformin Title Metformin + PF-04965842 Title Metformin
Description This reporting group refers to the total 12 participants who were enrolled in the study. Description Participants were administered a single oral dose of metformin 500 mg on Day 1 in Period 1 followed by a washout period of at least 4 days. Then in Period 2 participants were administered a single oral dose of metformin 500 mg on Day 1 along with oral doses of PF-04965842 200 mg once daily (QD) for 2 days on Days 1-2. Description Participants were administered a single oral dose of metformin 500 mg on Day 1 along with oral doses of PF-04965842 200 mg QD for 2 days on Days 1-2 in Period 1 followed by a washout period of at least 4 days. Then in Period 2 participants were administered a single oral dose of metformin 500 mg on Day 1. Description This reporting group refers to the participants who were randomized to the group of concomitantly single oral administration of metformin 500 mg QD on Day 1 and oral administration of PF-04965842 200 mg QD for 2 days on Days 1-2 in either of the periods. Description This reporting group refers to the participants who were randomized to the group of single oral administration of metformin 500 mg QD on Day 1 in either of the periods. Description This reporting group refers to the participants who were randomized to the group of concomitantly single oral administration of metformin 500 mg QD on Day 1 and oral administration of PF-04965842 200 mg QD for 2 days on Days 1-2 in either of the periods. Description This reporting group refers to the participants who were randomized to the group of single oral administration of metformin 500 mg QD on Day 1 in either of the periods.

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 124996082 Sequence: 124996083 Sequence: 124996084 Sequence: 124996085 Sequence: 124996086 Sequence: 124996087 Sequence: 124996088 Sequence: 124996089 Sequence: 124996090 Sequence: 124996091 Sequence: 124996092 Sequence: 124996093 Sequence: 124996094
Result Group Id 55879894 Result Group Id 55879894 Result Group Id 55879894 Result Group Id 55879894 Result Group Id 55879894 Result Group Id 55879894 Result Group Id 55879894 Result Group Id 55879894 Result Group Id 55879894 Result Group Id 55879894 Result Group Id 55879894 Result Group Id 55879894 Result Group Id 55879894
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000
Category Female Category Male Category Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino Category Unknown or Not Reported Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category Asian Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Black or African American Category White Category More than one race Category Unknown or Not Reported
Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB)
Units Years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 39.0 Param Value 0 Param Value 12 Param Value 1 Param Value 11 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 10 Param Value 0 Param Value 0
Param Value Num 39.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 12.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 11.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 10.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 8.42
Dispersion Value Num 8.42
Number Analyzed 12 Number Analyzed 12 Number Analyzed 12 Number Analyzed 12 Number Analyzed 12 Number Analyzed 12 Number Analyzed 12 Number Analyzed 12 Number Analyzed 12 Number Analyzed 12 Number Analyzed 12 Number Analyzed 12 Number Analyzed 12

]]>

<![CDATA[ Effect of Intervention for Colonoscopy Quality is Associated With the Personal Characteristics ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796169
2018-12-12

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796169
NCT03796169https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796169?tab=tableNANANAThis study aims to investigate whether the personal characteristics of the endoscopist is associated with effect of interventions for colonoscopy quality improvement.

This is a prospective, 9-month, multicenter, single-blind study. Baseline quality indicators including adenoma detection rate, polyp detection rate, withdrawal time and adenomas per colonoscopy of each endoscopist were measured in the health promotion centers of academic hospitals for 3 months. Follow-up measurements of quality indicators were repeated every 3 months after each interventions (personal notification of quality indicators, open notification of quality indicators, and colonoscopy quality education by a GI faculty. At the end of the study, personal characteristics of each endoscopist was evaluated using fear of negative evaluation scale, cognitive flexibility inventory, and almost perfect scale.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-16
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-09-09
Start Month Year December 12, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year December 12, 2019
Verification Month Year September 2020
Verification Date 2020-09-30
Last Update Posted Date 2020-09-09

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20741058
Description Suboptimal colonoscopy quality is associated with development of interval colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer-related death. It is uncertain how to improve colonoscopy quality effectively. The quality of screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer depends on the endoscopist who performed the examination. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of endoscopists' personal characteristics on the quality of colonoscopy and effectiveness of intervention.

Facilities

Sequence: 200279951
Name Division of Gastroenterology; Seoul St. Mary's hospital
City Seoul
Zip 137-701
Country Korea, Republic of

Conditions

Sequence: 52221249 Sequence: 52221250
Name Colonoscopy Name Human Characteristics
Downcase Name colonoscopy Downcase Name human characteristics

Id Information

Sequence: 40195438
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value XC15FIMI0020K

Countries

Sequence: 42609412
Name Korea, Republic of
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55649497
Group Type Experimental
Title Endoscopist
Description Intervention for personal notification, open notification and colonoscopy quality education by a GI faculty

Interventions

Sequence: 52535024 Sequence: 52535025 Sequence: 52535026
Intervention Type Behavioral Intervention Type Behavioral Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Personal notification Name Open notification Name Education
Description Baseline quality indicators of each endoscopist were measured and those were notified individually. Description Quality indicators were measured for 3 months after 1st interventions and those were notified openly Description Quality indicators were measured for 3 months after 2nd interventions and educated the importance of colonoscopy quality by a GI faculty

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177560372 Sequence: 177560373 Sequence: 177560374 Sequence: 177560375 Sequence: 177560376 Sequence: 177560377 Sequence: 177560378 Sequence: 177560379 Sequence: 177560380 Sequence: 177560381 Sequence: 177560382 Sequence: 177560383 Sequence: 177560384 Sequence: 177560385 Sequence: 177560386 Sequence: 177560387
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Measurement of overall adenoma detection rate Measure Measurement of adenoma detection rate after personal notification Measure Measurement of adenoma detection rate after open notification Measure Measurement of adenoma detection rate after education Measure Measurement of overall polyp detection rate Measure Measurement of overall withdrawal time Measure Measurement of overall adenomas per colonoscopy Measure Measurement of polyp detection rate after personal notification Measure Measurement of polyp detection rate after open notification Measure Measurement of polyp detection rate after education Measure Measurement of withdrawal time after personal notification Measure Measurement of withdrawal time after open notification Measure Measurement of withdrawal time after education Measure Measurement of adenomas per colonoscopy after personal notification Measure Measurement of adenomas per colonoscopy after open notification Measure Measurement of adenomas per colonoscopy after education
Time Frame 9 months Time Frame 3 months after personal notification Time Frame 3 months after open notification Time Frame 3 months after education Time Frame 9 months Time Frame 9 months Time Frame 9 months Time Frame 3 months after personal notification Time Frame 3 months after open notification Time Frame 3 months after education Time Frame 3 months after personal notification Time Frame 3 months after open notification Time Frame 3 months after education Time Frame 3 months after personal notification Time Frame 3 months after open notification Time Frame 3 months after education
Description Primary outcome measures include overall adenoma detection rate. Description Primary outcome measures include adenoma detection rate after personal notification Description Primary outcome measures include adenoma detection rate after open notification Description Primary outcome measures include adenoma detection rate after education Description Secondary outcome measures include overall polyp detection rate. Description Secondary outcome measures include overall withdrawal time. Description Secondary outcome measures include overall adenomas per colonoscopy. Description Primary outcome measures include polyp detection rate after personal notification Description Primary outcome measures include polyp detection rate after open notification Description Primary outcome measures include polyp detection rate after education Description Primary outcome measures include withdrawal time after personal notification Description Primary outcome measures include withdrawal time after open notification Description Primary outcome measures include withdrawal time after education Description Primary outcome measures include adenomas per colonoscopy after personal notification. Description Primary outcome measures include adenomas per colonoscopy after open notification Description Primary outcome measures include adenoma detection rate after education

Sponsors

Sequence: 48366157 Sequence: 48366158 Sequence: 48366159
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Seoul St. Mary's Hospital Name Saint Vincent's Hospital, Korea Name Uijeongbu St. Mary Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29312781
Role Principal Investigator
Name Bo-In Lee, MD, PhD
Affiliation Division of Gastroenterology; Seoul St. Mary's hospital

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68216954 Sequence: 68216955 Sequence: 68216956
Design Group Id 55649497 Design Group Id 55649497 Design Group Id 55649497
Intervention Id 52535024 Intervention Id 52535025 Intervention Id 52535026

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30794549
Gender All
Minimum Age N/A
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Highly experienced board-certified gastroenterologists performed colonoscopies in health screening endoscopy centers.
Endoscopists who sign the consent

Patients for quality indicators of endoscopists

routinely perform outpatient screening, surveillance and diagnostic colonoscopy (first-time screening colonoscopies performed and had no previous colonoscopy within 3 years).

Exclusion Criteria:

endoscopists who refuse to sign the consent

Patients for quality indicators of endoscopists

Known hereditary polyposis syndrome, Inflammatory bowel disease, those with surgically altered anatomy, undergone previous colonoscopy within 3 years

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254004048
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 12
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 4
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 12

Designs

Sequence: 30540589
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Sequential Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Screening
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28906909
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Bo-In Lee
Title Professor, MD, PhD
Affiliation Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

Study References

Sequence: 52117952 Sequence: 52117953 Sequence: 52117954
Pmid 23295274 Pmid 19665583 Pmid 26845473
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Coe SG, Crook JE, Diehl NN, Wallace MB. An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb;108(2):219-26; quiz 227. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.417. Epub 2013 Jan 8. Citation Shaukat A, Oancea C, Bond JH, Church TR, Allen JI. Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Dec;7(12):1335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.07.027. Epub 2009 Aug 7. Citation Jover R, Zapater P, Bujanda L, Hernandez V, Cubiella J, Pellise M, Ponce M, Ono A, Lanas A, Seoane A, Marin-Gabriel JC, Chaparro M, Cacho G, Herreros-de-Tejada A, Fernandez-Diez S, Peris A, Nicolas-Perez D, Murcia O, Castells A, Quintero E; COLONPREV Study Investigators. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2016 Mar;48(3):241-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100185. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Aspirin to Target Arterial Events in Chronic Kidney Disease ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796156
2019-02-25

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796156
NCT03796156https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796156?tab=tableDiane Stevensondiane.stevenson@nottingham.ac.uk00441158231053This study aims to find out whether people with chronic kidney disease [CKD] should take low dose aspirin to reduce the risk of first heart attack or stroke (cardiovascular disease [CVD]). CKD is common and is associated with an increased risk of CVD.

CVD is caused by small blood clots and aspirin thins the blood to reduce the risk of such clots developing but it also increases the risk of bleeding.

Aspirin is recommended to prevent further CVD in people who have already had a first CVD event (so called secondary prevention). Here the investigators want to study the use of aspirin as primary prevention in people with CKD who have not had a CVD to prevent the first event, to assess whether the potential benefits exceed the risks.

Eligible patients will be recruited from their United Kingdom (UK) general practices and allocated by chance to be prescribed once daily low dose aspirin or usual care only. Follow-up will be for several years both electronically (for general practice, hospital and mortality data) and by annual questionnaires to ascertain CVD and bleeding events.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-20
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-23
Start Month Year February 25, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 2025
Verification Month Year May 2023
Verification Date 2023-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-23

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20779606
Description Aim To test the hypothesis that the addition of 75mg aspirin once daily to usual care reduces the risk of major vascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who do not have pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD)

Design Open label, multi-centre randomised controlled trial

Setting UK general practices

Sample size 25,210 patients (12,605 per arm). A total of 1,827 major vascular events overall are required.

Eligibility Inclusion Criteria

Males and females aged 18 years and over at the date of screening
Subjects with CKD (reduced eGFR and/or albuminuria) defined as: • estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60mL/min/1.73m2 for at least 90 days, and/or • kidney disease code on the GP electronic patient AND most recent eGFR in CKD-defining range (<60mL/min/1.73m2), and/or • albuminuria or proteinuria (defined as urine albumin:creatinine ratio [ACR] ≥3mg/mmol, and/or urine protein:creatinine ratio [PCR] ≥15mg/mmol, and/or +protein or greater on reagent strip)
Subjects who are willing to give permission for their paper and electronic medical records to be accessed by trial investigators
Subjects who are willing to be contacted and interviewed by trial investigators
Subjects who can communicate well with the investigator or designee, understand the requirements of the study and understand and sign the written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects with CKD eGFR category 5
Subjects with pre-existing cardiovascular disease (angina, myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), significant peripheral vascular disease, coronary or peripheral revascularisation for atherosclerotic disease)
Subjects with a current pre-existing condition associated with increased risk of bleeding other than CKD
Subjects currently prescribed anticoagulants or antiplatelet agent, or taking over the counter (OTC) aspirin continuously
Subjects who are currently and regularly taking other drugs with a potentially serious interaction with aspirin
Subjects with a known allergy to aspirin or definite previous clinically important adverse reaction
Subjects with poorly controlled hypertension (systolic blood pressure [BP] ≥180 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥105 mmHg)
Subjects with other conditions which in the opinion of their General Practitioner (GP) would preclude prescription of aspirin in routine clinical practice, for example significant anaemia or thrombocytopenia.
Subjects who are pregnant or likely to become pregnant during the study period
Subjects with malignancy that is life-threatening or likely to limit prognosis, other life-threatening co-morbidity, or terminal illness
Subjects whose behaviour or lifestyle would render them less likely to comply with study medication
Subjects in prison
Subjects currently participating in another clinical trial of an investigational medicinal product or who have taken part in such a trial in the last three months (Covid-19 vaccine studies are acceptable)

Interventions Suitable participants will be randomised to receive: 75mg non-enteric coated or dispersible aspirin once daily in addition to their usual medication; or no additional treatment and avoidance of aspirin.

Duration The trial will continue until at least 1,827 adjudicated primary endpoint events (major vascular events) have occurred, or before if the trial is discontinued after the internal pilot or for any other reason. It is anticipated that at least 6 years of recruitment (taking account a recruitment pause for the Covid-19 pandemic) and 2.5 years of follow-up will be required to complete the trial.

Randomisation and blinding Eligible participants, based on results of routine blood and urine tests at screening, will be randomised (open label randomisation) 1:1 to general practitioner (GP) prescription of aspirin vs. no prescription, stratified by age, diabetes and CKD severity.

Follow-up Data on potential CVD and bleeding outcomes will be collected electronically from GP records and national hospitalisation and mortality records. Adjudication panels (for CVD and for bleeding) will asses the information blind to allocation.

Patients will complete an annual quality of life questionnaire (EQ5D).

Outcomes. Primary outcome measure

Time to first major vascular event from the date of randomisation. A major vascular event is defined as a primary composite outcome of non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke and cardiovascular death (excluding confirmed intracranial haemorrhage and other fatal cardiovascular haemorrhage).

Secondary outcome measures (all time to event except quality of life)

Efficacy

Death from any cause
Composite outcome of major vascular event or revascularisation (coronary and non-coronary)
Individual components of the primary composite endpoint
Health-related quality of life

Safety

Composite outcome of intracranial haemorrhage (fatal and non-fatal), fatal extracranial haemorrhage and non-fatal major extracranial haemorrhage (adjudicated)
Fatal and non-fatal (reported individually and as a composite) intracranial haemorrhage comprising: i) primary haemorrhagic stroke (to distinguish from haemorrhagic transformation of ischaemic stroke); ii) other intracranial haemorrhage (adjudicated). Intra-cranial haemorrhage will be sub-categorised as traumatic or non-traumatic.
Fatal and non-fatal (reported individually and as a composite) major extracranial haemorrhage: i) upper gastrointestinal; ii) lower gastrointestinal; iii) sight-threatening ocular; iv) multiple trauma; v) other (adjudicated).
Clinically relevant non-major bleeding if hospitalised (adjudicated).
Composite outcome of fatal and non-fatal major extracranial haemorrhage and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (if hospitalised).

Tertiary (exploratory) outcome measures (all time to event except hospitalisation)

Transient ischaemic attack
Unplanned hospitalisation
Hospitalisation with heart failure
New diagnosis of cancer (colorectal/other)
Death due to cancer (where cancer is the underlying cause of death)
CKD progression
New diagnosis of dementia
Major non-traumatic lower limb amputation

Statistical methods The primary outcome measure of time to first major vascular event will be analysed for the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Deaths from other causes (including fatal bleeding) will be treated as competing events. Patients who do not experience a major vascular event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.

All primary, secondary and tertiary time to event outcomes will be described using Kaplan-Meier curves or Cumulative Hazard plots for time to event outcomes involving competing risks for the ITT population. Analyses of time to event outcomes will be performed using Cox proportional hazards models or Competing Risk regression models, both unadjusted and adjusted for stratification factors: age, diabetes and CKD severity.

The adjusted Competing Risk regression model for time to first major vascular event, with deaths from other causes (including fatal bleeding) treated as competing events, and patients who do not experience a major vascular event censored, will form the primary endpoint analysis model.

Other secondary and tertiary endpoints will be assessed by arm using summary statistics (e.g. Pearson's χ² tests) in the ITT population.

The amount of missing data and reasons for the incompleteness will be explored and presented overall i.e. not by group. If the amount of missing data is deemed too high and if appropriate (i.e. assuming the missing data is either missing at random [MAR] or missing completely at random [MCAR] and censoring assumed to be non-informative), multiple imputation will be performed accordingly, for which all covariates included in the multivariable model, together with the censoring/event indicator and the cumulative baseline hazard will be included in the multiple imputation model.

Health economic analysis will also be undertaken.

Facilities

Sequence: 200584876
Status Recruiting
Name Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre
City Nottingham
Zip NG72UH
Country United Kingdom

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28180480 Sequence: 28180481
Facility Id 200584876 Facility Id 200584876
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Jennifer Dumbleton Name Diane Stevenson
Email jennifer.dumbleton@nottingham.ac.uk Email diane.stevenson@nottingham.ac.uk
Phone 00441158231053 Phone 00441158231053

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96284055 Sequence: 96284056 Sequence: 96284057 Sequence: 96284058 Sequence: 96284059 Sequence: 96284060 Sequence: 96284061 Sequence: 96284062 Sequence: 96284063 Sequence: 96284064 Sequence: 96284065 Sequence: 96284066 Sequence: 96284067 Sequence: 96284068 Sequence: 96284069 Sequence: 96284070
Mesh Term Aspirin Mesh Term Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal Mesh Term Analgesics, Non-Narcotic Mesh Term Analgesics Mesh Term Sensory System Agents Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Agents Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Anti-Inflammatory Agents Mesh Term Antirheumatic Agents Mesh Term Fibrinolytic Agents Mesh Term Fibrin Modulating Agents Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors Mesh Term Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors Mesh Term Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Antipyretics
Downcase Mesh Term aspirin Downcase Mesh Term anti-inflammatory agents, non-steroidal Downcase Mesh Term analgesics, non-narcotic Downcase Mesh Term analgesics Downcase Mesh Term sensory system agents Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system agents Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term anti-inflammatory agents Downcase Mesh Term antirheumatic agents Downcase Mesh Term fibrinolytic agents Downcase Mesh Term fibrin modulating agents Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term platelet aggregation inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term cyclooxygenase inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term antipyretics
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52319485 Sequence: 52319486 Sequence: 52319487
Name Chronic Kidney Diseases Name Cardiovascular Diseases Name Bleeding
Downcase Name chronic kidney diseases Downcase Name cardiovascular diseases Downcase Name bleeding

Id Information

Sequence: 40264681
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 31844

Countries

Sequence: 42684032
Name United Kingdom
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55758279 Sequence: 55758280
Group Type Experimental Group Type No Intervention
Title Aspirin Title Usual care
Description 75mg of non enteric coated or dispersible aspirin once daily added to usual medications Description Usual medications only

Interventions

Sequence: 52630547
Intervention Type Drug
Name Aspirin
Description 75mg low dose non enteric coated or dispersible

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177927070 Sequence: 177927071 Sequence: 177927086 Sequence: 177927072 Sequence: 177927073 Sequence: 177927074 Sequence: 177927075 Sequence: 177927076 Sequence: 177927077 Sequence: 177927078 Sequence: 177927079 Sequence: 177927080 Sequence: 177927081 Sequence: 177927082 Sequence: 177927083 Sequence: 177927084 Sequence: 177927085 Sequence: 177927087 Sequence: 177927088 Sequence: 177927089
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Number of participants with a Major vascular event: Composite outcome of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and cardiovascular death (excluding confirmed intracranial haemorrhage and other fatal cardiovascular haemorrhage) Measure Number of participants dying from any cause Measure Number of participants with new diagnosis of dementia Measure Number of participants with major vascular events plus revascularisation Measure Number of participants with Non-fatal myocardial infarction Measure Health-related quality of life, mean utility score Measure Number of participants with intra-cranial haemorrhage, fatal and non fatal major extra cranial haemorrhage Measure Number of participants with Fatal and non-fatal intra-cranial haemorrhage Measure Number of participants with Fatal and non-fatal major extra-cranial haemorrhage Measure Number of participants with Clinically relevant non major bleeding (hospitalised) Measure Number of participants with Non-fatal stroke Measure Number of participants with Cardiovascular death Measure Number of participants with fatal and non fatal major extra-cranial haemorrhage and clinically relevant non major bleed (if hospitalised) Measure Number of participants with transient ischaemic attack Measure Number of Unplanned hospitalisations per participant Measure Number of participants with new diagnosis of cancer Measure Number of participants with CKD progression Measure Hospitalisation with heart failure Measure Death due to cancer (where cancer is the underlying cause of death) Measure Major non traumatic lower limb amputation
Time Frame Over average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up Time Frame Average 4 years follow-up
Description Acute MI defined according to the Third Universal Definition of myocardial infarction (MI).

Acute stroke defined in accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) definition as "rapidly developing clinical signs of focal (or global) disturbance of cerebral function, with symptoms lasting 24 hours or longer, with no apparent cause other than of vascular origin". This excludes cases of primary cerebral tumour, cerebral metastasis, subdural haematoma, post-seizure palsy, brain trauma and TIA. Haemorrhagic stroke (fatal and non-fatal) including intracerebral haemorrhage and SAH which has been confirmed on appropriate imaging is excluded from the primary composite endpoint and included within the secondary endpoints.

Description Death from any cause Description Coded dementia (ICD, Read) from linked GP and hospital data Description Primary outcome plus coronary and non coronary arterial revascularisation. It will include open and percutaneous coronary and non-coronary (including carotid, aortic and limb) procedures (as defined in Office of Population Censuses and Surveys OPCS-4 procedure codes) and will be ascertained from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data. Description Non-fatal myocardial infarction. Acute MI defined according to the Third Universal Definition of myocardial infarction (MI). Description Euroqol EQ-5D utility score derived from 5 states (scoring 1-5) converted to utility values using UK general population set Description Intra-cranial haemorrhage includes intracerebral haemorrhage, subarachnoid haemorrhage, subdural haemorrhage, and extradural haemorrhage.

Extra-cranial haemorrhage is:

Fatal bleeding, or
Symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ, such as intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra-articular or pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome, or
Bleeding that leads to the transfusion of two or more units of whole blood or red cells

In particular, to be classified as major, bleeds in a critical area or organ should:

Be associated with a symptomatic clinical presentation (not following an incidental finding)
Be the cause of the symptoms

Description Fatal and non-fatal intra-cranial haemorrhage as above It comprises primary haemorrhagic stroke(to distinguish from haemorrhagic transformation of ischaemic stroke) ii)other intra-cranial haemorrhage (adjudicated). Intra-cranial haemorrhage will be sub categorised as traumatic and non-traumatic. Description Fatal and non-fatal major extra-cranial haemorrhage as above. Categorised as i) upper-gastro-intestinal ii) lower gastro-intestinal iii) sight threatening ocular iv)multiple trauma v) other Description Defined in accordance with the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) as any sign or symptom of haemorrhage (e.g. more bleeding than would be expected for a clinical circumstance, including bleeding found by imaging alone) that does not fit the criteria for the ISTH definition of major bleeding but does meet at least one of the following criteria:

• Leading to hospitalisation

This definition excludes all minor bleeding episodes that lead to medical evaluation involving direct patient contact.

Description Non-fatal stroke excluding confirmed intracranial haemorrhage. Acute stroke defined in accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) definition as "rapidly developing clinical signs of focal (or global) disturbance of cerebral function, with symptoms lasting 24 hours or longer, with no apparent cause other than of vascular origin". This excludes cases of primary cerebral tumour, cerebral metastasis, subdural haematoma, post-seizure palsy, brain trauma and TIA. Haemorrhagic stroke ( including intracerebral haemorrhage and sub-arachnoid haemorrhage) which has been confirmed on appropriate imaging is excluded. Description Cardiovascular death (excluding confirmed intracranial haemorrhage and other fatal cardiovascular haemorrhage). Description Definitions above Description A transient episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal brain spinal cord or retinal ischemia without acute infarction Description Defined as an official admission that is for a duration greater than 24 hours or a minimum of 2 calendar days where exact time of stay is unavailable. Description Any new cancer diagnosis excluding non melanotic skin cancer Description Defined as at least one of:

>30% fall in eGFR over two years, or
need for renal replacement therapy or 50% decline in eGFR, or
new eGFR<15mL/min/1.73m2, or
25% decline in GFR together with a drop in GFR category

Description Coded heart failure (ICD) from hospitalisation data Description Below or above knee amputation, coded (ICD) from hospitalisation data

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194051092 Sequence: 194051093 Sequence: 194051094 Sequence: 194051095 Sequence: 194051096 Sequence: 194051097 Sequence: 194051098 Sequence: 194051099 Sequence: 194051100 Sequence: 194051101 Sequence: 194051102 Sequence: 194051103
Mesh Term Kidney Diseases Mesh Term Renal Insufficiency, Chronic Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Urologic Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Male Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Renal Insufficiency Mesh Term Chronic Disease Mesh Term Disease Attributes Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term kidney diseases Downcase Mesh Term renal insufficiency, chronic Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term urologic diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases and pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term male urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term renal insufficiency Downcase Mesh Term chronic disease Downcase Mesh Term disease attributes Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48458177 Sequence: 48458178 Sequence: 48458179 Sequence: 48458180 Sequence: 48458181 Sequence: 48458182 Sequence: 48458183
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER_GOV Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University of Southampton Name University of Nottingham Name University of Warwick Name Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Name East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust Name University of Durham Name Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29364319 Sequence: 29364320
Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Hugh Gallagher, MD Name Paul Roderick, MD
Affiliation Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust Affiliation University of Southampton

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12045739 Sequence: 12045740
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Jennifer Dumbleton Name Diane Stevenson
Phone 00441158231053 Phone 00441158231053
Email jennifer.dumbleton@nottingham.ac.uk Email diane.stevenson@nottingham.ac.uk
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68349132
Design Group Id 55758279
Intervention Id 52630547

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30851236
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Males and females aged 18 years and over at the date of screening
.Subjects with CKD (reduced eGFR and/or albuminuria) defined as: • estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60mL/min/1.73m2 for at least 90 days, and/or • kidney disease code on the GP electronic patient AND most recent eGFR in CKD-defining range (<60mL/min/1.73m2), and/or • albuminuria or proteinuria (defined as urine albumin:creatinine ratio [ACR] ≥3mg/mmol, and/or urine protein:creatinine ratio [PCR] ≥15mg/mmol, and/or +protein or greater on reagent strip)
Subjects who are willing to give permission for their paper and electronic medical records to be accessed by trial investigators
Subjects who are willing to be contacted and interviewed by trial investigators
Subjects who can communicate well with the investigator or designee, understand the requirements of the study and understand and sign the written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects with CKD GFR category 5
Subjects with pre-existing cardiovascular disease (angina, myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), significant peripheral vascular disease, coronary or peripheral revascularisation for atherosclerotic disease)
Subjects with a current pre-existing condition associated with increased risk of bleeding other than CKD
Subjects currently prescribed anticoagulants or antiplatelet agent, or taking over the counter (OTC) aspirin continuously
Subjects who are currently and regularly taking other drugs with a potentially serious interaction with aspirin
Subjects with a known allergy to aspirin or definite previous clinically important adverse reaction
Subjects with poorly controlled hypertension (systolic blood pressure [BP] ≥180 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥105 mmHg)
. Subjects with other conditions which in the opinion of their General Practitioner (GP) would preclude prescription of aspirin in routine clinical practice, for example significant anaemia or thrombocytopenia
Subjects who are pregnant or likely to become pregnant during the study period
Subjects with malignancy that is life-threatening or likely to limit prognosis, other life-threatening co-morbidity, or terminal illness
Subjects whose behaviour or lifestyle would render them less likely to comply with study medication
Subjects in prison
Subjects currently participating in another clinical trial of an investigational medicinal product or who have taken part in such a trial in the last three months (Covid-19 vaccine studies are acceptable)

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254267868
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 11
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 8

Designs

Sequence: 30597093
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Prevention
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Masking Description Adjudication of outcomes blinded
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28963576
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52223818 Sequence: 52223819
Pmid 35449015 Pmid 35224730
Reference Type derived Reference Type derived
Citation Gallagher H, Dumbleton J, Maishman T, Whitehead A, Moore MV, Fuat A, Fitzmaurice D, Henderson RA, Lord J, Griffith KE, Stevens P, Taal MW, Stevenson D, Fraser SD, Lown M, Hawkey CJ, Roderick PJ. Aspirin to target arterial events in chronic kidney disease (ATTACK): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint, parallel group trial of low-dose aspirin vs. standard care for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in people with chronic kidney disease. Trials. 2022 Apr 21;23(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06132-z. Citation Natale P, Palmer SC, Saglimbene VM, Ruospo M, Razavian M, Craig JC, Jardine MJ, Webster AC, Strippoli GF. Antiplatelet agents for chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 28;2(2):CD008834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008834.pub4.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Evaluation of Self-help Books for Depression ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796143
2019-01-07

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796143
NCT03796143https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796143?tab=tableNANANAThe goal of this study is to compare the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for depression in a bibliotherapy format and assess hypothesized mechanisms of change in depression symptomatology, quality of life, and functioning.

This study will test the following hypotheses:

CBT and ACT will both result in decreased depression, distress, and self-stigma associated with depression. Life satisfaction and values progress will increase in both conditions.
CBT will result in greater use of reappraisal than ACT.
ACT will results in greater use of defusion and decreased psychological inflexibility than CBT.
Changes in experiential avoidance and defusion will predict changes in depression in the ACT condition.
Changes in reappraisal will predict changes in depression in the CBT condition.
Participants who are given their choice of treatment will show better adherence and satisfaction in the intervention.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-04-27
Start Month Year January 7, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year August 15, 2020
Verification Month Year April 2021
Verification Date 2021-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2021-04-27

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20727220
Description The investigators aim to recruit 150 participants for this RCT (50 per treatment condition). This will provided adequate power (0.80) to detect differences between groups of medium effect size (d=0.50). Note that detailed eligibility criteria are listed in the "Eligibility" section. Participants will be recruited via SONA, flyers, online postings, classroom announcements, and through the USU CBS lab website.

All study procedures will be completed online, on a computer/mobile phone. After completing informed consent online through Qualtrics, participants will complete an online baseline survey. Participants will then be randomized to one of three groups: a CBT book, an ACT book, or a choice between the two books. Participants will be asked not to access other self-help books during the study duration. A link will be provided to access the book online along with a 10-week suggested reading schedule. Participants will be asked to complete a midtreatment survey 5 weeks after the beginning of treatment, and a posttreatment survey 10 weeks after the beginning of treatment. A follow-up survey will be sent to participants 3 months after the posttreatment survey. In addition to psychological measures, these surveys will also ask about adherence and use of strategies taught in the book. Researcher contact will involve reminders to complete assessments and weekly reminders of the suggested reading schedule.

Participants assigned to the CBT condition will receive a link to access The Cognitive Behavioral Workbook for Depression (Knaus, 2008), based on a psychosocial treatment that has shown effectiveness in reducing depression symptoms (Jiménez, 2012). The primary treatment components in this book are psychoeducation (introducing the cognitive behavioral model of depression), self-assessment worksheets (e.g. identifying depressive thought patterns, separating sensations from appraisals), cognitive restructuring, using metacognition/logic, and avoiding perfectionism.

Participants assigned to the ACT condition will receive a link to access The Mindfulness and Acceptance Workbook for Depression (Strosahl & Robinson, 2008), based on a modern cognitive behavioral therapy that combines acceptance and mindfulness methods with values and behavior change methods (Hayes, Strosahl & Wilson, 2011). The primary treatment components in this book are psychoeducation (introducing the ACT model of depression), values and goals, mindfulness, acceptance, defusion, committed action, and "rewriting" inflexible life stories.

An additional subset of study participants will be given their choice of the two self-help books described above after completing the baseline assessment. Participants who are randomized to receive their choice of book will be provided a brief description of the contents of each book before making a decision.

Facilities

Sequence: 200159519
Name Utah State University
City Logan
State Utah
Zip 84322
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52185596
Name Mental Health
Downcase Name mental health

Id Information

Sequence: 40169143
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 9766

Countries

Sequence: 42580727
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609235 Sequence: 55609236 Sequence: 55609237
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Other
Title ACT self-help book condition Title CBT self-help book condition Title Choice of two self-help books
Description Participants in this condition will be asked to read The Mindfulness and Acceptance Workbook for Depression by Strosahl and Robinson (2008), a self-help book based on acceptance and commitment therapy. Description Participants in this condition will be asked to read Cognitive Behavioral Workbook for Depression by Knaus (2006), a self-help book based on acceptance and commitment therapy. Description Participants in this condition will have the option of receiving either the self-help book by Strosahl and Robinson (2008) or the book by Knaus (2006).

Interventions

Sequence: 52499530 Sequence: 52499531
Intervention Type Behavioral Intervention Type Behavioral
Name The Mindfulness and Acceptance Workbook for Depression Name The Cognitive Behavioral Workbook for Depression
Description Participants assigned to this condition will be asked to read this self-help book over an 8-week period. Description Participants assigned to this condition will be asked to read this self-help book over an 8-week period.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432376 Sequence: 177432377 Sequence: 177432378 Sequence: 177432379 Sequence: 177432380 Sequence: 177432381 Sequence: 177432382 Sequence: 177432383 Sequence: 177432384
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Change in Depression, Anxiety and Stress Measure Self-Stigma of Depression Scale (SSDS; Barney, Griffiths, Christensen, & Jorm, 2010) Measure Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II; Bond et al., 2011) Measure Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ; Gillanders et al., 2014) Measure The Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS; Kanter, Mulick, Busch, Berlin, & Martell, 2007) Measure Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire-Frequency (ATQ-30; Hollon & Kendall, 1980) Measure Thought Control Questionnaire-Reappraisal Subscale (TCQ; Wells & Davies, 1994) Measure Adherence to self-help book Measure Satisfaction with self-help book
Time Frame Baseline, midtreatment (5 weeks after baseline), posttreatment (10 weeks after baseline), and follow-up (3-months after posttreatment) Time Frame Baseline, midtreatment (5 weeks after baseline), posttreatment (10 weeks after baseline), and follow-up (3-months after posttreatment) Time Frame Baseline, midtreatment (5 weeks after baseline), posttreatment (10 weeks after baseline), and follow-up (3-months after posttreatment) Time Frame Baseline, midtreatment (5 weeks after baseline), posttreatment (10 weeks after baseline), and follow-up (3-months after posttreatment) Time Frame Baseline, midtreatment (5 weeks after baseline), posttreatment (10 weeks after baseline), and follow-up (3-months after posttreatment) Time Frame Baseline, midtreatment (5 weeks after baseline), posttreatment (10 weeks after baseline), and follow-up (3-months after posttreatment) Time Frame Baseline, midtreatment (5 weeks after baseline), posttreatment (10 weeks after baseline), and follow-up (3-months after posttreatment) Time Frame Midtreatment (5 weeks after baseline), posttreatment (10 weeks after baseline) Time Frame Posttreatment (10 weeks after baseline)
Description Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) : a self-report measure of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Higher scores indicate higher negative emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress. This measure assesses each of these symptoms as a distinct subscale. Items are rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 "did not apply to me at all" to 3 "applied to me very much, or most of the time." Ranges for depression, anxiety, and stress are 0-28, 0-20, and 0-33, respectively. Description The SSDS is a 16-item measure of self-directed stigma about one's own experience of depression and consists of subscales of shame, self-blame, social inadequacy, and help-seeking inhibition. The measure generates four subscales for shame, self-blame, help-seeking inhibition, and feelings of social inadequacy, with higher scores indicating greater presence of these experiences. The subscales are summed to calculate a total score which ranges from 16 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater overall self-stigma. Description The AAQ-II is a 10-item measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Items are rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 "never true" to 7 "always true." A total score is calculated by reverse coding so that higher scores indicate greater psychological flexibility. Description The CFQ is a 7-item measure of cognitive fusion. Items are rated on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 "never true" to 7 "always true." Total scores range from 7 to 49 with higher scores indicating greater levels of cognitive fusion. Description The BADS is a 25-item measure of approach and avoidance behaviors in depression, separated into two subscales. Two additional subscales measure work/school and social impairment due to depressive symptoms. Within each subscale, higher scores indicate greater frequency of these behaviors. Description The ATQ is a 30-item measure of the frequency of automatic negative self-statements associated with depression. Items are rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 "not at all" to 5 "all the time," with higher scores indicating a greater frequency of automatic thoughts. Description The TCQ-Reappraisal subscale is 6-item measure of cognitive reappraisal of negative thoughts. Items are rated on a 4 point scale ranging from 1 "never" to 4 "almost always" indicating the frequency of cognitive reappraisal of negative thoughts. Total scores range from 6 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater frequency of cognitive reappraisal of negative thoughts. Description Participants will be asked to rate their adherence to the exercises in the book with a single question on 7-point scale from "Did all recommended assignments" to "Did no recommended assignments," with higher scores indicating a greater proportion of the assignments were completed. This is adapted from previous studies of self-help adherence (Abramowitz, Moore, Braddock, & Harrington, 2009). Description Participants will be asked to rate 7 items evaluating their satisfaction with the self-help book on a 6-point scale from "Strongly disagree" to "Strongly agree." The scale produces a total score ranging from 7 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with the book. These items have been used to evaluate program satisfaction in previous self-help research conducted by our lab (e.g., Levin, Pierce, & Schoendorff, in press).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193540529 Sequence: 193540530
Mesh Term Depression Mesh Term Behavioral Symptoms
Downcase Mesh Term depression Downcase Mesh Term behavioral symptoms
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332420
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Utah State University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29293049
Role Principal Investigator
Name Michael Levin, PhD
Affiliation Utah State University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168308 Sequence: 68168309 Sequence: 68168310 Sequence: 68168311
Design Group Id 55609235 Design Group Id 55609237 Design Group Id 55609236 Design Group Id 55609237
Intervention Id 52499530 Intervention Id 52499530 Intervention Id 52499531 Intervention Id 52499531

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773637
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Age 18 or older
Enrolled at Utah State University
Have not participated in other self-help studies run by the USU CBS Lab
Interested in using self-help book for depression
Elevated depressive symptoms as determined by scoring a 10 or higher on the depression subscale of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21)

Exclusion Criteria:

Below the age of 18
Not a student at Utah State University
Have participated in other self-help studies run by the USU CBS Lab
Not interested in using self-help book for depression
No elevated depressive symptoms as determined by scoring lower than 10 on the depression subscale of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21)

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253952982
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 19
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30519768
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two active self-help interventions, or their choice of intervention, for the duration of the study.

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886069
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Michael Levin
Title Associate Professor
Affiliation Utah State University

Study References

Sequence: 52079078 Sequence: 52079079 Sequence: 52079080 Sequence: 52079081 Sequence: 52079082 Sequence: 52079083 Sequence: 52079084 Sequence: 52079085 Sequence: 52079086 Sequence: 52079087 Sequence: 52079088 Sequence: 52079089 Sequence: 52079090 Sequence: 52079091 Sequence: 52079092 Sequence: 52079093 Sequence: 52079094 Sequence: 52079095 Sequence: 52079096 Sequence: 52079097 Sequence: 52079098 Sequence: 52079099 Sequence: 52079100 Sequence: 52079101 Sequence: 52079102 Sequence: 52079103 Sequence: 52079104 Sequence: 52079105
Pmid 18514614 Pmid 20683846 Pmid 29224000 Pmid 22035996 Pmid 21740624 Pmid 24411117 Pmid 16004657 Pmid 26995255 Pmid 12813115 Pmid 24313693 Pmid 25595660 Pmid 7726811 Pmid 28903117 Pmid 17107299 Pmid 10576301 Pmid 22126636 Pmid 10224639 Pmid 24000835 Pmid 15121346 Pmid 7993332 Pmid 12377297
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Abramowitz JS, Moore EL, Braddock AE, Harrington DL. Self-help cognitive-behavioral therapy with minimal therapist contact for social phobia: a controlled trial. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;40(1):98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 Apr 26. Citation Barney LJ, Griffiths KM, Christensen H, Jorm AF. The Self-Stigma of Depression Scale (SSDS): development and psychometric evaluation of a new instrument. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010 Dec;19(4):243-54. doi: 10.1002/mpr.325. Citation Beaufort IN, De Weert-Van Oene GH, Buwalda VAJ, de Leeuw JRJ, Goudriaan AE. The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) as a Screener for Depression in Substance Use Disorder Inpatients: A Pilot Study. Eur Addict Res. 2017;23(5):260-268. doi: 10.1159/000485182. Epub 2017 Dec 8. Citation Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, Waltz T, Zettle RD. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676-88. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 May 25. Citation Fledderus M, Bohlmeijer ET, Pieterse ME, Schreurs KM. Acceptance and commitment therapy as guided self-help for psychological distress and positive mental health: a randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2012 Mar;42(3):485-95. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001206. Epub 2011 Jul 11. Citation Gillanders DT, Bolderston H, Bond FW, Dempster M, Flaxman PE, Campbell L, Kerr S, Tansey L, Noel P, Ferenbach C, Masley S, Roach L, Lloyd J, May L, Clarke S, Remington B. The development and initial validation of the cognitive fusion questionnaire. Behav Ther. 2014 Jan;45(1):83-101. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 18. Citation Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. Guilford Press. Citation Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;44(Pt 2):227-39. doi: 10.1348/014466505X29657. Citation Hollon, S. D., & Kendall, P. C. (1980). Cognitive self-statements in depression: Development of an automatic thoughts questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 4(4), 383-395. Citation Jiménez, F. J. R. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy versus traditional cognitive behavioral therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current empirical evidence. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 12(3), 333-358. Citation Fuhr K, Hautzinger M, Krisch K, Berking M, Ebert DD. Validation of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS)-Psychometric properties of the long and short form. Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;66:209-18. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 9. Citation Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Koretz D, Merikangas KR, Rush AJ, Walters EE, Wang PS; National Comorbidity Survey Replication. The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA. 2003 Jun 18;289(23):3095-105. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3095. Citation Knaus, W. J. (2006). The cognitive behavioral workbook for depression: a step-by-step program. New Harbinger Publications. Citation Levin, M. E., Haeger, J., & Cruz, R. A. (2018). Tailoring Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Skill Coaching in the Moment Through Smartphones: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Mindfulness, 1-11. Citation Levin ME, Pistorello J, Seeley JR, Hayes SC. Feasibility of a prototype web-based acceptance and commitment therapy prevention program for college students. J Am Coll Health. 2014;62(1):20-30. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2013.843533. Citation Lorenzo-Luaces L, German RE, DeRubeis RJ. It's complicated: The relation between cognitive change procedures, cognitive change, and symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Nov;41:3-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.12.003. Epub 2014 Dec 24. Citation Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335-43. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u. Citation Maslej MM, Bolker BM, Russell MJ, Eaton K, Durisko Z, Hollon SD, Swanson GM, Thomson JA Jr, Mulsant BH, Andrews PW. The Mortality and Myocardial Effects of Antidepressants Are Moderated by Preexisting Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-Analysis. Psychother Psychosom. 2017;86(5):268-282. doi: 10.1159/000477940. Epub 2017 Sep 14. Citation Masuda, A., & Tully, E. C. (2012). The role of mindfulness and psychological flexibility in somatization, depression, anxiety, and general psychological distress in a nonclinical college sample. Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine, 17(1), 66-71. Citation Mohr DC, Hart SL, Howard I, Julian L, Vella L, Catledge C, Feldman MD. Barriers to psychotherapy among depressed and nondepressed primary care patients. Ann Behav Med. 2006 Dec;32(3):254-8. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3203_12. Citation Reynolds M, Wells A. The Thought Control Questionnaire–psychometric properties in a clinical sample, and relationships with PTSD and depression. Psychol Med. 1999 Sep;29(5):1089-99. doi: 10.1017/s003329179900104x. Citation Ridgway N, Williams C. Cognitive behavioural therapy self-help for depression: an overview. J Ment Health. 2011 Dec;20(6):593-603. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2011.613956. Citation Rokke PD, Tomhave JA, Jocic Z. The role of client choice and target selection in self-management therapy for depression in older adults. Psychol Aging. 1999 Mar;14(1):155-69. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.14.1.155. Citation Strosahl, K. D., & Robinson, P. J. (2008). The mindfulness and acceptance workbook for depression: Using acceptance and commitment therapy to move through depression and create a life worth living. New Harbinger Publications. Citation Tompkins KA, Swift JK, Callahan JL. Working with clients by incorporating their preferences. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2013 Sep;50(3):279-83. doi: 10.1037/a0032031. Citation van Schaik DJ, Klijn AF, van Hout HP, van Marwijk HW, Beekman AT, de Haan M, van Dyck R. Patients' preferences in the treatment of depressive disorder in primary care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004 May-Jun;26(3):184-9. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2003.12.001. Citation Wells A, Davies MI. The Thought Control Questionnaire: a measure of individual differences in the control of unwanted thoughts. Behav Res Ther. 1994 Nov;32(8):871-8. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)90168-6. Citation Wing RR, Phelan S, Tate D. The role of adherence in mediating the relationship between depression and health outcomes. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Oct;53(4):877-81. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00315-x.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Does Myomectomy for Intramural Fibroid Improve ART Outcome? ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796130
2019-12-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796130
NCT03796130https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796130?tab=tableEman ElGindy, MD, PhDeman_elgindy2013@hotmail.com01227491143Intamural fibroids (myoma) do exist in some infertile women undergoing IVF treatment. There is controversy whether myomectomy before IVF treatment could improve IVF outcome. This trial will examine whether myomectomy in those patients could improve the results.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-12-16
Start Month Year December 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year April 2021
Verification Month Year November 2019
Verification Date 2019-11-30
Last Update Posted Date 2019-12-16

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20716327
Description This study will include women who have intramural myoma ranging from 3-5 cm

The participants will be randomly allocated into two groups.

In group (1): myomectomy will be performed before ART

In group (2):women will have their trial of ART without myomectomy

In group A, ART will be performed 3 months after myomectomy if the uterine cavity is not opened and 6 months after myomectomy upon inadvertent opening of the uterine cavity during surgery

Facilities

Sequence: 200053454
Status Recruiting
Name Mansoura University Hospital
City Mansoura
State Dakahlia
Zip 35111
Country Egypt

Conditions

Sequence: 52156572
Name Fibroid Uterus
Downcase Name fibroid uterus

Id Information

Sequence: 40148258
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value H0008

Countries

Sequence: 42557794
Name Egypt
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55577974 Sequence: 55577975
Group Type Experimental Group Type No Intervention
Title (A)Myomectomy Title (B) No myomectomy
Description This study will include women who have intramural myomas ranging from 3-5 cm

The participants will be randomlyallocated intotwo groups.

In group (A): myomectomy will be performed before ART

In group 1, ART will be performed 3 months after myomectomy if the uterine cavity is not opened and 6 months after myomectomy upon inadvertent opening of the uterine cavity during surgery

Description This study will include women who have intramural myomas ranging from 3-5 cm

The participants will be randomly allocated into two groups.

In group (B):women will have their trial of ART without myomectomy

Interventions

Sequence: 52472077
Intervention Type Procedure
Name Myomectomy
Description This study will include women who have intramural myomas ranging from 3-5 cm

The participants will be randomly allocated into two groups.

In group (1): myomectomy will be performed before ART

In group (2):women will have their trial of ART without myomectomy

In group A, ART will be performed 3 months after myomectomy if the uterine cavity is not opened and 6 months after myomectomy upon inadvertent opening of the uterine cavity during surgery

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328343 Sequence: 177328344 Sequence: 177328345
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure The primary outcome will be ongoing pregnancy rate Measure -Implantation rate Measure -clinical pregnancy rate
Time Frame 3 months after embryo transfer Time Frame 15 days after embryo transfer Time Frame 5 weeks after embryo transfer
Description Pregnancy continued after 12 week gestation per randomised women

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193432307 Sequence: 193432308 Sequence: 193432309 Sequence: 193432310 Sequence: 193432311 Sequence: 193432312 Sequence: 193432313 Sequence: 193432314
Mesh Term Leiomyoma Mesh Term Myofibroma Mesh Term Neoplasms, Muscle Tissue Mesh Term Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms, Connective Tissue Mesh Term Connective Tissue Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term leiomyoma Downcase Mesh Term myofibroma Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, muscle tissue Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, connective and soft tissue Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, connective tissue Downcase Mesh Term connective tissue diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306154 Sequence: 48306155 Sequence: 48306156 Sequence: 48306157 Sequence: 48306158
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER_GOV Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Mansoura University Name Alexandria University Name Zagazig University Name Sohag University Name Assiut University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29277977 Sequence: 29277978 Sequence: 29277979 Sequence: 29277980 Sequence: 29277981 Sequence: 29277982 Sequence: 29277983 Sequence: 29277984 Sequence: 29277985
Role Principal Investigator Role Study Director Role Study Director Role Study Director Role Study Director Role Study Director Role Study Chair Role Study Director Role Study Chair
Name Ahmed Gibreel, MD Name Mohamed S Abdelhafez, MD Name Salah Rasheed, MD Name Ahmed Nasr, MD Name Hisham A Saleh, MD Name Hassan El Maghraby, MD Name Eman El Gindy, MD Name Hoda Sibai, MD Name Hamed Yossef, MD
Affiliation Mansoura University Affiliation Mansoura University Affiliation Sohag University Affiliation Assiut Universit Affiliation Alexandria University Affiliation Alexandria University Affiliation Zagazig University Affiliation Zagazig University Affiliation Mansoura University

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12004758
Contact Type primary
Name Eman ElGindy, MD, PhD
Phone 01227491143
Email eman_elgindy2013@hotmail.com
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130948
Design Group Id 55577974
Intervention Id 52472077

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757398
Gender Female
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 35 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria:
Women with intramural fibroid without any cavity involvement
Age ˂ 35 years
I onCSI or IVF cycles
normal uterine cavity

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria:
low ovarian reserve (AFC < 7 and or AMH < 1.1 ng/ml)
Endometrioma
Untreated hydrosalpinx
Non obstructive azoospermia
Any other cavitary lesions (Asherman syndrome, Mullerian anomalies)
recurrent implantation failure

Gender Description Women
Gender Based True
Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254228952
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 35
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30503623
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869901
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Ahmed Gibreel
Title Assistant professor
Affiliation Mansoura University

]]>

<![CDATA[ Pulsed Current Versus Russian Current Effects in Healthy Young Subjects. ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796117
2019-01-08

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796117
NCT03796117https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796117?tab=tableNANANALow frequency pulsed current (PC) and medium frequency alternating current (Russian current – RC, 2.5 kHz) have been largely studied due to their clinical use. However, it is not clear which current is the most efficient due to the existente literature conflicts.Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the neuromuscular efficiency, evoked torque, current intensity, fatigability and level of discomfort between the PC and the RC in healthy young. The current types will be tested in the same participant by the intervention sequences randomization. On the first, second, third and fourth days, the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), the current intensity level, discomfort level, evoked torque, and clinical and neuromuscular efficiency of each current will be evaluated. Anthropometric measurements will also be assessed on the first day. In addition, the current intensity required to produce a torque level of 20% of the MVIC, the current intensity required to generate a torque of 40 Nm and the maximum intensity tolerated by the participant will be evaluated. Three contractions will be recorded in each condition, and the level of discomfort will be assessed during the evoked contractions. Evoked torque will be evaluated at the maximum tolerated intensity level using the isokinetic dynamometer. Clinical and neuromuscular efficiency will be evaluated (1) at the current intensity necessary to evoke 20% MVIC, (2) at the current intensity necessary to generate 40 Nm, and (3) at the maximum tolerated current intensity. On the fifth and sixth days, muscle fatigue induced by the diferente current types will be evaluated. Fatigue will be evaluated with sufficient current intensity to generate 20% of the MVIC. MVIC will be performed before and after the fatigue protocol, and the fatigue will be determined by the relative variation of the MVIC before and after the fatigue protocol. Fatigue will also be evaluated through the evoked torque variation between the first and the last minute of the fatigue protocol, as well as by the total work generated in each protocol. Neuromuscular efficiency will be evaluated before and immediately after the protocol through (1) the ratio between input NMES current intensity and output evoked torque, (2) total work (area under the evoked force by time curves) generated during the fatigue protocol, and (3) by the changes in muscle architecture from rest to evoked contraction at the maximal current intensity.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-24
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-06-10
Start Month Year January 8, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year June 30, 2019
Verification Month Year June 2021
Verification Date 2021-06-30
Last Update Posted Date 2021-06-10

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735723
Description This study is characterized by a quantitative approach, with a randomized crossover clinical study design, blinded to evaluators and participants. The objective is to compare the neuromuscular and clinical efficiency, evoked torque, current intensity, fatigue and discomfort level between the low frequency biphasic pulsed current (PC) and the median frequency sinusoidal alternating Russian current (RC) in healthy young participants. The effect of the two neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) current types on the cited variables will be evaluated in the same participant, by means of the randomization of the interventions sequences for each participant. The evaluation protocols will be performed by 2 blinded raters for the current type and for the outcome variables. A blinded evaluator to the study will randomize the current type, which will be applied on the different evaluation days, through a lottery using opaque envelopes. A researcher blinded to the study groups will analyze the data. Participants will be blinded to the current type will be receiving. The evaluations will be performed in six days, and a minimum interval of 7 days will be observed between the evaluation days. On the first, second, third and fourth days, characterized as Stage 1, the currents' intensity levels, discomfort level, evoked torque, and neuromuscular and clinical efficiency of each randomized current will be evaluated. On the fifth and sixth days, characterized as Stage 2, the muscle fatigue level induced by the two electrical currents will be evaluated. The first evaluation day will be divided into two phases. Phase 1 corresponds to the initial evaluation, anthropometric data collection and physical activity level evaluation. In Phase 2, the quadriceps femoris motor point will be located with a pen-shaped electrode and a neuromuscular electrical stimulation unit, and the subcutaneous adipose layer thickness covering the motor point will be evaluated by means of ultrasonography. Subsequently, the ultrasound probe will be maintained on the vastus lateralis muscle (VL) to obtain muscle architecture data at rest, during the maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) and during the evoked contractions. Next, a warming up protocol will be performed and the participants will perform three MVICs at the knee joint angles of 60° and 90° of knee flexion (0° = full knee extension) on the isokinetic dynamometer. Subsequently, the investigators will evaluate (1) the current intensity required to produce a torque equivalent to 20% MVIC, (2) the current intensity required to produce a 40 Nm torque, the maximum current intensity (mA) tolerated by the subject (3) at an angle of 60° of knee flexion, and (4) at 90° of knee flexion. From these evaluations, the investigators will analyze the neuromuscular efficiency (ratio between current intensity and evoked torque). After each NMES test, participants will indicate, on the visual-analog scale, the discomfort level perceived with each NMES current type. Clinical efficiency will be evaluated by the ratio between the discomfort level and the evoked torque in the above-described situations. On the second, third and fourth evaluation day, participants will perform all the evaluations described in Phase 2 of the first evaluation day, but with different configurations of the type of current randomized being applied. On the fifth day, the fatigue protocol will be applied with appropriated parameters according to the randomized current type, and sufficient current intensity to generate 20% of the MVIC. The discomfort level during the fatigue protocol will be recorded immediately after the end of the fatigue test. Participants will conduct three pre- and post-fatigue protocol MVICs in order to assess the fatigue level. For the sixth evaluation day, the same evaluations reported for the fifth day will be carried out, but with the second randomized current.

Facilities

Sequence: 200243997
Name Exercise Research Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
City Porto Alegre
State Rio Grande Do Sul
Zip 90690-200
Country Brazil

Conditions

Sequence: 52207926 Sequence: 52207927
Name Healthy Young Name Electric Stimulation Therapy
Downcase Name healthy young Downcase Name electric stimulation therapy

Id Information

Sequence: 40186055
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 3.064.351

Countries

Sequence: 42599560
Name Brazil
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55634528 Sequence: 55634529
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title Experimental Group 1: healthy young Title Experimental Group 2: healthy young
Description Participants receive two interventions (Pulsed Current – PC, or Russian Current – RC) in a specific order, according to randomization. Evoked torque, discomfort level, current intensity, neuromuscular efficiency, clinical efficiency and fatigability level will be evaluated. Description Participants receive two interventions (Pulsed Current – PC, or Russian Current – RC) in a specific order, according to randomization. Evoked torque, discomfort level, current intensity, neuromuscular efficiency, clinical efficiency and fatigability level will be evaluated.

Interventions

Sequence: 52521945 Sequence: 52521946
Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Device
Name Pulsed current Name Russian Current
Description For stage 1 of the study, which corresponds to analysis of the evoked torque, evaluation of the discomfort level, current intensity, analysis of neuromuscular efficiency and clinical efficiency, 2 configurations (PC1 and PC2) will be used.

PC1, will be set at a frequency of 100 Hz, phase duration of 1000 microseconds, ON-OFF time of 5s:10s.

PC2, will be set at a frequency of 100 Hz, phase duration of 200 microseconds ON-OFF time of 5s:10s.

For stage 2 of the study, which corresponds to the analysis of the fatigability level, only the PC1 configuration will be used.

Description For stage 1 of the study, which corresponds to analysis of the evoked torque, discomfort level, current intensity, neuromuscular efficiency and clinical efficiency, 2 configurations (RC1 and RC2) will be used.

RC1, will be set to a frequency of 100 Hz, burst duty cycle of 20%, ON-OFF time of 5s:10s.

RC2, will be set at a frequency of 100 Hz, burst duty cycle of 50%, ON-OFF time of 5s:10s.

For stage 2 of the study, which corresponds to the analysis of the fatigability level, only the RC2 configuration will be used.

Keywords

Sequence: 79922731 Sequence: 79922732 Sequence: 79922733 Sequence: 79922734 Sequence: 79922735
Name Muscle Strength Name Fatigue Name Neuromuscular efficiency Name Discomfort level Name Electric Stimulation
Downcase Name muscle strength Downcase Name fatigue Downcase Name neuromuscular efficiency Downcase Name discomfort level Downcase Name electric stimulation

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177510733 Sequence: 177510726 Sequence: 177510727 Sequence: 177510728 Sequence: 177510729 Sequence: 177510730 Sequence: 177510731 Sequence: 177510732 Sequence: 177510734 Sequence: 177510735 Sequence: 177510736 Sequence: 177510737 Sequence: 177510738 Sequence: 177510739 Sequence: 177510740 Sequence: 177510741 Sequence: 177510742 Sequence: 177510743 Sequence: 177510744 Sequence: 177510745 Sequence: 177510746 Sequence: 177510747 Sequence: 177510748 Sequence: 177510749
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Muscular architecture during the fatigue protocol Measure Maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the knee extensors Measure Knee extensors evoked torque during the tests at submaximal current intensity levels Measure Knee extensors evoked torque during the tests at maximal current intensity levels Measure Knee extensors evoked torque during the fatigue protocol Measure Muscular architecture during the knee extensors maximum voluntary isometric contraction tests Measure Muscular architecture during knee extensors evoked torque tests at submaximal current intensity levels Measure Muscular architecture during knee extensors evoked torque tests at maximal current intensity levels Measure Discomfort level generated by electrical stimulation during evoked torque tests at submaximal current intensity levels Measure Discomfort level generated by electrical stimulation during evoked torque tests at maximal current intensity levels Measure Discomfort level generated by electrical stimulation during the fatigue protocol Measure Current intensity required to evoke knee extensors submaximal torque Measure Current intensity required to evoke knee extensors maximal torque Measure Neuromuscular efficiency during knee extensors submaximal evoked torque tests Measure Neuromuscular efficiency during knee extensors maximal evoked torque tests Measure Neuromuscular efficiency during the fatigue protocol Measure Clinical efficiency during knee extensors submaximal evoked torque tests Measure Clinical efficiency during knee extensors maximal evoked torque tests Measure Clinical efficiency during the fatigue protocol Measure Muscle Fatigue Index Measure Fatigue Index from Evoked Torque Measure Total work generated during the fatigue protocol Measure Thickness of the subcutaneous fat layer on the motor point Measure Level of physical activity
Time Frame During 20 minutes of electrical stimulation Time Frame 14 minutes Time Frame During 90 seconds of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 90 seconds of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 20 minutes of electrical stimulation Time Frame 14 minutes Time Frame During 90 seconds of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 90 seconds of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 90 seconds of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 90 seconds of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 20 minutes of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 90 seconds of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 90 seconds of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 90 seconds of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 90 seconds of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 20 minutes of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 90 seconds of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 90 seconds of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 20 minutes of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 20 minutes of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 20 minutes of electrical stimulation Time Frame During 20 minutes of electrical stimulation Time Frame It will be evaluated during the first evaluation day. Time Frame 8 minutes. It will be evaluated during the first evaluation day
Description is an expression used to describe the muscle fibers arrangement within the muscle, and is evaluated by determining the muscle thickness, fascicle pennation angle and fascicle length, which will be assessed by ultrasonography. Description is an expression of the muscular strength, and will be evaluated by dynamometry. Description is an expression describing the muscular strength generated by electrical stimulation, and will be assessed by dynamometry. Description is an expression describing the muscular strength generated by electrical stimulation, and will be assessed by dynamometry. Description is an expression describing the muscular strength generated by electrical stimulation, and will be assessed by dynamometry. Description is an expression used to describe the muscle fibers arrangement within the muscle, and is evaluated by determining the muscle thickness, fascicle pennation angle and fascicle length, which will be assessed by ultrasonography. Description is an expression used to describe the muscle fibers arrangement within the muscle, and is evaluated by determining the muscle thickness, fascicle pennation angle and fascicle length, which will be assessed by ultrasonography. Description is an expression used to describe the muscle fibers arrangement within the muscle, and is evaluated by determining the muscle thickness, fascicle pennation angle and fascicle length, which will be assessed by ultrasonography. Description Discomfort will be measured with a Visual Analogue Scale (0-100mm), where 0 and 100 mm corresponded to no discomfort and worst perceived discomfort, respectively. Description Discomfort will be measured with a Visual Analogue Scale (0-100mm), where 0 and 100 mm corresponded to no discomfort and worst perceived discomfort, respectively. Description Discomfort will be measured with a Visual Analogue Scale (0-100mm), where 0 and 100 mm corresponded to no discomfort and worst perceived discomfort, respectively. Description Current intensity is defined as the amount or amplitude of electrical current (in milliamperes – mA) required to achieve a specific force, and will be evaluated in the electrical stimulation device. Description Current intensity is defined as the amount or amplitude of electrical current (in milliamperes – mA) required to achieve a specific force, and will be evaluated in the electrical stimulation device. Description Neuromuscular efficiency of the electrical currents will be evaluated by calculating the current intensity (input parameter or input) by the evoked torque (output parameter) ratio. Description Neuromuscular efficiency of the electrical currents will be evaluated by calculating the current intensity (input parameter or input) by the evoked torque (output parameter) ratio. Description Neuromuscular efficiency of the electrical currents will be evaluated by calculating the current intensity (input parameter or input) by the evoked torque (output parameter) ratio. Description Clinical efficiency of the two electrical currents will be evaluated by calculating the ratio between the evoked torque (output parameter) and the level of discomfort generated. Description Clinical efficiency of the two electrical currents will be evaluated by calculating the ratio between the evoked torque (output parameter) and the level of discomfort generated. Description Clinical efficiency of the two electrical currents will be evaluated by calculating the ratio between the evoked torque (output parameter) and the level of discomfort generated. Description Characterized by the force decrease after the fatigue protocol, it will be evaluated by dynamometry. Description Characterized by the decrease of the evoked torque during the fatigue protocol, the fatigue index from evoked torque will be evaluated by dynamometry, and obtained by the analysis of evoked torque curves. Description The torque-time integral of the evoked torque curves during the fatigue protocol will be evaluated. The sum of the torque curve integral of all evoked contractions during the fatigue protocol will be calculated to determine the total work evoked by each current during the fatigue protocol. Description Corresponds to the amount of subcutaneous adipose tissue and will be evaluated by ultrasonography. Description The level of physical activity (PA) of each subject will be assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).The scores will be assessed by calculating the metabolic equivalents (MET) for each activity level. Walking score will be achieved by the multiplication of 3.3 METs with the total walking duration in minutes in a week. Moderate physical activity scores will be achieved by the multiplication of 4.0 METs with the total moderate physical activity duration in minutes in a week. Vigorous physical activity scores will be achieved by the multiplication of 8.0 METs with the total vigorous physical activity duration in minutes in a week. Total physical activity MET-minutes/week will be obtained through sum of walking, moderate and vigorous MET minutes/week scores. Categorical Score will be classified into three levels of physical activity: low, moderate and high.

Sponsors

Sequence: 48353571
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29305916
Role Principal Investigator
Name Marco A Vaz, PhD
Affiliation Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199020 Sequence: 68199021 Sequence: 68199022 Sequence: 68199023
Design Group Id 55634528 Design Group Id 55634529 Design Group Id 55634528 Design Group Id 55634529
Intervention Id 52521945 Intervention Id 52521945 Intervention Id 52521946 Intervention Id 52521946

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30786796
Gender Male
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 35 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Young male
Age between 18 and 35 years
Physically active,
Normal knee function and range of motion
No pain complaints
No presence of lower limb pathology at the dominant limb.

Exclusion Criteria:

Health problems (neurological, musculoskeletal impairment),
Contraindication to maximal exercise,
Having been treated with NMES in the last 3 months in the lower limb
Not meeting the inclusion criteria.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989471
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 5
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 35
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 22
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30532866
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Crossover Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899160
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Marco Aurélio Vaz, PhD
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Study References

Sequence: 52102861
Pmid 33561279
Reference Type derived
Citation Paz IA, Rigo GT, Sgarioni A, Baroni BM, Frasson VB, Vaz MA. Alternating Current Is More Fatigable Than Pulsed Current in People Who Are Healthy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Crossover Trial. Phys Ther. 2021 Jun 1;101(6):pzab056. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab056.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Prognostic Impact of Delta-haemolysin Production Deficiency in Staphylococcus Aureus on the Prognosis of Infected Implant Treated by DAIR ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796104
2018-01-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796104
NCT03796104https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796104?tab=tableJohanna Boulant, CRAjohanna.boulant@chu-lyon.frNAThe aim of this study is to determine if delta-haemolysin production deficiency of Staphylococcus aureus is a marker in favour of chronic infections on implants
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-04-13
Start Month Year January 1, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2018
Verification Month Year April 2023
Verification Date 2023-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2023-04-13

Facilities

Sequence: 200362608
Status Recruiting
Name Hospices Civils de Lyon
City Lyon
Zip 69004
Country France

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28142683
Facility Id 200362608
Contact Type primary
Name Eugenie Mabrut, CRA

Conditions

Sequence: 52248625 Sequence: 52248626
Name Bone and Joint Infection Name Staphylococcus Aureus
Downcase Name bone and joint infection Downcase Name staphylococcus aureus

Id Information

Sequence: 40215171
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 18-333

Countries

Sequence: 42630116
Name France
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55680233 Sequence: 55680234
Title Deficiency of delta-hemolysine Title Presence of delta-hemolysine
Description Implant infected by Staphylococcus aureus with delta-haemolysin Production Deficiency Description Implant infected by Staphylococcus aureus with delta-haemolysin Production

Interventions

Sequence: 52561782
Intervention Type Other
Name Delta-haemolysin
Description comparison of groups having infection with S. aureus with and without delta-haemolysin Production

Keywords

Sequence: 79978437 Sequence: 79978438 Sequence: 79978439
Name Bone and Joint Infection Name Staphylococcus Aureus Name chronic infection
Downcase Name bone and joint infection Downcase Name staphylococcus aureus Downcase Name chronic infection

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177662829 Sequence: 177662830
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Rate of infection with or witout delta-haemolysin in Staphylococcus Aureus Measure Rate of Treatment Failure
Time Frame Outcome is measured at the end of follow-up (usually between 12 and 24 months after antibiotic therapy disruption Time Frame Outcome is measured at the end of follow-up (usually between 12 and 24 months after antibiotic therapy disruption
Description patients, profile of the bacterium, medical and chirurgical treatment, rate. comparison between the 2 groups Description Treatment failure is defined by local clinical and/or microbiological relapse; and/or need for additional surgery; death of septic origin. Analyse of risk factor. Comparison between the 2 groups

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193782737 Sequence: 193782738 Sequence: 193782739 Sequence: 193782740 Sequence: 193782741
Mesh Term Infections Mesh Term Staphylococcal Infections Mesh Term Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections Mesh Term Bacterial Infections Mesh Term Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Downcase Mesh Term infections Downcase Mesh Term staphylococcal infections Downcase Mesh Term gram-positive bacterial infections Downcase Mesh Term bacterial infections Downcase Mesh Term bacterial infections and mycoses
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48392095
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Hospices Civils de Lyon

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29327533
Role Principal Investigator
Name FLORENT VALOUR, Md,PhD
Affiliation Hospices Civils de Lyon

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12026757
Contact Type primary
Name Johanna Boulant, CRA
Email johanna.boulant@chu-lyon.fr
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68253786 Sequence: 68253787
Design Group Id 55680233 Design Group Id 55680234
Intervention Id 52561782 Intervention Id 52561782

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30810633
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 99 Years
Population patients having implant infection due to S. aureus treated by DAIR managed at the Lyon Bone and joint infection reference Center between 2006 and 2018
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

patients having implant infection due to S. aureus treated by DAIR

Exclusion Criteria:

none

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254039461
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 12
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 99
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30556616
Observational Model Case-Control
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28922997
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Eugénie MABRUT
Title clinical research assistant
Affiliation Hospices Civils de Lyon

]]>

<![CDATA[ Efficacy Trial of a Dissonance Based Eating Disorder Program ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796091
2018-11-18

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796091
NCT03796091https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796091?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate whether symptoms of disordered eating change among participants who complete an intervention. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three intervention conditions and will undergo assessments of symptoms before, after, and 2 months after each intervention. Investigators are evaluating which interventions are most effective in reducing eating disorder symptoms and disorder-related psychological and cardiac risk factors.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-31
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-12-09
Start Month Year November 18, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year April 15, 2021
Verification Month Year November 2022
Verification Date 2022-11-30
Last Update Posted Date 2022-12-09
Results First Posted Date 2022-12-09

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20667846
Description Assessment Sessions (Preintervention, Postintervention, 2-month follow-up): Participants in all conditions will participate in a series of 3 assessment sessions. Prior to each session, participants will complete online questions assessing eating disorder symptoms and associated psychological risk factors. This process will take approximately 40 minutes. Next participants will report to the laboratory at their scheduled appointment time to have their cardiac function assessed via blood pressure measurements and electrocardiography (EKG or ECG). Participants' height and weight will also be recorded.

Prior to each assessment session, participants should:

Complete the online survey (if not completed prior to each laboratory appointment this will need to be completed at the lab appointment)
Fast (not consume any food or beverages other than water) for at least 3 hours.
Refrain from using nicotine for at least 3 hours.
Refrain from vigorous physical exercise for at least 24 hours.
Not show any symptoms of acute physical illness for 48 hours. It is important for participants to follow these directions so researchers can gather the most accurate data. If participants forget to follow these guidelines, or if an illness occurs, participants should contact their experimenter to reschedule.

On the day of an assessment session, participants will drive to the assessment location. Participants will receive directions via e-mail prior to each session. During the assessment session, participants will lie down on a laboratory cot for 10 minutes while preparation for electrocardiography (EKG or ECG) occurs. Electrodes will be applied to the chest and torso and lead wires will be attached to the electrodes. Participants' blood pressure will be assessed several times throughout this interval. Next, the experimenter will collect a 5 minute and 30 second recording of participants' cardiovascular data via electrocardiography (ECG or EKG). This data will later be analyzed to examine cardiac function.Next experimenters will assess participants' height and weight.

After each assessment session, participants' eating disorder symptoms, psychological risk factors, and cardiac indices will be evaluated by the research team. If the team determines that symptoms or cardiac indices are atypical and indicate a further need for evaluation, the participant will be contacted via both e-mail and phone to be informed results are atypical and the participant will be referred for further evaluation by a medical provider. If the participant is a minor, this information will be provided both to the participant and to the participant's parent and/or the participant's legal guardian. If participants' symptoms or risk factors worsen significantly over the duration of the trial, participants will also be contacted and provided with referral recommendations.

All participants will receive a comprehensive symptom report at the end of the trial. Referral resources will be provided again at that time if significant eating disorder symptoms remain.

Treatment Conditions: Participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment conditions.

Brochure Treatment Condition: Participants randomly assigned to the educational brochure will receive two educational brochures which discuss eating disorder symptoms. The brochures will also include treatment referral information and recommended resources for persons struggling with disordered eating. The brochure will take approximately 10 minutes to read; follow-up with treatment or self-help referral resources is completely voluntary.

Group Therapy Treatment Conditions: Participants randomly assigned to one of the two group treatment intervention conditions will complete a 4-week group treatment program with 3-8 other women and 2 trained treatment co-facilitators. For approximately 1 hour each week, participants will meet in this group to complete a series of readings, written activities, and verbal activities designed to reduce disordered eating. During the 4 intervention sessions, participants will be asked to analyze the weight and appearance-related messages received from the media, peers, family, romantic partners, and other sources. Participants will also be asked to record, analyze, and evaluate weight and appearance-related thoughts, emotions, and behaviors. Participants will engage in a variety of exercises designed to evaluate the meaning of thinness in our culture and its personal impact. These exercises are designed to combat the detrimental impact of messages which promote thinness.

Other risk factors will also be addressed, depending upon program. Participants may talk about the pressures women receive to focus on appearance. The relationship between these appearance-related pressures and eating disorder symptoms will be explored. Participants will explore the way they compare themselves to others and participate in a series of discussions and activities designed to decrease appearance-based comparisons with others.

After the 4-week program is complete, participants in both intervention conditions will continue to work on homework assignments related to the program for a period of 2-months until the final assessment session.

Facilities

Sequence: 199503355
Name Cornell College Eating Disorder Institute
City Mount Vernon
State Iowa
Zip 52314
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52030689
Name Eating Disorder
Downcase Name eating disorder

Id Information

Sequence: 40048387 Sequence: 40048388
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value 1516-105-GRE Id Value R15MH113044
Id Type U.S. NIH Grant/Contract
Id Link https://reporter.nih.gov/quickSearch/R15MH113044

Countries

Sequence: 42446005
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55438552 Sequence: 55438553 Sequence: 55438554
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator
Title Educational Brochure Title Body Project Traditional Title Body Project Expanded
Description Participants will read an educational brochure from the National Eating Disorder Association and will receive referral resources. Description Participants will complete group therapy for 1-hour per week for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project group therapy program (Stice & Shaw, 2001). Description Participants will complete group therapy for 1-hour per week for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project Expanded group therapy program (Green et al., 2017).

Interventions

Sequence: 52342940 Sequence: 52342941 Sequence: 52342942
Intervention Type Behavioral Intervention Type Behavioral Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Educational Brochure Name Body Project Traditional Name Body Project Expanded
Description Participants will read an educational brochure from the National Eating Disorders Association and will receive treatment referral resources. Description Participants will complete a 1-hour per week group therapy program for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project Traditional group therapy program (see Stice & Shaw, 2001). Description Participants will complete a 1-hour per week group therapy program for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project Expanded group therapy program (see Green et al., 2017).

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176892915 Sequence: 176892916 Sequence: 176892917 Sequence: 176892918 Sequence: 176892919 Sequence: 176892920 Sequence: 176892921 Sequence: 176892922 Sequence: 176892923 Sequence: 176892924 Sequence: 176892925 Sequence: 176892926 Sequence: 176892927 Sequence: 176892928 Sequence: 176892929 Sequence: 176892930 Sequence: 176892931 Sequence: 176892932 Sequence: 176892933 Sequence: 176892934 Sequence: 176892935 Sequence: 176892936 Sequence: 176892937 Sequence: 176892938 Sequence: 176892939 Sequence: 176892940 Sequence: 176892941 Sequence: 176892942 Sequence: 176892943 Sequence: 176892944 Sequence: 176892945 Sequence: 176892946 Sequence: 176892947 Sequence: 176892948 Sequence: 176892949 Sequence: 176892950 Sequence: 176892951 Sequence: 176892952 Sequence: 176892953
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary
Measure Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Measure Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Measure Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Measure Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Measure Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Measure Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Measure Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). Measure Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). Measure Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). Measure Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS). Measure Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS). Measure Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS). Measure Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) Measure Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) Measure Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) Measure Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised. Measure Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised. Measure Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised. Measure State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y. Measure State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y. Measure State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y. Measure Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Measure Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Measure Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Measure Mean R Wave Amplitude Measure Mean R Wave Amplitude Measure Mean R Wave Amplitude Measure QT Interval Length Measure QT Interval Length Measure QT Interval Length Measure Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Measure Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Measure Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Measure Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Measure Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Measure Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Measure Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Measure Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Measure Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect
Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment.
Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS) is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS) is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS) is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Mean R wave amplitude represents ventricular depolarization. Higher magnitudes indicated increased polarity associated with an increased force of ventricular contraction. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Mean R wave amplitude represents ventricular depolarization and is measured in millivolts. Higher magnitudes indicated increased polarity associated with an increased force of ventricular contraction. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Mean R wave amplitude represents ventricular depolarization and is measured in millivolts. Higher magnitudes indicated increased polarity associated with an increased force of ventricular contraction. Description QTc prolongation was measured in msec and was assessed via 3-lead ECG. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. For detection, typical QRS width was set at 80ms and R waves were at least 300ms apart. QTc was corrected with Bazett's formula. QT interval length represents the length of ventricular depolarization and repolarization and is measured in msec. Description QTc prolongation was measured in msec and was assessed via 3-lead ECG. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. For detection, typical QRS width was set at 80ms and R waves were at least 300ms apart. QTc was corrected with Bazett's formula. QT interval length represents the length of ventricular depolarization and repolarization and is measured in msec. Description Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Description High frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Increased high frequency spectral power represents increased vagal input to the heart. Description High frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Increased high frequency spectral power represents increased vagal input to the heart. Description High frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Increased high frequency spectral power represents increased vagal input to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192928376 Sequence: 192928375
Mesh Term Mental Disorders Mesh Term Feeding and Eating Disorders
Downcase Mesh Term mental disorders Downcase Mesh Term feeding and eating disorders
Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list

Sponsors

Sequence: 48188116 Sequence: 48188117
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class NIH
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Cornell College Name National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29204182
Role Principal Investigator
Name Melinda A Green, PhD
Affiliation Green Counseling Services PLLC

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67961690 Sequence: 67961691 Sequence: 67961692
Design Group Id 55438552 Design Group Id 55438553 Design Group Id 55438554
Intervention Id 52342940 Intervention Id 52342941 Intervention Id 52342942

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30682906
Gender Female
Minimum Age 15 Years
Maximum Age 34 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria

Women
Age 15-34
Postmenarcheal
Premenopausal
Subclinical or Clinical Eating Disorder Symptoms

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion Criteria

Must get physician clearance to participate if at medically high risk as defined in the protocol
Must not be pregnant
Must be able to read and speak English

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253884917
Number Of Facilities 1
Number Of Sae Subjects 3
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 29
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 15
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 15
Maximum Age Num 34
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 39

Designs

Sequence: 30429636
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description Randomized, controlled clinical trial with 3 treatment interventions

Milestones

Sequence: 40895442 Sequence: 40895443 Sequence: 40895444 Sequence: 40895445 Sequence: 40895446 Sequence: 40895447 Sequence: 40895448 Sequence: 40895449 Sequence: 40895450
Result Group Id 55977669 Result Group Id 55977670 Result Group Id 55977671 Result Group Id 55977669 Result Group Id 55977670 Result Group Id 55977671 Result Group Id 55977669 Result Group Id 55977670 Result Group Id 55977671
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG002
Title STARTED Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 40 Count 38 Count 45 Count 20 Count 22 Count 15

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3911191
Recruitment Details Women aged 15-35 displaying subclinical and clinical eating disorder symptoms were recruited from 2 Midwestern cities and 5 surrounding suburban communities from November of 2018 to March of 2021. All participants were treated in accordance with federal guidelines (Title 45, Code of Regulations Part 46) for the treatment of human participants. The research was approved by an Institutional Review Board at the host institution.
Pre Assignment Details All participants were screened to ensure inclusion criteria were met. Inclusion criteria specified female participants ages 15-34 (postmenarcheal and premenopausal) who were not pregnant. Participant selection was limited to this group to control for the effects of estrogen on cardiac function and in accordance with previous research which suggests dissonance-based programs are most effective when offered solely to females over the age of 15.

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 73775412 Sequence: 73775413 Sequence: 73775414 Sequence: 73775415 Sequence: 73775416 Sequence: 73775417 Sequence: 73775418 Sequence: 73775419 Sequence: 73775420 Sequence: 73775421 Sequence: 73775422 Sequence: 73775423 Sequence: 73775424 Sequence: 73775425 Sequence: 73775426 Sequence: 73775427 Sequence: 73775428 Sequence: 73775429 Sequence: 73775430 Sequence: 73775431 Sequence: 73775432 Sequence: 73775433 Sequence: 73775434 Sequence: 73775435 Sequence: 73775436 Sequence: 73775437 Sequence: 73775438 Sequence: 73775439 Sequence: 73775440 Sequence: 73775441 Sequence: 73775442 Sequence: 73775443 Sequence: 73775444 Sequence: 73775445 Sequence: 73775446 Sequence: 73775447 Sequence: 73775448 Sequence: 73775449 Sequence: 73775450 Sequence: 73775451 Sequence: 73775452 Sequence: 73775453 Sequence: 73775454 Sequence: 73775455 Sequence: 73775456 Sequence: 73775457 Sequence: 73775458 Sequence: 73775459 Sequence: 73775460 Sequence: 73775461 Sequence: 73775462 Sequence: 73775463 Sequence: 73775464 Sequence: 73775465 Sequence: 73775466 Sequence: 73775467 Sequence: 73775468 Sequence: 73775469 Sequence: 73775470 Sequence: 73775471 Sequence: 73775472 Sequence: 73775473 Sequence: 73775474 Sequence: 73775475 Sequence: 73775476 Sequence: 73775477 Sequence: 73775478 Sequence: 73775479 Sequence: 73775480 Sequence: 73775481 Sequence: 73775482 Sequence: 73775483 Sequence: 73775484 Sequence: 73775485 Sequence: 73775486 Sequence: 73775487 Sequence: 73775488 Sequence: 73775489 Sequence: 73775490 Sequence: 73775491 Sequence: 73775492 Sequence: 73775493 Sequence: 73775494 Sequence: 73775495 Sequence: 73775496 Sequence: 73775497 Sequence: 73775498 Sequence: 73775499 Sequence: 73775500 Sequence: 73775501 Sequence: 73775502 Sequence: 73775503 Sequence: 73775504 Sequence: 73775505 Sequence: 73775506 Sequence: 73775507 Sequence: 73775508 Sequence: 73775509 Sequence: 73775510 Sequence: 73775511 Sequence: 73775512 Sequence: 73775513 Sequence: 73775514 Sequence: 73775515 Sequence: 73775516 Sequence: 73775517 Sequence: 73775518 Sequence: 73775519 Sequence: 73775520 Sequence: 73775521 Sequence: 73775522 Sequence: 73775523 Sequence: 73775524 Sequence: 73775525 Sequence: 73775526 Sequence: 73775527 Sequence: 73775528
Outcome Id 30711145 Outcome Id 30711145 Outcome Id 30711145 Outcome Id 30711146 Outcome Id 30711146 Outcome Id 30711146 Outcome Id 30711147 Outcome Id 30711147 Outcome Id 30711147 Outcome Id 30711148 Outcome Id 30711148 Outcome Id 30711148 Outcome Id 30711149 Outcome Id 30711149 Outcome Id 30711149 Outcome Id 30711150 Outcome Id 30711150 Outcome Id 30711150 Outcome Id 30711151 Outcome Id 30711151 Outcome Id 30711151 Outcome Id 30711152 Outcome Id 30711152 Outcome Id 30711152 Outcome Id 30711153 Outcome Id 30711153 Outcome Id 30711153 Outcome Id 30711154 Outcome Id 30711154 Outcome Id 30711154 Outcome Id 30711155 Outcome Id 30711155 Outcome Id 30711155 Outcome Id 30711156 Outcome Id 30711156 Outcome Id 30711156 Outcome Id 30711157 Outcome Id 30711157 Outcome Id 30711157 Outcome Id 30711158 Outcome Id 30711158 Outcome Id 30711158 Outcome Id 30711159 Outcome Id 30711159 Outcome Id 30711159 Outcome Id 30711160 Outcome Id 30711160 Outcome Id 30711160 Outcome Id 30711161 Outcome Id 30711161 Outcome Id 30711161 Outcome Id 30711162 Outcome Id 30711162 Outcome Id 30711162 Outcome Id 30711163 Outcome Id 30711163 Outcome Id 30711163 Outcome Id 30711164 Outcome Id 30711164 Outcome Id 30711164 Outcome Id 30711165 Outcome Id 30711165 Outcome Id 30711165 Outcome Id 30711166 Outcome Id 30711166 Outcome Id 30711166 Outcome Id 30711167 Outcome Id 30711167 Outcome Id 30711167 Outcome Id 30711168 Outcome Id 30711168 Outcome Id 30711168 Outcome Id 30711169 Outcome Id 30711169 Outcome Id 30711169 Outcome Id 30711170 Outcome Id 30711170 Outcome Id 30711170 Outcome Id 30711171 Outcome Id 30711171 Outcome Id 30711171 Outcome Id 30711172 Outcome Id 30711172 Outcome Id 30711172 Outcome Id 30711173 Outcome Id 30711173 Outcome Id 30711173 Outcome Id 30711174 Outcome Id 30711174 Outcome Id 30711174 Outcome Id 30711175 Outcome Id 30711175 Outcome Id 30711175 Outcome Id 30711176 Outcome Id 30711176 Outcome Id 30711176 Outcome Id 30711177 Outcome Id 30711177 Outcome Id 30711177 Outcome Id 30711178 Outcome Id 30711178 Outcome Id 30711178 Outcome Id 30711179 Outcome Id 30711179 Outcome Id 30711179 Outcome Id 30711180 Outcome Id 30711180 Outcome Id 30711180 Outcome Id 30711181 Outcome Id 30711181 Outcome Id 30711181 Outcome Id 30711182 Outcome Id 30711182 Outcome Id 30711182 Outcome Id 30711183 Outcome Id 30711183 Outcome Id 30711183
Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60 Count 60

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2573981 Sequence: 2573982 Sequence: 2573983
Document Type Study Protocol Document Type Statistical Analysis Plan Document Type Informed Consent Form
Has Protocol True Has Protocol False Has Protocol False
Has Icf False Has Icf False Has Icf True
Has Sap False Has Sap True Has Sap False
Document Date 2018-05-08 Document Date 2018-05-08 Document Date 2018-12-08
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/91/NCT03796091/Prot_000.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/91/NCT03796091/SAP_001.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/91/NCT03796091/ICF_002.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 27868729 Sequence: 27868730 Sequence: 27868731 Sequence: 27868732 Sequence: 27868733 Sequence: 27868734 Sequence: 27868735 Sequence: 27868736 Sequence: 27868737
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG002
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 60 Subjects At Risk 60 Subjects At Risk 60 Subjects At Risk 60 Subjects At Risk 60 Subjects At Risk 60 Subjects At Risk 60 Subjects At Risk 60 Subjects At Risk 60
Created At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Created At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Created At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Created At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Created At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Created At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Created At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Created At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Created At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691
Updated At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Updated At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Updated At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Updated At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Updated At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Updated At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Updated At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Updated At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691 Updated At 2023-08-08 03:32:03.780691

Reported Events

Sequence: 526305423 Sequence: 526305424 Sequence: 526305425 Sequence: 526305426 Sequence: 526305427 Sequence: 526305428
Result Group Id 55977675 Result Group Id 55977676 Result Group Id 55977677 Result Group Id 55977675 Result Group Id 55977676 Result Group Id 55977677
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002
Time Frame Information regarding adverse events were reported at baseline, postintervention (approximately 4 weeks after treatment initiation) and 2-month follow-up (approximately 8 weeks after treatment conclusion). Time Frame Information regarding adverse events were reported at baseline, postintervention (approximately 4 weeks after treatment initiation) and 2-month follow-up (approximately 8 weeks after treatment conclusion). Time Frame Information regarding adverse events were reported at baseline, postintervention (approximately 4 weeks after treatment initiation) and 2-month follow-up (approximately 8 weeks after treatment conclusion). Time Frame Information regarding adverse events were reported at baseline, postintervention (approximately 4 weeks after treatment initiation) and 2-month follow-up (approximately 8 weeks after treatment conclusion). Time Frame Information regarding adverse events were reported at baseline, postintervention (approximately 4 weeks after treatment initiation) and 2-month follow-up (approximately 8 weeks after treatment conclusion). Time Frame Information regarding adverse events were reported at baseline, postintervention (approximately 4 weeks after treatment initiation) and 2-month follow-up (approximately 8 weeks after treatment conclusion).
Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious
Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2
Subjects At Risk 60 Subjects At Risk 60 Subjects At Risk 60 Subjects At Risk 60 Subjects At Risk 60 Subjects At Risk 60
Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 2
Organ System Psychiatric disorders Organ System Psychiatric disorders Organ System Psychiatric disorders Organ System Psychiatric disorders Organ System Psychiatric disorders Organ System Psychiatric disorders
Adverse Event Term Hospitalization Adverse Event Term Hospitalization Adverse Event Term Hospitalization Adverse Event Term Suicidal Ideation Adverse Event Term Suicidal Ideation Adverse Event Term Suicidal Ideation
Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5
Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28796140
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Dr. Melinda Green
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation Cornell College

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3841935
Pi Employee No

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3841900
Organization Green Counseling Services PLLC
Name Dr. Melinda Green
Phone 5154508913
Email drgreen@greencounselingservice.com

Outcomes

Sequence: 30711145 Sequence: 30711146 Sequence: 30711147 Sequence: 30711148 Sequence: 30711149 Sequence: 30711150 Sequence: 30711151 Sequence: 30711152 Sequence: 30711153 Sequence: 30711154 Sequence: 30711155 Sequence: 30711156 Sequence: 30711157 Sequence: 30711158 Sequence: 30711159 Sequence: 30711160 Sequence: 30711161 Sequence: 30711162 Sequence: 30711163 Sequence: 30711164 Sequence: 30711165 Sequence: 30711166 Sequence: 30711167 Sequence: 30711168 Sequence: 30711169 Sequence: 30711170 Sequence: 30711171 Sequence: 30711172 Sequence: 30711173 Sequence: 30711174 Sequence: 30711175 Sequence: 30711176 Sequence: 30711177 Sequence: 30711178 Sequence: 30711179 Sequence: 30711180 Sequence: 30711181 Sequence: 30711182 Sequence: 30711183
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary
Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Title Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). Title Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). Title Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). Title Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS). Title Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS). Title Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS). Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised. Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised. Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised. Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y. Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y. Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y. Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title QT Interval Length Title QT Interval Length Title QT Interval Length Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect
Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS) is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS) is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS) is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Mean R wave amplitude represents ventricular depolarization. Higher magnitudes indicated increased polarity associated with an increased force of ventricular contraction. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Mean R wave amplitude represents ventricular depolarization and is measured in millivolts. Higher magnitudes indicated increased polarity associated with an increased force of ventricular contraction. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Mean R wave amplitude represents ventricular depolarization and is measured in millivolts. Higher magnitudes indicated increased polarity associated with an increased force of ventricular contraction. Description QTc prolongation was measured in msec and was assessed via 3-lead ECG. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. For detection, typical QRS width was set at 80ms and R waves were at least 300ms apart. QTc was corrected with Bazett's formula. QT interval length represents the length of ventricular depolarization and repolarization and is measured in msec. Description QTc prolongation was measured in msec and was assessed via 3-lead ECG. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. For detection, typical QRS width was set at 80ms and R waves were at least 300ms apart. QTc was corrected with Bazett's formula. QT interval length represents the length of ventricular depolarization and repolarization and is measured in msec. Description Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Description High frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Increased high frequency spectral power represents increased vagal input to the heart. Description High frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Increased high frequency spectral power represents increased vagal input to the heart. Description High frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Increased high frequency spectral power represents increased vagal input to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect.
Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment. Time Frame Baseline assessments occurred after screening and prior to the delivery of any interventions. Time Frame Postintervention assessments were conducted approximately 4 weeks following the baseline assessment. Time Frame Follow-up assessments began approximately 8 weeks after the postintervention assessment.
Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Population Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses.
Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units millivolts (mV) Units millivolts (mV) Units millivolts (mV) Units msec Units msec Units msec Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz) Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 234886577 Sequence: 234886578 Sequence: 234886579 Sequence: 234886580 Sequence: 234886581 Sequence: 234886582 Sequence: 234886583 Sequence: 234886584 Sequence: 234886585 Sequence: 234886586 Sequence: 234886587 Sequence: 234886588 Sequence: 234886589 Sequence: 234886590 Sequence: 234886591 Sequence: 234886592 Sequence: 234886593 Sequence: 234886603 Sequence: 234886594 Sequence: 234886595 Sequence: 234886596 Sequence: 234886597 Sequence: 234886598 Sequence: 234886599 Sequence: 234886600 Sequence: 234886601 Sequence: 234886602 Sequence: 234886604 Sequence: 234886605 Sequence: 234886606 Sequence: 234886607 Sequence: 234886608 Sequence: 234886609 Sequence: 234886610 Sequence: 234886611 Sequence: 234886612 Sequence: 234886613 Sequence: 234886614 Sequence: 234886615 Sequence: 234886616 Sequence: 234886617 Sequence: 234886618 Sequence: 234886619 Sequence: 234886620 Sequence: 234886621 Sequence: 234886622 Sequence: 234886623 Sequence: 234886636 Sequence: 234886624 Sequence: 234886625 Sequence: 234886626 Sequence: 234886627 Sequence: 234886628 Sequence: 234886629 Sequence: 234886630 Sequence: 234886631 Sequence: 234886632 Sequence: 234886633 Sequence: 234886634 Sequence: 234886635 Sequence: 234886637 Sequence: 234886638 Sequence: 234886639 Sequence: 234886640 Sequence: 234886641 Sequence: 234886642 Sequence: 234886643 Sequence: 234886644 Sequence: 234886645 Sequence: 234886646 Sequence: 234886647 Sequence: 234886648 Sequence: 234886649 Sequence: 234886650 Sequence: 234886651 Sequence: 234886652 Sequence: 234886653 Sequence: 234886654 Sequence: 234886655 Sequence: 234886656 Sequence: 234886657 Sequence: 234886658 Sequence: 234886659 Sequence: 234886660 Sequence: 234886661 Sequence: 234886662 Sequence: 234886663 Sequence: 234886664 Sequence: 234886665 Sequence: 234886666 Sequence: 234886667 Sequence: 234886668 Sequence: 234886669 Sequence: 234886670 Sequence: 234886671 Sequence: 234886672 Sequence: 234886673 Sequence: 234886674 Sequence: 234886675 Sequence: 234886676 Sequence: 234886677 Sequence: 234886678 Sequence: 234886679 Sequence: 234886680 Sequence: 234886681 Sequence: 234886682 Sequence: 234886683 Sequence: 234886684 Sequence: 234886685 Sequence: 234886686 Sequence: 234886687 Sequence: 234886688 Sequence: 234886689 Sequence: 234886690 Sequence: 234886691 Sequence: 234886692 Sequence: 234886693
Outcome Id 30711145 Outcome Id 30711145 Outcome Id 30711145 Outcome Id 30711146 Outcome Id 30711146 Outcome Id 30711146 Outcome Id 30711147 Outcome Id 30711147 Outcome Id 30711147 Outcome Id 30711148 Outcome Id 30711148 Outcome Id 30711148 Outcome Id 30711149 Outcome Id 30711149 Outcome Id 30711149 Outcome Id 30711150 Outcome Id 30711150 Outcome Id 30711153 Outcome Id 30711150 Outcome Id 30711151 Outcome Id 30711151 Outcome Id 30711151 Outcome Id 30711152 Outcome Id 30711152 Outcome Id 30711152 Outcome Id 30711153 Outcome Id 30711153 Outcome Id 30711154 Outcome Id 30711154 Outcome Id 30711154 Outcome Id 30711155 Outcome Id 30711155 Outcome Id 30711155 Outcome Id 30711156 Outcome Id 30711156 Outcome Id 30711156 Outcome Id 30711157 Outcome Id 30711157 Outcome Id 30711157 Outcome Id 30711158 Outcome Id 30711158 Outcome Id 30711158 Outcome Id 30711159 Outcome Id 30711159 Outcome Id 30711159 Outcome Id 30711160 Outcome Id 30711160 Outcome Id 30711164 Outcome Id 30711160 Outcome Id 30711161 Outcome Id 30711161 Outcome Id 30711161 Outcome Id 30711162 Outcome Id 30711162 Outcome Id 30711162 Outcome Id 30711163 Outcome Id 30711163 Outcome Id 30711163 Outcome Id 30711164 Outcome Id 30711164 Outcome Id 30711165 Outcome Id 30711165 Outcome Id 30711165 Outcome Id 30711166 Outcome Id 30711166 Outcome Id 30711166 Outcome Id 30711167 Outcome Id 30711167 Outcome Id 30711167 Outcome Id 30711168 Outcome Id 30711168 Outcome Id 30711168 Outcome Id 30711169 Outcome Id 30711169 Outcome Id 30711169 Outcome Id 30711170 Outcome Id 30711170 Outcome Id 30711170 Outcome Id 30711171 Outcome Id 30711171 Outcome Id 30711171 Outcome Id 30711172 Outcome Id 30711172 Outcome Id 30711172 Outcome Id 30711173 Outcome Id 30711173 Outcome Id 30711173 Outcome Id 30711174 Outcome Id 30711174 Outcome Id 30711174 Outcome Id 30711175 Outcome Id 30711175 Outcome Id 30711175 Outcome Id 30711176 Outcome Id 30711176 Outcome Id 30711176 Outcome Id 30711177 Outcome Id 30711177 Outcome Id 30711177 Outcome Id 30711178 Outcome Id 30711178 Outcome Id 30711178 Outcome Id 30711179 Outcome Id 30711179 Outcome Id 30711179 Outcome Id 30711180 Outcome Id 30711180 Outcome Id 30711180 Outcome Id 30711181 Outcome Id 30711181 Outcome Id 30711181 Outcome Id 30711182 Outcome Id 30711182 Outcome Id 30711182 Outcome Id 30711183 Outcome Id 30711183 Outcome Id 30711183
Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674 Result Group Id 55977672 Result Group Id 55977673 Result Group Id 55977674
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002
Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Title Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q). Title Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). Title Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). Title Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). Title Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). Title Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). Title Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). Title Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). Title Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). Title Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS). Title Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS). Title Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS). Title Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS). Title Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS). Title Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS). Title Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS). Title Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS). Title Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS). Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised. Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised. Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y. Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised. Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised. Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised. Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised. Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised. Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised. Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised. Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y. Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y. Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y. Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y. Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y. Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y. Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y. Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory – Form Y. Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title QT Interval Length Title QT Interval Length Title QT Interval Length Title QT Interval Length Title QT Interval Length Title QT Interval Length Title QT Interval Length Title QT Interval Length Title QT Interval Length Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect
Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS) is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS) is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS) is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS) is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS) is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS) is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS) is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS) is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS) is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Mean R wave amplitude represents ventricular depolarization. Higher magnitudes indicated increased polarity associated with an increased force of ventricular contraction. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Mean R wave amplitude represents ventricular depolarization. Higher magnitudes indicated increased polarity associated with an increased force of ventricular contraction. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Mean R wave amplitude represents ventricular depolarization. Higher magnitudes indicated increased polarity associated with an increased force of ventricular contraction. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Mean R wave amplitude represents ventricular depolarization and is measured in millivolts. Higher magnitudes indicated increased polarity associated with an increased force of ventricular contraction. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Mean R wave amplitude represents ventricular depolarization and is measured in millivolts. Higher magnitudes indicated increased polarity associated with an increased force of ventricular contraction. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Mean R wave amplitude represents ventricular depolarization and is measured in millivolts. Higher magnitudes indicated increased polarity associated with an increased force of ventricular contraction. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Mean R wave amplitude represents ventricular depolarization and is measured in millivolts. Higher magnitudes indicated increased polarity associated with an increased force of ventricular contraction. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Mean R wave amplitude represents ventricular depolarization and is measured in millivolts. Higher magnitudes indicated increased polarity associated with an increased force of ventricular contraction. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Mean R wave amplitude represents ventricular depolarization and is measured in millivolts. Higher magnitudes indicated increased polarity associated with an increased force of ventricular contraction. Description QTc prolongation was measured in msec and was assessed via 3-lead ECG. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. For detection, typical QRS width was set at 80ms and R waves were at least 300ms apart. QTc was corrected with Bazett's formula. QT interval length represents the length of ventricular depolarization and repolarization and is measured in msec. Description QTc prolongation was measured in msec and was assessed via 3-lead ECG. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. For detection, typical QRS width was set at 80ms and R waves were at least 300ms apart. QTc was corrected with Bazett's formula. QT interval length represents the length of ventricular depolarization and repolarization and is measured in msec. Description QTc prolongation was measured in msec and was assessed via 3-lead ECG. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. For detection, typical QRS width was set at 80ms and R waves were at least 300ms apart. QTc was corrected with Bazett's formula. QT interval length represents the length of ventricular depolarization and repolarization and is measured in msec. Description QTc prolongation was measured in msec and was assessed via 3-lead ECG. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. For detection, typical QRS width was set at 80ms and R waves were at least 300ms apart. QTc was corrected with Bazett's formula. QT interval length represents the length of ventricular depolarization and repolarization and is measured in msec. Description QTc prolongation was measured in msec and was assessed via 3-lead ECG. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. For detection, typical QRS width was set at 80ms and R waves were at least 300ms apart. QTc was corrected with Bazett's formula. QT interval length represents the length of ventricular depolarization and repolarization and is measured in msec. Description QTc prolongation was measured in msec and was assessed via 3-lead ECG. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. For detection, typical QRS width was set at 80ms and R waves were at least 300ms apart. QTc was corrected with Bazett's formula. QT interval length represents the length of ventricular depolarization and repolarization and is measured in msec. Description Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Description Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Description Mean scores and standard deviations were reported as a function of group and time. Single mean imputation was used to impute all missing scores to reflect a sample size of n=60 per condition (N=180 total) based on participants admitted at the beginning of the trial. The outcome analyses were based on imputed values and therefore, overall number of participants analyzed equals 60 per condition in the outcome analyses. Description High frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Increased high frequency spectral power represents increased vagal input to the heart. Description High frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Increased high frequency spectral power represents increased vagal input to the heart. Description High frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Increased high frequency spectral power represents increased vagal input to the heart. Description High frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Increased high frequency spectral power represents increased vagal input to the heart. Description High frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Increased high frequency spectral power represents increased vagal input to the heart. Description High frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Increased high frequency spectral power represents increased vagal input to the heart. Description High frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Increased high frequency spectral power represents increased vagal input to the heart. Description High frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Increased high frequency spectral power represents increased vagal input to the heart. Description High frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Increased high frequency spectral power represents increased vagal input to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect.
Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units millivolts (mV) Units millivolts (mV) Units millivolts (mV) Units millivolts (mV) Units millivolts (mV) Units millivolts (mV) Units millivolts (mV) Units millivolts (mV) Units millivolts (mV) Units msec Units msec Units msec Units msec Units msec Units msec Units msec Units msec Units msec Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz) Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean
Param Value 22.71 Param Value 22.50 Param Value 22.62 Param Value 23.55 Param Value 25.45 Param Value 25.08 Param Value 24.55 Param Value 25.55 Param Value 26.60 Param Value 4.25 Param Value 3.93 Param Value 3.96 Param Value 4.17 Param Value 2.93 Param Value 3.07 Param Value 3.74 Param Value 2.73 Param Value 105.29 Param Value 2.78 Param Value 139.42 Param Value 134.37 Param Value 134.73 Param Value 137.65 Param Value 110.96 Param Value 114.50 Param Value 129.51 Param Value 105.19 Param Value 45.59 Param Value 43.83 Param Value 43.00 Param Value 51.02 Param Value 51.09 Param Value 47.35 Param Value 46.28 Param Value 53.39 Param Value 53.18 Param Value 10.13 Param Value 7.71 Param Value 6.32 Param Value 10.40 Param Value 6.70 Param Value 2.35 Param Value 9.80 Param Value 2.81 Param Value 1.78 Param Value 3.81 Param Value 3.82 Param Value 54.63 Param Value 3.76 Param Value 3.76 Param Value 3.39 Param Value 3.60 Param Value 3.76 Param Value 3.34 Param Value 3.46 Param Value 58.87 Param Value 58.02 Param Value 58.70 Param Value 57.15 Param Value 53.05 Param Value 55.63 Param Value 51.63 Param Value 52.58 Param Value 26.35 Param Value 25.53 Param Value 25.24 Param Value 25.54 Param Value 28.57 Param Value 27.82 Param Value 26.60 Param Value 27.84 Param Value 27.98 Param Value 1.27 Param Value 1.19 Param Value 1.27 Param Value 1.32 Param Value 1.19 Param Value 1.27 Param Value 1.26 Param Value 1.14 Param Value 1.12 Param Value .38 Param Value .38 Param Value .38 Param Value .38 Param Value .39 Param Value .39 Param Value .38 Param Value .38 Param Value .38 Param Value 60.08 Param Value 57.26 Param Value 61.61 Param Value 60.15 Param Value 60.04 Param Value 60.58 Param Value 51.65 Param Value 56.60 Param Value 58.81 Param Value 1.02 Param Value .99 Param Value .72 Param Value 1.45 Param Value 1.05 Param Value .85 Param Value 1.54 Param Value 1.86 Param Value 1.32 Param Value 30.15 Param Value 29.00 Param Value 29.64 Param Value 29.63 Param Value 25.61 Param Value 25.59 Param Value 28.50 Param Value 24.24 Param Value 25.00
Param Value Num 22.71 Param Value Num 22.5 Param Value Num 22.62 Param Value Num 23.55 Param Value Num 25.45 Param Value Num 25.08 Param Value Num 24.55 Param Value Num 25.55 Param Value Num 26.6 Param Value Num 4.25 Param Value Num 3.93 Param Value Num 3.96 Param Value Num 4.17 Param Value Num 2.93 Param Value Num 3.07 Param Value Num 3.74 Param Value Num 2.73 Param Value Num 105.29 Param Value Num 2.78 Param Value Num 139.42 Param Value Num 134.37 Param Value Num 134.73 Param Value Num 137.65 Param Value Num 110.96 Param Value Num 114.5 Param Value Num 129.51 Param Value Num 105.19 Param Value Num 45.59 Param Value Num 43.83 Param Value Num 43.0 Param Value Num 51.02 Param Value Num 51.09 Param Value Num 47.35 Param Value Num 46.28 Param Value Num 53.39 Param Value Num 53.18 Param Value Num 10.13 Param Value Num 7.71 Param Value Num 6.32 Param Value Num 10.4 Param Value Num 6.7 Param Value Num 2.35 Param Value Num 9.8 Param Value Num 2.81 Param Value Num 1.78 Param Value Num 3.81 Param Value Num 3.82 Param Value Num 54.63 Param Value Num 3.76 Param Value Num 3.76 Param Value Num 3.39 Param Value Num 3.6 Param Value Num 3.76 Param Value Num 3.34 Param Value Num 3.46 Param Value Num 58.87 Param Value Num 58.02 Param Value Num 58.7 Param Value Num 57.15 Param Value Num 53.05 Param Value Num 55.63 Param Value Num 51.63 Param Value Num 52.58 Param Value Num 26.35 Param Value Num 25.53 Param Value Num 25.24 Param Value Num 25.54 Param Value Num 28.57 Param Value Num 27.82 Param Value Num 26.6 Param Value Num 27.84 Param Value Num 27.98 Param Value Num 1.27 Param Value Num 1.19 Param Value Num 1.27 Param Value Num 1.32 Param Value Num 1.19 Param Value Num 1.27 Param Value Num 1.26 Param Value Num 1.14 Param Value Num 1.12 Param Value Num 0.38 Param Value Num 0.38 Param Value Num 0.38 Param Value Num 0.38 Param Value Num 0.39 Param Value Num 0.39 Param Value Num 0.38 Param Value Num 0.38 Param Value Num 0.38 Param Value Num 60.08 Param Value Num 57.26 Param Value Num 61.61 Param Value Num 60.15 Param Value Num 60.04 Param Value Num 60.58 Param Value Num 51.65 Param Value Num 56.6 Param Value Num 58.81 Param Value Num 1.02 Param Value Num 0.99 Param Value Num 0.72 Param Value Num 1.45 Param Value Num 1.05 Param Value Num 0.85 Param Value Num 1.54 Param Value Num 1.86 Param Value Num 1.32 Param Value Num 30.15 Param Value Num 29.0 Param Value Num 29.64 Param Value Num 29.63 Param Value Num 25.61 Param Value Num 25.59 Param Value Num 28.5 Param Value Num 24.24 Param Value Num 25.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 4.71 Dispersion Value 4.81 Dispersion Value 4.07 Dispersion Value 4.30 Dispersion Value 4.50 Dispersion Value 4.57 Dispersion Value 4.74 Dispersion Value 4.09 Dispersion Value 4.48 Dispersion Value .8 Dispersion Value 1.15 Dispersion Value 1.02 Dispersion Value .64 Dispersion Value 1.20 Dispersion Value 1.23 Dispersion Value .89 Dispersion Value 1.20 Dispersion Value 28.28 Dispersion Value 1.14 Dispersion Value 23.92 Dispersion Value 30.15 Dispersion Value 28.32 Dispersion Value 20.91 Dispersion Value 33.39 Dispersion Value 30.96 Dispersion Value 23.74 Dispersion Value 32.23 Dispersion Value 17.10 Dispersion Value 13.18 Dispersion Value 13.80 Dispersion Value 16.34 Dispersion Value 11.68 Dispersion Value 14.82 Dispersion Value 17.39 Dispersion Value 10.93 Dispersion Value 15.88 Dispersion Value 9.75 Dispersion Value 13.11 Dispersion Value 12.46 Dispersion Value 9.08 Dispersion Value 11.39 Dispersion Value 13.65 Dispersion Value 8.34 Dispersion Value 12.39 Dispersion Value 12.61 Dispersion Value 0.5 Dispersion Value .45 Dispersion Value 9.31 Dispersion Value .5 Dispersion Value 0.47 Dispersion Value .69 Dispersion Value .54 Dispersion Value .52 Dispersion Value .59 Dispersion Value .40 Dispersion Value 8.42 Dispersion Value 7.84 Dispersion Value 7.90 Dispersion Value 7.39 Dispersion Value 8.22 Dispersion Value 9.45 Dispersion Value 7.00 Dispersion Value 9.71 Dispersion Value 5.76 Dispersion Value 7.10 Dispersion Value 6.46 Dispersion Value 6.36 Dispersion Value 5.64 Dispersion Value 6.69 Dispersion Value 6.44 Dispersion Value 5.85 Dispersion Value 5.26 Dispersion Value .36 Dispersion Value .31 Dispersion Value .36 Dispersion Value .32 Dispersion Value .24 Dispersion Value .36 Dispersion Value .31 Dispersion Value .26 Dispersion Value .26 Dispersion Value .02 Dispersion Value .02 Dispersion Value .02 Dispersion Value .02 Dispersion Value .01 Dispersion Value .01 Dispersion Value .02 Dispersion Value .01 Dispersion Value .01 Dispersion Value 19.56 Dispersion Value 19.78 Dispersion Value 5.87 Dispersion Value 21.20 Dispersion Value 23.46 Dispersion Value 17.52 Dispersion Value 20.56 Dispersion Value 22.83 Dispersion Value 19.68 Dispersion Value 1.55 Dispersion Value .84 Dispersion Value .53 Dispersion Value 3.51 Dispersion Value 1.17 Dispersion Value 1.02 Dispersion Value 1.99 Dispersion Value 4.64 Dispersion Value 2.84 Dispersion Value 7.46 Dispersion Value 6.88 Dispersion Value 6.60 Dispersion Value 6.67 Dispersion Value 6.99 Dispersion Value 6.89 Dispersion Value 7.96 Dispersion Value 6.24 Dispersion Value 5.82
Dispersion Value Num 4.71 Dispersion Value Num 4.81 Dispersion Value Num 4.07 Dispersion Value Num 4.3 Dispersion Value Num 4.5 Dispersion Value Num 4.57 Dispersion Value Num 4.74 Dispersion Value Num 4.09 Dispersion Value Num 4.48 Dispersion Value Num 0.8 Dispersion Value Num 1.15 Dispersion Value Num 1.02 Dispersion Value Num 0.64 Dispersion Value Num 1.2 Dispersion Value Num 1.23 Dispersion Value Num 0.89 Dispersion Value Num 1.2 Dispersion Value Num 28.28 Dispersion Value Num 1.14 Dispersion Value Num 23.92 Dispersion Value Num 30.15 Dispersion Value Num 28.32 Dispersion Value Num 20.91 Dispersion Value Num 33.39 Dispersion Value Num 30.96 Dispersion Value Num 23.74 Dispersion Value Num 32.23 Dispersion Value Num 17.1 Dispersion Value Num 13.18 Dispersion Value Num 13.8 Dispersion Value Num 16.34 Dispersion Value Num 11.68 Dispersion Value Num 14.82 Dispersion Value Num 17.39 Dispersion Value Num 10.93 Dispersion Value Num 15.88 Dispersion Value Num 9.75 Dispersion Value Num 13.11 Dispersion Value Num 12.46 Dispersion Value Num 9.08 Dispersion Value Num 11.39 Dispersion Value Num 13.65 Dispersion Value Num 8.34 Dispersion Value Num 12.39 Dispersion Value Num 12.61 Dispersion Value Num 0.5 Dispersion Value Num 0.45 Dispersion Value Num 9.31 Dispersion Value Num 0.5 Dispersion Value Num 0.47 Dispersion Value Num 0.69 Dispersion Value Num 0.54 Dispersion Value Num 0.52 Dispersion Value Num 0.59 Dispersion Value Num 0.4 Dispersion Value Num 8.42 Dispersion Value Num 7.84 Dispersion Value Num 7.9 Dispersion Value Num 7.39 Dispersion Value Num 8.22 Dispersion Value Num 9.45 Dispersion Value Num 7.0 Dispersion Value Num 9.71 Dispersion Value Num 5.76 Dispersion Value Num 7.1 Dispersion Value Num 6.46 Dispersion Value Num 6.36 Dispersion Value Num 5.64 Dispersion Value Num 6.69 Dispersion Value Num 6.44 Dispersion Value Num 5.85 Dispersion Value Num 5.26 Dispersion Value Num 0.36 Dispersion Value Num 0.31 Dispersion Value Num 0.36 Dispersion Value Num 0.32 Dispersion Value Num 0.24 Dispersion Value Num 0.36 Dispersion Value Num 0.31 Dispersion Value Num 0.26 Dispersion Value Num 0.26 Dispersion Value Num 0.02 Dispersion Value Num 0.02 Dispersion Value Num 0.02 Dispersion Value Num 0.02 Dispersion Value Num 0.01 Dispersion Value Num 0.01 Dispersion Value Num 0.02 Dispersion Value Num 0.01 Dispersion Value Num 0.01 Dispersion Value Num 19.56 Dispersion Value Num 19.78 Dispersion Value Num 5.87 Dispersion Value Num 21.2 Dispersion Value Num 23.46 Dispersion Value Num 17.52 Dispersion Value Num 20.56 Dispersion Value Num 22.83 Dispersion Value Num 19.68 Dispersion Value Num 1.55 Dispersion Value Num 0.84 Dispersion Value Num 0.53 Dispersion Value Num 3.51 Dispersion Value Num 1.17 Dispersion Value Num 1.02 Dispersion Value Num 1.99 Dispersion Value Num 4.64 Dispersion Value Num 2.84 Dispersion Value Num 7.46 Dispersion Value Num 6.88 Dispersion Value Num 6.6 Dispersion Value Num 6.67 Dispersion Value Num 6.99 Dispersion Value Num 6.89 Dispersion Value Num 7.96 Dispersion Value Num 6.24 Dispersion Value Num 5.82

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11353580 Sequence: 11353581 Sequence: 11353582 Sequence: 11353583
Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Scope overall Scope overall Scope overall Scope overall
Count 49 Count 51 Count 50 Count 150

Result Groups

Sequence: 55977665 Sequence: 55977666 Sequence: 55977667 Sequence: 55977668 Sequence: 55977669 Sequence: 55977670 Sequence: 55977671 Sequence: 55977672 Sequence: 55977673 Sequence: 55977674 Sequence: 55977675 Sequence: 55977676 Sequence: 55977677
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG002 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG002 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG002
Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event
Title Educational Brochure Title Body Project Traditional Title Body Project Expanded Title Total Title Educational Brochure Title Body Project Traditional Title Body Project Expanded Title Educational Brochure Title Body Project Traditional Title Body Project Expanded Title Educational Brochure Title Body Project Traditional Title Body Project Expanded
Description Participants will read an educational brochure from the National Eating Disorder Association and will receive referral resources.

Educational Brochure: Participants will read an educational brochure from the National Eating Disorders Association and will receive treatment referral resources.

Description Participants will complete group therapy for 1-hour per week for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project group therapy program (Stice & Shaw, 2001).

Body Project Traditional: Participants will complete a 1-hour per week group therapy program for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project Traditional group therapy program (see Stice & Shaw, 2001).

Description Participants will complete group therapy for 1-hour per week for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project Expanded group therapy program (Green et al., 2017).

Body Project Expanded: Participants will complete a 1-hour per week group therapy program for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project Expanded group therapy program (see Green et al., 2017).

Description Total of all reporting groups Description Participants will read an educational brochure from the National Eating Disorder Association and will receive referral resources.

Educational Brochure: Participants will read an educational brochure from the National Eating Disorders Association and will receive treatment referral resources.

Description Participants will complete group therapy for 1-hour per week for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project group therapy program (Stice & Shaw, 2001).

Body Project Traditional: Participants will complete a 1-hour per week group therapy program for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project Traditional group therapy program (see Stice & Shaw, 2001).

Description Participants will complete group therapy for 1-hour per week for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project Expanded group therapy program (Green et al., 2017).

Body Project Expanded: Participants will complete a 1-hour per week group therapy program for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project Expanded group therapy program (see Green et al., 2017).

Description Participants will read an educational brochure from the National Eating Disorder Association and will receive referral resources.

Educational Brochure: Participants will read an educational brochure from the National Eating Disorders Association and will receive treatment referral resources.

Description Participants will complete group therapy for 1-hour per week for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project group therapy program (Stice & Shaw, 2001).

Body Project Traditional: Participants will complete a 1-hour per week group therapy program for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project Traditional group therapy program (see Stice & Shaw, 2001).

Description Participants will complete group therapy for 1-hour per week for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project Expanded group therapy program (Green et al., 2017).

Body Project Expanded: Participants will complete a 1-hour per week group therapy program for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project Expanded group therapy program (see Green et al., 2017).

Description Participants will read an educational brochure from the National Eating Disorder Association and will receive referral resources.

Educational Brochure: Participants will read an educational brochure from the National Eating Disorders Association and will receive treatment referral resources.

Description Participants will complete group therapy for 1-hour per week for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project group therapy program (Stice & Shaw, 2001).

Body Project Traditional: Participants will complete a 1-hour per week group therapy program for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project Traditional group therapy program (see Stice & Shaw, 2001).

Description Participants will complete group therapy for 1-hour per week for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project Expanded group therapy program (Green et al., 2017).

Body Project Expanded: Participants will complete a 1-hour per week group therapy program for 4 weeks consisting of the Body Project Expanded group therapy program (see Green et al., 2017).

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 125269444 Sequence: 125269434 Sequence: 125269435 Sequence: 125269436 Sequence: 125269437 Sequence: 125269438 Sequence: 125269439 Sequence: 125269440 Sequence: 125269441 Sequence: 125269442 Sequence: 125269443 Sequence: 125269445 Sequence: 125269446 Sequence: 125269447 Sequence: 125269448 Sequence: 125269449 Sequence: 125269450 Sequence: 125269451 Sequence: 125269452 Sequence: 125269453 Sequence: 125269454 Sequence: 125269455 Sequence: 125269456 Sequence: 125269457 Sequence: 125269458 Sequence: 125269459 Sequence: 125269460 Sequence: 125269461 Sequence: 125269462 Sequence: 125269463 Sequence: 125269464 Sequence: 125269465 Sequence: 125269466 Sequence: 125269467 Sequence: 125269468 Sequence: 125269469 Sequence: 125269470 Sequence: 125269471 Sequence: 125269472 Sequence: 125269473 Sequence: 125269474 Sequence: 125269475 Sequence: 125269476 Sequence: 125269477 Sequence: 125269478 Sequence: 125269479 Sequence: 125269480 Sequence: 125269481 Sequence: 125269482 Sequence: 125269483 Sequence: 125269484 Sequence: 125269485 Sequence: 125269486 Sequence: 125269487 Sequence: 125269488 Sequence: 125269489 Sequence: 125269490 Sequence: 125269491 Sequence: 125269492 Sequence: 125269493 Sequence: 125269494 Sequence: 125269495 Sequence: 125269496 Sequence: 125269497 Sequence: 125269498 Sequence: 125269499 Sequence: 125269500 Sequence: 125269501 Sequence: 125269502 Sequence: 125269503 Sequence: 125269504 Sequence: 125269505 Sequence: 125269506 Sequence: 125269507 Sequence: 125269508 Sequence: 125269509 Sequence: 125269510 Sequence: 125269511 Sequence: 125269512 Sequence: 125269513 Sequence: 125269514 Sequence: 125269515 Sequence: 125269516 Sequence: 125269517 Sequence: 125269518 Sequence: 125269519 Sequence: 125269520 Sequence: 125269521 Sequence: 125269522 Sequence: 125269523 Sequence: 125269524 Sequence: 125269525 Sequence: 125269526 Sequence: 125269527 Sequence: 125269528 Sequence: 125269529
Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668 Result Group Id 55977665 Result Group Id 55977666 Result Group Id 55977667 Result Group Id 55977668
Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG003
Classification United States Classification United States Classification United States Classification United States
Category Male Category Female Category Female Category Female Category Female Category Male Category Male Category Male Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category Asian Category Asian Category Asian Category Asian Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category White Category White Category White Category White Category More than one race Category More than one race Category More than one race Category More than one race Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported
Title Sex: Female, Male Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Region of Enrollment Title Region of Enrollment Title Region of Enrollment Title Region of Enrollment Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Title Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Title Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Title Body Shape Questionnaire Title Body Shape Questionnaire Title Body Shape Questionnaire Title Body Shape Questionnaire Title Social Comparison Rating Scale Title Social Comparison Rating Scale Title Social Comparison Rating Scale Title Social Comparison Rating Scale Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire Title Self-Objectification Questionnaire Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale Revised Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale Revised Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale Revised Title Ideal Body Stereotype Scale Revised Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y Title State Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Positive Affect Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title Mean R Wave Amplitude Title QTc Prolongation Title QTc Prolongation Title QTc Prolongation Title QTc Prolongation Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Title Positive and Negative Affect Scale – Negative Affect Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Vagal Cardiac Tone – High Frequency Spectral Power Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency/High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency/High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency/High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio Title Sympathetic Cardiac Tone – Low Frequency/High Frequency Spectral Power Ratio
Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is designed to assess global feelings of self-worth. The RSE includes 10 items (e.g. "I feel that I'm a person of worth'') rated on a four-point scale (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree). A total score represents the sum of individual item responses. Scores range from 10 to 40 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self-esteem. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The 28-item Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire global score was used to measure eating disorder symptomatology. Participants report symptomatology over the past 28 days on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (no days) to 6 (everyday). The EDE-Q contains 4 subscales: Restraint, Weight Concern, Eating Concern, and Shape Concern. Subscale scores are calculated by finding the averages of the subscale items. A global score is also calculated by averaging the subscale scores. Scores range from 0 to 6; higher scores indicate higher levels of eating disorder pathology. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) was used to measure body dissatisfaction in the present trial. The BSQ is a 34-item scale. Items are measured on a 6-point Likert scale designed to assess the frequency of negative body-related thoughts (1= never, 6 = always). Individual items are summed to compute an overall score. Scores on this scale range from 34 to 204. Higher scores indicate higher frequency of negative body-related thoughts and higher levels of body dissatisfaction. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Social Comparison Rating Scale (SCRS is an 11-item scale used to assess perception of social rank and social comparison tendencies in the present trial. The scale consists of a series of bipolar adjectives (e.g., inferior/superior) separated by the numbers 1 through 10. For each adjective pair, participants are asked to rank themselves in comparison to others. A score around 60 indicates a person, on average, sees themselves approximately equal to others. Higher scores indicate higher levels of favorable social comparison and higher perceived social rank. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Self-Objectification Questionnaire (SOQ) is a 10-item self-report inventory designed to assess the relative importance of body competence versus body appearance in sense of self. Participants rank appearance- versus competence-based attributes from 0 to 9 with higher scores representing higher importance. An overall trait self-objectification score is computed by summing competence and appearance ratings and subtracting the sum of competence ratings from the sum of appearance ratings. Resulting scores range from -25 to 25. Higher scores denote higher levels of trait self-objectification. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The Ideal Body Stereotype Scale – Revised was used to assess the extent to which participants internalized the cultural feminine thin-ideal. The IBSS-R is a self-report inventory which asks participants to report their level of agreement with 6 statements which indicate what attractive women look like on a 5-point scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Responses are averaged to compute a total score. Scores ranges from 1 to 5; higher scores indicate higher levels of thin-ideal internalization. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The State Trait Anxiety Inventory- Form Y (STAI) is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess level of trait anxiety in the present study. Each item consists of a statement which assesses feelings of anxiety or relaxation on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). Responses to individual items are summed to create an overall score. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Description Mean R wave amplitude was determined via a 3-lead ECG and was measured in millivolts (mV). The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. A total of 5 minutes and 30 seconds of ECG data were collected to allow for artifact trimming. Artifacts were flagged by experimenters during data collection. Description QTc prolongation was measured in msec and was assessed via 3-lead ECG. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. For detection, typical QRS width was set at 80ms and R waves were at least 300ms apart. QTc was corrected with Bazett's formula. Description QTc prolongation was measured in msec and was assessed via 3-lead ECG. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. For detection, typical QRS width was set at 80ms and R waves were at least 300ms apart. QTc was corrected with Bazett's formula. Description QTc prolongation was measured in msec and was assessed via 3-lead ECG. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. For detection, typical QRS width was set at 80ms and R waves were at least 300ms apart. QTc was corrected with Bazett's formula. Description QTc prolongation was measured in msec and was assessed via 3-lead ECG. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. For detection, typical QRS width was set at 80ms and R waves were at least 300ms apart. QTc was corrected with Bazett's formula. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that used to measure positive and negative affect. Items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very slightly) to 5 (extremely) which measures the extent to which the client has experienced that affect over the past week. The 10 positive and 10 negative items are summed separately to create a positive affect score and a negative affect score respectively. Each score ranges between 0 and 50 with higher scores indicating higher positive or negative affect. Description Vagal tone was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Description Vagal tone was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Description Vagal tone was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Description Vagal tone was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis of 3-lead ECG data and was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. ECG data were analyzed via PowerLab LabChart 8 software. Maximum frequency was set at 0.5 Hz with number of frequencies at 500. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart. Description Low frequency to high frequency spectral power was assessed via heart rate variability (HRV) power spectral analysis. This index was reported in normalized units. The ECG signal was acquired via PowerLab 16/35 psychophysiological data acquisition system with a sampling rate of 1000 Hz. Hardware setup included an ECG100C amplifier with a 35Hz LPN filter and a .5Hz HP filter. LF spectral power ranged from 0.04-0.15 Hz. HF spectral power ranged from 0.15-0.45 Hz. The ratio is designed to assess degree of sympathetic innervation to the heart.
Units Participants Units years Units years Units years Units years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units mV Units mV Units mV Units mV Units msec Units msec Units msec Units msec Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units Normalized units: HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz) Units ratio: LF (watts/HZ) / HF (watts/Hz)
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean
Param Value 0 Param Value 22.48 Param Value 23.95 Param Value 21.73 Param Value 22.75 Param Value 49 Param Value 51 Param Value 50 Param Value 150 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 1 Param Value 3 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 6 Param Value 10 Param Value 42 Param Value 42 Param Value 38 Param Value 122 Param Value 4 Param Value 3 Param Value 1 Param Value 8 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 3 Param Value 5 Param Value 49 Param Value 51 Param Value 50 Param Value 150 Param Value 22.71 Param Value 22.50 Param Value 22.62 Param Value 22.61 Param Value 4.25 Param Value 3.93 Param Value 3.96 Param Value 4.04 Param Value 139.42 Param Value 134.37 Param Value 134.73 Param Value 136.17 Param Value 45.59 Param Value 43.83 Param Value 43.00 Param Value 44.15 Param Value 10.13 Param Value 7.71 Param Value 6.32 Param Value 8.07 Param Value 3.81 Param Value 3.82 Param Value 3.76 Param Value 3.79 Param Value 58.87 Param Value 58.02 Param Value 58.70 Param Value 58.52 Param Value 26.35 Param Value 25.53 Param Value 25.24 Param Value 25.71 Param Value 1.27 Param Value 1.19 Param Value 1.24 Param Value 1.23 Param Value .38 Param Value .38 Param Value .38 Param Value .38 Param Value 30.15 Param Value 29.00 Param Value 29.64 Param Value 29.59 Param Value 60.08 Param Value 57.26 Param Value 61.61 Param Value 58.51 Param Value 1.02 Param Value .99 Param Value .72 Param Value .91
Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 22.48 Param Value Num 23.95 Param Value Num 21.73 Param Value Num 22.75 Param Value Num 49.0 Param Value Num 51.0 Param Value Num 50.0 Param Value Num 150.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 10.0 Param Value Num 42.0 Param Value Num 42.0 Param Value Num 38.0 Param Value Num 122.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 49.0 Param Value Num 51.0 Param Value Num 50.0 Param Value Num 150.0 Param Value Num 22.71 Param Value Num 22.5 Param Value Num 22.62 Param Value Num 22.61 Param Value Num 4.25 Param Value Num 3.93 Param Value Num 3.96 Param Value Num 4.04 Param Value Num 139.42 Param Value Num 134.37 Param Value Num 134.73 Param Value Num 136.17 Param Value Num 45.59 Param Value Num 43.83 Param Value Num 43.0 Param Value Num 44.15 Param Value Num 10.13 Param Value Num 7.71 Param Value Num 6.32 Param Value Num 8.07 Param Value Num 3.81 Param Value Num 3.82 Param Value Num 3.76 Param Value Num 3.79 Param Value Num 58.87 Param Value Num 58.02 Param Value Num 58.7 Param Value Num 58.52 Param Value Num 26.35 Param Value Num 25.53 Param Value Num 25.24 Param Value Num 25.71 Param Value Num 1.27 Param Value Num 1.19 Param Value Num 1.24 Param Value Num 1.23 Param Value Num 0.38 Param Value Num 0.38 Param Value Num 0.38 Param Value Num 0.38 Param Value Num 30.15 Param Value Num 29.0 Param Value Num 29.64 Param Value Num 29.59 Param Value Num 60.08 Param Value Num 57.26 Param Value Num 61.61 Param Value Num 58.51 Param Value Num 1.02 Param Value Num 0.99 Param Value Num 0.72 Param Value Num 0.91
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 3.63 Dispersion Value 5.73 Dispersion Value 4.08 Dispersion Value 4.65 Dispersion Value 4.71 Dispersion Value 4.81 Dispersion Value 4.07 Dispersion Value 4.53 Dispersion Value 0.8 Dispersion Value 1.15 Dispersion Value 1.02 Dispersion Value 1.00 Dispersion Value 23.92 Dispersion Value 30.15 Dispersion Value 28.32 Dispersion Value 27.55 Dispersion Value 17.10 Dispersion Value 13.18 Dispersion Value 13.80 Dispersion Value 14.75 Dispersion Value 9.75 Dispersion Value 13.11 Dispersion Value 12.46 Dispersion Value 11.91 Dispersion Value 0.5 Dispersion Value .45 Dispersion Value 0.5 Dispersion Value .48 Dispersion Value 8.42 Dispersion Value 7.84 Dispersion Value 7.90 Dispersion Value 7.84 Dispersion Value 5.76 Dispersion Value 7.10 Dispersion Value 6.46 Dispersion Value 6.45 Dispersion Value .36 Dispersion Value .31 Dispersion Value .37 Dispersion Value .35 Dispersion Value .02 Dispersion Value .02 Dispersion Value .02 Dispersion Value .02 Dispersion Value 7.46 Dispersion Value 6.88 Dispersion Value 6.60 Dispersion Value 6.97 Dispersion Value 19.56 Dispersion Value 19.78 Dispersion Value 5.87 Dispersion Value 16.90 Dispersion Value 1.55 Dispersion Value .84 Dispersion Value .53 Dispersion Value 1.18
Dispersion Value Num 3.63 Dispersion Value Num 5.73 Dispersion Value Num 4.08 Dispersion Value Num 4.65 Dispersion Value Num 4.71 Dispersion Value Num 4.81 Dispersion Value Num 4.07 Dispersion Value Num 4.53 Dispersion Value Num 0.8 Dispersion Value Num 1.15 Dispersion Value Num 1.02 Dispersion Value Num 1.0 Dispersion Value Num 23.92 Dispersion Value Num 30.15 Dispersion Value Num 28.32 Dispersion Value Num 27.55 Dispersion Value Num 17.1 Dispersion Value Num 13.18 Dispersion Value Num 13.8 Dispersion Value Num 14.75 Dispersion Value Num 9.75 Dispersion Value Num 13.11 Dispersion Value Num 12.46 Dispersion Value Num 11.91 Dispersion Value Num 0.5 Dispersion Value Num 0.45 Dispersion Value Num 0.5 Dispersion Value Num 0.48 Dispersion Value Num 8.42 Dispersion Value Num 7.84 Dispersion Value Num 7.9 Dispersion Value Num 7.84 Dispersion Value Num 5.76 Dispersion Value Num 7.1 Dispersion Value Num 6.46 Dispersion Value Num 6.45 Dispersion Value Num 0.36 Dispersion Value Num 0.31 Dispersion Value Num 0.37 Dispersion Value Num 0.35 Dispersion Value Num 0.02 Dispersion Value Num 0.02 Dispersion Value Num 0.02 Dispersion Value Num 0.02 Dispersion Value Num 7.46 Dispersion Value Num 6.88 Dispersion Value Num 6.6 Dispersion Value Num 6.97 Dispersion Value Num 19.56 Dispersion Value Num 19.78 Dispersion Value Num 5.87 Dispersion Value Num 16.9 Dispersion Value Num 1.55 Dispersion Value Num 0.84 Dispersion Value Num 0.53 Dispersion Value Num 1.18
Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150 Number Analyzed 49 Number Analyzed 51 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 150

Ipd Information Types

Sequence: 3325504 Sequence: 3325505 Sequence: 3325506 Sequence: 3325507 Sequence: 3325508
Name Study Protocol Name Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) Name Informed Consent Form (ICF) Name Clinical Study Report (CSR) Name Analytic Code

]]>

<![CDATA[ Maxillomandibular Advancement in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796078
2018-04-30

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796078
NCT03796078https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796078?tab=tableAdaia Valls-Ontañón, PhDavalls@institutomaxilofacial.com+34933 933 185ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To study the correlation between pharyngeal airway volume (PAV), the clinical indicators of obstructive sleep apnea (AHI, ESS), and the impact of orthognathic surgery on them.

METHODS: A prospective, descriptive, unicentric study carried out by a multidisciplinary team to evaluate the following parameters in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery at Maxillofacial institute Teknon medical center.

During the study period:

Record of the type, magnitude and direction of surgical movements of the maxillofacial complex made during the surgery (Day 0-Month 1).

Assessment of PAS/PAV stability (relapse) at short term (1 month).

3D PAV assessment by cranial voxel-based superimposition protocol before and one month and 12 months after orthognathic surgery.

Household polysomnography (PSG) registry/ apnea-hypopnea index (Day 0, Month 1 and Month 12). (AHI evaluation bu neurophysiologist)
Assessment of the clinical indicators of obstructive sleep apnea at day 0, month 1 and month 12:, blood pressure (mm Hg) , and daytime hypersomnia test (Epworth sleepiness scale, ESS) (Day 0, Month 1 and Month 12).
Record of body mass index (BMI) (cm/Kg2)

Main Objective:

• Evaluate the impact of orthognathic surgery (bimaxillary or monomaxillary) and its movements on the PAV and the clinical indicators of OSA.

Specific objectives:

• Interrelate the degree of dentofacial deformity with the IAH.

Study the potential correlation between the volume of the VAS and the IAH.
Correlate the type, direction and magnitude of the surgical movements of the maxillofacial complex with PAV/PAS increase Correlate the type, direction and magnitude of the surgical movements of the maxillofacial complex with the cure of OSA (household PSG AHI assessment) and the following clinical indicators of OSA: diurnal hypersomnia test (ESD, ESS).
Evaluate negative effects of either maxillary or mandibular surgical movements in PAS/PAV increase and the cures of OSA.

Evaluate negative effects of either maxillary or mandibular surgical movements in the improvement of the clinical symptoms and the cure of OSA.

To study the possible effect of surgical complications on PAS/PAV stability at long term and the clinical symptoms of OSA.
Demonstrate that maxillomandibular surgery is a defined, predictable and a definitive cure for OSA.
Demonstrate that skeletal, linear, and cross-sectional volume parameters remain stable at long-term.
Demonstrate that AHI and OSA-related parameters stay stable at long term after mono- or bimaxillary surgery.

Hypothesis

H1a: Maxillomandibular advancement (orthognathic surgery) does correlate with the volume of the upper airway, at both short or long term.
H2a: Maxillomandibular advancement (orthognathic surgery) does correlate with the clinical indicators of obstructive sleep apnea, at both short or long term.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-16
Start Month Year April 30, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year January 1, 2024
Verification Month Year May 2023
Verification Date 2023-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-05-16

Facilities

Sequence: 199057016
Status Recruiting
Name Institute of Maxillofacial Surgery, Teknon Medical Center
City Barcelona
Zip 08022
Country Spain

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 27991443 Sequence: 27991444
Facility Id 199057016 Facility Id 199057016
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Maria Giralt-Hernando, MSC Name Adaia Valls-Ontañón, PhD
Email avalls@institutomaxilofacial.com
Phone +34933 933 185 Phone +34933 933 185
Phone Extension 112 Phone Extension 112

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18259945
Facility Id 199057016
Role Principal Investigator
Name Federico Hernández-Alfaro, PhD

Conditions

Sequence: 51910350 Sequence: 51910351 Sequence: 51910352 Sequence: 51910353
Name OSA Name OSAS Name Apnea, Obstructive Sleep Name Orthognathic Surgery
Downcase Name osa Downcase Name osas Downcase Name apnea, obstructive sleep Downcase Name orthognathic surgery

Id Information

Sequence: 39954133
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value OSAS-OS

Countries

Sequence: 42346745
Name Spain
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55317748 Sequence: 55317749 Sequence: 55317750
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator
Title Bimaxillary surgery (MMA) Title monomaxillary surgery (Isolated MaxS) Title monomandibullary surgery (Isolated MandS)
Description Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery. MMA Description Monomaxillary surgery (Isolated MaxS) Description Monomandibular surgery (Isolated MandS)

Interventions

Sequence: 52224950 Sequence: 52224951 Sequence: 52224952
Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Procedure
Name Maxillomandibular advancement Name monomaxillary surgery (isolated MaxS) Name monomandibullary surgery (MandS)
Description Treatment: Mono or Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery. The surgery of Reposition of the jaws is carried out under general anesthesia using minimally invasive techniques, the patient is extubated After surgery, antibiotics are prescribed during admission, anti-inflammatories, antiemetics and a local cold mask is applied of closed circuit at 17ºCelsius. The patient is discharged at 24 h. Description Monomaxillary surgery (Isolated MaxS): The surgery of Reposition of the maxilla is carried out under general anesthesia using minimally invasive techniques, the patient is extubated After surgery, antibiotics are prescribed during admission, anti-inflammatories, antiemetics and a local cold mask is applied of closed circuit at 17ºCelsius. The patient is discharged at 24 h. Description Monomandibullary surgery (Isolated MandS): The surgery of Reposition of the maxilla is carried out under general anesthesia using minimally invasive techniques, the patient is extubated After surgery, antibiotics are prescribed during admission, anti-inflammatories, antiemetics and a local cold mask is applied of closed circuit at 17ºCelsius. The patient is discharged at 24 h.

Keywords

Sequence: 79454243 Sequence: 79454244
Name OSA Name orthognathic surgery
Downcase Name osa Downcase Name orthognathic surgery

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176482914 Sequence: 176482915 Sequence: 176482916 Sequence: 176482917 Sequence: 176482918 Sequence: 176482919 Sequence: 176482920 Sequence: 176482921
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Upper airway volume change Measure Pharyngeal airway space (amount of movement) Measure Direction of movement (advancement or setback) Measure Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) assessment Measure Blood pressure changes Measure Body mass index (BMI) Measure Lowest oxygen saturation 90% (LSat 90%) Measure Epworth sleepiness scale test (ESS)
Time Frame Evaluated before surgery (Day 0), 1 month after surgery (Month 1) and 12 months after surgery (Month 12). Time Frame Evaluated before surgery (Day 0), 1 month after surgery (Month 1) and 12 months after surgery (Month 12). Time Frame Evaluated before surgery (Day 0), 1 month after surgery (Month 1) and 12 months after surgery (Month 12). Time Frame Evaluated before surgery (Day 0), 1 month after surgery (Month 1) and 12 months after surgery (Month 12). Time Frame Evaluated before surgery (Day 0), 1 month after surgery (Month 1) and 12 months after surgery (Month 12). Time Frame Evaluated before surgery (Day 0), 1 month after surgery (Month 1) and 12 months after surgery (Month 12). Time Frame Evaluated before surgery (Day 0), 1 month after surgery (Month 1) and 12 months after surgery (Month 12). Time Frame Evaluated before surgery (Day 0), 1 month after surgery (Month 1) and 12 months after surgery (Month 12).
Description Evaluation of volume change of the pharyngeal airway before (Day 0) and month (Month 1) and 12 months (Month 12) comparing the three-dimensional measurements of maxillary /bimaxillary surgery by conical beam computed tomography superposition. Cubic millimeters (mm^3 will be used to evaluate this outcome) Description Evaluation of the amount of movement (pharyngeal airway space increase) before (Day 0) and month (Month 1) and 12 months (Month 12) comparing the three-dimensional measurements of maxillary /bimaxillary surgery by conical beam computed tomography superposition. Millimeters will be used to determine this outcome Description Evaluation of the direction of movement (advancement or setback) and its impact (negative/positive) in the total upper airway volume change, before (Day 0) and month (Month 1) and 12 months (Month 12) comparing the three-dimensional measurements of maxillary /bimaxillary surgery by conical beam computed tomography superposition. Millimetres will be used to determine this outcome. Description Evaluation of clinical indicators of obstructive sleep apnea: Apnea-hypopnea index by polysomnography evaluated before surgery (Day 0), 1 month after surgery (Month 1) and 12 months after surgery (Month 12). AHI scale: Mild OSA 5-15/ moderate OSA: 15-30/ severe OSA: >30 events/hour. A higher score means a worse outcome. Description Evaluation of clinical indicators of obstructive sleep apnea: blood pressure change evaluated before surgery (Day 0), 1 month after surgery (Month 1) and 12 months after surgery (Month 12). Systolic and diastolic pressures will be both recorded. Mean cardiac frequency will be obtained.

Evaluation of clinical indicators of obstructive sleep apnea: blood pressure change evaluated before surgery (Day 0), 1 month after surgery (Month 1) and 12 months after surgery (Month 12). Systolic and diastolic pressures will be both recorded. Mean cardiac frequency will be obtained.

Evaluation of clinical indicators of obstructive sleep apnea: blood pressure change evaluated before surgery (Day 0), 1 month after surgery (Month 1) and 12 months after surgery (Month 12). Systolic and diastolic pressures will be both recorded. Mean cardiac frequency will be obtained. Assessed in mm Hg

Description Evaluation of Body mass index (e.g., weight in kilograms, height in m) change before surgery (Day 0), 1 month after surgery (Month 1) and 12 months after surgery (Month 12). (e.g., weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2). Description Evaluation of clinical indicators of obstructive sleep apnea: lowest oxygen saturation (90%) change evaluated before surgery (Day 0), 1 month after surgery (Month 1) and 12 months after surgery (Month 12). Description The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a scale intended to measure daytime sleepiness that is measured by use of a very short questionnaire. Used clinically to screen for the manifestations of the behavioral morbidity associated to obstructive sleep apnea, first used by Johns, 1991.

The ESS asks people to rate, on a four-point scale, their usual chances of falling asleep in eight different situations. These must be answered beyond 4 punctuations ranges depending on: 0 = would never doze, 1 = slight chance of dozing, 2 = moderate chance of dozing or 3 = high chance of dozing. The total ESS score is the sum of item-scores and ranges between 0 and 24; the higher the score, the higher the person's level sleepines. A score of 10-12 is suggested as the cutoff among clinic populations being screened for a sleep disorder.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192438336 Sequence: 192438337 Sequence: 192438338 Sequence: 192438339 Sequence: 192438340 Sequence: 192438341 Sequence: 192438342 Sequence: 192438343 Sequence: 192438344 Sequence: 192438345
Mesh Term Apnea Mesh Term Sleep Apnea, Obstructive Mesh Term Respiration Disorders Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases Mesh Term Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory Mesh Term Sleep Apnea Syndromes Mesh Term Sleep Disorders, Intrinsic Mesh Term Dyssomnias Mesh Term Sleep Wake Disorders Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term apnea Downcase Mesh Term sleep apnea, obstructive Downcase Mesh Term respiration disorders Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases Downcase Mesh Term signs and symptoms, respiratory Downcase Mesh Term sleep apnea syndromes Downcase Mesh Term sleep disorders, intrinsic Downcase Mesh Term dyssomnias Downcase Mesh Term sleep wake disorders Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48073446
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Centro Medico Teknon

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29131987 Sequence: 29131988
Role Study Chair Role Principal Investigator
Name Federico Hernández-Alfaro, PhD Name Adaia Valls-Ontañón, PhD
Affiliation Institute of Maxillofacial Surgery, Teknon Medical Center Affiliation Institute of Maxillofacial Surgery, Teknon Medical Center

Central Contacts

Sequence: 11951908 Sequence: 11951909
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Maria Giralt-Hernando, PhD Name Adaia Valls-Ontañón, PhD
Phone +34933 933 185 Phone +34933 933 185
Email mgiralt@uic.es Email avalls@institutomaxilofacial.com
Phone Extension 112 Phone Extension 112
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67816450 Sequence: 67816451 Sequence: 67816452
Design Group Id 55317748 Design Group Id 55317749 Design Group Id 55317750
Intervention Id 52224950 Intervention Id 52224951 Intervention Id 52224952

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30610336
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients over 18 years of age who present any kind of dentofacial deformity candidates for orthognathic surgery treatment.
Growth of the maxillofacial complex completed.
Patients without uncontrolled cardio-pulmonary disease.
Patients willing to understand the procedures of the study and that agree to give their signed informed consent.
Patients who commit to perform the postoperative controls for at least one postoperative year.
Patients with a good general condition of health, confirmed by pre-operative study and assessment by Anaesthesiology (ASA).

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with a clinical history in which any surgery would be contraindicated
Patients with any facial Syndromic malformation
Patients who have undergone chemotherapy or radiotherapy during the last 5 years, including area of head and neck.
Patients who refuse to accept the clinical conditions of the study and are not willing to sign the form corresponding informed consent.
Patients who are expected to lack adherence to follow-up or to the treatment.
Treatment with bisphosphonates or Denosumab (Prolia®).

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253951448
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 7

Designs

Sequence: 30357580
Allocation Non-Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26546547
Intervention Id 52224950
Name MMA (maxillomandibular advancement)

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2571007 Sequence: 2571008
Document Type Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan Document Type Informed Consent Form
Has Protocol True Has Protocol False
Has Icf False Has Icf True
Has Sap True Has Sap False
Document Date 2017-10-30 Document Date 2017-10-30
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/78/NCT03796078/Prot_SAP_002.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/78/NCT03796078/ICF_003.pdf

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28729449
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Dr. Federico Hernández-Alfaro MD, DDS, PhD, FEBOMS
Title Chief Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department
Affiliation Centro Medico Teknon

Study References

Sequence: 51797494 Sequence: 51797495 Sequence: 51797496
Pmid 31673361 Pmid 33171114 Pmid 33632574
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Giralt-Hernando M, Valls-Ontanon A, Guijarro-Martinez R, Masia-Gridilla J, Hernandez-Alfaro F. Impact of surgical maxillomandibular advancement upon pharyngeal airway volume and the apnoea-hypopnoea index in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019 Oct 9;6(1):e000402. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000402. eCollection 2019. Citation Giralt-Hernando M, Valls-Ontanon A, Haas Junior OL, Masia-Gridilla J, Hernandez-Alfaro F. What are the Surgical Movements in Orthognathic Surgery That Most Affect the Upper Airways? A Three-Dimensional Analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Feb;79(2):450-462. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.10.017. Epub 2020 Oct 15. Citation Hernandez-Alfaro F, Giralt-Hernando M, Brabyn PJ, Haas OL Jr, Valls-Ontanon A. Variation between natural head orientation and Frankfort horizontal planes in orthognathic surgery patients: 187 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Sep;50(9):1226-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Addressing Mental Health Disparities in Refugee Children ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796065
2018-08-27

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796065
NCT03796065https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796065?tab=tableNANANAThe proposed study will employ a cross-cultural Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach to build from prior needs assessments and mixed-methods research to evaluate the effectiveness of the Family Strengthening Intervention for Refugees (FSI-R), a preventative family home-based visiting intervention intended to mitigate mental health disparities among refugee children and families using a hybrid implementation-effectiveness design. Results of the investigator’s trial will expand the evidence-base on community-based interventions for refugees and has the potential to be replicated to reduce mental health disparities affecting diverse groups of refugee children and families.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-08
Start Month Year August 27, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year June 30, 2022
Verification Month Year February 2023
Verification Date 2023-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20852498
Description Using a CBPR approach, a family based prevention model, the Family Strengthening Intervention for Refugees (FSI-R) was adapted from a tested model used in Africa and designed for delivery by refugee community health workers with through a process involving stakeholder consultation and local refugee Community Advisory Board input. Pilot data on the FSI-R demonstrates strong feasibility and acceptability, but further data are needed on effectiveness as well as barriers and facilitators to implementation by community health workers embedded in refugee-serving social services agencies. Specific aims are to (1) examine the impact of a family-based preventive intervention on outcomes of parent-child relationships, family functioning, and child mental health using a Hybrid Type 2 Effectiveness-Implementation Design (families with children aged 7-17 in a two-arm randomized controlled trial); (2) identify barriers and facilitators to implementation of the FSI-R by community health workers by conducting a process evaluation concurrent with the delivery of the intervention; and (3) strengthen the science of community engagement to address health disparities by fortifying CBPR-based pathways of change via collaborative partnerships between refugee communities, service providers, and academic stakeholders.

Facilities

Sequence: 201290271 Sequence: 201290272
Name Maine Immigrant and Refugee Services Name Jewish Family Service
City Lewiston City Springfield
State Maine State Massachusetts
Zip 04240 Zip 01108
Country United States Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52508014
Name Family Research
Downcase Name family research

Id Information

Sequence: 40399523
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 18.251.01

Countries

Sequence: 42835837
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55964500 Sequence: 55964501
Group Type Experimental Group Type No Intervention
Title FSI-R Treatment Title FSI-R Control
Description Families randomized into the FSI-R Treatment arm will receive the 10-module Family Strengthening Intervention in addition to any outside services or programs they are participating in. Description Families randomized into the FSI-R Control arm will not receive the FSI-R treatment. Instead, they will continue with their usual care, referred to as Treatment as Usual (TAU).

Interventions

Sequence: 52815941
Intervention Type Behavioral
Name FSI-R Treatment
Description The FSI-R involves a series of separate and joint meetings with parents and children to discuss challenges the family has faced and the strengths that helped them make it through past challenging times. Additional psychoeducation on mental health and promoting resilience along with coaching to enhance parenting skills is provided throughout and may be tailored to family needs. The FSI-R provides a shared space for refugee families both to recognize their strengths and to problem-solve in a more collective way on family challenges and shared hopes for the future. The FSI-R is delivered in the home, by a trained interventionist, over the course of 10-modules.

Keywords

Sequence: 80325870 Sequence: 80325871 Sequence: 80325872 Sequence: 80325873 Sequence: 80325874 Sequence: 80325875 Sequence: 80325876
Name refugees Name parental self-efficacy Name family communication Name family connectedness Name refugee youth Name youth functioning Name integration
Downcase Name refugees Downcase Name parental self-efficacy Downcase Name family communication Downcase Name family connectedness Downcase Name refugee youth Downcase Name youth functioning Downcase Name integration

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178632828 Sequence: 178632829 Sequence: 178632830 Sequence: 178632831 Sequence: 178632832 Sequence: 178632833
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change in conflict via the Family Conflict Scale Measure Change in communication via the Revised Parent- Adolescent Communication Form Measure Change in family conflict via the Intergenerational Conflict Index Measure Change in parenting via the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire Measure Change in youth externalizing behaviors via the African Youth Psychosocial Assessment Measure Change in youth depression via the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale
Time Frame T1 (Baseline), T2 (approximately 24-months post-baseline), T3 (6-months follow-up from T2) Time Frame T1 (Baseline), T2 (approximately 24-months post-baseline), T3 (6-months follow-up from T2) Time Frame T1 (Baseline), T2 (approximately 24-months post-baseline), T3 (6-months follow-up from T2) Time Frame T1 (Baseline), T2 (approximately 24-months post-baseline), T3 (6-months follow-up from T2) Time Frame T1 (Baseline), T2 (approximately 24-months post-baseline), T3 (6-months follow-up from T2) Time Frame T1 (Baseline), T2 (approximately 24-months post-baseline), T3 (6-months follow-up from T2)
Description The Family Conflict Scale utilizes a 7-point Likert Scale (0-6) to assess family conflict within the past month. Higher scores reflect greater family conflict. Description Utilizes a 5-point Likert scale (1-5) to assess parent-child communication. Greater scores indicate higher communication between parents and their children. Description Utilizes a 5-point Likert scale (1-5) to assess intergenerational congruence across several domains of the parent-child relationship. Higher scores denote greater intergenerational congruence. Description Likert scale (1-5) that includes 5 sub-domains. Each sub-domain results in a summed score that relates to 5 domains of parenting: involvement, positive parenting, poor monitoring/supervision, inconsistent discipline, and corporal punishment. Description This assessment utilizes a 4-point Likert scale (1-4) to assess for externalizing problems in youth with greater scores reflecting greater conduct problems. Description This measures utilizes a 4-point Likert scale (0-3) to assess depression in youth with higher scores indicated increasing levels of depression. The time frame referenced is "during the past week".

Sponsors

Sequence: 48630935
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Boston College

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29461098
Role Principal Investigator
Name Theresa Betancourt, ScD
Affiliation Boston College

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68607891
Design Group Id 55964500
Intervention Id 52815941

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30957296
Gender All
Minimum Age 7 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria for families:

being a resettled refugee family
having one or more school-aged children living in the home (aged 7-17)

Inclusion Criteria for parents/caregivers:

be aged 18 or older
cares for and lives in the same household of the children at least 50% of the time
is the child'd legal guardian

Exclusion Criteria:

not meeting the above inclusion criteria
families in the midst of a crisis (e.g. active suicide attempts)

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253957500
Number Of Facilities 2
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 46
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 7
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 4
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30702872
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Prevention
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Masking Description The Research Assistants (RAs) who will collect both qualitative and quantitative data will be blind to the condition in which study participants are randomized.
Intervention Model Description The investigators will conduct a Randomized Controlled Trial among Somali Bantu and Bhutanese families (N=300; 150 per group). Half of the families will be randomized to receive the FSI-R and half will be randomized to the control condition where the participants will receive Treatment as Usual (TAU).
Caregiver Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26841657
Intervention Id 52815941
Name Family Strengthening Intervention for Refugees

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29069629
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Study Determining Safety and Efficacy of Avena Sativa (Oat) Skincare Products for Treating Skin Dryness and Itching in Cancer Patients ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796052
2019-05-23

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796052
NCT03796052https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796052?tab=tableNANANAThis study will test the safety and efficacy of three topical agents containing oat kernel flour to determine how well they relieve skin dryness and itching related to cancer therapies. Participants will receive a body wash, a body cream, and an anti-itch balm to use at home for 4-6 weeks.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-11-04
Start Month Year May 23, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 18, 2019
Verification Month Year October 2020
Verification Date 2020-10-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-11-04

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20716326
Description Many patients undergoing cancer therapies experience skin reactions like dry skin, rash, redness, itchiness, and hyperpigmentation. Dry skin and itching are especially common for those undergoing chemotherapy and targeted treatments.

Skincare products containing Avena sativa (oat) kernel flour have a long history of tolerance and efficacy in treating various skin conditions involving pruritus (itching) and xerosis (dry skin), as Avena sativa (oat) kernel flour is known for its skin protectant properties and soothing effects on skin. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a regimen of three topical agents containing Avena sativa (oat) kernel flour for cancer patients experiencing mild to moderate pruritus and/or xerosis.

Participants will received the products at Baseline (Visit 1) and return to the clinical site at Week 5 +/- 1 week for Visit 2. In addition, questionnaires will be completed remotely between Baseline and Visit 2.

Facilities

Sequence: 200053453
Name Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
City New York
State New York
Zip 10022
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52156570 Sequence: 52156571
Name Ichthyosis Name Pruritus
Downcase Name ichthyosis Downcase Name pruritus

Id Information

Sequence: 40148257
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value CCSSKA000844

Countries

Sequence: 42557793
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55577973
Group Type Experimental
Title Avena Sativa Skincare Regimen
Description Avena sativa-containing body wash, body cream, and anti-itch balm

Interventions

Sequence: 52472076
Intervention Type Other
Name Avena Sativa Skincare Regimen
Description Regimen consisting of 3 topical agents containing Avena Sativa (oat) kernel flour: a body wash (type = cosmetic), a body cream (type = cosmetic), and an anti-itch balm (type = OTC monograph drug with 0.5% Pramoxine HCl)

Keywords

Sequence: 79848192 Sequence: 79848193 Sequence: 79848194 Sequence: 79848195
Name Pruritis Name Itching Name Dryness Name Xerosis
Downcase Name pruritis Downcase Name itching Downcase Name dryness Downcase Name xerosis

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328320 Sequence: 177328336 Sequence: 177328321 Sequence: 177328322 Sequence: 177328323 Sequence: 177328324 Sequence: 177328325 Sequence: 177328326 Sequence: 177328327 Sequence: 177328328 Sequence: 177328329 Sequence: 177328330 Sequence: 177328337 Sequence: 177328331 Sequence: 177328332 Sequence: 177328333 Sequence: 177328334 Sequence: 177328335 Sequence: 177328338 Sequence: 177328339 Sequence: 177328340 Sequence: 177328341 Sequence: 177328342
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in CTCAE Grading of Xerosis Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Flakiness Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in CTCAE Grading of Pruritus Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Overall Xerosis Grading Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Overall Pruritus Grading Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Overall Irritation Assessment Measure Frequency Distribution for Overall Tolerance at Visit 2 – Subject Rating Measure Frequency Distribution for Overall Tolerance at Visit 2 – Investigator Rating Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in PRO-CTCAE Skin Dryness Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in PRO-CTCAE Itching Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skindex-16 Global Score Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skindex-16 Emotional Subscale Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Itchiness Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skindex-16 Symptoms Subscale Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skindex-16 Functional Subscale Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skin Moisture Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Skin Water Loss Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Dryness Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Roughness Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Smoothness Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Softness Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Comfort Measure Mean Change from Baseline to Visit 2 in Self-Assessment of Overall Look/Feel
Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week Time Frame Baseline to Week 5 +/- 1 week
Description The investigator will evaluate subjects for overall xerosis (skin dryness) using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading scale. For xerosis, the scale ranges from 1 (dryness covering less 10% of body surface area and no associated erythema or pruritus) to 3 (dryness covering greater than 30% of body surface area and associated with itching; limits daily self care activities of daily living). A "0" grade will be used to document subjects with no presence of the CTCAE skin adverse event symptoms for xerosis. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description Subjects will be asked to rate their overall skin flakiness on a scale of 1 (flaking very apparent) to 10 (no visible flaking). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description The investigator will evaluate subjects for overall pruritus (skin itching) using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grading scale. For pruritus, the scale ranges from 1 (Mild or localized; topical intervention indicated) to 3 (widespread and constant itching; limits daily self-care activities or sleep). A "0" grade will be used to document subjects with no presence of the CTCAE skin adverse event symptoms for pruritus. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description The investigator will evaluate subjects for overall xerosis (skin dryness) using a 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description The investigator will question subjects for overall pruritus (skin itching) using a 0 (none) to 3 (severe) scale. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description The investigator will evaluate subjects for overall irritation using a 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) scale. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description The subject will rate how well he/she tolerated the study regimen using the following choices: Well tolerated, tolerated, or not tolerated. Description The investigator will rate how well the participant tolerated the study regimen using the following choices: Well tolerated, tolerated, or not tolerated. Description The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) will be completed for Skin Dryness. The question asks subjects to rate the severity of their dry skin at its worst over the last 7 days from None to Very Severe on a 5-point scale. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) will be completed for Itching. The question asks subjects to rate the severity of their itchy skin at its worst over the last 7 days from None to Very Severe on a 5-point scale. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description The Skindex-16 is a dermatology-specific quality of life measuring tool. (The SKINDEX contact information and permission to use: Mapi Research Trust, Lyon, France. Internet: https://eprovide.mapi-trust.org). It contains 16 questions that ask subjects to rate how often over the last 7 days they have been bothered by various skin conditions on a scale of 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered). The global score is the average score for all questions and is transformed to a linear scale ranging from 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered) so a higher score indicates a lower quality of life. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description The Skindex-16 is a dermatology-specific quality of life measuring tool (The SKINDEX contact information and permission to use: Mapi Research Trust, Lyon, France. Internet: https://eprovide.mapi-trust.org). It contains 16 questions that ask subjects to rate how often over the last 7 days have they been bothered by various skin conditions on a scale of 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered). The Emotional subscale looks at the average score of questions 5-11 regarding emotion; the emotional score is transformed to a linear scale ranging from 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered) so a higher score indicates a lower quality of life. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description Subjects will be asked to rate their overall skin itchiness on a scale of 1 (very itchy) to 10 (not at all itchy). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 weeks). Description The Skindex-16 is a dermatology-specific quality of life measuring tool (The SKINDEX contact information and permission to use: Mapi Research Trust, Lyon, France. Internet: https://eprovide.mapi-trust.org). It contains 16 questions that ask subjects to rate how often over the last 7 days have they been bothered by various skin conditions on a scale of 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered). The Symptoms subscale looks at the average score of questions 1-4 individual responses regarding symptoms; the symptoms score is transformed to a linear scale ranging from 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered) so a higher score indicates a lower quality of life. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description The Skindex-16 is a dermatology-specific quality of life measuring tool (The SKINDEX contact information and permission to use: Mapi Research Trust, Lyon, France. Internet: https://eprovide.mapi-trust.org). It contains 16 questions that ask subjects to rate how often over the last 7 days have they been bothered by various skin conditions on a scale of 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered). The Functional subscale looks at the average score of questions 12 – 16 regarding daily functioning; the functional score is transformed to a linear scale ranging from 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered) so a higher score indicates a lower quality of life. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description Skin moisture will be measured with a Corneometer, with values ranging from 0 (no moisture) to 120 (most moisturized) arbitrary units. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description The amount of water lost through the skin will be measured with a Vapometer. Higher numbers indicate more water loss. Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description Subjects will be asked to rate their overall skin dryness on a scale of 1 (very dry) to 10 (skin feels moisturized). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description Subjects will be asked to rate their overall skin roughness/texture on a scale of 1 (very rough) to 10 (not at all rough). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 weeks). Description Subjects will be asked to rate their overall skin smoothness on a scale of 1 (not at all smooth) to 10 (very smooth). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description Subjects will be asked to rate their overall skin softness on a scale of 1 (not at all soft) to 10 (very soft). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description Subjects will be asked to rate their overall skin comfort on a scale of 1 (uncomfortable/irritated) to 10 (very comfortable/not at all irritated). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week). Description Subjects will be asked to rate the overall look and feel of their skin on a scale of 1 (not healthy looking) to 10 (healthy looking). Baseline will be compared to the subjects' final visit (Week 5 +/- 1 week).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193432306 Sequence: 193432299 Sequence: 193432300 Sequence: 193432301 Sequence: 193432302 Sequence: 193432303 Sequence: 193432304 Sequence: 193432305
Mesh Term Keratosis Mesh Term Ichthyosis Mesh Term Pruritus Mesh Term Skin Diseases Mesh Term Skin Manifestations Mesh Term Skin Abnormalities Mesh Term Congenital Abnormalities Mesh Term Infant, Newborn, Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term keratosis Downcase Mesh Term ichthyosis Downcase Mesh Term pruritus Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases Downcase Mesh Term skin manifestations Downcase Mesh Term skin abnormalities Downcase Mesh Term congenital abnormalities Downcase Mesh Term infant, newborn, diseases
Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306153
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (J&JCI)

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29277976
Role Principal Investigator
Name Mario Lacouture, M.D.
Affiliation Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130947
Design Group Id 55577973
Intervention Id 52472076

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757397
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 75 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

able to read, write, speak, and understand English
has signed Informed Consent including Photograph Release

has a prior diagnosis of a solid or hematologic tumor and either:

is currently undergoing therapy with a systemic agent and has completed at least 3 cycles without severe skin reactions.
has received therapy with a systemic agent in the past 28 days.
is greater than 1 year status post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
is undergoing one or more types of cancer treatment that are commonly known to cause mild to moderate skin reactions such as rash, dryness, and/or itching
is diagnosed with mild to moderate skin dryness (xerosis) and/or itching (pruritus).
is capable of all self-care and is up and mobile at least 50% of the day
intends to complete the study and is willing/able to follow all study instructions.

Exclusion Criteria:

has known allergies or sensitivity to skincare products or study product ingredients.
has other skin conditions or diseases that the investigator thinks would interfere with the study or put the subject at higher risk (e.g. immunosuppressive diseases, skin infections, etc.)
has severe skin dryness, itching, or rash.
is undergoing radiation therapy.
is undergoing chemotherapy or adjuntive therapies known to commonly cause complex or severe skin reactions.
has uncontrolled diabetes.
is pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study.
is participating in another study for which the participant is receiving a treatment or therapy (observational studies are okay).
is an employee or family member of the investigator, study site, or Sponsor.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254228941
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 6
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 75
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 5
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 18

Designs

Sequence: 30503622
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description All participants will receive the same study regimen consisting of 3 products: a body wash, a body cream, and an anti-itch balm.

Links

Sequence: 4386998
Url https://filehosting-v2.pharmacm.com/api/Attachment/Download?tenantId=80217051&amp;parentIdentifier=CCSSKA000844&amp;attachmentIdentifier=48eeefb6-abfc-4be4-87ec-7d1620ff69d8&amp;fileName=CCSSKA000844_Ribbons_Clinical_Study_Report_Synopsis_14OCT2020.pdf&amp;versionIdentifier=
Description Related Info

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869900
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52049452 Sequence: 52049453 Sequence: 52049454 Sequence: 52049455 Sequence: 52049456 Sequence: 52049457 Sequence: 52049458 Sequence: 52049459 Sequence: 52049460 Sequence: 52049461 Sequence: 52049462 Sequence: 52049463
Pmid 17373175 Pmid 25607551 Pmid 27272074 Pmid 18461339 Pmid 23204849 Pmid 7165009 Pmid 19995367 Pmid 11443481 Pmid 26994263
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Kurtz ES, Wallo W. Colloidal oatmeal: history, chemistry and clinical properties. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007 Feb;6(2):167-70. Citation Fowler JF Jr. Colloidal oatmeal formulations and the treatment of atopic dermatitis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014 Oct;13(10):1180-3; quiz 1184-5. Citation Ilnytska O, Kaur S, Chon S, Reynertson KA, Nebus J, Garay M, Mahmood K, Southall MD. Colloidal Oatmeal <em>(Avena Sativa)</em> Improves Skin Barrier Through Multi-Therapy Activity. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016 Jun 1;15(6):684-90. Citation Sur R, Nigam A, Grote D, Liebel F, Southall MD. Avenanthramides, polyphenols from oats, exhibit anti-inflammatory and anti-itch activity. Arch Dermatol Res. 2008 Nov;300(10):569-74. doi: 10.1007/s00403-008-0858-x. Epub 2008 May 7. Citation Criquet M, Roure R, Dayan L, Nollent V, Bertin C. Safety and efficacy of personal care products containing colloidal oatmeal. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2012;5:183-93. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S31375. Epub 2012 Nov 8. Citation Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55. No abstract available. Citation Elman S, Hynan LS, Gabriel V, Mayo MJ. The 5-D itch scale: a new measure of pruritus. Br J Dermatol. 2010 Mar;162(3):587-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09586.x. Epub 2009 Dec 1. Citation Chren MM, Lasek RJ, Sahay AP, Sands LP. Measurement properties of Skindex-16: a brief quality-of-life measure for patients with skin diseases. J Cutan Med Surg. 2001 Mar-Apr;5(2):105-10. doi: 10.1007/BF02737863. Epub 2001 Mar 21. Citation Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). (2018, Mar 01). Retrieved from https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm Citation The PRO-CTCAE Measurement System. (2018, Sep 14). Retrieved from https://healthcaredelivery.cancer.gov/pro-ctcae/measurement.html Citation Blume-Peytavi U, Kottner J, Sterry W, Hodin MW, Griffiths TW, Watson RE, Hay RJ, Griffiths CE. Age-Associated Skin Conditions and Diseases: Current Perspectives and Future Options. Gerontologist. 2016 Apr;56 Suppl 2:S230-42. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw003. Citation Skin Conditions. (2012, Jun 26). Retrieved from https://www.cancer.net/navigating-cancer-care/side-effects/skin-conditions

]]>

<![CDATA[ Stand if You Can: A Standing Intervention in Long Term Care ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796039
2019-04-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796039
NCT03796039https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796039?tab=tableNANANAIt is currently unknown if reducing sitting time, an activity that is highly prevalent in frail older adults living in long term care (LTC) facilities, is associated with an improvement in physical capacity such as walking speed. Simple tasks such as walking speed is associated with important outcomes for residents in LTC such as autonomy and hospitalization. The investigators hypothesize that standing an additional 100 minutes per week for 5 months will result in a clinically meaningful improvement in walking speed (0.1m/sec) in LTC residents compared to residents receiving a sitting social activity.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-20
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-06-27
Start Month Year April 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 23, 2020
Verification Month Year May 2023
Verification Date 2023-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-06-27
Results First Posted Date 2021-07-06

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20731200
Description LTC facilities from Moncton and Fredericton will be recruited, with half of the LTC facilities randomized as the intervention and half as the control group. The investigators are aiming to enrol half of the LTC in Fredericton and half in Moncton. A total of 88 residents (44 in the control group, 44 in the intervention group) will be enrolled in the program.

Facilities

Sequence: 200215712
Name Pine Grove Nursing Home
City Fredericton
State New Brunswick
Zip E3B 2J2
Country Canada

Conditions

Sequence: 52196216 Sequence: 52196217 Sequence: 52196218
Name Frailty Name Sedentary Behavior Name Physical Disability
Downcase Name frailty Downcase Name sedentary behavior Downcase Name physical disability

Id Information

Sequence: 40177499
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value CAT2018-15

Countries

Sequence: 42591363
Name Canada
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55621908 Sequence: 55621909
Group Type Experimental Group Type No Intervention
Title Standing and Social Intervention Title Control Group
Description Participants be exposed to an additional 100 minutes of standing per week. Participants will do this by standing for 20 minutes Monday through Friday. Description Control group will receive social visits, but no exposure to standing

Interventions

Sequence: 52511030
Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Standing
Description Standing for an additional 100 minutes per week; 20 minutes Monday-Friday

Keywords

Sequence: 79905351 Sequence: 79905352
Name Long Term Care Name Physical Function
Downcase Name long term care Downcase Name physical function

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177472274 Sequence: 177472275 Sequence: 177472276 Sequence: 177472277 Sequence: 177472278 Sequence: 177472279 Sequence: 177472280 Sequence: 177472281 Sequence: 177472282 Sequence: 177472283 Sequence: 177472284 Sequence: 177472285 Sequence: 177472286 Sequence: 177472287
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Changes in Walking Speed Measure Change in Balance Measure Change in Leg Strength Measure Change Lower Limb Power Measure Change in Anxiety Symptoms Measure Depression Measure Loneliness Measure Fall Efficacy Measure Rate of Falls Measure Metabolic Profile – Triglycerides Measure Social Behaviours Measure Metabolic Profile – High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Measure Metabolic Profile – Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Measure Metabolic Profile – Blood Glucose
Time Frame Pre and post intervention testing Time Frame Pre and post testing (following the 5 month intervention). Data was collected but investigators are still analyzing findings. Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (following the 5 month intervention) Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (following the 5 month intervention) Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (following the 5 month intervention) Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (following the 5 month intervention) Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (following the 5 month intervention) Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (following the 5 month intervention) Time Frame The number of falls will be collected from three timeframes: 1. Between 6 months prior to and the start of program 2. the duration of the program (5 months) 3. From the end of the program to 6 months follow up. Data is still being analyzed at this time. Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (before and following the 5 month intervention). Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (following the 5-month intervention). Data has been collected, but is still being analyzed Time Frame Pre and post testing (before and after the 5-month intervention) Time Frame Pre-Post intervention (before and after 5-month intervention) Time Frame Pre-Post Intervention (before and after 5-month intervention)
Description Measured by the 10m walking speed test Description Measured by a portable device (Wii Balance board), which has sensors that detects sway . Description Using hand-held dynamometer to quantify leg strength through knee extension Description Using the 30second sit-stand test following senior fitness test protocol Description The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (Scale 0-20). A low score means a better outcome. Description Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (0-15 scale). Lower score is better outcome. Description Loneliness was measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale (20-80). A low score indicates a better outcome Description Falls Efficacy Scale-International Questionnaire (16-64 scale). Low score indicates a better score Description Falls, injuries due to falls and hospitalization will be collected at 3 timepoints Description Capillary blood analyzed with a cardiochek device. Blood collected via a finger prick and analyzed with a cardiochek device. Note that Total Cholesterol, HDL, Triglycerides, LDL and Glucose were all measured using the cardiochek device. Description Semi-structured interviews with residents (participants and non-participants), family members and staff will be administered at the end of the study Description High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was analyzed using the CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA). A finger prick was conducted using a single use lancet and approximately 60 µL of whole blood was collected for this test. Description Low-density lipoprotein was assessed using a CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA). Description Fasted blood glucose was analyzed using a CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193582011 Sequence: 193582012
Mesh Term Frailty Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term frailty Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48342339 Sequence: 48342340 Sequence: 48342341 Sequence: 48342342 Sequence: 48342343
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class UNKNOWN Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University of New Brunswick Name Horizon Health Network Name St. Thomas University Name Universite de Moncton Name Canadian Frailty Network

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68184471
Design Group Id 55621908
Intervention Id 52511030

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30779945
Gender All
Minimum Age N/A
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Resident at one of the selected LTC facilities;
Able to provide consent or have a power of attorney agree on behalf of a resident to participate in the study;
Able to walk for ten meters, with or without a walking aid; The main outcome is walking speed performed for a distance of 10 meters. Therefore, we want everyone who participates in the study to be able to complete the test at baseline. This way we can answer the main research question, while adhering to our sample size calculation.

Exclusion Criteria:

If Identified by staff at the facility as too high risk for falling by participating in the intervention.

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253974905
Number Of Facilities 1
Number Of Nsae Subjects 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 9
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 15
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 13

Designs

Sequence: 30526046
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Supportive Care
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Masking Description Investigator was masked at pre-testing. It was unknown which participants would be receiving the intervention. However, due to resources this was not repeated at post testing
Intervention Model Description Long term care (LTC) facilities will be recruited, with half of the LTC facilities randomized as the intervention (n=2) and half as the control group (n=2).
Investigator Masked True

Drop Withdrawals

Sequence: 29004831 Sequence: 29004832 Sequence: 29004833 Sequence: 29004834
Result Group Id 56113141 Result Group Id 56113142 Result Group Id 56113141 Result Group Id 56113142
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Reason Death Reason Death Reason Withdrawal by Subject Reason Withdrawal by Subject
Count 2 Count 1 Count 7 Count 4

Milestones

Sequence: 41028181 Sequence: 41028182 Sequence: 41028183 Sequence: 41028184 Sequence: 41028185 Sequence: 41028186
Result Group Id 56113141 Result Group Id 56113142 Result Group Id 56113141 Result Group Id 56113142 Result Group Id 56113141 Result Group Id 56113142
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Count 50 Count 47 Count 41 Count 42 Count 9 Count 5

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3922904

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 74040275 Sequence: 74040276 Sequence: 74040277 Sequence: 74040278 Sequence: 74040279 Sequence: 74040280 Sequence: 74040281 Sequence: 74040282 Sequence: 74040283 Sequence: 74040284 Sequence: 74040285 Sequence: 74040286 Sequence: 74040287 Sequence: 74040288 Sequence: 74040289 Sequence: 74040290 Sequence: 74040291 Sequence: 74040292 Sequence: 74040293 Sequence: 74040294 Sequence: 74040295 Sequence: 74040296
Outcome Id 30820885 Outcome Id 30820885 Outcome Id 30820887 Outcome Id 30820887 Outcome Id 30820888 Outcome Id 30820888 Outcome Id 30820889 Outcome Id 30820889 Outcome Id 30820890 Outcome Id 30820890 Outcome Id 30820891 Outcome Id 30820891 Outcome Id 30820892 Outcome Id 30820892 Outcome Id 30820894 Outcome Id 30820894 Outcome Id 30820896 Outcome Id 30820896 Outcome Id 30820897 Outcome Id 30820897 Outcome Id 30820898 Outcome Id 30820898
Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 50 Count 47 Count 50 Count 47 Count 50 Count 47 Count 20 Count 25 Count 20 Count 25 Count 20 Count 25 Count 20 Count 25 Count 32 Count 38 Count 32 Count 38 Count 32 Count 38 Count 32 Count 38

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2581659
Document Type Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True
Has Icf False
Has Sap True
Document Date 2020-05-01
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/39/NCT03796039/Prot_SAP_000.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 27956176 Sequence: 27956177 Sequence: 27956178 Sequence: 27956179 Sequence: 27956180 Sequence: 27956181
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 50 Subjects At Risk 50 Subjects At Risk 50 Subjects At Risk 47 Subjects At Risk 47 Subjects At Risk 47
Created At 2023-08-09 05:38:27.102685 Created At 2023-08-09 05:38:27.102685 Created At 2023-08-09 05:38:27.102685 Created At 2023-08-09 05:38:27.102685 Created At 2023-08-09 05:38:27.102685 Created At 2023-08-09 05:38:27.102685
Updated At 2023-08-09 05:38:27.102685 Updated At 2023-08-09 05:38:27.102685 Updated At 2023-08-09 05:38:27.102685 Updated At 2023-08-09 05:38:27.102685 Updated At 2023-08-09 05:38:27.102685 Updated At 2023-08-09 05:38:27.102685

Reported Events

Sequence: 528513020 Sequence: 528513021
Result Group Id 56113145 Result Group Id 56113146
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Time Frame During trial (5 months) Time Frame During trial (5 months)
Event Type other Event Type other
Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 50 Subjects At Risk 47
Event Count 1 Event Count 0
Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Adverse Event Term Fall Adverse Event Term Fall
Frequency Threshold 2 Frequency Threshold 2
Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28892352
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Danielle Bouchard
Title Associate Investigator
Affiliation University of New Brunswick

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3853648
Pi Employee No

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3853613
Organization University of New Brunswick
Name Dr. Danielle Bouchard
Phone (506) 443-3908
Email dboucha1@unb.ca

Outcomes

Sequence: 30820885 Sequence: 30820886 Sequence: 30820887 Sequence: 30820888 Sequence: 30820889 Sequence: 30820890 Sequence: 30820891 Sequence: 30820892 Sequence: 30820893 Sequence: 30820894 Sequence: 30820895 Sequence: 30820896 Sequence: 30820897 Sequence: 30820898
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary
Title Changes in Walking Speed Title Change in Balance Title Change in Leg Strength Title Change Lower Limb Power Title Change in Anxiety Symptoms Title Depression Title Loneliness Title Fall Efficacy Title Rate of Falls Title Metabolic Profile – Triglycerides Title Social Behaviours Title Metabolic Profile – High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Title Metabolic Profile – Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Title Metabolic Profile – Blood Glucose
Description Measured by the 10m walking speed test Description Measured by a portable device (Wii Balance board), which has sensors that detects sway . Description Using hand-held dynamometer to quantify leg strength through knee extension Description Using the 30second sit-stand test following senior fitness test protocol Description The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (Scale 0-20). A low score means a better outcome. Description Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (0-15 scale). Lower score is better outcome. Description Loneliness was measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale (20-80). A low score indicates a better outcome Description Falls Efficacy Scale-International Questionnaire (16-64 scale). Low score indicates a better score Description Falls, injuries due to falls and hospitalization will be collected at 3 timepoints Description Capillary blood analyzed with a cardiochek device. Blood collected via a finger prick and analyzed with a cardiochek device. Note that Total Cholesterol, HDL, Triglycerides, LDL and Glucose were all measured using the cardiochek device. Description Semi-structured interviews with residents (participants and non-participants), family members and staff will be administered at the end of the study Description High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was analyzed using the CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA). A finger prick was conducted using a single use lancet and approximately 60 µL of whole blood was collected for this test. Description Low-density lipoprotein was assessed using a CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA). Description Fasted blood glucose was analyzed using a CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA).
Time Frame Pre and post intervention testing Time Frame Pre and post testing (following the 5 month intervention). Data was collected but investigators are still analyzing findings. Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (following the 5 month intervention) Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (following the 5 month intervention) Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (following the 5 month intervention) Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (following the 5 month intervention) Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (following the 5 month intervention) Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (following the 5 month intervention) Time Frame The number of falls will be collected from three timeframes: 1. Between 6 months prior to and the start of program 2. the duration of the program (5 months) 3. From the end of the program to 6 months follow up. Data is still being analyzed at this time. Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (before and following the 5 month intervention). Time Frame Pre-Post Testing (following the 5-month intervention). Data has been collected, but is still being analyzed Time Frame Pre and post testing (before and after the 5-month intervention) Time Frame Pre-Post intervention (before and after 5-month intervention) Time Frame Pre-Post Intervention (before and after 5-month intervention)
Population Only participants with MMSE score greater than or equal to 18 were included (to ensure participants had the cognitive abilities to respond to the questionnaires) Population Only participants with a MMSE score of 18 or higher were included Population Participants only included if MMSE score is equal to or greater than 18. Population This was only measured among participants who had a MMSE score of 18 or higher (to ensure they had the cognitive capacity to properly answer the questionnaire) Population Blood draws were difficult among this population due to participant agitation, therefore we were not able to collect blood for all participants Population Research assistants were not able to collect blood data for all participants (due to participant agitation or refusal) Population Research assistants were not able to collect blood data for all participants (due to participant agitation or refusal) Population Research assistants were not able to collect blood data for all participants (due to participant agitation or refusal)
Anticipated Posting Date 2024-09-01 Anticipated Posting Date 2024-09-01 Anticipated Posting Date 2024-09-01
Anticipated Posting Month Year 09/2024 Anticipated Posting Month Year 09/2024 Anticipated Posting Month Year 09/2024
Units m/s Units kg Units Number of repetitions Units units on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units mmol/L Units mmol/L Units mmol/L Units mmol/L
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 235804563 Sequence: 235804564 Sequence: 235804565 Sequence: 235804554 Sequence: 235804555 Sequence: 235804556 Sequence: 235804557 Sequence: 235804558 Sequence: 235804559 Sequence: 235804560 Sequence: 235804561 Sequence: 235804562 Sequence: 235804532 Sequence: 235804533 Sequence: 235804534 Sequence: 235804535 Sequence: 235804536 Sequence: 235804537 Sequence: 235804538 Sequence: 235804539 Sequence: 235804540 Sequence: 235804541 Sequence: 235804542 Sequence: 235804543 Sequence: 235804544 Sequence: 235804545 Sequence: 235804546 Sequence: 235804547 Sequence: 235804548 Sequence: 235804549 Sequence: 235804550 Sequence: 235804551 Sequence: 235804552 Sequence: 235804553 Sequence: 235804566 Sequence: 235804567 Sequence: 235804568 Sequence: 235804569 Sequence: 235804570 Sequence: 235804571 Sequence: 235804572 Sequence: 235804573 Sequence: 235804574 Sequence: 235804575
Outcome Id 30820894 Outcome Id 30820896 Outcome Id 30820896 Outcome Id 30820891 Outcome Id 30820891 Outcome Id 30820892 Outcome Id 30820892 Outcome Id 30820892 Outcome Id 30820892 Outcome Id 30820894 Outcome Id 30820894 Outcome Id 30820894 Outcome Id 30820885 Outcome Id 30820885 Outcome Id 30820885 Outcome Id 30820885 Outcome Id 30820887 Outcome Id 30820887 Outcome Id 30820887 Outcome Id 30820887 Outcome Id 30820888 Outcome Id 30820888 Outcome Id 30820888 Outcome Id 30820888 Outcome Id 30820889 Outcome Id 30820889 Outcome Id 30820889 Outcome Id 30820889 Outcome Id 30820890 Outcome Id 30820890 Outcome Id 30820890 Outcome Id 30820890 Outcome Id 30820891 Outcome Id 30820891 Outcome Id 30820896 Outcome Id 30820896 Outcome Id 30820897 Outcome Id 30820897 Outcome Id 30820897 Outcome Id 30820897 Outcome Id 30820898 Outcome Id 30820898 Outcome Id 30820898 Outcome Id 30820898
Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144 Result Group Id 56113143 Result Group Id 56113144
Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Classification Post Classification Pre Classification Pre Classification Post Classification Post Classification Pre Classification Pre Classification Post Classification Post Classification Pre Classification Pre Classification Post Classification Pre Classification Pre Classification Post Classification Post Classification Pre Classification Pre Classification Post Classification Post Classification Pre Classification Pre Classification Post Classification Post Classification Pre Classification Pre Classification Post Classification Post Classification Pre Classification Pre Classification Post Classification Post Classification Pre Classification Pre Classification Post Classification Post Classification Pre Classification Pre Classification Post Classification Post Classification Pre Classification Pre Classification Post Classification Post
Title Metabolic Profile – Triglycerides Title Metabolic Profile – High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Title Metabolic Profile – High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Title Loneliness Title Loneliness Title Fall Efficacy Title Fall Efficacy Title Fall Efficacy Title Fall Efficacy Title Metabolic Profile – Triglycerides Title Metabolic Profile – Triglycerides Title Metabolic Profile – Triglycerides Title Changes in Walking Speed Title Changes in Walking Speed Title Changes in Walking Speed Title Changes in Walking Speed Title Change in Leg Strength Title Change in Leg Strength Title Change in Leg Strength Title Change in Leg Strength Title Change Lower Limb Power Title Change Lower Limb Power Title Change Lower Limb Power Title Change Lower Limb Power Title Change in Anxiety Symptoms Title Change in Anxiety Symptoms Title Change in Anxiety Symptoms Title Change in Anxiety Symptoms Title Depression Title Depression Title Depression Title Depression Title Loneliness Title Loneliness Title Metabolic Profile – High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Title Metabolic Profile – High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Title Metabolic Profile – Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Title Metabolic Profile – Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Title Metabolic Profile – Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Title Metabolic Profile – Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Title Metabolic Profile – Blood Glucose Title Metabolic Profile – Blood Glucose Title Metabolic Profile – Blood Glucose Title Metabolic Profile – Blood Glucose
Description Capillary blood analyzed with a cardiochek device. Blood collected via a finger prick and analyzed with a cardiochek device. Note that Total Cholesterol, HDL, Triglycerides, LDL and Glucose were all measured using the cardiochek device. Description High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was analyzed using the CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA). A finger prick was conducted using a single use lancet and approximately 60 µL of whole blood was collected for this test. Description High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was analyzed using the CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA). A finger prick was conducted using a single use lancet and approximately 60 µL of whole blood was collected for this test. Description Loneliness was measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale (20-80). A low score indicates a better outcome Description Loneliness was measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale (20-80). A low score indicates a better outcome Description Falls Efficacy Scale-International Questionnaire (16-64 scale). Low score indicates a better score Description Falls Efficacy Scale-International Questionnaire (16-64 scale). Low score indicates a better score Description Falls Efficacy Scale-International Questionnaire (16-64 scale). Low score indicates a better score Description Falls Efficacy Scale-International Questionnaire (16-64 scale). Low score indicates a better score Description Capillary blood analyzed with a cardiochek device. Blood collected via a finger prick and analyzed with a cardiochek device. Note that Total Cholesterol, HDL, Triglycerides, LDL and Glucose were all measured using the cardiochek device. Description Capillary blood analyzed with a cardiochek device. Blood collected via a finger prick and analyzed with a cardiochek device. Note that Total Cholesterol, HDL, Triglycerides, LDL and Glucose were all measured using the cardiochek device. Description Capillary blood analyzed with a cardiochek device. Blood collected via a finger prick and analyzed with a cardiochek device. Note that Total Cholesterol, HDL, Triglycerides, LDL and Glucose were all measured using the cardiochek device. Description Measured by the 10m walking speed test Description Measured by the 10m walking speed test Description Measured by the 10m walking speed test Description Measured by the 10m walking speed test Description Using hand-held dynamometer to quantify leg strength through knee extension Description Using hand-held dynamometer to quantify leg strength through knee extension Description Using hand-held dynamometer to quantify leg strength through knee extension Description Using hand-held dynamometer to quantify leg strength through knee extension Description Using the 30second sit-stand test following senior fitness test protocol Description Using the 30second sit-stand test following senior fitness test protocol Description Using the 30second sit-stand test following senior fitness test protocol Description Using the 30second sit-stand test following senior fitness test protocol Description The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (Scale 0-20). A low score means a better outcome. Description The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (Scale 0-20). A low score means a better outcome. Description The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (Scale 0-20). A low score means a better outcome. Description The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (Scale 0-20). A low score means a better outcome. Description Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (0-15 scale). Lower score is better outcome. Description Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (0-15 scale). Lower score is better outcome. Description Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (0-15 scale). Lower score is better outcome. Description Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (0-15 scale). Lower score is better outcome. Description Loneliness was measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale (20-80). A low score indicates a better outcome Description Loneliness was measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale (20-80). A low score indicates a better outcome Description High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was analyzed using the CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA). A finger prick was conducted using a single use lancet and approximately 60 µL of whole blood was collected for this test. Description High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was analyzed using the CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA). A finger prick was conducted using a single use lancet and approximately 60 µL of whole blood was collected for this test. Description Low-density lipoprotein was assessed using a CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA). Description Low-density lipoprotein was assessed using a CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA). Description Low-density lipoprotein was assessed using a CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA). Description Low-density lipoprotein was assessed using a CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA). Description Fasted blood glucose was analyzed using a CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA). Description Fasted blood glucose was analyzed using a CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA). Description Fasted blood glucose was analyzed using a CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA). Description Fasted blood glucose was analyzed using a CardioChek Professional Analyzer system (PTS Diagnostics, Whitestown, Indiana, USA).
Units mmol/L Units mmol/L Units mmol/L Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units mmol/L Units mmol/L Units mmol/L Units m/s Units m/s Units m/s Units m/s Units kg Units kg Units kg Units kg Units Number of repetitions Units Number of repetitions Units Number of repetitions Units Number of repetitions Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units score on a scale Units mmol/L Units mmol/L Units mmol/L Units mmol/L Units mmol/L Units mmol/L Units mmol/L Units mmol/L Units mmol/L Units mmol/L
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean
Param Value 1.47 Param Value 1.37 Param Value 1.33 Param Value 38.7 Param Value 33.8 Param Value 36.7 Param Value 31.0 Param Value 41.3 Param Value 39.0 Param Value 1.79 Param Value 1.21 Param Value 1.48 Param Value 0.34 Param Value 0.43 Param Value 0.35 Param Value 0.40 Param Value 9.48 Param Value 7.87 Param Value 9.15 Param Value 7.28 Param Value 0.74 Param Value 0.89 Param Value 0.71 Param Value 1.1 Param Value 6.1 Param Value 6.6 Param Value 6.7 Param Value 6.6 Param Value 5.1 Param Value 4.9 Param Value 5.5 Param Value 4.5 Param Value 42.3 Param Value 39.7 Param Value 1.27 Param Value 1.17 Param Value 2.40 Param Value 2.91 Param Value 2.19 Param Value 2.72 Param Value 5.96 Param Value 5.43 Param Value 6.08 Param Value 5.47
Param Value Num 1.47 Param Value Num 1.37 Param Value Num 1.33 Param Value Num 38.7 Param Value Num 33.8 Param Value Num 36.7 Param Value Num 31.0 Param Value Num 41.3 Param Value Num 39.0 Param Value Num 1.79 Param Value Num 1.21 Param Value Num 1.48 Param Value Num 0.34 Param Value Num 0.43 Param Value Num 0.35 Param Value Num 0.4 Param Value Num 9.48 Param Value Num 7.87 Param Value Num 9.15 Param Value Num 7.28 Param Value Num 0.74 Param Value Num 0.89 Param Value Num 0.71 Param Value Num 1.1 Param Value Num 6.1 Param Value Num 6.6 Param Value Num 6.7 Param Value Num 6.6 Param Value Num 5.1 Param Value Num 4.9 Param Value Num 5.5 Param Value Num 4.5 Param Value Num 42.3 Param Value Num 39.7 Param Value Num 1.27 Param Value Num 1.17 Param Value Num 2.4 Param Value Num 2.91 Param Value Num 2.19 Param Value Num 2.72 Param Value Num 5.96 Param Value Num 5.43 Param Value Num 6.08 Param Value Num 5.47
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 0.82 Dispersion Value 1.52 Dispersion Value 0.51 Dispersion Value 12.4 Dispersion Value 11.2 Dispersion Value 13.2 Dispersion Value 12.8 Dispersion Value 17.4 Dispersion Value 11.8 Dispersion Value 1.30 Dispersion Value 0.45 Dispersion Value 0.74 Dispersion Value 0.17 Dispersion Value 0.20 Dispersion Value 0.20 Dispersion Value 0.20 Dispersion Value 5.95 Dispersion Value 5.42 Dispersion Value 5.25 Dispersion Value 4.90 Dispersion Value 1.84 Dispersion Value 2.34 Dispersion Value 1.81 Dispersion Value 2.82 Dispersion Value 7.2 Dispersion Value 6.0 Dispersion Value 7.1 Dispersion Value 6.1 Dispersion Value 3.2 Dispersion Value 3.5 Dispersion Value 4.0 Dispersion Value 2.9 Dispersion Value 12.0 Dispersion Value 12.6 Dispersion Value 0.44 Dispersion Value 0.57 Dispersion Value 1.63 Dispersion Value 1.42 Dispersion Value 1.21 Dispersion Value 1.56 Dispersion Value 2.38 Dispersion Value 1.95 Dispersion Value 2.29 Dispersion Value 1.77
Dispersion Value Num 0.82 Dispersion Value Num 1.52 Dispersion Value Num 0.51 Dispersion Value Num 12.4 Dispersion Value Num 11.2 Dispersion Value Num 13.2 Dispersion Value Num 12.8 Dispersion Value Num 17.4 Dispersion Value Num 11.8 Dispersion Value Num 1.3 Dispersion Value Num 0.45 Dispersion Value Num 0.74 Dispersion Value Num 0.17 Dispersion Value Num 0.2 Dispersion Value Num 0.2 Dispersion Value Num 0.2 Dispersion Value Num 5.95 Dispersion Value Num 5.42 Dispersion Value Num 5.25 Dispersion Value Num 4.9 Dispersion Value Num 1.84 Dispersion Value Num 2.34 Dispersion Value Num 1.81 Dispersion Value Num 2.82 Dispersion Value Num 7.2 Dispersion Value Num 6.0 Dispersion Value Num 7.1 Dispersion Value Num 6.1 Dispersion Value Num 3.2 Dispersion Value Num 3.5 Dispersion Value Num 4.0 Dispersion Value Num 2.9 Dispersion Value Num 12.0 Dispersion Value Num 12.6 Dispersion Value Num 0.44 Dispersion Value Num 0.57 Dispersion Value Num 1.63 Dispersion Value Num 1.42 Dispersion Value Num 1.21 Dispersion Value Num 1.56 Dispersion Value Num 2.38 Dispersion Value Num 1.95 Dispersion Value Num 2.29 Dispersion Value Num 1.77

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11388510 Sequence: 11388511 Sequence: 11388512
Result Group Id 56113138 Result Group Id 56113139 Result Group Id 56113140
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Scope overall Scope overall Scope overall
Count 50 Count 47 Count 97

Result Groups

Sequence: 56113138 Sequence: 56113139 Sequence: 56113140 Sequence: 56113141 Sequence: 56113142 Sequence: 56113143 Sequence: 56113144 Sequence: 56113145 Sequence: 56113146
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event
Title Standing and Social Intervention Title Control Group Title Total Title Standing and Social Intervention Title Control Group Title Standing and Social Intervention Title Control Group Title Standing and Social Intervention Title Control Group
Description Participants be exposed to an additional 100 minutes of standing per week. Participants will do this by standing for 20 minutes Monday through Friday.

Standing: Standing for an additional 100 minutes per week; 20 minutes Monday-Friday

Description Control group will receive social visits, but no exposure to standing Description Total of all reporting groups Description Participants be exposed to an additional 100 minutes of standing per week. Participants will do this by standing for 20 minutes Monday through Friday.

Standing: Standing for an additional 100 minutes per week; 20 minutes Monday-Friday

Description Control group will receive social visits, but no exposure to standing Description Participants be exposed to an additional 100 minutes of standing per week. Participants will do this by standing for 20 minutes Monday through Friday.

Standing: Standing for an additional 100 minutes per week; 20 minutes Monday-Friday

Description Control group will receive social visits, but no exposure to standing Description Participants be exposed to an additional 100 minutes of standing per week. Participants will do this by standing for 20 minutes Monday through Friday.

Standing: Standing for an additional 100 minutes per week; 20 minutes Monday-Friday

Description Control group will receive social visits, but no exposure to standing

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 125657415 Sequence: 125657416 Sequence: 125657417 Sequence: 125657418 Sequence: 125657419 Sequence: 125657420 Sequence: 125657421 Sequence: 125657422 Sequence: 125657423 Sequence: 125657424 Sequence: 125657425 Sequence: 125657426 Sequence: 125657427 Sequence: 125657428 Sequence: 125657429 Sequence: 125657430 Sequence: 125657431 Sequence: 125657432 Sequence: 125657433 Sequence: 125657434 Sequence: 125657435 Sequence: 125657436 Sequence: 125657437 Sequence: 125657438 Sequence: 125657439
Result Group Id 56113138 Result Group Id 56113139 Result Group Id 56113140 Result Group Id 56113138 Result Group Id 56113139 Result Group Id 56113140 Result Group Id 56113138 Result Group Id 56113139 Result Group Id 56113140 Result Group Id 56113140 Result Group Id 56113138 Result Group Id 56113139 Result Group Id 56113140 Result Group Id 56113138 Result Group Id 56113139 Result Group Id 56113140 Result Group Id 56113138 Result Group Id 56113139 Result Group Id 56113140 Result Group Id 56113138 Result Group Id 56113139 Result Group Id 56113140 Result Group Id 56113138 Result Group Id 56113139 Result Group Id 56113140
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Category Female Category Female Category Female Category Male Category Male Category Male
Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Race and Ethnicity Not Collected Title BMI Title BMI Title BMI Title Frailty Title Frailty Title Frailty Title Transfer Status (Independent Transfer) Title Transfer Status (Independent Transfer) Title Transfer Status (Independent Transfer) Title Length of stay in LTC Title Length of stay in LTC Title Length of stay in LTC Title Cognition (MMSE) Title Cognition (MMSE) Title Cognition (MMSE)
Description Frailty was measured using the Clinical Frailty Scale (1-9). 1 indicates very fit, 9 indicates terminally ill. LTC staff were asked to rate participants at pre and post intervention Description Frailty was measured using the Clinical Frailty Scale (1-9). 1 indicates very fit, 9 indicates terminally ill. LTC staff were asked to rate participants at pre and post intervention Description Frailty was measured using the Clinical Frailty Scale (1-9). 1 indicates very fit, 9 indicates terminally ill. LTC staff were asked to rate participants at pre and post intervention Description Transfer status was assessed by LTC staff following jurisdiction regulations (Work Safe New Brunswick). It is assessed upon admission, quarterly (90 days) and when a significant change in health status occurs (e.g., fall, stroke). For our study, we used the most recent Transfer status update. Residents were categorized as requiring no assistance to transfer from sit to stand (independent), requiring staff assistance to stand (assisted transfer), or requiring staff and mechanical assistance to stand (dependent). Description Transfer status was assessed by LTC staff following jurisdiction regulations (Work Safe New Brunswick). It is assessed upon admission, quarterly (90 days) and when a significant change in health status occurs (e.g., fall, stroke). For our study, we used the most recent Transfer status update. Residents were categorized as requiring no assistance to transfer from sit to stand (independent), requiring staff assistance to stand (assisted transfer), or requiring staff and mechanical assistance to stand (dependent). Description Transfer status was assessed by LTC staff following jurisdiction regulations (Work Safe New Brunswick). It is assessed upon admission, quarterly (90 days) and when a significant change in health status occurs (e.g., fall, stroke). For our study, we used the most recent Transfer status update. Residents were categorized as requiring no assistance to transfer from sit to stand (independent), requiring staff assistance to stand (assisted transfer), or requiring staff and mechanical assistance to stand (dependent). Description The mini-mental state examination was administered by research assistants at baseline to assess cognition. Scored out of 30, the questionnaire categorized a person as having none, mild or severe cognitive impairment. A score of 0-17 indicates severe cognitive impairment, 18-23 as mild, and 24-30 as no cognitive impairment. Description The mini-mental state examination was administered by research assistants at baseline to assess cognition. Scored out of 30, the questionnaire categorized a person as having none, mild or severe cognitive impairment. A score of 0-17 indicates severe cognitive impairment, 18-23 as mild, and 24-30 as no cognitive impairment. Description The mini-mental state examination was administered by research assistants at baseline to assess cognition. Scored out of 30, the questionnaire categorized a person as having none, mild or severe cognitive impairment. A score of 0-17 indicates severe cognitive impairment, 18-23 as mild, and 24-30 as no cognitive impairment.
Units years Units years Units years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units kg/m2 Units kg/m2 Units kg/m2 Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units years Units years Units years Units units on a scale Units units on a scale Units units on a scale
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean
Param Value 87.14 Param Value 85.11 Param Value 86 Param Value 37 Param Value 31 Param Value 68 Param Value 13 Param Value 16 Param Value 29 Param Value 0 Param Value 26.93 Param Value 25.56 Param Value 26.2 Param Value 6 Param Value 6.13 Param Value 6.1 Param Value 8 Param Value 25 Param Value 33 Param Value 4.6 Param Value 3.9 Param Value 4.2 Param Value 15.76 Param Value 17.7 Param Value 16.7
Param Value Num 87.14 Param Value Num 85.11 Param Value Num 86.0 Param Value Num 37.0 Param Value Num 31.0 Param Value Num 68.0 Param Value Num 13.0 Param Value Num 16.0 Param Value Num 29.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 26.93 Param Value Num 25.56 Param Value Num 26.2 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 6.13 Param Value Num 6.1 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 25.0 Param Value Num 33.0 Param Value Num 4.6 Param Value Num 3.9 Param Value Num 4.2 Param Value Num 15.76 Param Value Num 17.7 Param Value Num 16.7
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 8.46 Dispersion Value 7.63 Dispersion Value 8 Dispersion Value 6.53 Dispersion Value 9.01 Dispersion Value 7.8 Dispersion Value 1.5 Dispersion Value 0.8 Dispersion Value 1.2 Dispersion Value 5.4 Dispersion Value 3.5 Dispersion Value 4.5 Dispersion Value 9.2 Dispersion Value 8.8 Dispersion Value 9.0
Dispersion Value Num 8.46 Dispersion Value Num 7.63 Dispersion Value Num 8.0 Dispersion Value Num 6.53 Dispersion Value Num 9.01 Dispersion Value Num 7.8 Dispersion Value Num 1.5 Dispersion Value Num 0.8 Dispersion Value Num 1.2 Dispersion Value Num 5.4 Dispersion Value Num 3.5 Dispersion Value Num 4.5 Dispersion Value Num 9.2 Dispersion Value Num 8.8 Dispersion Value Num 9.0
Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 47 Number Analyzed 97 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 47 Number Analyzed 97 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 47 Number Analyzed 97 Number Analyzed 97 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 47 Number Analyzed 97 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 47 Number Analyzed 97 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 47 Number Analyzed 97 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 47 Number Analyzed 97 Number Analyzed 50 Number Analyzed 47 Number Analyzed 97
Population Description Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Study to Assess the Effect of Seltorexant Compared to Placebo on Respiration During Sleep in Adult Participants With Obstructive Sleep Apnea ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796026
2019-01-04

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796026
NCT03796026https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796026?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of multiple doses of seltorexant compared with placebo on respiration during sleep in adult participants with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-06-10
Start Month Year January 4, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year June 7, 2019
Verification Month Year June 2022
Verification Date 2022-06-30
Last Update Posted Date 2022-06-10

Facilities

Sequence: 198783018 Sequence: 198783019 Sequence: 198783020 Sequence: 198783021
Name NeuroTrials Research, Inc. Name Clinilabs Name CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services Name AMR New Orleans, Formerly New Orleans Center for Clinical Research – New Orleans, an AMR company
City Atlanta City New York City Cincinnati City Knoxville
State Georgia State New York State Ohio State Tennessee
Zip 30342 Zip 10019 Zip 45212 Zip 37923
Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 51850227
Name Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
Downcase Name sleep apnea, obstructive

Id Information

Sequence: 39901940 Sequence: 39901941
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value CR108576 Id Value 42847922MDD1010
Id Type Other Identifier
Id Type Description Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Countries

Sequence: 42300029
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55276862 Sequence: 55276863
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title Seltorexant Followed by Placebo Title Placebo Followed by Seltorexant
Description Participants will receive seltorexant (40 milligram [mg] capsules) once daily for 4 consecutive days, and after a washout period of 7 to 10 days, participants will receive matching placebo orally once daily for 4 consecutive days. Description Participants will receive placebo once daily for 4 consecutive days, and after a washout period of 7 to 10 days, participants will receive seltorexant (40 mg capsules) orally once daily for 4 consecutive days.

Interventions

Sequence: 52170797 Sequence: 52170798
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Seltorexant 40 mg Name Placebo
Description Seltorexant 40 mg capsules (over-encapsulated tablets) will be administered orally. Description Matching placebo to seltorexant 40 mg capsules (over-encapsulated tablets) will be administered orally.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176338198 Sequence: 176338199 Sequence: 176338200 Sequence: 176338201 Sequence: 176338202 Sequence: 176338203 Sequence: 176338204 Sequence: 176338205 Sequence: 176338206 Sequence: 176338207 Sequence: 176338208 Sequence: 176338209 Sequence: 176338210 Sequence: 176338211 Sequence: 176338212 Sequence: 176338213 Sequence: 176338214 Sequence: 176338215 Sequence: 176338216 Sequence: 176338217 Sequence: 176338218 Sequence: 176338219 Sequence: 176338220 Sequence: 176338221 Sequence: 176338222
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) Score as Measured by Polysomnography (PSG) Measure AHI Score as Measured by PSG Measure Mean Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) During Total Sleep Time (TST) Measure Mean SpO2 During Rapid Eye Movement (REM), Non-Rapid Eye Movement (NREM), and Awake Stages Measure Percentage of Total Sleep Time with SpO2 less than 90 percent (%), 85%, and 80% Measure Mean Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS) as Assessed by PSG Measure Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) by PSG Measure Sleep Efficiency (SE) by PSG Measure Total Sleep Time (TST) Measure Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep Latency Measure Total Duration of Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep Measure NREM Sleep Latency Measure Total Duration of NREM Sleep Measure Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability Measure Percentage of Participants with all Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Events of Special Interest Measure Number of Participants with Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities Measure Number of Participants with Clinically Significant Physical Examination Abnormalities Measure Number of Participants with Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities Measure Number of Participants with Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Measure Number of participants with suicidal ideation measured using Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Measure Bond-Lader Visual Analog Scales (B-L VAS) Score Measure Next-Day Residual Effect Measured by the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) Score Measure Residual Effect on a Cognitive Test Battery Evaluated by Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Measure Performance Score on a Cognitive Test Battery Evaluated by Trail Making Test Form B (TMT-B) Measure Residual Effect on Cognitive Function Measured by Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R)
Time Frame Day 4 Time Frame Day 1 (Night) Time Frame Nights 1 and 4 Time Frame Nights 1 and 4 Time Frame Nights 1 and 4 Time Frame Nights 1 and 4 Time Frame Nights 1 and 4 Time Frame Days 1, 2, 3, and 4 Time Frame Nights 1 and 4 Time Frame Nights 1 and 4 Time Frame Nights 1 and 4 Time Frame Nights 1 and 4 Time Frame Nights 1 and 4 Time Frame Baseline up to end of study (approximately up to 9 weeks) Time Frame Baseline up to end of study (approximately up to 9 weeks) Time Frame Baseline up to end of study (approximately up to 9 weeks) Time Frame Baseline up to end of study (approximately up to 9 weeks) Time Frame Baseline up to end of study (approximately up to 9 weeks) Time Frame Baseline up to end of study (approximately up to 9 weeks) Time Frame Baseline, Days 1, 2, 4, 5, and end of study (approximately 9 weeks) Time Frame Baseline, Day 2, and Day 5 Time Frame Baseline, Day 2, and Day 5 Time Frame Baseline and Day 5 Time Frame Baseline and Day 5 Time Frame Baseline and Day 5
Description AHI score is used to indicate the severity of sleep apnea. The AHI is calculated by dividing the number of apnea events by the number of hours of sleep. The AHI values for adults are categorized as: Normal: AHI less than (<)5, Mild sleep apnea: 5 less than or equal to (<=) AHI <15, Moderate sleep apnea: 15<= AHI <30, and Severe sleep apnea: AHI greater than or equal to (>=)30. Description AHI score is used to indicate the severity of sleep apnea. The AHI is calculated by dividing the number of apnea events by the number of hours of sleep. The AHI values for adults are categorized as: Normal: AHI <5, Mild sleep apnea: 5<= AHI <15, Moderate sleep apnea: 15<= AHI <30, and Severe sleep apnea: AHI >=30. Description The mean SpO2 during TST on Night 4 and Night 1 will be assessed by continuous finger pulse oximetry. Description The mean SpO2 during REM, NREM and awake stages of sleep will be assessed by continuous finger pulse oximetry. Description The percentage of TST with SpO2 level less than 90%, 85%, and 80% during the night, assessed by continuous finger pulse oximetry will be reported. Description LPS is a sleep parameter and will be measured by PSG during PSG screening. Elapsed time from the beginning of the PSG recording to the onset of the first 10 minutes of continuous sleep will be measured over 4 nights and the average time to sleep will be calculated. Description WASO is a sleep parameter and will be measured by PSG during PSG screening. WASO is measured during overnight sleep laboratory PSG assessment and is defined as the duration of wakefulness from the onset of persistent sleep (that is, 10 consecutive minutes of sleep) over the first 6 hours of PSG assessment. The number of minutes in the Awake stage after the onset of persistent sleep to the end of the recording. Description SE is a sleep parameter and will be measured by PSG during PSG screening. The total sleep time divided by the total time in bed (that is, the number of minutes from the beginning of the PSG recording to the end of the recording). Description TST is a sleep parameter and will be measured by PSG during PSG screening. All of the hours of non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, as measured by PSG, are summed to determine the TST. Description REM sleep is a normal stage of sleep characterized by the rapid and random movement of the eyes. REM sleep latency is the time from sleep onset until first period of REM sleep. PSG recordings will be used to determine the time spent in different sleep stages (S1: light sleep, S2: light sleep, S3: deep sleep, and S4: REM sleep). Description PSG recordings will be used to determine the time spent in different sleep stages (S1: light sleep, S2: light sleep, S3: deep sleep, and S4: REM sleep). It will be calculated as number of epochs scored as REM sleep divided by 2. Description NREM sleep latency is the time from sleep onset until first period of NREM sleep. Polysomnographic recordings will be used to determine the time spent in different sleep stages (S1: light sleep, S2: light sleep, S3: deep sleep, and S4: NREM sleep). Description Polysomnographic recordings will be used to determine the time spent in different sleep stages (S1: light sleep, S2: light sleep, S3: deep sleep, and S4: NREM sleep). It will be calculated as number of epochs scored as NREM sleep divided by 2. Description An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Description An SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. All SAEs and events of special interest including cataplexy (sudden, transient episode of muscle weakness accompanied by conscious awareness), sleep paralysis (the experience of not being able to move, react, or speak when falling asleep/awakening), and complex, sleep-related behaviors/parasomnias such as confusional arousals, somnambulism (sleep walking), sleep terrors, bruxism (teeth grinding), sleep sex, sleep related eating disorder, sleep behavior disorder, and catathrenia (Rapid Eye Movement [REM]-associated end-inspiratory apnea/breath holding) will be reported. Description Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in the vital signs including temperature, pulse/heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure will be reported. Description Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in the physical examination including examination of height, body weight, and waist circumference will be reported. Description Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in the ECG will be reported. Description Blood samples for serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis will be collected for clinical laboratory testing. Description C-SSRS is a clinician rated assessment of suicidal behavior and / or intent. Scale consists of 28 items in 4 sections: suicide behavior, actual attempts, suicidal ideation, and intensity of ideation. Suicidal ideation consists of 5 'yes/no' items: wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intention to act, active suicidal ideation with some intent to act without specific plan, active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent. Only items with yes responses are listed. Worsening of suicidal ideation indicates an increase in severity of suicidal ideation from baseline. Description The B-L VAS is a patient-rated scale designed to assess the current level of sedation and consists of sixteen 100-milliliter (mm) VAS anchored by antonyms (Alert-Drowsy, Lethargic-Energetic). Scores are combined to form 3 mood factors: alertness, calmness, and contentedness. The score is measured from the left to a mark made on the line by the patient and ranges from 0 (alert) to 100 (drowsy). Description The KSS is a patient reported assessment of level of drowsiness at the time of scale administration. This scale is focused mainly on the propensity to fall asleep and has a high validity in measuring sleepiness. It consists of a 9-point Likert scale with response options from: 1=very alert, 3=alert, 5=neither alert nor sleepy, 7=sleepy (but not fighting sleep), 9=very sleepy (fighting sleep). Description The SDMT is a widely used, paper-and-pencil assessment of complex scanning and visual tracking, requiring elements of attention, visuoperceptual processing, working memory, and cognitive/psychomotor speed. The test is viewed as a robust screening test for adult neuropsychological impairment and has been used to demonstrate worse cognitive functioning in patients with MDD. The test includes a coding key consisting of 9 abstract symbols, each paired with a number ranging from 1 to 9. Following the key, the participant is presented with randomly ordered symbols and is required to write the number corresponding to each symbol as fast as possible. The number of correct substitutions within 90 seconds is recorded by examiner-administered cognitive test battery. Description The TMT-B measures divided attention and executive function (tracking and sequencing). The participant is instructed to draw a line to connect a set of 25 consecutively numbered and lettered circles, alternating sequentially between numbers and letters (that is, 1-A-2-B). The participant is instructed to work as quickly as possible while still maintaining accuracy. The TMT-B has acceptable reliability; reliability coefficients have typically been reported as exceeding 0.65. The TMT-B is sensitive to cognitive decline associated with MDD. Description The HVLT-R, a measure of verbal learning and memory, is a 12-item word list recall test. Administration includes 3 learning trials, a delayed recall (20-minute) trial, and a 24-word recognition list (including 12 target and 12 foil words). The test administrator reads instructions and word lists aloud, and records words recalled/recognized by the participant. Three learning trials are combined to calculate a total recall score learning, delayed recall, and recognition trials.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192190949 Sequence: 192190950 Sequence: 192190951 Sequence: 192190952 Sequence: 192190953 Sequence: 192190954 Sequence: 192190955 Sequence: 192190956 Sequence: 192190957 Sequence: 192190958
Mesh Term Apnea Mesh Term Sleep Apnea Syndromes Mesh Term Sleep Apnea, Obstructive Mesh Term Respiration Disorders Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases Mesh Term Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory Mesh Term Sleep Disorders, Intrinsic Mesh Term Dyssomnias Mesh Term Sleep Wake Disorders Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term apnea Downcase Mesh Term sleep apnea syndromes Downcase Mesh Term sleep apnea, obstructive Downcase Mesh Term respiration disorders Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases Downcase Mesh Term signs and symptoms, respiratory Downcase Mesh Term sleep disorders, intrinsic Downcase Mesh Term dyssomnias Downcase Mesh Term sleep wake disorders Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48022590
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29098478
Role Study Director
Name Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Affiliation Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67763580 Sequence: 67763581 Sequence: 67763582 Sequence: 67763583
Design Group Id 55276863 Design Group Id 55276862 Design Group Id 55276863 Design Group Id 55276862
Intervention Id 52170797 Intervention Id 52170797 Intervention Id 52170798 Intervention Id 52170798

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30577752
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 70 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Participant must be a women of non-childbearing potential (WONCBP) or man. A WONCBP is defined as: a) Postmenopausal (postmenopausal state is defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative medical cause. A high follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level in the postmenopausal range may be used to confirm a postmenopausal state in women not using hormonal contraception or hormonal replacement therapy; b) Permanently sterile (permanent sterilization methods include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, bilateral tubal occlusion/ligation procedures, and bilateral oophorectomy
Meet the International Classification of Sleep Disorder diagnostic criteria for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) based on the investigator's assessment with or without sleep study. The OSA diagnosis can be confirmed by previous sleep studies, appropriate documentations (for example, medical records or letters from treating physicians) or documented conversation with the treating physician
Mild to moderate OSA, defined as AHI greater than or equal to (>=)5 to less than (<)30, based on screening polysomnography (PSG)
Body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 40 kilogram per meter square (kg/m^2) (inclusive) (BMI = weight/height^2)
Must be otherwise healthy based on physical examination, medical history, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), and clinical laboratory tests performed at screening. If there are abnormalities, they must be consistent with the underlying illness in the study population. If the results of the clinical laboratory tests are outside the normal reference ranges, the participant may be included only if the investigator judges the abnormalities from normal to be not clinically significant or to be appropriate and reasonable for the population under study

Exclusion Criteria:

Has a history of, or current signs and symptoms of, severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance <30 milliliter per minute [mL/min]); moderate to severe hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh Score >=7), significant or unstable cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, immunologic, or endocrine disorders (including uncontrolled hypo- or hyperthyroidism or diabetes mellitus). Participants with diabetes mellitus who are under good control (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] <= 8.5 percent [%] and fasting glucose <=140 milligram per deciliter [mg/dL] at screening) may be eligible to participate if otherwise medically healthy, and if on a stable regimen of glucose-lowering medications for at least 2 months prior to screening
Screening PSG with oxygen (O2) saturation <=80% for >=5% of total sleep time (TST)
Screening PSG with >=10 periodic limb movements per hour associated with an arousal
Currently using or used within 7 days of screening a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), a dental appliance, or home oxygen use for OSA, or required to use any of them for the duration of the study
Has other respiratory disorders such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma that need systemic and/or inhaled steroids, bronchiectasis, or emphysema, documented by history or physical examination

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254301447
Number Of Facilities 4
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 5
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 70
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 24

Designs

Sequence: 30325943
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Crossover Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Subject Masked True
Investigator Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26519137
Intervention Id 52170797
Name JNJ-42847922

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28704692
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Study to Investigate the Bioequivalence of Two Different Forms of Entrectinib (Forms A and C) Under Fasted Conditions in Healthy Subjects ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796013
2019-01-10

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796013
NCT03796013https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796013?tab=tableNANANAThis study aims to demonstrate similarities between two different forms of entrectinib (A and C) when administered under fasted conditions in healthy subjects.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-03-09
Start Month Year January 10, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year February 6, 2019
Verification Month Year February 2020
Verification Date 2020-02-29
Last Update Posted Date 2020-03-09
Results First Posted Date 2020-03-09

Facilities

Sequence: 198555260
Name Covance Research Unit – Dallas
City Dallas
State Texas
Zip 75247
Country United States

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 95262862 Sequence: 95262863 Sequence: 95262864 Sequence: 95262865
Mesh Term Entrectinib Mesh Term Protein Kinase Inhibitors Mesh Term Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Downcase Mesh Term entrectinib Downcase Mesh Term protein kinase inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 51768966
Name Healthy Volunteers
Downcase Name healthy volunteers

Id Information

Sequence: 39838377
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value GP41049

Countries

Sequence: 42236618
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55187950 Sequence: 55187951
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title Form A to Form C Crossover Title Form C to Form A Crossover
Description Participants first randomized to this arm will receive a single oral dose of entrectinib form A (reference form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of each Period. This dose will be followed by a minimum 14-day washout period, after which participants will receive a single oral dose of entrectinib form C (test form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Participants first randomized to this arm will receive a single oral dose of entrectinib form C (test form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of each Period. This dose will be followed by a minimum 14-day washout period, after which participants will receive a single oral dose of entrectinib form A (reference form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days).

Interventions

Sequence: 52090625 Sequence: 52090626
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Entrectinib Form A Name Entrectinib Form C
Description Participants will receive a single oral dose of entrectinib form A under fasted conditions. Description Participants will receive a single oral dose of entrectinib form C under fasted conditions.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176078397 Sequence: 176078398 Sequence: 176078399
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-t) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Measure Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Measure Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame At pre-defined intervals from Hour 0 through Day 5 of each study Period (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days) Time Frame At pre-defined intervals from Hour 0 through Day 5 of each study Period (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 06 Feb 2019 [28 days])
Description An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.

Sponsors

Sequence: 47944492
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Genentech, Inc.

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29048863
Role Study Director
Name Clinical Trials
Affiliation Hoffmann-La Roche

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67660225 Sequence: 67660226 Sequence: 67660227 Sequence: 67660228
Design Group Id 55187950 Design Group Id 55187951 Design Group Id 55187950 Design Group Id 55187951
Intervention Id 52090625 Intervention Id 52090625 Intervention Id 52090626 Intervention Id 52090626

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30529694
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 60 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Healthy in the opinion of the investigator. Healthy is defined by the absence of evidence of any active disease or clinically significant medical condition based on a detailed medical history and examination
Negative test results for Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
Females must not be pregnant or breastfeeding, and females of childbearing potential will agree to use highly-effective contraception. Females of childbearing potential must also agree to refrain from donating eggs during the treatment period and for 6 weeks after the final dose of study drug
Males must agree to use contraception and to refrain from sperm donation from check-in (Day -1 of Period 1) to 90 days after the final dose of study drug

Exclusion Criteria:

History of gastrointestinal surgery or other gastrointestinal disorder that might affect absorption of medicines from the gastrointestinal tract
Presence of a clinically significant disease, illness, medical condition or disorder, or any other medical history determined by the investigator to be clinically significant and relevant. Ongoing chronic disorders which are not considered clinically significant are permissible providing they are stable
Clinically significant change in health status, as judged by the investigator, or any major illness within the 4 weeks before screening, or clinically significant acute infection or febrile illness within the 14 days before screening
Participation in any other clinical study involving an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or device within 30 days or 5 half-lives (if known), whichever is longer, before screening

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254104823
Number Of Facilities 1
Number Of Nsae Subjects 4
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 0
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 11
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 60
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30278375
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Crossover Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Milestones

Sequence: 40762336 Sequence: 40762337 Sequence: 40762338 Sequence: 40762339 Sequence: 40762340 Sequence: 40762341 Sequence: 40762342 Sequence: 40762343 Sequence: 40762344 Sequence: 40762345 Sequence: 40762346 Sequence: 40762347
Result Group Id 55835860 Result Group Id 55835861 Result Group Id 55835860 Result Group Id 55835861 Result Group Id 55835860 Result Group Id 55835861 Result Group Id 55835860 Result Group Id 55835861 Result Group Id 55835860 Result Group Id 55835861 Result Group Id 55835860 Result Group Id 55835861
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Period 1 Period Period 1 Period Period 1 Period Period 1 Period Period 1 Period Period 1 Period Period 2 Period Period 2 Period Period 2 Period Period 2 Period Period 2 Period Period 2
Count 14 Count 14 Count 14 Count 14 Count 0 Count 0 Count 14 Count 14 Count 14 Count 14 Count 0 Count 0

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3898683

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 73531528 Sequence: 73531529 Sequence: 73531530 Sequence: 73531531 Sequence: 73531532 Sequence: 73531533
Outcome Id 30610058 Outcome Id 30610058 Outcome Id 30610059 Outcome Id 30610059 Outcome Id 30610060 Outcome Id 30610060
Result Group Id 55835862 Result Group Id 55835863 Result Group Id 55835862 Result Group Id 55835863 Result Group Id 55835862 Result Group Id 55835863
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 28 Count 28 Count 28 Count 28 Count 28 Count 28

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2566480 Sequence: 2566481
Document Type Study Protocol Document Type Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True Has Protocol False
Has Icf False Has Icf False
Has Sap False Has Sap True
Document Date 2018-11-05 Document Date 2019-01-31
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/13/NCT03796013/Prot_000.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/13/NCT03796013/SAP_001.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 27776965 Sequence: 27776966 Sequence: 27776967 Sequence: 27776968 Sequence: 27776969 Sequence: 27776970
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28
Created At 2023-08-06 15:14:11.904880 Created At 2023-08-06 15:14:11.904880 Created At 2023-08-06 15:14:11.904880 Created At 2023-08-06 15:14:11.904880 Created At 2023-08-06 15:14:11.904880 Created At 2023-08-06 15:14:11.904880
Updated At 2023-08-06 15:14:11.904880 Updated At 2023-08-06 15:14:11.904880 Updated At 2023-08-06 15:14:11.904880 Updated At 2023-08-06 15:14:11.904880 Updated At 2023-08-06 15:14:11.904880 Updated At 2023-08-06 15:14:11.904880

Reported Events

Sequence: 524410874 Sequence: 524410875 Sequence: 524410876 Sequence: 524410877 Sequence: 524410878 Sequence: 524410879
Result Group Id 55835864 Result Group Id 55835865 Result Group Id 55835864 Result Group Id 55835865 Result Group Id 55835864 Result Group Id 55835865
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 06 Feb 2019 [28 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 06 Feb 2019 [28 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 06 Feb 2019 [28 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 06 Feb 2019 [28 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 06 Feb 2019 [28 days]) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 06 Feb 2019 [28 days])
Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other
Subjects Affected 2 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28 Subjects At Risk 28
Description The Safety Population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment. Description The Safety Population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment.
Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Organ System Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Adverse Event Term Arthropod bite Adverse Event Term Arthropod bite Adverse Event Term Cough Adverse Event Term Cough Adverse Event Term Nasal congestion Adverse Event Term Nasal congestion
Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0 Frequency Threshold 0
Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1 Vocab MedDRA 21.1
Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment Assessment Non-systematic Assessment

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28657604
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3829427
Pi Employee No
Restriction Type OTHER
Other Details The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
Restrictive Agreement The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3829392
Organization Hoffmann-La Roche
Name Medical Communications
Phone 800 821-8590
Email genentech@druginfo.com

Outcomes

Sequence: 30610059 Sequence: 30610058 Sequence: 30610060
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary
Title Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-t) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Description An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Time Frame At pre-defined intervals from Hour 0 through Day 5 of each study Period (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days) Time Frame At pre-defined intervals from Hour 0 through Day 5 of each study Period (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days) Time Frame Baseline through the end of study (up to clinical cut-off date 06 Feb 2019 [28 days])
Population The PK Population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 evaluable postdose PK sample. Population The PK Population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 evaluable postdose pharmacokinetic (PK) sample. Population The Safety Population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 postdose safety assessment.
Units nmol/L Units nmol*h/L Units Percentage of Participants
Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation
Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Number

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 234085135 Sequence: 234085136 Sequence: 234085137 Sequence: 234085138 Sequence: 234085139 Sequence: 234085140 Sequence: 234085141 Sequence: 234085142 Sequence: 234085143 Sequence: 234085144
Outcome Id 30610058 Outcome Id 30610058 Outcome Id 30610058 Outcome Id 30610058 Outcome Id 30610059 Outcome Id 30610059 Outcome Id 30610059 Outcome Id 30610059 Outcome Id 30610060 Outcome Id 30610060
Result Group Id 55835862 Result Group Id 55835863 Result Group Id 55835862 Result Group Id 55835863 Result Group Id 55835862 Result Group Id 55835863 Result Group Id 55835862 Result Group Id 55835863 Result Group Id 55835862 Result Group Id 55835863
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Classification Entrectinib Classification Entrectinib Classification M5 metabolite Classification M5 metabolite Classification Entrectinib Classification Entrectinib Classification M5 metabolite Classification M5 metabolite
Title Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-t) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-t) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-t) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC0-t) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Entrectinib and M5 Metabolite Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Title Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Description An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. Description An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Units nmol*h/L Units nmol*h/L Units nmol*h/L Units nmol*h/L Units nmol/L Units nmol/L Units nmol/L Units nmol/L Units Percentage of Participants Units Percentage of Participants
Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Geometric Mean Param Type Number Param Type Number
Param Value 18500 Param Value 16600 Param Value 3610 Param Value 3070 Param Value 796 Param Value 726 Param Value 138 Param Value 114 Param Value 7.1 Param Value 0
Param Value Num 18500.0 Param Value Num 16600.0 Param Value Num 3610.0 Param Value Num 3070.0 Param Value Num 796.0 Param Value Num 726.0 Param Value Num 138.0 Param Value Num 114.0 Param Value Num 7.1 Param Value Num 0.0
Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation Dispersion Type Geometric Coefficient of Variation
Dispersion Value 37.9 Dispersion Value 30.7 Dispersion Value 37.0 Dispersion Value 36.9 Dispersion Value 35.6 Dispersion Value 28.9 Dispersion Value 47.9 Dispersion Value 50.3
Dispersion Value Num 37.9 Dispersion Value Num 30.7 Dispersion Value Num 37.0 Dispersion Value Num 36.9 Dispersion Value Num 35.6 Dispersion Value Num 28.9 Dispersion Value Num 47.9 Dispersion Value Num 50.3

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11317264 Sequence: 11317265 Sequence: 11317266
Result Group Id 55835857 Result Group Id 55835858 Result Group Id 55835859
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Scope overall Scope overall Scope overall
Count 14 Count 14 Count 28

Result Groups

Sequence: 55835857 Sequence: 55835858 Sequence: 55835859 Sequence: 55835860 Sequence: 55835861 Sequence: 55835862 Sequence: 55835863 Sequence: 55835864 Sequence: 55835865
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event
Title Form A to Form C Crossover Title Form C to Form A Crossover Title Total Title Form A to Form C Crossover Title Form C to Form A Crossover Title Form A Reference Formulation Title Form C Test Formulation Title Form A Reference Formulation Title Form C Test Formulation
Description Participants first randomized to this arm received a single oral dose of entrectinib form A (reference form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 1. This dose was followed by a minimum 14-day washout period, after which participants received a single oral dose of entrectinib form C (test form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Participants first randomized to this arm received a single oral dose of entrectinib form C (test form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 1. This dose was followed by a minimum 14-day washout period, after which participants received a single oral dose of entrectinib form A (reference form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Total of all reporting groups Description Participants first randomized to this arm received a single oral dose of entrectinib form A (reference form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 1. This dose was followed by a minimum 14-day washout period, after which participants received a single oral dose of entrectinib form C (test form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Participants first randomized to this arm received a single oral dose of entrectinib form C (test form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 1. This dose was followed by a minimum 14-day washout period, after which participants received a single oral dose of entrectinib form A (reference form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Participants who received a single oral dose of entrectinib form A (reference form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 1 and Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Participants who received a single oral dose of entrectinib form C (test form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 1 and Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Participants who received a single oral dose of entrectinib form A (reference form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 1 and Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days). Description Participants who received a single oral dose of entrectinib form C (test form) under fasted conditions on Day 1 of Period 1 and Day 1 of Period 2 (Periods 1 and 2 = 6 days).

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 124879624 Sequence: 124879625 Sequence: 124879626 Sequence: 124879627 Sequence: 124879628 Sequence: 124879629 Sequence: 124879630 Sequence: 124879631 Sequence: 124879632 Sequence: 124879633 Sequence: 124879634 Sequence: 124879635 Sequence: 124879636 Sequence: 124879637 Sequence: 124879638 Sequence: 124879639 Sequence: 124879640 Sequence: 124879641 Sequence: 124879642 Sequence: 124879643 Sequence: 124879644 Sequence: 124879645 Sequence: 124879646 Sequence: 124879647 Sequence: 124879648 Sequence: 124879649 Sequence: 124879650
Result Group Id 55835857 Result Group Id 55835858 Result Group Id 55835859 Result Group Id 55835857 Result Group Id 55835858 Result Group Id 55835859 Result Group Id 55835857 Result Group Id 55835858 Result Group Id 55835859 Result Group Id 55835857 Result Group Id 55835858 Result Group Id 55835859 Result Group Id 55835857 Result Group Id 55835858 Result Group Id 55835859 Result Group Id 55835857 Result Group Id 55835858 Result Group Id 55835859 Result Group Id 55835857 Result Group Id 55835858 Result Group Id 55835859 Result Group Id 55835857 Result Group Id 55835858 Result Group Id 55835859 Result Group Id 55835857 Result Group Id 55835858 Result Group Id 55835859
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Category Female Category Female Category Female Category Male Category Male Category Male Category White Category White Category White Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category Asian Category Asian Category Asian Category Multiple Category Multiple Category Multiple Category Hispanic or Latino Category Hispanic or Latino Category Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino
Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Units Years Units Years Units Years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 43.9 Param Value 44.4 Param Value 44 Param Value 6 Param Value 5 Param Value 11 Param Value 8 Param Value 9 Param Value 17 Param Value 8 Param Value 8 Param Value 16 Param Value 5 Param Value 5 Param Value 10 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 5 Param Value 3 Param Value 8 Param Value 9 Param Value 11 Param Value 20
Param Value Num 43.9 Param Value Num 44.4 Param Value Num 44.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 11.0 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 9.0 Param Value Num 17.0 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 16.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 10.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 9.0 Param Value Num 11.0 Param Value Num 20.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 8.4 Dispersion Value 11.7 Dispersion Value 10.4
Dispersion Value Num 8.4 Dispersion Value Num 11.7 Dispersion Value Num 10.4
Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 28 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 14 Number Analyzed 28

]]>

<![CDATA[ Characterization of Human Intestinal Macrophages in Metabolic Disease ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03796000
2018-05-14

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03796000
NCT03796000https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03796000?tab=tableNANANAThis is a prospective, observational study aiming at improving the understanding of the pathophysiology of metabolic disease. As inflammation has been recognized as a key characteristic of metabolic disease but its starting point is still unknown, the investigators’ aim is to characterize intestinal macrophages from human gut biopsies taken in diagnostic endoscopies of the gastrointestinal tract or in bariatric surgeries for clinical reasons.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-21
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-06-23
Start Month Year May 14, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year April 14, 2022
Verification Month Year June 2022
Verification Date 2022-06-30
Last Update Posted Date 2022-06-23

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20654972
Description Metabolic disease including obesity and diabetes has reached epidemic proportions in the past years. Besides classical risk factors such as unhealthy diet and physical inactivity, smoking and air pollution have also emerged as unexpected risk factors for type 2 Diabetes.

Inflammation has been reported as key characteristic of metabolic disease and is predictive of future cardiovascular events. However, the starting point of chronic low-grade inflammation is not known.

As the gastrointestinal tract first comes into contact with dietary components, but potentially also air pollution/ smoke particles ingested upon mucociliary clearance from the lung, the gut could be the starting point of inflammation in metabolic disease.

The aim of this study is to characterize intestinal macrophages in obese versus lean subjects and smokers versus non-smokers to translate the principal investigator's preclinical findings to human disease and assess whether an inflammatory shift prevails in human intestinal macrophages in metabolic disease. Additionally, to assess whether intestinal macrophage subpopulations can be altered deliberately by nutritional intervention, the investigators will assess intestinal macrophages from subjects scheduled for bariatric surgery that will be on a calorie-restricted diet during the last 2 to 4 weeks prior to surgery.

The macrophages originate from human gut samples. As patients will undergo diagnostic endoscopy of the gastrointestinal tract or bariatric surgery for clinical reasons and the standard of care will not be changed by the study, there will be no additional interventions to patients by their participation in the study. Additionally, three EDTA and one serum blood tube for the analysis of inflammatory cells and markers in the blood will be taken as well as a single stool sample. The investigators' goal is to recruit in total 150 patients as it will be a pilot study in a first step.

Facilities

Sequence: 199372664
Name University Hospital Basel
City Basel
State Baselstadt
Zip 4031
Country Switzerland

Conditions

Sequence: 51997951
Name Metabolic Disease
Downcase Name metabolic disease

Id Information

Sequence: 40023640 Sequence: 40023641
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value 2018-00712 Id Value 2018-00712
Id Type Other Identifier
Id Type Description EKNZ

Countries

Sequence: 42418828
Name Switzerland
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55402347 Sequence: 55402348 Sequence: 55402349 Sequence: 55402350 Sequence: 55402351 Sequence: 55402352
Title colonoscopy: obese and smoker Title colonoscopy: obese and non-smoker Title colonoscopy: lean and smoker Title colonoscopy: lean and non-smoker Title gastroscopy: obese and non-smoker undergoing bariatric surgery Title gastroscopy: lean and non-smoker
Description 10 small tissue samples of the Colon transversum
3 EDTA blood samples and 1 Serum blood sample
in some cases 1 single stool sample
Description 10 small tissue samples of the Colon transversum
3 EDTA blood samples and 1 Serum blood sample
in some cases 1 single stool sample
Description 10 small tissue samples of the Colon transversum
3 EDTA blood samples and 1 Serum blood sample
in some cases 1 single stool sample
Description 10 small tissue samples of the Colon transversum
3 EDTA blood samples and 1 Serum blood sample
in some cases 1 single stool sample
Description 6 small tissue samples of the gastric corpus and 6 of the Duodenum
3 EDTA blood samples and 1 Serum blood sample
in some cases 1 single stool sample
1cm long piece of the jejunum, which is usually disposed during bariatric surgery.
Description 6 small tissue samples of the gastric corpus and 6 of the Duodenum
3 EDTA blood samples and 1 Serum blood sample
in some cases 1 single stool sample

Interventions

Sequence: 52310326
Intervention Type Procedure
Name tissue samples, blood and stool sample
Description Tissue samples from gastroscopy/colonoscopy.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176771592 Sequence: 176771593 Sequence: 176771594 Sequence: 176771595 Sequence: 176771596
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Number of intestinal macrophages Measure Type and rate of subpopulations of intestinal macrophages Measure Number of other intestinal immune cells Measure Type and rate of subpopulations of other intestinal immune cells Measure Gene expression profile of intestinal macrophages
Time Frame 2 years Time Frame 2 years Time Frame 2 years Time Frame 2 years Time Frame 2 years
Description Quantity (absolute and relative numbers) of intestinal macrophages in biopsies from the gastrointestinal tract in obese versus lean subjects and smokers versus non-smokers measured with flow cytometry. Description Quality (inflammatory versus non-inflammatory subpopulations) of intestinal macrophages in biopsies from the gastrointestinal tract in obese versus lean subjects and smokers versus non-smokers measured with flow cytometry. Description In case the investigators do not find clear differences in frequency of intestinal macrophages, they will assess other intestinal immune cells (e.g. B-, T-lymphocytes), and enteroendocrine cells (e.g. L-cells) as a secondary endpoint in an explorative manner. Additionally, the investigators aim to correlate their findings from the biopsy samples with inflammation markers and immune cells in the blood, with microbiota and immune cells in the stool and with the eating habits of the patients. Description In case the investigators do not find clear differences in subpopulations of intestinal macrophages, they will assess other intestinal immune cells (e.g. B-, T-lymphocytes), and enteroendocrine cells (e.g. L-cells) as a secondary endpoint in an explorative manner. Additionally, the investigators aim to correlate their findings from the biopsy samples with inflammation markers and immune cells in the blood, with microbiota and immune cells in the stool and with the eating habits of the patients. Description Gene expression of intestinal macrophages in biopsies from the colon in obese versus lean non-smokers by RNA sequencing.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192801405
Mesh Term Metabolic Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term metabolic diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list

Sponsors

Sequence: 48157250
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29186010
Role Principal Investigator
Name Claudia Cavelti-Weder, PD Dr. med.
Affiliation University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67917341 Sequence: 67917342 Sequence: 67917343 Sequence: 67917344 Sequence: 67917345 Sequence: 67917346
Design Group Id 55402350 Design Group Id 55402349 Design Group Id 55402348 Design Group Id 55402347 Design Group Id 55402352 Design Group Id 55402351
Intervention Id 52310326 Intervention Id 52310326 Intervention Id 52310326 Intervention Id 52310326 Intervention Id 52310326 Intervention Id 52310326

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30663779
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 80 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Population All patients planned for diagnostic endoscopy of the gastrointestinal tract or bariatric surgery at the University Hospital of Basel, the doctor's Office MagenDarm Basel or the Department of Visceral Surgery, Hospital Lindenhof of Bern will be screened for study participation, contacted and informed about the study if suitable to all inclusion and exclusion criterias.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patient undergoing colonoscopy:

Obese (BMI > 32 kg/m2 ) and smoker (≥ 1 pack cigarettes/d)
Obese (BMI > 32 kg/m2 ) and non-smoker (control group)
Lean (BMI < 27 kg/m2 ) and smoker (≥ 1 pack cigarettes/d)
Lean (BMI < 27 kg/m2 ) and non-smoker (control group)

Patient undergoing gastroscopy:

Obese (BMI > 35 kg/m2 ) and non-smoker planned for bariatric surgery
Lean (BMI < 27 kg/m2 ) and non-smoker (control group)

Exclusion Criteria:

Inability to provide informed consent, e.g. mental impairment or insufficient knowledge of project language
Intake of corticosteroids
Anti-inflammatory/ immunosuppressive drugs
Clinical signs of current infection
Known anemia (e.g. hemoglobin < 110 g/L for males, < 100 g/L for females)
Known neutropenia (e.g. leukocyte count < 1.5 × 10^9/L or ANC < 0.5 × 10^9/L)
Known immunodeficiency, e.g. HIV
Known vasculitis, collagenosis
Known inflammatory bowel disease
Known adrenal insufficiency and/or substitution with glucocorticoids
Known clinically significant kidney or liver disease (e.g. creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL, AST/ALT > 2 × ULN, alkaline phosphatase > 2 × ULN, or total bilirubin [tBili] > 1.5 × ULN)
Risky daily alcohol consumption (> 24g/d for males, > 12g for females), known liver cirrhosis Child B or C
Known uncontrolled congestive heart failure
Known uncontrolled malignant disease
Currently pregnant or breastfeeding

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254280730
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 47
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 80
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30410583
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2573020
Document Type Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True
Has Icf False
Has Sap True
Document Date 2018-11-12
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/00/NCT03796000/Prot_SAP_000.pdf

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28777101
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Claudia Cavelti
Title private lecturer
Affiliation University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

]]>

<![CDATA[ Traumatic Nightmares Treated by NightWare (To Arouse Not Awaken) ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795987
2019-02-07

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795987
NCT03795987https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795987?tab=tableNANANAThis study will provide preliminary estimates of safety and efficacy of the NightWare digital therapeutic system (iPhone + Apple watch + proprietary application) for the treatment of nightmare disorder associated with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-related sleep disturbance and the impact of improved sleep with the NightWare digital therapeutic system. The investigators hypothesize that the NightWare digital therapeutic system will significantly improve sleep quality in participants with PTSD-Related nightmares and poor sleep quality.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-02-26
Start Month Year February 7, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year August 14, 2019
Verification Month Year February 2020
Verification Date 2020-02-29
Last Update Posted Date 2020-02-26

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20727223
Description Nightmares are a common problem affecting 2-8% of the general population and a higher proportion of clinical populations. The negative consequences of untreated nightmares are significant and include impaired quality of life, sleep deprivation (often resulting in an increased intensity of nightmares), insomnia, daytime sleepiness, and fatigue. Untreated nightmares can also exacerbate the symptoms of underlying psychological dysfunction in people with depression and anxiety, leading to poor occupational and or social functioning. Nightmares can be idiopathic or associated with the use (or withdrawal) of certain medications or substances, or associated with disorders including PTSD.

NightWare (Minneapolis, MN) has developed a novel approach to the treatment of nightmares. Through the use of a smartwatch-based application that senses physiologic parameters, the participant is aroused from sleep (without awakening the participant) so that the nightmare is interrupted prior to reaching a threshold of severity in which the participant would awaken in distress. Seconds later the participant returns to sleep without having experienced a nightmare. This approach avoids risk from pharmacological treatment, avoids exacerbation of symptoms from image rehearsal therapy and allows for a simple method with easily achieved adherence compared to existing treatments.

The NightWare digital therapeutic system consists of a proprietary software application installed on a smartwatch. The application has been effective in focus groups when used on both Apple smartwatches and Motorola smartwatches. For the purposes of this study, the investigators will be using only the Apple (Cupertino, CA) 3rd generation smartwatch and the Apple iPhone. The NightWare application uses physiological markers obtained via the smartwatch to determine by proprietary algorithm whether a participant is in the early stages of a nightmare, but has not yet awoken in distress. As directed by the algorithm, the smartwatch then applies varying degrees of vibratory stimulation to the wrist over variable lengths of time with the intention of arousing the participant from sleep without eliciting an awakening.

Facilities

Sequence: 200159526
Name Minneapolis VA Healthcare System
City Minneapolis
State Minnesota
Zip 55417
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52185601 Sequence: 52185602 Sequence: 52185603 Sequence: 52185604 Sequence: 52185605 Sequence: 52185606
Name Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic Name Combat Disorders Name Ptsd Name Nightmare Name Nightmares, REM-Sleep Type Name Nightmare Disorder With Associated Non-Sleep Disorder
Downcase Name stress disorders, post-traumatic Downcase Name combat disorders Downcase Name ptsd Downcase Name nightmare Downcase Name nightmares, rem-sleep type Downcase Name nightmare disorder with associated non-sleep disorder

Id Information

Sequence: 40169148
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value NW101001

Countries

Sequence: 42580731
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609245
Group Type Experimental
Title Open Label Treatment Arm
Description Intervention with NightWare Therapeutic System

Interventions

Sequence: 52499537
Intervention Type Device
Name NightWare Therapeutic System
Description A wearable digital therapeutic system that will measure physiologic data when worn during sleep to deliver a mild vibration via the watch to elicit arousal thereby disrupting nightmares. This detection and stimulation sequence will be performed according to NightWare's proprietary algorithm.

Keywords

Sequence: 79888930 Sequence: 79888931 Sequence: 79888932 Sequence: 79888933 Sequence: 79888934 Sequence: 79888935 Sequence: 79888936
Name PTSD Name Nightmare Name Nightmare Disorder Name Post-traumatic stress disorder Name Veteran Name Digital therapeutic Name Digital medicine
Downcase Name ptsd Downcase Name nightmare Downcase Name nightmare disorder Downcase Name post-traumatic stress disorder Downcase Name veteran Downcase Name digital therapeutic Downcase Name digital medicine

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432398
Outcome Type primary
Measure Change in global score on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) from Day 0 to Day 60
Time Frame 0-60 days
Description The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate seven "component" scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these seven components yields one global score. In scoring the PSQI, seven component scores are derived, each scored 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (severe difficulty). The component scores are summed to produce a global score (range 0 to 21). Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality. This outcome is the difference between the global score on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score at baseline (Day 0) and average global PSQI score across the four post-treatment initiation assessments (Days 14, 30, 44 and 60).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193540575 Sequence: 193540576 Sequence: 193540577 Sequence: 193540578 Sequence: 193540579
Mesh Term Stress Disorders, Traumatic Mesh Term Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic Mesh Term Combat Disorders Mesh Term Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders Mesh Term Mental Disorders
Downcase Mesh Term stress disorders, traumatic Downcase Mesh Term stress disorders, post-traumatic Downcase Mesh Term combat disorders Downcase Mesh Term trauma and stressor related disorders Downcase Mesh Term mental disorders
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332425 Sequence: 48332426
Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class FED
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name NightWare Name Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29293053
Role Study Chair
Name Daniel R Karlin, MD MA
Affiliation NightWare

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168319
Design Group Id 55609245
Intervention Id 52499537

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773641
Gender All
Minimum Age 22 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Veteran Enrolled in the Minneapolis/St. Cloud VAHCS.
Diagnosis of PTSD via American Psychiatric Association PTSD diagnostic criteria in the fifth edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5).
Equal to or older than 22 years of age.
Proficient in both reading and writing in the English language.
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score 10 or higher.
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS): On question #8 any score above "0" will prompt an additional question: Do you drive ("get behind the wheel") when you are drowsy? The answer must be "No" to be enrolled in the study due to safety concerns.
Have repetitive nightmares contributing to disrupted sleep as reported by the patient
Wireless Internet and two power outlets where they sleep
Prazosin use; if yes, the patient may be included if tapered by prescribing provider. Taper must be completed and subject must be off prazosin for 2 days prior to enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score greater than or equal to 20. A score of 1 or more on the suicide ideation item of the PHQ-9 will trigger a risk assessment.
Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation
Current use of varenicline
Current use of beta-blockers (unless ophthalmic solutions)
Current use of non-dihydropyridines
Current use of Prazosin for the treatment of nightmares (can include patients 2 days following taper and discontinuation) This would be coordinated with the prescribing provider
Circadian rhythm disruption on a regular basis (shift-work)
Known diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Diagnosis of an active disorder of arousal from non-rapid eye movement sleep
Diagnosis of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder
Diagnosis of narcolepsy
Alcohol Use Disorders Inventory Test (AUDIT) (score of 8 or higher)
Drug Abuse Screening Test-10 (DAST-10) (score greater than 2)
Suspicion of nightmares being secondary to substance abuse or withdrawal
Diagnosis or suspicion of dementia
Previous or foreseeable legal proceedings involving nightmares or trauma
Nocturia that causes awakening from sleep
Known sleepwalking
Acting out of dreams prior to PTSD trauma

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253952986
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 6
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 22
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30519772
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886073
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Efficacy of Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Derived Hematopoietic and Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Cerebral Palsy ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795974
2017-07-23

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795974
NCT03795974https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795974?tab=tableNANANACerebral palsy(CP) consisted of a group of developmental disability in the field of motor function and is one of the major problems of pediatric neurology and at the present time there is no standard curative medical or surgical treatment for it .Stem cell therapy is one of a new and hopeful therapeutic methods of therapy for CP .This double blind study designed for the evaluation of safety and therapeutic effects of intrathecal hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells derived from allogenic umbilical cord in change and probable improvement of developmental functions of spastic CP participants between 4-14 years old and comparing with control group of CP participants without cell therapy . 108 cases recruited and randomly divided to 3 groups of 36 cases : hematopoietic stem cells derived from allogenic umbilical cord , Mesenchymal cells derived from allogenic umbilical cord and control group without injection and appearance simulating lumbar puncture without awareness of the patients and evaluators . Developmental functions and spasticity evaluated before intervention and will be done 1 , 3 , 6 and 12 months after injection . During this period neuro rehabilitation will be continued . Brain neuroimaging were done at the recruitment time and will be repeated after 12 months .
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year July 23, 2017
Primary Completion Month Year October 2019
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20716324
Description CP is characterized by aberrant control of movement or posture of a patient , appearing early in life , and not the result of a recognized progressive or degenerative brain disease . CP is an umbrella term and represents a group of conditions (not a single disorder) , has a broad range of expression with a static condition originally within the developing central nervous system . CP Is a disturbance of movement and or posture . At the present time there is no standard medical or surgical treatment for it .Stem cell therapy is a new and promising treatment .

150 cases of diparetic and quadiparetic spastic CP between 4-14 years old selected among the patients referred to the pediatric neurology outpatient department of Children's Medical Center Hospital (CMC) affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences and had our inclusion criteria. HLA analysis were done for these patients and 36 cases of class 6 matched cases enrolled to the hematopoietic stem cells derived from allogenic umbilical cord (MNC) because of necessity of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) matching in this type of cells and 72 cases among the remaining patients randomly divided to Mesenchymal stem cells derived from allogenic umbilical cord (MSC) and control group . Therefore 108 cases enrolled in 3 divided group of 36 patients .

Patients admitted to CMC hospital and intrathecal injection were done with sedation . Only one injection of stem cell was done for each patient . In the control group after insertion of the needle into the skin with an appearance of lumbar puncture simulation , no injection were done without the awareness of the patients or their parents. All of the patients admitted for one day and discharged the next day . As we wrote in the consent form for ethical consideration we are committed to perform stem cell injection for control participants free of charge after 12 months of the follow up . All of the participants will be referred for neurorehabilitation with a identical protocol .Both parents and clinical evaluators are not aware of the 3 divided groups and our study is double blind .Outcome measures will be evaluated 1, 3, 6. and 12 months after intervention .

Standard brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) were done before injection as baseline and will be repeated after 12 months of clinical follow up . This study designed for the evaluation of therapeutic effects of intrathecal MNC and MSC derived from allogenic umbilical cord in change and probable improvement of developmental functions of spastic CP patients between 4-14 years old in comparison with control group .Different scoring systems such as Gross Motor Functional Classification System (GMFCS) , Gross Motor Function Measure Score (GMFM66) , Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) , Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) , CP QOL , Life Habits Questionnaire and Modified Ashworth scale for spasticity were done at baseline and then will be repeated in follow ups until 12 months of final evaluation .

Acute side effects and probable long term side effects will be reported and noted on our preformed questioners .

Facilities

Sequence: 200053421 Sequence: 200053422 Sequence: 200053423 Sequence: 200053424
Name Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Growth and Development Research Center- Children's Medical Center Name Tehran University of Medical Sciences Chidren's Medical Center Radiology Department Name Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Department of Pediatric Neurology , Children's Medical Center Name ROYAN Stem Cell Technology Co
City Tehran City Tehran City Tehran City Tehran
Zip 1419733151 Zip 1419733151 Zip 1419733151 Zip 1665666311
Country Iran, Islamic Republic of Country Iran, Islamic Republic of Country Iran, Islamic Republic of Country Iran, Islamic Republic of

Conditions

Sequence: 52156564
Name Cerebral Palsy, Spastic
Downcase Name cerebral palsy, spastic

Id Information

Sequence: 40148253
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value IRCT201706176907N13

Countries

Sequence: 42557790
Name Iran, Islamic Republic of
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55577962 Sequence: 55577963
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Experimental
Title MNC & MSC with Control Title MNC & MSC
Description One intrathecal injection of Hematopoietic stem cells and Mesenchymal stem cells derived from allogenic umbilical cord for each group of 36 cases of spastic CP and neurorehabilitation during the 12 months of follow up of clinical evaluation of developmental functions and spasticity Description Comparison of effects of intrathecal injection of MNC and MSC on improvement of developmental functions and spasticity of CP patients

Interventions

Sequence: 52472064 Sequence: 52472065 Sequence: 52472066
Intervention Type Biological Intervention Type Biological Intervention Type Procedure
Name MNC Name MSC Name Control
Description Hematopoietic stem cells derived from allogenic umbilical cord Description Mesenchymal cells derived from allogenic umbilical cord Description control group without injection and appearance simulating lumbar puncture without awareness of the patients and evaluators , but rehabilitation continued .

Keywords

Sequence: 79848190
Name Quadriparetic CP, Diparetic CP, Spastic
Downcase Name quadriparetic cp, diparetic cp, spastic

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328238 Sequence: 177328239 Sequence: 177328240 Sequence: 177328241 Sequence: 177328242 Sequence: 177328243 Sequence: 177328244 Sequence: 177328245 Sequence: 177328246 Sequence: 177328247 Sequence: 177328248 Sequence: 177328249 Sequence: 177328250 Sequence: 177328251 Sequence: 177328252 Sequence: 177328253 Sequence: 177328254 Sequence: 177328255 Sequence: 177328256 Sequence: 177328257 Sequence: 177328258 Sequence: 177328259 Sequence: 177328260 Sequence: 177328261 Sequence: 177328262 Sequence: 177328263 Sequence: 177328264
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change from baseline Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Measure Change from baseline Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Measure Change from baseline Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Measure Change from baseline Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Measure Change from baseline GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION MEASURE (GMFM66) Measure Change from baseline GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION MEASURE (GMFM66) Measure Change from baseline GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION MEASURE (GMFM66) Measure Change from baseline GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION MEASURE (GMFM66) Measure Change from baseline GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION MEASURE (GMFM66) Measure Change from baseline Manual Ability Classification System for Children with Cerebral Palsy (MACS) Measure Change from baseline Manual Ability Classification System for Children with Cerebral Palsy (MACS) Measure Change from baseline Manual Ability Classification System for Children with Cerebral Palsy (MACS) Measure Change from baseline Manual Ability Classification System for Children with Cerebral Palsy (MACS) Measure Change from baseline Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Measure Change from baseline Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Measure Change from baseline Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) Measure Change from baseline Modified Ashworth scale Measure Change from baseline Modified Ashworth scale Measure Change from baseline Modified Ashworth scale Measure Change from baseline Modified Ashworth scale Measure Change from baseline Modified Ashworth scale Measure Change from baseline acquired Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings Measure Change from baseline acquired Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings Measure Change from baseline Brain Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Measure Change from baseline Brain Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) Measure Change from baseline Diffuse Tensor Imaging (DTI) fiber count of periventricular white matter Measure Change from baseline Diffuse Tensor Imaging (DTI) fiber count of periventricular white matter
Time Frame Baseline Time Frame "month" 3 Time Frame "month" 6 Time Frame "month" 12 Time Frame Baseline Time Frame "month" 1 Time Frame "month" 3 Time Frame "month" 6 Time Frame "month" 12 Time Frame Baseline Time Frame "month" 3 Time Frame "month" 6 Time Frame "month" 12 Time Frame Baseline Time Frame "month" 6 Time Frame "month" 12 Time Frame Baseline Time Frame "month" 1 Time Frame "month" 3 Time Frame "month" 6 Time Frame "month" 12 Time Frame Baseline Time Frame "month" 12 Time Frame Baseline Time Frame "month" 12 Time Frame Baseline Time Frame "month" 12
Description The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) for cerebral palsy is based on self-initiated movement, with emphasis on sitting, transfers, and mobility. When defining a five-level classification system, our primary criterion has been that the distinctions between levels must be meaningful in daily life. Distinctions are based on functional limitations, the need for hand-held mobility devices (such as walkers, crutches, or canes) or wheeled mobility, and to a much lesser extent, quality of movement.

LEVEL I – Walks without Limitations LEVEL II – Walks with Limitations LEVEL III – Walks Using a Hand-Held Mobility Device LEVEL IV – Self-Mobility with Limitations; May Use Powered Mobility LEVEL V – Transported in a Manual Wheelchair We enrolled the patients with GMFCS more than class II and evaluate for change of this scale during the follow up period . Lower scores demonstrate better gross motor function of children .

Description The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) for cerebral palsy is based on self-initiated movement, with emphasis on sitting, transfers, and mobility. When defining a five-level classification system, our primary criterion has been that the distinctions between levels must be meaningful in daily life. Distinctions are based on functional limitations, the need for hand-held mobility devices (such as walkers, crutches, or canes) or wheeled mobility, and to a much lesser extent, quality of movement.

LEVEL I – Walks without Limitations LEVEL II – Walks with Limitations LEVEL III – Walks Using a Hand-Held Mobility Device LEVEL IV – Self-Mobility with Limitations; May Use Powered Mobility LEVEL V – Transported in a Manual Wheelchair We enrolled the patients with GMFCS more than class II and evaluate for change of this scale during the follow up period . Lower scores demonstrate better gross motor function of children .

Description The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) for cerebral palsy is based on self-initiated movement, with emphasis on sitting, transfers, and mobility. When defining a five-level classification system, our primary criterion has been that the distinctions between levels must be meaningful in daily life. Distinctions are based on functional limitations, the need for hand-held mobility devices (such as walkers, crutches, or canes) or wheeled mobility, and to a much lesser extent, quality of movement.

LEVEL I – Walks without Limitations LEVEL II – Walks with Limitations LEVEL III – Walks Using a Hand-Held Mobility Device LEVEL IV – Self-Mobility with Limitations; May Use Powered Mobility LEVEL V – Transported in a Manual Wheelchair We enrolled the patients with GMFCS more than class II and evaluate for change of this scale during the follow up period . Lower scores demonstrate better gross motor function of children .

Description The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) for cerebral palsy is based on self-initiated movement, with emphasis on sitting, transfers, and mobility. When defining a five-level classification system, our primary criterion has been that the distinctions between levels must be meaningful in daily life. Distinctions are based on functional limitations, the need for hand-held mobility devices (such as walkers, crutches, or canes) or wheeled mobility, and to a much lesser extent, quality of movement.

LEVEL I – Walks without Limitations LEVEL II – Walks with Limitations LEVEL III – Walks Using a Hand-Held Mobility Device LEVEL IV – Self-Mobility with Limitations; May Use Powered Mobility LEVEL V – Transported in a Manual Wheelchair We enrolled the patients with GMFCS more than class II and evaluate for change of this scale during the follow up period . Lower scores demonstrate better gross motor function of children .

Description The GMFM is a standardized observational instrument designed and validated to measure change in gross motor function over time in children with cerebral palsy.

GMFM 66 contained 66 item and each item include 4 score (0-3) SCORING KEY 0 = does not initiate 1 = initiates 2 = partially completes 3 = completes We are using validated Persian version of GMFM 66 in this research. Higher scores demonstrate better gross motor function of children.

Description The GMFM is a standardized observational instrument designed and validated to measure change in gross motor function over time in children with cerebral palsy.

GMFM 66 contained 66 item and each item include 4 score (0-3) SCORING KEY 0 = does not initiate 1 = initiates 2 = partially completes 3 = completes We are using validated Persian version of GMFM 66 in this research. Higher scores demonstrate better gross motor function of children.

Description The GMFM is a standardized observational instrument designed and validated to measure change in gross motor function over time in children with cerebral palsy.

GMFM 66 contained 66 item and each item include 4 score (0-3) SCORING KEY 0 = does not initiate 1 = initiates 2 = partially completes 3 = completes We are using validated Persian version of GMFM 66 in this research. Higher scores demonstrate better gross motor function of children.

Description The GMFM is a standardized observational instrument designed and validated to measure change in gross motor function over time in children with cerebral palsy.

GMFM 66 contained 66 item and each item include 4 score (0-3) SCORING KEY 0 = does not initiate 1 = initiates 2 = partially completes 3 = completes We are using validated Persian version of GMFM 66 in this research. Higher scores demonstrate better gross motor function of children.

Description The GMFM is a standardized observational instrument designed and validated to measure change in gross motor function over time in children with cerebral palsy.

GMFM 66 contained 66 item and each item include 4 score (0-3) SCORING KEY 0 = does not initiate 1 = initiates 2 = partially completes 3 = completes We are using validated Persian version of GMFM 66 in this research. Higher scores demonstrate better gross motor function of children.

Description The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)describes how children with cerebral palsy (CP)use their hands to handle objects in daily activities.

MACS describes five levels. The levels are based on the children's self-initiated ability to handle objects and their need for assistance or adaptation to perform manual activities in everyday life.

Handle objects easily and successfully
Handles most objects but with somewhat reduced quality and/or speed of achievement
Handle objects with difficulty; needs help to prepare and/or modify activities
Handles a limited selection of easily managed objects in adapted situations
Does not handle objects and has severely limited ability to perform even simple actions Level I include children with minor limitations, while children with severe functional limitations will usually be found at levels IV and V.

We are using validated Persian classification system.

Description The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)describes how children with cerebral palsy (CP)use their hands to handle objects in daily activities.

MACS describes five levels. The levels are based on the children's self-initiated ability to handle objects and their need for assistance or adaptation to perform manual activities in everyday life.

Handle objects easily and successfully
Handles most objects but with somewhat reduced quality and/or speed of achievement
Handle objects with difficulty; needs help to prepare and/or modify activities
Handles a limited selection of easily managed objects in adapted situations
Does not handle objects and has severely limited ability to perform even simple actions Level I include children with minor limitations, while children with severe functional limitations will usually be found at levels IV and V.

We are using validated Persian classification system.

Description The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)describes how children with cerebral palsy (CP)use their hands to handle objects in daily activities.

MACS describes five levels. The levels are based on the children's self-initiated ability to handle objects and their need for assistance or adaptation to perform manual activities in everyday life.

Handle objects easily and successfully
Handles most objects but with somewhat reduced quality and/or speed of achievement
Handle objects with difficulty; needs help to prepare and/or modify activities
Handles a limited selection of easily managed objects in adapted situations
Does not handle objects and has severely limited ability to perform even simple actions Level I include children with minor limitations, while children with severe functional limitations will usually be found at levels IV and V.

We are using validated Persian classification system.

Description The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)describes how children with cerebral palsy (CP)use their hands to handle objects in daily activities.

MACS describes five levels. The levels are based on the children's self-initiated ability to handle objects and their need for assistance or adaptation to perform manual activities in everyday life.

Handle objects easily and successfully
Handles most objects but with somewhat reduced quality and/or speed of achievement
Handle objects with difficulty; needs help to prepare and/or modify activities
Handles a limited selection of easily managed objects in adapted situations
Does not handle objects and has severely limited ability to perform even simple actions Level I include children with minor limitations, while children with severe functional limitations will usually be found at levels IV and V.

We are using validated Persian classification system.

Description The PEDI contains items to measure functional capability, and also items to measure the performance in three content domains: Self Care (SC), Mobility (M) and Social Function (SF), Capability is measured by the assessment of the functional skills of which the child has shown mastery.

The items in the FSS are discrete and are accompanied by scoring criteria and sometimes examples of behavior to help clarify scoring decisions. The items can be scored 0 or 1. 0 = unable or limited in capability to perform item in most situations 1 = capable of performing item in most situations, or item has been previously mastered and functional skills have progressed beyond this level.

We are using validated Persian version of this Questionnaire. Higher scores demonstrate better functional capability.

Description The PEDI contains items to measure functional capability, and also items to measure the performance in three content domains: Self Care (SC), Mobility (M) and Social Function (SF), Capability is measured by the assessment of the functional skills of which the child has shown mastery.

The items in the FSS are discrete and are accompanied by scoring criteria and sometimes examples of behavior to help clarify scoring decisions. The items can be scored 0 or 1. 0 = unable or limited in capability to perform item in most situations 1 = capable of performing item in most situations, or item has been previously mastered and functional skills have progressed beyond this level.

We are using validated Persian version of this Questionnaire. Higher scores demonstrate better functional capability.

Description The PEDI contains items to measure functional capability, and also items to measure the performance in three content domains: Self Care (SC), Mobility (M) and Social Function (SF), Capability is measured by the assessment of the functional skills of which the child has shown mastery.

The items in the FSS are discrete and are accompanied by scoring criteria and sometimes examples of behavior to help clarify scoring decisions. The items can be scored 0 or 1. 0 = unable or limited in capability to perform item in most situations 1 = capable of performing item in most situations, or item has been previously mastered and functional skills have progressed beyond this level.

We are using validated Persian version of this Questionnaire. Higher scores demonstrate better functional capability.

Description Scoring (taken from Bohannon and Smith, 1987):

0 No increase in muscle tone

Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM
More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved
Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult
Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension ankle plantar flexion ,knee flexion ,hip flexion , wrist flexion , elbow flexion will be exam-ed by Modified Ashwotth scale and change in severity of spasticity

ankle plantar flexion,knee flexion,hip flexion,wrist flexion,elbow flexion,Spasticity improvement of patients according to Modified Ashworth scale

Description Scoring (taken from Bohannon and Smith, 1987):

0 No increase in muscle tone

Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM
More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved
Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult
Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension ankle plantar flexion ,knee flexion ,hip flexion , wrist flexion , elbow flexion will be exam-ed by Modified Ashwotth scale and change in severity of spasticity

ankle plantar flexion,knee flexion,hip flexion,wrist flexion,elbow flexion,Spasticity improvement of patients according to Modified Ashworth scale

Description Scoring (taken from Bohannon and Smith, 1987):

0 No increase in muscle tone

Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM
More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved
Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult
Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension ankle plantar flexion ,knee flexion ,hip flexion , wrist flexion , elbow flexion will be exam-ed by Modified Ashwotth scale and change in severity of spasticity

ankle plantar flexion,knee flexion,hip flexion,wrist flexion,elbow flexion,Spasticity improvement of patients according to Modified Ashworth scale

Description Scoring (taken from Bohannon and Smith, 1987):

0 No increase in muscle tone

Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM
More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved
Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult
Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension ankle plantar flexion ,knee flexion ,hip flexion , wrist flexion , elbow flexion will be exam-ed by Modified Ashwotth scale and change in severity of spasticity

ankle plantar flexion,knee flexion,hip flexion,wrist flexion,elbow flexion,Spasticity improvement of patients according to Modified Ashworth scale

Description Scoring (taken from Bohannon and Smith, 1987):

0 No increase in muscle tone

Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM
More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved
Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult
Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension ankle plantar flexion ,knee flexion ,hip flexion , wrist flexion , elbow flexion will be exam-ed by Modified Ashwotth scale and change in severity of spasticity

ankle plantar flexion,knee flexion,hip flexion,wrist flexion,elbow flexion,Spasticity improvement of patients according to Modified Ashworth scale

Description One of our inclusion criteria for enrollment of the cases was evidence of definite acquired abnormal imaging findings compatible with CP such as periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) , cystic encephalomalacia ,periventricular gliosis , porencephalic cyst , basal ganglia involvement and brain atrophy . Decrements in size or improvement of Brain imaging findings would be expected due to Stem Cell therapy and will be followed 12 months after injection . Description One of our inclusion criteria for enrollment of the cases was evidence of definite acquired abnormal imaging findings compatible with CP such as periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) , cystic encephalomalacia ,periventricular gliosis , porencephalic cyst , basal ganglia involvement and brain atrophy . Decrements in size or improvement of Brain imaging findings would be expected due to Stem Cell therapy and will be followed 12 months after injection . Description MRS allows noninvasive detection and measurement of normal and abnormal metabolites and biochemical changes in the brain . The frequency of different metabolites is measured in units called parts per million (PPM) and plotted on a graph as peaks of varying height . The metabolites normally detected in the brain, regardless of the adopted echo time, include Nacetyl aspartate (NAA),a neuronal marker, choline (Cho), a membrane marker, and creatine (Cr), an energy metabolism marker. Increase in NAA /Cr and NAA/Cho ratios expected as baseline and would be expected to have a change after Stem Cell therapy in favor of neuroglia cells load or number increase at the site of previous brain damage. Description MRS allows noninvasive detection and measurement of normal and abnormal metabolites and biochemical changes in the brain . The frequency of different metabolites is measured in units called parts per million (PPM) and plotted on a graph as peaks of varying height . The metabolites normally detected in the brain, regardless of the adopted echo time, include Nacetyl aspartate (NAA),a neuronal marker, choline (Cho), a membrane marker, and creatine (Cr), an energy metabolism marker. Increase in NAA /Cr and NAA/Cho ratios expected as baseline and would be expected to have a change after Stem Cell therapy in favor of neuroglia cells load or number increase at the site of previous brain damage. Description DTI is a modification of the MRI technique that is sensitive to the Brownian motion of water molecules in biological tissues and is a new clinical method that can demonstrate the orientation and integrity of white matter fibers . Periventricular white matter injury is a major form of brain injury observed in CP . Significant reduction in DTI fiber count on the periventricular or other regions of cerebral white matter injury involving corticospinal tract , corticobulbar tract and superior thalamic radiation expected as baseline . Increase in DTI fiber count would be expected due to Stem Cell therapy and will be followed 12 months after injection . Description DTI is a modification of the MRI technique that is sensitive to the Brownian motion of water molecules in biological tissues and is a new clinical method that can demonstrate the orientation and integrity of white matter fibers . Periventricular white matter injury is a major form of brain injury observed in CP . Significant reduction in DTI fiber count on the periventricular or other regions of cerebral white matter injury involving corticospinal tract , corticobulbar tract and superior thalamic radiation expected as baseline . Increase in DTI fiber count would be expected due to Stem Cell therapy and will be followed 12 months after injection .

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193432282 Sequence: 193432283 Sequence: 193432284 Sequence: 193432285 Sequence: 193432286 Sequence: 193432287 Sequence: 193432288 Sequence: 193432289 Sequence: 193432290 Sequence: 193432291 Sequence: 193432292
Mesh Term Muscle Spasticity Mesh Term Cerebral Palsy Mesh Term Neurologic Manifestations Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Brain Damage, Chronic Mesh Term Brain Diseases Mesh Term Central Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Muscular Diseases Mesh Term Musculoskeletal Diseases Mesh Term Muscle Hypertonia Mesh Term Neuromuscular Manifestations
Downcase Mesh Term muscle spasticity Downcase Mesh Term cerebral palsy Downcase Mesh Term neurologic manifestations Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term brain damage, chronic Downcase Mesh Term brain diseases Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term muscular diseases Downcase Mesh Term musculoskeletal diseases Downcase Mesh Term muscle hypertonia Downcase Mesh Term neuromuscular manifestations
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306149 Sequence: 48306150
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Tehran University of Medical Sciences Name Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29277967 Sequence: 29277968 Sequence: 29277969 Sequence: 29277970 Sequence: 29277971 Sequence: 29277972
Role Principal Investigator Role Study Director Role Study Director Role Study Director Role Study Director Role Study Director
Name Mahmoudreza Ashrafi, MD Name Amirali Hamidieh, MD Name Hadi Montazerlotfelahi, MD Name Anahita Majma, MD Name Masood Ghahvechi akbari, MD Name Ali Reza Moaeidi, MD
Affiliation Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Children's Medical Center Affiliation Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Children's Medical Center Affiliation Alborz University of Medical Sciences Affiliation Tehran University of Medical Sciences Children's Medical Center Affiliation Tehran University of Medical Sciences ,Children's Medical Center Affiliation Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130927 Sequence: 68130928 Sequence: 68130929 Sequence: 68130930 Sequence: 68130931
Design Group Id 55577963 Design Group Id 55577962 Design Group Id 55577963 Design Group Id 55577962 Design Group Id 55577962
Intervention Id 52472064 Intervention Id 52472064 Intervention Id 52472065 Intervention Id 52472065 Intervention Id 52472066

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757394
Gender All
Minimum Age 4 Years
Maximum Age 14 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion criteria :

Spastic cerebral palsy (Diparetic , Quadriparetic)
Ages between 4 – 14 years
Gross motor function classification ( GMFC) between 2 -5
No seizure disorder or with controlled seizures
Evidence of definite acquired abnormal imaging findings compatible with CP
Informed consent is taken from their parents

Exclusion criteria:

Normal brain MRI
Progressive neurologic disorders
Congenital cortical malformations
TORCH infections (Toxoplasmosis,Other,Rubella,Cytomegalovirus and Herpes infections)
Other types of cerebral palsy including athetoid , atonic , ataxic , and mixed type
Acute intercurrent infections such as Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Malignancies
Hemorrhagic diathesis
Severe anemia ( Hemoglobin less than 8 g/dl )
Ventilator dependent pulmonary diseases
Renal insufficiency
Severe liver dysfunction

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254228608
Number Of Facilities 4
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 4
Maximum Age Num 14
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 21
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30503619
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Triple
Masking Description only one of the investigators knows the type of cell therapy for intervention group and simulation of intrathecal injection for control group .
Intervention Model Description HLA typing were done for 150 cases of spastic CP with our inclusion criteria and 36 cases of class 6 matching of HLA selected for hematopoietic stem cells derived from allogenic umbilical cord and 72 cases were randomly divided to Mesenchymal cells derived from allogenic umbilical cord and control group .
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26665944 Sequence: 26665945
Intervention Id 52472064 Intervention Id 52472065
Name Hematopoietic stem cells Name Mesenchymal stem cells

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2578358
Document Type Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True
Has Icf False
Has Sap True
Document Date 2017-01-18
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/74/NCT03795974/Prot_SAP_000.pdf

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869897
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Mahmoud Reza Ashrafi
Title Professor of Pediatric Neurology
Affiliation Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Study References

Sequence: 52049439 Sequence: 52049440 Sequence: 52049441 Sequence: 52049442 Sequence: 52049443 Sequence: 52049444 Sequence: 52049445 Sequence: 52049446 Sequence: 52049447 Sequence: 52049448 Sequence: 52049449 Sequence: 52049450
Pmid 21335665 Pmid 26236347 Pmid 16049045 Pmid 25593079 Pmid 16108461 Pmid 19416339 Pmid 15037681 Pmid 24100132 Pmid 12529557 Pmid 24909743 Pmid 35351020 Pmid 34362453
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type derived Reference Type derived
Citation Papadopoulos KI, Low SS, Aw TC, Chantarojanasiri T. Safety and feasibility of autologous umbilical cord blood transfusion in 2 toddlers with cerebral palsy and the role of low dose granulocyte-colony stimulating factor injections. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(1):17-22. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0572. Citation Feng M, Lu A, Gao H, Qian C, Zhang J, Lin T, Zhao Y. Safety of Allogeneic Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cells Therapy in Patients with Severe Cerebral Palsy: A Retrospective Study. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:325652. doi: 10.1155/2015/325652. Epub 2015 Jul 8. Citation Thomas B, Eyssen M, Peeters R, Molenaers G, Van Hecke P, De Cock P, Sunaert S. Quantitative diffusion tensor imaging in cerebral palsy due to periventricular white matter injury. Brain. 2005 Nov;128(Pt 11):2562-77. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh600. Epub 2005 Jul 27. Citation Zali A, Arab L, Ashrafi F, Mardpour S, Niknejhadi M, Hedayati-Asl AA, Halimi-Asl A, Ommi D, Hosseini SE, Baharvand H, Aghdami N. Intrathecal injection of CD133-positive enriched bone marrow progenitor cells in children with cerebral palsy: feasibility and safety. Cytotherapy. 2015 Feb;17(2):232-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Nov 1. Citation Bax M, Goldstein M, Rosenbaum P, Leviton A, Paneth N, Dan B, Jacobsson B, Damiano D; Executive Committee for the Definition of Cerebral Palsy. Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy, April 2005. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005 Aug;47(8):571-6. doi: 10.1017/s001216220500112x. Citation Shevell MI, Dagenais L, Hall N; REPACQ CONSORTIUM*. The relationship of cerebral palsy subtype and functional motor impairment: a population-based study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Nov;51(11):872-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03269.x. Epub 2009 Mar 11. Citation Ashwal S, Russman BS, Blasco PA, Miller G, Sandler A, Shevell M, Stevenson R; Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Practice parameter: diagnostic assessment of the child with cerebral palsy: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2004 Mar 23;62(6):851-63. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000117981.35364.1b. Citation Wang X, Cheng H, Hua R, Yang J, Dai G, Zhang Z, Wang R, Qin C, An Y. Effects of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells on gross motor function measure scores of children with cerebral palsy: a preliminary clinical study. Cytotherapy. 2013 Dec;15(12):1549-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Oct 5. Citation Romanov YA, Svintsitskaya VA, Smirnov VN. Searching for alternative sources of postnatal human mesenchymal stem cells: candidate MSC-like cells from umbilical cord. Stem Cells. 2003;21(1):105-10. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.21-1-105. Citation Crompton KE, Elwood N, Kirkland M, Clark P, Novak I, Reddihough D. Feasibility of trialling cord blood stem cell treatments for cerebral palsy in Australia. J Paediatr Child Health. 2014 Jul;50(7):540-4. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12618. Epub 2014 Jun 9. Citation Zarrabi M, Akbari MG, Amanat M, Majmaa A, Moaiedi AR, Montazerlotfelahi H, Nouri M, Hamidieh AA, Badv RS, Karimi H, Rabbani A, Mohebbi A, Rahimi-Dehgolan S, Rahimi R, Dehghan E, Vosough M, Abroun S, Shamsabadi FM, Tavasoli AR, Alizadeh H, Pak N, Zamani GR, Mohammadi M, Javadzadeh M, Ghofrani M, Hassanpour SH, Heidari M, Taghdiri MM, Mohseni MJ, Noparast Z, Masoomi S, Goudarzi M, Mohamadpour M, Shodjaee R, Samimi S, Mohammad M, Gholami M, Vafaei N, Koochakzadeh L, Valizadeh A, Malamiri RA, Ashrafi MR. The safety and efficacy of umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells in individuals with spastic cerebral palsy: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial. BMC Neurol. 2022 Mar 29;22(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02636-y. Citation Amanat M, Majmaa A, Zarrabi M, Nouri M, Akbari MG, Moaiedi AR, Ghaemi O, Zamani F, Najafi S, Badv RS, Vosough M, Hamidieh AA, Salehi M, Montazerlotfelahi H, Tavasoli AR, Heidari M, Mohebi H, Fatemi A, Garakani A, Ashrafi MR. Clinical and imaging outcomes after intrathecal injection of umbilical cord tissue mesenchymal stem cells in cerebral palsy: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021 Aug 6;12(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02513-4.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Neuromedulatory Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Electrical Stimulation in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795961
2018-12-16

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795961
NCT03795961https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795961?tab=tableAhmed Maatyaimaaty@hotmail.com+201027089991This is a double blinded randomized clinical trial to study the neuromodulatory effect of tDCS in patients with CTS, the study subject will be randomly into two groups; active and sham group , the active group will receive five sessions of active TDCS over the M1 while the Sham group will receive sham tDCS in which the device will be turned off after 30 seconds. The patient will be assessed by VAS score, Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire , central sensetization inventory , pressure pain threshold, sensory and pain threshold for electerical stimulation before , after the end of the sessions and 4 weeks later.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year December 16, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year January 2020
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735726
Description The study will be carried out on patients attending the Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic in Suez Canal University Hospital, Ismailia, EGYPT and diagnosed with CTS according to clinical examination and to the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) practice recommendations for CTS.

Study subjects will be divided into two groups:

Group (1): (active group) will include 42 patients with CTS and will receive anodal tDCS of M1 for 20 minutes, at 2 mA for 5 sessions and less than 72 hrs. may be allowed between experimental sessions for each participant to avoid any interference.

Group (2): (sham group) will include 42 patients with CTS and will receive sham tDCS M1 (the set will be turned off after 30 seconds) for 20 minutes, at 2 mA for 5 sessions.

The study sample will be collected from all patients with CTS attending to the Physical medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic in Suez Canal University Hospital fulfilling the eligibility criteria, will be eligible to join the study (either referred for electrophysiological study or presented to the clinic for primary assessment). To make sure that no bias should enter the assessment of the results, neither the patient nor the clinicians will be aware whether active tDCS will be applicated to a particular case. To ensure this result, two symbols (Square and Triangle) will be applicated to the physiotherapy sheet and only the physiotherapist knew the key for each symbol. The triangle may represent the cases of CTS for active tDCS and the square may represent the sham group or vice versa. At the end of the study the two groups will be revealed in order to analyze the results according to proper statistical measures.

Facilities

Sequence: 200244000
Status Recruiting
Name Suez Canal University Hospital
City Ismailia
Zip 41522
Country Egypt

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28127922 Sequence: 28127923
Facility Id 200244000 Facility Id 200244000
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Gehad Swilam, MSc Name Ahmed Maaty, MD
Email gsa237@gmail.com Email aimaaty@hotmail.com
Phone +201027089991 Phone +201004978451

Conditions

Sequence: 52207934
Name Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Downcase Name carpal tunnel syndrome

Id Information

Sequence: 40186059
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value GSMGAEAM

Countries

Sequence: 42599563
Name Egypt
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55634534 Sequence: 55634535
Group Type Experimental Group Type Sham Comparator
Title Active tDCS group Title Sham tDCS group
Description This group will include 42 patients with CTS Intervention (active transcranial direct current electrical stimulation) Stimulation site (M1) Stimulation mode (anodal) Duration of session (20 minutes) Stimulation intensity (2 mA) Number of sessions (5 sessions) Intervals (every another day) Description This group will include 42 patients with CTS Intervention (sham or inactive transcranial direct current electrical stimulation) Stimulation site (M1) Stimulation mode (anodal) Duration of session (20 minutes) Stimulation intensity (2 mA) Number of sessions (5 sessions) Intervals (every another day)

Interventions

Sequence: 52521950
Intervention Type Device
Name transcranial direct current electrical stimulation
Description anodal tDCS of M1 for 20 minutes, at 2 mA for 5 sessions (day after day)

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177510762 Sequence: 177510763 Sequence: 177510764 Sequence: 177510765 Sequence: 177510766 Sequence: 177510767 Sequence: 177510768 Sequence: 177510769 Sequence: 177510770 Sequence: 177510771 Sequence: 177510772 Sequence: 177510773 Sequence: 177510774 Sequence: 177510775 Sequence: 177510776
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Visual analogue scale Measure Visual analogue scale (VAS) Measure Visual analogue scale (VAS) Measure Sensory threshold and pain threshold for electrical stimulation Measure Sensory threshold and pain threshold for electrical stimulation Measure Sensory threshold and pain threshold for electrical stimulation Measure Pressure pain threshold assessment Measure Pressure pain threshold assessment Measure Pressure pain threshold assessment Measure Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire Measure Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire Measure Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire Measure Central sensitization inventory Measure Central sensitization inventory (CSI) Measure Central sensitization inventory (CSI)
Time Frame before sessions (baseline assessment) Time Frame immediately after the ending of sessions Time Frame four weeks after the ending of sessions Time Frame before sessions (baseline assessment) Time Frame immediately after the ending of sessions Time Frame four weeks after the ending of sessions Time Frame before sessions (baseline assessment) Time Frame immediately after the ending of sessions Time Frame four weeks after the ending of sessions Time Frame before sessions (baseline assessment) Time Frame immediately after the ending of sessions Time Frame four weeks after the ending of sessions Time Frame before sessions (baseline assessment) Time Frame immediately after the ending of sessions Time Frame four weeks after the ending of sessions
Description Visual analogue scale is a measurement instrument that measure the pain across a continuum of values. Visual analogue scale is measured in millimeters and ranged from minimum (0 millimeter) to maximum (100 millimeters), where, score 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst pain ever. Description Visual analogue scale is a measurement instrument that measure the pain across a continuum of values. Visual analogue scale is measured in millimeters and ranged from minimum (0 millimeter) to maximum (100 millimeters), where, score 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst pain ever. Description Visual analogue scale is a measurement instrument that measure the pain across a continuum of values. Visual analogue scale is measured in millimeters and ranged from minimum (0 millimeter) to maximum (100 millimeters), where, score 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst pain ever. Description Electrical stimulation will be applied by a pen electrode (model: 2762CC; Chattanooga) to the median nerve (pulse duration – 200 microseconds) at wrist level. Current supply start at 0 milli-ampere and will be increased in steps of 0.1 milli-ampere, until the participant report sensation and pain. The intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which perception of the electrical stimulus first reported will be taken as sensory threshold; the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which participants first reported pain will be taken as pain threshold. These measurements will be averaged for analysis. Both sides will be assessed and compared. The lower the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the better the threshold. Description Electrical stimulation will be applied by a pen electrode (model: 2762CC; Chattanooga) to the median nerve (pulse duration – 200 microseconds) at wrist level. Current supply start at 0 milli-ampere and will be increased in steps of 0.1 milli-ampere, until the participant report sensation and pain. The intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which perception of the electrical stimulus first reported will be taken as sensory threshold; the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which participants first reported pain will be taken as pain threshold. These measurements will be averaged for analysis. Both sides will be assessed and compared. The lower the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the better the threshold. Description Electrical stimulation will be applied by a pen electrode (model: 2762CC; Chattanooga) to the median nerve (pulse duration – 200 microseconds) at wrist level. Current supply start at 0 milli-ampere and will be increased in steps of 0.1 milli-ampere, until the participant report sensation and pain. The intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which perception of the electrical stimulus first reported will be taken as sensory threshold; the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) at which participants first reported pain will be taken as pain threshold. These measurements will be averaged for analysis. Both sides will be assessed and compared. The lower the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the intensity of current (in milli-ampere) perceived, the better the threshold. Description Pressure will be induced using a pressure algometer (PainTest™ FPN 100 Algometer (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, USA)) with a flat circular metal probe dressed in a rubber cover with a surface area of 1 cm2 applied to median, ulnar, radial, and c5-6 zygoapophyseal joint, The algometer will be mounted vertically and the pressure will be increased. Patients are asked to notify the investigator when they start to feel pain (pain threshold). For each measurement the algometer will be calibrated to enable force to be applied at a controlled and steady rate, the mean of three trials (intra-examiner reliability) will be calculated and used for main analysis. A 30 seconds resting period will be allowed between each measure. Both sides will be assessed and compared. Abnormal pressure pain threshold is at least 2 kg/cm2 different than that of the opposite site. The lower the value perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the value perceived, the better the threshold. Description Pressure will be induced using a pressure algometer (PainTest™ FPN 100 Algometer (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, USA)) with a flat circular metal probe dressed in a rubber cover with a surface area of 1 cm2 applied to median, ulnar, radial, and c5-6 zygoapophyseal joint, The algometer will be mounted vertically and the pressure will be increased. Patients are asked to notify the investigator when they start to feel pain (pain threshold). For each measurement the algometer will be calibrated to enable force to be applied at a controlled and steady rate, the mean of three trials (intra-examiner reliability) will be calculated and used for main analysis. A 30 seconds resting period will be allowed between each measure. Both sides will be assessed and compared. Abnormal pressure pain threshold is at least 2 kg/cm2 different than that of the opposite site. The lower the value perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the value perceived, the better the threshold. Description Pressure will be induced using a pressure algometer (PainTest™ FPN 100 Algometer (Wagner Instruments, Greenwich, USA)) with a flat circular metal probe dressed in a rubber cover with a surface area of 1 cm2 applied to median, ulnar, radial, and c5-6 zygoapophyseal joint, The algometer will be mounted vertically and the pressure will be increased. Patients are asked to notify the investigator when they start to feel pain (pain threshold). For each measurement the algometer will be calibrated to enable force to be applied at a controlled and steady rate, the mean of three trials (intra-examiner reliability) will be calculated and used for main analysis. A 30 seconds resting period will be allowed between each measure. Both sides will be assessed and compared. Abnormal pressure pain threshold is at least 2 kg/cm2 different than that of the opposite site. The lower the value perceived, the worse the threshold, while the higher the value perceived, the better the threshold. Description Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire is a disease-specific measure of self-reported symptom severity and functional status. It is frequently used in the reporting of outcomes from trials into interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome. Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire contains two sub-scales: symptom severity scale (11 items) and functional status scale (8 items). Scoring instructions: add the numbers corresponding to all answers and divide by the number of questions answered. Composite score (round to nearest 1/100th). The scores of symptom severity scale is ranged from 1-5, where, score 1 indicates no pain and score 5 indicates very severe pain. The scores of functional status scale is ranged from 1-5, where, score 1 indicates no difficulty and score 5 indicates cannot do at all due to hand or wrist. Description Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire is a disease-specific measure of self-reported symptom severity and functional status. It is frequently used in the reporting of outcomes from trials into interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome. Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire contains two sub-scales: symptom severity scale (11 items) and functional status scale (8 items). Scoring instructions: add the numbers corresponding to all answers and divide by the number of questions answered. Composite score (round to nearest 1/100th). The scores of symptom severity scale is ranged from 1-5, where, score 1 indicates no pain and score 5 indicates very severe pain. The scores of functional status scale is ranged from 1-5, where, score 1 indicates no difficulty and score 5 indicates cannot do at all due to hand or wrist. Description Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire is a disease-specific measure of self-reported symptom severity and functional status. It is frequently used in the reporting of outcomes from trials into interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome. Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire contains two sub-scales: symptom severity scale (11 items) and functional status scale (8 items). Scoring instructions: add the numbers corresponding to all answers and divide by the number of questions answered. Composite score (round to nearest 1/100th). The scores of symptom severity scale is ranged from 1-5, where, score 1 indicates no pain and score 5 indicates very severe pain. The scores of functional status scale is ranged from 1-5, where, score 1 indicates no difficulty and score 5 indicates cannot do at all due to hand or wrist. Description Central sensitization inventory is a screening instrument for clinicians to help identify patients with central sensitivity syndrome. Central sensitization inventory consists of two parts. Part A, one is asked how often he/she experiences each symptom ("never, rarely, sometimes, often, or always"). Individual items are scored from "0" (never) to "4" (always), resulting in a total score range for all 25 items from "0" to "100." A score of 40 or higher indicates the presence of central sensitivity syndrome. Part B asked if one has been previously diagnosed with seven common central sensitivity syndrome diagnoses (tension headaches/migraines, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, restless leg syndrome, temporomandibular joint disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome, and multiple chemical sensitivities) and three central sensitization-related diagnoses (depression, anxiety/panic attacks, and neck injury). Central sensitization inventory B is for information only and is not scored. Description Central sensitization inventory is a screening instrument for clinicians to help identify patients with central sensitivity syndrome. Central sensitization inventory consists of two parts. Part A, one is asked how often he/she experiences each symptom ("never, rarely, sometimes, often, or always"). Individual items are scored from "0" (never) to "4" (always), resulting in a total score range for all 25 items from "0" to "100." A score of 40 or higher indicates the presence of central sensitivity syndrome. Part B asked if one has been previously diagnosed with seven common central sensitivity syndrome diagnoses (tension headaches/migraines, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, restless leg syndrome, temporomandibular joint disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome, and multiple chemical sensitivities) and three central sensitization-related diagnoses (depression, anxiety/panic attacks, and neck injury). Central sensitization inventory B is for information only and is not scored. Description Central sensitization inventory is a screening instrument for clinicians to help identify patients with central sensitivity syndrome. Central sensitization inventory consists of two parts. Part A, one is asked how often he/she experiences each symptom ("never, rarely, sometimes, often, or always"). Individual items are scored from "0" (never) to "4" (always), resulting in a total score range for all 25 items from "0" to "100." A score of 40 or higher indicates the presence of central sensitivity syndrome. Part B asked if one has been previously diagnosed with seven common central sensitivity syndrome diagnoses (tension headaches/migraines, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, restless leg syndrome, temporomandibular joint disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome, and multiple chemical sensitivities) and three central sensitization-related diagnoses (depression, anxiety/panic attacks, and neck injury). Central sensitization inventory B is for information only and is not scored.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193626444 Sequence: 193626445 Sequence: 193626446 Sequence: 193626447 Sequence: 193626448 Sequence: 193626449 Sequence: 193626450 Sequence: 193626451 Sequence: 193626452 Sequence: 193626453 Sequence: 193626454 Sequence: 193626455 Sequence: 193626456
Mesh Term Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Mesh Term Syndrome Mesh Term Disease Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Median Neuropathy Mesh Term Mononeuropathies Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Neuromuscular Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Nerve Compression Syndromes Mesh Term Cumulative Trauma Disorders Mesh Term Sprains and Strains Mesh Term Wounds and Injuries
Downcase Mesh Term carpal tunnel syndrome Downcase Mesh Term syndrome Downcase Mesh Term disease Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term median neuropathy Downcase Mesh Term mononeuropathies Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term neuromuscular diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term nerve compression syndromes Downcase Mesh Term cumulative trauma disorders Downcase Mesh Term sprains and strains Downcase Mesh Term wounds and injuries
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48353575
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Suez Canal University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29305920
Role Study Director
Name Mona S Ghaly, MD
Affiliation Suez Canal University

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12017167 Sequence: 12017168
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Gehad Swilam Name Ahmed Maaty
Phone +201027089991 Phone +201027089991
Email gsa237@gmail.com Email aimaaty@hotmail.com
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199028 Sequence: 68199029
Design Group Id 55634534 Design Group Id 55634535
Intervention Id 52521950 Intervention Id 52521950

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30786799
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 60 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patient diagnosed as CTS by history, clinical examination and NCS for more than 3 months.

Both genders. Adult of aged 18 years and above. Able to understand the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with diabetes mellitus, collagen disorders, thyroid disease, peripheral neuropathy, traumatic nerve injury, cervical radiculopathy, fibromyalgia.

Pregnancy. Malignant. Patients with any clinically significant or unstable medical or psychiatric disorder.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989475
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 60
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 9
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30532869
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Masking Description To make sure that no bias should enter the assessment of the results, neither the patient nor the clinicians will be aware whether active tDCS will be applicated to a particular case. To ensure this result, two symbols (Square and Triangle) will be applicated to the physiotherapy sheet and only the physiotherapist knew the key for each symbol. The triangle may represent the cases of CTS for active tDCS and the square may represent the sham group or vice versa. At the end of the study the two groups will be revealed in order to analyze the results according to proper statistical measures.
Intervention Model Description the study subject will be allocated into two group ; active and sham group
Subject Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899163
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Gehad Swilam Abdelmonem Swilam
Title Assistant Lecturer
Affiliation Suez Canal University

]]>

<![CDATA[ Patient Reported Outcomes in Stroke Care ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795948
2017-07-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795948
NCT03795948https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795948?tab=tableNANANAThe presented study is an explorative prospective study. First, it focusses on the longitudinal analysis of outcome quality in stroke treatment (12 months). Particularly, it addresses patient reported quality of life after inpatient stroke treatment and influencing factors. Second, it focusses on the feasibility and acceptance of a standard set of measures capturing outcome quality of medical care in stroke patients.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-01-19
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-04-10
Start Month Year July 1, 2017
Primary Completion Month Year June 30, 2019
Verification Month Year April 2020
Verification Date 2020-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2020-04-10

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20721567
Description With a shift in focus to patient-centered health care and a constant effort to improve the quality of treatment, the role of the patient's perception of his/her medical care becomes essential. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are among the most adequate instruments for assessing the patient's perspective on symptom load, functional status, and quality of life. After stroke, patients not only suffer from objectively scaled and measurable symptoms and impairments but also experience dramatic changes in everyday routine and quality of life.

In this project, a standardized outcome measurement, including PROMs, for stroke patients is used.

This stoke standard set was developed by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM; www.ICHOM.org); an international, interdisciplinary and inter-professional expert group with the contribution of patient representatives, aiming to create a comprehensive tool for measuring the most important outcomes and risk factors applicable to a broad variety of diseases.

Main objective of this study is the analysis of quality of life 90 and 360 days after stroke and its association with stroke specific risk factors and complications, also measured within the scope of the ICHOM tool.

Furthermore, the process and success of the implementation of the ICHOM stroke standard set within the stroke unit of the University Medical Centre Hamburg- Eppendorf (UKE) will be studied and evaluated.

Facilities

Sequence: 200107784
Name Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE)
City Hamburg
Zip 20246
Country Germany

Conditions

Sequence: 52171072
Name Stroke
Downcase Name stroke

Id Information

Sequence: 40158516
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 0977_114

Countries

Sequence: 42568825
Name Germany
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55593007
Group Type Other
Title PROM Evaluation for stroke patients
Description Patient will be enrolled and PROMs will be collected.

Interventions

Sequence: 52485317
Intervention Type Other
Name PROMs
Description Introduction and assessment of the ICHOM standard set consisting of demographic and medical data as well as questionnaires filled in by patients, shortly after admission to the stroke unit, at discharge, and at 90 and 360 days after stroke.

Specifically the intervention includes an assembly of clinical records, in particular records of complications, recurrence of disease and mortality. Further patients will be required to complete a questionnaire assessing their situation in terms of housing and symptom burden as well as their self-perceived autonomy and quality of life.

Telephone assessments will be administered to support patients if necessary and validate their responses.

Keywords

Sequence: 79868247 Sequence: 79868248 Sequence: 79868249 Sequence: 79868250 Sequence: 79868251 Sequence: 79868252 Sequence: 79868253 Sequence: 79868254 Sequence: 79868255
Name Stoke Name Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) Name Quality of life Name Morbidity Name Mortality Name Functional status Name Patient-centered care Name ICHOM Name Treatment quality
Downcase Name stoke Downcase Name patient-reported outcomes (pros) Downcase Name quality of life Downcase Name morbidity Downcase Name mortality Downcase Name functional status Downcase Name patient-centered care Downcase Name ichom Downcase Name treatment quality

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177378205 Sequence: 177378203 Sequence: 177378204 Sequence: 177378206 Sequence: 177378207 Sequence: 177378208 Sequence: 177378209 Sequence: 177378210
Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Recurrence of disease Measure Global patient reported health-related quality of life Measure Patient reported mental health status Measure Acute complications of treatment Measure Use of healthcare services after stroke Measure Quantitative process evaluation of the implementation of the ICHOM stroke standard set in routine care Measure Psychometric evaluation of the patient-reported outcome measures Measure Qualitative process evaluation of the implementation of the ICHOM stroke standard set in routine care
Time Frame 90 days Time Frame 90 days Time Frame 90 days Time Frame at discharge from inpatient care, on average 6 days after admission Time Frame 90 days Time Frame after study completion (2 years) Time Frame after study completion (2 years) Time Frame after study completion (2 years)
Description patient-reported measures Description PROMIS-10 Description PHQ-4 (depression, anxiety) Description clinical assessment of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage Description Patient-reported measures about the patient's level of care and use of specific rehabilitation measures as part of the ICHOM stroke standard set, specifically two questions ranging from 0 to 5 and 0 to 4 with 0 denoting self-containment and no use of rehabilitation services respec-tively and 5 and 4 denoting high level care-dependency and admission in longterm care facilities respectively. Description Quantitative indicators on feasibility of the intervention (i.e. recruitente and respective response rate) Description Psychometric evaluation of the patient-reported outcome measueres of the ICHOM stroke standard set in the study population Description qualitative interviews with the staff and patients on acceptability, feasibility, barriers, and facilitators of the intervention

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193486038 Sequence: 193486039 Sequence: 193486040 Sequence: 193486041 Sequence: 193486042 Sequence: 193486043 Sequence: 193486044
Mesh Term Stroke Mesh Term Cerebrovascular Disorders Mesh Term Brain Diseases Mesh Term Central Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Vascular Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term stroke Downcase Mesh Term cerebrovascular disorders Downcase Mesh Term brain diseases Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48319127
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29285254
Role Principal Investigator
Name Thomalla Götz, MD, Prof.
Affiliation Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68148941
Design Group Id 55593007
Intervention Id 52485317

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30765253
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients in inpatient care in the stroke unit of the UKE with the following diagnoses (ICD-10):

Ischemic attack (I63),
Transient ischemic attack (G45)
Intracerebral hemorrhage (I64)
Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Substantially impaired communication capacity due to aphasia or dementia

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253875413
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 24
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 7

Designs

Sequence: 30511420
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28877714
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52063104 Sequence: 52063105 Sequence: 52063106 Sequence: 52063107
Pmid 35292028 Pmid 34420516 Pmid 33324894 Pmid 32810906
Reference Type derived Reference Type derived Reference Type derived Reference Type derived
Citation Lebherz L, Fraune E, Thomalla G, Frese M, Appelbohm H, Rimmele DL, Harter M, Kriston L. Implementability of collecting patient-reported outcome data in stroke unit care – a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 16;22(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07722-y. Citation Rimmele DL, Schrage T, Lebherz L, Kriston L, Gerloff C, Harter M, Thomalla G. Profiles of patients' self-reported health after acute stroke. Neurol Res Pract. 2021 Aug 23;3(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s42466-021-00146-9. Citation Rimmele DL, Lebherz L, Frese M, Appelbohm H, Bartz HJ, Kriston L, Gerloff C, Harter M, Thomalla G. Outcome evaluation by patient reported outcome measures in stroke clinical practice (EPOS) protocol for a prospective observation and implementation study. Neurol Res Pract. 2019 Nov 1;1:28. doi: 10.1186/s42466-019-0034-0. eCollection 2019. Citation Rimmele DL, Lebherz L, Frese M, Appelbohm H, Bartz HJ, Kriston L, Gerloff C, Harter M, Thomalla G. Health-related quality of life 90 days after stroke assessed by the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement standard set. Eur J Neurol. 2020 Dec;27(12):2508-2516. doi: 10.1111/ene.14479. Epub 2020 Sep 7.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Relief From Side Effects: Clinical Use of Electrodes With Direction ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795935
2018-09-17

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795935
NCT03795935https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795935?tab=tableNatasha Sarai, BSNnatasha.sarai@vch.ca6048754111Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) uses electrical pulses sent through a lead (insulated wire) to help stop unwanted symptoms in a variety of brain diseases, including the tremor seen in patients with Essential Tremor (ET). The current standard lead allows this stimulation to spread out uniformly in all directions. As these diseases progress, however, the amount of electrical stimulation required to stop the symptom usually increases. This may become problematic because the increased electrical stimulation required for advanced symptoms may spread outside the desired targeted area, and effect other parts of the brain and causing unwanted side effects. A new type of DBS lead has been developed which can steer, or focus, the electrical stimulation in a given direction toward the desired target area and away from areas that would cause side effects. We would like to quantify the benefit seen in patients who have been switched from the traditional lead to this new directional lead.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-09-17
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year September 17, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year July 1, 2019
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20741070
Description Patients implanted with a DBS may experience unwanted side effects such as motor contractures, paresthesia, or dysarthria. This occurs when the electrical field of the stimulation spreads out beyond the targeted area. This is especially common in patients whose disease has progressed, and must use increasingly higher currents in order to regain control of their tremor. Unfortunately, because the electrical field affects neurons in a symmetrical sphere around the DBS, it is often impossible to reach the additional desired neuronal elements without simultaneously affecting equidistant brain regions responsible for side effects. For many of our advanced patients, this means choosing between a debilitating tremor or disabling side effects.The directional lead is a FDA and Health Canada approved DBS lead which features radially segmented electrodes which can selectively steer the electrical field in a predefined direction, orthogonal to the lead trajectory. This will allow DBS clinicians to steer current towards desired structural areas, while avoiding locations, which produce negative side effects.

Facilities

Sequence: 200280070
Status Recruiting
Name The Vancouver General Hospital
City Vancouver
State British Columbia
Zip V5Z 4E3
Country Canada

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28132783
Facility Id 200280070
Contact Type primary
Name Christopher R Honey, MD, DPhil
Email chris.honey@telus.net
Phone 604.875.5894

Conditions

Sequence: 52221268 Sequence: 52221269 Sequence: 52221270
Name Deep Brain Stimulation Name Directional Lead Name Essential Tremor
Downcase Name deep brain stimulation Downcase Name directional lead Downcase Name essential tremor

Id Information

Sequence: 40195459
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value H17-00672

Countries

Sequence: 42609463
Name Canada
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55649527
Group Type Experimental
Title Treatment
Description Patients who were previously implanted with a traditional DBS lead and have subsequently developed stimulation induced side effects will gain significantly more tremor control without side effects when re-implanted with a directional DBS lead. We expect these patients' quality of life will improve. These patients typically will have had significant tremor relief (greater than 75% reduction from preoperative tremor rating scale) without side effects at their one year post operative follow-up. With the expected disease progression they will have had to increase their DBS stimulation to the degree that their DBS now causes side effects in order to block their tremor

Interventions

Sequence: 52535051
Intervention Type Other
Name No side-effect stimulator settings with directional lead
Description Individuals in this arm will have their stimulator settings programmed to the point in which they have maximum tremor control with no side effects.

Keywords

Sequence: 79941459 Sequence: 79941460 Sequence: 79941461
Name Deep Brain Stimulation Name Directional Lead Name Essential Tremor
Downcase Name deep brain stimulation Downcase Name directional lead Downcase Name essential tremor

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177560482 Sequence: 177560483 Sequence: 177560484 Sequence: 177560485
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Tremor Control Measure Quality of life based on participant's best real life setting Measure Quality of life based on tremor management participant's best real life setting Measure Quality of life based on voice handicap with participant's best real life setting
Time Frame Assessed once all tests performed – 1 to 2 months post-operatively Time Frame Assessed during study visits – The initial assessment will occur during a pre-operative study visit which will be compared post operatively 3 months after outcome 1 has been measured Time Frame Assessed during study visits – The initial assessment will occur during a pre-operative study visit which will be compared post operatively 3 months after outcome 1 has been measured Time Frame Assessed during study visits – The initial assessment will occur during a pre-operative study visit which will be compared post operatively 3 months after outcome 1 has been measured
Description Maximum percentage change in tremor (as measured by the Tremor Rating Scale) without side-effects (comparing DBS "on" versus "off") in each patient using the standard lead compared to the directional lead. Description Quality of life will be based on each participant's subjective opinion using the Short Form 36 (SF36) (a patient-reported survey focusing on health and quality of life) assessment form. Description Quality of life will be based on each participant's subjective opinion using the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionare. Description Quality of life will be based on each participant's subjective opinion using the Vocal handicap Index scale.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193677586 Sequence: 193677587 Sequence: 193677588 Sequence: 193677589 Sequence: 193677590 Sequence: 193677591 Sequence: 193677585
Mesh Term Essential Tremor Mesh Term Dyskinesias Mesh Term Neurologic Manifestations Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Movement Disorders Mesh Term Central Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Tremor
Downcase Mesh Term essential tremor Downcase Mesh Term dyskinesias Downcase Mesh Term neurologic manifestations Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term movement disorders Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term tremor
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list

Sponsors

Sequence: 48366177 Sequence: 48366178
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University of British Columbia Name Boston Scientific Corporation

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12020528 Sequence: 12020529
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Christopher Honey, DPhil Name Natasha Sarai, BSN
Phone 6048755894 Phone 6048754111
Email chris.honey@telus.net Email natasha.sarai@vch.ca
Phone Extension 69584
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68217006
Design Group Id 55649527
Intervention Id 52535051

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30794565
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 80 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Participants must have been implanted with the DBS
Participants must have been diagnosed with Essential Tremor
Participants must experience negative side effects from their DBS which limit control over their tremor
Participants must be able to receive benefit from their stimulator, but at the cost of negative side effects

Exclusion Criteria:

All individuals who meet criteria outlined in "inclusion criteria" may be eligible for this study

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254004070
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 80
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30540605
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Pending Results

Sequence: 1502290 Sequence: 1502291 Sequence: 1502292 Sequence: 1502293 Sequence: 1502294 Sequence: 1502295 Sequence: 1502296 Sequence: 1502297
Event Release Event Reset Event Release Event Reset Event Release Event Reset Event Release Event Reset
Event Date Description October 26, 2020 Event Date Description November 19, 2020 Event Date Description November 20, 2020 Event Date Description December 18, 2020 Event Date Description January 8, 2021 Event Date Description January 28, 2021 Event Date Description April 26, 2021 Event Date Description May 21, 2021
Event Date 2020-10-26 Event Date 2020-11-19 Event Date 2020-11-20 Event Date 2020-12-18 Event Date 2021-01-08 Event Date 2021-01-28 Event Date 2021-04-26 Event Date 2021-05-21

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28906924
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Christopher Honey
Title Neurosurgeon, Professor of Surgery (Neurosurgery), Director of Surgical Centre for Movement Disorders
Affiliation University of British Columbia

Study References

Sequence: 52117979 Sequence: 52117980
Pmid 21096152 Pmid 28385887
Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Toader E, Decre MM, Martens HC. Steering deep brain stimulation fields using a high resolution electrode array. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:2061-4. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626472. Citation Reinacher PC, Kruger MT, Coenen VA, Shah M, Roelz R, Jenkner C, Egger K. Determining the Orientation of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes Using 3D Rotational Fluoroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Jun;38(6):1111-1116. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5153. Epub 2017 Apr 6.

]]>

<![CDATA[ MT10109L in the Treatment of Glabellar Lines ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795922
2018-12-24

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795922
NCT03795922https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795922?tab=tableNANANATo evaluate the safety and efficacy of MT10109L in the treatment of glabellar lines (GL) in participants with moderate to severe GL.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-20
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-07-27
Start Month Year December 24, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year March 13, 2020
Verification Month Year July 2023
Verification Date 2023-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-07-27
Results First Posted Date 2023-06-27

Facilities

Sequence: 198680615 Sequence: 198680616 Sequence: 198680617 Sequence: 198680618 Sequence: 198680619 Sequence: 198680620 Sequence: 198680621 Sequence: 198680622 Sequence: 198680623 Sequence: 198680624 Sequence: 198680625 Sequence: 198680626 Sequence: 198680627 Sequence: 198680628 Sequence: 198680629
Name Investigate MD Name Art of Skin MD Name Weinkle Dermatology Name Etre, Cosmetic Dermatology and Laser Center Name Dermatology and Laser Surgery Center of New York Name SkinSearch of Rochester, Inc. Name M3 Wake Research, Inc. Name Aventiv Research, Inc. Name Westlake Dermatology & Cosmetic Surgery Name Centre de la Fontaine Name Medical Skin Care Name Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel Name CHU Liege Name Kazan State Medical University Name Medical Centre Capital-Zdorovie
City Scottsdale City Solana Beach City Bradenton City New Orleans City New York City Rochester City Raleigh City Dublin City Austin City Loverval City Sint-Truiden City Brussels City Liege City Kazan City Moscow
State Arizona State California State Florida State Louisiana State New York State New York State North Carolina State Ohio State Texas State Hainaut State Limburg State Tatarstan Republic
Zip 85255 Zip 92075 Zip 34209 Zip 70130 Zip 10028 Zip 14623 Zip 27612 Zip 43016 Zip 78746 Zip 6280 Zip 3800 Zip 1090 Zip 4000 Zip 420105 Zip 109369
Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country Belgium Country Belgium Country Belgium Country Belgium Country Russian Federation Country Russian Federation

Conditions

Sequence: 51805991
Name Glabellar Lines
Downcase Name glabellar lines

Id Information

Sequence: 39867741 Sequence: 39867742
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value MT10109L-001 Id Value 2018-004384-31
Id Type EudraCT Number

Countries

Sequence: 42266302 Sequence: 42266303 Sequence: 42266304
Name United States Name Belgium Name Russian Federation
Removed False Removed False Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55226133 Sequence: 55226134
Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title MT10109L Title Placebo
Description MT10109L will be injected into the GL: initial double-blind treatment on Day 1, and up to 2 open-label study interventions during the retreatment period. Description Placebo will be injected into the GL: initial double-blind treatment on Day 1.

Interventions

Sequence: 52127684 Sequence: 52127683
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Placebo Name MT10109L
Description Placebo will be injected into the GL. Description MT10109L will be injected into the GL.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176201931 Sequence: 176201932 Sequence: 176201933 Sequence: 176201934 Sequence: 176201935 Sequence: 176201936 Sequence: 176201937 Sequence: 176201938 Sequence: 176201939 Sequence: 176201940 Sequence: 176201941 Sequence: 176201942 Sequence: 176201943 Sequence: 176201944 Sequence: 176201945 Sequence: 176201946 Sequence: 176201947 Sequence: 176201948
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure The Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS) According to INVESTIGATOR AND PARTICIPANT Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown at Day 30 Measure The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) Measure The Duration of Glabellar Lines (GL) Treatment in Participants Who Achieved a Rating of ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline in GL Severity at Maximum Frown at Day 30 According to Investigator Assessments Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) Measure The Percentage of Participants Reporting Mostly Satisfied/Very Satisfied on the Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) Follow-up Version Item 5 for Glabellar Lines (GL) Measure The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Rest Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS). Measure Number of Patients Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE) Through the Study Duration Measure Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Systolic Blood Pressure (BP) Measure Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) Measure Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Pulse Rate Measure Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Respiratory Rate Measure Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – Heart Rate Measure Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – PR Interval Measure Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QRS Duration Measure Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QT Interval Measure Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QTcB Interval Measure Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QTcF Interval Measure Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – RR Interval Measure Number of Participants With Binding and Neutralizing Antibodies
Time Frame Day 30 Time Frame Day 30 Time Frame Day 1 (first treatment) to Day 180 Time Frame Day 60 Time Frame Day 30 Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame Baseline to Study exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Up to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit)
Description The primary efficacy measure is a composite endpoint and a participant is considered responder only if both the investigator and participant independently report a ≥ 2-grade improvement at Day 30 of Double-Blind Period from baseline. Both participant and investigator used FWS to assess GL severity. FWS is 4-grade scale (0 to 3): 0=none and 3=severe.

The primary endpoint is achieved and recorded as a count only when BOTH INVESTIGATOR AND PARTICIPANT assess the improvement in FWS from baseline to be ≥ 2-grade improvement. Therefore, the primary endpoint is the proportion/percentage of participants who meet the dual assessment threshold of ≥2-grade improvement from baseline.

Description The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where a Responder was defined as Achieving a ≥2-grade Improvement from Baseline at Maximum Frown at Day 30 of double-blind period. The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-point scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3=severe Description The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-grade scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3 = severe. The outcome is measured as median time to loss of treatment effect (i.e., return to moderate or severe GL severity at maximum frown using the FWS). Description The Satisfaction Question 5 grades facial line treatment satisfaction on a 5-point scale (-2 to 2) where -2=Very dissatisfied and 2=Very satisfied. Description The outcome was measured among participants who Were rated at least mild at rest at baseline, where a Responder was defined as achieving a ≥1-grade improvement from Baseline at Day 30 of double-blind period. The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-point scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3=severe. Description This section focuses primarily on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), i.e., AEs that started or worsened after the first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit. The safety analyses were conducted in the Safety population. Unless otherwise noted, safety results refer to TEAEs. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Only samples that tested positive in the binding antibody confirmatory assay were evaluated for neutralizing antibodies. The participants with positive neutralizing antibodies are only shown.

Sponsors

Sequence: 47978755
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Medy-Tox

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29069668
Role Study Director
Name SangMi Park
Affiliation Medytox Inc.

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67707419 Sequence: 67707420
Design Group Id 55226133 Design Group Id 55226134
Intervention Id 52127683 Intervention Id 52127684

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30550793
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria

• Female participants must not be pregnant or planning to get pregnant and willing to minimize the risk of inducing pregnancy for the duration of the clinical study and follow-up period.

Exclusion Criteria

Known immunization or hypersensitivity to any botulinum toxin serotype.
Any medical condition that may put the participant at increased risk with exposure to MT10109L including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other condition that might interfere with neuromuscular function.
History of facial nerve palsy.
Any uncontrolled systemic disease.
Anticipated need for treatment with botulinum toxin of any serotype for any reason during the study (other than study intervention).
Anticipated need for surgery or overnight hospitalization during the study.
Prior exposure to botulinum toxin of any serotype for any reason.
Prior periorbital surgery, facial lift (full face or mid-face), thread lift, brow lift, or related procedures (eg, eyelid [blepharoplasty] and/or eyebrow surgery).
Prior facial treatment with permanent soft tissue fillers, synthetic implantation (eg, Gore-Tex®), and/or autologous fat transplantation.
Current enrollment in an investigational drug or device study or participation in such a study within 30 days of entry into this study.
Females who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy during the study.
Participants who plan for an extended absence away from the immediate area of the study site that would preclude them from returning for all protocol-specified study visits.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254231768
Number Of Facilities 15
Number Of Nsae Subjects 46
Number Of Sae Subjects 11
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 14
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 39
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 17

Designs

Sequence: 30299162
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Drop Withdrawals

Sequence: 28781919 Sequence: 28781920 Sequence: 28781921 Sequence: 28781922 Sequence: 28781923 Sequence: 28781924 Sequence: 28781925 Sequence: 28781926 Sequence: 28781927 Sequence: 28781928 Sequence: 28781929 Sequence: 28781930 Sequence: 28781931 Sequence: 28781932
Result Group Id 55884677 Result Group Id 55884678 Result Group Id 55884677 Result Group Id 55884678 Result Group Id 55884677 Result Group Id 55884678 Result Group Id 55884677 Result Group Id 55884678 Result Group Id 55884677 Result Group Id 55884678 Result Group Id 55884677 Result Group Id 55884678 Result Group Id 55884677 Result Group Id 55884678
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Reason Adverse Event Reason Adverse Event Reason Withdrawal by Subject Reason Withdrawal by Subject Reason Lost to Follow-up Reason Lost to Follow-up Reason Pregnancy Reason Pregnancy Reason Physician Decision Reason Physician Decision Reason Protocol Violation Reason Protocol Violation Reason Other (Early termination, COVID, Family issue) Reason Other (Early termination, COVID, Family issue)
Count 2 Count 1 Count 5 Count 13 Count 2 Count 3 Count 0 Count 1 Count 1 Count 2 Count 0 Count 1 Count 3 Count 4

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26497657
Intervention Id 52127683
Name NivobotulinumtoxinA

Milestones

Sequence: 40803746 Sequence: 40803747 Sequence: 40803748 Sequence: 40803749 Sequence: 40803750 Sequence: 40803751
Result Group Id 55884677 Result Group Id 55884678 Result Group Id 55884677 Result Group Id 55884678 Result Group Id 55884677 Result Group Id 55884678
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Count 80 Count 154 Count 67 Count 129 Count 13 Count 25

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3903280
Pre Assignment Details 234 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were randomized.

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 73600980 Sequence: 73600981 Sequence: 73600982 Sequence: 73600983 Sequence: 73600984 Sequence: 73600985 Sequence: 73600986 Sequence: 73600987 Sequence: 73600988 Sequence: 73600989 Sequence: 73600990 Sequence: 73600991 Sequence: 73600992 Sequence: 73600993 Sequence: 73600994 Sequence: 73600995 Sequence: 73600996 Sequence: 73600997 Sequence: 73600998 Sequence: 73600999 Sequence: 73601000 Sequence: 73601001 Sequence: 73601002 Sequence: 73601003 Sequence: 73601004 Sequence: 73601005 Sequence: 73601006 Sequence: 73601007 Sequence: 73601008 Sequence: 73601009 Sequence: 73601010 Sequence: 73601011 Sequence: 73601012 Sequence: 73601013 Sequence: 73601014 Sequence: 73601015
Outcome Id 30640031 Outcome Id 30640031 Outcome Id 30640032 Outcome Id 30640032 Outcome Id 30640033 Outcome Id 30640033 Outcome Id 30640034 Outcome Id 30640034 Outcome Id 30640035 Outcome Id 30640035 Outcome Id 30640036 Outcome Id 30640036 Outcome Id 30640037 Outcome Id 30640037 Outcome Id 30640038 Outcome Id 30640038 Outcome Id 30640039 Outcome Id 30640039 Outcome Id 30640040 Outcome Id 30640040 Outcome Id 30640041 Outcome Id 30640041 Outcome Id 30640042 Outcome Id 30640042 Outcome Id 30640043 Outcome Id 30640043 Outcome Id 30640044 Outcome Id 30640044 Outcome Id 30640045 Outcome Id 30640045 Outcome Id 30640046 Outcome Id 30640046 Outcome Id 30640047 Outcome Id 30640047 Outcome Id 30640048 Outcome Id 30640048
Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884681 Result Group Id 55884682 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 80 Count 154 Count 77 Count 153 Count 1 Count 94 Count 72 Count 145 Count 73 Count 140 Count 80 Count 223 Count 73 Count 133 Count 73 Count 133 Count 73 Count 133 Count 73 Count 133 Count 70 Count 130 Count 70 Count 130 Count 70 Count 130 Count 70 Count 130 Count 70 Count 130 Count 70 Count 130 Count 70 Count 130 Count 80 Count 154

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2569044 Sequence: 2569045
Document Type Study Protocol Document Type Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True Has Protocol False
Has Icf False Has Icf False
Has Sap False Has Sap True
Document Date 2020-09-30 Document Date 2020-11-18
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/22/NCT03795922/Prot_002.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/22/NCT03795922/SAP_003.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 27808474 Sequence: 27808475 Sequence: 27808476 Sequence: 27808477 Sequence: 27808478 Sequence: 27808479
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 3 Subjects Affected 8 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 5 Subjects Affected 32 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 223 Subjects At Risk 223 Subjects At Risk 223
Created At 2023-08-06 20:07:19.130372 Created At 2023-08-06 20:07:19.130372 Created At 2023-08-06 20:07:19.130372 Created At 2023-08-06 20:07:19.130372 Created At 2023-08-06 20:07:19.130372 Created At 2023-08-06 20:07:19.130372
Updated At 2023-08-06 20:07:19.130372 Updated At 2023-08-06 20:07:19.130372 Updated At 2023-08-06 20:07:19.130372 Updated At 2023-08-06 20:07:19.130372 Updated At 2023-08-06 20:07:19.130372 Updated At 2023-08-06 20:07:19.130372

Reported Events

Sequence: 524858577 Sequence: 524858578 Sequence: 524858579 Sequence: 524858580 Sequence: 524858581 Sequence: 524858582 Sequence: 524858583 Sequence: 524858584 Sequence: 524858585 Sequence: 524858586 Sequence: 524858587 Sequence: 524858588 Sequence: 524858589 Sequence: 524858590 Sequence: 524858591 Sequence: 524858592 Sequence: 524858593 Sequence: 524858594 Sequence: 524858595 Sequence: 524858596 Sequence: 524858597 Sequence: 524858598 Sequence: 524858599 Sequence: 524858600 Sequence: 524858601 Sequence: 524858602
Result Group Id 55884683 Result Group Id 55884684 Result Group Id 55884683 Result Group Id 55884684 Result Group Id 55884683 Result Group Id 55884684 Result Group Id 55884683 Result Group Id 55884684 Result Group Id 55884683 Result Group Id 55884684 Result Group Id 55884683 Result Group Id 55884684 Result Group Id 55884683 Result Group Id 55884684 Result Group Id 55884683 Result Group Id 55884684 Result Group Id 55884683 Result Group Id 55884684 Result Group Id 55884683 Result Group Id 55884684 Result Group Id 55884683 Result Group Id 55884684 Result Group Id 55884683 Result Group Id 55884684 Result Group Id 55884683 Result Group Id 55884684
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit).
Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other Event Type other
Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 22 Subjects Affected 4 Subjects Affected 16
Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 223 Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 223 Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 223 Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 223 Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 223 Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 223 Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 223 Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 223 Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 223 Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 223 Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 223 Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 223 Subjects At Risk 80 Subjects At Risk 223
Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Description All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow.
Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 1 Event Count 1 Event Count 0 Event Count 4 Event Count 22 Event Count 4 Event Count 16
Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Infections and infestations Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Gastrointestinal disorders Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) Organ System Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) Organ System Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) Organ System Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) Organ System Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) Organ System Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System Nervous system disorders Organ System General disorders Organ System General disorders
Adverse Event Term COVID-19 pneumonia Adverse Event Term COVID-19 pneumonia Adverse Event Term Pneumonia Adverse Event Term Pneumonia Adverse Event Term Rectal prolapse Adverse Event Term Rectal prolapse Adverse Event Term Fall Adverse Event Term Fall Adverse Event Term Hip fracture Adverse Event Term Hip fracture Adverse Event Term Radius fracture Adverse Event Term Radius fracture Adverse Event Term Road traffic accident Adverse Event Term Road traffic accident Adverse Event Term Breast Cancer Adverse Event Term Breast Cancer Adverse Event Term Breast Cancer Stage II Adverse Event Term Breast Cancer Stage II Adverse Event Term Malignant Melanoma in situ Adverse Event Term Malignant Melanoma in situ Adverse Event Term Intentional Overdose Adverse Event Term Intentional Overdose Adverse Event Term Headache Adverse Event Term Headache Adverse Event Term Injection site pain Adverse Event Term Injection site pain
Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5 Frequency Threshold 5
Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1 Vocab MedDRA, Version 23.1
Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment Assessment Systematic Assessment

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28677730
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3834024
Pi Employee No
Restriction Type OTHER
Other Details General research agreement between the sponsor and PI's that includes a confidentiality section that includes a statement that the sponsor is and shall remain the exclusive owner of 'Information'. 'Information' shall include, but shall not be limited to, protocols, trade secrets, know-how, formulations, inventions, techniques, equipment, data and results.
Restrictive Agreement General research agreement between the sponsor and PI's that includes a confidentiality section that includes a statement that the sponsor is and shall remain the exclusive owner of 'Information'. 'Information' shall include, but shall not be limited to, protocols, trade secrets, know-how, formulations, inventions, techniques, equipment, data and results.

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3833989
Organization Medytox Inc.
Name Young Ryu
Phone +82-2-6901-5424
Email aab005@medytox.com

Outcomes

Sequence: 30640031 Sequence: 30640038 Sequence: 30640032 Sequence: 30640033 Sequence: 30640034 Sequence: 30640035 Sequence: 30640036 Sequence: 30640037 Sequence: 30640039 Sequence: 30640040 Sequence: 30640041 Sequence: 30640042 Sequence: 30640043 Sequence: 30640044 Sequence: 30640045 Sequence: 30640046 Sequence: 30640047 Sequence: 30640048
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary
Title The Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS) According to INVESTIGATOR AND PARTICIPANT Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown at Day 30 Title Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) Title The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) Title The Duration of Glabellar Lines (GL) Treatment in Participants Who Achieved a Rating of ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline in GL Severity at Maximum Frown at Day 30 According to Investigator Assessments Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) Title The Percentage of Participants Reporting Mostly Satisfied/Very Satisfied on the Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) Follow-up Version Item 5 for Glabellar Lines (GL) Title The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Rest Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS). Title Number of Patients Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE) Through the Study Duration Title Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Systolic Blood Pressure (BP) Title Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Pulse Rate Title Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Respiratory Rate Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – Heart Rate Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – PR Interval Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QRS Duration Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QT Interval Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QTcB Interval Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QTcF Interval Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – RR Interval Title Number of Participants With Binding and Neutralizing Antibodies
Description The primary efficacy measure is a composite endpoint and a participant is considered responder only if both the investigator and participant independently report a ≥ 2-grade improvement at Day 30 of Double-Blind Period from baseline. Both participant and investigator used FWS to assess GL severity. FWS is 4-grade scale (0 to 3): 0=none and 3=severe.

The primary endpoint is achieved and recorded as a count only when BOTH INVESTIGATOR AND PARTICIPANT assess the improvement in FWS from baseline to be ≥ 2-grade improvement. Therefore, the primary endpoint is the proportion/percentage of participants who meet the dual assessment threshold of ≥2-grade improvement from baseline.

Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where a Responder was defined as Achieving a ≥2-grade Improvement from Baseline at Maximum Frown at Day 30 of double-blind period. The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-point scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3=severe Description The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-grade scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3 = severe. The outcome is measured as median time to loss of treatment effect (i.e., return to moderate or severe GL severity at maximum frown using the FWS). Description The Satisfaction Question 5 grades facial line treatment satisfaction on a 5-point scale (-2 to 2) where -2=Very dissatisfied and 2=Very satisfied. Description The outcome was measured among participants who Were rated at least mild at rest at baseline, where a Responder was defined as achieving a ≥1-grade improvement from Baseline at Day 30 of double-blind period. The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-point scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3=severe. Description This section focuses primarily on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), i.e., AEs that started or worsened after the first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit. The safety analyses were conducted in the Safety population. Unless otherwise noted, safety results refer to TEAEs. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Only samples that tested positive in the binding antibody confirmatory assay were evaluated for neutralizing antibodies. The participants with positive neutralizing antibodies are only shown.
Time Frame Day 30 Time Frame Baseline to Study exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Day 30 Time Frame Day 1 (first treatment) to Day 180 Time Frame Day 60 Time Frame Day 30 Time Frame The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit). Time Frame Baseline to Study exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit) Time Frame Up to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit)
Population All primary and secondary efficacy analyses endpoints were carried out using the Intent-To-Treat (ITT) analysis set, which was defined as all participants who were randomized. Multiple imputation method was used for missing variables in primary efficacy endpoint. Analyses of the secondary efficacy variables were performed using observed data. Population All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population subset at study exit , defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. In order to calculate the mean change from baseline, participants with non-missing analysis values at both baseline and post-baseline during that analysis visit were used. Population All secondary efficacy analyses were carried out using the Intent To Treat (ITT) analysis set, which was defined as all participants who were randomized. Analyses of the secondary efficacy variables were performed using observed data. Population The analysis population for this outcome includes the participants who achieved a rating of ≥ 2-gradeimprovement from baseline in GL severity at maximum frown at Day 30 of double-blind period according to investigator assessments using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS). This corresponds to the responders for Outcome 2. Note: Analyses of the secondary efficacy variables were performed using observed data. Population All secondary efficacy analyses were carried out using the Intent To Treat (ITT) analysis set, which wasdefined as all participants who were randomized. Analyses of the secondary efficacy variables wereperformed using observed data Population All secondary efficacy analyses were carried out using the Intent To Treat (ITT) analysis set, which was defined as all participants who were randomized. Analyses of the secondary efficacy variables were performed using observed data. Population All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. Placebo participants who entered open-label phase (post Day 180) and received study intervention (MT10109L) are counted in MT10109L Group. Thus, overall number of participants in MT10109L Group is greater than what is noted in participant flow. Population All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population subset at study exit , defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. In order to calculate the mean change from baseline, participants with non-missing analysis values at both baseline and post-baseline during that analysis visit were used. Population All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population subset at study exit, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. In order to calculate the mean change from baseline, participants with non-missing analysis values at both baseline and post-baseline during that analysis visit were used. Population All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population subset at study exit, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. In order to calculate the mean change from baseline, participants with non-missing analysis values at both baseline and post-baseline during that analysis visit were used. Population All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population subset at study exit, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. In order to calculate the mean change from baseline, participants with non-missing analysis values at both baseline and post-baseline during that analysis visit were used. Population All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population subset at study exit, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. In order to calculate the mean change from baseline, participants with non-missing analysis values at both baseline and post-baseline during that analysis visit were used. Population All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population subset at study exit , defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. In order to calculate the mean change from baseline, participants with non-missing analysis values at both baseline and post-baseline during that analysis visit were used. Population All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population subset at study exit, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. In order to calculate the mean change from baseline, participants with non-missing analysis values at both baseline and post-baseline during that analysis visit were used. Population All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population subset at study exit, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. In order to calculate the mean change from baseline, participants with non-missing analysis values at both baseline and post-baseline during that analysis visit were used. Population All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population subset at study exit , defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. In order to calculate the mean change from baseline, participants with non-missing analysis values at both baseline and post-baseline during that analysis visit were used. Population All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population subset at study exit, defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention. In order to calculate the mean change from baseline, participants with non-missing analysis values at both baseline and post-baseline during that analysis visit were used. Population All safety analyses were carried out using the Safety population subset at study exit , defined as participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.
Units Participants Units mmHg Units Participants Units Days Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units mmHg Units beats/min Units breaths/min Units beats/min Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units Participants
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Median Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 234260165 Sequence: 234260166 Sequence: 234260167 Sequence: 234260168 Sequence: 234260169 Sequence: 234260170 Sequence: 234260177 Sequence: 234260178 Sequence: 234260171 Sequence: 234260172 Sequence: 234260173 Sequence: 234260174 Sequence: 234260175 Sequence: 234260176 Sequence: 234260179 Sequence: 234260180 Sequence: 234260181 Sequence: 234260182 Sequence: 234260183 Sequence: 234260184 Sequence: 234260185 Sequence: 234260186 Sequence: 234260187 Sequence: 234260188 Sequence: 234260189 Sequence: 234260190 Sequence: 234260191 Sequence: 234260192 Sequence: 234260193 Sequence: 234260194 Sequence: 234260195 Sequence: 234260196 Sequence: 234260197 Sequence: 234260198 Sequence: 234260199 Sequence: 234260200
Outcome Id 30640031 Outcome Id 30640031 Outcome Id 30640032 Outcome Id 30640032 Outcome Id 30640033 Outcome Id 30640033 Outcome Id 30640037 Outcome Id 30640037 Outcome Id 30640034 Outcome Id 30640034 Outcome Id 30640035 Outcome Id 30640035 Outcome Id 30640036 Outcome Id 30640036 Outcome Id 30640038 Outcome Id 30640038 Outcome Id 30640039 Outcome Id 30640039 Outcome Id 30640040 Outcome Id 30640040 Outcome Id 30640041 Outcome Id 30640041 Outcome Id 30640042 Outcome Id 30640042 Outcome Id 30640043 Outcome Id 30640043 Outcome Id 30640044 Outcome Id 30640044 Outcome Id 30640045 Outcome Id 30640045 Outcome Id 30640046 Outcome Id 30640046 Outcome Id 30640047 Outcome Id 30640047 Outcome Id 30640048 Outcome Id 30640048
Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884681 Result Group Id 55884682 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680 Result Group Id 55884679 Result Group Id 55884680
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Title The Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS) According to INVESTIGATOR AND PARTICIPANT Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown at Day 30 Title The Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS) According to INVESTIGATOR AND PARTICIPANT Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown at Day 30 Title The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) Title The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) Title The Duration of Glabellar Lines (GL) Treatment in Participants Who Achieved a Rating of ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline in GL Severity at Maximum Frown at Day 30 According to Investigator Assessments Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) Title The Duration of Glabellar Lines (GL) Treatment in Participants Who Achieved a Rating of ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline in GL Severity at Maximum Frown at Day 30 According to Investigator Assessments Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) Title Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Systolic Blood Pressure (BP) Title Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Systolic Blood Pressure (BP) Title The Percentage of Participants Reporting Mostly Satisfied/Very Satisfied on the Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) Follow-up Version Item 5 for Glabellar Lines (GL) Title The Percentage of Participants Reporting Mostly Satisfied/Very Satisfied on the Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) Follow-up Version Item 5 for Glabellar Lines (GL) Title The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Rest Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS). Title The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Rest Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS). Title Number of Patients Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE) Through the Study Duration Title Number of Patients Who Experienced an Adverse Event (AE) Through the Study Duration Title Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) Title Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) Title Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Pulse Rate Title Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Pulse Rate Title Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Respiratory Rate Title Mean Change From Baseline in Vital Signs – Respiratory Rate Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – Heart Rate Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – Heart Rate Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – PR Interval Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – PR Interval Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QRS Duration Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QRS Duration Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QT Interval Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QT Interval Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QTcB Interval Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QTcB Interval Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QTcF Interval Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – QTcF Interval Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – RR Interval Title Mean Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters – RR Interval Title Number of Participants With Binding and Neutralizing Antibodies Title Number of Participants With Binding and Neutralizing Antibodies
Description The primary efficacy measure is a composite endpoint and a participant is considered responder only if both the investigator and participant independently report a ≥ 2-grade improvement at Day 30 of Double-Blind Period from baseline. Both participant and investigator used FWS to assess GL severity. FWS is 4-grade scale (0 to 3): 0=none and 3=severe.

The primary endpoint is achieved and recorded as a count only when BOTH INVESTIGATOR AND PARTICIPANT assess the improvement in FWS from baseline to be ≥ 2-grade improvement. Therefore, the primary endpoint is the proportion/percentage of participants who meet the dual assessment threshold of ≥2-grade improvement from baseline.

Description The primary efficacy measure is a composite endpoint and a participant is considered responder only if both the investigator and participant independently report a ≥ 2-grade improvement at Day 30 of Double-Blind Period from baseline. Both participant and investigator used FWS to assess GL severity. FWS is 4-grade scale (0 to 3): 0=none and 3=severe.

The primary endpoint is achieved and recorded as a count only when BOTH INVESTIGATOR AND PARTICIPANT assess the improvement in FWS from baseline to be ≥ 2-grade improvement. Therefore, the primary endpoint is the proportion/percentage of participants who meet the dual assessment threshold of ≥2-grade improvement from baseline.

Description The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where a Responder was defined as Achieving a ≥2-grade Improvement from Baseline at Maximum Frown at Day 30 of double-blind period. The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-point scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3=severe Description The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where a Responder was defined as Achieving a ≥2-grade Improvement from Baseline at Maximum Frown at Day 30 of double-blind period. The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-point scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3=severe Description The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-grade scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3 = severe. The outcome is measured as median time to loss of treatment effect (i.e., return to moderate or severe GL severity at maximum frown using the FWS). Description The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-grade scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3 = severe. The outcome is measured as median time to loss of treatment effect (i.e., return to moderate or severe GL severity at maximum frown using the FWS). Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description The Satisfaction Question 5 grades facial line treatment satisfaction on a 5-point scale (-2 to 2) where -2=Very dissatisfied and 2=Very satisfied. Description The Satisfaction Question 5 grades facial line treatment satisfaction on a 5-point scale (-2 to 2) where -2=Very dissatisfied and 2=Very satisfied. Description The outcome was measured among participants who Were rated at least mild at rest at baseline, where a Responder was defined as achieving a ≥1-grade improvement from Baseline at Day 30 of double-blind period. The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-point scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3=severe. Description The outcome was measured among participants who Were rated at least mild at rest at baseline, where a Responder was defined as achieving a ≥1-grade improvement from Baseline at Day 30 of double-blind period. The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-point scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3=severe. Description This section focuses primarily on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), i.e., AEs that started or worsened after the first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit. The safety analyses were conducted in the Safety population. Unless otherwise noted, safety results refer to TEAEs. Description This section focuses primarily on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), i.e., AEs that started or worsened after the first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit. The safety analyses were conducted in the Safety population. Unless otherwise noted, safety results refer to TEAEs. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Change from baseline at study exit. Description Only samples that tested positive in the binding antibody confirmatory assay were evaluated for neutralizing antibodies. The participants with positive neutralizing antibodies are only shown. Description Only samples that tested positive in the binding antibody confirmatory assay were evaluated for neutralizing antibodies. The participants with positive neutralizing antibodies are only shown.
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Days Units Days Units mmHg Units mmHg Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units mmHg Units mmHg Units beats/min Units beats/min Units breaths/min Units breaths/min Units beats/min Units beats/min Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units milliseconds Units Participants Units Participants
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Median Param Type Median Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 0 Param Value 71 Param Value 1 Param Value 94 Param Value 64 Param Value 121 Param Value 0.3 Param Value -0.6 Param Value 7 Param Value 121 Param Value 23 Param Value 95 Param Value 35 Param Value 118 Param Value 0.5 Param Value -1.9 Param Value 2.5 Param Value 0.4 Param Value -0.3 Param Value -0.3 Param Value 4.8 Param Value 2.8 Param Value -1.2 Param Value -1.2 Param Value 0.4 Param Value 1.2 Param Value -11.7 Param Value -8.4 Param Value 2.7 Param Value 0.0 Param Value -2.4 Param Value -2.9 Param Value -64.6 Param Value -39.3 Param Value 1 Param Value 0
Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 71.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 94.0 Param Value Num 64.0 Param Value Num 121.0 Param Value Num 0.3 Param Value Num -0.6 Param Value Num 7.0 Param Value Num 121.0 Param Value Num 23.0 Param Value Num 95.0 Param Value Num 35.0 Param Value Num 118.0 Param Value Num 0.5 Param Value Num -1.9 Param Value Num 2.5 Param Value Num 0.4 Param Value Num -0.3 Param Value Num -0.3 Param Value Num 4.8 Param Value Num 2.8 Param Value Num -1.2 Param Value Num -1.2 Param Value Num 0.4 Param Value Num 1.2 Param Value Num -11.7 Param Value Num -8.4 Param Value Num 2.7 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num -2.4 Param Value Num -2.9 Param Value Num -64.6 Param Value Num -39.3 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 0.0
Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type 95% Confidence Interval Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 13.26 Dispersion Value 15.28 Dispersion Value 10.04 Dispersion Value 10.64 Dispersion Value 10.35 Dispersion Value 10.54 Dispersion Value 2.44 Dispersion Value 2.18 Dispersion Value 10.38 Dispersion Value 8.52 Dispersion Value 11.67 Dispersion Value 11.91 Dispersion Value 6.65 Dispersion Value 6.41 Dispersion Value 23.87 Dispersion Value 19.71 Dispersion Value 18.69 Dispersion Value 17.14 Dispersion Value 15.43 Dispersion Value 14.06 Dispersion Value 127.1 Dispersion Value 106.19
Dispersion Value Num 13.26 Dispersion Value Num 15.28 Dispersion Value Num 10.04 Dispersion Value Num 10.64 Dispersion Value Num 10.35 Dispersion Value Num 10.54 Dispersion Value Num 2.44 Dispersion Value Num 2.18 Dispersion Value Num 10.38 Dispersion Value Num 8.52 Dispersion Value Num 11.67 Dispersion Value Num 11.91 Dispersion Value Num 6.65 Dispersion Value Num 6.41 Dispersion Value Num 23.87 Dispersion Value Num 19.71 Dispersion Value Num 18.69 Dispersion Value Num 17.14 Dispersion Value Num 15.43 Dispersion Value Num 14.06 Dispersion Value Num 127.1 Dispersion Value Num 106.19
Dispersion Lower Limit 113.0
Dispersion Upper Limit 145.0
Explanation Of Na 95% Confidence Interval cannot be calculated as there was only 1 responder.

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11330055 Sequence: 11330056 Sequence: 11330057
Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Scope overall Scope overall Scope overall
Count 80 Count 154 Count 234

Result Groups

Sequence: 55884674 Sequence: 55884675 Sequence: 55884676 Sequence: 55884677 Sequence: 55884678 Sequence: 55884679 Sequence: 55884680 Sequence: 55884681 Sequence: 55884682 Sequence: 55884683 Sequence: 55884684
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event
Title Placebo/MT10109L Title MT10109L/MT10109L Title Total Title Placebo/MT10109L Title MT10109L/MT10109L Title Placebo/MT10109L Title MT10109L/MT10109L Title Placebo Title MT10109L Title Placebo Title MT10109L
Description Placebo was injected into the Glabellar Lines (GL): initial double-blind treatment on Day 1. In the open-label part, participants who met retreatment criteria were allowed up to 2 MT10109L treatments. Description MT10109L was injected into the Glabellar Lines (GL): initial double-blind treatment on Day 1, and up to 2 open-label study interventions during the retreatment period. Description Total of all reporting groups Description Placebo was injected into the Glabellar Lines (GL): initial double-blind treatment on Day 1. In the open-label part, participants who met retreatment criteria were allowed up to 2 MT10109L treatments. Description MT10109L was injected into the Glabellar Lines (GL): initial double-blind treatment on Day 1, and up to 2 open-label study interventions during the retreatment period. Description Placebo was injected into the Glabellar Lines (GL): initial double-blind treatment on Day 1. In the open-label part, participants who met retreatment criteria were allowed up to 2 MT10109L treatments. Description MT10109L was injected into the Glabellar Lines (GL): initial double-blind treatment on Day 1, and up to 2 open-label study interventions during the retreatment period. Description Placebo was injected into the Glabellar Lines (GL): initial double-blind treatment on Day 1. Placebo participants were allowed to enter open-label phase for retreatment but the TEAEs with onset date after the retreatment were not counted here. Description MT10109L was injected into the Glabellar Lines (GL): initial double-blind treatment on Day 1, and up to 2 open-label study interventions during the retreatment period. Placebo participants who experienced TEAE after receiving MT10109L during open-label phase were counted here. Description Placebo was injected into the Glabellar Lines (GL): initial double-blind treatment on Day 1. In the open-label part post day 180, up to 2 open-label study interventions during the retreatment period. Placebo participants were allowed to enter open-label phase for retreatment but the TEAEs with onset date after the retreatment were not counted here. Description MT10109L was injected into the Glabellar Lines (GL): initial double-blind treatment on Day 1, and up to 2 open-label study interventions during the retreatment period. Placebo participants who experienced TEAE after receiving MT10109L during open-label phase were counted here.

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 125010995 Sequence: 125010996 Sequence: 125010997 Sequence: 125010998 Sequence: 125010985 Sequence: 125010986 Sequence: 125010987 Sequence: 125010988 Sequence: 125010989 Sequence: 125010990 Sequence: 125010991 Sequence: 125010992 Sequence: 125010993 Sequence: 125010994 Sequence: 125010999 Sequence: 125011000 Sequence: 125011001 Sequence: 125011002 Sequence: 125011003 Sequence: 125011004 Sequence: 125011005 Sequence: 125011006 Sequence: 125011007 Sequence: 125011008 Sequence: 125011009 Sequence: 125011010 Sequence: 125011011 Sequence: 125011012 Sequence: 125011013 Sequence: 125011014 Sequence: 125011015 Sequence: 125011016 Sequence: 125011017 Sequence: 125011018 Sequence: 125011019 Sequence: 125011020 Sequence: 125011021 Sequence: 125011022 Sequence: 125011023 Sequence: 125011024 Sequence: 125011025 Sequence: 125011026 Sequence: 125011027 Sequence: 125011028 Sequence: 125011029 Sequence: 125011030 Sequence: 125011031 Sequence: 125011032
Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884676 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676 Result Group Id 55884674 Result Group Id 55884675 Result Group Id 55884676
Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Category Female Category Female Category <=18 years Category <=18 years Category <=18 years Category Between 18 and 65 years Category Between 18 and 65 years Category Between 18 and 65 years Category >=65 years Category >=65 years Category >=65 years Category Female Category Male Category Male Category Male Category Hispanic or Latino Category Hispanic or Latino Category Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino Category Not Hispanic or Latino Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category Asian Category Asian Category Asian Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category White Category White Category White Category More than one race Category More than one race Category More than one race Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported
Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB)
Units years Units years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 47.3 Param Value 47.0 Param Value 76 Param Value 140 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 77 Param Value 141 Param Value 218 Param Value 3 Param Value 13 Param Value 16 Param Value 46.4 Param Value 216 Param Value 4 Param Value 14 Param Value 18 Param Value 3 Param Value 10 Param Value 13 Param Value 77 Param Value 144 Param Value 221 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 6 Param Value 8 Param Value 76 Param Value 146 Param Value 222 Param Value 1 Param Value 1 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0
Param Value Num 47.3 Param Value Num 47.0 Param Value Num 76.0 Param Value Num 140.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 77.0 Param Value Num 141.0 Param Value Num 218.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 13.0 Param Value Num 16.0 Param Value Num 46.4 Param Value Num 216.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 14.0 Param Value Num 18.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 10.0 Param Value Num 13.0 Param Value Num 77.0 Param Value Num 144.0 Param Value Num 221.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 8.0 Param Value Num 76.0 Param Value Num 146.0 Param Value Num 222.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 12.64 Dispersion Value 12.27 Dispersion Value 11.57
Dispersion Value Num 12.64 Dispersion Value Num 12.27 Dispersion Value Num 11.57
Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 234 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 234 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 234 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 234 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 234 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 234 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 234 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 234 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 234 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 234 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 234 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 234 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 234 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 234 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 234 Number Analyzed 80 Number Analyzed 154 Number Analyzed 234

]]>

<![CDATA[ Ruxolitinib Combined With Dexamethasone for HLH ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795909
2017-03-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795909
NCT03795909https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795909?tab=tablexiaodong d Shi, MD18611196921@163.com8613911601076A protocol named as “HLH-DR” for patients with refractory and secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosismay.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year March 1, 2017
Primary Completion Month Year March 1, 2020
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20727226
Description A modified protocol about ruxolitinib combined with dexamethasone which includes oral ruxolitinib (2.5 mg twice daily for patients if the age<14 years and the weight <25kg,5 mg twice daily for patients if the age<14 years and the weight≥25kg, 10mg twice daily for patients if the age ≥14 years and<18 years). Dexamethasone (10mg/m2.d) delayes for the first 2 weeks (form week 1 to 2),(5mg/m2.d) from week 3 to 4,(2.5mg/m2.d) from week 5 to 6),1.25mg/m2.d for week 7,and dropped off on week 8. Every 2 weeks, patients can be evaluated based the diagnosed index

Facilities

Sequence: 200159531 Sequence: 200159532
Status Recruiting Status Recruiting
Name Yan Yue Name Yan Yue
City Beijing City Beijing
State Chaoyang District
Zip 100020
Country China Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28113755 Sequence: 28113756 Sequence: 28113757 Sequence: 28113758
Facility Id 200159531 Facility Id 200159531 Facility Id 200159532 Facility Id 200159532
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Yan Yue, MD Name Yan Yue, MD Name xiaodong Shi, MD Name Yan Yue, MD
Email 18611196921@163.com Email adaile123@sina.com Email adaile123@sina.com Email adaile123@sina.com
Phone 8618515238169 Phone 8618515238169 Phone 008613911601076 Phone 8618515238169
Phone Extension 8618515238169 Phone Extension 8618515238169 Phone Extension 8618515238169 Phone Extension 8618515238169

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18336506
Facility Id 200159531
Role Principal Investigator
Name Jia Y Qin, MD

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96074360 Sequence: 96074361 Sequence: 96074362 Sequence: 96074363 Sequence: 96074364 Sequence: 96074365 Sequence: 96074366 Sequence: 96074367 Sequence: 96074368 Sequence: 96074369 Sequence: 96074370 Sequence: 96074371
Mesh Term Dexamethasone Mesh Term Anti-Inflammatory Agents Mesh Term Antiemetics Mesh Term Autonomic Agents Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Agents Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Gastrointestinal Agents Mesh Term Glucocorticoids Mesh Term Hormones Mesh Term Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents
Downcase Mesh Term dexamethasone Downcase Mesh Term anti-inflammatory agents Downcase Mesh Term antiemetics Downcase Mesh Term autonomic agents Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system agents Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term gastrointestinal agents Downcase Mesh Term glucocorticoids Downcase Mesh Term hormones Downcase Mesh Term hormones, hormone substitutes, and hormone antagonists Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents, hormonal Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52185611
Name Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis
Downcase Name hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Id Information

Sequence: 40169152
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value HLH-DR

Countries

Sequence: 42580735
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609252 Sequence: 55609253
Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title Ruxolitinib and Placebo Title Placebo and Ruxolitinib
Description Ruxolitinib 2.5 mg twice daily by oral Description Sugar pill 2.5 mg twice daily by oral

Interventions

Sequence: 52499543 Sequence: 52499544
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Ruxolitinib Name Dexamethasone
Description Ruxolitinib (2.5 mg twice daily for patients if the age<14 years and the weight <25kg,5 mg twice daily for patients if the age<14 years and the weight≥25kg, 10mg twice daily for patients if the age ≥14 years and<18 years) Description Dexamethasone (10mg/m2.d) delayes for the first 2 weeks(form week 1 to 2),(5mg/m2.d) from week 3 to 4,(2.5mg/m2.d) from week 5 to 6),1.25mg/m2.d for week 7,and dropped off on week 8.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432418 Sequence: 177432419
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Severity of disease Measure Axillary temperature
Time Frame 2 weeks Time Frame 2 weeks
Description Serum ferritin>2000ng/ml, disease actvie; serum ferritin<2000ng/ml, disease control; Description 36<Axillary temperature<37.2, disease control; 37.2<Axillary temperature<38.2, disease partly control; Axillary temperature>38.2, disease active

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193540588 Sequence: 193540589 Sequence: 193540590 Sequence: 193540591
Mesh Term Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic Mesh Term Histiocytosis, Non-Langerhans-Cell Mesh Term Histiocytosis Mesh Term Lymphatic Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term lymphohistiocytosis, hemophagocytic Downcase Mesh Term histiocytosis, non-langerhans-cell Downcase Mesh Term histiocytosis Downcase Mesh Term lymphatic diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332433
Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Capital Research Institute of Pediatrics

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29293058
Role Principal Investigator
Name Yan Yue, MD
Affiliation Capital Institute of Pediatrics, China

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12012330 Sequence: 12012331
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Yan Yue, MD Name xiaodong d Shi, MD
Phone 8618515238169 Phone 8613911601076
Email adaile123@sina.com Email 18611196921@163.com
Phone Extension 8618515238169 Phone Extension 8618515238169
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168326 Sequence: 68168327 Sequence: 68168328 Sequence: 68168329
Design Group Id 55609253 Design Group Id 55609252 Design Group Id 55609253 Design Group Id 55609252
Intervention Id 52499543 Intervention Id 52499543 Intervention Id 52499544 Intervention Id 52499544

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773645
Gender All
Minimum Age 1 Year
Maximum Age 18 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Secondary and refractory HLH.

Exclusion Criteria:

Family HLH.

Gender Based True
Adult True
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253952997
Number Of Facilities 2
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 1
Maximum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Year
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30519776
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Sequential Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Subject Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26680465 Sequence: 26680466
Intervention Id 52499543 Intervention Id 52499544
Name Jakafi Name Hormone

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886077
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Yan Yue
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation Capital Research Institute of Pediatrics

]]>

<![CDATA[ Ocular Ultrasonography as a Tool for Monitoring the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795896
2018-09-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795896
NCT03795896https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795896?tab=tableNANANARaised intracranial pressure (ICP) is a common and life threatening condition especially in patients with traumatic brain injury.There are many methods for monitoring the increased (ICP) either invasive or non- invasive ,but the gold standard is invasive method. Optic nerve sheath ultrasonography provides a very promising bedside tool for detection of increased ICP. This study will monitor the dynamic changes of intracranial pressure by optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in response to mannitol osmotherapy
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-01
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year September 1, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year June 1, 2019
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20716328
Description Traumatic brain injury is the main cause of increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in the intensive care .

There are multiple methods for monitoring the raised ICP either invasive or non-invasive.The gold standard is the invasive devices because it is more accurate and reliable .However ,it requires a surgical intervention which has many hazards such as (infection ,hemorrhage,malfunction ).

Optic nerve sheath ultrasonography is a promising bedside tool for detection of increased ICP. The optic nerve is surrounded by cerebro-spinal fluid ,thus if the circulation of cerebro-spinal fluid not blocked ,an increase in ICP will be transmitted through the subarachnoid space around the optic nerve within the nerve sheath especially the retro-bulbar segment.

The study will be conducted to monitor the dynamic changes of intracranial pressure by optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) in response to mannitol osmotherapy as a primary outcome and secondary to evaluate the efficacy of ONSD in assessing the severity of the disease

Facilities

Sequence: 200053457
Name Reem Abdelraouf Elsharkawy
City Mansourah
State Dakahlia
Zip 35516
Country Egypt

Conditions

Sequence: 52156576
Name Traumatic Brain Injury
Downcase Name traumatic brain injury

Id Information

Sequence: 40148260
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value Ms/15.05.88

Countries

Sequence: 42557796
Name Egypt
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55577979
Group Type Experimental
Title Optic nerve sheath diameter
Description The intracranial pressure will be measured by optic nerve sheath diameter while the patient in supine position with 30 -degree bed position .The linear probe in the two -dimensional mode will be placed gently on the upper eyelid without pressure .In linear horizontal orientation for both right and left optic nerve sheath will be measured

Interventions

Sequence: 52472081
Intervention Type Diagnostic Test
Name Optic nerve sheath diameter
Description The intracranial pressure will be measured by the optic nerve sheath diameter and after giving the mannitol osmotherapy the intracranial pressure will be monitored by the optic nerve sheath diameter

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328349 Sequence: 177328350 Sequence: 177328351
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Assessing the changes in the intracranial pressure Measure Assessing the changes in the heart rate Measure Assessing the changes in the mean arterial pressure
Time Frame from 20 minutes before mannitol therapy (basal reading) till 48 hours after the end of mannitol infusion Time Frame from 20 minutes before mannitol therapy (basal reading ) till 48 hours after the end of mannitol infusion Time Frame from 20 minutes before mannitol therapy(basal reading) till 48 hours after the end of mannitol infusion
Description It will be monitored and recorded the changes in intracranial pressure to the mannitol therapy .Basal (before mannitol therapy).20 minutes after the end of mannitol infusion ,2 hours ,6 hours,12 hours ,24 hours and 48 hours after the end of mannitol infusion Description It will be recorded basal (before mannitol therapy).20 minutes after the end of mannitol infusion ,2 hours ,6 hours,12 hours ,24 hours and 48 hours after the end of mannitol infusion Description It will be calculated according to the formula systolic blood pressure+2(diastolic blood pressure)recorded basal (before mannitol therapy).20 minutes after the end of mannitol infusion ,2 hours ,6 hours,12 hours ,24 hours and 48 hours after the end of mannitol infusion

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193432319 Sequence: 193432320 Sequence: 193432321 Sequence: 193432322 Sequence: 193432323 Sequence: 193432324 Sequence: 193432325 Sequence: 193432326
Mesh Term Brain Injuries Mesh Term Brain Injuries, Traumatic Mesh Term Wounds and Injuries Mesh Term Brain Diseases Mesh Term Central Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Craniocerebral Trauma Mesh Term Trauma, Nervous System
Downcase Mesh Term brain injuries Downcase Mesh Term brain injuries, traumatic Downcase Mesh Term wounds and injuries Downcase Mesh Term brain diseases Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term craniocerebral trauma Downcase Mesh Term trauma, nervous system
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306161
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Mansoura University Hospital

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130952
Design Group Id 55577979
Intervention Id 52472081

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757400
Gender All
Minimum Age 21 Years
Maximum Age 60 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients with traumatic brain injury

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with history of optic neuritis
past history of eye trauma
patient with optic nerve trauma
patient with history of arachnoid cyst of the optic nerve
high myopic patients
patients with cavernous sius mass

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254228969
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 21
Maximum Age Num 60
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30503625
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Diagnostic
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Masking Description No masking
Intervention Model Description prospective observational study

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26665947
Intervention Id 52472081
Name ONSD

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869903
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Abdelraouf Elsharkawy
Title Lecturer of anesthesia and surgical intensive care
Affiliation Mansoura University Hospital

]]>

<![CDATA[ The Thrombotic Potential of Heart Chambers in the Presence or Absence of Atrial Fibrillation. ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795883
2019-02-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795883
NCT03795883https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795883?tab=tableNANANAThe investigators aim to test the thrombotic potential of various heart chambers including left atrium, left atrial appendage, right atrium and peripheral veins. Blood samples will be taken from the different chambers in 50 patients admitted for standard pulmonary vein ablation and compared to patients without atrial fibrillation admitted for left sided supra ventricular tachycardia or mitral clip. Thrombin generation parameters will be assessed by the calibrated automated thrombogram.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-30
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-03-10
Start Month Year February 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2021
Verification Month Year March 2022
Verification Date 2022-03-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-03-10

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20576912
Description Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia, there is a strong correlation between atrial fibrillation and embolic stroke. In order to lower the risk for embolic stroke anticoagulation is recommended for patients with CHADS-VASC score equal or above 2. The mechanism for thrombus formation in the left atrium is thought to be caused by various factors 1. blood stasis due to the loss of atrial kick 2. endothelial dysfunction 3. blood hemostatic alteration leading to procoagulant state.

Previous studies demonstrated increased thrombin generation in the left atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation, when compared to other heart chambers and when compared to control group in patients with structurally normal heart.

In recent years calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) is considered a good indicator for total thrombotic activity in hypercoagulable states.

In the current study the investigators aim to test the thrombotic potential of various heart chambers including left atrium, left atrial appendage, right atrium and peripheral veins. Blood samples will be taken from the different chambers in 50 patients admitted for standard pulmonary vein ablation without changing the course of the procedure. Thrombin generation parameters will be assessed by the calibrated automated thrombogram. A control group composed of 50 patients admitted for standard left sided supra ventricular tachycardia ablation or patients admitted to mitral clip procedure without the presence of atrial fibrillation.

In addition demographic data,CHADS-VASC score, atrial fibrillation burden, echocardiographic and cardiac CT parameters will be collected.

Facilities

Sequence: 198653047
Name Rambam Health Care Campus
City Haifa
Zip 31999
Country Israel

Conditions

Sequence: 51797601 Sequence: 51797602 Sequence: 51797603
Name Atrial Fibrillation Name Thrombosis Cardiac Name Left Atrial Thrombosis
Downcase Name atrial fibrillation Downcase Name thrombosis cardiac Downcase Name left atrial thrombosis

Id Information

Sequence: 39861468
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value RMB CTIL-0216-18

Countries

Sequence: 42259144
Name Israel
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55217087 Sequence: 55217088
Title Participants with atrial fibrillation Title Participants without atrial fibrillation
Description Patients with atrial fibrillation admitted for standard pulmonary vein ablation. Description Patients without atrial fibrillation admitted for standard left sided supra ventricular tachycardia ablation or patients admitted to mitral clip procedure.

Keywords

Sequence: 79254891 Sequence: 79254892 Sequence: 79254893
Name Thrombin generation Name Calibrated automated thrombogram Name Atrial fibrillation
Downcase Name thrombin generation Downcase Name calibrated automated thrombogram Downcase Name atrial fibrillation

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176174172 Sequence: 176174173 Sequence: 176174174 Sequence: 176174175 Sequence: 176174176 Sequence: 176174177
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure ETP of various heart chambers measured by the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) Measure Peak height of various heart chambers measured by the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) Measure Lag time of various heart chambers measured by the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) Measure Time to peak of various heart chambers measured by the calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT) Measure The 1 year incidence of thromboembolic events Measure The number of participants with spontaneous echocardiographic contrast demonstrated in trans-esophageal echocardiogram (TEE)
Time Frame 1 Day Time Frame 1 Day Time Frame 1 Day Time Frame 1 Day Time Frame 1 Year Time Frame 1 Days
Description ETP (endogenous thrombotic potential) nM*min Description Peak height nM Description Lag time in minutes Description Time to peak in minutes

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 191981780 Sequence: 191981781 Sequence: 191981782 Sequence: 191981783 Sequence: 191981784 Sequence: 191981785 Sequence: 191981786 Sequence: 191981779
Mesh Term Thrombosis Mesh Term Arrhythmias, Cardiac Mesh Term Heart Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Embolism and Thrombosis Mesh Term Vascular Diseases Mesh Term Atrial Fibrillation
Downcase Mesh Term thrombosis Downcase Mesh Term arrhythmias, cardiac Downcase Mesh Term heart diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term embolism and thrombosis Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term atrial fibrillation
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list

Sponsors

Sequence: 47970754
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Rambam Health Care Campus

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30545893
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Study group:Participants with atrial fibrillation admitted to pulmonary vein ablation Control group: Participant without atrial fibrillation admitted to left sided SVT ablation or Mitral clip.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Age above 18
Pulmonary vein ablation, SVT ablation or mitral clip.
Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Left atrial thrombus
Pregnancy
Active malignancy
Thrombophilia
Anticoagulants 24 hours before procedure
Active infectious disease
Chronic kidney disease (eGFR<30)

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254224132
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 35
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 4
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30294296
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28672848
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Adi Elias MD
Title Resident Physician at Cardiology Department, Principal Investigator
Affiliation Rambam Health Care Campus

]]>

<![CDATA[ Enteral Nutrition Tolerance and the Gut Microbiome Study ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795870
2018-07-07

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795870
NCT03795870https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795870?tab=tableVishakantha (Vishu) Murthy, PhDMurthy.Vishakantha@mayo.edu507-255-8112The current study will enroll patients who are going to require enteral nutrition support for at least 4 weeks and randomize them to standard polymeric formulas or blenderized tube feeding. They will be asked to fill out a questionnaire about their tolerance of enteral feeds. They will also be asked to provide stool samples before enrollment and after 4-6 weeks.

The study is trying to assess whether the use of whole food in blenderized tube feeding will be better tolerated and also lead to greater diversity of microbiome.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-10
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-08
Start Month Year July 7, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year December 2023
Verification Month Year February 2023
Verification Date 2023-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20601528
Description Malnutrition remains highly prevalent in both acute and chronic diseases, leading to longer hospital length of stay, greater risk of hospital readmission, and overall increase in morbidity and mortality. Over the last few decades, studies have continued to reveal significant clinical benefit from nutrition support, including reduction in complications and length of stay, maintenance of gastrointestinal integrity, and overall improvement in clinical outcomes and mortality. Despite high prevalence of Home Enteral Nutrition(HEN), patients continue to struggle with intolerance of tube feeds leading to chronic underfeeding and weight loss. Current guidelines recommend using standard polymeric formula or high-protein standard formula in the hospitalized patient requiring EN and also recommend against routine use of formulas designed to be immune-modulatory, elemental/semi-elemental, disease-specific (diabetes), and organ-specific (hepatic, renal, pulmonary).

Blenderized Tube Feeding(BTF) offers a number of advantages to standard polymeric formula including being able to modify the macro-nutrient and fiber content based on patient preference. BTF use has also been increasing significantly in the past few years.

The gut microbiome, or gut host environment, consists of approximately 10 thousand cells and has been the subject of much interest as it relates to gastrointestinal homeostasis. Our aim therefore is to (1) characterize the structure and dynamics of complex microbial communities using 16S rRNA- encoding gene sequences; (2) determine how they change with EN and; (3) how they may be correlated with tolerance of EN.

A total of fifty subjects who are willing to participate in current trial and who meet eligibility will be recruited from the Mayo Clinic HEN program. Suitable subjects will be identified when they present at the initial HEN visit prior to undergoing enteral tube placement.

Written informed consent will be obtained from all individuals who participate in the study. The principal investigator or member of study team meet with each participant, review the consent form in detail and confirm the subject's understanding of the study. The study team will answer all questions posed by the participants and when convinced that the subject verbally demonstrates understanding of the protocol, they will obtain a signed consent. Only designated staff members are authorized to obtain informed consent.

At the pre-enteral tube visit, subjects will complete a gastrointestinal quality of life (QoL) questionnaire which will form the baseline assessment for symptoms and functional status. Body composition will be measured using Bio-impedance analysis (BIA; InBody™). A stool specimen will be obtained for analysis of the gut microbiome at baseline. Baseline clinical data such as current medical problems will be recorded.

Facilities

Sequence: 198874317
Status Recruiting
Name Mayo Clinic in Rochester
City Rochester
State Minnesota
Zip 55905
Country United States

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 27978798
Facility Id 198874317
Contact Type primary
Name Manpreet Mundi, MD

Conditions

Sequence: 51864456
Name Enteral Feeding Intolerance
Downcase Name enteral feeding intolerance

Id Information

Sequence: 39912689
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 18-004416

Countries

Sequence: 42311136
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55291922 Sequence: 55291923
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator
Title Polymeric Tube Feeds Title Blenderized Tube Feeds
Description This arm will be receiving Polymeric Tube Feeds as a part of the regular HEN Protocol. Description This arm will be receiving Blenderized tube feeds as a part of the regular HEN Protocol.

Interventions

Sequence: 52184096 Sequence: 52184097
Intervention Type Dietary Supplement Intervention Type Dietary Supplement
Name Polymeric Tube Feeds Name Blenderized Tube Feeds
Description Polymeric tube feeds will be given to HEN patients to assess the percentage of goal calories provided in comparison with blenderized tube feeds Description Blenderized tube feeds will be given to HEN patients to assess the percentage of goal calories provided in comparison with polymeric tube feeds

Keywords

Sequence: 79367746 Sequence: 79367747 Sequence: 79367748
Name Home Enteral Nutrition Name Gut Microbiome Name Blenderized Tube Feeds
Downcase Name home enteral nutrition Downcase Name gut microbiome Downcase Name blenderized tube feeds

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176382087 Sequence: 176382088
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Percentage of goal calories provided Measure Gut microbiome
Time Frame 4-6 weeks Time Frame 1 week, 4-6 weeks
Description A stool specimen will be collected to assess the composition of the gut microbiome at baseline and at the follow-up visit.

Sponsors

Sequence: 48034673
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Mayo Clinic

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29106355
Role Principal Investigator
Name Manpreet S Mundi, MD
Affiliation Mayo Clinic

Central Contacts

Sequence: 11945683 Sequence: 11945684
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Manpreet S Mundi, MD Name Vishakantha (Vishu) Murthy, PhD
Phone 507-284-0106 Phone 507-255-8112
Email Mundi.Manpreet@mayo.edu Email Murthy.Vishakantha@mayo.edu
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67782512 Sequence: 67782513
Design Group Id 55291922 Design Group Id 55291923
Intervention Id 52184096 Intervention Id 52184097

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30585519
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

All subjects who are above 18 years of age, who present to Mayo Clinic HEN program for initial evaluation prior to enteral tube placement
Require enteral nutrition support for at least 4-6 weeks from enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes will be excluded due to the known pre-existing changes in the gut microbiome in this population.
Patients who have had exposure to probiotics, prebiotics or antibiotics in the preceding 4 weeks will be excluded.
Known allergy or intolerance to study products will be excluded.
Patients on parenteral nutrition will be excluded.
If oral feeding accounts for >25% of daily caloric intake.
Presence of entero-cutaneous fistula
Patients with short bowel syndrome will be excluded.
Patients who have had bariatric surgery or other alteration of GI tract will be excluded.
Hematologic malignancy with absolute neutrophil count < 500/mm3
History of renal or liver transplant or on transplant list.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253864035
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30333669
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Supportive Care
Time Perspective
Masking Triple
Masking Description The randomization list will be generated using http://www.randomization.com and the investigator team will be blinded at enrollment using supplement codes. A designated study coordinator will hold the randomization codes and the codes will be revealed to the investigators only after the statistical analysis is complete.
Intervention Model Description Prospective Randomized Controlled
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True

Links

Sequence: 4361438
Url http://www.mayo.edu/research/clinical-trials/
Description Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28712445
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Manpreet S. Mundi
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation Mayo Clinic

]]>

<![CDATA[ Antenatal Palliative Care ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795857
2019-01-14

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795857
NCT03795857https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795857?tab=tableNANANAIn France, according to current legislation, termination of pregnancy could be performed without any upper gestational age limit, if there is a strong probability that the fetus will be affected by a particularly severe and incurable disease. When there is a lethal fetal diagnosis most of parents wish to terminate their pregnancy. However, and despite some medical resistance a few of them do wish to continue pregnancy. In these situations, palliative care seems to be a good way to prepare to welcome the child and surround him until death.

The aim of the study is to describe parents’ experience for a better understanding and a better care.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-08-29
Start Month Year January 14, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year April 11, 2019
Verification Month Year August 2019
Verification Date 2019-08-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-08-29

Facilities

Sequence: 200618371 Sequence: 200618372 Sequence: 200618373
Name Équipe de psychopathologie périnatale – Service de psychopathologie du développement – Centre Hospitalier Femme-Mère-Enfant – Hospices Civils de Lyon Name Service de gynécologie obstétrique – Hôpital de la Croix Rousse Name Service de gynécologie-obstétrique – Centre hospitalier Lyon sud
City Bron City Lyon City Pierre-Bénite
Zip 69677 Zip 69004 Zip 69495
Country France Country France Country France

Conditions

Sequence: 52328329 Sequence: 52328330
Name Fetal Death Name Fetal Anomaly
Downcase Name fetal death Downcase Name fetal anomaly

Id Information

Sequence: 40271109
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 69HCL18_0371

Countries

Sequence: 42691178
Name France
Removed False

Interventions

Sequence: 52639324
Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Semi-structured interviews
Description The purpose of this study is to describe the experience of pregnancy by parents who have chosen to carry to term despite a lethal fetal diagnosis. Therefore, semi-structured interviews will be conducted to explore the links between context, feeling, involvement, decision and actions during pregnancy, whether within the couple or in its environment.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177960025
Outcome Type primary
Measure Description of the pregnancy by parents who have chosen to carry to term despite a lethal fetal diagnosis
Time Frame About 1 hour and 30 minutes
Description The purpose of this study is to describe the experience of pregnancy by parents who have chosen to carry to term despite a lethal fetal diagnosis. Therefore, semi-structured interviews will be conducted to explore the links between context, feeling, involvement, decision and actions during pregnancy, whether within the couple or in its environment.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194085249 Sequence: 194085250 Sequence: 194085251 Sequence: 194085252 Sequence: 194085253 Sequence: 194085254 Sequence: 194085255
Mesh Term Fetal Death Mesh Term Congenital Abnormalities Mesh Term Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Death Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term fetal death Downcase Mesh Term congenital abnormalities Downcase Mesh Term pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases and pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term death Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48466455
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Hospices Civils de Lyon

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30856349
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Population This study will focus on couples who have been diagnosed with lethal fetal pathology and who have chosen to continue the pregnancy for a birth in palliative care.

The death of the child may have occurred in utero or after birth.

Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

The woman must be between the ages of 18 and 50 and the adult,
Participants must have received the information and not have objected to participating in the study,
the lethal / adverse short-term prognosis of the fetal pathology must have been confirmed by a committee of experts (CPDPN),
The choice to continue the pregnancy should have been clearly expressed,
The birth of the child should not be older than 24 months.
The child's death must be more than 6 months old (or not have occurred)

Exclusion Criteria:

Non-mastery of the French language,
Measure of legal protection of one of the members of the couple (guardianship, trusteeship, …),
Severe psychiatric or neurological disorders inducing significant cognitive impairment.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254313069
Number Of Facilities 3
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 2
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30602187
Observational Model Other
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28968703
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ COMPARISON OF LIVER RETRACTOR FOR INTRATOPERATIVE LIVER DAMAGE ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795844
2019-11-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795844
NCT03795844https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795844?tab=tableNANANAThe frequency of laparoscopic bariatric surgery is increasing day by day. In these surgeries, the liver masses are also found to be significantly larger due to the high Body Mass Index scores. It is known that the application of a diet called liver shrinkage protein diet which is applied preoperatively is a method that contributes to the comfort of the surgeon during surgery by reducing the size of the liver. The large size of the liver narrows the field of view of the surgeon in operation and decreases the comfort of surgery. One of the most important points that the surgeon must solve during surgery is the exclusion of the left lobe of the liver. The most commonly used types of liver retractors today; Nathanson retractor, Snowden-Window retractor, Snake retractor, Fan retractor, LIvac retractor and many other retractors. Some of these retractors require an additional incision under xiphoid, which may lead to an injury risk. The installation of these retractors also increases the operation time and requires additional time. Numerous studies have shown that retractors, which are used to rule out liver left lobe during surgery, cause liver damage. However, in order to reveal His angle in the esophageal-gastric composition, hepatic left lobe exclusion is mandatory. Therefore, it is necessary to determine and use the retractor type which causes the least damage between the liver retractors. In our study, it was aimed to reveal three types of liver retractors in our hospital in different cases and to reveal the type of trocar that causes the least amount of liver damage.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-03-23
Start Month Year November 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 1, 2020
Verification Month Year March 2021
Verification Date 2021-03-31
Last Update Posted Date 2021-03-23

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20709984
Description During laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery, the operative view is usually blocked by the left lobe of the liver. An effective liver retraction is important for good vision and safety during operation. In this study, 120 patients who are over 18 years old with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy will be included. 4 groups will be formed and each group will be planned to include 30 patients. In group 1, a 5 mm incision was made under xiphoid during the operation, and Nathanson retractor was placed and liver left lobe retraction would be achieved. In the second group, a snake retractor with a 5 mm incision under the xiphoid will be used. In the 3rd group, liver retraction will be provided by using a 5 mm trocar from the intersection of the right midclavicular line. In the group, liver retraction through a 5 mm trocar entrained from the intersection of the right midclavicular line and a 4 cm superior umbilicus will be provided with the aid of laparoscopic grasper without any special tools. In these patients, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and Bilirubin levels will be examined on the postoperative 1st, 2nd and 3rd days and the patients will be examined with postoperative first day abdominal abdomen magnetic resonance imaging and the liver injury will be evaluated by the radiologist. Patients will not know which liver excision method is used during surgery. The radiologist who will perform damage assessment on imaging will not know which type of liver dislocation is used. Therefore, the study will be planned as double blind. The liver excision method will be applied sequentially. Randomization will be done in this way.

Facilities

Sequence: 199965061
Name Fatih Sultan Mehmet Research and Training Hospital
City Istanbul
Zip 34734
Country Turkey

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 95996886 Sequence: 95996887
Mesh Term Liver Extracts Mesh Term Hematinics
Downcase Mesh Term liver extracts Downcase Mesh Term hematinics
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52138990
Name Liver Damage
Downcase Name liver damage

Id Information

Sequence: 40135055
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value ANIL ERGIN…….

Countries

Sequence: 42542680
Name Turkey
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55559328 Sequence: 55559329 Sequence: 55559330 Sequence: 55559331
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator
Title Nathanson retractor Title snake retractor Title fan retractor Title CONTROL GROUP
Description Liver retraction in group 1, a 5 mm incision was made under xiphoid during the operation, and Nathanson retractor was placed and liver left lobe retraction would be achieved. Description Liver retraction in group 2 ; 5 mm incision under the xiphoid will be used. Snake retractor was placed and liver left lobe retraction would be achieved. Description Liver retraction in group 3 ; through a 5 mm trocar entrained from the intersection of the right midclavicular line and a 4 cm superior umbilicus Description Liver retraction in group 4 ; through a 5 mm trocar entrained from the intersection of the right midclavicular line and a 4 cm superior umbilicus will be provided with the aid of laparoscopic grasper without any special tools

Interventions

Sequence: 52454897 Sequence: 52454898 Sequence: 52454899 Sequence: 52454900
Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Procedure
Name liver retraction Nathanson retractor Name liver retraction snake retractor Name liver retraction fan retractor Name liver retraction laparoscopic grasper
Description liver retractor will be used for the retraction of left lobe of liver Description liver retractor will be used for the retraction of left lobe of liver Description liver retractor will be used for the retraction of left lobe of liver Description laparoscopic grasper without any special tools

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177263604
Outcome Type primary
Measure Liver damage of liver retractors by measurement of AST(Aspartate Aminotransferase), ALT (alanine aminotransferase) , GGT (Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase) , Bilirubin (Total , direct , indirect ) levels.
Time Frame 72 hours
Description measurement of AST(Aspartate Aminotransferase), ALT (alanine aminotransferase) , GGT (Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase) , Bilirubin (Total , direct , indirect ) levels will be measured preoperatively and postoperative 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 days and record.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193366474 Sequence: 193366475
Mesh Term Liver Diseases Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term liver diseases Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48290699
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68107437 Sequence: 68107438 Sequence: 68107439 Sequence: 68107440
Design Group Id 55559328 Design Group Id 55559329 Design Group Id 55559330 Design Group Id 55559331
Intervention Id 52454897 Intervention Id 52454898 Intervention Id 52454899 Intervention Id 52454900

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30747715
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 70 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

The patients older than 18 years planned for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

The patients with liver failure
The patients with impaired preoperative liver function tests
The patients who have been diagnosed with any liver disease
The patients with bleeding disorders

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254121843
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 2
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 70
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30493998
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Crossover Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Prevention
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description In this study, 120 patients who are over 18 years old with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy will be included. 4 groups will be formed and each group will be planned to include 30 patients. In group 1, a 5 mm incision was made under xiphoid during the operation, and Nathanson retractor was placed and liver left lobe retraction would be achieved. In the second group, a snake retractor with a 5 mm incision under the xiphoid will be used. In the 3rd group, liver retraction will be provided by using a 5 mm trocar from the intersection of the right midclavicular line. In the control group, liver retraction through a 5 mm trocar entrained from the intersection of the right midclavicular line and a 4 cm superior umbilicus will be provided with the aid of laparoscopic grasper without any special tools.

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26655412
Intervention Id 52454897
Name nathanson retractor

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28860278
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name ANIL ERGIN
Title Dr Anil ERGIN , General Surgery , Asistant doctor
Affiliation Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital

]]>

<![CDATA[ Validation Study in Patients of a Non-invasive Blood Pressure Monitor for Perioperative Use ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795831
2017-03-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795831
NCT03795831https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795831?tab=tableD.P. Veelo, Drd.p.veelo@amc.uva.nl0031205662533Collecting all available data (waveforms, beat to beat data, status data) generated by a non invasive blood pressure monitor on each hand and compare this to the actual data obtained by intra arterial (radial) monitoring.

This to see if the non invasive bloodpressure monitor can be validated for intraoperative use.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-10
Start Month Year March 1, 2017
Primary Completion Month Year December 30, 2019
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-10

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20727262
Description Although a blood pressure monitoring device could be evaluated by the comparing systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure to a reference pressure, it is the specific aim to collect all available data (waveforms, beat to beat data, status data) generated by the blood pressure monitor.

After data analysis and comparison to patient's actual intra-arterial waveform, the outcome will be evaluated by Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) standards to see if the non invasive bloodpressure monitor can be validated for intraoperative use.

The study is targeted at patients already monitored with a system that accurately measures and stores the intra-arterial waveform, such as the FloTrac system in the EV1000 monitor.

This study is a substudy of a feasability protocol evaluating a new algorithm for the Clearsight system.

Facilities

Sequence: 200159743
Status Recruiting
Name Academic Medical Center
City Amsterdam
Zip 1105AZ
Country Netherlands

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28113776
Facility Id 200159743
Contact Type primary
Name D.P. Veelo, Dr.
Email d.p.veelo@amc.uva.nl
Phone 0031205662533

Conditions

Sequence: 52185702
Name Intraoperative Hypotension
Downcase Name intraoperative hypotension

Id Information

Sequence: 40169220
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 2017-14

Countries

Sequence: 42580805
Name Netherlands
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609364
Title Cohort
Description Adult patients, undergoing surgery requiring general anesthesia, planned to be monitored with a system that accurately measures and stores the intra-arterial waveform.

Interventions

Sequence: 52499643
Intervention Type Device
Name ClearSight feasibility testing
Description A cuff is placed on a finger of the patient. The ClearSight system uses a volume clamp technology allowing measuring of continuous blood pressure waveform. Note: There will only be observational recordings, no interventions

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432851 Sequence: 177432852
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary
Measure validation systole, diastole, mean ABP and pulse pressure Measure implementation of software alterations to improve systole, diastole, mean ABP accuracy and pulse pressure
Time Frame within 1 hour Time Frame time during surgery
Description accuracy and precision of invasive blood pressure curve vs non-invasive blood pressure curves(ipsilateral and contralateral) Description Comparison of the non-invasive blood pressure curve after software alterations to the reference and invasive arterial blood pressure curve

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193540935 Sequence: 193540936 Sequence: 193540937
Mesh Term Hypotension Mesh Term Vascular Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term hypotension Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332529 Sequence: 48332530
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Academisch Medisch Centrum – Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) Name Edwards Lifesciences

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29293110
Role Principal Investigator
Name D.P. Veelo, Dr
Affiliation inverstigator

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12012351
Contact Type primary
Name D.P. Veelo, Dr
Phone 0031205662533
Email d.p.veelo@amc.uva.nl
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168457
Design Group Id 55609364
Intervention Id 52499643

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773703
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Population Patients in a perioperative setting already monitored with a system that accurately measures and stores the intra-arterial waveform, such as the FloTrac system in the EV1000 monitor.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients whose arterial blood pressure is measured invasively with technology that allows for the storage of the intra-arterial waveform with sufficient quality and resolution (Flotrac).
Patients older than 18, for elective general surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

– Patient conditions that are expected to potentially and significantly affect the transfer of pressure between radial artery and the finger, e.g. due to recent finger fractures

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253953224
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30519833
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886135
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name D.P.Veelo
Title Principal investigator
Affiliation Academisch Medisch Centrum – Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Study References

Sequence: 52079252
Pmid 36174389
Reference Type derived
Citation Kho E, van der Ster BJP, van der Ven WH, Vlaar APJ, Immink RV, Veelo DP. Clinical agreement of a novel algorithm to estimate radial artery blood pressure from the non-invasive finger blood pressure. J Clin Anesth. 2022 Dec;83:110976. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110976. Epub 2022 Sep 26.

]]>

<![CDATA[ IPT-A for Adolescents With PTSD Symptoms ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795818
2019-08-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795818
NCT03795818https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795818?tab=tableLaura Mufson, Ph.D.Laura.Mufson@nyspi.columbia.edu646-774-5791In the present study, the investigators propose to 1) adapt Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Adolescents (IPT-A) as an intervention for adolescents who report elevated symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and/or meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria for PTSD; and 2) conduct a small open pilot study of IPT-A for PTSD. Ten adolescents ages 13 to 18 who meet DSM-5 criteria for a PTSD diagnosis or have elevated symptoms of PTSD (Child PTSD Symptom Scale [CPSS-5] ≥ 31) will be treated with 14-16 weeks of an adapted version of IPT-A. If participants have evidenced a decrease in PTSD symptoms (CPSS-5 < 31) they will also receive 3 months of once a month maintenance treatment and be assessed by a clinician evaluator at the conclusion of the 3 monthly sessions. If participants have not evidenced a decrease in PTSD symptoms (CPSS-5 ≥ 31), they will be referred for alternative treatments in the community and be assessed by a clinician evaluator 3 months following the completion of IPT-A. All evaluations and therapy sessions will be done over telehealth platform until able to be done in person.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-24
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-09-30
Start Month Year August 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year June 30, 2023
Verification Month Year September 2022
Verification Date 2022-09-30
Last Update Posted Date 2022-09-30

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20618027
Description Please see the brief summary for study description.

Facilities

Sequence: 199044753
Status Recruiting
Name New York State Psychiatric Institute
City New York
State New York
Zip 10032
Country United States

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 27990130 Sequence: 27990131
Facility Id 199044753 Facility Id 199044753
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Hannah Ishimuro, MA Name Laura Mufson, Ph.D.
Email Hannah.Ishimuro@nyspi.columbia.edu Email Laura.Mufson@nyspi.columbia.edu
Phone 646-774-5793 Phone 6467745791

Conditions

Sequence: 51906595
Name PTSD
Downcase Name ptsd

Id Information

Sequence: 39951185
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 7717

Countries

Sequence: 42343624
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55314802
Group Type Other
Title IPT-A
Description Interpersonal psychotherapy for adolescents (IPT-A) is a psychosocial treatment for adolescents. It has been shown to be effective for adolescents with depression. It is now being studied as to its benefit for adolescents who meet criteria for PTSD or have subthreshold PTSD symptoms.

Interventions

Sequence: 52221420
Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Adolescents
Description IPT-A is a psychosocial intervention for adolescents that focuses on improving interpersonal relationships that seem to be associated with the psychiatric symptoms.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176471167 Sequence: 176471168 Sequence: 176471169 Sequence: 176471170 Sequence: 176471171 Sequence: 176471172 Sequence: 176471173 Sequence: 176471174
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change in Child PTSD Symptom Scale (CPSS-5) Measure Change in Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5, Child/Adolescent Version (CAPS-CA-5) Measure Change in Clinical Global Scale of Illness – Improvement/Severity (CGI-I/S) Measure Change in Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ) Measure Change in Social Adjustment Scale-Self Report (SAS-SR) Measure Change in Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Measure Change in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Measure Change in Conflict Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ)
Time Frame baseline, week 7, between weeks 14-16 (post-intervention), and at the 3 month follow-up, each time rating the 4 weeks prior to the assessment date. Time Frame baseline, between weeks 14-16 (post-intervention), and at the 3 month follow-up, each time rating the 4 weeks prior to the assessment date. Time Frame baseline, week 7, between weeks 14-16 (post-intervention), and at the 3 month follow-up, each time rating the 2 weeks prior to the assessment date Time Frame baseline, week 7, between weeks 14-16 (post-intervention), and at the 3 month follow-up, each time rating the 2 weeks prior to the assessment date Time Frame baseline, week 7, between weeks 14-16 (post-intervention), and at the 3 month follow-up, each time rating the 2 weeks prior to the assessment date Time Frame lifetime from birth to baseline time period, the month (4 weeks) prior to the initial baseline assessement prior to treatment, and at weeks 7, 14-16 (post intervention) and 3 month follow-up ratings on behavior since prior assessment up to 36 weeks. Time Frame baseline, week 7, between weeks 14-16 (post-intervention), and at the 3 month follow-up, each time rating the past 4 weeks prior to the assessment date Time Frame baseline, week 7, between weeks 14-16(post-intervention), and at the 3 month follow-up, each time rating the past 2 weeks prior to the assessment date.
Description The Child Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptom Scale (CPSS-5) is a self-report scale designed to assess PTSD symptoms in children and adolescents ages 8-18. The measure screens for stressful life events and asks about the emotional impact of these events in the 4 weeks prior to the assessment. Items are rated on a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (almost always) for how often the problem bothers the youth in the prior 4 weeks. A total symptom severity rating is calculated by summing the ratings of all 20 items and ranges from 0-80, with a higher score indicating greater symptom severity. The CPSS-5 will be used to assess change in PTSD symptoms through study completion at the 3-month follow-up assessment. The scale will be completed at baseline about the prior 4 weeks, at week 7 about the prior 4 weeks, between weeks 14-16 (post-intervention) about the prior 4 weeks, and at the 3-month follow-up assessment about the prior 4 weeks. Description The Clinician-Administered Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DMS-5) – Child/Adolescent Version (CAPS-CA-5) is a 30-item scale that assesses PTSD in children and adolescents ages 7 and older based on the 20 DSM-5 PTSD symptoms. Each item is given a severity rating based on symptom frequency and intensity. Ratings are given for the 4 weeks prior to each assessment timepoint. A total symptom severity score is calculated by summing severity scores for the 20 DSM-5 PTSD symptoms and ranges from 0-80, with a higher score indicating greater symptom severity. The CAPS-CA-5 will be used to assess change in symptoms through study completion at the 3-month follow-up assessment. The measure will be administered at baseline rating the prior 4 weeks, between weeks 14-16 (post-intervention) rating the prior 4 weeks, and at the 3-month follow-up assessment rating the prior 4 weeks. Description The Clinical Global Scale of Illness – Improvement/Severity (CGI-I/S) is a 2-item clinician-rated instrument that assesses change in global illness severity and global improvement from baseline prior to treatment to study completion at the 3-month follow-up assessment. The improvement item is scored on a 7-point scale and ranges from 1 (very much improved since the initiation of treatment) to 7 (very much worse since the initiation of treatment). The severity item is scored on a 7-point scale and ranges from 1 (normal) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). It will be administered at baseline rating the prior 2 weeks, at week 7 rating the prior 2 weeks, between weeks 14-16 (post-intervention) rating the prior 2 weeks, and at the 3-month follow-up assessment rating the prior 2 weeks. Description The Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ) is a 33-item self-report measure completed by the parent and adolescent to identify symptoms of depression in children and adolescents ages 6-17. Items are scored from 0 (not true) to 2 (true). A total score is calculated by summing the point values of all items and ranges from 0 to 66, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. The measure will be completed at baseline about the prior 2 weeks, at week 7 about the prior 2 weeks, between weeks 14-16 (post-intervention) about the prior 2 weeks, and at the 3-month follow-up assessment about the prior 2 weeks. Scores at these timepoints will enable assessment of change in symptoms through completion of the study at the 3-month follow-up assessment. Description The Social Adjustment Scale-Self Report (SAS-SR) is a 23-item scale that assesses social adjustment/functioning for the past 2 weeks in 5 areas: overall adjustment, school behavior, relationships with friends, relationships with family, and dating. Items are scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5. A total score is calculated by averaging all items. Subscale scores are calculated by averaging all items within each subscale. The total and subscale scores range from 1-5, with higher scores indicating more impaired social adjustment. The SAS-SR will be completed at baseline about the prior 2 weeks, at week 7 about the prior 2 weeks, between weeks 14-16 (post-intervention) about the prior 2 weeks, and at the 3-month follow-up assessment about the prior 2 weeks. Ratings will provide information regarding change in social adjustment through study completion at the 3-month follow-up assessment. Description The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a clinician-administered measure that collects information on suicidal behavior, suicide attempts, and presence and intensity of suicidal ideation. The majority of the items are scored as yes or no for being present, severity items for suicidal ideation are scored regarding frequency and intensity. A numerical Suicidal Ideation Score is equivalent to the maximum category of items 1-5 that is present at the assessment, where 0 is no suicidal ideation and 5 is active suicidal ideation with specific plan or intent. The baseline version will assess lifetime of the adolescent and past 4 weeks of suicidal ideation and behavior. At week 7, between 14-16 weeks (post-intervention), and at the 3-month follow-up timepoint, it will be administered and assess suicidal ideation and behavior for the past 7 weeks at weeks 7 and 14-16 (post-intervention), and the past 36 weeks at the 3-month follow-up assessment. Description The Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) is a clinician-rated scale that assesses overall/global impairment across aspects of the child's life for the 4 weeks prior to the assessment. It has been found to be a reliable instrument for assessing impairment in children with psychiatric disorders. Based on clinical interview, the evaluator assigns a single score for the person's level of impairment in various domains of his/her life including relationships, school, work, and symptomatology in the 4 weeks prior to the assessment. A single global rating is provided on a scale of 1-100, with 100 being no impairment. It will be completed at baseline, week 7, between weeks 14-16 (post-intervention), and at the 3-month follow-up assessment, rating the 4 weeks prior to each of these timepoints. The repeated timepoints will allow assessment of change from baseline through the study completion at the 3-month follow-up assessment. Description The Conflict Behavior Questionnaire is a self-report that assesses the parent-child relationship for the 2 weeks prior to the assessment. It has been found to be a reliable measure of the quality of the relationship between mother and adolescent and father and adolescent. It is completed both by the adolescent about the parents and the parent about the adolescent. It is a 20-item scale scored on a true/false scale. The total score is calculated by summing the point values of all of the items and ranges from 0-20. Higher scores indicate greater conflict in the relationship. The CBQ will be completed at baseline, week 7, between weeks 14-16 (post-intervention), and at the 3-month follow-up assessment, rating the 2 weeks prior to each of these timepoints. The repeated timepoints will allow assessment of the change from baseline through the study completion at 3-month follow-up assessment.

Sponsors

Sequence: 48069783
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name New York State Psychiatric Institute

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29129571
Role Principal Investigator
Name Laura Mufson, Ph.D.
Affiliation Columbia University/NYSPI

Central Contacts

Sequence: 11951026
Contact Type primary
Name Laura Mufson, Ph.D.
Phone 646-774-5791
Email Laura.Mufson@nyspi.columbia.edu
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67812962
Design Group Id 55314802
Intervention Id 52221420

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30608050
Gender All
Minimum Age 13 Years
Maximum Age 18 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Adolescents who meet criteria for DSM-5 diagnosis of PTSD or have elevated PTSD symptoms
English speaking adolescent and parent
Males and Females ages 13-18 years
Mild to moderate impairment in functioning

Exclusion Criteria:

Severe impairment in functioning
Diagnoses of substance abuse, Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Conduct Disorder, primary eating disorder, psychotic symptoms
Engagement in significant self-injurious behavior in the past 3 months
Active suicidality – presence of plan and/or intent
Intellectual disability or severe learning disability
Medical illness that may interfere with treatment
Current physical or sexual abuse
Open Administration for Children's Services (ACS) case
Currently receiving treatment for depression and/or PTSD or have begun a medication trial for another diagnosis within the previous three months

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253939197
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 13
Maximum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 3
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 5

Designs

Sequence: 30355314
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description This is an open clinical trial of an psychosocial intervention for adolescents

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26545263
Intervention Id 52221420
Name IPT-A

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28727663
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Laura Mufson
Title Professor of Medical Psychology (in Psychiatry)
Affiliation New York State Psychiatric Institute

]]>

<![CDATA[ After Surgery Acute Renal Failure Incidence in Total Knee Arthroplasty With and Without Tourniquet ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795805
2018-03-15

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795805
NCT03795805https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795805?tab=tableNANANAThis study analize the incidence of acute renal failure after performing total knee arthroplasty with or without use of tourniquet limb cuff (half of patients for each group) in a randomized clinical trial
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-26
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09
Start Month Year March 15, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year November 20, 2018
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-09

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735755
Description This study analize the incidence of acute renal failure after performing total knee arthroplasty with or without (using local intraarticular anesthesia) use of tourniquet limb cuff (half of patients for each group) in a randomized clinical trial

Facilities

Sequence: 200244151
Name UMAE Dr. Victorio de La Fuente Narvaez
City Ciudad de México
Zip 07020
Country Mexico

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96113032 Sequence: 96113033 Sequence: 96113034 Sequence: 96113035 Sequence: 96113036 Sequence: 96113037 Sequence: 96113038 Sequence: 96113039 Sequence: 96113040 Sequence: 96113041 Sequence: 96113042 Sequence: 96113043
Mesh Term Lidocaine Mesh Term Anesthetics, Local Mesh Term Anesthetics Mesh Term Central Nervous System Depressants Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Sensory System Agents Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Agents Mesh Term Anti-Arrhythmia Agents Mesh Term Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers Mesh Term Sodium Channel Blockers Mesh Term Membrane Transport Modulators Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Downcase Mesh Term lidocaine Downcase Mesh Term anesthetics, local Downcase Mesh Term anesthetics Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system depressants Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term sensory system agents Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system agents Downcase Mesh Term anti-arrhythmia agents Downcase Mesh Term voltage-gated sodium channel blockers Downcase Mesh Term sodium channel blockers Downcase Mesh Term membrane transport modulators Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52208067 Sequence: 52208068 Sequence: 52208069 Sequence: 52208070
Name Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Name Acute Kidney Injury Name Tourniquets Name Knee Osteoarthritis
Downcase Name arthroplasty, replacement, knee Downcase Name acute kidney injury Downcase Name tourniquets Downcase Name knee osteoarthritis

Id Information

Sequence: 40186118
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value R-2018-3401-053

Countries

Sequence: 42599610
Name Mexico
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55634624 Sequence: 55634625
Group Type Other Group Type Experimental
Title TKA and Tourniquet Title Intraarticular lidocain
Description Total knee arthroplasty and use of tourniquet limb cuff at 270 mmHg Description Total knee arthroplasty with Intaarticular lidocain

Interventions

Sequence: 52522040 Sequence: 52522041 Sequence: 52522042
Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Drug
Name total knee arthroplasty Name Tourniquet limb cuff Name Intaarticular lidocain
Description Total knee arhroplasty Description Tourniquet limb cuff and regular anesthesia Description 20 ml of 2% lidocain application intraarticular before surgery (intraarticular lidocain)

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177511059 Sequence: 177511060 Sequence: 177511061
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary
Measure Creatinin before surgery Measure Creatinin after surgery 1 Measure Creatinin after surgery 2
Time Frame Creatinin before surgery Time Frame Creatinin after surgery 1 at 24 hours Time Frame Creatinin after surgery 2 at 48 hours
Description Blood Creatinin meassure in mg/dl before surgery Description Blood Creatinin meassure in mg/dl at 24 hours Description Blood Creatinin meassure in mg/dl at 48 hours

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193626857 Sequence: 193626858 Sequence: 193626859 Sequence: 193626860 Sequence: 193626861 Sequence: 193626862 Sequence: 193626863 Sequence: 193626864
Mesh Term Acute Kidney Injury Mesh Term Renal Insufficiency Mesh Term Kidney Diseases Mesh Term Urologic Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Male Urogenital Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term acute kidney injury Downcase Mesh Term renal insufficiency Downcase Mesh Term kidney diseases Downcase Mesh Term urologic diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases and pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term male urogenital diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48353651
Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29305958
Role Principal Investigator
Name Avelino Colin Vázquez, MD
Affiliation IMSS

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199148 Sequence: 68199149 Sequence: 68199150 Sequence: 68199151
Design Group Id 55634625 Design Group Id 55634624 Design Group Id 55634624 Design Group Id 55634625
Intervention Id 52522040 Intervention Id 52522040 Intervention Id 52522041 Intervention Id 52522042

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30786846
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 99 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients knee arthrosis
Required a surgical treatment with Total Knee Arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

Not accept to be in the study
Not signed consent form
Not having blood sample for creatinin meassure

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989588
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 8
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 99
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30532916
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Prevention
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Intervention Model Description Randomized Clinical Trial
Subject Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26692025 Sequence: 26692026
Intervention Id 52522040 Intervention Id 52522042
Name TKA Name lidocaine

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899210
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name JUAN LOPEZ VALENCIA
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

]]>

<![CDATA[ Oral Curcumin Administration to Remit Metabolic Syndrome ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795792
2018-05-06

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795792
NCT03795792https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795792?tab=tableNANANAThe metabolic syndrome consists of a set of risk factors that increases the probability to develop heart diseases and type 2 diabetes, two of the principal chronic diseases that affect Mexican population. The curcumin is a compound that is extracted from the root of a plant called Cúrcuma longa. There exists information that curcumin helps to diminish weight and the levels of blood glucose and blood fats. The hypothesis of this study is: that curcumin administration combined with diet and exercise remits the metabolic syndrome.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-04-17
Start Month Year May 6, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year August 6, 2019
Verification Month Year April 2020
Verification Date 2020-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2020-04-17

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20721569
Description Objective: The aim of this study is to determinate the efficacy of oral administration of curcumin in the remission of metabolic syndrome.

Design: clinical trial, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled.

Study population: Men and women from 20 to 55 years old with metabolic syndrome according to the ATP III criteria, will be included.

Study groups: intervention and control group.

Sample size: It was calculated using a statistical power of 80%, an alpha value of 0.05. A 50% of the difference in the mean of remission of metabolic syndrome between control group and intervention groups was considered. The estimated sample size was 220 subjects for each group.

Process: All eligible participants according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, will be randomized to one of the study groups.

The intervention group will receive a total dose of curcumin 1.2 g / black pepper 10 mg a day; and control group will receive a total dose of hydrolyzed collagen 1.2 g / black pepper 10 mg a day; plus dietary and exercise recommendations for both groups during three months.

The blood concentrations of glucose, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterol will be measured, as well as the abdominal perimeter and blood pressure, at baseline conditions, at one month and three months after treatment.

Statistical analysis: Numerical values will be expressed as mean ± standard deviation; categorical variables will be expressed as proportions. Differences between the groups were estimated by unpaired Student t test for numerical variables (Mann-Whitney U test for skewed data) or Chi-square and Fisher´s exact test for categorical variables. Intragroup differences were estimated by paired Student t-test.

Facilities

Sequence: 200107790
Name Biomedical Research Unit. IMSS. Durango
City Durango
State Dgo
Zip 34067
Country Mexico

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96049985 Sequence: 96049986 Sequence: 96049987 Sequence: 96049988 Sequence: 96049989 Sequence: 96049990 Sequence: 96049991 Sequence: 96049992 Sequence: 96049993 Sequence: 96049994 Sequence: 96049995 Sequence: 96049996
Mesh Term Curcumin Mesh Term Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal Mesh Term Analgesics, Non-Narcotic Mesh Term Analgesics Mesh Term Sensory System Agents Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Agents Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Anti-Inflammatory Agents Mesh Term Antirheumatic Agents Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents Mesh Term Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
Downcase Mesh Term curcumin Downcase Mesh Term anti-inflammatory agents, non-steroidal Downcase Mesh Term analgesics, non-narcotic Downcase Mesh Term analgesics Downcase Mesh Term sensory system agents Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system agents Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term anti-inflammatory agents Downcase Mesh Term antirheumatic agents Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents Downcase Mesh Term enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52171076
Name Metabolic Syndrome
Downcase Name metabolic syndrome

Id Information

Sequence: 40158520
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value R-2017-785-132

Countries

Sequence: 42568828
Name Mexico
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55593011 Sequence: 55593012
Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title Curcumin Title Hydrollased collagen
Description Curcumin 1.2 g / black pepper 10 mg a day for 3 months, plus recommendations to decrease calories intake and do exercise. Description Hydrolyzed collagen 1.2 g / black pepper 10 mg a day for 3 months, plus recommendations to decrease calories intake and do exercise.

Interventions

Sequence: 52485321 Sequence: 52485322
Intervention Type Dietary Supplement Intervention Type Dietary Supplement
Name Curcumin Name Hydrolyzed collagen
Description Will be provided in capsules Description Will be provided in capsules.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177378218
Outcome Type primary
Measure Remission of metabolic syndrome.
Time Frame Three months.
Description Presence of two or less metabolic syndrome criteria, according to the ATP III criteria.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193486064 Sequence: 193486065 Sequence: 193486066 Sequence: 193486067 Sequence: 193486068 Sequence: 193486069 Sequence: 193486070 Sequence: 193486071
Mesh Term Metabolic Syndrome Mesh Term Syndrome Mesh Term Disease Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Insulin Resistance Mesh Term Hyperinsulinism Mesh Term Glucose Metabolism Disorders Mesh Term Metabolic Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term metabolic syndrome Downcase Mesh Term syndrome Downcase Mesh Term disease Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term insulin resistance Downcase Mesh Term hyperinsulinism Downcase Mesh Term glucose metabolism disorders Downcase Mesh Term metabolic diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48319134
Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29285257 Sequence: 29285258 Sequence: 29285259 Sequence: 29285260
Role Principal Investigator Role Study Chair Role Study Chair Role Study Chair
Name Fernando Guerrero, PhD Name Luis Simental, PhD Name Gerardo Martínez, PhD Name Claudia Gamboa, PhD
Affiliation Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Affiliation Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Affiliation Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Affiliation Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68148945 Sequence: 68148946
Design Group Id 55593011 Design Group Id 55593012
Intervention Id 52485321 Intervention Id 52485322

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30765256
Gender All
Minimum Age 20 Years
Maximum Age 55 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Women and men.
20 to 55 years old.
Diagnosis of metabolic syndrome according to the ATP III criteria.
Informed consent of the participant.

Exclusion Criteria:

Diabetes or hypoglycaemic therapy.
High blood pressure o anti-hypertensive treatments.
Hypertriglyceridemia (>400 g/dL) or lipid lowering treatment.
Neoplasia disease.
Thyroid disease
Syndrome of polycystic ovary.
Pregnancy or lactation.
Smoking.
Anti-inflammatory medicines in the last two months.
Food supplements in the last two months.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253876615
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 15
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 20
Maximum Age Num 55
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30511423
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Masking Description Neither the patient nor the treating doctor will know the study group the participant was randomized.
Intervention Model Description Study groups:

Intervention group: curcumin 1.2 g / black pepper 10 mg a day for 3 months, plus recommendations to decrease calories intake and do exercise.

Control group: hydrolyzed collagen 1.2 g / black pepper 10 mg a day for 3 months, plus recommendations to decrease calories intake and do exercise.

Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26673662
Intervention Id 52485321
Name Turmeric

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28877717
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Fernando Guerrero Romero MD
Title Head of the research unit
Affiliation Coordinación de Investigación en Salud, Mexico

Study References

Sequence: 52063109 Sequence: 52063110 Sequence: 52063111 Sequence: 52063112 Sequence: 52063113 Sequence: 52063114 Sequence: 52063115 Sequence: 52063116 Sequence: 52063117 Sequence: 52063118 Sequence: 52063119 Sequence: 52063120 Sequence: 52063121 Sequence: 52063122 Sequence: 52063123 Sequence: 52063124 Sequence: 52063125
Pmid 27980598 Pmid 28538842 Pmid 26592847 Pmid 27325504 Pmid 20607063 Pmid 22996406 Pmid 22610853 Pmid 25374024 Pmid 22930403 Pmid 24260564 Pmid 27761427 Pmid 17437639 Pmid 28639538 Pmid 22253696 Pmid 22386732 Pmid 22058071 Pmid 25131839
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Azhar Y, Parmar A, Miller CN, Samuels JS, Rayalam S. Phytochemicals as novel agents for the induction of browning in white adipose tissue. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2016 Dec 3;13:89. doi: 10.1186/s12986-016-0150-6. eCollection 2016. Citation Cabrera-Rode E, Stusser B, Calix W, Orlandi N, Rodriguez J, Cubas-Duenas I, Echevarria R, Alvarez A. [Diagnostic concordance between seven definitions of metabolic syndrome in overweight and obese adults]. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2017 Jan-Mar;34(1):19-27. doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2017.341.2763. Spanish. Citation Di Pierro F, Bressan A, Ranaldi D, Rapacioli G, Giacomelli L, Bertuccioli A. Potential role of bioavailable curcumin in weight loss and omental adipose tissue decrease: preliminary data of a randomized, controlled trial in overweight people with metabolic syndrome. Preliminary study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Nov;19(21):4195-202. Citation Jimenez-Osorio AS, Monroy A, Alavez S. Curcumin and insulin resistance-Molecular targets and clinical evidences. Biofactors. 2016 Nov 12;42(6):561-580. doi: 10.1002/biof.1302. Epub 2016 Jun 21. Citation Kim M, Kim Y. Hypocholesterolemic effects of curcumin via up-regulation of cholesterol 7a-hydroxylase in rats fed a high fat diet. Nutr Res Pract. 2010 Jun;4(3):191-5. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2010.4.3.191. Epub 2010 Jun 28. Citation Metzler M, Pfeiffer E, Schulz SI, Dempe JS. Curcumin uptake and metabolism. Biofactors. 2013 Jan-Feb;39(1):14-20. doi: 10.1002/biof.1042. Epub 2012 Sep 20. Citation Mohammadi A, Sahebkar A, Iranshahi M, Amini M, Khojasteh R, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Ferns GA. Effects of supplementation with curcuminoids on dyslipidemia in obese patients: a randomized crossover trial. Phytother Res. 2013 Mar;27(3):374-9. doi: 10.1002/ptr.4715. Epub 2012 May 21. Citation Na LX, Yan BL, Jiang S, Cui HL, Li Y, Sun CH. Curcuminoids Target Decreasing Serum Adipocyte-fatty Acid Binding Protein Levels in Their Glucose-lowering Effect in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Biomed Environ Sci. 2014 Nov;27(11):902-6. doi: 10.3967/bes2014.127. Citation Na LX, Li Y, Pan HZ, Zhou XL, Sun DJ, Meng M, Li XX, Sun CH. Curcuminoids exert glucose-lowering effect in type 2 diabetes by decreasing serum free fatty acids: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013 Sep;57(9):1569-77. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201200131. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Citation Neyrinck AM, Alligier M, Memvanga PB, Nevraumont E, Larondelle Y, Preat V, Cani PD, Delzenne NM. Curcuma longa extract associated with white pepper lessens high fat diet-induced inflammation in subcutaneous adipose tissue. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 19;8(11):e81252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081252. eCollection 2013. Citation Rahimi HR, Mohammadpour AH, Dastani M, Jaafari MR, Abnous K, Ghayour Mobarhan M, Kazemi Oskuee R. The effect of nano-curcumin on HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, and lipid profile in diabetic subjects: a randomized clinical trial. Avicenna J Phytomed. 2016 Sep-Oct;6(5):567-577. Citation Kowluru RA, Kanwar M. Effects of curcumin on retinal oxidative stress and inflammation in diabetes. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2007 Apr 16;4:8. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-4-8. Citation Rochlani Y, Pothineni NV, Kovelamudi S, Mehta JL. Metabolic syndrome: pathophysiology, management, and modulation by natural compounds. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Aug;11(8):215-225. doi: 10.1177/1753944717711379. Epub 2017 Jun 22. Citation Shao W, Yu Z, Chiang Y, Yang Y, Chai T, Foltz W, Lu H, Fantus IG, Jin T. Curcumin prevents high fat diet induced insulin resistance and obesity via attenuating lipogenesis in liver and inflammatory pathway in adipocytes. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e28784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028784. Epub 2012 Jan 9. Citation Shen L, Ji HF. The pharmacology of curcumin: is it the degradation products? Trends Mol Med. 2012 Mar;18(3):138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 Mar 1. Citation Shin SK, Ha TY, McGregor RA, Choi MS. Long-term curcumin administration protects against atherosclerosis via hepatic regulation of lipoprotein cholesterol metabolism. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2011 Dec;55(12):1829-40. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201100440. Epub 2011 Nov 7. Citation Yang YS, Su YF, Yang HW, Lee YH, Chou JI, Ueng KC. Lipid-lowering effects of curcumin in patients with metabolic syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Phytother Res. 2014 Dec;28(12):1770-7. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5197. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

]]>

<![CDATA[ CLL1-CD33 cCAR in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory, High Risk Hematologic Malignancies ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795779
2018-03-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795779
NCT03795779https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795779?tab=tableKevin Pinzkevin.pinz@icellgene.com6315386218Phase I, interventional, single arm, open label, treatment study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of CLL1-CD33 cCAR in patients with relapsed and/or refractory, high risk hematologic malignancies.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-05-19
Start Month Year March 1, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year September 30, 2022
Verification Month Year May 2021
Verification Date 2021-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2021-05-19

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20741098
Description AML bears heterogeneous cells that can consequently offset killing by single-CAR-based therapy, which results in disease relapse. Leukemic stem cells (LSCs) associated with CLL1 expression comprise a rare population that also plays an important role in disease progression and relapse for myeloid malignancies. CD33 is widely expressed in AML, high risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms. Targeting both CD33 and CLL1 surface antigens together may offer two distinct benefits. First, targeting both bulk disease and leukemic stem cells together allows for a more comprehensive ablation of the disease. Second, dual targeting of myeloid malignancies by both CD33 and CLL1 directed therapy overcomes the pitfalls of single-antigen therapy by preventing relapse due to antigen loss. While loss of a single antigen under antigen-specific selection pressure is possible, loss of two antigens simultaneously is much less likely.

CLL1-CD33 cCAR is a compound Chimeric Antigen Receptor (cCAR) immunotherapy with two distinct functional CAR molecules expressed on a T-cell, directed against the surface proteins CLL1 and CD33. cCAR intends to target the mechanisms of single-CAR relapse, specifically antigen escape and leukemic stem cells.

Facilities

Sequence: 200280127 Sequence: 200280128
Status Recruiting Status Not yet recruiting
Name The General Hospital of Western Theater Command Name Peking University Shenzhen Hospital
City Chengdu City Shenzhen
Country China Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28132819 Sequence: 28132820 Sequence: 28132821 Sequence: 28132822
Facility Id 200280127 Facility Id 200280127 Facility Id 200280128 Facility Id 200280128
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Fang Liu, MD, PhD Name Hongyu Zhang, MD, PhD
Email lfyh2006@yahoo.com Email HongyuZhang@pkuszh.com

Conditions

Sequence: 52221341 Sequence: 52221342 Sequence: 52221343 Sequence: 52221344 Sequence: 52221345
Name Hematologic Malignancy Name Acute Myeloid Leukemia Name Myelodysplastic Syndromes Name Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Name Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Downcase Name hematologic malignancy Downcase Name acute myeloid leukemia Downcase Name myelodysplastic syndromes Downcase Name myeloproliferative neoplasm Downcase Name chronic myeloid leukemia

Id Information

Sequence: 40195497
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value ICG141-001

Countries

Sequence: 42609490
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55649586
Group Type Experimental
Title CLL1-CD33 cCAR T cells
Description CLL1-CD33cCAR T cells transduced with a lentiviral vector to express two distinct units of anti-CLL1 and CD33 CARs

Interventions

Sequence: 52535110
Intervention Type Biological
Name CLL1-CD33 cCAR T cells
Description CLL1-CD33 cCAR T cells transduced with a lentiviral vector to express two distinct units of anti-CLL1 and CD33 CARs.

Keywords

Sequence: 79941515 Sequence: 79941516 Sequence: 79941517 Sequence: 79941518 Sequence: 79941519
Name CLL1 Name CD33 Name CLL1-CD33 cCAR Name Leukemia Name Hematologic Malignancies
Downcase Name cll1 Downcase Name cd33 Downcase Name cll1-cd33 ccar Downcase Name leukemia Downcase Name hematologic malignancies

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177560695 Sequence: 177560696 Sequence: 177560697 Sequence: 177560698 Sequence: 177560699 Sequence: 177560700
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Number of participants with dose limiting toxicity (DLT) as assessed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 Measure Type of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) Measure Number of participants with adverse event by severity as assessed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 Measure Overall Response Rate (ORR) Measure Progression-free survival (PFS) Measure Overall survival
Time Frame 28 days Time Frame 28 days Time Frame 2 years Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year Time Frame 1 year
Description Assessment of morphologic complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete recovery of counts (CR1), no residual disease as analyzed by flow cytometry analysis, and molecular remission by molecular studies

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193677780 Sequence: 193677781 Sequence: 193677782 Sequence: 193677783 Sequence: 193677784 Sequence: 193677785 Sequence: 193677786 Sequence: 193677787 Sequence: 193677788 Sequence: 193677789 Sequence: 193677790 Sequence: 193677791 Sequence: 193677792 Sequence: 193677793
Mesh Term Leukemia Mesh Term Leukemia, Myeloid Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Hematologic Neoplasms Mesh Term Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive Mesh Term Myelodysplastic Syndromes Mesh Term Myeloproliferative Disorders Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Bone Marrow Diseases Mesh Term Hematologic Diseases Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Chronic Disease Mesh Term Disease Attributes Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term leukemia Downcase Mesh Term leukemia, myeloid Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term hematologic neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term leukemia, myelogenous, chronic, bcr-abl positive Downcase Mesh Term myelodysplastic syndromes Downcase Mesh Term myeloproliferative disorders Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term bone marrow diseases Downcase Mesh Term hematologic diseases Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term chronic disease Downcase Mesh Term disease attributes Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48366240 Sequence: 48366241 Sequence: 48366242 Sequence: 48366243
Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class OTHER Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name iCell Gene Therapeutics Name The General Hospital of Western Theater Command Name iCAR Bio Therapeutics Ltd. Name Peking University Shenzhen Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29312821 Sequence: 29312822
Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Hongyu Zhang, MD, PhD Name Fang Liu, MD, PhD
Affiliation Peking University Shenzhen Hospital Affiliation The General Hospital of Western Theater Command

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12020545
Contact Type primary
Name Kevin Pinz
Phone 6315386218
Email kevin.pinz@icellgene.com
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68217097
Design Group Id 55649586
Intervention Id 52535110

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30794596
Gender All
Minimum Age N/A
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Prior HSCT relapse beyond 6 months without active GVHD; systematic usage of immunosuppressive drug or corticosteroid must have been stopped for more than 4 weeks
De novo AML
Transformed AML
MDS with excess blasts (RAEB-2)
MDS that is not a candidate for induction chemotherapy.
Myeloproliferative neoplasms with blastic transformation
Patients have exhausted standard therapeutic options

Exclusion Criteria:

Prior solid organ transplantation
Potentially curative therapy including hematopoietic cell transplant
Prior treatment with CD123xCD3 or CLL1x3 bispecific agents, T cells expressing CD123 CAR or CLL1 CAR, or toxin-conjugated to CD123 or CLL1 antibodies.

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254004113
Number Of Facilities 2
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 3
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30540636
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28906955
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Nausea and Vomiting After Gynecologic Surgery ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795766
2019-01-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795766
NCT03795766https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795766?tab=tableLei Lilileigh@163.com+8613911988831In this cross-section study, all patients in the gynecologic ward of Peking Union Medical College Hospital will accepted a survey about the prevalence and severity of nausea and vomiting according to visual analogue scale and WHO classification. Epidemiological, surgical, anaesthetic characteristics and post-operative treatment are considered as predictors for the post-operative nausea and vomiting. The primary objective is the incidence of nausea and vomiting. The secondary objective is the possible predictors of nausea and vomiting.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year January 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 1, 2020
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Facilities

Sequence: 199965076
Status Recruiting
Name Lei Li
City Beijing
State Beijing
Zip 100730
Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28086649
Facility Id 199965076
Contact Type primary
Name Lei Li, MD
Email lileigh@163.com
Phone 008613911988831

Conditions

Sequence: 52139006 Sequence: 52139007
Name Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Name Gynecologic Surgery
Downcase Name postoperative nausea and vomiting Downcase Name gynecologic surgery

Id Information

Sequence: 40135064
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value GY-PONV

Countries

Sequence: 42542689
Name China
Removed False

Interventions

Sequence: 52454911
Intervention Type Procedure
Name Surgeries for gynecologic disease
Description All patients accept surgeries for gynecologic disease.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177263644 Sequence: 177263645 Sequence: 177263646
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting Measure Severity of post-operative nausea and vomiting by visual analogue scale Measure Severity of post-operative nausea and vomiting by World Health Organization classification
Time Frame 72 hours post-operative Time Frame 72 hours post-operative Time Frame 72 hours post-operative
Description Incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting Description Severity of post-operative nausea and vomiting according to the visual analogue scale. In th scale, 0 denotes none, 10 denotes the most severe conditions. The scale will be judged by the patients. Description Severity of post-operative nausea and vomiting according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification. In WHO classfication, I denotes none, II, III and IV denote mild, moderate and severe conditions.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193366532 Sequence: 193366533 Sequence: 193366534 Sequence: 193366535 Sequence: 193366536 Sequence: 193366537
Mesh Term Nausea Mesh Term Vomiting Mesh Term Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Mesh Term Signs and Symptoms, Digestive Mesh Term Postoperative Complications Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term nausea Downcase Mesh Term vomiting Downcase Mesh Term postoperative nausea and vomiting Downcase Mesh Term signs and symptoms, digestive Downcase Mesh Term postoperative complications Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48290710
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29268532
Role Principal Investigator
Name Lei Li, M.D.
Affiliation Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12000488
Contact Type primary
Name Lei Li
Phone +8613911988831
Email lileigh@163.com
Role Contact

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30747724
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender Female
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population All patients accept elective surgeries for gynecologic disease with good performance status.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Aged 18 years or older
Elective surgeries for gynecologic disease
Good performance status
Signed an approved informed consents
Post-operative stay 72 hours or longer

Exclusion Criteria:

Emergency surgeries
Not meeting all of the inclusion criteria

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254121855
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30494007
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28860287
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Lei Li
Title Professor
Affiliation Peking Union Medical College Hospital

]]>

<![CDATA[ Determining the Benefits of Improving Communication in BPAP/CPAP Users ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795753
2019-03-22

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795753
NCT03795753https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795753?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a non-invasive communication aid for BPAP/CPAP masks. This study also looks to determine the potential impact of the device on patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and the individuals that interact with the device.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-28
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-09-18
Start Month Year March 22, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year July 8, 2019
Verification Month Year August 2020
Verification Date 2020-08-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-09-18
Results First Posted Date 2020-09-18

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20554144
Description Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is a crucial tool used to treat respiratory distress and failure, especially when patients have acute worsening (also called exacerbations) of emphysema or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study will randomize patients who use Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) to a control (non-functioning) and intervention (functioning) device to determine how well speech can be understood while wearing the device.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a non-invasive communication aid for BPAP/CPAP masks. This study also looks to determine the potential impact of the device on patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and the individuals that interact with the device.

Facilities

Sequence: 198449409 Sequence: 198449410 Sequence: 198449411
Name Emory Clinic Name Emory University Hospital Name Grady Health System
City Atlanta City Atlanta City Atlanta
State Georgia State Georgia State Georgia
Zip 30322 Zip 30322 Zip 30322
Country United States Country United States Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 51740957 Sequence: 51740958
Name Positive-Pressure Respiration Name Communication
Downcase Name positive-pressure respiration Downcase Name communication

Id Information

Sequence: 39815706
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value IRB00097529

Countries

Sequence: 42215022
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55162111 Sequence: 55162112
Group Type Experimental Group Type Sham Comparator
Title F2S Communicator Title Non-functioning Communicator
Description The F2S Communication System is a communication aid for use with a noninvasive ventilation (NIV) mask covering at least the mouth. It is a two-component system consisting of (1) a disposable, single patient use patch and signal cable and (2) a reusable communicator with power cable.The non-invasive aid for patients receiving BPAP/CPAP therapy delivers communication between the patient and medical personnel. Description Non-functioning study communication device is used.

Interventions

Sequence: 52062608 Sequence: 52062609
Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Other
Name F2S Communicator Name Non-functioning Communicator
Description The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. The study coordinator will ENABLE the communicator. A list of single words and 5-word through 15-word sentences will be provided to the patient. Each single word may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must then select the read word out of a list of twelve possible words. Each sentence may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must transcribe each sentence on a standardized form. A survey will be provided to evaluate the "mask on, communicator on" period. Description The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. The study coordinator will DISABLE the communicator. A list of single words and 5-word through 15-word sentences will be provided to the patient. Each single word may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must then select the read word out of a list of twelve possible words. Each sentence may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must transcribe each sentence on a standardized form. A survey will be provided to evaluate the "mask on, communicator on" period.

Keywords

Sequence: 79164427 Sequence: 79164428 Sequence: 79164429
Name Emphysema Name Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Name Obstructive sleep apnea
Downcase Name emphysema Downcase Name chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Downcase Name obstructive sleep apnea

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 175985123 Sequence: 175985124 Sequence: 175985125 Sequence: 175985126
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Accuracy of Single Word Selection (Proportion of Right Words From Total) Measure Accuracy of Sentence Selection (Proportion of Right Sentences From Total) Measure Speech Transmission Index (STI) Measure Number of Subjects That Found That the Device Significantly Improved Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) Comfort
Time Frame Mask on-communicator on-20 minutes Time Frame Mask on-communicator on-20 minutes Time Frame Mask on with communicator on (20 min) Time Frame Mask on-communicator on-20 minutes
Description Data will be collected using audio recording – accuracy of single word selection (spoken by patient -> selected by partner). The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. A list of single words will be provided to the patient. Each single word may be read aloud by patient up to two times. The partner must then select the read word out of a list of twelve possible words. Description Data will be collected using audio recording – accuracy of sentence selection (spoken by patient -> transcribed by partner). The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. A list of 5-word through 15-word sentences will be provided to the patient. Each sentence may be read aloud by patient up to two times. The partner must transcribe each sentence on a standardized form. Description STI is a numeric representation measure of communication channel characteristics whose value varies from 0 = bad to 1 = excellent.On this scale, an STI of at least 0.5 is desirable for most applications. Description Number of subjects that found that the device significantly improved noninvasive ventilation (NIV) comfort was calculated and reported. Assessment of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) comfort was conducted using Likert Scale Score on clarity of communication on a symmetric seven-level agree-disagree scale.

Sponsors

Sequence: 47919613
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Emory University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29034567
Role Principal Investigator
Name Nancy Collop, MD
Affiliation Emory University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67626741 Sequence: 67626742
Design Group Id 55162111 Design Group Id 55162112
Intervention Id 52062608 Intervention Id 52062609

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30514363
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients must be receiving BPAP/CPAP therapy in the outpatient setting (e.g. clinics, sleep centers).

Exclusion Criteria:

Intubated or have a tracheostomy.
Vulnerable populations (children, pregnant women, decisionally impaired adults, and prisoners).
Speech disabilities, reading disabilities, dyslexia.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254064853
Number Of Facilities 3
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 3
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 11
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30263427
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26464041
Intervention Id 52062608
Name BPAP/CPAP communicator

Milestones

Sequence: 40721694 Sequence: 40721695 Sequence: 40721696 Sequence: 40721697 Sequence: 40721698 Sequence: 40721699
Result Group Id 55787774 Result Group Id 55787775 Result Group Id 55787774 Result Group Id 55787775 Result Group Id 55787774 Result Group Id 55787775
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Count 23 Count 13 Count 23 Count 13 Count 0 Count 0

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3894040

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 73462179 Sequence: 73462180 Sequence: 73462181 Sequence: 73462182 Sequence: 73462183 Sequence: 73462184 Sequence: 73462185 Sequence: 73462186
Outcome Id 30579292 Outcome Id 30579292 Outcome Id 30579293 Outcome Id 30579293 Outcome Id 30579294 Outcome Id 30579294 Outcome Id 30579295 Outcome Id 30579295
Result Group Id 55787776 Result Group Id 55787777 Result Group Id 55787776 Result Group Id 55787777 Result Group Id 55787776 Result Group Id 55787777 Result Group Id 55787776 Result Group Id 55787777
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 23 Count 13 Count 23 Count 13 Count 0 Count 0 Count 23 Count 13

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2562479
Document Type Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True
Has Icf False
Has Sap True
Document Date 2019-03-27
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/53/NCT03795753/Prot_SAP_000.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 27745774 Sequence: 27745775 Sequence: 27745776 Sequence: 27745777 Sequence: 27745778 Sequence: 27745779
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 23 Subjects At Risk 23 Subjects At Risk 23 Subjects At Risk 13 Subjects At Risk 13 Subjects At Risk 13
Created At 2023-08-06 11:22:12.610978 Created At 2023-08-06 11:22:12.610978 Created At 2023-08-06 11:22:12.610978 Created At 2023-08-06 11:22:12.610978 Created At 2023-08-06 11:22:12.610978 Created At 2023-08-06 11:22:12.610978
Updated At 2023-08-06 11:22:12.610978 Updated At 2023-08-06 11:22:12.610978 Updated At 2023-08-06 11:22:12.610978 Updated At 2023-08-06 11:22:12.610978 Updated At 2023-08-06 11:22:12.610978 Updated At 2023-08-06 11:22:12.610978

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28643876
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Nancy Abbey Collop, MD
Title Professor
Affiliation Emory University

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3824784
Pi Employee Yes

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3824749
Organization Emory University
Name Dr. Nancy Collop
Phone 404-712-7533
Email nancy.collop@emory.edu

Outcomes

Sequence: 30579292 Sequence: 30579293 Sequence: 30579294 Sequence: 30579295
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary
Title Accuracy of Single Word Selection (Proportion of Right Words From Total) Title Accuracy of Sentence Selection (Proportion of Right Sentences From Total) Title Speech Transmission Index (STI) Title Number of Subjects That Found That the Device Significantly Improved Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) Comfort
Description Data will be collected using audio recording – accuracy of single word selection (spoken by patient -> selected by partner). The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. A list of single words will be provided to the patient. Each single word may be read aloud by patient up to two times. The partner must then select the read word out of a list of twelve possible words. Description Data will be collected using audio recording – accuracy of sentence selection (spoken by patient -> transcribed by partner). The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. A list of 5-word through 15-word sentences will be provided to the patient. Each sentence may be read aloud by patient up to two times. The partner must transcribe each sentence on a standardized form. Description STI is a numeric representation measure of communication channel characteristics whose value varies from 0 = bad to 1 = excellent.On this scale, an STI of at least 0.5 is desirable for most applications. Description Number of subjects that found that the device significantly improved noninvasive ventilation (NIV) comfort was calculated and reported. Assessment of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) comfort was conducted using Likert Scale Score on clarity of communication on a symmetric seven-level agree-disagree scale.
Time Frame Mask on-communicator on-20 minutes Time Frame Mask on-communicator on-20 minutes Time Frame Mask on with communicator on (20 min) Time Frame Mask on-communicator on-20 minutes
Population A validated conversion for word/sentence accuracy and STI was not predetermined and the intent was to record at both the mask and the speaker. However, the conversion was not able to be determined and recording at the mask level was limited by the device. Thus, there is no effective comparator to calculate STI and this information is unavailable.
Units proportion of right words Units proportion of sentence intelligibility Units Participants
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 233916452 Sequence: 233916453 Sequence: 233916454 Sequence: 233916455 Sequence: 233916456 Sequence: 233916457
Outcome Id 30579292 Outcome Id 30579292 Outcome Id 30579293 Outcome Id 30579293 Outcome Id 30579295 Outcome Id 30579295
Result Group Id 55787776 Result Group Id 55787777 Result Group Id 55787776 Result Group Id 55787777 Result Group Id 55787776 Result Group Id 55787777
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Title Accuracy of Single Word Selection (Proportion of Right Words From Total) Title Accuracy of Single Word Selection (Proportion of Right Words From Total) Title Accuracy of Sentence Selection (Proportion of Right Sentences From Total) Title Accuracy of Sentence Selection (Proportion of Right Sentences From Total) Title Number of Subjects That Found That the Device Significantly Improved Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) Comfort Title Number of Subjects That Found That the Device Significantly Improved Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV) Comfort
Description Data will be collected using audio recording – accuracy of single word selection (spoken by patient -> selected by partner). The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. A list of single words will be provided to the patient. Each single word may be read aloud by patient up to two times. The partner must then select the read word out of a list of twelve possible words. Description Data will be collected using audio recording – accuracy of single word selection (spoken by patient -> selected by partner). The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. A list of single words will be provided to the patient. Each single word may be read aloud by patient up to two times. The partner must then select the read word out of a list of twelve possible words. Description Data will be collected using audio recording – accuracy of sentence selection (spoken by patient -> transcribed by partner). The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. A list of 5-word through 15-word sentences will be provided to the patient. Each sentence may be read aloud by patient up to two times. The partner must transcribe each sentence on a standardized form. Description Data will be collected using audio recording – accuracy of sentence selection (spoken by patient -> transcribed by partner). The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. A list of 5-word through 15-word sentences will be provided to the patient. Each sentence may be read aloud by patient up to two times. The partner must transcribe each sentence on a standardized form. Description Number of subjects that found that the device significantly improved noninvasive ventilation (NIV) comfort was calculated and reported. Assessment of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) comfort was conducted using Likert Scale Score on clarity of communication on a symmetric seven-level agree-disagree scale. Description Number of subjects that found that the device significantly improved noninvasive ventilation (NIV) comfort was calculated and reported. Assessment of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) comfort was conducted using Likert Scale Score on clarity of communication on a symmetric seven-level agree-disagree scale.
Units proportion of right words Units proportion of right words Units proportion of sentence intelligibility Units proportion of sentence intelligibility Units Participants Units Participants
Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 0.61 Param Value 0.35 Param Value 0.76 Param Value 0.33 Param Value 11 Param Value 2
Param Value Num 0.61 Param Value Num 0.35 Param Value Num 0.76 Param Value Num 0.33 Param Value Num 11.0 Param Value Num 2.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 0.13 Dispersion Value 0.17 Dispersion Value 0.22 Dispersion Value 0.25
Dispersion Value Num 0.13 Dispersion Value Num 0.17 Dispersion Value Num 0.22 Dispersion Value Num 0.25

Study References

Sequence: 51633089
Pmid 33011202
Reference Type derived
Citation Wong AI, Cheung PC, Zhang J, Cotsonis G, Kutner M, Gay PC, Collop NA. Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Communication Device Assessed During Noninvasive Ventilation Therapy. Chest. 2021 Apr;159(4):1531-1539. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.250. Epub 2020 Oct 1.

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11304609 Sequence: 11304610 Sequence: 11304611
Result Group Id 55787771 Result Group Id 55787772 Result Group Id 55787773
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Scope overall Scope overall Scope overall
Count 23 Count 13 Count 36

Result Groups

Sequence: 55787771 Sequence: 55787772 Sequence: 55787773 Sequence: 55787774 Sequence: 55787775 Sequence: 55787776 Sequence: 55787777 Sequence: 55787778 Sequence: 55787779
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event
Title F2S Communicator Title Non-functioning Communicator Title Total Title F2S Communicator Title Non-functioning Communicator Title F2S Communicator Title Non-functioning Communicator Title F2S Communicator Title Non-functioning Communicator
Description The F2S Communication System is a communication aid for use with a noninvasive ventilation (NIV) mask covering at least the mouth. It is a two-component system consisting of (1) a disposable, single patient use patch and signal cable and (2) a reusable communicator with power cable.The non-invasive aid for patients receiving BPAP/CPAP therapy delivers communication between the patient and medical personnel.

F2S Communicator: The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. The study coordinator will ENABLE the communicator. A list of single words and 5-word through 15-word sentences will be provided to the patient. Each single word may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must then select the read word out of a list of twelve possible words. Each sentence may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must transcribe each sentence on a standardized form. A survey will be provided to evaluate the "mask on, communicator on" period.

Description Non-functioning study communication device is used.

Non-functioning Communicator: The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. The study coordinator will DISABLE the communicator. A list of single words and 5-word through 15-word sentences will be provided to the patient. Each single word may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must then select the read word out of a list of twelve possible words. Each sentence may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must transcribe each sentence on a standardized form. A survey will be provided to evaluate the "mask on, communicator on" period.

Description Total of all reporting groups Description The F2S Communication System is a communication aid for use with a noninvasive ventilation (NIV) mask covering at least the mouth. It is a two-component system consisting of (1) a disposable, single patient use patch and signal cable and (2) a reusable communicator with power cable.The non-invasive aid for patients receiving BPAP/CPAP therapy delivers communication between the patient and medical personnel.

F2S Communicator: The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. The study coordinator will ENABLE the communicator. A list of single words and 5-word through 15-word sentences will be provided to the patient. Each single word may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must then select the read word out of a list of twelve possible words. Each sentence may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must transcribe each sentence on a standardized form. A survey will be provided to evaluate the "mask on, communicator on" period.

Description Non-functioning study communication device is used.

Non-functioning Communicator: The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. The study coordinator will DISABLE the communicator. A list of single words and 5-word through 15-word sentences will be provided to the patient. Each single word may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must then select the read word out of a list of twelve possible words. Each sentence may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must transcribe each sentence on a standardized form. A survey will be provided to evaluate the "mask on, communicator on" period.

Description The F2S Communication System is a communication aid for use with a noninvasive ventilation (NIV) mask covering at least the mouth. It is a two-component system consisting of (1) a disposable, single patient use patch and signal cable and (2) a reusable communicator with power cable.The non-invasive aid for patients receiving BPAP/CPAP therapy delivers communication between the patient and medical personnel.

F2S Communicator: The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. The study coordinator will ENABLE the communicator. A list of single words and 5-word through 15-word sentences will be provided to the patient. Each single word may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must then select the read word out of a list of twelve possible words. Each sentence may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must transcribe each sentence on a standardized form. A survey will be provided to evaluate the "mask on, communicator on" period.

Description Non-functioning study communication device is used.

Non-functioning Communicator: The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. The study coordinator will DISABLE the communicator. A list of single words and 5-word through 15-word sentences will be provided to the patient. Each single word may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must then select the read word out of a list of twelve possible words. Each sentence may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must transcribe each sentence on a standardized form. A survey will be provided to evaluate the "mask on, communicator on" period.

Description The F2S Communication System is a communication aid for use with a noninvasive ventilation (NIV) mask covering at least the mouth. It is a two-component system consisting of (1) a disposable, single patient use patch and signal cable and (2) a reusable communicator with power cable.The non-invasive aid for patients receiving BPAP/CPAP therapy delivers communication between the patient and medical personnel.

F2S Communicator: The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. The study coordinator will ENABLE the communicator. A list of single words and 5-word through 15-word sentences will be provided to the patient. Each single word may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must then select the read word out of a list of twelve possible words. Each sentence may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must transcribe each sentence on a standardized form. A survey will be provided to evaluate the "mask on, communicator on" period.

Description Non-functioning study communication device is used.

Non-functioning Communicator: The communicator will be attached to the BPAP/CPAP mask. The study coordinator will DISABLE the communicator. A list of single words and 5-word through 15-word sentences will be provided to the patient. Each single word may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must then select the read word out of a list of twelve possible words. Each sentence may be read aloud up to two times. The partner must transcribe each sentence on a standardized form. A survey will be provided to evaluate the "mask on, communicator on" period.

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 124738140 Sequence: 124738128 Sequence: 124738129 Sequence: 124738130 Sequence: 124738131 Sequence: 124738132 Sequence: 124738133 Sequence: 124738134 Sequence: 124738135 Sequence: 124738136 Sequence: 124738137 Sequence: 124738138 Sequence: 124738139 Sequence: 124738141 Sequence: 124738142 Sequence: 124738143 Sequence: 124738144 Sequence: 124738145 Sequence: 124738146 Sequence: 124738147 Sequence: 124738148 Sequence: 124738149 Sequence: 124738150 Sequence: 124738151 Sequence: 124738152 Sequence: 124738153 Sequence: 124738154 Sequence: 124738155 Sequence: 124738156 Sequence: 124738157 Sequence: 124738158 Sequence: 124738159 Sequence: 124738160
Result Group Id 55787771 Result Group Id 55787771 Result Group Id 55787772 Result Group Id 55787773 Result Group Id 55787771 Result Group Id 55787772 Result Group Id 55787773 Result Group Id 55787771 Result Group Id 55787772 Result Group Id 55787773 Result Group Id 55787771 Result Group Id 55787772 Result Group Id 55787773 Result Group Id 55787772 Result Group Id 55787773 Result Group Id 55787771 Result Group Id 55787772 Result Group Id 55787773 Result Group Id 55787771 Result Group Id 55787772 Result Group Id 55787773 Result Group Id 55787771 Result Group Id 55787772 Result Group Id 55787773 Result Group Id 55787771 Result Group Id 55787772 Result Group Id 55787773 Result Group Id 55787771 Result Group Id 55787772 Result Group Id 55787773 Result Group Id 55787771 Result Group Id 55787772 Result Group Id 55787773
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Classification United States Classification United States Classification United States
Category Asian Category Female Category Female Category Female Category Male Category Male Category Male Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category American Indian or Alaska Native Category Asian Category Asian Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category Black or African American Category White Category White Category White Category More than one race Category More than one race Category More than one race Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported Category Unknown or Not Reported
Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Race (NIH/OMB) Title Region of Enrollment Title Region of Enrollment Title Region of Enrollment
Units Participants Units years Units years Units years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units participants Units participants Units participants
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number
Param Value 0 Param Value 55.4 Param Value 59.9 Param Value 57.03 Param Value 13 Param Value 6 Param Value 19 Param Value 10 Param Value 7 Param Value 17 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 13 Param Value 4 Param Value 17 Param Value 10 Param Value 9 Param Value 19 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 23 Param Value 13 Param Value 36
Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 55.4 Param Value Num 59.9 Param Value Num 57.03 Param Value Num 13.0 Param Value Num 6.0 Param Value Num 19.0 Param Value Num 10.0 Param Value Num 7.0 Param Value Num 17.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 13.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 17.0 Param Value Num 10.0 Param Value Num 9.0 Param Value Num 19.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 23.0 Param Value Num 13.0 Param Value Num 36.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 13.3 Dispersion Value 17.1 Dispersion Value 14.7
Dispersion Value Num 13.3 Dispersion Value Num 17.1 Dispersion Value Num 14.7
Number Analyzed 23 Number Analyzed 23 Number Analyzed 13 Number Analyzed 36 Number Analyzed 23 Number Analyzed 13 Number Analyzed 36 Number Analyzed 23 Number Analyzed 13 Number Analyzed 36 Number Analyzed 23 Number Analyzed 13 Number Analyzed 36 Number Analyzed 13 Number Analyzed 36 Number Analyzed 23 Number Analyzed 13 Number Analyzed 36 Number Analyzed 23 Number Analyzed 13 Number Analyzed 36 Number Analyzed 23 Number Analyzed 13 Number Analyzed 36 Number Analyzed 23 Number Analyzed 13 Number Analyzed 36 Number Analyzed 23 Number Analyzed 13 Number Analyzed 36 Number Analyzed 23 Number Analyzed 13 Number Analyzed 36

]]>

<![CDATA[ Pulmonary Endarterectomy Guided by CT Scanning for Patients With Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension—-PEACT ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795740
2017-02-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795740
NCT03795740https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795740?tab=tableJiade Zhu, MD15801204824@163.com86-15801204824This study is a effectiveness study of the application of high-definition enhanced computed-tomography for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension(CTEPH).The patients with CTEPH was randomized into 2 groups,precise pulmonary endarterectomy group(guided by enhanced CT scanning) and traditional pulmonary endarterectomy group,the hemodynamic changes tested with right sided heart catherization from baseline to post-operative period and end-point including peri-operative deaths,follow-up mortality,follow-up parameters of ultrasonic cardiogram(UCG),right-sided heart catherization(RHC),nuclear magnetic resonance imaging(MRI),cardiac pulmonary exercise test(CPET) are documented,so as to compare the prognosis between these 2 groups.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-19
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year February 1, 2017
Primary Completion Month Year May 31, 2020
Verification Month Year December 2018
Verification Date 2018-12-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Facilities

Sequence: 200053473
Status Recruiting
Name Fuwai Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
City Beijing
State Beijing
Zip 100044
Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28097585
Facility Id 200053473
Contact Type primary
Name Sheng Liu, MD
Email liusheng@fuwai.com
Phone 86-13501331366

Conditions

Sequence: 52156591 Sequence: 52156592
Name Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Name Pulmonary Embolism
Downcase Name chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension Downcase Name pulmonary embolism

Id Information

Sequence: 40148274
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value liusheng-1999

Countries

Sequence: 42557808
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55578002 Sequence: 55578003
Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title Precise Title Placebo
Description precise PEA therapy with the guide of 3-D imaging techniques Description traditional PEA therapy solely by surgical probe and traditional CT scanning/pulmonary angiography method

Interventions

Sequence: 52472100
Intervention Type Diagnostic Test
Name 3-D CT scanning
Description For patients in Group 1,precisely analyzed CT scanning and/or pulmonary angiography will be done,and the patients in Group 1 will receive PEA procedure with the guide of precise 3-D imaging techniques

Keywords

Sequence: 79848233 Sequence: 79848234 Sequence: 79848235 Sequence: 79848236 Sequence: 79848237
Name computed tomography Name chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension Name pulmonary endarterectomy Name result Name randomized controlled trial
Downcase Name computed tomography Downcase Name chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension Downcase Name pulmonary endarterectomy Downcase Name result Downcase Name randomized controlled trial

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328448 Sequence: 177328449 Sequence: 177328450 Sequence: 177328451 Sequence: 177328452 Sequence: 177328453 Sequence: 177328454 Sequence: 177328455 Sequence: 177328456 Sequence: 177328457 Sequence: 177328458 Sequence: 177328459 Sequence: 177328460
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change from Baseline pulmonary systolic pressure within 1 month Measure Change from Baseline pulmonary mean pressure within 1 month Measure Change from Baseline pulmonary vascular resistance within 1 month Measure Change from Baseline cardiac output within 1 month Measure mortality rate after surgery Measure Follow-up right ventricular ejection fraction Measure Follow-up tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion Measure Follow-up right ventricular anterior-posterior diameter Measure Follow-up tricuspid insufficiency level Measure Follow-up peak oxygen consumption (Peak O2) result Measure Follow-up Peak O2% Measure Follow-up 6-minutes walking distance Measure follow-up NYHA classes
Time Frame within 1 month before and after pulmonary endarterectomy surgery Time Frame within 1 month before and after pulmonary endarterectomy surgery Time Frame within 1 month before and after pulmonary endarterectomy surgery Time Frame within 1 month before and after pulmonary endarterectomy surgery Time Frame immediately after the surgery to the longest 48 months follow-up period Time Frame 3-24 months after the surgeries Time Frame 3-24 months after the surgeries Time Frame 3-24 months after the surgeries Time Frame 3-24 months after the surgeries Time Frame 6-24 months after the surgeries Time Frame 6-24 months after the surgeries Time Frame 6-24 months after the surgeries Time Frame 6-24 months after surgeries
Description Systolic pulmonary pressure result tested by right-sided heart Description Mean pulmonary pressure result tested by right-sided heart Description Pulmonary vascular resistance result tested by right-sided heart Description Cardiac output result tested by right-sided heart Description mortality rate after surgery Description Assessed by UCG Description Assessed by UCG Description Assessed by UCG Description Assessed by UCG Description Assessed by cardio-pulmonary exercise test (CPET) Description Assessed by CPET Description Assessed by CPET Description NYHA classes in the follow up period,either with telephone follow-up or out-patient follow up

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193432390 Sequence: 193432385 Sequence: 193432386 Sequence: 193432387 Sequence: 193432388 Sequence: 193432389 Sequence: 193432391 Sequence: 193432392 Sequence: 193432393
Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Hypertension, Pulmonary Mesh Term Pulmonary Embolism Mesh Term Hypertension Mesh Term Embolism Mesh Term Vascular Diseases Mesh Term Lung Diseases Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases Mesh Term Embolism and Thrombosis
Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term hypertension, pulmonary Downcase Mesh Term pulmonary embolism Downcase Mesh Term hypertension Downcase Mesh Term embolism Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases Downcase Mesh Term embolism and thrombosis
Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306181
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Sheng Liu

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12004767 Sequence: 12004768
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Sheng Liu, MD Name Jiade Zhu, MD
Phone 13501331366 Phone 86-15801204824
Email liusheng@fuwai.com Email 15801204824@163.com
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130982 Sequence: 68130983
Design Group Id 55578003 Design Group Id 55578002
Intervention Id 52472100 Intervention Id 52472100

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757411
Gender All
Minimum Age N/A
Maximum Age 85 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Definite diagnosed with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension with the right-sided cathrization and pulmonary angiography;
The computed tomography imaging implied that the location of the embolism could be reached with surgeries;

Exclusion Criteria:

Beyond the age limit described above,or combined with other severe conditions such as severe organ dysfunction and considered contraindicated for surgical therapy by the cardiac surgeons;
Without the consent by the patient or his/her families;
Acute pulmonary embolism;
Pulmonary sarcoma;
Pulmonary arteritis;
Combined with cardiogenic pulmonary hypertension or idiopathic pulmonary hypertension;

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254229066
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Maximum Age Num 85
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 5
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 8

Designs

Sequence: 30503636
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Links

Sequence: 4387000
Url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed
Description a website could find all the citation above,enter the website of "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed",input the PubMed ID of corresponding citation,and the citation will be shown in the webpage.

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2578359 Sequence: 2578360
Document Type Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan Document Type Informed Consent Form
Has Protocol True Has Protocol False
Has Icf False Has Icf True
Has Sap True Has Sap False
Document Date 2018-12-19 Document Date 2018-12-19
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/40/NCT03795740/Prot_SAP_000.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/40/NCT03795740/ICF_001.pdf

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869914
Responsible Party Type Sponsor-Investigator
Name Sheng Liu
Title Adult Cardiac Surgery Center
Affiliation Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

Study References

Sequence: 52049466 Sequence: 52049467 Sequence: 52049468 Sequence: 52049469 Sequence: 52049470 Sequence: 52049471 Sequence: 52049472
Pmid 14602267 Pmid 15163775 Pmid 29563171 Pmid 21793646 Pmid 26826181 Pmid 24728482 Pmid 21969018
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Jamieson SW, Kapelanski DP, Sakakibara N, Manecke GR, Thistlethwaite PA, Kerr KM, Channick RN, Fedullo PF, Auger WR. Pulmonary endarterectomy: experience and lessons learned in 1,500 cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Nov;76(5):1457-62; discussion 1462-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00828-2. Citation Pengo V, Lensing AW, Prins MH, Marchiori A, Davidson BL, Tiozzo F, Albanese P, Biasiolo A, Pegoraro C, Iliceto S, Prandoni P; Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Study Group. Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 27;350(22):2257-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032274. Citation Coquoz N, Weilenmann D, Stolz D, Popov V, Azzola A, Fellrath JM, Stricker H, Pagnamenta A, Ott S, Ulrich S, Gyorik S, Pasquier J, Aubert JD. Multicentre observational screening survey for the detection of CTEPH following pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J. 2018 Apr 4;51(4):1702505. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02505-2017. Print 2018 Apr. Citation Kirson NY, Birnbaum HG, Ivanova JI, Waldman T, Joish V, Williamson T. Prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in the United States. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Sep;27(9):1763-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.604310. Epub 2011 Jul 27. Citation Delcroix M, Lang I, Pepke-Zaba J, Jansa P, D'Armini AM, Snijder R, Bresser P, Torbicki A, Mellemkjaer S, Lewczuk J, Simkova I, Barbera JA, de Perrot M, Hoeper MM, Gaine S, Speich R, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Kovacs G, Jais X, Ambroz D, Treacy C, Morsolini M, Jenkins D, Lindner J, Dartevelle P, Mayer E, Simonneau G. Long-Term Outcome of Patients With Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Results From an International Prospective Registry. Circulation. 2016 Mar 1;133(9):859-71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016522. Epub 2016 Jan 29. Citation Inami T, Kataoka M, Ando M, Fukuda K, Yoshino H, Satoh T. A new era of therapeutic strategies for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension by two different interventional therapies; pulmonary endarterectomy and percutaneous transluminal pulmonary angioplasty. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 11;9(4):e94587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094587. eCollection 2014. Citation Pepke-Zaba J, Delcroix M, Lang I, Mayer E, Jansa P, Ambroz D, Treacy C, D'Armini AM, Morsolini M, Snijder R, Bresser P, Torbicki A, Kristensen B, Lewczuk J, Simkova I, Barbera JA, de Perrot M, Hoeper MM, Gaine S, Speich R, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Kovacs G, Hamid AM, Jais X, Simonneau G. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH): results from an international prospective registry. Circulation. 2011 Nov 1;124(18):1973-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015008. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Clinical Evaluation of Sectional Matrix Versus Circumferential Matrix for Reproduction of Proximal Contact ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795727
2020-01-20

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795727
NCT03795727https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795727?tab=tableNANANAThe aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of different matricing techniques either sectional matrix or circumferential matrix on reproduction of optimum proximal contacts and contours during restoration of class II cavities with resin composite by undergraduate students or postgraduate dentists.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-04-21
Start Month Year January 20, 2020
Primary Completion Month Year February 12, 2020
Verification Month Year April 2020
Verification Date 2020-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2020-04-21

Facilities

Sequence: 200244227
Name Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
City Cairo
State El Manial
Zip 11553
Country Egypt

Conditions

Sequence: 52208105
Name Proximal Contact
Downcase Name proximal contact

Id Information

Sequence: 40186148
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value circumferential vs sectional

Countries

Sequence: 42599642
Name Egypt
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55634665 Sequence: 55634666
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Sectional matrix Title Circumferential matrix
Description precontoured sectional matrix band Description Circumferential matrix band applied by tofflemire retainer

Interventions

Sequence: 52522075 Sequence: 52522076
Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Device
Name MD ring and precontoured sectional matrix by TOR VM Name Circumferential matrix and tofflemire retainer by Kerr
Description MD ring (separation ring) and precontoured sectional matrix (thickness 0.035mm hard) and a wedge was used to secure matrix in place Description Circumferential matrix (thickness 0.038mm) applied by tofflemire retainer and secured in place with wedge

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177511222
Outcome Type primary
Measure Proximal contact
Time Frame Up to 3 hours from randomization till contact is restored
Description Reproduction of proximal contact either optimum, tight or loose (Categorical)

Sponsors

Sequence: 48353696
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Cairo University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199188 Sequence: 68199189
Design Group Id 55634665 Design Group Id 55634666
Intervention Id 52522075 Intervention Id 52522076

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30786871
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 40 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Compound class II cavities
Good oral hygiene
No spacing or crowding
Healthy peridontium

Exclusion Criteria:

Complex class II cavities
Poor oral hygiene
Spacing or crowding
Evidence of peridontal disease

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989626
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 0
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 40
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30532941
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Subject Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899235
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Omar Osama Shaalan
Title Lecturer of conservative dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry
Affiliation Cairo University

]]>

<![CDATA[ Association Between IVUS and OCT Parameters and Invasive Physiologic Indices ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795714
2017-11-17

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795714
NCT03795714https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795714?tab=tableKi Hong Choi, MDcardiokh@gmail.com82-10-8875-1648to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and performance of IVUS and OCT-derived quantitative parameters to predict functional significance of stenosis defined using all the available physiologic indices.
to explores the association between intravascular imaging-derived plaque characteristics and invasive physiologic indices.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-28
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-22
Start Month Year November 17, 2017
Primary Completion Month Year January 31, 2019
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-22

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20721572
Description Given the inherent limitations of coronary angiography to depict the presence of functionally significant epicardial coronary stenosis and discrepancy between angiographic stenosis severity and the presence of myocardial ischemia, invasive physiologic indices such as fractional flow reserve (FFR) or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) has been a standard method to guide decision of revascularization.

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) are an intracoronary imaging method able to provide information about lumen area, vessel area, plaque burden, and plaque characteristics that can be used for the guidance of revascularization procedure. Several previous studies explored the diagnostic performance of intravascular imaging-defined quantitative parameters to predict functional significance defined by FFR, however, quantitative parameter derived from intravascular imaging showed only moderate diagnostic accuracy and the optimal cut-off value of intravascular imaging-derived minimal lumen area (MLA) or minimal lumen diameter (MLD) were varied according to the patient population, interrogated vessels, and the location of target lesions, suggesting limited clinical relevance of judging functional significance of target stenosis using intravascular imaging alone. Nevertheless, the adoption rate of FFR-guided decision has been limited due to various reasons and intravascular image-guided decision has been still used in substantial proportion of the patients.

Recently, new resting pressure-derived indices including resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) or diastolic pressure ratio (dPR) have been introduced as other substitutes for iFR, which does not require administration of hyperemic agents, therefore, possess more convenient in daily practice. Recent study with the largest sample size demonstrated identical diagnostic property and prognostic implication among iFR, RFR, and dPR. As those resting pressure-derived indices might have more generalizability for daily practice, it is expected to raise the adoption rate of physiologic interrogation. Therefore, understanding the association between all the available physiologic indices and intravascular imaging-derived quantitative and qualitative parameters might be important in clinical decision for patient who underwent invasive coronary angiography.

In this regard, the investigators sought to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and performance of intravascular imaging-derived quantitative parameters to predict functional significance of stenosis defined using all the available physiologic indices and further explores the association between IVUS and OCT-derived plaque characteristics and invasive physiologic indices.

Facilities

Sequence: 200107794 Sequence: 200107795
Status Recruiting Status Recruiting
Name Samsung Medical Center Name Seoul national university hospital
City Seoul City Seoul
Zip 06351 Zip 110-744
Country Korea, Republic of Country Korea, Republic of

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28106374 Sequence: 28106375 Sequence: 28106376
Facility Id 200107794 Facility Id 200107794 Facility Id 200107795
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup Contact Type primary
Name Joo Myung Lee, MD, MPH, PhD Name Ki Hong Choi, MD Name Bon-kown Koo, MD/PhD
Email drone80@hanmail.net Email cardiokh@gmail.com Email bkkoo@snu.ac.kr
Phone 82-2-2072-2062

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18332477 Sequence: 18332478 Sequence: 18332479
Facility Id 200107794 Facility Id 200107794 Facility Id 200107795
Role Principal Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Joo Myung Lee, MD, MPH, PhD Name Ki Hong Choi, MD Name Bon-kwon Koo, MD/PhD

Conditions

Sequence: 52171082
Name Ischemic Heart Disease
Downcase Name ischemic heart disease

Id Information

Sequence: 40158527
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value IVUS2017-11-056-001

Countries

Sequence: 42568832
Name Korea, Republic of
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55593020
Title Intravascular Imaging and Physiologic Assessment
Description 330 patients with suspected ischemic heart disease and who underwent IVUS or OCT assessment and invasive physiologic assessment.

Interventions

Sequence: 52485330
Intervention Type Diagnostic Test
Name IVUS or OCT and Invasive physiologic indices
Description IVUS or OCT measurement in order to evaluate the lesion morphology and stent optimization, and invasive physiologic measurement in order to functional significance of epicardial stenosis

Keywords

Sequence: 79868276 Sequence: 79868277 Sequence: 79868278 Sequence: 79868279 Sequence: 79868280 Sequence: 79868281 Sequence: 79868282
Name Intravascular Ultrasound Name Optical Coherence Tomography Name Fractional Flow Reserve Name Diastolic Pressure Ratio Name Resting Full-Cycle Ratio Name Ischemic Heart Disease Name Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio
Downcase Name intravascular ultrasound Downcase Name optical coherence tomography Downcase Name fractional flow reserve Downcase Name diastolic pressure ratio Downcase Name resting full-cycle ratio Downcase Name ischemic heart disease Downcase Name instantaneous wave-free ratio

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177378246 Sequence: 177378247 Sequence: 177378248 Sequence: 177378249 Sequence: 177378250 Sequence: 177378251 Sequence: 177378252 Sequence: 177378253 Sequence: 177378254 Sequence: 177378255 Sequence: 177378256 Sequence: 177378257 Sequence: 177378258 Sequence: 177378259 Sequence: 177378260 Sequence: 177378261 Sequence: 177378262 Sequence: 177378263 Sequence: 177378264 Sequence: 177378265 Sequence: 177378266 Sequence: 177378267 Sequence: 177378268 Sequence: 177378269 Sequence: 177378270 Sequence: 177378271 Sequence: 177378272 Sequence: 177378273 Sequence: 177378274 Sequence: 177378275 Sequence: 177378276 Sequence: 177378277 Sequence: 177378278 Sequence: 177378279 Sequence: 177378280 Sequence: 177378281 Sequence: 177378282 Sequence: 177378283 Sequence: 177378284 Sequence: 177378285 Sequence: 177378286 Sequence: 177378287 Sequence: 177378288 Sequence: 177378289 Sequence: 177378290 Sequence: 177378291 Sequence: 177378292 Sequence: 177378293 Sequence: 177378294 Sequence: 177378295 Sequence: 177378296 Sequence: 177378297 Sequence: 177378298 Sequence: 177378299 Sequence: 177378300 Sequence: 177378301 Sequence: 177378302 Sequence: 177378303 Sequence: 177378304 Sequence: 177378305 Sequence: 177378306 Sequence: 177378307 Sequence: 177378308 Sequence: 177378309 Sequence: 177378310 Sequence: 177378311 Sequence: 177378312 Sequence: 177378313 Sequence: 177378314 Sequence: 177378315 Sequence: 177378316 Sequence: 177378317 Sequence: 177378318 Sequence: 177378319 Sequence: 177378320 Sequence: 177378321 Sequence: 177378322 Sequence: 177378323 Sequence: 177378324 Sequence: 177378325
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Diagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by fractional flow reserve (FFR) Measure Diagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) Measure Diagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by diastolic pressure ratio (dPR) Measure Diagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) Measure Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFR Measure Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFR Measure Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPR Measure Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFR Measure Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFR Measure Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFR Measure Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPR Measure Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFR Measure Diagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFR Measure Diagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by IVUS to predict functional significance assessed by iFR Measure Diagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by IVUS to predict functional significance assessed by dPR Measure Diagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFR Measure Sensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFR Measure Sensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFR Measure Sensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPR Measure Sensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFR Measure Sensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFR Measure Sensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFR Measure Sensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPR Measure Sensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFR Measure Sensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFR Measure Sensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFR Measure Sensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPR Measure Sensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFR Measure Sensitivity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFR Measure Sensitivity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFR Measure Sensitivity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPR Measure Sensitivity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFR Measure Specificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFR Measure Specificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFR Measure Specificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPR Measure Specificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFR Measure Specificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFR Measure Specificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFR Measure Specificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPR Measure Specificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFR Measure Specificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFR Measure Specificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFR Measure Specificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPR Measure Specificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFR Measure Specificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by FFR Measure Specificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by iFR Measure Specificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by dPR Measure Specificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance assessed by RFR Measure Linear correlation between percent diameter stenosis and FFR Measure Linear correlation between percent diameter stenosis and iFR Measure Linear correlation between percent diameter stenosis and dPR Measure Linear correlation between percent diameter stenosis and RFR Measure Linear correlation between minimal lumen diameter and FFR Measure Linear correlation between minimal lumen diameter and iFR Measure Linear correlation between minimal lumen diameter and dPR Measure Linear correlation between minimal lumen diameter and RFR Measure Linear correlation between minimal lumen area and FFR Measure Linear correlation between minimal lumen area and iFR Measure Linear correlation between minimal lumen area and dPR Measure Linear correlation between minimal lumen area and RFR Measure Linear correlation between plaque burden and FFR Measure Linear correlation between plaque burden and iFR Measure Linear correlation between plaque burden and dPR Measure Linear correlation between plaque burden and RFR Measure Discriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance assessed by FFR Measure Discriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance assessed by iFR Measure Discriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance assessed by dPR Measure Discriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance assessed by RFR Measure Discriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance assessed by FFR Measure Discriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance assessed by iFR Measure Discriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance assessed by dPR Measure Discriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance assessed by RFR Measure Discriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance assessed by FFR Measure Discriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance assessed by iFR Measure Discriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance assessed by dPR Measure Discriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance assessed by RFR Measure Discriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance assessed by FFR Measure Discriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance assessed by iFR Measure Discriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance assessed by dPR Measure Discriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance assessed by RFR
Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath Time Frame During Cardiac Cath
Description Diagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80 Description Diagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89 Description Diagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89 Description Diagnostic accuracy of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89 Description Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80 Description Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89 Description Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89 Description Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89 Description Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80 Description Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89 Description Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89 Description Diagnostic accuracy of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89 Description Diagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80 Description Diagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by IVUS to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89 Description Diagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by IVUS to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89 Description Diagnostic accuracy of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89 Description Sensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80 Description Sensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89 Description Sensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89 Description Sensitivity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89 Description Sensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80 Description Sensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89 Description Sensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89 Description Sensitivity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89 Description Sensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80 Description Sensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89 Description Sensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89 Description Sensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89 Description Sensitivity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80 Description Sensitivity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89 Description Sensitivity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89 Description Sensitivity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89 Description Specificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80 Description Specificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89 Description Specificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89 Description Specificity of percent diameter stenosis assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89 Description Specificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80 Description Specificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89 Description Specificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89 Description Specificity of minimal lumen diameter assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89 Description Specificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80 Description Specificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89 Description Specificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89 Description Specificity of minimal lumen area assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89 Description Specificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by FFR ≤0.80 Description Specificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by iFR ≤0.89 Description Specificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by dPR ≤0.89 Description Specificity of plaque burden assessed by intravascular imaging to predict functional significance defined by RFR ≤0.89 Description Linear regression analysis between percent diameter stenosis and FFR Description Linear regression analysis between percent diameter stenosis and iFR Description Linear regression analysis between percent diameter stenosis and dPR Description Linear regression analysis between percent diameter stenosis and RFR Description Linear regression analysis between minimal lumen diameter and FFR Description Linear regression analysis between minimal lumen diameter and iFR Description Linear regression analysis between minimal lumen diameter and dPR Description Linear regression analysis between minimal lumen diameter and RFR Description Linear regression analysis between minimal lumen area and FFR Description Linear regression analysis between minimal lumen area and iFR Description Linear regression analysis between minimal lumen area and dPR Description Linear regression analysis between minimal lumen area and RFR Description Linear regression analysis between plaque burden and FFR Description Linear regression analysis between plaque burden and iFR Description Linear regression analysis between plaque burden and dPR Description Linear regression analysis between plaque burden and RFR Description Discriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance defined by FFR≤0.80 Description Discriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance defined by iFR≤0.89 Description Discriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance defined by dPR≤0.89 Description Discriminatory function of percent diameter stenosis to predict functional significance defined by RFR≤0.89 Description Discriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance defined by FFR≤0.80 Description Discriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance defined by iFR≤0.89 Description Discriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance defined by dPR≤0.89 Description Discriminatory function of minimal lumen diameter to predict functional significance defined by RFR≤0.89 Description Discriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance defined by FFR≤0.80 Description Discriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance defined by iFR≤0.89 Description Discriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance defined by dPR≤0.89 Description Discriminatory function of minimal lumen area to predict functional significance defined by RFR≤0.89 Description Discriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance defined by FFR≤0.80 Description Discriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance defined by iFR≤0.89 Description Discriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance defined by dPR≤0.89 Description Discriminatory function of plaque burden to predict functional significance defined by RFR≤0.89

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193486075 Sequence: 193486076 Sequence: 193486077 Sequence: 193486078 Sequence: 193486079 Sequence: 193486080 Sequence: 193486081 Sequence: 193486082
Mesh Term Heart Diseases Mesh Term Myocardial Ischemia Mesh Term Coronary Artery Disease Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Vascular Diseases Mesh Term Coronary Disease Mesh Term Arteriosclerosis Mesh Term Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term heart diseases Downcase Mesh Term myocardial ischemia Downcase Mesh Term coronary artery disease Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term coronary disease Downcase Mesh Term arteriosclerosis Downcase Mesh Term arterial occlusive diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48319142 Sequence: 48319143
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Seoul National University Hospital Name Samsung Medical Center

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29285269 Sequence: 29285270
Role Study Chair Role Principal Investigator
Name Bon-Kwon Koo, MD, PhD Name Joo Myung Lee, MD, MPH, PhD
Affiliation Professor Affiliation Assistant Professor

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12008836 Sequence: 12008837
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Joo Myung Lee, MD, MPH, PhD Name Ki Hong Choi, MD
Phone 82-10-8884-8439 Phone 82-10-8875-1648
Email drone80@hanmail.net Email cardiokh@gmail.com
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68148954
Design Group Id 55593020
Intervention Id 52485330

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30765262
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age N/A
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population 330 patients with suspected ischemic heart disease and who underwent IVUS or OCT assessment and invasive physiologic assessment.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients who suspected ischemic heart disease, and underwent invasive physiologic assessment and intravascular ultrasound

Exclusion Criteria:

Cardiogenic shock
Graft vessel
In-stent restenosis

Adult True
Child True
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253876967
Number Of Facilities 2
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 16
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 64

Designs

Sequence: 30511429
Observational Model Case-Only
Time Perspective Retrospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28877723
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Bon-Kwon Koo
Title Professor
Affiliation Seoul National University Hospital

Study References

Sequence: 52063128
Pmid 31812517
Reference Type derived
Citation Lee JM, Choi KH, Koo BK, Zhang J, Han JK, Yang HM, Park KW, Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Kim HS. Intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography-defined anatomic severity and hemodynamic severity assessed by coronary physiologic indices. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2020 Oct;73(10):812-821. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Dec 4. English, Spanish.

]]>

<![CDATA[ To Predict Weight Loss Response to Liraglutide (Saxenda®), From fMRI-based Determination of Food Cue Reactivity ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795701
2019-01-08

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795701
NCT03795701https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795701?tab=tableNANANAThe study is a single center, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled; parallel-group repeated measures design. Subjects will be randomly assigned to either Saxenda® or placebo group after baseline assessments. The study will consist of a 4-week partial dose period (Liraglutide 0.6mg, 1.2mg, 1.8mg, 2.4 mg) and a 12-week full-dose (Liraglutide 3.0 mg) period. The placebo group will administer equivalent volumes of the pre-filled solutions from pen-injector at the same time, using the same method during this period. The study proposes to identify factors contributing to early weight loss response in a Saxenda® treatment program. Specifically, the proposed experiments will help determine if Saxenda® changes brain functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Food Cue Reactivity (fMRI-FCR) and whether the magnitude of that change is associated with changes in behavioral and physiological variables (hunger, satiety, cravings and weight loss).
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-17
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2022-11-03
Start Month Year January 8, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 1, 2024
Verification Month Year November 2022
Verification Date 2022-11-30
Last Update Posted Date 2022-11-03

Facilities

Sequence: 199179138 Sequence: 199179139
Name Texas Tech Neuroimaging Institute Name Nutrition & Metabolic Health Initiative
City Lubbock City Lubbock
State Texas State Texas
Zip 79409 Zip 79410
Country United States Country United States

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 95633581 Sequence: 95633578 Sequence: 95633579 Sequence: 95633580 Sequence: 95633582 Sequence: 95633583
Mesh Term Incretins Mesh Term Liraglutide Mesh Term Hypoglycemic Agents Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Hormones Mesh Term Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
Downcase Mesh Term incretins Downcase Mesh Term liraglutide Downcase Mesh Term hypoglycemic agents Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term hormones Downcase Mesh Term hormones, hormone substitutes, and hormone antagonists
Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 51951359
Name Obesity
Downcase Name obesity

Id Information

Sequence: 39988107
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value TTUIRB2018-824

Countries

Sequence: 42378848
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55351059 Sequence: 55351060
Group Type Placebo Comparator Group Type Experimental
Title Placebo Title Liraglutide 3.0
Description Subjects in placebo group will receive placebo plus behavioral weight loss counselling to portion control to achieve 500 kcal daily deficit based on MedGem required maintenance calories (not to be reduced below 1000 kcal per day for any subject). Subjects will also be asked to maintain physical activity. Description Subjects in Liraglutide 3.0 group will receive Saxenda® plus behavioral weight loss counselling to portion control to achieve 500 kcal daily deficit based on MedGem required maintenance calories (not to be reduced below 1000 kcal per day for any subject). Subjects will be asked to maintain physical activity. The dose of Saxenda® will be increased weekly in the first 4 weeks (.6; 1.2; 1.8; 2.4 mg) and maintained on 3 mg for 12 weeks.

Interventions

Sequence: 52263460 Sequence: 52263461
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Other
Name Saxenda® Name Placebo
Description Receiving escalating dose of Saxenda® for the first 4 weeks (0.6mg, 1.2mg, 1.8mg, 2.4 mg) and receiving full-dose (3.0 mg) for 12 weeks. Description Receiving equivalent volumes of the pre-filled solutions from pen-injector as Liraglutide 3.0 group .

Keywords

Sequence: 79525927 Sequence: 79525928
Name Neuroimaging Name Hormones
Downcase Name neuroimaging Downcase Name hormones

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176598563 Sequence: 176598564 Sequence: 176598565 Sequence: 176598566 Sequence: 176598567 Sequence: 176598568 Sequence: 176598569 Sequence: 176598570 Sequence: 176598571 Sequence: 176598572 Sequence: 176598573 Sequence: 176598574 Sequence: 176598575 Sequence: 176598576 Sequence: 176598577 Sequence: 176598578 Sequence: 176598579 Sequence: 176598580 Sequence: 176598581 Sequence: 176598582 Sequence: 176598583 Sequence: 176598584 Sequence: 176598585 Sequence: 176598586
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Compare the changes of pre-prandial fMRI-FCR in Liraglutide 3.0 vs. Placebo Group Measure Compare the changes of post-prandial fMRI-FCR in Liraglutide 3.0 vs. Placebo Group Measure Compare the changes of energy intake in Liraglutide 3.0 vs. Placebo Group Measure Compare the changes of hunger/satiety in Liraglutide 3.0 vs. Placebo Group Measure Compare the changes of hunger/satiety in Liraglutide 3.0 vs. Placebo Group Measure Compare the changes of hunger/satiety in Liraglutide 3.0 vs. Placebo Group Measure Compare the changes of hunger/satiety in Liraglutide 3.0 vs. Placebo Group Measure Prediction of weight loss in Liraglutide 3.0 group by examine early change in pre-prandial fMRI-FCR Measure Prediction of weight loss in Liraglutide 3.0 group by examine early change in post-prandial fMRI-FCR Measure Correlation between changes in post-prandial fMRI-FCR and changes in energy intake Measure Correlation between changes in post-prandial fMRI-FCR and changes in hunger/satiety Measure Correlation between changes in post-prandial fMRI-FCR and changes in hunger/satiety Measure Correlation between changes in post-prandial fMRI-FCR and changes in hunger/satiety Measure Correlation between changes in post-prandial fMRI-FCR and changes in hunger/satiety Measure Examine if the correlations described in outcome 10 differ in Liraglutide 3.0 vs. Placebo Group Measure Examine if the correlations described in outcome 11 differ in Liraglutide 3.0 vs. Placebo Group Measure Examine if the correlations described in outcome 12 differ in Liraglutide 3.0 vs. Placebo Group Measure Examine if the correlations described in outcome 13 differ in Liraglutide 3.0 vs. Placebo Group Measure Examine if the correlations described in outcome 14 differ in Liraglutide 3.0 vs. Placebo Group Measure Prediction of weight loss after 16 weeks intervention by assessing early changes in energy intake Measure Prediction of weight loss after 16 weeks intervention by assessing early changes in hunger/satiety Measure Prediction of weight loss after 16 weeks intervention by assessing early changes in hunger/satiety Measure Prediction of weight loss after 16 weeks intervention by assessing early changes in hunger/satiety Measure Prediction of weight loss after 16 weeks intervention by assessing early changes in hunger/satiety
Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16 Time Frame Baseline, Week 4, and Week 16
Description Pre-prandial fMRI-FCR will be measured via fMRI Description Post-prandial fMRI-FCR will be measured via fMRI Description Energy intake will be assessed via ad libitum feeding Description Hunger/satiety will be assessed via Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Subjects will rate on the 100 mm line with a vertical line. There is no specific number on the scale. On each 100-mm line, an sensation is paired with the opposing sensation, (for example, 'not at all hungry' and 'extremely hungry' or 'Not at all satiated' and 'extremely satiated'). Description Hunger/satiety will be assessed via glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) Description Hunger/satiety will be assessed via Peptide YY (PYY) Description Hunger/satiety will be assessed via ghrelin Description Pre-prandial fMRI-FCR will be measured via fMRI Description Post-prandial fMRI-FCR will be measured via fMRI Description Post-prandial fMRI-FCR measured via fMRI. Energy intake will be assessed via ad libitum feeding. Description Post-prandial fMRI-FCR measured via fMRI. Hunger/satiety will be measured via Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Subjects will rate on the 100 mm line with a vertical line. There is no specific number on the scale. On each 100-mm line, an sensation was paired with the opposing sensation, (for example, 'not at all hungry' and 'extremely hungry'). Description Post-prandial fMRI-FCR measured via fMRI. Hunger/satiety will be measured via glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Description Post-prandial fMRI-FCR measured via fMRI. Hunger/satiety will be measured via peptide YY (PYY). Description Post-prandial fMRI-FCR measured via fMRI. Hunger/satiety will be measured via ghrelin. Description Energy intake will be assessed via ad libitum feeding. Description Hunger/satiety will be measured via Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Subjects will rate on the 100 mm line with a vertical line. There is no specific number on the scale. On each 100-mm line, an sensation was paired with the opposing sensation, (for example, 'not at all hungry' and 'extremely hungry'). Description Hunger/satiety will be measured via glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) Description Hunger/satiety will be measured via peptide YY (PYY) Description Hunger/satiety will be measured via ghrelin Description Energy intake will be assessed via ad libitum feeding Description Hunger/satiety will be measured via Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Subjects will rate on the 100 mm line with a vertical line. There is no specific number on the scale. On each 100-mm line, an sensation was paired with the opposing sensation, (for example, 'not at all hungry' and 'extremely hungry' or 'Not at all satiated' and 'extremely satiated'). Description Hunger/satiety will be measured via glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) Description Hunger/satiety will be measured via peptide YY (PYY) Description Hunger/satiety will be measured via ghrelin

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192614778 Sequence: 192614779 Sequence: 192614780
Mesh Term Weight Loss Mesh Term Body Weight Changes Mesh Term Body Weight
Downcase Mesh Term weight loss Downcase Mesh Term body weight changes Downcase Mesh Term body weight
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48113598 Sequence: 48113599
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Texas Tech University Name Novo Nordisk A/S

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29159763
Role Principal Investigator
Name Nikhil V Dhurandhar, PhD
Affiliation Texas Tech University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67854775 Sequence: 67854776
Design Group Id 55351060 Design Group Id 55351059
Intervention Id 52263460 Intervention Id 52263461

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30635850
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 60 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Age 18-60 years
BMI 30-50 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
Participants with motor, visual or hearing impairment.
Females with irregular menstrual cycles (onset of menstruation greater than 1 week from expected data during the last 3 months).
Females who are currently breastfeeding or intend to start breastfeeding.
Participants with diagnosed diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2) or uncontrolled hypertension, history of ischemic heart disease, stroke, neurological disease.
Participants with current severe psychiatric illnesses (e.g. psychosis, schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, depression).
Participants experiencing current suicidal ideation, and recent or past suicide attempts.
Participants with history of psychiatric hospitalization.
Participants who are currently on (or have been on within the past 4 weeks) any medication in the broader drug classes of anti-depressant, anti-epileptic, or anti-anxiety medicines will be excluded (as these affect fMRI-FCR in the brain).

Participants with contraindications for MRI scanning.

aneurism clips
any implanted medical devices (pacemaker, neurostimulator)
known pregnancy
shrapnel in body or any injury to eye involving metal
any ferrous metal in body
Participants with a history of diagnosed eating disorders such as bulimia nervosa, anorexia nervosa and severe binge eating disorder.
Participants with a history of diagnosed substance abuse or alcohol abuse.
Patients experiencing persistent loss of appetite, nausea or vomiting within the last 4 weeks without known cause (e.g. flu, food poisoning).
Participants who have been involved in a weight loss intervention program (including anti-obesity medication) within the past 3 months (and or loss >10% of body weight) or who have ever had bariatric surgery or have weight loss devices implanted.
Current smokers (smoked within the last 30 days).
The receipt of any investigational drug within (3 months) prior to this trial.
Previous participation in this trial (i.e. randomized).
Unable or unwilling to consume required study meals for any reason (e.g. dietary restrictions, allergies, or aversions to any of the food items used in the study).

Contraindications to study medications,

Subject with a personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC).
Subject with multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome 2 (MEN 2).
Allergic to Liraglutide or any of the ingredients in Saxenda® (i.e. Active ingredient: liraglutide; Inactive ingredients: disodium phosphate dehydrate, propylene glycol, phenol and water for injection)
Women who are pregnant, or have the intention of becoming pregnant.
Taking other GLP-1 receptor agonists (currently or in the past 3 months).
Current severe problems with stomach, such as slowed emptying of the stomach (gastroparesis) or problems with digesting food.
Current or past known serious chronic illness of liver, kidney and pancreas.
Current or recent (30 days) depression or suicidal thoughts.
Current fasting plasma glucose 126mg/dL or higher or HbA1c 6.5% or higher, or alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) 10% above normal range for the assay.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254115092
Number Of Facilities 2
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 60
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 9
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 15

Designs

Sequence: 30382789
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26559211
Intervention Id 52263460
Name Liraglutide 3.0

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28749582
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Martin Binks
Title Associate Professor
Affiliation Texas Tech University

]]>

<![CDATA[ The Role of Sex Steroids and Serotonin Brain Dynamics in Perinatal Mental Health ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795688
2019-01-24

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795688
NCT03795688https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795688?tab=tableNANANAHormonal transitions such as across pregnancy and postpartum may trigger depressive episodes in some women. It is not known why, but estrogen sensitivity may play a critical role. A preclinical human risk model showed that depressive symptoms induced by pharmacological sex-hormone manipulation is linked to increases in serotonin transporter (SERT) brain binding, which lowers serotonergic brain tone. It is currently unknown if these findings translates to women across pre- to postpartum transitions.

This longitudinal project studies a group of women who will deliver by planned caesarian, thus permitting the collection of cerebrospinal fluid (csf) containing central markers of serotonergic signaling, at the latest point in pregnancy. The women are followed across late pregnancy, delivery and 6 months postpartum to illuminate relations between sex-hormones, stress-regulation, estradiol sensitivity, csf markers of neurotransmission, serotonin transporter genotype variance, and potential development of subclinical or manifest depressive symptoms. Further, markers of relevance for the infant brain development and stress-regulation will be obtained from placenta tissue and umbilical cord blood. A subgroup of 70 women will participate in a brain imaging program early postpartum (week 3-5), which includes an evaluation of brain activity and structure and in vivo molecular brain imaging serotonergic markers. Thus, serotonergic markers in csf can be combined with postpartum molecular brain imaging of key features of serotonin signaling. Women in the imaging program are selected based on variation in their level of mental distress immediately postpartum (day 2-5).

The study’s main hypothesis is that women with high-expressing SERT genotypes are more sensitive to peripartum hormonal transition in terms of changes in serotonergic tone and emergence of depressive symptoms and that such an association will be stronger in the presence of candidate gene transcript biomarkers of oestrogen sensitivity. A further hypothesis is that in vivo molecular brain imaging and csf based serotonergic markers will be associated with depressive symptoms both early and later postpartum.

Ideally, this project will provide a rationale for future targeted prevention and/or treatment of perinatal depression in women at high risk, which holds grand potential to protect not only mother but also infant brain health long-term.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-18
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-12-17
Start Month Year January 24, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 1, 2020
Verification Month Year December 2020
Verification Date 2020-12-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-12-17

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20709989
Description Motivation:

Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects twice as many women as men and women are at an increased risk during hormonal transition phases such as pregnancy and birth. A highly relevant subpopulation within the mixed MDD diagnostic category comprises women who develop perinatal depression (PND). PND is defined as a depressive episode with onset during pregnancy or up to 4 weeks postpartum, however epidemiological studies show that the risk of developing depression is heightened for 6 months postpartum. PND affects 10-15% of mothers postpartum. Why certain women are at high risk of developing perinatal depression (PND) remains unclear but recent studies suggest that these women might be particularly sensitive to the transition from high levels of placenta-produced sex-steroids in pregnancy to the hormone withdrawal phase postpartum. Further, pharmacologically induced changes in ovarian sex-hormones can produce depressive symptoms in a subgroup of otherwise healthy women and that the emergence of depressive symptoms is linked to both estrogen fluctuations and increases in serotonin transporter (SERT) brain binding (which putatively lowers serotonergic brain tone). Intriguingly, common gene variants that index SERT expression levels show "gene BY environment" associations with risk for depression, such that high-expressing SERT genotypes render women more vulnerable to depressive symptoms early – but not late – postpartum in a "gene-dose" dependent manner. Further, DNA methylation and gene expression markers of estradiol sensitivity predispose to PND and are linked to the estradiol stimulation phase in the pharmacological manipulation of sex-steroids risk model, thus constituting a candidate biomarker for PND.

It is currently unknown if estradiol sensitivity during pregnancy confers to PND risk through mechanism that (transiently) affect serotonergic tone in susceptible women. Changes in brain function late in pregnancy may extend to the early postpartum and shape how the brain integrates additional neurobiological changes that are associated with the postpartum hormonal withdrawal phase. This study will examine these mechanisms in a group of pregnant women that are followed from late pregnancy across early to late postpartum up to 6 month.

Natural variation in SERT-genotypes provides a unique opportunity to specifically address the interaction between SERT-gene expression-capacity and estradiol exposure through pregnancy in processes driving changes in serotonergic tone, brain structure and activity, and mental health from late pregnancy to 6 months postpartum. The time-points comprise: basic program: 2-5 days postpartum, 6 weeks postpartum and 6 months postpartum for all participants and for the imaging program participants: 2-5 days postpartum, 3-5 weeks postpartum, 12 weeks postpartum, 6 months postpartum.

By including women who undergo planned caesarean section, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can be obtained and thus, for the first time combine CSF markers of serotonergic tone and other transmitter systems (serotonin, 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid, other monoamines, γ-aminobutyric acid) with molecular brain imaging methods that index serotonergic tone (i.e. serotonin 4 receptor binding)

Aims:

Determine if depressive symptoms from late pregnancy to 6 months postpartum map onto molecular brain imaging markers of serotonin signaling early postpartum (week 3-5), and evaluate if such markers and/or symptoms are dependent on serotonin transporter genotype and/or predicted by candidate gene transcription biomarkers for estrogen sensitivity.
Evaluate how markers of stress-regulation capacity, brain activity, brain structure (hippocampal volume) and central markers of neurotransmission are associated with the emergence of depressive symptoms in women postpartum.
Map the association between serotonin-4 receptor binding and cerebrospinal fluid markers of serotonergic tone (serotonin and 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid levels).
Determine if markers of mental distress in women during pregnancy and the postpartum period are associated with infant markers of stress-regulation and serotonergic signaling in placenta and umbilical cord blood.

Hypotheses:

Women with high-expressing SERT genotypes are more sensitive to estradiol exposure in late pregnancy in terms of changes in proxies for serotonergic tone (PET imaging or csf based) and emergence of depressive symptoms in late pregnancy and/or postpartum and such an association will be stronger in the presence of candidate gene transcript PND biomarkers.
CSF levels of 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid are associated with serotonin 4 receptor brain PET (Positron Emission Tomography) binding.

Study design:

150 pregnant women between 18-40 years of age who deliver by planned caesarean section, due to breech presentation of the fetus or previous caesarean section, will be included in a longitudinal study. Participants will be recruited at the midwife clinic of Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. Based on natural variation in European populations the expected distribution of high vs. low expressing SERT genotypes is 40/60, respectively, thus genotype status can be included in the analysis structure. Self-reported psychometrics and questionnaires will be collected online at inclusion, across the pre- to postpartum transition and up to 6 months postpartum (basic program: 2-5 days postpartum, 6 weeks postpartum and 6 months postpartum; imaging program: 2-5 days postpartum, 3-5 weeks postpartum, 12 weeks postpartum, 6 months postpartum). CSF will be collected as part of the anesthetic procedures for a planned caesarean section, thus avoiding any additional invasive procedures. CSF markers of serotonergic tone (serotonin and its main metabolite, 5-HIAA) will be measured by HPLC techniques. Corresponding blood samples for determining relevant biomarkers (sex-steroids, DNA, mRNA and microRNA) and saliva for hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dynamics, will be taken just before the planned caesarean section. Hair from mother and infant will be collected around delivery for further cortisol analyses. Placenta tissue and umbilical cord blood will also be collected for determining relevant markers of serotonergic and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis functioning.

A subgroup of the study cohort selected towards high (N=35) or low risk for later manifest PND (N=35), based on symptoms of mental distress 2-5 days postpartum (in-house interview, high-risk scores correspond to at least 12 on the Kennerley Maternity Blues Questionnaire and at least 8 on Stein's Maternity Blues Scale), will participate in an extended brain imaging program. This program will include 5-HT4R ([11C]SB207145) PET, structural MRI, functional MRI (including emotional processing, reward processing and resting state fMRI), neuropsychological testing and face to face rating of mental state with a semi-structured interview (HAM-D17).

The study includes long-term follow-up at six months. Collected data will enter the Center for Integrated Molecular Brain Imaging database, thus providing a basis for longitudinal follow-up, data sharing and crossvalidation.

Statistics:

Power calculations based on inter-subject variability of the 5-HT4R show that an imaging group size of 35 is required to detect a 15% difference with a power of 0.8 for the brain regions of interest. With the full cohort number of 150 and due to oversampling of high and low risk women, about 25 women are expected to develop manifest PND episodes and more will display subclinical depressive symptoms, which will allow for correlation analyses with relevant outcome parameters including the candidate gene transcript based biomarker of estrogen sensitivity.

Highly correlated self-reported psychometric outcomes will be included in a latent variable construct of self-reported mental state (composite measure) using structural equation modelling.

Ethics:

The PET scans convey no known risk for adults. Infants will not be exposed to radiation and will be nursed by special staff or a close relative while the mother is scanned. Participants who develop levels of mental distress or depressive symptoms that approach clinical thresholds will be referred to relevant and timely psychiatric care. The study has been approved by the local ethics committee.

Facilities

Sequence: 199965079
Name Rigshospitalet
City Copenhagen
Zip 2100
Country Denmark

Conditions

Sequence: 52139010 Sequence: 52139011
Name Major Depressive Disorder Name Perinatal Depression
Downcase Name major depressive disorder Downcase Name perinatal depression

Id Information

Sequence: 40135067 Sequence: 40135068
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value PND1 Id Value H-18029563
Id Type Other Identifier
Id Type Description Regional ethics committee

Countries

Sequence: 42542692
Name Denmark
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55559360 Sequence: 55559361
Title Basic, non-imaging group Title Extended, imaging group
Description Pregnant women who will deliver by planned caesarian. Participants enrolled in the study that are not eligible for the imaging subgroup.

All participants start in the basic program. Includes collection of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, hair, placenta tissues, umbilical cord blood and psychometrics.

Description A subgroup of 70 pregnant women who will deliver by planned caesarian selected towards either high (N=35) or low (N=35) risk for perinatal depression will undergo brain imaging in addition to the elements of the basic program. The extended imaging program includes functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography (PET) and a semistructured interview for depression symptoms (HAM-D17).

Interventions

Sequence: 52454915
Intervention Type Other
Name Pregnancy
Description Peripartum transition from pregnant to postpartum state

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177263659 Sequence: 177263660 Sequence: 177263661 Sequence: 177263662 Sequence: 177263663 Sequence: 177263664 Sequence: 177263665 Sequence: 177263666 Sequence: 177263667 Sequence: 177263668 Sequence: 177263669 Sequence: 177263699 Sequence: 177263670 Sequence: 177263671 Sequence: 177263672 Sequence: 177263673 Sequence: 177263674 Sequence: 177263675 Sequence: 177263676 Sequence: 177263677 Sequence: 177263678 Sequence: 177263679 Sequence: 177263680 Sequence: 177263681 Sequence: 177263682 Sequence: 177263683 Sequence: 177263684 Sequence: 177263700 Sequence: 177263685 Sequence: 177263686 Sequence: 177263687 Sequence: 177263688 Sequence: 177263689 Sequence: 177263690 Sequence: 177263691 Sequence: 177263692 Sequence: 177263693 Sequence: 177263694 Sequence: 177263695 Sequence: 177263696 Sequence: 177263697 Sequence: 177263698 Sequence: 177263701 Sequence: 177263702 Sequence: 177263703 Sequence: 177263704 Sequence: 177263705 Sequence: 177263706 Sequence: 177263707 Sequence: 177263708 Sequence: 177263709 Sequence: 177263710 Sequence: 177263711 Sequence: 177263712 Sequence: 177263713 Sequence: 177263714 Sequence: 177263715 Sequence: 177263716 Sequence: 177263717 Sequence: 177263718 Sequence: 177263719 Sequence: 177263720 Sequence: 177263721 Sequence: 177263732 Sequence: 177263722 Sequence: 177263723 Sequence: 177263724 Sequence: 177263725 Sequence: 177263726 Sequence: 177263727 Sequence: 177263728 Sequence: 177263729 Sequence: 177263730 Sequence: 177263731 Sequence: 177263733 Sequence: 177263734 Sequence: 177263735 Sequence: 177263736 Sequence: 177263737 Sequence: 177263738 Sequence: 177263739 Sequence: 177263740 Sequence: 177263741 Sequence: 177263742 Sequence: 177263743 Sequence: 177263744 Sequence: 177263745 Sequence: 177263746 Sequence: 177263747 Sequence: 177263748 Sequence: 177263749 Sequence: 177263750 Sequence: 177263751 Sequence: 177263752 Sequence: 177263753 Sequence: 177263754 Sequence: 177263755 Sequence: 177263756 Sequence: 177263757 Sequence: 177263758 Sequence: 177263759
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Depressive symptoms Measure Depressive symptoms Measure Gene transcript and DNA methylation markers of estrogen sensitivity Measure Cerebral serotonin 4 receptor binding postpartum Measure CSF levels of GABA Measure CSF levels of serotonin metabolite (5-HIAA) Measure Cortisol awakening response Measure Hair cortisol level mothers Measure Hair cortisol level newborns Measure Hippocampal volumes Measure functional MRI response to reward Measure Change in DNA methylation of the FK506-binding protein 51 (FKBP5) gene Measure Resting state functional connectivity MRI Measure Change in epigenetic SERT status Measure Concentration of inflammatory markers, i.e hsCRP and immunoactive cytokines, in peripheral blood Measure functional MRI response to emotional faces Measure Depressive symptoms Measure Depressive symptoms Measure Depressive symptoms Measure Depressive symptoms Measure CSF levels of serotonin Measure CSF levels of dopamine metabolites Measure CSF levels of noradrenaline metabolites Measure CSF levels of inflammatory markers Measure Estradiol level Measure Estradiol level Measure Change in estradiol level Measure DNA methylation of the glucocorticoid receptor gene Measure Progesterone level Measure Progesterone level Measure Change in progesterone level Measure Allopregnanolone level Measure Allopregnanolone level Measure Change in allopregnanolone level Measure Change in cortisol level Measure Cortisol awakening response Measure Cortisol awakening response Measure Change in cortisol awakening response Measure DNA methylation of the SERT gene Measure DNA methylation of the SERT gene Measure DNA methylation of the FK506-binding protein 51 (FKBP5) gene Measure DNA methylation of the FK506-binding protein 51 (FKBP5) gene Measure DNA methylation of the glucocorticoid receptor gene Measure Change in DNA methylation of the glucocorticoid receptor gene Measure DNA methylation of the COMT gene Measure DNA methylation of the COMT gene Measure Change in DNA methylation of the COMT gene Measure DNA methylation of the MAO-A gene Measure Change in DNA methylation of the MAO-A gene Measure DNA methylation of the MAO-A gene Measure DNA methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene Measure DNA methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene Measure Change in DNA methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene Measure DNA methylation of the oxytocin gene Measure DNA methylation of the oxytocin gene Measure Change in DNA methylation of the oxytocin gene Measure Systemic inflammation peripheral blood hsCRP and immunoactive cytokines Measure Change in systemic inflammation peripheral blood hsCRP and immunoactive cytokines Measure Self reported family history of mood disorders Measure Self reported impulsiveness score Measure Self reported Neuroticism score from NEO personality questionnaire Measure Self reported parental bonding quality Measure Self-reported perceived stress Measure Change in self-reported mood Measure Self-reported perceived stress Measure Change in self-reported perceived stress Measure Self-reported anhedonia Measure Self-reported anhedonia Measure Change in self-reported anhedonia Measure Self-reported rumination Measure Self-reported rumination Measure Change in elf-reported rumination Measure Self-reported mood Measure Self-reported mood Measure Self-reported sleep quality Measure Self-reported sleep quality Measure Change in self-reported sleep quality Measure Self-reported psychiatric symptoms Measure Self-reported psychiatric symptoms Measure Change in self-reported psychiatric symptoms Measure Self-reported well-being Measure Self-reported well-being Measure Change in self-reported well-being Measure Self-reported anxiety Measure Self-reported anxiety Measure Change in self-reported anxiety Measure Self-reported obsessive and compulsive symptoms Measure Self-reported obsessive and compulsive symptoms Measure Change in self-reported obsessive and compulsive symptoms Measure Performance on Simple Reaction Time Measure Gray matter brain volume prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex Measure Serotonergic turnover in placenta Measure 11-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 activity in placenta Measure Methylation status of genes relevant for stress-hormone regulation in placenta Measure Methylation status of genes related to serotonergic signaling in placenta Measure Methylation status and gene transcript profiles of relevance for early brain development and stress regulation in newborn infants Measure COMT-genotype (rs4680) variant, i.e met/met vs other polymorphisms Measure BDNF genotype (rs6265) status, i.e. val/val versus met-carrier variants Measure 5-HTT genotype status, i.e LALA vs low-expressing (S or LG) variants Measure Postpartum blues symptoms Measure Postpartum blues symptoms
Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Prior to caesarean section Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame On day of caesarean section Time Frame On day of caesarean section Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame On day of caesarean section. Time Frame Day 0-5 postpartum. Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum. Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum. Time Frame From baseline (caesarean section to week 3-6 postpartum) Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame From just before delivery to 3-6 weeks postpartum Time Frame At week 3-6 Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum. Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum Time Frame Week 12 postpartum Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum Time Frame 6 months postpartum Time Frame On day of caesarean section Time Frame On day of caesarean section Time Frame On day of caesarean section Time Frame On day of caesarean section Time Frame Prior to caesarean section. Time Frame At week 3-6 postpartum. Time Frame From baseline (caesarean section to week 3-6 postpartum) Time Frame Prior to caesarean section. Time Frame Prior to caesarean section. Time Frame At week 3-6 postpartum. Time Frame From baseline (caesarean section to week 3-6 postpartum) Time Frame Prior to caesarean section. Time Frame At week 3-6 postpartum. Time Frame From baseline (caesarean section to week 3-6 postpartum) Time Frame From baseline (caesarean section to week 3-6 postpartum) Time Frame Week 12 postpartum Time Frame Prior to caesarean section Time Frame ´From baseline (caesarean section to week 3-6 postpartum) Time Frame Prior to caesarean section Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Prior to caesarean section. Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame From baseline (caesarean section to week 3-6 postpartum) Time Frame Prior to caesarean section. Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame From baseline (caesarean section to week 3-6 postpartum) Time Frame Prior to caesarean section. Time Frame From baseline (caesarean section to week 3-6 postpartum) Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Prior to caesarean section. Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame From baseline (caesarean section to week 3-6 postpartum) Time Frame Prior to caesarean section. Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame From baseline (caesarean section to week 3-6 postpartum) Time Frame Prior to caesarean section. Time Frame From baseline (caesarean section to week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum or before Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum or before Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum or before Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum or before Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum Time Frame Change from day 3-5 to week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Change from day 3-5 to week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Change from day 3-5 to week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Change from day 3-5 to week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Change from day 3-5 to week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Change from day 3-5 to week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Change from day 3-5 to week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Change from day 3-5 to week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Day 3-5 Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Change from day 3-5 to week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame Week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame At week 3-6 postpartum Time Frame At delivery. Time Frame At delivery Time Frame At delivery Time Frame At delivery Time Frame At delivery. Time Frame Prior to caesarean section. Time Frame Prior to caesarean section. Time Frame Prior to caesarean section. Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum. Time Frame Day 3-5 postpartum.
Description Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Score range: 0-30. Higher scores indicate more symptoms of postpartum depression. Total group Description Score on the Hamilton 17-item depression scale. Score range: 0-52. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. Assessed in imaging group Description 116 a priori defined gene transcripts, which where differentially expressed in third trimester of women who later developed perinatal depression with postpartum onset relative to pregnant women who did not and to other depressed (reference Mehta et al, 2014, Psychological Medicine) and confirmed to be coupled to estrogen fluctuations (Mehtaet al. 2018 British Journal of Psychiatry) will be evaluated in the total group.

Also DNA methylation of the genes of these transcripts will be determined and analysed in terms of their predictive value (above chance) for perinatal depression.

Description Latent variable construct of brain 5-HT4R level based on quantification of 5-HT4R binding from 11C-SB207145 positron emission tomography in primary volumes of interest; neocortex, nucleus caudatus, putamen and hippocampus. Assessed in imaging group. Description Assessed in total group Description Assessed in total group Description Cortisol awakening response, area under the curve with respect to baseline from 0 to 60 minutes from awakening. Description Provides an estimate of cortisol exposure up to 6 months prior to delivery, total group Description Provides an estimate of fetal cortisol exposure, infants from total group Description Hippocampal brain volume (including hippocampus) from structural MRI, imaging group. Description fMRI (BOLD response) based assessment of brain activity in response to reward, relative to non-reward, stimuli. Assessed in imaging cohort Description Change in methylation status for the FK506-binding protein 51 (FKBP5) gene from late pregnancy to postpartum week 3-6. Description rsfMRI based spontaneous co-fluctuations in low frequency BOLD signal, (functional connectivity). Assessed with rsfMRI scan in the resting state, i.e. non-goal oriented spontaneous thought and awake. Assessed in imaging group. Description Change in epigenetic SERT status from late pregnancy to postpartum week 3-6. Description Composite measure of hsCRP, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-18 and IL-10 levels, total group Description fMRI (BOLD response) based assessment of brain activity to emotionally salient, relative to neutral, stimuli. Assessed in imaging cohort. Description Score on the Hamilton 17-item depression scale. Score range: 0-52. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. Assessed in imaging group Description Score on the Hamilton 17-item depression scale. Score range: 0-52. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms. Assessed in imaging group Description Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Score range: 0-30. Higher scores indicate more symptoms of postpartum depression. Assessed in total group Description Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Score range: 0-30. Higher scores indicate more symptoms of postpartum depression. Assessed in all Description Assessed in total group Description Assessed in total group Description Assessed in total group Description Composite measure of IFN-c, IFN-alfa TNF-alfa og IL-6, in total group Description Estradiol level in peripheral blood, total group Description Estradiol level peripheral blood, total group Description Estradiol change pre- to postpartum, peripheral blood total group Description Methylation status for the glucocorticoid receptor gene, total group Description Progesterone level in peripheral blood Description Progesterone level in peripheral blood Description Progesterone change pre- to postpartum, peripheral blood total group Description Allopregnanolone level in peripheral blood Description Allopregnanolone level in peripheral blood Description Change in allopregnanolone level in peripheral blood Description Cortisol change pre- to postpartum, peripheral blood total group Description Cortisol awakening response, area under the curve with respect to baseline from 0 to 60 minutes from awakening. Description Cortisol awakening response, area under the curve with respect to baseline from 0 to 60 minutes from awakening. Description Change in cortisol awakening response, from caesarean section to 3-6 weeks postpartum. Description Methylation status for the SERT gene, total group Description DNA Methylation status for the SERT gene, total group Description Methylation status for the FK506-binding protein 51 (FKBP5) gene, total group Description Methylation status for the FK506-binding protein 51 (FKBP5) gene, total group Description Methylation status for the glucocorticoid receptor gene, total group Description Change in methylation status for the glucocorticoid receptor gene from late pregnancy to postpartum week 3-6. Description Methylation status for the COMT gene, total group Description Methylation status for the COMT gene, total group Description Change in methylation status for the COMT gene from just before delivery to 3-6 weeks postpartum Description Methylation status for the MAO-A gene, total group Description Change in methylation status for the MAO-A gene, total group Description Methylation status for the MAO-A gene, total group Description Methylation status for the oxytocin receptor gene, total group Description Methylation status for the oxytocin receptor gene, total group Description Change in methylation status for the oxytocin receptor gene, total group Description Methylation status for the oxytocin gene, total group Description Methylation status for the oxytocin gene, total group Description Change methylation status for the oxytocin gene, total group Description Composite measure of hsCRP, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-18 and IL-10 levels, total group Description Change in composite measure of hsCRP, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-18 and IL-10 levels, total group Description Family History Assessment Module (OS-FHAM). Number of first degree relatives with a history of depressive episodes or bipolar disorder. Total group. Description Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), self-reported. Range: 30-120. Total group. Description NEO-PI-R – Revised NEO Personality Inventory, self-reported. Participants may score 20-80 for each of the personality traits: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. The higher the score, the more prominent is the personality trait. Total group. Description Parental bonding instrument (PBI), both parents, self-reported. Total group. Description Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), range 0-40, a score of 0 indicates no perceived stress. Total group. Description Change in Profile of Mood States (POMS) score, range 0-260, a score of 0 indicates no mood disturbance. Total group. Description Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), range 0-40, a score of 0 indicates no perceived stress. Total group. Description Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), range 0-40, a score of 0 indicates no perceived stress. Total group. Description Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), range 0-14, a score of 0 indicates no self-reported anhedonia. Total group. Description Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), range 0-14, a score of 0 indicates no self-reported anhedonia. Total group. Description Change in Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) score, range 0-14, a score of 0 indicates no self-reported anhedonia. Total group. Description Rumination Response Scale (RRS), range 22-88, a score of 22 indicates no ruminative symptoms. Total group. Description Rumination Response Scale (RRS), range 22-88, a score of 22 indicates no ruminative symptoms. Total group. Description Change in Rumination Response Scale (RRS) score, range 22-88, a score of 22 indicates no ruminative symptoms. Total group. Description Profile of Mood States (POMS), range 0-260, a score of 0 indicates no mood disturbance. Total group. Description Profile of Mood States (POMS), range 0-260, a score of 0 indicates no mood disturbance. Total group. Description Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), range 0-21, a score of 0 indicates a healthy sleep quality. Total group. Description Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), range 0-21, a score of 0 indicates a healthy sleep quality. Total group. Description Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), range 0-21, a score of 0 indicates a healthy sleep quality. Total group. Description Brief symptom Inventory-53 item (BSI-53), range 0-212, increasing score means worsening of symptoms.Total group. Description Brief symptom Inventory-53 item (BSI-53), range 0-212, increasing score means worsening of symptoms.Total group. Description Change in Brief symptom Inventory-53 item (BSI-53) score, range 0-212, increasing score means worsening of symptoms.Total group. Description WHO-5 well-being index, range 0-100, low score means less well-being. Total group. Description WHO-5 well-being index, range 0-100, low score means less well-being. Total group. Description Change in WHO-5 well-being index, range 0-100, low score means less well-being. Total group. Description State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-AD-D), state and trait subscales each have a range of 20-80, 20 means no anxiety. Total group. Description State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-AD-D), state subscale range 20-80, 20 means no anxiety. Total group. Description Change in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-AD-D) score, state subscale range 20-80, 20 means no anxiety. Total group. Description Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (OCI) score, self-reported, range 0-72, higher scores indicate more symptoms. Total group. Description Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (OCI) score, self-reported, range 0-72, higher scores indicate more symptoms. Total group. Description Change in Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (OCI) score, self-reported, range 0-72, higher scores indicate more symptoms. Total group. Description Performance on Simple Reaction Time, in imaging cohort. Description Gray matter brain volume prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex Description Composite measure of serotonin, tryptophan og tryptofan hydroxylase levels relative to 5-HIAA, in placenta sample. Infants from total group Description 11-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 activity in placenta. Infants from total group Description Composite measure of methylation status for the FKBP5, glucocorticoid receptor, 11-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 genes. Infants from total group Description Composite measure of the methylation status for monoamine oxidase, serotonin receptor and serotonin transporter genes. Infants from total group Description Composite measure of methylation status and gene transcript profiles of Glucocorticoid receptor, FKBP5, oxytocin and oxytocin receptors, Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) genes. Assessed in blood from umbilical cord blood sample from infants, total group. Description val158met (rs4680) status, binary variable, i.e. "val/val, val/met" vs "met/met" variants Description BDNF val66met (rs6265) status, binary variable, i.e. "val/val" versus "met-carrier" status Description 5-HTTLPR genotype status (binary), i.e. high-expressing LALA vs low-expressing (S or LG) variants, based on SLC6A4, i.e. L or S variants, and further subtyping on rs25531 haplotype L(A)L(A) vs LGLA, LGLG or variants containing as S as specified above. Description In house interview based on Kennerley Maternity Blues Questionnaire, range: 0-28, higher score indicates more severe postpartum blues symptoms. High blues score is associated with greater risk for perinatal depression at week 3-6. Description In house interview based on Stein's Maternity Blues Scale, range 0-26. High blues score is associated with greater risk for perinatal depression at week 3-6.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193366552 Sequence: 193366553 Sequence: 193366554 Sequence: 193366555
Mesh Term Depressive Disorder Mesh Term Depressive Disorder, Major Mesh Term Mood Disorders Mesh Term Mental Disorders
Downcase Mesh Term depressive disorder Downcase Mesh Term depressive disorder, major Downcase Mesh Term mood disorders Downcase Mesh Term mental disorders
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48290713 Sequence: 48290714 Sequence: 48290715 Sequence: 48290716
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Vibe G Frøkjær, MD, PhD Name Center for Integrated Molecular Brain Imaging, Copenhagen, Denmak Name Mental Health Centre Copenhagen Name University of Copenhagen

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29268534
Role Principal Investigator
Name Vibe Frokjaer, MD, PhD
Affiliation Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68107470 Sequence: 68107471
Design Group Id 55559360 Design Group Id 55559361
Intervention Id 52454915 Intervention Id 52454915

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30747727
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender Female
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 40 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Population Participants will be recruited from the midwife clinic at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, i.e., included women will be residents of the central Copenhagen area.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Age 18-40 years
Healthy pregnant women planned to deliver by caesarean section due to breech position of the fetus or previous caesarean section.

Exclusion Criteria:

Current or previous severe psychiatric disorder such as psychotic disorders, eating disorder and bipolar disorder or current or previous psychiatric disorder requiring hospitalization.
Current or previous neurological diseases, severe somatic disease, severe postpartum hemorrhage or use of medication that can interfere with study outcomes
Severe disease or malformations in infants
Obesity or underweight (pre-gestational BMI below 18 or above 35)
Not fluent in Danish or severe visual or hearing impairments
Earlier or present learning disabilities
MRI contraindications (claustrophobia, metal implants)
Previous exposure to radioactivity > 10 millisievert (mSv) within the last year
Alcohol or drug abuse

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254121879
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 22
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 40
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 15
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 81
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 5

Designs

Sequence: 30494010
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28860290
Responsible Party Type Sponsor-Investigator
Name Vibe G Frøkjær, MD, PhD
Title Senior researcher, Principal investigator
Affiliation Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Study References

Sequence: 52032732 Sequence: 52032733 Sequence: 52032734 Sequence: 52032735 Sequence: 52032736 Sequence: 52032737 Sequence: 52032738 Sequence: 52032739 Sequence: 52032740 Sequence: 52032741 Sequence: 52032742
Pmid 12589387 Pmid 20231323 Pmid 23689534 Pmid 24189342 Pmid 23442893 Pmid 25891375 Pmid 20096787 Pmid 24495551 Pmid 30457060 Pmid 17148723 Pmid 18978318
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Carpenter LL, Anderson GM, Siniscalchi JM, Chappell PB, Price LH. Acute changes in cerebrospinal fluid 5-HIAA following oral paroxetine challenge in healthy humans. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003 Feb;28(2):339-47. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300025. Citation Caspi A, Hariri AR, Holmes A, Uher R, Moffitt TE. Genetic sensitivity to the environment: the case of the serotonin transporter gene and its implications for studying complex diseases and traits. Am J Psychiatry. 2010 May;167(5):509-27. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09101452. Epub 2010 Mar 15. Citation Guintivano J, Arad M, Gould TD, Payne JL, Kaminsky ZA. Antenatal prediction of postpartum depression with blood DNA methylation biomarkers. Mol Psychiatry. 2014 May;19(5):560-7. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.62. Epub 2013 May 21. Erratum In: Mol Psychiatry. 2014 May; 19(5):633. Citation Haahr ME, Fisher PM, Jensen CG, Frokjaer VG, Mahon BM, Madsen K, Baare WF, Lehel S, Norremolle A, Rabiner EA, Knudsen GM. Central 5-HT4 receptor binding as biomarker of serotonergic tonus in humans: a [11C]SB207145 PET study. Mol Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;19(4):427-32. doi: 10.1038/mp.2013.147. Epub 2013 Nov 5. Citation Klengel T, Binder EB. Gene-environment interactions in major depressive disorder. Can J Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;58(2):76-83. doi: 10.1177/070674371305800203. Citation Knudsen GM, Jensen PS, Erritzoe D, Baare WFC, Ettrup A, Fisher PM, Gillings N, Hansen HD, Hansen LK, Hasselbalch SG, Henningsson S, Herth MM, Holst KK, Iversen P, Kessing LV, Macoveanu J, Madsen KS, Mortensen EL, Nielsen FA, Paulson OB, Siebner HR, Stenbaek DS, Svarer C, Jernigan TL, Strother SC, Frokjaer VG. The Center for Integrated Molecular Brain Imaging (Cimbi) database. Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt B):1213-1219. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.025. Epub 2015 Apr 17. Citation Marner L, Gillings N, Madsen K, Erritzoe D, Baare WF, Svarer C, Hasselbalch SG, Knudsen GM. Brain imaging of serotonin 4 receptors in humans with [11C]SB207145-PET. Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 15;50(3):855-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.054. Epub 2010 Jan 22. Citation Mehta D, Newport DJ, Frishman G, Kraus L, Rex-Haffner M, Ritchie JC, Lori A, Knight BT, Stagnaro E, Ruepp A, Stowe ZN, Binder EB. Early predictive biomarkers for postpartum depression point to a role for estrogen receptor signaling. Psychol Med. 2014 Aug;44(11):2309-22. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713003231. Epub 2014 Feb 5. Citation Mehta D, Rex-Haffner M, Sondergaard HB, Pinborg A, Binder EB, Frokjaer VG. Evidence for oestrogen sensitivity in perinatal depression: pharmacological sex hormone manipulation study. Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;215(3):519-527. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.234. Citation Munk-Olsen T, Laursen TM, Pedersen CB, Mors O, Mortensen PB. New parents and mental disorders: a population-based register study. JAMA. 2006 Dec 6;296(21):2582-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.21.2582. Citation Sanjuan J, Martin-Santos R, Garcia-Esteve L, Carot JM, Guillamat R, Gutierrez-Zotes A, Gornemann I, Canellas F, Baca-Garcia E, Jover M, Navines R, Valles V, Vilella E, de Diego Y, Castro JA, Ivorra JL, Gelabert E, Guitart M, Labad A, Mayoral F, Roca M, Gratacos M, Costas J, van Os J, de Frutos R. Mood changes after delivery: role of the serotonin transporter gene. Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;193(5):383-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.045427.

Ipd Information Types

Sequence: 3331370
Name Study Protocol

]]>

<![CDATA[ CI Following VS Removal or Labyrinthectomy ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795675
2019-01-14

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795675
NCT03795675https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795675?tab=tableWilliam Riggs, AuDWilliam.Riggs@osumc.edu614-293-9750This study is a prospective, clinical study to determine if it is safe and effective to use a cochlear implant over time in individuals undergoing removal of a vestibular schwannoma (VS), benign tumor of the hearing and balance nerve or undergoing a labyrinthectomy for treatment of Meniere’s disease. Individuals undergoing these surgeries will be deaf on the surgical side after the procedure. Currently, cochlear implants are approved for use and not considered investigational in individuals with hearing loss on both sides. However, use of a cochlear implant for these patient populations (single-sided hearing loss) will be considered a new use of an approved device. Participants undergoing surgery to remove a VS or having a labyrinthectomy will have a cochlear implant inserted after the surgical procedure for clinical care. Approximately 4 weeks after surgery, participants will be fitted with an external speech processor on the surgical side that will stimulate the internal cochlear implant. Participants will return at the following intervals after the initial processor fitting: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months. At each interval, participants will complete questionnaires on how they are hearing with the implant and their quality of life with the implant and be tested on their ability to hear sounds and understand speech. Potential risks are those associated with all cochlear implant surgeries, and include device failure resulting in removal of device, irritation or redness in surgical area and/or area where processor is attached, increased ringing in the ear, facial nerve stimulation and a change in the way speech and other sounds sound through the implant. Potential benefits to individual participants in this study include improvement in detection and speech understanding of the surgical ear. Participants may also experience improved abilities to locate sound and understand speech in noise as the result of having hearing on both sides.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-07
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-04-06
Start Month Year January 14, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 2024
Verification Month Year April 2023
Verification Date 2023-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2023-04-06

Facilities

Sequence: 198439366
Status Recruiting
Name The Ohio State University
City Columbus
State Ohio
Zip 43210
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 51737149 Sequence: 51737150
Name Vestibular Schwannoma Name Meniere Disease
Downcase Name vestibular schwannoma Downcase Name meniere disease

Id Information

Sequence: 39812883
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 2017H0273

Countries

Sequence: 42212129
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55157763
Group Type Experimental
Title Meniere's Disease/Vestibular Schwannoma
Description Individuals diagnosed with Meniere's disease and undergoing labyrinthectomy or diagnosed with vestibular schwannoma and undergoing surgical excision via translabyrinthine approach for treatment will receive cochlear implant at the time of surgery.

Interventions

Sequence: 52058574
Intervention Type Device
Name Cochlear Implant
Description Cochlear implant device to be implanted at time of surgical intervention.

Keywords

Sequence: 79158994
Name Cochlear implants
Downcase Name cochlear implants

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 175969873 Sequence: 175969874 Sequence: 175969875 Sequence: 175969876 Sequence: 175969877 Sequence: 175969878
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change in Sound Detection Testing Measure Change in Speech Perception Testing Measure Change in Sound Localization Testing Measure Change in Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) Scores Measure Change in Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) Scores Measure Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) Scores
Time Frame Measurements assessed 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post-implantation. Time Frame Measurements assessed 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post-implantation. Time Frame Measurements assessed 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post-implantation. Time Frame Measurements assessed 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post-implantation. Time Frame Measurements assessed 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post-implantation. Time Frame Measurements assessed 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months post-implantation.
Description Sounds that vary in pitch (frequency) will be presented in a sound field to identify hearing thresholds in decibels (dB). Participant indicates when a sound is detected/perceived when listening with the cochlear implant. The softest sound at each specific frequency (125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000, 8000 Hertz (Hz)) will be recorded in dB hearing level. Description Arizona (AZ) Bio sentences (speech perception test comprised of 660 unique sentences, presented in 33 independent lists of 20 sentences each) and the Maryland consonant-vowel nucleus-consonant (CNC) (10 phonetically balanced 50-word lists) word lists will be presented through a sound field speaker, and participant will be asked to repeat back the sentences and/or word that was heard. Background noise will be presented in conjunction with the sentences/words at various signals to noise levels (quiet [no noise], +0 dB and +5 dB signal to noise ratio). The percentage of sentences/words correctly repeated will be calculated for each test (AZ Bio, CNC) at each signal to noise level. Higher percentages indicate better word and sentence recognition ability. Description Participant listens to bursts of sounds (100 trials of pink noise [random noise having equal energy per octave and having more low-frequency components than white noise; the power per hertz decreases as the frequency increases] presented randomly from seven speakers in a half-moon orientation and identifies which speaker presented the sounds. Two testing conditions will be evaluated (implant on, implant off). Total percentage of sounds correctly identified for each condition (0-100%) will be calculated, with a larger percentage indicating higher accuracy. Additionally, root mean square error (average of total degree of error when localizing) will be calculated for each trial. Description Subjective questionnaire designed to study the relationship of disability and handicap across many listening domains using 49 questions in a clinician/patient interview format. The scale is sub-divided into three domains: 14 items on speech hearing, 17 items on spatial hearing (direction and distance judgments), and 18 items on "other" functions and qualities of hearing. The "other" qualities section contains items related to recognition and segregation of sounds, clarity, naturalness, and listening effort. Items are scored with ratings of 0 to 10, with 0 representing complete inability with regard to the item in question and 10 representing perfect ability. The average score (0-10) for each subscale/domain is reported individually. Description Questionnaire encompassing hearing and speech, psychological, and social domains and is used to evaluate quality of life. This questionnaire contains six subdomains of hearing that are rated categorically (1-5 (never-always) and "not applicable"). The subdomains are 1. Basic sound perception, 2. Advanced sound perception (in difficult daily listening situations or background noise), 3. Speech production, 4. Self-esteem, 5. Activity limitations, 6. Social interaction. The answer categories must first be transformed (1=0, 2=25, 3=50, 4=75 and 5=100). Afterwards, the final subdomain score is computed by adding together all the item scores and dividing by the number of completed items, resulting in a range of scores from 0 to 100. A higher score reflects a greater ability. Description Subjective questionnaire that identifies, qualifies, and evaluates the difficulties that may be experienced due to tinnitus. It is a 25-item questionnaire grouped into three subscales: functional, emotional and catastrophic responses. The functional subscale items reflect the effect of tinnitus on mental, social, occupational and physical functioning. The emotional subscale items probe the individual's emotional reactions to tinnitus, and the catastrophic response items address whether tinnitus makes the respondent feel desperate, trapped, hopeless or out of control. A "yes" response is given 4 points, a "sometimes" response 2 points and a "no" response 0 points. The questionnaire yields scores for each subscale and a total score that ranges from 0 and 100, with high scores indicating a greater handicap. The total score of this questionnaire represents the overall severity of tinnitus: slight (0-16), mild (18-36), moderate (38-56), severe (58-76) or catastrophic (78-100).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 191738829 Sequence: 191738816 Sequence: 191738817 Sequence: 191738818 Sequence: 191738819 Sequence: 191738820 Sequence: 191738821 Sequence: 191738822 Sequence: 191738823 Sequence: 191738824 Sequence: 191738825 Sequence: 191738826 Sequence: 191738827 Sequence: 191738828 Sequence: 191738830 Sequence: 191738831 Sequence: 191738832 Sequence: 191738833 Sequence: 191738834 Sequence: 191738835 Sequence: 191738836 Sequence: 191738837 Sequence: 191738838 Sequence: 191738839
Mesh Term Ear Diseases Mesh Term Neurilemmoma Mesh Term Neuroma, Acoustic Mesh Term Meniere Disease Mesh Term Neuroendocrine Tumors Mesh Term Neuroectodermal Tumors Mesh Term Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Neuroma Mesh Term Nerve Sheath Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue Mesh Term Endolymphatic Hydrops Mesh Term Labyrinth Diseases Mesh Term Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases Mesh Term Cranial Nerve Neoplasms Mesh Term Nervous System Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Neoplasms Mesh Term Vestibulocochlear Nerve Diseases Mesh Term Retrocochlear Diseases Mesh Term Otorhinolaryngologic Neoplasms Mesh Term Cranial Nerve Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term ear diseases Downcase Mesh Term neurilemmoma Downcase Mesh Term neuroma, acoustic Downcase Mesh Term meniere disease Downcase Mesh Term neuroendocrine tumors Downcase Mesh Term neuroectodermal tumors Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, germ cell and embryonal Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neuroma Downcase Mesh Term nerve sheath neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, nerve tissue Downcase Mesh Term endolymphatic hydrops Downcase Mesh Term labyrinth diseases Downcase Mesh Term otorhinolaryngologic diseases Downcase Mesh Term cranial nerve neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term nervous system neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term vestibulocochlear nerve diseases Downcase Mesh Term retrocochlear diseases Downcase Mesh Term otorhinolaryngologic neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term cranial nerve diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 47915944 Sequence: 47915945
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Ohio State University Name Advanced Bionics

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29032350
Role Principal Investigator
Name Oliver Adunka, MD
Affiliation Ohio State University

Central Contacts

Sequence: 11921154 Sequence: 11921155
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Meghan Hiss, AuD Name William Riggs, AuD
Phone 614-366-1549 Phone 614-293-9750
Email Meghan.Hiss@osumc.edu Email William.Riggs@osumc.edu
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67621315
Design Group Id 55157763
Intervention Id 52058574

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30512115
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 70 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Have a diagnosis of a vestibular schwannoma confirmed by a physician with an MRI and/or CT scan; Or have a diagnosis of Meniere's disease by a physician
Be scheduled to undergo surgery to remove the vestibular schwannoma through translabyrinthine approach; Or be scheduled to undergo a labyrinthectomy
Be English-speaking due to objective speech perception tasks. Non-English speakers may show a reduced speech perception score due to language differences
For patients undergoing tumor removal, tumor removal must allow preservation of the auditory division of the VIIIth cranial nerve

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects with bilateral Meniere's disease or bilateral vestibular schwannomas
Inability to preserve the auditory division of the VIIIth cranial nerve during removal of vestibular schwannoma
Ossification or fibrosis of the cochlear found on preoperative imaging (CT or MRI) that precludes cochlear implantation
Active middle ear disease
Greater than 70 years of age
Vestibular schwannoma greater than 2 cm
Patient refusal of receiving pneumococcal vaccine
Any contra-indication(s) for undergoing surgery.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254061437
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 70
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 3
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30261184
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2561517
Document Type Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True
Has Icf False
Has Sap True
Document Date 2018-05-02
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/75/NCT03795675/Prot_SAP_000.pdf

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28641657
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Oliver Adunka
Title Professor-Clinical Otolaryngology
Affiliation Ohio State University

]]>

<![CDATA[ Surviving Pneumonia ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795662
2019-01-07

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795662
NCT03795662https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795662?tab=tableMaria Hegelund, MScmaria.hein.hegelund.01@regionh.dk+4548293250The study aims to explore risk factors for poor prognosis among patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). During a 5-year study period, all patients (aged ≥ 18 years) admitted with CAP at North Zealand Hospital will be invited for inclusion. Questionnaires, anthropometric measures, laboratory tests, and biomaterials will be collected at admission, daily during admission, at discharge and at follow-up. The main clinical outcomes of the study consist of deaths and development of diabetes.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-11-09
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-04-29
Start Month Year January 7, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2023
Verification Month Year April 2021
Verification Date 2021-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2021-04-29

Facilities

Sequence: 200053468
Status Recruiting
Name Department of Pulmonary and Infectious Diseases, Nordsjællands Hospital
City Hillerød
Zip 3400
Country Denmark

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28097584
Facility Id 200053468
Contact Type primary
Name Birgitte Lindegaard, MD, PhD
Email birgitte.lindegaard.madsen@regionh.dk

Conditions

Sequence: 52156586
Name Community-acquired Pneumonia
Downcase Name community-acquired pneumonia

Id Information

Sequence: 40148268
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value Surviving Pneumonia

Countries

Sequence: 42557803
Name Denmark
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55577990
Title Community-acquired pneumonia
Description Adults over 18 years old admitted with confirmed community-acquired pneumonia.

Interventions

Sequence: 52472090
Intervention Type Other
Name No intervention
Description Obervational

Keywords

Sequence: 79848207 Sequence: 79848208 Sequence: 79848209 Sequence: 79848210 Sequence: 79848211 Sequence: 79848212
Name Community-acquired pneumonia Name Diabetes Name Immune status Name Nutritional status Name Physical inactivity Name Risk factors
Downcase Name community-acquired pneumonia Downcase Name diabetes Downcase Name immune status Downcase Name nutritional status Downcase Name physical inactivity Downcase Name risk factors

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328376 Sequence: 177328377 Sequence: 177328378 Sequence: 177328379 Sequence: 177328380 Sequence: 177328381 Sequence: 177328382 Sequence: 177328383 Sequence: 177328384 Sequence: 177328385 Sequence: 177328386 Sequence: 177328387 Sequence: 177328388 Sequence: 177328389 Sequence: 177328390 Sequence: 177328391 Sequence: 177328392 Sequence: 177328393 Sequence: 177328394 Sequence: 177328395 Sequence: 177328396 Sequence: 177328397 Sequence: 177328398 Sequence: 177328399 Sequence: 177328400 Sequence: 177328401 Sequence: 177328402 Sequence: 177328403 Sequence: 177328404 Sequence: 177328405 Sequence: 177328406 Sequence: 177328407 Sequence: 177328408 Sequence: 177328409 Sequence: 177328410 Sequence: 177328411 Sequence: 177328412 Sequence: 177328413 Sequence: 177328414 Sequence: 177328415 Sequence: 177328416 Sequence: 177328417 Sequence: 177328418 Sequence: 177328419 Sequence: 177328420 Sequence: 177328421 Sequence: 177328422 Sequence: 177328423 Sequence: 177328424 Sequence: 177328425 Sequence: 177328426 Sequence: 177328427 Sequence: 177328428 Sequence: 177328429 Sequence: 177328430 Sequence: 177328431 Sequence: 177328432
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Number of death from any causes Measure Number of participants who develop diabetes Measure Length of hospital stay Measure Oral glucose tolerance test Measure Number of participants who are readmitted Measure Facal sample to assess changes in microbiome Measure Urine samples to assess metabolomics Measure Physical activity monitoring (measured by the AX3 accelerometers) Measure Self-reported physical activity by scoring of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) Measure Muscle strength (measured by hand grip test) Measure Muscle strength (measured by 30-sec chair stand test) Measure Functional capacity (measured by 6-minutes walking test) Measure Activities of daily living (measured by Barthel100) Measure BMI Measure Waist circumference (measured in cm) Measure Body composition analysis (measured by DEXA scans) Measure Body composition analysis (measured by bioimpedance) Measure Nutritional status (measured by NRS2002) Measure Concentration of p-phosphate (mmol/l), p-sodium (mmol/l), p-carbamide (mmol/l), p-potassium (mmol/l) Measure Concentration of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, Il-1ra, IL-18, IL-10, TNF-alpha) Measure Immune cell phenotyping to identify cell counts various T-cells, B-cells, NK-cells and monocytes Measure Concentration of blood lipids Measure Scoring of the Charlson Comorbidity Index to predict 10-year survival Measure Oral status (determined by revised oral assessment guide) Measure Dysphagia screening (eating assessment tool 10) Measure Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) Measure Glycemic control during oral glucose tolerance test Measure Glucagon concentration during oral glucose tolerance test Measure Insulin concentration during oral glucose tolerance test Measure C-peptide concentration during oral glucose tolerance test Measure GLP-1 concentration during oral glucose tolerance test Measure GLP-2 concentration during oral glucose tolerance test Measure GIP concentration during oral glucose tolerance test Measure Insulin sensitivity index (Matsuda) based on oral glucose tolerance test Measure Insulin secretion index based on oral glucose tolerance test Measure Concentration of galectin-3 (ng/ml), sST2 (ng/ml), and troponins (ng/ml) Measure Concentration of NT-proBNP (ng/l) Measure Z-value of left ventricle (LV) out of echocardiography Measure Z-value of right ventricle (RV) out of echocardiography Measure Z-value of left atrium (LA) out of echocardiography Measure Shortening fraction (SF) measured in echocardiography Measure Ejection fraction (EF) measured in echocardiography Measure Valvular insufficiency measured in echocardiography Measure Heart rate of 12-lead resting ECG Measure Rhythm during 12-lead resting ECG Measure Axis of the QRS complex out of the 12-lead resting ECG Measure Duration of PQ interval out of the 12-lead resting ECG Measure Duration of the QRS complex out of the 12-lead resting ECG Measure Number of cardiac events Measure Sputum samples to assess glucose and lactate concentration (measured by ABL) Measure Sputum samples to evaluate drug resistance and O2 content Measure Forced vital capacity (FVC) during spirometry Measure Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) during spirometry Measure FEV1% predicted during spirometry Measure Chest x-ray to image inflammation of the lungs Measure Early Warning Score (EWS) to identify patients at risk of deterioration in hospital Measure HbA1c to assess the average blood glucose levels 3 months before admission
Time Frame From date of admission until the day of death from any causes, up to 24 months Time Frame Up to 24 months Time Frame Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 5 days Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6-month Time Frame Up to 6 months Time Frame Day 1, 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Day 1, 1 month and 6 months Time Frame During admission (up to 7 days), 14 days from discharge (an average of 5 days) Time Frame Day 1 Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 months and 6 months Time Frame Day 1 and discharge (an average of 5 days) Time Frame Day 1 and discharge (an average of 5 days) Time Frame Discharge (an average of 5 days) Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Daily during admission, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Day 1 Time Frame Daily during admission, 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Daily during admission, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Day 1 and discharge (an average of 5 days) Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Day 1 Time Frame Day 1 Time Frame Day 1 Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Day 1, discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Daily during admission, 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Daily during admission, 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Discharge (an average of 5 days), 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Daily during admission (up to 5 days) Time Frame Daily during admission (up to 5 days) Time Frame Daily during admission (up to 5 days) Time Frame Daily during admission (up to 5 days) Time Frame Daily during admission (up to 5 days) Time Frame From date of admission up to 24 months Time Frame On admission, 1 month and 6 months Time Frame On admission, 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Discharge (an average of 5 days) Time Frame Discharge (an average of 5 days) Time Frame Discharge (an average of 5 days) Time Frame On admission, 1 month and 6 months Time Frame Daily during admission (up to 5 days) Time Frame Day 1
Description Assessed through patient files Description Assessed through patient files and the national registers Description Through patient files Description Through patient files Description Weight (kilograms) and height (cm) will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2 Description Blood sampling Description Flow cytometry on whole blood Description Blood sampling Description Scale ranges from 0 to 33 points to predict survival (%) Description Blood sampling Description Blood sampling Description Blood sampling Description Blood sampling Description Blood sampling Description Blood sampling Description Blood sampling Description Blood sampling Description Z-value LV Description Z-value RV Description Z-value LA Description SF (%) Description EF (%) Description Aorta valve regurgitation, pulmonary valve regurgitation, tricuspid valve regurgitation and mitral valve regurgitation (no, minimal, moderate, severe) Description bpm Description Sinus rhythm yes/no Description Degree Description ms Description ms Description Assessed through patient files and the national registers Description Litre Description Litre

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193432361 Sequence: 193432362 Sequence: 193432363 Sequence: 193432364 Sequence: 193432365
Mesh Term Pneumonia Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Infections Mesh Term Infections Mesh Term Lung Diseases Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term pneumonia Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract infections Downcase Mesh Term infections Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306173
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Nordsjaellands Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29277991
Role Principal Investigator
Name Birgitte Lindegaard, Assoc. Prof
Affiliation Nordsjaellands Hospital

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12004764 Sequence: 12004765
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Camilla Ryrsø, MSc Name Maria Hegelund, MSc
Phone +4548293250 Phone +4548293250
Email camilla.koch.ryrsoe.01@regionh.dk Email maria.hein.hegelund.01@regionh.dk
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130964
Design Group Id 55577990
Intervention Id 52472090

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757407
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Adults (≥18 years) admitted with community-acquired pneumonia
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Infiltrate on chest radiograph plus one or more of the following:

Fever (temperature, ≥38.0°C)
Hypothermia (<35.0°C),
New cough with or without sputum production
Pleuritic chest pain
Dyspnea
Altered breath sounds on auscultation.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients unable to give informed consent
Patients unwilling to give informed consent

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254229052
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 52

Designs

Sequence: 30503632
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869910
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Birgitte Lindegaard Madsen
Title Associated professor, MD, PhD
Affiliation Nordsjaellands Hospital

Study References

Sequence: 52049464
Pmid 36362554
Reference Type derived
Citation Ryrso CK, Hegelund MH, Dungu AM, Faurholt-Jepsen D, Pedersen BK, Ritz C, Krogh-Madsen R, Lindegaard B. Association between Barthel Index, Grip Strength, and Physical Activity Level at Admission and Prognosis in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 27;11(21):6326. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216326.

]]>

<![CDATA[ The Immunomodulatory Effect of Antrifibrinolytic (Tranexamic Acid) in Total Knee Arthroplasty ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795649
2018-12-18

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795649
NCT03795649https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795649?tab=tableRenata Letica-Brnadićrlbrnadic@gmail.com+38598340722The administration of the tranexamic acid (TRAXA), an antifibrinolytic, blocks primary fibrinolysis, and thus the haemorrhage, in the early postoperative period. Significant surgical operations, as well as trauma, initiate a similar dynamic homeostatic mechanism between the creation of a clot (primary and secondary haemostasis) and its dissolution (fibrinolysis). Antifibrinolytics have been proven effective in reducing haemorrhage in patients who have undergone significant surgical operations with normal fibrinolysis, with the use of an appropriate surgical technique.

A pharmacokinetic study has shown that peak fibrinolytic activity is present for 6 hours after the incision and it persists for 18 hours in total knee and hip arthroplasty. The administration of the tranexamic acid in optional orthopaedic surgery of total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty reduces the postoperative haemorrhage, as well as the number and volume of the postoperative autologous blood.

A trauma in the organism triggers the immunologic response. New term has been introduced – the post-traumatic immunosuppression (PTI), characterised by: a change on the immunologic cells (neutrophilia, monocytosis, increased number of mesenchymal stromal cells, reduced expression of HLA-DR on monocytes, reduced function of natural killer (NK) cells, increased lymphocyte apoptosis, a shift in homoeostasis towards the Th2 phenotype facilitated by Treg lymphocytes – CD4+CD25+CD127-); a change in production levels of various cytokines (anti-inflammatory cytokines): IL-10, IL-4; anti- and pro-inflammatory cytokine: IL-6; pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-2, TNF-α, IFN-γ); the activation of the complement system (C5a and C3a via factor VII – tissue factor system, activated by cell damage).

Post-traumatic immunosuppression can be made worse by transfusion, haemorrhage, stress, significant surgical operation and immunosuppressive drugs.

The research has shown that Treg lymphocytes CD4+CD25+CD127- have an important role in controlling the acquired and innate immunity (comprising 6-8% of all CD4+ lymphocytes).

Stopping haemorrhage prevents the occurrence of anaemia, as well as the need for transfusion of blood products, which lead to developing the post-traumatic immunosuppression (PTI).
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-30
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year December 18, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year December 2019
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735748
Description The administration of the tranexamic acid (TRAXA), an antifibrinolytic, blocks primary fibrinolysis, and thus the haemorrhage, in the early postoperative period. Significant surgical operations, as well as trauma, initiate a similar dynamic homeostatic mechanism between the creation of a clot (primary and secondary haemostasis) and its dissolution (fibrinolysis). Antifibrinolytics are initially used in patients with an accelerated fibrinolysis of different pathogeneses. However, they have been proven effective in reducing haemorrhage in patients who have undergone significant surgical operations with normal fibrinolysis, with the use of an appropriate surgical technique.

A pharmacokinetic study has shown that peak fibrinolytic activity is present for 6 hours after the incision and it persists for 18 hours in total knee and hip arthroplasty. The administration of the tranexamic acid in optional orthopaedic surgery of total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty reduces the postoperative haemorrhage, as well as the number and volume of the postoperative autologous blood.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial CRAS-2 has validated that the early post-traumatic administration of the tranexamic acid, within 8 hours after the injury, in adult patients with traumas or in patients with the risk of significant haemorrhage, reduces the fatality rate.

The tranexamic acid is a synthetic derivative of lysine, an amino acid which blocks lysine binding sites of the plasminogen molecule which are essential for its biding to fibrin. This mechanism inhibits the plasminogen activation via a plasminogen activator which also binds to fibrin. Thus, it prevents the conversion of plasminogen into plasmin, which is essential for fibrin dissolution, the integral element of a stable clot. The second important antifibrinolytic effect is blocking the lysine binding sites on the free plasmin molecule which has already been formed through the conversion from the plasminogen. This inhibits its binding to fibrin, and the TRAXA-plasmin complex is rapidly inactivated with the α-2-antiplasmin and α-2-macroglobulin. Biological half-life is approximately 2-3 hours.

A trauma in the organism triggers the immunologic response. The initial immunologic reaction occurs at the location of the injury, and it is called an inflammation. The inflammatory response is characterized by a complex interaction of macrophages (a type of leukocytes which develop from monocytes and are a part of the mononuclear phagocyte system, the main task of which are phagocytosis, i.e. the clearance of foreign materiel from the organism, performing the immunologic function – the defence against foreign materiel – antigens, and the regulation of the inflammation via interleukins which they secrete – IL1, IL-2,TNF) and dendritic cells (antigen-presenting cells), the consequence of which is the release of cytokines (interleukins – glycoproteins which regulate interactions among cells) and chemokine (small proteins from the cytokine group – able to induce chemotaxis, cell migration), and the activation of the neutrophils, monocytes and mesenchymal stem cells (cells not containing any information, located in the adipose tissue, cartilage and muscle tissue).

If the initial inflammatory response at the location of the injury is strong enough, it will develop into a systemic inflammatory response, called systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), which implies an inflammatory response of the entire body without a proven source of infection. The criteria for the diagnosis of the SIRS are: heart rate higher than 90 bpm; body temperature lower than 36°C or higher than 38°C; tachypnoea, respiratory rate higher than 20 breaths per minute or the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the blood lower than 4.3 kPa (32 mm Hg); the number of white blood cells, leukocytes, lower than 4.000 cells in 1 mm³ or higher than 12.000 cells in 1 mm³; or the presence of more than 10% of immature neutrophils. A destructive immunologic inflammatory cascade can prevent or delay healing.

At the same time the compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome (CARS) is initiated, which includes the immunologic response with the aim of re-establishing the immunologic homeostasis. It is characterized by: a reduced cytokine response of monocytes to the stimulation; a reduced number of antigen-presenting receptors (human leukocyte antigens or HLA) on monocytes; an increased level of IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine; lymphocyte apoptosis (T-cells); lymphocyte dysfunction, i.e. reduced proliferation; reduced Th1 proinflammatory cytokine production (a shift in homoeostasis towards the Th2 phenotype facilitated by the regulatory T lymphocytes). It clinically manifests as skin allergy, hypothermia and leukopenia. Additional criteria include elevated levels of C-reactive proteins, lactates and hyperglycaemia. If the immunosuppressive response persists, it may increase the possibility of an infection occurring, and the inability to defend against the infection, which may result in the development of sepsis, multiple organ failure and death.

Due to the wide clinical and laboratory criteria which both the SIRS and CARS terms include, they are not the best terms for describing the immunologic response to a trauma, and a new term has been introduced – the post-traumatic immunosuppression (PTI), characterised by: a change on the immunologic cells (neutrophilia, monocytosis, increased number of mesenchymal stromal cells, reduced expression of HLA-DR on monocytes, reduced function of natural killer (NK) cells, increased lymphocyte apoptosis, a shift in homoeostasis towards the Th2 phenotype facilitated by Treg lymphocytes – CD4+CD25+CD127-); a change in production levels of various cytokines (anti-inflammatory cytokines): IL-10, IL-4; anti- and pro-inflammatory cytokine: IL-6; pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-2, TNF-α, IFN-γ); the activation of the complement system (C5a and C3a via factor VII – tissue factor system, activated by cell damage).

Post-traumatic immunosuppression can be made worse by transfusion, haemorrhage, stress, significant surgical operation and immunosuppressive drugs.

The research has shown that Treg lymphocytes CD4+CD25+CD127- have an important role in controlling the acquired and innate immunity (comprising 6-8% of all CD4+ lymphocytes).

The normal function of Treg lymphocytes is the suppression of the T-cell response against its own antigens.

Stopping haemorrhage prevents the occurrence of anaemia, as well as the need for transfusion of blood products, which lead to developing the post-traumatic immunosuppression (PTI).

Monitoring the immunologic status of patients with the understanding of the PTI mechanism can enable timely and individual modulation of the immunologic status with pre-planned procedures (preventing haemorrhage, anaemia, avoiding transfusion) and/or immunotherapy (drugs and nutrients), and thereby prevent the occurrence of complications, such as infections. Infections may result in sepsis and multiple-organ failure, and eventually be lethal for the patient.

The research has proved that Treg lymphocytes CD4+CD25+CD127- have an important role in controlling the acquired and innate immunity (comprising 6-8% of all CD4+ lymphocytes).

The normal function of Treg lymphocytes is the suppression of the T-cell response against its own antigens.

There are two main types of regulatory lymphocytes: natural Treg, which are mostly developed in the thymus, and inducible Treg, which arise in the periphery after being exposed to cytokines, antigen-presenting cells or immunosuppressive drugs. It may be difficult to differentiate these two lymphocyte Treg populations in vivo. Nevertheless, it is known that different stages of the infection require different regulations. Acute infection, tissue damage, inflammation caused by the innate immunologic response is limited, i.e. locally controlled via natural Treg lymphocytes. This mechanism triggers the activation of inducible Treg lymphocytes.

For the first time, in 1995, it was described that the suppression of CD4+ T-lymphocytes is caused by a low T-cell population with the CD4+ CD25+ expression. Natural Treg lymphocytes, apart from belonging to CD4+ T-cell population, have a CD25+ receptor, an α-receptor chain for IL-2, and a receptor for the cytotoxic T-lymphocytic antigen 4 (CTLA 4), the tumour necrosis factor receptor (TNF), but it differs from the activated T-cells by the expression of the transcription factor FoxP3 (transcription factor encoded with the FoxP3 gene). The expression of CD 127lo, an α-chain receptor for the interleukin 7 enables us to differentiate Treg lymphocytes from the activated T-lymphocytes via flow cytometry. The number of CD25+CD127lo cells correlates to the number of CD25+FoxP3+ cells in the peripheral blood.

Different studies show that the application of the 3-colour flow cytometry shows small variation in the percentage of Treg lymphocytes in the peripheral blood from 6.35% to 8.34%.

There is a number of different mechanisms which achieve regulation by using the Treg lymphocytes: the long-term interaction with dendritic cells (DC), thereby modulating the function of antigen-presenting cells (APC), the production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine, IL-10 and the CTLA4 expression on Treg cells which induces the enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) in APC which degrade the amino acid tryptophan, the lack of which inhibits the activation of T-cells and induces T-cell apoptosis. Treg lymphocytes also induce the apoptosis of monocytes and affect the lower expression of HLA-DR on monocytes whereby they directly affect the innate immunological response.

Elevated, suppressive activity of Treg cells in traumas prevents the protective Th1 response for up to 7 days in comparison with the healthy population.

Facilities

Sequence: 200244138
Status Recruiting
Name Klinički Bolnički Centar Sestre Milosrdnice
City Zagreb
Zip 10000
Country Croatia

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28127956
Facility Id 200244138
Contact Type primary
Name Renata Letica-Brnadić
Email rlbrnadic@gmail.com
Phone +38598340722

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96112987 Sequence: 96112988 Sequence: 96112989 Sequence: 96112990 Sequence: 96112991 Sequence: 96112992
Mesh Term Tranexamic Acid Mesh Term Antifibrinolytic Agents Mesh Term Fibrin Modulating Agents Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Hemostatics Mesh Term Coagulants
Downcase Mesh Term tranexamic acid Downcase Mesh Term antifibrinolytic agents Downcase Mesh Term fibrin modulating agents Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term hemostatics Downcase Mesh Term coagulants
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52208043
Name Hemorrhage
Downcase Name hemorrhage

Id Information

Sequence: 40186103
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value EP-12939/18-1

Countries

Sequence: 42599599
Name Croatia
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55634590 Sequence: 55634591 Sequence: 55634592 Sequence: 55634593
Group Type No Intervention Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Other Group Type Other
Title The control group (Group K) Title Group A, Tranexamic acid Title Group B, autologous transfusion Title Group C, alogenous transfusion
Description The control group (Group K) is comprised of surgical patients who will not receive blood transfusion, and who have contraindications for Tranexamic Acid. Description The treatment group (Group A) is comprised of the patients who will receive Tranexamic acid 1g intravenous 15 min. before releasing the pneumatic tourniquet and the repeating dose 3 hours later Description The treatment group (Group B) will be comprised of the patients who in the second selection have one or more contraindications for Tranexamic Acid administration and transfusion of autologous blood will be performed. Description The treatment group (Group C) contraindications for Tranexamic Acid administration and the transfusion of alogenous blood will be performed in the case of acute haemorrhage followed by patient's hemodynamic instability.

Interventions

Sequence: 52522015
Intervention Type Drug
Name Tranexamic Acid
Description Imunomodulatory effect

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177511000 Sequence: 177511001
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure The immunomodulation effect of Tranexamic Acid (IM) Measure The effect of the Tranexamic Acid on the primary fibrinolysis (F)
Time Frame two years Time Frame two years
Description Trial will include approximately 100 patients in total, which will be divided into four groups of 25 patients. The immunomodulation effect is monitored through the analysis of the lymphocyte subpopulation in the peripheral blood through flow cytometry.

The result of each lymphocyte subpopulation will be registered as a percentage of all helper cells (CD4+) and all lymphocytes, as well as their absolute number in the peripheral blood.

These parameters will be monitored dynamically in the chronological order as shown below:

Day 1 – Preoperatively; Day 1 – Postoperatively T1 (IM) K – 6 hrs postoperatively T1 (IM) A – 6 hrs after the first TRAXA dose, and two hours before LMWH T1 (IM) B – 6 hrs postoperatively (after the transfusion of the autologous blood by means of the autotransfusion system); Day 3 – Postoperatively; Day 5 – Postoperatively; Day 7 – Postoperatively; For immunologic testing of each patient's blood 25 ml (5 ml x 5) during 7 days will be sampled.

Description The fibrinolytic activity of plasma will be examined through euglobulin lysis time testing Blood sampling follows the same time intervals of blood sampling for determining Treg lymphocytes. Fibrinolysis is monitored until the third postoperative day.

In total per patient for analysis of the fibrinolytic activity 15 mL (5 mL x 3) of blood will be sampled during a 3-day period.

Day 1 – Preoperatively; Day 3 – Postoperatively T1 (F) K – 6 hrs postoperatively T1 (F) A – 6 hrs after the first TRAXA dose, and two hours before LMWH T1 (F) B – 6 hrs postoperatively (after the transfusion of the autologous blood by means of the autotransfusion system); Day 3 – Postoperatively;

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193626796 Sequence: 193626797
Mesh Term Hemorrhage Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term hemorrhage Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48353632 Sequence: 48353633
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Sisters of Mercy University Hospital Name Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29305950
Role Study Chair
Name Renata Letica-Brnadić
Affiliation Clinical Hospital Centre "Sisters of Mercy"

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12017196
Contact Type primary
Name Renata Letica-Brnadić
Phone +38598340722
Email rlbrnadic@gmail.com
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199113 Sequence: 68199114 Sequence: 68199115
Design Group Id 55634591 Design Group Id 55634592 Design Group Id 55634593
Intervention Id 52522015 Intervention Id 52522015 Intervention Id 52522015

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30786834
Gender All
Minimum Age 30 Years
Maximum Age 80 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

ASA I/II status
scheduled for endoprosthetic total knee arthroplasty.
laboratory results suitable for elective endoprosthetic surgery: blood panel, coagulation, liver enzymes, kidney function parameters, urine sediment;
patient voluntarily, in accordance with the KBCSM form on the administration of Tranexamic Acid in endoprosthetic total knee arthroplasty, give their consent for its administration.
signed informed consent for transfusion

Exclusion criteria:

general anaesthesia
revision arthroplasty
previous blood transfusions
known allergic reaction to TRAXA
presence of an infection and/or acutization of a chronic disease
existing malignant disease
autoimmune disease
hematologic disease
diabetes
renal failure
liver cirrhosis
chronic anticoagulant therapy
analgesia by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
combined use of the autologous and allogeneic blood postoperatively when the recovery of the autologous blood is insufficient in relation to the haemorrhage.

Exclusion Criteria refers to the patients for whom Tranexamic Acid was contraindicated: —-thromboembolic events (IM, CVI, DVT)

known risk of thrombosis or thromboembolic events (thrombogenic valve disease, thrombogenic rhythm disorder, coagulation-hypercoagulation disorder)
epilepsy
patients who use oral contraceptives
known retinal arterial or venous occlusions.

To patients who fulfil the participation criteria for the trial in the first selection, and for whom TRAXA is contraindicated in the second selection, blood transfusion will be administered in accordance with the indication.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989556
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 30
Maximum Age Num 80
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30532904
Allocation Non-Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26692016
Intervention Id 52522015
Name Medsamic

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899198
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Renata Letica-Brnadić
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation Sisters of Mercy University Hospital

Study References

Sequence: 52102984 Sequence: 52102985 Sequence: 52102986 Sequence: 52102987 Sequence: 52102988 Sequence: 52102989 Sequence: 52102990 Sequence: 52102991 Sequence: 52102992 Sequence: 52102993 Sequence: 52102994 Sequence: 52102995 Sequence: 52102996 Sequence: 52102997 Sequence: 52102998 Sequence: 52102999 Sequence: 52103000 Sequence: 52103001 Sequence: 52103002
Pmid 17943760 Pmid 3321402 Pmid 23477634 Pmid 23614539 Pmid 24405302 Pmid 11403834 Pmid 27195120 Pmid 1303622 Pmid 8849154 Pmid 18954697 Pmid 29930824 Pmid 16818676 Pmid 18946659 Pmid 17913974 Pmid 17948021 Pmid 16903906 Pmid 17173927 Pmid 25270110 Pmid 23195143
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type result
Citation Henry DA, Carless PA, Moxey AJ, O'Connell D, Stokes BJ, McClelland B, Laupacis A, Fergusson D. Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD001886. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001886.pub2. Citation Astedt B. Clinical pharmacology of tranexamic acid. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1987;137:22-5. Citation Roberts I, Shakur H, Coats T, Hunt B, Balogun E, Barnetson L, Cook L, Kawahara T, Perel P, Prieto-Merino D, Ramos M, Cairns J, Guerriero C. The CRASH-2 trial: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of the effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events and transfusion requirement in bleeding trauma patients. Health Technol Assess. 2013 Mar;17(10):1-79. doi: 10.3310/hta17100. Citation Oremus K, Sostaric S, Trkulja V, Haspl M. Influence of tranexamic acid on postoperative autologous blood retransfusion in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Transfusion. 2014 Jan;54(1):31-41. doi: 10.1111/trf.12224. Epub 2013 Apr 25. Citation Raveendran R, Wong J. Tranexamic acid: more evidence for its use in joint replacement surgery. Transfusion. 2014 Jan;54(1):2-3. doi: 10.1111/trf.12494. No abstract available. Citation Parkin J, Cohen B. An overview of the immune system. Lancet. 2001 Jun 2;357(9270):1777-89. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04904-7. Citation Islam MN, Bradley BA, Ceredig R. Sterile post-traumatic immunosuppression. Clin Transl Immunology. 2016 Apr 29;5(4):e77. doi: 10.1038/cti.2016.13. eCollection 2016 Apr. Citation Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM, Sibbald WJ. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992 Jun;101(6):1644-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644. Citation Bone RC. Immunologic dissonance: a continuing evolution in our understanding of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Ann Intern Med. 1996 Oct 15;125(8):680-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-8-199610150-00009. Citation Ward NS, Casserly B, Ayala A. The compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome (CARS) in critically ill patients. Clin Chest Med. 2008 Dec;29(4):617-25, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2008.06.010. Citation Osuka A, Ogura H, Ueyama M, Shimazu T, Lederer JA. Immune response to traumatic injury: harmony and discordance of immune system homeostasis. Acute Med Surg. 2014 Jan 28;1(2):63-69. doi: 10.1002/ams2.17. eCollection 2014 Apr. Citation Seddiki N, Santner-Nanan B, Martinson J, Zaunders J, Sasson S, Landay A, Solomon M, Selby W, Alexander SI, Nanan R, Kelleher A, Fazekas de St Groth B. Expression of interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-7 receptors discriminates between human regulatory and activated T cells. J Exp Med. 2006 Jul 10;203(7):1693-700. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060468. Epub 2006 Jul 3. Citation Venet F, Chung CS, Kherouf H, Geeraert A, Malcus C, Poitevin F, Bohe J, Lepape A, Ayala A, Monneret G. Increased circulating regulatory T cells (CD4(+)CD25 (+)CD127 (-)) contribute to lymphocyte anergy in septic shock patients. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Apr;35(4):678-86. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1337-8. Epub 2008 Oct 23. Citation Venet F, Chung CS, Monneret G, Huang X, Horner B, Garber M, Ayala A. Regulatory T cell populations in sepsis and trauma. J Leukoc Biol. 2008 Mar;83(3):523-35. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0607371. Epub 2007 Oct 3. Citation Belkaid Y. Regulatory T cells and infection: a dangerous necessity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007 Nov;7(11):875-88. doi: 10.1038/nri2189. Citation Shevach EM, DiPaolo RA, Andersson J, Zhao DM, Stephens GL, Thornton AM. The lifestyle of naturally occurring CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Immunol Rev. 2006 Aug;212:60-73. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00415.x. Citation Hartigan-O'Connor DJ, Poon C, Sinclair E, McCune JM. Human CD4+ regulatory T cells express lower levels of the IL-7 receptor alpha chain (CD127), allowing consistent identification and sorting of live cells. J Immunol Methods. 2007 Jan 30;319(1-2):41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2006.10.008. Epub 2006 Nov 3. Citation Fragkou PC, Torrance HD, Pearse RM, Ackland GL, Prowle JR, Owen HC, Hinds CJ, O'Dwyer MJ. Perioperative blood transfusion is associated with a gene transcription profile characteristic of immunosuppression: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2014 Oct 1;18(5):541. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0541-x. Citation Blanie A, Bellamy L, Rhayem Y, Flaujac C, Samama CM, Fontenay M, Rosencher N. Duration of postoperative fibrinolysis after total hip or knee replacement: a laboratory follow-up study. Thromb Res. 2013 Jan;131(1):e6-e11. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.11.006. Epub 2012 Nov 26.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Allium Sativum Extract as an Irrigant ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795636
2016-10-30

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795636
NCT03795636https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795636?tab=tableNANANAGarlic extract as herbal compound has potent antibacterial properties and can be used safely as an irrigant for pulpectomy procedure of primary molars root canals with high clinical and radiographic outcomes
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2019-10-25
Start Month Year October 30, 2016
Primary Completion Month Year August 13, 2018
Verification Month Year October 2019
Verification Date 2019-10-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-10-25

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20721570
Description Aim: This study indented to assess the clinical and radiographic assessment of garlic extract as an intracanal irrigant for pulpectomy of primary molars.

Methodology: 91 child with 100 teeth submitted into this study were equally categorized into the test group (group 1) which irrigated with garlic extract and control group (group 2) that received sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Then, each group has been subjected to further specification according to the tooth preoperative clinical and radiographic features into has been into 2 subgroups. Clinical and radiographic success rates were checked at 3, 6 and 12 months. Fisher's exact test for binary variable was used for data analysis with p-value ≤ 0.05.

Conditions

Sequence: 52171078
Name Infected Root Canals of Primary Molars
Downcase Name infected root canals of primary molars

Id Information

Sequence: 40158522
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 307

Design Groups

Sequence: 55593015 Sequence: 55593016
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Garlic extracts root canal irrigation group Title Sodium hypochlorite root canal irrigation group
Description Experimental group treated with garlic extract

A 100 gram of garlic cloves has been cleaned, peeled and dried. Ethanol of 70% concentration was added for 60 seconds. The cloves were placed in a laminar airflow chamber for evaporation of residual ethanol. Using a sterile mortar and pestle, cloves were homogenized aseptically and filtered through a double layer paper. The fully concentrated extracted was diluted to the concentration of 25% with distilled water

Description Control group which treated conventionally using .5 ml of 5.25% NaOCl (COLTENE®ENDO, Switzerland)

Interventions

Sequence: 52485325 Sequence: 52485326
Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other
Name Garlic extract Name NaOCl (COLTENE®)
Description A 100 gram of garlic cloves has been cleaned, peeled and dried. Ethanol of 70% concentration was added for 60 seconds. The cloves were placed in a laminar airflow chamber for evaporation of residual ethanol. Using a sterile mortar and pestle, cloves were homogenized aseptically and filtered through a double layer paper. The fully concentrated extracted was diluted to the concentration of 25% with distilled water Description Sodium hypochlorite

Keywords

Sequence: 79868265 Sequence: 79868266 Sequence: 79868267 Sequence: 79868268
Name Primary molars Name Garlic extract Name Sodium hypochlorite Name Pulpectomy
Downcase Name primary molars Downcase Name garlic extract Downcase Name sodium hypochlorite Downcase Name pulpectomy

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177378222 Sequence: 177378223 Sequence: 177378224
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure oral examination Measure radiographic success or failure Measure Types of failures
Time Frame 12 months Time Frame 12 months Time Frame 12 months
Description Pain assessment using Visual Analog Score for pain Description Radiographic assessment using periapical radiograph and score (0) applied for absence of radiolucency and score (1) for presence of radiolucency Description detecting the percent of different failure types accompanied with pulpectomy procedures after using garlic as an irrigant solution.

Sponsors

Sequence: 48319138
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Minia University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68148949 Sequence: 68148950
Design Group Id 55593015 Design Group Id 55593016
Intervention Id 52485325 Intervention Id 52485326

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30765258
Gender All
Minimum Age 4 Years
Maximum Age 6 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Class I or II according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)
Irreversible pulpititis recognised through; (1) profuse bleeding from root canal orifices after complete debridement of coronal pulp tissue and cannot be dominated by moist cotton pellet. (2) History of lingered thermal pain spontaneous nocturnal pain
Necrotic pulp tissues which may be asymptomatic or manifested with dull ache pain
Pathological tooth mobility
Percussion sensitivity
Swelling close to involved tooth accompanied with or without fistula Radiographic characteristics of the root and supporting structures

1. Normal radiographic findings

2. Interruption of lamina dura

3. Furcation radiolucency

Exclusion Criteria:

Specifications of exclusion

Uncooperativeness of child and/or parents or caregivers behavior
Unrestorable tooth
Presence of internal root resorption
Presence of calcific metamorphosis inside root canals
Presence of root resorption exceeding one third of its length

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253876643
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 21
Were Results Reported False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 4
Maximum Age Num 6
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30511425
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Double
Subject Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Pending Results

Sequence: 1500674 Sequence: 1500675
Event Release Event Reset
Event Date Description February 11, 2020 Event Date Description February 26, 2020
Event Date 2020-02-11 Event Date 2020-02-26

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28877719
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Ahmad Elheeny
Title Lecturer of pediatric dentistry
Affiliation Minia University

Study References

Sequence: 52063126
Pmid 31452953
Reference Type derived
Citation Elheeny AAH. Allium sativum extract as an irrigant in pulpectomy of primary molars: A 12-month short-term evaluation. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019 Jun 26;5(4):420-426. doi: 10.1002/cre2.197. eCollection 2019 Aug.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Voices of Patients’ Relatives to Support Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795623
2019-02-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795623
NCT03795623https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795623?tab=tableNANANAPatients with severe brain injuries, such as ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage, frequently require mechanical ventilation. Weaning of stroke patients is complicated by impaired consciousness and respiratory drive. Higher rates of weaning failure and delayed extubation (≥ 48h) lead to ventilator associated pneumonia, higher mortality and necessity of tracheostomy.

Therefore, improving the weaning of stroke patients from mechanical ventilation is warranted to prevent ventilator-associated complications and eventually improve clinical outcomes.

This single-center, randomized, clinical trial aims at demonstrating that voices of patients’ relatives support weaning from mechanical ventilation and reduce weaning failure in brain-injured patients.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-31
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-02
Start Month Year February 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 31, 2021
Verification Month Year January 2023
Verification Date 2023-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-02

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20551406
Description Methods: Adult ICU-patients with controlled mechanical ventilation ≥48h due to a neurological disease will be included in the intensive care unit. A predefined text – including information on the patient's condition and recurrent request to breath in and out – will be recorded as an audio file by one of the patient's relatives. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the conventional treatment arm or the Voice-Weaning arm. In the conventional arm, audio recordings will be muted by an independent person resulting in a mute recording without audio signals.

When conversion from controlled to assisted mechanical ventilation is intended according to standard treatment, audio recordings will be administered in repeat mode for 10 minutes and performed three times per day. If spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) are intended according to standard treatment, the audio recordings will be played during the SBT three times per day.

Criteria for weaning not to be intended – according to Boles et al. (Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J. 2007) and adapted to neurological patients:

Objective measurements:

Unstable clinical condition

Cardiovascular status (fC≥140/min, systolic BP <90mmHg or >180mmHg, more than minimal vasopressors)
Metabolic status (e.g. inacceptable electrolytes)

Inadequate oxygenation

SaO2 ≤90% on FiO2 >40% or pO2/FiO2 <150mmHg or pO2/FiO2 <120mmHg in case of chronic hypoxemia (Horowitz index)
PEEP>8cmH2O

Inadequate pulmonary function

fR ≥35/min
MIP>(-20 -) -25cmH2O
VT ≤5ml/kgKG
VC ≤10ml/kgKG
fR/VT ≥105 breaths/min x l (RSBI)
significant respiratory acidosis (pH≤7.25)

Unstable neurological condition

sedation or inadequate mentation on sedation
present or anticipated intracranial mass effect (e.g. midline shift >10mm or progression, basal cistern effacement or oculomotor disturbance, signs of transfalxial/transtentorial/transforaminal herniation
elevation of intracranial pressure (>20 cmH2O) and/or obstructive hydrocephalus
severe vasospasms (>6 kHz in transcranial Doppler, or determined by CT-A/CT-P)
status epilepticus (determined by EEG)
acute intracranial infection (without established and/or treated origin)

Clinical assessment:

Inadequate cough
Excessive tracheobronchial secretion
Disease acute phase for which the patient was intubated

Ethics Approval: The Institutional Review Board of the Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg approved of the study on 13 November 2018.

Sample Size Calculation: The sample size is computed with 80% power and a 5% α-risk for the hypothesis of Voice Weaning achieving a 15% absolute weaning failure reduction. The sample size is increased by 10% to correct for dropouts and lost to follow up: a maximum of 354 patients will be included and an interim analysis be performed after inclusion of 50% of the calculated subjects.

Facilities

Sequence: 198429036
Name University of Giessen
City Gießen
Country Germany

Conditions

Sequence: 51734127 Sequence: 51734128 Sequence: 51734129
Name Ventilator Weaning Name Weaning Failure Name Brain Injuries
Downcase Name ventilator weaning Downcase Name weaning failure Downcase Name brain injuries

Id Information

Sequence: 39810772
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 417_18 B

Countries

Sequence: 42209988
Name Germany
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55154575 Sequence: 55154576
Group Type Sham Comparator Group Type Experimental
Title Conventional arm Title Voice-Weaning arm
Description Muted audio recordings of the patients relatives. Description Audio recordings of the patients relatives including information on the patient's condition and recurrent request to breath in and out.

Interventions

Sequence: 52055742 Sequence: 52055743
Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other
Name Voice-Weaning Name Sham control
Description Audio recordings of patients' relatives for 10 minutes x 3 daily from initiation of assisted mechanical ventilation to extubation or ICU discharge. Description Muted audio recordings of patients' relatives for 10 minutes x 3 daily from initiation of assisted mechanical ventilation to extubation or ICU discharge.

Keywords

Sequence: 79154846 Sequence: 79154847 Sequence: 79154848
Name Critical Illness Name Respiration Disorder Name Neurology
Downcase Name critical illness Downcase Name respiration disorder Downcase Name neurology

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 175959860 Sequence: 175959861 Sequence: 175959862 Sequence: 175959863 Sequence: 175959864
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Rate of weaning failure Measure Time of controlled ventilation Measure Rate of tracheotomy Measure All cause mortality rate at 90 days Measure Rate of ICU delirium
Time Frame first 28 days after start of ventilation, or until 48 hours after extubation, or discharge from intensive care, whichever came first Time Frame first 28 days after start of ventilation or discharge from intensive care, whichever came first Time Frame first 28 days after start of ventilation or discharge from intensive care, whichever came first Time Frame first 90 days after start of ventilation Time Frame first 28 days after start of ventilation or discharge from intensive care, whichever came first
Description Reintubation and/or resumption of ventilatory support following extubation or death following extubation or failed spontaneous breathing trial Description Proportion of patients requiring tracheotomy performed as percutaneous dilatative tracheotomy or surgical tracheotomy Description Development of delirium according to the Confusion Assessment Method for intensive care unit (CAM-ICU)

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 191727693 Sequence: 191727694 Sequence: 191727695 Sequence: 191727696 Sequence: 191727697 Sequence: 191727698 Sequence: 191727699
Mesh Term Brain Injuries Mesh Term Brain Diseases Mesh Term Central Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Nervous System Diseases Mesh Term Craniocerebral Trauma Mesh Term Trauma, Nervous System Mesh Term Wounds and Injuries
Downcase Mesh Term brain injuries Downcase Mesh Term brain diseases Downcase Mesh Term central nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term nervous system diseases Downcase Mesh Term craniocerebral trauma Downcase Mesh Term trauma, nervous system Downcase Mesh Term wounds and injuries
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 47913313
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29030699 Sequence: 29030700 Sequence: 29030701
Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Hagen B. Huttner, MD, PhD Name Joji B. Kuramatsu, MD Name Maximilian I. Sprügel, MD
Affiliation University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School, Department of Neurology, Germany Affiliation University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School, Department of Neurology, Germany Affiliation University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School, Department of Neurology, Germany

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67617438 Sequence: 67617439
Design Group Id 55154576 Design Group Id 55154575
Intervention Id 52055742 Intervention Id 52055743

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30510448
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Intubation and controlled mechanical ventilation ≥48h due to a neurological disease
Weaning from mechanical ventilation intended by the attending physician
Obtained informed consent from the legal representative

Exclusion Criteria:

Age < 18 years
History of psychiatric disease
Weaning from mechanical ventilation not intended or decision to limit therapeutic interventions

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254052421
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 24
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 4

Designs

Sequence: 30259521
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Triple
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28640017
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Hagen B. Huttner
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School

]]>

<![CDATA[ Window of Opportunity Study of IPI-549 in Patients With Locally Advanced HPV+ and HPV- Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795610
2020-03-06

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795610
NCT03795610https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795610?tab=tableElaine Enge1eng@ucsd.eduNAThe purpose of this study is to investigate how effective the study drug IPI-549 is against types of cancers. IPI-549 is considered experimental because it is not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of cancer.

Patients will be treated with 2 weeks of IPI-549, a specific PI3Kγ inhibitor. Tumor tissue for research purposes through core biopsies will be obtained prior to initiation of IPI-549 and at surgery.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-21
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2023-03-10
Start Month Year March 6, 2020
Primary Completion Month Year June 2023
Verification Month Year March 2023
Verification Date 2023-03-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-03-10

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20723420
Description This is a phase 2 window of opportunity trial in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. A key objective is to provide the first proof that macrophage phenotype switching can be accomplished in humans and lay the groundwork for future trials of this novel approach to immune therapy. Patients who are candidates for surgical resection will be enrolled and treated with 2 weeks of IPI-549, a specific PI3Kγ inhibitor. Tumor tissue for research purposes through core biopsies will be obtained prior to initiation of IPI-549 and at surgery.

The study team hypothesizes that mRNA signatures of immune response will be increased in IPI-549-treated patients. For the efficacy endpoints, RECISTv1.1 will be used.

Facilities

Sequence: 200123964
Status Recruiting
Name UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
City La Jolla
State California
Zip 92093
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52175912 Sequence: 52175913 Sequence: 52175914 Sequence: 52175915 Sequence: 52175916 Sequence: 52175917 Sequence: 52175918 Sequence: 52175919
Name Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Name Head and Neck Cancer Name Head and Neck Carcinoma Name Head and Neck Cancer Stage IV Name Head and Neck Cancer Stage III Name HPV-Related Carcinoma Name HPV-Related Malignancy Name HPV-Related Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Downcase Name head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Downcase Name head and neck cancer Downcase Name head and neck carcinoma Downcase Name head and neck cancer stage iv Downcase Name head and neck cancer stage iii Downcase Name hpv-related carcinoma Downcase Name hpv-related malignancy Downcase Name hpv-related squamous cell carcinoma

Id Information

Sequence: 40161848
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 172058

Countries

Sequence: 42572550
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55598338
Group Type Experimental
Title Arm A: IPI-549 40 mg PO qdaily
Description Patients enrolled in Arm A will receive IPI-549 40 mg by mouth daily for at least 14 days

Interventions

Sequence: 52490003
Intervention Type Drug
Name IPI-549
Description 40mg by mouth (PO) every day (QD) for at least 14 days

Keywords

Sequence: 79874588 Sequence: 79874589 Sequence: 79874590 Sequence: 79874591 Sequence: 79874592 Sequence: 79874593 Sequence: 79874594 Sequence: 79874595 Sequence: 79874596 Sequence: 79874597 Sequence: 79874598 Sequence: 79874599 Sequence: 79874600 Sequence: 79874601 Sequence: 79874602 Sequence: 79874603 Sequence: 79874604 Sequence: 79874605 Sequence: 79874606
Name HPV positive Name HPV negative Name HPV- Name HPV+ Name PI3K-γ Name microenvironment Name immunotherapy Name tumor Name resection Name PI3K Name cancer Name carcinoma Name malignancy Name head Name neck Name throat Name esophageal Name nasopharyngeal Name nasopharynx
Downcase Name hpv positive Downcase Name hpv negative Downcase Name hpv- Downcase Name hpv+ Downcase Name pi3k-γ Downcase Name microenvironment Downcase Name immunotherapy Downcase Name tumor Downcase Name resection Downcase Name pi3k Downcase Name cancer Downcase Name carcinoma Downcase Name malignancy Downcase Name head Downcase Name neck Downcase Name throat Downcase Name esophageal Downcase Name nasopharyngeal Downcase Name nasopharynx

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177397508 Sequence: 177397509 Sequence: 177397510 Sequence: 177397511
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure PI3K-y changes Measure Changes of Myeloid composition Measure changes in T cell composition Measure Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Time Frame 2 years Time Frame 2 years Time Frame 2 years Time Frame 2 years
Description To detect IPI-549-induced changes in PI3Kγ-regulated signatures of immune suppression. Description Compare pre- vs. post-treatment tumor tissue Description T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing at baseline, surgery, end of treatment or at time of disease progression. Description To determine safety and tolerability of IPI-549 and change in tumor size in patients with locally advanced HNSCC

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193504504 Sequence: 193504505 Sequence: 193504506 Sequence: 193504507 Sequence: 193504508 Sequence: 193504509 Sequence: 193504510 Sequence: 193504511 Sequence: 193504512
Mesh Term Carcinoma Mesh Term Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Head and Neck Neoplasms Mesh Term Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck Mesh Term Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms, Squamous Cell Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site
Downcase Mesh Term carcinoma Downcase Mesh Term carcinoma, squamous cell Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term head and neck neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, glandular and epithelial Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, squamous cell Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48323436 Sequence: 48323437
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Ezra Cohen Name The V Foundation for Cancer Research

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29287671
Role Principal Investigator
Name Ezra Cohen, MD
Affiliation University of California, San Diego

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12010070 Sequence: 12010071
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Debanjali Ghosh, MA Name Elaine Eng
Phone 858-246-0357
Email d1ghosh@health.ucsd.edu Email e1eng@ucsd.edu
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68155453
Design Group Id 55598338
Intervention Id 52490003

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30767978
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Have locally advanced that is amenable to surgical resection
Must be able to swallow tablets
Must be able to undergo a core tumor biopsy.
Must have adequate organ function.

Exclusion Criteria:

Diagnosis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) related nasopharynx cancer.
Planned major surgery within 4 weeks prior to initiation of study drug
Patients treated with chemotherapy, biologic therapy, or other investigational agent within < 28 days of starting study drug
History of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, or hepatitis C virus (HCV)
On going treatment with chronic immunosuppressants (e.g., cyclosporine) or systemic steroids
Prior surgery or gastrointestinal dysfunction that may affect drug absorption (e.g. gastric bypass surgery, gastrectomy)
Female subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding
Concurrent active malignancy other than nonmelanoma skin cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or prostate intraepithelial neoplasia

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253927723
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30514138
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28880439
Responsible Party Type Sponsor-Investigator
Name Ezra Cohen
Title Professor of Medicine
Affiliation University of California, San Diego

Study References

Sequence: 52068414 Sequence: 52068415 Sequence: 52068416 Sequence: 52068417 Sequence: 52068418 Sequence: 52068419
Pmid 27179037 Pmid 27642729 Pmid 23518347 Pmid 22437938 Pmid 21665146 Pmid 19097774
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Kaneda MM, Cappello P, Nguyen AV, Ralainirina N, Hardamon CR, Foubert P, Schmid MC, Sun P, Mose E, Bouvet M, Lowy AM, Valasek MA, Sasik R, Novelli F, Hirsch E, Varner JA. Macrophage PI3Kgamma Drives Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Progression. Cancer Discov. 2016 Aug;6(8):870-85. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1346. Epub 2016 May 13. Citation Kaneda MM, Messer KS, Ralainirina N, Li H, Leem CJ, Gorjestani S, Woo G, Nguyen AV, Figueiredo CC, Foubert P, Schmid MC, Pink M, Winkler DG, Rausch M, Palombella VJ, Kutok J, McGovern K, Frazer KA, Wu X, Karin M, Sasik R, Cohen EE, Varner JA. PI3Kgamma is a molecular switch that controls immune suppression. Nature. 2016 Nov 17;539(7629):437-442. doi: 10.1038/nature19834. Epub 2016 Sep 19. Erratum In: Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):124. Citation De Palma M, Lewis CE. Macrophage regulation of tumor responses to anticancer therapies. Cancer Cell. 2013 Mar 18;23(3):277-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.02.013. Citation Gabrilovich DI, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Bronte V. Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumours. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012 Mar 22;12(4):253-68. doi: 10.1038/nri3175. Citation Schmid MC, Avraamides CJ, Dippold HC, Franco I, Foubert P, Ellies LG, Acevedo LM, Manglicmot JR, Song X, Wrasidlo W, Blair SL, Ginsberg MH, Cheresh DA, Hirsch E, Field SJ, Varner JA. Receptor tyrosine kinases and TLR/IL1Rs unexpectedly activate myeloid cell PI3kgamma, a single convergent point promoting tumor inflammation and progression. Cancer Cell. 2011 Jun 14;19(6):715-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.04.016. Citation Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Busulfan, Melphalan, Escalating Carfilzomib Conditioning Auto Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma (MM) ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795597
2019-05-22

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795597
NCT03795597https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795597?tab=tableMary Lee, RNmailto:mlee@luc.edu708-327-2241In this protocol, the investigators hypothesize that the combination of intravenous busulfan and melphalan with carfilzomib will be an effective preparative regimen with acceptable toxicity for participants with multiple myeloma who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation. To test this hypothesis, the investigators designed a phase I/II trial combining IV busulfan 130 mg/m2 plus melphalan 140 mg combined with escalating doses of carfilzomib ranging from 20 mg/m2 to 45 mg/m2. These results will be compared with the center’s historical controls of participants treated with melphalan, busulfan and bortezomib.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-10-17
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2021-04-26
Start Month Year May 22, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year November 1, 2022
Verification Month Year April 2021
Verification Date 2021-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2021-04-26

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20727227
Description Participants enrolled in this study protocol will receive daily intravenous (IV) infusions of carfilzomib for a total of 4 days (Day-9, -8 and Days -2, -1). The first two daily infusions will be given at a fixed dose of 20 mg/m2 and the final two doses will be escalated from the standard dose of 27 mg/m2 to 56 mg/m2 in a Phase I design, based on toxicity. The busulfan will be administered for 2 days over 3 hours from D-7, -6, at 130 mg/m2 . This dose was found to be safe and equivalent to the standard daily dose of 3.2 mg/kg. The 3rd and 4th daily doses of IV Busulfan will be adjusted in order to yield a systemic plasma drug exposure represented by a daily area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of approximately 5,000 millimoles-minute per dose (mM-min). These targeted plasma concentration of IV busulfan will be based on pharmacokinetics studies performed during the first day of IV busulfan. Melphalan will be given at a dose of 140 mg/m2 on Day -3. Each cohort will start with a goal of accruing three patients to determine the dose limiting toxicity.

Facilities

Sequence: 200159534
Status Recruiting
Name Loyola University Medical Center
City Maywood
State Illinois
Zip 60153
Country United States

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28113759 Sequence: 28113760
Facility Id 200159534 Facility Id 200159534
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Patrick Stiff, MD Name Mary Lee, RN
Email pstiff@lumc.edu Email mlee@luc.edu
Phone 708-327-3148 Phone 708-327-2241

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96074372 Sequence: 96074373 Sequence: 96074374 Sequence: 96074375 Sequence: 96074376 Sequence: 96074377 Sequence: 96074378 Sequence: 96074379 Sequence: 96074380 Sequence: 96074381
Mesh Term Melphalan Mesh Term Busulfan Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating Mesh Term Alkylating Agents Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents Mesh Term Myeloablative Agonists Mesh Term Immunosuppressive Agents Mesh Term Immunologic Factors Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs
Downcase Mesh Term melphalan Downcase Mesh Term busulfan Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents, alkylating Downcase Mesh Term alkylating agents Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents Downcase Mesh Term myeloablative agonists Downcase Mesh Term immunosuppressive agents Downcase Mesh Term immunologic factors Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52185613
Name Multiple Myeloma
Downcase Name multiple myeloma

Id Information

Sequence: 40169154
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 209274

Countries

Sequence: 42580737
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609255 Sequence: 55609256 Sequence: 55609257 Sequence: 55609258 Sequence: 55609259
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title Carfilzomib IV at dose: 20 mg/m2 Title Carfilzomib IV at dose: 27 mg/m2 Title Carfilzomib IV at dose: 36 mg/m2 Title Carfilzomib IV at dose: 45 mg/m2 Title Carfilzomib IV at dose: 56 mg/m2
Description The participants will receive Carfilzomib IV at dose: 20 mg/m2 on days -9 and -8 over 30 minutes. The participant will receive Busulfan IV over 3 hours every 24 hours for a total of 4 doses from Day -6 to Day -3 and Melphalan IV over 15-30 minutes for one dose on day -3.The participants will receive stem cell infusion on Day 0 and Granulocyte-Colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) given daily until engraftment occurs. Description The participants will receive Carfilzomib IV at dose: 27 mg/m2 on days -9 and -8 over 30 minutes. The participant will receive Busulfan IV over 3 hours every 24 hours for a total of 4 doses from Day -6 to Day -3 and Melphalan IV over 15-30 minutes for one dose on day -3.The participants will receive stem cell infusion on Day 0 and G-CSF given daily until engraftment occurs. Description The participants will receive Carfilzomib IV at dose: 36 mg/m2 on days -9 and -8 over 30 minutes. The participant will receive Busulfan IV over 3 hours every 24 hours for a total of 4 doses from Day -6 to Day -3 and Melphalan IV over 15-30 minutes for one dose on day -3.The participants will receive stem cell infusion on Day 0 and G-CSF given daily until engraftment occurs. Description The participants will receive Carfilzomib IV at dose: 45 mg/m2 on days -9 and -8 over 30 minutes. The participant will receive Busulfan IV over 3 hours every 24 hours for a total of 4 doses from Day -6 to Day -3 and Melphalan IV over 15-30 minutes for one dose on day -3.The participants will receive stem cell infusion on Day 0 and G-CSF given daily until engraftment occurs. Description The participants will receive Carfilzomib IV at dose: 56 mg/m2 on days -9 and -8 over 30 minutes. The participant will receive Busulfan IV over 3 hours every 24 hours for a total of 4 doses from Day -6 to Day -3 and Melphalan IV over 15-30 minutes for one dose on day -3.The participants will receive stem cell infusion on Day 0 and G-CSF given daily until engraftment occurs.

Interventions

Sequence: 52499546 Sequence: 52499547 Sequence: 52499548
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Carfilzomib Name Busulfan IV Name Melphalan IV
Description Carfilzomib is an anti-cancer drug acting as a selective proteasome inhibitor that is used to treat Multiple Myeloma. Description Busulfan is an anti-cancer drug acting as a bifunctional alkylating agent that is used to treat Multiple Myeloma. Description Melphalan is an anti-cancer drug acting as alkylating agent that is used to treat Multiple Myeloma.

Keywords

Sequence: 79888957 Sequence: 79888958 Sequence: 79888959 Sequence: 79888960 Sequence: 79888961
Name Multiple Myeloma Name Autologous Name Stem Cell Transplantation Name Bone Marrow Transplant Name Carfilzomib
Downcase Name multiple myeloma Downcase Name autologous Downcase Name stem cell transplantation Downcase Name bone marrow transplant Downcase Name carfilzomib

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432421 Sequence: 177432422 Sequence: 177432423 Sequence: 177432424 Sequence: 177432425 Sequence: 177432426 Sequence: 177432427 Sequence: 177432428 Sequence: 177432429 Sequence: 177432430 Sequence: 177432431 Sequence: 177432432
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure 36 participants evaluated for safety with treatment-related adverse events and grading by using CTCAE v4.0. Measure 36 participants evaluated for tolerability with treatment-related adverse events and grading by using CTCAE v4.0. Measure 36 participants evaluated for response to treatment by testing blood for multiple myeloma levels. Measure 36 participants evaluated for progression by testing blood for multiple myeloma levels. Measure 36 participants evaluated for overall survival by clinical visit or contact by phone. Measure 36 participants evaluated for absolute neutrophil count by testing white blood cells levels. Measure 36 participants evaluated for platelet engraftment by testing platelet count in blood cells. Measure 36 participants evaluated by oral exam to assess mucositis events and grading levels by using CTCAE v4.0. Measure 36 participants evaluated by the liver to assess Veno-occlusive disease and grading levels by using CTCAE v4.0. Measure 36 participants evaluated by a physical exam to assess peripheral neuropathy and grading by using CTCAE v4.0. Measure 36 participants evaluated for response to treatment by testing urine for multiple myeloma levels. Measure 36 participants evaluated for progression by testing urine for multiple myeloma levels.
Time Frame 3 years Time Frame 3 years Time Frame 100 days Time Frame 3 years Time Frame 3 years Time Frame 100 days Time Frame 100 days Time Frame 100 days Time Frame 100 days Time Frame 3 years Time Frame 100 days Time Frame 3 years
Description To determine the maximal tolerated dose of carfilzomib when added to busulfan and melphalan as a preparative regimen for high dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic transplantation for patients with multiply myeloma. Description To determine the maximal tolerated dose of carfilzomib when added to busulfan and melphalan as a preparative regimen for high dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic transplantation for patients with multiply myeloma. Description To evaluate complete, very good partial, partial and stable disease response rate for both clinical and biologic endpoints. Description Progression Free Survival Description Overall Survival Description Days to neutrophil engraftment: Absolute neutrophil count > 500/microliter Description Days to platelet engraftment: platelet count > 20,000/microliter untransfused Description Mucositis: CTCAE v 4.0 grade and severity Description Veno-occlusive disease Description Peripheral neuropathy greater than or equal to CTCAE V 4.0 Grade 3 Description To evaluate complete, very good partial, partial no stable disease response rate for both clinical and biologic endpoints Description Progression Free Survival

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193540592 Sequence: 193540593 Sequence: 193540594 Sequence: 193540595 Sequence: 193540596 Sequence: 193540597 Sequence: 193540598 Sequence: 193540599 Sequence: 193540600 Sequence: 193540601 Sequence: 193540602 Sequence: 193540603 Sequence: 193540604 Sequence: 193540605
Mesh Term Multiple Myeloma Mesh Term Neoplasms, Plasma Cell Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Hemostatic Disorders Mesh Term Vascular Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Paraproteinemias Mesh Term Blood Protein Disorders Mesh Term Hematologic Diseases Mesh Term Hemorrhagic Disorders Mesh Term Lymphoproliferative Disorders Mesh Term Immunoproliferative Disorders Mesh Term Immune System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term multiple myeloma Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms, plasma cell Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term hemostatic disorders Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term paraproteinemias Downcase Mesh Term blood protein disorders Downcase Mesh Term hematologic diseases Downcase Mesh Term hemorrhagic disorders Downcase Mesh Term lymphoproliferative disorders Downcase Mesh Term immunoproliferative disorders Downcase Mesh Term immune system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332435 Sequence: 48332436
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Loyola University Name Amgen

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29293059
Role Principal Investigator
Name Patrick Stiff, MD
Affiliation Loyola University

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12012332 Sequence: 12012333
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Patrick Stiff, MD Name Mary Lee, RN
Phone 708-327-3148 Phone 708-327-2241
Email mailto:pstiff@lumc.edu Email mailto:mlee@luc.edu
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168331 Sequence: 68168332 Sequence: 68168333 Sequence: 68168334 Sequence: 68168335 Sequence: 68168336 Sequence: 68168337 Sequence: 68168338 Sequence: 68168339 Sequence: 68168340 Sequence: 68168341 Sequence: 68168342 Sequence: 68168343 Sequence: 68168344 Sequence: 68168345
Design Group Id 55609255 Design Group Id 55609256 Design Group Id 55609257 Design Group Id 55609258 Design Group Id 55609259 Design Group Id 55609255 Design Group Id 55609256 Design Group Id 55609257 Design Group Id 55609258 Design Group Id 55609259 Design Group Id 55609255 Design Group Id 55609256 Design Group Id 55609257 Design Group Id 55609258 Design Group Id 55609259
Intervention Id 52499546 Intervention Id 52499546 Intervention Id 52499546 Intervention Id 52499546 Intervention Id 52499546 Intervention Id 52499547 Intervention Id 52499547 Intervention Id 52499547 Intervention Id 52499547 Intervention Id 52499547 Intervention Id 52499548 Intervention Id 52499548 Intervention Id 52499548 Intervention Id 52499548 Intervention Id 52499548

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773647
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Participants must be greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
Participants must have been diagnosed with multiple myeloma in a first or subsequent remission and have undergone a successful pre-transplant work up and are otherwise eligible for an autotransplant with a busulfan/melphalan preparative regimen at Loyola University Medical Center.
Participants may receive this preparative regimen if in first or subsequent remission. Participants may enter if they have received a prior autologous stem cell transplant and this therapy produced a remission that lasted greater than 18 months before progression of disease. Participants who have undergone prior allogeneic transplantation are excluded.
All participants must have responsive disease as defined by a Partial Response or greater to most recent conventional regimen.
Participants receiving prior carfilzomib will be eligible for inclusion provided they demonstrated responsive disease to this agent and either had a remission that lasted greater than 6 months after its discontinuance, or if in remission after a carfilzomib containing regimen administered to qualify for transplant.
Participants must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) less than or equal to 2.
Acceptable heart function test.

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants must not have below normal kidney function.
Participants must not have below normal liver function.
Participants must not have active bacterial, fungal, or viral infection.
Participants must not have severe lung function.
Participants must not have Grade 2 or greater peripheral neuropathy.
Participants must not have uncontrolled hypertension.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253953000
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 10

Designs

Sequence: 30519778
Allocation Non-Randomized
Intervention Model Sequential Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description Busulfan IV over 3 hours every 24 hours for a total of 4 doses from D-6 to D-3. First two daily infusions will be given at a fixed dose of 3.2 mg/kg over 3 hours from D-6 to D-5. The 3rd and 4th daily doses will be adjusted to an AUC of approximately 5,000 mMol-min per dose.

Melphalan 140 mg/ m2 IV over 15-30 minutes for one dose on day -3.

Carfilzomib administration will follow a Phase I dose escalation design.

Each cohort will start with a goal of accruing three patients to determine the dose limiting toxicities.

Once the Maximum Tolerated Dose is established an expansion cohort will be treated to include a total of 10 additional patients.

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26680467 Sequence: 26680468 Sequence: 26680469
Intervention Id 52499546 Intervention Id 52499547 Intervention Id 52499548
Name Kyprolis Name Busulfex Name Alkeran

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886079
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Patrick Stiff
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation Loyola University

]]>

<![CDATA[ Endoclip Papillaplasty Restores Sphincter of Oddi Function ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795584
2018-05-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795584
NCT03795584https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795584?tab=tableYonghui Huang, MD13911765322@163.com86-10-13911765322Gallstones in the common bile duct (CBD) may be asymptomatic but may lead to complications such as acute cholangitis or acute pancreatitis. EST is widely used for the treatment of bile duct gallstones. Despite its efficacy and improvements over time, EST is still associated with complications such as hemorrhage, perforation, pancreatitis, and permanent loss of function of the sphincter of Oddi (SO). Permanent loss of SO function can cause duodenobiliary reflux, bacterial colonization of the biliary tract, gallstone recurrence, cholangitis, and liver abscess.

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) was first proposed in 1983 and it is now recognized as an alternative technique for the removal of CBD gallstones. The small balloon (diameter <8 mm) is less invasive, reduces the occurrence of adverse effects, and preserves the SO function, but it has limitations in the presence of CBD gallstones ≥10 mm in diameter. EST combined with endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) has been introduced for patients with large gallstone, but EPLBD widens the distal common bile duct and still may cause SO function damage, partially or completely. Repairing the ampulla of Vater and SO may reduce the long-term complication rates, especially gallstone recurrence. Unfortunately, no efficient strategy has been proposed. The present pilot study aimed to examine the feasibility and efficiency of an innovative strategy named endoclip papilloplasty to repair the damaged ampulla and recover SO function. The advantage of this device is that it can be rotated clockwise or counterclockwise by turning the handle until the correct position is achieved. Another advantage is if the clip is not in desired position, it may be re-opened and repositioned. Once satisfying clip positioning is achieved, the clip can be firmly attached to the tissue by pulling the slider back until tactile resistance is felt in the handle.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-06-12
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-08
Last Update Posted Date 2020-08-05
Start Month Year May 1, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year March 21, 2019
Verification Month Year August 2020
Verification Date 2020-08-31
Last Update Posted Date 2020-08-05

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20716330
Description Gallstones in the common bile duct (CBD) may be asymptomatic but may lead to complications such as acute cholangitis or acute pancreatitis. EST is widely used for the treatment of bile duct gallstones. Despite its efficacy and improvements over time, EST is still associated with complications such as hemorrhage, perforation, pancreatitis, and permanent loss of function of the sphincter of Oddi (SO). Permanent loss of SO function can cause duodenobiliary reflux, bacterial colonization of the biliary tract, gallstone recurrence, cholangitis, and liver abscess.

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) was first proposed in 1983 and it is now recognized as an alternative technique for the removal of CBD gallstones. The small balloon (diameter <8 mm) is less invasive, reduces the occurrence of adverse effects, and preserves the SO function, but it has limitations in the presence of CBD gallstones ≥10 mm in diameter. EST combined with endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation (EPLBD) has been introduced for patients with large gallstone, but EPLBD widens the distal common bile duct and still may cause SO function damage, partially or completely. Repairing the ampulla of Vater and SO may reduce the long-term complication rates, especially gallstone recurrence. Unfortunately, no efficient strategy has been proposed. The present pilot study aimed to examine the feasibility and efficiency of an innovative strategy named endoclip papilloplasty to repair the damaged ampulla and recover SO function. The advantage of this device is that it can be rotated clockwise or counterclockwise by turning the handle until the correct position is achieved. Another advantage is if the clip is not in desired position, it may be re-opened and repositioned. Once satisfying clip positioning is achieved, the clip can be firmly attached to the tissue by pulling the slider back until tactile resistance is felt in the handle.

The investigators will recruit patients according to admission criteria and exclusion criteria. The participants underwent SOM before, immediately after EST, and 3 weeks after EST with endoclip papilloplasty. The participants were followed for 3 days during hospitalized. Complications including perforation, bleeding, and PEP were recorded. Blood routine, pancreatic enzymes (amylase and lipase), and liver function (serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, r-glutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase) were tested at 4 and 24 h after ERCP. All participants were followed at 3 weeks. Symptoms were examined and blood tests as above were repeated ahead of stents retrieval and sphincter of Oddi monitoring through duodenoscope.

Facilities

Sequence: 200053465
Status Recruiting
Name Peking University Third Hosptial
City Beijing
State Beijing
Zip 100000
Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28097581
Facility Id 200053465
Contact Type primary
Name Yonghui Huang, archiater
Email pskyq@163.com
Phone 13911765322

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96027937 Sequence: 96027938
Mesh Term Hemostatics Mesh Term Coagulants
Downcase Mesh Term hemostatics Downcase Mesh Term coagulants
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52156581
Name Sphincter of Oddi Function
Downcase Name sphincter of oddi function

Id Information

Sequence: 40148264
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value HYH20180520

Countries

Sequence: 42557800
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55577985
Title Endoclip papillaplasty
Description Endoclip papilloplasty was performed to repair the Oddi sphincter using sterile repositionable hemostasis clipping device (Micro-tech (Nanjing), Co., Ltd.; stainless-steel). The participants underwent SOM before, immediately after EST, and 3 weeks after EST with endoclip papilloplasty. The participants were followed for 3 days during hospitalized.

Interventions

Sequence: 52472085
Intervention Type Procedure
Name sterile repositionable hemostasis clipping device close the large duodenal papilla incision
Description After the bile duct stent was placed, the investigators can use sterile repositionable hemostasis clipping device to close large duodenal papilla incision at 11 o'clock on the duodenal papilla.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328362 Sequence: 177328363
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure SO manometric data Measure Frequency of use of ML and the incidence of adverse events
Time Frame Before operation、During operation、Three weeks after operation Time Frame Three weeks after operation
Description The comparison of the SO manometric data before and after the procedure Description Measure the frequency of use of ML and the incidence of adverse events, and to evaluate the healing of the ampulla.

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306169
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Peking University Third Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29277988
Role Study Director
Name Yonghui Huang, MD
Affiliation Peking University Third Hosptial

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12004761
Contact Type primary
Name Yonghui Huang, MD
Phone 86-10-13911765322
Email 13911765322@163.com
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130957
Design Group Id 55577985
Intervention Id 52472085

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757404
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 85 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Population This was a prospective pilot study of consecutive patients with CBD gallstones (transverse diameter ≥10 mm) who were treated at the Gastroenterology Department of Peking University Third Hospital by large-EST combined with endoclip papilloplasty between May 2018 and March 2019.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

– 1)18-85 years of age; 2) informed consent obtained before ERCP; 3) CBD diameter ≥12 mm; 4) CBD gallstones visualized at magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with at least one gallstone ≥10 mm (transverse diameter)

Exclusion Criteria:

gallstone transverse diameter >35 mm, which is not appropriate to be extracted;
history of previous sphincterotomy, previous EPBD;
accompanied with choledochoduodenal fistula, coagulopathy, anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy, or Billroth II or Roux-en-Y reconstruction;
papilla located deep within a diverticulum;
small papilla and short intramural segment, which was not suitable for large EST;
medications known to affect the SO (calcium channel blockers, nitrates, opiates, and anticholinergics) taken within 48 h of the procedure;
benign or malignant biliary stricture.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254228989
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 10
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 85
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30503629
Observational Model Case-Only
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869907
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Huang Yonghui
Title chief physician
Affiliation Peking University Third Hospital

]]>

<![CDATA[ Lenalidomide, Rituximab, Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin and Dexamethasone in Relapse and Refractory DLBCL ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795571
2019-01-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795571
NCT03795571https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795571?tab=tableHuayuan Zhu, PhD& MDhuayuan.zhu@hotmail.com86 25 68306034Previous study showed that Lenalidomide or R-GDP could achieve response in Relapse and Refractory DLBCL.The investigators therefore design this phase I study to investigate the safety and efficacy of R2-GOD in relapsed diffuse large-cell lymphoma.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-01
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2019-02-15
Start Month Year January 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2019
Verification Month Year February 2019
Verification Date 2019-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2019-02-15

Facilities

Sequence: 200244112
Status Recruiting
Name The first Affiliated Hospital Of Nanjing Medical University(JiangSu Province Hospital
City Nanjing
State Jiangsu
Zip 210000
Country China

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28127955
Facility Id 200244112
Contact Type primary
Name Huayuan Zhu, PhD,MD
Email huayuan.zhu@hotmail.com
Phone +86 68136034

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96112984 Sequence: 96112961 Sequence: 96112962 Sequence: 96112963 Sequence: 96112964 Sequence: 96112965 Sequence: 96112966 Sequence: 96112967 Sequence: 96112968 Sequence: 96112969 Sequence: 96112970 Sequence: 96112971 Sequence: 96112972 Sequence: 96112973 Sequence: 96112974 Sequence: 96112975 Sequence: 96112976 Sequence: 96112977 Sequence: 96112978 Sequence: 96112979 Sequence: 96112980 Sequence: 96112981 Sequence: 96112982 Sequence: 96112983 Sequence: 96112985 Sequence: 96112986
Mesh Term Angiogenesis Modulating Agents Mesh Term Dexamethasone Mesh Term Rituximab Mesh Term Gemcitabine Mesh Term Oxaliplatin Mesh Term Lenalidomide Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents Mesh Term Immunologic Factors Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Antirheumatic Agents Mesh Term Anti-Inflammatory Agents Mesh Term Antiemetics Mesh Term Autonomic Agents Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Agents Mesh Term Gastrointestinal Agents Mesh Term Glucocorticoids Mesh Term Hormones Mesh Term Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal Mesh Term Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic Mesh Term Antimetabolites Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Angiogenesis Inhibitors Mesh Term Growth Substances Mesh Term Growth Inhibitors
Downcase Mesh Term angiogenesis modulating agents Downcase Mesh Term dexamethasone Downcase Mesh Term rituximab Downcase Mesh Term gemcitabine Downcase Mesh Term oxaliplatin Downcase Mesh Term lenalidomide Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents, immunological Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents Downcase Mesh Term immunologic factors Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term antirheumatic agents Downcase Mesh Term anti-inflammatory agents Downcase Mesh Term antiemetics Downcase Mesh Term autonomic agents Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system agents Downcase Mesh Term gastrointestinal agents Downcase Mesh Term glucocorticoids Downcase Mesh Term hormones Downcase Mesh Term hormones, hormone substitutes, and hormone antagonists Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents, hormonal Downcase Mesh Term antimetabolites, antineoplastic Downcase Mesh Term antimetabolites Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term angiogenesis inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term growth substances Downcase Mesh Term growth inhibitors
Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52207990 Sequence: 52207991
Name Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Recurrent Name Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Refractory
Downcase Name diffuse large b-cell lymphoma recurrent Downcase Name diffuse large b cell lymphoma refractory

Id Information

Sequence: 40186095
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value R2-GOD regimen

Countries

Sequence: 42599596
Name China
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55634588
Group Type Experimental
Title R2-GOD

Interventions

Sequence: 52522007 Sequence: 52522008 Sequence: 52522009 Sequence: 52522010 Sequence: 52522011
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Rituximab Name Gemcitabine Name Oxaliplatin Name Dexamethasone Name Lenalidomide Oral Capsule
Description Rituximab 375mg/m2,d0 Description Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2,d1,d5 Description Oxaliplatin 75mg/m2,d1 Description Dexamethasone 40mg/d,d1~d4 Description Lenalidomide 10mg/d、15mg/d、20mg/d、25mg/d d1~d10; 21days a cycle

Keywords

Sequence: 79922863 Sequence: 79922864 Sequence: 79922865
Name lenalidomide Name R-GOD Name DLBCL
Downcase Name lenalidomide Downcase Name r-god Downcase Name dlbcl

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177510991 Sequence: 177510992 Sequence: 177510993 Sequence: 177510994
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure maximum tolerated dose and dose limited toxicity Measure Overall response rate, Measure Progressive free survival Measure Overall survival
Time Frame 28 days after first cycle of R2-GOD regimen Time Frame 6 months Time Frame 2 years Time Frame 2 years
Description overall response rate after treated by R-GemOx or R-miniCHOP overall response rate after treated by R2-GOD regimen regimen Description from date of inclusion to date of progression, relapse, or death from any causePFS:from date of inclusion to date of progression, relapse, or death from any cause Description from the date of inclusion to date of death, irrespective of cause

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193626704 Sequence: 193626705 Sequence: 193626706 Sequence: 193626707 Sequence: 193626708 Sequence: 193626709 Sequence: 193626710 Sequence: 193626711 Sequence: 193626712 Sequence: 193626703
Mesh Term Lymphoma, B-Cell Mesh Term Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse Mesh Term Neoplasms by Histologic Type Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Lymphoproliferative Disorders Mesh Term Lymphatic Diseases Mesh Term Immunoproliferative Disorders Mesh Term Immune System Diseases Mesh Term Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Mesh Term Lymphoma
Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma, b-cell Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma, large b-cell, diffuse Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by histologic type Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term lymphoproliferative disorders Downcase Mesh Term lymphatic diseases Downcase Mesh Term immunoproliferative disorders Downcase Mesh Term immune system diseases Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma, non-hodgkin Downcase Mesh Term lymphoma
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list

Sponsors

Sequence: 48353630
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29305948
Role Principal Investigator
Name Wei Xu, PhD& MD
Affiliation The first Affiliated Hospital Of Nanjing Medical University(JiangSu Province Hospital)

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12017195
Contact Type primary
Name Huayuan Zhu, PhD& MD
Phone 86 25 68306034
Email huayuan.zhu@hotmail.com
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199105 Sequence: 68199106 Sequence: 68199107 Sequence: 68199108 Sequence: 68199109
Design Group Id 55634588 Design Group Id 55634588 Design Group Id 55634588 Design Group Id 55634588 Design Group Id 55634588
Intervention Id 52522007 Intervention Id 52522008 Intervention Id 52522009 Intervention Id 52522010 Intervention Id 52522011

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30786832
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 65 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Age 18-65 years old;
ECOG PS 0- 2;

Histologically confirmed diffuse large B cell lymphoma(With exception of Primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma、Primary central nervous system lymphoma、HIV-related lymphoma),relapse or refractory,defined as:

relapse after standard first-line immunochemotherapy( R-CHOP or R-CHOP like)
SD as best response after 4 cycles or PD after 2 cycles of first-line immunochemotherapy;
a measurable or evaluable disease at the time of enrollment(diameter ≥ 1.5cm);
Eligible for subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation;
Female subjects in childbearing age, their serum or urine pregnancy test must be negative. All patients must agree to take effective contraceptive measures during the trial measures
Expected survival ≥ 12 weeks;
Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form, able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

Women who are pregnant or lactating. Patients have breeding intent in 12 months or cannot take effective contraceptive measures during the trial measures;
Uncontrollable active infection within four week. Prophylactic antibiotic, antiviral and antifungal treatment is permissible. Active hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus infection, as well as acquired, congenital immune deficiency diseases, including but not limited to HIV-infected persons;
Used of systemic anti-tumor treatment within four weeks;
CNS or meningeal involvement;
Poor hepatic and/or renal function, defined as total bilirubin, ALT, AST, Cr more than two fold of upper normal level,Ccr< 50 mL/min unless these abnormalities were related to the lymphoma;
Poor bone-marrow reserve, defined as neutrophil count less than 1.5×10⁹/L or platelet count less than 75×10⁹/L, unless caused by bone marrow infiltration;
New York Heart Association class III or IV cardiac failure; or Ejection fraction less than 50%;or history of following disease in past 6 months: acute coronary syndrome、acute heart failure、severe ventricular arrhythmia;
Known sensitivity or allergy to investigational Product;
Major surgery within three weeks;
Presence of Grade III nervous toxicity within past two weeks;
Active and severe infectious diseases;
History of DVT or PE within past 12 months;
Any potential drug abuse, medical, psychological or social conditions which may disturb this investigation and assessment;
In any conditions which investigator considered ineligible for this study.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989549
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 65
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30532902
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899196
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name WEI XU
Title Professor
Affiliation The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

Study References

Sequence: 52102980 Sequence: 52102981 Sequence: 52102982 Sequence: 52102983
Pmid 24661044 Pmid 26847165 Pmid 25267740 Pmid 29752199
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Feldman T, Mato AR, Chow KF, Protomastro EA, Yannotti KM, Bhattacharyya P, Yang X, Donato ML, Rowley SD, Carini C, Valentinetti M, Smith J, Gadaleta G, Bejot C, Stives S, Timberg M, Kdiry S, Pecora AL, Beaven AW, Goy A. Addition of lenalidomide to rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide (RICER) in first-relapse/primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2014 Jul;166(1):77-83. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12846. Epub 2014 Mar 25. Citation Martin A, Redondo AM, Dlouhy I, Salar A, Gonzalez-Barca E, Canales M, Montes-Moreno S, Ocio EM, Lopez-Guillermo A, Caballero D; Spanish Group for Lymphomas and Autologous Bone Marrow (GELTAMO). Lenalidomide in combination with R-ESHAP in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase 1b study from GELTAMO group. Br J Haematol. 2016 Apr;173(2):245-52. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13945. Epub 2016 Feb 5. Citation Crump M, Kuruvilla J, Couban S, MacDonald DA, Kukreti V, Kouroukis CT, Rubinger M, Buckstein R, Imrie KR, Federico M, Di Renzo N, Howson-Jan K, Baetz T, Kaizer L, Voralia M, Olney HJ, Turner AR, Sussman J, Hay AE, Djurfeldt MS, Meyer RM, Chen BE, Shepherd LE. Randomized comparison of gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin versus dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin chemotherapy before autologous stem-cell transplantation for relapsed and refractory aggressive lymphomas: NCIC-CTG LY.12. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 1;32(31):3490-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.9593. Epub 2014 Sep 29. Citation Shen QD, Zhu HY, Wang L, Fan L, Liang JH, Cao L, Wu W, Xia Y, Li JY, Xu W. Gemcitabine-oxaliplatin plus rituximab (R-GemOx) as first-line treatment in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Jun;5(6):e261-e269. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30054-1. Epub 2018 May 8.

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Study to Investigate the Influence of PTH-lowering by Etelcalcetide (Parsabiv®) on the Calcification Propensity of Serum in Dialysis Patients ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795558
2019-05-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795558
NCT03795558https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795558?tab=tableNANANAThis is a single-center, prospective, dose-escalation, pilot study in 15 end-stage renal disease patients on chronic hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-09-18
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2022-03-23
Start Month Year May 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 21, 2021
Verification Month Year March 2022
Verification Date 2022-03-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-03-23

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20588758
Description Fifteen prevalent and stable hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism eligible for treatment with calcium receptor sensitizers according to current KDIGO will be included.

Study phases will begin and end on the day of the first hemodialysis session of the week.

The run-in phase will last 4 weeks. No calcimimetics will be prescribed during the run-in phase.

The treatment phase starts with a dose of etelcalcetide is 2.5mg thrice weekly. Etelcalcetide dose will be escalated every 4 weeks in 2.5mg/dialysis session increments to a maximum dose of 15mg thrice weekly.

The wash-out Phase starts after completion of the 15mg thrice-weekly phase or in case a pre-specified safety endpoint is reached, etelcalcetide will be discontinued and patients will be followed for additional 8 weeks to study any potential reversibility of PTH lowering on T50 results.

For the individual patient, the study duration will be 9 months

Facilities

Sequence: 198738355
Name Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH Elisabethinen
City Linz
State Upper Austria
Zip 4020
Country Austria

Conditions

Sequence: 51829160
Name End Stage Renal Disease
Downcase Name end stage renal disease

Id Information

Sequence: 39885430
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value Etelcalcetide-T50-CKD5D

Countries

Sequence: 42283957
Name Austria
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55252117 Sequence: 55252112 Sequence: 55252113 Sequence: 55252114 Sequence: 55252115 Sequence: 55252116
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title Etelcalcetide 15 mg Title Etelcalcetide 2.5 mg Title Etelcalcetide 5 mg Title Etelcalcetide 7,5 mg Title Etelcalcetide 10 mg Title Etelcalcetide 12,5 mg
Description Etelcalcetide, starting dose of 2.5mg thrice weekly, dose will be escalated every 4 weeks in 2.5mg/dialysis session increments to a maximum dose of 15mg thrice weekly Description Etelcalcetide, starting dose of 2.5mg thrice weekly, dose will be escalated every 4 weeks in 2.5mg/dialysis session increments to a maximum dose of 15mg thrice weekly Description Etelcalcetide, starting dose of 2.5mg thrice weekly, dose will be escalated every 4 weeks in 2.5mg/dialysis session increments to a maximum dose of 15mg thrice weekly Description Etelcalcetide, starting dose of 2.5mg thrice weekly, dose will be escalated every 4 weeks in 2.5mg/dialysis session increments to a maximum dose of 15mg thrice weekly Description Etelcalcetide, starting dose of 2.5mg thrice weekly, dose will be escalated every 4 weeks in 2.5mg/dialysis session increments to a maximum dose of 15mg thrice weekly Description Etelcalcetide, starting dose of 2.5mg thrice weekly, dose will be escalated every 4 weeks in 2.5mg/dialysis session increments to a maximum dose of 15mg thrice weekly

Interventions

Sequence: 52150124
Intervention Type Drug
Name Etelcalcetide
Description Up-Titration

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176273042
Outcome Type primary
Measure T50-Laboratory Test for measuring calcification
Time Frame 32 weeks
Description The changes in T50 values between the different study phases will be evaluated as the primary outcome.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 192106952 Sequence: 192106948 Sequence: 192106949 Sequence: 192106950 Sequence: 192106951 Sequence: 192106953 Sequence: 192106954 Sequence: 192106955 Sequence: 192106956 Sequence: 192106957 Sequence: 192106958 Sequence: 192106959
Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Kidney Failure, Chronic Mesh Term Kidney Diseases Mesh Term Urologic Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Male Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Renal Insufficiency, Chronic Mesh Term Renal Insufficiency Mesh Term Chronic Disease Mesh Term Disease Attributes Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases and pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term kidney failure, chronic Downcase Mesh Term kidney diseases Downcase Mesh Term urologic diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term male urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term renal insufficiency, chronic Downcase Mesh Term renal insufficiency Downcase Mesh Term chronic disease Downcase Mesh Term disease attributes Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48001221 Sequence: 48001222
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Prim. Priv. Doz. Dr. Daniel Cejka Name Amgen

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29084329
Role Principal Investigator
Name Daniel Cejka, Md
Affiliation Head of Nephrology

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67736273 Sequence: 67736274 Sequence: 67736275 Sequence: 67736276 Sequence: 67736277 Sequence: 67736278
Design Group Id 55252115 Design Group Id 55252116 Design Group Id 55252117 Design Group Id 55252112 Design Group Id 55252113 Design Group Id 55252114
Intervention Id 52150124 Intervention Id 52150124 Intervention Id 52150124 Intervention Id 52150124 Intervention Id 52150124 Intervention Id 52150124

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30564637
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Prevalent patients (≥ 3 months on dialysis) treated with thrice weekly hemodialysis (HD) or hemodiafiltration (HDF)
Secondary hyperparathyroidism defined as PTH levels > 9x ULN according to current KDIGO guidelines if therapy-naïve, or patients already treated with calcium receptor sensitizers with PTH > 2x ULN
Albumin corrected calcium ≥ 2,08 mmol/l
Calcium concentrations of dialysate stable for at least 2 weeks prior to screening

Exclusion Criteria:

Currently receiving treatment in another investigational device or drug study or participation in non-interventional studies
Current treatment with etelcalcetide (Parsabiv©) or treatment with etelcalcetide within 3 months prior to study inclusion
Patient has known sensitivity to any of the products or components of Parsabiv©
Patient has received a parathyroidectomy
Parathyroidectomy planned or expected during the study period
Elective kidney transplant scheduled during the study period
Therapy with bisphosphonates within the past 12 months
Therapy with denosumab within the past 6 months
Antacids containing aluminum, calcium, magnesium or bicarbonate
Patient has a history of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias or Torsades de Pointes
Patient has a history of myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty, or coronary arterial bypass grafting within the past 6 months prior to screening.
Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254259138
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 32
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30312915
Allocation Non-Randomized
Intervention Model Sequential Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Diagnostic
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Intervention Model Description This is a single-center, prospective, dose-escalation, pilot study. Starting dose 2.5 mg thrice weekly dose will be escalated every 4 weeks in 2.5mg/dialysis session increments to a maximum dose of 15mg thrice weekly.

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26509167
Intervention Id 52150124
Name Parsabiv

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28691556
Responsible Party Type Sponsor-Investigator
Name Prim. Priv. Doz. Dr. Daniel Cejka
Title Head of Nephrology department
Affiliation Elisabethinen Hospital

]]>

<![CDATA[ Ultraslow SWL Versus Slow SWL for Ureteric Stones With High Attenuation Value ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795545
2019-01-11

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795545
NCT03795545https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795545?tab=tableNANANAUltraslow full-power SWL versus slow power-ramping SWL in ureteric stones with high attenuation value
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2019-12-10
Start Month Year January 11, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year July 16, 2019
Verification Month Year December 2019
Verification Date 2019-12-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-12-10

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20741102
Description To evaluate the efficacy of ultraslow rate of SWL versus slow rate, power ramping SWL

Facilities

Sequence: 200280141
Name Beni-Suef Hospitals
City Banī Suwayf
State Outside U.S./Canada
Country Egypt

Conditions

Sequence: 52221355
Name Ureteric Stone
Downcase Name ureteric stone

Id Information

Sequence: 40195507
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 16231

Countries

Sequence: 42609498
Name Egypt
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55649598 Sequence: 55649599
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator
Title Ultraslow shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) Title Slow power-ramping SWL
Description SWL at ultraslow rate of 30 SW/min. Power ramping at the first 100 SW from 6 to 18 kv followed by safety pause for two minutes then power ramping from 18 to 22kv during the second 100 SW followed by safety pause for another two minutes.

The rest of the session at 22kv (full power).

Description SWL at a slow rate of 60 SW/min. Power ramping from 6 – 10 kv during the first 500 SW then from 11 – 14 kv during the second 500 SW then from 15 – 18 kv during the following 500 SW then from 19 – 22 kv during the remaining 1000 – 1500 SW.

Interventions

Sequence: 52535125
Intervention Type Procedure
Name SWL
Description Shock wave lithotripsy

Keywords

Sequence: 79941537 Sequence: 79941538 Sequence: 79941539 Sequence: 79941540 Sequence: 79941541 Sequence: 79941542 Sequence: 79941543
Name ureteric stone Name SWL Name High density stones Name Ultraslow SWL Name Slow SWL Name Ramping Name Pause
Downcase Name ureteric stone Downcase Name swl Downcase Name high density stones Downcase Name ultraslow swl Downcase Name slow swl Downcase Name ramping Downcase Name pause

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177560766 Sequence: 177560767
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure stone free rate Measure Complications rate
Time Frame 3 months following last session of SWL Time Frame 3 months following last session of SWL
Description Complete clearance of stones in addition to clinically insignificant residual fragments Description Comparison of rate of complications in both groups

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193677830 Sequence: 193677831 Sequence: 193677832 Sequence: 193677833 Sequence: 193677834 Sequence: 193677835 Sequence: 193677836 Sequence: 193677837 Sequence: 193677838 Sequence: 193677839 Sequence: 193677840 Sequence: 193677841
Mesh Term Ureteral Calculi Mesh Term Ureterolithiasis Mesh Term Calculi Mesh Term Pathological Conditions, Anatomical Mesh Term Ureteral Diseases Mesh Term Urologic Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Urolithiasis Mesh Term Urinary Calculi Mesh Term Male Urogenital Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term ureteral calculi Downcase Mesh Term ureterolithiasis Downcase Mesh Term calculi Downcase Mesh Term pathological conditions, anatomical Downcase Mesh Term ureteral diseases Downcase Mesh Term urologic diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases and pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term urolithiasis Downcase Mesh Term urinary calculi Downcase Mesh Term male urogenital diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48366261 Sequence: 48366262
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Cairo University Name Beni-Suef University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29312829
Role Study Director
Name Ahmad Aref Al-Dessoukey, Ass. Prof.
Affiliation Beni-Suef University

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68217118 Sequence: 68217119
Design Group Id 55649599 Design Group Id 55649598
Intervention Id 52535125 Intervention Id 52535125

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30794604
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

single upper ureteric stone less than or equal to 2 cm
radio-opaque stone
high attenuation value (≥ 1000 HU) stone

Exclusion Criteria:

Abnormal renal anatomy
renal insufficiency
solitary kidney
coagulopathies
uncontrolled hypertension
renal artery or aortic aneurysm
active urinary tract infection
pregnancy
severe skeletal malformations (spinal deformity) precluding proper stone localization

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254004123
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 6
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30540644
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Triple
Subject Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26696872
Intervention Id 52535125
Name ESWL

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28906963
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Mohammed Said ElSheemy
Title Associate Professor of Urology
Affiliation Cairo University

]]>

<![CDATA[ Ultraslow SWL Versus Slow SWL for Renal Stones With High Attenuation Value ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795532
2019-01-11

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795532
NCT03795532https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795532?tab=tableAhmad Aref Al-Dessoukey, Ass. Prof.NANAUltraslow full-power SWL versus slow power-ramping SWL in Renal stones with high attenuation value
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-23
Start Month Year January 11, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year May 2019
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-23

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20709990
Description To evaluate the efficacy of ultraslow rate of SWL versus slow rate, power ramping SWL for renal stones

Facilities

Sequence: 199965080
Status Recruiting
Name Beni-Suef Hospitals
City Banī Suwayf
State Outside U.S./Canada
Country Egypt

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28086651
Facility Id 199965080
Contact Type primary
Name A AlDessoukey, Ass. Prof.

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18318892
Facility Id 199965080
Role Principal Investigator
Name Mohammed S ElSheemy, A Professor

Conditions

Sequence: 52139012
Name Renal Stones
Downcase Name renal stones

Id Information

Sequence: 40135069
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 16224

Countries

Sequence: 42542693
Name Egypt
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55559362 Sequence: 55559363
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator
Title Ultraslow shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) Title Slow power-ramping SWL
Description SWL at ultraslow rate of 30 SW/min. Power ramping at the first 100 SW from 6 to 18 kv followed by safety pause for two minutes then power ramping from 18 to 22kv during the second 100 SW followed by safety pause for another two minutes. The rest of the session at 22kv (full power). Description SWL at a slow rate of 60 SW/min. Power ramping from 6 – 10 kv during the first 500 SW then from 11 – 14 kv during the second 500 SW then from 15 – 18 kv during the following 500 SW then from 19 – 22 kv during the remaining 1000 – 1500 SW.

Interventions

Sequence: 52454916
Intervention Type Procedure
Name SWL
Description Shock wave lithotripsy

Keywords

Sequence: 79822833 Sequence: 79822834 Sequence: 79822835 Sequence: 79822836 Sequence: 79822837 Sequence: 79822838 Sequence: 79822839
Name renal stones Name SWL Name High density stones Name Ultraslow SWL Name Slow SWL Name Ramping Name Pause
Downcase Name renal stones Downcase Name swl Downcase Name high density stones Downcase Name ultraslow swl Downcase Name slow swl Downcase Name ramping Downcase Name pause

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177263760 Sequence: 177263761
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure stone free rate Measure Complications rate
Time Frame 3 months following last session of SWL Time Frame 3 months following last session of SWL
Description Complete clearance of stones in addition to clinically insignificant residual fragments Description Comparison of rate of complications in both groups

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193366556 Sequence: 193366557 Sequence: 193366558 Sequence: 193366559 Sequence: 193366560 Sequence: 193366561 Sequence: 193366562 Sequence: 193366563 Sequence: 193366564 Sequence: 193366565 Sequence: 193366566 Sequence: 193366567
Mesh Term Kidney Calculi Mesh Term Nephrolithiasis Mesh Term Calculi Mesh Term Pathological Conditions, Anatomical Mesh Term Kidney Diseases Mesh Term Urologic Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Urolithiasis Mesh Term Urinary Calculi Mesh Term Male Urogenital Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term kidney calculi Downcase Mesh Term nephrolithiasis Downcase Mesh Term calculi Downcase Mesh Term pathological conditions, anatomical Downcase Mesh Term kidney diseases Downcase Mesh Term urologic diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases and pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term urolithiasis Downcase Mesh Term urinary calculi Downcase Mesh Term male urogenital diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48290717 Sequence: 48290718
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Cairo University Name Beni-Suef University

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29268535
Role Study Director
Name Ahmad Aref Al-Dessoukey
Affiliation Beni-Suef University

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12000490 Sequence: 12000491
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Mohammed S ElSheemy, Ass. Prof. Name Ahmad Aref Al-Dessoukey, Ass. Prof.
Phone 01006117755
Email mohammedshemy@yahoo.com
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68107472 Sequence: 68107473
Design Group Id 55559363 Design Group Id 55559362
Intervention Id 52454916 Intervention Id 52454916

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30747728
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

single Renal stone less than or equal to 3 cm (2 cm for lower calyceal stones)
radio-opaque stone
high attenuation value (≥ 1000 HU) stone

Exclusion Criteria:

Abnormal renal anatomy
renal insufficiency
solitary kidney
coagulopathies
uncontrolled hypertension
renal artery or aortic aneurysm
active urinary tract infection
pregnancy
severe skeletal malformations (spinal deformity) precluding proper stone localization
skin to stone distance (SSD) > 11 cm
BMI > 30 Kgm/m2

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254121880
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30494011
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Triple
Subject Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26655415
Intervention Id 52454916
Name ESWL

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28860291
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Mohammed Said ElSheemy
Title Associate Professor of Urology
Affiliation Cairo University

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Trial to Study the Absorption, Metabolism, and Excretion of [14C]-Olinciguat in Healthy Male Volunteers ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795519
2019-01-17

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795519
NCT03795519https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795519?tab=tableNANANAThe primary objective is to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of olinciguat and total radioactivity and to assess the elimination of total radioactivity from a single oral dose of [14C]-olinciguat.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-14
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2019-04-03
Start Month Year January 17, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year February 27, 2019
Verification Month Year April 2019
Verification Date 2019-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2019-04-03

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20727233
Description OLI-103 is a Phase 1 open-label, nonrandomized, single-dose study in up to 8 subjects that will be conducted at a single center in the US. Safety assessments will be performed throughout the clinic period and multiple PK samples will be collected. Subjects will be confined to the clinical research center for at least 8 days.

The purpose of the study is to determine the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of [14C]-olinciguat and to characterize and determine, where possible, the metabolites present in plasma, urine, and feces after a single oral dose. The study will help identify and characterize olinciguat metabolites, evaluate the likelihood of effects of liver or kidney impairment on the disposition of olinciguat, and assess the likelihood of drug-drug interactions with olinciguat.

Facilities

Sequence: 200159555
Name Covance Clinical Research Unit Inc.
City Madison
State Wisconsin
Zip 53704
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52185629
Name Healthy Volunteers
Downcase Name healthy volunteers

Id Information

Sequence: 40169167
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value OLI-103

Countries

Sequence: 42580749
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609277
Group Type Experimental
Title Healthy Male Volunteers
Description Single oral dose of [14C]-olinciguat

Interventions

Sequence: 52499567
Intervention Type Drug
Name [14C]-olinciguat
Description oral capsule

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432495 Sequence: 177432496 Sequence: 177432497 Sequence: 177432498 Sequence: 177432499 Sequence: 177432500 Sequence: 177432501 Sequence: 177432523 Sequence: 177432524 Sequence: 177432502 Sequence: 177432503 Sequence: 177432504 Sequence: 177432505 Sequence: 177432506 Sequence: 177432507 Sequence: 177432508 Sequence: 177432509 Sequence: 177432510 Sequence: 177432511 Sequence: 177432512 Sequence: 177432513 Sequence: 177432514 Sequence: 177432515 Sequence: 177432516 Sequence: 177432517 Sequence: 177432518 Sequence: 177432519 Sequence: 177432520 Sequence: 177432521 Sequence: 177432522
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Amount of total radioactivity excreted in urine (Aeu) and feces (Aef) Measure Cumulative Aeu and cumulative Aef Measure Percentage of total radioactivity excreted in urine (feu) and feces (fef) Measure Cumulative feu and cumulative fef Measure Percentage of total radioactivity in total excreta (feces + urine) Measure Area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf) of olinciguat in plasma Measure AUC0-inf of total radioactivity in plasma and whole blood Measure Number(s) of participants with ≥1 Grade ≥3 AE (per CTCAE v. 5.0) Measure Number(s) of participants with ≥1 clinically significant abnormal physical examination finding Measure AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-last) of olinciguat in plasma Measure AUC0-last of total radioactivity in plasma and whole blood Measure Maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of olinciguat in plasma Measure Cmax of total radioactivity in plasma and whole blood Measure Time of Cmax (Tmax) of olinciguat in plasma Measure Tmax of total radioactivity in plasma and whole blood Measure Apparent terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) of olinciguat in plasma Measure t1/2 total radioactivity in plasma and whole blood Measure Apparent total clearance of olinciguat (CL/F) Measure Apparent volume of distribution of olinciguat (Vz/F) Measure AUC0-inf of plasma olinciguat concentration relative to AUC0-inf of plasma total radioactivity (AUC0-inf Ratio of Plasma Olinciguat/Plasma Total Radioactivity) Measure AUC0-inf of whole blood total radioactivity to AUC0-inf of plasma total radioactivity (AUC0-inf Ratio of Blood Total Radioactivity/Plasma Total Radioactivity) Measure Levels of metabolite radioactivity excreted in urine and feces Measure AUC0-inf of metabolite radioactivity levels in plasma Measure AUC0-inf of plasma metabolite radioactivity levels relative to AUC0-inf of plasma total radioactivity (Plasma AUC0-inf Ratio of Metabolite Radioactivity/Total Radioactivity) Measure Chromatographic retention time of metabolites Measure Molecular ion mass of metabolites Measure Characteristic mass spectrometry fragmentation ions of metabolites Measure Chemical structures (graphical representations showing atom connectivity) proposed for plasma, urine, and feces metabolites Measure Number(s) of participants with ≥1 treatment-emergent serious adverse event (SAE) Measure Number(s) of participants with ≥1 adverse event (AE) leading to study drug discontinuation
Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15 Time Frame up to Day 15

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332450
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Cyclerion Therapeutics

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29293071
Role Study Director
Name Bina Tejura, MD
Affiliation Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168364
Design Group Id 55609277
Intervention Id 52499567

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773657
Gender Male
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 55 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Males of any race, between 18 and 55 years of age, inclusive
Body mass index between 18 and 32 kg/m2, inclusive
Subject is in good health and has no clinically significant findings on physical examination
Men must agree to use protocol-specified contraception and also to not donate sperm throughout the study and for at least 90 days after the final dose of study drug

Exclusion Criteria:

Any active or unstable clinically significant medical condition
Use of any prescribed or non-prescribed medication

Additional inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply per protocol

Gender Based True
Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253953024
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 1
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 55
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 19
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 11

Designs

Sequence: 30519788
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26680476
Intervention Id 52499567
Name 14C-IW-1701

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886089
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ TLA in Children With Moderate to Severe Atopic Eczema (TLA4AE) ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795506
2019-07-08

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795506
NCT03795506https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795506?tab=tableClaudia Gore, MD PhDcgore@nhs.net+44 203 312 6650This is a single centre randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study in which 96 children age 4 to 16 years with moderate to severe, longstanding allergic eczema will be enrolled.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-18
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2022-09-23
Start Month Year July 8, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2023
Verification Month Year September 2022
Verification Date 2022-09-30
Last Update Posted Date 2022-09-23

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20850606
Description Following a 4 to 6 week period on standardised treatment (run-in period, to ensure everyone starts with the same treatment approach), participants will be randomised to an active or dummy temperature-controlled laminar airflow (TLA) device, which has been shown to markedly reduce exposure to particles which can cause allergic reactions when being inhaled (inhaled allergens) and other particles which are in the air the investigators breathe in. This has been shown to be an effective treatment of atopic asthma.

The participants will undergo a 12-week treatment period. The device will then be removed and a final follow-up visit occurs at 16 weeks. The total study duration, including the run-in period is up to 22 weeks.

Facilities

Sequence: 201277256
Status Recruiting
Name IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS Trust
City London
Zip W2 1NY
Country United Kingdom

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28280579
Facility Id 201277256
Contact Type primary
Name Claudia Gore, PhD
Email cgore@nhs.net

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18437963
Facility Id 201277256
Role Principal Investigator
Name Claudia Gore, PhD

Conditions

Sequence: 52503087
Name Atopic Dermatitis Eczema
Downcase Name atopic dermatitis eczema

Id Information

Sequence: 40395928
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 18SM4747

Countries

Sequence: 42832466
Name United Kingdom
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55959196 Sequence: 55959197
Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title Active TLA Device Title Placebo TLA Device
Description 12 week overnight treatment with the active Temperature Controlled Laminar Airflow device. Description 12 week overnight treatment with the placebo Temperature Controlled Laminar Airflow device.

Interventions

Sequence: 52811077 Sequence: 52811078
Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Device
Name Nocturnal Temperature controlled Laminar Airflow (TLA) Treatment Name Placebo TLA Device
Description 12 weeks of overnight treatment with active TLA device Description 12 weeks of overnight use of placebo TLA device

Keywords

Sequence: 80318916
Name Atopic Dermatitis Eczema
Downcase Name atopic dermatitis eczema

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178617001 Sequence: 178617002 Sequence: 178617003 Sequence: 178617004 Sequence: 178617005 Sequence: 178617006 Sequence: 178617007 Sequence: 178617008 Sequence: 178617009 Sequence: 178617010 Sequence: 178617011
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Change of eczema severity (Eczema Area Severity Index = EASI Score, total) at week 12 compared to baseline Measure (Eczema Area Severity Index = EASI): EASI 50, EASI 75 Measure Change in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis = SCORAD Index Measure Proportion of subjects achieving Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 Measure Change in health related quality of life [QoL] from baseline for participants: CDQLI Measure Improvement of itch; Visual Analogue Score (VAS), from baseline Measure Improvement of sleep; Visual Analogue Score (VAS), from baseline Measure Change in adverse impact on participants' families from baseline Measure Change of patient reported eczema activity from baseline Measure Change in medication requirements (topical immunomodulators) from baseline Measure Change in sleep quality from baseline: actigraphy
Time Frame 12 weeks Time Frame 12 weeks Time Frame 12 weeks Time Frame 12 weeks Time Frame 20-22 weeks (baseline 4-6 weeks, intervention 12 weeks, 4 weeks after intervention) Time Frame 20-22 weeks (baseline 4-6 weeks, intervention 12 weeks, 4 weeks after intervention) Time Frame 20-22 weeks (baseline 4-6 weeks, intervention 12 weeks, 4 weeks after intervention) Time Frame 20-22 weeks (baseline 4-6 weeks, intervention 12 weeks, 4 weeks after intervention) Time Frame 20-22 weeks (baseline 4-6 weeks, intervention 12 weeks, 4 weeks after intervention) Time Frame 20-22 weeks (baseline 4-6 weeks, intervention 12 weeks, 4 weeks after intervention) Time Frame 4-6 weeks
Description Change of eczema severity (EASI Score) at week 12 compared to baseline; higher score = higher severity. range 0-72 (0=no eczema, 72 highest severity) Description Proportion of participants achieving at least a 50% (EASI 50) or 75% (EASI 75) reduction of eczema severity. EASI range 0-72 (0=no eczema, 72 highest severity) Description Change in total SCORAD Index at week 12 compared to baseline; higher score = higher severity; range 0-103 (0=no eczema, 103 highest severity) Description Proportion of subjects achieving Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1; maximum score is 5 = most severe Description Change in health related quality of life during run-in period, 12 week treatment period and 4 weeks after treatment end using Children's Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (CDQLI). Range 0-30 (0=no QoL impairment, 30 severe QoL impairment) Description Change of itch intensity during during run-in period, 12 week treatment period; and 4 weeks after treatment end; Visual Analogue Score (VAS) range 0-100; higher score = higher severity Description Change of sleep disturbance during run-in period, 12 week treatment period and 4 weeks after treatment end; Visual Analogue Score (VAS) range 0-100; higher score = higher severity Description Change in adverse impact of participants' eczema on families,during run-in period, 12 week treatment period and 4 weeks after treatment end using Dermatitis Family Impact Questionnaire (DFI); higher score = worse impact. Range 0-30 (0=no impact, 30 severe adverse impact) Description Change of patient reported eczema activity during run-in period, 12 week treatment period and 4 weeks after treatment end, using Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) tool; total score reported, higher score = higher severity; Range 0-28 (0=no impairment, 28 severe reported eczema symptoms) Description Change in medication requirements during run-in period, 12 week treatment period and 4 weeks after treatment end (topical immunomodulators, topical steroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors) from baseline Description Change in sleep quality, measured by actigraphy before and in first month after intervention start (total movement activity reported, higher scores = worse sleep disturbance); this is not a limited scale but simply counts the number of times an individual moves.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194752883 Sequence: 194752884 Sequence: 194752885 Sequence: 194752886 Sequence: 194752887 Sequence: 194752888 Sequence: 194752889 Sequence: 194752890 Sequence: 194752891 Sequence: 194752892
Mesh Term Dermatitis, Atopic Mesh Term Dermatitis Mesh Term Eczema Mesh Term Skin Diseases Mesh Term Skin Diseases, Genetic Mesh Term Genetic Diseases, Inborn Mesh Term Skin Diseases, Eczematous Mesh Term Hypersensitivity, Immediate Mesh Term Hypersensitivity Mesh Term Immune System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term dermatitis, atopic Downcase Mesh Term dermatitis Downcase Mesh Term eczema Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases, genetic Downcase Mesh Term genetic diseases, inborn Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases, eczematous Downcase Mesh Term hypersensitivity, immediate Downcase Mesh Term hypersensitivity Downcase Mesh Term immune system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48626637 Sequence: 48626638
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Imperial College London Name JP Moulton Charitable Foundation

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29458472
Role Principal Investigator
Name Claudia Gore, MD PhD
Affiliation Imperial College London

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12094392
Contact Type primary
Name Claudia Gore, MD PhD
Phone +44 203 312 6650
Email cgore@nhs.net
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68601131 Sequence: 68601132
Design Group Id 55959196 Design Group Id 55959197
Intervention Id 52811077 Intervention Id 52811078

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30954618
Gender All
Minimum Age 4 Years
Maximum Age 16 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Age 4 to 16 years at time of consent
Persistent moderate to severe eczema despite treatment with topical corticosteroids (TCS) Class II or more and/or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI, licenced use only) for at least 3 months.
Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score ≥12 at screening and randomisation visit and >10% body surface involved
Sensitisation to house dust mite species, confirmed by specific Immunoglobulin E (ImmunoCAP ≥2) and/or Skin Prick Test (SPT ≥5mm)
Child able to sleep in their own bed and able to use the device for at least 5 out of 7 nights per week
Written, informed consent of parent/legal guardian and patient assent

Exclusion Criteria:

very severe atopic dermatitis
use of systemic immunosuppression (such as cyclosporine, methotrexate, azathioprine, oral steroids) or UV therapy or extracorporal photopheresis within four weeks prior to the screening visit
received therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (such as Omalizumab or Dupilumab) within six months prior to the screening visit
Ongoing or planned desensitisation / immunotherapy during the study
Infections requiring systemic antimicrobial treatment within four weeks prior to the screening visit
Introduction of special dietary restriction (for eczema treatment) within three months prior to screening visit
Severe asthma ≥ Step 4 and/or ≥1 course of systemic oral steroids for asthma in the three months prior to screening visit
Significant underlying chronic medical condition (chronic other skin disease, inflammatory bowel disease, immunodeficiencies, other uncontrolled systemic disease, cancer)
Planned time away from home (=unable to use TLA) exceeding 2 days/week; unable to use the device at least 5/7 days in the 2-3 weeks prior to end of intervention period.
Prior research participation is not an exclusion criterion, except if it involved eczema disease modifying agents.
Participating in current research

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253909992
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 4
Maximum Age Num 16
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 10

Designs

Sequence: 30700198
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Quadruple
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29066964
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52410172 Sequence: 52410173 Sequence: 52410174 Sequence: 52410175
Pmid 29383776 Pmid 24750266 Pmid 27898693 Pmid 22131290
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Gore C, Gore RB, Fontanella S, Haider S, Custovic A. Temperature-controlled laminar airflow (TLA) device in the treatment of children with severe atopic eczema: Open-label, proof-of-concept study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2018 May;48(5):594-603. doi: 10.1111/cea.13105. Epub 2018 Mar 13. Citation Gore RB, Boyle RJ, Gore C, Custovic A, Hanna H, Svensson P, Warner JO. Effect of a novel temperature-controlled laminar airflow device on personal breathing zone aeroallergen exposure. Indoor Air. 2015 Feb;25(1):36-44. doi: 10.1111/ina.12122. Epub 2014 Jun 10. Citation Spilak MP, Sigsgaard T, Takai H, Zhang G. A Comparison between Temperature-Controlled Laminar Airflow Device and a Room Air-Cleaner in Reducing Exposure to Particles While Asleep. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 29;11(11):e0166882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166882. eCollection 2016. Citation Boyle RJ, Pedroletti C, Wickman M, Bjermer L, Valovirta E, Dahl R, Von Berg A, Zetterstrom O, Warner JO; 4A Study Group. Nocturnal temperature controlled laminar airflow for treating atopic asthma: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2012 Mar;67(3):215-21. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200665. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Diet Restriction and Exercise-induced Adaptations in Metastatic Breast Cancer ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795493
2019-04-23

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795493
NCT03795493https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795493?tab=tableNANANAFifty patients with metastatic breast cancer will be randomly assigned to an acute intervention consisting of both aerobic exercise and caloric restriction administered acutely prior to each of six chemotherapy cycles, or to usual care. The aerobic exercise intervention will consist of a single supervised recumbent cycle ergometer session performed concurrent to each chemotherapy infusion. The diet intervention consists of provision of meals freshly prepared in a metabolic kitchen with caloric content equivalent to 50% of measured energy requirements and low carbohydrate content for 48-72 hours prior to each chemotherapy infusion. Tumor outcomes will be assessed via CT scan (tumor size) and MRI (novel marker of tumor regression), while treatment side effects will be assessed by MRI and treatment symptoms and quality of life will be assessed via questionnaire before, during and after up to six chemotherapy cycles of a consistent treatment protocol. Progression-free and overall survival will be tracked for two years after diagnosis.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-11-26
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2023-01-05
Start Month Year April 23, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 31, 2023
Verification Month Year June 2022
Verification Date 2022-06-30
Last Update Posted Date 2023-01-05

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20548344
Description Despite major advances in recent decades in treatment for early stage breast cancer leading to an 89% 5-year survival rate, metastatic breast cancer is still considered incurable due to resistance to most available treatments. As such, 5-year survival rate for metastatic breast cancer is only 22%. One mechanism for resistance to cancer therapies and promotion of metastasis in solid tumors is that their vascular system is impaired causing diminished delivery of systemic therapy and oxygen. Furthermore, toxicity can be quite high with metastatic regimens, which can limit the dose received. Both diet and exercise have been used to attenuate treatment toxicity, but the promising preclinical evidence showing their potential to enhance chemotherapy efficacy and survival has not been studied in humans. For example, a single bout of aerobic exercise substantially increased tumor blood flow and oxygen delivery, suggesting that chemotherapy delivery to the tumor would be enhanced. Short periods of fasting or caloric restriction also appear to be safe and effective strategies to inhibit tumor growth and enhance chemotherapy efficacy, while also promoting resistance to chemotherapy in healthy cells. Furthermore, combining aerobic exercise and caloric restriction can elicit synergistic effects on outcomes relevant to cancer, including body composition, aerobic fitness, fasting insulin and glucose, insulin-like growth factor, and tumor promoter pathways.

Study Design: With preclinical proof-of-principle and clinical safety and feasibility of each intervention independently established, this study will be a phase II, two-arm, single blind, randomized controlled trial. Fifty patients will be randomly assigned to an acute intervention consisting of both caloric restriction administered acutely prior to and aerobic exercise during each treatment of six chemotherapy cycles, or to usual care.

Approach: Participants will include adults with metastatic breast cancer with measurable metastases that will receive intravenous chemotherapy. The aerobic exercise intervention will consist of a single supervised recumbent cycle ergometer session performed concurrent to each chemotherapy infusion. The diet intervention consists of provision of meals freshly prepared in a metabolic kitchen with caloric content equivalent to 50% of measured energy requirements and low carbohydrate content for 48-72 hours prior to each chemotherapy infusion. The diet period will be reduced from 72 to 48 hours when there are <7 days between infusions (ie weekly protocols) to avoid inducing a sustained caloric deficit leading to weight loss. This acute intervention does not lead to long-term nutritional imbalances. Exercise intensity and meals will be individualized to participant abilities and preferences. All participants, regardless of group assignment, will receive a one-time phone consultation with a registered dietitian and a certified exercise physiologist to enhance recruitment and retention. Tumor outcomes will be assessed via CT scan (tumor size) and MRI (novel marker of tumor regression), while treatment side effects will be assessed by MRI and treatment symptoms and quality of life will be assessed via questionnaire before, during and after up to six chemotherapy cycles of a consistent treatment protocol. Progression-free and overall survival will be tracked for two years after diagnosis.

Facilities

Sequence: 198399353
Name University of Alberta
City Edmonton
State Alberta
Zip T6G 2E1
Country Canada

Conditions

Sequence: 51726056
Name Breast Cancer
Downcase Name breast cancer

Id Information

Sequence: 39804765
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value HREBA.CC-18-0657

Countries

Sequence: 42203624
Name Canada
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55145824 Sequence: 55145825
Group Type Experimental Group Type No Intervention
Title Intervention Group Title Control Group
Description Standard chemotherapy treatment and oncology care plus short-term diet and exercise intervention. Description Standard chemotherapy treatment and oncology care.

Interventions

Sequence: 52047612
Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Short-term diet and exercise intervention
Description Participants assigned to the intervention group will perform both the diet and acute exercise interventions. The interventions will be applied prior to up to six chemotherapy cycles of a consistent protocol. The total number of treatments of a given protocol received prior to treatment conclusion is dependent on patient condition and oncologic care preferences.

Keywords

Sequence: 79143287 Sequence: 79143288 Sequence: 79143289 Sequence: 79143290
Name Exercise Name Nutrition Name Caloric Restriction Name Chemotherapy
Downcase Name exercise Downcase Name nutrition Downcase Name caloric restriction Downcase Name chemotherapy

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 175929515 Sequence: 175929516 Sequence: 175929517 Sequence: 175929518 Sequence: 175929519 Sequence: 175929520 Sequence: 175929521 Sequence: 175929522 Sequence: 175929523 Sequence: 175929524 Sequence: 175929525 Sequence: 175929526 Sequence: 175929527 Sequence: 175929528 Sequence: 175929529 Sequence: 175929530
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Tumor size change after 6 cycles (mm) Measure Tumor response to therapy by magnetic resonance imaging (mm²/s) Measure Tumor size change after 3 cycles (mm) Measure Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) Measure Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (%) Measure Left ventricular mass (g/m²) Measure Liver fat fraction (%) Measure Liver T1 relaxation time (ms) Measure Thigh skeletal muscle T1 relaxation time (ms) Measure Thigh muscle volume (mL) Measure Thigh skeletal muscle fat fraction % Measure Patient-reported treatment symptoms Measure Self reported quality of life Measure Fatigue Measure Progression-free survival (months) Measure Overall survival (months)
Time Frame 0-6 weeks before the first chemotherapy treatment of the first cycle and 1-4 weeks after the last chemotherapy treatment of the last cycle Time Frame 0-2 weeks before the first chemotherapy treatment of the first cycle and 2-3 weeks after the last chemotherapy treatment of the last cycle Time Frame 0-6 weeks before the first chemotherapy treatment of the first cycle and 1-3 weeks after the last chemotherapy treatment of the third cycle Time Frame 0-2 weeks before the first chemotherapy treatment of the first cycle and 2-3 weeks after the last chemotherapy treatment of the last cycle Time Frame 0-2 weeks before the first chemotherapy treatment of the first cycle and 2-3 weeks after the last chemotherapy treatment of the last cycle Time Frame 0-2 weeks before the first chemotherapy treatment of the first cycle and 2-3 weeks after the last chemotherapy treatment of the last cycle Time Frame 0-2 weeks before the first chemotherapy treatment of the first cycle and 2-3 weeks after the last chemotherapy treatment of the last cycle Time Frame 0-2 weeks before the first chemotherapy treatment of the first cycle and 2-3 weeks after the last chemotherapy treatment of the last cycle Time Frame 0-2 weeks before the first chemotherapy treatment of the first cycle and 2-3 weeks after the last chemotherapy treatment of the last cycle Time Frame 0-2 weeks before the first chemotherapy treatment of the first cycle and 2-3 weeks after the last chemotherapy treatment of the last cycle Time Frame 0-2 weeks before the first chemotherapy treatment of the first cycle and 2-3 weeks after the last chemotherapy treatment of the last cycle Time Frame 0-2 weeks before the first chemotherapy treatment of the first cycle, at each chemotherapy treatment, and 2-3 weeks after the last chemotherapy treatment of the last cycle Time Frame 0-2 weeks before the first chemotherapy treatment of the first cycle, at the first chemotherapy treatment of 4th cycle, and 2-3 weeks after the last chemotherapy treatment of the last cycle Time Frame 0-2 weeks before the first chemotherapy treatment of the first cycle, at the first chemotherapy treatment of 4th cycle, and 2-3 weeks after the last chemotherapy treatment of the last cycle Time Frame Two years after study enrollment Time Frame Two years after study enrollment
Description Change in tumor size measured by computerized tomography after 6 cycles. Description Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) derived water apparent diffusion coefficient within the tumor Description Change in tumor size measured by computerized tomography after 3 cycles. Description MRI-derived left ventricular ejection fraction Description MRI-derived left ventricular global longitudinal strain Description MRI-derived left ventricular mass Description Percent of fat in liver derived by PROFIT1 chemical-shift encoded MRI Description MRI-derived relaxation time from healthy liver Description MRI-derived skeletal muscle T1 relaxation time at mid-thigh Description PROFIT1 chemical-shift encoded MRI of the mid-thigh will be used to assess thigh muscle volume Description Percent of intermuscular fat in thigh muscle derived by PROFIT1 chemical-shift encoded MRI Description Patient-reported treatment symptoms assessed using the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist Description Quality of life assessed using the total score from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Fatigue Questionnaire. Scores can range from 0 – 52 where a high score represents a better quality of life. Description Fatigue assessed using the total score from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Fatigue Questionnaire. Scores can range from 0 – 52 where a high score represents a lower level of fatigue. Description Progression-free survival time extracted from Cancer Control Alberta's electronic database Description Overall survival time extracted from Cancer Control Alberta's electronic database

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 191696108 Sequence: 191696109 Sequence: 191696110 Sequence: 191696111 Sequence: 191696112
Mesh Term Breast Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Breast Diseases Mesh Term Skin Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term breast neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term breast diseases Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 47906138 Sequence: 47906139 Sequence: 47906140
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University of Alberta Name Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) Name Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29026424 Sequence: 29026425
Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Carla Prado, PhD Name Richard Thompson, PhD
Affiliation University of Alberta Affiliation University of Alberta

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67606165
Design Group Id 55145824
Intervention Id 52047612

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30505943
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Diagnosis of stage IV or metastatic breast cancer;
Measurable metastases.
Age >18
Starting (or having only received one treatment of) any type of intravenously administered chemotherapy;
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Score < 3
Oncologist approval to participate
Able to communicate and read and understand English;
Willing and able to adhere to the study interventions and assessments;

Exclusion Criteria:

Limitations to sustained exercise (including bone metastases in the femur neck);
Clinical evidence of cachexia (oncologist's discretion, study team will use body mass index <18.5kg/m² as a flag to highlight concern to treating oncologist);
Body mass >109 kg at time of enrollment;
Diabetes;
Severe food allergies;
History of eating disorder (diagnosed or self-reported);
Strict diet restrictions including vegetarian or vegan;
Unable to provide informed consent (i.e. cognitive impairment);
Supplemental oxygen requirement;
Uncontrolled pleural effusions (oncologists approval if pleural effusions exists and are controlled);
Bilirubin >30 umol/L;
Creatinine >120 umol/L;
Pregnant;
Contraindications to 3T MRI for research purposes

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254051894
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 13

Designs

Sequence: 30255025
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Supportive Care
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28635518
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 51617597
Pmid 34629067
Reference Type derived
Citation Kirkham AA, King K, Joy AA, Pelletier AB, Mackey JR, Young K, Zhu X, Meza-Junco J, Basi SK, Hiller JP, Brkin T, Michalowski B, Pituskin E, Paterson DI, Courneya KS, Thompson RB, Prado CM. Rationale and design of the Diet Restriction and Exercise-induced Adaptations in Metastatic breast cancer (DREAM) study: a 2-arm, parallel-group, phase II, randomized control trial of a short-term, calorie-restricted, and ketogenic diet plus exercise during intravenous chemotherapy versus usual care. BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 10;21(1):1093. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08808-2.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Online Intervention for Depression: MOOD ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795480
2018-05-07

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795480
NCT03795480https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795480?tab=tableNANANAThe study aims to examine the efficacy and acceptance of a self-help internet intervention “MOOD” in a sample of individuals with depressive symptoms. It is tested whether depressive symptomatology decreases in the intervention group compared to a wait-list control group. Further aims are to ascertain changes in self-worth and quality of life, to assess subjective evaluation of the program and to examine whether expectations of the program’s helpfulness would predict symptom reduction.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-08-16
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-07
Start Month Year May 7, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year July 22, 2018
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-07

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20721576
Description The study aims to examine the efficacy and acceptance of a self-help internet intervention "MOOD" in a sample of individuals with depressive symptoms. It is tested whether depressive symptomatology decreases in the intervention group compared to a wait-list control group. Secondary aims are to ascertain changes in self-worth and quality of life, to assess subjective evaluation of the program and to examine whether expectations of the program's helpfulness would predict symptom reduction. During the intervention period of six weeks, participants of the intervention group have access to the online program MOOD. Prior and following this period both groups complete a pre- and post-assessment. Participants of the wait-list control group receive access to MOOD following the post-assessment.

Facilities

Sequence: 200107801
Name Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy of University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
City Hamburg
Zip 20246
Country Germany

Conditions

Sequence: 52171091
Name Depressive Symptoms
Downcase Name depressive symptoms

Id Information

Sequence: 40158535
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value MOOD

Countries

Sequence: 42568837
Name Germany
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55593027 Sequence: 55593028
Group Type Experimental Group Type No Intervention
Title MOOD Title Control
Description The online program "MOOD" is based on methods of cognitive behavior therapy (KVT) and contains elements of mindfulness and metacognition. Participants can contact a moderator (trained psychologists) if they have any questions. However, this function is optional. The program consists of nine interactive modules, one of which is an introductory module. The other modules are called: ABC-Scheme, Positive Activities, Self-Worth, Social Competence, Mindfulness, Modifying Thoughts, Sleep, and Relapse Prevention. Description The wait-list control group does not receive additional treatment. However, previously started therapies (psychotherapy/ psychopharmacotherapy) may be continued during the study. Individuals of the wait-list control group receive access to MOOD after completion of the post-assessment.

Interventions

Sequence: 52485337
Intervention Type Behavioral
Name MOOD
Description MOOD is an online self-help program targeted on depressive symptoms. The program consists of nine modules, one of which is an introductory module. The other modules are called: ABC-Scheme, Positive Activities, Self-Worth, Social Competence, Mindfulness, Modifying Thoughts, Sleep, and Relapse Prevention. All modules are based on principles of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and include elements of mindfulness-based and metacognitive techniques. The modules contain interactive exercises which are aimed at incorporating the participant's experiences into the program and increasing identification of the participant with the presented material. Participants are free to work through the different modules in their own speed and way, however, it is recommended to work on one to two modules per week.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177378357 Sequence: 177378358 Sequence: 177378359 Sequence: 177378360 Sequence: 177378361 Sequence: 177378362
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Measure Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE) Measure WHOQOL-Bref Measure University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA) Measure Subjective appraisal Measure Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Depression Module (PHQ-9)
Time Frame Change in BDI from baseline to post (intervention period is 6 weeks) Time Frame Change in RSE from baseline to post (intervention period is 6 weeks) Time Frame Change in WHOQOL-Bref from baseline to post (intervention period is 6 weeks) Time Frame Only at Baseline (pre intervention) Time Frame Only at post-assessment (6 weeks) Time Frame Change in PHQ-9 from baseline to post (intervention period is 6 weeks)
Description This questionnaire assesses symptoms of depression and their severity (Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996). It contains 21 items and the participant is asked to rate how severe he or she experiences each symptom on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all severe) to 3 (extreme form of each symptom). Description The RSE is a self-report questionnaire assessing an individual's self-esteem (Rosenberg, 1965) The scale consists of 10 items and the participants are asked to rate in how far they agree with each item on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". Description The WHOQOL-Bref is a questionnaire assessing Quality of Life (QOL) (Whoqol Group, 1998). It is an abbreviated version of the WHOQOL-100 and contains 26 items. The questionnaire has four types of 5-point Likert scales asking the participant "how much", "how completely", "how often", "how good" or "how satisfied" he felt in the last two weeks. The four different scales are distributed across the four domains sampled in this questionnaire: Physical health, Psychological, Social relations, Environment. Description The URICA is a measure of willingness to change (Dozois, Westra, Collins, Fung & Garry, 2004) and was assessed at baseline. It consists of 32 items that depict four stages of change: pre-contemplation, contemplation, action and maintenance. In the present study, in total 9 items are used which were chosen from the subscales of pre-contemplation, contemplation and action. Internal consistency is .83 and test-retest reliability lies between .63-.75. Description In the post-assessment, individuals of the intervention group also answered questions on subjective evaluation and appraisal of the program. Items were for example "I think this program is useful as a self-help tool" or "I had to bring myself to make use of the program". The items could be answered on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from "Totally disagree" to "Totally agree". Participants also had the possibility to provide feedback on the program. Description The PHQ-9 is used to measure depression and its severity (Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2001). It consists of 9 items which can be rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), depending on the severity and frequency of the symptoms.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193486117 Sequence: 193486118
Mesh Term Depression Mesh Term Behavioral Symptoms
Downcase Mesh Term depression Downcase Mesh Term behavioral symptoms
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48319153
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29285274
Role Principal Investigator
Name Steffen Moritz, Prof.
Affiliation Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68148962
Design Group Id 55593027
Intervention Id 52485337

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30765267
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 65 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

presence of psychological strain and desire for treatment for depressive symptoms
internet access
sufficient command of the German language

Exclusion Criteria:

acute suicidality (as assessed with one item of the BDI)
lifetime diagnoses of bipolar disorder and psychosis

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253877212
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 2
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 65
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 5

Designs

Sequence: 30511434
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28877728
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52063131
Pmid 31579014
Reference Type derived
Citation Bucker L, Schnakenberg P, Karyotaki E, Moritz S, Westermann S. Diminishing Effects After Recurrent Use of Self-Guided Internet-Based Interventions in Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 2;21(10):e14240. doi: 10.2196/14240.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Peripheral Perfusion Index, Haemoglobin and Blood Transfusion in Acute Surgical Patients ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795467
2017-11-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795467
NCT03795467https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795467?tab=tableNANANAThe peripheral perfusion index (PPI) is a non-invasive, feasible measure of peripheral perfusion and, assumed, the overall circulation, which all patients are monitored by.

This study is carried out to assess the association between values of PPI, haemoglobin and blood transfusion.

Hypothetically, patients with low values of hb are more susceptible to a deteriorating circulation reflected in poorer PPI regardless of blood pressure and that resuscitation with blood products improves PPI measurements. Moreover, that patients with low values of PPI have more surgical complications and higher mortality.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-07
Start Month Year November 1, 2017
Primary Completion Month Year October 31, 2018
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-07

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20783049
Description Background: Acute surgical patients with e.g. hip fracture (HF) or acute abdominal surgical conditions often have comorbidities and a fragile circulation. Haemodynamic challenges make these patients vulnerable during anaesthesia, and perioperative complications are frequent.

Anaemia is associated with increased mortality and adverse outcomes in patients undergoing surgery. One of the consequences of acute anaemia is reduced blood oxygen content, leading to reduced tissue oxygen delivery and development of tissue hypoxia. Patients with e.g. HF have a large drop in haemoglobin (hb) level that occurs after the injury, yet prior to the surgery. It is therefore important to be aware of the risk of preoperative anaemia even when the initial hb levels appear to be normal. Perioperative hb are associated with shorter lengths of hospital stay, reduced mortality and lower readmission rates, and patients with postoperative anaemia have increased mortality and length of hospital stay.

Haemodynamic monitoring is traditionally based on measurement of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) but these measurements may be insufficient in evaluating overall oxygen delivery and perfusion of vital organs. An apparently sufficient BP and, for patients with more specialised monitoring, cardiac output (CO), does not necessarily mean a sufficient peripheral microcirculatory flow due to compensatory mechanisms, but on the other hand a low CO may be sufficient in context of low metabolic demand.

The non-invasive peripheral perfusion index (PPI) is a numerical value of peripheral perfusion measured by the pulse oximeter derived from the photoelectric plethysmographic signal. PPI is represents the ratio between the pulsatile component (arterial) and the non-pulsatile component (venous blood, capillary blood and other tissues) of the light reaching the detector of the pulse oximeter, and reflects changes in peripheral blood flow as the pulsatile component increases with vasodilatation and decreases with vasoconstriction. It is an accessible way to obtain a measure for peripheral perfusion as pulse oximeters are universally available in all operating rooms and intensive care units. Previous studies have shown that PPI is a useful indicator of reduced peripheral blood flow both in clinical and experimental settings. Correlation between clinical symptoms of reduced peripheral perfusion such as low temperature, increased capillary response and reduced PPI in critically ill patients has been demonstrated, and a reduced peripheral perfusion may be a predictor of mortality and complications in patients undergoing major surgical procedures and in septic shock patients.

Hypothetically, patients with low values of hb are more susceptible to a deteriorating circulation reflected in poorer PPI regardless of blood pressure and that resuscitation with blood products improves PPI measurements. Moreover, that patients with low values of PPI have more surgical complications and higher mortality.

Method: The main objective of this study is to estimate the association between perioperative values of PPI and haemoglobin levels. The secondary objectives are to evaluate PPI in patients with low hb in relation to mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and evaluate changes in PPI with patients with low and normal hb in relation to transfusion with blood products.

Facilities

Sequence: 200618374
Name Department of Anesthesia, Hvidovre Hospital
City Hvidovre
State Copenhagen
Zip 2650
Country Denmark

Conditions

Sequence: 52328331 Sequence: 52328332 Sequence: 52328333 Sequence: 52328334
Name Fracture of Hip Name Ileus Name Perforated Viscus Name Anastomotic Leak
Downcase Name fracture of hip Downcase Name ileus Downcase Name perforated viscus Downcase Name anastomotic leak

Countries

Sequence: 42691179
Name Denmark
Removed False

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177960026 Sequence: 177960027 Sequence: 177960028 Sequence: 177960029 Sequence: 177960030
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Peripheral perfusion index Measure Haemoglobin level Measure Evaluation of Peripheral perfusion index in patients with high vs. low haemoglobin levels in relation to mean arterial blood pressure (MAP). Measure Proportion of transfusion with blood products in patients with perioperative high vs. low haemoglobin levels. Measure Evaluation of peripheral perfusion index changes in patients with perioperative high vs. low haemoglobin levels in relation to transfusion with blood products .
Time Frame Perioperative with 5 minute interval Time Frame Time interval: From 3 hours preoperative to 10 hours postoperative Time Frame Perioperative Time Frame Perioperative Time Frame Perioperative
Description Absolute PPI levels Description Measurement of haemoglobin by blood sample or artery gas. Description High vs. low hb defined as 6,0 < hb > 6,0. Absolute PPI levels perioperative with a 5 minute interval. Absolute values of MAP measured perioperative with a 5 minute interval. Description High vs. low hb defined as 6,0 < hb > 6,0. Blood transfusion measured as total amount used perioperatively. Description High vs. low hb defined as 6,0 < hb > 6,0. Absolute PPI levels perioperative measured with a 5 minute interval. Blood transfusion measured as total amount used perioperatively.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194085256 Sequence: 194085257 Sequence: 194085258 Sequence: 194085259 Sequence: 194085260 Sequence: 194085261 Sequence: 194085262 Sequence: 194085263 Sequence: 194085264
Mesh Term Anastomotic Leak Mesh Term Hip Fractures Mesh Term Postoperative Complications Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Femoral Fractures Mesh Term Fractures, Bone Mesh Term Wounds and Injuries Mesh Term Hip Injuries Mesh Term Leg Injuries
Downcase Mesh Term anastomotic leak Downcase Mesh Term hip fractures Downcase Mesh Term postoperative complications Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term femoral fractures Downcase Mesh Term fractures, bone Downcase Mesh Term wounds and injuries Downcase Mesh Term hip injuries Downcase Mesh Term leg injuries
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48466456
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Hvidovre University Hospital

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30856350
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Patients > 18 years of age having performed acute abdominal or orthopedic surgery from 1th November 2017 through 31th October 2018 at Hvidovre and Bispebjerg University Hospitals. Study subjects will be obtained from the hospitals electronic medical records via specific procedural- or diagnostic codes representing the acute orthopedic or abdominal surgery in the specified one-year period.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Orthopedic surgery patients with fracture of the hip, booked in the electronic patient record for operation with procedural codes:KNFB02 HNFJ81 KNFJ51 KNFJ52 KNFJ70
Acute abdominal surgery patients booked in the electronic patient record for operation with procedural codes:KJAH01 KJAH00

Exclusion Criteria:

No sampling of PPI registered
Foreign/temporary civil registration number
Already included in cohort

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254313070
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 12
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30602188
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Retrospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28968704
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Marianne Agerskov
Title MD, Research Fellow
Affiliation Hvidovre University Hospital

]]>

<![CDATA[ Can Singing Kangaroo Improve Outcome of Preterm Infants ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795454
2013-05-03

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795454
NCT03795454https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795454?tab=tableNANANATo assess whether a musical intervention (maternal/paternal singing) during the skin-to-skin sessions (Kangaroo care) would improve the language development of the preterm infant. Infants will be randomized to singing or silence during the Kangaroo care from the age corresponding to 30th gestational week until term age (40 gestational weeks).
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-11-30
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2023-06-02
Start Month Year May 3, 2013
Primary Completion Month Year May 31, 2018
Verification Month Year June 2023
Verification Date 2023-06-30
Last Update Posted Date 2023-06-02

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20820184
Description The outcomes are:

a 2- (3-)year neurodevelopmental follow up

– Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (in Finnish in Finland and in Swedish in Sweden)

At the age corresponding to term (40 gestational weeks)

Auditory event related potentials (AERPs) in electroencephalography (EEG), in Helsinki cohort
Auditory event related magnetic fields in magnetoencephalgraphy (MEG) in Karolinska cohort
Parental stress with The State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)

Conditions

Sequence: 52423699 Sequence: 52423700
Name Neurocognitive Dysfunction Name Language Development
Downcase Name neurocognitive dysfunction Downcase Name language development

Id Information

Sequence: 40337873
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value IRB00003181SK

Design Groups

Sequence: 55873513 Sequence: 55873514
Group Type Experimental Group Type No Intervention
Title Singing Kangaroo Title Silent Kangaroo
Description The parent is singing during the skin-to -skin sessions Musical therapeutist gives the instructions Description The parent is silent during the skin-to -skin sessions Musical therapeutist gives the instructions

Interventions

Sequence: 52732914
Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Singing
Description Infant-directed singing and singing of self-invented songs, especially songs emerging from the interaction with the infant, are especially encouraged. The families will receive audio material of children's songs, lullabies, and lyrics of the lullabies to support them if they feel unable to accomplish the task otherwise.

Keywords

Sequence: 80210000 Sequence: 80210001 Sequence: 80210002 Sequence: 80210003
Name Kangaroo care Name MEG Name AERP Name preterm infant
Downcase Name kangaroo care Downcase Name meg Downcase Name aerp Downcase Name preterm infant

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178325870 Sequence: 178325871 Sequence: 178325872
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Auditory cortical responses Measure Parental anxiety Measure Neurocognitive development, language development
Time Frame Age corresponding to term, ie 40 gestational weeks Time Frame 3 months age Time Frame 2 year of age
Description Auditory Event-Related Potentials (AERPs) at full-term age will be recorded with multi-feature paradigm (MFP), in which the mismatch negativity (MMN) to 5 speech-related auditory features can be recorded in a short time period. Description Parents' state anxiety is measured using the STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Spielberger, 1983) with 20 self-descriptive statements once per week until the infant leaves the hospital and once in two weeks until the infant reaches the corrected age of 3 months, Description "Bayley III" :- Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Develoment, Third Edition (in Finnish in Finland and in Swedish in Sweden)

– The following scales will be used: Cognitive, Language, Motor, Language scale includes Expressive Language and Receptive Language Motor scale includes Fine Motorics and Gross Motorics

All scale ranges will be included (i.e., minimum and maximum scores) required to interpret any values. For example, if the *total* score is reported, the *total* range should be provided. If *subscale* scores are reported, the range for each *subscale* should be provided.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194446880 Sequence: 194446881 Sequence: 194446882 Sequence: 194446883
Mesh Term Cognitive Dysfunction Mesh Term Cognition Disorders Mesh Term Neurocognitive Disorders Mesh Term Mental Disorders
Downcase Mesh Term cognitive dysfunction Downcase Mesh Term cognition disorders Downcase Mesh Term neurocognitive disorders Downcase Mesh Term mental disorders
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48553415 Sequence: 48553416 Sequence: 48553417
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University of Helsinki Name Helsinki University Central Hospital Name Karolinska University Hospital

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29416620
Role Principal Investigator
Name Kaija Mikkola, M.D. PhD
Affiliation Helsinki University Central Hospital

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68493628
Design Group Id 55873513
Intervention Id 52732914

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30910372
Gender All
Minimum Age 7 Days
Maximum Age 6 Weeks
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

preterm infants at 30th gestational week capable of being in Kangaroo care

Exclusion Criteria:

intensive care preventing Kangaroo care

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254171452
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 61
Were Results Reported False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 7
Maximum Age Num 6
Minimum Age Unit Days
Maximum Age Unit Weeks
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30656076
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Sequential Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Supportive Care
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Masking Description Assessors do not know the intervention that took place before outcome assessed
Intervention Model Description In Helsinki, block randomization, one intervention at the time in the hospital. In Stockholm, both groups simultaneously cared in the hospital
Outcomes Assessor Masked True

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29022740
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Vineta Fellman
Title professor
Affiliation University of Helsinki

Study References

Sequence: 52334440 Sequence: 52334441 Sequence: 52334442
Pmid 35444514 Pmid 34539329 Pmid 37026177
Reference Type result Reference Type result Reference Type result
Citation Partanen E, Martensson G, Hugoson P, Huotilainen M, Fellman V, Aden U. Auditory Processing of the Brain Is Enhanced by Parental Singing for Preterm Infants. Front Neurosci. 2022 Apr 4;16:772008. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.772008. eCollection 2022. Citation Kostilainen K, Partanen E, Mikkola K, Wikstrom V, Pakarinen S, Fellman V, Huotilainen M. Repeated Parental Singing During Kangaroo Care Improved Neural Processing of Speech Sound Changes in Preterm Infants at Term Age. Front Neurosci. 2021 Sep 3;15:686027. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.686027. eCollection 2021. Citation Kostilainen K, Hugoson P, Haavisto A, Partanen E, Mikkola K, Huotilainen M, Pakarinen S, Furmark C, Aden U, Fellman V. No impact of parental singing during the neonatal period on cognition in preterm-born children at 2-3 years. Acta Paediatr. 2023 Jul;112(7):1471-1477. doi: 10.1111/apa.16788. Epub 2023 Apr 25.

]]>

<![CDATA[ A Shedding Study of Adenovirus Serotype 26 Based Respiratory Syncytial Virus Pre-fusion F Protein (Ad26.RSV.preF) Vaccine in Adults ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795441
2019-01-07

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795441
NCT03795441https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795441?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this study is to assess the shedding and kinetics of the Adenovirus Serotype 26 Based Respiratory Syncytial Virus Pre-fusion F Protein (Ad26.RSV.preF) vaccine after one intramuscular injection of Ad26.RSV.preF in adults.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2019-08-30
Start Month Year January 7, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year July 28, 2019
Verification Month Year August 2019
Verification Date 2019-08-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-08-30

Facilities

Sequence: 200159641
Name Clinical Pharmacology Unit
City Merksem
Zip 2170
Country Belgium

Conditions

Sequence: 52185669
Name Healthy
Downcase Name healthy

Id Information

Sequence: 40169197 Sequence: 40169198 Sequence: 40169199
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value CR108554 Id Value 2018-003261-34 Id Value VAC18193RSV1005
Id Type EudraCT Number Id Type Other Identifier
Id Type Description Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V.

Countries

Sequence: 42580785
Name Belgium
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609326
Group Type Experimental
Title Ad26.RSV.preF
Description Participants will receive one intramuscular injection of an adenovirus serotype 26- based vaccine encoding for the respiratory syncytial virus pre-fusion F protein (Ad26.RSV.preF) on Day 1.

Interventions

Sequence: 52499605
Intervention Type Biological
Name Ad26.RSV.preF
Description Ad26.RSV.preF will be administered as intramuscular injection on Day 1.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432645 Sequence: 177432646 Sequence: 177432647 Sequence: 177432648
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Percentage of Participants with Presence of Ad26.RSV.preF (shedding) as Assessed by qPCR Measure Number of Participants with Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Measure Number of Participants with Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) After Vaccination Measure Number of Participants with Unsolicited AEs as a Measure of Safety
Time Frame Up to Day 183 Time Frame First vaccination (Day 1) to the end of the study (Day 183) Time Frame 7 days after vaccination (Day 1 up to Day 7) Time Frame Day 1 Up to Day 28
Description Percentage of Participants with presence of Ad26.RSV.preF in the adhesive bandage covering the injection site, the injection site area, nares (mid-turbinate), throat, rectum, urine, semen and blood, will be assessed by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR). Percentage of participants with presence of Ad26.RSV.preF (shedding) will be assessed. Description Number of participants with SAEs will be evaluated. An SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, is medically important, and may jeopardize participant or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. Description Number of participants with solicited local and systemic AEs will be evaluated. Solicited local AEs (erythema, swelling/induration, and pain/tenderness at the injection site) and solicited systemic AEs (fatigue, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, chills, nausea, and fever) will be noted in the participant diary through the 7 days post-vaccination. Local and systemic AEs will be graded according to severity as mild (Grade 1), moderate (Grade 2), severe (Grade 3) and potentially life threatening (Grade 4). Description Number of participants with unsolicited AEs will be evaluated. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product, and it does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention, therefore an AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product, whether or not related to that medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product. Unsolicited AEs will include all AEs for which the participant is specifically not questioned in the participant diary. Unsolicited AEs will be graded according to severity as mild (Grade 1), moderate (Grade 2), severe (Grade 3) and potentially life threatening (Grade 4).

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332487
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V.

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29293094
Role Study Director
Name Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V. Clinical Trial
Affiliation Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V.

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168415
Design Group Id 55609326
Intervention Id 52499605

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773683
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

In the investigator's clinical judgment, participant must be in good or stable health. Participants may have underlying illnesses such as hypertension, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipoproteinemia, or hypothyroidism, as long as their symptoms and signs are medically controlled. If they are on medication for a condition, the medication dose must have been stable for at least 12 weeks preceding vaccination and expected to remain stable for the duration of the study. Participants will be included on the basis of physical examination, medical history, vital signs measurement and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG; for participants greater than [>] 65 years of age only) performed at screening
Contraceptive use by women should be consistent with local regulations regarding the use of contraceptive methods for participants in clinical studies
All women of childbearing potential must have a negative highly sensitive serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) pregnancy test at screening and a negative urine beta-hCG pregnancy test immediately prior to study vaccine administration
From the time of vaccination through 3 months after vaccination, participant agrees not to donate blood
Participant must be willing to provide verifiable identification, have means to be contacted and to contact the investigator during the study

Exclusion Criteria:

Participant has a serious chronic disorder, including severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or clinically significant congestive heart failure, requirement for supplemental oxygen, end-stage renal disease with or without dialysis, clinically unstable cardiac disease, Alzheimer's disease, or has any condition for which, in the opinion of the investigator, participation would not be in the best interest of the participant (eg, compromise well-being) or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments
Per medical history, participant has chronic active hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection
Participant has received an investigational drug or used an invasive investigational medical device within 30 days or received an investigational vaccine within 6 months before the planned administration of study vaccine or is currently enrolled or plans to participate in another investigational study during the course of this study
Participant has received treatment with immunoglobulin in the 2 months, or blood products in the 4 months before the planned administration of study vaccine or has any plans to receive such treatment during the study
Participant has received any RSV vaccine in any previous RSV vaccine study at any time prior to randomization

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253953140
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 6
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30519814
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Prevention
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26680487
Intervention Id 52499605
Name JNJ-64400141

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886115
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Long-Term, Open Label Extension Study of Pemziviptadil (PB1046) in PAH Subjects Following Completion of Study PB1046-PT-CL-0004 ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795428
2019-04-10

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795428
NCT03795428https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795428?tab=tableNANANAThis is a multi-center, Phase 2 Long-Term, Open Label Extension (OLE) Study to assess the safety and tolerability of pemziviptadil (PB1046) at an optimally titrated dose. This is a Long-Term, Open label Extension (OLE) Study for subjects with (PAH), having participated in double-blind Study PB1046-PT-CL-0004. The study will include adult subjects previously diagnosed with symptomatic PAH, who are receiving background clinician-directed therapy for PAH.

During this period, subjects will continue to be followed for safety and tolerability, as well as for periodic efficacy, quality of life data and immunogenicity. The study will continue per the schedule of events until such time when pemziviptadil (PB1046) is able to be self-administered, becomes commercially available to the subjects in a particular country or region, or the sponsor terminates the study due to lack of efficacy, safety or other reasons.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-18
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2022-02-22
Start Month Year April 10, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 11, 2022
Verification Month Year February 2022
Verification Date 2022-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2022-02-22

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20731479
Description Subjects entering this study will enter from the double-blind Study PB1046-PT-CL-0004. The starting dose level of pemziviptadil (PB1046) for all subjects in this parent study was a sub-therapeutic or minimally effective dose (MED) of 0.2 mg/kg, administered by SC injection.

Subjects were randomized into the MED) Group or a dose-titration group. In the dose-titration group, individual subjects were titrated up to their maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in a blinded fashion, with the objective of titrating subjects up to a dose of at least 1.2 mg/kg or higher in the MTD Group, while subjects in the MED Group remained at the MED level of 0.2 mg/kg, and underwent "sham dose-titration" to maintain the blind.

Subjects entering the 0006 trial prior to implementation of this protocol amendment will remain blinded until such time that open label dosing will not unblind the 0004 study.

Facilities

Sequence: 200216877 Sequence: 200216878 Sequence: 200216879 Sequence: 200216880 Sequence: 200216881 Sequence: 200216882 Sequence: 200216883 Sequence: 200216884 Sequence: 200216885 Sequence: 200216886 Sequence: 200216887 Sequence: 200216888 Sequence: 200216889 Sequence: 200216890 Sequence: 200216891 Sequence: 200216892
Name University of California San Diego Name University of California – Davis Name University of Miami – Pulmonary Research Center Name Emory University, The Emory Clinic Name University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Name University of Kansas Medical Center Name Tufts Medical Center Name Brigham and Women's Hospital Name NYU Langone Health Name University of Rochester Medical Center Name The Lindner Center for Research and Education at The Christ Hospital Name University of Cincinnati Name INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center Name Allegheny General Hospital Name UPMC Presbyterian Name University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
City La Jolla City Sacramento City Miami City Atlanta City Iowa City City Kansas City City Boston City Boston City New York City Rochester City Cincinnati City Cincinnati City Oklahoma City City Pittsburgh City Pittsburgh City Dallas
State California State California State Florida State Georgia State Iowa State Kansas State Massachusetts State Massachusetts State New York State New York State Ohio State Ohio State Oklahoma State Pennsylvania State Pennsylvania State Texas
Zip 92037 Zip 95817 Zip 33125 Zip 30322 Zip 52242 Zip 66160 Zip 02111 Zip 02115 Zip 10016 Zip 14642 Zip 45219 Zip 45267 Zip 73112 Zip 15212 Zip 15213 Zip 75390
Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96095642 Sequence: 96095643
Mesh Term VIP-ELP fusion molecule PB1046 Mesh Term Vasodilator Agents
Downcase Mesh Term vip-elp fusion molecule pb1046 Downcase Mesh Term vasodilator agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52196928
Name Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Downcase Name pulmonary arterial hypertension

Id Information

Sequence: 40178041
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value PB1046-PT-CL-0006

Countries

Sequence: 42591830
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55622640
Group Type Experimental
Title Pemziviptadil (PB1046) Injection-OL Active Drug-Up-Titration to Stable Dose
Description Pemziviptadil (PB1046) Injection: Regardless of dose assignment, all subjects will be up-titrated in 0.2 mg/kg weekly increments, beginning with 0.4 mg/kg at Week 1, to the target dose of 1.2 mg/kg or higher depending on safety and tolerability.

Interventions

Sequence: 52511740
Intervention Type Drug
Name Pemziviptadil (PB1046) Injection
Description Once-weekly subcutaneous injection

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177474658 Sequence: 177474642 Sequence: 177474643 Sequence: 177474644 Sequence: 177474645 Sequence: 177474646 Sequence: 177474647 Sequence: 177474648 Sequence: 177474649 Sequence: 177474650 Sequence: 177474651 Sequence: 177474652 Sequence: 177474653 Sequence: 177474654 Sequence: 177474655 Sequence: 177474656 Sequence: 177474657 Sequence: 177474659 Sequence: 177474660 Sequence: 177474661
Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Change in REVEAL Registry Risk Calculator Score Measure Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events Measure Incidence of Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Measure Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure from baseline Measure Change in Systolic Blood Pressure from baseline Measure Change in Oral Body Temperature from baseline Measure Change in Respiratory Rate from baseline Measure Change in Heart Rate from baseline Measure 12-Lead ECG – Incidence of clinically significant abnormal ECG findings as measured by 12 Lead ECG Measure Incidence of Immunogenicity Measure Survival Measure Change from baseline in 6MWD (6 minute walk distance test) Measure Change from baseline in NT-proBNP Measure Change from baseline in NYHA/WHO Functional Class (FC) Measure Change from baseline in emPHasis-10 (Health Related Quality of Life) score Measure Change from baseline in Borg Dyspnea Index (BDI) Measure Incidence of Clinical Worsening Measure Change in pulmonary artery pressure from baseline Measure Change in cardiac index from baseline Measure Change in total pulmonary resistance from baseline
Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting up to 30 days prior to first dose of study drug in original study (PB1046-PT-CL-0004/0005) and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose. Time Frame Duration of extension study – Starting the day of first dose and completing 28 days after last dose.
Description Risk scores range from 0 (Lowest risk) to 22 (Highest risk) in PAH subjects Description Incidence of positive immunogenicity results after receipt of study drug Description Measured in meters walked in 6 minutes. Description Scores, which assess breathlessness, fatigue, control and confidence, range from 0 to 50, higher scores indicate worse quality of life. Description BDI scale as measured from 0 to 10 (0 being no breathlessness and 10 being maximal breathlessness) Description As defined by any one of the following: 1. All cause mortality; 2. Hospitalization due to worsening PAH; 3. Initiation of parenteral prostacyclin; 4. Any three of the following: 15% decrease in 6MWD, Functional class III or IV symptoms, Addition of PAH therapy, Worsening right heart failure Description PB1046-PT-CL-0005 subjects only as measured by CardioMEMS device Description PB1046-PT-CL-0005 subjects only as measured by CardioMEMS device Description PB1046-PT-CL-0005 subjects only as measured by CardioMEMS device

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193584728 Sequence: 193584729 Sequence: 193584730 Sequence: 193584731 Sequence: 193584732 Sequence: 193584733 Sequence: 193584734 Sequence: 193584735
Mesh Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Mesh Term Familial Primary Pulmonary Hypertension Mesh Term Hypertension Mesh Term Vascular Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Hypertension, Pulmonary Mesh Term Lung Diseases Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term pulmonary arterial hypertension Downcase Mesh Term familial primary pulmonary hypertension Downcase Mesh Term hypertension Downcase Mesh Term vascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term hypertension, pulmonary Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48343021
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name PhaseBio Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68185308
Design Group Id 55622640
Intervention Id 52511740

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30780377
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 79 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects must have completed Week 17 / End of Study of PB1046-PT-CL-0004;
Willing and able to sign a written Informed Consent (IC) prior to all study-related procedures;
Agrees to use a medically acceptable method of contraception (both male and female patients) throughout the entire study period and continuing for 30 days after their last dose of study drug. if the possibility of conception exists. Medically acceptable methods of contraception include the following: abstinence (not having sex), vasectomy (with confirmed negative sperm counts), condoms and partner using vaginal spermicide and/or cervical cap with spermicide or sponge; oral, implantable, or injectable contraceptives (starting ˃2 months before dosing), diaphragm with vaginal spermicide, intrauterine device, surgical sterilization (˃6 months after surgery). Female subjects ˂45 years of age of non-childbearing potential are defined as being surgically sterile by bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy. Female subjects 45to-60 years of age, inclusive, who are post-menopausal for at least 1 year, and have a follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level confirmation indicating post-menopausal status, will be considered to be of non-childbearing potential. Female subjects > 60 years of age are considered post-menopausal and of non-childbearing potential;
Willing and able to understand and follow instructions, return to the study unit for specified study visits; and, be able to participate in the study through the Stable Dose Maintenance Period, at a minimum.

Exclusion Criteria:

Concomitant medical disorder, condition, or history, that in the opinion of the Investigator, would impair the subject's ability to participate in or complete the requirements of the study;
Pregnant or lactating female subjects;
Significant liver dysfunction as measured by any one of the following during participation in PB1046-PT-CL-0004. (If exclusionary laboratory results become available after the subject has enrolled in PB1046-PT-CL-0006 they should be discontinued. a. alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 3.0 times upper limit of normal (ULN) or; b. aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 3.0 times ULN or; c. serum bilirubin ≥ 1.6 mg/dL.
Recent history of substance abuse that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would impair the subject's ability to participate in or complete the requirements of the study;
In the opinion of the principal investigator (PI), any major surgical procedure within 90 days, or a planned surgical procedure during the study period; which would impact participation in PB1046-PT-CL-0006.
Other new medical or psychiatric conditions which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would place the subject at increased risk, would preclude obtaining voluntary consent, or would confound the objectives of the study;
Known hypersensitivity to study drug or any of the excipients of the drug formulation.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253975613
Number Of Facilities 16
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 33
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 79
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 9
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 8
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30526476
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Sequential Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)
Masking Description Subjects entering the 0006 trial prior to the implementation of this protocol amendment will remain blinded until such time that open label dosing will not unblind the 0004 study.
Intervention Model Description To protect the blind of the parent study (PB1046-PT-CL-0004), all subjects entering PB1046-PT-CL-0006 will commence dosing at Week 1 on 0.4 mg/kg and will be up-titrated in 0.2 mg/kg increments in an open label fashion for 9 weeks.

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28892779
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ ANRS12373 GUNDO SO – Evaluation of an Empowerment Program for WLHIV in Mali ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795415
2019-05-27

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795415
NCT03795415https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795415?tab=tableMarie Préau, Prmarie.preau@univ-lyon2.fr+33 4 78 77 31 63The objective of this research is to measure the short- and mid-term effects of an empowerment program focused on serostatus disclosure management for women living with HIV (WLHIV) in Mali on the “burden of secrecy”.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-06-15
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2019-07-05
Start Month Year May 27, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year February 2020
Verification Month Year July 2019
Verification Date 2019-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-07-05

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735785
Description Serostatus disclosure is a critical issue for persons living with HIV (PLHIV). Studies identified numerous benefits associated with disclosure, but various negative consequences have also been documented. Gender inequality must be taken into account regarding the disclosure issue, in particular in Mali, where women are economically dependent and have a low decision-making power. Moreover, in Mali, since 2006, PLHIV have a legal obligation to disclose their serostatus to their spouse and sexual partner(s) " as soon as possible, or within 6 weeks " after the diagnosis. Although this law is not enforced, it highlights the sensitive nature of the serostatus disclosure issue and raise concerns among PLHIV and other stakeholders.

To support women living with HIV (WLHIV), an empowerment program (Gundo-So) was implemented by ARCAD-SIDA in Mali, in collaboration with several partners. This program aims to empower WLHIV, so that they can make informed decision about disclosing or keeping their serostatus secret in their various life contexts, and that they can identify strategies to disclose or to keep the secret, as well as to manage potential negative reactions. Gundo-So ("The room of confidences") was adapted from a program established in quebec and has been implemented in Mali.

The objective of this research is to measure the short- and mid-term effects of an empowerment program focused on serostatus disclosure management for women living with HIV (WLHIV) in Mali on the "burden of secrecy".

The evaluation of the effects of the Gundo-So program will be helpful to assess the relevance of a national or subregional extension of the program, or even an adaptation to other target populations (e.g. heterosexual men and men who have sex with men living with HIV).

Facilities

Sequence: 200244319 Sequence: 200244320 Sequence: 200244321 Sequence: 200244322 Sequence: 200244323 Sequence: 200244324
Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting
Name CESAC de BAMAKO Name Usac Cnam Name USAC commune IV Name USAC commune I Name USAC commune VI Name USAC commune V
City Bamako City Bamako City Bamako City Bamako City Bamako City Bamako
Country Mali Country Mali Country Mali Country Mali Country Mali Country Mali

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28128019 Sequence: 28128020 Sequence: 28128021 Sequence: 28128022 Sequence: 28128023 Sequence: 28128024
Facility Id 200244319 Facility Id 200244320 Facility Id 200244321 Facility Id 200244322 Facility Id 200244323 Facility Id 200244324
Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary
Name Djénébou Traoré, Dr Name Djénébou Traore, Dr Name Djénébou Traoré, Dr Name Djénébou Traore, Dr Name Djénébou Traore, Dr Name Djénébou Traore, Dr

Conditions

Sequence: 52208134 Sequence: 52208135 Sequence: 52208136 Sequence: 52208137
Name HIV Seropositivity Name Disclosure Name Empowerment Name HIV/AIDS
Downcase Name hiv seropositivity Downcase Name disclosure Downcase Name empowerment Downcase Name hiv/aids

Id Information

Sequence: 40186167
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value ANRS12373

Countries

Sequence: 42599663
Name Mali
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55634691 Sequence: 55634692
Title Immediate Arm (G1) Title Delayed Arm (G2)
Description 3 months after enrollment, each big groups of 16 will be split in two groups. Women in G1 will receive the intervention Gundo-So immediately. (From month 3 to month 6).

112 women will be in immediate arm in 14 groups of 8 women.

Description 3 months after enrollment, each big groups of 16 will be split in two groups. Women in G2 will receive the intervention Gundo-So 3 months after. (From month 6 to month 9).

112 women will be in delayed arm in 14 groups of 8 women.

Interventions

Sequence: 52522097
Intervention Type Behavioral
Name Gundo So
Description Gundo-So was adapted from a program established in quebec. It has been implemented in Mali following 3 phases: 1) cultural adaptation; 2) validation using a pre-post intervention evaluation; 3) scale-up

The programm consists on 9 group meetings group spread over 9 weeks (for 8 WLHIV + 2 trained community-based leaders). Each meeting has some particular thematics with adapted tools.

Keywords

Sequence: 79922980 Sequence: 79922981 Sequence: 79922982 Sequence: 79922983
Name WLHIV Name empowerment Name disclosure Name Mali
Downcase Name wlhiv Downcase Name empowerment Downcase Name disclosure Downcase Name mali

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177511416 Sequence: 177511417 Sequence: 177511418 Sequence: 177511419 Sequence: 177511420 Sequence: 177511421 Sequence: 177511422 Sequence: 177511423 Sequence: 177511424 Sequence: 177511425
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Short term evaluation of the burden associated with the disclosure issue using questionnaires Measure Short term evaluation of the burden associated with the secrecy issue using questionnaires Measure Mid term evaluation of the burden associated with the disclosure issue using questionnaires Measure Mid term evaluation of the burden associated with the secrecy issue using questionnaires Measure Changes in quality of life of WLHIV: questionnaire Measure Evolution of sexual practices and use of risk reduction strategies Measure Reported compliance (questionnaire) Measure Biological data : HIV viral load Measure Biological data : cluster of differentiation 4 levels Measure Satisfaction of the intervention: questionnaire
Time Frame The short term effect will be measured at the end of the intervention and compared between Group 1 and 2. Up to 6 months from the beginning of the randomization to the end of the intervention Time Frame The short term effect will be measured at the end of the intervention and compared between Group 1 and 2. Up to 6 months from the beginning of the randomization to the end of the intervention Time Frame The mid term effect will be measured 9 months after the intervention : up to 9 months after the intervention Time Frame The mid term effect will be measured 9 months after the intervention : up to 9 months after the intervention Time Frame Measured at the randomization and then immediately after the intervention Time Frame Measured at the randomization and then immediately after the intervention Time Frame Measured at the randomization and then immediately after the intervention Time Frame From 6 months before the intervention until the last follow up (total 2 years) Time Frame From 6 months before the intervention until the last follow up (total 2 years) Time Frame Measured immediately after the intervention
Description Improvement of the management of the sharing of the serological status. Empowerment in sharing the HIV status (questionnaire) Description Improvement of the management of the secret of the serological status. Empowerment in keeping secret the HIV status (questionnaire) Description Improvement of the management of the sharing of the serological status. Empowerment in sharing the HIV status (questionnaire) Description Improvement of the management of the secret of the serological status. Empowerment in keeping secret the HIV status (questionnaire) Description Assess the changes in quality of life (questionnaire) Description Assess changes of sexual practices and risk reductions strategies (questionnaire) Description Assess changes of reported compliance throught HIV antiretroviral treatments (questionnaire) Description Access changes in HIV viral load due to the intervention (via the medical file) Description Access changes in cluster of differentiation 4 levels due to the intervention (via the medical file) Description Assess the satisfaction of the intervention using questionnaire

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193627114 Sequence: 193627115 Sequence: 193627116 Sequence: 193627117 Sequence: 193627118 Sequence: 193627119 Sequence: 193627120 Sequence: 193627121 Sequence: 193627122 Sequence: 193627123 Sequence: 193627124 Sequence: 193627125 Sequence: 193627126 Sequence: 193627127 Sequence: 193627128
Mesh Term HIV Seropositivity Mesh Term HIV Infections Mesh Term Blood-Borne Infections Mesh Term Communicable Diseases Mesh Term Infections Mesh Term Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral Mesh Term Sexually Transmitted Diseases Mesh Term Lentivirus Infections Mesh Term Retroviridae Infections Mesh Term RNA Virus Infections Mesh Term Virus Diseases Mesh Term Genital Diseases Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes Mesh Term Immune System Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term hiv seropositivity Downcase Mesh Term hiv infections Downcase Mesh Term blood-borne infections Downcase Mesh Term communicable diseases Downcase Mesh Term infections Downcase Mesh Term sexually transmitted diseases, viral Downcase Mesh Term sexually transmitted diseases Downcase Mesh Term lentivirus infections Downcase Mesh Term retroviridae infections Downcase Mesh Term rna virus infections Downcase Mesh Term virus diseases Downcase Mesh Term genital diseases Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term immunologic deficiency syndromes Downcase Mesh Term immune system diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48353714 Sequence: 48353715 Sequence: 48353716 Sequence: 48353717 Sequence: 48353718 Sequence: 48353719 Sequence: 48353720 Sequence: 48353721
Agency Class OTHER_GOV Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class UNKNOWN Agency Class OTHER Agency Class UNKNOWN Agency Class UNKNOWN
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases Name Fondation de France Name Aix Marseille Université Name Université du Québec a Montréal Name Centre Population et Développement (CEPED), Paris, France Name ARCAD-SIDA MALI Name Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale (GRePS), Bron, France Name Coalition Plus, France

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29305993
Role Principal Investigator
Name Marie Préau, Pr
Affiliation GRePS

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12017224 Sequence: 12017225
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Lucas Riegel Name Marie Préau, Pr
Phone +33 1 77 93 97 63 Phone +33 4 78 77 31 63
Email lriegel@coalitionplus.org Email marie.preau@univ-lyon2.fr
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199216 Sequence: 68199217
Design Group Id 55634692 Design Group Id 55634691
Intervention Id 52522097 Intervention Id 52522097

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30786885
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Gender Female
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population The programm Gundo So has been adapted for groups of malian women living with HIV (WLHIV). The study population is described with the inclusion criteria. Moreover, in order to participate at this research, women have to answer "Yes" at at least one of those 2 questions :

(1) is it difficult for you to share your HIV serostatus ; and (1.1) is it inconvenient for you?
(2) is it difficult for you to keep your HIV serostatus secret; and (2.1) is it inconvenient for you?

Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

women living with HIV
living in Bamako area (Mali)
over 18 years old
knowing their serological status for more than 6 months and less than 5 years
being available to participate in the 9 weekly sessions lasting about 2 hours each.

Exclusion Criteria:

having already participated in Gundo-So

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989644
Number Of Facilities 6
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 4
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30532955
Observational Model Case-Control
Time Perspective Prospective

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26692039
Intervention Id 52522097
Name Gundo So – The room of confidences

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899249
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52103098
Pmid 28789863
Reference Type background
Citation Bernier A, Yattassaye A, Beaulieu-Prevost D, Otis J, Henry E, Flores-Aranda J, Massie L, Preau M, Keita BD. Empowering Malian women living with HIV regarding serostatus disclosure management: Short-term effects of a community-based intervention. Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Feb;101(2):248-255. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.030. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Analysis of Non-Invasively Collected Microneedle Device Samples From Mild Plaque Psoriasis for Use in Transcriptomics Profiling ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795402
2019-03-15

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795402
NCT03795402https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795402?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this study is to collect skin biopsies and non-invasive microneedle device samples from participants with mild chronic plaque psoriasis vulgaris to use for transcriptomics profiling for further investigation.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2019-12-13
Start Month Year March 15, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year November 25, 2019
Verification Month Year December 2019
Verification Date 2019-12-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-12-13

Facilities

Sequence: 200107811
Name Innovaderm Research Inc.
City Montreal
State Quebec
Zip H2K 4L5
Country Canada

Conditions

Sequence: 52171106
Name Psoriasis Vulgaris
Downcase Name psoriasis vulgaris

Id Information

Sequence: 40158545 Sequence: 40158546
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value 8004053 Id Value 8004053
Id Type Other Identifier
Id Type Description Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Countries

Sequence: 42568845
Name Canada
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55593046 Sequence: 55593047
Title Group A Title Group B
Description Three microneedle device samples will be collected from a psoriasis lesion and from nonlesional (healthy) skin on Day 1. Two skin biopsies of 4 millimeter (mm) will be performed on Day 1. No investigational drug product will be administered during this study. Description One microneedle device sample will be collected from a psoriasis lesion and from nonlesional (healthy) skin on Day 1 and at Weeks 2 and 4. Two skin biopsies of 4 mm will be performed on Day 1. No investigational drug product will be administered during this study.

Interventions

Sequence: 52485352
Intervention Type Device
Name Microneedle Device
Description Microneedle device will be used for collecting skin samples as a non-invasive method.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177378421
Outcome Type primary
Measure Measurement of Expression by RNA-sequencing (RNAseq) of Extracted RNA Using Punch Biopsy Method Versus Microneedle Device Sampling Method
Time Frame Up to 28 days
Description Measurement of expression by ribonucleic acid (RNA)-sequencing of extracted RNA by the frequently used punch biopsy method and the microneedle device will be performed to have a comparison between both the methods.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193486196 Sequence: 193486197 Sequence: 193486198
Mesh Term Psoriasis Mesh Term Skin Diseases, Papulosquamous Mesh Term Skin Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term psoriasis Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases, papulosquamous Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48319170 Sequence: 48319171
Agency Class INDUSTRY Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Janssen Research & Development, LLC Name Innovaderm Research Inc.

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29285291
Role Study Director
Name Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Affiliation Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68148978 Sequence: 68148979
Design Group Id 55593046 Design Group Id 55593047
Intervention Id 52485352 Intervention Id 52485352

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30765277
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Population Participants with mild chronic plaque psoriasis vulgaris, defined as having a body surface area (BSA) greater than or equal to (>=) 1 percent (%) and less than (<) 10% (excluding palms, soles, face, scalp, and genitals), will be included in this study.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Participant has a history of chronic plaque psoriasis vulgaris for at least 6 months prior to the screening visit
Participant has had stable psoriasis conditions for at least 3 months before screening (information obtained from medical chart or participant's physician, or directly from the participant)
Participant has plaque psoriasis covering >= 1% but < 10% of his total BSA on Day 1
For Group A: Participant has one psoriasis target lesion or individual lesions within the same anatomical region (excluding palms, soles, face, scalp, and genitals), with a target lesion severity score (TLSS) score of >= 6 on Day 1 allowing the collection of three microneedle device samples and one biopsy sample
For Group B: Participant has one psoriasis target lesion or individual lesions within the same anatomical region (excluding palms, soles, face, scalp, and genitals), with a TLSS score of >= 6 on Day 1 allowing the collection of one microneedle device sample per visit (replicating the extraction on the same area at each visit) and one biopsy sample

Exclusion Criteria:

Participant is a female who is breastfeeding, pregnant, or who is planning to become pregnant during the study
Participant has evidence of erythrodermic, pustular, predominantly guttate psoriasis, or drug-induced psoriasis
Participant has a history of skin disease or presence of skin condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the sample collection or interpretation
Participant is known to have immune deficiency or is immunocompromised
Participant has a history of cancer or lymphoproliferative disease within 5 years prior to Day 1. Participants with successfully treated nonmetastatic cutaneous squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma and/or localized carcinoma in situ of the cervix are not to be excluded

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253877529
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 8
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30511444
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28877738
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Study to Assess PK, Safety and Tolerability in Patients With DM and CKD ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795389
2019-02-12

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795389
NCT03795389https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795389?tab=tableNANANAAn open-label, phase IB, multi-center study evaluating DM199 in subjects with Type 1 Diabetes or Type 2 Diabetes and Stage 3 or 4 Chronic Kidney Disease. The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate safety, tolerability, and PK profile of DM199 in these subjects.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2021-09-13
Start Month Year February 12, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year July 21, 2019
Verification Month Year July 2019
Verification Date 2019-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2021-09-13

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20741142
Description The study evaluates the safety, tolerability, and PK profile of DM199 in subjects with T1D or T2D and with Stage 3 or Stage 4 CKD. Additionally, this study evaluates urine concentrations of KLK1 pre and post dose.

Cohort 1: Subjects with T1D or T2D and Stage 3 CKD will be administered one of three DM199 doses: 3.0 ug/kg or 5.0 ug/kg or 8.0 ug/kg single SC dose. Cohort 2: Subjects with T1D or T2D and Stage 4 CKD will be administered a single 3.0 µg/kg single SC dose. Secondary and exploratory study objectives include collection and analysis of vital signs, biomarkers, eGFR, blood glucose, and ECG's.

Facilities

Sequence: 200280512 Sequence: 200280513 Sequence: 200280514
Name Clinical Pharmacology of Miami Name Orlando Clinical Research Center Inc Name Prism Research
City Hialeah City Orlando City Saint Paul
State Florida State Florida State Minnesota
Zip 33014 Zip 32803 Zip 55114
Country United States Country United States Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52221455 Sequence: 52221456 Sequence: 52221457 Sequence: 52221458
Name Chronic Kidney Disease Name Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3 (Moderate) Name Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 4 (Severe) Name Diabetes
Downcase Name chronic kidney disease Downcase Name chronic kidney disease, stage 3 (moderate) Downcase Name chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe) Downcase Name diabetes

Id Information

Sequence: 40195583
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value DM199-2018-001

Countries

Sequence: 42609615
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55649736 Sequence: 55649737 Sequence: 55649738
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title 3.0 µg/kg SC, single dose Title 5.0 µg/kg SC, single dose Title 8.0 µg/kg SC, single dose
Description n=8, study group of T1D or T2D with stage 3 CKD. separate n=8 of study group with T1D or T2D with CKD stage 4). Description n=8, study group of T1D or T2D with stage 3 CKD. Description n=8, study group of T1D or T2D with stage 3 CKD.

Interventions

Sequence: 52535271
Intervention Type Drug
Name DM199
Description Single SC dose

Keywords

Sequence: 79941658 Sequence: 79941659
Name Diabetes Name Chronic Kidney Disease
Downcase Name diabetes Downcase Name chronic kidney disease

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177561241 Sequence: 177561242 Sequence: 177561243 Sequence: 177561244 Sequence: 177561245 Sequence: 177561246 Sequence: 177561247 Sequence: 177561248 Sequence: 177561249 Sequence: 177561250 Sequence: 177561251 Sequence: 177561252 Sequence: 177561253 Sequence: 177561254
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Safety as assessed by incidence, severity, and causality of adverse events Measure Tolerability as assessed by incidence and severity of AEs Measure plasma measurements of DM199 Measure DM199 urine concentrations of KLK1 Measure C Reactive protein (CRP) Measure Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) Measure Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Measure Nitric Oxide (NO) Measure Serum creatinine Measure Cystatin C Measure neutrophil gelatinase-associated prostaglandin E2 Measure Urine Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (Kim1) Measure serum creatinine Measure Blood glucose
Time Frame 11 days Time Frame 11 days Time Frame 11 days Time Frame 11 days Time Frame 11 days Time Frame 11 days Time Frame 11 days Time Frame 11 days Time Frame 11 days Time Frame 11 days Time Frame 11 days Time Frame 11 days Time Frame 11 days Time Frame 11 days
Description as measured in the three different dosing groups; 3.0 ug/kg, 5.0 ug/kg, and 8.0 ug/kg. Description urine KLK1 will be measured pre and post study drug administration.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193678175 Sequence: 193678176 Sequence: 193678177 Sequence: 193678178 Sequence: 193678183 Sequence: 193678184 Sequence: 193678185 Sequence: 193678179 Sequence: 193678180 Sequence: 193678181 Sequence: 193678182
Mesh Term Kidney Diseases Mesh Term Renal Insufficiency, Chronic Mesh Term Urologic Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Chronic Disease Mesh Term Disease Attributes Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Male Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Renal Insufficiency
Downcase Mesh Term kidney diseases Downcase Mesh Term renal insufficiency, chronic Downcase Mesh Term urologic diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term chronic disease Downcase Mesh Term disease attributes Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases and pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term male urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term renal insufficiency
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48366364
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name DiaMedica Therapeutics Inc

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29312883
Role Study Director
Name Harry Alcorn, Pharm.D.
Affiliation DiaMedica Inc.

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68217310 Sequence: 68217311 Sequence: 68217312
Design Group Id 55649736 Design Group Id 55649737 Design Group Id 55649738
Intervention Id 52535271 Intervention Id 52535271 Intervention Id 52535271

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30794669
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent for study participation.
Subject is ≥ 18 years of age.
Subject has an established diagnosis of T1D or T2D as determined by medical evaluation at screen.
Subjects A1c <9.8%
Subject is clinically stable with respect to underlying renal impairment and diabetes, as assessed by the Investigator's medical evaluation.
Subject has been diagnosed with Stage 3 CKD as defined by eGFR (MDRD) between 30 – <60 or Stage 4 as defined by eGFR <30 (not on dialysis) at screening.
Subject has a body mass index (BMI) between 18 to 45 kg/m2 (inclusive).

Exclusion Criteria:

Subject has positive drug test for drugs of abuse and/or positive alcohol breath test at screening and Day 0.
Subject is unable or unwilling to comply with protocol requirements, including assessments, tests, and follow-up visits.
Subject has a history of significant allergic diathesis such as urticaria, angioedema, or anaphylaxis.
Subject has had any live vaccination ≤ 3 months prior to enrollment or will require vaccination during the study.
Subject must not be taking an ACEi medication for 5 half-lives prior to study drug administration and for 5 days post study drug administration.
Subject is unwilling or unable to limit smoking to ≤ 10 cigarettes per day (or other products that contain nicotine limited to < 200 mg of nicotine/day) during the study participation period.
Subject has a current malignancy or active malignancy ≤ 3 years prior to enrollment except basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ cervical cancer that has undergone potentially curative therapy and ≥ six months have elapsed since the procedure.
Subject has an active infection at the time of enrollment, and/or a history of clinically significant acute bacterial, viral, or fungal systemic infections that required systemic treatment in the last four weeks prior to enrollment.
Subject has known medical history of alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency (α1-antitrypsin deficiency).
Subject has serological evidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or anti-hepatitis C virus (Anti-HCV) at screen.
Subject is pregnant or nursing or is planning a pregnancy during the study period.
Subject is male or female of childbearing potential, is participating in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy and is unable or unwilling to practice medically effective contraception during the study.
Subject has received any investigational drug or device within 14 days (or 5 half lives, whichever is longer) prior to study drug administration on Day 1
Subject has renal artery stenosis as determine at screen with medical history.
Subject has hypotension as defined by systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 and diastolic blood pressure ≤ 60 mmHg.
Subject has Proteinuria: PCR>2000mg/gm (spot testing).
Subject does not have adequate venous access for blood sampling.
Subject has any other medical condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, will make participation medically unsafe or interfere with the study results.
Subject has any other clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory test results at screening that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, increase the subject's risk of participation, jeopardize complete participation in the study, or compromise interpretation of study data.

Subject has any of the following conditions as determined by ECG or medical record:

Any significant arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, which, in the opinion of the Investigators and Medical Monitor, may interfere with the safety of the subject.
Subject is taking Cimetidine, St. John's Wort, or any other herbal or probiotic supplement.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254004254
Number Of Facilities 3
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Actual Duration 5
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 4
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 8
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 2

Designs

Sequence: 30540709
Allocation Non-Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28907029
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Dat’Aids Prevention ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795376
2019-01-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795376
NCT03795376https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795376?tab=tableSolène Secherdpo@dataids.orgNADatAIDS prevention is a cohort study of HIV prevention in over 23 HIV sites in France including overseas, aiming to describe HIV prevention in every aspect including HIV screening, STI and hepatitis screening, post-exposure prophylaxis and pre-exposure prophylaxis
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-21
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-16
Start Month Year January 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 1, 2024
Verification Month Year February 2023
Verification Date 2023-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2023-02-16

Facilities

Sequence: 201134191 Sequence: 201134192 Sequence: 201134193 Sequence: 201134194 Sequence: 201134195 Sequence: 201134196 Sequence: 201134197 Sequence: 201134198 Sequence: 201134199 Sequence: 201134200 Sequence: 201134201 Sequence: 201134202 Sequence: 201134203 Sequence: 201134204 Sequence: 201134205 Sequence: 201134206 Sequence: 201134207 Sequence: 201134208 Sequence: 201134209 Sequence: 201134210 Sequence: 201134211 Sequence: 201134212 Sequence: 201134213 Sequence: 201134214 Sequence: 201134215 Sequence: 201134216 Sequence: 201134217
Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting
Name CHU Besançon – Hôpital Jean Minjoz Name CHRU Brest Name CHU Clermont-Ferrand – Hôpital Gabriel-Montpied Name CHD Vendée Name Hôpital Bicêtre – Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Name Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse – Hospices Civils de Lyon Name Hôpital de la Conception – Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille Name Hôpital Sainte Marguerite – Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Marseille Name CHR Metz-Thionville Name Hôpital Gui de Chauliac Name CHU Nancy – Hôpital Brabois Name CHU Nantes – Hôtel-Dieu Name CHU Nice – Hôpital l'Archet Name CH Niort Name Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière – Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Name Hôpital Bichat – Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Name Hôpital Necker-Pasteur – Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris Name Centre Hospitalier de Cornouaille Name CHU Reims – Hôpital Robert Debré Name CHU Rennes – Hôpital Pontchaillou Name CHU St Etienne – Hôpital Nord Name CHU Strasbourg – Hôpital Civil Name CHU Toulouse – Hôpital Purpan Name CHU Tourcoing – Hôpital Guy Chatiliez Name CH Bretagne-Atlantique Name CHU de Guadeloupe Name CHU de Martinique
City Besançon City Brest City Clermont-Ferrand City La Roche-sur-Yon City Le Kremlin-Bicêtre City Lyon City Marseille City Marseille City Metz City Montpellier City Nancy City Nantes City Nice City Niort City Paris City Paris City Paris City Quimper City Reims City Rennes City Saint-Étienne City Strasbourg City Toulouse City Tourcoing City Vannes City Pointe-à-Pitre City Fort-de-France
Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country Guadeloupe Country Martinique

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28261127 Sequence: 28261128 Sequence: 28261129 Sequence: 28261130 Sequence: 28261131 Sequence: 28261132 Sequence: 28261133 Sequence: 28261134 Sequence: 28261135 Sequence: 28261136 Sequence: 28261137 Sequence: 28261138 Sequence: 28261139 Sequence: 28261140 Sequence: 28261141 Sequence: 28261142 Sequence: 28261143 Sequence: 28261144 Sequence: 28261145 Sequence: 28261146 Sequence: 28261147 Sequence: 28261148 Sequence: 28261149 Sequence: 28261150 Sequence: 28261151 Sequence: 28261152 Sequence: 28261153
Facility Id 201134191 Facility Id 201134192 Facility Id 201134193 Facility Id 201134194 Facility Id 201134195 Facility Id 201134196 Facility Id 201134197 Facility Id 201134198 Facility Id 201134199 Facility Id 201134200 Facility Id 201134201 Facility Id 201134202 Facility Id 201134203 Facility Id 201134204 Facility Id 201134205 Facility Id 201134206 Facility Id 201134207 Facility Id 201134208 Facility Id 201134209 Facility Id 201134210 Facility Id 201134211 Facility Id 201134212 Facility Id 201134213 Facility Id 201134214 Facility Id 201134215 Facility Id 201134216 Facility Id 201134217
Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary Contact Type primary
Name Catherine CHIROUZE Name Sylvain JAFFUEL Name Christine JACOMET Name Dominique MERRIEN Name Antoine CHERET Name Laurent COTTE Name Isabelle RAVAUX Name Sylvie BREGIGEON-RONOT Name Céline ROBERT Name Alain MAKINSON Name Benjamin LEFEVRE Name François RAFFI Name Pascal PUGLIESE Name Simon SUNDER Name Christine KATLAMA Name Yazdan YAZDANPANAH Name Claudine DUVIVIER Name Nolwenn HALL Name Firouze BANISADR Name Pierre TATTEVIN Name Amandine GAGNEUX-BRUNON Name David REY Name Pierre DELOBEL Name Olivier ROBINEAU Name Grégory CORVAISIER Name Isabelle LAMAURY Name André CABIE

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18427536 Sequence: 18427537 Sequence: 18427538 Sequence: 18427539 Sequence: 18427540 Sequence: 18427541 Sequence: 18427542 Sequence: 18427543 Sequence: 18427544 Sequence: 18427545 Sequence: 18427546 Sequence: 18427547 Sequence: 18427548 Sequence: 18427549 Sequence: 18427550 Sequence: 18427551 Sequence: 18427552 Sequence: 18427553 Sequence: 18427554 Sequence: 18427555 Sequence: 18427556 Sequence: 18427557 Sequence: 18427558 Sequence: 18427559 Sequence: 18427560 Sequence: 18427561 Sequence: 18427562
Facility Id 201134191 Facility Id 201134192 Facility Id 201134193 Facility Id 201134194 Facility Id 201134195 Facility Id 201134196 Facility Id 201134197 Facility Id 201134198 Facility Id 201134199 Facility Id 201134200 Facility Id 201134201 Facility Id 201134202 Facility Id 201134203 Facility Id 201134204 Facility Id 201134205 Facility Id 201134206 Facility Id 201134207 Facility Id 201134208 Facility Id 201134209 Facility Id 201134210 Facility Id 201134211 Facility Id 201134212 Facility Id 201134213 Facility Id 201134214 Facility Id 201134215 Facility Id 201134216 Facility Id 201134217
Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Catherine CHIROUZE Name Sylvain JAFFUEL Name Christine JACOMET Name Dominique MERRIEN Name Antoine CHERET Name Laurent COTTE Name Isabelle RAVAUX Name Sylvie BREGIGEON-RONOT Name Céline ROBERT Name Alain MAKINSON Name Benjamin LEFEVRE Name François RAFFI Name Pascal PUGLIESE Name Simon SUNDER Name Christine KATLAMA Name Yazdan YAZDANPANAH Name Claudine DUVIVIER Name Nolwenn HALL Name Firouze BANISADR Name Pierre TATTEVIN Name Amandine GAGNEUX-BRUNON Name David REY Name Pierre DELOBEL Name Olivier ROBINEAU Name Grégory CORVAISIER Name Isabelle LAMAURY Name André CABIE

Conditions

Sequence: 52460702
Name HIV Prevention
Downcase Name hiv prevention

Id Information

Sequence: 40365787
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value DAT_002

Countries

Sequence: 42799728 Sequence: 42799729 Sequence: 42799730
Name France Name Guadeloupe Name Martinique
Removed False Removed False Removed False

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178465106 Sequence: 178465107 Sequence: 178465108 Sequence: 178465109 Sequence: 178465110 Sequence: 178465111 Sequence: 178465112 Sequence: 178465113
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Number of patients enrolled for HIV prevention in the cohort Measure Proportion of persons enrolled for pre-exposure prophylaxis in the cohort Measure Proportion of persons enrolled for post-exposure prophylaxis in the cohort Measure Proportion of persons enrolled for hepatitis screening in the cohort Measure Proportion of persons enrolled for pre-exposure prophylaxis in the cohort according to national French guidelines Measure Proportion of persons enrolled for post-exposure prophylaxis in the cohort according to national French guidelines Measure Incidence of STIs Measure Incidence of hepatitis
Time Frame From date of enrollment, through study completion, an average of 1 year Time Frame From date of enrollment, through study completion, an average of 1 year Time Frame From date of enrollment, through study completion, an average of 1 year Time Frame From date of enrollment, through study completion, an average of 1 year Time Frame From date of enrollment, through study completion, an average of 1 year Time Frame From date of enrollment, through study completion, an average of 1 year Time Frame From date of enrollment, through study completion, an average of 1 year Time Frame From date of enrollment, through study completion, an average of 1 year
Description Demographics, risk factors clinical and biological characteristics, treatment of patients enrolled for HIV prevention in the cohort Description Demographics, risk factors clinical and biological characteristics, treatment of patients attending for pre-exposure prophylaxis in the cohort Description Demographics, risk factors clinical and biological characteristics, treatment of patients attending for post-exposure prophylaxis in the cohort Description Demographics, risk factors clinical and biological characteristics, treatment of patients attending for hepatitis screening in the cohort Description Adequation between prevention practices and guidelines Description Adequation between prevention practices and guidelines

Sponsors

Sequence: 48588516
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name DatAids

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29436901 Sequence: 29436902
Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Pascal PUGLIESE, MD Name André CABIE, MD-PhD
Affiliation Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice Affiliation Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12083325 Sequence: 12083326
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Pascal Pugliese, MD Name Solène Secher
Phone 0033492035802
Email pugliese.p@chu-nice.fr Email dpo@dataids.org
Role Contact Role Contact

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30931494
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Population All persons attending for HIV prevention and seeking care at 23 centers using NADIS are included in the Dataids Prevention cohort after receiving oral information and giving written consent. NADIS is an electronic medical record (EMR) for HIV infection (and Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV), STI) and HIV prevention in French public hospitals.

The Dataids Prevention study recruits persons HIV- and above the age of 18 years.

Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Male and female over 18 years old,
HIV negative
Attending for :
HIV screening
Hepatitis screening
STI screening / treatment
Blood, body fluid or sexual exposure
Post-exposure prophylaxis
Pre-exposure prophylaxis
Signed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

HIV-infection
Refusal to participate

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254214857
Number Of Facilities 27
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 7

Designs

Sequence: 30677136
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29043846
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Orkambi Treatment in 2 to 5 Year Old Children With CF ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795363
2019-04-10

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795363
NCT03795363https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795363?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this observational research study is to determine the effects of clinically prescribed Orkambi treatment on 2 to 5 year old children homozygous for the F508del Mutations in the Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene on sleeping energy expenditure, growth status and gut health and function.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-28
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2021-12-02
Start Month Year April 10, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year June 16, 2021
Verification Month Year December 2021
Verification Date 2021-12-31
Last Update Posted Date 2021-12-02

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20762942
Description Orkambi is a novel FDA approved (August, 2018) therapy for use in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) who are 2 to 5 years of age and homozygous for F508del mutations in the CFTR gene. It is a combination of lumacaftor and ivacaftor that addresses both the processing and gating defects of the F508del mutation. This investigator-initiated study is designed to evaluate the nutritional, growth and GI impact of Orkambi treatment for this unique younger (2 to 5 years) patient cohort. This proposal extends previous highly informative nutrition and weight gain investigation of ivacaftor treatment in people with CF gating mutations to another CFTR modulator treatment (Orkambi) in people homozygous for F508del mutations. The primary aims of the study are to evaluate the impact of 24 weeks of Orkambi treatment in 2 to 5 year old subjects with CF homozygous for F508del mutations on sleeping or resting energy expenditure, growth status and gut health and function in n=32 children ages 2.0 to 5.9 years of age. Protocol evaluations will occur at baseline (pre-treatment) and 12 and 24 weeks after clinically prescribed Orkambi treatment has begun. Other outcomes of significant clinical interest in young subjects with CF will be explored. All subjects will be evaluated as outpatient at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and will be recruited both regionally and nationally to ensure timely enrollment.

Facilities

Sequence: 200458228
Name Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
City Philadelphia
State Pennsylvania
Zip 19146
Country United States

Conditions

Sequence: 52277487
Name Cystic Fibrosis
Downcase Name cystic fibrosis

Id Information

Sequence: 40235487
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 18-015669

Countries

Sequence: 42653081
Name United States
Removed False

Interventions

Sequence: 52589550
Intervention Type Drug
Name Orkambi
Description Orkambi is a novel approved therapy for use in people homozygous for the F508del mutation in the CFTR gene. It is a combination of lumacaftor (VX-809) and ivacaftor( VX-770) that addresses both the processing and gating defects of the F508del mutation. The small-molecule corrector lumacaftor corrects the F508del processing defect and increases epithelial delivery of CFTR protein1. Ivacaftor is a CFTR potentiator that increases the channel open probability in F508del-mutant CFTRs that undergo epithelial delivery in vitro and has an additive effect with lumacaftor on chloride transport (2,3,4,5).

Keywords

Sequence: 80019010 Sequence: 80019011 Sequence: 80019012
Name CF Name CFTR Name Cystic Fibrosis
Downcase Name cf Downcase Name cftr Downcase Name cystic fibrosis

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177770768 Sequence: 177770769 Sequence: 177770770 Sequence: 177770771 Sequence: 177770772 Sequence: 177770773 Sequence: 177770774 Sequence: 177770775 Sequence: 177770776 Sequence: 177770777 Sequence: 177770778
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other Outcome Type other
Measure Sleeping or Resting Energy Expenditure Measure Anthropometric Assessment Measure Fecal Elastase I/Pancreatic Function Measure Fecal Calprotectin/Gut Inflammation Measure Plasma Total Fatty Acids Measure Dietary Intake Measure Serum fat soluble vitamin levels Measure Changes in bile acid concentration levels Measure Changes in concentration levels of serum calprotectin Measure Muscle-Fat Stores Measure Growth status changes
Time Frame 24 Weeks Time Frame 24 Weeks Time Frame 24 Weeks Time Frame 24 Weeks Time Frame 24 Weeks Time Frame 24 Weeks Time Frame 24 Weeks Time Frame 24 Weeks Time Frame 24 Weeks Time Frame 24 Weeks Time Frame 24 Weeks
Description Investigators will examine the effects of 24 weeks of orkambi treatment on subject's SEE (sleeping energy expenditure) or REE (resting energy expenditure). Using indirect calorimetry, SEE/REE will be assessed using a computerized metabolic cart Vmax ENCORE at each protocol visit while the child is asleep or resting quietly. SEE/REE will be assessed in the morning if possible and careful note of previous feeding of the child, including the time of day, amount of food, and feeding interval prior to test. It will depend on the age of the subject, and if the subject still takes daily naps and is able to rest quietly without moving, if they will perform sleeping energy expenditure or resting energy expenditure. This will be one outcome measure for each subject, and it will depend on if the subject can nap (SEE) or rest quietly without moving (REE). Description Investigators will examine the effects of 24 weeks of orkambi treatment on subject's body mass index (BMI). Investigators will compare the results to BMI Z scores over 24 weeks compared to baseline. Description Investigators will examine the effects of 24 weeks of orkambi treatment on subject's pancreatic function. Pancreatic function will be assessed at two visits by obtaining spot stool samples with fecal elastase 1. The concentration of fecal elastase I is indicative of pancreatic function. Description Investigators will examine the effects of 24 weeks of orkambi treatment on subject's fecal calprotectin concentration. Spot stool samples will be obtained to determine fecal calprotectin concentration, which is a marker for gut inflammation. Description Investigators will examine the effects of 24 weeks of orkambi treatment on subject's dietary fat absorption. A total plasma fatty acid panel will be assessed to measure the change in status of 22 fatty acids. Description Three day weighed food record will be obtained and to determine changes in dietary caloric intake and micro and macronutrient intake over the course of 24 weeks on orkambi treatment. Description Investigators will examine the changes in serum fat soluble vitamin A, E, D and K concentration levels after 24 weeks of orkambi treatment. Description Investigators will examine changes in the concentration levels of 14 bile acid species in subjects over the course of 24 weeks on orkambi treatment. Description Investigators will examine changes in the concentration levels of serum calprotectin in subjects over the course of 24 weeks on orkambi treatment. Description Investigators will measure body composition to determine muscle and fat store changes over the course of 24 weeks on orkambi treatment compared to baseline. Description Investigators will observe the changes in growth status over time. Growth status will be measured by determining the changes in three different measurements- length (cm), weight (kg) and head circumference (cm). Each value will be used to calculate BMI (kg/cm^2), which will be used in accordance with age to determine the growth velocity percentile of the subjects over the course of 24 weeks on orkambi treatment. The growth velocity percentile will be indicative of changes in growth status over time.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193892896 Sequence: 193892897 Sequence: 193892898 Sequence: 193892899 Sequence: 193892900 Sequence: 193892901 Sequence: 193892902 Sequence: 193892903 Sequence: 193892904
Mesh Term Cystic Fibrosis Mesh Term Fibrosis Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Pancreatic Diseases Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases Mesh Term Lung Diseases Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases Mesh Term Genetic Diseases, Inborn Mesh Term Infant, Newborn, Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term cystic fibrosis Downcase Mesh Term fibrosis Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term pancreatic diseases Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases Downcase Mesh Term genetic diseases, inborn Downcase Mesh Term infant, newborn, diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48418669 Sequence: 48418670
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Name Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29342635
Role Principal Investigator
Name Virginia Stallings, MD
Affiliation Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30827051
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 2 Years
Maximum Age 5 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Population 2 to 5 year old subjects with a diagnosis of cystic fibrosis and homozygous for F508del mutations and who are in a usual state of good health with a clinical decision to start orkambi treatment.
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Cystic fibrosis and homozygous for F508del mutations, approved for treatment
Age: 2.0 to 5.9 years
In usual state of good health
A clinical decision has been made for subject to begin Orkambi treatment
Family committed to the 6 to 8 month study protocol with visits to the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) that will last 2-3 days for the baseline visit (Visit 1) prior to Orkambi and the 24 week visit (Visit 3) after clinically prescribed Orkambi treatment has begun, and will last up to 2 days for the 12 week visit (Visit 2) after Orkambi treatment has begun.

Exclusion Criteria:

On parenteral nutrition
Use of any medications that inhibit or induce cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A
Liver function tests elevated above 3x the reference range for age and sex
Lung disease considered severe based on clinical impression by home CF center.
Other illness affecting growth or nutritional status
Other contraindications described for Orkambi therapy

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254123752
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 26
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 2
Maximum Age Num 5
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3
Number Of Other Outcomes To Measure 6

Designs

Sequence: 30572981
Observational Model Cohort
Time Perspective Prospective

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2589081 Sequence: 2589082
Document Type Study Protocol Document Type Informed Consent Form
Has Protocol True Has Protocol False
Has Icf False Has Icf True
Has Sap False Has Sap False
Document Date 2019-10-28 Document Date 2019-12-04
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/63/NCT03795363/Prot_000.pdf Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/63/NCT03795363/ICF_001.pdf

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28939403
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 52177395 Sequence: 52177396 Sequence: 52177397 Sequence: 52177398 Sequence: 52177399 Sequence: 52177400 Sequence: 52177401 Sequence: 52177402 Sequence: 52177403 Sequence: 52177404 Sequence: 52177405 Sequence: 52177406 Sequence: 52177407
Pmid 30029855 Pmid 22383668 Pmid 19846789 Pmid 27805836 Pmid 26510034 Pmid 3937340 Pmid 4044297 Pmid 15343184 Pmid 17255835 Pmid 27473897
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Stallings VA, Sainath N, Oberle M, Bertolaso C, Schall JI. Energy Balance and Mechanisms of Weight Gain with Ivacaftor Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis Gating Mutations. J Pediatr. 2018 Oct;201:229-237.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 Jul 18. Citation Flume PA, Liou TG, Borowitz DS, Li H, Yen K, Ordonez CL, Geller DE; VX 08-770-104 Study Group. Ivacaftor in subjects with cystic fibrosis who are homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation. Chest. 2012 Sep;142(3):718-724. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2672. Citation Van Goor F, Hadida S, Grootenhuis PD, Burton B, Cao D, Neuberger T, Turnbull A, Singh A, Joubran J, Hazlewood A, Zhou J, McCartney J, Arumugam V, Decker C, Yang J, Young C, Olson ER, Wine JJ, Frizzell RA, Ashlock M, Negulescu P. Rescue of CF airway epithelial cell function in vitro by a CFTR potentiator, VX-770. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 3;106(44):18825-30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904709106. Epub 2009 Oct 21. Citation Milla CE, Ratjen F, Marigowda G, Liu F, Waltz D, Rosenfeld M; VX13-809-011 Part B Investigator Group *. Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor in Patients Aged 6-11 Years with Cystic Fibrosis and Homozygous for F508del-CFTR. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 1;195(7):912-920. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201608-1754OC. Citation Wainwright CE, Elborn JS, Ramsey BW. Lumacaftor-Ivacaftor in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis Homozygous for Phe508del CFTR. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 29;373(18):1783-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1510466. No abstract available. Citation Energy and protein requirements. Report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1985;724:1-206. No abstract available. Citation Schofield WN. Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1985;39 Suppl 1:5-41. Citation World Health Organization. WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height, and body mass index-for-age. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press, World Health Organization; 2006. Citation Borowitz D, Baker SS, Duffy L, Baker RD, Fitzpatrick L, Gyamfi J, Jarembek K. Use of fecal elastase-1 to classify pancreatic status in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 2004 Sep;145(3):322-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.04.049. Citation Borowitz D, Lin R, Baker SS. Comparison of monoclonal and polyclonal ELISAs for fecal elastase in patients with cystic fibrosis and pancreatic insufficiency. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007 Feb;44(2):219-23. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31802c41de. Citation O'Connor MG, Seegmiller A. The effects of ivacaftor on CF fatty acid metabolism: An analysis from the GOAL study. J Cyst Fibros. 2017 Jan;16(1):132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 26. Citation World Health Organization. WHO Child Growth Standards: Head circumference-for-age, arm circumference-for-age, triceps skinfold-for-age, and subscapular skinfold-for-age. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press, World Health Organization; 2007. Citation WHO Multicenter Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards: Growth Velocity Based on Weight, Length and Head Circumference: Methods and Development. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press: World Health Organization; 2009.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Lung Deposition of TRIMBOW® pMDI in Healthy Volunteers, Asthmatic and COPD Patients ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795350
2019-01-14

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795350
NCT03795350https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795350?tab=tableNANANAThe purpose of this study is to investigate the lung deposition and distribution pattern of TRIMBOW using a Gamma-scintigraphic technique after inhalation of a single dose of 99mTc radiolabelled TRIMBOW administered via pMDI in healthy volunteers, asthmatic and COPD patients
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-18
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2022-05-06
Start Month Year January 14, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year April 3, 2020
Verification Month Year May 2022
Verification Date 2022-05-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-05-06

Facilities

Sequence: 198524740
Name Simbec Research Ltd
City Merthyr Tydfil
Country United Kingdom

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 95242344 Sequence: 95242348 Sequence: 95242343 Sequence: 95242345 Sequence: 95242346 Sequence: 95242347 Sequence: 95242349 Sequence: 95242350 Sequence: 95242351 Sequence: 95242352 Sequence: 95242353 Sequence: 95242354 Sequence: 95242355 Sequence: 95242356 Sequence: 95242357 Sequence: 95242358 Sequence: 95242359 Sequence: 95242360 Sequence: 95242361 Sequence: 95242362 Sequence: 95242363 Sequence: 95242364 Sequence: 95242365 Sequence: 95242366 Sequence: 95242367
Mesh Term Glycopyrrolate Mesh Term Autonomic Agents Mesh Term Beclomethasone Mesh Term Bromides Mesh Term Formoterol Fumarate Mesh Term Bronchodilator Agents Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Agents Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Anti-Asthmatic Agents Mesh Term Respiratory System Agents Mesh Term Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists Mesh Term Adrenergic beta-Agonists Mesh Term Adrenergic Agonists Mesh Term Adrenergic Agents Mesh Term Neurotransmitter Agents Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Anticonvulsants Mesh Term Adjuvants, Anesthesia Mesh Term Muscarinic Antagonists Mesh Term Cholinergic Antagonists Mesh Term Cholinergic Agents Mesh Term Anti-Inflammatory Agents Mesh Term Glucocorticoids Mesh Term Hormones Mesh Term Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
Downcase Mesh Term glycopyrrolate Downcase Mesh Term autonomic agents Downcase Mesh Term beclomethasone Downcase Mesh Term bromides Downcase Mesh Term formoterol fumarate Downcase Mesh Term bronchodilator agents Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system agents Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term anti-asthmatic agents Downcase Mesh Term respiratory system agents Downcase Mesh Term adrenergic beta-2 receptor agonists Downcase Mesh Term adrenergic beta-agonists Downcase Mesh Term adrenergic agonists Downcase Mesh Term adrenergic agents Downcase Mesh Term neurotransmitter agents Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term anticonvulsants Downcase Mesh Term adjuvants, anesthesia Downcase Mesh Term muscarinic antagonists Downcase Mesh Term cholinergic antagonists Downcase Mesh Term cholinergic agents Downcase Mesh Term anti-inflammatory agents Downcase Mesh Term glucocorticoids Downcase Mesh Term hormones Downcase Mesh Term hormones, hormone substitutes, and hormone antagonists
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 51761838 Sequence: 51761839
Name Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Name Asthma
Downcase Name chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Downcase Name asthma

Id Information

Sequence: 39831237 Sequence: 39831238
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value CLI-05993AA1-20 Id Value 2017-005030-29
Id Type EudraCT Number

Countries

Sequence: 42231003
Name United Kingdom
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55182582
Group Type Experimental
Title TRIMBOW
Description Experimental: BDP/FF/GB

4 puffs of 99mTc Radiolabelled Beclometasone dipropionate/Formoterol Fumarate/Glycopyrronium Bromide administered via pMDI

Interventions

Sequence: 52082952
Intervention Type Drug
Name Beclometasone dipropionate Formoterol Fumarate Glycopyrronium Bromide
Description single inhalation of 99mTc radiolabelled TRIMBOW pMDI (4 puffs for a total dose of 400mcg BDP, 24mcg FF, 50 mcg GB)

Keywords

Sequence: 79193847 Sequence: 79193848
Name Lung deposition Name Gamma scintigraphy
Downcase Name lung deposition Downcase Name gamma scintigraphy

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 176060042 Sequence: 176060043 Sequence: 176060044 Sequence: 176060045 Sequence: 176060046 Sequence: 176060047 Sequence: 176060048 Sequence: 176060049 Sequence: 176060050 Sequence: 176060051 Sequence: 176060052
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure intrapulmonary lung deposition Measure Intrapulmonary lung distribution of deposition: C/P ratio Measure extrathoracic deposition Measure amount of exhaled drug Measure TRIMBOW pharmacokinetics – (AUC0-t) Measure lung function assessment – FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, FEF25%, FEF50%, FEF75% Measure TRIMBOW pharmacokinetics – (AUC0-30) Measure TRIMBOW pharmacokinetics – (Cmax) Measure TRIMBOW – (tmax) Measure TRIMBOW pharmacokinetics – (AUC0-∞) Measure TRIMBOW pharmacokinetics – (t1/2)
Time Frame immediately after dosing Time Frame immediately after dosing Time Frame immediately after dosing Time Frame immediately after dosing Time Frame up to 24 hours post dose Time Frame up to 24 hours post dose Time Frame up to 24 hours post dose Time Frame up to 24 hours post dose Time Frame up to 24 hours post dose Time Frame up to 24 hours post dose Time Frame up to 24 hours post dose
Description calculated using individual Gamma camera images Description Area Under plasma Concentration from 0 to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t) for BDP, B17MP, FF and GB Description FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, FEF25%, FEF50%, FEF75% Description area under plasma concentration from 0 to 30 min (AUC0-30) for B17MP, FF and GB Description Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for BDP, B17MP, FF and GB Description time of the maximum plasma concentration (tmax) for BDP, B17MP, FF and GB Description area under curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) for B17MP, FF and GB Description terminal half-life (t1/2) for B17MP, FF and GB

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 191834733 Sequence: 191834734 Sequence: 191834735 Sequence: 191834736 Sequence: 191834737 Sequence: 191834738 Sequence: 191834739
Mesh Term Lung Diseases, Obstructive Mesh Term Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Mesh Term Lung Diseases Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases Mesh Term Chronic Disease Mesh Term Disease Attributes Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases, obstructive Downcase Mesh Term pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive Downcase Mesh Term lung diseases Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases Downcase Mesh Term chronic disease Downcase Mesh Term disease attributes Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 47938464
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 67652701
Design Group Id 55182582
Intervention Id 52082952

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30525771
Gender All
Minimum Age 28 Years
Maximum Age 80 Years
Healthy Volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria for all subjects:

Subject's written informed consent obtained prior to any study-related procedure;
Ability to understand the study procedures, the risks involved and ability to demonstrate correct use of the inhaler using the AIM™ (Aerosol Inhalation Monitor) Vitalograph®
Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18 and 32 kg/m2 extremes inclusive;
Good physical status, determined on the basis of the medical history and a general clinical examination, at screening;
Vital signs within normal limits: Diastolic BP 40-90 mmHg, Systolic BP 90-140 mmHg or 90-160 mmHg if >45 yrs

Males fulfilling one of the following criteria:

Males with non-pregnant Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) partners: they and/or their partner of childbearing potential must be willing to use a highly effective birth control method in addition to the male condom from the signature of the informed consent and until 90 days after the follow-up visit. Subjects must not donate sperm during the study and for 90 days after the follow-up visit or
Males with pregnant WOCBP partner: they must be willing to use male contraception (condom) from the signature of the informed consent and until 90 days after the follow-up visit. Subjects must not donate sperm during the study and for 90 days after the follow-up visit or
Non-fertile male subjects (contraception is not required in this case) or
Males with partner not of childbearing potential (contraception is not required in this case).

WOCBP fulfilling one of the following criteria:

WOCBP with fertile male partners: they and/or their partner must be willing to use a highly effective birth control method with low user dependency from the signature of the informed consent and until 30 days after the follow-up visit or
WOCBP with non-fertile male partners (contraception is not required in this case).
Females of non-childbearing potential defined as physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant (i.e. post-menopausal or permanently sterile). Tubal ligation or partial surgical interventions are not acceptable. If indicated, as per investigator's request, post-menopausal status may be confirmed by follicle-stimulating hormone levels (according to local laboratory ranges)
12 -lead digitised Electrocardiogram (12-lead ECG) considered as normal at screening and at Day -1

Additional Criteria only for Healthy Volunteers and Asthmatic patients:

Male and female subjects aged 28-55 years inclusive;
Non- or ex-smokers who smoked < 5 pack years (pack-years = the number of cigarette packs per day times the number of years) and stopped smoking > 6 months prior to screening;

Additional Inclusion Criteria only for Healthy Volunteers:

1. Lung function measurements within normal limits at screening: FEV1 equal to or more than 80% of predicted

Additional Inclusion Criteria only for Asthmatic patients:

Diagnosis of asthma: Established diagnosis of permanent asthma for at least 12 months according to GINA guidelines
Patients with a pre-bronchodilator 60%≤ FEV1 < 80% of the predicted normal value
Patients with a documented reversibility defined as an increase ≥ 12% and 200mL over baseline within 30 min after inhalation of 400µg salbutamol pMDI

Additional Inclusion Criteria only for COPD patients:

Male and female patients aged 40-80 years inclusive
A smoking history of at least 10 pack-years
Current or ex-smokers are eligible.
Established diagnosis of COPD
A post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≤ 50% of the predicted normal value and a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 10-15 minutes after 4 puffs (4×100 µg) of Salbutamol pMDI.

Exclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria for all subjects:

Pregnant or lactating women;
Clinically relevant and uncontrolled respiratory, cardiac, hepatic, gastrointestinal, renal, endocrine, metabolic, neurologic, or psychiatric disorders
Clinically relevant abnormal laboratory values at screening suggesting an unknown disease and requiring further clinical investigation
Subjects with medical diagnosis of narrow-angle glaucoma, prostatic hypertrophy or bladder neck obstruction
Positive HIV1 or HIV2 serology at screening
Blood donation or blood loss less than 2 months prior screening
Participation to another clinical trial where investigational drug was received and last investigations were performed less than 90 days prior to screening;
Documented history of alcohol abuse within 12 months prior to screening or a positive alcohol breath test
Documented history of drug abuse within 12 months prior to screening
Positive results from the Hepatitis serology which indicates acute or chronic Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C at screening
Subjects who have cardiovascular condition such as, but not limited to unstable ischemic heart disease, NYHA Class III/IV left ventricular failure, acute ischemic heart disease in the last year prior to study screening, which may impact the safety of the subject or the evaluation of the result of the study according to the Investigator's judgment
Unsuitable veins for repeated venepuncture/cannulation
Intake of non-permitted concomitant medications in the predefined period prior to screening
Radiation exposure, including that from the present study, in the last 12 months
Known intolerance/hypersensitivity or contra-indication to treatment

Additional exclusion Criteria only for Healthy volunteers and Asthmatic patients:

Positive urine test for cotinine at screening or prior Day 1
Current use of any nicotine or nicotine replacement product

Additional exclusion criteria only for Asthmatic and COPD patients:

Use of systemic corticosteroids medication within 4 weeks prior to the screening or slow release corticosteroids within 12 weeks before the screening or prior Day 1
A diagnosis of lung cancer or a history of lung cancer
A history of lung volume reduction surgery
Lower respiratory tract infection that requires use of antibiotics

Additional exclusion Criteria only for Healthy volunteers:

1. Subjects with history of breathing problems

Additional exclusion Criteria only for Asthmatic patients:

History of near fatal asthma, hospitalization for asthma in intensive care unit
Any change in dose, schedule or formulation in the treatment of asthma in the 4 weeks prior to the screening visit or prior Day 1
Non-persistent asthma:
Treatment with chronic systemic corticosteroids or anti IgE or other monoclonal antibodies
Known respiratory disorders other than asthma

Additional exclusion Criteria only for COPD patients:

Any change in dose, schedule or formulation in the treatment for COPD in the 4 weeks prior to the screening
A concurrent diagnosis of asthma, in the opinion of the investigator
Known respiratory disorder other than COPD that in the Investigator's opinion would affect efficacy and safety evaluation or place the patient at risk.
Oxygen therapy: patients requiring long term (at least 12 hours daily) oxygen therapy for chronic hypoxemia.
Change in dose or type of any medications for COPD within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254091713
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 14
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 28
Maximum Age Num 80
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 10

Designs

Sequence: 30274680
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28654602
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Study References

Sequence: 51654575
Pmid 35128939
Reference Type result
Citation Usmani OS, Baldi S, Warren S, Panni I, Girardello L, Rony F, Taylor G, DeBacker W, Georges G. Lung Deposition of Inhaled Extrafine Beclomethasone Dipropionate/Formoterol Fumarate/Glycopyrronium Bromide in Healthy Volunteers and Asthma: The STORM Study. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2022 Aug;35(4):179-185. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2021.0046. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Hypofractionated Radiosurgery for Localised Prostate Cancer (HYPOSTAT-II) ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795337
2019-03-05

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795337
NCT03795337https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795337?tab=tableOliver Blanck, Dr.blanck@saphir-rc.com+4943123989970Hypofractionated radiosurgery has been investigated in a few trials and appears to be safe and feasible.

Investigators initiated this multicenter phase II prospective trial to analyse feasibility (toxicity) of hypofractionated radiosurgery with 5 fractions in patients with localised prostate cancer under the hypothesis that the ratio of patients with late toxicity ≥ grade 2 after 3 years amounts 4.1% and is significant lower than 12.3% and 8.7% currently.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-19
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2022-04-04
Start Month Year March 5, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year June 2024
Verification Month Year March 2022
Verification Date 2022-03-31
Last Update Posted Date 2022-04-04

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735798
Description Experimental radiosurgery of prostate with 5 fractions each with 7,00 Gy (total application rate of 35,00 Gy).

Planned visits are: Baseline, visits at every radiation day and eight follow ups (4-6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and every year thereafter after last day of radiation).

Facilities

Sequence: 200244447 Sequence: 200244448 Sequence: 200244449 Sequence: 200244450 Sequence: 200244451 Sequence: 200244452 Sequence: 200244453
Status Recruiting Status Recruiting Status Active, not recruiting Status Recruiting Status Active, not recruiting Status Recruiting Status Recruiting
Name Charité Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy (CVK) Name University Medical Center Cologne, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife- and Radiotherapy Name Saphir Radiosurgery Center Frankfurt am Main Name University Hospital Frankfurt, Department of Radiation Therapy and Oncology Name Saphir Radiosurgery Center Northern Germany Name University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Name European Cyberknife Center Munich
City Berlin City Cologne City Frankfurt am Main City Frankfurt am Main City Kiel City Kiel City Munich
Zip 13353 Zip 50937 Zip 60528 Zip 60590 Zip 24105 Zip 24105 Zip 81377
Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany

Facility Investigators

Sequence: 18343628 Sequence: 18343629 Sequence: 18343630 Sequence: 18343631 Sequence: 18343632 Sequence: 18343633 Sequence: 18343634 Sequence: 18343635 Sequence: 18343636 Sequence: 18343637 Sequence: 18343638 Sequence: 18343639
Facility Id 200244447 Facility Id 200244447 Facility Id 200244448 Facility Id 200244448 Facility Id 200244450 Facility Id 200244450 Facility Id 200244452 Facility Id 200244452 Facility Id 200244452 Facility Id 200244453 Facility Id 200244453 Facility Id 200244453
Role Principal Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Principal Investigator Role Sub-Investigator Role Sub-Investigator
Name Arne Grün, Dr. Name David Kaul, Dr. Name Christian Baues, Dr. Name Karolina Jablonska, Dr. Name Georgios Chatzikonstantinou, Dr. Name Detlef Imhoff, Dr. Name Juergen Dunst, Prof. Name Krug David, Dr. Name Schulz Christian, Dr. Name Alexander Muacevic, Prof. Name Alfred Haidenberger, Dr. Name Markus Kufeld, Dr.

Conditions

Sequence: 52208169
Name Prostate Cancer
Downcase Name prostate cancer

Id Information

Sequence: 40186192 Sequence: 40186193
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value ZKS-121-08 Id Value ARO-2018-4
Id Type Other Identifier
Id Type Description German Cancer Society

Countries

Sequence: 42599693
Name Germany
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55634728
Group Type Experimental
Title Hypofractionated Radiosurgery
Description 5 fractions with 7 Gy, total dose 35 Gy

Interventions

Sequence: 52522128
Intervention Type Radiation
Name Hypofractionated Radiosurgery
Description Image-guided stereotactic Linac based RT preferable with "dedicated radiosurgery system" such as CyberKnife

Keywords

Sequence: 79923026 Sequence: 79923027 Sequence: 79923028 Sequence: 79923029
Name Hypofractionation Name Prostate Cancer Name Radiotherapy Name long-term toxicity
Downcase Name hypofractionation Downcase Name prostate cancer Downcase Name radiotherapy Downcase Name long-term toxicity

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177511532 Sequence: 177511533 Sequence: 177511534 Sequence: 177511535 Sequence: 177511536
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Late toxicity measured with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-(RTOG)-Score Measure Acute toxicity analysed by Adverse Event (AE)- and Serious Adverse Event (SAE)-reports. Measure Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Measure International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Measure EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) C30
Time Frame 3, 6-9, 12-15 months and thereafter annually for 4 years after radiotherapy Time Frame 4-6 weeks after radiotherapy; 3, 6-9, 12-15 months after radiotherapy thereafter annually for 4 years after radiotherapy Time Frame At the time of inclusion; 4-6 weeks after radiotherapy; 3, 6-9, 12-15 months after radiotherapy thereafter annually for 4 years after radiotherapy Time Frame At the time of inclusion; 4-6 weeks after radiotherapy; 3, 6-9, 12-15 months after radiotherapy thereafter annually for 4 years after radiotherapy Time Frame At the time of inclusion; 12-15 months after radiotherapy thereafter annually for 4 years after radiotherapy

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193627225 Sequence: 193627226 Sequence: 193627227 Sequence: 193627228 Sequence: 193627229 Sequence: 193627230 Sequence: 193627231 Sequence: 193627232 Sequence: 193627233 Sequence: 193627234
Mesh Term Prostatic Neoplasms Mesh Term Genital Neoplasms, Male Mesh Term Urogenital Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Genital Diseases, Male Mesh Term Genital Diseases Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Prostatic Diseases Mesh Term Male Urogenital Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term prostatic neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term genital neoplasms, male Downcase Mesh Term urogenital neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term genital diseases, male Downcase Mesh Term genital diseases Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term prostatic diseases Downcase Mesh Term male urogenital diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48353749 Sequence: 48353750 Sequence: 48353751
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class UNKNOWN
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Name University of Luebeck Name Saphir Radiosurgery Center Northern Germany

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29306010 Sequence: 29306011
Role Principal Investigator Role Principal Investigator
Name Juergen Dunst, Prof. Name Alexander Muacevic, Prof.
Affiliation University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Affiliation European CyberKnife Center Munich

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12017229 Sequence: 12017230
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Juergen Dunst, Prof. Name Oliver Blanck, Dr.
Phone +494315973011 Phone +4943123989970
Email Juergen.Dunst@uksh.de Email blanck@saphir-rc.com
Phone Extension 3011 Phone Extension 0
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199254
Design Group Id 55634728
Intervention Id 52522128

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30786904
Gender Male
Minimum Age 60 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

non-metastatic, histopathologically confirmed prostate carcinoma cT 1-3 N0 M0
Gleason-grade ≤7
Guideline-based staging
Age ≥ 60 years
PSA < 15 ng / ml
Volume of the prostate < 80 cm³
IPSS-Score ≤ 12
Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Age ≤ 60 years
History of prior pelvic radiotherapy
Contraindication to MRI or Fiducial marker implantation (e.g. allergy to gold),
Immunosuppressive therapy
Relevant comorbidity thought to adversely affect treatment compliance,
Legal incapacity or lack of informed consent

Gender Based True
Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989665
Number Of Facilities 7
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 60
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 4

Designs

Sequence: 30532974
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899268
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Juergen Dunst, Prof.
Title Clinical Professor, Director, Head of Department
Affiliation University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein

]]>

<![CDATA[ Red-fleshed Apple as a Novel Anthocyanin-biofortified Food to Improve Cardiometabolic Risk Factors. ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795324
2019-01-31

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795324
NCT03795324https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795324?tab=tableRosa Solà, Drrosa.sola@urv.cat636 944 723The primary aim is to evaluate the added health value of the presence of anthocyanins in the redlove apple, versus a green apple with a similar matrix, on cardiometabolic risk, and compare the matrix effect on the bioavailability of anthocyanins, and its effect on cardiometabolic risk factors, in two different products with a similar phenolic and anthocyanin content: the redlove apple and an aronia drink.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-21
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-07
Start Month Year January 2019
Primary Completion Month Year December 2019
Verification Month Year December 2018
Verification Date 2018-12-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-07

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20721584
Description The worldwide high prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) requires lifestyle changes and new dietary prevention strategies based on the increased intake of foods rich in bioactive compounds, as they are considered as key mediators in the improvement of CVD risk factors.

Regarding the health impact on anthocyanins in cardiometalic risk factors and CVD, it has been reported that the dietary intake of anthocyanidins, among other classes of flavonoids, is inversely associated with the risk of CVD in both European and US population. A recent systematic review of human randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of anthocyanins on CVD markers concluded that one of the main modulated outcomes is the decrease of serum LDLc. However, diet does not appear to be sufficient to guarantee the necessary intake to obtain the health benefits specified. Due to previous positive results, a new dietetic strategy based on biofortification to enhance the levels of phenolic compounds is proposed in the present project.

The primary aim is to evaluate the added health value of the presence of anthocyanins in the redlove apple, versus a green apple with a similar matrix, on cardiometabolic risk, and compare the matrix effect on the bioavailability of anthocyanins and its effect on cardiometabolic risk factors, in two different products with a similar phenolic and anthocyanin content: the redlove apple and an aronia drink.

Participants will be 120 free-living volunteers (men and women) with high LDL-cholesterol levels (LDL-cholesterol levels ≥115 mg/dl and ≥190 mg/dl) who will be assigned to one of the three arms for 6-week period of dietary treatment. The design of the intervention study is controlled, parallel and randomized. The intervention will combine acute (post-prandial) and chronic effects.

The sample size was computed to be sufficient to detect differences between treatment groups regarding the evolution in time of LDL-cholesterol levels. Justification of chosen sample size is based on assuming a 0.50mmol/l (approximately 15%) post-intervention difference of LDL-cholesterol and a 0.72mmol/l Standard deviation (SD), with α=0.05 and 1-β=0.08 a minimum of 22 participants were required. However the sample size will be 40 participants for arm, in total 120 subjects.

For the acute study, the investigators have chosen n=10 subjects per arm according to the most studies that have addressed the metabolic effects of a postprandial intervention have been performed using a very similar number of subjects with statistically good quality results.

Facilities

Sequence: 200107810
Name University Rovira i Virgili
City Reus
State Tarragona
Country Spain

Conditions

Sequence: 52171105
Name High LDL-cholesterol Levels
Downcase Name high ldl-cholesterol levels

Id Information

Sequence: 40158544
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value AppleCor

Countries

Sequence: 42568844
Name Spain
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55593043 Sequence: 55593044 Sequence: 55593045
Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental Group Type Experimental
Title Redlove Apple Title Green Apple Title Aronia Drink
Description Redlove Apple intervention

This product is a biofortified cultivar apple with anthocyanins.

Description Green Apple intervention

This product is a common cultivar apple without anthocyanins.

Description Aronia drink intervention

This product is an infusion of aronia fruit extract rich in anthocyanin.

Interventions

Sequence: 52485349 Sequence: 52485350 Sequence: 52485351
Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Other
Name Redlove Apple intervention Name Green Apple intervention Name Aronia drink intervention
Description The bioactive compounds present in this product are anthocyanins (50mg per 80g of product).It was a 6 weeks nutritional intervention. Volunteers will eat 80g per day of lyophilized redlove apple. Description It was a 6 weeks nutritional intervention. Volunteers will eat 80g per day of lyophilized green apple. Description The bioactive compounds present in this extract are anthocyanins (50mg per 1L of water).It was a 6 weeks nutritional intervention. Volunteers will drink 1L per day of an aronia drink

Keywords

Sequence: 79868318 Sequence: 79868319 Sequence: 79868320 Sequence: 79868321 Sequence: 79868322 Sequence: 79868323
Name Anthocyanins Name apple Name biofortification Name cardiometabolic Name LDL cholesterol Name polyphenols
Downcase Name anthocyanins Downcase Name apple Downcase Name biofortification Downcase Name cardiometabolic Downcase Name ldl cholesterol Downcase Name polyphenols

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177378405 Sequence: 177378406 Sequence: 177378407 Sequence: 177378408 Sequence: 177378409 Sequence: 177378410 Sequence: 177378411 Sequence: 177378412 Sequence: 177378413 Sequence: 177378414 Sequence: 177378415 Sequence: 177378416 Sequence: 177378417 Sequence: 177378418 Sequence: 177378419 Sequence: 177378420
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Changes in serum LDL-cholesterol (measured in mg/dL) Measure Changes in parameters of body composition (weight measured in kg) Measure Parameters of body composition (height measured in meters) Measure Changes in parameters of body composition (BMI measured in kg/m2) Measure Changes in parameters of body composition (waist circumference measured in cm) Measure Changes in blood pressure (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure measured in mmHg) Measure Changes in ischemic reactive hyperemia (IRH measured in perfusion units) Measure Changes in lipid plasmatic markers (total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, non-esterified fatty acids, Apo B100 and Apo A. All these lipid plasmatic markers will be measured in mg/dL) Measure Changes in glucose markers (glucose and insulin measured in mg/dL) Measure Changes in oxidative markers (LDLox and Endogenous fat soluble antioxidants measured in mg/dL) Measure Changes in inflammation markers (c-reactive protein and serum endothelin-1 measured in mg/dL) Measure Changes in dietary compliance markers (Phenolic compounds and metabolites measured in mg/L in 24h urine samples) Measure Changes in faeces metabolites (Short Chain Fatty Acids, bile acids and sterols measured in mg/L in faeces samples) Measure Changes in fecal microbiota composition (relative abundance of the identified operational taxonomic units (OTUs) measured as % change from baseline) Measure Changes in lipoprotein profile (number of LDL and HDL particles measured as % change from baseline) Measure Changes in cholesterol efflux (measured as % change from baseline)
Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1 and week 6 Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1, week 2, week 4 and week 6 Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1 Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1, week 2, week 4 and week 6 Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1, week 2, week 4 and week 6 Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1, week 2, week 4 and week 6 Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1 and week 6 Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1 and week 6 Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1 and week 6 Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1 and week 6 Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1 and week 6 Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1 and week 6 Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1 and week 6 Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1 and week 6 Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1 and week 6 Time Frame 6 weeks, week 1 and week 6
Description Serum lipids will be measured by standardized enzymatic automated methods in an autoanalyzer (Beckman Coulter-Synchron, Galway, Ireland). Then, LDL-cholesterol will be alculated by the Friedewald formula. Description Trained dieticians measure weight using a body composition analyzer (Tanita SC 330-S; Tanita Corp., Barcelona, Sapin) Description Trained dieticians measure height using a well mounted stadiometer (Tanita Leicester Portable; Tanita Corp., Barcelona, Spain). Description Body mass index (BMI) is calculated as the ratio between measured weight (kg)/and the square of height (m). Description Waist circumference (WC) is measured at the umbilicus using a 150 cm anthropometric steel measuring tape. Description Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) are measured twice after 2-5 minutes of patient seated, with one-minute interval in between, using an automatic sphygmomanometer (OMRON HEM-907; Peroxfarma, Barcelona, Spain). Description The endothelial-dependent vasomotor functions will be measured as IRH by a Laser-Doppler linear Periflux 5000 flowmeter (Perimed AB, Järfälla, Stockholm, Sweden) Description Total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, non-esterified fatty acids, Apo B100 and Apo A will be measured by standardized enzymatic automated methods in an autoanalyzer (Beckman Coulter-Synchron, Galway, Ireland). Description measured by standardized enzymatic automated methods in an autoanalyzer (Beckman Coulter-Synchron, Galway, Ireland). Description Plasma oxidized LDL measured by ELISA kit (Mercodia AB, Uppsala, Sweden). The analysis of fat-soluble vitamins (vitamin D, alpha-tocopherol, and carotenoids) will be carried out in whole blood with DBS cards. The determinations will be performed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) coupled to photodiode array (PDA) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) detectors. Description Serum high sensitive C reactive measured by standardized methods in a Cobas Mira Plus autoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostics Systems, Madrid, Spain). Serum endothelin type 1 measured by ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA). Description will be analysed by UPLC-MS/MS as previously described. Description will be performed by gas chromatography (GC). Description will be studied by sequencing its whole genomic content. Illumina platform will be used to obtain the metagenomics and metatranscriptomics of each sample following previous protocols developed. Description Number of particles and size LDL and HDL measured by NMR technology, in a Vantera Clinical Analyzer (LipoScience Inc., Raleigh, NC, USA). Description Cholesterol efflux measured by in vitro assays in Murine J-774A.1 macrophages labeled with TopFluor-Cholesterol, a fluorescent cholesterol probe in which the cholesterol molecule is linked to boron dipyrromethene difluoride (BODIPY) moiety (Avanti Polar Lipids, USA).

Sponsors

Sequence: 48319167 Sequence: 48319168 Sequence: 48319169
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER_GOV
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name University Rovira i Virgili Name Universitat de Lleida Name Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29285290
Role Principal Investigator
Name Rosa Sola, MD, PhD
Affiliation University Rovira i Virgili

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12008848
Contact Type primary
Name Rosa Solà, Dr
Phone 636 944 723
Email rosa.sola@urv.cat
Phone Extension 0034
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68148975 Sequence: 68148976 Sequence: 68148977
Design Group Id 55593043 Design Group Id 55593044 Design Group Id 55593045
Intervention Id 52485349 Intervention Id 52485350 Intervention Id 52485351

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30765276
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Men and women over 18 years old.
LDL-cholesterol levels ≥115 mg/dl and ≥190 mg/dl.
Sign the informed consent provided before the initial screening visit.

Exclusion Criteria:

LDL-cholesterol levels ≤115 mg/dl and <190 mg/dl.
Use of hypolipemiant treatment (drugs and functional foods), or hypoglucaemiant treatment.
Having diabetes mellitus type 1 or type 2.
BMI values ≥35kg/m2.
Present triglycerides levels ≥350mg/dl.
Presenting anemia (hemoglobin ≤13g/dl in men and ≤12g/dl in women).
Subjects diagnosed of intestinal disorders such as Chron disease, colitis ulcerous, celiac disease and irritable bowel syndrome.
Present fructose and/or sorbitol and/or gluten intolerance.
Present clinical active chronic disease
Use of antioxidants supplements.
Being pregnant or intending to become pregnant.
Be in breastfeeding period.
Present chronic alcoholism.
Tobacco use.
Participate in or have participated in a clinical trial or nutritional intervention study in the last 30 days prior to inclusion in the study.
Being unable to follow the study guidelines.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253877527
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 15

Designs

Sequence: 30511443
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Prevention
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28877737
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Rosa Sola
Title MD, PhD
Affiliation University Rovira i Virgili

]]>

<![CDATA[ Evaluation of the Efficacy and the Safety of FOLFIRINOX3 Bevacizumab Treatment in Patients With Colorectal Cancer (FOLFIRINOX 3) ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795311
2018-11-07

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795311
NCT03795311https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795311?tab=tableEmilie REDERSTORFFerederstorff@cgfl.fr03 45 34 81 16In patients in progression after oxaliplatin and irinotecan, the study FOLFIRINOX 3 proposes to evaluate the interest of modifying the standard pattern of administration of the molecule of irinotecan in order to make it more efficient. In combination with other chemotherapy drugs (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, folinic acid and bevacizumab), irinotecan will be administered at the beginning and end of each cycle of chemotherapy, whereas it is normally administered at one time in the regimen. standard of treatment.

The hypothesis of this study is an increase in the objective response rate at 2 months of 10 to 30% with a scheme by FOLFIRINOX3 – bevacizumab compared to an optimal treatment to date by FOLFIRINOX-bevacizumab.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2019-03-15
Start Month Year November 7, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year January 7, 2023
Verification Month Year March 2019
Verification Date 2019-03-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-03-15

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20741130
Description Primary objective

Main objective of phase I: To evaluate the acute toxicity of treatment with FOLFIRINOX 3 – bevacizumab
Main objective of phase II: To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with FOLFIRINOX 3 – bevacizumab in terms of objective response according to the RECIST criteria.

Secondary objectives

To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with FOLFIRINOX 3 – bevacizumab in terms of objective response according to the criteria of CHOI, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)
To evaluate the late toxicity of treatment with FOLFIRINOX 3 – bevacizumab
Evaluate the quality of life

Facilities

Sequence: 200280341
Status Recruiting
Name Centre Georges François Leclerc
City Dijon
Zip 21000
Country France

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28132843 Sequence: 28132844
Facility Id 200280341 Facility Id 200280341
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name François Ghiringhelli, PU PH Name Emilie Rederstorff
Email FGhiringhelli@cgfl.fr Email erederstorgg@cgfl.fr
Phone 03 80 73 77 53 Phone 03 45 34 81 16

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96132802 Sequence: 96132803 Sequence: 96132804 Sequence: 96132805 Sequence: 96132806 Sequence: 96132807 Sequence: 96132808 Sequence: 96132809 Sequence: 96132810
Mesh Term Bevacizumab Mesh Term Folfirinox Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents Mesh Term Angiogenesis Inhibitors Mesh Term Angiogenesis Modulating Agents Mesh Term Growth Substances Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs Mesh Term Growth Inhibitors
Downcase Mesh Term bevacizumab Downcase Mesh Term folfirinox Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents, immunological Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents Downcase Mesh Term angiogenesis inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term angiogenesis modulating agents Downcase Mesh Term growth substances Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs Downcase Mesh Term growth inhibitors
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52221424
Name Colorectal Cancer
Downcase Name colorectal cancer

Id Information

Sequence: 40195559
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value FOLFIRINOX3

Countries

Sequence: 42609570
Name France
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55649689
Group Type Experimental
Title Administration of chemotherapy molecules
Description The treatment period is divided into 15-day periods.

Schema of the administration to the treatments which will proceed in the same way with each cycle:

Bevacizumab (5 mg/kg; during 30 min) + Oxaliplatine (85 mg/m2, during 2 hours) + Acide folinique (400 mg/m2) or Levofolinate de calcium (200 mg/m2) AND Irinotecan (during 2 hours) + 5-fluorouracile (2400 mg/m2 ; 46 hours) + Irinotecan (1 hour)

Interventions

Sequence: 52535226
Intervention Type Drug
Name FOLFIRINOX Bevacizumab
Description In phase 1, the goal is to define the DLT (maximum tolerated dose). 3 levels of doses will be evaluated with a different dose of irinotecan in each level.

Level -1: Bevacizumab + Oxaliplatine + Acide folinique + Irinotecan: 60mg / m2
Level 0: Bevacizumab + Oxaliplatine + Acide folinique +Irinotecan: 70mg / m2
Level 1: Bevacizumab + Oxaliplatine + Acide folinique +Irinotecan: 90mg / m2

The inclusion of patients will start at level 0. Dose-limiting toxicities will be identified during the first 2 cycles.

Keywords

Sequence: 79941620
Name FOLFIRINOX3 Bevacizumab
Downcase Name folfirinox3 bevacizumab

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177561118
Outcome Type primary
Measure Number of Participants with Acute toxicities as a Measure of treatment specific Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame each chemotherapy cycle (15 days) up to progression (6 months on average)
Description Acute toxicities will be assessed according to the NCI CTCAE v4.03

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193678078 Sequence: 193678079 Sequence: 193678080 Sequence: 193678081 Sequence: 193678082 Sequence: 193678083 Sequence: 193678084 Sequence: 193678085 Sequence: 193678086 Sequence: 193678087 Sequence: 193678088
Mesh Term Colorectal Neoplasms Mesh Term Intestinal Neoplasms Mesh Term Gastrointestinal Neoplasms Mesh Term Digestive System Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Digestive System Diseases Mesh Term Gastrointestinal Diseases Mesh Term Colonic Diseases Mesh Term Intestinal Diseases Mesh Term Rectal Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term colorectal neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term intestinal neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term gastrointestinal neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term digestive system neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term digestive system diseases Downcase Mesh Term gastrointestinal diseases Downcase Mesh Term colonic diseases Downcase Mesh Term intestinal diseases Downcase Mesh Term rectal diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48366327
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Centre Georges Francois Leclerc

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12020567 Sequence: 12020568
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name François Ghiringhelli, PU PH Name Emilie REDERSTORFF
Phone 03 80 73 77 53 Phone 03 45 34 81 16
Email FGhiringhelli@cgfl.fr Email erederstorff@cgfl.fr
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68217238
Design Group Id 55649689
Intervention Id 52535226

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30794649
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Men or women
Age ≥ 18 years
Performance status of 0 or 1 (WHO ECOG Index)
Patient with metastatic colon cancer
History of chemotherapy treatment including oxaliplatin, irinotecan, antiangiogenic (bevacizumab or aflibercept) and anti-EGFR if indicated
Patient eligible for treatment with FOLFIRINOX bevacizumab
Tumor evaluation (thoraco-abdominopelvic CT scan) performed within 4 weeks before inclusion with at least one measurable lesion according to RECIST criteria 1.1
Patient able and able to abide by the protocol throughout the study, including treatment, visits, scheduled examinations and follow-up.

Biological values within the following limits:

Bilirubinemia ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (N)
ASAT and ALAT ≤ 5 N
Creatinine ≤ 1.5 N and creatinine clearance> 60 mlmin
Neutrophils ≥ 1.5. 109 / L
Platelets ≥ 150. 109 / L
Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g / dL (patients can be included even if they have been transfused).
Albuminémie≥30g / L
Hepatitis B, C and HIV negative serologies
Information note given and signed informed consent
Patient affiliated to a social security scheme
Women must have effective contraception and must have a negative pregnancy test at the time of entry into the study or must no longer be of childbearing age (ie, postmenopausal, after 60 years and no menstruation for ≥1 year without any other medical cause, OR history of hysterectomy, OR history of bilateral oophorectomy),

Exclusion Criteria:

Other cancer in the 5 years prior to entry into the trial or concomitant (except in situ cancer of the cervix or basal cell carcinoma of the skin).
Presence of cerebral metastasis (s)
Prognosis estimated <3 months
Presence of a contraindication to bevacizumab (major surgery in the previous 28 days, risk of arterial thrombosis, risk of haemorrhage, deep vein thrombosis without effective anticoagulant therapy or unbalanced anticoagulant therapy)
History of grade 4 toxicity to oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5FU or bevacizumab
Persistence of neuropathy greater than a grade 1
Hypersensitivity to one of the compounds of the treatments
Participation in course or within 30 days prior to entry into the study to another therapeutic trial with an experimental molecule.
Demonstration of a DPYD and / or UGT1A1 mutation
Unbalanced serious illness, underlying infection that may prevent the patient from receiving treatment
Pregnancy (compulsory pregnancy test at baseline), breastfeeding or lack of effective contraception for men and women of childbearing age
Psychiatric illness compromising understanding of information or completion of study
Patient under tutorship, curatorship or court of justice
Inability to sign informed consent or to undergo medical follow-up of the trial for geographical, social or psychological reasons.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254004196
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30540689
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28907009
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Comparison of Anticoagulation With Left Atrial Appendage Closure After AF Ablation ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795298
2019-05-20

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795298
NCT03795298https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795298?tab=tableNANANAThe primary objective of this study is to determine if left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN FLX Device is a reasonable alternative to oral anticoagulation following percutaneous catheter ablation for high risk patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-02
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2023-07-24
Start Month Year May 20, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year November 2024
Verification Month Year July 2023
Verification Date 2023-07-31
Last Update Posted Date 2023-07-24

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20682790
Description This study is a prospective, randomized, multi-center, global investigation to determine if left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN FLX Device is a reasonable alternative to oral anticoagulation in patients after AF ablation.

A subject who signs informed consent is considered enrolled in the study. Subjects will be randomized to OAC or WATCHMAN FLX in equal fashion. Randomization will be stratified by sequential vs. concomitant planned ablation +/- WATCHMAN implantation, to help ensure balance of treatment assignments within the sequential and concomitant groups.

Facilities

Sequence: 199631683 Sequence: 199631684 Sequence: 199631685 Sequence: 199631686 Sequence: 199631687 Sequence: 199631688 Sequence: 199631689 Sequence: 199631690 Sequence: 199631691 Sequence: 199631692 Sequence: 199631693 Sequence: 199631694 Sequence: 199631695 Sequence: 199631696 Sequence: 199631697 Sequence: 199631698 Sequence: 199631699 Sequence: 199631700 Sequence: 199631701 Sequence: 199631702 Sequence: 199631703 Sequence: 199631704 Sequence: 199631705 Sequence: 199631706 Sequence: 199631707 Sequence: 199631708 Sequence: 199631709 Sequence: 199631710 Sequence: 199631711 Sequence: 199631712 Sequence: 199631713 Sequence: 199631714 Sequence: 199631715 Sequence: 199631716 Sequence: 199631717 Sequence: 199631718 Sequence: 199631719 Sequence: 199631720 Sequence: 199631721 Sequence: 199631722 Sequence: 199631723 Sequence: 199631724 Sequence: 199631725 Sequence: 199631726 Sequence: 199631727 Sequence: 199631728 Sequence: 199631729 Sequence: 199631730 Sequence: 199631731 Sequence: 199631732 Sequence: 199631733 Sequence: 199631734 Sequence: 199631735 Sequence: 199631736 Sequence: 199631737 Sequence: 199631738 Sequence: 199631739 Sequence: 199631740 Sequence: 199631741 Sequence: 199631742 Sequence: 199631743 Sequence: 199631744 Sequence: 199631745 Sequence: 199631746 Sequence: 199631747 Sequence: 199631748 Sequence: 199631749 Sequence: 199631750 Sequence: 199631751 Sequence: 199631752 Sequence: 199631753 Sequence: 199631754 Sequence: 199631755 Sequence: 199631756 Sequence: 199631757 Sequence: 199631758 Sequence: 199631759 Sequence: 199631760 Sequence: 199631761 Sequence: 199631762 Sequence: 199631763 Sequence: 199631764 Sequence: 199631765 Sequence: 199631766 Sequence: 199631767 Sequence: 199631768 Sequence: 199631769 Sequence: 199631770 Sequence: 199631771 Sequence: 199631772 Sequence: 199631773 Sequence: 199631774 Sequence: 199631775 Sequence: 199631776 Sequence: 199631777 Sequence: 199631778 Sequence: 199631779 Sequence: 199631780 Sequence: 199631781 Sequence: 199631782 Sequence: 199631783 Sequence: 199631784 Sequence: 199631785 Sequence: 199631786 Sequence: 199631787 Sequence: 199631788 Sequence: 199631789 Sequence: 199631790 Sequence: 199631791 Sequence: 199631792 Sequence: 199631793 Sequence: 199631794 Sequence: 199631795 Sequence: 199631796 Sequence: 199631797 Sequence: 199631798
Name Grandview Medical Center Name Heart Center Research Name Alaska Regional Hospital Name Arizona Arrhythmia Research Center Name Phoenix Cardiovascular Research Group Name St. Bernard's Medical Center Name Heart Clinic Arkansas Name Mills Peninsula Health Services Name Scripps Memorial Hospital Name Marin General Hospital Name University of Southern California Hospital Name Sharp Memorial Hospital Name Kaiser Permanente Santa Clara Medical Center Name Marian Regional Medical Center Name Los Robles Hospital & Medical Center Name Memorial Hospital Name Centura Health Name Medical Center of the Rockies (Loveland) Name Yale University School of Medicine Name Washington Hospital Center Name Manatee Memorial Hospital Name Broward General Medical Center Name St. Vincent's Medical Center Name AdventHealth Ocala Name Tallahassee Memorial Hospital Name Emory University Hospital Name Wellstar Kennestone Hospital Name St. Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Name St. Lukes Idaho Cardiology Associates Name Edward Hospital Name St. John's Hospital Name Methodist Hospital of Indianapolis Name St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana Name Iowa Heart Center Name Overland Park Regional Medical Center Name University of Kansas Hospital Name Kansas City Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Name Baptist Health Lexington Name Massachusetts General Hospital Name Lahey Clinic Hospital Name Henry Ford Hospital Name MyMichigan Medical Center Midland Name Abbott Northwestern Hospital Name Mayo Clinic Name HealthEast St. Joseph's Hospital Name St. Luke's Hospital of Kansas City Name Mercy Research Name Nebraska Heart Institute Name Catholic Medical Center Name Cardiovascular Associates of the Delaware Valley Name Valley Hospital Name Northwell Health Name Montefiore Medical Center Name New York University Medical Center Name Mount Sinai Medical Center Name Carolinas Medical Center Name Duke University Medical Center Name Rex Hospital Name Lindner Center for Research and Education at Christ Hospital Name Cleveland Clinic Foundation Name OhioHealth Research and Innovation Institute – Riverside Methodist Hospital Name Pinnacle Health at Harrisburg Hospital Name Presbyterian University of Pennsylvania Medical Center Name University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Name Lankenau Institute for Medical Research Name York Hospital Name Centennial Medical Center Name Saint Thomas Health Name Vanderbilt University Medical Center Name Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Name HeartPlace Mid-Cities EP Name The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano Name Cardiology Clinic of San Antonio Name Christus Trinity Mother Frances Health System Name St. Mark's Hospital Name Chippenham Medical Center Name CHI Franciscan Health System Name PeaceHealth Southwest Medical Name Monongalia General Hospital Name West Virginia University Hospitals Name Advara HeartCare Name Monash Health Name Onze Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis Name Aarhus University Hospital Name CHRU de Lille Name Hospital de la Pitie-Salpetriere Name CHRU de Clermont-Ferrand Name CHU Grenoble – Hopital Michallon Name Hospital Europeen Georges-Pompidou Name Clinique Pasteur Name Centre Hôpital Universitaire Rangueil Name CHU Henri Mondor Name DHZC – Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité Name Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Intensivmedizin Mittelallee Name Klinikum Coburg GmbH Name St.Johann Nepomuk Katholisches Hospitalvereinigung Thüringen GmbH Name Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien Name Universitatsklinik Greifswald Name Asklepios Klinik Saint Georg Name Allgemeines Krankenhaus Altona Name Klinikum St. Georg Name Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Name St. Josefs-Hospital GmbH Name Centro Cardiologico Monzino Name Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Name St. Antonius Ziekenhuis Name Gornoslaskie Centrum Medyczne im. Prof. Leszka Gieca Slaskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Katowicach Ziolow Name University Clinical Hospital in Poznań/ UNIWERSYTECKI SZPITAL KLINICZNY W POZNANIU Name Slaskie Centrum Chorob Serca Name Hospital General Universitario Name Hospital Puerta Del Mar Name Hospital Clinico San Carlos Name Clinica Universidad de Navarra Name Hospital Clinico Salamanca Name Clinico de Valladolid Name Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro
City Birmingham City Huntsville City Anchorage City Phoenix City Phoenix City Jonesboro City Little Rock City Burlingame City La Jolla City Larkspur City Los Angeles City San Diego City Santa Clara City Santa Maria City Thousand Oaks City Colorado Springs City Littleton City Loveland City New Haven City Washington City Bradenton City Fort Lauderdale City Jacksonville City Ocala City Tallahassee City Atlanta City Marietta City Boise City Boise City Naperville City Springfield City Indianapolis City Indianapolis City Des Moines City Kansas City City Kansas City City Overland Park City Lexington City Boston City Burlington City Detroit City Midland City Minneapolis City Rochester City Saint Paul City Kansas City City Saint Louis City Lincoln City Manchester City Haddon Heights City Ridgewood City Bay Shore City Bronx City New York City New York City Charlotte City Durham City Raleigh City Cincinnati City Cleveland City Columbus City Harrisburg City Philadelphia City Pittsburgh City Wynnewood City York City Nashville City Nashville City Nashville City Austin City Bedford City Plano City San Antonio City Tyler City Salt Lake City City Richmond City Tacoma City Vancouver City Morgantown City Morgantown City Brisbane City Clayton City Aalst City Aarhus City Lille City Paris City Clermont-Ferrand City Grenoble City Paris City Toulouse City Toulouse City Créteil City Berlin City Berlin City Coburg City Erfurt City Frankfurt City Greifswald City Hamburg City Hamburg City Leipzig City Lübeck City Wiesbaden City Milano City Torino City Nieuwegein City Katowice City Poznan City Zabrze City Alicante City Cadiz City Madrid City Pamplona City Salamanca City Valladolid City Vigo
State Alabama State Alabama State Alaska State Arizona State Arizona State Arkansas State Arkansas State California State California State California State California State California State California State California State California State Colorado State Colorado State Colorado State Connecticut State District of Columbia State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Florida State Georgia State Georgia State Idaho State Idaho State Illinois State Illinois State Indiana State Indiana State Iowa State Kansas State Kansas State Kansas State Kentucky State Massachusetts State Massachusetts State Michigan State Michigan State Minnesota State Minnesota State Minnesota State Missouri State Missouri State Nebraska State New Hampshire State New Jersey State New Jersey State New York State New York State New York State New York State North Carolina State North Carolina State North Carolina State Ohio State Ohio State Ohio State Pennsylvania State Pennsylvania State Pennsylvania State Pennsylvania State Pennsylvania State Tennessee State Tennessee State Tennessee State Texas State Texas State Texas State Texas State Texas State Utah State Virginia State Washington State Washington State West Virginia State West Virginia State Queensland State Victoria State East Flanders State Hauts-de-France State Ile-de-France State Île-de-France State Utrecht
Zip 35243 Zip 35801 Zip 99508 Zip 85016 Zip 85016 Zip 72401 Zip 72205 Zip 94010 Zip 92037 Zip 94939 Zip 90017 Zip 92123 Zip 95051 Zip 93454 Zip 91360 Zip 80909 Zip 80120 Zip 80538 Zip 06510 Zip 20010 Zip 34205 Zip 33316 Zip 32204 Zip 34471 Zip 32308 Zip 30322 Zip 30060 Zip 83704 Zip 83712 Zip 60540 Zip 62701 Zip 46202 Zip 46290 Zip 50266 Zip 66160 Zip 66160 Zip 66215 Zip 40503 Zip 02114 Zip 01805 Zip 48202 Zip 48670 Zip 55407 Zip 55905 Zip 55102 Zip 64111 Zip 63141 Zip 68526 Zip 03102 Zip 08035 Zip 07450 Zip 11706 Zip 10467 Zip 10016 Zip 10029 Zip 28203 Zip 27705 Zip 27607 Zip 45219 Zip 44195 Zip 43214 Zip 17101 Zip 19104 Zip 15237 Zip 19096 Zip 17403 Zip 37203 Zip 37205 Zip 37232 Zip 78705 Zip 76021 Zip 75093 Zip 78229 Zip 75702 Zip 84124 Zip 23225 Zip 98405 Zip 98664 Zip 26506 Zip 26506 Zip 4120 QLD Zip 3168 Zip 9300 Zip 8200 Zip 59037 Zip 75013 Zip 63000 Zip 38043 Zip 75015 Zip 31076 Zip 31400 Zip 94010 Zip 12203 Zip 13353 Zip 96450 Zip 99097 Zip 60431 Zip 17475 Zip 20099 Zip 22763 Zip 4129 Zip D-23538 Zip 65189 Zip 20138 Zip 10123 Zip 3430 EM Zip 40635 Zip 61-848 Zip 41800 Zip 3010 Zip 11009 Zip 28040 Zip 31008 Zip 37007 Zip 47005 Zip 36312
Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country United States Country Australia Country Australia Country Belgium Country Denmark Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country France Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Germany Country Italy Country Italy Country Netherlands Country Poland Country Poland Country Poland Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain Country Spain

Conditions

Sequence: 52068454
Name Atrial Fibrillation
Downcase Name atrial fibrillation

Id Information

Sequence: 40076840
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value S2239

Countries

Sequence: 42474945 Sequence: 42474946 Sequence: 42474947 Sequence: 42474948 Sequence: 42474949 Sequence: 42474950 Sequence: 42474951 Sequence: 42474952 Sequence: 42474953 Sequence: 42474954
Name United States Name Australia Name Belgium Name Denmark Name France Name Germany Name Italy Name Netherlands Name Poland Name Spain
Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55480370 Sequence: 55480371
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title WATCHMAN FLX Title Market-approved OAC
Description WATCHMAN FLX implant including modified post-implant drug regimen. Description Used per IFU for atrial fibrillation stroke prevention for the duration of the trial.

Interventions

Sequence: 52380861 Sequence: 52380862
Intervention Type Device Intervention Type Drug
Name WATCHMAN FLX Implant Name Market-approved OAC
Description Left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN FLX device Description Used per IFU for atrial fibrillation stroke prevention for the duration of the trial.

Keywords

Sequence: 79698919 Sequence: 79698920 Sequence: 79698921
Name Non-valvular atrial fibrillation Name Left atrial appendage Name Ablation
Downcase Name non-valvular atrial fibrillation Downcase Name left atrial appendage Downcase Name ablation

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177025793 Sequence: 177025794 Sequence: 177025795
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Stroke, all cause death, and systemic embolism Measure Non-procedural bleeding Measure Major bleeding
Time Frame 36 months Time Frame 36 months Time Frame 36 months
Description WATCHMAN therapy is non-inferior for the occurrence of stroke (including ischemic and/or hemorrhagic), all cause death, and systemic embolism. Description WATCHMAN therapy is superior for non-procedural bleeding (ISTH major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding). Description WATCHMAN therapy is non-inferior for ISTH major bleeding (including procedural bleeding).

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193076454 Sequence: 193076455 Sequence: 193076456 Sequence: 193076457 Sequence: 193076458
Mesh Term Atrial Fibrillation Mesh Term Arrhythmias, Cardiac Mesh Term Heart Diseases Mesh Term Cardiovascular Diseases Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term atrial fibrillation Downcase Mesh Term arrhythmias, cardiac Downcase Mesh Term heart diseases Downcase Mesh Term cardiovascular diseases Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48223673
Agency Class INDUSTRY
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Boston Scientific Corporation

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29225043
Role Principal Investigator
Name Oussama Wazni, MD
Affiliation The Cleveland Clinic

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68011976 Sequence: 68011977
Design Group Id 55480370 Design Group Id 55480371
Intervention Id 52380861 Intervention Id 52380862

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30705274
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

The subject is of legal age to participate in the study per the laws of their respective geography.
Underwent a prior catheter ablation procedure for non-valvular AF between 90 and 180 days prior to randomization (sequential) or is planning to have clinically indicated catheter ablation within 10 days of randomization (concomitant).
The subject has a calculated CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2 or greater for males or 3 or greater for females.
The subject is deemed to be suitable for the defined protocol pharmacologic regimen.
The subject is able to undergo TEE examinations.
The subject or legal representative is able to understand and is willing to provide written informed consent to participate in the trial.
The subject is able and willing to return for required follow-up visits and examinations.

Exclusion Criteria:

The subject is currently enrolled in another investigational study that would directly interfere with the current study, except when the subject is participating in a mandatory governmental registry, or a purely observational registry with no associated treatments. Each instance must be brought to the attention of the sponsor to determine eligibility, regardless of type of co-enrollment being proposed.
The subject requires long-term anticoagulation therapy for reasons other than AF-related stroke risk reduction, for example due to an underlying hypercoagulable state (i.e., even if the device is implanted, the subjects would not be eligible to discontinue OAC due to other medical conditions requiring chronic OAC therapy).
The subject is deemed by the treating physician to be unsuitable for chronic anticoagulation and/or aspirin therapy due to bleeding risk, allergy, or other reasons.
The subject had or is planning to have any cardiac or major non-cardiac interventional or surgical procedure (excluding non-valvular AF ablation and cardioversion) within 30 days prior to or 60 days after randomization [including, but not limited to: percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), other cardiac ablation (VT ablation, etc.), etc.].
The subject had a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the 60 days prior to randomization.
The subject had a prior major bleeding event per ISTH definition within the 14 days prior to randomization. Lack of resolution of related clinical sequelae, or planned and pending interventions to resolve bleeding/bleeding source, are a further exclusion regardless of timing of the bleeding event.
The subject has had a myocardial infarction (MI) documented in the clinical record as either a non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI) or as an ST-elevation MI (STEMI), with or without intervention, within 90 days prior to randomization.
The subject has a history of atrial septal repair or has an ASD/PFO device.
The subject has an implanted mechanical valve prosthesis in any position.
The subject is of childbearing potential and is, or plans to become pregnant during the time of the study (method of assessment upon study physician's discretion)
The subject has a documented life expectancy of less than two years.
The subject has a cardiac tumor.
The subject has signs/symptoms of acute or chronic pericarditis.
There is evidence of tamponade physiology.
Contraindications (anatomical or medical) to percutaneous catheterization procedures.
The subject has documented NYHA Class IV heart failure.
The subject has documented surgical closure of the left atrial appendage.
The subject has an active infection.

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253924550
Number Of Facilities 116
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 2
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30451892
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Prevention
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28818366
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ The Role of Neutrophil CD64 and Soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 1 in Neonatal Sepsis ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795285
2019-02-20

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795285
NCT03795285https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795285?tab=tablereham elmahdyreham.elmahdy@aun.edu.eg+201002714637Neonatal sepsis (NS) is a rather serious but relatively common health problem. Despite recent advances in the treatment of neonatal infection, mortality and comorbidities remain high.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2019-01-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08
Start Month Year February 20, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year September 20, 2019
Verification Month Year January 2019
Verification Date 2019-01-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-01-08

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20727252
Description Neonatal sepsis is a major contributor to an estimated 2.6 million annual deaths and accounts for approximately 3 % of all disability-adjusted life years. The consequences of NS can be minimized by early initiation of antibiotic therapy. Due to high NS rates, the vulnerability of the organism in the neonatal period and concerns about consequences (considerable mortality, association with other acute or chronic complications), antibiotic therapy is com¬monly started in clinical practice even though non-spe¬cific clinical signs develop. This is in spite of the fact that antibiotic overuse is linked to major negative outcomes. The reliable and early diagnosis of NS is therefore essential but, unfortunately, rather difficult.

Probably the most widely used "biochemical" marker of NS, C-reactive protein (CRP), is one of the so-called late markers. Its sensitivity is mainly low in the early stages of infection; its reliability increases, particularly with serial measurements. In that case, its negativity practically rules out the presence of NS. It is not completely specific for NS. Procalcitonin (PCT), an intermediate marker, is relatively specific, providing prognostic information as well; it decreases rapidly in response to effective therapy. However, its complex postnatal "physiological" dynamics makes its measurements difficult, particularly in early-onset sepsis.

CD64 is normally expressed in very low concentrations by unstimulated neutrophils. It is considerably upregulated on the trigger of bacterial invasion and has been shown to be involved in the process of phagocytosis and intracellular killing of pathogens. More importantly, neutrophils from preterm infants express CD64 during bacterial infections to the same degree as those from term infants, children, and adults. So in newborns, neutrophil CD64 have been found to be promising markers for diagnosis of early and late infections.

Among several candidate receptors, triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid cells 1 (TREM-1) appears to play a relevant role in the modulation of innate immunity, amplifying or attenuating Toll-Like Receptor (TLR)-induced signals. TREM-1 is a receptor of the immunoglobulin superfamily, expressed on human neutrophils and monocytes. In the early phase of infection, the engagements of Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) by microbial components induce up-regulation of TREM-1. After recognition of a still unknown ligand, TREM-1 associates with a signal transduction molecule called DAP12, triggering the sustained release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-alpha and IL-1b) and chemokines (IL-8 and monocyte chemotactic protein), which may result in prolonged survival of neutrophils and monocytes at the inflammatory site.

Conditions

Sequence: 52185677
Name Neonatal SEPSIS
Downcase Name neonatal sepsis

Id Information

Sequence: 40169205
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value Neonatal sepsis

Design Groups

Sequence: 55609337 Sequence: 55609338
Title Septic neonates: Title Controls:
Description fifty neonates with sepsis. Description twenty healthy neonates.

Interventions

Sequence: 52499615
Intervention Type Diagnostic Test
Name Expression of neutrophil CD64
Description Expression of neutrophil CD64 will be measured by Flow cytometry. In addition, sTREM-1 will be measured in the serum by ELISA

Keywords

Sequence: 79889043 Sequence: 79889044 Sequence: 79889045
Name Early onset sepsis Name sTREM-1 Name Neutrophil CD64
Downcase Name early onset sepsis Downcase Name strem-1 Downcase Name neutrophil cd64

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177432677
Outcome Type primary
Measure The mean difference of neutrophil CD64 expression and sTREM-1 before and after treatment
Time Frame 72 hours
Description better understanding of neutrophil CD64 role as an essential player in pathogenesis of neonatal sepsis and the role of and sTREM-1 in pathogenesis of neonatal sepsis

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193540830 Sequence: 193540831 Sequence: 193540836 Sequence: 193540837 Sequence: 193540832 Sequence: 193540833 Sequence: 193540834 Sequence: 193540835
Mesh Term Sepsis Mesh Term Toxemia Mesh Term Pathologic Processes Mesh Term Infant, Newborn, Diseases Mesh Term Neonatal Sepsis Mesh Term Infections Mesh Term Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Mesh Term Inflammation
Downcase Mesh Term sepsis Downcase Mesh Term toxemia Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes Downcase Mesh Term infant, newborn, diseases Downcase Mesh Term neonatal sepsis Downcase Mesh Term infections Downcase Mesh Term systemic inflammatory response syndrome Downcase Mesh Term inflammation
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48332503
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Assiut University

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12012343
Contact Type primary
Name reham elmahdy
Phone +201002714637
Email reham.elmahdy@aun.edu.eg
Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68168425 Sequence: 68168426
Design Group Id 55609338 Design Group Id 55609337
Intervention Id 52499615 Intervention Id 52499615

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30773689
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Gender All
Minimum Age 1 Day
Maximum Age 50 Days
Population Neonatal sepsis
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Sepsis was defined as a positive blood culture in infants with clinical and laboratory findings of infection. Manifestations of sepsis include poor suckling, sleepiness, respiratory distress, apnea, poor perfusion, cyanosis, bradycardia, fever or hypothermia, feeding intolerance, and neurological signs (as seizures). Routine sepsis evaluations included complete blood count, C-reactive protein, and blood culture.

Exclusion Criteria:

malformations
prematurity
Apgar score less than seven
on antibiotics treatment before the start of the study

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253953148
Registered In Calendar Year 2019
Were Results Reported False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 1
Maximum Age Num 50
Minimum Age Unit Day
Maximum Age Unit Days
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1

Designs

Sequence: 30519820
Observational Model Case-Control
Time Perspective Prospective

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28886121
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name Reham I El-mahdy
Title Principal Investigator
Affiliation Assiut University

Study References

Sequence: 52079194 Sequence: 52079195 Sequence: 52079196 Sequence: 52079197
Pmid 29955185 Pmid 29571293 Pmid 19230638 Pmid 18604302
Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background Reference Type background
Citation Halek J, Novak M, Medkova A, Furst T, Juranova J. The role of nCD64 in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis in preterm newborns. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2018 Jun 21. doi: 10.5507/bp.2018.033. Online ahead of print. Citation Wright JK, Hayford K, Tran V, Al Kibria GM, Baqui A, Manajjir A, Mahmud A, Begum N, Siddiquee M, Kain KC, Farzin A. Biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction predict sepsis mortality in young infants: a matched case-control study. BMC Pediatr. 2018 Mar 23;18(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1087-x. Citation Ford JW, McVicar DW. TREM and TREM-like receptors in inflammation and disease. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009 Feb;21(1):38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2009.01.009. Epub 2009 Feb 21. Citation Groselj-Grenc M, Ihan A, Derganc M. Neutrophil and monocyte CD64 and CD163 expression in critically ill neonates and children with sepsis: comparison of fluorescence intensities and calculated indexes. Mediators Inflamm. 2008;2008:202646. doi: 10.1155/2008/202646.

]]>

<![CDATA[ Rucaparib Maintenance Therapy in Advanced Cervical Cancer ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795272
2019-10-01

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795272
NCT03795272https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795272?tab=tableNANANATo evaluate the efficacy of PARP inhibitor, rucaparib as maintenance therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-11-03
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2019-11-01
Start Month Year October 1, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year October 10, 2019
Verification Month Year October 2019
Verification Date 2019-10-31
Last Update Posted Date 2019-11-01

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20716336
Description The use of concomitant cisplatin-based chemo-radiation for cervical cancer has improved survival of locally advanced cervical cancer patients and has become the standard of care. A meta-analysis revealed that the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to radiation increased the 5-year overall survival rate by 6% (HR 0.81: 60 vs 66%), and 5-year disease-free survival rate by 8%, though there is still considerable need for improvement as most patients who relapse are incurable. The unmet need is particularly higher in patients that are at high risk of recurrence. The main negative prognostic factors are higher FIGO stage as well as the presence of positive lymph nodes. Current studies are evaluating role of adjuvant chemotherapy following chemo-radiation in locally advanced disease and will possibly improve survival by reducing risk of distant metastases, however at the cost of excessive toxicity.

PARP inhibitors have shown considerable clinical benefit especially in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. Several PARP inhibitors have been evaluated in other gynaecological malignancies and three PARP inhibitors (olaparib, rucaparib & niraparib) are approved by European Medicines Agency and Food & Drug Administration for treatment or as maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer. Human papillomavirus causes oxidative stress that may result in DNA single-strand breaks. In cervical cancer PARP-1 expression/activity may be up-regulated in response to the ongoing oxidative stress (HPV and inflammation), and this may promote progression. This may create a vicious circle of inflammation, PARP activation, NAD+ consumption, adenosine triphosphate consumption, necrosis, and inflammation. PARPi may limit the role of PARP-1 in promoting inflammation and oxidative stress. There is theoretical plausibility that PARPi may have a role in the treatment of cervical carcinoma.

This phase II randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of rucaparib as adjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who are responding to chemo-radiation. This investigator-initiated study will be performed within the GCIG/ENGOT collaboration

Facilities

Sequence: 200053474 Sequence: 200053475
Name Rigshospitalet Name Rigshospitalet
City Copenhagen City København Ø
State Sjaelland State Sjaelland
Zip 2100 Zip 2100
Country Denmark Country Denmark

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96027951 Sequence: 96027952 Sequence: 96027953 Sequence: 96027954 Sequence: 96027955
Mesh Term Rucaparib Mesh Term Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors Mesh Term Enzyme Inhibitors Mesh Term Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Mesh Term Antineoplastic Agents
Downcase Mesh Term rucaparib Downcase Mesh Term poly(adp-ribose) polymerase inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term enzyme inhibitors Downcase Mesh Term molecular mechanisms of pharmacological action Downcase Mesh Term antineoplastic agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52156593
Name Cervical Cancer
Downcase Name cervical cancer

Id Information

Sequence: 40148275
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value ENGOT-Cx7-NSGO/MaRuC

Countries

Sequence: 42557809
Name Denmark
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55578004 Sequence: 55578005
Group Type Experimental Group Type Placebo Comparator
Title Rucaparib Title Placebo
Description Patients will be treated with active oral drug, Rucaparib twice daily for 24 months Description Patients will be treated with oral placebo twice daily for 24 months

Interventions

Sequence: 52472101 Sequence: 52472102
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Rucaparib Name Placebo
Description 2:1 randomization to receive rucaparib/placebo twice daily for 24 month Description placebo

Keywords

Sequence: 79848239 Sequence: 79848238 Sequence: 79848240 Sequence: 79848241
Name rucaparib Name Cervical cancer Name maintenance therapy Name placebo-controlled
Downcase Name rucaparib Downcase Name cervical cancer Downcase Name maintenance therapy Downcase Name placebo-controlled

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177328461 Sequence: 177328462 Sequence: 177328463 Sequence: 177328464
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Progression-Free Survival in months Measure Progression Free Survival in Sub-Population in months Measure Patient Reported Outcomes Measure Overall Survival in months
Time Frame 42 months Time Frame 42 months Time Frame 42 months Time Frame 60 months
Description the time from randomization until the date of the first objective radiological disease progression according to investigator assessment of RECIST v1.1 or death by any cause, whichever occurs first. Description the time from randomization until the date of the first objective radiological disease progression according to investigator assessment of RECIST v1.1 or death by any cause, whichever occurs first for the predefined study subgroups. Description Quality of Life Questionnaire Description the time from randomization until the date of death by any cause

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193432394 Sequence: 193432395 Sequence: 193432396 Sequence: 193432397 Sequence: 193432398 Sequence: 193432399 Sequence: 193432400 Sequence: 193432401 Sequence: 193432402 Sequence: 193432403 Sequence: 193432404 Sequence: 193432405 Sequence: 193432406
Mesh Term Uterine Cervical Neoplasms Mesh Term Uterine Neoplasms Mesh Term Genital Neoplasms, Female Mesh Term Urogenital Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Uterine Cervical Diseases Mesh Term Uterine Diseases Mesh Term Genital Diseases, Female Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases Mesh Term Genital Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term uterine cervical neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term uterine neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term genital neoplasms, female Downcase Mesh Term urogenital neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term uterine cervical diseases Downcase Mesh Term uterine diseases Downcase Mesh Term genital diseases, female Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term female urogenital diseases and pregnancy complications Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases Downcase Mesh Term genital diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48306182 Sequence: 48306183 Sequence: 48306184 Sequence: 48306185 Sequence: 48306186 Sequence: 48306187 Sequence: 48306188 Sequence: 48306189 Sequence: 48306190
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class UNKNOWN Agency Class OTHER Agency Class UNKNOWN
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology – Clinical Trials Unit Name Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom Name Central and Eastern European Oncology Group Name North Eastern German Society of Gynaecological Oncology Name Belgian Gynaecological Oncology Group Name Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada Name PGOG (Polish Gynaecologic Oncology Group) Name GSO Global Clinical Research BV Name GCP-enhederne

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68130984 Sequence: 68130985
Design Group Id 55578004 Design Group Id 55578005
Intervention Id 52472101 Intervention Id 52472102

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30757412
Gender Female
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 100 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Histologically confirmed squamous cell, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix.
Patient must have completed definitive chemoradiation and is evaluated to be in complete remission 10-12 week's post definitive treatment.
Initial FIGO stage IIB with positive nodes (histological verification or verified by MRI/PET-CT), FIGO stages IIIA, IIIB, IVA; or any stage with para-aortic metastases (including IB and IIA with positive aortic nodes).
Toxicities resulting from definitive treatment must resolve to grade ≤1 prior to randomization.
Patient must consent that archival tumour tissue can be collected at the time of screening and used for translational studies.
Patient must consent to collection of whole blood and blood plasma during the study period. These samples will be stored and later used for translational studies.
Patient agrees to undergo all analysis; radiological examinations according to protocol.
The patient agrees to complete PROs (QoL questionnaire) during study treatment.
Patients must give informed consent.
Patients must be at least 18 years of age.
ECOG performance status 0-1
Serum albumin >30g/l.

Adequate organ function

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1,500/mcL
Platelets >100,000/mcL
Haemoglobin ≥ 9g/dl (no blood transfusions for 4 weeks prior entering the trial.)
Serum creatinine ≤1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN) or calculated creatinine clearance ≥50mL/min using Cockcroft-Gault formula.
Total bilirubin ≤1.5x ULN.
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤2.5x ULN
Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
Women of childbearing potential must use highly effective methods of birth control for the duration of study participation and for 6 months afterwards.
All patients: Patients should not donate blood or blood components while participating in this study and through 90 days after receipt of the final dose of IMP. –

Exclusion Criteria:

Histological types other than in inclusion criteria, like sarcomas, small cell carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation, non-epithelial cancers.
Concurrent cancer therapies or cancer therapy (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, immunotherapy, biologic or hormonal therapy) within last 4 weeks.
Concurrent treatment with an investigational agent or participation in another clinical trial.
Previous malignant disease: patients are not eligible for the study if actively being treated of invasive cancer. Patients with previous malignant disease who are relapse-free and treatment-free for more than three years may enter this study. Patients with previous history of in-situ carcinoma of cervix, or non-invasive basal cell and squamous cell skin carcinoma can enter this trial.
Active infections or other serious underlying significant medical illness, abnormal laboratory finding or psychiatric illness/social situation that would, in the investigator's judgment, make the patient inappropriate for this study. Known active or chronic hepatitis C and/or B infection. Has known history of tuberculosis.
Gastrointestinal disorders or abnormalities that would interfere with absorption of the study drug.
Any evidence of distant metastases.
Significant cardiovascular diseases, including uncontrolled hypertension, clinically relevant cardiac arrhythmia, unstable angina or myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to randomization, congestive heart failure >NYHA II (New York Heart Association), severe peripheral vascular disease, clinically significant pericardial effusion.
Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Patients with preserved reproductive capacity, unwilling to use a medically acceptable method of contraception for the duration of the trial and for 6 months afterwards.
Known hypersensitivity to the trial drugs, or to their excipients.
Persons who have been committed to an institution by official or judicial order
Patients with dependency on the sponsor, investigator or study site –

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254229126
Number Of Facilities 2
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 0
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility False
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 100
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30503637
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Triple
Masking Description double-blinded placebo-controlled
Intervention Model Description This is a multicentre, phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of maintenance rucaparib to obtain evidence of clinical benefit of rucaparib in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Subject Masked True
Caregiver Masked True
Investigator Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26665951 Sequence: 26665952
Intervention Id 52472101 Intervention Id 52472102
Name active maintenance Name matched placebo maintenance

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28869915
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Effect of Rocuronium and Sugammadex Under Sevoflurane and Desflurane Anesthesia in Children ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795259
2018-12-28

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795259
NCT03795259https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795259?tab=tableNANANASugammadex is the first selective relaxant binding agent approved to reverse certain non-depolarizing neuromuscular drugs in patients 2 years old and above. Although it has been in use over the last 10 years, more pharmacological studies are needed to understand its overall effects on participants.

As investigators’ primary outcome, the investigators aimed to investigate how differently sugammadex reverses neumuscular blockade caused by rocuronium under general anesthesia maintenance with sevoflurane compared with desflurane. Also, to compare the changes in peak airway pressure. As investigators’ secondary outcome, the investigators aimed to compare the changes in heart rate and blood pressures after sugammadex injection under sevoflurane and desflurane general anesthesia.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-27
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2021-05-04
Start Month Year December 28, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year May 19, 2019
Verification Month Year April 2021
Verification Date 2021-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2021-05-04

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20735782
Description 160 participants aged between 2-10 years old and scheduled for lower urinary tract or minor abdominal surgery will be enrolled in the study. Each participant will be assigned sevoflurane (Group S) or desflurane (Group D) anesthesia at enrollment by drawing lots. Parental consent after written and verbal information will be asked on the morning of the surgery.

Participants will be premedicated with midazolam (0.05 mg/kg, Zolamid, Defarma-Turkey) and ketamine (0.1 mg/kg, Ketalar, Pfizer-USA) and brought into operating theater. Routine monitoring will be done with non-invasive blood pressure (every 5 minutes), continuous peripheral oxygen saturation, continuous 3-lead ECG, body temperature and continuous end-tidal carbon dioxide measurements. Participants will be actively warmed to ensure normo-thermia. Train-of-four (TOF) measurements will be performed on the arm without the vascular access.

Anesthesia will be induced with thiopenthal (5-6 mg/kg, Pental, Ulagay-Turkey) and fentanyl (2 mcg/kg, Talinat, VEM-Turkey). After the participant loses consciousness, TOF calibration will be performed and baseline value will be recorded. Then 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium (Myocron, VEM-Turkey) will be given intravenously and serial TOF measurements at 15 seconds intervals will be taken. The time from TOF of 100% to 0% will be recorded as T1. Participant will be orotracheal intubated when the TOF value is 0%. All the patients will be ventilated with Datex Ohmeda S/5 Avance in a volume controlled ventilation mode (air-oxygen mixture, FiO2: 40%, I/E: 1/1.5, PEEP: 5 cmH2O, tidal volume: 8ml/kg). Participant will receive 2% sevoflurane (Sevoran, Abbvie-Italy) or 6% desflurane (Suprane, Baxter-Belgium) according to their groups.

Non-invasive blood pressure, heart rate and peak airway pressure will be recorded at 5 minute intervals after orotracheal intubation. Continuous TOF measurements will be taken until TOF value reaches 25%. Time from TOF of 0% to 25% will be recorded as T2.

When the TOF value is 25%, 2 mg/kg sugammadex (Bridion, MSD-Greece) will be given intravenously and TOF measurements will continue every 15 seconds. The time from sugammadex injection (TOF of 25%) to TOF of 90% will be recorded as T3. Non-invasive blood pressure, heart rate and peak airway pressure will be recorded at the time of sugammadex injection and at 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 10th minutes. Any reactions to sugammadex will be recorded (anaphylaxis, bronchospasm, etc.).

T1, T2 and T3 of Group S and D will be compared. Non-invasive blood pressure, heart rate and peak airway pressure after sugammadex injection at time 0min, 1min, 2min, 3min and 10min will be compared.

Facilities

Sequence: 200244316
Name Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty
City Istanbul
State Please Select
Zip 34098
Country Turkey

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96113114 Sequence: 96113115 Sequence: 96113116 Sequence: 96113117 Sequence: 96113118 Sequence: 96113119
Mesh Term Rocuronium Mesh Term Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents Mesh Term Neuromuscular Blocking Agents Mesh Term Neuromuscular Agents Mesh Term Peripheral Nervous System Agents Mesh Term Physiological Effects of Drugs
Downcase Mesh Term rocuronium Downcase Mesh Term neuromuscular nondepolarizing agents Downcase Mesh Term neuromuscular blocking agents Downcase Mesh Term neuromuscular agents Downcase Mesh Term peripheral nervous system agents Downcase Mesh Term physiological effects of drugs
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52208124 Sequence: 52208125 Sequence: 52208126
Name Anesthetics, Inhalation Name Neuromuscular Blockade Name Anesthesia, General
Downcase Name anesthetics, inhalation Downcase Name neuromuscular blockade Downcase Name anesthesia, general

Id Information

Sequence: 40186163
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value 83045809-604.01

Countries

Sequence: 42599660
Name Turkey
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55634684 Sequence: 55634685
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator
Title Sevoflurane Title Desflurane
Description Anesthesia will be induced with thiopenthal 5-6 mg/kg and fentanyl 2 mcg/kg. Then rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg will be given by intravenously and patients will be orotracheal intubated when TOF value reaches 0%. Anesthesia will continue with 2% sevoflurane while the patient is ventilated in volume controlled mode (FiO2: 40%, I/E: 1/1.5, PEEP: 5 cmH2O, tidal volume: 8ml/kg). Continuous TOF measurement will continue until the value reaches %25. At this time, sugammadex 2 mg/kg will be given to measure the time for TOF to reach 90%. Description Anesthesia will be induced with thiopenthal 5-6 mg/kg and fentanyl 2 mcg/kg. Then rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg will be given by intravenously and patients will be orotracheal intubated when TOF value reaches 0%. Anesthesia will continue with 6% desflurane while the patient is ventilated in volume controlled mode (FiO2: 40%, I/E: 1/1.5, PEEP: 5 cmH2O, tidal volume: 8ml/kg). Continuous TOF measurement will continue until the value reaches %25. At this time, sugammadex 2 mg/kg will be given to measure the time for TOF to reach 90%.

Interventions

Sequence: 52522090 Sequence: 52522091
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Rocuronium Name Sugammadex
Description After induction, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg will be given by intravenously and patients will be orotracheal intubated when TOF value reaches 0%. Description Continuous TOF measurement will continue until the value reaches %25. At this time, sugammadex 2 mg/kg will be given intravenously.

Keywords

Sequence: 79922967 Sequence: 79922968 Sequence: 79922969 Sequence: 79922970 Sequence: 79922971 Sequence: 79922972 Sequence: 79922973
Name Sugammadex Name Sevoflurane Name Desflurane Name Rocuronium Name TOF Name Child Name Train-of-four
Downcase Name sugammadex Downcase Name sevoflurane Downcase Name desflurane Downcase Name rocuronium Downcase Name tof Downcase Name child Downcase Name train-of-four

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177511392 Sequence: 177511386 Sequence: 177511387 Sequence: 177511388 Sequence: 177511389 Sequence: 177511390 Sequence: 177511391
Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Percentage of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE) after Administration of Study Intervention Measure Time from TOF of 25% to 90% after 2 mg/kg sugammadex injection Measure Time from TOF of 100% to 0% after 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium injection Measure Time from TOF of 0% to 25% after orotracheal intubation Measure Sugammadex effects on respiratory parameters Measure Sugammadex effects on heart rate Measure Sugammadex effects on systolic and diastolic blood pressures
Time Frame Intraoperative and postoperative first 24 hour. Time Frame Up to end of surgery Time Frame Up to end of surgery Time Frame Up to end of surgery Time Frame Up to 10 minutes post-administration of study intervention Time Frame Up to 10 minutes post-administration of study intervention Time Frame Up to 10 minutes post-administration of study intervention
Description Observation bronchospasm and anaphylaxis after sugammadex injection Description When the TOF value reaches 25% from 0% after the anesthesia induction, 2 mg/kg sugammadex will be given to reverse neuromuscular blockade. Continuous TOF monitoring will continue every 15 seconds. The time it takes for TOF to reach 90% is the primary outcome. Description After induction of anesthesia a baseline TOF will be recorded (anticipated 100%). 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium will be injected and TOF will be measured every 15 seconds. The time it takes for TOF to reach 0% is the second primary outcome. Description After TOF reaches 0%, orotracheal intubation will be performed. Continuous TOF monitoring will be done every 5 minutes in first 15 minutes and every 15 seconds afterwards. No additional neuromuscular blocking drugs will be given. The time it takes for TOF to reach 25% is the third primary outcome. Description Peak airway pressure observed at and after sugammadex injection at 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 10th minutes. Description Heart rate observed at and after sugammadex injection at 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 10th minutes. Description blood pressures observed at and after sugammadex injection at 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 10th minutes.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193627083 Sequence: 193627084 Sequence: 193627085 Sequence: 193627086
Mesh Term Respiratory Aspiration Mesh Term Respiration Disorders Mesh Term Respiratory Tract Diseases Mesh Term Pathologic Processes
Downcase Mesh Term respiratory aspiration Downcase Mesh Term respiration disorders Downcase Mesh Term respiratory tract diseases Downcase Mesh Term pathologic processes
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48353706 Sequence: 48353707 Sequence: 48353708 Sequence: 48353709
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class UNKNOWN Agency Class UNKNOWN Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Istanbul University Name GAMZE PİRİNÇ ŞAŞIOĞLU Name GÜNER KAYA Name Ayse Cigdem Tutuncu

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29305990
Role Study Director
Name Guner Kaya, Prof.
Affiliation Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68199207 Sequence: 68199208 Sequence: 68199209 Sequence: 68199210
Design Group Id 55634685 Design Group Id 55634684 Design Group Id 55634685 Design Group Id 55634684
Intervention Id 52522090 Intervention Id 52522090 Intervention Id 52522091 Intervention Id 52522091

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30786881
Gender All
Minimum Age 2 Years
Maximum Age 10 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Lower urinary tract surgery (cystoscopy, examination under general anaesthesia, circumcision etc.) and inguinal hernia surgery expected no to last more than 2 hours
ASA I-II

Exclusion Criteria:

Liver and failure
Upper airway infection
Asthma
Exposure to second hand smoke
Kidney failure
Obesity (BMI> 30%)
Rocuronium allergy
Muscle disease (myasthenia gravis, muscular dystrophies, etc.)
Calcium channel blocker use
Patient or family refusal

Adult False
Child True
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 253989640
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 4
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 2
Maximum Age Num 10
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 4
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 3

Designs

Sequence: 30532951
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Screening
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26692037 Sequence: 26692038
Intervention Id 52522090 Intervention Id 52522091
Name Esmeron, MSD Name Bridion, MSD

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28899245
Responsible Party Type Principal Investigator
Name pinar kendigelen
Title MD, Principal investigator
Affiliation Istanbul University

]]>

<![CDATA[ Follow-up of Sequential Chemotherapy and Stimulation for Fertility Preservation in Young Patients With Breast Cancer ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795246
2018-03-23

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795246
NCT03795246https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795246?tab=tableNANANAInterventional research with low risks and constraints, prospective and monocentric on the assessment of long-term fertility in patients who underwent an adjuvant sequential chemotherapy with or without a controled ovarian hyperstimulation. This study follows a previous one called NCT 01614704.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-31
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2022-02-03
Start Month Year March 23, 2018
Primary Completion Month Year January 2028
Verification Month Year February 2022
Verification Date 2022-02-28
Last Update Posted Date 2022-02-03

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20747690
Description The patients will have a follow-up once a year during ten years beginning at the end of their chemotherapy.

They will have a consultation in oncology consisting of:

a clinical exam,
a collection and follow-up of oncological data
a collection of ongoing cancer treatments

and a consultation in gynecology consisting of:

a pelvic ultrasound scan (for AFC: Antral Follicle Count)
a biological test (FSH, LH, E2, AMH)
a collection of gynecological data, contraception and reproductive medicine

Facilities

Sequence: 200326984
Name Centre Oscar Lambret
City Lille
Country France

Conditions

Sequence: 52237537
Name Breast Cancer
Downcase Name breast cancer

Id Information

Sequence: 40207057
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value KSF2-1707

Countries

Sequence: 42621450
Name France
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55667921
Group Type Experimental
Title Study Process
Description Consultation, Biological Test, Pelvic Ultrasound

Interventions

Sequence: 52551164 Sequence: 52551165 Sequence: 52551166
Intervention Type Procedure Intervention Type Biological Intervention Type Procedure
Name Consultation Name Biological Test Name Pelvic Ultrasound
Description Consultation in oncology: collection of oncological data and ongoing cancer treatments, clinical exam Consultation in gynecology: collection of gynecological data, contraception and reproductive medicine Description Blood test:

FSH, LH, E2 and AMH
4 tubes of 7 mL

Description Antral Follicles Count

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 177621208 Sequence: 177621209 Sequence: 177621210 Sequence: 177621211 Sequence: 177621212 Sequence: 177621213 Sequence: 177621214 Sequence: 177621215
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Assessment of fertility in terms of cumulative incidence of long-term pregnancy Measure Assessment of fertility in terms of cumulative incidence of births Measure Assessment of fertility – number of pegnancies spontaneous versus assisted Measure Assessment of fertility – pregnancy outcome : miscarriage or single or multiple birth separately Measure Assessment of the number of patient willing to re-exploit their frozen gametes Measure Assessment of the gonadotoxicity of the adjuvant sequential chemotherapy based on anthracyclines and taxanes – AMH rate Measure Assessment of the gonadotoxicity of the adjuvant sequential chemotherapy based on anthracyclines and taxanes – Antral Follicle Count Measure Study the long-term carcinologic safety of Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation without Letrozole or Tamoxifen co-treatment in terms of survival without relapse
Time Frame 10 years after chemotherapy Time Frame 10 years after chemotherapy Time Frame 10 years after chemotherapy Time Frame 10 years after chemotherapy Time Frame 10 years after chemotherapy Time Frame 10 years after chemotherapy Time Frame 10 years after chemotherapy Time Frame After chemotherapy ad until disease progression or death regardless of the cause, up to 10 years after chemotherapy
Description for patients who underwent adjuvant sequential chemotherapy of anthracycline and taxane separately, depending on whether or not they have had Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Description separately, depending on whether or not they have had Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Description describing the pregnancy type – number of pegnancies spontaneous versus assisted, with ot without the use of frozen gametes) Description describing the pregnancy outcome : miscarriage or single or multiple birth separately, depending on whether or not they have had Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Description for patients who have had Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Description in terms of AMH rate depending on whether or not they have had Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Description in terms of Antral Follicle Count depending on whether or not they have had Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Description Survival without relapse defined by the time frame between the date of surgery and the date of the first recurrence

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 193739150 Sequence: 193739151 Sequence: 193739152 Sequence: 193739153 Sequence: 193739154
Mesh Term Breast Neoplasms Mesh Term Neoplasms by Site Mesh Term Neoplasms Mesh Term Breast Diseases Mesh Term Skin Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term breast neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms by site Downcase Mesh Term neoplasms Downcase Mesh Term breast diseases Downcase Mesh Term skin diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48381601
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Centre Oscar Lambret

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29321570 Sequence: 29321571
Role Study Director Role Study Director
Name Audrey MAILLIEZ, MD Name Christine DECANTER, MD
Affiliation Centre Oscar Lambret Affiliation Centre Hopsitalier Regional Universitaire de Lille – Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68239185 Sequence: 68239186 Sequence: 68239187
Design Group Id 55667921 Design Group Id 55667921 Design Group Id 55667921
Intervention Id 52551164 Intervention Id 52551165 Intervention Id 52551166

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30804156
Gender Female
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Patients included in the study CT 01614704
Informed and written consent
Affiliated to the National Social Security System

Exclusion Criteria:

Impossibility to submit at the study procedures due to geographic, social or mental reasons
Patient deprived of their liberty or under guardianship or tutorship.

Gender Based True
Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254022143
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 7

Designs

Sequence: 30550166
Allocation N/A
Intervention Model Single Group Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Other
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28916516
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

]]>

<![CDATA[ Fecal Microbiota Transplant for Primary CDI ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795233
2019-08-23

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795233
NCT03795233https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795233?tab=tableNANANAClostridium difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most urgent health threats in the U.S. associated with antibiotic use. After an initial episode, disease recurrence is high and relapses can occur in 20-30% of people treated with oral vancomycin. An antibiotic course can affect the gut microbiome for years, and patients with CDI have additional dysbiosis of their gut flora. Oral vancomycin perturbs the gut microbiome further. Restoration of the microbiome with Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) has been proven a highly efficacious and cost-effective treatment for recurrent CDI. FMT has had very limited study for a primary episode of CDI to date because an endoscopic procedure was the recommended route of delivery. However, FMT is now available via frozen oral capsules and has been shown to be non-inferior to FMT via colonoscopy in randomized controlled trials.

The investigators hypothesize that outcomes after a first episode of CDI can be improved if the microbiome is restored with oral FMT. It is further hypothesized that this will compensate for any additional microbiome perturbation caused by administration of oral vancomycin and decrease the likelihood of recurrence. Because the hypothesis is based on restoration of the microbiome, the investigators propose this proof-of-concept pilot study to examine whether FMT administered after oral vancomycin therapy for primary CDI restores microbiome diversity compared to patients who do not receive FMT. Because of the potential health benefits, this approach deserves further study. The results from this pilot study on the microbiome diversity as well as the surveys to be conducted about GI symptomatology (e.g., diarrhea, abdominal pain, bloating), CDI recurrence and healthcare utilization, would provide preliminary data to support a randomized controlled, multicenter clinical trial.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-11-21
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2021-12-15
Start Month Year August 23, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 15, 2021
Verification Month Year November 2021
Verification Date 2021-11-30
Last Update Posted Date 2021-12-15
Results First Posted Date 2021-12-15

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20794793
Description Population: Patients >= 18 years hospitalized at Boston Medical Center (BMC) with a first documented episode of CDI.

Intervention: 30 FMT capsules administered orally under direct observation within 7 days of completion of 10-14 day treatment of oral vancomycin for CDI.

Objectives:

To characterize the microbial diversity in stool samples from subjects with a primary episode of CDI before and after oral vancomycin and determine the impact of FMT after completion of oral vancomycin course.
To characterize the feasibility and tolerability of FMT after completion of a course of oral vancomycin therapy for primary CDI, and to describe 30-day hospital readmission and gastrointestinal symptomatology and/or CDI recurrence during 60-day follow-up.

Design/Methodology:

15 subjects will be enrolled who are hospitalized at BMC for a primary episode of CDI. A discard aliquot from baseline stool samples obtained clinically for diagnosis will be frozen. Subjects will receive the standard of care treatment (oral vancomycin for 10-14 days) and within 7 days following completion will receive oral FMT during a 2 hour visit in the Infectious Disease (ID) Clinical Trials Unit. An additional 5 subjects will be enrolled as controls. Stool samples will be collected at time of CDI diagnosis and again 3 weeks after FMT for intervention group and 4 weeks after completion of oral vancomycin treatment for control subjects. The post-treatment samples will be obtained by the patient using special stool sample collection kits known as RNAlater kits (ribonucleic acid stabilization). These contain a liquid nontoxic tissue storage reagent known as RNAlater and helps preserve the stool sample. The subjects will mail this stool sample to the BMC Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) where it will aliquoted, centrifuged and frozen.

Samples will be processed at a collaborating lab at Tufts to characterize the fecal microbiome pre- and post oral FMT.

Study personnel will contact participants via telephone 60 days after FMT dosing to administer a follow-up survey (including questions on residual symptoms. CDI recurrence, re-hospitalization, adverse events and FMT acceptability).

Total Study Duration: Anticipated time: 12 months

Subject Participation Duration: The researchers anticipate a period of 1-2 hours while an inpatient for the screening and consent process, 2 hours for the CTU visit for FMT and 20-30 minutes responding to a follow up telephone survey. Total time in the study from enrollment to completion of follow-up will be approximately 3 months and will include 10-14 days of CDI treatment with oral vancomycin (per standard of care treatment), the FMT administration and a 60 day follow up.

Facilities

Sequence: 200756068
Name Boston Medical Center
City Boston
State Massachusetts
Zip 02118
Country United States

Browse Interventions

Sequence: 96347443 Sequence: 96347444 Sequence: 96347445
Mesh Term Vancomycin Mesh Term Anti-Bacterial Agents Mesh Term Anti-Infective Agents
Downcase Mesh Term vancomycin Downcase Mesh Term anti-bacterial agents Downcase Mesh Term anti-infective agents
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Conditions

Sequence: 52359128
Name Clostridium Difficile Infection
Downcase Name clostridium difficile infection

Id Information

Sequence: 40293197
Id Source org_study_id
Id Value H-37574

Countries

Sequence: 42716303
Name United States
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55802142 Sequence: 55802143
Group Type Experimental Group Type Active Comparator
Title Fecal microbiota transplantation Title Oral vancomycin alone (Control)
Description Fecal microbiota transplant G3 capsules will be administered after standard of care with oral vancomycin therapy in participants with primary Clostridium difficile infection. Description Oral vancomycin therapy will be administered as per standard of care in participants with primary clostridium difficile infection.

Interventions

Sequence: 52670006 Sequence: 52670005
Intervention Type Other Intervention Type Biological
Name Oral Vancomycin alone Name Fecal microbiota transplant G3 capsules
Description Standard of care will be provided with oral vancomycin therapy. Description After standard of care therapy with oral vancomycin, frozen oral FMT capsules will be provided in a formulation designed to deliver the product to the large intestine. 30 FMT capsules will be administered over a 2 hour period under direct observation

Keywords

Sequence: 80126968 Sequence: 80126969 Sequence: 80126970 Sequence: 80126971 Sequence: 80126972
Name Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) Name Vancomycin Name Dysbiosis Name fecal microbiome Name C difficile infection
Downcase Name fecal microbiota transplant (fmt) Downcase Name vancomycin Downcase Name dysbiosis Downcase Name fecal microbiome Downcase Name c difficile infection

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178073071 Sequence: 178073072 Sequence: 178073073 Sequence: 178073074 Sequence: 178073075 Sequence: 178073076
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Stool Microbiome With and Without FMT Administration Measure Feasibility of Administering FMT After Completion of a Course of Oral Vancomycin Therapy Measure Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] of FMT After a Course of Oral Vancomycin Therapy Measure Incidence of Gastrointestinal Symptomatology Based on a Survey After CDI Measure CDI Recurrence Measure Number of Hospital Readmissions After Treatment
Time Frame 11 months Time Frame 12 months Time Frame During test dose, during 90 minutes of FMT administration, 30 minutes after FMT administration, 48-72 hours after FMT administration Time Frame 60 days Time Frame 60 days Time Frame 30 days
Description The stool microbiome in participants who receive additional FMT at end of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treatment with oral vancomycin will be compared to the stool microbiome in participants with standard treatment or oral vancomycin alone Description The number and proportion of FMT pills participants ingest after completion of a course of oral vancomycin therapy will be documented. Description Study participants will be monitored for any adverse events to FMT such as nausea or vomiting, abdominal pain or diarrhea. Description A detailed survey with 15 questions will be administered on GI symptoms Physicians will go over any significant adverse events to determine if they are related, possibly related or unrelated to oral FMT administration Description Patients will be monitored for recurrent C difficile infection defined as non-resolution or recurrence of GI symptoms (abdominal pain, diarrhea etc) and/or a positive stool C difficile test The proportion of participants with CDI recurrence will be documented. Description The number of hospital readmissions within 30 days after CDI treatment per patient history and chart review will be obtained

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194201955 Sequence: 194201956 Sequence: 194201957 Sequence: 194201958 Sequence: 194201959
Mesh Term Infections Mesh Term Clostridium Infections Mesh Term Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections Mesh Term Bacterial Infections Mesh Term Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Downcase Mesh Term infections Downcase Mesh Term clostridium infections Downcase Mesh Term gram-positive bacterial infections Downcase Mesh Term bacterial infections Downcase Mesh Term bacterial infections and mycoses
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48494171
Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead
Name Boston Medical Center

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29384700
Role Principal Investigator
Name Tamar Barlam, MD MSC
Affiliation Boston Medical Center

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68405513 Sequence: 68405514
Design Group Id 55802142 Design Group Id 55802143
Intervention Id 52670005 Intervention Id 52670006

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30873712
Gender All
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age N/A
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Diagnosis of primary clostridium difficile infection (CDI) defined by the presence of diarrhea and a positive C. difficile Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test
Admitted to Boston Medical Center
English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

Primary CDI treatment failure
History of CDI
Diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease, immunocompromised state, or active malignancy
Dysphagia: oropharyngeal, esophageal, functional, neuromuscular (e.g. stroke, multiple sclerosis, ALS), or patient shows evidence of dysphagia when the 'safety test' capsule is administered
History of aspiration
History of gastroparesis
History of intestinal obstruction
Severe food allergy (e.g. anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reaction) Adverse event attributable to a previous FMT
Patients with allergies to sodium chloride, glycerol, theobroma oil, hide bovine gelatin, sodium lauryl sulfate, Food, Drugs & Cosmetics certified colorants (FD&C), or titanium dioxide, all ingredients Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS)
History of ongoing antibiotic use (e.g. nitrofurantoin for urinary tract infection (UTI) prophylaxis) Currently pregnant or breastfeeding -Any condition for which the treating physician thinks the treatment may pose a health risk (e.g. severely immunocompromised)-

Adult True
Child False
Older Adult True

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254049153
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Actual Duration 17
Were Results Reported True
Months To Report Results 10
Has Us Facility True
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Minimum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 5

Designs

Sequence: 30619505
Allocation Non-Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking None (Open Label)

Drop Withdrawals

Sequence: 29076734 Sequence: 29076735 Sequence: 29076736 Sequence: 29076737 Sequence: 29076738 Sequence: 29076739
Result Group Id 56202117 Result Group Id 56202118 Result Group Id 56202117 Result Group Id 56202118 Result Group Id 56202117 Result Group Id 56202118
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Reason Withdrawal by Subject Reason Withdrawal by Subject Reason Lost to Follow-up Reason Lost to Follow-up Reason Death Reason Death
Count 2 Count 1 Count 1 Count 0 Count 1 Count 0

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26768686 Sequence: 26768687
Intervention Id 52670005 Intervention Id 52670006
Name FMT Name Oral Vancocin alone

Milestones

Sequence: 41123172 Sequence: 41123173 Sequence: 41123174 Sequence: 41123175 Sequence: 41123176 Sequence: 41123177
Result Group Id 56202117 Result Group Id 56202118 Result Group Id 56202117 Result Group Id 56202118 Result Group Id 56202117 Result Group Id 56202118
Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001
Title STARTED Title STARTED Title COMPLETED Title COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED Title NOT COMPLETED
Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study Period Overall Study
Count 4 Count 1 Count 0 Count 0 Count 4 Count 1

Participant Flows

Sequence: 3930289

Outcome Counts

Sequence: 74215440 Sequence: 74215441 Sequence: 74215442 Sequence: 74215443 Sequence: 74215444 Sequence: 74215445 Sequence: 74215446 Sequence: 74215447 Sequence: 74215448 Sequence: 74215449 Sequence: 74215450 Sequence: 74215451
Outcome Id 30891810 Outcome Id 30891810 Outcome Id 30891811 Outcome Id 30891811 Outcome Id 30891812 Outcome Id 30891812 Outcome Id 30891813 Outcome Id 30891813 Outcome Id 30891814 Outcome Id 30891814 Outcome Id 30891815 Outcome Id 30891815
Result Group Id 56202119 Result Group Id 56202120 Result Group Id 56202119 Result Group Id 56202120 Result Group Id 56202119 Result Group Id 56202120 Result Group Id 56202119 Result Group Id 56202120 Result Group Id 56202119 Result Group Id 56202120 Result Group Id 56202119 Result Group Id 56202120
Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001
Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure Scope Measure
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Count 0 Count 0 Count 0 Count 0 Count 1 Count 0 Count 0 Count 0 Count 0 Count 0 Count 0 Count 0

Provided Documents

Sequence: 2593322
Document Type Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Has Protocol True
Has Icf False
Has Sap True
Document Date 2020-02-18
Url https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ProvidedDocs/33/NCT03795233/Prot_SAP_000.pdf

Reported Event Totals

Sequence: 28013689 Sequence: 28013690 Sequence: 28013691 Sequence: 28013692 Sequence: 28013693 Sequence: 28013694
Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths Event Type serious Event Type other Event Type deaths
Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality Classification Total, serious adverse events Classification Total, other adverse events Classification Total, all-cause mortality
Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 1 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0 Subjects Affected 0
Subjects At Risk 4 Subjects At Risk 4 Subjects At Risk 4 Subjects At Risk 1 Subjects At Risk 1 Subjects At Risk 1
Created At 2023-08-10 06:29:42.775791 Created At 2023-08-10 06:29:42.775791 Created At 2023-08-10 06:29:42.775791 Created At 2023-08-10 06:29:42.775791 Created At 2023-08-10 06:29:42.775791 Created At 2023-08-10 06:29:42.775791
Updated At 2023-08-10 06:29:42.775791 Updated At 2023-08-10 06:29:42.775791 Updated At 2023-08-10 06:29:42.775791 Updated At 2023-08-10 06:29:42.775791 Updated At 2023-08-10 06:29:42.775791 Updated At 2023-08-10 06:29:42.775791

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 28986033
Responsible Party Type Sponsor

Result Agreements

Sequence: 3861033
Pi Employee Yes

Result Contacts

Sequence: 3860998
Organization Boston Medical Center
Name Tamar Barlam, MD MSC
Phone 617 414 5190
Email tamar.barlam@bmc.org

Outcomes

Sequence: 30891810 Sequence: 30891811 Sequence: 30891812 Sequence: 30891813 Sequence: 30891814 Sequence: 30891815
Outcome Type Primary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary Outcome Type Secondary
Title Stool Microbiome With and Without FMT Administration Title Feasibility of Administering FMT After Completion of a Course of Oral Vancomycin Therapy Title Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] of FMT After a Course of Oral Vancomycin Therapy Title Incidence of Gastrointestinal Symptomatology Based on a Survey After CDI Title CDI Recurrence Title Number of Hospital Readmissions After Treatment
Description The stool microbiome in participants who receive additional FMT at end of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treatment with oral vancomycin will be compared to the stool microbiome in participants with standard treatment or oral vancomycin alone Description The number and proportion of FMT pills participants ingest after completion of a course of oral vancomycin therapy will be documented. Description Study participants will be monitored for any adverse events to FMT such as nausea or vomiting, abdominal pain or diarrhea. Description A detailed survey with 15 questions will be administered on GI symptoms Physicians will go over any significant adverse events to determine if they are related, possibly related or unrelated to oral FMT administration Description Patients will be monitored for recurrent C difficile infection defined as non-resolution or recurrence of GI symptoms (abdominal pain, diarrhea etc) and/or a positive stool C difficile test The proportion of participants with CDI recurrence will be documented. Description The number of hospital readmissions within 30 days after CDI treatment per patient history and chart review will be obtained
Time Frame 11 months Time Frame 12 months Time Frame During test dose, during 90 minutes of FMT administration, 30 minutes after FMT administration, 48-72 hours after FMT administration Time Frame 60 days Time Frame 60 days Time Frame 30 days
Population This outcome measure was not obtained on any of the participants as no participant was in the study at 11 months. Population This outcome measure was not obtained on any of the participants as no participant was in the study at 12 months. Population Only one participant in the FMT arm ingested the intervention. Population This outcome measure was not obtained on any of the participants. Population This outcome measure was not obtained on any of the participants. Population This outcome measure was not obtained on any of the participants.
Units Participants
Param Type Count of Participants

Outcome Measurements

Sequence: 236371372
Outcome Id 30891812
Result Group Id 56202119
Ctgov Group Code OG000
Title Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] of FMT After a Course of Oral Vancomycin Therapy
Description Study participants will be monitored for any adverse events to FMT such as nausea or vomiting, abdominal pain or diarrhea.
Units Participants
Param Type Count of Participants
Param Value 0
Param Value Num 0.0

Baseline Counts

Sequence: 11411301 Sequence: 11411302 Sequence: 11411303
Result Group Id 56202114 Result Group Id 56202115 Result Group Id 56202116
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants
Scope overall Scope overall Scope overall
Count 4 Count 1 Count 5

Result Groups

Sequence: 56202114 Sequence: 56202115 Sequence: 56202116 Sequence: 56202117 Sequence: 56202118 Sequence: 56202119 Sequence: 56202120 Sequence: 56202121 Sequence: 56202122
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code FG000 Ctgov Group Code FG001 Ctgov Group Code OG000 Ctgov Group Code OG001 Ctgov Group Code EG000 Ctgov Group Code EG001
Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Baseline Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Participant Flow Result Type Outcome Result Type Outcome Result Type Reported Event Result Type Reported Event
Title Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Title Oral Vancomycin Alone (Control) Title Total Title Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Title Oral Vancomycin Alone (Control) Title Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Title Oral Vancomycin Alone (Control) Title Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Title Oral Vancomycin Alone (Control)
Description Fecal microbiota transplant G3 capsules will be administered after standard of care with oral vancomycin therapy in participants with primary Clostridium difficile infection.

Fecal microbiota transplant G3 capsules: After standard of care therapy with oral vancomycin, frozen oral FMT capsules will be provided in a formulation designed to deliver the product to the large intestine. 30 FMT capsules will be administered over a 2 hour period under direct observation

Description Oral vancomycin therapy will be administered as per standard of care in participants with primary clostridium difficile infection.

Oral Vancomycin alone: Standard of care will be provided with oral vancomycin therapy.

Description Total of all reporting groups Description Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) G3 capsules will be administered after standard of care with oral vancomycin therapy in participants with primary Clostridium difficile infection.

Fecal microbiota transplant G3 capsules: After standard of care therapy with oral vancomycin, frozen oral FMT capsules will be provided in a formulation designed to deliver the product to the large intestine. 30 FMT capsules will be administered over a 2 hour period under direct observation

Description Oral vancomycin therapy will be administered as per standard of care in participants with primary clostridium difficile infection.

Oral Vancomycin alone: Standard of care will be provided with oral vancomycin therapy.

Description Fecal microbiota transplant G3 capsules will be administered after standard of care with oral vancomycin therapy in participants with primary Clostridium difficile infection.

Fecal microbiota transplant G3 capsules: After standard of care therapy with oral vancomycin, frozen oral FMT capsules will be provided in a formulation designed to deliver the product to the large intestine. 30 FMT capsules will be administered over a 2 hour period under direct observation

Description Oral vancomycin therapy will be administered as per standard of care in participants with primary clostridium difficile infection.

Oral Vancomycin alone: Standard of care will be provided with oral vancomycin therapy.

Description Fecal microbiota transplant G3 capsules will be administered after standard of care with oral vancomycin therapy in participants with primary Clostridium difficile infection.

Fecal microbiota transplant G3 capsules: After standard of care therapy with oral vancomycin, frozen oral FMT capsules will be provided in a formulation designed to deliver the product to the large intestine. 30 FMT capsules will be administered over a 2 hour period under direct observation

Description Oral vancomycin therapy will be administered as per standard of care in participants with primary clostridium difficile infection.

Oral Vancomycin alone: Standard of care will be provided with oral vancomycin therapy.

Baseline Measurements

Sequence: 125972760 Sequence: 125972761 Sequence: 125972762 Sequence: 125972763 Sequence: 125972764 Sequence: 125972765 Sequence: 125972766 Sequence: 125972767 Sequence: 125972768 Sequence: 125972769 Sequence: 125972770 Sequence: 125972771 Sequence: 125972772 Sequence: 125972773 Sequence: 125972774 Sequence: 125972775 Sequence: 125972776 Sequence: 125972777 Sequence: 125972778 Sequence: 125972779 Sequence: 125972780 Sequence: 125972781 Sequence: 125972782 Sequence: 125972783 Sequence: 125972784 Sequence: 125972785 Sequence: 125972786
Result Group Id 56202114 Result Group Id 56202115 Result Group Id 56202116 Result Group Id 56202114 Result Group Id 56202115 Result Group Id 56202116 Result Group Id 56202114 Result Group Id 56202115 Result Group Id 56202116 Result Group Id 56202114 Result Group Id 56202115 Result Group Id 56202116 Result Group Id 56202114 Result Group Id 56202115 Result Group Id 56202116 Result Group Id 56202114 Result Group Id 56202115 Result Group Id 56202116 Result Group Id 56202114 Result Group Id 56202115 Result Group Id 56202116 Result Group Id 56202114 Result Group Id 56202115 Result Group Id 56202116 Result Group Id 56202114 Result Group Id 56202115 Result Group Id 56202116
Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002 Ctgov Group Code BG000 Ctgov Group Code BG001 Ctgov Group Code BG002
Classification Black or African Am Classification Black or African Am Classification Black or African Am Classification White Classification White Classification White Classification United States Classification United States Classification United States
Category <=18 years Category <=18 years Category <=18 years Category Between 18 and 65 years Category Between 18 and 65 years Category Between 18 and 65 years Category >=65 years Category >=65 years Category >=65 years Category Female Category Female Category Female Category Male Category Male Category Male
Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Categorical Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Age, Continuous Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Sex: Female, Male Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Race/Ethnicity, Customized Title Region of Enrollment Title Region of Enrollment Title Region of Enrollment
Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units years Units years Units years Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units Participants Units participants Units participants Units participants
Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Mean Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Count of Participants Param Type Number Param Type Number Param Type Number
Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 4 Param Value 1 Param Value 5 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 0 Param Value 49.8 Param Value 58 Param Value 51.4 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 1 Param Value 3 Param Value 2 Param Value 0 Param Value 2 Param Value 2 Param Value 1 Param Value 3 Param Value 4 Param Value 1 Param Value 5
Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 5.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 49.8 Param Value Num 58.0 Param Value Num 51.4 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 0.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 2.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 3.0 Param Value Num 4.0 Param Value Num 1.0 Param Value Num 5.0
Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation Dispersion Type Standard Deviation
Dispersion Value 11.9 Dispersion Value 10.9
Dispersion Value Num 11.9 Dispersion Value Num 10.9
Number Analyzed 4 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 5 Number Analyzed 4 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 5 Number Analyzed 4 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 5 Number Analyzed 4 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 5 Number Analyzed 4 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 5 Number Analyzed 4 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 5 Number Analyzed 4 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 5 Number Analyzed 4 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 5 Number Analyzed 4 Number Analyzed 1 Number Analyzed 5

]]>

<![CDATA[ Preparing and Timing of the Endometrium in Modified Natural Cycle Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfers ]]>
https://zephyrnet.com/NCT03795220
2019-01-06

https://zephyrnet.com/?p=NCT03795220
NCT03795220https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03795220?tab=tableMarte Saupstad, MDmarte.saupstad@regionh.dkNAThe increasing use of FET emphasizes the importance of preparing and timing the endometrium in FET cycles, however there is no consensus on luteal phase progesterone supplementation in mNC-FET and the optimal day of blastocyst warming and transfer. The aim of this multicenter RCT is to assess the effect of progesterone supplementation in hCG-triggered mNC-FET and the effect of embryo thawing and transfer at hCG+6 or hCG+7 days, respectively. In total 604 patients will be included with n=151 in each of the four study arms. The primary outcome is live birth rate per transfer (LBR) and the goal is to show a 10% increase in LBR after progesterone supplementation and to assess whether blastocyst warming+transfer 6 days after hCG trigger is superior to 7 days after hCG trigger in mNC-FET.
<![CDATA[

Studies

Study First Submitted Date 2018-12-04
Study First Posted Date 2019-01-07
Last Update Posted Date 2023-04-05
Start Month Year January 6, 2019
Primary Completion Month Year January 1, 2024
Verification Month Year April 2023
Verification Date 2023-04-30
Last Update Posted Date 2023-04-05

Detailed Descriptions

Sequence: 20835576
Description Single embryo transfer and freezing of surplus embryos has lowered twin birth rates after in vitro fertilization (IVF) to a level of less than 5% in Denmark. However, several treatments with repeated frozen embryo transfers (FET) before a viable pregnancy is confirmed are burdensome to the patients. New freezing techniques has optimized the quality of the embryo transferred in FET cycles, but optimization of the endometrium in the luteal phase is still lacking behind. In a mNC-FET, which is the routine in many clinics, ovulation is induced with an hCG injection when the leading follicle is ≥17 mm. The hCG trigger is important for controlling the time of ovulation, but triggering an unhealthy follicle at an inappropriate time may cause luteal phase insufficiency and thus suboptimal function of the endometrium. Danish public fertility clinics are not routinely using progesterone supplementation in mNC-FET, but there may be a rationale to do so, and some implantations may be rescued. In this study we will compare live birth rates in mNC-FET with and without progesterone supplementation in the luteal phase, and further we will explore the optimal timing of blastocyst warming and transfer by comparing embryo transfer at hCG trigger +6 days versus +7 days. This is a superiority study with the aim to detect an increase in live birth rates of 10%. Hence, this adequately powered RCT may make a major contribution to knowledge on mNC-FET to the benefits of patients. We will include 604 patients divided 1:1 (302:302) in each arm +/- progesterone and these will further be divided 1:1 in blastocyst warming and transfer +6 and +7 days after hCG injection. The primary endpoint is live birth rate per transfer.

Facilities

Sequence: 201146938
Status Recruiting
Name Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
City Copenhagen
Zip 2100
Country Denmark

Facility Contacts

Sequence: 28262590 Sequence: 28262591
Facility Id 201146938 Facility Id 201146938
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Anja B. Pinborg, Prof., DMSc Name Marte Saupstad, MD
Email anja.bisgaard.pinborg@regionh.dk Email marte.saupstad@regionh.dk
Phone 004535456430 Phone 004535455289

Conditions

Sequence: 52463356
Name Infertility
Downcase Name infertility

Id Information

Sequence: 40367774 Sequence: 40367775
Id Source org_study_id Id Source secondary_id
Id Value 63569 Id Value 2018-002207-34
Id Type EudraCT Number

Countries

Sequence: 42802234
Name Denmark
Removed False

Design Groups

Sequence: 55917557 Sequence: 55917558 Sequence: 55917559 Sequence: 55917560
Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator Group Type Active Comparator
Title Vaginal progesterone + transfer 6. day Title Vaginal progesterone + transfer 7. day Title No progesterone + transfer 6. day Title No progesterone + transfer 7. day
Description Lutinus + blastocyst warming and transfer 6 days after hCG trigger Description Lutinus + blastocyst warming and transfer 7 days after hCG trigger Description No Lutinus + blastocyst warming and transfer 6 days after hCG trigger Description No Lutinus + blastocyst warming and transfer 7 days after hCG trigger

Interventions

Sequence: 52773294 Sequence: 52773295 Sequence: 52773296 Sequence: 52773297
Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug Intervention Type Drug
Name Lutinus + transfer day 6 Name Lutinus + transfer day 7 Name No Lutinus + transfer day 6 Name No Lutinus + transfer day 7
Description Four parallel groups of patients undergoing fertility treatment (modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer) will be compared using/not using vaginal progesterone (Lutinus) and subject to blastocyst warming and transfer 6/7 days after hCG trigger. Description Four parallel groups of patients undergoing fertility treatment (modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer) will be compared using/not using vaginal progesterone (Lutinus) and subject to blastocyst warming and transfer 6/7 days after hCG trigger. Description Four parallel groups of patients undergoing fertility treatment (modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer) will be compared using/not using vaginal progesterone (Lutinus) and subject to blastocyst warming and transfer 6/7 days after hCG trigger. Description Four parallel groups of patients undergoing fertility treatment (modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer) will be compared using/not using vaginal progesterone (Lutinus) and subject to blastocyst warming and transfer 6/7 days after hCG trigger.

Design Outcomes

Sequence: 178475421 Sequence: 178475422 Sequence: 178475423 Sequence: 178475424 Sequence: 178475425 Sequence: 178475426 Sequence: 178475427 Sequence: 178475428 Sequence: 178475429 Sequence: 178475430 Sequence: 178475431 Sequence: 178475432 Sequence: 178475433 Sequence: 178475434 Sequence: 178475435 Sequence: 178475436 Sequence: 178475437 Sequence: 178475438
Outcome Type primary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary Outcome Type secondary
Measure Live birth rates per transfer Measure Chemical pregnancy rates per transfer Measure Clinical pregnancy rates per transfer Measure Abortion rates per transfer Measure ASAT (U/L) Measure ALAT (U/L) Measure AMH (pol/L) Measure Estradiole (mmol/L) Measure FSH (IU/L) Measure LH (IU/L) Measure Progesterone (nmol/L) Measure OH-progesterone (nmol/L) Measure beta-hCG Measure TSH (*10^3 IU/L) Measure Thyroglobulin antibodies (arb.units/L) Measure Thyroid peroxidase anitbodies (arb.units/L) Measure Obstetric complication rates Measure Neonatal complication rates
Time Frame Registered at the one-year follow-up after a positive pregnancy test. Time Frame Measured 16 days after ovulation trigger (hCG+16). Time Frame Ultrasound performed at 7-8 weeks of gestation. Time Frame Registered at the one-year follow-up after a positive pregnancy test. Time Frame Measured at baseline. Time Frame Measured at baseline. Time Frame Measured at baseline. Time Frame Measured at baseline, at ovulation trigger day (hCG+0), at transfer day (hCG+6/7) and at hCG+11. Time Frame Measured at baseline, at ovulation trigger day (hCG+0), at transfer day (hCG+6/7) and at hCG+11. Time Frame Measured at baseline, at ovulation trigger day (hCG+0), at transfer day (hCG+6/7) and at hCG+11. Time Frame Measured at baseline, at ovulation trigger day (hCG+0), at transfer day (hCG+6/7) and at hCG+11. Time Frame Measured at ovulation trigger day (hCG+0), at transfer day (hCG+6/7) and at hCG+11. Time Frame Measured at transfer day (hCG+6/7), hCG+11 and hCG+16. Time Frame Measured at baseline, at ovulation trigger day (hCG+0), at transfer day (hCG+6/7), at hCG+11, at hCG+14 and at hCG+19. Time Frame Measured at baseline. Time Frame Measured at baseline. Time Frame Registered at the one-year follow-up after a positive pregnancy test. Time Frame Registered at the one-year follow-up after a positive pregnancy test.
Description Comparison of live birth rates between patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or 7 after hCG trigger. Description Comparison of chemical pregnancy rates between patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or 7 after hCG trigger. Description Comparison of clinical pregnancy rates (ultrasound) between patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or seven after hCG trigger. Description Comparison of abortion rates between patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or 7 after hCG trigger. Description ALAT measured by blood sample to ensure normal liver parameters before administration of progesterone. Description ALAT measured by blood sample to ensure normal liver parameters before administration of progesterone. Description Comparison of AMH measured by blood samples between patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or 7 after hCG trigger. Description Comparison of estradiole measured by blood samples between patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or 7 after hCG trigger. Description Comparison of FSH measured by blood samples between patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or 7 after hCG trigger. Description Comparison of LH measured by blood samples between patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or 7 after hCG trigger. Description Comparison of progesterone measured by blood samples between patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or 7 after hCG trigger. Description Comparison OH-progesterone measured by blood samples between patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or 7 after hCG trigger. Description Comparison of beta-hCG measured by blood samples between patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or 7 after hCG trigger. Description Comparison of TSH measured by blood samples between patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or 7 after hCG trigger. Description Comparison of thyroglobulin antibodies measured by blood samples between patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or 7 after hCG trigger. Description Comparison of thyroid peroxidase antibodies measured by blood samples between patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or 7 after hCG trigger. Description Comparison of obstetric complication rates between patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or 7 after hCG trigger. Description Comparison of neonatal complication rates for children of patients receiving and not receiving Lutinus, with blastocyst warming and transfer day 6 or 7 after hCG trigger.

Browse Conditions

Sequence: 194602077 Sequence: 194602078 Sequence: 194602079
Mesh Term Infertility Mesh Term Genital Diseases Mesh Term Urogenital Diseases
Downcase Mesh Term infertility Downcase Mesh Term genital diseases Downcase Mesh Term urogenital diseases
Mesh Type mesh-list Mesh Type mesh-ancestor Mesh Type mesh-ancestor

Sponsors

Sequence: 48590793 Sequence: 48590794 Sequence: 48590795 Sequence: 48590796 Sequence: 48590797 Sequence: 48590798 Sequence: 48590799 Sequence: 48590800
Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER Agency Class OTHER
Lead Or Collaborator lead Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator Lead Or Collaborator collaborator
Name Anja Bisgaard Pinborg Name Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre Name Regionshospitalet Horsens Name Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev Name Aalborg University Hospital Name Hillerod Hospital, Denmark Name Zealand University Hospital Name Regionshospitalet Viborg, Skive

Overall Officials

Sequence: 29438259
Role Principal Investigator
Name Anja B. Pinborg, Prof., DMSC
Affiliation Fertility Clinic Rigshospitalet

Central Contacts

Sequence: 12083938 Sequence: 12083939
Contact Type primary Contact Type backup
Name Anja B. Pinborg, Prof., DMSC Name Marte Saupstad, MD
Phone 0045 35 45 64 30
Email anja.bisgaard.pinborg@regionh.dk Email marte.saupstad@regionh.dk
Role Contact Role Contact

Design Group Interventions

Sequence: 68549347 Sequence: 68549348 Sequence: 68549349 Sequence: 68549350
Design Group Id 55917557 Design Group Id 55917558 Design Group Id 55917559 Design Group Id 55917560
Intervention Id 52773294 Intervention Id 52773295 Intervention Id 52773296 Intervention Id 52773297

Eligibilities

Sequence: 30932952
Gender Female
Minimum Age 18 Years
Maximum Age 41 Years
Healthy Volunteers No
Criteria Inclusion Criteria:

Female age 18-41 years, regular menstrual cycle (23-35 days), vitrified blastocysts derived from 1.-3. IVF/ICSI cycle in a public hospital and undergoing single blastocyst transfer.

Exclusion Criteria:

– Previous participation in the study, uterine malformations, intrauterine polyps or submucosal myomas, breast feeding, oocyte donation, preimplantation genetic testing, blastocyst conceived with sperm from testicular sperm aspiration, HIV (woman), hepatitis B and C (woman), known luteal phase insufficiency or if patients are not fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Further exclusion criteria are the following contraindications to progesterone; allergy to the study medication, undiagnosed vaginal bleeding, current missed abortion or ectopic pregnancy, hepatic insufficiency or severe hepatic disease, genital or breast cancer, arterial or venous thromboembolism, thrombophlebitis or porphyria. For patients participating in the sub-study, thyroid disease is an exclusion criterion.

Gender Based True
Adult True
Child False
Older Adult False

Calculated Values

Sequence: 254218164
Number Of Facilities 1
Registered In Calendar Year 2018
Were Results Reported False
Has Us Facility False
Has Single Facility True
Minimum Age Num 18
Maximum Age Num 41
Minimum Age Unit Years
Maximum Age Unit Years
Number Of Primary Outcomes To Measure 1
Number Of Secondary Outcomes To Measure 17

Designs

Sequence: 30678590
Allocation Randomized
Intervention Model Parallel Assignment
Observational Model
Primary Purpose Treatment
Time Perspective
Masking Single
Masking Description The study is a single blinded study; therefore, the study medication will be blinded for the treating doctors, but not for the patients, the non-treating doctors or the study nurses. Patients will only be seen by a treating doctor at the day of blastocyst transfer and at the day of the pregnancy scan. The participants will not take progesterone the morning of the blastocyst transfer, but immediately after to keep the treating doctors blinded. Patients will be instructed in not disclosing their study group to the treating doctor.
Intervention Model Description Randomized, controlled multicenter trial with inclusion of 604 mNC-FET cycles. We will include 604 patients divided 1:1 (302:302) in each arm +/- progesterone supplementation and these will further be divided 1:1 in blastocyst warming and transfer +6 and +7 days after hCG injection. Patients randomised to progesterone supplementation will start administering medicine four days after the ovulation trigger up til the day of the pregnancy test. If the pregnancy test is positive, medication will continue for 30 days more.
Investigator Masked True

Intervention Other Names

Sequence: 26818956 Sequence: 26818957
Intervention Id 52773294 Intervention Id 52773295
Name Lutinus Name Lutinus

Responsible Parties

Sequence: 29045300
Responsible Party Type Sponsor-Investigator
Name Anja Bisgaard Pinborg
Title Professor, chief consultant, DMSC
Affiliation Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Study References

Sequence: 52373884
Pmid 31843833
Reference Type derived
Citation Saupstad M, Freiesleben NC, Skouby SO, Andersen LF, Knudsen UB, Petersen KB, Husth M, Egeberg A, Petersen MR, Ziebe S, Andersen AN, Lossl K, Pinborg A. Preparation of the endometrium and timing of blastocyst transfer in modified natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfers (mNC-FET): a study protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e031811. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031811.

Ipd Information Types

Sequence: 3358203
Name Study Protocol

]]>