Edwards, R. A. et al. Using pyrosequencing to shed light on deep mine microbial ecology. BMC Genomics 7, 57 (2006).
Tamburini, F. B. et al. Short- and long-read metagenomics of urban and rural South African gut microbiomes reveal a transitional composition and undescribed taxa. Nat. Commun. 13, 926 (2022).
van Almsick, V., Schuler, F., Mellmann, A. & Schwierzeck, V. The use of long-read sequencing technologies in infection control: horizontal transfer of a blaCTX-M-27 containing lncFII plasmid in a patient screening sample. Microorganisms 10, 491 (2022).
Sedlazeck, F. J. et al. Accurate detection of complex structural variations using single-molecule sequencing. Nat. Methods 15, 461–468 (2018).
Sedlazeck, F. J., Lee, H., Darby, C. A. & Schatz, M. C. Piercing the dark matter: bioinformatics of long-range sequencing and mapping. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 329–346 (2018).
Kong, Y., Mead, E. A. & Fang, G. Navigating the pitfalls of mapping DNA and RNA modifications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10.1038/s41576-022-00559-5 (2023).
De Coster, W., Weissensteiner, M. H. & Sedlazeck, F. J. Towards population-scale long-read sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 572–587 (2021).
Garalde, D. R. et al. Highly parallel direct RNA sequencing on an array of nanopores. Nat. Methods 15, 201–206 (2018).
Gehrig, J. L. et al. Finding the right fit: evaluation of short-read and long-read sequencing approaches to maximize the utility of clinical microbiome data. Microb. Genom. 8, 000794 (2022).
Kiguchi, Y., Nishijima, S., Kumar, N., Hattori, M. & Suda, W. Long-read metagenomics of multiple displacement amplified DNA of low-biomass human gut phageomes by SACRA pre-processing chimeric reads. DNA Res. 28, dsab019 (2021).
Olson, N. D. et al. Metagenomic assembly through the lens of validation: recent advances in assessing and improving the quality of genomes assembled from metagenomes. Brief. Bioinform. 20, 1140–1150 (2019).
Ni, Y., Liu, X., Simeneh, Z. M., Yang, M. & Li, R. Benchmarking of Nanopore R10.4 and R9.4.1 flow cells in single-cell whole-genome amplification and whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 21, 2352–2364 (2023).
Castro-Wallace, S. L. et al. Nanopore DNA sequencing and genome assembly on the international space station. Sci. Rep. 7, 18022 (2017).
Cheng, H. et al. A rapid bacterial pathogen and antimicrobial resistance diagnosis workflow using Oxford nanopore adaptive sequencing method. Brief. Bioinform. 23, bbac453 (2022).
Zhang, L. et al. Rapid detection of bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes in clinical urine samples with urinary tract infection by metagenomic nanopore sequencing. Front. Microbiol. 13, 858777 (2022).
Isidro, J. et al. Phylogenomic characterization and signs of microevolution in the 2022 multi-country outbreak of monkeypox virus. Nat. Med. 28, 1569–1572 (2022).
Karthikeyan, S. et al. Wastewater sequencing reveals early cryptic SARS-CoV-2 variant transmission. Nature 609, 101–108 (2022).
Gaulke, C. A. et al. Evaluation of the effects of library preparation procedure and sample characteristics on the accuracy of metagenomic profiles. mSystems 6, e0044021 (2021).
Portik, D. M., Brown, C. T. & Pierce-Ward, N. T. Evaluation of taxonomic classification and profiling methods for long-read shotgun metagenomic sequencing datasets. BMC Bioinformatics 23, 541 (2022).
Wang, C. et al. Toward efficient and high-fidelity metagenomic data from sub-nanogram DNA: evaluation of library preparation and decontamination methods. BMC Biol. 20, 225 (2022).
Salter, S. J. et al. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 12, 87 (2014).
Davis, N. M., Proctor, D. M., Holmes, S. P., Relman, D. A. & Callahan, B. J. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome 6, 226 (2018).
Martí, J. M. Recentrifuge: Robust comparative analysis and contamination removal for metagenomics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006967 (2019).
Warris, S. et al. Correcting palindromes in long reads after whole-genome amplification. BMC Genomics 19, 798 (2018).
McCall, C. et al. Targeted metagenomic sequencing for detection of vertebrate viruses in wastewater for public health surveillance. ACS EST Water https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.3c00183 (2023).
Ludwig, K. U. et al. LAMP-Seq enables sensitive, multiplexed COVID-19 diagnostics using molecular barcoding. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1556–1562 (2021).
Loose, M., Malla, S. & Stout, M. Real-time selective sequencing using nanopore technology. Nat. Methods 13, 751–754 (2016).
Samarakoon, H., Ferguson, J. M., Gamaarachchi, H. & Deveson, I. W. Accelerated nanopore basecalling with SLOW5 data format. Bioinformatics 39, btad352 (2023).
De Coster, W., D’Hert, S., Schultz, D. T., Cruts, M. & Van Broeckhoven, C. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 34, 2666–2669 (2018).
Meyer, F. et al. Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation: the second round of challenges. Nat. Methods 19, 429–440 (2022).
Sayers, E. W. et al. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D20–D26 (2022).
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013).
Cole, J. R. et al. Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D633–D642 (2014).
DeSantis, T. Z. et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5069–5072 (2006).
Douglas, G. M. et al. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 685–688 (2020).
Curry, K. D. et al. Emu: species-level microbial community profiling of full-length 16S rRNA Oxford Nanopore sequencing data. Nat. Methods 19, 845–853 (2022).
Rodríguez-Pérez, H., Ciuffreda, L. & Flores, C. NanoCLUST: a species-level analysis of 16S rRNA nanopore sequencing data. Bioinformatics 37, 1600–1601 (2021).
Zaragoza-Solas, A., Haro-Moreno, J. M., Rodriguez-Valera, F. & López-Pérez, M. Long-read metagenomics improves the recovery of viral diversity from complex natural marine samples. mSystems 7, e0019222 (2022).
Chen, I.-M. A. et al. IMG/M: integrated genome and metagenome comparative data analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D507–D516 (2017).
Keegan, K. P., Glass, E. M. & Meyer, F. MG-RAST, a metagenomics service for analysis of microbial community structure and function. Methods Mol. Biol. 1399, 207–233 (2016).
Dilthey, A. T., Jain, C., Koren, S. & Phillippy, A. M. Strain-level metagenomic assignment and compositional estimation for long reads with MetaMaps. Nat. Commun. 10, 3066 (2019).
Huson, D. H. et al. MEGAN-LR: new algorithms allow accurate binning and easy interactive exploration of metagenomic long reads and contigs. Biol. Direct 13, 6 (2018).
Mirdita, M., Steinegger, M., Breitwieser, F., Söding, J. & Levy Karin, E. Fast and sensitive taxonomic assignment to metagenomic contigs. Bioinformatics 37, 3029–3031 (2021).
Bui, V.-K. & Wei, C. CDKAM: a taxonomic classification tool using discriminative k-mers and approximate matching strategies. BMC Bioinformatics 21, 468 (2020).
Fan, J., Huang, S. & Chorlton, S. D. BugSeq: a highly accurate cloud platform for long-read metagenomic analyses. BMC Bioinformatics 22, 160 (2021).
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).
Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12, 59–60 (2015).
Marić, J., Križanović, K., Riondet, S., Nagarajan, N. & Šikić, M. Comparative analysis of metagenomic classifiers for long-read sequencing datasets. BMC Bioinformatics 25, 15 (2024).
Watson, M. & Warr, A. Errors in long-read assemblies can critically affect protein prediction. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 124–126 (2019).
Balaji, A. et al. SeqScreen-Nano: a computational platform for rapid, in-field characterization of previously unseen pathogens. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.10.528096 (2023).
Breitwieser, F. P., Pertea, M., Zimin, A. V. & Salzberg, S. L. Human contamination in bacterial genomes has created thousands of spurious proteins. Genome Res. 29, 954–960 (2019).
Wenger, A. M. et al. Accurate circular consensus long-read sequencing improves variant detection and assembly of a human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1155–1162 (2019).
Kazantseva, E., Donmez, A., Pop, M. & Kolmogorov, M. stRainy: assembly-based metagenomic strain phasing using long reads. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.31.526521 (2023).
Maguire, F. et al. Metagenome-assembled genome binning methods with short reads disproportionately fail for plasmids and genomic Islands. Microb. Genom. 6, mgen000436 (2020).
Bickhart, D. M. et al. Generating lineage-resolved, complete metagenome-assembled genomes from complex microbial communities. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 711–719 (2022).
Ye, C., Hill, C. M., Wu, S., Ruan, J. & Ma, Z. S. DBG2OLC: Efficient assembly of large genomes using long erroneous reads of the third generation sequencing technologies. Sci. Rep. 6, 31900 (2016).
Wick, R. R., Judd, L. M., Gorrie, C. L. & Holt, K. E. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005595 (2017).
Haro-Moreno, J. M., López-Pérez, M. & Rodriguez-Valera, F. Enhanced recovery of microbial genes and genomes from a marine water column using long-read metagenomics. Front. Microbiol. 12, 708782 (2021).
Bertrand, D. et al. Hybrid metagenomic assembly enables high-resolution analysis of resistance determinants and mobile elements in human microbiomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 937–944 (2019).
Luo, X., Kang, X. & Schönhuth, A. VeChat: correcting errors in long reads using variation graphs. Nat. Commun. 13, 6657 (2022).
Zhang, Z., Yang, C., Veldsman, W. P., Fang, X. & Zhang, L. Benchmarking genome assembly methods on metagenomic sequencing data. Brief. Bioinform. 24, (2023).
Kolmogorov, M. et al. metaFlye: scalable long-read metagenome assembly using repeat graphs. Nat. Methods 17, 1103–1110 (2020).
Koren, S. et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 27, 722–736 (2017).
Feng, X., Cheng, H., Portik, D. & Li, H. Metagenome assembly of high-fidelity long reads with hifiasm-meta. Nat. Methods 19, 671–674 (2022).
Moss, E. L., Maghini, D. G. & Bhatt, A. S. Complete, closed bacterial genomes from microbiomes using nanopore sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 701–707 (2020).
Majidian, S., Agustinho, D. P., Chin, C.-S., Sedlazeck, F. J. & Mahmoud, M. Genomic variant benchmark: if you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it. Genome Biol. 24, 221 (2023).
Ghurye, J., Treangen, T., Fedarko, M., Hervey, W. J. 4th & Pop, M. MetaCarvel: linking assembly graph motifs to biological variants. Genome Biol. 20, 174 (2019).
Luo, X., Kang, X. & Schönhuth, A. Enhancing long-read-based strain-aware metagenome assembly. Front. Genet. 13, 868280 (2022).
Wick, R. R. et al. Trycycler: consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes. Genome Biol. 22, 266 (2021).
Vicedomini, R., Quince, C., Darling, A. E. & Chikhi, R. Strainberry: automated strain separation in low-complexity metagenomes using long reads. Nat. Commun. 12, 4485 (2021).
Yang, C. et al. A review of computational tools for generating metagenome-assembled genomes from metagenomic sequencing data. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 19, 6301–6314 (2021).
Mattock, J. & Watson, M. A comparison of single-coverage and multi-coverage metagenomic binning reveals extensive hidden contamination. Nat. Methods 20, 1170–1173 (2023).
Wickramarachchi, A., Mallawaarachchi, V., Rajan, V. & Lin, Y. MetaBCC-LR: metagenomics binning by coverage and composition for long reads. Bioinformatics 36, i3–i11 (2020).
Wickramarachchi, A. & Lin, Y. Binning long reads in metagenomics datasets using composition and coverage information. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 17, 14 (2022).
Lamurias, A., Sereika, M., Albertsen, M., Hose, K. & Nielsen, T. D. Metagenomic binning with assembly graph embeddings. Bioinformatics 38, 4481–4487 (2022).
Muralidharan, H. S., Shah, N., Meisel, J. S. & Pop, M. Binnacle: using scaffolds to improve the contiguity and quality of metagenomic bins. Front. Microbiol. 12, 638561 (2021).
Wilbanks, E. G. et al. Metagenomic methylation patterns resolve bacterial genomes of unusual size and structural complexity. ISME J. 16, 1921–1931 (2022).
Berthelier, J. et al. Long-read direct RNA sequencing reveals epigenetic regulation of chimeric gene-transposon transcripts in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Commun. 14, 3248 (2023).
Lee, J. Y. et al. Comparative evaluation of Nanopore polishing tools for microbial genome assembly and polishing strategies for downstream analysis. Sci. Rep. 11, 20740 (2021).
Huang, Y. -T., Liu, P. -Y. & Shih, P. -W. Homopolish: a method for the removal of systematic errors in nanopore sequencing by homologous polishing. Genome Biol. 22, 95 (2021).
Shafin, K. et al. Haplotype-aware variant calling with PEPPER-Margin-DeepVariant enables high accuracy in nanopore long-reads. Nat. Methods 18, 1322–1332 (2021).
Cornet, L. & Baurain, D. Contamination detection in genomic data: more is not enough. Genome Biol. 23, 60 (2022).
Manni, M., Berkeley, M. R., Seppey, M. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genomic data quality and beyond. Curr. Protoc. 1, e323 (2021).
Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, A. Y., Gao, M. & Chong, Z. Accurate long-read de novo assembly evaluation with Inspector. Genome Biol. 22, 312 (2021).
Chklovski, A., Parks, D. H., Woodcroft, B. J. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM2: a rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning. Nat. Methods 20, 1203–1212 (2023).
Mineeva, O., Rojas-Carulla, M., Ley, R. E., Schölkopf, B. & Youngblut, N. D. DeepMAsED: evaluating the quality of metagenomic assemblies. Bioinformatics 36, 3011–3017 (2020).
Wood, D. E., Lu, J. & Langmead, B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 20, 257 (2019).
Rhie, A., Walenz, B. P., Koren, S. & Phillippy, A. M. Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 21, 245 (2020).
Chaumeil, P.-A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H. GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 38, 5315–5316 (2022).
Blanco-Miguez, A. et al. Extending and improving metagenomic taxonomic profiling with uncharacterized species with MetaPhlAn 4. Nat Biotechnol. 41, 1633–1644 (2023).
Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).
Tatusova, T. et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 6614–6624 (2016).
von Meijenfeldt, F. A. B., Arkhipova, K., Cambuy, D. D., Coutinho, F. H. & Dutilh, B. E. Robust taxonomic classification of uncharted microbial sequences and bins with CAT and BAT. Genome Biol. 20, 217 (2019).
Koboldt, D. C. Best practices for variant calling in clinical sequencing. Genome Med. 12, 91 (2020).
Ajami, N. J., Wong, M. C., Ross, M. C., Lloyd, R. E. & Petrosino, J. F. Maximal viral information recovery from sequence data using VirMAP. Nat. Commun. 9, 3205 (2018).
Kim, D. et al. The architecture of SARS-CoV-2 transcriptome. Cell 181, 914–921 (2020).
Liu, Y. et al. Rescuing low frequency variants within intra-host viral populations directly from Oxford Nanopore sequencing data. Nat. Commun. 13, 1321 (2022).
Sahlin, K., Baudeau, T., Cazaux, B. & Marchet, C. A survey of mapping algorithms in the long-reads era. Genome Biol. 24, 133 (2023).
Su, J., Zheng, Z., Ahmed, S. S., Lam, T.-W. & Luo, R. Clair3-trio: high-performance Nanopore long-read variant calling in family trios with trio-to-trio deep neural networks. Brief. Bioinform. 23, bbac301 (2022).
Poplin, R. et al. A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 983–987 (2018).
Ahsan, M. U., Liu, Q., Fang, L. & Wang, K. NanoCaller for accurate detection of SNPs and indels in difficult-to-map regions from long-read sequencing by haplotype-aware deep neural networks. Genome Biol. 22, 261 (2021).
Wilm, A. et al. LoFreq: a sequence-quality aware, ultra-sensitive variant caller for uncovering cell-population heterogeneity from high-throughput sequencing datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 11189–11201 (2012).
Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6, 80–92 (2012).
Wang, K., Li, M. & Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e164–e164 (2010).
McLaren, W. et al. The ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 17, 122 (2016).
Dylus, D., Altenhoff, A., Majidian, S., Sedlazeck, F. J. & Dessimoz, C. Inference of phylogenetic trees directly from raw sequencing reads using Read2Tree. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 139–147 (2024).
Corel, E. et al. Bipartite network analysis of gene sharings in the microbial world. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 899–913 (2018).
Chen, L. et al. Short- and long-read metagenomics expand individualized structural variations in gut microbiomes. Nat. Commun. 13, 3175 (2022).
Pérez-Losada, M., Arenas, M., Galán, J. C., Palero, F. & González-Candelas, F. Recombination in viruses: mechanisms, methods of study, and evolutionary consequences. Infect. Genet. Evol. 30, 296–307 (2015).
Li, H. et al. A synthetic-diploid benchmark for accurate variant-calling evaluation. Nat. Methods 15, 595–597 (2018).
Marçais, G. et al. MUMmer4: a fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1005944 (2018).
Smolka, M. et al. Detection of mosaic and population-level structural variants with Sniffles2. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02024-y (2024).
Heller, D. & Vingron, M. SVIM-asm: structural variant detection from haploid and diploid genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 36, 5519–5521 (2020).
Geoffroy, V. et al. AnnotSV: an integrated tool for structural variations annotation. Bioinformatics 34, 3572–3574 (2018).
Jeffares, D. C. et al. Transient structural variations have strong effects on quantitative traits and reproductive isolation in fission yeast. Nat. Commun. 8, 14061 (2017).
English, A. C., Menon, V. K., Gibbs, R. A., Metcalf, G. A. & Sedlazeck, F. J. Truvari: refined structural variant comparison preserves allelic diversity. Genome Biol. 23, 271 (2022).
Curry, K. D. et al. Reference-free structural variant detection in microbiomes via long-read coassembly graphs. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.25.577285 (2024).
Zhang, T. et al. N6-methyladenosine RNA modification promotes viral genomic RNA stability and infection. Nat. Commun. 13, 6576 (2022).
Barros-Silva, D., Joana Marques, C., Henrique, R. & Jerónimo, C. Profiling DNA methylation based on next-generation sequencing approaches: new insights and clinical applications. Genes 9, 429 (2018).
Simpson, J. T. et al. Detecting DNA cytosine methylation using nanopore sequencing. Nat. Methods 14, 407–410 (2017).
Ni, P. et al. DeepSignal: detecting DNA methylation state from Nanopore sequencing reads using deep-learning. Bioinformatics 35, 4586–4595 (2019).
Bonet, J. et al. DeepMP: a deep learning tool to detect DNA base modifications on Nanopore sequencing data. Bioinformatics 38, 1235–1243 (2021).
Tourancheau, A., Mead, E. A., Zhang, X. -S. & Fang, G. Discovering multiple types of DNA methylation from bacteria and microbiome using nanopore sequencing. Nat. Methods 18, 491–498 (2021).
Leger, A. et al. RNA modifications detection by comparative Nanopore direct RNA sequencing. Nat. Commun. 12, 7198 (2021).
Liu, H. et al. Accurate detection of m6A RNA modifications in native RNA sequences. Nat. Commun. 10, 4079 (2019).
Fu, Y. et al. MethPhaser: methylation-based haplotype phasing of human genomes. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.12.540573 (2023).
Nurk, S. et al. The complete sequence of a human genome. Science 376, 44–53 (2022).
Pfeiffer, F. et al. Systematic evaluation of error rates and causes in short samples in next-generation sequencing. Sci. Rep. 8, 10950 (2018).
Espinosa, E., Bautista, R., Larrosa, R. & Plata, O. Advancements in long-read genome sequencing technologies and algorithms. Genomics 116, 110842 (2024).
Salamon, D. et al. Comparison of iSeq and MiSeq as the two platforms for 16S rRNA sequencing in the study of the gut of rat microbiome. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 106, 7671–7681 (2022).
41J Blog. Cost per gigabase. https://41j.com/blog/2022/09/cost-per-gigabase/ (2022).
Mastrorosa, F. K., Miller, D. E. & Eichler, E. E. Applications of long-read sequencing to Mendelian genetics. Genome Med. 15, 42 (2023).
- SEO Powered Content & PR Distribution. Get Amplified Today.
- PlatoData.Network Vertical Generative Ai. Empower Yourself. Access Here.
- PlatoAiStream. Web3 Intelligence. Knowledge Amplified. Access Here.
- PlatoESG. Carbon, CleanTech, Energy, Environment, Solar, Waste Management. Access Here.
- PlatoHealth. Biotech and Clinical Trials Intelligence. Access Here.
- Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-024-02262-1