Klein, A.-M. et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 303–313 (2007).
Staveley, J. P., Law, S. A., Fairbrother, A. & Menzie, C. A. A causal analysis of observed declines in managed honey bees (Apis mellifera). Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 20, 566–591 (2014).
Gray, A. et al. Honey bee colony loss rates in 37 countries using the COLOSS survey for winter 2019–2020: the combined effects of operation size, migration and queen replacement. J. Apicultural Res. 62, 204–210 (2023).
Farina, W. M., Arenas, A., Díaz, P. C., Susic Martin, C. & Corriale, M. J. In-hive learning of specific mimic odours as a tool to enhance honey bee foraging and pollination activities in pear and apple crops. Sci. Rep. 12, 20510 (2022).
Genersch, E. Honey bee pathology: current threats to honey bees and beekeeping. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 87, 87–97 (2010).
in NASDAQ OMX’s News Release Distribution Channel (New York, 2022).
Papa, G. et al. The honey bee Apis mellifera: an insect at the interface between human and ecosystem health. Biology 11, 233 (2022).
Smutin, D., Lebedev, E., Selitskiy, M., Panyushev, N. & Adonin, L. Micro“bee“ota: honey bee normal microbiota as a part of superorganism. Microorganisms https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10122359 (2022).
Galanis, A. et al. Bee foraging preferences, microbiota and pathogens revealed by direct shotgun metagenomics of honey. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 22, 2506–2523 (2022).
Smith, K. E. et al. Honey as a biomonitor for a changing world. Nat. Sustain. 2, 223–232 (2019).
Wirta, H., Abrego, N., Miller, K., Roslin, T. & Vesterinen, E. DNA traces the origin of honey by identifying plants, bacteria and fungi. Sci. Rep. 11, 4798 (2021).
Cunningham, M. M. et al. Honey bees as biomonitors of environmental contaminants, pathogens, and climate change. Ecol. Indic. 134, 108457 (2022).
Soares, S., Rodrigues, F. & Delerue-Matos, C. Towards DNA-based methods analysis for honey: an update. Molecules 28, 2106 (2023).
Pascher, K., Švara, V. & Jungmeier, M. Environmental DNA-based methods in biodiversity monitoring of protected areas: application range, limitations, and needs. Diversity 14, 463 (2022).
Rodríguez-Ezpeleta, N. et al. Biodiversity monitoring using environmental DNA. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21, 1405–1409 (2021).
Hassoon, I. M., Kassir, S. A. & Altaie, S. M. A review of plant species identification techniques. Int. J. Sci. Res. 7, 325–328 (2018).
Ohe, W. V. D., Oddo, L. P., Piana, M. L., Morlot, M. & Martin, P. Harmonized methods of melissopalynology. Apidologie 35, S18–S25 (2004).
Friedheim, S. Comparison of species identification methods DNA barcoding versus morphological taxonomy. Mānoa Horiz. 1, 74–86 (2016).
Aldhebiani, A. Y. Species concept and speciation. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 25, 437–440 (2018).
Islam, M. K. et al. An investigation of the suitability of melissopalynology to authenticate Jarrah honey. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 5, 506–514 (2022).
Ajmal Ali, M. et al. The changing epitome of species identification—DNA barcoding. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 21, 204–231 (2014).
Vogler, A. P. & Monaghan, M. T. Recent advances in DNA taxonomy. J. Zool. Syst. Evolut. Res. 45, 1–10 (2007).
Michael, W. in Birds (ed Mikkola H.) Ch. 1 (IntechOpen, 2021).
Pawlowski, J., Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil, L. & Altermatt, F. Environmental DNA: what’s behind the term? Clarifying the terminology and recommendations for its future use in biomonitoring. Mol. Ecol. 29, 4258–4264 (2020).
Garibyan, L. & Avashia, N. Polymerase chain reaction. J. Invest. Dermatol. 133, 1–4 (2013).
Liu, Y.-X. et al. A practical guide to amplicon and metagenomic analysis of microbiome data. Protein Cell 12, 315–330 (2021).
Rieder, J., Kapopoulou, A., Bank, C. & Adrian-Kalchhauser, I. Metagenomics and metabarcoding experimental choices and their impact on microbial community characterization in freshwater recirculating aquaculture systems. Environ. Microbiome 18, 8 (2023).
Jones, L. et al. Temporal patterns of honeybee foraging in a diverse floral landscape revealed using pollen DNA metabarcoding of honey. Integr. Comp. Biol. 62, 199–210 (2022).
Ruppert, K. M., Kline, R. J. & Rahman, M. S. Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: a systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 17, e00547 (2019).
Ratnasingham, S. & Hebert, P. D. N. bold: The Barcode of Life Data System. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7, 355–364, https://www.barcodinglife.org (2007).
Sayers, E. W. et al. GenBank 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D141–D144 (2023).
Meiklejohn, K. A., Damaso, N. & Robertson, J. M. Assessment of BOLD and GenBank—their accuracy and reliability for the identification of biological materials. PLoS ONE 14, e0217084 (2019).
Milla, L., Schmidt-Lebuhn, A., Bovill, J. & Encinas-Viso, F. Monitoring of honey bee floral resources with pollen DNA metabarcoding as a complementary tool to vegetation surveys. Ecol. Solut. Evid. 3, e12120 (2022).
Keck, F., Couton, M. & Altermatt, F. Navigating the seven challenges of taxonomic reference databases in metabarcoding analyses. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 23, 742–755 (2023).
Daisley, B. A. & Reid, G. BEExact: a Metataxonomic Database Tool for High-Resolution Inference of Bee-Associated Microbial Communities. mSystems https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00082-00021 (2021).
Bharti, R. & Grimm, D. G. Current challenges and best-practice protocols for microbiome analysis. Brief Bioinforma. 22, 178–193 (2021).
Yang, C. et al. A review of computational tools for generating metagenome-assembled genomes from metagenomic sequencing data. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 19, 6301–6314 (2021).
Parks, D. H. et al. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 1533–1542 (2017).
Bovo, S., Utzeri, V. J., Ribani, A., Cabbri, R. & Fontanesi, L. Shotgun sequencing of honey DNA can describe honey bee derived environmental signatures and the honey bee hologenome complexity. Sci. Rep. 10, 9279 (2020).
Bovo, S. et al. Shotgun metagenomics of honey DNA: Evaluation of a methodological approach to describe a multi-kingdom honey bee derived environmental DNA signature. PLoS ONE 13, e0205575 (2018).
Schrader, C., Schielke, A., Ellerbroek, L. & Johne, R. PCR inhibitors—occurrence, properties and removal. J. Appl. Microbiol. 113, 1014–1026 (2012).
Prudnikow, L., Pannicke, B. & Wünschiers, R. A primer on pollen assignment by nanopore-based DNA sequencing. Front. Ecol. Evolut. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1112929 (2023).
Liu, S. et al. Tracing the origin of honey products based on metagenomics and machine learning. Food Chem. 371, 131066 (2022).
Bohmann, K. et al. Strategies for sample labelling and library preparation in DNA metabarcoding studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 22, 1231–1246 (2022).
Gardner, T. A. et al. The cost-effectiveness of biodiversity surveys in tropical forests. Ecol. Lett. 11, 139–150 (2008).
Massana, R. & López-Escardó, D. Metagenome assembled genomes are for eukaryotes too. Cell Genomics 2, 100130 (2022).
Mc Cartney, A. M. et al. Indigenous peoples and local communities as partners in the sequencing of global eukaryotic biodiversity. npj Biodivers. 2, 8 (2023).
Peel, N. et al. Semi-quantitative characterisation of mixed pollen samples using MinION sequencing and Reverse Metagenomics (RevMet). Methods Ecol. Evolut. 10, 1690–1701 (2019).
Saraiva, J. P., Bartholomäus, A., Toscan, R. B., Baldrian, P. & Nunes da Rocha, U. Recovery of 197 eukaryotic bins reveals major challenges for eukaryote genome reconstruction from terrestrial metagenomes. Mol. Ecol. Resour. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13776 (2023).
Patin, N. V. & Goodwin, K. D. Long-read sequencing improves recovery of picoeukaryotic genomes and zooplankton marker genes from marine metagenomes. mSystems 7, e00595–00522 (2022).
Tedersoo, L., Albertsen, M., Anslan, S. & Callahan, B. Perspectives and benefits of high-throughput long-read sequencing in microbial ecology. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 87, e00626–00621 (2021).
Saary, P., Mitchell, A. L. & Finn, R. D. Estimating the quality of eukaryotic genomes recovered from metagenomic analysis with EukCC. Genome Biol. 21, 244 (2020).
Sanderson, K. Bioinformatics: curation generation. Nature 470, 295–296 (2011).
Odell, S. G., Lazo, G. R., Woodhouse, M. R., Hane, D. L. & Sen, T. Z. The art of curation at a biological database: principles and application. Curr. Plant Biol. 11-12, 2–11 (2017).
Steinhauer, N. et al. Drivers of colony losses. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 26, 142–148 (2018).
Kalayci, G. et al. The role of viral and parasitic pathogens affected by colony losses in Turkish apiaries. Koloni Kaybından Etkilenen Türk Arılıklarında Viral ve Paraziter Patojenlerin Rolü 26, 671–677 (2020).
Brown, M. J. F. & Paxton, R. J. The conservation of bees: a global perspective. Apidologie 40, 410–416 (2009).
Biesmeijer, J. C. et al. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313, 351–354 (2006).
Manivanan, P., Rajagopalan, S. & Subbarayalu, M. Studies on authentication of true source of honey using pollen DNA barcoding. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 6, 255–261 (2018).
Utzeri, V. J., Ribani, A., Taurisano, V. & Fontanesi, L. Entomological authentication of honey based on a DNA method that distinguishes Apis mellifera mitochondrial C mitotypes: application to honey produced by A. m. ligustica and A. m. carnica. Food Control 134, 108713 (2022).
Fakhlaei, R. et al. The toxic impact of honey adulteration: a review. Foods https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111538 (2020).
Zhou, X., Taylor, M. P., Salouros, H. & Prasad, S. Authenticity and geographic origin of global honeys determined using carbon isotope ratios and trace elements. Sci. Rep. 8, 14639 (2018).
Jaafar, M. B. et al. A review on honey adulteration and the available detection approaches. Int. J. Integr. Eng. 12, 125–131 (2020).
Soares, S., Amaral, J. S., Oliveira, M. B. P. P. & Mafra, I. A comprehensive review on the main honey authentication issues: production and origin. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 16, 1072–1100 (2017).
Kaškoniene, V. & Venskutonis, P. R. Floral markers in honey of various botanical and geographic origins: a review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 9, 620–634 (2010).
Sniderman, J. M. K., Matley, K. A., Haberle, S. G. & Cantrill, D. J. Pollen analysis of Australian honey. PLoS ONE 13, e0197545 (2018).
Balkanska, R., Stefanova, K. & Stoikova – Grigorova, R. Main honey botanical components and techniques for identification: a review. J. Apicultural Res. 59, 852–861 (2020).
Prosser, S. W. J. & Hebert, P. D. N. Rapid identification of the botanical and entomological sources of honey using DNA metabarcoding. Food Chem. 214, 183–191 (2017).
Sobrino-Gregorio, L., Vilanova, S., Prohens, J. & Escriche, I. Detection of honey adulteration by conventional and real-time PCR. Food Control 95, 57–62 (2019).
Truong, A. T., Kim, S. & Yoon, B. Determination of honey adulterated with corn syrup by quantitative amplification of maize residual DNA using ultra-rapid real-time PCR. J. Sci. Food Agric. 102, 774–781 (2022).
Zannat, R. et al. Towards authentication of entomological origin of honey in Bangladesh through molecular and biochemical approaches. J. Agric. Food Res. 12, 100543 (2023).
Utzeri, V. J. et al. Entomological signatures in honey: an environmental DNA metabarcoding approach can disclose information on plant-sucking insects in agricultural and forest landscapes. Sci. Rep. 8, 9996 (2018).
Lannutti, L., Gonzales, F. N., Dus Santos, M. J., Florin-Christensen, M. & Schnittger, L. Molecular detection and differentiation of arthropod, fungal, protozoan, bacterial and viral pathogens of honeybees. Vet. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9050221 (2022).
Ribani, A., Utzeri, V. J., Taurisano, V. & Fontanesi, L. Honey as a source of environmental DNA for the detection and monitoring of honey bee pathogens and parasites. Vet. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7030113 (2020).
Ribani, A., Taurisano, V., Utzeri, V. J. & Fontanesi, L. Honey environmental DNA can be used to detect and monitor honey bee pests: development of methods useful to identify Aethina tumida and Galleria mellonella infestations. Vet. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9050213 (2022).
Salkova, D. et al. Molecular detection of Nosema spp. in honey in Bulgaria. Vet. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9010010 (2022).
Stavropoulou, E. et al. Microbial community structure among honey samples of different pollen origin. Antibiotics https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010101 (2023).
Kešnerová, L. et al. Gut microbiota structure differs between honeybees in winter and summer. ISME J. 14, 801–814 (2020).
Romero, S., Nastasa, A., Chapman, A., Kwong, W. K. & Foster, L. J. The honey bee gut microbiota: strategies for study and characterization. Insect Mol. Biol. 28, 455–472 (2019).
Wu, J. et al. Honey bee genetics shape the strain-level structure of gut microbiota in social transmission. Microbiome 9, 225 (2021).
Liberti, J. et al. The gut microbiota affects the social network of honeybees. Nat. Ecol. Evolut. 6, 1471–1479 (2022).
Zhang, Z., Mu, X., Shi, Y. & Zheng, H. Distinct roles of honeybee gut bacteria on host metabolism and neurological processes. Microbiol. Spectr. 10, e0243821 (2022).
Raymann, K. & Moran, N. A. The role of the gut microbiome in health and disease of adult honey bee workers. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 26, 97–104 (2018).
Zheng, H., Steele, M. I., Leonard, S. P., Motta, E. V. S. & Moran, N. A. Honey bees as models for gut microbiota research. Lab Anim. (NY) 47, 317–325 (2018).
Cuesta-Maté, A. et al. Resistance and vulnerability of honeybee (Apis mellifera) gut bacteria to commonly used pesticides. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.717990 (2021).
Dosch, C. et al. The gut microbiota can provide viral tolerance in the honey bee. Microorganisms https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040871 (2021).
Peixoto, R. S. et al. Harnessing the microbiome to prevent global biodiversity loss. Nat. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01173-1 (2022).
Angulo, V. et al. Plant–microbe eco-evolutionary dynamics in a changing world. N. Phytol. 234, 1919–1928 (2022).
Girotti, S. et al. Bioindicators and biomonitoring: honeybees and hive products as pollution impact assessment tools for the Mediterranean area. Eur.-Mediterr. J. Environ. Integr. 5, 62 (2020).
Rodney, S. & Purdy, J. Dietary requirements of individual nectar foragers, and colony-level pollen and nectar consumption: a review to support pesticide exposure assessment for honey bees. Apidologie 51, 163–179 (2020).
Chabert, S. et al. Rapid measurement of the adult worker population size in honey bees. Ecol. Indic. 122, 107313 (2021).
Sanmartín, I. Historical biogeography: evolution in time and space. Evolution 5, 555–568 (2012).
Richardson, D. M. & Whittaker, R. J. Conservation biogeography—foundations, concepts and challenges. Divers. Distrib. 16, 313–320 (2010).
Dawson, M. N., Ribas, C. C., Dolby, G. A. & Fritz, S. C. Geogenomics: toward synthesis. J. Biogeogr. 49, 1657–1661 (2022).
Ribas, C. C., Fritz, S. C. & Baker, P. A. The challenges and potential of geogenomics for biogeography and conservation in Amazonia. J. Biogeogr. 49, 1839–1847 (2022).
de Vere, N. et al. Using DNA metabarcoding to investigate honey bee foraging reveals limited flower use despite high floral availability. Sci. Rep. 7, 42838 (2017).
Saravanan, M., Mohanapriya, G., Laha, R. & Sathishkumar, R. DNA barcoding detects floral origin of Indian honey samples. Genome 62, 341–348 (2019).
Korell, L., Auge, H., Chase, J. M., Harpole, W. S. & Knight, T. M. Responses of plant diversity to precipitation change are strongest at local spatial scales and in drylands. Nat. Commun. 12, 2489 (2021).
Singh, B. K. et al. Climate change impacts on plant pathogens, food security and paths forward. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-023-00900-7 (2023).
Jetz, W. et al. Monitoring plant functional diversity from space. Nat. Plants 2, 16024 (2016).
Cavender-Bares, J., Gamon, J. A. & Townsend, P. A. in Remote Sensing of Plant Biodiversity 1–12 (Springer International Publishing, 2020).
Larson, E. R. et al. From eDNA to citizen science: emerging tools for the early detection of invasive species. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18, 194–202 (2020).
Thaler, D. S. Is global microbial biodiversity increasing, decreasing, or staying the same? Front. Ecol. Evolut. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.565649 (2021).
Sivakumar, N., Sathishkumar, R., Selvakumar, G., Shyamkumar, R. & Arjunekumar, K. in Plant Microbiomes for Sustainable Agriculture 113–172 (Springer International Publishing, 2020).
Tremblay, É. D. et al. High-resolution biomonitoring of plant pathogens and plant species using metabarcoding of pollen pellet contents collected from a honey bee hive. Environ. DNA 1, 155–175 (2019).
Krüger, A., Schäfers, C., Busch, P. & Antranikian, G. Digitalization in microbiology—paving the path to sustainable circular bioeconomy. N. Biotechnol. 59, 88–96 (2020).
Al-Waili, N., Salom, K., Al-Ghamdi, A. & Ansari, M. J. Antibiotic, pesticide, and microbial contaminants of honey: human health hazards. Sci. World J. 2012, 930849 (2012).
Arpaia, S., Smagghe, G. & Sweet, J. B. Biosafety of bee pollinators in genetically modified agro-ecosystems: Current approach and further development in the EU. Pest Manag. Sci. 77, 2659–2666 (2021).
Cosi, V. & Gadermaier, G. The role of defensins as pollen and food allergens. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 23, 277–285 (2023).
de Jongh, E. J. et al. One Health, One Hive: a scoping review of honey bees, climate change, pollutants, and antimicrobial resistance. PLoS ONE 17, e0242393 (2022).
Woodcock, B. A. et al. Neonicotinoid use on cereals and sugar beet is linked to continued low exposure risk in honeybees. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 308, 107205 (2021).
Hénaff, E. et al. Holobiont urbanism: sampling urban beehives reveals cities’ metagenomes. Environ. Microbiome 18, 23 (2023).
Danko, D. et al. A global metagenomic map of urban microbiomes and antimicrobial resistance. Cell 184, 3376–3393.e3317 (2021).
Velardi, S., Leahy, J., Collum, K., McGuire, J. & Ladenheim, M. “You treat them right, They’ll treat you right”: Understanding beekeepers’ scale management decisions within the context of bee values. J. Rural Stud. 81, 27–36 (2021).
Sponsler, D. B. & Bratman, E. Z. Beekeeping in, of or for the city? A socioecological perspective on urban apiculture. People Nat. 3, 550–559 (2021).
Angelella, G. M., McCullough, C. T. & O’Rourke, M. E. Honey bee hives decrease wild bee abundance, species richness, and fruit count on farms regardless of wildflower strips. Sci. Rep. 11, 3202 (2021).
Osterman, J. et al. Global trends in the number and diversity of managed pollinator species. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 322, 107653 (2021).
Flores, F. F., Hilgert, N. I. & Lupo, L. C. Melliferous insects and the uses assigned to their products in the northern Yungas of Salta, Argentina. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 14, 27 (2018).
Islam, M. K. et al. Australian honeypot ant (Camponotus inflatus) honey—a comprehensive analysis of the physiochemical characteristics, bioactivity, and HPTLC profile of a traditional indigenous Australian food. Molecules https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27072154 (2022).
Rhodes, C. J. Pollinator decline—an ecological calamity in the making? Sci. Prog. 101, 121–160 (2018).
Sentil, A. et al. Impact of the “Farming With Alternative Pollinators” approach on crop pollinator pollen diet. Front. Ecol. Evolut. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.824474 (2022).
Scheper, J. et al. Museum specimens reveal loss of pollen host plants as key factor driving wild bee decline in The Netherlands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17552–17557 (2014).
Wood, T. J., Gibbs, J., Graham, K. K. & Isaacs, R. Narrow pollen diets are associated with declining Midwestern bumble bee species. Ecology 100, e02697 (2019).
Creedy, T. J. et al. Coming of age for COI metabarcoding of whole organism community DNA: towards bioinformatic harmonisation. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 22, 847–861 (2022).
Pathiraja, D., Cho, J., Kim, J. & Choi, I.-G. Metabarcoding of eDNA for tracking the floral and geographical origins of bee honey. Food Res. Int. 164, 112413 (2023).
Giebner, H. et al. Comparing diversity levels in environmental samples: DNA sequence capture and metabarcoding approaches using 18S and COI genes. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 20, 1333–1345 (2020).
Wasimuddin et al. Evaluation of primer pairs for microbiome profiling from soils to humans within the One Health framework. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 20, 1558–1571 (2020).
Yang, R.-H. et al. Evaluation of the ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS), specifically ITS1 and ITS2, for the analysis of fungal diversity by deep sequencing. PLoS ONE 13, e0206428 (2018).
Banchi, E. et al. PLANiTS: a curated sequence reference dataset for plant ITS DNA metabarcoding. Database https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baz155 (2020).
Khansaritoreh, E. et al. Employing DNA metabarcoding to determine the geographical origin of honey. Heliyon 6, e05596 (2020).
Balzan, S. et al. Microbial metabarcoding highlights different bacterial and fungal populations in honey samples from local beekeepers and market in north-eastern Italy. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 334, 108806 (2020).
Mohamadzade Namin, S., Kim, M.-J., Son, M. & Jung, C. Honey DNA metabarcoding revealed foraging resource partitioning between Korean native and introduced honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sci. Rep. 12, 14394 (2022).
Bruni, I. et al. A DNA barcoding approach to identify plant species in multiflower honey. Food Chem. 170, 308–315 (2015).
Laha, R. C. et al. Meta-barcoding in combination with palynological inference is a potent diagnostic marker for honey floral composition. AMB Express 7, 132 (2017).
Milla, L., Sniderman, K., Lines, R., Mousavi-Derazmahalleh, M. & Encinas-Viso, F. Pollen DNA metabarcoding identifies regional provenance and high plant diversity in Australian honey. Ecol. Evolut. 11, 8683–8698 (2021).
- SEO Powered Content & PR Distribution. Get Amplified Today.
- PlatoData.Network Vertical Generative Ai. Empower Yourself. Access Here.
- PlatoAiStream. Web3 Intelligence. Knowledge Amplified. Access Here.
- PlatoESG. Carbon, CleanTech, Energy, Environment, Solar, Waste Management. Access Here.
- PlatoHealth. Biotech and Clinical Trials Intelligence. Access Here.
- Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44185-024-00040-y