Distribution of Cs
The elemental distribution of L. casei JCM1134 and Bifidobacterium adolescentis JCM1275 cultured for 24 h in a medium supplemented with 100 mM Cs was analysed using an electron probe micro analyser. Cs was distributed in a granular form in both strains (Fig. 1). Moreover, phosphorus (P) and K were distributed in high amounts at sites with a high Cs content.
Caesium (Cs), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) distribution and backscattered electron images (COMPO) of bacterial cells. Element maps show that the concentration of each element is higher at the point where the measurement level is higher.
Metal removal by microorganisms can be broadly classified into two categories: bioaccumulation, in which metals are taken up by living bacteria, and biosorption, in which metals are incorporated independently of microbial metabolism, such as adsorption to the surface layer of bacteria22. When Cs is removed by biosorption, it should be present evenly in the bacterial body; however, in Fig. 1, Cs was observed to be localized in both bacteria. On the other hand, Cs localization can be explained by considering that it is removed due to bioaccumulation. Some microorganisms store granular substances called polyphosphate inside their cells, which has a negative charge and can trap cations23. Therefore, considering that the cations K+ and Cs+ were trapped by polyphosphate, the results in Fig. 1 that P, K, and Cs were localized in similar locations are consistent. Kuwahara et al24. also mentioned the possibility that Cs could be trapped by polyphosphate in their study investigating Cs accumulation in Streptomyces sp. K202.
Hence, in L. casei JCM1134 and B. adolescentis JCM1275, Cs is likely removed via bioaccumulation. This suggests the possibility of simultaneously removing the two representative elements, Cs and Sr, using different removal mechanisms in one microorganism strain.
Growth inhibition by Cs
As the growth of microorganisms is inhibited when the Cs concentration is too high25,26, we compared the growth of microorganisms to determine the optimal amount of Cs that could support the growth of each microbe (Fig. 2). A Cs concentration of 50 mM had almost no effect on the growth of the lactobacilli strains (Fig. 2a–c); however, at 100 mM or higher, the growth rate and final cell concentration decreased. Three strains of Bifidobacterium (Fig. 2d–f) were more susceptible to Cs toxicity than were lactobacilli. For Bifidobacterium bifidum JCM1254 (Fig. 2d) and B. adolescentis JCM1275 (Fig. 2f), the cell concentrations after 24 h were generally the same at Cs concentrations of 50 mM or less. In contrast, in Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis JCM1260 (Fig. 2e), both the growth rate and final cell concentration decreased at 50 mM. Based on these results, Cs concentration of 50 mM was used for later experiments to minimize growth inhibition by Cs.
Growth curves of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria on Cs-supplemented medium. The vertical axis shows unit optical density at 680 nm (U.O.D.680). Each legend indicates the concentration of caesium supplemented to the medium. Error bars represent the standard error (n = 3).
It should be noted that a Cs concentration of 50 mM is not realistic, considering the actual gastrointestinal environment. For example, the concentration of 137Cs in food collected after the Chernobyl nuclear accident was as high as 1 × 104 Bq/kg1. When this was converted to a molar concentration assuming that 1 kg represents 1 L, it was approximately 2 × 10−11 M, which was far lower than the Cs concentration used in the present study. However, the K concentration has a large effect on the amount of Cs removed because they behave similarly27,28,29. The concentrations of K and other substances in the culture environment did not indicate an environment suitable for the gastrointestinal tract. We considered that there was no reason to set only the Cs concentration at a realistic value. Hence, an evaluation under practical conditions was not conducted in the present study, and the possibility of simultaneous removal of Cs and Sr was explored.
Cs removal capacity
To evaluate the amount of Cs that could be removed when only Cs was present (Fig. 3a), the Cs content of each strain was measured. As a result, 3.3–6.3 mg-Cs/g-dry cells were detected in lactobacilli and 23.8–70.5 mg-Cs/g-dry cells in Bifidobacterium (Fig. 4a). The accumulation of Cs was confirmed in all the bacteria used, and large differences were observed in the Cs accumulation capacity depending on the species.
Experimental design for removal of Cs and Sr by bacteria.
Amount of Cs and Sr contained in each bacterium. Cs ( +) indicates the addition of 50 mM Cs to the culture medium, and Sr (+ ) indicates the suspension of cells in the solution containing 1 mM Sr. Error bars represent the standard error (n = 3).
We compared our current results on the Cs removal capacity with those previously reported for other Cs-removing bacteria. Kato et al30. investigated the Cs content per unit number of bacteria by Cs-resistant bacteria and reported 142.2 ± 7.1 mg-Cs/g-dry cell and 61.5 ± 6.9 mg-Cs/g-dry cell for Streptomyces sp. TOHO-2 and Streptomyces lividans TK24, respectively. Tomioka et al. reported 92 mg-Cs/g-dry cells for Rhodococcus erythropolis CS98 and 52 mg-Cs/g-dry cells for Rhodococcus sp. strain CS40226. The results of the present study showed that the three strains of lactobacilli had lower Cs content than the Bifidobacterium strains, with the highest removal capacity observed for B. adolescentis JCM1275 (70.5 mg-Cs/g-dry cells). The Cs removal capacity of B. adolescentis JCM1275 in the present study was similar to that previously reported for other Cs-removing bacteria.
Sr removal capacity
The Sr removal capacity was evaluated by suspending the cells cultured for 24 h in a buffer containing Sr and then measuring the amount of Sr contained in the cells (Fig. 3b). Sr was detected in the cells of all the strains used: 1.1–5.3 mg-Sr/g-dry cell for lactobacilli and 6.3–10.9 mg-Sr/g-dry cell for Bifidobacterium (Fig. 4b).
Based on our results, it is plausible that Sr is removed by biosorption, which occurs independently of bacterial metabolism, as Sr removal occurred without a nutrient source. In previous reports, the mechanism of Sr removal using microorganisms was considered to be through biosorption occurring on the surface of bacteria13,31. In addition, our previous study suggested that L. casei JCM1134 removed Sr via adsorption21.
Comparing the amount of Sr removed in the present study with that of other previously reported microbial adsorbents, 24.4 mg-Sr/g-dry cell was reported for Rhizopus nigricans32, 6.6 mg-Sr/g-dry cell for Rhizopus arrhizus33, and 10.0 mg-Sr/g-dry cell for S. cerevisiae18. Although making a direct comparison is difficult because the removal ability of microorganisms varies with culture and adsorption conditions, the Sr removal capacity of Bifidobacterium (6.3–10.9 mg-Sr/g-dry cell) in our study was similar to those previously reported for other microbial adsorbents. On the other hand, the removal ability of lactobacilli (1.1–5.3 mg-Sr/g-dry cell) was slightly lower than that of the previously reported microorganism adsorbents.
Simultaneous removal of Cs and Sr
To examine the amounts of Cs and Sr that one type of microbial strain can simultaneously retain, bacterial cells cultured in Cs-supplemented medium were suspended in Sr-containing buffer (Fig. 3c). As mentioned above, we expected the amounts of Cs and Sr to be irrelevant because they were thought to be removed by different mechanisms. However, contrary to expectations, all the strains showed a decrease in Cs content after Sr adsorption. The amount of released Cs differed depending on the strain, with B. adolescentis JCM1275 and B. longum subsp. infantis JCM1260 releasing 21% and 75%, respectively (Fig. 4a). In contrast, the amount of Sr removed was almost the same between cells cultured in the normal medium and those cultured in the Cs-supplemented medium (Fig. 4b).
The release of Cs after Sr adsorption can be explained by considering multiple mechanisms for Cs removal. As shown in Fig. 1, Cs is most likely retained in bacteria by trapping in polyphosphate; however, this does not mean that other mechanisms are not involved. Some previously published studies have reported Cs biosorption by the surface components of bacteria13,28,34,35, and it is possible that the microorganisms used in this study also adsorbed Cs on the surface. Therefore, the adsorbed Cs+ may have been replaced by the highly charged Sr2+ and released.
Although a certain amount of Cs was released, B. adolescentis JCM1275 showed high removal capacities of 55.7 mg-Cs/g-dry cell and 8.1 mg-Sr/g-dry cell. This indicates that with appropriate strain selection, it may be possible to remove multiple radioactive materials using a single type of microorganism.
Because some microbial functions change depending on the environment, it is necessary to investigate whether similar effects can be expected in an in vivo environment. Through these studies, it is expected that probiotic bacteria can be used as a highly accessible method for excreting radioactive elements from the gastrointestinal tract through fecal excretion.
Conclusion
Cs has been suggested to bioaccumulate in lactobacilli and Bifidobacterium. Therefore, we investigated whether Cs and Sr can be removed simultaneously using two mechanisms, bioaccumulation and biosorption, in combination with the metal-adsorption function of microorganisms. We showed that B. adolescentis JCM1275 simultaneously retained these two metals at high concentrations. If these functions were replicated in the gastrointestinal tract, they could be used to inhibit the absorption of multiple radionuclides into the human body.
- SEO Powered Content & PR Distribution. Get Amplified Today.
- PlatoData.Network Vertical Generative Ai. Empower Yourself. Access Here.
- PlatoAiStream. Web3 Intelligence. Knowledge Amplified. Access Here.
- PlatoESG. Carbon, CleanTech, Energy, Environment, Solar, Waste Management. Access Here.
- PlatoHealth. Biotech and Clinical Trials Intelligence. Access Here.
- Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-57678-8