Implications and Controversies Surrounding the Passage of the Biological Diversity (Amendment) Bill by Lok Sabha
The Biological Diversity (Amendment) Bill, recently passed by the Lok Sabha, has sparked both implications and controversies among various stakeholders. The bill aims to amend the existing Biological Diversity Act, 2002, which provides for the conservation, sustainable use, and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the utilization of biological resources.
One of the key implications of this bill is the strengthening of India’s biodiversity conservation efforts. The amendment seeks to enhance the regulatory framework by introducing stricter penalties for violations related to biodiversity conservation. It also proposes the establishment of a National Biodiversity Authority (NBA) to oversee the implementation of the act and ensure compliance with international obligations.
Furthermore, the bill aims to streamline the process of granting access to biological resources and associated traditional knowledge. It introduces a single-window clearance system, which is expected to facilitate research and development activities while ensuring that the benefits derived from such activities are shared equitably with local communities.
However, the passage of this bill has not been without controversy. One major point of contention is the provision that allows for the transfer of genetic material to foreign entities without the need for prior informed consent from local communities. Critics argue that this provision undermines the rights of indigenous communities and could lead to the exploitation of their traditional knowledge and resources.
Another controversial aspect of the bill is the proposed exemption for certain categories of research from seeking prior approval from the NBA. This exemption has raised concerns about potential misuse and inadequate oversight, as it may allow for unchecked access to biological resources and associated traditional knowledge.
Additionally, some stakeholders have expressed reservations about the composition and functioning of the NBA. They argue that the authority should have greater representation from indigenous communities and civil society organizations to ensure a more inclusive decision-making process.
The passage of this bill also raises questions about its alignment with international commitments and agreements. India is a signatory to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), which emphasizes the importance of prior informed consent and equitable sharing of benefits. Critics argue that the bill’s provisions regarding access and benefit-sharing may not fully comply with the CBD’s principles.
In conclusion, the passage of the Biological Diversity (Amendment) Bill by the Lok Sabha has both implications and controversies. While it strengthens India’s biodiversity conservation efforts and streamlines access to biological resources, concerns remain regarding the potential exploitation of traditional knowledge, inadequate oversight, and alignment with international commitments. It is crucial for all stakeholders to engage in constructive dialogue to address these concerns and ensure that the bill’s implementation promotes sustainable development and equitable sharing of benefits.
- SEO Powered Content & PR Distribution. Get Amplified Today.
- PlatoData.Network Vertical Generative Ai. Empower Yourself. Access Here.
- PlatoAiStream. Web3 Intelligence. Knowledge Amplified. Access Here.
- PlatoESG. Automotive / EVs, Carbon, CleanTech, Energy, Environment, Solar, Waste Management. Access Here.
- BlockOffsets. Modernizing Environmental Offset Ownership. Access Here.
- Source: Plato Data Intelligence.