Xue, B., Dunker, A. K. & Uversky, V. N. Orderly order in protein intrinsic disorder distribution: disorder in 3500 proteomes from viruses and the three domains of life. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 30, 137–149 (2012).
Wright, P. E. & Dyson, H. J. Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 18–29 (2015).
Babu, M. M. The contribution of intrinsically disordered regions to protein function, cellular complexity, and human disease. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 44, 1185–1200 (2016).
Wang, C., Uversky, V. N. & Kurgan, L. Disordered nucleiome: abundance of intrinsic disorder in the DNA- and RNA-binding proteins in 1121 species from Eukaryota, Bacteria and Archaea. Proteomics 16, 1486–1498 (2016).
Calabretta, S. & Richard, S. Emerging roles of disordered sequences in RNA-binding proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40, 662–672 (2015).
Jarvelin, A. I., Noerenberg, M., Davis, I. & Castello, A. The new (dis)order in RNA regulation. Cell Commun. Signal 14, 9 (2016).
Hentze, M. W., Castello, A., Schwarzl, T. & Preiss, T. A brave new world of RNA-binding proteins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 327–341 (2018).
Ottoz, D. S. M. & Berchowitz, L. E. The role of disorder in RNA binding affinity and specificity. Open Biol. 10, 200328 (2020).
Zaharias, S. et al. Intrinsically disordered electronegative clusters improve stability and binding specificity of RNA-binding proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 297, 100945 (2021).
Protter, D. S. W. et al. Intrinsically disordered regions can contribute promiscuous interactions to RNP granule assembly. Cell Rep. 22, 1401–1412 (2018).
Lashkevich, K. A. & Dmitriev, S. E. mRNA targeting, transport and local translation in eukaryotic cells: from the classical view to a diversity of new concepts. Mol. Biol. 55, 507–537 (2021).
Roy, B. & Jacobson, A. The intimate relationships of mRNA decay and translation. Trends Genet. 29, 691–699 (2013).
Li, W., Deng, X. & Chen, J. RNA-binding proteins in regulating mRNA stability and translation: roles and mechanisms in cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 86, 664–677 (2022).
Campbell, Z. T. et al. Cooperativity in RNA-protein interactions: global analysis of RNA binding specificity. Cell Rep. 1, 570–581 (2012).
Weidmann, C. A. et al. Drosophila Nanos acts as a molecular clamp that modulates the RNA-binding and repression activities of Pumilio. eLife 5, e17096 (2016).
Hennig, J. et al. Structural basis for the assembly of the Sxl-Unr translation regulatory complex. Nature 515, 287–290 (2014).
Qiu, C. et al. A crystal structure of a collaborative RNA regulatory complex reveals mechanisms to refine target specificity. eLife 8, e48968 (2019).
Qiu, C., Wine, R. N., Campbell, Z. T. & Hall, T. M. T. Bipartite interaction sites differentially modulate RNA-binding affinity of a protein complex essential for germline stem cell self-renewal. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 536–548 (2022).
Crittenden, S. L. et al. A conserved RNA-binding protein controls germline stem cells in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 417, 660–663 (2002).
Kershner, A. M., Shin, H., Hansen, T. J. & Kimble, J. Discovery of two GLP-1/Notch target genes that account for the role of GLP-1/Notch signaling in stem cell maintenance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3739–3744 (2014).
Shin, H. et al. SYGL-1 and LST-1 link niche signaling to PUF RNA repression for stem cell maintenance in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 13, e1007121 (2017).
Haupt, K. A. et al. The molecular basis of LST-1 self-renewal activity and its control of stem cell pool size. Development 146, dev181644 (2019).
Ferdous A. S. et al. The in vivo functional significance of PUF hub partnerships in C. elegans germline stem cells. Development 150, dev201705 (2023).
Albarqi, M. M. Y. & Ryder, S. P. The role of RNA-binding proteins in orchestrating germline development in Caenorhabditis elegans. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 1094295 (2022).
Barker, D. D., Wang, C., Moore, J., Dickinson, L. K. & Lehmann, R. Pumilio is essential for function but not for distribution of the Drosophila abdominal determinant Nanos. Genes Dev. 6, 2312–2326 (1992).
Goldstrohm, A. C., Hall, T. M. T. & McKenney, K. M. Post-transcriptional regulatory functions of mammalian pumilio proteins. Trends Genet. 34, 972–990 (2018).
Macdonald, P. M. The Drosophila pumilio gene: an unusually long transcription unit and an unusual protein. Development 114, 221–232 (1992).
Zamore, P. D., Williamson, J. R. & Lehmann, R. The Pumilio protein binds RNA through a conserved domain that defines a new class of RNA-binding proteins. RNA 3, 1421–1433 (1997).
Zhang, B. et al. A conserved RNA-binding protein that regulates sexual fates in the C. elegans hermaphrodite germ line. Nature 390, 477–484 (1997).
Wickens, M., Bernstein, D. S., Kimble, J. & Parker, R. A. PUF family portrait: 3’UTR regulation as a way of life. Trends Genet. 18, 150–157 (2002).
Wang, M., Oge, L., Perez-Garcia, M. D., Hamama, L. & Sakr, S. The PUF protein family: overview on PUF RNA targets, biological functions, and post transcriptional regulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 410 (2018).
Edwards, T. A., Pyle, S. E., Wharton, R. P. & Aggarwal, A. K. Structure of Pumilio reveals similarity between RNA and peptide binding motifs. Cell 105, 281–289 (2001).
Wang, X., McLachlan, J., Zamore, P. D. & Hall, T. M. Modular recognition of RNA by a human Pumilio-homology domain. Cell 110, 501–512 (2002).
Wang, X., Zamore, P. D. & Hall, T. M. Crystal structure of a Pumilio homology domain. Mol. Cell 7, 855–865 (2001).
Bernstein, D., Hook, B., Hajarnavis, A., Opperman, L. & Wickens, M. Binding specificity and mRNA targets of a C. elegans PUF protein, FBF-1. RNA 11, 447–458 (2005).
Prasad, A. et al. The PUF binding landscape in metazoan germ cells. RNA 22, 1026–1043 (2016).
Opperman, L., Hook, B., DeFino, M., Bernstein, D. S. & Wickens, M. A single spacer nucleotide determines the specificities of two mRNA regulatory proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 945–951 (2005).
Suh, N. et al. FBF and its dual control of gld-1 expression in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Genetics 181, 1249–1260 (2009).
Wang, Y., Opperman, L., Wickens, M. & Hall, T. M. Structural basis for specific recognition of multiple mRNA targets by a PUF regulatory protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20186–20191 (2009).
Qiu, C. et al. Divergence of Pumilio/fem-3 mRNA binding factor (PUF) protein specificity through variations in an RNA-binding pocket. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 6949–6957 (2012).
Wang, X. et al. Dynein light chain DLC-1 promotes localization and function of the PUF protein FBF-2 in germline progenitor cells. Development 143, 4643–4653 (2016).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Varadi, M. et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D439–D444 (2022).
Ramos, A., Hollingworth, D. & Pastore, A. G-quartet-dependent recognition between the FMRP RGG box and RNA. RNA 9, 1198–1207 (2003).
Shen, H., Kan, J. L. & Green, M. R. Arginine-serine-rich domains bound at splicing enhancers contact the branchpoint to promote prespliceosome assembly. Mol. Cell 13, 367–376 (2004).
Zhang, J. et al. Molecular mechanisms for the regulation of histone mRNA stem-loop-binding protein by phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E2937–E2946 (2014).
Stowell, J. A. W. et al. A low-complexity region in the YTH domain protein Mmi1 enhances RNA binding. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 9210–9222 (2018).
Santiago-Frangos, A., Jeliazkov, J. R., Gray, J. J. & Woodson, S. A. Acidic C-terminal domains autoregulate the RNA chaperone Hfq. eLife 6, e27049 (2017).
Zhang, J., Gonzalez, L. E. & Hall, T. M. T. Structural analysis reveals the flexible C-terminus of Nop15 undergoes rearrangement to recognize a pre-ribosomal RNA folding intermediate. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 2829–2837 (2017).
Luitjens, C., Gallegos, M., Kraemer, B., Kimble, J. & Wickens, M. CPEB proteins control two key steps in spermatogenesis in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 14, 2596–2609 (2000).
Eckmann, C. R., Crittenden, S. L., Suh, N. & Kimble, J. GLD-3 and control of the mitosis/meiosis decision in the germline of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 168, 147–160 (2004).
Campbell, Z. T. et al. Identification of a conserved interface between PUF and CPEB proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 18854–18862 (2012).
Menichelli, E., Wu, J., Campbell, Z. T., Wickens, M. & Williamson, J. R. Biochemical characterization of the Caenorhabditis elegans FBF.CPB-1 translational regulation complex identifies conserved protein interaction hotspots. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 725–737 (2013).
Wu, J., Campbell, Z. T., Menichelli, E., Wickens, M. & Williamson, J. R. A protein.protein interaction platform involved in recruitment of GLD-3 to the FBF.fem-3 mRNA complex. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 738–754 (2013).
Haupt, K. A. et al. A PUF hub drives self-renewal in Caenorhabditis elegans germline stem cells. Genetics 214, 147–161 (2020).
Voronina, E., Paix, A. & Seydoux, G. The P granule component PGL-1 promotes the localization and silencing activity of the PUF protein FBF-2 in germline stem cells. Development 139, 3732–3740 (2012).
Wang, X. et al. Antagonistic control of Caenorhabditis elegans germline stem cell proliferation and differentiation by PUF proteins FBF-1 and FBF-2. eLife 9, e52788 (2020).
Blom, N., Gammeltoft, S. & Brunak, S. Sequence and structure-based prediction of eukaryotic protein phosphorylation sites. J. Mol. Biol. 294, 1351–1362 (1999).
Blom, N., Sicheritz-Ponten, T., Gupta, R., Gammeltoft, S. & Brunak, S. Prediction of post-translational glycosylation and phosphorylation of proteins from the amino acid sequence. Proteomics 4, 1633–1649 (2004).
Koh, Y. Y. et al. A single C. elegans PUF protein binds RNA in multiple modes. RNA 15, 1090–1099 (2009).
Bhat, V. D. et al. Engineering a conserved RNA regulatory protein repurposes its biological function in vivo. eLife 8, e43788 (2019).
Stumpf, C. R., Kimble, J. & Wickens, M. A. Caenorhabditis elegans PUF protein family with distinct RNA binding specificity. RNA 14, 1550–1557 (2008).
Mossessova, E. & Lima, C. D. Ulp1-SUMO crystal structure and genetic analysis reveal conserved interactions and a regulatory element essential for cell growth in yeast. Mol. Cell 5, 865–876 (2000).
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326 (1997).
McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Case, D. A. et al. AMBER 2020. (eds) (2020).
Yang, H. & Song, Y. Structural insight for roles of DR5 death domain mutations on oligomerization of DR5 death domain-FADD complex in the death-inducing signaling complex formation: a computational study. J. Mol. Model 22, 89 (2016).
Erdos, G. & Dosztanyi, Z. Analyzing protein disorder with IUPred2A. Curr. Protoc. Bioinf. 70, e99 (2020).
Meszaros, B., Erdos, G. & Dosztanyi, Z. IUPred2A: context-dependent prediction of protein disorder as a function of redox state and protein binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W329–W337 (2018).
Ferdous, A. S. et al. LST-1 is a bifunctional regulator that feeds back on Notch-dependent transcription to regulate C. elegans germline stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2309964120 (2023).