Search
Close this search box.

Genetic contribution to microglial activation in schizophrenia – Molecular Psychiatry

Expression of common homeostatic markers of human iMGLs was affected by SCZ

We used a previously established protocol to generate human iMGLs in 40 days [20] (Fig. 1a). The generated iMGLs had a ramified morphology and expressed pan-macrophage marker IBA1, and microglia-specific markers TREM2, P2RY12 and CX3CR1 (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1). iMGLs also upregulated macrophage- and microglia-related genes compared to their intermediate progenitors (hematopoietic progenitor cells, HPCs) and separately generated hiPSC-macrophages (iMφ) (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 2a). iMGLs responded to 24-h LPS treatment by significant reduction of ITGAM, TREM2 and P2RY12 gene expression (p = 0.029 in all, Mann–Whitney test). No significant batch differences were discovered (Supplementary Fig. 2b).

Fig. 1: Characterization of human iMGLs derived from monozygotic twins discordant for SCZ.
figure 1

a Timeline for iMGL differentiation. Scale bar 50 µm in all. Generated iMGLs expressed (b) on protein level pan-macrophage marker IBA1, and microglia-specific markers P2Y12, TREM2 and CX3CR1 (nuclei on blue, scale bar 50 µm), and (c) on transcriptomic level AIF1 (IBA1; H(3) = 10.08, p = 0.0035), ITGAM (CD11b; H(3) = 10.93, p = 0.001; HPC vs. iMGL U = 0, p = 0.0286; iMGL vs. iMGL + LPS U = 0, p = 0.0286), P2RY12 (H(3) = 8.717, p = 0.014; HPC vs. iMGL U = 0, p = 0.0286; iMGL vs. iMGL + LPS U = 0, p = 0.0286) and TREM2 (H(3) = 9.175, p = 0.009; HPC vs. iMGL U = 0, p = 0.0286; iMGL vs. iMGL + LPS U = 0, p = 0.0286). Kruskal–Wallis test, Mann–Whitney test, n = 3–4 CTRL lines. d Illustration of patient cohort created with BioRender. e RNA expression of AIF1, TREM2, PTPRC (CD45) and TMEM119 based on bulk RNA sequencing. CTRL healthy individuals, ST affected twin, HT healthy twin, HPC hematopoietic stem cell, iMφ hiPSC-macrophage, iMGL hiPSC-microglia like cell, iMGL + LPS LPS-treated iMGL.

We generated iMGLs from a total of five monozygotic twin pairs, where one twin was diagnosed with SCZ (ST) and the other twin was healthy (HT), but had thus a high genetic risk to develop SCZ. Additionally, we generated iMGLs from five non-related healthy individuals (CTRL) (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Table 1). In order to identify disease-related gene expression changes, we performed bulk RNA sequencing for four twin lines and four CTRL lines and compared group expressions to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). One of the twin pairs (pair 4) was excluded from RNA sequence due to poor sample quality. The success rate for differentiation was statistically similar for ST iMGL lines (67%, n = 18 attempts, χ2 test), HT iMGL lines (84%, n = 19) and CTRL iMGL lines (78%, n = 18) (Supplementary Fig. 2d).

We first looked at the expression of common homeostatic microglial markers as their downregulation has been previously implicated in SCZ [21]. None of analyzed markers showed within-pair differences, but the twins differed from CTRLs. AIF1 (Iba1) was significantly upregulated in both ST and HT iMGLs compared to CTRLs by nominal p value (ST p = 1.2 × 10−9, HT p = 0.032) and ST also by Bonferroni corrected p value (adj.p = 1.3 × 10−6) (Fig. 1e). Also PTPRC (CD45) was upregulated in ST twins compared to CTRL iMGL (p = 0.0012, adj.p = 0.0081), while TREM2 was downregulated in STs (p = 0.003) and TMEM119 downregulated in HTs (p = 0.030) compared to CTRL. Other analyzed microglia-specific markers showed no significant group difference, e.g., P2RY12, CX3CR1, ITGAM, and PROS1 (Supplementary Fig. 2c).

Twins with SCZ had aberrant expression of inflammatory genes and reduced IL6 response to IL1β

HLA-DR is one of the commonly used markers for microglial activation in postmortem studies [6, 22, 23]. Expression of HLA-DRA, as well as many other HLA class II genes, was upregulated in our ST iMGLs vs. CTRL iMGLs (HLA-DRA p = 5.2 × 10−5, adj.p = 0.0049) (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 3). The expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL1β was upregulated in ST vs. CTRL iMGLs (p = 0.021). On the other hand, TSPO, a controversial marker for inflammation used in PET imaging studies showed no significant alterations [24].

Fig. 2: Inflammation, cytokine release and phagocytosis in iMGLs.
figure 2

a Gene expression of inflammatory related HLA-DRA, TSPO and IL1β based on RNA sequencing. b Representative image after 4-h migration assay. Cells were masked with magenta for analysis. Scale bar 800 µm. c The number of migrated cells normalized to unstimulated condition for each group. Performed Kruskal–Wallis test (H(2) = 2.371, p = 0.3305; H(2) = 0.7829, p = 0.6927). d Release of IL6 (CTRL: χ2(3) = 10.33, p = 0.0030; ST: χ2(3) = 1.114, p = 0.8307; HT: χ2(3) = 5.864, p = 0.1132), IL8 (CTRL: χ2(3) = 8.400, p = 0.0190; ST: χ2(3) = 7.500, p = 0.0517; HT: χ2(3) = 7.800, p = 0.0443) and MCP1 (CTRL: χ2(3) = 5.100, p = 0.1897; ST: χ2(3) = 11.10, p = 0.0009; HT: χ2(3) = 9.72, p = 0.0120) cytokines after 24 h treatment with either 20 ng/ml IL1β, 20 ng/ml TNFα or 20 ng/ml IFNγ. Friedman test and Mann–Whitney test. e Gene expression of TLR2 and TLR4. f Representative image from phagocytosis after 6 h (Scale bar 100 µm) and (g) phagocytosis of pHrodo-zymosan bioparticles. h Phagocytosis between the groups after 6 h (H(2) = 0.7800, p = 0.7027). Kruskal–Wallis test. n = 4–5 cell lines.

Microglia are extremely motile and survey their environment for injuries and pathogens. In response to ATP and ADP, molecules secreted during neuronal damage, iMGLs showed more than five-fold increased migration (Fig. 2b, c). ST and HT iMGLs responded normally to both ATP and ADP, as the number of migrated iMGL cells did not differ between the groups (Kruskal–Wallis test). Next, we checked whether ST, HT and CTRL iMGLs respond differently to pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL1β, TNFα and IFNγ) measured as induced release of cytokines IL6, interleukin 8 (IL8) and TNFα and chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP1) 24 h after exposure. In unstimulated conditions, release of IL6 and TNFα was undetectable. As expected, CTRL iMGLs significantly increased the release of IL6 (p = 0.030) and IL8 (p = 0.019) after all the cytokine treatments. However, ST iMGLs significantly increased only MCP1 release (p = 0.0009, Friedman test). Between ST and CTRL, ST iMGLs had significantly reduced IL6 response to IL1β treatment (U = 0, p = 0.0286, Mann–Whitney test). These data indicate that ST iMGLs are less responsive to central cell-to-cell pro-inflammatory signals.

Recognition of pathogens is the first step of innate immune activation and thus precedes pro-inflammatory cytokine release. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) detect various viral, bacterial and fungal structures. Interestingly, we observed that TLR2 expression was significantly downregulated in ST iMGLs compared to CTRL iMGLs (p = 0.003), while TLR4 receptor showed no difference (Fig. 2e). To find out whether the decreased TLR2 expression of ST iMGLs is reflected as an altered ability to detect pathogens and phagocytose them, we incubated iMGLs with pHrodo-labeled zymosan bioparticles (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Fig. 4), which are recognized through TLR2, TLR6 and non-TLR receptor CLEC7A [25, 26]. A 6-h live imaging ST iMGL showed a slightly reduced phagocytosis of zymosan particles, but the reduction was not statistically significant (p = 0.70 Mann–Whitney test) (Fig. 2g, h).

SCZ iMGLs did not significantly alter neuronal activity in NGN2-neuron co-culture with iMGLs

In addition to neuroinflammation regulation, promotion of neurogenesis and synaptogenesis by neurotrophic factor secretion is another important function of microglia [27]. Especially brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) released by microglia enhances learning-related synapse formation [28]. BNDF is also one of the most considered biomarkers for SCZ, which has been found to be reduced in plasma samples in SCZ [29]. Interestingly, BDNF was significantly less expressed in both ST and HT iMGLs compared to CTRL iMGLs (p = 0.005 and p = 0.008, respectively) (Fig. 3a). iMGLs expressed also glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), which has been reported to show de novo expression in microglia/macrophages upon neuroinflammation or injury [30], but its expression was similar in all three groups (Fig. 3a). Another neurotrophic factor that showed altered expression in ST iMGLs was mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor (MANF), which in turn was upregulated in ST iMGLs vs. CTRL (p = 0.006, adj.p = 0.008). MANF has been reported to induce anti-inflammatory microglia polarization after endoplasmic reticulum-associated stress [31]. Microglia express different neurotransmitter receptors for communicating with neurons and glia [32,33,34]. We found that especially N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor gene GRIN2D was highly expressed in iMGLs and showed downregulation in HT vs. CTRL (p = 0.015) (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3: Expression of neurotrophic factors and neural activity in co-culture model.
figure 3

a Neurotrophic factor BDNF, GDNF and MANF and (b) neurotransmitter receptor GRIN2D, GRIK2 and GABRA2 gene expression. c Timeline for co-culture design and MEA recording. d Representative images from CTRL iMGL co-cultures at 30 and 60 days in vitro (DIV) with stainings for NGN2-neurons (MAP2, red), rat astrocytes (GLT1, magenta), iMGLs (ABI3, green), and nuclei (DAPI). e Representative raster plots from weekly CTRL iMGL co-culture MEA recordings. Spikes detected on individual electrodes marked with black lines, bursts with blue lines and network bursts with purple boxes. f MEA recording results as Number of spikes (95% CI of diff. = −27,769 to −3067, adj.p = 0.0212; 95% CI of diff. = −11,671 to −1434, adj.p = 0.0104; 95% CI of diff. = −8259 to −331.2, adj.p = 0.0366; 95% CI of diff. = −19,980 to −4147, adj.p = 0.0113), Weighted mean firing rate (95% CI of diff. = −2.821 to −0.4223, adj.p = 0.0152; 95% CI of diff. = −1.418 to −0.07197, adj.p = 0.0288; 95% CI of diff. = −2.117 to −0.3807, adj.p = 0.0139), Network IBI coefficient of variation (95% CI of diff. = −1.499 to −0.1199, adj.p = 0.0222; 95% CI of diff. = −1.181 to −0.4205, adj.p = 0.0060), and Synchrony index (95% CI of diff. = −0.6299 to −0.09522, adj.p = 0.0125; 95% CI of diff. = −0.6945 to −0.09386, adj.p = 0.0147) from co-culture with and without iMGLs. n = 5–7 wells for no iMGL and n = 6–10 wells from two CTRL iMGL lines. g MEA recording results as Number of spikes, Weighted mean firing rate, ISI coefficient of variation, Number of bursts, Burst duration (95% CI of diff. = −0.1197 to −0.007484, adj.p = 0.0368; 95% CI of diff. = −0.2053 to −0.05687, adj.p = 0.0165), Mean ISI within burst (95% CI of diff. = 0.0004615 to 0.01288, adj.p = 0.0436; 95% CI of diff. = 0.002695 to 0.01507, adj.p = 0.0248; 95% CI of diff. = 0.005213 to 0.007635, adj.p = 0.0019), Network IBI coefficient of variation (95% CI of diff. = −1.574 to −0.3703, adj.p = 0.0197; 95% CI of diff. = −1.173 to −0.1141, adj.p = 0.0331), and Synchrony index (95% CI of diff. = −0.3168 to −0.1937, adj.p = 0.0030; 95% CI of diff. = −0.6867 to −0.03380, adj.p = 0.0414) from ST, HT and CTRL iMGL co-cultures. n = 3 lines per group. Dunnett’s (timepoints compared to week 4 timepoint) or Tukey’s (comparison between with/without iMGL groups) multiple comparisons tests were used for significance. CTRL healthy individuals, ST affected twin, HT healthy twin.

Other neurotransmitter genes, such as kainate receptor GRIK2 and GABA-receptor GABRA2 were expressed only in low level, but were significantly downregulated in ST and HT compared to CTRL iMGLs (ST GRIK2 p = 0.0012; ST GABRA2 p = 0.0035, and HT GABRA2 p = 0.0045). Even though no microglial complement pathway genes (C1Q and C3) were expressed differently in ST or HT iMGLs (Supplementary Fig. 5), the reduction in neurotrophic factors and neurotransmitter expression suggests reduced potential for synaptic remodeling in microglia from patients with SCZ.

In order to investigate if the reduction in neurotrophic factor expressions in iMGLs from patients with SCZ leads to altered neuronal activity, we designed a tri-culture system with doxycycline-inducible Neurogenin 2 (NGN2)-expressing hiPSC-cortical neurons, rat astrocytes and iMGLs (Fig. 3c). Astrocyte, neuron, and microglial survival were verified by stainings with cell-type specific markers in 30 and 60 days old co-cultures (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 6). To follow functional maturation of the neurons in co-cultures, we used multi-electrode array (MEA) to detect neural activity and synchronicity. We were able to reliably detect network-level activity after 4 weeks in co-culture and follow it until 8 weeks (Fig. 3e and Supplementary Fig. 7). First, we tested how adding iMGLs changes neural firing by comparing co-cultures without iMGLs with two CTRL line iMGL co-cultures. Including iMGLs into co-culture system significantly reduced neural activity at 6- and 7-week time points (reduced number of spikes p = 0.021 and p = 0.01, lower weighted mean firing rate p = 0.015 and p = 0.029, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test) and the activity significantly increased by time in co-cultures without microglia (number of spikes 4 vs. 6 weeks p = 0.011, and mean firing rate 4 vs. 6 p = 0.01; Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test; Fig. 3f). On the other hand, Network IBI (inter-network burst interval) coefficient of variation for network burst rhythmicity and Synchrony index for spiking synchronicity were lower in iMGL containing co-cultures than without iMGLs (Network IBI coefficient of variation 4 weeks p = 0.022) and these measures increased over time until no differences were detectable between the co-cultures at later time points (Network IBI coefficient of variation 4 vs. 8 weeks p = 0.006, Synchrony index 4 vs. 6 weeks p = 0.013, 4 vs. 8 weeks p = 0.015). Additional data from burst and network burst metrics are collected in Supplementary Fig. 8. Thus, NGN2 neurons were firing less with iMGL co-cultures and it took longer for them to establish mature network-level activity.

Next, we compared the co-cultures with three female CTRL, ST or HT iMGL lines (Fig. 3g and Supplementary Fig. 9). Overall, there were no differences in neural spiking activity (number of spikes, weighted mean firing rate and ISI (inter-spike interval) coefficient of variation) between neurons co-cultured with CTRL, HT, and ST-derived iMGLs. The number of bursts was not altered either, but the burst duration was significantly increased in HT vs. CTRL iMGL co-cultures at 4-week time point (p = 0.037), and between 4 and 8 weeks in CTRL iMGLs (p = 0.017), but not in ST or HT iMGL co-cultures. Mean ISI within bursts significantly decreased over time in CTRL iMGLs indicating increased spiking within bursts (in CTRLs 4 vs. 5 weeks p = 0.047, 4 vs. 6 weeks p = 0.025, 4 vs. 8 weeks p = 0.002). The only significant difference between ST iMGL co-cultures compared with CTRL or HT co-cultures was an increase between ST and CTRL iMGLs in Network IBI coefficient of variation at the 4-week time point (p = 0.033). This indicates greater irregularity in neuronal network bursting in ST iMGL containing cultures. No significant changes were detected in ST iMGL co-culture neural network activity compared to the 4-week time point, but bursting in CTRL and HT iMGL co-cultures slightly improved over time. ST iMGL cultures gave more mature firing earlier than CTRL and HT co-cultures, but we did not see changes in ST iMGLs over time. However, before 4 weeks of age only a small number of electrodes per well showed activity, hence it was not reliable to use earlier time point. We conclude that even though the electrophysiological properties of NGN neurons were slightly differentially affected by ST, HT and control iMGLs, the iMGL co-culture system did not produce clear evidence for the impact of ST iMGLs on neuronal activity.

Global downregulation of genes was associated with increased risk to develop SCZ and upregulation of MHC region to clinical manifestation of SCZ

We further examined comprehensively the DEGs between the study groups (Fig. 4a). While the ST twins differed significantly from the HT twins only by 2 DEGs (adj.p < 0.05, abs log2FC > 1), we found more expression changes related to clinical illness (ST vs. CTRL, 456 DEGs) than increased risk to develop SCZ (HT vs. CTRL, 123 DEGs) (Supplementary Data file 13). Most of the SCZ-related gene expression changes were reductions, as 77.4% of the DEGs in ST vs. CTRL and 99.2% in HT vs. CTRL were downregulated. These comparisons overlapped by 66 DEGs, which is 53.7% of altered expression changes in the HT vs. CTRL comparison and 14.5% in the ST vs. CTRL comparison (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4: iMGL expression profile and pathway analysis.
figure 4

a Overview of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in different comparisons. b Venn diagram of shared DEGs between HT vs. CTRL and ST vs. CTRL. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) canonical pathways (c) from ST vs. CTRL and (d) HT vs. CTRL comparisons. Cutt-offs: Fold change > abs 2, adjusted p < 0.05. e Downregulated and (f) upregulated Gene Ontology (GO) Molecular function terms from ST vs. CTRL comparison and (g) downregulated terms from HT vs. CTRL comparison. CTRL healthy individuals, ST affected twin, HT healthy twin. RNAseq n = 4 lines in each group.

Next, we used Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) to identify canonical pathways related to DEGs in ST or HT vs. CTRL comparisons in iMGLs (adj.p < 0.05 and abs log2FC > 1 threshold for DEGs). Both twin comparisons to CTRL group shared the first four pathways, which together with Wound Healing Signaling Pathway and Pulmonary Fibrosis Idiopathic Signaling Pathway contained Hepatic Fibrosis/Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation (−log10(p value) = 11.5 in ST vs. CTRL and 10.9 in HT vs. CTRL) and GP6 Signaling Pathway (−log10(p value) = 5.1 in ST vs. CTRL and 4.5 in HT vs. CTRL). These pathways include genes encoding extracellular matrix molecules and have been identified in previous studies with the same cohort to be involved in hiPSC-neuron and hiPSC-astrocyte dysregulation in ST [35, 36] (Fig. 4c, d and Supplementary Data files 4 and 5).

In order to study down- and upregulated DEGs separately, we used additionally Gene Ontology (GO) term analysis (Supplementary Data file 68). Downregulated GO Molecular function terms were similar between ST vs. CTRL and HT vs. CTRL (Fig. 4e, g). The most significant functions were Extracellular matrix structural constituent (−log10(p value) = 16.4 in ST vs. CTRL and 11.8 in HT vs. CTRL), Extracellular matrix structural constituent conferring tensile strength(−log10(p value) = 11.1 in ST vs. CTRL and 7.3 in HT vs. CTRL), and Heparin binding (−log10(p value) = 6.3 in ST vs. CTRL and 4.7 in HT vs. CTRL) terms. These pathways shared several collagen genes.

In turn, the upregulated GO terms in STs compared to CTRLs were related to Protein heterodimerization (−log10(p value) = 11.0) and MHC class II receptor activities (−log10(p value) = 2.3) (Fig. 4f). The first functional term contains several histone modification genes of which Clustered Histone genes H3C12, H2BC17, H2AC13, H3C10, and H3C11 (5/18 DEGs) belong to a small cluster of histone genes in chromosome 6p22.1, which is in close proximity of MHC region (Supplementary Data file 7) [37]. Also nine out of 18 DEGs belonged to a large histone cluster in 6p22.2. MHC class II receptor activity term consists of HLA-genes (HLA-DQA2 and HLA-DQB2 genes in Supplementary Fig. 3). Thus, clinical manifestation of SCZ is associated with activation of chromosome 6 MHC region in iMGLs.

Heterogeneous response to different drug treatments in twins with SCZ

As STs showed specific dysregulations to several SCZ-associated genes, we tested if these transcriptomic changes can be rescued either with clozapine, an efficient atypical antipsychotic drug, minocycline, a tetracycline antibiotic proposed also as treatment of negative symptoms in SCZ due to its anti-inflammatory properties, and sulforaphane, an organosulfur isothiocyanate antioxidant with histone deacetylase inhibitory properties proposed for treatment of cognitive functions for patients with SCZ. We selected the drug concentration range from previously used cell culture studies with primary murine microglia or BV2 cell line microglia [12, 17, 38], and tested the suitable concentration by viability assay. Clozapine and sulforaphane had dose-dependent decreased effect on cell viability after 24 h, while minocycline showed no clear toxicity up to 100 µM concentration (Fig. 5a).

Fig. 5: iMGL responses to different drug treatments.
figure 5

a Viability of iMGLs after 24-h treatment with clozapine (W = −21.00, p = 0.0313 all), minocycline and sulforaphane (W = −21.00, p = 0.0313). Tested with four independent experiments with two control, two HT and two ST lines (n = 6 lines) (Wilcoxon test). b NFκB pathway downstream gene FOS. Heatmaps of CTRL, ST and HT line gene expression changes after (c) 10 µM clozapine (d) 10 µM minocycline and (e) 5 µM sulforaphane treatments. No data from ST5 patient after clozapine and sulforaphane. f Gene expression differences after drug treatments in BDNF, HLA-DRA, TLR2 and IL1β. RNAseq n = 3–4 lines in each group. CTRL healthy individuals, ST affected twin, HT healthy twin.

We tested the drug effect on phagocytosis, as minocycline has been previously shown to reduce phagocytosis of synaptic material dose-dependently in monocyte-derived microglia [12]. Phagocytosis was significantly increased after 24-h treatment with 10 µM sulforaphane, but no significant changes were discovered after clozapine or minocycline treatment (Supplementary Fig. 10a, c). We repeated the experiment with iMφs, but again only sulforaphane significantly increased phagocytosis of zymosan, and the highest used concentration of clozapine and sulforaphane were toxic and caused significant reduction in phagocytosis (Supplementary Fig. 10b, d). As we could not detect any response in phagocytosis of zymosan after minocycline treatment, this drug might inhibit only complement system mediated synapse phagocytosis as previously reported [12].

We continued using drug concentrations which did not affect viability (clozapine 10 µM, minocycline 10 µM and sulforaphane 5 µM), and performed RNA sequencing for drug treatments as well. All of the three drugs have been suggested to suppress NF-κB pro-inflammatory pathway activation as one beneficial mechanism. NF-κB downstream transcription factor FOS was significantly downregulated in CTRL iMGLs after 24-h minocycline and sulforaphane treatments, but not after clozapine treatment (Fig. 5b). However, the same downregulation was not seen in ST or HT twins untreated vs. treated. None of the drugs had any significant effect on IL8 and MCP-1 release (Supplementary Fig. 10e–g).

As clozapine inhibits NF-κB activation by inhibiting Akt pathway and sulforaphane promotes anti-inflammatory activation and microglia process elongation through Akt activation [17, 39], we performed western blot for phosphorylated NF-κB and Akt. Clozapine reduced significantly Akt phosphorylation in HT, whereas the response of HTs to NF-κB phosphorylation and of STs to both Akt and NF-κB varied (Supplementary Fig. 11a, b). Sulforaphane especially induces NRF2 pathway, and this pathway’s downstream targets GCLM and HMOX1 were significantly upregulated on transcriptomic level in CTRL and HT untreated vs. sulforaphane as expected, but not in ST (Supplementary Fig. 11c).

ST microglia appeared less-responsive to drug treatments HT and CTRL iMGLs, so next we compared the significant DEGs between untreated and drug-treated in CTRL, ST or HT groups (p value < 0.05, abs log2FC > 1). Interestingly, especially ST iMGLs had heterogeneous response to drug treatments (Fig. 5c clozapine, d minocycline, e sulforaphane, Supplementary Data file 1217). While iMGLs of all CTRL lines responded similarly to drug treatments, iMGLs of ST1 patient had stronger response to clozapine, iMGLs of ST3 and ST5 patients a stronger response to minocycline and iMGLs of ST3 patient a stronger response to sulforaphane than iMGLs of other ST patients. It is to be note that we had data from ST5 iMGL response only after minocycline treatment. The iMGLs of different HT lines showed consistent responses to both clozapine and minocycline treatments, with exception of HT5 iMGLs, which responded differently after clozapine and minocycline treatments.

Sulforaphane has been previously shown to upregulate BDNF in BV2 microglia cell line [16]. While we did not detect upregulation of BDNF after sulforaphane treatment in iMGLs of any individual, we noticed a significant upregulation of BDNF expression after clozapine and minocycline treatments in ST iMGLs (Fig. 5f). However, while minocycline has been shown to reduce expression of MHC class II genes, TLR2 and IL1β in rodent microglia [13, 14, 40], minocycline treatment did not results in such gene expression changes in our iMGL cells of any individual. Instead, HLA-DRA expression was downregulated in CTRL but not ST or HT iMGL group after sulforaphane treatment. Similarly, IL1β expression was reduced only in CTRL iMGL group after clozapine and sulforaphane. None of the treatments resulted in altered TLR2 expression in any iMGL group. Altogether, iMGLs of monozygotic twins from pairs discordant for SCZ appear to be less responsive than iMGLs of healthy controls to drug treatments that have been previously shown to affect microglia and be relevant for treating SCZ.

ST twin iMGLs did not activate differently after LPS-induced inflammation

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation is the most common way to induce microglial inflammation. LPS activation occurs especially through TLR4-mediated NF-κB pathway activation. To see whether ST or HT iMGLs are more sensitive for LPS-induced activation, we treated iMGLs for 24 h with LPS and measured the cytokine release and phagocytosis of zymosan bioparticles. However, no differences were observed in IL6, IL8 and MCP1 secretion after LPS treatment between the groups (Fig. 6a). Similarly, LPS had no significant effect on phagocytosis in any of the groups (p = 0.49, CTRL; 0.54, ST; 0.63, HT; Friedman test) (Fig. 6b). Clozapine, minocycline and sulforaphane have all been reported to suppress LPS-induced activations of mouse primary microglia or BV2 microglia [17, 18, 38, 40, 41]. However, none of the drugs added 1 h prior to LPS was able to reduce IL6, IL8, MCP1 or TNFα release (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Fig. 12).

Fig. 6: Drug treatment protection from LPS-induced inflammation in iMGLs.
figure 6

a IL6 (H(2) = 0.9800, p = 0.6500), IL8 (H(2) = 1.8600, p = 0.4163) and MCP1 (H(2) = 1.220, p = 0.5824) secretion after 24-h 100 ng/ml LPS treatment between the groups. Kruskal–Wallis test. b LPS effect on pHrodo-zymosan phagocytosis after 24-h LPS treatment and 6 h after adding pHrodo bioparticles (CTRL: H(4) = 3.397, p = 0.4937; ST: H(4) = 3.094, p = 0.5422; HT: H(4) = 2.592, p = 0.6282). Kruskal–Wallis test. c IL6 (χ2(4) = 5.400, p = 0.1514), IL8 (χ2(4) = 6.360, p = 0.0933), MCP1 (χ2(4) = 3.480, p = 0.3720) and TNFα (χ2(4) = 3.735, p = 0.3141) secretion in CTRL iMGL cultures after 30 min pre-treatment with 10 µM clozapine, 10 µM minocycline or 5 µM sulforaphane and 24-h 100 ng/ml LPS treatment. Friedman test, n = 5 lines.

Latest Intelligence