Urbina, L., Corcuera, M. Á., Gabilondo, N., Eceiza, A. & Retegi, A. A review of bacterial cellulose: Sustainable production from agricultural waste and applications in various fields. Cellulose 28, 8229–8253 (2021).
Williams, W. S. & Cannon, R. E. Alternative environmental roles for cellulose produced by Acetobacter xylinum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55, 2448–2452 (1989).
Rahman, S. S. A. et al. Production of bacterial cellulose using Gluconacetobacter kombuchae immobilized on Luffa aegyptiaca support. Sci. Rep. 11, 2912 (2021).
Comparison of Bacterial Cellulose Production among Different Strains and Fermented Media.
Gregory, D. A. et al. Bacterial cellulose: A smart biomaterial with diverse applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 145, 100623 (2021).
El-Gendi, H., Taha, T. H., Ray, J. B. & Saleh, A. K. Recent advances in bacterial cellulose: A low-cost effective production media, optimization strategies and applications. Cellulose 29, 7495–7533 (2022).
Choi, S. M., Rao, K. M., Zo, S. M., Shin, E. J. & Han, S. S. Bacterial cellulose and its applications. Polymers (Basel) 14, 1080 (2022).
Lupașcu, R. E. et al. An overview regarding microbial aspects of production and applications of bacterial cellulose. Materials (Basel) 15, 676 (2022).
Portela, R., Leal, C. R., Almeida, P. L. & Sobral, R. G. Bacterial cellulose: A versatile biopolymer for wound dressing applications. Microb. Biotechnol. 12, 586–610 (2019).
Bacakova, L. et al. Versatile application of nanocellulose: From industry to skin tissue engineering and wound healing. Nanomaterials (Basel) 9, 164 (2019).
Swingler, S. et al. Recent advances and applications of bacterial cellulose in biomedicine. Polymers (Basel) 13, 412 (2021).
Salimi, S., Sotudeh-Gharebagh, R., Zarghami, R., Chan, S. Y. & Yuen, K. H. Production of nanocellulose and its applications in drug delivery: A critical review. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7, 15800–15827 (2019).
Unal, S., Gunduz, O. & Uzun, M. Tissue engineering applications of bacterial cellulose based nanofibers. In Green Nanomaterials (eds Ahmed, S. & Ali, W.) 319–346 (Springer, 2020).
Moniri, M. et al. Production and status of bacterial cellulose in biomedical engineering. Nanomaterials (Basel) 7, 257 (2017).
Castro, C. et al. Structural characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter swingsii sp. from Colombian agroindustrial wastes. Carbohydr. Polym. 84, 96–102 (2011).
Al-Shamary, E. & Esmaeel, A.K.A.-D. Influence of fermentation condition and alkali treatment on the porosity and thickness of bacterial cellulose membranes. Tojsat 3, 194–203 (2013).
Andritsou, V. et al. Synthesis and characterization of bacterial cellulose from citrus-based sustainable resources. ACS Omega 3, 10365–10373 (2018).
Molina-Ramírez, C. et al. Effect of different carbon sources on bacterial nanocellulose production and structure using the low pH resistant strain Komagataeibacter medellinensis. Materials (Basel) 10, 639 (2017).
Feng, X. et al. Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose from kombucha-fermented soy whey. Food Prod. Process. Nutr. 6, 1–14 (2024).
Fatima, A., Ortiz-Albo, P., Neves, L. A., Nascimento, F. X. & Crespo, J. G. Biosynthesis and characterization of bacterial cellulose membranes presenting relevant characteristics for air/gas filtration. J. Memb. Sci. 674, 121509 (2023).
Troncoso, O. P. & Torres, F. G. Bacterial cellulose-graphene based nanocomposites. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 6532 (2020).
Torres, F. G., Arroyo, J. J. & Troncoso, O. P. Bacterial cellulose nanocomposites: An all-nano type of material. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 98, 1277–1293 (2019).
McCarthy, R. R., Ullah, M. W., Booth, P., Pei, E. & Yang, G. The use of bacterial polysaccharides in bioprinting. Biotechnol. Adv. 37, 107448 (2019).
Tai, C. et al. Use of anionic polysaccharides in the development of 3D bioprinting technology. Appl. Sci. (Basel) 9, 2596 (2019).
Schaffner, M., Rühs, P. A., Coulter, F., Kilcher, S. & Studart, A. R. 3D printing of bacteria into functional complex materials. Sci. Adv. 3, eaao6804 (2017).
Athukoralalage, S. S., Balu, R., Dutta, N. K. & Roy Choudhury, N. 3D bioprinted nanocellulose-based hydrogels for tissue engineering applications: A brief review. Polymers (Basel) 11, 898 (2019).
Markstedt, K. et al. 3D bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulose-alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules 16, 1489–1496 (2015).
Huang, L. et al. Bacterial cellulose nanofibers promote stress and fidelity of 3D-printed silk based hydrogel scaffold with hierarchical pores. Carbohydr. Polym. 221, 146–156 (2019).
Müller, M., Öztürk, E., Arlov, Ø., Gatenholm, P. & Zenobi-Wong, M. Alginate sulfate-nanocellulose bioinks for cartilage bioprinting applications. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 45, 210–223 (2017).
Wu, Z. et al. Biocompatibility evaluation of a 3D-bioprinted alginate-GelMA-bacteria nanocellulose (BNC) scaffold laden with oriented-growth RSC96 cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 129, 112393 (2021).
Pillai, M. M. et al. Symbiotic culture of nanocellulose pellicle: A potential matrix for 3D bioprinting. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 119, 111552 (2021).
Coelho, R. M. D., de Almeida, A. L., Amaral, R. Q. G. D., da Mota, R. N. & de Sousa, P. H. M. Kombucha: Review. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 22, 100272 (2020).
Kitwetcharoen, H. et al. Kombucha healthy drink—recent advances in production, chemical composition and health benefits. Fermentation 9, 48 (2023).
Jayabalan, R., Malbaša, R. V., Lončar, E. S., Vitas, J. S. & Sathishkumar, M. A review on kombucha tea—microbiology, composition, fermentation, beneficial effects, toxicity, and tea fungus. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 13, 538–550 (2014).
Ramírez Tapias, Y. A., Peltzer, M. A., Delgado, J. F. & Salvay, A. G. Kombucha tea by-product as source of novel materials: Formulation and characterization of films. Food Bioproc. Tech. 13, 1166–1180 (2020).
Betlej, I., Salerno-Kochan, R., Krajewski, K. J., Zawadzki, J. & Boruszewski, P. The influence of culture medium components on the physical and mechanical properties of cellulose synthesized by kombucha microorganisms. Bioresources 15, 3125–3135 (2020).
Villarreal-Soto, S. A. et al. Impact of fermentation conditions on the production of bioactive compounds with anticancer, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties in kombucha tea extracts. Process Biochem. 83, 44–54 (2019).
Tsilo, P. H., Basson, A. K., Ntombela, Z. G., Maliehe, T. S. & Pullabhotla, R. V. S. R. Isolation and optimization of culture conditions of a bioflocculant-producing fungi from Kombucha tea SCOBY. Microbiol. Res. (Pavia) 12, 950–966 (2021).
Oyewole, O. A. et al. Production and characterization of a bioflocculant produced by microorganisms isolated from earthen pond sludge. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 22, 101492 (2023).
Kurniawan, S. B. et al. Challenges and opportunities of biocoagulant/bioflocculant application for drinking water and wastewater treatment and its potential for sludge recovery. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 9312 (2020).
Mohammed, J. N. & Wan Dagang, W. R. Z. Implications for industrial application of bioflocculant demand alternatives to conventional media: Waste as a substitute. Water Sci. Technol. 80, 1807–1822 (2019).
Giri, S. S., Ryu, E. & Park, S. C. Characterization of the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of a polysaccharide-based bioflocculant from Bacillus subtilis F9. Microb. Pathog. 136, 103642 (2019).
Thu, T. T. M., Moreira, R. A., Weber, S. A. L. & Poma, A. B. Molecular insight into the self-assembly process of cellulose Iβ microfibril. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 8505 (2022).
Kim, J., Park, H.-D. & Chung, S. Microfluidic approaches to bacterial biofilm formation. Molecules 17, 9818–9834 (2012).
Tsuboi, M. Infrared spectrum and crystal structure of cellulose. J. Polym. Sci. 25, 159–171 (1957).
Li, J. et al. Production of high crystallinity type-I cellulose from Komagataeibacter hansenii JR-02 isolated from Kombucha tea. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 66, 108–118 (2019).
Amarasekara, A. S., Wang, D. & Grady, T. L. A comparison of kombucha SCOBY bacterial cellulose purification methods. SN Appl. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-1982-2 (2020).
Peretz, R., Mamane, H., Sterenzon, E. & Gerchman, Y. Rapid quantification of cellulose nanocrystals by Calcofluor White fluorescence staining. Cellulose 26, 971–977 (2019).
Nanocellulose-Based Inks for 3D Bioprinting: Key Aspects in ResearchDevelopment and Challenging Perspectives in Applications-AMini Review.
Williams, D., Thayer, P., Martinez, H., Gatenholm, E. & Khademhosseini, A. A perspective on the physical, mechanical and biological specifications of bioinks and the development of functional tissues in 3D bioprinting. Bioprinting 9, 19–36 (2018).
Ben Rebah, F., Mnif, W. & Siddeeg, M. S. Microbial flocculants as an alternative to synthetic polymers for wastewater treatment: A review. Symmetry (Basel) 10, 556 (2018).
Olivero, E. et al. Gradient porous structures of mycelium: A quantitative structure-mechanical property analysis. Res. Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3186215/v1 (2023).
Di Natale, C. et al. Engineered bacterial cellulose nanostructured matrix for incubation and release of drug-loaded oil in water nanoemulsion. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 851893 (2022).
Brown, R. M. Jr., Millard, A. C. & Campagnola, P. J. Macromolecular structure of cellulose studied by second-harmonic generation imaging microscopy. Opt. Lett. 28, 2207–2209 (2003).
Nadiarnykh, O., Lacomb, R. B., Campagnola, P. J. & Mohler, W. A. Coherent and incoherent SHG in fibrillar cellulose matrices. Opt. Express 15, 3348–3360 (2007).
Vielreicher, M. et al. Bacterial nanocellulose stimulates mesenchymal stem cell expansion and formation of stable collagen-I networks as a novel biomaterial in tissue engineering. Sci. Rep. 8, 9401 (2018).
Sharma, C. & Bhardwaj, N. K. Biotransformation of fermented black tea into bacterial nanocellulose via symbiotic interplay of microorganisms. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 132, 166–177 (2019).
Bäckdahl, H. et al. Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 27, 2141–2149 (2006).
Tang, W., Jia, S., Jia, Y. & Yang, H. The influence of fermentation conditions and post-treatment methods on porosity of bacterial cellulose membrane. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26, 125–131 (2010).
Sharma, C., Bhardwaj, N. K. & Pathak, P. Static intermittent fed-batch production of bacterial nanocellulose from black tea and its modification using chitosan to develop antibacterial green packaging material. J. Clean. Prod. 279, 123608 (2021).
Hornung, M., Ludwig, M., Gerrard, A. M. & Schmauder, H.-P. Optimizing the production of bacterial cellulose in surface culture: Evaluation of substrate mass transfer influences on the bioreaction (part 1). Eng. Life Sci. 6, 537–545 (2006).
Vasconcelos, N. F. et al. Oxidized bacterial cellulose membrane as support for enzyme immobilization: Properties and morphological features. Cellulose 27, 3055–3083 (2020).
De Gregorio, V. et al. Intestine-on-chip device increases ECM remodeling inducing faster epithelial cell differentiation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 117, 556–566 (2020).
De Gregorio, V. et al. Immunoresponsive microbiota-gut-on-chip reproduces barrier dysfunction, stromal reshaping and probiotics translocation under inflammation. Biomaterials 286, 121573 (2022).
Zhong, C. Industrial-scale production and applications of bacterial cellulose. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 605374 (2020).
Iguchi, M., Yamanaka, S. & Budhiono, A. Bacterial cellulose—A masterpiece of nature’s arts. J. Mater. Sci. 35, 261–270 (2000).
Park, A., Jeong, H.-H., Lee, J., Kim, K. P. & Lee, C.-S. Effect of shear stress on the formation of bacterial biofilm in a microfluidic channel. Biochip J. 5, 236–241 (2011).
Chao, Y., Sugano, Y. & Shoda, M. Bacterial cellulose production under oxygen-enriched air at different fructose concentrations in a 50-liter, internal-loop airlift reactor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 55, 673–679 (2001).
Lombardo, D., Calandra, P., Pasqua, L. & Magazù, S. Self-assembly of organic nanomaterials and biomaterials: The bottom-up approach for functional nanostructures formation and advanced applications. Materials (Basel) 13, 1048 (2020).
Caro-Astorga, J., Walker, K. T., Herrera, N., Lee, K.-Y. & Ellis, T. Bacterial cellulose spheroids as building blocks for 3D and patterned living materials and for regeneration. Nat. Commun. 12, 5027 (2021).
Indurkar, A., Choudhary, R., Rubenis, K. & Locs, J. Advances in sintering techniques for calcium phosphates ceramics. Materials (Basel) 14, 6133 (2021).
Hotaling, N. A., Bharti, K., Kriel, H. & Simon, C. G. Jr. DiameterJ: A validated open source nanofiber diameter measurement tool. Biomaterials 61, 327–338 (2015).
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Agostini, M., Greco, G. & Cecchini, M. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) irreversible bonding to untreated plastics and metals for microfluidics applications. APL Mater. 7, 081108 (2019).
Aran, K., Sasso, L. A., Kamdar, N. & Zahn, J. D. Irreversible, direct bonding of nanoporous polymer membranes to PDMS or glass microdevices. Lab. Chip. 10, 548–552 (2010).
- SEO Powered Content & PR Distribution. Get Amplified Today.
- PlatoData.Network Vertical Generative Ai. Empower Yourself. Access Here.
- PlatoAiStream. Web3 Intelligence. Knowledge Amplified. Access Here.
- PlatoESG. Carbon, CleanTech, Energy, Environment, Solar, Waste Management. Access Here.
- PlatoHealth. Biotech and Clinical Trials Intelligence. Access Here.
- Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-62462-9