Nichols, E. et al. Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health 7, e105–e125 (2022).
Feigin, V. L. et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 18, 459–480 (2019).
Velandia, P. P. et al. Global and regional spending on dementia care from 2000–2019 and expected future health spending scenarios from 2020–2050: an economic modelling exercise. EClinicalMedicine 45, 101337 (2022).
GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry 9, 137–150 (2022).
Pollak, T. A. et al. The blood–brain barrier in psychosis. Lancet Psychiatry 5, 79–92 (2018).
McCutcheon, R. A., Reis Marques, T. & Howes, O. D. Schizophrenia — an overview. JAMA Psychiatry 77, 201 (2020).
Millan, M. J. et al. Altering the course of schizophrenia: progress and perspectives. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15, 485–515 (2016).
McNally, J. M. & McCarley, R. W. Gamma band oscillations: a key to understanding schizophrenia symptoms and neural circuit abnormalities. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 29, 202–210 (2016).
Sweeney, M. D., Sagare, A. P. & Zlokovic, B. V. Blood-brain barrier breakdown in Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 14, 133–150 (2018).
Canter, R. G., Penney, J. & Tsai, L. H. The road to restoring neural circuits for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 539, 187–196 (2016).
Knopman, D. S. et al. Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 7, 33 (2021).
Hampel, H. et al. The amyloid-β pathway in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Psychiatry 26, 5481–5503 (2021).
Tzioras, M., McGeachan, R. I., Durrant, C. S. & Spires-Jones, T. L. Synaptic degeneration in Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 19, 19–38 (2023).
Hosoki, S. et al. Molecular biomarkers for vascular cognitive impairment and dementia. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 19, 737–753 (2023).
Perovnik, M., Rus, T., Schindlbeck, K. A. & Eidelberg, D. Functional brain networks in the evaluation of patients with neurodegenerative disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 19, 73–90 (2023).
Arrowsmith, J. Phase II failures: 2008–2010. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 328–329 (2011).
Arrowsmith, J. Phase III and submission failures: 2007–2010. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 87 (2011).
Arrowsmith, J. & Miller, P. Phase II and phase III attrition rates 2011–2012. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 12, 569 (2013).
Smietana, K., Siatkowski, M. & Møller, M. Trends in clinical success rates. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15, 379–380 (2016).
Sun, D., Gao, W., Hu, H. & Zhou, S. Why 90% of clinical drug development fails and how to improve it? Acta Pharm. Sin. B 12, 3049–3062 (2022).
Butlen-Ducuing, F. et al. Challenges in drug development for central nervous system disorders: a European Medicines Agency perspective. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15, 813–814 (2016).
Kesselheim, A. S., Hwang, T. J. & Franklin, J. M. Two decades of new drug development for central nervous system disorders. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 14, 815–816 (2015).
Gribkoff, V. K. & Kaczmarek, L. K. The need for new approaches in CNS drug discovery: why drugs have failed, and what can be done to improve outcomes. Neuropharmacology 120, 11–19 (2017).
Danon, J. J., Reekie, T. A. & Kassiou, M. Challenges and opportunities in central nervous system drug discovery. Trends Chem. 1, 612–624 (2019).
Paul, S. M. et al. How to improve RD productivity: the pharmaceutical industry’s grand challenge. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 203–214 (2010).
Han, J. J. FDA modernization Act 2.0 allows for alternatives to animal testing. Artif. Organs 47, 449–450 (2023).
Stewart, A., Denoyer, D., Gao, X. & Toh, Y.-C. The FDA modernisation act 2.0: bringing non-animal technologies to the regulatory table. Drug Discov. Today 28, 103496 (2023).
Franzen, N. et al. Impact of organ-on-a-chip technology on pharmaceutical R&D costs. Drug Discov. Today 24, 1720–1724 (2019).
Low, L. A., Mummery, C., Berridge, B. R., Austin, C. P. & Tagle, D. A. Organs-on-chips: into the next decade. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 345–361 (2021).
Stresser, D. M. et al. Towards in vitro models for reducing or replacing the use of animals in drug testing. Nat. Biomed. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-023-01154-7 (2023).
Li, T. L. et al. Stretchable mesh microelectronics for the Biointegration and stimulation of neural organoids. Biomaterials 290, 121825 (2022).
Floch, P. L. et al. Stretchable mesh nanoelectronics for 3D single-cell chronic electrophysiology from developing brain organoids. Adv. Mater. 34, e2106829 (2022).
Yang, X. et al. Kirigami electronics for long-term electrophysiological recording of human neural organoids and assembloids. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02081-3 (2024).
Li, Q. et al. Cyborg organoids: implantation of nanoelectronics via organogenesis for tissue-wide electrophysiology. Nano Lett. 19, 5781–5789 (2019). This article reports flexible electronics that can be wrapped into tissue models during cell aggregation.
Skylar-Scott, M. A. et al. Orthogonally induced differentiation of stem cells for the programmatic patterning of vascularized organoids and bioprinted tissues. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 6, 449–462 (2022).
You, S. et al. High cell density and high-resolution 3D bioprinting for fabricating vascularized tissues. Sci. Adv. 9, eade7923 (2023).
Wang, Y. et al. Peptide programmed hydrogels as safe sanctuary microenvironments for cell transplantation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1900390 (2020).
Law, K. C. L. et al. A selective, hydrogel‐based prodrug delivery system efficiently activates a suicide gene to remove undifferentiated human stem cells within neural grafts. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2305771 (2023).
Nakatsuka, N. et al. Aptamer–field-effect transistors overcome Debye length limitations for small-molecule sensing. Science 362, 319–324 (2018). This article reports aptamer–field-effect transistors combining the versatility of an aptamer bio-recognition element with the high sensitivity of field-effect transistors.
Nakatsuka, N. et al. Sensing serotonin secreted from human serotonergic neurons using aptamer-modified nanopipettes. Mol. Psychiatry 26, 2753–2763 (2021).
Zhao, C. et al. Implantable aptamer–field-effect transistor neuroprobes for in vivo neurotransmitter monitoring. Sci. Adv. 7, eabj7422 (2021).
Abbott, N. J. Dynamics of CNS barriers: evolution, differentiation, and modulation. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 25, 5–23 (2005).
Kasinathan, N., Jagani, H. V., Alex, A. T., Volety, S. M. & Venkata Rao, J. Strategies for drug delivery to the central nervous system by systemic route. Drug Deliv. 22, 243–257 (2015).
Pardridge, W. M. The blood-brain barrier: bottleneck in brain drug development. NeuroRX 2, 3–14 (2005).
Sierra, S. et al. Statins as neuroprotectants: a comparative in vitro study of lipophilicity, blood-brain-barrier penetration, lowering of brain cholesterol, and decrease of neuron cell death. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 23, 307–318 (2011).
Wolff, A., Antfolk, M., Brodin, B. & Tenje, M. In vitro blood-brain barrier models — an overview of established models and new microfluidic approaches. J. Pharm. Sci. 104, 2727–2746 (2015).
Liu, C. C. et al. Peripheral apoE4 enhances Alzheimer’s pathology and impairs cognition by compromising cerebrovascular function. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 1020–1033 (2022).
Chuapoco, M. R. et al. Adeno-associated viral vectors for functional intravenous gene transfer throughout the non-human primate brain. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 1241–1251 (2023).
Chen, X. et al. Functional gene delivery to and across brain vasculature of systemic AAVs with endothelial-specific tropism in rodents and broad tropism in primates. Nat. Commun. 14, 3345 (2023).
Zhang, S. L., Yue, Z., Arnold, D. M., Artiushin, G. & Sehgal, A. A circadian clock in the blood-brain barrier regulates xenobiotic efflux. Cell 173, 130–139.e10 (2018).
Yao, Y. et al. Variants of the adeno-associated virus serotype 9 with enhanced penetration of the blood–brain barrier in rodents and primates. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 6, 1257–1271 (2022).
Wang, P. et al. Blood–brain barrier injury and neuroinflammation induced by SARS-CoV-2 in a lung–brain microphysiological system. Nat. Biomed. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-023-01054-w (2023).
Padmanabhan, P. & Götz, J. Clinical relevance of animal models in aging-related dementia research. Nat. Aging 3, 481–493 (2023).
McClain, S. P. et al. In vivo photopharmacology with light-activated opioid drugs. Neuron 111, 3926–3940.e10 (2023).
Chung, J. E. et al. High-density single-unit human cortical recordings using the Neuropixels probe. Neuron 110, 2409–2421.e3 (2022).
Luo, T. Z. et al. An approach for long-term, multi-probe neuropixels recordings in unrestrained rats. eLife 9, e59716 (2020).
van Daal, R. J. J. et al. Implantation of Neuropixels probes for chronic recording of neuronal activity in freely behaving mice and rats. Nat. Protoc. 16, 3322–3347 (2021).
Steinmetz, N. A. et al. Neuropixels 2.0: a miniaturized high-density probe for stable, long-term brain recordings. Science 372, eabf4588 (2021). The article reports one of the highest-density probes, which can record densely packed neurons across multiple cortical layers.
Ji, B. et al. Flexible and stretchable opto-electric neural interface for low-noise electrocorticogram recordings and neuromodulation in vivo. Biosens. Bioelectron. 153, 112009 (2020).
Obaid, A. et al. Massively parallel microwire arrays integrated with CMOS chips for neural recording. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay2789 (2020).
Leber, M. et al. in Neural Interface: Frontiers and Applications (ed. Zheng, X.) Ch. 1 (Springer, 2019). [Series Eds Crusio, W. E. et al. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology Vol. 1101].
Holmes, A., Bonner, F. & Jones, D. Assessing drug safety in human tissues-what are the barriers? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 14, 585–587 (2015).
Haring, A. P., Sontheimer, H. & Johnson, B. N. Microphysiological human brain and neural systems-on-a-chip: potential alternatives to small animal models and emerging platforms for drug discovery and personalized medicine. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 13, 381–406 (2017).
Bhatia, S. N. & Ingber, D. E. Microfluidic organs-on-chips. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 760–772 (2014).
Hajal, C., Le Roi, B., Kamm, R. D. & Maoz, B. M. Biology and models of the blood-brain barrier. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 23, 359–384 (2021).
Bang, S., Lee, S., Choi, N. & Kim, H. N. Emerging brain-pathophysiology-mimetic platforms for studying neurodegenerative diseases: brain organoids and brains-on-a-chip. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, e202002119 (2021).
Iadecola, C. The neurovascular unit coming of age: a journey through neurovascular coupling in health and disease. Neuron 96, 17–42 (2017).
Hong, G. & Lieber, C. M. Novel electrode technologies for neural recordings. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 330–345 (2019).
Jun, J. J. et al. Fully integrated silicon probes for high-density recording of neural activity. Nature 551, 232–236 (2017).
Son, Y. et al. In vivo optical modulation of neural signals using monolithically integrated two-dimensional neural probe arrays. Sci. Rep. 5, 15466 (2015).
Paulk, A. C. et al. Large-scale neural recordings with single neuron resolution using Neuropixels probes in human cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 252–263 (2022).
Canales, A. et al. Multifunctional fibers for simultaneous optical, electrical and chemical interrogation of neural circuits in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 277–284 (2015).
Kuzum, D. et al. Transparent and flexible low noise graphene electrodes for simultaneous electrophysiology and neuroimaging. Nat. Commun. 5, 5259 (2014).
Khodagholy, D. et al. NeuroGrid: recording action potentials from the surface of the brain. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 310–315 (2015).
Park, J. S. et al. A multimodality CMOS sensor array for cell-based assay and drug screening. Dig. Tech. Pap. IEEE Int. Solid. State Circuits Conf. 58, 208–209 (2015).
Miccoli, B. et al. High-density electrical recording and impedance imaging with a multi-modal CMOS multi-electrode array chip. Front. Neurosci. 13, 641 (2019).
Wen, X. et al. Flexible, multifunctional neural probe with liquid metal enabled, ultra-large tunable stiffness for deep-brain chemical sensing and agent delivery. Biosens. Bioelectron. 131, 37–45 (2019).
Huang, Q. et al. Shell microelectrode arrays (MEAs) for brain organoids. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq5031 (2022).
Cools, J. et al. A micropatterned multielectrode shell for 3D spatiotemporal recording from live cells. Adv. Sci. 5, 1700731 (2018).
Shin, H. et al. 3D high-density microelectrode array with optical stimulation and drug delivery for investigating neural circuit dynamics. Nat. Commun. 12, 492 (2021).
Ryynänen, T. et al. Microelectrode array with transparent ALD TiN electrodes. Front. Neurosci. 13, 226 (2019).
Kshirsagar, P. et al. Transparent graphene/PEDOT:PSS microelectrodes for electro- and optophysiology. Adv. Mater. Technol. 4, 1800318 (2019).
Susloparova, A. et al. Low impedance and highly transparent microelectrode arrays (MEA) for in vitro neuron electrical activity probing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 327, 128895 (2021).
Wang, Y. I., Abaci, H. E. & Shuler, M. L. Microfluidic blood–brain barrier model provides in vivo‐like barrier properties for drug permeability screening. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 114, 184–194 (2017).
Maoz, B. M. et al. A linked organ-on-chip model of the human neurovascular unit reveals the metabolic coupling of endothelial and neuronal cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 865–877 (2018).
Salmon, I. et al. Engineering neurovascular organoids with 3D printed microfluidic chips. Lab. Chip 22, 1615–1629 (2022).
Zhang, S., Wan, Z. & Kamm, R. D. Vascularized organoids on a chip: strategies for engineering organoids with functional vasculature. Lab. Chip 21, 473–488 (2021).
Campisi, M. et al. 3D self-organized microvascular model of the human blood-brain barrier with endothelial cells, pericytes and astrocytes. Biomaterials 180, 117–129 (2018). This article reports a foundational microfluidic BBB model with self-assembled vasculature highlighting the strong remodelling characteristics of these tissue models.
Muoio, V., Persson, P. B. & Sendeski, M. M. The neurovascular unit–concept review. Acta Physiol. 210, 790–798 (2014).
Choublier, N. et al. Exposure of human cerebral microvascular endothelial cells hCMEC/D3 to laminar shear stress induces vascular protective responses. Fluids Barriers CNS 19, 41 (2022).
Reinitz, A., DeStefano, J., Ye, M., Wong, A. D. & Searson, P. C. Human brain microvascular endothelial cells resist elongation due to shear stress. Microvasc. Res. 99, 8–18 (2015).
Mehta, A. et al. Bio-mimicking brain vasculature to investigate the role of heterogeneous shear stress in regulating barrier integrity. Adv. Biol. 6, e2200152 (2022).
DeStefano, J. G., Xu, Z. S., Williams, A. J., Yimam, N. & Searson, P. C. Effect of shear stress on iPSC-derived human brain microvascular endothelial cells (dhBMECs). Fluids Barriers CNS 14, 20 (2017).
Garcia-Polite, F. et al. Pulsatility and high shear stress deteriorate barrier phenotype in brain microvascular endothelium. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 37, 2614–2625 (2017).
Park, T. E. et al. Hypoxia-enhanced blood-brain barrier chip recapitulates human barrier function and shuttling of drugs and antibodies. Nat. Commun. 10, 2621 (2019).
Wevers, N. R. et al. A perfused human blood–brain barrier on-a-chip for high-throughput assessment of barrier function and antibody transport. Fluids Barriers CNS 15, 23 (2018).
Huh, D. et al. Microfabrication of human organs-on-chips. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2135–2157 (2013).
Henry, O. Y. F. et al. Organs-on-chips with integrated electrodes for trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements of human epithelial barrier function. Lab. Chip 17, 2264–2271 (2017).
Matthiesen, I., Voulgaris, D., Nikolakopoulou, P., Winkler, T. E. & Herland, A. Continuous monitoring reveals protective effects of N-acetylcysteine amide on an isogenic microphysiological model of the neurovascular unit. Small 17, e2101785 (2021).
Park, J. et al. A 3D human triculture system modeling neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 941–951 (2018).
Sances, S. et al. Human iPSC-derived endothelial cells and microengineered organ-chip enhance neuronal development. Stem Cell Rep. 10, 1222–1236 (2018).
Vatine, G. D. et al. Human iPSC-derived blood-brain barrier chips enable disease modeling and personalized medicine applications. Cell Stem Cell 24, 995–1005.e6 (2019).
Graybill, P. M. et al. Ultra-thin and ultra-porous nanofiber networks as a basement-membrane mimic. Lab. Chip 23, 4565–4578 (2023).
Ye, M. et al. Brain microvascular endothelial cells resist elongation due to curvature and shear stress. Sci. Rep. 4, 4681 (2014).
Marino, A. et al. A 3D real-scale, biomimetic, and biohybrid model of the blood-brain barrier fabricated through two-photon lithography. Small 14, https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201702959 (2018).
Tricinci, O. et al. A 3D biohybrid real-scale model of the brain cancer microenvironment for advanced in vitro testing. Adv. Mater. Technol. 5, 2000540 (2020).
Yildirim, E. et al. Phaseguides as tunable passive microvalves for liquid routing in complex microfluidic networks. Lab. Chip 14, 3334–3340 (2014).
Koo, Y., Hawkins, B. T. & Yun, Y. Three-dimensional (3D) tetra-culture brain on chip platform for organophosphate toxicity screening. Sci. Rep. 8, 2841 (2018).
Ragelle, H., Goncalves, A., Kustermann, S., Antonetti, D. A. & Jayagopal, A. Organ-on-a-chip technologies for advanced blood-retinal barrier models. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 36, 30–41 (2020).
Bolognin, S. et al. 3D cultures of Parkinson’s disease‐specific dopaminergic neurons for high content phenotyping and drug testing. Adv. Sci. 6, 1800927 (2019).
Park, T. I. H. et al. Routine culture and study of adult human brain cells from neurosurgical specimens. Nat. Protoc. 17, 190–221 (2022).
Bernas, M. J. et al. Establishment of primary cultures of human brain microvascular endothelial cells to provide an in vitro cellular model of the blood-brain barrier. Nat. Protoc. 5, 1265–1272 (2010).
Ades, E. W. et al. HMEC-1: establishment of an immortalized human microvascular endothelial cell line. J. Investig. Dermatol. 99, 683–690 (1992).
Daniels, B. P. et al. Immortalized human cerebral microvascular endothelial cells maintain the properties of primary cells in an in vitro model of immune migration across the blood brain barrier. J. Neurosci. Methods 212, 173–179 (2013).
Eigenmann, D. E. et al. Comparative study of four immortalized human brain capillary endothelial cell lines, hCMEC/D3, hBMEC, TY10, and BB19, and optimization of culture conditions, for an in vitro blood-brain barrier model for drug permeability studies. Fluids Barriers CNS 10, 33 (2013).
Ohtsuki, S. et al. Quantitative targeted absolute proteomic analysis of transporters, receptors and junction proteins for validation of human cerebral microvascular endothelial cell line hCMEC/D3 as a human blood-brain barrier model. Mol. Pharm. 10, 289–296 (2013).
Roux, F. et al. Regulation of gamma‐glutamyl transpeptidase and alkaline phosphatase activities in immortalized rat brain microvessel endothelial cells. J. Cell Physiol. 159, 101–113 (1994).
Sano, Y. et al. Establishment of a new conditionally immortalized human brain microvascular endothelial cell line retaining an in vivo blood-brain barrier function. J. Cell Physiol. 225, 519–528 (2010).
Lippmann, E. S., Al-Ahmad, A., Azarin, S. M., Palecek, S. P. & Shusta, E. V. A retinoic acid-enhanced, multicellular human blood-brain barrier model derived from stem cell sources. Sci. Rep. 4, 4160 (2014).
Katt, M. E., Linville, R. M., Mayo, L. N., Xu, Z. S. & Searson, P. C. Functional brain-specific microvessels from iPSC-derived human brain microvascular endothelial cells: the role of matrix composition on monolayer formation. Fluids Barriers CNS 15, 7 (2018).
Li, Y. et al. Investigation of neurodevelopmental deficits of 22 q11.2 deletion syndrome with a patient-ipsc-derived blood–brain barrier model. Cells 10, 2576 (2021).
Casas, B. S. et al. Schizophrenia-derived hiPSC brain microvascular endothelial-like cells show impairments in angiogenesis and blood–brain barrier function. Mol. Psychiatry 27, 3708–3718 (2022).
Grifno, G. N. et al. Tissue-engineered blood-brain barrier models via directed differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci. Rep. 9, 13957 (2019).
Linville, R. M. et al. Human iPSC-derived blood-brain barrier microvessels: validation of barrier function and endothelial cell behavior. Biomaterials 190–191, 24–37 (2019).
Lippmann, E. S., Azarin, S. M., Palecek, S. P. & Shusta, E. V. Commentary on human pluripotent stem cell-based blood–brain barrier models. Fluids Barriers CNS 17, 4–9 (2020).
Nguyen, J., Lin, Y. Y. & Gerecht, S. The next generation of endothelial differentiation: tissue-specific ECs. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1188–1204 (2021).
Floy, M. E., Shabnam, F. & Palecek, S. P. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to epicardial-derived fibroblasts. STAR Protoc. 3, 48–50 (2022).
Lim, R. G. et al. Huntington’s disease iPSC-derived brain microvascular endothelial cells reveal WNT-mediated angiogenic and blood-brain barrier deficits. Cell Rep. 19, 1365–1377 (2017).
Hollmann, E. K. et al. Accelerated differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells to blood-brain barrier endothelial cells. Fluids Barriers CNS 14, 9 (2017).
Lu, T. M. et al. Pluripotent stem cell-derived epithelium misidentified as brain microvascular endothelium requires ETS factors to acquire vascular fate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2016950118 (2021).
Workman, M. J. & Svendsen, C. N. Recent advances in human iPSC-derived models of the blood-brain barrier. Fluids Barriers CNS 17, 30 (2020).
Linville, R. M. et al. Brain microvascular endothelial cell dysfunction in an isogenic juvenile iPSC model of Huntington’s disease. Fluids Barriers CNS 19, 54 (2022).
Krasemann, S. et al. The blood-brain barrier is dysregulated in COVID-19 and serves as a CNS entry route for SARS-CoV-2. Stem Cell Rep. 17, 307–320 (2022).
Lippmann, E. S. et al. Derivation of blood-brain barrier endothelial cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 783–791 (2012).
Hajal, C. et al. Engineered human blood–brain barrier microfluidic model for vascular permeability analyses. Nat. Protoc. 17, 95–128 (2022).
Cho, A. N. et al. Microfluidic device with brain extracellular matrix promotes structural and functional maturation of human brain organoids. Nat. Commun. 12, 4730 (2021).
Park, J. et al. Three-dimensional brain-on-a-chip with an interstitial level of flow and its application as an in vitro model of Alzheimer’s disease. Lab. Chip 15, 141–150 (2015).
Giandomenico, S. L., Sutcliffe, M. & Lancaster, M. A. Generation and long-term culture of advanced cerebral organoids for studying later stages of neural development. Nat. Protoc. 16, 579–602 (2021).
Lancaster, M. A. et al. Guided self-organization and cortical plate formation in human brain organoids. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 659–666 (2017).
Giandomenico, S. L. et al. Cerebral organoids at the air–liquid interface generate diverse nerve tracts with functional output. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 669–679 (2019).
Li, N. et al. Patterning neuroepithelial cell sheet via a sustained chemical gradient generated by localized passive diffusion devices. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 7, 1713–1721 (2021).
Rifes, P. et al. Modeling neural tube development by differentiation of human embryonic stem cells in a microfluidic WNT gradient. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1265–1273 (2020).
Xiang, Y. et al. Fusion of regionally specified hPSC-derived organoids models human brain development and interneuron migration. Cell Stem Cell 21, 383–398.e7 (2017).
Bagley, J. A., Reumann, D., Bian, S., Lévi-Strauss, J. & Knoblich, J. A. Fused cerebral organoids model interactions between brain regions. Nat. Methods 14, 743–751 (2017).
Birey, F. et al. Assembly of functionally integrated human forebrain spheroids. Nature 545, 54–59 (2017).
Andersen, J. et al. Generation of functional human 3D cortico-motor assembloids. Cell 183, 1913–1929.e26 (2020).
Meng, X. et al. Assembloid CRISPR screens reveal impact of disease genes in human neurodevelopment. Nature 622, 359–366 (2023).
Xiang, Y. et al. hESC-derived thalamic organoids form reciprocal projections when fused with cortical organoids. Cell Stem Cell 24, 487–497.e7 (2019).
Cai, H. et al. Trapping cell spheroids and organoids using digital acoustofluidics. Biofabrication 12, 035025 (2020).
Ao, Z. et al. Controllable fusion of human brain organoids using acoustofluidics. Lab. Chip 21, 688–699 (2021).
Bonanini, F. et al. In vitro grafting of hepatic spheroids and organoids on a microfluidic vascular bed. Angiogenesis 25, 455–470 (2022).
Obergrussberger, A., Friis, S., Brüggemann, A. & Fertig, N. Automated patch clamp in drug discovery: major breakthroughs and innovation in the last decade. Exp. Opin. Drug Discov. 16, 1–5 (2020).
Khan, T. A. et al. Neuronal defects in a human cellular model of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Nat. Med. 26, 1888–1898 (2020).
Peng, Y. et al. High-throughput microcircuit analysis of individual human brains through next-generation multineuron patch-clamp. eLife 8, e48178 (2019).
Bell, D. C. & Dallas, M. L. Using automated patch clamp electrophysiology platforms in pain-related ion channel research: insights from industry and academia. Br. J. Pharmacol. 175, 2312–2321 (2018).
Chambers, C., Witton, I., Adams, C., Marrington, L. & Kammonen, J. High-throughput screening of NaV1.7 modulators using a giga-seal automated patch clamp instrument. Assay. Drug Dev. Technol. 14, 93–108 (2016).
Obergrussberger, A. et al. Automated patch clamp meets high-throughput screening: 384 cells recorded in parallel on a planar patch clamp module. J. Lab. Autom. 21, 779–793 (2016).
Semyanov, A., Henneberger, C. & Agarwal, A. Making sense of astrocytic calcium signals — from acquisition to interpretation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 551–564 (2020).
Sun, X. R. et al. Fast GCaMPs for improved tracking of neuronal activity. Nat. Commun. 4, 2170 (2013).
Dana, H. et al. High-performance calcium sensors for imaging activity in neuronal populations and microcompartments. Nat. Methods 16, 649–657 (2019).
Chen, T. W. et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature 499, 295–300 (2013).
Zhang, Y. et al. Fast and sensitive GCaMP calcium indicators for imaging neural populations. Nature 615, 884–891 (2023).
Klioutchnikov, A. et al. Three-photon head-mounted microscope for imaging deep cortical layers in freely moving rats. Nat. Methods 17, 509–513 (2020).
Zhao, C. et al. Miniature three-photon microscopy maximized for scattered fluorescence collection. Nat. Methods 20, 617–622 (2023).
Klioutchnikov, A. et al. A three-photon head-mounted microscope for imaging all layers of visual cortex in freely moving mice. Nat. Methods 20, 610–616 (2023).
Liu, P. & Miller, E. W. Electrophysiology, unplugged: imaging membrane potential with fluorescent indicators. Acc. Chem. Res. 53, 11–19 (2020).
Kralj, J. M., Douglass, A. D., Hochbaum, D. R., MacLaurin, D. & Cohen, A. E. Optical recording of action potentials in mammalian neurons using a microbial rhodopsin. Nat. Methods 9, 90–95 (2012).
Klimas, A. et al. OptoDyCE as an automated system for high-throughput all-optical dynamic cardiac electrophysiology. Nat. Commun. 7, 11542 (2016).
Hochbaum, D. R. et al. All-optical electrophysiology in mammalian neurons using engineered microbial rhodopsins. Nat. Methods 11, 825–833 (2014).
Emiliani, V., Cohen, A. E., Deisseroth, K. & Häusser, M. All-optical interrogation of neural circuits. J. Neurosci. 35, 13917–13926 (2015).
Wysmolek, P. M. et al. A minimal-complexity light-sheet microscope maps network activity in 3D neuronal systems. Sci. Rep. 12, 20420 (2022).
Kagan, B. J. et al. In vitro neurons learn and exhibit sentience when embodied in a simulated game-world. Neuron 110, 3952–3969.e8 (2022).
Müller, J. et al. High-resolution CMOS MEA platform to study neurons at subcellular, cellular, and network levels. Lab. Chip 15, 2767–2780 (2015).
Yuan, X. et al. Versatile live-cell activity analysis platform for characterization of neuronal dynamics at single-cell and network level. Nat. Commun. 11, 4854 (2020).
Ballini, M. et al. Europe PMC funders group europe pmc funders author manuscripts a 1024-channel CMOS microelectrode array with 26, 400 electrodes for recording and stimulation of electrogenic cells in vitro. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 49, 2705–2719 (2017).
Emmenegger, V., Obien, M. E. J., Franke, F. & Hierlemann, A. Technologies to study action potential propagation with a focus on HD-MEAs. Front. Cell Neurosci. 13, 159 (2019).
Sharf, T. et al. Functional neuronal circuitry and oscillatory dynamics in human brain organoids. Nat. Commun. 13, 4403 (2022).
Ronchi, S. et al. Single-cell electrical stimulation using CMOS-based high-density microelectrode arrays. Front. Neurosci. 13, 208 (2019).
Ronchi, S. et al. Electrophysiological phenotype characterization of human iPSC-derived neuronal cell lines by means of high-density microelectrode arrays. Adv. Biol. 5, e2000223 (2021).
Suzuki, I. et al. Large-area field potential imaging having single neuron resolution using 236 880 electrodes CMOS-MEA technology. Adv. Sci. 10, e2207732 (2023).
Duru, J. et al. Investigation of the input-output relationship of engineered neural networks using high-density microelectrode arrays. Biosens. Bioelectron. 239, 115591 (2023).
Kim, E. et al. A neurospheroid-based microrobot for targeted neural connections in a hippocampal slice. Adv. Mater. 35, e2208747 (2023).
Kim, T. et al. Predicting in vitro single-neuron firing rates upon pharmacological perturbation using Graph Neural Networks. Front. Neuroinform. 16, 1032538 (2023).
Bryson, A. et al. Classification of antiseizure drugs in cultured neuronal networks using multielectrode arrays and unsupervised learning. Epilepsia 63, 1693–1703 (2022).
Antonello, P. C. et al. Self-organization of in vitro neuronal assemblies drives to complex network topology. eLife 11, e74921 (2022).
Isomura, T., Shimazaki, H. & Friston, K. J. Canonical neural networks perform active inference. Commun. Biol. 5, 55 (2022).
Isomura, T. & Friston, K. In vitro neural networks minimise variational free energy. Sci. Rep. 8, 16926 (2018).
Isomura, T., Kotani, K., Jimbo, Y. & Friston, K. J. Experimental validation of the free-energy principle with in vitro neural networks. Nat. Commun. 14, 4–6 (2023).
Lamberti, M. et al. Maximum entropy models provide functional connectivity estimates in neural networks. Sci. Rep. 12, 9656 (2022).
Middya, S. et al. Microelectrode arrays for simultaneous electrophysiology and advanced optical microscopy. Adv. Sci. 8, 2004434 (2021).
Bounik, R., Cardes, F., Ulusan, H., Modena, M. M. & Hierlemann, A. Impedance imaging of cells and tissues: design and applications. BME Front. 2022, 1–21 (2022).
Thiébaud, P. et al. An array of Pt-tip microelectrodes for extracellular monitoring of activity of brain slices. Biosens. Bioelectron. 14, 61–65 (1999).
Heuschkel, M. O., Fejtl, M., Raggenbass, M., Bertrand, D. & Renaud, P. A three-dimensional multi-electrode array for multi-site stimulation and recording in acute brain slices. J. Neurosci. Methods 114, 135–148 (2002).
Quadrato, G. et al. Cell diversity and network dynamics in photosensitive human brain organoids. Nature 545, 48–53 (2017).
Noskovicova, N., Hinz, B. & Pakshir, P. Implant fibrosis and the underappreciated role of myofibroblasts in the foreign body reaction. Cells 10, 1794 (2021).
Kozai, T. D. Y. et al. Mechanical failure modes of chronically implanted planar silicon-based neural probes for laminar recording. Biomaterials 37, 25–39 (2015).
Guan, S. et al. Self-assembled ultraflexible probes for long-term neural recordings and neuromodulation. Nat. Protoc. 18, 1712–1744 (2023).
Le Floch, P. et al. 3D spatiotemporally scalable in vivo neural probes based on fluorinated elastomers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 319–329 (2023).
Tringides, C. M. et al. Viscoelastic surface electrode arrays to interface with viscoelastic tissues. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1019–1029 (2021).
Tang, X., Shen, H., Zhao, S., Li, N. & Liu, J. Flexible brain–computer interfaces. Nat. Electron. 6, 109–118 (2023).
Cotton, K. Y. et al. Three-dimensional, multifunctional neural interfaces for cortical spheroids and engineered assembloids. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf9153 (2021).
Soscia, D. A. et al. A flexible 3-dimensional microelectrode array for: In vitro brain models. Lab. Chip 20, 901–911 (2020).
Kalmykov, A. et al. Bioelectrical interfaces with cortical spheroids in three-dimensions. J. Neural Eng. 18, https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/abf290 (2021).
Kalmykov, A. et al. Organ-on-e-chip: three-dimensional self-rolled biosensor array for electrical interrogations of human electrogenic spheroids. Sci Adv 5, eaax0729 (2019).
Woeppel, K., Yang, Q. & Cui, X. T. Recent advances in neural electrode–tissue interfaces. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 4, 21–31 (2017).
Hernández, D. et al. Culture variabilities of human iPSC-derived cerebral organoids are a major issue for the modelling of phenotypes observed in Alzheimer’s disease. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 18, 718–731 (2015).
Partyka, P. P. et al. Mechanical stress regulates transport in a compliant 3D model of the blood-brain barrier. Biomaterials 115, 30–39 (2017).
Shin, Y. et al. Blood–brain barrier dysfunction in a 3D in vitro model of Alzheimer’s disease. Adv. Sci. 6, 1900962 (2019).
Fan, Y., Nguyen, D. T., Akay, Y., Xu, F. & Akay, M. Engineering a brain cancer chip for high-throughput drug screening. Sci. Rep. 6, 25062 (2016).
Grebenyuk, S. et al. Large-scale perfused tissues via synthetic 3D soft microfluidics. Nat. Commun. 14, 193 (2023).
Eichmüller, O. L. & Knoblich, J. A. Human cerebral organoids — a new tool for clinical neurology research. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 18, 661–680 (2022).
Bhaduri, A. et al. Cell stress in cortical organoids impairs molecular subtype specification. Nature 578, 142–148 (2020).
Mansour, A. A. et al. An in vivo model of functional and vascularized human brain organoids. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 432–441 (2018).
Qian, X. et al. Sliced human cortical organoids for modeling distinct cortical layer formation. Cell Stem Cell 26, 766–781.e9 (2020).
Cakir, B. et al. Engineering of human brain organoids with a functional vascular-like system. Nat. Methods 16, 1169–1175 (2019).
Vértesy, Á. et al. Gruffi: an algorithm for computational removal of stressed cells from brain organoid transcriptomic datasets. EMBO J 41, e111118 (2022).
Uzquiano, A. et al. Single-cell multiomics atlas of organoid development uncovers longitudinal molecular programs of cellular diversification of the human cerebral cortex. Cell 185, 3770–3788.e27 (2022).
Ning, L. et al. A 3D bioprinted in vitro model of neuroblastoma recapitulates dynamic tumor-endothelial cell interactions contributing to solid tumor aggressive behavior. Adv. Sci. 22, e2200244 (2022).
Bischel, L. L., Lee, S.-H. & Beebe, D. J. A practical method for patterning lumens through ECM hydrogels via viscous finger patterning. SLAS Technol. 17, 96–103 (2012).
Delannoy, E. et al. Multi-layered human blood vessels-on-chip design using double viscous finger patterning. Biomedicines 10, 797 (2022).
Faley, S. L. et al. iPSC-derived brain endothelium exhibits stable, long-term barrier function in perfused hydrogel scaffolds. Stem Cell Rep. 12, 474–487 (2019).
Skylar-Scott, M. A. et al. Biomanufacturing of organ-specific tissues with high cellular density and embedded vascular channels. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw2459 (2019).
Lancaster, M. A. & Knoblich, J. A. Generation of cerebral organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2329–2340 (2014).
Lancaster, M. A. et al. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature 501, 373–379 (2013).
Hughes, C. S., Postovit, L. M. & Lajoie, G. A. Matrigel: a complex protein mixture required for optimal growth of cell culture. Proteomics 10, 1886–1890 (2010).
Dauth, S. et al. Extracellular matrix protein expression is brain region dependent. J. Comp. Neurol. 524, 1309–1336 (2016).
Reed, M. J., Damodarasamy, M. & Banks, W. A. The extracellular matrix of the blood–brain barrier: structural and functional roles in health, aging, and Alzheimer’s disease. Tissue Barriers 7, 1651157 (2019).
Pantazopoulos, H. et al. Molecular signature of extracellular matrix pathology in schizophrenia. Eur. J. Neurosci. 53, 3960–3987 (2021).
Barry, C. et al. Uniform neural tissue models produced on synthetic hydrogels using standard culture techniques. Exp. Biol. Med. 242, 1679–1689 (2017).
Ranga, A. et al. Neural tube morphogenesis in synthetic 3D microenvironments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E6831–E6839 (2016).
Wang, Y. et al. Hydrogel oxygen reservoirs increase functional integration of neural stem cell grafts by meeting metabolic demands. Nat. Commun. 14, 1457 (2023).
Long, K. R. & Huttner, W. B. How the extracellular matrix shapes neural development. Open Biol. 9, 180216 (2019).
Hynd, M. R., Frampton, J. P., Dowell-Mesfin, N., Turner, J. N. & Shain, W. Directed cell growth on protein-functionalized hydrogel surfaces. J. Neurosci. Methods 162, 255–263 (2007).
George, J. et al. Neural tissue engineering with structured hydrogels in CNS models and therapies. Biotechnol. Adv. 42, 107370 (2020).
Ho, C. M. B., Ng, S. H., Li, K. H. H. & Yoon, Y. J. 3D printed microfluidics for biological applications. Lab. Chip 15, 3627–3637 (2015).
Au, A. K., Huynh, W., Horowitz, L. F. & Folch, A. 3D-printed microfluidics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 3862–3881 (2016).
Akbari, M. & Khademhosseini, A. ll Tissue bioprinting for biology and medicine. Cell 185, 2644–2648 (2022).
Hospodiuk, M., Dey, M., Sosnoski, D. & Ozbolat, I. T. The bioink: a comprehensive review on bioprintable materials. Biotechnol. Adv. 35, 217–239 (2017).
Bliley, J. M., Shiwarski, D. J. & Feinberg, A. W. 3D-bioprinted human tissue and the path toward clinical translation. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabo7047 (2022).
Ouyang, L. Pushing the rheological and mechanical boundaries of extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Trends Biotechnol. 40, 891–902 (2022).
Qiu, B. et al. Bioprinting neural systems to model central nervous system diseases. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1910250 (2020).
Zhang, Y., Chen, H., Long, X. & Xu, T. Three-dimensional-engineered bioprinted in vitro human neural stem cell self-assembling culture model constructs of Alzheimer’s disease. Bioact. Mater. 11, 192–205 (2022).
Blaeser, A. et al. Controlling shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5, 326–333 (2016).
Nair, K. et al. Characterization of cell viability during bioprinting processes. Biotechnol. J. 4, 1168–1177 (2009).
Hölzl, K. et al. Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication 8, 032002 (2016).
Habib, A., Sathish, V., Mallik, S. & Khoda, B. 3D printability of alginate-carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel. Materials 11, 454 (2018).
Ning, L. et al. Process-induced cell damage: pneumatic versus screw-driven bioprinting. Biofabrication 12, 025011 (2020).
Ning, L., Guillemot, A., Zhao, J., Kipouros, G. & Chen, X. Influence of flow behavior of alginate-cell suspensions on cell viability and proliferation. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 22, 652–662 (2016).
Highley, C. B., Rodell, C. B. & Burdick, J. A. Direct 3D printing of shear-thinning hydrogels into self-healing hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 27, 5075–5079 (2015).
Liu, W. et al. Extrusion bioprinting of shear-thinning gelatin methacryloyl bioinks. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 6, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201601451 (2017).
Daly, A. C., Davidson, M. D. & Burdick, J. A. 3D bioprinting of high cell-density heterogeneous tissue models through spheroid fusion within self-healing hydrogels. Nat. Commun. 12, 753 (2021).
Roth, J. G. et al. Spatially controlled construction of assembloids using bioprinting. Nat. Commun. 14, 4346 (2023).
Li, W. et al. iScience Stereolithography apparatus and digital light processing-based 3D bioprinting for tissue fabrication. iScience 26, 106039 (2023).
Zandrini, T., Florczak, S., Levato, R. & Ovsianikov, A. Breaking the resolution limits of 3D bioprinting: future opportunities and present challenges. Trends Biotechnol. 41, 604–614 (2023).
Yi, H. G. et al. A bioprinted human-glioblastoma-on-a-chip for the identification of patient-specific responses to chemoradiotherapy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 509–519 (2019).
Silvani, G. et al. A 3D-bioprinted vascularized glioblastoma-on-a-chip for studying the impact of simulated microgravity as a novel pre-clinical approach in brain tumor therapy. Adv. Ther. 4, 2170033 (2021).
Tang, M. et al. Rapid 3D bioprinting of glioblastoma model mimicking native biophysical heterogeneity. Small 17, e2006050 (2021).
Harley, W. S. et al. Advances in biofabrication techniques towards functional bioprinted heterogeneous engineered tissues: a comprehensive review. Bioprinting 23, e00147 (2021).
Seymour, J. P., Wu, F., Wise, K. D. & Yoon, E. State-of-the-art mems and microsystem tools for brain research. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 3, 16066 (2017).
Jiang, Y. & Tian, B. Inorganic semiconductor biointerfaces. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 473–490 (2018).
Schaumann, E. N. & Tian, B. Biological interfaces, modulation, and sensing with inorganic nano-bioelectronic materials. Small Methods 4, 1900868 (2020).
Pettikiriarachchi, J. T. S., Parish, C. L., Shoichet, M. S., Forsythe, J. S. & Nisbet, D. R. Biomaterials for brain tissue engineering. Aust. J. Chem. 63, 1143–1154 (2010).
Muller, J. et al. Conferring flexibility and reconfigurability to a 26,400 microelectrode CMOS array for high throughput neural recordings. 2013 Transducers and Eurosensors XXVII: The 17th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, TRANSDUCERS and EUROSENSORS 2013. 744–747 (2013).
HajjHassan, M., Chodavarapu, V. & Musallam, S. NeuroMEMS: neural probe microtechnologies. Sensors 8, 6704–6726 (2008).
Yeung, T. et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 60, 24–34 (2005).
Heo, D. N. et al. Development of 3D printable conductive hydrogel with crystallized PEDOT:PSS for neural tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 99, 582–590 (2019).
Spencer, A. R. et al. Bioprinting of a cell-laden conductive hydrogel composite. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 30518–30533 (2019).
Pires, F., Ferreira, Q., Rodrigues, C. A. V., Morgado, J. & Ferreira, F. C. Neural stem cell differentiation by electrical stimulation using a cross-linked PEDOT substrate: expanding the use of biocompatible conjugated conductive polymers for neural tissue engineering. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 1850, 1158–1168 (2015).
Stavrinidou, E. et al. Direct measurement of ion mobility in a conducting polymer. Adv. Mater. 25, 4488–4493 (2013).
Guarino, V., Alvarez-Perez, M. A., Borriello, A., Napolitano, T. & Ambrosio, L. Conductive PANi/PEGDA macroporous hydrogels for nerve regeneration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2, 218–227 (2013).
Vijayavenkataraman, S. et al. 3D-printed PCL/PPy conductive scaffolds as three-dimensional porous nerve guide conduits (NGCs) for peripheral nerve injury repair. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 7, 266 (2019).
Liu, X. et al. Functionalized carbon nanotube and graphene oxide embedded electrically conductive hydrogel synergistically stimulates nerve cell differentiation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 14677–14690 (2017).
Ye, L. et al. Carbon nanotube–hydrogel composites facilitate neuronal differentiation while maintaining homeostasis of network activity. Adv. Mater. 33, 2102981 (2021).
Liao, M. et al. 3D Ti 3C 2T x MXene–Matrigel with electroacoustic stimulation to promote the growth of spiral ganglion neurons. ACS Nano 16, 16744–16756 (2022).
Lotfi, R. et al. Engineering photo-cross-linkable MXene-based hydrogels: durable conductive biomaterials for electroactive tissues and interfaces. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 10, 800–813 (2023).
Xavier Mendes, A. et al. Enhanced electroactivity, mechanical properties, and printability through the addition of graphene oxide to photo-cross-linkable gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 7, 2279–2295 (2021).
Pitsalidis, C. et al. Transistor in a tube: a route to three-dimensional bioelectronics. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat4253 (2018).
Cheung, K. M. et al. Phenylalanine monitoring via aptamer-field-effect transistor sensors. ACS Sens. 4, 3308–3317 (2019).
Nakatsuka, N., Abendroth, J. M., Yang, K.-A. & Andrews, A. M. Divalent cation dependence enhances dopamine aptamer biosensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 9425–9435 (2021).
Shui, B. et al. A novel electrochemical aptamer-antibody sandwich assay for the detection of tau-381 in human serum. Analyst 143, 3549–3554 (2018).
Dauphin-Ducharme, P. et al. Electrochemical aptamer-based sensors for improved therapeutic drug monitoring and high-precision, feedback-controlled drug delivery. ACS Sens. 4, 2832–2837 (2019).
Anand, A. et al. Detection of K+ efflux from stimulated cortical neurons by an aptamer-modified silicon nanowire field-effect transistor. ACS Sens. 2, 69–79 (2017).
Santos-Cancel, M., Simpson, L. W., Leach, J. B. & White, R. J. Direct, real-time detection of adenosine triphosphate release from astrocytes in three-dimensional culture using an integrated electrochemical aptamer-based sensor. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 10, 2070–2079 (2019).
Zhang, Y. et al. Electrochemical dual-aptamer biosensors based on nanostructured multielectrode arrays for the detection of neuronal biomarkers. Nanoscale 12, 16501–16513 (2020).
Liang, S. et al. Measuring luteinising hormone pulsatility with a robotic aptamer-enabled electrochemical reader. Nat. Commun. 10, 852 (2019).
Kutovyi, Y. et al. Amyloid-beta peptide detection via aptamer-functionalized nanowire sensors exploiting single-trap phenomena. Biosens. Bioelectron. 154, 112053 (2020).
Renous, N. et al. Spatial trans-epithelial electrical resistance (S-TEER) integrated in organs-on-chips. Lab. Chip 22, 71–79 (2022).
Wei, W., Cardes, F., Hierlemann, A. & Modena, M. M. 3D in vitro blood-brain-barrier model for investigating barrier insults. Adv. Sci. 10, e2205752 (2023).
Mantle, J. L., Min, L. & Lee, K. H. Minimum transendothelial electrical resistance thresholds for the study of small and large molecule drug transport in a human in vitro blood-brain barrier model. Mol. Pharm. 13, 4191–4198 (2016).
Viswam, V. et al. Impedance spectroscopy and electrophysiological imaging of cells with a high-density CMOS microelectrode array system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 12, 1356–1368 (2018).
Nicolas, A. et al. High throughput transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements on perfused membrane-free epithelia. Lab. Chip 21, 1676–1685 (2021).
Riahi, R. et al. Automated microfluidic platform of bead-based electrochemical immunosensor integrated with bioreactor for continual monitoring of cell secreted biomarkers. Sci. Rep. 6, 24598 (2016).
Dabaghi, M. et al. PHAIR: a biosensor for pH measurement in air–liquid interface cell culture. Sci. Rep. 11, 3477 (2021).
Weltin, A. et al. Accessing 3D microtissue metabolism: lactate and oxygen monitoring in hepatocyte spheroids. Biosens. Bioelectron. 87, 941–948 (2017).
Kim, J. et al. Manufactured tissue-to-tissue barrier chip for modeling the human blood-brain barrier and regulation of cellular trafficking. Lab. Chip 23, 2990–3001 (2023).
Piergiovanni, M., Leite, S. B., Corvi, R. & Whelan, M. Standardisation needs for organ on chip devices. Lab. Chip 21, 2857–2868 (2021).
Reyes, D. R. et al. From animal testing to in vitro systems: advancing standardization in microphysiological systems. Lab. Chip 24, 1076–1087 (2024).
Ham, O., Jin, Y. B., Kim, J. & Lee, M. O. Blood vessel formation in cerebral organoids formed from human embryonic stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 521, 84–90 (2020).
Wurmser, A. E. et al. Cell fusion-independent differentiation of neural stem cells to the endothelial lineage. Nature 430, 350–356 (2004).
Li, T. L. et al. Stretchable mesh microelectronics for the biointegration and stimulation of human neural organoids. Biomaterials 290, 121825 (2022).
Ahn, Y., Lee, H., Lee, D. & Lee, Y. Highly conductive and flexible silver nanowire-based microelectrodes on biocompatible hydrogel. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 18401–18407 (2014).
Ko, Y. et al. A simple silver nanowire patterning method based on poly(ethylene glycol) photolithography and its application for soft electronics. Sci. Rep. 7, 2282 (2017).
Atty, S. A. et al. Simultaneous voltammetric detection of anti-depressant drug, sertraline HCl and paracetamol in biological fluid at CNT-cesium modified electrode in micellar media. Microchem. J. 159, 105524 (2020).
Incaviglia, I. et al. An approach for the real-time quantification of cytosolic protein–protein interactions in living cells. ACS Sens. 6, 1572–1582 (2021).
Dornhof, J. et al. Microfluidic organ-on-chip system for multi-analyte monitoring of metabolites in 3D cell cultures. Lab. Chip 22, 225–239 (2022).
Misun, P. M., Rothe, J., Schmid, Y. R. F., Hierlemann, A. & Frey, O. Multi-analyte biosensor interface for real-time monitoring of 3D microtissue spheroids in hanging-drop networks. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2, 16022 (2016).
Sciurti, E. et al. TEER and ion selective transwell-integrated sensors system for Caco-2 cell model. Micromachines 14, 496 (2023).
Su, S.-H. et al. A tissue chip with integrated digital immunosensors: in situ brain endothelial barrier cytokine secretion monitoring. Biosens. Bioelectron. 224, 115030 (2023).
Wise, K. D., Angell, J. B. & Starr, A. An integrated-circuit approach to extracellular microelectrodes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-17, 238–247 (1970).
Wise, K. D. & Angell, J. B. A low-capacitance multielectrode probe for use in extracellular neurophysiology. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-22, 212–219 (1975).
Neher, E. & Sakmann, B. Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres. Nature 260, 799–802 (1976).
Neher, E., Sakmann, B. & Steinbach, J. H. The extracellular patch clamp: A method for resolving currents through individual open channels in biological membranes. Pflugers Arch. 375, 219–228 (1978).
Sigworth, F. & Neher, E. Single Na+ channel currents observed in cultured rat muscle cells. Nature 287, 447–449 (1980).
Hamill, O. P., Marty, A., Neher, E., Sakmann, B. & Sigworth, F. J. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 391, 85–100 (1981).
Maynard, E. M., Nordhausen, C. T. & Normann, R. A. The Utah Intracortical Electrode Array: A recording structure for potential brain-computer interfaces. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 102, 228–239 (1997).
Campbell, P. K., Jones, K. E., Huber, R. J., Horch, K. W. & Normann, R. A. A silicon-based, three-dimensional neural interface: manufacturing processes for an intracortical electrode array. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 38, 758–768 (1991).
Nordhausen, C. T., Maynard, E. M. & Normann, R. A. Single unit recording capabilities of a 100 microelectrode array. Brain Res. 726, 129–140 (1996).
Stark, E., Koos, T. & Buzsáki, G. Diode probes for spatiotemporal optical control of multiple neurons in freely moving animals. J. Neurophysiol. 108, 349–363 (2012).
Wu, F. et al. Monolithically integrated μLEDs on silicon neural probes for high-resolution optogenetic studies in behaving animals. Neuron 88, 1136–1148 (2015).
Viventi, J. et al. Flexible, foldable, actively multiplexed, high-density electrode array for mapping brain activity in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1599–1605 (2011).
Khodagholy, D., Gelinas, J. N. & Buzsáki, G. Learning-enhanced coupling between ripple oscillations in association cortices and hippocampus. Science 358, 369–372 (2017).
Loewa, A., Feng, J. J. & Hedtrich, S. Human disease models in drug development. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 1, 545–559 (2023).
- SEO Powered Content & PR Distribution. Get Amplified Today.
- PlatoData.Network Vertical Generative Ai. Empower Yourself. Access Here.
- PlatoAiStream. Web3 Intelligence. Knowledge Amplified. Access Here.
- PlatoESG. Carbon, CleanTech, Energy, Environment, Solar, Waste Management. Access Here.
- PlatoHealth. Biotech and Clinical Trials Intelligence. Access Here.
- Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44222-024-00184-3