Viana, M. P. et al. Integrated intracellular organization and its variations in human iPS cells. Nature 613, 345–354 (2023).
Ounkomol, C., Seshamani, S., Maleckar, M. M., Collman, F. & Johnson, G. R. Label-free prediction of three-dimensional fluorescence images from transmitted-light microscopy. Nat. Methods 15, 917–920 (2018).
Donovan-Maiye, R. M. et al. A deep generative model of 3D single-cell organization. PLoS Comput. Biol. 18, e1009155 (2022).
Mahla, R. S. Stem cells applications in regenerative medicine and disease therapeutics. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2016, 6940283 (2016).
Roberts, B. et al. Systematic gene tagging using CRISPR/Cas9 in human stem cells to illuminate cell organization. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 2854–2874 (2017).
Paull, D. et al. Automated, high-throughput derivation, characterization and differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Methods 12, 885–892 (2015).
Baghbaderani, A. A. et al. cGMP-manufactured human induced pluripotent stem cells are available for pre-clinical and clinical applications. Stem Cell Rep. 5, 647–659 (2015).
Archibald, P. R. T. et al. Comparability of automated human induced pluripotent stem cell culture: a pilot study. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 39, 1847–1858 (2016).
Crombie, D. E. et al. Development of a modular automated system for maintenance and differentiation of adherent human pluripotent stem cells. SLAS Discov. 22, 1016–1025 (2017).
Koike, H. et al. Establishment of automated culture system for murine induced pluripotent stem cells. BMC Biotechnol. 12, 81 (2012).
Kami, D. et al. Large-scale cell production of stem cells for clinical application using the automated cell processing machine. BMC Biotechnol. 13, 102 (2013).
Terstegge, S. et al. Automated maintenance of embryonic stem cell cultures. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 96, 195–201 (2007).
Thomas, R. J. et al. Automated, scalable culture of human embryonic stem cells in feeder-free conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 102, 1636–1644 (2009).
Daniszewski, M. et al. Automated cell culture systems and their applications to human pluripotent stem cell studies. SLAS Technol. 23, 315–325 (2018).
Wang, Y., Cheng, L. & Gerecht, S. Efficient and scalable expansion of human pluripotent stem cells under clinically compliant settings: a view in 2013. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 42, 1357–1372 (2014).
Hussain, W. et al. Reproducible culture and differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells using an automated microwell platform. Biochem. Eng. J. 77, 246–257 (2013).
Konagaya, S., Ando, T., Yamauchi, T., Suemori, H. & Iwata, H. Long-term maintenance of human induced pluripotent stem cells by automated cell culture system. Sci. Rep. 5, 16647 (2015).
Webb, D. J. & Brown, C. M. Epi-fluorescence microscopy. Methods Mol. Biol. 931, 29–59 (2013).
Chatterjee, I. et al. in Induced Pluripotent Stem (iPS) Cells. Vol. 1357 (eds. Turksen, K. & Nagy, A.) 311–327 (Springer, 2015).
Le, M. N. T. & Hasegawa, K. Expansion culture of human pluripotent stem cells and production of cardiomyocytes. Bioengineering 6, 48 (2019).
Conway, M. K. et al. Scalable 96-well plate based iPSC culture and production using a robotic liquid handling system. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/52755 (2015).
Chan, S. W., Rizwan, M. & Yim, E. K. F. Emerging methods for enhancing pluripotent stem cell expansion. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 70 (2020).
Haenel, F. & Garbow, N. Application note: Cell counting and confluency analysis as quality controls in cell-based assays. PerkinElmer https://resources.perkinelmer.com/lab-solutions/resources/docs/011833_01_app.pdf (2014).
Jaccard, N. et al. Automated method for the rapid and precise estimation of adherent cell culture characteristics from phase contrast microscopy images. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 111, 504–517 (2014).
Kreitzer, F. R. et al. A robust method to derive functional neural crest cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Am. J. Stem Cells 2, 119–131 (2013).
Schulz, T. C. et al. Directed neuronal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. BMC Neurosci. 4, 27 (2003).
Zemirli, N., Morel, E. & Molino, D. Mitochondrial dynamics in basal and stressful conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 564 (2018).
Chen, J. et al. The Allen Cell Structure Segmenter: a new open source toolkit for segmenting 3D intracellular structures in fluorescence microscopy images. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/491035 (2018).
Berg, S. et al. ilastik: interactive machine learning for (bio)image analysis. Nat. Methods 16, 1226–1232 (2019).
van der Walt, S. et al. scikit-image: image processing in Python. PeerJ 2, e453 (2014).
Carpenter, A. E. et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol. 7, R100 (2006).
Kamentsky, L. et al. Improved structure, function and compatibility for CellProfiler: modular high-throughput image analysis software. Bioinformatics 27, 1179–1180 (2011).
McQuin, C. et al. CellProfiler 3.0: next-generation image processing for biology. PLoS Biol. 16, e2005970 (2018).
- SEO Powered Content & PR Distribution. Get Amplified Today.
- PlatoData.Network Vertical Generative Ai. Empower Yourself. Access Here.
- PlatoAiStream. Web3 Intelligence. Knowledge Amplified. Access Here.
- PlatoESG. Carbon, CleanTech, Energy, Environment, Solar, Waste Management. Access Here.
- PlatoHealth. Biotech and Clinical Trials Intelligence. Access Here.
- Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41596-023-00912-w